42AB5NEa085 2 .5347 GODFREY 010

REPORT ON

A GROUND ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY

IN GODFREY TOWNSHIP

PORCUPINE MINING DIVISION

TIMMINS AREA, ONTARIO

NTS: 42A/12

TORONTO, ONTARIO, CANADA

NOVEMBER 1982

J. A. MCCANCE, P.Eng.

SAMIM CANADA LTD.

4 2A/12 42A05NE0885 Z . 5247 GODFREY 010C

TIMMINS PROJECT - STr,tf ^KAIJ

GODFREY TOWNSHIP, ONTARIO

A GROUND ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY, 1982

TABLE OF CONTENTSPAGE

1. INTRODUCTION l

2. THE PROPERTY 2

3. LOCATION AND ACCESS 3

4. GEOLOGY 4

5. PREVIOUS WORK 6

6. SURVEY PROCEDURE 8

7. SURVEY RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION 11

8. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13

APPENDICES

APPENDIX "A" - CERTIFICATE - J. A. McCance

APPENDIX "B" - TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT including

LIST OF CLAIMS and INSTRUMENT

SPECIFICATION DATA.

LIST OF FIGURES

FIGURE 1: Steep Group Godfrey Township Scale l" s 1/2 mile

FIGURE 2: Location MapScale l" ~ 4 miles

FIGURE 3: Steep Grid Sketch

GEOPHYSICAL MAPS

EM Profile 1777 Hz 1:2,500 l sheet)in pockets

EM Profile 444 Hz 1:2,500 l sheet Import. Of

TIMMINS PROJECT - STEEP GRID

GODFREY TOWNSHIP, ONTARIO

NTS: 42A/12

A GROUND ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY, 1982

1. INTRODUCTION

In May, 1981, a ground geophysical program began on claims

staked in response to an October 1980 land release by the

Ontario government and certain indications by Texasgulf of

a possible zinc discovery in the Kamiskotia area. Staked by

Norcen Energy Resources on behalf of the Timmins Joint Venture

Group, these 10 contiguous claims, the "STEEP GROUP", are

located in Godfrey township. Subsequently, these claims

have been transferred to Samim Canada Ltd., the current owners

and manager/operator of the joint venture activities, having

assumed Norcen's position upon its withdrawal from all

mineral exploration near the end of 1981.

Evaluation of these claims was initiated with the entire

property being gridded on east-west lines spaced 120 metres

apart. Subsequent field work included a horizontal loop

electromagnetic survey. All field work and map and data

preparation including profiling was effected using contract

facilities local to the Timmins, Ontario and Rouyn, Quebec

areas. The finished maps were then delivered to Norcen Energy

Resources and subsequently to Samim Canada Ltd. in Toronto

for interpretation.

This report contains an interpretation of these survey results

with recommendations.

- 2 -

THE PROPERTY

The STEEP GROUP consists of 10 claims staked in 1980 in competition with Texasgulf. Numbered P.585000...etc., these claims are recorded on the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources claim map number M-284. They are located in Lots 8, 9 and 10, Concession V, VI Godfrey township.

An outline of this claim group is indicated in Figure l of this report with all claims listed on the technical data statement in the attached Appendix "B".

11

, Area Covered by Grid Ground Conductor

10 9 ' l

m Canadian Jamieson " Mine

Steep Lakereccia pe

STEEP GROUP Godfrey Township

Scott l"' 1/2 Mil*

(Long Group)

Figure l

- 3 -

3. LOCATION AND ACCESS

The approximate centre of the STEEP GROUP is located about

10.5 miles (17 kilometres) west-northwest of Timmins, Ontario

(see Figure 2). Co-ordinates of this centerpoint are 81 0 33'30" W longitude and 48 0 31'30" N latitude as indicated

on the 1:50,000 series topographic map 42A/12 "KAMISKOTIA

LAKE".

Access to the property was from Timmins by truck along highways 101 and 576 to a gravel pit opposite the turn-off

to the Kamiskotia ski hill. This road leads to the former

Genex Mine in Lot 9 , Concession 3. Accessible by 2 wheel

driye and 4 wheel drive vehicle (seasonal dependence) it

extends south for about five kilometres roughly following the

line between Lots 8 and 9. Most grid lines are directly

accessible from the Genex road. Several trails and old roads

that branch off this road facilitate skidoo travel under winter

conditions.

