introduction to modern physics a (mainly) historical perspective on - atomic physics - nuclear...
DESCRIPTION
Planck’s “Quantum Theory” The “oscillators” in the walls can only have certain energies – NOT continuous!TRANSCRIPT
Introduction to Modern Physics
A (mainly) historical perspective on
- atomic physics - nuclear physics- particle physics
Theories of Blackbody Radiation
Classical disaster !
Quantum solution
Planck’s “Quantum Theory”
The “oscillators” in the walls can only have certain energies – NOT continuous!
1,
5
kThc
eTI
The Photoelectric Effect
Light = tiny particles!
Wave theory: takes too long to get enough energy to eject electronsParticle theory: energy is concentrated in packets -> efficiently ejects electrons!
The Photoelectric Effect
Energy of molecular oscillator, E = nhfEmission: energy nhf -> (n-1)hf Light emitted in packet of energy E = hf
Einstein’s prediction: hf = KE + W (work function)
c = f
Speed of light3 x 108
meter/secondor
30cm (1 foot) per
nanosecond
Wavelength (meter)
Frequency#vibrations/
second
hf = KE + W (work function)
The Photoelectric Effect
Wave Theory Photon Theory
Increase light intensity ->more electrons with more KE
Increase light intensity -> more photons -> more electronsbut max-KE unchanged !
Frequency of light does not affect electron KE Max-KE = hf - W
If f < f(minimum) , where hf(minimum) = W,Then NO electrons are emitted!
X
X
How many photons from a lightbulb?
100W lightbulb, wavelength = 500nm
Energy/sec = 100 Joules
E = nhf -> n = E/hf = E/hc
n = 100J x 500 x 10-9 = 2.5 x 1020 !! 6.63 x 10-34 J.s x 3 x 108 m/s
So matter contains electrons and light can be emitted in “chunks”… so what does this tell us about atoms??
Possible models of the atom
Which one is correct?
Electric potentialV(r) ~ 1/r
The Rutherford Experiment
Distance of closest approach ~ size of nucleus
At closest point KE -> PE, and PE = charge x potential
KE = PE = 1/40 x 2Ze2/R
R = 2Ze2/ (40 x KE) = 2 x 9 x 109 x 1.6 x 10-19 x Z 1.2 x 10-12 J= 3.8 x 10-16 Z meters = 3.0 x 10-14 m for Z=79 (Gold)
The “correct” model of the atom
…but beware of simple images!
Atomic “signatures”
Rarefied gas
Only discrete lines!
An empirical formula!
2
1211
2 nR
2
1211
2 nR
n = 3,4,…
The Origin of Line Spectra
Newton’s 2nd Law and Uniform Circular Motion
F = ma
Acceleration = v2/rTowards center of circle!
How do we get “discrete energies”?
Linear momentum = mv
Radius r
Angular momentumL = mvr
Bohr’s “quantum” condition – motivated by the Balmer formula
2hnmvrL n ,...3,2,1n
Electron “waves” and the Bohr condition
De Broglie(1923): = h/mv
Only waves with a whole number of wavelengths persist
Quantized orbits!
n = 2r
2hnmvrL n
Same!!
Electrostatic force: Electron/Nucleus
COULOMBS LAW
Combine Coulomb’s Law with the Bohr condition:
maF Newton’s 2nd LawCircular motion r
va2
nn rmv
reZe 2
20
)(4
1
2hnmvrL n
nmrnhv2
1
2
20
22
rZn
mZehnrn
mx
xxxx
mehr
10
1931
1234
20
2
1
10529.0
)10602.1)(1011.9)(14.3()1085.8)(10626.6(
(for Z = 1, hydrogen)
Calculate the total energy for the electron:Total Energy = Kinetic + Potential EnergyElectrostatic potential r
ZerQV
00 41
41
Electrostatic potential energy r
ZeeVU2
041
nn r
ZemvE2
0
2
41
21
Total energy
Substitute
12
2
2220
42 18
EnZ
nhmeZEn
eVJoulesxh
meE 6.13181017.28 2
0
4
1
2
6.13neVEn
So the energy is quantized !… now we can combine this with
hchf
EEhf lu
223
0
42 1'1
8'11
nnchmeZEE
hc n
…and this correctly predicts the line spectrum for hydrogen,…and it gets the Rydberg constant R right!…however, it does not work for more complex atoms…
Experimental results
Quantum Mechanics – or how the atomic world really works (apparently!)
De Broglie(1923): = h/mv
Take the wave description of matter for real: Describe e.g. an electron by a “wavefunction” (x), then this obeys:
)()()(2 2
22
xExxUdxd
mh
Schroedinger’s famous equation
Now imagine we confine an electron in a “box” with infinitely hard/high walls:
Waves must end at the walls so:
and the energy levels for these states are:
Discrete energies!
The probabilities for the electron to be at various places inside the box are:
vs. Classical Mechanics
Uniform probability!
Applying the same quantum mechanical approach to the hydrogen atom:
Probability “cloud”
Bohr radius
The “n = 2” state of hydrogen:
Atomic orbitals
Weird stuff!!
Weird stuff!!
Ghosts!!??
Conclusions- Classical mechanics/electromagnetism does not describe atomic behavior- The Bohr model with a “quantum condition” does better…but only for hydrogen- Quantum mechanics gives a full description and agrees with experiment- …but QM is weird!!