ipcrf - t1, t2, t3, mt1-4
DESCRIPTION
IPCRFTRANSCRIPT
Name of Employee: Name of Rater:
Position: Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Weight ACTUAL
per KRA RESULTS
Journal
LESSON LOG
LESSON PLAN/
1. TEACHING-Signed Observation
Form with agreement LEARNING PROCESS
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATIONTO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
TIMELINEOBJECTIVESKRAsMFOs
Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency,
Timeliness)
TEACHER I-III
RATING
USED EFFECTIVE TEACHING LEARNING STRATEGIES
PREPARED DAILY LESSON PLAN/LOG
INITIATED DISCIPLINE AMONG PUPILS, CLASSROOM/ ORDERLINESS & CLEANLINESS
JUNE,2014 to MARCH, 2015
40% 5- Has provided individual activities for a 130% and above of the classes handled for the rating period, Cooperative learning strategies was 130% and above effective when used, Teaching methods and strategies elicited 130% and above interaction from a class, ICT integration is 130% and above 4- Only 115-129% is evident 3-Lacking 2 indicators 2-Lacking 3 indicators 1-Indicators not evident
5-All daily lesson plans had the following objective, subject matter, procedures, evaluation and assignment/Each part had a full description of what to do with an example/Objective was specific, measurable, attainable, result-oriented and time-bound/130% and above based on the budget of work /Attained 130% and above of the desired learning competencies 4- Lacking 1 indicator 3-Lacking 2 indicators 2-Lacking 3 indicators 1-Indicators not evident 5-Pupils were 130% and above guided in the observation of classroom rules and guidelines as
Name of Employee: Name of Rater:
Position: Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Weight ACTUAL
per KRA RESULTS
Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form
CERTIFICATES 2. LEARNING
OUTCOMES
Form 1
RATING(Quality, Efficiency,
Timeliness)
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
TEACHER I-III
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MONITORED DAILY ATTENDANCE
PARTICIPATED CURRICULAR & CO-CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES
JUNE,2014 to MARCH, 2015
30%
Safety, orderliness and cleanliness of floors, toilets and proper waste disposal were 130% and above maintained 4- Only 115-129% is evident 3-Lacking 1 indicator 2-Lacking 2indicators 1-Indicators not evident 5- Attendance checking was 130% and above systematically carried out 4-Attendance checking was 115-129% 3-Attendance checking was 100-114% 2-Attendance checking was 51-99% 1-Attendance checking was 50% and below 5-Initiated at least 2 curricular/ co-curricularschool activities with documented results
4-initiated and participated in co-curricular/school activities with documented results
3-participated in most of co-curricular/ school activities with documented results
2-Participation only without documented results
Name of Employee: Name of Rater:
Position: Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Weight ACTUAL
per KRA RESULTS
PERFORMANCE
INDICATOR
PERFORMANCE
INDICATOR
MPS RECORD
RATING(Quality, Efficiency,
Timeliness)
ALL SCHOOL FORMS
Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINEPERFORMANCE INDICATORS
TEACHER I-III
UPDATED SCHOOL RECORDS FORM 137,138, 1,2, CLASS RECORDS,TEST QUESTIONS,ETC.
