introduction to large-signal modeling of compound...

56
W. R. Curtice 2008 Introduction to Large-Signal Modeling of Compound Semiconductor Transistors Walter R. Curtice, Ph. D. W. R. Curtice Consulting 53 Commanders Drive Washington Crossing, PA 18977 [email protected]

Upload: dongoc

Post on 11-Jul-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

W. R. Curtice 2008

Introduction to Large-Signal Modeling of Compound

Semiconductor TransistorsWalter R. Curtice, Ph. D.W. R. Curtice Consulting

53 Commanders DriveWashington Crossing, PA 18977

[email protected]

W. R. Curtice 2008

Introduction

• Philosophy of Modeling

• Modeling of HEMT Devices

• Modeling of Bipolar Devices

W. R. Curtice 2008

Modeling Considerations• Device application must be considered when

choosing a model and when characterizing a device.

• Pulsed modulated applications require more attention to the time domain behavior than do CW applications.

• Large-signal, nonlinear equivalent circuit models are more useful than behavior models(for trimming model, for scaling model, etc.).

W. R. Curtice 2008

Modeling Considerations

• Modeling accuracy requirements are related to the device application

• The model’s accuracy need not be better than the variation in the device data

• Any given model can always be improved upon, at a price

• All models can be shown to behave non-physically under some operating condition

W. R. Curtice 2008

Modeling Choices

• Range of usefulness?• Number of model parameters?• Include self-heating effects?• Include dispersion effects?• Include breakdown effects?• Model useful for statistical analysis?

W. R. Curtice 2008

Types of Large-Signal Transistor Models

• Physical or “Physics-Based” Device ModelsCalibrated Using Data

• Measurement-Based Models: Analytical Models Black Box ModelsTable-Based

• Artificial Neural Network (ANN) Models

This presentation willonly deal with this type!

(Also called SPICE Models)

W. R. Curtice 2008

Angelov Model: an Analytical Example

Plot Angelov_ADS/dc_iv_2008/id_vds __1/id_vd

Angelov Model

vd [E+0] i

d.s

[E-3

] 0 2 4 6 8 10

0

100

200

300

400

500

Plot Angelov_ADS/dc_iv_2008/id_vds __1/id_vd

GaAs HEMT Data

vd [E+0]

id.

m [

E-3

]

0 2 4 6 8 100

100

200

300

400

500

Vgs =-1V

-2V

-3V

-4V

Ids = IPK0*(1 + Tanh(P1*(Vgs-Vpk))*Tanh(A*Vds)

The model parameters for current are IPK0, P1, Vpk and A plus Rth and temperature coefficients

W. R. Curtice 2008

W. R. Curtice 2008

Part 1: HEMT Modeling

Characterization and Modeling of GaAs, GaN, SiC and Si LDMOS RF

Power Devices

W. R. Curtice 2008

Modeling Pluses

• GaAs, GaN, SiC and Si LDMOS devices are all three terminal devices

• Many large-signal circuit models available for use with these devices

• Many conventional models can be enhanced to be more accurate for a specific device type.

W. R. Curtice 2008

ADS* FET Models, 2006

Angelov is the onlymodel here that iselectro thermal!

This model has acrude thermal correctionterm applied

19801985

*Agilent Technologies, Inc.

W. R. Curtice 2008

FET Models in MWO(AWR Design Environment 2006)

Angelov2 is the only

FET

electro thermal!

model here that is

MET_LDMOSis electro thermal

EEHEMTalso here

W. R. Curtice 2008

Other HEMT Model Choices• EE_HEMT, Materka, Tajima, etc. models can

be enhanced to be electro thermal • A new model for large devices is reported by

Tijama in Microwave Journal, May 2007• C_FET model (Curtice Consulting) is electro

thermal• Cabral, Pedro et al. model looks promising

(MTT Trans. Nov 2004)• Modified models can be entered into ADS or

MWO • Verilog-A models may be used with ADS

W. R. Curtice 2008

Example of Self HeatingGaN Id vs. Vd for Vg=0 V

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0 5 10 15

Vg (V)

Id (A

)

DC

Pulsed

Vds

W. R. Curtice 2008

C_FET GaN Chip Model(W. R. Curtice Consulting)

Typical GaN Modelusing C_FET8D

PortP1Num=1

LL2

R=L=.09 nH

Temp2

C_FET8DC_FET8D1

CGD_S=-5CGD_P=300RDS_S=8GGS=1.e-9 SGM_RF=1.AREA=1

X_EXP=.55FFE=1.AF=1.KF=0.R_TH=10T_TH=1.e-6A3T=-2.796mA2T=-27.47mA1T=.3383A0T=1.168TSNK=25TMPH=125TMP=25LAMB=3.368mP12=0

P11=2.7P10=-1P09=0P08=-1P07=500P06=700P05=2800P04=9.5P03=-657.8pP02=2.8P01=430VBR=500.NF=1.0IS=5.2e-13R2=10.

