1

INVESTIGATION

AGAINST

DR. ALEXANDER

DUNCAN SCOTT

2

EVIDENCE PRESENTED BY KEVIN GALALAE

File # 13-CRV-0670

COMPLAINANT: Kevin Galalae

RESPONDENT: Dr. Duncan Alexander Scott (CPSO# 51601)

INTRODUCTION

On the 6th

of May 2013, the Inquiries, Complaints and Reports Committee of the College of

Physicians and Surgeons (“the Committee”) decided to take “no further action” with respect to

my complaint about Dr. Duncan Alexander Scott, which I initiated in July 2012 to seek redress

for my involuntary 72-hour detention at Hotel Die Hospital in May 2011 and the malicious and

intentional misdiagnosis that followed two months later.

Pursuant to the Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991, I appealed the Committee’s decision to

the Health Professions Appeal and Review Board (“the Board”), which decided to review the

Committee’s decision today, the 19th

of November 2014.

A pre-review teleconference was held on 17 September 2014.

RESPONSE TO THE COMMITTEE’S DECISION

I will not review the chronology of the investigation, as that would be an unnecessary

duplication, and will instead go straight into disputing the validity of the decision made by the

Committee, which should have referred Dr. Scott’s egregious misconduct to the College’s

Discipline Committee.

I should also like to point out that had Dr. Scott withdrawn his false diagnosis and admitted his

errors, as Dr. McIlquham’s has done, we would not be here today. Dr. Scott has not done so

because the Kingston Police needs his false diagnosis to continue to keep me away from my

children and to protect the system from civil liability and because political entities in Ottawa and

beyond need that false diagnosis to discredit my activism and my writings with respect to illegal,

immoral, divisive and racist national and international policies with grand and hidden

geopolitical objectives; objectives that I have exposed in countless articles and eight books to

date, all of which have been published and republished around the world.

3

Dr. Scott, in other words, has decided to prostitute himself and to defile the Hippocratic Oath in

order to serve political interests and satisfy the deep-seated prejudices of the Kingston

establishment against foreigners in general and Muslims in particular.

I will review my complaints against Dr. Scott one by one, as well as his response to each

complaint and the Committee’s analysis and conclusions.

Complaint A:

Dr. Scott stated that I confirmed having a history of paranoia.

Dr. Scott’s response to this complaint was:

“It was felt by his team that Mr. Galalae agreed he had a history of paranoia. However, Mr.

Galalae now says that he did not confirm this.”

The Committee’s analysis and conclusion with respect to complaint A was:

“Mr. Galalae expressed concern that Dr. Scott implied that Mr. Galalae confirmed his alleged

history of paranoia. Although Mr. Galalae appears to have changed his mind in the interim, the

Committee has not reason to doubt Dr. Scott’s impression, documented in the hospital record, of

Mr. Galalae’s acceptance during his May 2011 hospitalization that he had a history of

paranoia.”

My response is this:

1. Dr. Scott’s feelings are not backed up by the medical record or by my actions before and

since my involuntary detainment at Hotel Dieu Hospital. The medical record shows that I

never suffered from any mental disorder let alone paranoia. The record also shows that I

have always defended my perfect mental health and did so publicly and repeatedly.

Evidence 1: Letter from Dr. McIlquham, my family doctor, dated 25 October 2001, states: “I

have personally reviewed your entire record in my possession both written and electronic (EMR

started in the fall of 2007), and can confirm there are no entries of a psychological, psychiatric

nature or relating to any mental disorder.”

Also available online at:

http://wikispooks.com/w/images/7/7c/Dr_McIlquham_Letter_2011-10-26.pdf

Evidence 2: Dr. Bruce Cook Forensic Report, dated 1 June 2011, states: “Mr. Galalae seemed to

have a great deal of insight into him and into his own psychological functioning. He clearly did

not present as having any violence issues or mental health issues. Mr. Galalae was calm, rational

and he was able to demonstrate reasonable logical thought, without any suggestion of paranoid

or psychotic content.” (pp. 7 & 8)

4

“Mr. Galalae did not present with any formal thought disorder, nor did he complain of any

attention or concentration problems. Mr. Galalae did not have any illogical or bizarre thought

content. He also did not admit to any secondary symptomatology. Mr. Galalae also denied any

significant symptoms of depression and anxiety. There was no evidence to suggest that he was

experiencing any manic or hypomanic episodes. Mr. Galalae also did not admit to any obsessive

thinking, but there was no evidence of compulsive behaviors. There was also no evidence of

dissociative disorders, or depersonalization experiences. Overall, in terms of my impressions

derived from the forensic interview, it would appear that Mr. Galalae is not suffering from any

form of mental illness.” (p. 8)

Also available online at:

http://wikispooks.com/w/images/3/36/Bruce_Cook_forensic_report_2011_06_14.pdf

Evidence 3: Dr. Beharry, PH.D., Psychological Consultation Report, dated 20 June 2011, states:

“On mental status, Mr. Galalae was well oriented to time, place and person, articulate and

coherent and displayed clear and logical thinking. There was no evidence of hallucinations or

delusions. Judgment and insight appeared intact. Intellectually, he appeared to be functioning in

the above average range.” (p. 3)

Also available online at:

http://wikispooks.com/w/images/3/3a/Dr_Beharry_Report_2011-06-24.pdf

Evidence 4: Letter from Psychotherapist Jan Dalluegge, dated 19 October 2011, states: “I have

had the privilege to know Kevin Galalae for 31 years now. I consider him my oldest and best

friend. With great confidence I can state that Kevin is a warm hearted and caring healthy Human

Being with an extraordinary sense of responsibility for himself and his people. In fact he is

continuing the tradition of his family who has brought up only the finest scientists and doctors.

Anybody with only a little interest in Kevin's curriculum cannot but stumble about these facts.

Moreover I would like to suggest that those who have attested Kevin any kind of sufferings from

mental or psychological illness should lay down their profession because they are truly

dangerous for the public health.”

Also available online at:

http://wikispooks.com/w/images/1/1c/Letter_from_Psychotherapist_Jan_Dallugge.pdf

Evidence 5: Dr. Bruce Cook Progress Report, dated 18 October 2011: “Based on my continuing

clinical contact with Mr. Galalae, I have not discovered any delusional or paranoid thinking that

is out of proportion with the reality of facts that he has discussed in psychotherapy with me.”

