ipr protection ok

Upload: humptysharma

Post on 03-Jun-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/12/2019 IPR Protection Ok

    1/26

    IPR PROTECTION IN INDIA

    VIJAY PAL DALMIA

    HEAD IP & IT LAWS DIVISIONVAISH ASSOCIATES ADVOCATES

  • 8/12/2019 IPR Protection Ok

    2/26

    Comprises of the following Laws:-

    Laws relating to Trade Marks / Brands (Trade Marks

    Act, 1999), Property Marks

    Laws relating to Copyright (Copyright Act, 1957)Artistic Work, Literary Work, Audio Video Records andSoftware

    Laws relating to Industrial Designs (Designs Act, 2000)

    INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW

    INTRODUCTION

  • 8/12/2019 IPR Protection Ok

    3/26

    Laws relating to Patents (The Patent Act, 1970)

    Laws relating to Geographical Indications. The

    geographical Indications of (Registration and Protection)Act, 1999

    Laws relating to Internet, Web and InformationTechnology (Information Technology Act, 2000)

    Domain Names

  • 8/12/2019 IPR Protection Ok

    4/26

    INFRINGEMENT WHEN AN IPR IS

    REGISTERED i.e.Trade Mark , Patent IndustrialDesigns , Geographical

    Indications

    Copyright

    INFRINGEMENT OF IPR AND

    LEGAL REMEDIES

  • 8/12/2019 IPR Protection Ok

    5/26

    Passing off is a common law tort which can be used toenforce unregistered trademark rights. Passing offessentially occurs where the reputation of party A ismisappropriated by party B, such that party B misrepresents

    this reputation and damages the goodwill of party A.

    The law of passing off prevents one person frommisrepresenting his or her goods or services as being thegoods and services of the plaintiff, and also prevents one

    person from holding out his or her goods or services ashaving some association or connection with the plaintiffwhen this is not true.

    PASSING OFF

  • 8/12/2019 IPR Protection Ok

    6/26

    REMEDIES

    LEGAL REMEDIES AGAINST

    INFRINGEMENT AND

    PASSING OFF

    CIVIL CRIMINAL

  • 8/12/2019 IPR Protection Ok

    7/26

    NO In case of

    Trade Mark

    Copyright

    Yes For

    Patents

    Industrial Designs

    Geographical Indications

    IS REGISTRATION OF IPR NECESSARY?

  • 8/12/2019 IPR Protection Ok

    8/26

    COPYRIGHT: -

    Registration of Copyright w.r.t any logo / trademark is not necessary or compulsory under the

    provisions of the Indian Copyright Act, 1957.Automatic protection is available to an artisticwork, form the date when the artistic work / logowas designed.

    Copyright Comes in to existence when theconcept in mind is put in to some tangible formor crated

    HOW COPYRIGHT COMES IN TO

    EXISTENCE !

  • 8/12/2019 IPR Protection Ok

    9/26

    A trade mark is granted protection on the basis of

    First Adoption

    First User

    First Inventor

    First Invention / Adoption/ User is superior thenthe Registration

    TRADE MARK ! WHO IS PROTECTED ?

  • 8/12/2019 IPR Protection Ok

    10/26

    Monopoly for the specified period is created infavour of the Registrant

    In case of litigation onus of proof shifts on theopposite party

    Prima facie presumption is raised in favour of theRegistrant

    WHAT ARE THE RIGHTS CONFERRED

    BY THE

    REGISTRATION OF IPR ?

  • 8/12/2019 IPR Protection Ok

    11/26

    Yes, in case the registration has been obtained by

    Fraud Misrepresentation

    Wrongly

    Against the rights of some other party / opponent

    Registered by the Registrar erroneously Registration prohibited under some law

    Registration is against public policy or morals

    CAN THE REGISTRATION OF IPR BE

    CANCELLED OR REVOKED ?

  • 8/12/2019 IPR Protection Ok

    12/26

    During the Process of RegistrationByfiling Opposition

    After RegistrationBy filing RectificationPetition

    WHEN REGISTRATION CAN BE OPPOSED

    OR REVOKED/CANCELLED ?

  • 8/12/2019 IPR Protection Ok

    13/26

    There are two ways to compare similaritiesbetween two trade marks :-

    PHONETIC Similarity

    OCULAR Similarity

    Other tests for comparison are :-

    WHAT IS THE TEST OF COMPARISON IN

    CASE OF VIOLATION OF IPR ?

  • 8/12/2019 IPR Protection Ok

    14/26

    Likely hood of confusion and deception

    From the angle of a prudent person of ordinaryintelligence

    No microscopic comparison

    No actual confusion or deception is required

    Actual loss or damage not necessary

    OTHER TESTS OF COMPARISON

  • 8/12/2019 IPR Protection Ok

    15/26

    Injunction/stay

    Damages

    Accounts and handing over of profits Appointment of local commissioner by the

    court for custody/sealing of infringingmaterial/accounts

    Interim Injunction:Ex-Parte

    After Hearing

    CIVIL REMEDIES

  • 8/12/2019 IPR Protection Ok

    16/26

    Filing of plaint with supporting evidence at the time of filingof the suit

    Filing of application under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 read with sec.

    151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, for grant of ex-parte ad-interim;

    Filing of application under Order 26 of the Code of CivilProcedure for appointment of a local commissioner, to makeinventory and/or to take possession of the infringing materialform the premises of the defendants, their agents, retailers anddistributors etc.

    Hearing of arguments by court on application for grant of ex-parte injunction and appointment of local commissioner;

    The court may, if satisfied, grant ex-parte and interiminjunction and appoint a local commissioner.

