is309

Upload: yadunandan-nanda

Post on 03-Jun-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/12/2019 is309

    1/6

    S. Yasodhai

    Cauvery Research Journal, Volume 3, Issue 1 & 2, Jul. 2009 Jan. 2010 42

    MANAGEMENT OF NON PERFORMING ASSESTS IN

    TIRUCHIRAPALLI DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK Ltd.

    Dr.T.Unnamalai Abstract

    A strong rural (cooperative banks) banking sector isimportant for flourishing ecoomy. The failure of the rural(cooperative banks) banking sector may have an adverse impact onother sectors. The present paper focus on.(1) To understand the meanings and nature of NPAS.(2) To examine the reasons for building of NPAS in TDCC Bank.(3) To examine the causes of NPAS in TDCC Bank(4) Management of NPAS in TDCC Bank

    Assistant Professor,Dept.of. Commerce,Bharathidasan UniversityCollege, Perambalur.

    INTRODUCTIONTiruchirapalli District Central Co-

    operative Bank (TDCC) is the most

    important component of rural development

    of Tiruchy; Karur and Perambalur

    districts, because TDCC Bank covers three

    districts. TDCC Bank provides banking

    facilities and services to both rural and

    urban people to develop the economy of

    the three districts. Hence their financial

    health is a prime concern. Nowadays non-

    performing assets (NPAs) are one of the

    major problematic areas, which require

    attention. TDCC Bank is facings the

    problem of mountings of NPAs, which

    will yield lower income to the bank.

    TDCC Bank is in a position to provide

    more reserves against NPAs. Non

    performing assets means, credit facilities

    in respect of which interest or instalment

    of principal is in arrear for two quarters or

    more.(Prudential Norms- Application to

    SCB and DCCBs p2).Non performing

    assets also mean an assets which ceases to

    generate income for a bank.

    Objective of the study

    A strong rural (Cooperative Banks)

    banking sector is important for flourishingeconomy. The failure of the rural

    (Cooperative Banks) banking sector mayhave an adverse impact on other sectors.

    Non-performing assets are one of the

    major concerns for (Cooperative Banks)

    banks in India. NPAs reflect the

    performance of banks. A high level of

    NPAs suggests high probability of a large

    number of credit defaults that affect the

    profitability of the banking sector. The

    NPA growth involves the necessity of

    provisions, which reduces the over all

    profitability position of the banks. The

    paper deals with understanding the

    concept of NPAs, its magnitude and major

    causes of NPAs, NPAs of Cooperative

    banks in Tamilnadu, the NPAs of TDCC

    Bank, % of NPAs in total loans and

    advances, provisions for NPAs made by

    TDCC Bank, and the profitability position

    of the Bank.

    1. To understand the meaning & nature

    of NPAs.

    2.

    To examine the reasons for bulging of

    NPAs in TDCC Bank

    3.

    To examine the causes of NPAs in

    TDCC Bank.

    4. Management of NPAs in TDCC Bank

  • 8/12/2019 is309

    2/6

    Forfaiting as a source of Finance for Global Trade

    Cauvery Research Journal, Volume 3, Issue 1 & 2, Jul. 2009 Jan. 2010 43

    Methodology

    Only secondary data have been

    collected for this purpose of the study. The

    simple percentage and average are

    calculated for this study.

    Meaning of NPAs

    An asset is classified as Non-

    performing Asset (NPA) if due in the form

    of principal and interest are not paid by the

    borrower for a period of 180 (3 months)

    days. However with effect from March

    2004, default status would be given to a

    borrower if dues are not paid for 90 days.

    If any advance or credit facility granted bybanks to a borrower becomes non-

    performing, then the bank will have to

    treat all the advances/credit facilities

    granted to that borrower as non-

    performing without having any regard to

    the fact that there may still exist certain

    advances / credit facilities having

    performing status.

    Assets classification and provisioning

    norms

    Assets are classified as

    Standard Assets

    Sub-standard Assets

    Doubtful assets

    Loss assets

    Standard Assets

    Standard asset is one, which does not

    disclose any problem and which does not

    carry more than normal risk attached to

    business. Loans and advances which are

    not, classified under the category of sub-

    standard, doubtful, loss assets are

    classified as standard assets. Provision is

    required for standard assets 0.25 percent.

    Sub-Standard Assets (over due up to 3

    years)

    Staff loanover dueless than 3 years.

    Short term loans whether it is

    agricultural loan or non- agricultural

    loan over due from 12 months to 3years.

    Instalments for medium term loan and

    long term loans over due from 6

    months to 3 years.

    Agricultural cash credit out of order

    from 6 months to 3 years.

    All other cash credits out of order

    from 6 months to 3 years.

    Provision is required for sub-standard assets 10 per cent.

    Doubtful Assets

    Secured loan

    All agricultural loans, loans cash

    credits sanctioned against the mortgage of

    immovable properties and other loans and

    cash credits covered by reasonable value

    of securities are classified as securedloans.

    Category

    Overdue for 3 years to 4 years.

    Provision for this category is 20

    percent.

