j, i so - ontario

S 2.18078 DMAS 010

J", i So

- REPORT on -

PHYSICAL WORK, BENEFICIATION, and

FIELD STUDIES of

THE SIMS GARNET PROPERTY

- DAVIS to JANES TOWNSHIP -

Prepared by:

Bedrock Consulting May 25, 1995

2. M07B DAVIS

TABLE OF CQNTi-N i;* 010C

page

INTRODUCTION...........................................................................^

PREVIOUS WORK...................................................................2PRESENT WORK....................................................................2

A iRkd.^l\M#fUJ.^I\J*

GARNET BENEFICIATION STUDY..........................................5

ARCHIVAL STUDY ft FIELD OBSERVATION.....................^

RECONNAISANCE TRAVERSES..............................................?

CERTIFICATE.............................................................................^

List of MapsMap # l - Index Map......................................................2-iMap # 2 - Claim Location Map......................................2-liMap # 3 - Drilling, Blasting and Stripping .................6-1Map # 4 - Reconaissance Traverse Maps ....................7-i

W. Sims Assessment Work May 25,1995 pg l

REPORT on PHYSICAL WORK, BENEFICIATION, and

FIELD STUDIES of THE SIMS GARNET PROPERTY

INTRODUCTIONThe following report represents a collection of data obtained over die

last five years or so on the Sim's Garnet Property which has not previously been submitted for assessment purposes.

LOCATION and ACCESS

The Sun's Garnet Property consists of S contiguous claims numbered: S1043291 and SI 197532 in the southwest corner of Janes township and S1043457, S1043460 and S1043463 in the southeast corner of Davis Township.

The property is located in the M.NJI administrative Division of North Bay, the Land Titles Administrative Registry Division of Sudbury and within the Sudbury Mining Division. According to the N.T.S system it Is located hi the northwest quarter of 411/9 or at a longitude of 80* 25' and latitude of 46* 38'. Access to the property can be obtained via highway #535 north of Hagar . The property is found straddling the gravel road about 7 miles north of the hamlet of Riviere Veuve. The study area lies directly to tile east and the borders on the roadway.

PREVIOUS EXPLORATION WORK

Previously submitted exploration work in the area consists of: 1) a regional airborne magnetometer and E. M. geophysical survey ft 2) a geological map of the stripped area with a percussion drill program evaluation report.

PRESENT WORK

The present work consists of stripping along a portion of the current baseline and line 0+50, test pitting, garnet beneficiation studies and subsequent archival studies with field observations were undertaken prior to the previously submitted percussion drill program report.

The reconaissance traverses both on existing Haimy and on adjacent crown lards were ^inrff*rtaic**n after the submission of the percussion drill program report.

W. Suns Assessment Work May 25,1995 pg 2

-J.^o ' r^X

MAP

DAVIS l JANES TWPh G--2907 J G -3182 MO 9

2-iiSCALE 1:2O OOO

TEST PITTING (TRENCHING)

On May 7,1990, drilling and blasting vos undertaken to produce a bulk sample of garnet for beneficiation tests.

Two pits were blasted, noted as Pit #1 and #2 as shown on line 0+50E near the baseline 0+00 on Map #J.

Pit #1 was blasted along the east-west contact of an amphibolite gneiss found in the south part of the pit with a paragneiss in the north part of the pit. Both the amphibolite gneiss and the paragneiss are garnetiferous. The amphibolite gneiss has an east - west strike and dips to the south at about 70* and probably represents a metamorphosed anorthosite. The paragneiss consists of various bands of quartz feldspar and biotite gneiss and schist.

Pit #2 was blasted in a band of biotite schist. Golfball sized snowball garnets were encountered hi this pit exceeding 3096 of the rock.

Material later extracted from this site was sent for beneficiation tests at Qrtech. The results of these tests are included later hi t-his submission hi a separate section.

The material used hi this work consisted of a portable 250 CFM air compressor, plugger and several sticks of explosives with blasting caps.

The work was conducted with the above equipment and material over a period of 6 hours during May 7,1990 at an hourly rate of SSO.OOXhr by Camroy Construction Limited.

Pit dimensions are shown on Map #2.

All this work was conducted on claim S1043463.


T—T

STRIPPING

After completion of the blasting as described earlier and between June 5 and November 20,1990, a PC200 Komatsu Excavator operated by Camroy Construction Limited of Hagar Ontario, was used for a ten hour period for one day (@ S75.007hr) to remove about 1/2 ton of the blasted material for bulk sampling of garnet and to strip an L shaped area of about 80 meters long and 15 meters wide comprising 1200 square meters. The depth of this overburden being in the range of one to three feet at most. The location of this stripping is shown on Map # .

The nature of the rock exposed was of two varieties. To the south of the baseline along lin** 0+50 the bedrock consists primarily of a banded amphibolite gneiss probably derived from a metamorphosed anorthosite. At the baseline, sunA heading eastward along the baseline, the amphibolite gnriss contact occurs along the southern edge of the stripped area while a paragneiss comprised of feldspathic and quartzitic bands with some biotitic schist covers the majority of the stripped area. All rock types exhibited garnets with the greatest concentrations of garnets being within the biotite schist and quartzitic bands near the amphibolitegneiss contact. Maximum localized concentrations of garnets exceeded 3O96 of the rock volume. A detailed description of this mapping has been previously submitted and is shown in Map #2.

All this work was conducted on claim S1043463.


MINERAL BENEFICIATION TESTS

Part of the 1/2 ton sample collected from the test pits on claim S1043463 (see Map #2) were transported to Qrtech international for beneficiation tests based on gravity separation (almandine garnet specific gravity is approx 4.3 while Ae surrounding waste rock is hi the range of 2.5-3.0). Two techniques were used and compared that of the Reichert Spiral and that of a gravity

table. The methodology and results of these two techniques aredescribed hi the attached report from Qrtech International that follows.

The fee for this service was invoiced at S500.00 on January 14, 1991.

All this work wu conducted on claim S1043463.


O RT EC H: \TE-ftNATIONAl

:mfJ4lfl8iH446

January 21,1991

WilPam Sims Industries Ud. 392 Paisley Blvd. W. Mtesissauga, Ontario L5B2A8

Attn: Mr. W. Sims

Dear Mr. Sims:

Enclosed Is material describing the results of some exploratory tests that were conducted for recovery of garnet from pro-crushed samples of feed supplied.

Based on the test data and results obtained, enclosed are flowsheets to be considered for testing of a bulk sample to determine recovery and obtain a

; quantity of garnet concentrate for evaluation.

Yours truly,i

J. Melnbards Technologist Mineral Resources Centre

0.0. V.I. Lakshmanan C A Booth

End:

r'age

TEST PROCEDURE AND RESULTS

Initially two spiral tests using the modified Retehert spiral, were carried out as follows:

Test l - 5 kg of approximately dBMiflfld was slurried In a pump to pulp solids density and circulated on the spiral In a closed loop where the spiral products discharged back to the feed pump.

This arrangement provided a constant operating condition for as long as necessary to make observations and adjustments in distribution of the products discharged as either concentrate, middlings and tailings.

When by observation, the best obtainable spot between the products was deemed to have been established a sample was simultaneously cut from each of the 3 discharge streams.

At this point, the test was over since removal of samples alters the test condition.

In Test 2, the test procedure was the same except that the spiral feed solds content was Increased from 5 Kg to 12 kg. This resulted In a higher feed pulp density and higher feed rate.

The available data and results of the spiral tests are shown in Tables 1 and 2.

aan T6 *- oaa

The results Indteate Test 1 feed rate as 085 Whr at IT* pulp solids density and 1900 kg/hr In Test 2 at Sl.6% pulp soUs density. Examination of the products appeared to indicate that Test l (lower feed density and feed rate) had resulted In a better separation (cleaner, less garnet in tailings) but there was not noticeable difference between the concentrate and middlings produced in Test 1. Both of these product fractions were screened to determine their size distribution as shown in Table 2.

The screen fractions that appeared to contain the most garnet particles were the 35 and 48 M size fractions thereby Indicating that the mesh of grind or liberation size should be -28M.

To determine the approximate percentage of garnet contained in the -28M concentrate and middlings, the fractions were submitted to sink- float tests in a heavy Iquid whose specific gravity (s.g.) was 2.9.

The separated sink and float fractions of several tests were combined, filtered, dried and collected to show the following weight distribution:

sink fraction (s.g. higher than 2.9) 4TO weight float fraction (s.g. fighter than 2.9) 53*fc weight

Since the specific gravity of different garnets is between 3.5 and 4.5 the float fractions of those tests definitely establish that a high proportion of the upgraded feed Is not garnet.

Overall, the feed garnet content Is Indcated to be about WK calculated as follows:

Weight tt

Feed 100.047.0

Spiral concentrate and middlings 63.0 Sink-float float fraction

Sink-float sink fraction (garnet) 25.0

Subsequently, some feed samples were submitted to gravity (shaking) table separation tests. In comparison with the spiral, the table was not at an effective in separating garnet concentrate from unsized -6M feed. A concentrate similar in appearance to that obtained from spiral Test l products by screening at -28+48M was separated from feed sized at -28+48M. The split obtained on the table between the concentrate and talHngs then again was 4TO by weight concentrate and 63*fc weight tailings.

The concentrate was not dean and would require further upgrading In a closed drcuit test with a grinding mill as suggested in flowsheet of Figure 2.

The two alternatives of test flowsheets are recommended for treating a bulk sample to determine the amount and quality of garnet contained In the feed.

Please note that alternative 1 does not require crushing to fine size. A minus 0.2 m size feed is suitable for autogenous grinding.

