investigating the current blood culture system for ... · the bactec blood culture system. the...
TRANSCRIPT
Investigating the Current Blood Culture System
for Possible Improvements in Isolation of
Fungal Pathogens
Nicole Spiteri
May 2014
A Dissertation presented to the Faculty of Health Sciences in part-
fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science
(Honours) (Applied Biomedical Science) at the University of Malta
Supervisor: Mr. Stephen Decelis
University of Malta Library – Electronic Thesis & Dissertations (ETD) Repository
The copyright of this thesis/dissertation belongs to the author. The author’s rights in respect of this
work are as defined by the Copyright Act (Chapter 415) of the Laws of Malta or as modified by any
successive legislation.
Users may access this full-text thesis/dissertation and can make use of the information contained in
accordance with the Copyright Act provided that the author must be properly acknowledged.
Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the prior permission of the
copyright holder.
i
Declaration
I declare that the work presented in this thesis is original and not copied from other
sources. References to other works are well documented.
______________________
Nicole Spiteri
ii
Dedication
Dedicated to my beloved late grandparents who were always there for
me and supported me all the way
iii
Acknowledgements
First of all I would like to thank my supervisor Mr. Stephen Decelis for all his
patience, help and guidance throughout this project.
I would also like to thank Dr. Christopher Barbara and the Pathology Department for
allowing me to utilise the Mycology laboratory as well as the necessary equipment
required for this project.
My gratitude also goes to Mr. Kenneth Mallia at the Mycology Laboratory, Mr.
Mario Camilleri Brennan and Mr. Jean-Pierre Gialanze at the Microbiology
Laboratory for their help during the practical work; Mrs. Monique Borg Inguanez for
helping me out with the statistical part of the project.
I also thank the Dean of the Faculty of Health Sciences Profs. Angela Xuereb,
lecturers and staff, for their constant support and guidance throughout these past four
years.
Last but not least, I would like to show my gratitude towards my family, friends,
classmates and especially my fiancé, for their constant support and encouragement
throughout the course.
iv
Abstract
Invasive fungal infections are the cause of morbidity and mortality in developed
countries. Unfortunately blood culture systems possess several limitations in the
isolation of fungi. The lack of ability to culture Aspergillus species from blood in
invasive aspergillosis is probably the most important limitation in the diagnosis of
fungal infections. The aim of this project was to evaluate the blood culture system
(BacT/Alert) for possible improvements in the isolation of fungi. In the first part of this
project, the growth of four Aspergillus species was evaluated in the Standard Aerobic
and FAN Aerobic blood culture media. Terminal subcultures were then prepared using a
‘novel’ subculture technique. In the second part of the project false negatives were
tested by preparing terminal subcultures from automated negative blood cultures, which
contained the blood of neutropenic and immunocompromised patients. All four species
were detected visually in both bottles between 24 and 48 hours, at the highest conidial
concentration. Growth was less successful in the bottles inoculated with the hyphal
suspensions due to serious limitations in the technique used for their preparation. The
novel subculture technique was also successful in the recovery of Aspergillus on solid
media, even at the lowest inocula concentrations. After performing terminal subcultures,
Candida tropicalis was recovered from one automated negative bottle, thus identifying
a false negative. The results obtained were compared with similar studies which utilised
the BACTEC blood culture system. The latter produced better results. This study has
shown that blood culture media support the growth of Aspergillus. This is concordant
with similar studies performed on other blood culture systems. The challenge is
therefore finding the cause for the lack of positive blood cultures in patients with
invasive aspergillosis. This study has also shown the importance of terminal subcultures
in cases of suspected Candidaemia.
v
List of Tables
Table 3.1: Average number of colonies counted from SDA plates inoculated
with the conidial and hyphal concentrations ............................................ 47
Table 3.2: Results showing time of growth at different conidial concentrations
in both SA and FAN bottles & results of terminal subcultures ............... 53
Table 3.3: Results showing time of growth at different hyphal concentrations
in both SA and FAN bottles & results of terminal subcultures ............... 54
Table 3.4: P-values obtained when testing the effect of concentration on time
for both the conidial and hyphal inocula .................................................. 60
Table 3.5: P-values obtained when testing the difference in the time of growth
between the highest and lowest conidial and hyphal concentrations ....... 61
vi
List of Figures
Figure 1.1: Infectious life cycle of Aspergillus spp. (Dagenais & Keller, 2009) ......... 8
Figure 1.2: Distribution of isolated Candida spp. CALB: Candida albicans;
CDUB: Candida dubliniensis; CGLB: Candida glabrata; CGUI:
Candida guillermondii; CKRU: Candida krusei; CLUS: Candida
lusitaniae; CPAR: Candida parapsilosis; CTRO: Candida
tropicalis (Horn et al., 2009) ................................................................... 10
Figure 1.3: BacT/ALERT 3D's colorimetric sensor-and-detection technology
detects microorganisms by tracking CO2 production (BioMérieux,
n.d) ........................................................................................................... 25
Figure 1.4: Schematic diagram of the BacT/Alert blood culture bottle showing
the: a) Bottle wall; b) Semi-permeable membrane; c) Carbon
dioxide sensor; d) Light emitting diode; e) Light absorbing
photodiode; f) Amplifier; g) Block (Thrope et al., 1990) ........................ 26
Figure 2.1: Densimat readings and corresponding spore counts for a) A.
fumigatus and b) A. flavus (Araujo, Rodrigues & Pina Vaz, 2004) ......... 34
Figure 2.2: Preparation of conidial suspensions for A. flavus and A. niger using
a prepared 2McF conidial suspension and sterile distilled water
(SDW) (Figure created from data in: SciQuip Ltd., n.d) ......................... 35
Figure 2.3: Preparation of conidial suspensions for A. fumigatus and A. terreus
using a prepared 2McF conidial suspension and sterile distilled
water (SDW) (Figure created from data in: SciQuip Ltd., n.d) ............... 36
vii
Figure 2.4: Standard Aerobic (blue cap) and FAN aerobic (green cap)
BacT/Alert blood culture bottles inoculated with the prepared serial
dilutions .................................................................................................... 38
Figure 3.1: Detection of growth of A. fumigatus in the BacT/Alert standard
aerobic blood cultures after 7 days .......................................................... 45
Figure 3.2: Detection of growth of A. fumigatus in the BacT/Alert FAN aerobic
blood cultures after 7 days ....................................................................... 46
Figure 3.3: Graph showing the linear relationship between the average number
of colonies and different conidial concentrations .................................... 49
Figure 3.4: Subcultures of A. fumigatus (left) and A. flavus (right) on
Sabouraud Dextrose Agar ........................................................................ 51
Figure 3.5: Subcultures of A. niger (left) and A. terreus (right) on Sabouraud
Dextrose Agar .......................................................................................... 52
Figure 3.6: Graph comparing the detection of growth of A. fumigatus by the
BACTEC automated system; the grey, white and black bars
represent the BACTEC Plus Aerobic/F, Mycosis-IC/F and Myco/F
Lytic bottles respectively, as presented in the study by Rosa et al.
(2011) ....................................................................................................... 55
Figure 3.7: Graph comparing the detection time of growth of A. fumigatus
using the BacT/Alert SA and FAN aerobic bottles .................................. 55
Figure 3.8: Average time of growth for each Aspergillus spp. in the SA bottles ....... 62
Figure 3.9: Average time of growth for each Aspergillus spp. in the FAN
bottles ....................................................................................................... 63
viii
List of Abbreviations
c.f.u Colony-forming unit
IA Invasive Aspergillosis
DNA Deoxyribonucleic acid
KOH Potassium hydroxide
McF McFarland
MDH Mater Dei Hospital
NAC Non-albicans Candida
PCR Polymerase Chain Reaction
SA Standard Aerobic
SDA Sabouraud Dextrose Agar
SDW Sterile distilled water
SOP Standard Operating Procedure
Spp Species
ix
Table of Contents
Declaration ...................................................................................................................i
Dedication ................................................................................................................... ii
Acknowledgements ................................................................................................... iii
Abstract… ...................................................................................................................iv
List of Tables ............................................................................................................... v
List of Figures .............................................................................................................vi
List of Abbreviations .............................................................................................. viii
CHAPTER 1: LITERATURE REVIEW ................................................................. 1
1.1. Introduction ....................................................................................................... 2
1.1.1. Characteristics of Fungi .......................................................................... 2
1.1.2. Genus Aspergillus ................................................................................... 3
1.1.3. Genus Candida ....................................................................................... 4
1.2. Systemic Fungal Infections ............................................................................... 6
1.2.1. Introduction to Fungaemia ...................................................................... 6
1.2.2. Invasive Aspergillosis ............................................................................. 7
1.2.3. Systemic Candidiasis .............................................................................. 9
1.2.4. Other fungi that can cause systemic fungal infections ......................... 11
x
1.3. Diagnosis of fungal infections ......................................................................... 12
1.3.1. Culture and microscopy ........................................................................ 13
1.3.2. Blood Cultures ...................................................................................... 15
1.3.3. Galactomannan Antigen Assay ............................................................. 17
1.3.4. β-D- glucan assay.................................................................................. 18
1.3.5. The Polymerase Chain Reaction ........................................................... 19
1.3.6. Radiology .............................................................................................. 20
1.4. Methodology ..................................................................................................... 21
1.4.1. Blood Culture Systems ......................................................................... 21
1.4.1.1. Manual Blood Culture Systems ....................................................... 21
1.4.1.2. Automated Blood Culture Systems .................................................. 22
1.4.1.2.1. The BACTEC blood culture system ....................................... 23
1.4.1.2.2. The BacT/Alert Blood Culture System ................................... 24
1.5. Sub-Culture Techniques from Mycology ...................................................... 27
1.5.1. Routine Sub-Culture Technique ........................................................... 27
1.5.2. ‘Novel’ Sub-Culture Technique ............................................................ 28
1.5.3. Terminal Sub-cultures ........................................................................... 28
1.6. Limitations ....................................................................................................... 29
1.7. Statement of Problem ...................................................................................... 30
1.8. Objectives and Aims of Project ...................................................................... 31
xi
CHAPTER 2: METHODOLOGY .......................................................................... 32
2.1. Ethics Approval ............................................................................................... 33
2.2. Fungal Species .................................................................................................. 33
2.3. Inoculation of conidial and hyphal suspensions in blood culture bottles ... 33
2.3.1. Preparation of conidial suspensions ...................................................... 33
2.3.2. Preparation of hyphal suspensions ........................................................ 36
2.3.3. Inoculation of suspensions into BacT/Alert blood culture bottles ........ 37
2.4. Incubation of blood culture bottles ................................................................ 38
2.5. Preparation of terminal sub-cultures: the ‘Novel’ sub-culture technique . 39
2.6. Preparation of terminal sub-cultures from negative blood cultures .......... 39
2.6.1. Collection of blood culture bottles ........................................................ 39
2.6.2. Terminal sub-cultures ........................................................................... 40
CHAPTER 3: RESULTS ......................................................................................... 41
3.1. Results involving visual readings ................................................................... 42
3.1.1. Detection of Aspergillus spp. In BacT/Alert blood cultures ................. 42
3.1.1.1. Conidial inoculum ............................................................................ 42
3.1.1.2. Hyphal inoculum .............................................................................. 43
3.1.2. Results of growth after 7 days .............................................................. 44
3.1.2.1. Conidial inoculum ............................................................................ 44
3.1.2.2. Hyphal Inoculum ............................................................................. 45
xii
3.1.3. Validation of inocula ............................................................................ 47
3.1.3.1. Number of colonies grown from plates inoculated with prepared
concentrations .................................................................................. 47
3.1.4. Recovery of Aspergillus spp. on solid culture medium ........................ 49
3.1.4.1. Conidial inoculum ............................................................................ 49
3.1.4.2. Hyphal inoculum .............................................................................. 50
3.1.5. Recovery of yeast from negative blood culture .................................... 52
3.2. Statistical analysis ............................................................................................ 55
3.2.1. Comparison of results with results of published study ......................... 55
3.2.2. Testing for normality – The Shapiro Wilk’s Test ................................. 57
3.2.3. Comparison of results: The Kruskal-Wallis Test ................................. 58
3.2.3.1. Comparison of SA and FAN BacT/Alert bottles ............................. 58
3.2.3.2. Comparing results of conidial and hyphal inocula .......................... 59
3.2.3.3. Comparing the effect of concentration on time ............................... 60
3.2.3.4. Comparing the time of growth for each Aspergillus spp. ................ 62
CHAPTER 4: DISCUSSION & CONCLUSION ................................................... 65
4.1. Detection of fungi in automated blood culture systems: Comparison with
published studies.............................................................................................. 66
4.2. The Type of Inoculum ..................................................................................... 70
4.3. The ‘Novel’ (Rosa et al., 2011) subculture technique ................................... 71
xiii
4.4. The importance of terminal subcultures from negative blood cultures ..... 72
4.5. Limitations ....................................................................................................... 75
4.6. Conclusion ........................................................................................................ 78
REFERENCES .......................................................................................................... 80
APPENDIX ................................................................................................................ 91
Preparation of Culture Media ......................................................................... 92 I.
Quality Control of Media ............................................................................... 94 II.
Tables of Results ............................................................................................ 95 III.
Statistical Analysis ....................................................................................... 103 IV.
Costs……. .................................................................................................... 108 V.
Permissions to carry out study ..................................................................... 109 VI.
1
1. CHAPTER 1
LITERATURE REVIEW
2
1.1. Introduction
1.1.1. Characteristics of Fungi
The fungal kingdom includes a spectrum of eukaryotic organisms which
mainly consist of yeasts and moulds (Blackwell, 2011). Fungi are more complex than
bacteria (Fridkin & Jarvis, 1996). They are ubiquitous in nature since they are very
fit for survival. Even though thousands of fungal species have been identified, only
approximately two hundred of these species are considered to be able to cause human
disease. However, studies have shown an increased incidence in systemic diseases
caused by several different fungal species (Chakrabarti, 2005). Due to their
ubiquitous nature, several other fungi capable of causing infections and their
potential fungal habitat are yet to be discovered.
Fungi can exist in three different forms:
a) Unicellular organisms, such as yeasts, which reproduce by simple budding.
b) Filamentous fungi, which include moulds and are composed of thread-like
hyphae. These reproduce by means of specialised structures which produce
conidia. The latter are the source of fungal infections. Conidia can survive
several extreme environmental conditions, such as heat and dehydration. They
are present in air, soil and water.
c) Certain fungi can also exist as both forms and are thus referred to as
dimorphic. (Law, 2010).
3
Fungi are heterotrophic organisms and thereby feed by absorption. They
consist of several membrane bound organelles including ribosomes, mitochondria as
well as an endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi apparatus. A polysaccharide cell wall
consisting of chitin and glucan is also present. Reproduction can be sexual i.e. by
meiosis, or asexual i.e. by mitosis. Due to their ubiquitous nature, fungi may survive
in different habitats, however, they are mainly found in soil or decomposing material,
with the main role of recycling nutrients in the environment (Webster & Weber,
2007).
1.1.2. Genus Aspergillus
Aspergilli fall under the Phylum Ascomycota which includes most medically
important genera. There are over two hundred and fifty Aspergillus species all of
which play an important role, both clinically and commercially (Anzai et al., 2008).
Aspergilli are filamentous, saprophytic fungi which primarily grow on organic debris
or decaying vegetation. They produce conidia which are easily dispersed into the air
and can survive several environmental conditions. (Dagenais & Keller, 2009).
Aspergilli consist of branching hyphae with the conidia arranged on conidiophores.
Different species can be classified on different conidiophore structures as well as
conidial arrangement (Ryan, Ray, Ahmad, Drew & Plorde, 2010). Upon germination,
Aspergillus spp. grow as a mycelium exhibiting dichotomous branching. The hyphae
are able to invade tissue and cause disease in susceptible patients (Reichenberger,
Habicht, Gratwohl &, Tamm, 2002).
4
The genus Aspergillus plays an important role in the production of several food
products such as fermented foods (Anzai et al., 2008) as well as in the production of
pharmaceutical products. For example, Aspergillus niger is used in the production of
proteases and amylases. However, these can also have a negative impact on public
health. Medically important Aspergillus species include: Aspergillus fumigatus,
Aspergillus terreus, Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus flavus as well as Aspergillus
nidulans (Dagenais & Keller, 2009).