48*30

SCALE

t il- m 4

• li*!

FIG.2 LOCATION MAP

- 4 -

4. GEOLOGY

As indicated on the Ontario Division of Mines Map No. 2255 -

Robb and Jamieson townships, the STEEP GROUP is underlain

predominantly by metavolcanic rocks that wrap around the

large Kamiskotia Intrusive Complex, centered to the west.

The metavolcanics comprise both mafic and felsic rocks. The

mafics are units of mostly pillowed to massive basalts which

in the north part of the property forms a basal unit that

appears to underlie the Canadian Jamieson deposit while to

the south the mafics appear to correlate with the magnetite

bearing pillowed basalts at the Genex Mine. The felsics form a thick unit of massive to locally fragmental and

variably quartz and feldspar porphyritic rhyolite. This

unit is poorly exposed in the west central part of the claims,

Geologic strike of these units is north-northwest.

Stratigraphic tops are easterly where measured and dips are

probably steep to vertical.

Apophyses of the Kamiskotia Intrusive Complex occur only in

the western part of the STEEP claims. These consist of very

strongly carbonated, rusty weathering but generally hard

siliceous rocks that R. S. Middleton has mapped as micro-

diorite.

North and north-northwest trending diabase dikes cut all

rocks. Additionally, all rocks except the diabases are

characterized by a penetrative east trending schistosity.

This fabric may be related to that developed at the

Canadian Jamieson Mine which reportedly controls the

distribution of the ore.

In the eastern half of the property all units are well

exposed with outcrop exceeding 50 percent. In the

northwest part of the property outcrop does not exceed

35 percent and along Godfrey Creek in the south and west

central part of the property less than 5 percent outcrop

exists.

- 6 -

5. PREVIOUS WORK

Most earlier work has concentrated on exploration and development near the former Canadian Jamieson Mine. More recently an area of widespread zinc mineralization east

and southeast of these claims has received significant exploration by Hollinger Mines Limited and a long-term

program of exploration, including a major drill program,

is in progress over the Godfrey 51 claim groups owned by Kidd Creek Mines Limited. Relatively little work is known in the STEEP claims.

Several old trenches, near most outcrop areas are mapped but little of this work has been reported as these claims were patented until their cancellation in 1980. A limited amount of work was reported by Hollinger Mines Limited and Dominion Gulf Limited in the area of the eastern half of the property. Results of these surveys are available at the Toronto assessment files research office as file 63.2 and 63.614 respectively. Two or three airborne magnetic and electromagnetic surveys completed on behalf of Mespi Mines Ltd. are recorded as files 63.1289 and 63.1310. Flown in a northeasterly direction by Canadian Aero Mineral Surveys in 1963 the airborne electromagnetic results identified several relatively weak or isolated anomalies in the area of the STEEP claims. Mespi completed a ground follow-up EM survey using Crone Dual frequency EM equipment and a 300 foot coil separation. No positive or strong EM responses were obtained (63.1628), yet one drill hole (DR #26 Godfrey) was completed in 1970.

To the southeast and east of the STEEP GROUP, Hollinger

Mines Ltd. undertook a major drill program between 1968 and 1970. Approximately 9000 feet of drilling is known in this area and zinc intersections grading 7% to 15% have been reported by Hollinger. A major Ttfcram EM survey was completed in this area for Hollinger in 1974 (file 2.1550).

To the southwest of the STEEP GROUP, work by Mespi Mines on the original Godfrey 51 grid included magnetic and VLF-EM surveys and drilling. Since 1970 a major exploration program has been undertaken by Texasgulf/Kidd Creek Mines Limited on these claims and an additional 28 claims surrounding the STEEP GROUP. To date in excess of 10,000 feet of drilling is reported {files DR-33, 35, 37, 28, 39) as are ground geophysical surveys including magnetics, VLF-EM and horizontal loop EM (files 2.1726, 2.2615) and geological coverage (file 2.2898).

Further work in the area remains unknown.

