ist-fp6 summary status asms task force meeting 30 january, 2003 nb: the views expressed herein are...
DESCRIPTION
Satcoms: IST vs Aeronautics & Space Application vs network technologies; Application vs network technologies; Niche markets vs generic applicability; Niche markets vs generic applicability; Relevance to telecoms at large, vs sector specific; Relevance to telecoms at large, vs sector specific; Long/medium term focus vs shorter term applicability; Long/medium term focus vs shorter term applicability; Integration with other space applications, GMES & Galileo; Integration with other space applications, GMES & Galileo; 1 st calls decoupled. 1 st calls decoupled.TRANSCRIPT
IST-FP6 Summary Status
ASMS Task Force Meeting30 January, 2003
NB: The views expressed herein are those of the author, and are not necessarily those of the European Commission
1. Pushing the limits of CMOS,preparing for post-CMOS
2. Micro and nano-systems
3. Broadband for All
4. Mobile and wireless systems beyond 3G
5. Towards a global dependability and security framework
6. Multimodal interfaces
7. Semantic-based knowledge systems
8. Networked audiovisual systems and home platforms
9. Networked business and government
10. eSafety for road and air transport
11. e Health
12. Technology-enhanced learning and access to cultural heritage
Strategic objectives addressed in Call 1
1. Advanced displays2. Optical, opto-electronic, photonic
functional components3. Open development platforms for
software and services4. Cognitive systems5. Embedded systems6. Applications and services for the mobile
user and worker7. Cross-media content for leisure and
entertainment8. GRID-based Systems and solving
complex problems9. Improving Risk management10. eInclusion11. Product design and manufacturing 2010
Strategic objectives covered in Call 2
IST Structure of CallsIST Structure of Calls
In red: most likely landing points for ‘space’ related proposals, either telecom, or GMES or Galileo related, but other SO’s are not excluding satellite technology if the added value is clearly
demonstrated
Satcoms: IST vs Aeronautics & Satcoms: IST vs Aeronautics & SpaceSpace
Application vs network technologies;Application vs network technologies; Niche markets vs generic applicability;Niche markets vs generic applicability; Relevance to telecoms at large, vs sector specific;Relevance to telecoms at large, vs sector specific; Long/medium term focus vs shorter term applicability;Long/medium term focus vs shorter term applicability; Integration with other space applications, GMES & Integration with other space applications, GMES &
Galileo;Galileo; 11stst calls decoupled. calls decoupled.
Open 17th December 2002Open 17th December 2002 Close 17h00 24th April 2003Close 17h00 24th April 2003 Evaluation (of written proposals): 12-23 MayEvaluation (of written proposals): 12-23 May Hearings (IP & NoEs): first half of June latest 13 JuneHearings (IP & NoEs): first half of June latest 13 June ER for call 1 consolidated: 20/6ER for call 1 consolidated: 20/6 Draft IP Call 1 approved by DG: 27/6Draft IP Call 1 approved by DG: 27/6 Invitation to negotiation: 30/6Invitation to negotiation: 30/6 Bilaterals ISTC: 10/7Bilaterals ISTC: 10/7 GoD: 1-20 JulyGoD: 1-20 July Discussion in ISTC: 24 JulyDiscussion in ISTC: 24 July 1st contracts expected 1/10 or 1/111st contracts expected 1/10 or 1/11
Timetable Call 1Timetable Call 1
FP6 contract: Basic principles FP6 contract: Basic principles (1)(1)
Simplification of contract content and form:Simplification of contract content and form:– Core contract and general conditions applicable to all Core contract and general conditions applicable to all
instruments (annex II)instruments (annex II)– Specific annexes (annex III) for each instrument.Specific annexes (annex III) for each instrument.– All contractors the same rights and obligations, only the All contractors the same rights and obligations, only the
coordinator has additional tasks.coordinator has additional tasks.– Minimum financial detailsMinimum financial details
Signature and entry into forceSignature and entry into force– Only signed by the Commission and the coordinatorOnly signed by the Commission and the coordinator– The coordinator to ensure the other contractors sign The coordinator to ensure the other contractors sign
within the delays established.within the delays established.
Collective responsibility:Collective responsibility:– Collective technical responsibility as in FP5Collective technical responsibility as in FP5– NEW: Collective responsibility extensive to financial but limited to NEW: Collective responsibility extensive to financial but limited to
contractor’s sharecontractor’s share– Still to be discussed/decided the way to asses the LFV issues. Still to be discussed/decided the way to asses the LFV issues.
Financial aspectsFinancial aspects– Advance payment to cover up 85% of 18 months periods . (Paid Advance payment to cover up 85% of 18 months periods . (Paid
every 12 months).every 12 months).– Following the new FR, Following the new FR, advance payment is considered to be “pre-advance payment is considered to be “pre-
financing”financing”.. Limited duration contract (option); an initial contract of typically Limited duration contract (option); an initial contract of typically
two years may be offered to the successful proposalstwo years may be offered to the successful proposals
FP6 contract: Basic principles FP6 contract: Basic principles (2)(2)
Financial aspectsFinancial aspects– No costs categoriesNo costs categories– Costs must be:Costs must be:
• actual, economic and necessary for the projectactual, economic and necessary for the project• incurred during the life of the project and recorded in the accounts incurred during the life of the project and recorded in the accounts
following the contractor’s own accounting rules.following the contractor’s own accounting rules.• Certified by an external auditor.Certified by an external auditor.