    PROCEDURE & PROCESS FOR

    A CIVIL CASE

  • 8/12/2019 IPR Protection Ok

    17/26

    Judgment by the court.

    The court may give a short notice to the defendants forgiving them an opportunity of hearing before granting any

    temporary injunction or appointing a local commissioners Service of notice/summons of the court on the defendant

    Filing of written statement / reply by the defendant;

    Hearing on application for grant of interim injunction;

    Further proceedings in the suit including filing ofreplication/rejoinder, admission/denial of documents,framing of issues;

    Trial

    ELSE

  • 8/12/2019 IPR Protection Ok

    18/26

    Trade Marks Act, 1999

    Copyright Act, 1957

    Designs Act, 2000

    Patents Act, 1970

    Geographical Indications of Goods( Registration andProtection) Act, 1999

    Code of Civil Procedure, 1908

    Specific Relief Act, 1963

    STATUTORY PROVISIONS

  • 8/12/2019 IPR Protection Ok

    19/26

    Filing of criminal complaint before the chief judicialmagistrate/chief metropolitan magistrate of the concerned

    jurisdiction

    Leading evidence w.r.t. the infringement of the trade mark

    Filing of application under sec. 91/93 of the Code of CriminalProcedure for issue of search and seizure warrants

    Orders/directions by the Court to police for the search and seizureof infringing material.

    OR IN ALTERNATIVE Direction by the court to police for investigation, lodging of an

    FIR and search and seizure, under sec. 156 of the Code ofCriminal Procedure, 1973.

    OR IN ALTERNATIVE

    Filing a Complaint / FIR with Police

    CRIMINAL REMEDIES

  • 8/12/2019 IPR Protection Ok

    20/26

    Sec. 103/104 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999

    Sec. 63 and 64 of the Copyright Act, 1957

    Sec. 39 of the Geographical Indication of Goods Act,1999

    Sec. 420 of the India Penal Code

    Sec. 91/93 of the Code of Criminal Procedure

    STATUES INVOKED

    FOR CRIMINAL ACTION

  • 8/12/2019 IPR Protection Ok

    21/26

    In India, the jurisdiction for the purposes of filing a civil suit,will depend upon following facts, and subject to thefollowing conditions:-

    Where the cause of action has accrued;

    Where the part of the cause of action has accrued;

    Where the properties / violations are taking place;

    Where the defendants reside or work for gain;

    In brief, the jurisdiction for the purposes of filing a casewould depend upon the place of business of thedefendants.

    IN WHICH COURT A CIVIL CASE CAN

    BE FILED AGAINST VIOLATION OF IPR ?

  • 8/12/2019 IPR Protection Ok

    22/26

    In India a suit may be instituted in any Court of originaljurisdiction, subject to its pecuniary & territorialjurisdiction. The designation of the lowest court isDistrict & Sessions Judge. Such cases can also bedirectly filed in the High Court, if such High Court isvested with original jurisdiction, e.g. Delhi High Court.

    The Jurisdiction of High Court could be invoked, subjectto the payment of Court fees. The structure of Court feesvary from state to state.

    COMPETENT COURT FOR CIVIL ACTION

  • 8/12/2019 IPR Protection Ok

    23/26

    Yes, if the artwork, get up, design, color combination ofa trade mark/ label/ packing material is similar and / or

    deceptively similar, the provisions of the Copyright Act,1957, can also be invoked along with the Trade MarksAct, 1959, and this course of action is always preferable,as under the provisions of the Copyright Act, 1957, theoffence becomes COGINIZABLE, and police can, on itsown directly initiate Criminal proceedings afterregistration of an FIR.

    CAN LEGAL ACTION UNDER THE TRADE

    MARKS ACT, 1999 AND THE COPYRIGHT

    ACT, 1957 , BE COMBINED ?

  • 8/12/2019 IPR Protection Ok

    24/26

    Criminal Complaint in the Court of competentjurisdiction;

    Pre summoning Evidence, for satisfying the court on thebasis of the evidence placed on record, that the

    allegations by complainant are prima facie maintainable;

    Issue of General/ specific Search and Seizure Warrants,along with directions to police;

    PROCEDURE FOR FILING A

    CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

  • 8/12/2019 IPR Protection Ok

    25/26

    Raid / Search & Seizure by Police

    Investigation and arrest (if necessary) of accusedpersons;

    Arguments; Summons / Warrants against accused persons;

    Accused Appear and seek bail;

    Framing of charges, after notice of allegations;

    Trial Onus of proof is on the complainant

  • 8/12/2019 IPR Protection Ok

    26/26

    Contact Us

    India Head Office

    Flat No. 5, 2ndFloor, 10, Hailey Road,New Delhi-110001, India

    email: [email protected]:- +91-11-42492525 Fax :- +91-11-23320484

    Branch Offices at

    MumbaiDGP House, Ground Floor, 88 C , Old Prabha

    Devi Road, Mumbai-400025, India

    [email protected]

    Phone: +91-22-24384101 Fax : +91-22-24384103

    Gurgaon, Haryana803, Tower A, Signature Towers, South City-1, NH-

    8,Gurgaon-122001, Haryana, India

    [email protected]

    Phone- +91-124-4541000 Fax:: +91-124-4541010

    IP & IT Laws Division

    Vaish Associates Advocates

    Flat No. 903, Indra Prakash, 21, Barakhamba Road,

    New Delhi-110001, India

    email: [email protected]

    Phone:- +91-11-42492532 (Direct) Mobile: +91-9810081079

    Fax :- +91-11-23320484

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]