issues in education and technology
DESCRIPTION
Issues in Education and Technology. Home. ώ Educational Issues ώ. Click on the box icon □ beside the word to go directly to a specific topic. Mark S. Baliguat 3 rd -Year BEED Gen. Ed. Click Home. Directed Learning Theory. Directed Learning Theory - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Issues in Education and Technology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070409/5681449c550346895db14965/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Issues in Education and TechnologyώEducational Issues ώ
Mark S. Baliguat3rd-Year BEED Gen. Ed.
□ Direct vs □ Constructivist Debate
□ Single Subject vs □ Interdisciplinary instruction
□ Role of Distance Learning
Home
Click on the box
icon □beside the word to go directly to a specific topic.
![Page 2: Issues in Education and Technology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070409/5681449c550346895db14965/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Mark S. Baliguat3rd-Year BEED Gen. Ed.
Directed vs Constructivist Debate
Single Subject vs Interdisciplinary instruction
Role of Distance Learning
Directed Learning Theory• According to Doering and Roblyer (2010) "Learning is transmitted
knowledge. Teaching should be directed, systematic and structured." (p.34)
• Students should be given the same exams. Standardized exams are accountable. (Doering and Roblyer,2010)
• Doering and Roblyer (2010) mention that, "Inquiry approaches are too slow to be practical; learning has to be teacher directed." (p. 34)
Directed Learning Theory
Doering, Aaron H., Roblyer, M.D. (2010). Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching.Pearson Education Inc.
Click Home
![Page 3: Issues in Education and Technology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070409/5681449c550346895db14965/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Mark S. Baliguat3rd-Year BEED Gen. Ed.
Directed vs Constructivist Debate
Single Subject vs Interdisciplinary instruction
Role of Distance Learning
Constructivist Learning Theory• Learning happens through construction, not through transmission.
Students participate in hands on lessons and produce their own knowledge. (Doering and Roblyer,2010)
• Allows students to express what they have learned in several ways. (Doering and Roblyer,2010)
• As stated by Doering and Roblyer (2010), "Directed instruction is teacher centered; hands-on instruction is student centered." (p.34)
Constructivist Learning Theory
Doering, Aaron H., Roblyer, M.D. (2010). Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching.Pearson Education Inc.
Click Home
![Page 4: Issues in Education and Technology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070409/5681449c550346895db14965/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Mark S. Baliguat3rd-Year BEED Gen. Ed.
Directed vs Constructivist Debate
Single Subject vs Interdisciplinary instruction
Role of Distance Learning
In this form , Teachers tend to give instruction in no overarching aim. They have nothing to say about the relative importance of various kinds of knowledge with respect to other subjects. They do notgive students a mental framework for organizing and relating what they are taught. In a departmentalized setting, teachers specialize in one, or possibly two, subject areas and students move from one teacher to another throughout the school day.
Single Subject Instruction
http://www.marionbrady.com/articles/journal/1993-SingleDisciplineKappan2-93.pdf.
Click Home
![Page 5: Issues in Education and Technology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070409/5681449c550346895db14965/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Mark S. Baliguat3rd-Year BEED Gen. Ed.
Directed vs Constructivist Debate
Single Subject vs Interdisciplinary instruction
Role of Distance Learning
In interdisciplinary teaching, educators apply methods and language from more than one academic discipline to examine a theme, issue, question, problem, topic, or experience. Interdisciplinary methods work to create connections between traditionally discrete disciplines such as mathematics, the sciences, social studies or history, and English language arts.
Interdisciplinary Instruction
Jacobs, H. (1989). Interdisciplinary Curriculum: Design and Implementation. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Click Home
![Page 6: Issues in Education and Technology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070409/5681449c550346895db14965/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Mark S. Baliguat3rd-Year BEED Gen. Ed.
Directed vs Constructivist Debate
Single Subject vs Interdisciplinary instruction
Role of Distance Learning
Future Roles of EmergingTechnologies: The CSU CommissionThe California State University formed a systemwide commission in 1991 to examine the role of emerging technologies as a means of addressing the three concerns that dominate virtually all discussions of higher education in this decade —student access, academic quality, and fiscal efficiency.
Click Home
Stephen L. Daigle and Patricia M. Cuocco, “Alternative Educational Delivery,” in Grasping the Momentum of the Information Age: Proceedings of the 1992 CAUSE Annual Conference(Boulder, Colo.: CAUSE, 1993). Available online at http:// www.cause.org/information-resources/ir-library/abstracts/ cnc9238.html
![Page 7: Issues in Education and Technology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070409/5681449c550346895db14965/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Mark S. Baliguat3rd-Year BEED Gen. Ed.
Directed vs Constructivist Debate
Single Subject vs Interdisciplinary instruction
Role of Distance Learning
The Commission reached several interestingconclusions:• Teaching and learning in the information age will be less print-oriented
and classroom bound than ever before.• It will need to be less labor-intensive and more portable and modular
in formats and delivery.• The home and the workplace may become the classrooms of
tomorrow.
Click Home
Stephen L. Daigle and Patricia M. Cuocco, “Alternative Educational Delivery,” in Grasping the Momentum of the Information Age: Proceedings of the 1992 CAUSE Annual Conference(Boulder, Colo.: CAUSE, 1993). Available online at http:// www.cause.org/information-resources/ir-library/abstracts/ cnc9238.html
![Page 8: Issues in Education and Technology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070409/5681449c550346895db14965/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Mark S. Baliguat3rd-Year BEED Gen. Ed.
Directed vs Constructivist Debate
Single Subject vs Interdisciplinary instruction
Role of Distance Learning
• Instructional and support services will be based on the convenience of the consumers rather than that of campus constituencies.• Education that is truly learner-centered ought to be delivered directly
to the individual at a time and in a place determined by the learner.• The recent “marriage” of computing and various forms of
telecommunications can be expected to increase the scope and pace of technological innovation almost beyond imagination.