Spiral TMt 1

Table 1

Spiral Test Data and Results

m

Cmdufit

ConeMkJdsTainqa

Weight

29.024.4 4fl.fi

Pulp Density

74.668.2 04

Rate kg/hr

286240 469

Feed 100.0 17.4 985

Snlral Test 2

Cone 29.9 76.0 681 MkJds 17.3 74.3 336

Feed 100.0 31.6 1944

Pages

Table 2

Product Structures Test 1

SizeMesh

142026354865

100150

-1SO ———

ConeWl*,

4.68.08.39.5

10.915.116.311.3mo

MkJdsWt.%

8.511.312.615.114.19.9

13.56.19.0

Total 100.0 100.0

Figure 1

Recommended Test Flowsheet Alternative 1

Ovei {128*4-

Ulddllnqs-

Feed sizeDJ

Autogenous Mill 1.7 m dta. x 0.6 m

28 M Screen

Spiral Separator

Cone iilittte

Shaking Table

/Talllnpa

TaJllnaa

Figure 2

Recoimnendod Test Flowsheet Alternative 2

FeediCrushing and

10 M

Spiral (Relchen) Gravity Separation

Ball Mill

Screen 28 M

Jndarafae

Shaking Table

fallings

Concentrate

90 " d aa

EVALUATION of ARCHIVAL DATA COMPARED WITH FIELD OBSERVATIONS

A report was prepared by Brian Donner which evaluated archival information on garnets in thfo area a**d compared the*** locations with field observations conducted hi the foil of 1990.on the Suns Garnet Occurrence. Mr. Donner also made further recommendations for further evaluation and, if warranted, development suggestions. Mr. Donner's report is attached on the next page.

Mr. Donner's observations were conducted primarily on claim S1043463.

W. Sims Assessment Work May 25,1995 pg 6

Brian H. Donner P.Eng.P.O. Box 393

Grand Valley, OntarioLON1CO

March 15, 1991

Mr. William Sims, 392 Paisley Blvd. West, Mississauga, Ontario LSB2A6

Dear Bill;

I have reviewed the data on your garnet property in Davis Township, Ontario and have the following recommendations on how to proceed with the evaluation.

History Review

Garnet was first recorded by the Ontario Department of Mines (Vol XLVID Part X ) in 1939 three quarters of a mile south of Ess Creek station Quote 'Imperfect crystals l to 2 inches in diameter have grown together in aa almost solid mass' unquote. The location as described appears to coincide with die Sims claims.

In the Ontario Department of Mines report number IS, (page 8) Garnet is again mentioned Quote The Granitic Gneiss is intimately associated with foliated biotite gneiss and garnetiferous gneiss,the later facies may contain as much as 20ft almandine garnet in dodechedral crystals up to 3 inches in diameter* unquote. The specific location is not described but it would appear to be geologically in the same location as the Sims claims.

In a report written by the Ontario Research Foundation (Ortech) dated July 14th. 1988, a crushing experiment was conducted to determine the extractabilily of garnets from a grab sample Quote 'Two grab samples visually contained purplish red garnets varying in size from 1/4 inch to 2 inches in diameter, the garnets were easily liberated from the other minerals" unquote. It was also observed that when the screen fractions, 16 mesh and 30 mesh were subjected to a dry magnetic separation the garnets were easily extracted (concentrated) This type of information is useful for pilot plant design.

Ulrich kretschmar in a report dated August 1989 reported garnets up to 10" cm. in diameter*but generally l cm. or less in concentrations of 30 - SO 8 garnet but most importantly said that the average percentage of garnet cannot be estimated without detailed mapping.

Terraquest flew an airborne magnetic VLF-EM survey and reported their findings in a report dated Feb. 2nd 1990. Airborne surveys cannot detect garnet specifically. They did detect a number of new contacts and faults and plotted four VLF-EM conductor axis that they believe to have "potential sulphide origins"

The author visited the site for one day in the fall of 1990 and traced the occnrance for approximately 300 feet before il disappeared into the underbrush. Several trenches have been blasted in places S to 6 feet in depth and garnets can be observed scattered throughout the host rock in concentrations estimated to be up to 30*.

Ortech International in a report dated Jan 21, 1991 noted that "Two specimens subjected to a modified Rechert spiral classifier indicated that the garnet content in the feed was 2556', they also included two possible flow sheets.

- 2 -

Summary

From the data accumulated to date it can be said that there are garnets on the Sims property ranging in concentrations of from 2W 10 9l)lb, that they can be up lo 2 inches in diameter, and that a satisfactory recovery can bc achieved if the material is crushed to -28 mesh and subjected to a modified Reichert spiral classifier. What needs to be determined is the extent of the deposit or the number of tons of sufficient dollar value to prove or disprove the viability of the property. To achieve this objective it is recommended that a progressive exploration program be conducted beginning with a detailed geological mapping of the area in the immediate vicinity of the outcrop and a geological examination of all nine claims. X-Ray drilling down to a depth of 50 ft. on the outcrop would assist in this examination. If at the conclusion of this program it is determined that geologically the property has the potential the next step would be to produce a sufficient quantity of finished product, garnets of a quality that meet industrial standards. This can.be accomplished in- two ways:

(1) Construct a small pilot plant on the property

(2) Take a bulk sample and have it processed in a test milling facility.

The pilot plant or bulk sample processing would not only produce a quantity of material for evaluation, it would also provide information as to what treatment is required for maximum recovery.

It is believed that 20 tons of finished product would be sufficient to send to end users for evaluation. If the response by the end users is positive, a decision would have to be made to determine:

(1) How many tons of garnets would have to be produced yearly to make the property commercially viable.

(2) What additional drilling and exploration is necessary to prove up sufficient reservesto support this yearly production. The percentage of garnets in the drill cores converted

into dollars as established from the industrial testing would provide the information neoeaay to determine the value per ton of rock in the ground.

(3) What would be the cost to construct and operate a plant, or what is the cost per ton of rock to extract the finished product.

In conclusion, the evaluation of a property containing an industrial product such as garnet differ! ^rq^ajgase. metal .or precious^metal property Jn.that the end product has to meet specific quality standardise as loHti^ accepted? This complicates the process'of evaluating a property as hot only "is" it necessary to determine the size of the deposit it also becomes necessary to determine the quality of the product in the deposit so as to obtain a dollar value per ton of rock.

Please give me a call if yon have any qi

Yours Truly;

Brian Dpnner, P.Eng. Consulting Engineer

- RECONNAISANCE TRAVERSE REPORT -

PARTS OF JANES and DAVIS TOWNSHIPS

Prepared by:

Bedrock Consulting May 22, 1995


GARNET INVESTIGATION REPORT

INTRODUCTION

Between May 30 to June 8,1994, two areas were briefly examined to determine an estimate of their garnet potential. Reconnaissance traverses were done on each of the areas using a compass, hip chain with enlarged and corrected airphotos for control A map, attached to this report, was prepared of these areas at a scale of 1:5,000. The significant garnetiferous locations observed during these traverses are described below. Additional unknown showings may also exist hi these areas.

AREA 2 - JANES TOWNSHIP

Two days of field examinations were spent on area 2. On May 30 traverse #1 was conducted by Bob Komarechka as shown on the attached map. The primary purpose of this traverse was to locate and examine the baseball sized garnet showing. Traverse #3 was conducted on June 6,1994 by Frank Racicot and concentrated further on the Suns garnetiferous trend extending eastward from Davis township further into Janes township.

TRAVERSE #1- lanes Township

Traverse #1 continued southward across the anticipated strike extensions of the main east-west garnet trend until about 100 meters into the anorthosite band found to the south of claim 1043291. Generally, on this traverse, outcrop exposure of the metasediment portion was very poor and no significant exposures of garnet, other than the baseball sized garnet showing were observed on this traverse. The following description summarizes rock types and interesting observations encountered along this traverse.

Garnet Investigation Report - May 22,1995 Bedrock Consulting pg. l

This traverse begins to the north of L1+75E1 down the cliff to and across the beaver dam and eastward along the north shore of the beaver pond. Some garnet bands approximately one meter wide were observed parallel along the cliff face, magnetite rich quartzite was observed in the trough on some outcrops crossing the beaver dam, while on the north shore of the beaver pond the rock consisted primarily of anorthosite metamorphosed to a banded plagioclase amphibolite straight gneiss. Strike was generally parallel to the length of the beaver pond trough hi an east-southeast direction but this may be due to a local linear tectonic orientation from a possible north thrusting fault along the trough. Near the east end of this beaver pond by the second beaver dam at L3+50E1 several bands of biotite plagioclase quartz amphibole gneiss with thin (l meter) bands of 1596 garnet were observed along the shoreline.

Traveling northeastward along a creek draining the second pond, the anorthosite, as earlier described, continued; this time with a northwest strike becoming east-west further to the north. An interesting vein of quartz l to 6 meter wide was encountered hi the lower portion of this creek bed. This quartz was a brilliant white and if found hi more substantial quantities may meet the requirements for optical glass. This quartz may also be part of a pegmatite body. Overburden hi this area prevented further evaluation. No further outcrop was observed downstream to the flood plain of the Kabikatitwia River so the traverse was continued along outcrop exposures along the southern edge of the floodplaln. The first outcrop encountered was a banded anorthosite straight gneiss as earlier described followed by a metasedimentary band. The baseball garnet showing was found within this band.