ATTAINED 75% MPS AND ABOVE IN EVERY GRADING PERIOD
ZERO (0) DROP-OUT
ONE HUNDRED (100) PERCENT PROMOTION RATE
JUNE, 2014 to MARCH, 2015
5- Class record reflected the bases of 130% and above of pupils’ ratings in all classes/subject areas handled/Students’ portfolio contained 130% and above of his accomplishment/Table of Specifications is 130% and above prepared for tests that require it/Test questions were130% and above logically sequenced/130% and above used and updated SF1,SF2, F138,F137-e 4- Lacking 1 indicator 3-Lacking 2 indicators 2-Lacking 3 indicators 1-Lacking 4 indicators 5-130% and above MPS 4-115-129% MPS 3-100-114% MPS 2-51-99% MPS 1-50% and below MPS 5-130% and above Zero Drop-Out 4-115-129% Zero Drop-Out 3-100-114% Zero Drop-Out 2-51-99% Zero Drop-Out 1-50% and below Zero Drop-Out 5-130% and above Promotion 4-115-129% Promotion 3-100-114% Promotion 2-51-99% Promotion
Name of Employee: Name of Rater:
Position: Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Weight ACTUAL
per KRA RESULTS
Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency,
Timeliness)
TEACHER I-III
PHIL-IRI FORMS
SREYEA FORMS
PUPILS HEALTH
RECORD
MINUTES OF MEETING 3. COMMUNITY
INVOLVEMENT
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
RATING
ATTAINED 75% INSTRUCTIONAL READING LEVEL
ACHIEVED 95% READERS IN SREYEA
ACHIEVED 95% NORMAL LEVEL OF NUTRITIONAL HEALTH STATUS
CONDUCTED PERIODIC PTA MEETINGS/CONFERENCES
JUNE, 2014 to MARCH, 2015
20%
5-130% and above Instructional level
4-115-129% Instructional level 3-100-114% Instructional level 2-51-99% Instructional level 1-50% and below Instructional level 5-130% and above Readers 4-115-129% Readers 3-100-114% Readers 2-51-99% Readers 1-50% and below Readers 5-130% and above NORMAL STATUS 4-115-129% NORMAL STATUS 3-100-114% NORMAL STATUS 2-51-99% NORMAL STATUS 1-50% and below NORMAL STATUS 5-130% and above accomplishment with set agreements met 4-115-129% of planned meetings conducted producing only set agreements and partial accomplishment of these 3-100-114% of planned meetings conducted producing set of agreements 2-51-99% of planned meetings conducted with minimal results 1-50% and below of planned meetings conducted with no results
Name of Employee: Name of Rater:
Position: Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Weight ACTUAL
per KRA RESULTS
Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
RATING(Quality, Efficiency,
Timeliness)
TEACHER I-III
RECEIPTS,PICTURES,
ETC
BE ATTENDANCE FORM
MEMBERSHIP FORM 4. PROFESSIONAL
GROWTH AND
DEVELOPMENT
UNDERTAKEN/INITIATED PROJECTS/EVENTS/ ACTIVITIES WITH EXTERNAL FUNDING/SPONSORSHIP
ACHIEVED 100% PARTICIPATION DURING BRIGADA ESKWELA
PARTICIPATED IN RELATED ORGANIZATIONS/ ASSOCIATION
10%
5-130% and above project accomplishment with full documentation report on completion 4-115-129% project accomplishment with partial completion 3-100-114% project initiative only with no completion report 2-51-99% project initiative only with no completion report 1-No project/event/activity initiated 5-130% and above PARTICIPATION 4-115-129% PARTICIPATION 3-100-114% PARTICIPATION 2-51-99% PARTICIPATION 1-50% and below PARTICIPATION 5- Active member of at least 2 associations.organizations 4- member of at least 2 associations.organizations 3- Active member of at least 1 associations.organizations 2-member of at least 1 associations.organizations 1-Non-participation to any related associations.organizations
Name of Employee: Name of Rater:
Position: Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Weight ACTUAL
per KRA RESULTS
T.O.R.
* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned OVERALL
RATING FOR
ACCOMPLI-
SHMENTS
Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
RATING(Quality, Efficiency,
Timeliness)
TEACHER I-III
CERTIFICATES
VARIES
Rater Ratee
ATTENDED TWO (2) CURRICULAR TRAININGS
DEMONSTRATED BASIC COMPUTER LITERACY
ATTAINED POST GRADUATE STUDIES
5-130% and above ATTENDED 4-115-129% ATTENDED 3-100-114% ATTENDED 2-51-99% ATTENDED 1-50% and below ATTENDED
5-130% and above SKILLS Demonstrated 4-115-129% ICT SKILLS Demonstrated 3-100-114% ICT SKILLS Demonstrated 2-51-99% ICT SKILLS Demonstrated 1-50% and below ICT SKILLS Demonstrated 5- Doctorate Degree 4- Doctoral Units 3-MAED 2-CAR 1-with Masteral Units
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
SCORE
SCORE
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
SCORE
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
SCORE
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
SCORE
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
SCORE
Name of Employee: Name of Rater:
Position: Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Weight ACTUAL
per KRA RESULTS(Quality, Efficiency,
Timeliness)
CERTIFICATES 1. PROFESSIONAL
Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MASTER TEACHER I-IV
GROWTH AND
DEVELOPMENT
RATING
demonstration
teaching
Documented
CONDUCTED SEMINARS/WORKSHOPS/ TRAININGS FOR TEACHERS IN SPECIFIC LEARNING AREAS
SERVED AS DEMONSTRATION TEACHER FOR SCHOOL/DIVISION LEVEL TRAININGS