Also available online at:

http://wikispooks.com/w/images/9/9f/Bruce_Cook_Progress_Report_2011-10-18.pdf

5

Evidence 6: Doctors for Sale, dated 5 September 2011, where I repeatedly defend my mental

health and show how doctors have falsified my medical record to discredit my activism: “In

Soviet style, Canada uses psychiatry to silence and discredit political dissenters and human

rights activists. As a case in point, doctors at Hotel Dieu Hospital in Kingston, Ontario, have

coordinated their actions with those of the Kingston Police and have debased their professional

standards and codes in order to throw doubt on my ability to reason and therefore discredit my

human rights activism and parenting abilities.”

Also available online at:

http://wikispooks.com/w/images/6/62/Doctors_for_Sale.pdf

Evidence 7: The Man Inside: Incipient Totalitarianism in the Western World, dated 20 June

2011, is a detailed account of my state of my mind and the events and details of my involuntary

detention. Nowhere in this account, part of which I wrote during my 72-hour involuntary

detention, am I not revolted by the manner in which Dr. Scott and his colleagues have treated me.

Furthermore, on page 10 of this article I show two of my wife’s handwritten notes, which give a

clear indication that my wife is not mentally fit, a fact that I have told Dr. Scott and his colleagues

repeatedly. Of course, Dr. Scott chose to ignore my wife’s long-standing mental health problems

and her postpartum depression, both of which were recorded and well-known, because they had

an agenda, to discredit me at all costs by painting me as a lunatic.

Also available online at:

http://wikispooks.com/w/images/3/34/THE_MAN_INSIDE._INCIPIENT_TOTALITARIANISM

_IN_THE_WESTERN_WORLD.pdf

Dr. Scott’s feelings are irrelevant in the absence of evidence and are merely a desperate attempt

to justify his malicious actions. Dr. Scott cannot provide a single shred of evidence that I am or

ever was paranoid because no such evidence exists.

Dr. Scott’s duty as a doctor is to look at the evidence before him and at the medical record, none

of which indicated that I had ever suffered from any mental disorder let alone paranoia. In fact,

the medical record shows that I was always in full control of my mind.

Evidence 8: The Mental Health Assessment Sheets from May 17 and 18 filed by Hotel Dieu

Hospital show conclusively that I am perfectly normal on all psychological and physiological

categories: cognitive status, perception, thought content and process, appearance, sleep, speech,

affect, mood and behavior. (See pp. 149 to 155, Exhibit 19 in Affidavit of Kevin Galalae)

Evidence 9: Dr. Scott’s hand notes indicate that he did not find any reason to involuntarily detain

me for 30 days, as the Kingston Police had asked, and that he informed the police on May 18 to

release me. Had I been paranoid and confirmed that I am paranoid, as Dr. Scott maintains, he

would certainly not have released me. (See p. 157, Exhibit 20 in Affidavit of Kevin Galalae)

6

Dr. Scott’s multiaxial diagnosis issued two months after my involuntary confinement at Hotel

Dieu Hospital does not include paranoia, so how can I possibly confirm suffering from an illness

that Dr. Scott himself concluded I do not suffer from?

Complaint B:

Dr. Scott referred to my report that my phones are being tapped by the Canadian Security

Intelligence Service (CSIS) and that the British intelligence services engage in surveillance and

censorship of the academic environment in the UK as delusions when in fact they are hard cold

facts.

Dr. Scott’s response was:

“In viewing the discharge, it was his team’s interpretation that these were delusional thoughts.

He understands that Mr. Galalae states that these are “hard cold facts”.”

The Committee’s analysis and conclusion with respect to complaint B was:

“Dr. Scott’s interpretation of Mr. Galalae’s thoughts as delusional was made on the basis of his

education, training, clinical experience, and observation of Mr. Galalae at the time of his May

2011 hospitalization. Here is no factual information to support Mr. Galalae’s impression that

his telephones were being tapped, or that there were spies in his classrooms.”

My response is this:

First of all, I take issue with the language ascribed to me, which is misleading and intended to

sound not only paranoid but also idiotic. I have always used the designation government agent

and only once have I referred to the people involved in this covert program as spies.

Secondly, Dr. Scott is not qualified to judge whether or not my phones were tapped or not by

CSIS and whether the British Secret Service engages in surveillance and censorship of the

academic environment. He is neither an expert in electronic surveillance nor a secret service

agent. The most he could have done is doubt my assertion, but he had no evidence to conclude

that my report was delusional or paranoid, no more than he could conclude that Professor

Hawking is delusional and paranoid because he believes in the existence of Black Holes. He had

however every reason to believe that there could be a possibility I was right, especially since he

could read my hunger strike pamphlet, which explained briefly how the surveillance program

worked, and he could read my published article The Great Secret: Surveillance and Censorship

in Britain and the EU as well as my filed law suit against the government of the UK at the

European Court of Human rights, all of which provide ample evidence of sound and logical

7

reasoning and even documentary evidence to back up my assertions and were available online

even at that time and I encouraged him to read.

Evidence 10: Hunger Strike Pamphlet, dated April 2011, states:

Since 2007, the UK operates a covert program of surveillance and censorship (SAC) of

universities that is secretly enabled by the Prevent strand of its anti-terrorism legislation, whose

stated first objective is “to challenge the ideology behind violent extremism and support

mainstream voices”. Despite being unlawful and discriminatory SAC has been approved by the

EU Members States and scheduled for replication throughout the European Union as part of the

Stockholm Programme, which began implementation in 2010.

SAC avoids legal barriers by covertly embedding agents in online and onsite university programs

as common students, paying tuition fees out of pocket. This allows universities to claim innocence

should anyone glimpse the truth and to avoid legal consequences for violating privacy rules, data

protection laws, expressional rights, freedom of conscience, education law and the trust of their

students. Once embedded, the spies masquerade as legitimate students while secretly

collaborating with the course tutors. The prerogatives of Europe’s counter-terrorism strategy

trump academic freedom and are used to purge the academic environment of ideas and ideals

that are deemed to go against Europe’s “shared values” and “community cohesion”. Political

science, international relations and philosophy courses are primarily targeted by SAC.