Aspergillus fumigatus is not the most prevalent fungus in nature. It is highly
ubiquitous and produces abundant conidia which are small enough to enter the
alveoli of the lungs. Once they are dispersed in the air, humans are at risk of inhaling
hundreds of these spores daily. Disease will thus develop in the lungs; however,
immunocompetent individuals can easily remove the conidia through efficient
immune mechanisms of the body. Aspergillus fumigatus is thought to be responsible
for approximately 90% of human Aspergillus infections especially in
immunocompromised hosts, even though Aspergillus terreus, Aspergillus niger,
Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus nidulans are also responsible for causing human
disease (Latgé, 1999).
1.1.3. Genus Candida
The Genus Candida involves yeast-like organisms which consist of round to
elongated budding cells, also known as blastoconidia. Overall, Candida spp. are able
to grow at any temperature and under most conditions. The majority of these
5
organisms possess pseudohyphae which involve branches of elongated cells held
together in a chain-like pattern (Martinez-Anaya, Dickinson, Sudbery, 2003). Apart
from morphological characteristics, different species can be distinguished on the
basis of biochemical characteristics such as fermentation and carbohydrate
assimilation. Most Candida species can be grown on Sabouraud Dextrose agar as
well as an enriched medium such as blood agar (Ryan et al., 2010).
Candida spp. are the fourth most common pathogens causing bloodstream
infections in hospitalised patients (Horvath, George, Murray, Harrison, Hospenthal,
2004) with Candida albicans being the primary agent responsible for causing most
opportunistic infections in humans. It is commonly found in the gastrointestinal tract
as part of the normal commensal flora. It is able to produce hyphae depending on
different environmental conditions such as temperature, pH as well as the availability
of nutrients. For example, at 37oC, Candida albicans forms elongated hyphae known
as germ tubes. It can produce thick-walled chlamydoconidia which can be easily
distinguished from other Candida spp. Also, under different conditions the
composition of the cell wall components differs. The cell wall usually consists of
different polysaccharides which mainly include: mannan, glucan, and chitin (Ryan et
al., 2010).
Other Candida species including Candida tropicalis, Candida glabrata,
Candida parapsilosis and Candida krusei are also common yeasts responsible for
causing bloodstream infections and account for approximately 98% of all the blood
6
yeasts (Chang, Leaw, Huang, Wu, Chang, 2001). However, there is a possibility that
rare species of this genius can be encountered.
1.2. Systemic Fungal Infections
1.2.1. Introduction to Fungaemia
Fungaemia can be defined as the presence of fungi in blood. It has long been
recognised that the presence of such organisms in the bloodstream of a patient can be
highly fatal and bring about an increased morbidity and mortality (Reimer, Wilson &
Weinstein, 1997). Advancements in medicine and technology, such as organ
transplants and chemotherapeutic agents have led to an increase in
immunocompromised patient populations. These individuals have become
susceptible to opportunistic infections, including those caused by fungi. In the past,
such infections were considered as questionable, however their importance is now
recognised as these can become rapidly progressive, severe and difficult to manage
(Fridkin & Jarvis, 1996).
The increased incidence of fungaemia was first demonstrated in Denmark in
2003 where retrospective information was collected regarding fungaemia in
immunocompromised patients. (Arendrup et al., 2011). Other studies have also
shown that the etiology of fungaemia is changing and evolving (Nucci & Marr,
2005). Most of these infections are caused by Candida and Aspergillus spp. however
new fungal pathogens are being recognised such as non-albicans Candida spp.
7
(NAC) and Fusarium spp. (Fridkin & Jarvis, 1996). The rapid and reliable detection
of these organisms causing fungaemia has become a challenging problem. The
increased recognition of fungaemia has led to the development of newer diagnostic
systems however each system possesses several limitations (Thrope, Wilson, Turner,
DiGuiseppi, Willert, Mirrett & Barth Reller, 1990).
1.2.2. Invasive Aspergillosis
A wide spectrum of diseases are caused by Aspergillus species (Perfect et al.,
2001), however one of the most severe Aspergillus-related diseases is Invasive
Aspergillosis where neutropenia is considered to be the primary risk (Reichenberger
et al., 2002). Aspergilli begin their life cycle by the production of airborne conidia
which are dispersed into the air. Aspergillus fumigatus produces conidia with an
average size of 2-3µm and are thus capable of infiltrating the alveoli of the lungs,
unlike Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus terreus which produce larger conidia.
(Dagenais & Keller, 2009).
If immunocompromised patients come in contact with these conidia and inhale
them, they will be deposited in the alveolar spaces and bronchioles of the individual
resulting in conidial germination. Several host defences come into action in the case
of immunocompetent individuals. The primary defence mechanisms for the removal
of these conidia include alveolar macrophages, which phagocytose and kill the
invading conidia. Also, neutrophils, such as polymorphnuclear cells (PMN)
accumulate at the site of infection resulting in a pro-inflammatory response. Those
8
conidia that are not destroyed by macrophages become targeted by neutrophils
instead, in order to destroy the invading hyphae. Invasive aspergillosis results when
one of these host defences malfunctions leading to uncontrolled hyphal growth
(Dagenais & Keller, 2009).
Figure 1.1: Infectious life cycle of Aspergillus spp. (Dagenais & Keller, 2009)
Several epidemiological studies have shown an increased incidence of this
disease which has substantially increased the cost in hospitalisations associated with
aspergillosis. As a result patients are staying longer in hospitals thus leading to an
increase in the mortality rate (Perfect et al., 2001). The risk factors associated with
invasive aspergillosis can be several and these include: haematological malignancies
and transplants; medications such as chemotherapy; nosocomial risk factors such as
water and air filtration. Upon identifying these risk factors, as well as risk groups,
improvement in the diagnosis and management of patients with invasive
aspergillosis, such as antifungal therapy and new diagnostic methods, can be
implemented (Baddley, 2011).
9
1.2.3. Systemic Candidiasis
Yeasts have become one of the most important agents of blood stream
infections (Chang et al., 2001). Systemic candidiasis is an infection caused by the
presence of Candida in the blood (Law, 2010). Patients with invasive candidiasis
primarily present with acute sepsis (Cheng et al., 2005). Several risk factors
constitute to this infection and these include: patients in the Intensive Care Unit,
patients with intravascular catheters and patients on chemotherapy. Also, patients in
which anti-fungal therapy was delayed showed an increased risk of death due to
candidaemia (Søgaard, Hjort, Højbjerg & Schønheyder, 2006).
Studies have shown an increase in the number of reported cases of
candidaemia, especially in patients at Intensive Care units (ICU). Lengthy stays at
hospitals were shown to increase the risk of candidaemia and provide a poor outcome
for patients (Dupont, Lortholary, Ostrosky-Zeichner, Stucker & Yeldandi, 2009). An
increased prevalence of non-albicans Candida (NAC) species has also been recorded
in recent years where in some hospitals most cases of candidaemia reported were
caused by NAC species (Cheng et al., 2005). A study was conducted in 2009 in order
to evaluate the epidemiology and outcome of this disease in several American
centres. Results have shown that 50% of patients with invasive fungal infections had
candidaemia. Candida albicans was isolated in approximately 45% of the patients
however, 54% of other Candida spp. were isolated from blood cultures (Horn et al.,
2009). The distribution of Candida spp. isolated can be observed in Figure 1.2.
10
Figure 1.2: Distribution of isolated Candida spp. CALB: Candida albicans; CDUB:
Candida dubliniensis; CGLB: Candida glabrata; CGUI: Candida guillermondii; CKRU:
Candida krusei; CLUS: Candida lusitaniae; CPAR: Candida parapsilosis; CTRO:
Candida tropicalis (Horn et al., 2009)
The distribution of Candida species amongst different patients were due to
several factors including: antifungal treatment, organ transplantation, use of
catheters, presence of bacterial infections, neutropenia and other immunosuppressive
agents. The mortality rate amongst these patients was 35% with the highest mortality
being observed in patients infected with Candida krusei and the lowest mortality was
observed amongst patients infected with Candida parapsilosis. Even though Candida
albicans is the predominant species isolated worldwide, a surveillance program that
was carried out between 1997 and 2003 has shown a decrease in Candida albicans
and an increase in Candida parapsilosis and Candida tropicalis, with different
species distributed amongst several countries (Horn et al., 2009).
Possible increase in the prevalence of NAC species could be due to the use of
Fluconazole as a prophylactic agent (Charlier, Hart, Lefort, Ribaud, Dromer,
Denning & Lortholary, 2006). Candida albicans tends to be susceptible to this drug,
however the NAC species tend to have higher Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations
(MIC’s). According to the study carried out by Horn et al. (2009), there has been an
11
improvement in the survival rate in patients with invasive candidiasis and this can be
due to the fact that knowledge on the risk factors has improved as well as better
diagnostic tests and the introduction of newer antifungals such as Echinocandins
(antifungal drugs responsible for inhibiting the production of glucan in the cell wall).
1.2.4. Other fungi that can cause systemic fungal infections
The epidemiology of invasive fungal infections has developed over the years
and is still evolving. Yeasts other than Candida spp. and moulds other than
Aspergillus spp. are known to be the cause of fungal infections, some of which can
be very serious. Also, newly emerging fungi have been identified to cause invasive
mycoses especially in immunocompromised patients (Nucci & Marr, 2005).
One other yeast responsible for causing severe systemic mycosis is
Cyrptococcus neformans. The latter is a yeast-like fungus responsible for causing
life-threatening infections namely cryptococcosis and fungal meningitis (Law, 2010).
The latter is the commonest cause of infection and specifically affects patients with
AIDS (Mukherjee, Pirofski, Scharff & Casadevall, 1993). Spores formed by this
organism are less than 2µm in diameter and are thus able to enter the alveolar spaces
of the lung when inhaled. The virulence of Cyrptococcus neformans is primarily due
to the presence of a polysaccharide capsule surrounding its cell wall. This structure
acts as a barrier and will prevent phagocytosis from occurring (Bose, Reese, Ory,
Janbon & Doering, 2003). Rapid diagnosis is thus required in order to provide
immediate antifungal therapy.
12
A small number of infections can also be caused by other filamentous fungi
namely Fusarium and Scedosporium species (Law, 2010). Fusarium species can
cause a spectrum of infections in humans, most of which include disseminated
infections in immunocompromised patients. They are widely distributed in soil and
plant debris. They can also grow on a wide range of organic substrates and have
evolved several efficient mechanisms of dispersal, thus contributing to their
widespread distribution. Little information is provided on the pathogenesis of
invasive fusariosis; however, it shares several features with other mould infections
such as invasive aspergillosis (Nucci & Anaissie, 2007).
Organisms of the Genus Scedosporium include ubiquitous filamentous fungi
which can be found in the soil and sewage as well as polluted water (Cortez et al.,
2008). Scedosporiosis is the term used to describe a wide spectrum of fungal
infections caused by Scedosporium species. Such infections can be localised or
disseminated to several organs. Due to the resistance to several anti-fungal agents,
treatment of scedosporiosis can be challenging (Cortez et al., 2008).
1.3. Diagnosis of fungal infections
The diagnosis of invasive fungal infections has become a great challenge due
to a low sensitivity in the gold standard tests, these being, culture and histopathology
(Barnes & Marr, 2007). Clinicians must rely on clinical signs and symptoms as well
as laboratory investigations including culture, direct microscopy, histopathology,
antigen tests, PCR and other diagnostic tests. Radiology is also a very important tool.
13
There is no single best method for diagnosing invasive fungal infections, but a
combination of tests. Delayed diagnosis will only lead to an increase in the mortality
rate due to such infections (Posteraro, Torelli, Carolis, Posteraro, Sanguinetti, 2011).
1.3.1. Culture and microscopy
Culture, microscopy and identification still remain the current conventional
methods for the diagnosis of invasive fungal infections (Cuenca-Estrella, Bassetti,
Lass-Flörl, Rácil, Richardson & Rogers, 2011). However, culture and microscopy
are limited in the diagnosis of such infections and this can be due to the fact that
microbiological cultures are not very sensitive (Posteraro et al., 2011). Blood
cultures are primarily used for the diagnosis of invasive candidiasis, however studies
have shown that they are approximately 50% sensitive to Candida spp. (Pasqualotto
& Denning, 2005) and are hardly of use in detecting Aspergillus spp. Also, in cases
where fungal infections are suspected, blood cultures may need to be incubated for
longer periods in order to obtain positive growth (Pasqualotto & Denning, 2005).
Microscopy is very useful in the detection of fungi and is a faster diagnostic
method than culture. This rapid technique can provide a quick result upon receiving
the sample. It is also useful in presumptively identifying the fungal species present
based on morphological features, as well as aid in confirming the species isolated
through culture. However, sometimes it might be difficult to distinguish hyphal
elements from other cellular material (Law, 2010). Current microscopic techniques
involve the preparation of potassium hydroxide mounts. The latter involves the
14
addition of approximately 20-30% potassium hydroxide on a slide followed by
addition of the specimen. The prepared mounts can then be visualised under the
microscope for the presence of thread-like hyphae or spores (Shenoy, Teerthanath,
Karnaker, Girisha, & Pinto, 2008). Recently the use of Calcofluor white, a
fluorescent dye, has also been employed in addition to KOH preparations. This dye
binds to chitin present within fungal cell walls, resulting in fluorescence. Upon
examining under UV light, bright fluorescing fungal elements can be observed and
identified (Law, 2010). Direct microscopy can lead to diagnosis of invasive fungal
infections using specimens such as urines, aspirates and bronchoalveolar lavages.
The primary isolation of Candida spp. can be performed using Candida
Chromogenic Agar, which is the medium employed in the isolation of clinically
important Candida spp. and is able to identify Candida albicans, Candida tropicalis
and Candida krusei. Other species can be identified using rapid tests, biochemical
tests and morphological studies (Posteraro et al., 2011). Filamentous fungi can be
identified through macroscopic and macroscopic examination. Through macroscopic
analysis, identification of fungi includes colonial form, pigmentation as well as
surface colour.
The India ink stain can be utilised in order to visualise the capsule present in
the cell wall of Cryptococcus neoformans. This will prevent the ink particles from
entering the capsule thus forming a halo around the organism allowing easy detection
and visualisation by microscopy (Bose, Reese, Ory, Janbon & Doering, 2003).Also
15
the detection of cryptococcal antigen in serum or CSF can aid in providing a definite
diagnosis of cryptococcal meningitis.
1.3.2. Blood Cultures
Automated blood culture systems are routinely being used in order to diagnose
bloodstream infections even though sensitivity is low. Different blood culture
systems have been developed over the years in order to enhance the detection of
these organisms. The contents of the culture media used for detection differ between
one system and the other; however, the same standard procedure is used. Upon
obtaining a blood sample from the patient suspected of systemic mycoses, the blood
is inoculated into the blood culture bottle after which it is incubated for
approximately 5 days, or until growth is observed (Borst, Leverstein-Van Hall,
Verhoef & Fluit, 2000).
There are several factors which affect the sensitivity of blood cultures some of
which include the following:
a) Number of blood cultures used: Studies have shown that, in order to detect
septicaemia at least two blood cultures should be prepared for each sample.
Single blood cultures will not be sensitive enough for detecting organisms and
identification will be difficult (Weinstein, 1996).
b) Volume of blood required: In the case of adults with bloodstream infections,
relatively few organisms can be present in the blood thus requiring a larger
volume of blood. Studies have shown that the recommended volume of blood
16
required per culture is that of 10-30ml. However, a blood volume above 30ml
will not enhance the sensitivity and yield, and such volume may cause the blood
to clot in the syringe (Weinstein, 1996). For fungaemias, the amount of blood
culture does have an effect on outcome. To increase the blood volume cultured,
several bottles can be inoculated at the same time.
c) Different culture media: Different blood culture systems utilise different culture
media. Different manufacturers utilise supplements and additives in order to
enhance growth. One commonly used supplement is soybean casein digest broth
(Weinstein, 1996).
d) Dilution of blood sample: Another way to optimise the yield of growth is to
dilute the blood in the culture broth since blood contains substances such as
lysozymes and white blood cells which can inhibit microbial growth. By diluting
the blood, the effect of these substances is reduced (Weinstein, 1996).
e) Length of incubation: Studies have shown that an incubation of 5 days is
adequate for detecting and identifying pathogens since after 5 days any positive
blood cultures are most likely to be due to contamination. A study was conducted
by Wilson et al. (1993), which showed that after a 5-day incubation blood culture
bottles can be discarded with a minimal chance of obtaining true positive isolates
and maximal reduction in the presence of contaminants (Wilson, Mirrett, Reller,
Weinstein & Reimer, 1993). However an extended incubation period of more
than 5 days has been reported to be necessary in cases of fungaemia (Weinstein,
1996), even though several authors declare that clinically important organisms
will grow at a fast rate as opposed to slow growing organisms which are usually
considered contaminants (Borst et al., 2000).