The baseball garnet showing was rather disappointing. The length of the outcrop exposure was about 16 meters long but only about 2 meters wide and occurs along a north facing cliff about 3 meters high. To the north it is in contact with the earlier described anorthosite gneiss while to the south a reddish (hematitic stained) plagioclase quartz biotite amphibole gneiss occurs. This gneiss was often observed at the contacts of the banded anorthositic gneisses and the metasetUmmfary gneisses and may represent an alteration (sweat) zone either at the time of emplacement of the anorthosite and/or subsequent metamorphism. The average garnet content of the baseball showing is about 3596 with the average garnets being

iRomarechka, R., 1991, Map #3, Pg. 6-L

Garnet Investigation Report - May 22,1995 Bedrock Consulting pg. 2

plum size. These garnets and especially the occasional baseball sized garnets are subhedral and contain about 30-4096 of ameboid quartz inclusions. The garnets are contained in a biotite schist similar to the Sims locality hi Davis twp. The strike extensions of this outcrop disappears to the east A west hi overburden and was not traced. The traverse then continued southward hopefully to find an eastward strike extension of the Sims showing in Davis township. Only minor outcrop was encountered, that being the reddish plagioclase gneiss earlier described. The large area of no outcrop exposure along the strike direction of the Sims garnetiferous metasedimentary band should not preclude the possibility of an extension in this area.

A rather interesting massive gabbro (unmapped on current government maps) was encountered with minor disseminated sulphides, (pyrite, pyrrhotite 4 some chalcopyrite). Some of these samples were collected for later analysis. North of this intrusion the banded anorthosite gneiss again occurs changing to a more reddish quartz rich variety just before the swamp to the south. A small outcrop of white plagioclase quartz muscovite gneiss may be part of the eastern extension of a large albite pegmatite dyke. At the south end of the traverse on reaching the swamp the traverse was continued westward towards highway #535. The outcrop here consisted of reddish quartz rich amphibolitic gneiss. Just before reaching the swamp to the west, a snowmobile trail was encountered as well as a claim post on the shore. Traveling westward along the northern shore of the swamp more amphibolite gneiss was observed as well the presence of a pegmatite dyke contact along the shore. An old quarry site within this pegmatite dike was also observed. This location is incorrectly shown on existing geologic maps of the area. This site still contains pegmatitic albite. I have been told that clean hand cobbled albite used for dental spar sells for SSOO.OO/ton. A minor milky white pure quartz core was also observed in this area. A stringy interlaced pegmatite strike extension continues westward from this quarry site and along highway #535.

RECOMMENDATIONS- For Traverse #1

This reconnaissance traverse has not shown any obvious viable garnet prospects worthy of production although a new garnetiferous band (the baseball zone) was located. The possibility of a larger strike extension of this zone, the Suns garnetiferous metasedimentary band and further showings is, however, very good although these may be covered by overburden and hence not


apparent. This is generally suggested since most of the garnetsbands and these tend to weather

recessive^ (especially the quartz poor varieties).

In conclusion, based on the limited mapping conducted to date and the available airborne magnetometer survey conducted over this area it would be useful to try and correlate the magnetometer contours to locate contacts between the metasediment^ and anorthosite gneisses. This exercise should also bear in mind gabbroic intrusions and the possibility of south thrusting faults locally parallel to the Grenville front and discordant to the regional strike. Garnets should be sought in areas of thrust faulting and contacts between amphibole gneiss and metasedimentary bands. Consideration for a dynamic model for garnet formation should also be considered (see conclusion).

TRAVERSE #3- Janes Township

The following is based on communications with, and a report prepared by Frank Racicot, Sudbury geologist of a traverse undertaken by Frank on June 6, 1994. This information has been edited by Bob Komarechka and Is presented below.

There are three main garnets bearing areas that were located on this reconnaissance traverse . Two of them occurred around 1+00 east on the traverse base line. Zone A was a 2 -2.5 metre wide zone with 10 - 1596 peppercorn and pea size garnets and 40 - 6096 plum and peach size garnets. Zone B consisted of a 9 -10 metre wide zone with 10 -3096 pea size garnets in a very siliceous zone. Many of the rocks hosting these garnet zones were quartz rich biotiferous metasediments. Zone C, about 9+50E on the grid, consisted of a 2 metre wide garnet biotite gneiss zone with 10-+2096 almond and apple size garnets. Because of the nature of the traverse, moss or overburden cover and limited cliff exposure, none of these showings were traced along strike to look for variations or consistency.


More prospecting with a grub hoe along zones A, B A: C might determine if there is any continuity to the strike length.


AREA 3 - DAVIS TOWNSHIP

TRAVERSE #4- Davis Township

The following is a report prepared by Frank Racicot, Sudbury geologist and edited by Bob Komarechka of a traverse undertaken by Frank on June 8,1994.

At the far western end of this traverse, north of 8+OOW there were almost continuous outcrops (60-7096 exposure) or almost 150 metres across strike. Seven garnet zones were located, although only one, Zone 5, had enough width to warrant potential

Over a width of about 2 -21/2 metres, garnets ranged for 10- 1596 pea size to walnut size garnets over a two foot band to 7096 almond size garnets over a one foot band. AU 7 garnet zones occurred in very biotiferrous gneiss which were in turn located with quartz, biotite, plagioclase gneisses and near some anorthositic amphibole gneiss. Because of the proximity of a creek on two side of Zone 5, it is doubtful the strike length would exceed 150 metres before running Into wet low hying areas.


Should testing be required, access to the exposure for Zone 5 could be by a tote road to the north.

CONCLUSION - AU. AREAS

To date the significant garnet zones found hi this study area appear within the generally ductile metasedimentary gneiss hi proximity to geological contacts of more competent rocks (such as anorthosltes and quartzites) as well as fault zones or local minor thrusts. The presence of pinching and swelling, podiform shape and widely varying garnet sizes, especially within hydrous nonstratigraphic biotite rich zones near the Grenville tectonic zone suggests a dynamic model for garnet formation2. Proving this is, however, beyond the scope of this report

2EngIneering and Mining Journal, August 1994, pl3.


So for the garnet showings have been rather numerous but of highly variable grade, garnet size and limited tonnage. The economics of mining narrow widths of variable grade from multiple sources should be carefully considered before further expenditures are made. Access and rehabilitation costs should also be included in this evaluation.

As mentioned earlier the prospects for further showings in these areas is very good although their size, grade and form would probably be similar to those already located.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bruce, E L,1932: Geology of the Township of Janes, McNish, Pardo 6 Dana: Ontario Department of Mines, Volume 41, Part 4, p. 1-28. Accompanied by Map 41f, scale 1"-1X2 mile.

Card, K. D., Thompson Jas E,1963: Geology of Kelly and Davis Townships, District of Sudbury, Ontario Geological Survey Report #15. c/w Map 2037.

Dressler, Burkhard O.,1977a: Janes Township, District of Sudbury: Ontario Geological Survey, Preliminary Geological Map P1231, Geological Series, Scale 1:15,840 or r-1/4 mile.

1977b: McNish Township, District of Sudbury: Ontario Geological Survey, Preliminary Geological Map P1230, Geological Series, Scale 1:15,840 or 1--1/4 mile.

1979: Geology of McNish ft Janes Townships, District of Sudbury, Ontario Geological Survey, Report 191,91p., accompanied by Map 2425, Scale 1:31,680 (1^1/2 mile).

Engineering A Mining Journal,1994 August: Exploration Roundup, p!3, Dynamic Evolution of Diamonds, New South Wales (NSW) Department of Mineral Resources.


Komarechka, R.,1991: Geology Report on the Sims Garnet Property - Davis Township, Assessment File Submission, Sudbury Resident Geologists Office.


CERTIFICATE

I, Robert G. Komarechka, of the City of Sudbury, in the Province of Ontario hereby certify as follows:

1. That I am a consulting geologist currently residing in Sudbury.

2. That I am a graduate, BSc. Geology major, of Laurentian University of Sudbury, Ontario, a registered professional geologist in the Province of Alberta affiliated with the Canadian Council of Professional Engineers, a fellow of the canadian Gemmological Association and that I have been practicing my profession for eleven years.

3. That I have do not have an interest hi the property.

4. That this report is based on a personal examination of previously preformed work, some of which I assisted and others having been confirmed by field observations.

Robert G. Komarechka P. GeoL F.c.Gnu\.

Dated at Sudbury, Ontario, this 25th day of May, 1995.


5-t)

* UJ

tffNi*-

.e

9•fi^

fo*

OOO OZ--1 31VOS

w w o

00*

S3NVI ?dVW

f i ^* ^j^J^ MWWS.*

-^?^?^?H iffl^o l" i Si M *\Hs 55. ' \ r" I* — r* .1 \ |P j* **it

\ " — 5* ' * * \ ' — ** o *

JD OD

O O niU, U* 7*tr T -JO (T *INJ r* ^ ^n f f* ~J

? T- 5 /* ^ y

lil f

m -o

x m aCP i -' -' *

.,

-r.•o

^

U'*

-o-(r^(P

,JOJD -f*

-1 -*. Tl f**- \.

1 1 -

'•' nip- pi.a T -r* O1

i-l M^ CC ZIO f*

CP "^"^ -"^ ^

xV .-1n;"-

a

T.V

jC

JO~*

-f

-

?siy ~^0 pi

"3m30

09 o"

H 5 m ^

(Pnoa0oxooZc/*cf-t

Zo

>

00c*xo

f70moo:5•^o-f*

Ministry o*. Northern Development -^J and Mines

Ontario i *

Report of Work Conducted After Recording Claim

Mining Act

IMS ootodton should be dbected lo the Provincial Man Sudbury. Ontario. P3E SA5. telephone (70S) 670-7284.

ager. Mining Lands. Ministry ofnfjancB. QueMtom about Floor. 159 Cedar Street.