The embedded SAC agents monitor students, test their allegiance to the system, assist the course

tutors in deflecting and diverting the discussions away from subjects the government deems taboo

when the opinions expressed by students run counter to the State’s foreign or domestic policies,

manipulate and coerce students into toeing the politically correct line, manufacture consent and,

should that fail, provoke students to commit netiquette breaches or simply create an environment

so harassing as to cause targeted students to quit their studies of their own accord.

Whether deliberate or accidental, SAC imposes positions that are contrary to reason, factually

incorrect, and antithetical to the values, background and experience of foreign and domestic

students, positions that fly in the face of academic freedom, violate free speech and cause the

retreat of reason, endemic dishonesty, and the corruption of public debate; enchaining

intellectual discourse and political analysis to preconceived notions derived from a toxic mix of

political correctness, manufactured consent and hidden agendas. As a result, entrenched

discrimination towards foreigners who do not accept received wisdom and collective denial, and

natives who do not show unquestioned respect for institutions and policies, or who dare diverge

from accepted beliefs, is the order of the day in the European universities that have allowed SAC

operatives on their campuses and have given up control as to who defines the terms and

parameters of intellectual debate. The overall effect is to brainwash the young and the

impressionable to hold biased views in line with State policy and to squash dissenting opinions

that challenge the status quo before they reach a larger audience.

To keep SAC secret, the institutions of democracy and all branches of government have decayed

into a state of incestuous and self-serving secrecy, coercing the media and co-opting NGOs to

remain silent. The rule of law and due process have been suspended, reducing the entire

officialdom to systemic dishonesty and state-sanctioned fraud and turning Europe’s higher

education institutions into propaganda and indoctrination machines.

8

Those who contest SAC’s legitimacy or try to expose it, as I have done, are stripped of their

human rights, civil liberties and protection under the law and turned into second class citizens in

their own countries.

For detailed information on SAC see http://wikispooks.com/wiki/Kevin_Galalae or read the main

article at http://cryptome.org/0003/great-secret.pdf. SAC is currently contested at the European

Court of Human Rights. The pleading is entitled Galalae v. The United Kingdom (Application no.

13386/11).

Also available online at:

http://wikispooks.com/w/images/4/4a/Hunger_strike_handout.pdf

Evidence 11: The Great Secret: Surveillance and Censorship in Britain and the EU, dated 25

October 2010.

In this article I describe in great detail the modus operandi of the program of surveillance and

censorship and provide indirect evidence of its existence as well as the names of the people

involved from the lowest to the highest level. The article is backed up two years of adjudication

material and by direct and indirect evidence, all of which is archived by Wikispooks, a website

run by the British Secret Service, and is published even by the Chinese encyclopedia. In other

words, by the time I was involuntarily detained, I had been fighting this infringement of our

constitutional rights for two years and had not just woken up that morning and started

hallucinating, as Dr. Scott would have it.

Also available online at:

http://cryptome.org/0003/great-secret.pdf

Evidence 12: Galalae v. The United Kingdom (Application no. 13386/11), dated 25 February

2011.

This is a seventeen page legal document that had taken months to prepare and is backed up by

dozens of sources, correspondence and policy documents. This document alone shows clearly

that my assertions are backed up by direct and indirect evidence, and that they are well reasoned

and referenced and not empty delusions and paranoia, as Dr. Scott would have it.

Also available online at:

http://wikispooks.com/w/images/1/19/Kevin_Galalae_vs._the_United_Kingdom%2C_European_

Court_of_Human_Rights.pdf

Evidence 13: Freedom of Speech on Campus: Rights and Responsibilities in UK Universities

Had Dr. Scott done his work and read my article The Great Secret, he would have found clear and

unequivocal evidence that I was correct in all my assertions; evidence published by the most

important British oversight institution, Universities UK, the umbrella organization that represents

9

the interest of all British universities and which a month after I published my article The Great

Secret it published its own document and confirmed the program of surveillance and censorship I

had identified and exposed.

The report published by Universities UK is entitled “Freedom of Speech on Campus: rights and

responsibilities in UK universities”. The Report was a direct response to my article’s criticisms

and revelations. The Working Group responsible for the report was chaired by Professor Malcolm

Grant, Provost of University College London. It had started the report a year earlier but it was

waiting for the right moment to release it. Embarrassed in front of the world at their failure to

protect freedom of speech and at the ease with which British universities had succumbed to the

government’s pressure to illegally spy on and censor their students, the vice-chancellors who

make up the body of Universities UK jumped at the opportunity I provided them with to get the

secret service out of their lecture rooms and save face in front of the world and especially their

foreign students. They wasted no time publically informing the British government that it was not

the job of universities to impede freedom of speech, I quote, “through additional censorship,

surveillance or invasion of privacy”. The choice of Professor Grant’s words is significant because

they are a clear reference to the name I gave the programme. It is also an open admission that

British universities censor the academic environment, when their duty and legal responsibility is

not only to protect but to promote freedom of speech and conscience in universities.

The report also discloses that two-thirds of Britain’s universities cooperate with the British

government in covert surveillance of their students.

Also available online at:

http://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/highereducation/Documents/2011/FreedomOfSpeechOnCampus.

pdf

Third, the fact that Dr. Scott overextended far beyond his area of competence and of his mandate

as a psychiatrist has been amply confirmed in the meantime by multiple sources, which show

that I was correct in everything I said, including the tapping of my phones:

Evidence 14: CSIS Response, 22 September 2011

Through a request for information through the Freedom of Information Act, I obtained

information from the Canadian Security Intelligence Service that indicates I am the subject of an

investigation for “subversive or hostile activities”.

Also available online at:

http://wikispooks.com/w/images/9/98/CSIS_Response_2011-09-22.pdf

Evidence 15: Academics for Academic Freedom, see website at: http://www.afaf.org.uk/

10

This website was set up by university professors after I exposed the surveillance and censorship

of the academic environment. It contains in the meantime hundreds of testimonials by academics

that confirm the surveillance and censorship, just as I described.

