IPS Amazonia 2014 Results

Download IPS Amazonia 2014 Results

Post on 09-Dec-2014

479 views

Category:

News & Politics

0 download

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Results of the Social Progress Index for the Brazilian Amazon, covering 772 municipalities and nine states. Launched August 23, 2014.

TRANSCRIPT

<ul><li> 1. INDICE DE PROGRESSO SOCIAL NA AMAZONIA BRASILEIRA 2014 </li></ul> <p> 2. 2 RESULTS 3. TOP 20: URBAN WITH HIGH LEVELS OF INCOME AND HDI 3 IPS Ranking Municipality HDI Category HDI Income Level Reales Per Capita (2010) Urban/Rural IPS Score 1 Palmas High 0.788 High 1087.35 Urban 71.86 2 Barra do Garas High 0.748 High 789.99 Urban 70.77 3 Cuiab High 0.785 High 1161.49 Urban 70.44 4 Belm High 0.746 High 853.82 Urban 70.20 5 Novo Alegre Medium 0.699 Medium 433.31 Urban 69.40 6 Pimenteiras do Oeste Medium 0.665 Medium 493.67 Urban 69.14 7 Ftima Medium 0.697 Medium 464.94 Urban 69.04 8 Porto Nacional High 0.74 High 621.10 Urban 69.03 9 Ji-Paran High 0.714 High 743.35 Urban 68.31 10 Tangar da Serra High 0.729 High 846.59 Urban 68.25 11 Nova Santa Helena High 0.714 High 824.04 Urban 68.05 12 So Jos dos Quatro Marcos High 0.719 High 653.02 Urban 68.03 13 Lucas do Rio Verde High 0.768 High 938.65 Urban 67.57 14 Combinado Medium 0.697 Medium 455.39 Urban 67.42 15 Porto Rico do Maranho Medium 0.615 Low 227.87 Rural 67.37 16 Jaciara High 0.735 High 742.81 Urban 67.29 17 Campo Verde High 0.75 High 878.37 Urban 67.07 18 Guiratinga High 0.705 Medium 542.02 Urban 67.04 19 Pontal do Araguaia High 0.734 Medium 589.32 Urban 66.91 20 Gurupi High 0.759 High 778.90 Urban 66.76 4. BOTTOM 20:RURAL AND URBAN, LOW LEVELS OF INCOME AND HDI 4 IPS Ranking Municipality HDI Category HDI Income Level Reales Per Capita (2010) Urban/Rural IPS Score 753 So Joo do Car Low 0.509 Low 165.38 Urban 48.22 754 Itaipava do Graja Low 0.518 Low 136.77 Rural 48.20 755 Atalaia do Norte Very Low 0.45 Low 159.21 Rural 47.98 756 Mirador Low 0.545 Low 163.97 Rural 47.96 757 Penalva Low 0.554 Low 201.99 Rural 47.70 758 Portel Very Low 0.483 Low 195.22 Rural 47.60 759 Acar Low 0.506 Low 199.34 Rural 47.53 760 Marechal Thaumaturgo Low 0.501 Low 157.27 Rural 47.02 761 Recursolndia Low 0.5 Low 168.85 Urban 46.69 762 Amajari Very Low 0.484 Low 121.32 Rural 46.48 763 Porto Walter Low 0.532 Low 204.19 Rural 46.15 764 Barra do Ouro Medium 0.603 Low 256.28 Urban 45.89 765 Pacaj Low 0.515 Low 231.91 Rural 45.47 766 Santa Rosa do Purus Low 0.517 Low 201.58 Rural 45.22 767 Cumaru do Norte Low 0.55 Medium 417.06 Rural 44.81 768 Nova Esperana do Piri Low 0.502 Low 160.34 Rural 44.81 769 Anapu Low 0.548 Low 266.28 Rural 44.72 770 Alto Alegre Low 0.542 Low 201.32 Rural 43.68 771 Brejo de Areia Low 0.519 Low 187.95 Urban 42.95 772 Jordo Very Low 0.469 Low 178.03 Rural 42.31 5. IPS AMAZNIA 5 Urban: 492 municipalities Rural: 280 municipalities High income: 77 municipalities Middle income: 345 municipalities Low income: 350 municipalities High: 78 municipalities Medium: 366 municipalities Low : 306 municipalities Very Low: 22 municipalities 58.66 54.93 50 55 60 65 70 75 Urban Rural Average IPS by type of Municipality 63.62 58.84 54.41 50 55 60 65 70 75 High Medium Low Average IPS by Income Level 64.50 58.92 53.97 51.46 50 55 60 65 70 75 High Medium Low Very Low Average IPS by HDI Category 6. 