R1=1000.GAMMA=10.24BETA=617.6uA3=-4mA2=-45.42mA1=.3676A0=1.564VDSO=10TAU=2pCDS=.4pRIN=.1RDSO=150RS=.6RG=1RD=1.5

LL1

R=L=.07 nH

PortP2Num=2

NewRds and Cgd Parameters

Vds VoltageFor Characterization(10V)

Temperature monitored here

W. R. Curtice 2008

C_FET Model

*GM dispersion circuit not shown

*Thermal analogCircuit is critical forLarge periphery devices

W. R. Curtice 2008

Charge-based Capacitance FunctionsNeeded for Cap(Vgs, Vds)

Example of capacitance modeling fora Triquent HEMT

Cgs(Vgs)

Vds

Cgd(Vgs)

Vds

W. R. Curtice 2008

local

Q(Vi, Vj)

• Qgs(Vgs,Vds) gives rise to two capacitive current terms

• Likewise, Qgd(Vgs,Vds) gives rise to two current terms

• One term is the same as the small-signal cap term. The other is a transcapacitance term

remote

W. R. Curtice 2008

Jansen et al. Approach MTT Transactions, January 1995

• Assume Qgd = 0

• Then Qg = Qgs(Vgs,Vds)

• The transcapacitance then Accounts for the conventional drain to gate capacitance

W. R. Curtice 2008

Cgs (Vgs) Function needs toAccommodate Capacitance “Overshoot”

Behavior of HEMTs

-4.5 -4.0 -3.5 -3.0 -2.5 -2.0 -1.5 -1.0-5.0 -0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

0.5

3.0

VGS

data

_8x2

40_1

0v_C

GS.

.CG

S_10

Vcg

s VDS = 10V

-4 -3 -2 -1-5 0

1.0E-12

1.5E-12

2.0E-12

2.5E-12

3.0E-12

5.0E-13

3.5E-12

VGS

Cgs

EEHEMT

C_FET

Note decreasingValues after “turn-on”

Red is data

Both models usea charge functionto compute Cgs and Cgd

RF Transconductance must be modeled accurately to get agreement with IMD3 and IMD5

GaN MOSHFET Example

W. R. Curtice 2008

0

10

20

30

-10 -5 0Gate Source Voltage (V)

Tran

scon

duct

ance

(mS)

Transconductance at VD=10V extracted respectively from CW-IV (xxx), pulsed I-V (ooo), CW s-parameter (∆∆∆), pulsed s-parameter (���), compared with simulated result(—) Quiescent biasing: VGQ=-3V, VDQ=25V.

Fundamental and 2-tone outputPower at 1.9GHz for 25V, -4V operation

See Also:The COBRA Model Cojocaru and Brazil; MTT Trans. 1997

W. R. Curtice 2008

Characterization Problems

• It is difficult to test large periphery devices, so many important characterization tests are done on small devices and the results scaled

• DC and pulsed I/V data are influenced by many test conditions

• RF I/V and reactance data are also affected by measurement and environmental conditions

W. R. Curtice 2008

Parameter Extraction

• Pulsed I/V and pulsed S-parameters for various ambient temperatures enables separation of temperature effects from voltage effects

• Compound semiconductor HEMTs exhibit “surface gating” effects, due to traps

• Must characterize Gm and Gds dispersion• For switching or logic applications, lag effects due

to traps are important to characterize

W. R. Curtice 2008

Parameter Extraction

• Need short-pulse testing capability as well as longer pulses. See Teyssier et al., [Ref. 7]

• IC-CAP (Agilent Tech.) provides testing capability and parameter extraction for “SPICE” models

W. R. Curtice 2008

Some Factors Influencing DC I/V Data

• Ambient temperature effects• Self heating effects- Importance increases

with device peripheryDevice current scales directly with area, but thermal resistance does not scale inversely with area.