Evidence 16: Students for Academic Freedom

See website at: http://www.studentsforacademicfreedom.org/about/

Inspired by my work and courage students in Britain also found the courage to defend freedom of

speech and conscience in education and created their own website, Students for Academic

Freedom, whose “goal is to end the political abuse of the university and to restore integrity to the

academic mission as a disinterested pursuit of knowledge.”

Evidence 17: Edward Snowden

See Wikipedia article at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Snowden

In June 2013, Edward Snowden, a former system administrator for the Central Intelligence

Service, started leaking information about covert surveillance programs and had to flee to Russia

to be able to keep his freedom. Now everyone knows that not only universities but all of us are at

all times subjected to intrusive and illegal electronic surveillance. I did not flee anywhere. I

stood my ground and went to jail six times and spent a total of one year behind bars to defend our

rights and liberties. And Dr. Scott is responsible for the loss of my freedom because he did the

government’s bidding and not only involuntarily detained me for 72 hours but also issued a false

diagnosis to give the Canadian government what it asked for and what it needed to discredit and

destroy me and to take away my children, my property and my freedom.

I will not stop until Dr. Scott and his partners in crime sit behind bars for what they have done to me, to

the Canadian people, and to the world.

Dr. Scott is an ignoramus who does not know the first thing about international politics and policies but

who did not hesitate to lie and to cheat in order to destroy my life on the government’s orders.

Complaint C:

Dr. Scott stated in my hospital discharge that I went to the RCMP “thinking that my life was in

danger” and “the police then brought [me] to the Emergency Department”.

Dr. Scott’s response was:

“This was the information provided by Detective McCarthy, the police liaison officer, and from

Ms. Cindy Marshall, Mr. Galalae’s wife.”

11

The Committee’s analysis and conclusion with respect to complaint C was:

“Dr. Scott explained that, in documenting that Mr. Galalae went to the RCMP, he was reporting

information obtained from the Kingston police and Mr. Galalae’s wife. The Committee is

satisfied with Dr. Scott’s response; it was reasonable for him to report what he was told in this

matter.”

My response to this gross misrepresentation of facts is this:

I went to the RCMP in the winter of 2010 to give the officer in charge, Commander Arbour, my

evidence of international violations of expressional rights in academia and to ask him to hang on

to this evidence in the unlikely event that I or my family should come to harm. He took the

evidence I gave him and put it in his safe and promised to keep it for ten years. We had a very

polite conversation during which Commander Arbour was very interested to know everything I

knew and was amazed at the illegality of the surveillance program. I have not seen Commander

Arbour before or since that day.

Before Dr. Scott committed to the record information distorted by two intermediary sources he

should have asked me what the facts are.

But the manner in which Dr. Scott reported this event was deliberate for it intended to suggest

that two police services, the RCMP and the Kingston Police were involved in my arrest. This

deliberate misrepresentation of facts was necessary to lend credibility to a groundless involuntary

confinement purportedly for psychiatric reasons.

The entire hospital discharge written by Dr. Scott is riddled with such factual distortions and

linguistic manipulations, as are all reports issued by the Kingston Police, the Children’s Aid

Society and the Crown Office, which shows that great effort was put into the conspiracy to

arrest, discredit, convict and destroy me.

Complaint D:

Dr. Scott recorded that I told him I had poor sleep and poor appetite to the point where I lost 20

pounds, when in fact I told Dr. Scott that I slept well and that I lost 20 pounds because I had just

concluded a 30-day hunger strike in Strasbourg, France, and not because I had poor appetite.

Dr. Scott’s response was:

“This information was supplied to his team and in conversation with Mr. Galalae at the time, it

was felt that he had lost weight because of the stress he was under.”

12

The Committee’s analysis and conclusion with respect to complaint D was:

“Although Mr. Galalae now has a different interpretation of the reasons for his weight loss, the

Committee is satisfied that Dr. Scott reported that Mr. Galalae had poor sleep and appetite to

the point that he lost 20 pounds based on his observations and information from Mr. Galalae at

that time. This was reasonable.”

My response to this gross misrepresentation of facts is this:

The Committee subjects Dr. Scott’s statement to no critical inquiry whatsoever and concludes

that I had a “different interpretation”, in other words that I changed my mind.

But the record is both clear and publicly available, as I published four open letters during my

hunger strike in Strasbourg, France, describing my weight loss and overall condition on:

Day 8 of hunger strike, 19 April 2011 (Exhibit 18), when I wrote:

http://wikispooks.com/w/images/2/2f/Kevin_Galalae%27s_hunger_strike_appeal_letter.pdf ,

Dear Mr. Hammarberg,

A week has gone by since I first have hand delivered a letter to you at the fortified gates of the Council of

Europe, where I wrote that upon arriving in France on the 12th of April I began a hunger strike on behalf

of Freedom in Education.org, explained my reasons and that I need to speak to you. Next day I came to

see you but I was told you are too busy. At your secretary’s advice, I have followed my initial request for

an audience with an email that very afternoon and then again on the 18th of April, but to no avail. I am

now 20 pounds lighter, having lost 10% of my body weight, but tenfold stronger and more determined

than ever to see to it that Europe rescinds its unlawful, discriminatory, divisive and unethical program of

covert surveillance and censorship of students in universities, which I shall henceforth refer to by its

acronym SAC.

Day15 of hunger strike, 25 April 2011 (Exhibit 19), when I wrote:

http://wikispooks.com/w/images/3/31/Message_from_the_man_outside_after_14_days_of_hunger_strike.pdf,

Commissioner Hammarberg,

Two weeks have gone by since I first knocked on Commissioner Hammarberg’s door –figuratively

speaking since he is hidden behind layers and layers of bulletproof glass, concrete walls and security;

imprisoned, so to say, in an ivory tower. After 14 days of hunger strike I am 33 pounds (=15kg) lighter,

having lost 14% of my body weight, but one hundred times more determined to see to it that I succeed in

shutting down the covert program of discrimination, thought control and intimidation that Europe has

secretly adopted in 2010 as part of the Stockholm Programme and that I have baptized by the acronym

SAC.