    Overdue for 4years to 6 years.

    Provision for this category is 30

    percent.

    Overdue for above 6 years. Provision

    for this category is required 50

    percent.

    Unsecured overdue

    100 percent provision is required for

    unsecured loans.

  • 8/12/2019 is309

    3/6

    S. Yasodhai

    Cauvery Research Journal, Volume 3, Issue 1 & 2, Jul. 2009 Jan. 2010 44

    Loss Assets

    Overdue more than 6 years and 100

    percent provision are required for loss

    assets. This can be explained with the tree

    diagram.

    Table 1 shows that the non

    performing assets of Co-operative Bank.

    Table 1NON-PERFORMING ASSETS OF CO-OPERATIVE BANKS

    Year (end-

    March)

    Urban co-

    operative banks

    (UCBs)

    Rural co-operative banks

    Short term structure Long term structure

    StCB CCBs PACS* SCARDBs PCARDBs

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7

    1994-95 13.9 33.9 N.A N.A N.A N.A

    95-96 13.0 34.7 N.A N.A N.A N.A

    96-97 13.2 34.9 N.A N.A N.A N.A

    97-98 11.7 12.5 17.8 35.3 18.6 16.5

    98-99 11.7 12.6 17.8 35 19.2 16.1

    99-2000 12.2 10.7 17.2 35.4 18.7 20.0

    2000-01 16.1 13.0 17.9 34.9 20.5 24.3

    01-02 21.9 13.4 19.9 32.5 18.5 30.2

    02-03 19.0 18.2 21.2 37.9 20.9 33.8

    03-04 22.7 18.7 24.0 36.8 26.7 35.8

    04-05 23.0 16.3 19.9 33.6 31.3 31.9

    * Percentages of overdue to demand.

    StCBs State Co-operative Banks.

    CCBs Central Co-operative Banks.

    PACS Primary Agricultural Credit Societies.

    SCARDBs State Co-operative Agriculture and Rural Development Banks.

    PCARDBs Primary Co-operative Agriculture and Rural Development Banks.

    Note : Prudential norms were made applicable to the UCBs since 1992-93, the StCBs and

    CCBs since 1996-97 and SCARDBs and PCARDBs since 1997-98.

    Source : Reserve Bank for UCBs and NABARD for Rural Co-operative Banks (excluding

    PACS for which the source is NAFSCOB).

  • 8/12/2019 is309

    4/6

    Forfaiting as a source of Finance for Global Trade

    Cauvery Research Journal, Volume 3, Issue 1 & 2, Jul. 2009 Jan. 2010 45

    Table 2 explains that the Non performing

    assets of TDCC Bank.

    Table 2

    Non-Performing Assets of TDCC Bank

    Rs. in Lakhs

    YearAmount of

    NPAs

    % of

    increase

    or

    decrease

    1999-2000 6060.20 -

    2000-2001 7193.94 18.71

    2001-2002 8450.50 17.47

    2002-2003 9197.21 8.84

    Source: SODONR TDCC bank

    The above analysis shows that each

    and every year the non- performing assets

    of TDCC Bank have been increased.

    During 1999-2000 the non-performing

    assets amounted to Rs.6060.20 lakhs and it

    has increased by 18.71 percent during

    2000-2001. During 2001-2002 the non

    performing assets of the bank was

    amounted to Rs. 8450.50 lakhs and it has

    increased by 8.84 percent and amounted to

    Rs.9197.21 lakhs.With the above analysis,

    it is observed that each and every year the

    percentage of increasing rate has

    decreased. Table 3 shows that the

    percentage of NPAs in the total loans and

    advances.

    Table 3

    Percentage of NPAs in the Total Loans

    and Advances Rs.in lakhs

    Year

    Amount

    of

    NPAs

    Total

    loansand

    advances

    % of

    NPAs in

    TotalLoans

    and

    Advances

    1999-

    20006060.20 30296.91 20

    2000-

    20017193.94 38507.21 18.68

    2001-

    2002

    8450.50 41639.92 20.29

    2002-

    20039197.21 44015.87 18.20

    Source: SODONR TDCC bank of TDCC

    bank

    The above table reveals, the

    percentage of non-performing assets

    during 1999-2000 in the total loans and

    advances was 20 percent, it was 18.68

    percent during 2000-2001, it was 20.29

    percent during 2001-2002 and the

    percentage was decreased to 18.20 percent

    during 2002-2003. The above analysis

    shows that the percentage of NPAs in the

    total loans and advances during the study

    period almost varies between 18 percent to

    20 percent. With the help of the above

    tables 2 & 3 more over the % of NPAs in

    TDCC Bank is not more than that of over

    all percentage of NPAs in Cooperative

    sectors. . Table 4 shows that the provision

    made by TDCC Bank for NPAs

  • 8/12/2019 is309

    5/6

    S. Yasodhai

    Cauvery Research Journal, Volume 3, Issue 1 & 2, Jul. 2009 Jan. 2010 46

    Table 4

    Provision for NPAs

    Year Provision

    Rs.in

    lakhs

    % of

    increase

    or

    decrease1999-2000 3528.92 -

    2000-2001 4128.09 16.98

    2001-2002 5234.09 26.79

    2002-2003 5612.79 7.24

    Source: SODONR TDCC bank of TDCC bank

    During 1999-2000 the bank made a

    provision of Rs. 3528.92 lakhs, and it hasincreased by 16.98 percent, 26.79 percent

    and 7.24 percent, 2000-2001, 2001-2002,

    2002-2003 respectively. Each and everyyear the bank provides a huge amount for

    provision against non performing assets.