- 8 -

6. SURVEY PROCEDURE

Exsics Exploration Limited, Timmins, Ontario under an agreement with Norcen Energy Resources Limited performed all line cutting operations and horizontal loop

electromagnetic traverses to October 1981. Additional electromagnetic traverses were completed between August and September 1982 in areas made inaccessible to Exsics by flooding along Godfrey Creek. These latter traverses

were performed by Services Exploration ENR Rouyn, Quebec under an agreement with Samim Canada Ltd.

Throughout the 1981 exploration program Norcen acted as the

manager-operator of the Timmins Project. L. A. Baldwin and J. F. Gillan shared direct supervision of this activity

until Norcen resigned as manager/operator and was replaced by Samim Canada Ltd. effective December 31st, 1981. J. A. Mccance supervised the 1982 geophysical survey and prepared this report with interpretation.

Line Cutting; The entire property was systematically gridded with east-west lines and north-south baselines and tielines placed along surveyed lot lines (see Figure 3).

Twelve picket lines varying in length from 840 metres to 1.23 kilometres were cut. All lines are spaced at 120 metre intervals along the baseline with stations established every 30 metres on survey lines.

^ t o ? u^^T^^7S3n

FIGURE 3 NorcentlUMINS JOINT ViNTUII

1981 GRID SKETCHES

STEEP, FORBES AND IONG GROUPS GODFREY TOWNSHIP

Electromagnetic Survey; The instrument used for this survey

was an Apex Parametrics Max-Min II portable EM system. It was operated in a maximum-coupled horizontal loop mode using

a coil separation of 150 metres. Observations were recorded at two operating frequencies, 444 Hz and 1777 Hz. Corrections

for topographic effects were not completed. The instrument

receiver measures the in-phase and quadrature components of the secondary field, relative to a reference signal produced by the coplanar transmitting coil fed directly to the receiver console

through an unshielded reference cable. All receiver values

are read directly as a percentage of the primary field. The relative strengths of the real (in-phase) and imaginary

(quadrature) components are plotted as profiles for each

frequency and coil separation and are a guide to the

conductivity-width product of a buried conductor. This parameter is said to be directly related to the quantity of

conducting minerals present. In-phase or quadrature values

more negative than background generally indicate the presence of conductive material as based on generalized dike and half

plane models. A simple rule-of-thumb can be applied to such profiles to determine the approximate location and width of a conductive zone. It is cautioned however, that the form of

these EM response curves varies relative to the coil separation

used; to the geometry of the conductive source, i.e. body width,

depth and thickness, and also relative to the frequencies

involved. Consequently, by using multi-frequency and/or

multi-coil separation EM techniques in horizontal loop

measurements it is often possible to:(1) determine anomalies due to overburden effects and

to distinguish these sources from more important bedrock sources.

- 10 -

(2) Acquire information suitable for a detail evaluation of both the lateral and vertical parameters of conductors observed as horizontal loop anomalies.

(3) Detect weaker or multi-source conductors even under difficult terrain conditions and attempt an evaluation of the associated body width, depth and conductivity-thickness parameters.

A test program report prepared and widely disseminated by J. E. Betz, consultant for APEX PARAMETRICS, the manufacturer of Max-Min II equipment, is recommended for further discussion on the system components, field performance and handling characteristics of this instrument.

In total 1764 observations were recorded with approximately

17 line kilometres of survey completed.

- 11 -

7. SURVEY RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION

In-phase and quadrature values are plotted in profile form on each of two maps according to the operating frequency used. These profiles plotted using a scale of l cm - ioi;' are presented on a 1:2,500 scale plan map of the grid system. Observed data points are incorporated into the overall profile lines with respective in-phase values, quadrature values and station positions identified. Prominent geographic features, observed and assumed claim post positions, claim numbers and the position of any EM conductors as located by Exsics Exploration Ltd.have been added to these plans (see map pockets).Data acquired during the 1982 survey can be identified asthe in-phase and quadrature values have been inset using a Leroy template.

Four weak conductors have been outlined by this survey.Conductor A, a three line anomaly in the northeast cornerof the grid, coincides with the location of a powerlineand is interpreted to be of cultural origin. ConductorsB and C are inferred only as these probable conductors remainincompletely surveyed because of the proximity to the claimboundaries.