Instructions: - Please type or print and submit in duplicate.- Refer to the Mining Act and Regulations for r

Recorder.- A separate copy of this form must be comple- Technical reports and maps must accompany- A sketch, showing the claims the work is assi 4inoNWDOo5 216onrjAVIS 900

Rsoontod HokfsM\if

397. PAfSLr3Y ail//) USSfToimshlpMiea

- 41 83wunng ixwon M or G Plan No,

6-2107* C-3/S Zwo To:

Work Performed (Check One Work Group Only)WorkGroup Type

Geotechnical Survey

Physical Work. Inducing Drilling

Rehabilitation

Oil MM Authorized

Assays

AssJQnmont from

Total Assessment Work Claimed on the Attached Statement of Costs ooNote: The Minister may reject for assessment work credit all or part of the assessment work submitted if the recorded

holder cannot verify expenditures claimed in the statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification.

Persons and Survey Company Who Performed the Work (Give Name and Address of Author of Report)Name Address

30 POM. 1 X657 /'ac

JfceT ••^••*—**-*—*wf DOffWUvlal So0 Not0 No. 1 on revoroft skte

1 06tttty ttWt 4tt tn8 tfmo ttM ulB ClWflW OOVOIBG In ttllS WOfffcport were recorded bi On current holder's

by the current recorded holder.or heU under a benafcial interest

Certification of Work Reportl certify that l have a pereonal fcnowledBe of the facts eel torth in thle Work report, having performed the work or wtoumod same during andfar after Ma completion and annexed report is true.

and Address of Pereon Ceraylna-537

TsJeponeMoT(70S) 6 73 -0873

Del*

For Office Use Only IRY

Approval Dels Approved

___RECEIVED

MAY .3 O W5A.M.

l

*ifili

iir1

li

0*

oo

i'^J

O 0

OJ

0o

YtU\

0O

s

1^

m

0

Credits you are claiming in this report may be cut back. In order to minimize the adverse effects of such which claims you wish to priorize the deletion of credits. Please mark (.x) one of the following:1. D Credits are to be cut back starting with the claim listed last, working backwards.2. D Credits are to be cut back equally over al claims contained in this report of work.3. D Credits are to be cut back as priorized on the attached appendix.

In the event that you have not specified your choice of priority, option one will be implemented.

please indicate fn

Hotel: Examples of b t are unrecorded transfers, option agrto the mining

Note 2: H woik has been performed on patented or leased land, please complete the foNowlng:

its, memorandum of agreements, etc., with respect

l certify that the recorded holder had a beneficial in or teased land al the time the work was performed.

st in the patented Signature l Date

Ontario

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Ministere du i Oevetoppement du Nord et des mines

Statement of Costs for Assessment CreditEtat des couts aux fins du credit devaluation

Mining Act/Loi sur le* mines

Transaction No./N* de transaction

Personal information collected on this form is obtained under the authority of the Mining Act. This information will be used to maintain a record and ongoing status of the mining daim(s). Questions about this collection should be directed to the Provincial Manager. Minings Lands. Ministry of Northern Development and Mines. 4th Floor. 158 Cedar Street. Sudbury. Ontario P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 670-7264.

Les renseignements personnels contenus dans la presente formute sort recueMs en vertu de la Loi sur les mines el serviront a tenir a jour un registre des concessions minieres. Adresaer toute question sur la coHece da ces renseigneinents au chef provincial des terrains miniers. ministers du Devetoppement du Nord et des Mines. 159. rue Cedar. 4* etage. Sudbury (Ontario) P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 670-7264.

1. Direct Costs/Gouts directs

Type

Wages Salalres

Contractor's and Consultant's Fees Oroitade ('entrepreneuret de ('expert- conaeil

Supplle* Used Foumlturaa

EquipmentD^MtA^JnSUnt

Location dsntatSfftef

Description

Labour Main-d'oeuvreField Supervision Supervision sur le terrain

Type

10 PflS EnAviKV*

f PC Zoo tfoNrlf.**

Type

Type

Amount Montant

Total Direct Costs Total des coOts directs

Totals Total global

75CXOO

3S)*o

2. Indirect Costs/Gouts indirects* * Note: When claiming Rehabilitation work Indirect costs are not

allowable as assessment work.Pour le remboursement des travaux de rehabilitation, les couts indirects ne sont pas admissibtes en tarn que travaux d'evaluation.

Type

Transpoftation Transport

Food ami Lodgjnff NumiHmc stalMMfQMIMflt•JnliUlaallim — -*sVODIIIZnilHI mnO

Amoiint Allowttbte (

Total Value of Asa* (Total of Mroct and 4

Description

Type

Amount Montant

Sub Total of Indirect Costs Total parnel des couts indirects

not greater than 20* of Direct Coats) (n'excedant pas 20 H daa couts directs)•ament Credit Vateur totato du credit Movable d'evakiaoon

(Total dM caah dtacte

Totals Total global

Note: The recorded holder will be required to verify expenditures claimed in this statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification. If verification is not made, the Minister may reject for assessment work all or part of the assessment work submitted.

Note: Le Wulaire enregistre sera tenu de verifier tos dele present etat des couts dans les 30 jours suivant une demande a cet effet. Si la verification n'est pas effectuee. le ministre paul rejeter tout ou une partie des travaux d'evaluation presentes.

Filing Discounts

1. Work filed within two years of completion is claimed at lOOTfc of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit.

1. Les travaux deposes dans tos deux ara suivant tour achevement sont rembmirsesalOtmdelavaleurtolatesusmertor^

2. Work filed three, four or five years after completion is claimed at 5Q4b of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit. See calculations below:

Total Value of Assessment Credit

t?0 x 0.50

Total Assessment Claimed

2. Les travaux deposes trois, quatre ou cinq ans apres tour achevement sont rembourses a 50 *k de la vatour totate du credit d'evaluation susmentionnd. Voir tes caknils ci-dessous.

Vatour totato du credit d'evaluation

x 0.50

Evaluation tolale demandee

Certification Verifying Statement of Costs

l hereby certify:that the amounts shown are as accurate as possible and thesewere incurred white conducting assessment work on the lands shown on the accompanying Report of Work form.

that'(Recorded Holder. Agent. Position m Company)

to make this certification

Attestation de l'etat des couts

J'atteste par la presente :que tes montants indiques sont le plus exact possible et que ces depenses ont ete engagees pour effectuer tes travaux d'evaluation sur tes terrains indiques dans la formute de rapport de travail ci-joint.

l am authorized Et qu'a litre de

0212 (04/91) .C**f1

(tituteira enreoisM. reprAMMBnt. pocte occupA dans la

Nota : Dana cetWfomiule. loraqu'D dMgne das personnel, to maacuNn est utilise au sans neutre


Ontario


ymlngActLug 570.

IMSnation coBected on into fomi to obtained under the authority of ttw Miring Act TNsintonntftonvM b* iMd for oonMpondanoa. Questions about should bs directed to ttw Provincial Manager. MMng Lands. MMstry of Northern Devetopmenia/td Mhws. Fourth Floor. ISO Cedar Street.

Sudbury. Ontario. P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 870-7264.i Devetopmen^aMl Mhws. Fourth Floor. 158 Cedar Si

2.1607 6Instructions: - Please type or print and submit in duplicate.

- Refer to the Mining Act and Regulations for requirements of filing assessment work or consult the Mining Recorder.

- A separate copy of this form must be completed for each Work Group.- Technical reports and maps must accompany this form in duplicate.- A sketch, showing the claims the work is assigned to. must accompany this form.

Recorded HoUetfs)VHUIAK S /MS

NoI14M7

Address342. PA/SLEY WEST

No

MMng Division TownsNpMreaP AVIS

or G Ran No.G- - 3/02

From: Ta

Work Performed (Check One Work Group Only) RECEivFDWorkGroup TypeGeotechnical Survey urn i c raasPhysical Work. Including Drilling towN* ; BRANCH]Rehabilitation

Other Authorized Work 18AssiQnmont Reserve

Total Assessment Work Claimed on the Attached Statement of CostsNote: The Minister may rojoct for assessment work credft afl or part of the assessment work submitted if the recorded


Persons and Survey Company Who Performed the Work (Give Name and Address of Author of Report)Address

Z i 15 5r*C4K^AJJLSK /S3

U6/C- P3C,

(attach a echedute H

Certification of Beneficial Interest * See Note No. 1 on reverse sidel certify that at the time the work was performed, the cWms covered In this work report were recorded in the currant holder's name or held under a by Mie current recorded holder.

Certification of Work Reportl certify that l ham a personal knowledge of the facts set forth hi this Work report, hawing performed the work or witnessed same during and/or titS OOfHptattOn 4VHI eVinOXiM l

of Pwon OwvyinQ

rscTetoponeNo.

(705; 673- 0873 ^9 5For Office Use Only SUDBURY

Dsemeo Approval

Dale tor Sam

I VSDMAY 3 O 1995

MillP.M.

OM1IOM1)

Ministry of

OntarioMinistere du Devetoppement du Nord et des mines

.Statement off Costs for Assessment CreditEtat des coOts aux fins du credit devaluation

Mining Act/Loi sur les mines

Transaction NoJN0 de transaction

Personal information collected on this form is obtained under the authority of the Mining Act. This information will be used to maintain a record and ongoing status of the mining daim(s). Questions about this collection should be directed to the Provincial Manager. Minings Lands. Ministry of Northern Development and Mines. 4th ROOT. 159 Cedar Street. Sudbury. Ontario P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 670-7264.