• Trapping effects- Charge traps cause I/V “kinks”

W. R. Curtice 2008

Importance of Modeling Self-Heating in Large HEMTs

Thermal Effect in GaN/Si for 50mA/mm

0

50

100

150

200

250

0 10 20 30 40

Periphery, mm

Tem

pera

ture

Ris

e, C

28V56V

Self-Heating is more importantin larger devices because thethermal resistance does not decrease strongly with periphery increase

W. R. Curtice 2008

Example of I/V Kink

Notice kinkhere

W. R. Curtice 2008

I/V Kink Due to Aval. & Traps

-1V

-1V

-.75V

-.75V

-1.25V

-1.25V

Kink

Gate currentoccurring afterkink

W. R. Curtice 2008

Short Pulse Testing Permits Transistor Characterization for

Temperature Effects and Trapping Effects

W. R. Curtice 2008

The following viewgraphs show typical data for a 1-mm

AlGaN/GaN device on SiC substrate and with low dispersion

(Courtesy, WPAFB)

W. R. Curtice 2008

Evaluate the Dispersion in GaN HEMTs by comparing DC and

Pulsed I/VDC vs. Pulsed I/V

0.00100.00200.00300.00400.00500.00600.00700.00800.00900.00

0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00

Vds, V

Id, m

A

DC

.2us Pulsed

Large Dispersion Case(Other Vendor)

DC

PULSED

Note that Ids is about the samefor VDS=5V

Low Dispersion Case (WPAFB)

W. R. Curtice 2008

Final DC I/V Family Data and the C_FET Model

Red = DataBlue = C_FET Model

5 W heating power(R_TH = 8)

W. R. Curtice 2008

DC Sub-threshold Characteristic

Note that modelfollows the sub-thresholdcharacteristic very well!

W. R. Curtice 2008

Transconductance Nonlinearity

• gm(V) is the most important nonlinearity in any transistor

• Fundamental frequency output is directly related to gm

• Second harmonic output is directly related to first derivative of gm

• Third harmonic output (and IMD3) is directly related to second derivative of gm

• Nonlinear capacitance becomes more important at higher RF frequencies

W. R. Curtice 2008

External Transconductance, gmx

gmx 1st Deriv

2nd Deriv

VDS = 5V

Model and Data Are in good agreement

W. R. Curtice 2008

RF Modeling Procedure

• Use IC-CAP to extract capacitance parameters using capacitance data

• Optimize model parameters using “hot-FET” S- parameter data

• Evaluate the temperature dependence of the capacitance parameters

• Use load-pull data and power-sweep data to optimize the model parameter set

W. R. Curtice 2008

Typical S-Parameter Comparison

-8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8-10 10

freq (500.0MHz to 26.00GHz)

Smea

s(2,

1)Sm

odel

(2,1

)

-0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8-1.0 1.0

freq (500.0MHz to 26.00GHz)

Smea

s(1,

1)Sm

odel

(1,1

)Sm

eas(

2,2)

Smod

el(2

,2)

-0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10-0.15 0.15

freq (500.0MHz to 26.00GHz)

Smea

s(1,

2)Sm

odel

(1,2

) 5 10 15 20 250 30

-5

0

5

10

15

-10

20

freq, GHz

dB(S

mea

s(2,

1))

dB(S

mod

el(2

,1))

1E101E9 3E10

10

20

30

0

40

freq, Hz

dB(h

_val

(2,1

))dB

(h_v

al_m

od(2

,1))

c fet8 VDS=10 V, VGS = 0 V, 6-2-04

S11, S22S21

S12

S21_dB

H21_dB

0.5-26GHz

W. R. Curtice 2008

Tuned Power Sweep at 10GHz

10 15 20 255 30

10

20

30

40

0

50

RFpower

net_

pae

Pin

data

_20v

..PA

E*1

00

10 15 20 255 30

20

25

30

35

15

40

RFpower

p1_d

b

Pin

data

_20v

..Pou

t

10 15 20 255 30

0.30

0.35

0.40

0.25

0.45

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.00

0.05

RFpower

real

(I_P

robe

1.i[:

:,0])

Pin

data

_20v

..Ic*

.001

real(I_Probe3.i[::,0])

10 15 20 255 30

9

10

11

12

8

13

RFpower

gain

_db

Pin

data

_20v

..Pou

t-dat

a_20

v..P

in

I_GATE_SIM

C_FET8 Simulation vs. 441 Data, VDS=20V, Iq=300 mA, 6-02-04

DRAIN_CURRENT

Pout_dBm

PAE

GAINRed is modelBlue is data

4W/mm outputT_rise=36CT_rise=47C

W. R. Curtice 2008

Modeling the GaN on Silicon Substrate HEMT(Courtesy, Nitronex Corp.)