Conductor D identified as a two line anomaly is very weak. Based on the in-phase response at low frequency this feature is interpreted to be a bedrock conductor. It is also possible that conductor D may be due solely to coil misalignments that occurred between outcrop areas on lines 600N and 720N.

Other conductive zones are inferred to be located in theWest 1/2 Lot 9 on lines 120N and 240N and in the northcentral part of the claim group, an area of gabbroic intrusion.

- 12 -

On lines 120N and 24ON a moderate quadrature predominent anomaly can be identified in the area of Godfrey Creek. It remains equally permissible that the source of this feature can be interpreted as reflecting variable overburden conditions and the presence of a buried subcrop near 700W on line 120N or sulphides associated with a shear zone as inferred from magnetic observations over this grid. This shearing, if present, trends southwesterly, parallel to Godfrey Creek and presents a similarity in setting to the Steep Lake breccia pipe further to the southwest.

- 13 -

8. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

There are no obvious EM targets on these claims. However,

the close proximity and similar stratigraphy to the

Canadian Jamieson deposit to the north and the similarity in setting of the west and southwest parts of the property

to the Steep Lake breccia pipe, located further southwest, suggest that more detailed work is warrented.

Mineralization may not be massive or continuous enough to

constitute a conductor but it is recognized that the Canadian Jamieson orebodies, even though considered a non- conductive ore zone, do show up as very strong anomalies

using IP techniques.

It is recommended that limited IP traverses be completed

in the area of the gabbro intrusive on lines 960N and

1080N. IP traverses should also be completed on lines 120N, 240N and 360N in the vicinity of Godfrey Creek as a test for the presence of sulphide mineralization in this

area.

APPENDIX "A"

CERTIFICATE

CERTIFICATE

I t JOHN A. MCCANCE of the Borough of North York, Metropolitan

Toronto, Province of Ontario do hereby certify:

1. That I am a geophysicist and reside at 113 Hendon Avenue,

Willowdale, Ontario.

2. That I graduated from Queen's University at Kingston in 1970

with a degree of Bachelor of Science, Faculty of Applied

Science and have completed post-graduate training at the

University of Western Ontario, London.

3. That I am a member of the Association of Professional

Engineers of the Province of Ontario (Mining Branch).

4. That I have been practising my profession for a period of

ten years.

5. That I am employed by Samim Canada Ltd. as Chief Geophysicist.

6. That I supervised all 1982 survey operations and I have

thoroughly overviewed all field data and all survey details

submitted by prior contractors.

Date: November 25th, 1982.

APPENDIX "B"

TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

including LIST OF CLAIMS

and INSTRUMENT SPECIFICATION DATA

MAXIVIIIM IIEM

m F ive frequencies: SSS, 444, BBB, 1777 and 3555 Hz.

B Maximum coupled C horizontal-loop l operation with reference cable.

B Minimum coupled operation with reference cable.

m Vertical-loop operation without reference cable.

m Coil separations: 25, 50,100,150, BOO and S5Om t with cable ) or 100,800,300,400, BOO and BOO ft.

m Reliable data from depths of up to IBOm C BOO ft).

m Built-in voice communication circuitry with cable.

B Tilt meters to control .coil orientation.

il- l' . '- ' i***?- - --

l-^S- , . -V ' ' ' ,-. .

\ !--V V ^/, ^ v.

SPECIFICATIOMS

Frequencies: ,BBS, 1777 and 3555Hz. Repeatability i

Mode* of Operation: MAX : Transmitter coil plane and re ceiver coil plane horizontal (Max-coupled; Horizontal-loop mode). Used with refer, cabte.

M IN: Transmitter coil plane horizon tal and receiver coil plane ver tical (Min-coupted mode). Used with reference cable.

V.L. : Transmitter coil plane verti cal and receiver coil plane hori zontal (Vertical-loop mode). Used without reference cable , in parallel lines.

25,50.1OO,15O,2OO SSSOm (MMD) or 1OO. 2OO, 3OO, 4OO.BOO end BOO ft. (MM3IF). Coil eeparationa in VU.mode not re stricted to fixed values.

Parameters Reed: . in-Phase end Quadrature compo nents of the secondary field i n MAX end M IN modes.