Les renseignements personnels contenus dans la present* formate sont recueilNs en veitu de la Loi sur les mines el serviront a lenir a jour un registte des concessions minieres. Adresser lout* question sur la eoMece de ces renseignements au chef provincial des terrains miniers. mmistere du DAvetoppement du Nord et des Mines. 159. me Cedar. 4* stage. Sudbury (Ontario) P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 670-7264.

1. Direct Costs/CoiHs directs

Type

WagesSalalret

Contractor's and Consultant's

Drottsde rentrepreneuret de I'expert-

SuppHeslleedFournHunM

Rental Location de^H^AA^A!nwntivi

DeBcrylion


Type MIMCRfrlBasencMffiMi res 75

Type

Type

Amount Montant

500.00

Total Direct Costs Total des coOts directs

Totals Total global

i...

500.00

Soo.00

2. Indirect Costs/CoOts Indirects ** Note: When claiming Rehabilitation wn (direct

Pour to remboursement des travaux de rehabilitation, les couts indirects ne sont pas admisBiDles en tant que travaux d'evaluation.

Type

Transpottation

Lodging Nounttureet

Oescfiption

Of

Amount Montant

ISO- 00

Totals Total global

Sub Total of Indirect Coats Total partM des coots Indirect*

Amount Aaowabto (not greater than 20* of Direct Coats)

fToM of Obvct andInOeTKt CtMtl)

/SO-00

/oO.oD

Note: The recorded holder wM be required to verify expenditures claimed hi this statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification. If verification is not made, the Minister may reject for i aH or part of the assessment work submitted.

Note: Le ftutoreenreo^ sera teiw de verifier tesdeptto present Mat des coots dans lee 30 Jours suivant une demande a cet effet. Si la verification n'est paseffectuee. to mmtotre pout rejeter tout ou une partto des travaux d'evaluation presentes.

Hling Discounts Remises pour depot

1. Work filed within two years of completion is claimed at lOOTb of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit.

1. Les travaux deposes dans tos deux ans survant tour achevement sont reintxursesalOO^debvalBwtotttosusinentionnee du credH d'evaluation

2. Work filed three Jour or five years after completion is claimed at 504b of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit. See calculations below:

Total Value of Assessment Credit •XJT* x 0.50 -

2. Les travaux deposes trots, quatre ou cinq ans apres tour achievement sont rembourses a 50 to de la valour totaJe du credit d'evaluation susmentionne. Voir les calcuts cKtessous.

Vatour Male du credH d'evaluationx 0.50 -

Certification Verifying Statement of Costs Attestation de I'etat des coOts

l hereby certify:that the amounts shown are as accurate as possible and these costs were incurred white conducting assessment work on the lands shown on the accompanying Report of Work form.

J'atteste par la presente :que les montants indiques sont le phis exact possible et quo ces depenses ont ete engagees pout eflectuer les travaux d'evaluation sur les terrains indiques dans la formule de rapport de travail ci-joint.

that j(He id Hotter. Agent Position in Company)

l am authorized Et qu'a litre de . je suis autorise(Hdafee •nretfali*. reprfaentml. post* occupe dane la compagnie)

to make this certification a faire cette attestation.

0212(04*1) NotarDans formule. torsqu'il design* des pertonnes. l* maKuin est utilise au sens neuire

i i

o -kOJ li

ip -SJ

Total

o o

OJ

opb o

Oo o

fill

o oOO

o

-

O

o

w 8b o

O

ait3 i*

1

Credits you are claiming in this report mar be cut back. In order to minimize the adverse effects of such deletions, ptease indicate from which claims you wish to priorize the deletion of credits. Ptease mark (^) one of the following:1. D Credits are to be cut back starting with the claim fated test, working backwards.2. D Credits are to be cut back equaly over all claims contained in this report of work.3. D Credits are to be cut back as priorized on the attached appendix.


Notel: Examples of beneficial interest are unrecorded transfers, option agreements, memorandum of agreements, etc.. with respect to the mining claim.

Note 2: W work has been performed on patented or tandf please complete the following:

l certify thai the recorded holder had a beneficial interest in the patented or leased land at the time the work was performed.

Signature Date

'Ministry of' Northern Development and Mines

Ontario

Report of Work Conducted Before Recording Claim

Mining Act

Transaction Number

Personal information cosseted on this farm is obtained under the authority of ttwMHng Act Tlwintennaaonwil boused tothis coBectton should be directed to the Provincial Manager. Mining Lands. MMstry of Northern Development and Mhws. Fourth Floor. 159 Cedar Street.Sudbury. Ontario. P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 670-7264. ^s

Instructions: - Please type or print and submit in duplicate.- Refer to the Mining Act and Regulations for requirements of filing assessment work or consult the Mining

Recorder.- A separate copy of this form must be completed for each Work Group.- Technical reports and maps must accompany this form in duplicate.- A sketch, showing the claims the work is! assigned to, must accompany this form.

Recorded HoUerfs)

WILLIAM S/MSdent No.

PA/SiEYTelephone No.

- 4?83MMng DMMon MorGPtanNa

TAMESWork Pertooned

To:

Work Performed (Check One Work Group Only)WorkGroup

Regional Surveys

Prospecting

Type

#fcoAM)4#SAA)Cf Ceotocjc&t TX.AV&AS&

f- ^

* \ ZO6* OO K l

Total Assessment Work Claimed on the Attached Statement of Costs- ,. :

Note: The Minister may reject for assessment work credit-all or part of the assessmert work submitted if the recordedholder cannot verify expenditures claimed In the~statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification.

Persons and Survey Company Who Performed the Work (Give Name and Address of Author of Report)Address

*J S7. I&Z1046*7 C.

RECEIVED

JUN ^LANDS BRANCH

(attach c schedule H

Certification of Beneficial Intere t - See Note No. 1 on reverse side

Cei Uflu allon of Work Reportcertify that l have a personal knowtod| t of the fade set forth hi this work report, having performed the work or

0nd tn0 report Is t n.K during and/or after Ha

|T0toponi) Ne

[fas)*

C- cfk*_*/. our7o5j673^0673 , /f f 5

rtffied By (SJaaatualir i jTL/CrM- Jb

For Office Use OnlyValue Gr. Recorded

Dale NoUcb tor Sent AAL

E C ENAY 3 J 1995

OrV; jl V 3 D !

Ontario


Ministere du Devetoppement du Nord et des mines

Statement of Costs for Assessment CreditEtat des coQts aux fins du crgdit devaluation

Mining Act/Lot sur les mines

Transaction No /N0 de transaction

i) c\S 1C'-OOP4-k

rita i coMoctsd on this fiorni is obtsinsd undsr tho Authority Lss iof the Mining Act This information win be used to maintain a record and OOQOMIQ ststus of ths fiuning ctaim(s). QusstionS' sbout this coNoction should be directed to the Provincial Manager. Minings Lands. Ministry of Northern Development and Mines. 4th Floor. 158 Cedar Street. Sudbury. Ontario P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 670-7264.

gnements personnels contenus dans la presente formule sont t en vertu de la Loi sur tos mines et serviront a tenir a jour un registre

des concessions minieres. Adresser toute question sur la coioce de cos renseignements au chef provincial des terrains miners, ministere du Oevetoppement du Nord et des Mines. 159. rue Cedar. 4* etage. Sudbury (Ontario) P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 670-7264.

1. Direct Costs/CoOts directs

Type

WaM^skei

Sataires

Contractor's and Consunanfs Foes Droltsde [•entrepreneuret de rexpert- coneeil

Supplies Used FoumHures utfflsees

Equipment

Location de

Description


Typ* ^6foU CcfcC- T*Aw5jlS5

Type

Type

Amounta,aw— f.m-.tMoniarn

Zll-oo

Total Direct Costs Total des coots directs

Totato Total global

2l2.oo

\^.

li Z- oo

2. Indirect Costs/CoOto Indlrects** Note: When claiming Rehabilitation work Indirect costs are not

allowable as assessment work.Pour le remboursement des travaux de rehabilitation, les couts indirects ne sont pas admissiUes en tant que travaux d'evaluation.

Type

TnMtsportstlon Transport

Food snd Lodgingiliniiiilniei mfmmrmurv tji

^5?

DescriptionType

s

Amount Montan!

Sub Total of Indirect Cost* Total partial des coOts Indlrects

Amount Allowable (not greater than 20* ol Direct Costs) Uontant admissible (n'excManl pes M H des coots dbects)

(Total of Direct end AHoweMe d'evekietio Indirect eoetel (ToM ta ci

le du credit n Mtadmcts

Totals Total global

Note: The recorded holder will be required to verify expemttures claimed in this statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification. W verification is not made, the Minister may reject for i all or part of the assessment work submitted.

:LeN i lew de verifier toscle present etat des couts dans lee 30 jours suivant une demande a eel effet. Si la verification n'est pas effectuee. to ministre pout rejeter tout ou une partie des travaux d'evaluation presented.

Filing Discounts

1. WorkfiledwrthintjwyBarso*comple1k)nisclairnedat10(Wbof the above Total Value of Assessment Credit.

pour depot

1. Les travaux deposes dans tes deux ans suivant tour achevement sont rembouraesa lOO^o^lavateigtclatesusinerttonii

2. Work filed three, four or five years after completion is claimed at sem of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit. See calculations below:

Total Value of Assessment Credit Total Ai tsment Ctamedx 0.50

2. Les travaux deposes trois.quatre ou cinq ans apres tour achevement sont rembourses a 50 to de la vatour totate du credtt d'evaluation susrnentionne. Voir tos calculs ci-dessous.

