iucn red list categories and criteria examples. the iucn categories a. declining population b....
TRANSCRIPT
THE IUCN CATEGORIES
Extinct (EX)
Extinct in the Wild (EW)
Critically Endangered (CR)
Endangered (EN)
Vulnerable (VU)
Near Threatened (NT)
Least Concern (LC)
Data Deficient (DD)
Not Evaluated (NE)
(Adequate data)
(Evaluated)
(Threatened)
A. Declining Population B. Small Distribution and
Decline or Fluctuation C. Small Population Size
and Decline D. Very Small or
Restricted E. Quantitative Analysis
Ancistrocladus robertsoniorum
J. Léonard
Case study 1
Family: Ancistrocladaceae
Common Name: unknown
Distribution: Kenya - K7
(Kwale District)
• Liana growing up to 30 m and found in moist, semi-
deciduous, lowland forest.
• The population is restricted to 3 locations, all within national
and forest reserves, and has an area of occupancy less than
500 km2. Extent of occurrence is unknown.
• This species is locally common, although the total number of
mature individuals within the population is unknown.
• The plant is not harvested despite being thought to have
some insecticidal properties.
• Habitat is legally protected, although this protection is not
enforced - the main threat to the species is habitat
degradation caused by increasing human demand for land for
cultivation. Frequent fires during dry seasons may also be a
threat to this species.
Questions
• Is there enough information to assess the species?
• Is it Extinct or Extinct in the Wild?
• Does the plant qualify for any of the categories of threat?
Case study 1
Yes
No
• A. Declining Population
• B. Small Distribution and Decline or Fluctuation
• C. Small Population Size and Decline
• D. Very Small or Restricted
• E. Quantitative Analysis
IUCN CriteriaCase study 1
• A. Declining Population
• B. Small Distribution and Decline or Fluctuation
• C. Small Population Size and Decline
• D. Very Small or Restricted
• E. Quantitative Analysis
IUCN CriteriaCase study 1
B. Small Distribution
Extent of occurrence less than 100 km2
Extent of occurrenceless than 5000 km2
Extent of occurrenceless than 20 000 km2
Or
OrOr
Area of occupancyless than 10 km2
Area of occupancyless than 500 Km2
Area of occupancyless than 2000 km2
Critically Endangered Endangered Vulnerable
Case study 1
B. Small Distribution
Extent of occurrence less than 100 km2
Extent of occurrenceless than 5000 km2
Extent of occurrenceless than 20 000 km2
Or
OrOr
Area of occupancyless than 10 km2
Area of occupancyless than 500 km2
Area of occupancyless than 2000 km2
Critically Endangered Endangered Vulnerable
Case study 1
B. Criterion
Small Distribution
Severely fragmentedor few locations
Extreme fluctuation
Continuing Decline
Case study 1
B. Criterion
Small Distribution
Severely fragmentedor few locations
Extreme fluctuation
Continuing Decline
Case study 1
• A. Declining Population
• B. Small Distribution and Decline or Fluctuation
• C. Small Population Size and Decline
• D. Very Small or Restricted
• E. Quantitative Analysis
IUCN CriteriaCase study 1
Final Listing: Ancistrocladus robertsoniorum J. Léonard
Endangered B2ab(iii)
Case study 1
Area of occupancyless than 500 km2
• Severely fragmented (< 5 locations)
• Continuing decline in area, extent and quality of habitat
Ficus faulknerianaC.C. Berg
Case study 2
Family: Moraceae
Common Name: Mkuyu (Usamba) Mvumo (Swahili)
Distribution: Kenya, Tanzania - K7 (Kwale district), T3 (Pangani, Korogwe)
• An epiphytic/strangler tree found growing in coastal scrub and
wet forest areas.
• The fragmented population was known to occur at 4 locations,
with an additional site where one collection was made in 1968.
• Only 3 locations are now known and the extent of occurrence is
estimated at less than 20,000 km2 with a total area of occupancy
less than 10 km2.
•Ongoing loss of habitat and fragmentation are reported as the
main threats to the population which currently has less 50 mature
individuals (only 4 recorded in Dzirihini and Gongoni Forest
Reserve, Kenya).
• Habitat is highly degraded with danger of complete clearance.
Population decline attributed to habitat degradation.
Questions
• Is there enough information to assess the species?
• Is it Extinct or Extinct in the Wild? • Does the plant qualify for any of
the categories of threat?
Case study 2
- Yes
- No
• A. Declining Population
• B. Small Distribution and Decline or Fluctuation
• C. Small Population Size and Decline
• D. Very Small or Restricted
• E. Quantitative Analysis
IUCN CriteriaCase study 2
• A. Declining Population
• B. Small Distribution and Decline or Fluctuation
• C. Small Population Size and Decline
• D. Very Small or Restricted
• E. Quantitative Analysis
IUCN CriteriaCase study 2
B. Small Distribution
Extent of occurrence less than 100 km2
Extent of occurrenceless than 5000 km2
Extent of occurrenceless than 20 000 km2
Or
OrOr
Area of occupancyless than 10 km2
Area of occupancyless than 500 Km2
Area of occupancyless than 2000 km2
Critically Endangered Endangered Vulnerable
Case study 2
B. Small Distribution
Extent of occurrence less than 100 km2
Extent of occurrenceless than 5000 km2
Extent of occurrenceless than 20 000 km2
Or
OrOr
Area of occupancyless than 10 km2
Area of occupancyless than 500 Km2
Area of occupancyless than 2000 km2
Critically Endangered Endangered Vulnerable
Case study 2
B. Criterion
Small Distribution
Severely fragmentedor few locations
Extreme fluctuation
Continuing Decline
Case study 2
B. Criterion
Small Distribution
Severely fragmentedor few locations
Extreme fluctuation
Continuing Decline
Case study 2
Red Listing
Critically EndangeredB2ab(ii,iii,iv,v)
Case study 2
Area of occupancyless than 10 Km2
• Severely fragmented• Continuing decline in: area of
occupancy; area, extent and quality of habitat; number of locations or subpopulations; number of mature individuals
• A. Declining Population
• B. Small Distribution and Decline or Fluctuation
• C. Small Population Size and Decline
• D. Very Small or Restricted
• E. Quantitative Analysis
IUCN CriteriaCase study 2
• A. Declining Population
• B. Small Distribution and Decline or Fluctuation
• C. Small Population Size and Decline
• D. Very Small or Restricted
• E. Quantitative Analysis
IUCN CriteriaCase study 2
C. Criterion Population Figures
Critically Endangered <250
Endangered <2 500
Vulnerable <10 000
Case study 2
C. Criterion Population Figures
Critically Endangered <250
Endangered <2 500
Vulnerable <10 000
Case study 2
C. Criterion
Small Population
Continuing decline of at least 25% within 3 years or 1 generation
Case study 2
Continuing declinein numbers of mature individuals & at least one of a or b ….