- Tilt-angle of the total field in VL. mode .

Coll Separations:

Readouts:

Boale Ranges!

NOW ALSO i4# QUADRATURE FULL SCALE,

Readability:

- Automatic, direct readout on SO mm 13.5") edgewise meters in MAX and MIN modes. No null ing or compensation necessery.

- Tilt angle and null in SO mm edge wise meters in V.L.mode .

In-Phase: 2OV..*1OO* by push button switch .

Quadrature: *2O tt.. ±1OO* by push button switch.

Tilt: 175V. slope .NullCVLJ: Sensitivity adjustable

by separation switch.

In-Phase snd Quadrature : O.E5 V. to O.5V. ; Tilt: 1V. .

*O.E5'Atoi1'A normally, depending on conditions, frequencies and coil separation used.

Transmitter Output t. EEEHz J 22OAtmB . 444Hz iBOOAtm6- BBS Hz : leOAtnV*- 1777 Hz : BOAtm8-3S55HZI SOAtm*

Receiver Batteries i 8V trans, radio type batteries (4). Life: approx. 35hrs. continuous du ty (alkaline. O.5 Ah), less in ooid weather.

Transmitter Batteries t

Reference Cable i

Voloe Link:

Indicator Lights:

12V B Ah Gel-type rechargeable battery. (Charger supplied).

Light weight E-conductor teflon cable for minimum friction. Unshield ed. All reference cables optional at extra coat. Please specify.

Built-in intercom system for voice communication between re ceiver end transmitter operators In MAX end MIN modea, via re ference cable .

Built-in signal end reference warn ing lights to indicate erroneous readings .

Temperature Range: -*JD'C to+BO'C (-4O*FtoVWO*F).

Receiver Weight: 6kg (13 (bs.)

Transmitter Weight: 13kg CESIbs.)

Shipping Weight! Typically BOkg C133lbs.), depend ing on quantities of reference cable and batteries Included. Shipped in two field/shipping cases.

Specification* subject to change without notification.

APEX PARAMETRICS LIMITED200 STEELCASE RD. E.. MARKHAM. ONT.. CANADA. L3R 1B2

Pnone: (416) 495-1612 Cables: APEXPARA TORONTOO6-B6677B APEXPARA MKHM

Ontario

Mi

GEOPHYSIO TECH 42Aa5NE0eas 2.5347 GODFREY

300

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Survey(s). Township or Area. Claim Holder(s)—

ElectromagneticGodfrey Township (Steep Group)_____ Samim Canada Ltd.________________

____130 Adelaide St. W., Suite 2116, Toront Survey Company Exsics Exploration Ltd./Services Exp. ENR,Author of Report J. A. MccanceAddress of Author 130 Adelaide St. W.. Suite 2116. TorontCovering Dates of Survey.

Total Miles of Line Cut—

May. 1981 - November. 1982 (linecutting to office)

22.98 Kilometres_________

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.

ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical—Electromagnetic-—Magnetometer—.—Radiometric———Other——————-

DAYS per claim

Geological.

Geochemical.AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credit* do not apply to airborne lurveyi)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. . Radiometric(enter days per claim)

pATR- November 24/82 SIGNATURE:

Res. Geol.. .Qualifications.Previous Surveys

File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

...........?.......5.?.5.p.p.p........................(prefix) (number)

...........P......J&5.P.P.L......................

P 585697•••••t ••••••t •••••••••Tt •••••••••••

••••••i *T* * * * * * tTfV*T*V*tVr* ••*t***

P 585614••••••••••••••* * T *T*T* T *Ti r********

P 585715•**t**************f********l*****t*

P 586078••••••••••••••••••••T*T t***********

l

TOTAL CLAIMS. 10

837 (6/79)

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations. Station interval __ Profile scale ____Contour interval.