    Due to monsoon failure for the past three

    years, there was a poor recovery fromagricultural sector during 2001-2002.

    There is nil recovery from weavers

    societies, spinning mills and whole stores.Their financial strength is poor. There is

    poor recovery from government sponsoredschemes like gas loan, etc. So, there is aneed to make a huge provision against

    NPAs. The bankers are in a position to

    create a reserve for NPAs even though the

    credit generates income.Table -5 showsthat the profitability position of TDCC

    Bank.

    Table 5

    Profitability Position of TDCC bank

    Year Profit

    Rs.in

    lakhs

    Loss

    Rs.in

    lakhs

    1999-2000 830.90

    2000-2001 9.89

    2001-2002 625.18

    2002-2003 778.88

    Source: Annual Reports of TDCC bank

    TDCC Bank incurred loss for the

    year 1999-2000amounted to Rs.830.90

    lakhs. TDCC Bank has performed almost

    a miracle during the financial year 2000-

    2001, earning a profit of Rs.9.89 lakhs as

    against a loss of Rs.830.90 lakhs during1999-2000. From 2001-2002 and 2002-

    2003 the bank sustained loss amounted to

    Rs.625.18 and Rs. 778.88 lakhs

    respectively. TDCC Bank sustained losses

    for the past years due to nil recovery from

    weavers societies, spinning mills and

    wholesale stores and poor recovery from

    agricultural sector, government sponsored

    schemes like gas loan etc. Weaverssocieties, spinning mills and wholesale

    stores are not able to repay their debts

    because their financial health is not good.

    Due to monsoon failure for the past three

    years the due from agricultural sector are

    also low.

    Reasons for an account becoming NPA

    There are several reasons for an

    account becoming NPA.

    Internal factors

    External factors

    Internal factors

    (1) Loan borrowed for a particular

    purpose but not use for the said

    purpose.

    (2) Willful defaults

    External factors

    (a) Scarcity of raw material, power and

    other resources for rural industries

    (b) Monsoon failures

    Causes for Non Performing Assets

    A lot of practical problems have been

    found in Indian banks, especially in

    cooperative sector banks. A Cooperativesector is important for a flourishing rural

  • 8/12/2019 is309

    6/6

    Forfaiting as a source of Finance for Global Trade

    Cauvery Research Journal, Volume 3, Issue 1 & 2, Jul. 2009 Jan. 2010 47

    economy. Now the cooperative banks are

    facing the challenges of an open economy

    due to liberalization policy of our

    government. Out of 22 DCCBs in

    Tamilnadu 17 banks termed as red. This is

    mainly due to agricultural sector advances.The Tamilnadu government waivers the

    loans and advances borrowed by

    agricultural sector.

    Management of NPA

    Various steps have been taken by the

    government to recover and reduce NPAs.

    Some of them are.

    1. One time settlement / compromise

    scheme

    2. Lok adalats

    3. Debt Recovery Tribunals

    4. Securitization and reconstruction of

    financial assets and enforcement of

    Security Interest Act 2002.

    5. Corporate Reconstruction Companies

    6. Credit informationon defaulters and

    role of credit information bureaus

    CONCLUSION

    With the above analysis, it is

    observed that the TDCC Bank is faced

    with bulging of NPAs resulting in lower

    income higher provisioning making a dent

    in their profit figures. Since NPA affects

    the profitability and financial strength of

    the bank. The NPAs of TDCC Bank has

    been increased for the past years due to nil

    recovery from weavers societies, spinning

    mills and wholesale stores and poor

    recovery from agricultural sector,

    government sponsored schemes like gasloan etc. Weavers societies, spinning

    mills and wholesale stores are not able to

    repay their debts because their financial

    health is not good. Due to monsoon failure

    for the past few years the due from

    agricultural sector are also low.

    Government should help the bank because

    the financial strength of the weavers

    societies, spinning mills and wholesalestores is not good. The TDCC Bank would

    have been still in a better position; if the

    Government should help the bank to

    reduce their Non- Performing Assets.

    REFERENCE

    1.

    Annual Reports of TDCC Bank

    2. Bhabatosh Banerjee and Anish Kumar

    Dan, Management of NPA in Public

    Sector Banks in India, The Journal of

    Banking, Volume I, No.I, Jan. - June

    2004, P35.

    3.

    Himedu, P.Mathur, Indian Banking

    Challenges Ahead, Yojana Feb. 2001,

    P28.

    4.

    Prudential Norms-Applicable to SCBs

    and DCCBs.