17
1.3.3. Galactomannan Antigen Assay
One of the most useful methods in the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis is the
galactomannan antigen detection method using an enzyme immunoassay.
Galactomannan is a polysaccharide component present in the cell wall of Aspergillus
species (Pfeiffer, Fine & Safdar, 2006). This polysaccharide consists of a mannan
core as well as group residues consisting of galactofuranosyl units. This test involves
a double sandwich enzyme immunoassay which detects the presence of this
polysaccharide in serum samples (Verdaguer, Walsh, Hope & Cortez, 2007). This
test has been made available since 2003 and is one of the diagnostic methods for
invasive aspergillosis. It has proved to be highly sensitive and specific even though
there is a risk of false-positivity in certain cases. This test can also aid in monitoring
immunocompromised patients at risk of developing the galactomannan antigen, a
marker for invasive aspergillosis.
The galactomannan assay utilises specific monoclonal antibodies which act as
both a detector and acceptor of galactomannan (Pfeiffer, Fine & Safdar, 2006). Even
though this assay can be quite sensitive and accurate, it is time consuming and takes
approximately four hours to complete. Results are usually expressed using the
galactomannan index (GMI). Since Aspergillus is a common pathogen found in
hospitals as well as laboratory environments, there is a risk of contamination of
serum samples through collection, transport or processing of the sample and thus
result in a false positive result. Thus, this test should be restricted to patients who are
at high risk of invasive aspergillosis (Wheat & Walsh, 2008).
18
Even though this assay has proved to be highly sensitive and specific, there are
certain factors which can cause false positives or negatives, thus affecting the
accuracy of the test. These factors include:
a) Presence of antibiotics: studies have shown that antibiotics such as amoxicillin
are prone to cause false-positives. However, even though patients are receiving
such drugs, a positive result should not be disregarded since it can ultimately be
caused by invasive aspergillosis and thus further tests should be performed
(Wheat & Walsh, 2008);
b) Treatment with antifungal drugs: studies have shown that antifungal drugs tend
to reduce sensitivity of the test (Marr, Laverdiere, Gugel & Leisenring, 2005).
Thus, negative results obtained from patients taking antifungal therapy should be
further investigated before confirming the presence of a false negative;
c) Cross-reactivity: organisms such as Penicillium, Trychophyton, Histoplasma and
Cladosporium may contain a cross reactive galactomannan. The monoclonal
antibody will react with the β-1-5 galactofuranose present in the galactomannan
of these organisms resulting in a false positive result (Wheat & Walsh, 2008).
1.3.4. β-D- glucan assay
β-D- glucan is another fungal cell wall component and can be found in several
species such as Aspergillus and Candida spp. The β-D- glucan detection assay can
also be performed in order to confirm the presence of these organisms. However,
when compared to the galactomannan antigen assay, the sensitivity of the β-D-glucan
test is less. Also, it is not specific for invasive aspergillosis. Patients suffering from
19
this disease are also prone to the yeast infection candidiasis and this test will not be
useful in differentiating between the two fungal infections. Therefore, for such
reasons, the galactomannan test is preferred when diagnosing patients with invasive
aspergillosis. The test is highly useful in detecting fungaemias with other fungi
including Fusarium and Scedosporium.
1.3.5. The Polymerase Chain Reaction
The Polymerase Chain reaction (PCR) can also be useful in detecting fungi
causing systemic infections. Such molecular techniques are highly sensitive and
specific. PCR allows the amplification of specific target DNA sequences (Harwood,
2010). The ribosomal RNA gene is cluster is a popular target gene for PCR since
different fungi contain multiple copies of this cluster and can thus aid in increasing
the sensitivity of this assay. Examples of the target genes responsible for the
identification of fungi of the Aspergillus and Candida genus include the 18S rRNA,
28S rRNA, ITS-1 and ITS-2 (Khot & Fredricks, 2009).
Primers and probes can be designed so that the target DNA can be refined to a
taxonomic level i.e. to the genus or species level. In the case of real time PCR this
can provide rapid detection and confirmation of the fungus using a ‘taxon’-targeted
assay (Khot & Fredricks, 2009). There are several detection methods for the
amplified DNA sequences produced by the PCR assay. One of the most sensitive,
specific and utilised methods is gel electrophoresis where the PCR products are
separated according to size and charge after which they can be analysed.
20
The polymerase chain reaction also possesses certain limitations in the
detection of fungi since it differs from the detection of other microorganisms and can
thus be challenging (Khot & Fredricks, 2009). This can be due to the complicated
extraction of fungal DNA as a result of the presence of a durable cell wall, as well as
due to low amounts of DNA. (Dornbusch, Groll & Walsh, 2010). False positivity is
also an issue as a result of a high risk of contamination from the environment (Khot
& Fredricks, 2009). In addition, PCR is a more complex and expensive method when
compared to antigen detection techniques (Wheat & Walsh, 2008).
1.3.6. Radiology
The diagnosis of invasive fungal infections can also be based on radiological
methods since this can aid in early diagnosis of the disease (Nurzyńska-Flak,
Zawitkowska-Klaczyńska & Kowalczyk, 2004). CT scans have been proven to be
useful in the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis. This can be characterised by the
presence of a ‘halo sign’ which mainly consists of a dense fungal ball. As the disease
progresses a ‘nodular appearance’ can be observed. However, chest radiography can
be slightly insensitive for the diagnosis of invasive fungal infections since at very
early stages of the disease the halo sign might not be visible even though nodular
lesions would already be present. Overall a CT scan can be considered as a sensitive
radiological method for the early detection of invasive aspergillosis (Reichenberger
et al., 2002). Radiological techniques must be performed in conjunction with other
laboratory tests as well as based on clinical observations in order to diagnose
invasive fungal infections.
21
1.4. Methodology
1.4.1. Blood Culture Systems
1.4.1.1. Manual Blood Culture Systems
Before the introduction of automated blood culture systems, the traditional
manual systems were utilised. Such systems use bottles filled with liquid broth
medium which are inoculated with the patient’s blood sample. The bottles are
incubated aerobically or anaerobically for 7 days where each bottle is examined daily
for the presence of microbial growth (Weinstein, 1996). Growth can be identified
either by haemolysis, an increase in turbidity as well as gas production. Commonly
used blood culture media are the ‘Castenada’ bottles which incorporate plastic
paddles containing an agar slant within the bottle. Such bottles are advantageous
since they do not require venting to room air, however, they are relatively expensive
(Reimer, Wilson & Weinstein, 1997).
Manual systems are labour intensive since frequent checking of the bottle for
growth is required. Thus, they are not very practical, especially for laboratories
where large numbers of blood cultures are analysed daily (Reimer, Wilson &
Weinstein, 1997). Apart from frequent checking of the bottles, blind cultures are
usually prepared at the end of the incubation period. There is also a high risk of
contamination upon opening the bottles as well as risk of infection to the individual
22
analysing the bottles (Law, 2010). Processing of several blood cultures will also
increase laboratory costs.
1.4.1.2. Automated Blood Culture Systems
During the past few decades several automated systems have been developed
and introduced in order to make the processing of blood cultures more efficient.
These systems vary in the method to detect growth of microorganisms, as well as
other factors, such as the type of culture media and supplements used, the volume of
blood required to inoculate the media etc. (Wilson, Weinstein, Reimer, Mirrett &
Reller, 1992). Before the introduction of continuous-monitoring blood culture
systems, automated detection systems were utilised. Examples include the BACTEC
radiometric system, which was the first commercial blood culture system employed,
and the BACTEC non-radiometric system (Reimer, Wilson & Weinstein, 1997).
Advancements in blood cultures resulted in the introduction of the continuous-
monitoring blood culture systems which are commonly employed nowadays. These
systems differ from the automated detection systems due to continuous monitoring of
the blood culture bottles for the detection of microbial growth. Examples include the
BacT/Alert blood culture systems, BACTEC 9000 series blood culture systems, the
Vital blood culture system and the Signal Oxoid blood culture system (Reimer,
Wilson & Weinstein, 1997). However, the BACTEC and BacT/Alert are the most
commonly utilised systems. Most of these systems are based on carbon dioxide
detection. This is due to the fact that growth of organisms will increase the
23
concentration of carbon dioxide inside the blood culture bottle (Rohner, Pepey &
Auckenthaler, 1995) and thus growth can be detected by monitoring changes in
carbon dioxide concentration.
1.4.1.2.1. The BACTEC blood culture system
Amongst the commonly used blood culture systems is the BACTEC (BD
Diagnostics Systems, Sparks, Md.) blood culture system which is a continuously
automated monitoring system (Mirrett, Reller, Petti, Woods, Vazirani, Sivadas &
Weinstein, 2003) and is designed purposely to detect microorganisms from blood.
BACTEC systems include the BACTEC FX system and the BACTEC
9000 series
both of which are based on fluorescent technology. Blood cultures are monitored
through a fluorescent sensor and the production of carbon dioxide is detected,
indicating the growth and presence of microorganisms (Shigei, Shimabukuro, Pezzlo,
De La Maza & Peterson, 1995). These systems are highly reliable and safe and offer
high performance as well as quality media. Amongst the BACTEC 9000 series
include the BACTEC 9240, BACTEC 9120 and the BACTEC 9050 which
accommodate 240, 120 and 50 blood culture bottles respectively (Becton Dickinson
and Company, 2012).
Media of the BACTEC blood culture systems are particularly designed for
inoculation using a small volume of blood, allowing the effective growth of
microorganisms in order to identify bacteria, yeasts and fungi present in the
bloodstream. BACTEC blood culture media include:
24
BACTEC™ Plus Aerobic/F and Plus Anaerobic/F
BACTEC Peds Plus™/F Medium
BACTEC™ Lytic/10 Anaerobic/F Medium
The BACTEC Mycosis-IC/F is a selective fungal medium which is useful in
recovering yeasts or moulds from blood specimens (Rosa, Araujo, Rodrigues, Pinto-
de-Sousa & Pina-Vaz, 2011). Studies have concluded that it is a more effective and
reliable medium in the recovery of fungi than other standard media (Meyer,
Letscher-Bru, Jaulhac, Waller & Candolfi, 2004).
1.4.1.2.2. The BacT/Alert Blood Culture System
The BacT/Alert 3D automated blood culture system (BioMérieux, Inc.,
Durham, N.C.) was introduced by the Organon Teknika Corporation in 1990
(Wilson, Weinstein, Mirrett, Reimer, Feldman, Chuard & Reller, 1995) with the
purpose of identifying pathogens causing bloodstream infections (Rohner, Pepey &
Auckenthaler, 1995). This system consists of an incubator with an adjusting
temperature of between 35 and 37oC ±0.5
oC, a shaker which continuously mixes the
bottles, and a detector. It is based on the colorimetric detection of carbon dioxide
which is produced by microorganisms growing in the blood culture bottles (Thrope
et al, 1990). The following is a brief description of the features making up this
system:
25
Carbon Dioxide sensor: a sensor is attached to the bottom of the blood culture
bottle and this is separated from the culture medium by a semi-permeable membrane.
This acts as a barrier and is impermeable to ions, water, blood and other media
components. However, it is permeable to carbon dioxide which, upon production by
the growing microorganisms, it will cross the membrane and into the sensor. This
will lead to the dissolution of water, generating free hydrogen ions. The latter will
interact with the sensor producing a colour change from blue to green, due to a
decrease in the pH. As more carbon dioxide is produced, the green colour eventually
turns yellow (Thrope et al., 1990).
Figure 1.3: BacT/ALERT 3D's colorimetric sensor-and-detection technology detects
microorganisms by tracking CO2 production (BioMérieux, n.d)
Colorimetric detection system: within the system are blocks which consist of a
number of wells. Each well contains a colorimetric detector which consists of a red
light emitting diode. The latter emits light onto an absorbing photodiode. This will
result in the production of a voltage signal which is directly proportional to the
concentration of carbon dioxide produced in the bottle (Thrope et al., 1990).
26
Computer driven algorithm: Each voltage signal produced is then amplified
and filtered after which it is transmitted to a computer for analysis. The data acquired
is then plotted resulting in the production of a growth curve (Thrope et al., 1990).
Figure 1.4: Schematic diagram of the BacT/Alert blood culture bottle showing the: a)
Bottle wall; b) Semi-permeable membrane; c) Carbon dioxide sensor; d) Light emitting
diode; e) Light absorbing photodiode; f) Amplifier; g) Block (Thrope et al., 1990)
The BacT/Alert blood culture system utilises two types of media: one for the
growth of aerobic, microaerophlic bacteria and yeasts and another for the growth of
anaerobes. Blood culture systems differ in the type of supplement media utilised. In
the case of the BacT/Alert system, the culture media contain a tryptic soy broth
supplement. The following are the blood culture media utilised by the BacT/Alert
blood culture system:
BacT/Alert SA: Standard Aerobic medium
BacT/Alert SN: Standard Anaerobic medium
BacT/Alert FA: FAN Aerobic
BacT/Alert FN: FAN Anaerobic
BacT/Alert PF: Pediatric FAN
BacT/Alert MB: Mycobacteria Blood
27
The FAN aerobic blood cultures are useful in enhancing the recovering of
microorganisms from blood in order to detect fungaemia, as well as bacteraemia, in
patients taking antibiotics. It contains charcoal which plays an important role in
inactivating any anti-microbial agents thus allowing growth. Studies were conducted
where the standard aerobic and anaerobic BacT/Alert media were compared with the
FAN aerobic and anaerobic media and results showed a greater recovery of yeasts in
the FAN bottles (Weinstein et al., 1995; Wilson et al., 1995). Apart from isolating
Mycobacteria, the BacT/Alert MB medium is also designed in order to support the
growth of yeasts and other fungi (Mattei, Savarino, Fabbri, Moneta & Tortoli, 2009).
1.5. Sub-Culture Techniques from Mycology
1.5.1. Routine Sub-Culture Technique
In order to recovery microorganisms from blood cultures, sub-cultures onto
solid media must be prepared. This is performed in order to further characterise and
identify the species isolated within the blood culture medium and also perform
susceptibility testing. In a study performed by Rosa, Araujo et al. (2011), two sub-
culture techniques were performed in order to recover moulds from BACTEC blood
culture bottles, since the sensitivity of blood cultures for moulds is extremely low.
The first technique utilised was the routine sub-culture technique which involves the
collection of approximately 25µl (2-3 drops) of culture medium using a sterile
airway needle (Rosa et al., 2011). This technique is widely used for sub-culturing
blood culture bottles both for bacteriology and mycology.
28
1.5.2. ‘Novel’ Sub-Culture Technique
In the study performed by Rosa et al. (2011), a new sub-culture technique was
introduced and this involved the collection of a higher volume of culture medium
(approximately 100µl) using a tuberculin syringe. Before collection, the blood
culture bottle was vigorously agitated for approximately 10 seconds. In the presence
of fungi, this will allow the fragmentation of any fungal clumps, known as fungal
balls (aspergilloma), present within the medium (Rosa et al., 2011). When comparing
these two sub-culture techniques, the novel technique was more successful at
isolating Aspergillus spp., even in blood culture bottles inoculated with low conidial
concentrations.
1.5.3. Terminal Sub-cultures
Terminal subcultures are performed at the end of the incubation period onto
solid media, regardless of whether the blood culture reads positive or negative.
Several studies have been performed which determined the value of terminal sub-
cultures, especially in patients with invasive candidiasis. Isolation of yeasts from
blood cultures is considered the Gold Standard in diagnosis of disseminated yeast
infections. However, the sensitivity of blood culture systems for the isolation of
yeasts needs improvement since undiagnosed cases of invasive candidiasis have been
also recorded (Søgaard et al., 2006). A study was conducted by Borst et al. (2000)
which determined the value of terminal sub-cultures using blood cultures in patients
with invasive candidiasis. In this study it was recommended that sub-cultures are
29
prepared from both positive and negative blood cultures where disseminated fungal
infection is suspected. Results showed that by performing terminal sub-cultures on
negative bottles, additional important and relevant information can be obtained.