Vatour totato du crooH d'evaluationx 0.50 -

Evaluation totato demandea

Certification Verifying Statement off Costs

l hereby certify:that the amounts shown are as accurate as possible and these costs were incurred white conducting assessment work on the lands shown on the accompanying Report of Work form.

that as(Re id HoUer. Agent. Potiten in Compeny)

Attestation de I'etat des couts

J'atteste par la presente :qua tos montants indtqute sont to plus exact possible et que ces depenses ont ete engagees pour effectuer tes travaux d'evaluatnn sur tes terrains indiques dans la formule de rapport de travail ci-joint.

l am authorized Et qu'a tjtre de jesuis autorise(dbjlein) enreQistnl. rapnieenMni. poele Dccme* dene le oonpeorae)

to make this certification a faire cotte attestation.

0912 (OW91) formule. lorequ'fl design* des personnes. to mascuf n esl uNis* au sens neutre.

1?

I

*

.

*I2z

fi IIII

M

-

i"

O-^W-^flÔ

Cp~JO

(ftAlS)

1

c Qs-S-*

CQ f

N5 O 0

O0

D 88IfIfiil

I1

if1-ti f.

oc

V

O

Di

M

6o

O0

8

-J*Ni

||f

i3 ^

ffi t

If? Iiî * Ss?I ' 5

^ ^5? lO

O

—— i"

il11

—

oc

. -

0

f\J(Vi

oO

<

i?s4i it

Credits you are claiming in this report may be cut back. In order to minimize tt such deletions, please indicate fromwhich claims you wish to priorize the deletion of credits. Please mark (f) one of the following:

1. G Credits are to be cut back starting with the claim listed last, working backwards.

2. D Credits are to be cut back equally over all claims contained in this report of work.

3. D Credits are to be cut back as priorized on the attached appendix.


!

Mmtol- Fvmmnlm* nt twifMiHrtal Intartmt mnt imim f artist li'analm m j****loj* ^ ••rmm.*, . m tm — mm^^rmm, J..—. ~.* ---..-..-*- —**. ~ûw —— - . -*

to the mining claim*.

MlnWiyofNut II Mm Dovoloprnefit

Ontario

Report off Work Conducted After Recording Claim

Mining Act1^571.1004-7

Pwwnol Usfwinobon cowcfod on into lumi to obtMnod under nw ouDtonLy of tno MninQ Act. Thto bifofnuDon ww bo usod for oonwponosnco* Quofltions BlHmf tt* catoctin) should b* directed to ttw PnwhicW Menagar. MMng Lands, MWsUy of Northsm Dowtopmenl snd Mhws. Fourth Floor. 159 Cedar Straat. Sudbury. Ontario. P3E 8A5. talaphona (705) 670-7264. 2-1607 6Please type or print and submit in duplicate.

1 Refer to the Mining Act and Regulations for requirements of filing Recorder.A separate copy of this form must be completed for each Work Group. Technical reports and maps must accompany this form in duplicate. A sketch, showing the claims the work is assigned to. must accompany this form

work or consult the Mining

(Recorded Hotoerte)VHLUArA SINS

OantNo.

PAI S LEYTatophona No.

272-4183No.

Work Performed

From: toffi ^ [ *\H.O /s

Work Performed (Check One Work Group Only)WorkGroup Type

Geotechnical Surveynhi i a7n ral llfnHrrnysicai wonc. Including Drifting

Other Authorized Work lecrr^TiriM IPSECTION lO

Assays

Assignrnont from

Total Assessment Work Claimed on the Attached Statement of Costs 9 3SO.O0Note: The Minister may reject for assessment work credit al or part of the assessment work submitted if the recorded


Persons and Survey Company Who Performed the Work (Give Name and Address of Author of Report)Name

570 pyH-^^^^^^

S37

f m mua t , • ••••i —Mceiuiicsuon or ••vlAaMAt * gfc.^^ **—^— fcl-~ 4 — — m^Mm^m^^irneresi see NOW NO* i on reversel carwy that at ttw ttm tha i covarad hi thla work

rded bi ttia currant hoUafa rama or haU undar aby Ina currant i

Certification of Work Raport

MNMGDTV.O F l V F OFor Office Use Only

l carttfy lhat l hsva a paraonal knoBnsojQS1 of Ihs and amamd report to true.

eat forth bi ttris Work report, having pertormsd the work or i

Ontario

Ministry of . Northern Devolopment and Mines

MMsteredur^A.,-*——,, a aa. m m tt ^4k* UnmrlU6V9IOpp6m6fli Oil NOrQ01 oss fiiinos

' Statement of Costs for Assessment CreditIztat des coOts aux fins du credit devaluation

Mining Act/Loi sur lea mines

Transaction NoJN* da transaction

Personal information cosected on this term is obtained under the authority of the Mining Act. This information wM be used to maintain a record and ongoMig status of the inning dainXs). Questions stout this coasction should be directed to the Provincial Manager. Minings Lands. Ministry of Northern Development and Mines. 4th Floor. 158 Cedar Straat. Sudbury. Ontario P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 670-7264.

Los rensetgnemonts personnels contemn dans la presents formula sortrecuoiltaenvertu(tetol^surtosB*iaaetser^^des concessions mmieres. Adrasser toute ojuesNon sur to coHace de casfenasignsnients au chef piovlnclal das terrains iMntois. miniBtore duDevetoppament du Nord at das Mbwe. 158. rue Cedar. 4* Mage. Sudbury(Ontario) P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 670-7264.

1. Direct Costs/CoOts directs 2. Indirect Costs/CoOts Indirect*

Type

Wagae

Contractor's and Conauttanfa

DroNade

at da I'expert-

Foumnurea

Main-d'oeuvreRaU Supervision Supervision sur to terrain

GVRU/H700.OO

Total Direct Costs Total des couts directs

Totals Total global

•:

too.oo

NoteWhi work Indirect coats are not

Pour to remboursement das travaux de rehabiitation. tos couts indirecls ne aont pas admissibles en tant qua tnwaux d'evaluation.

Type

MourrMuro at

DescriptionTjppe

Amount Montant

Sub ToW of Indirect Costs Total partial des coots Indirect*

/••'aaM^aWfaVsfl Mssal 9A tA a4sssi

Total Value of Assessment C(ToM of Djract and ASmnbte Indirect coste)

Totals Total global

Nole: The recorded holder wHI be required to verify expenditures claimed In this statement of coats within 30 days of a request for verification. If verification to not made, the Minister may reject for i all or part of the assessment work submitted.

Note: Le Wuttreenregistre sere temi de verifier tescto present Mat des couts dans toe 30 jours suivart une dsmande a cat effet Si to verification n'est pas affectuee. to mmistre paul rejetertoui ou une partte das travaux d'evaluation presentaa.

FRInQ Discounts

t. Work filed within two years of completion is claimed at tOOttof the above Total Value of Assessment Credit.

i pour depot

1. Las travaux deposes dans tos deux ana suivant tour achevement aont

2. Work filed three, four or five years after completion is claimed at 50* of the above Total Value of Assessment Credtt. See calculations below:

l Value of

7OQ.OO x 0.50 330-00

2. Lea travaux deposes troto.qualreoudnqansapres tour aehevernent aont rembourses a 50 * de la vateur Mate du credit d'evaluation susmenttonne. Voir tes calcuto d-dessous.

x 0.50 -

Certification Verifying Statement of Costa

l hereby certify:that the amounts shown are as accurate as possible and these coste were incurred white conducting assessment work on the lands shown on the accompanying Report of Work form.

that as

Attestation de I'etat dea couts

J'atteste par la presents :quo tes montants indiques sont te plus exact possible et que ces depensss ont ste engagees pour effectuer tes travaux d'evaluation sur tes terrains indiques dans la formula de rapport de travail chjoint.

. l am authorized Et qu'a titre de Je suis autorise

to make this certification a faire cette attestation.

0212104*1) Note: Dans cane farmuto. torsqu'l dMgne dss est utlW au sens neuhe.

(n

lIfo o

vj*

0 O

o

^-,

1. r-i

0

o

1-

1t

N

s

o

H!m

|!3Credits you are claiming in this report may be cut back. In orderto minimize the adverse effecteof such deletions, please Indicate from which claims you wish to pnonze the deration of credits. Please mark (*^) one of the following:1. O Credits are to be cut back starting with the claim Mad last, working backwards.2. D Credits are to be cut back equaty over al claims contained fei this report of work.3. D Credits are to be cut back as priortzed on the attached appendfe.

In the event that you have not specified your choice of priority, option one win be implemented.

to the mining i

Note 2: H work has been perta

rt are unrecorded transfer*, optfc

l on patented or

I —AaAlaV* mfa^M MhA •^MWMwe^Mt h*^b^^# h* ri M t^^**^M*A^M lari^M^Mt canny irai ine racorooa nmoor raa * oonvncm uHBfoBior leaasd land at the time the worfc was performad.

Minrstry ofNorthern development

•and MinesOntario


Mining Act

~1Transaction Number

Personal information collected on this form is obtained under the authority of the Mming Act. This inicxmaticn will be used for correspondence. Questions about this collection should be directed to the Provincial Manager. Mining Lands. Ministry of Northern Development and Mines. Fourth Floor. 159 Cedar Street. Sudbury. Ontario. P3E 6A5. telephone (70S) 670-7264. -. —

jC* * 1 :^ 'O "^ ^ Instructions: - Please type or print and submit in duplicate. * -* ^ V ^ C

- Refer to the Mining Act and Regulations for requirements of filing assessment work or consult the Mining Recorder.