441

30 metres

l cm * 10%Not Applicable

.Number of Readings 1764 JLine spacing______120 metres

Instrument ——^^^——^^^^—^— Accuracy — Scale constant ————— Diurnal correction method —————— Base Station check-in interval (hours). Base Station location and value ___

l

Wi-Ja

InstrumentCoil configuration Coil separation — Accuracy ————— Method:

Apex Parametrics Max-Min II EM Unit

Horizontal Conlanar

150 metres

In—Phase and Quadrature

Q Fixed transmitter444 Hz and 1777

D Shoot back l In line l Parallel lineFrequency——————

(ipecify V.L.F. nation)

Parameters measured__In—Phase and Quadrature components of anomalous field as apercentage of the primary field strength at the receiver.

Instrument.Scale constant.

Corrections made.

O Base station value and location.

Elevation accuracy.

HC/2

Instrument —.—————— Method D Time Domain Parameters — On time ——

- Off time ——.— Delay time .--—— Integration time.

Frequency Domain Frequency _____Range ———^.^—.

Power.Electrode array — Electrode spacing . Type of electrode

SELF POTENTIALInstrument———-———^———-^—-—-——————--——^——————.—-—-.— Range.Survey Method ~—^^—^-——-——-——-—--—^——-~———.————^-————~—^^~.

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRIC Instrument -—-—Values measured.Energy windows (levels)——^^——-—^—————.———....————..——-——..—.^—— Height of instrument___________________________Background Count. Size of detector-———^———-—^^.—-—————.————^^———.^^————.—..-—Overburden ̂ —^-————--——.^^—-————-————.———-^——-.————..—^

(type, depth - include outcrop map)

JHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) ppe of survey———————————————————————

Instrument ̂ ^————-——^^-..———.^^-^—.—^ Accuracy^——————^-^^—————^^——^————.Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYS Type of survey(s) ——— Instrument(s) —————

(specify for each type of survey)

Accuracy^^—^————————————(specify for each type of survey)

Aircraft used.^^^——.^—.^———^^.—-———.—^^-—.——-Sensor altitude.Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude-————————^—^————^—.——.^-———.Line Sparing Miles flown over total area________________________Over claims only.

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken.

Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.

(Nature of Material)

Average Sample Weight——————— Method of Collection————————

Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth————

Terrain————————

Drainage Development——————————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

ANALYTICAL METHODS

Values expressed in: per cent p. p. m. p. p. b.

D DD

Cu, Pb,

Others—

Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As,-(circle)

Field Analysis (.Extraction Method.

Analytical Method. Reagents Used——

Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. ___________

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis————

Extraction Method. Analytical Method . Reagents Used^^.

Commercial Laboratory (- Name of Laboratory-— Extraction Method——

Analytical Method —— Reagents Used————

.tests)

tests)

.tests)

General. General.

Ministry o)NaturalResources

OntarioRecoil n

Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)

The Mining Act

Instructions: - Please type or print.— If number of mining claims traversed

exceeds space on this form, attach a list. ^ Note:— Only days credits calculated in the

){jf4- " Expenditures" section may be entered In the "Expend. Days Cr." columns.

— Do not use shaded areas below,Type of Survey(s)

ElectromagneticClaim Holder(s) - -

Samim Canada Ltd.Address

Suite 2116, 130 Adelaide St. W., Toronto^ OntarioSurvey Company

Exsics ExplorationDate of Survey

Ltd . Day | Mo. | 'Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)

J. A. Mccance, c/o Samim Canada Ltd. (see above)

Township or Area

Godfrey

S O '-TO//""?M5H 3P5 ( C/Ofcf^f 7

ifrom Si to) v^ Ifltall Miles of line Cut

rV. ] Day | Mo. | Yr. 4*1.70 XmS ,

Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at right Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Special Provisions

For first survey:

Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total(s) here

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days per Claim

20

Days per Claim

Days per Claim

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Typo of Work Performed

Performed on Claim(s)

Calc ulation of Expenditure Days Credits

Total Expenditures

S -i- 15

Total Days Credits

*

Instructions Total Days Credits may bo apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected In columns at right.

Datti ; IReVordfld Holder

Cretification Veiifying Re/ort'.'lo^Work \! hereby cijrtify.ihat 1 have a personal and or witnessed fi; me during and/or after its cc

Nome and Postal Address ofjPorson' Certifying

John A. \ Mccance ,. r 3,3^0^' ': ; l ''' : ' .'' ' l!'----^ ..- — -~

or Ape/vl (Signature)

Mining ClaimPrefix

P

Number

585000

585001

585002

585696585697

585698^585714

585715

585718

586078

Expend, Dcyi Cr.