1.6. Limitations
Even though blood cultures are nowadays being considered the gold standard
in the diagnosis of bloodstream infections, they possess several limitations. There
hasn’t been a single blood culture system which has proven to be hundred percent
sensitive in the detection of bloodstream pathogens since certain organisms grow
poorly in blood cultures (Weinstein, 1996) and this results in the detection of several
false negatives. In the case of yeasts, studies have shown that the sensitivity of blood
cultures for such organisms need improvement since several undiagnosed cases of
invasive candidiasis have been identified (Søgaard et al., 2006). This has led to the
importance of performing terminal sub-cultures. If sensitivity of these blood culture
systems can be improved then terminal sub-culture would not be necessary and thus
cut down on costs as well as provide better use of laboratory resources (Shigei et al.,
1995). In addition, the sensitivity of blood culture for detecting moulds is extremely
low. Rosa et al. (2011) speculate that when Aspergillus is cultured in blood cultures,
it is many times considered as a contaminant and thus other investigations should be
carried out in order to confirm or disprove this.
30
1.7. Statement of Problem
Blood culture systems have been found to be very useful in the detection of
bloodstream infections, however, when it comes to fungal pathogens their sensitivity
is not as high as with bacterial pathogens. Blood culture systems using culture bottles
are not considered useful for culturing moulds. Therefore, other serological tests, and
sometimes invasive procedures, must be performed instead. Culturing such an
organism from blood in blood culture bottles is highly desirable. Sensitivity of blood
culture bottles for Aspergillus is extremely low, and this is attributed to the fact that
Aspergillus produces airborne conidia rather than waterborne ones. In fact, systemic
infections caused by Fusarium and Scedosporium, which both produce waterborne
conidia; can lead to positive blood cultures.
Aspergillus is highly angioinvasive; therefore it is argued that other
structures, such as pieces of viable hyphae, can be present in the bloodstream. Other
reasons for the lack of positive blood cultures with Aspergillus may play a role, but
these are still not clearly identified (Rosa et al., 2011). If Aspergillus cultures could
be cultured in blood culture bottles, adequate and useful information on the mould
such as the identity of the species and material for susceptibility testing can be
obtained and therefore aid in the diagnosis and management of IA.
The detection of yeasts is also crucial in the diagnosis of systemic
candidiasis, which has become increasingly common. Automated blood culture
systems are routinely utilised in order to diagnose this infection (Borst et al, 2000).
31
Isolation of yeasts from blood cultures is considered the Gold Standard in diagnosis
of disseminated yeast infections. However, the sensitivity of blood culture systems
for the isolation of yeasts needs improvement. A study was conducted by Borst et al.
(2000) which determined the value of terminal sub-cultures using blood cultures in
patients with candidaemia.
1.8. Objectives and Aims of Project
The aim of this project is to enhance the blood culture system for Mycology by
evaluating the already existing system (BacT/Alert) for possible improvements. The
system will be tested to see whether it supports the growth of Aspergillus spp. This
part of the project will be based on a study performed by Rosa et al. (2011) using the
novel technique as the standard technique is not used at Microbiology Department
MDH. The system will also be evaluated to see whether the detection of yeast
infections can be improved. This will be done by preparing terminal sub-cultures
from all blood cultures containing the blood of neutropenic patients at Mater Dei
Hospital, in order to test for the potential growth of yeasts but also, not excluding
moulds. All this will be performed to see whether the changes mentioned will lead to
results that can be used to modify the current blood culture system for Mycology,
and therefore update the SOP for blood cultures for Mycology.
32
2. CHAPTER 2
METHODOLOGY
33
2.1. Ethics Approval
Before carrying out this project, ethics approval was obtained from the
University Research Ethics Committee (UREC). Attached in the Appendix (Section
VI) are copies of all the permissions required to carry out this study.
2.2. Fungal Species
Four clinical isolates of Aspergillus spp. belonging to the Mycology
Laboratory of Mater Dei Hospital (MDH) were utilised in this study. The four
Aspergillus spp. used were Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus
niger and Aspergillus terreus.
2.3. Inoculation of conidial and hyphal suspensions in blood culture bottles
2.3.1. Preparation of conidial suspensions
Serial suspensions of 2.5, 25, 250 and 2500 c.f.u per 10ml of the four
Aspergillus spp. were prepared. An initial concentration of 2McF was utilised for
each organism. This is equivalent to 1x107 c.f.u per ml for A. flavus and A. niger, and
2x107 c.f.u per ml for A. fumigatus and A. terreus. The higher value for the latter is
due to the fact that these organisms have smaller conidia than the former ones. These
concentrations were determined using the graphs in Figure 2.1 which indicate the
optical density values and their equivalent cell counts for each organism. The agar
34
cultures containing the Aspergillus spp. were first flooded in approximately 1ml of
1% Tween 80. Using a sterile pipette, the conidial suspension created was collected
and mixed together in sterile distilled water until a concentration of 2McF was
obtained. This was determined using a Densitometer (Densimat, BioMérieux). The
vial was mixed well using a vortex mixer in order to obtain a homogenous
suspension.
Figure 2.1: Densimat readings and corresponding spore counts for a) A. fumigatus and
b) A. flavus (Araujo, Rodrigues & Pina Vaz, 2004)
A rack with 5 conical-bottomed test tubes was set up for each organism and
each test tube was labelled with each dilution and the species’ name. An initial
concentration of 1x106 c.f.u per 10ml of sterile distilled water for A. flavus and A.
niger was prepared in the first test tube. This was done by mixing 100µl, using a
35
micropipette, from the 2McF conidial suspension previously prepared, together with
10mL distilled water. The tube was then vortexed. Twenty-five microliters of the
latter were transferred to the tube labelled with the highest conidial concentration
(2500 c.f.u/10ml) together with 10ml of sterile distilled water and vortexed. Further
dilutions were prepared by pipetting 1ml from the previous dilution to 9ml distilled
water in the next tube. After each dilution was prepared, the tubes were vortexed
well in order to obtain an even suspension. The preparation of the conidial
suspensions for A. flavus and A. niger can be summarised in Figure 2.2.
Figure 2.2: Preparation of conidial suspensions for A. flavus and A. niger using a
prepared 2McF conidial suspension and sterile distilled water (SDW) (Figure created
from data in: SciQuip Ltd., n.d)
In the case of A. fumigatus and A. terreus an initial concentration of 2x10-6
c.f.u/10ml, equivalent to 2McF, was prepared. Two hundred microliters of the latter
was pipetted in a tube containing 10ml of sterile distilled water thus diluting the
solution ten-fold. The tube was vortexed. The highest dilution was prepared by
pipetting 25µl of the latter suspension together with 20ml distilled water and
36
vortexed. The rest of the dilutions were then prepared. The process was repeated
until a total of 60ml for each dilution was prepared since each blood culture bottle
was inoculated with 10ml of each dilution. The preparation of the conidial
suspensions for A. fumigatus and A. terreus can be summarised in Figure 2.3.
Figure 2.3: Preparation of conidial suspensions for A. fumigatus and A. terreus using a
prepared 2McF conidial suspension and sterile distilled water (SDW) (Figure created
from data in: SciQuip Ltd., n.d)
2.3.2. Preparation of hyphal suspensions
All four Aspergillus spp. were previously cultured in Sabouraud broth in order
to allow the growth of hyphae. The media were incubated at 30oC and at intervals
they were mixed well on a magnetic stirrer to avoid the formation of a mycelium on
the surface. After approximately 5 days of allowing sufficient growth, the culture
media containing the hyphae were centrifuged in conical-bottomed universal
containers in order to deposit the hyphae. Following centrifugation, the hyphae were
37
washed three times with sterile distilled water (Wells, Dickson & Lester, 1996; Liu et
al., 2010). The hyphae were then utilised in order to prepare hyphal suspensions.
The same concentrations were used as for the conidial suspensions. In this
case, when preparing a 2McF concentration using the hyphae, the vial was vortexed
well using glass beads in order to produce hyphal fragments.
The concentrations of the serial suspensions were validated by cultures on
Sabouraud Dextrose agar. This was done by pipetting 100ul of the each prepared
dilution and inoculating separate Sabouraud Dextrose plates. These were incubated
for 3 days and the colonies were counted.
2.3.3. Inoculation of suspensions into BacT/Alert blood culture bottles
The standard aerobic (SA) and FAN aerobic BacT/Alert blood cultures were
utilised in this study. The bottles were first labelled with the species’ name,
concentration and date. Starting from the smallest dilution (2.5 c.f.u/10ml), 10mls
was first aspirated using a 10mL sterile syringe and the each bottle was inoculated
with 10mL of the chosen concentration. Care was taken so as not to handle the blood
culture bottles at the site of inoculation as this could easily result in contamination.
Each concentration was tested in triplicate. A set of 3 blood culture bottles was
inoculated using sterile distilled water and this served as a negative control.
38
A total of 30 bottles was thus required for each organism: 15 SA and 15 FAN
BacT/Alert blood cultures which were inoculated as follows:
o 3 of each bottle inoculated with the 2500 c.f.u/10ml suspension
o 3 of each bottle inoculated with the 250 c.f.u/10ml suspension
o 3 of each bottle inoculated with the 25 c.f.u/10ml suspension
o 3 of each bottle inoculated with the 2.5 c.f.u/10ml suspension
o 3 of each bottle inoculated with sterile distilled water which served as a negative
control
Figure 2.4: Standard Aerobic (blue cap) and FAN aerobic (green cap) BacT/Alert blood
culture bottles inoculated with the prepared serial dilutions
2.4. Incubation of blood culture bottles
Due to the lack of space in the BacT/Alert blood culture analyser of the
Microbiology laboratory, the blood culture bottles were incubated at 35oC for 7 days
39
using Mycology Laboratory incubator. The contents of the bottles were mixed every
day and observed for growth.
2.5. Preparation of terminal sub-cultures: the ‘Novel’ sub-culture technique
After 7 days, the bottles were observed visually for the presence of growth.
Terminal sub-cultures were prepared in a safety cabinet and Sabouraud Dextrose
agar plates were utilised. The plates were labelled with the species’ name,
concentration and date. The ‘novel’ sub-culture technique, as proposed by Rosa et al.
(2011), was carried out. The blood culture vials were vigorously agitated for
approximately 10 seconds in order to fragment the fungus. Using a 21G Vacuette®
blood collection needle, the culture medium was aspirated into a red-capped
vacutainer. One hundred microliters of the culture medium was used to inoculate the
corresponding agar plate which was then streaked accordingly. After all sub-cultures
were prepared, the plates were incubated at 30oC for 3 days. The plates were then
checked for growth.
2.6. Preparation of terminal sub-cultures from negative blood cultures
2.6.1. Collection of blood culture bottles
Approximately twice a week negative blood cultures inoculated with the blood
of neutropenic and immunocompromised patients, were collected from the blood
culture laboratory at the Microbiology department of MDH. Other negative blood
40
cultures which gave a positive galactomannan test were also utilised. The clinical
details were checked from the request form and any sample with the required criteria
was taken note of. If the specimen was issued as negative after 5 days incubation in
the BacT/Alert automated system, the blood culture bottle was collected and
incubated for another 5 days in the Mycology lab incubator since studies have shown
that an extended incubation period might be required in cases of suspected
fungaemia (Weinstein, 1996).
2.6.2. Terminal sub-cultures
After a total of 10 days incubation, terminal sub-cultures were performed from
the negative blood cultures. The ‘novel’ sub-culture technique (Rosa et al., 2011)
was performed again. The bottles were agitated vigorously for approximately 10
seconds before preparing the sub-cultures, in order to fragment the fungus or yeast, if
present. After 3 days the plates were observed for the presence or absence of growth.
41
3. CHAPTER 3
RESULTS
42
3.1. Results involving visual readings
3.1.1. Detection of Aspergillus spp. In BacT/Alert blood cultures
3.1.1.1. Conidial inoculum
Inoculated bottles were checked for growth every 24 hours. The growth of
Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus terreus was detected
visually within 24 hours in the BacT/Alert Standard Aerobic (SA) blood culture
bottles at the highest concentration of 2500 c.f.u/10ml. Aspergillus niger was
detected after 48 hours at conidial concentrations of 2500 and 250 c.f.u/10ml. The
growth of A. flavus was detected after 24 hours at a concentration of 250 c.f.u/10ml
whilst A. niger was detected after 48 hours. The growth of A. fumigatus and A.
terreus was detected after 48 hours. Growth was identified by the presence of a
white fungal ball floating within the culture medium. This was more visible in the
standard aerobic bottles due to the light colour of the medium.
Growth could also be observed after 24 hours in the BacT/Alert FAN aerobic
blood culture bottles; however, due to the dark nature of the FAN aerobic culture
medium, growth was more difficult to detect visually and could only be confirmed
through the preparation of terminal subcultures. All four Aspergillus spp. were also
detected at the lowest conidial concentration of 2.5 c.f.u/10ml after 72 hours for A.
fumigatus and A. terreus, and 120 hours for A. flavus and A. niger. Table 3.2
43
summarises the time of growth detected for each organism, at different conidial
concentrations.
Since the growth of each organism was detected visually and not by the
BacT/Alert automater, there might have already been growth several hours before,
which would have been difficult to detect visually.
3.1.1.2. Hyphal inoculum
Once again, inoculated bottles were checked for growth every 24 hours.
Slightly different results were produced for the hyphal concentrations. A. fumigatus
and A. niger were detected soon after 48 hours at concentrations of 2500 and 250
c.f.u/10ml whilst A. flavus and A. terreus were detected soon after 24 hours at a
concentration of 2500 c.f.u/10ml in the standard aerobic BacT/Alert bottles. It was
difficult to detect any growth at the lower concentrations of 25 and 2.5 c.f.u/10ml
for A. niger. On the other hand growth was detected soon after 48 hours for A.
terreus at a concentration of 25 c.f.u/10ml and after 96 hours for A. fumigatus.
Growth was detected after 120 hours at the lowest hyphal concentration of 2.5
c.f.u/10ml for A. terreus and A. fumigatus. Growth could be identified by the
presence of a white fungal ball in the blood culture medium.
As mentioned previously, the detection of growth in the BacT/Alert FAN
bottles was not easy to detect visually due to dark colour of the culture medium.
However, in the case of A. fumigatus growth was detected after 2 days at
44
concentrations of 2500 and 250 c.f.u/10ml and after 6 days in the 25 c.f.u/10ml
bottles. Table 3.3 summarises the time of growth for each organism at different
hyphal concentrations.
3.1.2. Results of growth after 7 days
3.1.2.1. Conidial inoculum
Since the blood culture bottles were incubated for a total of 7 days, each
bottle was observed for growth after the total incubation period. Growth was
observed in all standard aerobic bottles inoculated with concentrations of 2500, 250
and 25 c.f.u/10ml, for all four organisms. However, in the case of A. flavus, one of
the 25 c.f.u/10ml bottles was contaminated due to the presence of turbidity in the
blood culture medium. Contamination was also observed in the A. terreus SA
bottles inoculated with the lowest conidial concentration, as well as the negative
controls. Contamination could not be identified in the FAN bottles due to the dark-
coloured medium. After a total of 7 days, the white fungal clumps could be
visualised more clearly upon mixing of the bottles.
45
Figure 3.1: Detection of growth of A. fumigatus in the BacT/Alert standard aerobic
blood cultures after 7 days
3.1.2.2. Hyphal Inoculum
Due to the dark nature of the FAN blood culture medium, it was difficult to
identify whether any growth was present just through visual observation. However,
growth was observed in almost all the bottles with the highest conidial
concentrations, mainly those bottles inoculated with conidial concentrations of
2500 and 250 c.f.u/10ml. Growth was confirmed through the preparation of
terminal subcultures. All negative controls produced no growth.
46
Figure 3.2: Detection of growth of A. fumigatus in the BacT/Alert FAN aerobic blood
cultures after 7 days
In the case of the hyphal concentrations, less growth could be observed in the
bottles after 7 days. At a concentration of 2500 c.f.u/10ml growth was observed in all
bottles for all four organisms. No growth was observed at any other concentration for
A. flavus. The growth of A. fumigatus was only observed in one bottle at the lowest
concentration of 2.5 c.f.u/10ml whilst no growth was observed for the other three
Aspergillus spp.
In the case of the FAN aerobic bottles, growth was observed at the highest
concentrations (2500 and 250 c.f.u/10ml) in almost all FAN aerobic bottles. Only the
growth of A. fumigatus and A. terreus was observed at a concentration of 25
c.f.u/10ml unlike the remaining Aspergillus spp. It was difficult to identify any
growth at a concentration of 2.5 c.f.u/10ml.