- A separate copy of this form must be completed for each Work Group.- Technical reports and maps must accompany this form in duplicate.- A sketch, showing the claims the work is assigned to. must accompany this form.

rdad HoUer(s)S/MS

CaantNo.

PA/SLSV (iiti*Mor G Plan4H,)l72-41te

Mining Division TownsMD/Area (

3AKJSS \ D AU/SNo.

From: MAV 30. M94 ToWork Performed (Check One Work Group Only)

WorkGroup

Geotechnical Survey

Type

Physical Work. Including Drilling

Rehabilitation

Other Authorized Work SECTION 18 ONLYAssays

Assignment from Reserve

Total Assessment Work Claimed on the Attached Statement of CostsNote: The Minister may reject for assessment work credtt all or part of the assessment work submitted if the recorded


Persons and Survey Company Who Performed the Work (Give Name and Address of Author of Report)Name Address

537 HAtL 57 P3C fgz

(attach a schedule H necessary)

Ceilineation of Beneficial Interest * See Note No. 1 on reverse siderttfy that at the time the i oowsred in Hw wofk

i recorded to the current 1101481*8 name or hakf under a beneWal Merest by the current recorded holder.

Cai lineation of Work Reportl certify that l have a personal knowledge of the facts set forth to this Work report, having performed the work or witnessed same during andtor after Its completion and annexed raport is true.

N4wiw wid AOOTMB of Pswon CwiKyinQa-- HA/C- SYTatoponeNo.

L73-0&73Date Certified By

For Office Us* Only fJHnRI.IHY

R E C'ETV E D !O 1995 !

Deemed Approval

PM

(n

r; --B

^ *

JD

y*Os)

N

o* o

9

(^ o"

ot

oU)

(A

t

A

Oo

- — — --- - t

If

CQ fj 3 S S3 'S3 S

i ~*1

o O

Ht^

u\

ID

CO

li ifc c

I -

(Asj0

09s*

o oit

0^

t

CD 0

tD

fc0

CS0

O

O

o

0

o

o

o

(s*

Q)-,0 i

1vjj

o

i

iifrk3 *

i- 9

Credits you are claiming in this report may be cut back. In order to minimize the adverse effects of such deletions, please indicate from which claims you wish to prkxize the deletion of credits. Please mark (^) one of the following:1. G Credits are to be cut back starting with the claim listed last, working backwards.2. D Credits are to be cut back equally over all claims contained in this report of work.3. D Credits are to be cut back as priorized on the attached appendix.

In the event that you have not specified your choice of priority, option one win be implemented.

Notel: Examples of beneficial Interest are unrecorded transfers, option agr to the mining claims.

lent*, memorandum of

Note 2: If work has been performed on patented or tend, please complete the following:

etc., with respect

l l certify that the recorded holder had a beneficial interest in the patented | Sl9nature Date

OntarioMinistry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Ministers du Developpement du Nord

i Mines

Geoscience Approvals Office 933 Ramsey Lake Road 6th Floor Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6B5

Telephone Fax:

July 17, 1995

(705) 670-5853 (705) 670-5863

Our File: 2.16076 Transaction /: W9570.00043

W9570.00046 W9570.00047 W9570.00048

Mining RecorderMinistry of NorthernDevelopment ft Mines933 Ramsey Lake Road3rd FloorSudbury, OntarioP3E 6B5

Dear Mr. Denonme:

Subject: APPROVAL OF ASSESSMENT WORK CREDITS ON MIHXHO CLAIMS 81043291 et al. IN JANES i DAVIS TOWNSHIPS

Assessment credits have been approved as outlined on the report of work form. The credits have been approved under Section 12 (Geology) and Section 18 (Industrial Mineral Testing) of the Mining Act Regulations.

The approval date is July 17, 1995.

If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please contact Steven Beneteau at (705) 670-5858.

Your icerely,

/.Mark HallActing Senior Manager, Mining Lands SectionMining and Land Management BranchMines and Minerals Division

SBB/jn

cc: Resident Geologist Sudbury, Ontario

Assessment Files Library Sudbury, Ontariov/

Ministry of Ministry ofNatural Northern AffairsResources and Mines

MCNISHINDEX TO LAND DISPOSITION

M.N.R. ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT

NORTH BAYMINING DIVISION

SUDBURYLAND TITLES/REGISTRY DIVISION

SUDBURY

PLAN

G-2907TOWNSHIP

AMES.,BATE UF ISSUE

JUN 7 895

ECORBclTSOFFICE1000

Contour Interval 10 Metresl----~r---tr--^

' W . v , N,

AREAS WITHDRAWN FROM DISPOSITIONMRO- Mining Rights OnlySRO- Surface Rights OnlyM + S - Mining and Surface Rights

SYMBOLS Order No. Date 0-S-t/IB 0 41041ft

BoundaryTownship, Meridian, Baseline

Roed allowance, surveyed shoreline

Lot/Concession, surveyedunsurveyed

Parcel, surveyedunsurveyed

Right-of-way, roadrailway utility

Port of order W 2/84 REOPENED by order

0-ML 01/90 NER effective A*rl UMO e* 7.00 AM EAT.

l heriaml i uke \

Reservation

Cliff, Pit, Pile

Contour . . Interpolated . Approximate Depression

Control point (horizontal)

Flooded land . "

Mine head frame .

Pipeline (above ground)

Railway; single track double track abandoned

Road; highway, county, township access trail, bush

Shoreline (original).

Transmission line .

Wooded area . ..

NOTESSubdivision of this Township into Lots and Concessions was

annulled 291 h December, l 953Vy, --S I20Y229 , 2 07-2^2 8 i 5 1207227

QUARRY PERMITS

DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDSFILE No. laaUE DATE EXPIRATION DATE

PatentSurface 4 Mining Rights Surface Rights Only Mining Rights Only

LeaseSurface 4 Mining Rights Surface Rights Only . Mining Rights Only. .

Licence of Occupation ..

Order-in-Council . .

1197 9 4l l +S l -'•o,, '

P.O. 1903" 12036^8

P.O. 1904 12(^0639 li 9 79/4 5

19 o"^ fi 9 I97942VI ^^^^THF INFOHMATION THAT APPEARS ON THIS MAP HAS BEEN COMPILED FROM VARIOUS SOUMCES, AND ACCURACY IS NOT GUARANTEED THOSE WISHING TO STAKE MIN ING CLAIMS SHOULD CON SULT WITH THE MINING RECORDER, MINISTRY OF NORTHERN DEVELOP MENT AND MINES, FOR AD DITIONAL' INFORMATION ON THE STATUS OF THE LANDS SHOWN HEREON

Reservation.

Sand A Gravel98021

The disposition of land, location of lot fabric and parcel boundaries on this index was compiled for administrative purposes only.

Map base and land disposition drafting by Surveys and Mapping . Branch, Ministry of Natural Resources.

41I09NWOOOS 2 16076 DAVIS

f

,Xf

~- v

—,,

m j i! col

2I8S

NJ

O

h ft

1Mb

G-2

I8S

O ^

H

'm

z i

o o

mrn cow

B O

Cm

z O

DS)

0 0

m p

po v

-ip

(A

CO

-. o

oj*

f

. (O

2 2

*- *^

.,*

ytw

v

w

o*

-' ~

| -

n IZ

**

l^-v

W H

R

T

1 *

Z*

lm

5n M -i > T

Z Z z

C

Hr o

m r

- o

o H0 w

Z

! ®

\ ~s

1 0

1. i 1

O f If

1 2l

V

Itf If •^

w E f

. * 1

W

l f

1 |, 4 PO

K f

KV

*

aaM

o b

i '

'i 5

g z

S |

2

Mi

^

m

aZ

-B

~

O -

O

J8 S

3sp

O

Z

l-m

r-

K

a ^

o i ^

> a m M S ITHDRAWN

•n 30 i O S LJ 1

i *

r i

2

S r

-O

r

* w

5^1

8

A

i s

2 '

.7. *ii

V;. .

*

4 -K

*

;; *-

ft

5.* *

if *

S

c '

IM i

w

0

""

r si

•* ?.|ji,

ol -12|

| \\ i

| | }

| |

] |

f |

i l

* ^

"j

i

™" *

— *

s J

* 5

^ 5

o*-

- ?

* *

-"*e

o.

j o

.gS

t

S 5

y

2 -

i i f

4~ S

1 !

: *

*••i?

"S

g

- '

* •-

' \

S -

l ,

4

• •v

H

-4

1*

-'

S T

l' *

*

9

9

t f

S J

9

it

7 •-•v*o

:2

X ;-

*

5 1

s*

a

5: f i

iH

r M!

5 ? :

- ;5

i!

??

5 *"

! f

f M

I!

"

5 ss

i

3 ^

?:

-5

7 i i

! ,

g ,:

ss

" : 5

i

f*

l " i

1 c

. :s

.v*

x/

o n.

5 ?

't5 l! ^

U(

!^ v

I J t^

V

MM-

h'i

.4? Hl

l

*8

SCAD

DIN

G

TWP.

^

^wiA

-lX

^^

S^

.^

. J

-s

j *t-

5 .

i s

c 5

S

— ;-

. LJ

^I-^^

ft

--X

^ ^

1

Jl

JAN

ES

TW

P.

HI

CO

J CO

?

i **

G-2

I8S

O)

v:**

**

DVA

I3

1Mb

•^x^

^*iE

*W^f

'i^*^

G-2

185

*ii-*

^

* --

III M

ID

D

G-2

I8S

DVA1

3 1M

b

?K E

Z r

-n .

o 2

8 g

S 8

;:

rr

: l

? s

f i

l s

i 2

s ?

5 I

J s

J If

i f

l :

! -5

i ?

