34°

33°

Seismicity Hauksson et al. (2012)

• 0.5 <= M < 3.0 • 3.0 <= M < 5.5 * 5.5<= M

Mechanisms Yang et al. (2012)

~M6 ·~M4

"' , le • ~ , • ~

I "' ~ C • C C " C • • CJ a,

SW

0 5000

0 -E-2000 .c 15_

~ 4000

6000

8000 ..... ~001--' " .. " .," .. ;"' ~"'' .. " '~"' ~-- - ~-- ~' ~-~-- ..... - '

SW 0

.9 C (.) ctl 'rn Cc ctl +-'

CJ)~

5000

• • ~

10000

15000

C 0

Distance (m) 20000 25000

•• VE 1 :1 ' . ' . •• • ,. • •

• • •

-~ E CD 0 - ff)

ctl CD ~

a..o ' -Distance (m)

30000

•

l •-,. : • ~-tc • ,..,, t ~

• -"' a, ~

0, 0 C: C:

C:"' o_ (J)-

C: :::, (J) :::,

"'"" ·-"' ClllL :::, LL

15000 20000 25000 00 0

•

35000 40000

• elocity(m/s)

•

0 0 0 0 0 0 N "'

cg ctl·-

C/)~ CD C <fl

-:;::, ~CD C - +-' ~co~

0 0 0

"

NE 35000

0 0 0

"'

~ M2 -2000....-~--~--~--~--~--~- -+-- --~----.-

Figure 1. Map showing extent of the Salton Seismic Imaging Project (SSI P). Seismic lines/arrays are labeled with numbers. (Line 1 is labeled in three segments--Line 1 N, 1 M, and 1 S.)

'

0

~ • 0 ~ 50 I :::. I km" 0

-116°

¼

M )(iCO

•

-115°

ro C:

fl ~

<(

SSIP Seismic Lines

• OBS

0

•

•

CISN_s tation

Air-gun shot

Seismometer

Land shot (kg of explosives) • 3 - 39

• 40-1 62

e 163 - 365

e 366-684

• 685- 1440

Quaternary Fault

Highway

0 ~

E 2000 ~

'E._ 4000 CD o 6000

Velocity(mls)

■ I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OJ "' ,,. "' "'

Line4 SW

0

-E ._. ..c 5000 ...... Q. Q)

0 • 10000

0

VE 1 :1

10000

0 0 0 C\J

0 0 0 C")

20000

0 0 0

"""

0 0 0 l{)

0 0 0 (0

V.E. 1 :1

30000

•

•

• NE

40000

NE

I 0 0 0 (0

~

33.6

33.4

,·. ,, .

--2!

Salton Sea

. .

Hidden Spri r.gs Faull

o 10km -----·· 0 6

-116.0 - 115.8 - 115.6

A .B C DE F or-of_~ .. ~~-"'~---, r,~ .. 7sAF~---, r,--.,s~,~,-----c., .:\, :'•

:\

' : -.. =. -... '·., ...... ·, : · . :1 ··•.? :1 \ 1

• ~ I

IO

"01· .. ·· .. : .. " ii ..

\

150 2 4 6 8 0 2 4 6 8 0 2 4 6 8 Distance (km) Dis111rw~ (km) rn~tancc (Ian)

SE Ho:lden St,ring, F.

:2000

NW

1,4QQQ ', ' ' . \

0000 V.E. 1:1

' 6000 s-----=cc----==----c:~ ·:cc---~' t 0 5000 1 0000 1s ooo ,...,.000:c,:---~

I • 2

-~

' • ,

Ve locity (m/s)

■ .. Distance (m)

§~ij§~

•• •• 000

0000 ~-0000 0000 . . . . . ...

·100.00

000

-10.00

00 .00 L ~~ .,_..,.......--•••••••••• ••••••••••••• 00 .00

• .. ,: •

SAF

. . ,. .- ,;,: ,v---,-~ .. ··- .. • ••

--I f u -40.00 -t- ------------- --j- ----------

SE NW

0 . .,, I

k =l).0002

• 2 0 00

.......

', \

6 000 ' . \

8000 . '

s-..1---------~-------- --t..'' ·~--~ 0 =oo 1 0000 15000 000

Distance (m) Velocity(m/s)

■ ■ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

•

t • ,: •

iii 0 ~ 0 g ~ ~ •

SAF

•oo •oo , 000

! 0000

' 0000 • 2 0000

I 0000 • ■ •••

• -~ ---.. .., .... ~ • ·100.00 • 000 i

-\0 .00 --0000 L~~ ,__,.,.-----.........

•••••••••••••• 00 .00

0000 +-------------- +-----------'' - NW

" 0 ..