47
3.1.3. Validation of inocula
3.1.3.1. Number of colonies grown from plates inoculated with prepared
concentrations
Inoculum Organism Concentration
(c.f.u/10ml)
Average number
of colonies
Conidial
Inoculum
A. fumigatus 2500 15
250 2
25 1
A. flavus 2500 6
250 2
25 1
A. niger 2500 5
250 1
25 0
A. terreus 2500 16
250 2
25 0
Hyphal
Inoculum
A. fumigatus 2500 1
250 0
25 0
A. flavus 2500 0
250 0
25 0
A. niger 2500 1
250 0
25 0
A. terreus 2500 0
250 0
25 1
Table 3.1: Average number of colonies counted from SDA plates inoculated with the
conidial and hyphal concentrations
48
In order to validate the prepared concentrations, SDA plates were inoculated
with 100µl of the prepared suspensions.
Table 3.1 summaries the average number of colonies obtained after 3 days of
incubation. Since there is a ten-fold difference between each concentration, the
average number of colonies obtained is correct for the conidial suspensions and this
is clearly evident in the results of the conidial concentrations of A. fumigatus and A.
terreus. A graph of ‘concentration’ and ‘average number of colonies’ was plotted
proving the linear relationship between the two variables and thus confirming that
the conidial concentrations prepared were correct.
Due to limitations in the procedure utilised in preparing the hyphal
concentrations, the number of colonies obtained were not correct and some plates did
not produce any growth. As a result, a graph could not be plotted to show the
linearity between the two variables.
The same method for the preparation of conidial suspension was utilised for the
preparation of the hyphal concentrations. However, there was difficulty in breaking
the hyphal fragments, even when using glass beads. Thus, large hyphal clumps
remained and the concentrations prepared were not equal. As a result, lack of growth
was observed when validating the hyphal concentrations on solid media. Therefore
the hyphal suspensions could not be validated.
49
Figure 3.3: Graph showing the linear relationship between the average number of
colonies and different conidial concentrations
3.1.4. Recovery of Aspergillus spp. on solid culture medium
3.1.4.1. Conidial inoculum
Terminal subcultures were prepared after 7 days of incubation of the blood
culture bottles. The novel subculture technique (Rosa et al., 2011) was carried out
on each blood culture bottle respective of whether growth was observed or not. This
proposed sub-culture technique was successful in recovering all four Aspergillus
species even at low conidial concentrations of 2.5 c.f.u/10ml.
All four species were recovered at concentrations of 2500 and 250 c.f.u/10ml
from almost all three SA and FAN bottles. Aspergillus spp. were also recovered
from positive BacT/Alert bottles at lower conidial concentrations of 25 and 2.5
c.f.u/10ml from both the SA and FAN bottles.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
0 1000 2000 3000
Aver
age
nu
mb
er o
f co
lon
ies
Concentration (c.f.u/10ml)
A. fumigatus
A. flavus
A. niger
A. terreus
Linear (A. fumigatus)
Linear (A. flavus)
Linear (A. niger)
Linear (A. terreus)
50
For the negative controls, no fungal growth was observed however, in the case
of A. fumigatus and A. flavus contamination was observed in some of the plates
from both the SA and FAN bottles. Contamination was also observed in some sub-
cultures of A. terreus from both blood cultures which were inoculated at low
conidial concentrations. Since the growth of Aspergillus is not affected by bacterial
growth, terminal subcultures were not repeated.
Contamination was also observed in some of the bottles inoculated with
lowest conidial concentrations of A. flavus and A. terreus and this was confirmed
after the preparation of terminal subcultures. It is important to note that slight
turbidity was also observed in the bottles inoculated with the highest concentrations
(2500 and 250 c.f.u/10ml). However, Aspergillus spp. grew just the same and were
still recovered through terminal subculture on SDA. Thus, the presence of bacterial
contamination will not prevent the growth of Aspergillus.
3.1.4.2. Hyphal inoculum
Recovery of Aspergillus spp. by terminal subculture was less successful in
the case of the hyphal concentrations, especially at lower concentrations (25 and 2.5
c.f.u/10ml). The recovery of all four species was successful at the highest
concentration of 2500 c.f.u/10ml from both the SA and FAN bottles. A. flavus was
not recovered at any other hyphal concentration from the SA bottles. In the case of
the FAN aerobic bottles A. flavus was also recovered at a concentration of 250
c.f.u/10ml but not at the lowest hyphal concentrations (25 and 2.5 c.f.u/10ml).
51
A. fumigatus was recovered at all hyphal concentrations from both bottles,
except from the FAN aerobic bottles inoculated at a concentration of 2.5 c.f.u/10ml.
In contrast, A. terreus was recovered at all concentrations from the FAN bottles
except from the SA bottle inoculated at the lowest concentration. A. niger was
recovered from both bottles at the highest concentrations and at a concentration of
2.5 c.f.u/10ml for the FAN aerobic bottle but not at a concentration of 25
c.f.u/10ml. No growth was observed from the negative controls.
Lack of growth in the bottles inoculated with the hyphal concentrations is
likely due to the limitation of the procedure carried out for the preparation of the
hyphal concentrations. The ideal method for the preparation of the hyphal inocula
was described by Sande, Travakol, Vianen & Bakker-Woudenberg (2009) in which
a sonicator was utilised. Since the latter instrument was not available this method
could not be applied. The likely cause of this problem is the presence of uneven
concentrations due to errors in fragmenting the hyphal clumps.
Figure 3.4: Subcultures of A. fumigatus (left) and A. flavus (right) on Sabouraud
Dextrose Agar
52
Figure 3.5: Subcultures of A. niger (left) and A. terreus (right) on Sabouraud Dextrose
Agar
3.1.5. Recovery of yeast from negative blood culture
A total of hundred negative blood cultures were sub-cultured using the novel
sub-culture technique (Rosa et al., 2011) onto Sabouraud Dextrose agar. These blood
cultures were incubated for 10 days and the machine (BacT/Alert automater) did not
detect any growth in them, therefore these are normally issued as negative. One of
these blood cultures resulted in growth on terminal sub-culture. Yeast-like colonies
were observed after 24 hours incubation at 30oC. These appeared to be white/cream
in colour and smooth. The yeast was sub-cultured on Brilliance Candida Agar
(Oxoid) and identified as Candida tropicalis which is commonly known to cause
septicaemia.
53
Table 3.2: Results showing time of growth at different conidial concentrations in both SA and FAN bottles & results of terminal subcultures
Organism Concentration
(c.f.u/10ml)
Time of growth
(Hours)
SA
Time of growth
(Hours)
FAN
Terminal
Subculture
SA
Terminal
Subculture
FAN
A. fumigatus 2500 24 24 P P
250 48 48 P P
25 48 96 P P
2.5 72 120 P P
NC NG NG NG NG
A. flavus 2500 24 24 P P
250 24 24 P P
25 48 48 P P
2.5 120 72 P NG
NC NG NG NG NG
A. niger 2500 48 48 P P
250 48 48 P P
25 72 96 P P
2.5 120 96 P NG
NC NG NG NG NG
A. terreus 2500 24 48 P P
250 48 48 P P
25 48 72 P P
2.5 72 96 P P
NC NG NG NG NG
Legend:
NG = No Growth
NC = Negative Control
P = Positive growth
54
Table 3.3: Results showing time of growth at different hyphal concentrations in both SA and FAN bottles & results of terminal subcultures
Organism Concentration
(c.f.u/10ml)
Time of growth
(Hours)
SA
Time of growth
(Hours)
FAN
Terminal
Subculture
SA
Terminal
Subculture
FAN
A. fumigatus 2500 48 48 P P
250 48 96 P P
25 96 120 P P
2.5 120 NG P NG
NC NG NG NG NG
A. flavus 2500 24 48 P P
250 NG 48 NG P
25 NG NG NG NG
2.5 NG NG NG NG
NC NG NG NG NG
A. niger 2500 48 48 P P
250 48 48 P P
25 NG NG NG NG
2.5 NG NG NG P
NC NG NG NG NG
A. terreus 2500 24 48 P P
250 48 48 P P
25 48 96 P P
2.5 120 NG NG P
NC NG NG NG NG
Legend:
NG = No Growth
NC = Negative Control
P = Positive growth
N = Negative growth
55
3.2. Statistical analysis
3.2.1. Comparison of results with results of published study
Since no raw data was presented in the study by Rosa et al. (2011), no
statistical tests could be carried out to compare the studies. Instead, a similar graph
was plotted and compared visually, as can be seen in the figures below:
Figure 3.6: Graph comparing the detection of growth of A. fumigatus by the BACTEC
automated system; the grey, white and black bars represent the BACTEC Plus
Aerobic/F, Mycosis-IC/F and Myco/F Lytic bottles respectively, as presented in the
study by Rosa et al. (2011)
Figure 3.7: Graph comparing the detection time of growth of A. fumigatus using the
BacT/Alert SA and FAN aerobic bottles
56
When comparing the results of growth in the Aerobic/F, Mycosis-IC/F
BACTEC bottles (Rosa et al., 2011), with the SA and FAN aerobic BacT/Alert
bottles used in this study, similar results were obtained in both studies at the highest
conidial concentrations (2500 and 250 c.f.u/10ml). However, at a concentration of
250 c.f.u/10ml, growth was detected after 25 hours for the BACTEC bottles, whilst
for the BacT/Alert bottles growth was detected after 48 hours.
In the case of the lower concentrations (25 and 2.5 c.f.u/10ml), both the
Aerobic/F and Mycosis-IC/F BACTEC vials produced similar results when
compared to the BacT/Alert vials. In the latter, growth was more easily detectable in
the SA BacT/Alert bottles at low concentrations, when compared to the FAN aerobic
bottles.
The overall time of growth of A. fumigatus ranged between 20 and 99 hours for
the BACTEC vials, whilst for the BacT/Alert vials, the time of growth ranged
between 24 and 120 hours. On the other hand, A. flavus and A. niger were detected
after approximately 50 and 37 hours respectively in the study by Rosa et al. (2011),
whereas in this study all four organisms were detected at similar times, either 24 or
48 hours after inoculation.
Overall, when comparing both blood culture systems, the BACTEC produced
better results when compared to the BacT/Alert system. This can be easily identified
from the graphs in figures 3.6 and figure 3.7 where the overall detection time of
growth in the BacT/Alert vials is greater than in the BACTEC vials. Thus, the
57
Aspergillus spp. required less hours for growth in the BACTEC vials than in the
BacT/Alert vials indicating that the BACTEC system is the better choice, although
this could not be statistically verified.
3.2.2. Testing for normality – The Shapiro Wilk’s Test
We are interested in testing the effect of different types of blood culture media
on the time of growth using statistical tests.
However before deciding which statistical test can be used it is important to
check if the dependent variable ‘time’ follows a normal distribution. This is done
using the Shapiro Wilk’s test which tests the following hypotheses.
Ho: The variable ‘Time’ is normally distributed
H1: The variable ‘Time’ is not normally distributed
The following output is obtained:
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
Time in hours .321 52 .000 .835 52 .000
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
58
As can be seen in the table above, the p-value from the Shapiro-Wilk’s test
obtained is 0.000 which is smaller than 0.05 hence we reject the null hypothesis Ho
and accept H1. Therefore we can conclude that the variable ‘time’ is not normally
distributed hence non-parametric tests will be used.
3.2.3. Comparison of results: The Kruskal-Wallis Test
3.2.3.1. Comparison of SA and FAN BacT/Alert bottles
Since the variable ‘time’ is not normally distributed the Kruskal-Wallis test
will be used. The following hypotheses can be tested for the results of the conidial
inocula:
Ho: Average time of growth is the same for each bottle type
H1: Average time of growth is not the same for all bottle types
After performing the test, the following SPSS output was obtained:
Ranks
BacT/Alert Blood
Culture Bottle
N Mean
Rank
Time in
hours
SA 16 14.97
FAN 16 18.03
Total 32
Test Statisticsa,b
Time in hours
Chi-Square .932
Df 1
Asymp. Sig. .334
a. Kruskal Wallis Test
b. Grouping Variable:
BacT/Alert Blood Culture
Bottle
59
Since the p-value obtained is 0.334 and greater than 0.05, then we accept H0 showing
that the type of bottle does not affect the time of growth.
The same hypotheses can be tested for the results of the hyphal inocula. The
following output is obtained:
Since the p value obtained is also greater than 0.05, then we accept H0 showing
that the type of bottle does not affect the time of growth even in the case of the
hyphal inocula.
3.2.3.2. Comparing results of conidial and hyphal inocula
The following hypotheses can be tested:
Ho: The type of inoculum does not affect the time of growth
H1: The type of inoculum affects the time of growth
Ranks
BacT/Alert Blood
Culture Bottle
N Mean
Rank
Time in
hours
SA 10 9.35
FAN 10 11.65
Total 20
Test Statisticsa,b
Time in hours
Chi-Square 1.047
Df 1
Asymp. Sig. .306
a. Kruskal Wallis Test
b. Grouping Variable:
BacT/Alert Blood Culture
Bottle
60
The p value 0.864 is greater than 0.05, thus showing that the type of inoculum
does not affect the time of growth.
3.2.3.3. Comparing the effect of concentration on time
The effect of different conidial and hyphal concentrations on the time of
growth was determined using the Kruskal-Wallis test. The null and alternative
hypothesis will be as follows:
Ho: Concentration does not affect time
H1: Concentration has an effect on time
The following p-values were obtained:
P-Value
Conidial Inoculum SA 0.01
FAN 0.012
Hyphal Inoculum SA 0.116
FAN 0.043
Table 3.4: P-values obtained when testing the effect of concentration on time for both
the conidial and hyphal inocula
Ranks
Type of Inoculum N Mean Rank
Time in hours
Conidial Inoculum 32 26.23
Hyphal Inoculum 20 26.93
Total 52
Test Statisticsa,b
Time in
hours
Chi-Square .030
df 1
Asymp. Sig. .864
a. Kruskal Wallis Test
b. Grouping Variable: Type
of Inoculum
61
All the p-values obtained, except for the hyphal concentrations in the SA
bottles, are smaller than 0.05. Thus we reject H0 and accept H1 showing that
concentration affects the time of growth.
The test was also carried out in order to test the difference in the time of
growth between the highest (2500 and 250 CFU/10ml) and lowest concentrations (25
and 2.5 CFU/10ml). Table 3.5 illustrates the p-values obtained when comparing the
time of growth between the highest conidial and hyphal concentrations in the SA and
FAN aerobic bottles:
Conidial Inoculum Hyphal Inoculum
SA FAN SA FAN
High
Concentrations 0.186 0.495 0.180 0.317
Low
Concentrations 0.04 0.278 0.221 N/A
Table 3.5: P-values obtained when testing the difference in the time of growth between
the highest and lowest conidial and hyphal concentrations
All p-values obtained are greater than 0.05 except for the lowest conidial
concentrations in the SA bottles. The latter signifies that at lower concentrations
there is a significant difference in the time of growth. On the other hand the p-values
which are greater than 0.05 show that at higher concentrations the time of growth
does not vary significantly. This test could not be carried out for the results hyphal
62
concentrations in the FAN bottles since some bottles did not produce any growth and
no data was available.
3.2.3.4. Comparing the time of growth for each Aspergillus spp.
The line graphs below illustrate the time at which growth was detected at
different conidial concentrations for the SA and FAN aerobic BacT/Alert bottles.
Since no growth was observed at some hyphal concentrations, the graphs could not
be plotted.
Figure 3.8: Average time of growth for each Aspergillus spp. in the SA bottles
63
Figure 3.9: Average time of growth for each Aspergillus spp. in the FAN bottles
As can be observed from the graphs in Figure 3.8 and Figure 3.9, all four
organisms seem to have a similar average time of growth except for A. niger in the
SA bottles and A. flavus in the FAN bottles. The Kruskal-Wallis test was carried out
in order to confirm whether there is a significant difference in the time of growth
between all four species. According to the following hypotheses:
Ho: Different species produce similar results
H1: Different species produce different results
64
The following output was obtained:
Since the p-value obtained is greater than 0.05, then we accept H0, showing
that there isn’t a significant difference in the time of growth between the four
Aspergillus spp. even though A. niger had a greater average time of growth in the SA
bottles, compared to the other three species.