6 GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION OF SOCIAL PROGRESS 7. IPS AMAZNIA 2014 OVERALL PERFORMANCE 7 Max score: 71.86 Min score: 42.31 Average: 57.32 The Amazonas state scored the lowest levels. 8. BASIC HUMAN NEEDS 8 Max score: 83.72 Min score: 31.23 Average: 58.75 Mato Grosso state scored the highest levels. 9. FOUNDATIONS OF WELLBEING 9 Max score: 81.48 Min score: 41.98 Average: 64.85 Maranhao state shows very diverse situations. 10. OPPORTUNITY 10 Max score: 69.22 Min score: 30.87 Average: 48.33 Par and Amazonas are the worst states. 11. 11 INCOME VS IPS AMAZNIA 2014 12. IPS AMAZNIA 2014 VS. REALES PER CAPITA CORRELATION: 0.62 12 13. BASIC HUMAN NEEDS VS REALES PER CAPITA CORRELATION: 0.38 13 14. FOUNDATIONS OF WELLBEING VS REALES PER CAPITA CORRELATION: 0.33 14 15. OPPORTUNITY VS REALES PER CAPITA CORRELATION: 0.72 15 16. CORRELATIONS WITH REALES PER CAPITA 16 Shelter, Access to Basic Knowledge, and Access to Higher Education are highly correlated with income per capita. Personal Safety is negatively correlated with income per capita. RDPC per capita: Ratio between the sum of the income of all individuals living in permanent private households and the total number of these individuals. Values in Aug/2010 reales. Source: UNDP. NBMC WS S PS 0.28 0.25 0.75 -0.33 ABK AIC HW ES 0.67 0.16 0.22 0.12 PR PFC TI AHE 0.44 0.55 0.32 0.80 IPS Amaznia Basic Human Needs Foundations of Wellbeing 0.38 0.62 0.33 Opportunity 0.72 17. 17 POVERTY VS IPS AMAZNIA 2014 18. IPS AMAZNIA 2014 VS % OF POOR PEOPLE CORRELATION: -0.67 18 19. 19 BASIC HUMAN NEEDS VS % OF POOR PEOPLE CORRELATION: -0.40 20. 20 FOUNDATIONS OF WELLBEING VS % OF POOR PEOPLE CORRELATION: -0.39 21. 21 OPPORTUNITY VS % OF POOR PEOPLE CORRELATION: -0.75 22. CORRELATIONS WITH POVERTY 22 Social progress has a strong negative correlation with poverty. Shelter, Access to Basic Knowledge and Access to Higher Education have strong negative correlation with poverty. 43% of municipalities have more than 40% of their population living in poverty. PMPOB (% of poor people ): Share of individuals with household income per capita equal to, or less than, R$ 140.00 per month (in Aug/2010 reals). The population of individuals is limited to those living in permanent private households. Source: UNDP. NBMC WS S PS -0.24 -0.22 -0.84 0.34 ABK AIC HW ES -0.73 -0.22 -0.15 -0.01 PR PFC TI AHE -0.50 -0.61 -0.32 -0.75 -0.40 IPS Amaznia -0.67 Basic Human Needs Foundations of Wellbeing -0.39 Opportunity -0.75 23. 