Day 21 of hunger strike, 2 May 2011 (Exhibit 20), when I wrote:

http://wikispooks.com/w/images/f/f8/Educating_the_educated.pdf, and

13

Commissioner Hammarberg, Representatives of the media and civil society,

Three weeks have gone by since I first started my hunger strike. The 21 days that I have gone without

food have caused me far less distress than I would have thought possible. Were I a religious man I would

say it is downright miraculous that I am not yet crawling on the floor with hunger pains, but hunger is

truly absent. The only thing that hurts is the heartbreaking longing I feel for my children. Although I have

lost 17kg (c.37 pounds), or about18% of my initial body weight, I continue to feel strong and healthy and

walk at least 10km a day. More importantly, my mind remains clear and focused.

Day 29 of hunger strike, 9 May 2011 (Exhibit 21), when I wrote:

http://wikispooks.com/w/images/2/28/Is_Commissioner_Hammarberg_Protecting_the_Emir_of_Qatar.pdf.

Gentlemen,

Twenty-eight days have passed since I first started my hunger strike and in the absence of action on your

part have taken an apartment in Strasbourg to dig in for a long battle with you. With the life I have left in

me I will expose you for what you are. I am now 20Kg lighter, 20 years wiser and 20 times stronger than

when I began. I say 20 years wiser because the last four weeks I spent at the gates of EU power have been

an eye-opening experience. Europe is not a pretty sight. Proximity has revealed the true nature of

Europe’s institutions, which I have previously idealized, but that I now know to be riddled with hideous

blemishes, both in character and appearance.

If Dr. Scott is incapable of recording a fact as simple as weight loss due to a hunger strike, which

is thoroughly and publicly documented, and instead ascribes that weight loss to stress because he

“felt” I had lost weight because of stress, then what credibility can one give him as a doctor?

The answer is none.

Of course, Dr. Scott needed to write that I had lost weight and that I could not sleep due to stress

because those are symptoms that one can ascribe to mental disorders and in the absence of such

symptoms Dr. Scott needed to fashion them out of thin air. So he deliberately lied in the report.

The gap between the reality and Dr. Scott’s report as well as between the reality and the

Committee’s biased and perverse analysis are offensive to any critical mind. So much so that

even insiders of the security apparatus are appalled. Here is what Peter Presland, a lifelong

secret service agent and the director of Wikispooks, the website that carries all my evidence and

is funded and staffed by the British Secret Intelligence Service (SIS), has to say about Dr. Scott’s

report:

“This report is a brazen example of psychiatric professionals presenting unorthodox, dissenting

opinion and the interpretation by one man of his experiences at the hands of arbitrary secretive

and obstructive authorities, as mental illness.

The assumption underlying the report conclusion is as clear as it is absurd: anyone who believes

that the security services might be taking an interest in his opinions and activities and initiating

14

or co-ordinating actions to discredit him, must be delusional paranoid and/or otherwise mentally

ill.

As a case study in the abuse of both position and professional ethics (telling higher or more

powerful authorities what they clearly want to hear, on the most convoluted and twisted

interpretation of the facts) it is exemplary.”

The report accepts Kevin Galalae's incarceration in the Dieu hospital as being the result

of an "ILLNESS" - a-priori and before ANY interviews take place.

The report is symptomatic of a growing tendency on the part of the psychiatric

professions, under pressure from the security/law enforcement mover-and-shakers no

doubt, to characterise dissent as mental illness. Such characterisation is one of the

smaller tactical nukes of the domestic Intell arsenal and this report is pretty much a

classic specimen.

No matter the validity of his interpretation of his experiences, he has done no more than

try to publish them and persuade others of them.

His treatment by the Canadian authorities - bolstered by evidence of complicity by the

Intelligence and security services of the Crown - is appalling

http://wikispooks.com/wiki/File:KG-Dieu_Hospital_Report.pdf

Complaint E:

Dr. Scott recorded that I “appeared grandiose in conversation” when in fact I never had any

conversations with Dr. Scott, just two brief 15-minute interviews.

Dr. Scott’s response was:

“Mr. Galalae stated that he never had a conversation with him; rather he had two brief 15-

minute interviews. During those interviews the observations were made by himself and the

resident.”

The Committee’s analysis and conclusion with respect to complaint E was:

“Mr. Galalae disputes that Dr. Scott’s documenting that he was “grandiose in conversation” is

inaccurate because their interactions were limited to two 15-minute interviews. The Committee

disagrees with Mr. Galalae that Dr. Scott could not assess Mr. Galalae’s conversational style

during the course of two brief interviews. Dr. Scott’s observations, and documentation of those

15

observations, were reasonable under the circumstances.”

My response to this intentional misrepresentation of facts is this:

Dr. Scott refused to video-record the interviews as I requested on multiple occasions. The reason

he refused is because he knew a priori that he was to issue a false report and the last thing he

would have wanted is evidence of his willful misrepresentation of the facts.

Dr. Scott and the staff at Hotel Dieu Hospital also refused to grant me access to a patient

advocate, to which I was entitled as a matter of law and without having to request. The reason

no patient advocate ever came to see me is because I was to be held for 72-hours in violation of

the law and a patient advocate would have immediately found my involuntary detention to be a

gross violation of the Mental Health Act.

The reason Dr. Scott wrote that I appeared grandiose is because he needed a few classic

symptoms of paranoid behavior. But if indeed my speech is grandiose then that should be

evident in the many radio and several television interviews I gave since my involuntary detention

at Hotel Dieu Hospital in May 2011.