Ranks
Aspergillus species N Mean Rank
Time in
hours
A. fumigatus 4 8.00
A. flavus 4 6.63
A. niger 4 11.38
A. terreus 4 8.00
Total 16
Test Statisticsa,b
Time in hours
Chi-Square 2.440
df 3
Asymp. Sig. .486
a. Kruskal Wallis Test
b. Grouping Variable:
Aspergillus species
65
4. CHAPTER 4
DISCUSSION & CONCLUSION
66
4.1. Detection of fungi in automated blood culture systems: Comparison with
published studies
Several studies have been conducted in order to compare the BACTEC and
BacT/Alert blood culture systems. However, most of these studies were performed
solely for the detection of bacteria and yeasts. The reason behind the lack of such
studies for the detection of moulds such as Aspergillus spp. in blood culture systems
is due to the fact that the sensitivity of blood cultures for Aspergillus is extremely
low, most likely as a result of the production of airborne conidia rather than
waterborne ones.
Other structures, such as hyphae, can also be present in the bloodstream;
however it is argued that these may not proliferate in blood cultures thus reducing the
sensitivity of blood cultures for the detection of Aspergillus (Kami, Murashige,
Fujihara, Sakagami & Tanaka, 2005). It is also argued that in cases of disseminated
aspergillosis, hyphae are endocytosed by endothelial cells and the endocytosed
hyphae are not able to grow within blood cultures (Simoneau, Kelly, Labbe, Roy &
Laverdière (2005). Another factor which may play a role is the lack of carbon
dioxide production by certain fungal species in the blood culture vials (Fricker-
Hidalgo, Lebeau, Pelloux & Grillot, 2004).
Since Aspergillus is angioinvasive, it is argued that hyphal structures should be
found in the blood stream of patients with IA especially because haematogenous
spread to other organs occurs.
67
After carrying out this study, as well as comparing the results obtained with
those of the published study by Rosa et al. (2011), results have shown that it is, in
fact, possible to culture Aspergillus in both the BACTEC as well as the BacT/Alert
blood culture systems. Results have shown that most species are detected after
approximately 24 hours of incubation. When comparing both systems, the BACTEC
seemed to perform better. However, it must be taken into consideration that the
BacT/Alert automated machine was not utilised in this study, but rather, growth was
detected visually in order not to interfere with the workflow of the blood culture
laboratory. As a result, the time for the detection of growth might not have been very
accurate, that is growth could have been detected earlier if automation was used.
Most published works have tested the difference in the detection time of
growth between the two systems. One of the earliest studies carried out by Wilson et
al., (1992) (two years after the introduction of the BacT/Alert automated blood
culture system) demonstrated that the BacT/Alert system detects fungi (mainly
yeasts) much earlier than the BACTEC system. Mirrett et al., (2003), as well as
Hovarth et al. (2004) have also shown that the BacT/Alert system is better in the
detection of yeasts.
When comparing the BacT/Alert SA and FAN aerobic media statistically, no
significant difference (p>0.05) was observed between the two media for both the
conidial and hyphal inocula. The FAN aerobic medium is advantageous especially
when inoculating the media with the blood of patients taking antimicrobial agents. It
has been speculated that the Ecosorb supplement present within the FAN medium
68
might bind and inactivate antimicrobial agents thus reducing their inhibitory effects
and enhance growth (Smith, Bryce, Ngui-Yen & Roberts, 1995). Also, the use of
brain heart infusion broth present within the FAN medium, as opposed to the tryptic
soy broth in the SA medium, can enhance the recovery of such organisms (Weinstein
et al., 1995).
The BACTEC blood culture system includes a selective fungal medium: the
BACTEC Mycosis IC/F medium. The latter was developed in order to enhance the
detection of fungi from blood. This medium contains a lysing agent, chloramphenicol
in order to inhibit bacterial growth and other components, all of which enhance
fungal growth (Fricker-Hidalgo et al., 2004).
Unfortunately this type of medium also has its limitations such as the low
sensitivity for the detection of Aspergillus. This may lead to the conclusion that the
hypothesis of Aspergillus not growing would not be valid as this medium has a lytic
agent. Other limitations of this medium include additional volume of blood for
inoculation and it is very costly. As a result, most laboratories do not utilise this
medium and instead rely on terminal subcultures (Fricker-Hidalgo et al., 2004).
A study was also carried out in order to compare the BACTEC Mycosis IC/F
medium with the BacT/Alert FAN aerobic medium for the detection of fungaemia
(McDonald, Weinstein, Fune, Mirrett, Reimer & Barth Reller, 2001). Results have
shown that the FAN medium is more reliable in the detection of fungaemia due to
69
reasons mentioned previously such as the medium supplements which inactivate
antimicrobial agents.
A higher tendency of contamination with non-significant organisms in the FAN
aerobic media has also been described (Jorgensen et al., 1997). Similarly,
contamination was also observed in some of the FAN aerobic bottles in this study
and this was identified by terminal sub-culture. It is important to note that bacterial
contamination was also observed in the both the SA and FAN aerobic media. In fact,
a total of 8 SA and 6 FAN bottles were contaminated. However, contamination was
easily detected in the SA bottles as a result of turbidity within the medium. This was
not possible to detect in the dark-coloured FAN medium. In this case, the most
probable cause of contamination could be the result of a poor inoculation technique.
In order to solve this problem it was assumed that venting the FAN blood
cultures might reduce contamination. However, Weinstein et al. (1995) compared
unvented BacT/Alert FAN media to the SA BacT/Alert media and contamination
was observed in both media. This was also the case in this study, where bacterial
contamination most probably occurred during the inoculation of the bottles. The
latter is a problem which commonly results from skin commensals and is observed in
several microbiology laboratories (Weinstein, 2003). It is important to note, that
contamination did not, in any way, interfere with the results obtained, since fungal
growth was still observed in most bottles.
70
When taking into consideration the time of growth for all four Aspergillus spp.
no statistically significant difference (p>0.05) was observed in the detection time of
growth for both bottles. However, it is known that the conidia of A. fumigatus
germinate much faster than the other Aspergillus spp. Since this was not the case in
this study, the results obtained may be attributed to the fact that visual detection of
growth rather than detection via the automated system was performed.
With regards to the time of incubation, a total of 7 days may be required for the
growth of both moulds and yeasts. Several episodes of candidaemia have been
missed when a 5-day incubation period was applied (Hovarth et al., 2003) even
though a longer incubation period is more likely to result in contamination (Reisner
& Woods, 1996).
4.2. The Type of Inoculum
This study also tested whether growth is affected by the type of inoculum.
From the statistical analysis performed, there was no significant difference in the
time of growth (p>0.05) between the two inocula, taking into consideration the
limitation for the preparation of the hyphal inocula. Rosa et al. (2011) have also
tested the difference in the time of growth between the two inocula. The hyphal
inocula produced similar results to those of the conidial inocula. Therefore, the
detection time of growth was similar for both inocula and in both studies.
71
4.3. The ‘Novel’ (Rosa et al., 2011) subculture technique
In 2011, Rosa et al. proposed a new subculture technique which involves the
collection of a larger volume of culture medium (approximately 100µl), after
vigorously mixing the vial in order to dislodge the fungal ball. During this study, all
terminal subcultures were prepared using this technique and the latter was successful
in the recovery of all four Aspergillus spp. even at the lowest concentration (2.5
c.f.u/10ml). The routine method of subculture usually involves the collection of one
or two drops (25µl) of culture medium. Rosa et al (2011) compared the routine
technique with the ‘Novel’ technique. Results have shown that at a concentration of
25 c.f.u/10ml and lower concentrations, no Aspergillus spp. were recovered by the
classic subculture technique.
Overall, most laboratories often consider Aspergillus spp. as a contaminant
since Aspergilli are rarely recovered from blood cultures (Rosa et al., 2011). As a
matter of fact these results are, in most cases, interpreted as false-positives. Thus,
determining the presence of Aspergillus fungemia in immunocompromised patients
may be a limiting factor of blood culture systems as a result of what is falsely
interpreted as contamination (Girmenia, Gucci & Martino, 2001). Since this issue
was not properly being handled and blood cultures were being carelessly analysed, a
new subculture technique was proposed which was successful in the recovery of
Aspergillus even at very low concentrations (3 c.f.u/10ml) (Rosa et al., 2011).
72
In certain cases, during this study, it was difficult to visually identify growth,
especially in the FAN bottles due to the dark-coloured medium. Growth was thus
confirmed through the preparation of terminal subcultures using the ‘novel’ method
(Rosa et al., 2011). When taking into consideration the conidial inocula, this
proposed subculture technique was successful in the recovery of all four species,
even at the lowest conidial concentrations of 2.5 c.f.u/10ml. In fact, the growth of A.
flavus was not visually detected after 7 days, in any of the 3 bottles inoculated with a
concentration of 2.5 c.f.u/10ml. However, after performing terminal subculture, A.
flavus was recovered from one of the bottles.
When looking at the results of the hyphal inocula, growth could not be detected
in any of the FAN bottles inoculated with the lowest concentration of 2.5 c.f.u/10ml.
Upon preparing terminal subcultures, A. terreus and A. niger were recovered on solid
media from one out of the three bottles. Thus, this subculture technique has
overcome the limitations of the routine method. If this technique is applied, then
there is a greater probability of increasing the detection of Aspergillosis (Rosa et al.,
2011).
4.4. The importance of terminal subcultures from negative blood cultures
The value of terminal sub-cultures on negative blood cultures was evaluated in
this study. Several studies have been carried out and questioned the necessity of
performing terminal subcultures. From this study the importance of terminal
subcultures performed on negative blood cultures, especially in patients with
73
suspected fungaemia has been confirmed. Terminal sub-cultures were performed on
one hundred negative blood cultures which contained the blood of neutropenic,
septic and immunosuppressed patients. Out of the hundred samples, a positive
terminal sub-culture was obtained. The organism identified was the yeast Candida
tropicalis. During the period of the study there were no confirmed cases of invasive
aspergillosis, therefore the technique of terminal subculture applied in this study
could not be applied to blood cultures taken from such patients.
From the early 1980’s, studies were carried and evaluated the necessity of
terminal subcultures from negative blood cultures. The following findings were
obtained from these studies:
Campbell and Washington II (1980) were the first to test the value of terminal
subcultures. Two terminal subcultures yielded significant growth from 2780
negative bottles;
In the study by Gill (1981) 12 significant organisms were identified from
14,000 negative bottles;
Araj, Hopfer, Wenglar & Fainstein (1981), identified 15 positive cultures from
5354 previously negative blood cultures. The only fungus which was identified
is Cryptococcus neoformans.
The majority of these studies have shown that the isolates detected through
terminal subcultures had already been previously isolated from another bottle of the
same pair or a matching bottle belonging to the same set (Campbell & Washington
II, 1980; Gill, 1981).
74
Therefore, from these studies the results suggest that even though the blood
culture media, subculture methods as well as the time of incubation varies between
different laboratories, terminal subcultures might be of little value. However, one
particular study showed that the major false-negatives involved patients with
Candida infections (Shigei et al., 1995). Borst Leverstein-Van Hall, Verhoef and
Fluit (2000) also proved the importance of terminal subcultures from blood cultures
in patients with invasive candidiasis.
A more recent study conducted by Hovarth et al. (2004) detected Candida spp.
from 65 false negatives. Sixty-five out of 300 bottles showed no growth but after
performing terminal subcultures, all 65 bottles demonstrated the growth of pure yeast
colonies (Hovarth et al., 2004). Fifty of these bottles were of the BACTEC system,
however only 5 of these were aerobic; the other 15 bottles were of the BacT/Alert
system. Thus, this study also compared the BACTEC and BacT/Alert blood culture
systems.
At MDH, terminal subcultures are only performed on blood cultures sent for
mycology investigations, which include 2 aerobic bottles with a request for
mycology investigations. This could mean that some cases of fungaemia are being
missed as not all patients at risk have blood cultures taken for mycology
investigations.
Overall, the preparation of terminal subcultures has proved to be of vital
importance, especially in the detection of yeasts from previously negative bottles
75
following the incubation period. The detection of Aspergilli from immunosuppressed
and neutropenic patients must not be excluded and terminal subcultures should also
be performed in cases where patients have a positive galactomannan antigen.
4.5. Limitations
Unfortunately, this study faced several limitations. One of the main limitations
was the fact that the blood culture bottles were not incubated in the BacT/Alert
automated system in order to detect growth, due to the lack of space in the machine
utilised in the blood cultures laboratory at the Microbiology department of MDH and
to avoid disturbing the workflow of the blood culture laboratory. As a result, the
detection of growth was detected visually and thus lacked accuracy.
The BacT/Alert blood culture system is a continuous-monitoring device
(Weinstein, 1996) where positive cultures are detected upon the production of carbon
dioxide. The system monitors both the initial as well as the increased concentrations
of carbon dioxide (Kocoglu, Bayram & Balct, 2005) and is thus accurate in detecting
the time of growth. Since the bottles were checked every 24 hours, it could be the
case that there was growth beforehand, especially at the highest concentration (2500
c.f.u/10ml).
In order to minimise the effects of this limitation, similar conditions were
applied including the temperature of incubation (35oC), as well as agitation of the
blood culture vials. The automated system provides constant agitation of the bottles
76
and thus, in order to provide the same conditions, the bottles were agitated once a
day. Unfortunately, these could not be constantly agitated.
Early studies show that agitation decreases the detection time of growth
(Hawkins, Peterson de la Maza, 1986) due to an increase in the oxygen concentration
within the medium. However, others argue that if this principle was correct, then
hardly any organisms would grow in anaerobic blood cultures. This was evaluated in
several studies which have shown that automated systems that do not agitate
anaerobic bottles also recover anaerobic microorganisms from anaerobic blood
cultures (Wilson & Weinstein, 1994; Reimer, Wilson & Weinstein, 1997). Thus,
agitation may improve the yield and detection time of positive cultures but lack of
agitation will not affect positivity of growth.
Another important limitation with regards to the visual detection of growth is
the FAN aerobic blood culture bottle. The latter posed a problem as the dark colour
of the medium made it difficult to visually detect the presence of growth. Due to this,
recorded time for growth could have been greater than the actual time as there might
have already been positive growth within the bottle. In studies where the BacT/Alert
FAN aerobic and the BacT/Alert SA media were compared, the detection time of
growth of most organisms was shorter in the FAN aerobic medium (Weinstein et al.,
1995). However, it is important to note that such study did not test for the growth of
moulds such as Aspergillus spp. but was mainly based on bacteria and yeasts. The
new FAN bottles have been recently changed, and are now utilising a resin. The
contents are now clear, therefore growth would be easily visualised.
77
The method utilised in order to prepare the hyphal concentrations was not ideal
for this study. The method for the preparation of hyphal inocula was described by
Sande et al. (2009), where the hyphal clumps were homogenised using a sonicator at
a wavelength of 660nm. Through this method, the amount of hyphae present within
the hyphal clumps can be known (Sande et al., 2009). Unfortunately, a sonicator was
not available at the Microbiology or Mycology laboratories of MDH and this
technique could not be carried out.
The hyphal suspensions were thus prepared in the same way as the conidial
suspensions. Glass beads were used to break the hyphal clumps during vortexing, but
this technique was not successful at doing that. Due to the presence of large hyphal
fragments, it was difficult to break them up. As a result, these fragments were present
and the suspensions prepared were of unequal concentrations. This is the most
probable reason behind the lack of growth observed in most blood culture bottles
inoculated with the hyphal suspensions. However this may shed some light on the
fact that although Aspergillus is angioinvasive and spreads via the blood stream, it is
not found in blood cultures. It could be the case that clumps of hyphae are very few
in the blood stream, for the simple reason that hyphae do not break up easily into
smaller fragments.
During the preparation of the terminal subcultures, a 21G Vacuette® blood
collection needle was utilised. However, when aspirating the culture medium, the
fungal clumps blocked the needle and thus it was difficult to aspirate the medium
into the vacutainer. This could be due to the attachment of the fungus to the Ecosorb
78
particles present within the medium. As a result the process was time consuming.
The bottles required long periods of agitation in order to try and dislodge the fungal
balls, even though most of the time, the fungal clumps remained intact. Ultimately, a
small volume of the medium was aspirated.