– Cost modelsCost models• Still under discussion, keep the models FC/FF/AC as in FP5. Still under discussion, keep the models FC/FF/AC as in FP5.
(FF=20% flat rate)??(FF=20% flat rate)??– Community financial contributionCommunity financial contribution
• Based on actual costs and type of activity. (RTD=50%, Based on actual costs and type of activity. (RTD=50%, Demo=35%, Management=100%, …)Demo=35%, Management=100%, …)
FP6 contract: Basic principles FP6 contract: Basic principles (3)(3)
Consortium agreementConsortium agreement– Obligatory for all instruments unless otherwise specified Obligatory for all instruments unless otherwise specified
in the call. (Not for IST)in the call. (Not for IST)– Guidelines have been drafted by the Commission but EC Guidelines have been drafted by the Commission but EC
don’t need to approve CA.don’t need to approve CA.
IPRIPR– Many of the FP5 principles apply, main changes are:Many of the FP5 principles apply, main changes are:
• use of knowledge is the domain of the owner not all contractors.use of knowledge is the domain of the owner not all contractors.• It is possible to exclude access to pre-existing know-howIt is possible to exclude access to pre-existing know-how• It is no longer possible to give an exclusive licence to knowledgeIt is no longer possible to give an exclusive licence to knowledge
FP6 contract: Basic principles FP6 contract: Basic principles (4)(4)
Brochure “The 6FP in Brief” - An overviewBrochure “The 6FP in Brief” - An overview Guide for proposers - Call 1 - Integrated projectsGuide for proposers - Call 1 - Integrated projects Guide for proposers - Call 1 - Networks of excellenceGuide for proposers - Call 1 - Networks of excellence Guide for proposers - Call 1 - Spec. targeted research proj.Guide for proposers - Call 1 - Spec. targeted research proj. Guide for proposers - Call 1 - Coordination actionsGuide for proposers - Call 1 - Coordination actions Guide for proposers - Call 1 - Specific support measuresGuide for proposers - Call 1 - Specific support measures Guide for proposers - Continuous Call - FET OpenGuide for proposers - Continuous Call - FET Open Guide for proposers - Continuous Call - Grant applicationsGuide for proposers - Continuous Call - Grant applicationsDefines the administrative information (part A and the content part BDefines the administrative information (part A and the content part B
Brochure and Guides for Brochure and Guides for proposersproposers
Type of submission and evaluationType of submission and evaluation One step submission - a written proposalOne step submission - a written proposal One step evaluation for IPs and NOEs, based on written material and a hearing One step evaluation for IPs and NOEs, based on written material and a hearing
for all above-threshold proposalsfor all above-threshold proposals One step evaluation for other instruments, based on written material onlyOne step evaluation for other instruments, based on written material only
Electronic submission: EPSS:Electronic submission: EPSS:– Off line version is currently being tested - available end of JanuaryOff line version is currently being tested - available end of January– On line version foreseen before the end of February 2003On line version foreseen before the end of February 2003
– The EPSS is customised to each call and instrument with drop down menues for The EPSS is customised to each call and instrument with drop down menues for the objectives open in the call as 1st choice and contains also a template for the the objectives open in the call as 1st choice and contains also a template for the part B for each instrument. part B for each instrument.
Guide for proposersGuide for proposers
Overview of evaluation processOverview of evaluation process Commission eligibility check (C1 form): Commission eligibility check (C1 form):
Complete, eligible consortium, in scope, timely arrivalComplete, eligible consortium, in scope, timely arrival Experts’ individual reading Experts’ individual reading Consensus group - individual block scores, calculated overall Consensus group - individual block scores, calculated overall
score - consolidated comments and minutes of meetingscore - consolidated comments and minutes of meetingcurrent view: 3 experts per proposal for STREPs, Cas, SSAs - 5 experts for NoEs current view: 3 experts per proposal for STREPs, Cas, SSAs - 5 experts for NoEs and IPsand IPs
Panel discussion (Panel discussion (full panel)full panel) IP and NOE hearings (based on prepared questions)IP and NOE hearings (based on prepared questions) Panel discussion - finalisation: ESRs and Evaluation reportPanel discussion - finalisation: ESRs and Evaluation report
– Priority list Priority list
IST Guidelines for EvaluatorsIST Guidelines for Evaluators
Call for independent expertsCall for independent experts
Published 4.12.02 in the OJ of the ECPublished 4.12.02 in the OJ of the EC http://www.cordis.lu/experts/fp6_candidature.htmhttp://www.cordis.lu/experts/fp6_candidature.htm
Addressed to individuals and organisationsAddressed to individuals and organisations If already in the FP5 experts databaseIf already in the FP5 experts database
– data may be transferred and updateddata may be transferred and updated
If interested, register at:If interested, register at:
http://emmfp6.cordis.lu/http://emmfp6.cordis.lu/
FP6 Web referencesFP6 Web references
IST priority in FP6:IST priority in FP6:http://www.cordis.lu/ist/fp6/fp6.htmhttp://www.cordis.lu/ist/fp6/fp6.htm
FP6 EUROPA site:FP6 EUROPA site:http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/fp6/index_en.htmlhttp://europa.eu.int/comm/research/fp6/index_en.html
FP6 CORDIS site:FP6 CORDIS site:http://www.cordis.lu/fp6/http://www.cordis.lu/fp6/
ERA (European Research Area) site:ERA (European Research Area) site:http://www.cordis.lu/rtd2002/http://www.cordis.lu/rtd2002/