Here is a list of my interviews for the Commission to consider while evaluating the evidence:

RADIO INTERVIEWS

The History of the Global Depopulation Policy Interview by Vinny Eastwood, 19 November 2013 (New

Zealand)

http://youtu.be/puh1FAA8ocw

Interview by David Watts, 3 December 2013

Broadcast cancelled

Unveiling the Truth Interview by Mark Howitt, 4 January 2013 (Canada)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_r9fhsbuLE

The Politics and Tactics of Depopulation Explained, Kevin Galalae (January 2014)

http://www.thevinnyeastwoodshow.com/5/post/2014/01/14-january-2014-the-politics-tactics-of-

depopulation-explained-kevin-galalea.html

The Depopulation Bomb, interview with Kevin Galalae (15 February 2014)

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/sfpiradio/2014/02/15/the-depopulation-bomb-with-kevin-galalae

Depopulation via Fluoride, interview with Kevin Galalae by Kimberlee Schultz & Eugene Irvin (17

February 2014)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sl0btO8xxlM&feature=youtube_gdata_player

Killing Us Softly, interview with Kevin Galalae by Rick Staggenborg (16 February 2014)

16

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/sfpiradio/2014/02/16/killing-us-softly-with-ken-galalae

USI Special Report With Kevin Galalae: How Do We Turn a Nightmare Into a Dream?

https://theusindependent.com/usi-special-report-with-kevin-galalae-how-do-we-turn-a-nightmare-into-a-

dream/

Global Depopulation – Killing Us Softly, radio interview with Kevin Galalae by Leon Pittard

http://fairdinkumradio.com/?q=node/358

Sylvain Henry of MAD radio interviews Kevin Galalae to discuss the Global Depopulation Policy

and Kevin’s hunger strike at the gates of the Vatican (10 May 2014)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gFQPyWjEH-Q&feature=share

Matt Navarro of United We Strike Radio interviews Kevin Galalae to discuss depopulation and

Kevin’s hunger strike in Rome and Pope Francis continuing silence (10 may 2014)

http://www.d1100863-

22667.cp.blacknight.com/images/podcasts/a_Matt_Navarro_KevinGalalae_UWSMay2014.mp3

One hour radio presentation of the Global Depopulation Policy by Kevin Galalae on United We Strike

Radio (10 May 2014)

http://www.d1100863-22667.cp.blacknight.com/images/podcasts/f_Kevin_Galalae_UWSMay2014.mp3

Roundtable discussion on the Global Depopulation Policy on United We Strike Radio, with Kevin

Galalae, Vinny Eastwood, Am Rosen, Susanne Posel, Pamela Tartar, Larry Pinkney, Gary Hendershot

and Matt Navarro

http://www.d1100863-22667.cp.blacknight.com/images/podcasts/z_UWS_201405-US_RoundTable.mp3

Kevin Galalae interviewed by Neil Foster and Karen Quinn-Tostado on Reality Bytes Radio, United

Kingdom (19 June 2014)

https://www.facebook.com/kgalalae/posts/583083968476374?notif_t=like

TELEVISION INTERVIEWS

“Kevin Galalae’s Interview with Adam Bierman of Princeton TV”, December 2011, available

at: http://vimeo.com/33346698

Pre-Hunger Strike Interview with Gary Franchie of WHDT-Mimi, 31 March 2014

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKEM1aZ6i0A

Kevin Galalae Update Interview from Rome, 6 May 2014

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NG_tcCLUhCg

Complaint F:

17

Dr. Scott recorded under “family history” that my sister “has post traumatic major depressive

disorder”, but I never provided Dr. Scott such information because as far as I know my sister

never suffered from such disorder and therefore Dr. Scott can only be stating hearsay as fact.

Dr. Scott’s response was:

“This information under family history was gathered from Detective McCarthy and Ms.

Marshall.”

The Committee’s analysis and conclusion with respect to complaint F was:

“Dr. Scott explained that he documented information about Mr. Galalae’s family history (in

particular, his sister) on the basis of information provided by Detective McCarthy and Ms.

Marshall. It is not only acceptable, but essential, for physicians to document collateral history

from an ill patient’s family members, especially in conditions with a genetic component such as

mental illness. It was appropriate for Dr. Scott to obtain and document this information in Mr.

Galalae’s chart.”

My response to this intentional misrepresentation of facts is this:

First, it is indeed appropriate to document incidents of mental illness in the patient’s family

history if such history exists and is accurate, but it is absolutely prohibited to enter false or

invented information in a patient’s chart, which is what Dr. Scott did because he had promised

his full collaboration to his partners in crime, who are all either members of Opus Dei or

affiliated Catholics, which is why this incident happened in a Catholic Hospital, the Hotel Dieu

Hospital, and in the only town in Canada with an Opus Dei chapter, all others being located in

Canada’s large metropolises.

Secondly, if Dr. Scott had been interested in the truth, he would have written that I had with me

statements from three other family members, all of whom attest that I am perfectly healthy in

every respect and that I have never suffered from any mental illness. These reports, issued by

my mother, brother, and sister-in-law state unequivocally that I am perfectly mentally healthy

and that it is my wife who suffers from serious mental disorders. Dr. Scott could have easily

checked with Dr. McIlquham, my wife’s family doctor, to ascertain this fact. But he did not

because he already knew the facts and since Dr. McIlquham was part of the conspiracy, which is

why Dr. McIlquham had altered my medical record to show that I suffer from depression, a

falsification that he has since recanted because I made it clear to him that he will never get away

with it; a conversation I describe in my article The Kingston Hillbillies: A Conspiracy of racists

and Crown Loyalists which is available online:

https://wikispooks.com/w/images/2/24/The_Kingston_Hillbillies.pdf

18

Evidence of my perfect mental health became public before Dr. Scott issued his false hospital

discharge, as evidence items 1 to 7 show. Moreover, by then I had also published at least a

dozen letters from family, friends, and neighbors all of whom attest my perfect mental health and

outstanding parenting skills.

Thirdly, if my alleged condition was indeed genetic then why did it not manifest itself until I was

45 years old? And why did it manifest itself only on May 15 and 16, but not on May 17 and 18,

or since? As you will remember, only the hospital records issued on May 15 and 16 by the

members of the criminal conspiracy maintain that I am mentally ill but not the hospital records

from May 17 and 18, which were recorded by hospital staff who were not part of the conspiracy

and did their jobs faithfully.

Fourthly, my sister, who lives in Florida has never suffered from “post traumatic major

depressive disorder”, as Dr. Scott wrote. If she did than I am not aware of it and never was, and

if I am not aware of it then Dr. Scott could not be aware of it. After all, Dr. Scott could not

possibly have access to the medical records of an American citizen.

