ip based video conferencing system. a comparitive analysis by r. sureswaran

23
IP Based Video Conferencing System. A IP Based Video Conferencing System. A comparitive Analysis comparitive Analysis By R. Sureswaran By R. Sureswaran

Upload: angelica-newton

Post on 14-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: IP Based Video Conferencing System. A comparitive Analysis By R. Sureswaran

IP Based Video Conferencing IP Based Video Conferencing System. A comparitive AnalysisSystem. A comparitive Analysis

By R. SureswaranBy R. Sureswaran

Page 2: IP Based Video Conferencing System. A comparitive Analysis By R. Sureswaran

2

“Desktop IP Based Multi-point Multimedia Conferencing is positioned to become the next generation form of

communications, above and beyond the telephone”

(Quote by Industry Analysts)

IntroductionIntroduction

Page 3: IP Based Video Conferencing System. A comparitive Analysis By R. Sureswaran

3

Traditional/Legacy SystemTraditional/Legacy System Point-to-Point

Proprietary

Page 4: IP Based Video Conferencing System. A comparitive Analysis By R. Sureswaran

4

Traditional/Legacy SystemTraditional/Legacy System Point-to-Multipoint

ISDN running proprietary protocols

Page 5: IP Based Video Conferencing System. A comparitive Analysis By R. Sureswaran

5

Problems of today MCS System

•Requires dedicated ISDN lines to the desktop, which mean additional infrastructure.

•Expensive MCU (Hub) is needed for mixing and re-transmitting.

•Expensive WAN link is mostly proprietary and dedicated to video conferencing only.

•Expensive WAN bandwidth increases proportionally with each new user.

* MCS uses your existing LAN infrastructure.

* MCS does not need an MCU or any special hardware.

* MCS is IP-based and merges with your existing WAN link or uses the Internet.

* MCS WAN bandwidth requirements remains constant, irrespective of the number of users

Page 6: IP Based Video Conferencing System. A comparitive Analysis By R. Sureswaran

6

Modern MCSModern MCS Multipoint-to-Multipoint

Any IP Network

Page 7: IP Based Video Conferencing System. A comparitive Analysis By R. Sureswaran

7

Modern MCS Other AdvantagesModern MCS Other Advantages (Cont.)

Full Motion Video Conferencing and Video Streaming Up to 40 frames per second

Allows unlimited users per conference covering unlimited geographical distances

Support for World standards Real Time Streaming Protocol (RTP), Open

Systems Architecture and Non-Proprietary hardware requirements

Page 8: IP Based Video Conferencing System. A comparitive Analysis By R. Sureswaran

8

Unique features of MCSUnique features of MCS Multicast enabled for LANs and tunneling for

WANs and ATM networks MCS supports all types of networks in the

world. Desktop CPU is used minimally for the

conference About 16% on a Pentium 300

All entities are open systems and non-hardware specific.

Supports full duplex video at true color (64K colors) and full duplex CD quality Audio

Page 9: IP Based Video Conferencing System. A comparitive Analysis By R. Sureswaran

9

Unique features of MCSUnique features of MCS Meetings to be held in a virtual manner

directly from your desktop Extremely user-friendly interface

Takes 30 seconds to start a conference Minimal cost incurred as the system uses

existing network infrastructure Supports any IP Based Network

Page 10: IP Based Video Conferencing System. A comparitive Analysis By R. Sureswaran

10

InfrastructureInfrastructure MCS supports all IP-based network

architectures including: Broadband Baseband Wireless Satellite

Page 11: IP Based Video Conferencing System. A comparitive Analysis By R. Sureswaran

11

RSW Control CriteriaRSW Control Criteria MCS Supports the RSW Control Criteria

The RSW Control Criteria is an advanced set of controls for Multimedia Conferencing

RSW Control Criteria allows up to six different method of control communications

MCS has implemented 4 of the 6 control criteria

Page 12: IP Based Video Conferencing System. A comparitive Analysis By R. Sureswaran

12

Distributed Network Distributed Network EntitiesEntities Advantages:

Enables Legacy Networks (i.e. Shared Ethernet) to support high-speed multimedia applications

i.e. Multimedia Conferencing. Uses the standard IP language for

communications A futuristic architecture for high

speed distributed processing platforms

Page 13: IP Based Video Conferencing System. A comparitive Analysis By R. Sureswaran

13

Distributed Network Distributed Network EntitiesEntities Advantages:

Open Systems Architecture Allows implementation of entities in any

OS and programming languages Enables Bi-Directional multicast over

ATM and non-multicast enabled routers

Page 14: IP Based Video Conferencing System. A comparitive Analysis By R. Sureswaran

14

MCS EntitiesMCS Entities Conference Server Client MLIC Compression

Page 15: IP Based Video Conferencing System. A comparitive Analysis By R. Sureswaran

15

MCSMCS

MLIC

WAN

MLIC

RouterRouter

ServerServer

Page 16: IP Based Video Conferencing System. A comparitive Analysis By R. Sureswaran

16

Screen Capture of MCS Screen Capture of MCS ClientClient

Page 17: IP Based Video Conferencing System. A comparitive Analysis By R. Sureswaran

17

MLIC EntityMLIC Entity

MLIC

Server

Router

Server

MLIC

Client Client

LAN 1 LAN 2

Client Client

Compress Compress

Page 18: IP Based Video Conferencing System. A comparitive Analysis By R. Sureswaran

18

Compression EntityCompression Entity Provides real-time compression

and decompression Particularly useful when bandwidth is

an issue, like over the Internet. The compression algorithms used

are transparent. Currently, the following are supported:

MJPEG, INDIO, MPEG, H.261, YUV411, VDO

Page 19: IP Based Video Conferencing System. A comparitive Analysis By R. Sureswaran

19

ImplementationImplementation MCS is extremely simple to

implement The server plugs directly into your

network All it needs is an IP address and the IP

configuration information of your network

Clients are plug-and-play The whole setup usually takes about

2 hours only

Page 20: IP Based Video Conferencing System. A comparitive Analysis By R. Sureswaran

20

Intranet Within Intranet Within Organizations Organizations

Center

Sales

RD

WAN CLOUD

Page 21: IP Based Video Conferencing System. A comparitive Analysis By R. Sureswaran

21

Intercommunication Intercommunication Between CountriesBetween Countries

Par 3

APAN

CLOUD

COUNTRY C

Par 4

COUNTRY A

Par 1 Par 2

COUNTRY B

Page 22: IP Based Video Conferencing System. A comparitive Analysis By R. Sureswaran

22

Page 23: IP Based Video Conferencing System. A comparitive Analysis By R. Sureswaran

Thank YouThank You