j/ y results from phenix
DESCRIPTION
J/ y results from PHENIX. Abhisek Sen, Georgia State University for the PHENIX collaboration Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy Runs BNL, USA October 5, 2011. Probing the medium with Quarkonia. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: J/ y results from PHENIX](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681619a550346895dd14df1/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
J/y results from PHENIX
Abhisek Sen, Georgia State Universityfor the PHENIX collaboration
Fluctuations, Correlations and RHIC Low Energy RunsBNL, USA
October 5, 2011
1
![Page 2: J/ y results from PHENIX](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681619a550346895dd14df1/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Probing the medium with Quarkonia
Quarkonium dissociation is suggested as a thermometer for the medium created at heavy ion collisions.
J/ψ suppression in heavy ion collisions due to color screening if QGP is formed was proposed by Matsui & Satz [PLB 178, 416(1986)] which has not been exclusively verified by experiments to date.
2
Mocsy & PetreczkyPRL. 99, 211602 (2007)
P. Petreczky, 1001.5284
![Page 3: J/ y results from PHENIX](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681619a550346895dd14df1/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
PHENIX detector configurations
3
RPC1
Central arms:Hadrons, photons, electrons• J/y→ e+e-; y’ → e+e-; c → e+e-;• |η|<0.35• pe > 0.2 GeV/c• Δφ=π(2 arms x π/2)
Forward rapidity arms:Muons• J/y→ μ+μ- ; → μ+μ-
• 1.2<|η|<2.2• pμ > 1 GeV/c• Δφ = 2π
![Page 4: J/ y results from PHENIX](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681619a550346895dd14df1/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
200 GeV Results
4
![Page 5: J/ y results from PHENIX](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681619a550346895dd14df1/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Di-leptons in p+p
5
Midrapidity |y|<0.35 Forward Rapidity 1.2 < |y| <2.2
PHENIX has excellent capabilities of measuring different quarkonia states in di-electron and di-muon channels.
![Page 6: J/ y results from PHENIX](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681619a550346895dd14df1/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
J/ψproduction at p+p
6
Total J/ψ cross-section : 181 +/- 22 nb
ArXiv: 1105.1966v1
![Page 7: J/ y results from PHENIX](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681619a550346895dd14df1/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
J/y feed down measurement
7ArXiv: 1105.1966v1
c →J/y +
= 9.6 +/- 2.4%
= 32 +/- 9 %
![Page 8: J/ y results from PHENIX](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681619a550346895dd14df1/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
J/ψ suppression in Au+Au 200 GeV
8arXiv: 1103:6269 (accepted to PRC yesterday)
Puzzle:
Suppression is stronger at forward rapidity than mid-rapidity.
![Page 9: J/ y results from PHENIX](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681619a550346895dd14df1/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Understanding J/ψ suppression in Au+Au
9
Enough temperature to melt ψ’ and C according to lattice calculations.
An extreme case :
Total J/ψfeed-down : 42 +/- 9 %
![Page 10: J/ y results from PHENIX](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681619a550346895dd14df1/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Comparison with other energies
10
![Page 11: J/ y results from PHENIX](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681619a550346895dd14df1/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Adding more to the puzzle
11
NA50, 17.2 GeV
No obvious pattern of the suppression with energy density.
![Page 12: J/ y results from PHENIX](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681619a550346895dd14df1/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
PHENIX LOW ENERGY DATASET
12
Available Data Sets
Good for J/ψanalysis. Not enough J/ψ statistics.
![Page 13: J/ y results from PHENIX](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681619a550346895dd14df1/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
J/ψfrom Au+Au 62.4 GeV and 39 GeV
In 2010 PHENIX collected 700M (200M) MB events from 62.4 GeV (39 GeV) Au+Au collision.
Total No of J/ψ’s 62 GeV: 1130.4 +/-
172.7(stat) 39 GeV: 169.1 +/-
82.7(stat)
13
Accptance Weighted fit: RED : Total fit, BLACK: Double Gaussian components for J/Y , BLUE: Exponential component, GREEN: Low mass peak fit component.
62 GeV
39 GeV
![Page 14: J/ y results from PHENIX](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681619a550346895dd14df1/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
J/ψ Invariant yields in Au+Au collision
14
Rapidity 1.2 <|y| <2.2
![Page 15: J/ y results from PHENIX](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681619a550346895dd14df1/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Energy dependence of J/ψ RCP
15
PHENIX doesn’t have a p+p reference at 62 and 39 GeV. Rcp will give us an insight about the suppression level. Suppression is of similar level within uncertainties.
Rapidity 1.2 <|y| <2.2
![Page 16: J/ y results from PHENIX](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681619a550346895dd14df1/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Quarkonia Suppression Similarity in √s
16
Overall suppression of J/ψ is nearly “similar” between RHIC, SPS, & LHC ?
62 GeV 39 GeV
CMS - pT > 6.5
SPS
PHENIX forward
PHENIX y=0
![Page 17: J/ y results from PHENIX](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681619a550346895dd14df1/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
A Recipe for Suppression
The Ingredients:CNM effectsshadowing, gluon saturation, nuclear absorption, initial-state parton energy lossHNM effectsdissociation, regeneration
But what are the proportions? How they depend on energy?Is centrality is a good variable for comparison?
17
![Page 18: J/ y results from PHENIX](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681619a550346895dd14df1/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Few CNM effects in Quarkonia production
18
Traditional shadowing from fits to DIS or from coherence models
D
Dcc moversco-
Absorption (or dissociation) of into two D mesons by nucleus or co-movers
ccshadowing
anti-shadowing
R G in
Au
Start by looking at CNM effects using d+Au collisions.