All of the above show that it was not appropriate for Dr. Scott to record false and invented

information in my medical records; information designed to falsely diagnose me with a mental

illness, namely “delusional disorder with a differential diagnosis of hypomania secondary to

bipolar disorder versus hypomania secondary to personality disorder”.

Not only is Axis 1 of Dr. Scott’s completely false and tailor-made to discredit me as a human

rights activist and father, but also Axis 2 is completely false, in fact polar opposites of my

personality which the record shows is not that of a narcissist, as Dr. Scott would have it, but that

of an altruist. To date I have sacrificed five years of my life to defend our fundamental rights

and liberties and have suffered six arrests and five hunger strikes, the longest being 75 days and

the second and third longest 46 and 30 days respectively. These actions are not consistent with

narcissism but with altruism and one does not need an expert to make this distinction, which

poses the question “How could Dr. Scott be so completely wrong?” If we did not have more

than sufficient evidence to show that he intentionally falsified the medical record, we could

attribute his error to incompetence in which case Dr. Scott would be guilty of malpractice. But

since we have conclusive evidence of intentional falsification and conspiracy to prosecute, Dr.

Scott could only be found guilty of deliberate falsification of a patient’s medical record. That he

was assisted by the Hospital and the courts to hide this is a blemish on Canada that will go down

in history as Canada’s Dreyfuss Affair, because this is plain and simple a hate crime.

This hate crime goes far beyond just a few individuals, for it involves just about every state

institution in Canada, including the Inquiries, Complaints and Reports Committee of the College

of Physicians and Surgeons, which whitewashed their investigation. When this hate crime goes

before an unbiased jury in an unbiased court of law, and it will sooner or later, the truth will

come out and Canada and the world will discover not only that I was framed but also that the

19

people who framed me also broke into my residence in Ayr, Ontario, to steal and destroy the file

from the civil lawsuit against Hotel Dieu Hospital because that file contained copies of Dr. Orr’s

and Dr. Murray’s reports that were clearly forgeries since they did not correspond to the copies

of the originals; copies that the file of the attorneys for Hotel Dieu Hospital contained and that

the conspirators needed to destroy. And destroy them they did, which is why they broke into my

home on Christmas Eve 2013 and stole them. Interestingly, the police refused to investigate

even though I reported the incident to Federico dela Torre, investigator for the Office of the

Independent Police Review Director (OIPRD) who was investigating my case at that time and

who refused to even acknowledge my email. That is how deeply corrupted the Canadian system

is and why if this case is not referred to a judge by your Commission Canada will explode in

vigilante violence because my case is not unique but endemic in a system that is beyond

contempt because it has been corrupted by fanatical Christian elements and self-serving political

interests to serve the goals of the Global Depopulation Policy.

Complaint G:

Dr. Scott recorded that I was “started on Olanzepine pm 5mg q6h pm for sleep and agitation”

when no such medication was ever administered to me.

Dr. Scott’s response was:

“An order was written for Mr. Galalae to take Olanzepine pm 5 mgs q6h for sleep and agitation

if he wished to take it, but he did not take any of this.”

The Committee’s analysis and conclusion with respect to complaint G was:

“Dr. Scott explained that he ordered olanzapine for Mr. Galalae and documented the order. He

noted that Mr. Galalae had the option to take the medication or not. Even though Mr. Galalae

may not have taken the medication prescribed, it was necessary for Dr. Scott to document a

medication order in the record, which he did so appropriately.”

My response to this intentional misrepresentation of facts is this:

There is nothing appropriate in Dr. Scott’s documentation of medication. An appropriate

documentation would have been that I was calm and composed and slept normally and therefore

there was no need for medication and none was administered. Dr. Scott however needed to

create the impression that I was agitated and insomniac and that I needed to be medicated with

an antipsychotic drug used for the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, which is why

he entered that I was “started on olanzepine”.

20

For the Commission to say that this is appropriate is a disgrace that shows how deeply corrupted

not only the medical system is in Canada but also the institutions that are supposed to serve as

watchdogs but that instead sweep everything under the rug.

The disgraceful individuals who served on the Committee also stated that:

“Dr. Scott’s response demonstrates his willingness to meet with Mr. Galalae and clarify any

information that Mr. Galalae feels is not correct or accurate. The Committee believes Dr.

Scott’s response reflects the values of a caring and concerned physician.”

Once again this is the complete opposite of the facts. Dr. Scott never responded to my emails to

meet with me and recant his false diagnosis. I sent him several emails, all of which remain

unacknowledged to this day. Dr. McIlquham did respond to my emails which is why he is no

longer under investigation. But Dr. Scott never did respond, which is why we are here today.

The Commission also stated:

“Hotel Dieu Hospital has also reviewed a complaint from Mr. Galalae. The hospital’s letter to

Mr. Galalae of July 4, 2011, indicates the hospital is satisfied that all psychiatrists and

psychiatric residents acted in a respectful and courteous manner during Mr. Galalae’s

assessment on the inpatient unit in May 2011. On the basis of its review of the record, the

Committee shares this view.”

That nothing was appropriate in the way I was held against my will and without cause and that

every rule in the Mental Health Act was violated to keep me there against my will and at least a

dozen criminal code violations were committed to label me mentally ill and a danger to my

children I have shown at some length in my article “Doctors for Sale”, which I present here as

Evidence 6, and is also available online:

https://wikispooks.com/w/images/6/62/Doctors_for_Sale.pdf .

The Committee concludes that “Mr. Galalae was appropriately admitted for psychiatric

assessment on a Form 1. There is no information in the record to support Mr. Galalae’s

allegations against either Dr. McIlquham or Dr. Scott.”

That this conclusion is flawed in every respect and a complete whitewash is amply demonstrated

by the facts presented above as well as by the testimony of a clean cop in the Kingston Police

Department, which I have submitted to the Board as a Supplementary Affidavit more than two

weeks ago and that I reattach here as Evidence 22 and Evidence 23.

