iso 31000, 2009 - the institute of internal auditors

24
ISO 31000, 2009 The New International Standard for Risk Management By Remonde Brangman Risk Advisory Practice Leader CBIZ MHM, LLC Mid-Atlantic

Upload: others

Post on 03-Feb-2022

9 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

ISO 31000, 2009The New International Standard for

Risk ManagementBy

Remonde BrangmanRisk Advisory Practice Leader

CBIZ MHM, LLC Mid-Atlantic

Session Objectives

• Why is ISO 31000 relevant?• Scope• History and development of ISO standards• Key definitions• Principles• Framework• Process

Why ISO 31000?

• First Recognized International Standard• A roadmap to the future of ERM• Introduces a new perspective on Risk Management• Provides greater specific guidance to Risk Managers

Scope• Provides principles and generic guidelines• Can be used by any public, private or community enterprise,

association, group or individual – not industry or sector specific

• Can be applied throughout the life of an organization, and to a wide range of activities, including strategies and decisions, operations, processes, functions, projects, products, services and assets

• Can be applied to any type of risk, whatever its nature, whether having positive or negative consequences

• It is not intended to promote uniformity of risk management across organizations

Why implement Risk Management?• Increase the likelihood of achieving objectives;• Encourage proactive management;• Be aware of the need to identify and treat risk throughout the organization;• Improve the identification of opportunities and threats;• Comply with relevant legal and regulatory requirements and international norms;• Improve mandatory and voluntary reporting;• Improve governance;• Improve stakeholder confidence and trust;• Establish a reliable basis for decision making and planning;• Improve controls;• Effectively allocate and use resources for risk treatment;• Improve operational effectiveness and efficiency;• Enhance health and safety performance, as well as environmental protection;• Improve loss prevention and incident management;• Minimize losses;• Improve organizational learning; and • Improve organizational resilience

Risk Management Evolution

Compliance oriented

Financial focus

Negative risk events

Driven from credit and market risk modeling

Top down approach

Complex methodologies

Lacking front line involvementand buy-in

Not seen as a model forsmall businesses

Traditional Risk Management Modern Risk Management

Management oriented

Broad organizational focused

Positive and negativerisk events

Driven from strategic and organizational objectives

Both top down and bottom up

Simplified methodologies

Organizational buy-in

Excepted model forall businesses

Principles

Framework

Process

ISO 31000 Methodology

History and Development

ISO (International Organization for Standardization) is the world’s largest developer and publisher of International Standards.

Established in 1947, ISO is a network of the national standards institutes of 159 countries.

History and Development - continued•Australia, New Zealand and Japan initiated its creation – over 18 countries participated•US Technical Advisory Group established in 2008•Adopted in November 2009, now officially the first International Standard on Risk Management•ISO 31010 – Risk assessment Process issued•Guide 73 (terminology guide) issued

DefinitionsRisk:

Effect of uncertainty on objectives

NOTE 1: An effect is a deviation from the expected — positive and/or negative.NOTE 2: Objectives can have different aspects (such as financial, health and safety,

and environmental goals) and can apply at different levels (such as strategic, organization-wide, project, product and process).

NOTE 3: Risk is often characterized by reference to potential events (2.17) and consequences (2.18), or a combination of these.

NOTE 4: Risk is often expressed in terms of a combination of the consequences of an event (including changes in circumstances) and the associated likelihood (2.19) of occurrence.

NOTE 5: Uncertainty is the state, even partial, of deficiency of information related to, understanding or knowledge of an event, its consequence, or likelihood

DefinitionsRisk management:Coordinated activities to direct and control an organization with regard to r isk

Risk management framework:A set of components that provide the foundations and organizational arrangements for

designing, implementing, monitoring (2.28), reviewing and continually improving risk management (2.2) throughout the organization

• NOTE 1 The foundations include the policy, objectives, mandate and commitment to manage r isk (2.1).

• NOTE 2 The organizational arrangements include plans, relationships, accountabilities, resources, processes and

• activities.• NOTE 3 The risk management framework is embedded within the organization's

overall strategic and operational• policies and practices.

ISO 31000 Approach

Principles

Framework

Process

Integrated approachthat includes risk / opportunitymanagement

Keep it simple and practical –complexity is not an advantage

Requires strong and Sustained management commitment

Incorporates most ofthe key elements ofthe COSO framework

Principles

Risk Management must:

1. Create and protect value2. Be an integral part of all organizational processes3. Be part of decision making4. Explicitly address uncertainty5. Be systematic, structured and timely6. Be based on the best available information7. Be tailored to the organization8. Take human and cultural factors into account9. Be transparent and inclusive10. Be dynamic, iterative and responsive to change11. Facilitate the continual improvement of the organization

Risk Management Framework

Design of framework for managing risk•Understanding the organization and context

•Establishing policy•Accountability

•Integration into processes•Resources

•Establishing internal and externalcommunication and reporting mechanisms

Continual improvement Implementing risk managementFramework and process

Monitoring and review

Mandate and Commitment

Risk Management Process

Communicationand consultation

Monitoringand review

Establishing the context

Risk analysis

Risk evaluation

Risk treatment

Risk identification

Risk Assessment

Risk Management Heat Map

321

3

2

1 O - 8

12

R - 3

3

3

2

1

Oppor tunities RisksLikelihood Likelihood

Impa

ct o

n O

bjec

tives

Impa

ct o

n O

bjec

tives

Management addresses these key r isks andoppor tunities in its plans and pr ior itiesNote: Some adjustment to current pr ior ities may be required

O - 14 R - 34

R - 72

O - 21 R - 11

Developed byJay Mattingly

Framework Design: Clarifying Who Does What(Sample Federal Organization)

(Based on the Institute of Internal Auditors Position Paper & revised by CSA)