C. Criterion
Small Population
Case study 2
Continuing declinein numbers of mature individuals & at least one of a or b ….
Continuing decline of at least 25% within 3 years or 1 generation
C2. Continuing decline and one of a or b
C2a Population structure in form of: (i) no subpopulation > 50 mature individuals OR
(ii) 90% in one subpopulation
Case study 2
C2b Extreme fluctuations in numbers of mature individuals
OR
C2. Continuing decline and one of a or b
C2a Population structure in form of: (i) no subpopulation > 50 mature individuals OR
(ii) 90% in one subpopulation
Case study 2
C2b Extreme fluctuations in numbers of mature individuals
OR
• A. Declining Population
• B. Small Distribution and Decline or Fluctuation
• C. Small Population Size and Decline
• D. Very Small or Restricted
• E. Quantitative Analysis
IUCN CriteriaCase study 2
• A. Declining Population
• B. Small Distribution and Decline or Fluctuation
• C. Small Population Size and Decline
• D. Very Small or Restricted
• E. Quantitative Analysis
IUCN CriteriaCase study 2
Case study 2
D. Criterion
Critically Endangered 50
Endangered 250
Vulnerable D1 1000 D2 acute restriction in area of occupancy or in the number of locations
Case study 2
D. Criterion
Critically Endangered 50
Endangered 250
Vulnerable D1 1000 D2 acute restriction in area of occupancy or in the number of locations
Final Listing:Ficus faulkneriana C.C. Berg
Critically Endangered
B2ab(i,ii,iii,iv,v); C2a(i); D
Case study 2
Ziziphus robertsonianaBeentje
Case study 3
Family: Rhamnaceae
Common Name: unknown
Distribution: Kenya, Tanzania - K7 (Kwale district), T3
• A tree (6-16 m tall) growing in moist, semi-deciduous lowland forest.
• Extent of occurrence is recorded as less than 1,000 km2.
• The species is known to exist in 5 locations in Kenya. The Tanzanian population is unknown.
• Information on the number of mature trees in the population is largely anecdotal: it is thought that a large proportion of the population is juvenile with very few reproducing adults present.
• All the Kenyan locations are subject to ongoing encroachment and their long-term security remains unknown. The status of the Tanzanian sites is unknown.
• Main threats to this species are ongoing loss and degradation of forest areas, and competition from invasive plant species.
Questions
• Is there enough information to assess the species?
• Is it Extinct or Extinct in the Wild? • Does the plant qualify for any of
the categories of threat?
Case study 3
- Yes
- No
• A. Declining Population
• B. Small Distribution and Decline or Fluctuation
• C. Small Population Size and Decline
• D. Very Small or Restricted
• E. Quantitative Analysis
IUCN CriteriaCase study 3
• A. Declining Population
• B. Small Distribution and Decline or Fluctuation
• C. Small Population Size and Decline
• D. Very Small or Restricted
• E. Quantitative Analysis
IUCN CriteriaCase study 3
B. Small Distribution
Extent of occurrence less than 100 km2
Extent of occurrenceless than 5000 km2
Extent of occurrenceless than 20 000 km2
Or
OrOr
Area of occupancyless than 10 km2
Area of occupancyless than 500 Km2
Area of occupancyless than 2000 km2
Critically Endangered Endangered Vulnerable
Case study 3
B. Small Distribution
Extent of occurrence less than 100 km2
Extent of occurrenceless than 5000 km2
Extent of occurrenceless than 20 000 km2
Or
OrOr
Area of occupancyless than 10 km2
Area of occupancyless than 500 Km2
Area of occupancyless than 2000 km2
Critically Endangered Endangered Vulnerable
Case study 3
B. criterion
Small Distribution
Severely fragmentedor few locations
Extreme fluctuation
Continuing Decline
Case study 3
B. criterion
Small Distribution
Severely fragmentedor few locations
Extreme fluctuation
Continuing Decline
Case study 3
Red Listing Endangered
B1ab(i,ii,iii,iv,v)
Case study 3
Extent of occurrenceless than 5000 Km2
• Severely fragmented (< 5 locations)
• Continuing decline in: extent of occurrence; area of occupancy; area, extent and quality of habitat; number of locations or subpopulations; number of mature individuals
• A. Declining Population
• B. Small Distribution and Decline or Fluctuation
• C. Small Population Size and Decline
• D. Very Small or Restricted
• E. Quantitative Analysis
IUCN CriteriaCase study 3