4.6. Conclusion
The Galactomannan antigen assay still remains the Gold Standard test in the
diagnosis of Invasive Aspergillosis (IA) and thus cannot replace the detection of
Aspergillus by blood cultures systems. However, it would be ideal if such systems
could be utilised as a diagnostic test. Culture means that the identity of the fungus
can be obtained and material for susceptibility testing is available. From this study
and that by Rosa et al. (2011), it can be concluded that both the BACTEC as well as
the BacT/Alert blood culture systems support the growth of Aspergillus spp.
Most studies have shown that the BacT/Alert is more efficient and detects
organisms at an earlier stage. Since the two systems could not be compared
statistically, due to lack of data presented in the study by Rosa et al. (2011), results
were only compared visually. Also, if the BacT/Alert automated machine was
utilised, it is most likely that the detection time of growth would be shorter than
those obtained in this study. Ideally, a study should be carried out to confirm the
comparison between the BACTEC and BacT/Alert systems solely for the detection
of moulds using the automated system in order to produce more accurate results.
79
In order to confirm whether Aspergillus spp. can be isolated from
immunocompromised hosts with invasive aspergillosis, a study can be carried out
where blood samples are collected from patients already diagnosed with IA,
inoculated in both the SA and FAN blood culture media and incubated for a total of 7
days. This will allow the direct detection of Aspergillus from infected hosts and thus
conclude whether blood culture systems can be useful for the detection of such
species. Since Aspergillus may be found as a few clumps, multiple blood culture
bottles may be needed to culture a relatively large volume of blood. Other studies can
also be carried out in order to compare the time and cost for other methods of
identification including molecular based techniques such as PCR.
The ‘novel’ subculture technique should also be applied in laboratories as it has
been concluded that this newly proposed technique enhances the recovery of fungi
when compared to the routine sub-culture technique. Until further improvements are
made, it is still suggested that clinical laboratories perform terminal subcultures on
negative blood cultures, especially in immunocompromised and neutropenic hosts
where bloodstream infections caused by fungi are suspected (Hovarth et al., 2004).
Due to the increased morbidity and mortality as a consequence of neutropenia
and immunosuppression, it would be ideal if such fungi can be isolated through rapid
and reliable techniques such as blood culture systems. As a result this will provide an
early diagnosis and improve the management of patients with IA as well as
candidaemia. Cultures are important material both for identification of fungi and also
for susceptibility testing if required.
80
REFERENCES
Anzai K., Mayuzumi S., Nakashima T., Sato H., Inaba S., Park J. Y., . . . Ando K.
(2008). Comparison of groupings among members of the genus Aspergillus
based on phylogeny and production of bioactive compounds. Bioscience
Biotechnology & Biochemistry, 72(8), 2199-202. Doi:10.1271/bbb.80123
Araj G. F, Hopfer R. L., Wenglar M. & Fainstein V. (1981). Valuable of terminal
subcultures from negative BACTEC blood culture bottles. Journal of Clinical
Microbiology, 14(5), 589–590.
Araujo R., Rodrigues A. G., Pina-Vaz C. (2004). A fast, practical and reproducible
procedure for the standardization of the cell density of an Aspergillus
suspension. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 53(8), 783-6.
Arendrup M. K., Sulim S., Holm A., Nielsen L., Nielsen S. D., Knudsen J. D., . . .
Johansen H. K. 2001. Diagnostic issues clinical characteristics and outcomes
for patients with fungemia. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 39(10), 3466-
3471. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.10.3466-3471.2001
Baddley J. W. (2011). Clinical risk factors for invasive aspergillosis. Medical
Mycology, 49, 7-12. doi: 10.3109/13693786.2010.505204
Barnes P. D., Marr K.A. (2007). Risks, diagnosis and outcomes of invasive fungal
infections in haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. British Journal of
Haematology, 139(4), 519-31
81
Becton Dickinson and Company. (2012). BD BACTEC™ Instrumented Blood
Culture Systems. Retrieved from http://www.bd.com/ds/productCenter/BC-
Bactec.asp
BioMérieux Canada (n.d). BacT/ALERT® 3D Microbial Detection System. Retrieved
from
http://www.biomerieux.ca/servlet/srt/bio/canada/dynPage?open=CAN_IND_B
PA_PRD&doc=CAN_IND_BPA_PRD_G_PRD_NDY_2&pubparams.sform=
1&lang=ca_en
Borst A., Leverstein-Van Hall M., Verhoef J., Fluit A. (2000). Value of terminal
subculture of automated blood cultures in patients with invasive candidiasis.
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 19(10),
803-5.
Bose I., Reese A. J., Ory J. J., Janbon G., Doering T. L. (2003). A yeast under cover:
the capsule of Cryptococcus neoformans. Eukaryotic Cell, 2(4), 655-63. DOI:
10.1128/EC.2.4.655–663.2003
Campbell J., Washington J. A. 2nd. (1980). Evaluation of the necessity for routine
terminal subcultures of previously negative blood cultures. Journal of Clinical
Microbiology, 12(4), 576-8.
Chang H. C., Leaw S. N., Huang A. H., Wu T. L., Chang T. C. (2001). Rapid
Identification of Yeasts in Positive Blood Cultures by a Multiplex PCR
Method. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 39(10), 3466-3471. doi: 10.1128/
JCM.39.10.3466-3471.2001
82
Cheng M. F., Yang Y. L., Yao T. J., Lin C. Y., Liu J. S., Tang R. B., . . . Lo H. J.
(2005). Risk factors for fatal candidemia caused by Candida albicans and non-
albicans Candida species. BMC Infectious Diseases, 5, 22. doi:10.1186/1471-
2334-5-22
Chakrabarti A. (2005). Microbiology of systemic fungal infections. Journal of
Postgraduate Medicine, 51(1), 16-20.
Charlier C., Hart E., Lefort A., Ribaud P., Dromer F, Denning D. W., Lortholary O.
(2006). Fluconazole for the management of invasive candidiasis: where do we
stand after 15 years? Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 57(3), 384-410.
doi: 10.1093/jac/dki473
Cortez K. J., Roilides E., Quiroz-Telles F., Meletiadis J., Antachopoulos C., Knudsen
T. … Walsh T. J. (2008). Infections Caused by Scedosporium spp. Clinical
Microbiology Reviews, 21(1), 157–197.
Cuenca-Estrella M., Bassetti M., Lass-Flörl C., Rácil Z., Richardson M., Rogers T.
R. (2011). Detection and investigation of invasive mould disease. Journal of
Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 66(1), 15-24. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq438
Dagenais T. R., Keller N. P. (2009). Pathogenesis of Aspergillus fumigatus in
Invasive Aspergillosis. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 22(3), 447-65. doi:
10.1128/CMR.00055-08
Dornbusch H. J., Groll A., Walsh T. J. (2010). Diagnosis of invasive fungal
infections in immunocompromised children. Clinical Microbiology and
Infection, 16(9), 1328-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03336.x.
83
Dupont B. F., Lortholary O., Ostrosky-Zeichner L., Stucker F., Yeldandi V. (2009).
Treatment of candidemia and invasive candidiasis in the intensive care unit:
post hoc analysis of a randomized, controlled trial comparing micafungin and
liposomal amphotericin B. Critical Care, 13(1), 59. doi:10.1186/cc8117
Fricker-Hidalgo H., Lebeau B., Pelloux H., Grillot R (2004). Use of the BACTEC
9240 System with Mycosis-IC/F Blood Culture Bottles for Detection of
Fungemia. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 42(4), 1855–1856. doi:
10.1128/JCM.42.4.1855-1856.2004
Fridkin S. K., Jarvis W.R. (1996). Epidemiology of nosocomial fungal infections.
Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 9(4), 499-511.
Gill V. J. Lack of clinical relevance in routine terminal subculturing of blood
cultures. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 14(1), 116–118.
Girmenia C., Nucci M., Martino P. (2001). Clinical significance of Aspergillus
fungaemia in patients with haematological malignancies and invasive
aspergillosis. British Journal of Haematology, 114(1), 93-8.
Harwood J. (2010). Laboratory Investigations of viral infections. In M. Ford,
Medical Microbiology. (pp. 253-255). Oxford University Press
Hawkins B. L., Peterson E. M., de la Maza L. M. (1986). Improvement of positive
blood culture detection by agitation. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious
Disease, 5(3):207-13.
Horn D. L., Neofytos D., Anaissie E. J., Fishman J. A., Steinbach W. J., Olyaei A. J.,
. . . Webster K. M. (2009). Epidemiology and outcomes of candidemia in 2019
84
patients: data from the prospective antifungal therapy alliance registry. Clinical
Infectious Diseases, 48(12), 1695-703. doi: 10.1086/599039
Horvath L. L., George B. J., Murray C. K., Harrison L. S., Hospenthal D. R. (2004).
Direct comparison of the BACTEC 9240 and BacT/ALERT 3D automated
blood culture systems for candida growth detection. Journal of Clinical
Microbiology, 42(1), 115-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.1.115-118.2004
Jorgensen J. H., Mirrett S., McDonald L. C., Murray P. R., Weinstein M. P., Fune
J.,… Reller L. B. (1997). Controlled clinical laboratory comparison of
BACTEC plus aerobic/F resin medium with BacT/Alert aerobic FAN medium
for detection of bacteremia and fungemia. 35(1), 53-8.
Kami M., Murashige N., Fujihara T., Sakagami N., Tanaka Y. (2005). The
mechanism for low yield of blood culture in invasive aspergillosis; the clinical
importance of antigen detection tests revisited. Bone Marrow Transplantation,
36(1):85-6.
Khot P. D., Fredricks D. N. (2009). PCR-based diagnosis of human fungal infections.
Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy, 7(10),1201-21. doi:
10.1586/eri.09.104.
Kocoglu M. E., Bayram A. & Balct I. (2005). Evaluation of negative results of
BacT/Alert 3D automated blood culture system. Journal of Clinical
Microbiology, 43(3), 257-9.
Latgé J. P. (1999). Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillosis. Clinical Microbiology
Reviews, 12(2), 310–350.
85
Law D. (2010). Blood Cultures. In M. Ford, Medical Microbiology. (pp. 95). Oxford
University Press
Law D. (2010). Clinical Mycology. In M. Ford, Medical Microbiology. (pp. 253-
255). Oxford University Press
Liu P., Luo L., Guo J., Liu H., Wang B., Deng B., Long C. A., Cheng Y. (2010).
Farnesol induces apoptosis and oxidative stress in the fungal pathogen
Penicillium expansum. Mycologia, 102(2), 311-8.
Marr KA, Laverdiere M, Gugel A, Leisenring W. (2005). Antifungal therapy
decreases sensitivity of the Aspergillus galactomannan enzyme immunoassay.
The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 40(12), 1762-1769.
Martinez-Anaya C., Dickinson J. R., Sudbery P. E. (2003). In yeast, the
pseudohyphal phenotype induced by isoamyl alcohol results from the operation
of the morphogenesis checkpoint. Journal of Cell Science, 116(16), 3423-31.
doi:10.1242/jcs.00634
Mattei R., Savarino A., Fabbri M., Moneta S., Tortoli E. (2009). Use of the
BacT/Alert MB Mycobacterial Blood Culture System for Detection of
Mycobacteria in Sterile Body Fluids Other than Blood. Journal of Clinical
Microbiology, 47(3), 711-714. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01712-08
McDonald L.C., Weinstein M. P., Fune J., Mirrett S., Reimer L. G., Reller L. B.
(2001) Controlled comparison of BacT/ALERT FAN aerobic medium and
BACTEC fungal blood culture medium for detection of fungemia. Journal of
Clinical Microbiology, 39(2), 622-4.
86
Meyer M. H., Letscher-Bru V., Jaulhac B., Waller J., Candolfi E. (2004).
Comparison of Mycosis IC/F and plus Aerobic/F media for diagnosis of
fungemia by the bactec 9240 system. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 42(2),
773-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.2.773-777.2004
Mirrett S., Reller L. B., Petti C. A., Woods C. W., Vazirani B., Sivadas R.,
Weinstein M. P. (2003). Controlled Clinical Comparison of BacT/ALERT
Standard Aerobic Medium with BACTEC Standard Aerobic Medium for
Culturing Blood. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 41(6), 2391–2394.
Mukherjee J., Pirofski L. A., Scharff M. D., Casadevall A. (1993). Antibody-
mediated protection in mice with lethal intracerebral Cryptococcus neoformans
infection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 90(8), 3636-40.
Nucci M., Anaissie E. (2007). Fusarium infections in immunocompromised patients.
Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 20(4), 695-704. Doi:10.1128/CMR.00014-07
Nucci M., Marr K. A. (2005). Emerging fungal diseases. Clinical Infectious
Diseases, 41(4), 521-6. doi: 10.1086/432060
Nurzyńska-Flak J., Zawitkowska-Klaczyńska J., Kowalczyk J. R. (2004). The
radiologic diagnosis of invasive fungal infections in neutropenic children.
Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie Skłodowska, 59(2), 184-8.
Pasqualotto A., Denning D. W. (2005). Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Infections –
Current Limitations of Classical and New Diagnostic Methods. European
Oncology Review, 1(11).
87
Perfect J. R., Cox G. M., Lee J. Y., Kauffman C. A., De Repentigny L., Chapman S.
W., . . . Stevens D. A. (2001). The Impact of Culture Isolation of Aspergillus
Species: A Hospital-Based Survey of Aspergillosis. Clinical Infectious
Diseases, 33(11), 1824-1833. doi: 10.1086/323900
Pfeiffer C. D., Fine J. P., Safdar N. (2006). Diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis using
a galactomannan assay: a meta-analysis. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 42(10),
1417-27.
Posteraro B., Torelli R., De Carolis E., Posteraro P., Sanguinetti M. (2011). Update
on the laboratory diagnosis of invasive fungal infections. Mediterranean
Journal of Hematology and Infectious Diseases, 3(1). doi:
10.4084/MJHID.2011.002.
Reichenberger F., Habicht J. M., Gratwohl A., Tamm M. (2002). Diagnosis and
treatment of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in neutropenic patients.
European Respiratory Journal, 19(4), 743-55. DOI:
10.1183/09031936.02.00256102
Reimer L. G., Wilson M. L., Weinstein M. P. (1997). Update on detection of
bacteremia and fungemia. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 10(3), 444-65.
Reisner B.S., Woods G. L. (1999). Times to detection of bacteria and yeasts in
BACTEC 9240 blood culture bottles. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 37(6),
2024-6.
Rohner P., Pepey B., Auckenthaler R. (1995). Comparison of BacT/Alert with Signal
blood culture system. Journal of Medical Microbiology, 33(2), 313-317.
88
Rosa C., Araujo R., Rodrigues A. G., Pinto-de-Sousa M. I., Pina-Vaz C. (2011).
Detection of Aspergillus species in BACTEC blood cultures, Journal of
Medical Microbiology, 60(10), 1467-1471. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.030601-0
Ryan R. J., Ray C. G., Ahmad N., Drew W. L., Plorde J. J. (2010). Sherris Medical
Microbiology. USA: McGraw-Hill
Sande W. V., Tavakol M., Vianen W. V., Bakker-Woudenberg I. A. (2010). The
effects of antifungal agents to conidial and hyphal forms of Aspergillus
fumigatus. Medical Mycology, 48, 48–55.
SciQuip Ltd: The Scientific Equipment Specialists (n.d). Conical Skirted Bottom
Universal Sample Tube. Retrieved from
http://www.sciquip.co.uk/store/products/conical-skirted-universal-sample-tube/
Shenoy M. M., Teerthanath S., Karnaker V. K., Girisha B. S., Krishna Prasad M. S.,
Pinto J. (2008). Comparison of potassium hydroxide mount and mycological
culture with histopathologic examination using periodic acid-Schiff staining of
the nail clippings in the diagnosis of onychomycosis. Indian Journal of
Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, 74(3), 226-9.
Shigei J. T., Shimabukuro J. A., Pezzlo M. P., De La Maza L. M., Peterson E. M.
(1995). Value of terminal subcultures for blood cultures monitored by
BACTEC 9240. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 33(5), 1385–1388.
Simoneau E., Kelly M., Labbe A. C., Roy J., Laverdière M. (2005). What is the
clinical significance of positive blood cultures with Aspergillus sp in
hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients? A 23 year experience. Bone
Marrow Transplantation, 35(3), 303-6.
89
Smith J. A., Bryce E. A., Ngui-Yen J. H., Roberts F. J. (1995). Comparison of
BACTEC 9240 and BacT/Alert blood culture systems in an adult hospital.
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 33(7), 1905-8.