JUNE, 2014 to MARCH, 2015
30% 5- Conducted 5 seminars/workshops/trainings for teachers in specific learning areas (supported by evidence/assessment reports) 4- Conducted 4 seminars/workshops/trainings for teachers in specific learning areas (supported by evidence/assessment reports) 3-Conducted 3 seminars/workshops/trainings for teachers in specific learning areas (supported by evidence/assessment reports) 2-Conducted 2 seminars/workshop/ trainings for teachers in specific learning areas (supported by evidence/assessment reports)
1-Conducted 1 seminar/workshop/ training for teachers in specific learning areas (supported by evidence/assessment reports) 5-4 lesson demonstrations served 4-3 lesson demonstrations served 3-2 lesson demonstrations served 2-1 lesson demonstration served 1-No lesson demonstration served
Name of Employee: Name of Rater:
Position: Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Weight ACTUAL
per KRA RESULTS RATING(Quality, Efficiency,
Timeliness)
2. Instructional
Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MASTER TEACHER I-IV
Competence ACHIEVED ABOVE 85% OF THE STUDENTS PERFORMANCE AT THE END OF SCHOOL YEAR
COMPLETED THE REQUIRED COMPETENCIES FOR THE STUDENTS IN EVERY QUARTER
INCREASED NAT PERFORMANCE OF SCHOOL
JUNE, 2014 to MARCH, 2015
40% 5- 130% and above student peformance (in MPS ) 4- 115-129% student peformance (in MPS ) 3-100-114% student peformance (in MPS ) 2-51-99% student peformance (in MPS 1-50% and below student performance (in MPS ) 5- 130% and above of the required competencies in every quarter completed 4- 115-129% of the required competencies in every quarter completed 3-100-114% of the required competencies in every quarter completed 2-51-99% of the required competencies in every quarter competed 1-50% and below of the required competencies in every quarter completed
5- 10% increase 4- 6% increase 3-5% increase 2-4 % increase
100% mastery of learning competencies
85% annual student performance
NAT RESULT INCREASED
Name of Employee: Name of Rater:
Position: Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Weight ACTUAL
per KRA RESULTS(Quality, Efficiency,
Timeliness)
Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MASTER TEACHER I-IV
RATING
OBSERVED 100% OF THE TEACHERS IN THE SCHOOL WITH POST CONFERENCE IN EVERY QUARTER
CONDUCTED MENTORING/COACHING PROGRAM TO TEACHERS IN THE SCHOOL ON QUARTERLY BASIS
JUNE, 2014 to MARCH, 2015
30% 5- 130% and above of teachers observed with post conference with teacher observation reports held in every quarter 4- 115-129% of teachers observed with teacher observation and post conference reports, held in every quarter 3-100-114% of teachers observed with teacher observation and post conference reports, held in every quarter 2-51-99% teachers observed with teacher observation and post conference reports, held in every quarter 1-50% and below of teachers observed with teacher observation and post conference reports, held in every quarter 5- 5 and above teacher mentoring /coaching sessions were conducted in every quarter ( with report) 4- 4 teacher mentoring /coaching sessions conducted in every quarter (with report) 3- 3 teacher mentoring /coaching sessions conducted in every quarter (with report) 2-1-2 teacher mentoring /coaching sessions conducted in every quarter (with report)
Quarterly observation forms for teachers accomplished
Instructional Supervision
3 documented mentoring/ coaching activities per quarter
Name of Employee: Name of Rater:
Position: Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Weight ACTUAL
per KRA RESULTS
* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned OVERALL
RATING FOR
ACCOMPLI-
SHMENTS
RATING(Quality, Efficiency,
Timeliness)
Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MASTER TEACHER I-IV
Rater Ratee
MANAGED PERFORMANCE OF TEACHERS FOLLOWING THE RPMS CYCLE (PLANNING AND COMMITMENTS, COACHING AND MONITORING, REVIEW AND EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING)
JUNE, 2014 to MARCH, 2015
30% 5- Evaluated 130% and above teacher performance following RPMS framework cycle 4- Evaluated115-129% teacher performance following RPMS framework cycle 3-Evaluated100-114% teacher performance following RPMS framework cycle 2-Evaluated 51-99%of teacher performance following RPMS framework cycle 1-Evaluated 50% and below of teacher performance following RPMS framework cycle
Accomplished teacher’s evaluation report
SCORE
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
SCORE
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
SCORE
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
SCORE
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
JUNE,2014 to MARCH, 2015
40% 5- ALL DAILY lesson plans had the following objective, subject matter, procedures, evaluation and assignment, Each part had a full description of what to do with an example, Objective was specific, measurable, attainable, result-oriented and time-bound, 130% and above developed high order thinking skills