The Narrative Text Hardcopy (General Occurrence Report #2011-14304) written by Constable Krista

Loye on 22 May 2011 is the silver bullet of this case. Constable Loye is clearly an honest police officer

working in a police force that has been entirely corrupted by bad practices, bad cops, and political

interference. Constable Loye confirms what I have been saying all along, but had only circumstantial

21

evidence to prove it due to the fact that crucial evidence has been withheld from me for two and a half

years, police occurrence reports have been falsified or tampered with, police officers have perjured

themselves, and the Kingston Crown Office has committed gross acts of obstruction of justice by binding

my civil and criminal lawyers with mandatory undertakings not to release disclosure to me and by hiding

evidence that was exculpatory for me and inculpatory for the defense, both in the civil and criminal

proceedings.

6. Constable Loye confirms that my wife, Cindy Marshall, was at no time afraid of me or fearful for the

children because of me and that her fear that I might “take” the children away was unjustified, as she had

no evidence to support it. This stands in stark contradiction to Detective McCarthy’s assertions in her

reports and synopses and to my wife’s subsequent depositions, which betray that she was coached or

intimidated into pretending that I pose a threat to her and the children.

7. Constable Loye confirms that the entire Marshall clan was present at the in-laws’ house and directly

involved in the abduction of my children and in manipulating my wife to act contrary to her children’s

best interests and contrary to the law.

8. Constable Loye confirms that my wife had not taken any steps to get a custody order and had therefore

no right to prevent me from seeing my children and from withholding them from me.

9. Constable Loye confirms that an off-duty officer was present, which could only be Constable Marc

Gallant of the South Frontenac OPP (as subsequently revealed by police records) and who directly

interfered in the discussions between Cindy Marshall and Constable Loye by stating that “he did not think

it was a good idea for Marshall to be trying to give Galalae access to the children as Galalae may take

the children away”. As such, Constable Gallant is directly involved in my children’s abduction, in

deliberately denying me my legal rights to my children, and not just in chasing me off the property on

May 13 when he threatened me with arrest because I was “trespassing”.

10. Constable Loye confirms that it is my wife and her family who acted contrary to the law by taking my

children and withholding visitation.

11. Constable Loye confirms that Sargent Sands advised Constable Gemignano – her colleague that day –

to apprehend me under the Mental Health Act despite having no grounds to arrest me let alone use the

Mental Health Act to do so. That a high-ranking member of the Kingston Police force, Sargent Sands,

should interfere in an insignificant domestic dispute without ever having met me or being present during

any of the incidents when the Kingston Police responded to my 911 calls confirms that my arrest was

planned and that the order came from on high. It also confirms that my arrest was politically motivated, as

it had absolutely nothing to do with my conduct, which was always beyond reproach.

12. Constable Loye confirms that Constable Gemignano had no grounds to arrest me under the Mental

Health Act and that she said so specifically to her colleague who nevertheless ignored her and eagerly

broke the law and violated my rights to satisfy his superiors.

13. Constable Loye confirms that Constable Gemignano, who not only had no grounds to arrest me, even

informed my wife in advance of my arrest that he will arrest me. My false arrest therefore has always

been a foregone conclusion since the entire fiasco with my children’s abduction had been orchestrated to

give the police an excuse, any excuse, to arrest me.

14. Constable Loye confirms that despite her due diligence to contact a superior officer and voice her

objection to my arrest, the superior she contacted, Sargent Borel, “advised me [i.e. Constable Loye] that I

would be able to apprehend GALALAE based on Det. McCarthy’s assessment, should that need arise.”

22

This is proof that my arrest was a foregone conclusion and that the Kingston Police sergeants had all been

ordered to arrest me. The order therefore came from outside the Kingston Police and was most certainly

initiated by a higher entity.

15. Constable Loye confirms that Sargent Borel advised her that if the psychiatrists at the hospital did not

form me she would “be able to apprehend GALALAE based on Det. McCarthy’s assessment, should that

need arise.” In other words, one way or another I would be arrested that day, with or without cause.

16. Constable Loye confirms that “At HDH, Det. McCarthy informed me [i.e. Constable Loye] that if

GALALAE wasn’t formed by the doctors, she would like us to arrest him criminally so that he would be

able to get an assessment at Quinte.” Once again, my arrest was a foregone conclusion, as the decision

came from on high.

17. Constable Loye confirms that there were never any mental health issues with me and that psychiatrists

recognized this on the first day. She states that next day (thus on 16 May 2011) Gemignani told her “that

GALALAE had been released from the hospital by psychiatry, as they did not feel an assessment was

necessary”. Of course, despite the fact that the psychiatrists had concluded an assessment is not necessary

– a decision confirmed by the hospital records – the doctors were overridden and I was held for 72 hours

and then arrested before I could walk out of the hospital. Once again, this proves that my arrest and

detention were ordered from on high and that the objections of police constable and doctors who could

not be corrupted were ignored.

CONCLUSION

Deep and broad interagency collusion took place in order to put me behind bars and destroy my

life in retaliation for defending Muslims. Dr. Scott made himself a party to this collusion.

Dr. Scott made himself a party to a hate crime. A crime committed by good Christians against a

better Christian who dared to defend Muslims. Dr. Scott is a modern version of Dr. Mengele

though his tools of torture are psychological and he used them without mercy to ensure that I and

my children suffer the agony of hell.

For 75 days I hungered while held at the Quinte Detention Center for the sixth time and Dr. Scott

never told the truth even though my life was in the balance. He walked by my cell on three

different occasions while he did his rounds at Quinte and watched me with dispassionate eyes

while I wasted away for justice and for my children.

But he never withdrew his false diagnosis. Instead, he asked his colleague Dr. Chan to issue yet

another false diagnosis while I was imprisoned; a diagnosis that to this day has been withheld

from me but that Dr. Scott and his despicable colleagues have used in hidden proceedings to

keep me behind bars for nine months.

Dr. Scott belongs behind bars and he must never be allowed to practice medicine for as long as

he lives.

He is a public danger of the first order.

23

If this Board does not refer this case to a criminal court there will be serious consequences

because I will never abandon my children to religious fanatics and political zealots.

The longer justice is denied and delayed the more devastating the consequences will be. This is

a case that goes far beyond Kingston or even Canada. This is a case of global significance

because the attack on me was motivated and delegated by global interests with deep historical

roots and with a grip on the world that is corrosive and criminal and that affects the lives of 7

billion people and the future of all our children.

This is not grandiosity on my part but the bitter truth.