! ^

f i

M J

l-

; i

5 5

5 3

9 2

\ -

I l

3 l

h-

- -

s rs !

- s

I

i '

.7,

:'i*

'

V-. 1*4^

4

|-;;

* I

t .

* F

* -

II 2

54-

s

"

SCAD

DIN

G

TWP.

•'i n

\r^ s

ni^-

ri-^

,

JAN

ES

TW

R

G-2

I8S

DVA

I3

1MB

9-2I

8S

5l?30oOmN

HIGHWAY AND ROUTE No

OTHER ROADS

TRAILS

SURVEYED LINESTOWNSHIPS. BASE LINES, ETCLOTS. MINING CLAIMS. PARCELS, ETC

UNSURVEYED LINESLOT LINESPARCEL BOUNDARYMINING CLAIMS ETC

RAILWAY AND RIGHT OF WAY

UTILITY LINES

NON PERENNIAL STREAM

FLOODING OR FLOODING RIGHTS

SUBDIVISION OR COMPOSITE PLAN

RESERVATIONS

QRJGINAL SHORELINE

MARSH OR MUSKEG

MINES

TRAVERSE MONUMENT

DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDS

TYPE OF DOCUMENT SYMBOLPATENT. SURFACE tt M INING RIGHTS ........... ....... 0

" .SURFACE RIGHTSONLY ....................... 9" , MINING ^GMTS ONLY......................... O

LEASE. SURFACED MINING RIGHTS ..... B" .SURFACE RIGHTSONLY^.... .. ..... ..... H" , MINING RIGHTSONLY.--...--...... .... ..... Q

LICENCE OF OCCUPATION . -..-....— ............. —.. TORDER IN COUNCIL .... . . ..... ,... OCRESERVATION ........,... . —.(5)CANCELLED ...,. .. .. .... ®SAND&GRAVEL ......................... . .... (J)

NOTE: MINING RIGHTS IN PARCELS PATENTED PRIOR TO MAY 6. 1913. VESTED IN QRIGINAL PATENTEE BY THE PUBLIC LANDS ACT. R SO 1870. CHAP MO. SEC S3. SUHCC 1

S.R.O, SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY

MetresSOD

10Chains

10 20 30 40 SO M 70' Chains

FM!500 o 1000 2000 SOOO ' 4000

SCALE 1 :20 OOO

GRID ZONE'17

MAP 5YMBOLOOT

Aerial Cabltway

Boundar y

KELLY TWP.

Dtv*l* liat rivvr f''"f • II* •*ltl*l* r**l*i y 'fRooervoir f***"!**'

River, Stream, Canal MI975QI'li lin

L. - - . -

-h oolSpot Clovatlon

Tovor a *

Trantmittlon Lino i** - *

Outlint{C*M4trtttli*M tfltvrlt. l

• If

Flooded LandLockMarth or SwampMatt

Mm* Htad From* aOutcrop c-

Utility Pole* Wharf .Dock, Pier Wooded Area

AREAS WITHDRAWN FROM DISPOSITION ^^ _ _^ î ' i i

M.R.O. - MINING RIGHTS ONLY

S.R.O. - SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY

M.+ 8. - MINING AND SURFACE RIGHTS

DM* Dtapotltion FII*20/2/79 MSS 46248*2

WR 35830718

li—-J 6O74SJ

EL49

AE 569

1 Washagami

N 1/2 LOT 9 CONJ

SJTT/4 OF N 1/2 LOT 9 CONJ

SE 1/4 OF N 1/2 LOT K) CONJ

SW 1/4 OF N '/^ LOT 10 CONJ

THE SUBDIVISION OF THIS TOWNSHIP INTO LOTS AND CONCESSIONS WAS PARTIALLY ANNULLED ON DECEMBER 29,1953

985449 , 9 85452

3 144136 St fc ON I ..RIO GAZl'^ 1 ""' "' -' MAY 4TH. 1985 't OPY Al SO N AM- HOI l v

-.- —- - ^-" ^^îf. 7 ..*k 0 r ^

tt ^ l

119-6028

•i. J W

- ' 1,19 80 i 6TOWNSHIPm* 8 G ? S97.937

DAVISJUN 7 1995

SUDBURY MINING RECORDER'S OFFI M.N.R. ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT

SUDBURYMINING DIVISION

SUDBURYLAND TITLES/ REGISTRY DIVISION

SUDBURYLOUGHRIN TWP. MmiStryof Land

Management

THf INFORMATION THAF AF'I'LAFJS ON THIS MAP HAS BFFN COMPILEDmow VAHIOU:; souncesANO ACCURACY IS NOT

— ljUAKAN l LM- l HUMWISHING TO STAKE MIN- ING CLAIMS SHOULD CON SULT WITH THE MINING RECORDER, MINISTRY OF NORTHERN DEVELOP MF.N l ANDÎNES, FOR AD DITIONALyNFORMATION ON THE STATUS OF THE LANDS SHOWN HERL ON

JUNE

ONTARIO QA2KTTC VDU22-I6

6JKIM9

MC1MISH ;TOW SISK

~"~~~~ -~-

1(1 p, ~ ' l •"" ' .; L—f-n- —v— i—.*- SÂ^ -±^ ...^ .î . — — -lr r/' i i .f

--X - r- - .*n———————jr^s~^* j*4\'.' ' I *N'\3

S 1207229 t S 1207227tr/^V'Ti^L i.-?l_..-O-J

9 7 9,,V4

-f 2 03 68920369097942,/f - ,

70

âo

HI)t,

^\^

'' "^^^Li

LI rr Ki DK^-^ ' ~rr\\i*

"" 1 ^ ' ri . ^Q i, y i^ T ""^\v^/1 ' ' -'x x VK J : ',/,/ \ ^^

S \ t f.'î .1

, '"" 1 H^ ——— ' 7

Ui. X

X/'i xl,,../*V*i v

^ w-----if ^- l/f. - CS.

' .iU. f^^ .,,,', - L—I1 ;'i Lf-K 1 i *J"

)//!* ',

tfii

140

,0

-vC"^ *

• O* 2Z'

X^

90

\ ' ' ' ~~~7

N l 7\ i v ^v f'S l i

.-i!L--i v /. x T- y j/.

l y•H,y

X ,L-

J9 f-'/

ssOOoomE C.lo'on 1l 800'20

v;.^' ; ^/ x•AA

/m.20

\

Â ^:

s.o o

l30 594000mE

8O0 18

ZONE 17 85/10

Ministry of Ministry ofNatural Northern AffairsResources and Mines

Ontario

INDEX TO LAND DISPOSITION

PLAN

G-2907TOWNSHIP

JANES

M.N.R. ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT

NORTH BAYMINING DIVISION

SUDBURYLAND TITLES/REGISTRY DIVISION

SUDBURY

Scale 1:20 000

1000Metres

1000 O Feet H H HI HIH t—

1000 2000

1000 2000^rj ___. ,,^T^^

3000 4000I ,,,,

sooo:^^-- 6000 7000 8000 9000

Metre*

10000 -i Feel

Contour Interval 10 Metres

7 6

m AREAS WITHDRAWN FROM DISPOSITION4

MRO - Mining Rights OnlySRO - Surface Rights OnlyM f S - Mining and Surface Rights

SYMBOLS Description SEC.SB/10

Order No. Date 0-S-t/tS 04/04/11

ig J a y p ji "**^ 9 f O t

Disposition MSS

File 11*180

BoundaryTownship, Meridian, Baseline

Road allowance, surveyed.. shoreline

Lot/Concession, surveyedunsurveyed

Parcel, surveyed ..... ...unsurveyed

Right-of-way; road . railway utility

Reservation

Cliff. Pit, Pile , . lt . . .,.

Contour .. ...... ... .InterpolatedApproximateDepression.

Control point (horizontal)

Flooded land . . .. .

Mine head frame

Pipeline (above ground)

Railway; single track double track abandoned

Road; highway, county, township . access trail, bush

Shoreline (original)

Transmission line . .*

Wooded area . .

Sec 43/70 W 94/77 6/12/77 SRO

Hart of order W 2/84 REOP0CD by order

0-ML 01/90 NCR effective Apr! S.IMO at 7.00 AM EAT.

IB8530

A

. a

NOTESSubdivision of this Township into Lots and Concession* was

annulled 291 h December, l 953

QUARRY PERMITS

DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDSDESCRIPTION FILE No. ISSUE DATE EXARATION DATE

PatentSurface 4 Mining Rights Surface Rights Only Mining Rights Only

LeaseSurface 4 Mining Rights Surface Rights Only Mining Rights Only

Licence of Occupation

Order-in-Council .. .

Cancelled .

Reservation.

Sand &L G ravel . .. . .

L AND USE PERMIT

e o

By T

oc

©A

THF INFORMATION THAT APPEARS ON THIS MAP HAS BEEN COMPILED FROM VARIOUS SOU'lCES, AND ACCURACY IF. NOT GUARANTEED THOSE WISHING TO STAKE MIN ING CLAIMS SHOULD CON SULT WITH THE MINING RECORDER, MINISTRY OF NORTHERN DEVELOP ME NT AND MINES, FOR AD DITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE STATUS OF THE LANDS SHOWN HEREOF

Map base and land disposition drafting by Surveys and Mapping Branch, Ministry of Natural Resources.

The disposition of land, location of lot fabric and parcel boundaries on this mda\yvas compiled for administrative purposes only.

41I09NW0005 2 16076 DAVIS 240T

CF coLO l

CD

LO

CO LjJ

c

-^1 o(DLO

iCD

j, i so - ontario

Documents