••b.

1

-TS \

\P

ft

E

eettff '

For Office Use OnlyTotal Days Cr Recorded

•^00A*

\ \] \ 'J W

Date Recorded ,

, ft.'VJ 'J?

Mining ClaimPrefix

T'/'; 'J V'

'•r . ,'-"'"'''it**** fNIN •;:1';'-'

r'\ , .-t 'ML . 1

.'•' 'I'o;

f.!"'' ' ' -

COV

6ciSis.

Number

rf * fCEl v fc

CT 2 5 TO

sTbSHW SEC

\\

,

^^~- — 1^eo\5TS& — y.^sszssi-*— - — ~

Expend. Days Cr.

^ ———b/

TION

\\\

\

Total number of mining -i A claims covered by this J-U report of work,

* h;^r^S!^^KVA

^•^K^Z^^y^^rw*iJnrlbl**ttt}, n fS .1LJntlmate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work )mpletion and the annexed report is true.

dJeU^ide Street West.,.-~-r

, Suite 2116, Toronto, Ont. to5H 3P5Date Certified l^efjtified by (Slgr\aturjrf"J /-)

Ministry ofNaturalResources

Ontario

GeotechnicalReportApproval

Mining Lands Comments

To: Geophysics

Comments

{Approved [~| W ish to see again with correctionsPatr— Sign

To: Geology - ExpendituresComments

f] Approved |~| Wish to see again with correctionsDate Signature

r n To: Geochemistry

Comments

n Approved Wish to see again with correctionsDate Signature

f j JTo: Mining Lands Section, Room 6462, Whitney Block. (Tel: 5-1380)l"

15^3(81/10)

1982 12 08382

2.5247

Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources60 Wilson AvenueTimmins, OntarioP4N 2S7

Dear Sir:We have received reports and maps for a Geophysical (Electromagnetic) Survey submitted under Special Provisions (credit for Performance and Coverage) on Mining Claims P 585000 1n the Township of Godfrey.

This material will be examined and assessed and a statement of assessment work credits will be Issued.

Yours very truly,

E.F. AndersonDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1380

DW:sc

cc: Samlm Canada Limited Toronto, Ontario AtAn: J.A. McCance.

Canada Ltd.

November 29th, 1982

RECEIVEDOntario Ministry of Natural

Resources, "M.'V 2- 9 fckfc Mining Lands Branch,Whitney Block, Queen's Park, MINING LANDS SECTION Toronto, Ontario.

Attn; Mr. F. W. Matthews

Dear Mr. Matthews:

Enclosed please find two copies each of four geophysical reports on claims in Godfrey and Jamieson Townships.

These reports are hereby being filed for 20 days assessment credit on each of the respective claim groups designated as the FORBES GROUP, LONG GROUP, STEEP GROUP and KAM GROUP.

Please forward any correspondence to the undersigned.

Yours truly,

JAM/ams J. A. MccanceChief Geophysicist

End.: 2 copies Forbes EM Report 2 copies Steep EM Report 2 copies Long EM Report 2 copies Kam EM Report

cc: D. S. Kerby

130 Adelaide St. W. Telephone - (416)863-0168 Suite 2116, P.O. Box 7 Telex 06-217829 Toronto, Canada AA5H 3P5

-u

V

"t \

:-^:-

-t"

s-*f

*-S

*Sfjf

I!

HJ \

VV

OQOS&5- \

V33

*O

ro

exI-

13 I-

Jamieson Twp, (M. 288)Cop R odor StoDepf. of No t ion ol Defence

(Withdrawn from Staking , lSecJ4(p)of Mining Act. File 169051,

652556 f 65/2555— -ti652558 l QA3Q

P I P'

65372S 161*53285 641602 ^64I60

P

530001 i 20411

3075 1^3730

585b02'3 2)810 l 1

5217/881 l

498965 .530003

r t , F-53r OUT1 '.300C?

\498966 585T085?993C,5299?9

56500? l//5S5QU4[515633 /BI5634s-. -i. ---- _:-j::;--r

P* i O f P . 'P '

'515636 '315635

13941 M3942

rz*r4y~ --633533 ' 650140

P : P E) l P

24371 l 243(72, '^6634806 3-*7 5 5 115

~~ T." —— "443374 . 554683

P P.