23 HUMAN DEVELOPMENT VS IPS AMAZNIA 2014 24. 24 IPS AMAZNIA 2014 VS HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INDEX CORRELATION: 0.75 25. 25 BASIC HUMAN NEEDS VS HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INDEX CORRELATION: 0.49 26. 26 FOUNDATIONS OF WELLBEING VS HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INDEX CORRELATION: 0.40 27. 27 OPPORTUNITY VS HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INDEX CORRELATION: 0.82 28. CORRELATIONS WITH HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INDEX 28 Social progress has a strong relation with HDI. Shelter, Access to Basic Knowledge and Access to Higher Education have strong positive correlation with HDI. NBMC WS S PS 0.26 0.38 0.83 -0.31 ABK AIC HW ES 0.85 0.19 0.15 0.03 PR PFC TI AHE 0.45 0.64 0.45 0.880.82 IPS Amaznia 0.75 Basic Human Needs 0.49 Foundations of Wellbeing 0.40 Opportunity 29. 29 OVERPERFORMERS AND UNDERPERFORMERS 30. 10 LARGEST OVERPERFORMERS: ACTUAL VS. EXPECTED IPS AMAZNIA BY INCOME GROUP 30 Municipality Difference (Actual - Expected) IPS Ranking Barra do Garas 7.17 2 Porto Nacional 7.13 8 Belm 6.05 4 Palmas 5.99 1 So Jos dos Quatro Marcos 5.78 12 Ji-Paran 5.14 9 Santa Carmem 4.32 26 Pedro Afonso 4.24 34 Tangar da Serra 4.16 10 Nova Santa Helena 4.15 11 High Municipality Difference (Actual - Expected) IPS Ranking Novo Alegre 10.06 5 Ftima 9.20 7 Pimenteiras do Oeste 8.88 6 Lavandeira 7.88 46 Combinado 7.73 14 Santa F do Araguaia 7.61 47 Crixs do Tocantins 7.35 53 Parintins 6.91 74 Pequizeiro 6.81 76 Indiava 6.73 29 Medium Municipality Difference (Actual - Expected) IPS Ranking Porto Rico do Maranho 12.59 15 Santa Cruz do Arari 12.36 61 Rio da Conceio 10.15 38 Magalhes Barata 9.48 81 Cedral 9.23 94 Santa Filomena do Maranho 8.11 270 Peixe-Boi 7.28 124 Loreto 7.16 195 Carutapera 7.12 155 Cachoeira do Arari 7.11 178 Low 31. 31 10 LARGEST UNDERPERFORMERS: ACTUAL VS. EXPECTED IPS AMAZNIA BY INCOME GROUP Municipality Difference (Actual - Expected) IPS Ranking Novo Progresso -9.83 640 Ipiranga do Norte -5.94 351 Santa Cruz do Xingu -5.84 430 Brasnorte -5.63 447 Campos de Jlio -5.51 200 Nova Bandeirantes -5.43 427 Alta Floresta -4.67 359 Canarana -3.70 261 Querncia -3.58 323 Ariquemes -3.50 288 High Municipality Difference (Actual - Expected) IPS Ranking Cumaru do Norte -14.26 767 Bom Jesus do Araguaia -11.38 738 Campo Novo de Rondnia -11.21 729 Pedra Branca do Amapar -8.95 722 Graja -8.79 739 Nova Ipixuna -8.09 737 Santa Maria do Tocantins -8.02 726 Nova Ubirat -7.99 588 Uruar -7.93 719 Seringueiras -7.57 665 Medium Municipality Difference (Actual - Expected) IPS Ranking Cumaru do Norte -14.26 767 Bom Jesus do Araguaia -11.38 738 Campo Novo de Rondnia -11.21 729 Pedra Branca do Amapar -8.95 722 Graja -8.79 739 Nova Ipixuna -8.09 737 Santa Maria do Tocantins -8.02 726 Nova Ubirat -7.99 588 Uruar -7.93 719 Seringueiras -7.57 665 Medium 32. 32 IPS AMAZNIA 32 IPS AMAZNIA </p>