2 0 00

E £ 40 00 = ,3

60 00 I I I •

8000 7,--"----==----==--- -'::=:--o 5000 1 0000

I 15000

Distance (m) Velocity(m/s)

■ I o a a o a

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

•

•

. ' 000 • •

' ,: • •

CAL IFORNIA

Investigating Earthquake Hazards in the Northern Salton Trough, Southern California, Using Data from the Salton Seismic Imaging Project (SSIP)

G. S. Fuis1, J. A. Hole2, J. M. Stock3, N. W. Driscoll4, G. M. Kent5, A. J. Harding4, A. Kell5, M. R. Goldman1, E. J. Rose1, R. D. Catchings1,M. J. Rymer1, V. E. Langenheim1, D. S. Scheirer1, N. D. Athens1, J. M. Tarnowski6

Refraction Models Line 6 Line 7

Abstract 1 U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Earthquake Science Center (ESC), Menlo Park, CA.

The southernmost San Andreas fault (SAF) system, in the northern Salton Trough (Salton Sea and Coachella Valley), is considered likely to produce a large-magnitude, damaging earthquake in the 2 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University,near future. The geometry of the SAF and the velocity and geometry of adjacent sedimentary Dept. Geosciences, Blacksburg, VA basins will strongly influence energy radiation and strong ground shaking during a future rupture.The Salton Seismic Imaging Project (SSIP) was undertaken, in part, to provide more accurate infor- 3 California Institute of Technology, Seismological mation on the SAF and basins in this region. Laboratory 252-21, Pasadena, CA. .

We report preliminary results from modeling four seismic profiles (Lines 4-7) that cross the Salton 4 Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA. Trough in this region. Lines 4 to 6 terminate on the SW in the Peninsular Ranges,underlain by Meso-

From high-res -? active-source seismic PC and Mz igneouszoic batholithic rocks, and terminate on the NE in or near the Little San Bernardino or Orocopia 5 Nevada Seismological Laboratory, University of From 1986 North Palm modeling 8 km SE and metamorphic rocksMountains, underlain by Precambrian and Mesozoic igneous and metamorphic rocks. These lines Nevada, Reno, NV. Springs eqk sequence: (Catchings et al., 2009) either or both faults moved (see Jones et al., Pcross the Coachella Valley, which is underlain by Miocene to Holocene sedimentary deposits. Line 1986)

7 crosses the Salton Sea and sedimentary basin deposits to the northeast similar to those of the 6 University of California, Riverside PeninsularRangesCoachella Valley. On three lines (7, 4, 6) there is evidence from our seismic imaging, potential-field granitic rocksstudies, and (or) earthquakes that active strands of the SAF dip moderately NE.

From south to north, on Lines 7, 4, 5, and 6, maximum sedimentary basin depths are approximately 5.5?, 5.5, 3.5, and 3.5 km, respectively, as measured from the surface to the 5.3 km/s velocity contour. (In prior studies of the Imperial Valley, unmetamorphosed sediment is interpreted to lie above this

Line 5 Figure 14 of Lin et al. (2007) with Lines 4 and 7 approximate velocity contour [Kohler and Fuis, 1986].) Basement rocks that can be traced from the

Peninsular Ranges to depth beneath the Coachella Valley are characterized by relatively high ve- superposed. Dashed lines in the lower panel locities, averaging 4.9 km/s at the surface and 6.4 km/s at a depth of 4 km. They are also character- are alternative interpretations of the SAF. ized by high velocity gradients, averaging > 0.4/s. In contrast, rocks of the Little San Bernardino and Orocopia Mountains are characterized by relatively low velocities, averaging 3.9 km/s at the surface and 6.1 km/s at a depth of 4 km; and they are characterized by low velocity gradients, averaging < 0.4/s. The rocks of the Peninsular Ranges can be seen on Lines 4 and 6 extending at depth north-eastward beyond the active surface trace(s) of the SAF.

From magnetic Strong ground shaking from the ShakeOut Scenario Earthquake will be recalculated using our new modeling 9 km SE

(Fuis et al., 2012) non-vertical geometry for the SAF and new basin information.

? ?

From high-res P Peninsular active-source seismic

modeling 19 km NW Ranges (Catchings et al., 2009) granitic rocks

Model of Line 7 with earthquakes from above and interpretation of SAF superposed. Note that velocity contours in upper crust support a NE dip, as inter-preted by Lin et al. (2007). SA

F

OrocopiaPeninsular SchistRangesgranitic rocks

P

The tomographic velocity models in this column, and also in the next column, were ob-tained using the inversion algorithm of Hole (1992). Models for Lines 5 and 6 have not been fully tested using alternate starting velocity models, although alternate sets of picks have been used. The model for Line 4 has been more fully tested.

AREAOF MAP

TWTT

(S)

Reflection data

SW Line 7 (offshore part) NE0

NW Line 1M (all offshore)

01

12

2

On Lines 4-6, we superpose earthquakes from Hauksson et al. (2012) and focal mecha-nisms from Yang et al. (2012); for Line 7, earthquakes from Lin et al. (2007). For all lines, projection distances are 2 km on either side of the cross sections.