Søgaard M., Hjort U., Højbjerg T., Schønheyder H. C. (2006). Detection of
candidaemia in high risk patients: can yield of blood cultures be improved by
blind subculture?. Scandinavian journal of infectious disease, 38(3), 187-91.
DOI: 10.1080/00365540500388842
Thrope T. C., Wilson M. L., Turner J. E., DiGuiseppi J. L., Willert M., Mirrett S.,
Barth Reller L. (1990). BacT/Alert: an automated colorimetric microbial
detection system. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 28(7), 1608–1612.
Verdaguer V., Walsh T. J., Hope W., Cortez K. J. (2007). Galactomannan antigen
detection in the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis. Expert Review of Molecular
Diagnostics, 7(1), 21-32.
Webster J., Weber R. W. S. (2007). Introduction to Fungi. New York: Cambridge
University Press
Wells G.B., Dickson R. C, Lester R. L. (1996). Isolation and composition of
inositolphosphorylceramide-type sphingolipids of hyphal forms of Candida
albicans. Journal of Bacteriology, 178(21), 6223–6226.
Weinstein M. P. (1996). Current Blood Culture Methods and Systems: Clinical
Concepts, Technology, and Interpretation of Results. Clinical Infectious
Diseases, 23, 40-46
90
Weinstein M. P., Mirrett S., Reimer L. G., Wilson M. L., Smith-Elekes S., Chuard C.
R., . . . Reller L. B. (1995). Controlled evaluation of BacT/Alert standard
aerobic and FAN aerobic blood culture bottles for detection of bacteremia and
fungemia. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 33(4), 978-81.
Wheat L. J., Walsh T. J. (2008). Diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis by
galactomannan antigenemia detection using an enzyme immunoassay.
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 27(4), 245-
51. doi: 10.1007/s10096-007-0437-7.
Wilson M. L., Mirrett S., Reller L. B., Weinstein M. P., Reimer L. G. (1993).
Recovery of clinically important microorganisms from the BacT/Alert blood
culture system does not require testing for seven days. Diagnostic
Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 16(1), 31-4.
Wilson M. L., Weinstein M. P., Mirrett S., Reimer L. G., Feldman R. J., Chuard C.
R., Reller L. B. (1995). Controlled evaluation of BacT/alert standard anaerobic
and FAN anaerobic blood culture bottles for the detection of bacteremia and
fungemia. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 33(9), 2265–2270.
Wilson M. L., Weinstein M. P., Reimer L. G., Mirrett S., Reller L. B. (1992).
Controlled comparison of the BacT/Alert and BACTEC 660/730
nonradiometric blood culture systems. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 30(2),
323-9.
91
APPENDIX
92
Preparation of Culture Media I.
Sabouraud Dextrose Agar
Sixty-five grams of Sabouraud Dextrose Agar were weighed for each litre of
agar prepared. After weighing, the powder was transferred into a clean conical flask
and topped with 1 litre of distilled water. The contents were mixed thoroughly
allowing the powder to dissolve. Each flask was then placed in an autoclave and
sterilized at 121oC for 15 minutes. After allowing the mixture to cool and reach
50oC, 25ml of the medium was poured into sterile Petri dishes. This was carried out
in a laminar flow hood so as to prevent any contamination. After allowing the media
to solidify the plates were labelled with the batch number and expiry date.
Figure I: Media Preparation & Quality Control form showing the materials used as
well as the preparation procedure of Sabouraud Dextrose Agar
93
Sabouraud broth
Ten grams of peptone and 40g of glucose were weighed in order to prepare one
litre of Sabouraud broth. A total of 4 litres were prepared, one litre in each separate
flask. The contents were transferred into each flask and mixed well with one litre of
distilled water. The prepared media were then autoclaved at 121oC for 15 minutes.
Figure II: Media Preparation & Quality Control form showing the materials used as
well as the preparation procedure of Sabouraud Broth
94
Quality Control of Media II.
Sabouraud Dextrose Agar
The pH of the medium was checked using a pH meter. The intended pH of the
medium is 5.6 ± 0.2. A sterility check was performed by incubating three plates at
30oC for 3 days. Positive controls were prepared from clinical isolates of Candida
albicans (ATCC 102131), Aspergillus niger (ATCC 28191) and Trichophyton
rubrum (ATCC 16404).The plates were inoculated with the organisms and incubated
at 28oC for three days after which growth was observed.
Figure III: Media Preparation & Quality Control form showing the QC procedure
carried out on the prepared Sabouraud Dextrose Agar plates
95
Tables of Results III.
Table I: Results showing number of bottles (out of 3) with positive growth after 7 days
in SA bottles (conidial inoculum)
FAN Concentration (c.f.u/10ml)
2500 250 25 2.5 Negative Control
A. fumigatus 3 3 3 2 0
A. flavus 3 3 2 1 0
A niger 3 2 1 0 0
A. terreus 3 3 2 1 0
Table II: Results showing number of bottles (out of 3) with positive growth after 7 days
in FAN bottles (conidial inoculum)
Cont. = contaminated
SA Concentration (c.f.u/10ml)
2500 250 25 2.5 Negative Control
A. fumigatus 3 3 3 1 0
A. flavus 3 3 1
(1 cont.)
0 1 cont.
A niger 3 3 3 1 1 cont.
A. terreus 3 3 3 1
(1 cont.)
0
96
Table III: Results showing number of bottles (out of 3) with positive growth after 7
days in SA bottles (hyphal inoculum)
FAN Concentration (c.f.u/10ml)
2500 250 25 2.5 Negative Control
A. fumigatus 3 2 3 0 0
A. flavus 2 1 0 0 0
A niger 3 3 0 0 0
A. terreus 3 3 1 1 0
Table IV: Results showing number of bottles (out of 3) with positive growth after 7
days in FAN bottles (hyphal inoculum)
SA Concentration (c.f.u/10ml)
2500 250 25 2.5 Negative Control
A. fumigatus 3 3 1 1 0
A. flavus 3 0 0 0 0
A niger 3 2 0 0 0
A. terreus 3 3 2 0 0
97
Table V: Results of terminal sub-cultures of SA bottles (out of 3) showing number of
plates with positive growth (conidial inoculum)
FAN Concentration (c.f.u/10ml)
2500 250 25 2.5 Negative Control
A. fumigatus 3 3 3 1 0
A. flavus 3 3 3 1 cont. 2 cont.
A niger 3 3 2 0 1 cont.
A. terreus 3 3 1
(1 cont.)
1 cont. 0
Table VI: Results of terminal sub-cultures of FAN bottles showing number of plates
(out of 3) with positive growth (conidial inoculum)
Cont. = contaminated
SA Concentration (c.f.u/10ml)
2500 250 25 2.5 Negative Control
A. fumigatus 3 2 2 1 0
A. flavus 3 3 2 1 1 cont.
A niger 3 3 3 1 1 cont.
A. terreus 3 3 1
(1 cont.)
1
(1 cont.)
0
98
Table VII: Results of terminal sub-cultures of SA bottles showing number of plates (out
of 3) with positive growth (hyphal inoculum)
FAN Concentration (c.f.u/10ml)
2500 250 25 2.5 Negative Control
A. fumigatus 3 3 3 0 0
A. flavus 2 1 0 0 0
A niger 3 3 0 1 0
A. terreus 3 3 2 1 0
Table VIII: Results of terminal sub-cultures of FAN bottles showing number of plates
(out of 3) with positive growth (hyphal inoculum)
SA Concentration (c.f.u/10ml)
2500 250 25 2.5 Negative Control
A. fumigatus 3 2 1 1 0
A. flavus 3 0 0 0 0
A niger 3 2 0 0 0
A. terreus 3 3 2 0 0
99
Automated negative blood culture samples and the results of terminal subcultures
Sample Clinical Details Growth
1 Immunosuppressed; neutropenia NG
2 Immunosuppressed; neutropenia NG
3 Immunosuppressed; neutropenia NG
4 Immunosuppressed; neutropenia NG
5 Immunosuppressed; neutropenia NG
6 Immunosuppressed; neutropenia NG
7 Febrile neutropenia NG
8 Febrile neutropenia NG
9 Neutropenia NG
10 Neutropenia NG
11 Febrile neutropenia NG
12 Neutropenia NG
13 Neutropenia NG
14 Febrile neutropenia NG
15 Neutropenia NG
16 Sepsis on chemotherapy NG
17 Febrile neutropenia NG
18 Febrile neutropenia NG
19 Febrile neutropenia NG
20 Febrile neutropenia NG
21 Lethargy; immunosuppression NG
22 Lethargy; immunosuppression NG
23 Immunosuppression with lymphadenopathy NG
24 Neutropenia NG
25 Febrile neutropenia NG
26 Febrile neutropenia NG
27 Febrile neutropenia NG
28 Febrile neutropenia NG
100
29 Febrile neutropenia NG
30 Febrile neutropenia NG
31 Neutropenia; sepsis NG
32 Neutropenia; sepsis NG
33 Neutropenia; fever NG
34 Neutropenia; fever NG
35 Febrile neutropenia NG
36 Febrile neutropenia NG
37 Immunosuppressed NG
38 Neutropenia; sepsis NG
39 Hypotension in immunocompromised patient NG
40 Hypotension in immunocompromised patient NG
41 Hypotension in immunocompromised patient NG
42 Hypotension in immunocompromised patient NG
43 Neutropenia; fever NG
44 Neutropenia; fever NG
45 Neutropenia; fever NG
46 Neutropenia; fever NG
47 Neutropenia; fever NG
48 Neutropenia; fever NG
49 Neutropenia & sepsis in tALL patient NG
50 Neutropenia & sepsis in tALL patient NG
51 Neutropenia & sepsis in tALL patient NG
52 Neutropenia & sepsis in tALL patient NG
53 Neutropenia & sepsis in tALL patient NG
54 Neutropenia & sepsis in tALL patient NG
55 Febrile neutropenia NG
56 Febrile neutropenia NG
57 Febrile neutropenia NG
58 Febrile neutropenia NG
59 Neutropenia; sore throat NG
101
60 Neutropenia; sore throat NG
61 Febrile neutropenia NG
62 Febrile neutropenia NG
63 Sepsis P
64 Neutropenia; fever NG
65 Neutropenia; fever NG
66 Neutropenia; fever NG
67 Neutropenia; fever NG
68 Neutropenia; fever NG
69 Neutropenia; fever NG
70 Neutropenia; fever NG
71 Neutropenia; fever NG
72 Neutropenia; fever NG
73 Neutropenia; fever NG
74 Neutropenia; fever NG
75 Neutropenia; fever NG
76 Neutropenia; fever NG
77 Neutropenia; fever NG
78 Neutropenia; fever NG
79 Neutropenia; fever NG
80 Neutropenia; fever NG
81 Neutropenia; fever NG
82 Neutropenia; fever NG
83 Neutropenia; fever NG
84 Neutropenia; fever NG
85 Neutropenia; fever NG
86 Neutropenia; fever NG
87 Neutropenia; sepsis NG
88 Neutropenia; sepsis NG
89 Febrile neutropenia NG
90 Febrile neutropenia NG
102
Table IX: Results of terminal subcultures from negative blood cultures
91 Febrile neutropenia NG
92 Febrile neutropenia NG
93 Febrile neutropenia NG
94 Febrile neutropenia NG
95 Febrile neutropenia NG
96 Febrile neutropenia NG
97 Febrile neutropenia NG
98 Febrile neutropenia NG
99 Febrile neutropenia NG
100 Febrile neutropenia NG
101 Febrile neutropenia NG
102 Febrile neutropenia NG
Legend:
NG: No growth
P: Positive growth
tALL: T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia
103
Statistical Analysis IV.
SPSS output results comparing the effect of concentration on time
Ranks
Concentration
in c.f.u/10ml
N Mean Rank
Time in hours
2.5 4 14.13
25 4 9.38
250 4 6.63
2500 4 3.88
Total 16
Test Statisticsa,b
Time in
hours
Chi-Square 11.387
df 3
Asymp. Sig. .010
a. Kruskal Wallis Test
b. Grouping Variable:
Concentration in
c.f.u/10ml
Test Statisticsa,b
Time in
hours
Chi-Square 11.018
df 3
Asymp. Sig. .012
a. Kruskal Wallis Test
b. Grouping Variable:
Concentration in
c.f.u/10ml
Ranks
Concentration
in c.f.u/10ml
N Mean Rank
Time in hours
2.5 4 14.13
25 4 9.38
250 4 6.63
2500 4 3.88
Total 16
104
Test Statisticsa,b
Time in
hours
Chi-Square 5.913
df 3
Asymp. Sig. .116
a. Kruskal Wallis Test
b. Grouping Variable:
Concentration in
c.f.u/10ml
Ranks
Concentration
in c.f.u/10ml
N Mean Rank
Time in hours
2.5 1 10.00
25 2 7.25
250 3 5.50
2500 4 3.50
Total 10
Ranks
Concentration
in c.f.u/10ml
N Mean Rank
Time in hours
25 2 9.25
250 4 5.13
2500 4 4.00
Total 10
Test Statisticsa,b
Time in
hours
Chi-Square 6.281
df 2
Asymp. Sig. .043
a. Kruskal Wallis Test
b. Grouping Variable:
Concentration in
c.f.u/10ml
105
SPSS output results comparing high and low concentrations
Ranks
Concentration
in c.f.u/10ml
N Mean Rank
Time in hours
250 4 5.50
2500 4 3.50
Total 8
Test Statisticsa,b
Time in
hours
Chi-Square 1.750
df 1
Asymp. Sig. .186
a. Kruskal Wallis Test
b. Grouping Variable:
Concentration in
c.f.u/10ml
Test Statisticsa,b
Time in
hours
Chi-Square .467
df 1
Asymp. Sig. .495
a. Kruskal Wallis Test
b. Grouping Variable:
Concentration in
c.f.u/10ml
Ranks
Concentration
in c.f.u/10ml
N Mean Rank
Time in hours
250 4 5.00
2500 4 4.00
Total 8
Test Statisticsa,b
Time in
hours
Chi-Square 1.800
df 1
Asymp. Sig. .180
a. Kruskal Wallis Test
b. Grouping Variable:
Concentration in
c.f.u/10ml
Ranks
Concentration
in c.f.u/10ml
N Mean Rank
Time in hours
250 3 5.00
2500 4 3.25
Total 7
106
Ranks
Concentration
in c.f.u/10ml
N Mean Rank
Time in hours
250 4 5.00
2500 4 4.00
Total 8
Test Statisticsa,b
Time in
hours
Chi-Square 1.000
df 1
Asymp. Sig. .317
a. Kruskal Wallis Test
b. Grouping Variable:
Concentration in
c.f.u/10ml
Ranks
Concentration
in c.f.u/10ml
N Mean Rank
Time in hours
2.5 4 6.13
25 4 2.88
Total 8
Test Statisticsa,b
Time in
hours
Chi-Square 4.225
df 1
Asymp. Sig. .040
a. Kruskal Wallis Test
b. Grouping Variable:
Concentration in
c.f.u/10ml
Ranks
Concentration
in c.f.u/10ml
N Mean Rank
Time in hours
2.5 4 5.38
25 4 3.63
Total 8
Test Statisticsa,b
Time in
hours
Chi-Square 1.175
df 1
Asymp. Sig. .278
a. Kruskal Wallis Test
b. Grouping Variable:
Concentration in
c.f.u/10ml
107
Ranks
Concentration
in c.f.u/10ml
N Mean Rank
Time in hours
2.5 1 3.00
25 2 1.50
Total 3
Test Statisticsa,b
Time in
hours
Chi-Square 1.500
df 1
Asymp. Sig. .221
a. Kruskal Wallis Test
b. Grouping Variable:
Concentration in
c.f.u/10ml
108
Costs V.
Reagents/Materials Cost
Sabouraud Dextrose Agar €60
Standard Aerobic (SA) BacT/Alert blood culture bottles €200
FAN Aerobic BacT/Alert blood culture bottles €250
21G Vacuette®
blood collection needle €210
Total €720
Table X: Reagents and materials utilised in this project and their respective cost
The SA and FAN Aerobic BacT/Alert blood culture bottles as well as the 21G
Vacuette®
blood collection needles were supplied by the Microbiology laboratory of
MDH. The only reagent purchased was the Sabouraud Dextrose Agar. Disposable
equipment including sterile loops, conical-bottomed test tubes and sterile plastic
pipettes were supplied by the Mycology laboratory.
109
Permissions to carry out study VI.
Within this section please find all the permissions required for carrying out this
project.