Note: Gluon shadowing affects the underlying charm yield.Absorption reduces the fraction of charm forming bound charmonium.
There are other possible mechanisms that modify quarkonium production.Initial state energy loss and Cronin effect are examples.
![Page 19: J/ y results from PHENIX](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681619a550346895dd14df1/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
J/ψ suppression in d+Au
19
(Solid Red curves) A reasonable aggreement with EPS09 nPDF + sbr = 4 mb .
(Dashed green line) CGC calculations can’t reproduce mid-rapidity. (Nucl. Phys. A 770(2006) 40)
PhysRevLett.107.142301
y
What about Rcp ?
EPS09 with assumed linear thickness dependence fails to describe centrality dependence of forward rapidity region.
Geometry integrated EPS09 is in agreement with MB centrality integrated data.
Lets arbitrarily give EPS09 a linear geometry dependence
(Solid Red curves) A reasonable aggreement with EPS09 nPDF + sbr = 4 mb for central collisions but not peripheral.
(Dashed green line) CGC calculations can’t reproduce mid-rapidity. (Nucl. Phys. A 770(2006) 40)
Aud
![Page 20: J/ y results from PHENIX](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681619a550346895dd14df1/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
d+Au Geometry dependence
20
0
1( ) ( , )T Tr dz z r
Nuclear geometry via density-weighted longitudinal thickness
Woods-Saxon
• Break-up has exponential dependence.
• EPS09 has unknown dependence.
![Page 21: J/ y results from PHENIX](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681619a550346895dd14df1/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
RdAu with geometry
21
The forward rapidity points suggests a quadratic or higher geometry dependence.
For any value of a, we can put a point in the RCP(a) - RdAu(a) plane.
Ellipses are systematic uncertainties.
![Page 22: J/ y results from PHENIX](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681619a550346895dd14df1/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
CNM extrapolation in Au+Au
Projection of EPS09 shadowing and sbr to Au+Au collision in mid-rapidity and forward-rapidity doesn’t reproduce RAA or the ratio between rapidities.
Picture is more complex today with strong cold nuclear matter effects and different hot nuclear suppression.
22
![Page 23: J/ y results from PHENIX](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681619a550346895dd14df1/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Energy dependence of CNMs
23
JHEP 0902:014 (2009)
RG for J/ψ production at RHIC A systematic analysis at y~0 using EKS98 + σbreakup showed a clear collision energy dependence of σbreakup.
-2.2 < y < -1.21.2 < y < 2.2 |y| < 0.5
Work in progress
![Page 24: J/ y results from PHENIX](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681619a550346895dd14df1/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
PHENIX Run Plan
24
Run Species s Wks 30 cm 10 cm Pol Comments11 p+p 500 10 27 pb-1 50%(L) W program + G
Au+Au 19.6 1.5 13.7M MB evts energy scan
Au+Au 200 8 700 b-1 heavy flavor (VTX)12 p+p 200 5 13.1 pb-1 4.7 pb-1 60%(T) HI ref. + transv. spin
p+p 500 8 100 pb-1 35 pb-1 50%(L) W program + GAu+Au 200 7 800 b-1 Heavy flavor (FVTX/VTX)U+U 200 1.5 0.3 nb-1 explore geometryAu+Au 27 1 5.2 b-1 energy scan
13 p+p 500 10 200 pb-1 74 pb-1 60%(L) W programp+p 200 5 20 pb-1 4.7 pb-1 60%(T) HI ref. + transv. spinCu+Au 200 5 2.4 nb-1 geometryU+U 200 5 0.57 nb-1 geometry
14 p+p 200 10 34 pb-1 12 pb-1 65%(T) HI ref. + transv. spinp+p 62 3 0.6 pb-1 0.2 pb-1 60%(T/L) HI ref. + transv. spin
d+Au 200 8 260 nb-1 150 nb-1 CNMd+Au 62 2 6.5 nb-1 3.8 nb-1 CNM
15 Au+Au 200 10 2.8 nb-1 high bandwidthAu+Au 62 4 0.13 nb-1 HF vs sp+3He 132 5 (T) test run
![Page 25: J/ y results from PHENIX](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681619a550346895dd14df1/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Summary
Similar J/y suppression at 200, 62 and 39 GeV at Au+Au collision, when looking at centrality dependence.
CNM effects are a large fraction of the observed Au+Au suppression and extrapolation from d+Au to Au+Au is imperative.
Geometry dependence of shadowing is stronger than linear.
CNM effects not same at all energies. Need a consistent study of different nuclear matter effects to understand the suppression.
25
![Page 26: J/ y results from PHENIX](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681619a550346895dd14df1/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
BACK-UP
26
![Page 27: J/ y results from PHENIX](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681619a550346895dd14df1/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
PHENIX Muon-Arm
27
g+g -> J/y
Rapidity 1.2 <|y| <2.2
![Page 28: J/ y results from PHENIX](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681619a550346895dd14df1/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
PHENIX Muon Arm performance
28
Dimuon mass acceptanceInput: Flat Mass, Pt, rapidity
J/y acc*eff at 62 GeV Au+Au
Muon Tracker performance at
Run10
![Page 29: J/ y results from PHENIX](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681619a550346895dd14df1/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Few CNM effects in Quarkonia production
29
Traditional shadowing from fits to DIS or from coherence models
high xlow x
D
Dcc moversco-
Absorption (or dissociation) of into two D mesons by nucleus or co-movers
cc
Energy loss of incident gluon shifts effective xF and produces nuclear suppression which increases with xF
R(A/p)R=1 xF
Gluon saturation from non-linear gluon interactions for the high density at small x; amplified in a nucleus.
shadowing
anti-shadowing
R G in
Au
pA
Start by looking at CNM effects using d+Au collisions.