is cpted enough? planning effective and implementable
TRANSCRIPT
Is CPTED Enough?Planning Effective and Implementable Solutions to the
Vulnerability of our Schools
July 10, 2018FEFPA 2018 Summer Conference
BRPH 2018
Course Description
The recent tragedy at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School is only the latest event resulting in significant loss of life in our schools, something that has become all too frequent. Everyone agrees that this needs to change, but there is no real consensus on how to achieve that goal. Do we install metal detectors? Do we remove windows from our schools? Do we add additional security officers? Do we arm teachers? Do we revoke the Second Amendment?
Incremental changes to school design have proven inadequate to stop or even slow shooting episodes in our schools. Major changes are necessary, and this will impact how we design, construct, operate, and secure schools. Implementation of a successful strategy will be multi-faceted and will require stages of development.
There are lessons learned from implementing changes in other facility types that inform how we need to move forward with changes to our new and existing school facilities.
BRPH 2018
Learning Objectives
At the end of this course participants will:• Explore and understand how historic events have directly
impacted the design, construction, and operation of publicly used facilities after experiencing significant disruptive events using specific case studies.
• Understand how a holistic approach to assessing the vulnerability of facilities and campuses is necessary to confront and counter the ever-growing number of threats that continue to impact educational staff, students, and visitors in order to improve the safety and welfare of all.
• Identify the key team members and the process necessary to create an analytical framework for a comprehensive assessment to meet the goals of the different stakeholders with respect to how staff, students, and visitors can feel safe again.
• Learn about the challenges of modifying existing facilities vs. designing new ones especially given budget limitations, and discuss realistic expectations with respect to strategies currently being proposed, and how they can be phased in their implementation.
BRPH 2018
Discussion Panel
• Architects/Engineers
• Planners
• CPTED Certified
• Project Types:
− Education− Aviation− Military− Manufacturing− Commercial− Entertainment
• Risk Management
• Risk Mitigation
• Certified Protection Planners
• Training
• Project Types:
− Embassies− Correctional/Judicial− Educational− Military− Aviation− Research
• Construction Managers
• Cost Evaluation
• Phasing and Implementation
• Project Types:
− Medical − Educational− Institutional− Commercial− Manufacturing
BRPH 2018
Our Lady of the Angels, Chicago - 1958
BRPH 2018
BRPH 2018
Orange County Courthouse - 1984
BRPH 2018
Oklahoma City - 1995
BRPH 2018
World Trade Center/Pentagon - 2001
BRPH 2018
Airports: Orlando International Airport 2001
Security Checkpoint
Pre 911 Scenario
Post 911 Scenario
BRPH 2018
BRPH 2018
Columbine – 1999, Virginia Tech – 2007, Sandy Hook – 2012, Umpqua Community College – 2015, Stoneman Douglas – 2018, Santa Fe, TX – 2018, ?
What’sNext?
BRPH 2018
SCHOOL BOARD
STATE MANDATE
FEDERAL/ DOE
STATE FUNDING
FEDERAL FUNDING
FUTUREEXISTING
The Evaluation Process-Overview
BRPH 2018
HOLISTIC APPROACH
FINANCIAL
POLICIES & PROCEDURES
STAFFING & MANAGEMENT
PHYSICAL & ELECTRONIC
ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING
SCHOOL BOARD
STATE MANDATE
FEDERAL/ DOE
STATE FUNDING
FEDERAL FUNDING
A Holistic Approach
POLITICAL
BRPH 2018
ASSESSMENT APPROACH
POLICIES & PROCEDURES
STAFFING & MANAGEMENT
PHYSICAL & ELECTRONIC
ENTERPRISE SECURITY
Administration Faculty & StaffSecurity Resource Officers
Contract Security
Standard Operating ProcedureEmergency Operating Procedure
Emergency Response PlanContinuity Of Operation Plan
Mutual Aid Crisis/ Incident Mgmt.
Civil/LandscapeUtilities/Infrastructure
Traffic – VehicularTraffic – Pedestrian
Facilities
Life Safety/Hazmat Command, Control & Communications
SurveillanceAccess Control
CPTED/Public AddressMass Notification
CompartmentalizationIntrusion Detection
VIP Advance PlanningIt Data Security (Infosec)
The Assessment Detail
2018
Feeling Safe Again –Creating an Analytical Framework:Stakeholders
• Government Officials
• School Boards
• Administrators
• Teachers
• Parents
• Students
1916 – Women’s League- Parent Teachers Association Banner
A Social-Political-Economic Process
BRPH 2018
2018
Feeling Safe Again – Creating an Analytical Framework:Policy and Governance
• School Board Goals
• Board of Trustee Goals
• Local Government Goals
• State Government Goals
• Federal Government Goals
A Comprehensive &
Strategic Plan
BRPH 2018
2018
Feeling Safe Again – Creating an Analytical Framework:Stages of Confidence
• Perception
• Evaluate Alternatives
• Full Implementation
A Comprehensive &
Strategic Plan
BRPH 2018
2018
Feeling Safe Again – Creating an Analytical Framework:Implementable Standards & Criteria
• Level of Service
• Assessments
• ROM Costing (CAPEX)
• Schedule
A Comprehensive &
Strategic Plan
BRPH 2018
BRPH 2018
Feeling Safe Again – Creating an Analytical Framework:Is educational delivery changed?
• Class Changes/Bells
• Fire Alarms
• Areas of Refuge/Safe Havens
• Defensible Space
BRPH 2018
Companies that provide discount assessments because they are selling:
• Surveillance Cameras and Equipment
• Survey Tools
• Training
All of these tools are valuable and part of a whole approach. Your school district, college, or university does not deserve a “ONE SIZE FITS ALL” method.
CAVEAT EMPTOR
orLet the buyer beware
Thank YouFOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sean Tracy AIA, ALEP, CPTED
Director of Education – BRPH
EMAIL [email protected]
DIRECT 407-228-1004
W. Douglas Fitzgerald, CPP, CHS-III, CFE
President/CEO – FTG
EMAIL [email protected]
DIRECT 407-491-2202
Name
Title
DIRECT
Name
Title
DIRECT
Santiago Fernandez
Director of Planning – BRPH
EMAIL [email protected]
DIRECT 321-205-5756
Matthew J. Webster
Executive Vice President – CPPI
EMAIL [email protected]
DIRECT 352-494-2697