584685 ' 584684

636047 .636046

p IP) l p [Pl

24370 l 2278927216 27215

28252 28253——63476"* J634769

P i P

508523 i 508518537lbO 25476

ol Twp. (M.264)

OJO ro

o.? I-

c a o

42A05NEa005 2,5247 GODFREY 200

THE TOWNSHIP OF

GODFREYDISTRICT OFCOCHRANE

PORCUPINEMINING DIVISION

SCALE: 1-INCH-4O CHAINS

LEGEND

PATENTED LANDCROWN LAND SALELEASESLOCATED LANDLICENSE OF OCCUPATIONMINING RIGHTS ONLYSURFACE RIGHTS ONLYROADSIMPROVED ROADSKING'S HIGHWAYSRAILWAYSPOWER LINESMARSH OR MUSKEGMINESCANCELLEDPATENTED S.R,O.

or

c.e

NOTES

400 1 surface rights reservation along the shores of all lakes and rivers.

Flooding rights on either side of the Mattagami to H.E.RC.

This township lies within the M unicipality of CITY of T IMMINS.

Reservotions:t/)- S R O. undtr application lor agricultural purpo*ei

^)- Certified agricultural land 26/8/82 - Subject lo Sec. 41(1) ol The Mining Act.

DATE oTissuV l O 1983

PLAN NO. M .284

ONTARIO

MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCESSURVEYS AND MAPPING BRANCH

LOT 8 oCN

ooO)c

ID

L1260 N

L1200 N

L1080 N

L120N

LO

1 1 10

585697

585696

J SSSnf

^J5B57ie

? 8

y i1

585715

•565698

586078

SBiOOO

585001

5*5002r/

LOCATION MAP1 inch to '/2 mi le

' JVT

3

LEGEND

Conductor Axis

In Phase Profile ( scale l cm - 1 0V.}

Quodrorure Profile (scale l cm: ]Q V. J

Depth E s t i mote (me f res] /Dip Conductivity-Thickness (mhos J

Instrument: A pex Parametrics MAX-MIN J!

KEY

15

Claim Line

Bush Road

Trail

Previous Drill Hole

Recommended Drill Hole

MoreenEneryy Resources Limited

TIMMINS JOINT VENTURE

SURVEY TYPE: HEM

FREQUENCY: 4 44 Hz

GRID: STEEP

TOWNSHIP: GODFREY NTS: 42A/12

Coble Length: 150 metres

Contractor: E xsics Exploration Ltd

Survey Dare: May J, 1981

Interpretation: J ohn Grant

so 100 150 200 m*rr

Scale 1 :2500

42A05NE0005 2 . 5247 GODFREY 210

O roCN

LOT 10 zooo

•sOrsi ^t

LOT 9 LOT 8 oCM

CO

d)C

li

a L1260 N

L1200 N

L 1080 N

-**

JN.)e-

21

585697

585696

56571*

^

X

\5857157J"

^85698

5B5718 586076

585000

585001

535002 "TT

LOCATION MAP1 inch to '/2 mi le

LEGEND

Conductor Axis

Ir Phase Profile { scale l cm: |QV.J i -P.

Quadrature Profile ( scale l cm - 10 V. J O .P.

Depth Estimate [ metres] ''Dip Conduct i vi t/-Thickness (mhos J

25m f S O 0 S15

Instrument: Apex Parametric* MAX-MIN H

KEY

*. O C laim L ine

Bush Road

Trail

Previous Drill Hole

Recommended Drill Hole

LOT 10 O OCM

NorcenEnemy Resources Limited

TIMMINS JOINT VENTURE

SURVEY TYPE: H EM

FREQUENCY: 1 777 Hz

GRID S TEEP

TOWNSHIP: GODFREY NTS: 42A/12

Cable Length 150 m etres

Contractor: E xsics Exploration Ltc

Survey Date: M ay l , 1 981

Interpretation , John G rant

50 l JO 150 200 metres

Scale l 2500

O OOf LOT 9

42A05NE0005 2 .5247 GODFREY