The velocity models for Lines 4 and 6 are consistent with a NE dip for the active branches of the SAF, including the Garnet Hill and Banning faults on Line 6. This fault ge-ometry separates rocks with relatively high velocities and high velocity gradients (Peninsular Ranges granitic rocks) from rocks with relatively low velocities and low veloc-ity gradients (Precambrian and Mz igneous and metamorphic rocks in the Little San Ber-nardino Mts [Line 6] and Orocopia Schist in the Mecca Hills [Line 4]). Earthquakes align-ments and focal mechanisms are also consistent with NE dips on these two lines. Red Observed (black dots) and calculated (colored lines) gravity and arrows point to surface traces of the San Andreas fault. magnetic data are shown in these two panels, along with models

of these data for two cases: dipping SAF (upper panel) and verti-The velocity model for Line 5 shows no similar evidence for a NE dip. However, earth- cal SAF (lower panel). The dipping SAF is slightly favored by the quakes may outline the hanging wall of a NE-dipping Mission Creek fault. Modeling of magnetic data. [The magnetic data were collected on the magnetic data 8 km SE of Line 5 does indeed indicate a moderate NE dip (Fuis et al., ground and, offshore, in a boat.] 2012). In contrast, high-res seismic imaging across the Mission Creek fault 19 km to the NW of Line 5 (and 8 km to the SE of Line 6) suggest a steep SW dip (Catchings et al., 2009).The Mission Creek fault is inactive northwestward of a point approximately 10 km NW of Line 5 (Pat Williams, oral commun., 2012).

SE REFERENCES:Catchings, R.D., M.J. Rymer, M.R. Goldman, and G. Gandhok (2009). San Andreas fault geometry at Desert Hot Springs, California, and its effects on earthquake hazards and groundwater, Bulletin Seismological Society America, 99, 2190-2207.Fuis, G.S., W.D. Mooney, J.H. Healy, G.A. McMechan, and W.J. Lutter (1984). A seismic refraction survey of the Imperial Valley region, California, Journal Geophysical Research, 89, p. 1165-1189. Fuis, G.S., D.S. Scheirer, V.E. Langenheim, and M.D. Kohler (2012). A new perspective on the geometry of the San Andreas Fault in southern California and its relationship to lithospheric structure, Bulletin Seismological Society America , 102, p. 236-251. Hauksson E., W.Yang and P. M. Shearer (2012). Waveform relocated earthquake catalog for southern California (1981 - 2011), Bull. Seism. Soc. Am.,

103-104, in press.Hole, J.A. (1992). Nonlinear high-resolution three-dimensional seismic travel time tomography, Journal Geophysical Research, 97,

TWTT

(S)

p. 6553-6562.

gas gas Jones, L.M., K. Hutton, D.D. Given, and C.R. Allen (1986). The North Palm Springs, California, earthquake equence of July 1986, Bul

letin Seismological Society America, 76, 1830-1837.Kohler, W.M., and G.S. Fuis (1986). Travel-time, time-term, and basement depth maps for the Imperial Valley region, California, from explosions,

Beds thicken to NE(toward SAF)

Bulletin Seismological Society America, 76, p. 1289-1303.

gas Lin, G., P.M. Shearer, and E. Hauksson (2007). Applying a three-dimensional velocity model, waveform cross-correlation, and clus ter analysis to locate southern California seismicity from 1981 to 2005, Journal of Geophysical Research, 112, B12309,

doi:10/1029/2007JB004986.

NE-striking faults Yang, W., E. Hauksson and P. M. Shearer (2012). Computing a Large Refined Catalog of Focal Mechanisms for Southern California (1981 – 2010):Temporal Stability of the Style of Faulting, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 102, 1179-1294.

3 km V.E. ~ 3:1 3 km V.E. ~ 3:1 3

The panels above are reflection data recorded along two intersecting lines in the Salton Sea (see Figure 1 and insets). Airgun size was 210 cubic inches, except for the last day (90 cubic inches). Shot interval was 1 minute. The streamer was 300 m long and 48 channels. Reflection fold is 1-2 . Airgun signals were also recorded on 48 OBS’s placed at 78 locations and on land seismometers (Texans and RT 130’s). On Line 7 offshore, sedimentary beds dip and thicken northeastward toward the SAF. This type of structure is commonly seen where a normal fault bounds the sedimentary beds on the side toward which they dip and thicken. In this case, however, the northeastward dip and thickening may result from northeastward tilting of the Peninsular Ranges block , which underlies the Coachella Valley and the northern Salton Sea. Such tilting results from northwestward translation of the Pacific Plate against the “propeller”-shaped SAF of Fuis et al. (2012) (Michele Cooke and Laura Fattaruso, written comm., 2012).

3

4