Click Home
Stephen L. Daigle and Patricia M. Cuocco, “Alternative Educational Delivery,” in Grasping the Momentum of the Information Age: Proceedings of the 1992 CAUSE Annual Conference(Boulder, Colo.: CAUSE, 1993). Available online at http:// www.cause.org/information-resources/ir-library/abstracts/ cnc9238.html
![Page 9: Issues in Education and Technology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070409/5681449c550346895db14965/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Mark S. Baliguat3rd-Year BEED Gen. Ed.
Directed vs Constructivist Debate
Single Subject vs Interdisciplinary instruction
Role of Distance Learning
• Most estimates suggest that the technicalmeans for integrating the two dimensions of non-traditional instruction delivery and format are only a few years away.
Stephen L. Daigle and Patricia M. Cuocco, “Alternative Educational Delivery,” in Grasping the Momentum of the Information Age: Proceedings of the 1992 CAUSE Annual Conference(Boulder, Colo.: CAUSE, 1993). Available online at http:// www.cause.org/information-resources/ir-library/abstracts/ cnc9238.html
Click Home
![Page 10: Issues in Education and Technology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070409/5681449c550346895db14965/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
![Page 11: Issues in Education and Technology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070409/5681449c550346895db14965/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Mark S. Baliguat3rd-Year BEED Gen. Ed.
Rapid Changes
Increased Complexity
Click Home
Technical Aspects
Changes in society may influence the education sector
-By shaping new divisions of labor in educational matters-By placing new demands on the education sector
http://tntee.umu.se/publications/greenpaper/3.pdf
![Page 12: Issues in Education and Technology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070409/5681449c550346895db14965/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Mark S. Baliguat3rd-Year BEED Gen. Ed.
Rapid Changes
Increased Complexity
Click Home
Technical Aspects
In their turn these changes are presumed to influence teacher education. They become visible as changes in one or more of the following areas:
• The aims and goals of teacher education • The contents of curricula • The cultures and methodologies of teaching and learning • The allocation of resources to various components of
teacher education programs,
http://tntee.umu.se/publications/greenpaper/3.pdf
![Page 13: Issues in Education and Technology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070409/5681449c550346895db14965/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Mark S. Baliguat3rd-Year BEED Gen. Ed.
Rapid Changes
Increased Complexity
Click Home
Technical Aspects
In their turn these changes are presumed to influence teacher education. They become visible as changes in one or more of the following areas:
• The division of tasks between the different components of teacher education
• The structure of organization of teacher education • Its institutional location
![Page 14: Issues in Education and Technology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070409/5681449c550346895db14965/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Mark S. Baliguat3rd-Year BEED Gen. Ed.
Rapid Changes
Increased Complexity
Click Home
Technical Aspects
There are a number of reasons that education systems may decide not to integrate the use of technology into the curriculum, and especially not to hold teachers and students accountable for using technology in the teaching and learning process.Few education systems at this point can guarantee that all students have adequate and equal access to computers and the Internet to accomplish stated goals; a status that requires considerable resources for hardware, software, connectivity, technical assistance and teacher development. (Kerr, 1996)
![Page 15: Issues in Education and Technology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070409/5681449c550346895db14965/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Mark S. Baliguat3rd-Year BEED Gen. Ed.
Rapid Changes
Increased Complexity
Click Home
Technical Aspects
However, the downside of not integrating technology formally into the curriculum is that the costly investment in technology will be underutilized and valuable resources will be wasted. Many teachers who have access to the technology will not use it, either because they don’t knowhow, are satisfied with their current approach to teaching, feel that using technology is too fraught with technical difficulties, or that they don’t have sufficient time to devote to the types of lessons best supported by technology. (Kerr, 1996)
![Page 16: Issues in Education and Technology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070409/5681449c550346895db14965/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Mark S. Baliguat3rd-Year BEED Gen. Ed.
Rapid Changes
Increased Complexity
Click Home
Technical Aspects
Moreover, Kerr (1996) argues that integrating technology into classroom practice requires “a radical shift in both teaching style and the teacher’s vision of what classroom life is all about. This new vision is one that changes the teacher’s role in basic ways, reducing the importance of‘ chalk and talk’, increasing the need for sensitivity to individual students’ problems and achievements, shifting how classrooms are laid out, how evaluation is conducted, how teachers relate to their colleagues, and a hundred other particulars of daily life in schools” (p. 24)
![Page 17: Issues in Education and Technology](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022070409/5681449c550346895db14965/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Mark S. Baliguat3rd-Year BEED Gen. Ed.
Click HomeReferences:
Doering, Aaron H., Roblyer, M.D. (2010). Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching.Pearson Education Inc.
http://www.marionbrady.com/articles/journal/1993-SingleDisciplineKappan2-93.pdf.
Jacobs, H. (1989). Interdisciplinary Curriculum: Design and Implementation. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Stephen L. Daigle and Patricia M. Cuocco, “Alternative Educational Delivery,” in Grasping the Momentum of the Information Age: Proceedings of the 1992 CAUSE Annual Conference (Boulder, Colo.: CAUSE, 1993). Available online at http:// www.cause.org/information-resources/ir-library/abstracts/ cnc9238.html
Conception, Benjamin, et.al (2012). Let Reviewer, MET Review Center. Manila, Philippines.
http://tntee.umu.se/publications/greenpaper/3.pdf
Kerr, S.T. (Ed.) (1996) Technology and the future of schooling: Ninety-fifth Yearbook of the National Society of the Study of Education, part 2, pp. 131-171. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.