W. R. Curtice 2008

Over 100W Pulsed Power Obtained 36mm Packaged Device

25 30 35 4020 45

6

8

10

12

4

14

Pin

data

_36m

m_2

8V_P

ULS

ED..G

ain

RFpower

gain

_db

VDS = 28VFreq = 3.5GHzInput,output tuned

RED = data, Blue=model

25 30 35 4020 45

20

40

60

80

100

120

0

140

Pin

pow

(10,

data

_36m

m_2

8V_P

ULS

ED

..Pou

t/10)

*.00

RFpower

p1_w

W. R. Curtice 2008

Modeling Large Periphery Devices

• I/V data can often be scaled accurately from smaller devices

• S-parameter data may or may not be useful due to the low impedance values

• Load-pull and power sweep data can help with capacitance modeling

• Accurate packaging models with losses are extremely important for the large devices

• More data needed for modeling larger devices operated at frequencies at or above 10GHz

W. R. Curtice 2008

Conclusion: Part 1- HEMT Models

• Thermal analog circuit for self-heating effects• Rds, Cgd function of Vds• Charge function for modeling capacitance• Cgs(Vgs) permits fitting of “overshoot” • RF gm(Vgs) must be modeled accurately to

several derivatives• Rds and gm dispersion should be accommodated• Trapping effects may need to be included

W. R. Curtice 2008

Part 2: Bipolar Modeling

A thermal analog circuit is critical for accurately simulate temperature effects in

power bipolar devices.

W. R. Curtice 2008

Simulator Models Availablewith Self-Heating Effects

• ADSVBIC, HICUM, AgilentHBT

• MWOVBIC, HICUM, UCSD HBT

One Problem with VBIC:It is hard coded for Silicon

W. R. Curtice 2008

Compact BJT/HBT Models

• Gummel-Poon Model –All SPICE versions hard coded for Silicon only (TF Equation), No self-heating effects

• VBIC - VBIC95 BCTM Meeting 1995, Weak Aval., Self-heating effects, Some NQS effects

• MEXTRAM -1995, Weak Aval., NQS effects• HICUM –Weak Aval., Self-Heating, NQS

W. R. Curtice 2008

Cut-off Frequency, Ft

• Ft is frequency of unity current gain• Ft is a measure of the frequency response

Slope=-2.242E+001 [LIN/DEC] Yo=2.378E+002 Xo=4.068E+010freq [LOG]

10*

log(

s2h.

m.2

1) [

E+0

]

1E+8 1E+9 1E+10 1E+110

10

20

30

40

50

Ft = 40.68 GHz

(Data = Red points)

HEMTExample

H21 vs. freq

W. R. Curtice 2008

Bipolar Model must Accommodatethe Behavior of the Material

Ft goes up With VcIn Silicon

Ft goes down With VcIn GaAs

GaAsHBT Data

SiGeHBT Data

This behavior is related to the electron velocity-fieldrelationship.

In the modelsFt behavior is controlledby the parameters of theTF function.

W. R. Curtice 2008

GP_M Model (Curtice Consulting)

• Uses GP current and capacitance expressions• The thermal analog circuit was added to model

self-heating and elevated heat sink temperatures• B-C breakdown current, punch-through

capacitance and other effects were added• TF function changed for GaAs to get correct

dependence of FT upon VC

W. R. Curtice 2008

Thermal Analog Circuit

RRR =R _th

CCC =C _th

ItUs e rDe fS R C 1I_Tra n=I(t)*V(t) V_th

I_Tran= Instantaneous power dissipation

R_th*C_th = Thermal time constant

V_th is numerically equal to the temperature rise

Note: Some models useTwo thermal time constants

W. R. Curtice 2008

Thermal Modeling Example

• AlGaAs/GaAs HBT with emitter ballast resistance

• 4-finger(2x20) device on a thinned wafer• R_th = 200 C/W• Modified Gummel-Poon model (GP_M)

used to model device • GP has most model parameters as function

of device temperature

W. R. Curtice 2008

Model and Data forIC-VC Family for IB = .2, .4, .6, .8 ma

Heat Sink = 25 C

VB vs VCIC vs VC

Data is red

W. R. Curtice 2008

RF ParametersVC=1.5VIB=.6 mA

H21 S21

S22

S11

W. R. Curtice 2008

Thermal run-a-way simulation and dataHeat Sink = 25 C

IC vs VCVB=1.4 V

1.375 V

1.350 V

1.325 V1.3 V

Data is red

W. R. Curtice 2008

Previous data and thermal run-a-way simulationwith ballast resistance removed

Heat Sink = 25 C

IC vs VCVB=1.4 V

1.375 V

1.350 V

1.325 V1.3 V

Data is red

W. R. Curtice 2008

Thermal run-a-way for SiGe HBTusing HICUM model

Heat Sink = 25 C

IC vs VCVB=0.85 V

0.825V

0.80 V0.775 V0.75V

Data is red

W. R. Curtice 2008

Conclusion: Bipolar Modeling

• The thermal analog circuit is needed to accurately simulate temperature effects in GaAs-based HBTs

• The TF function must be adaptable to characteristics like GaAs, which is opposite to Si BJT behavior

• Breakdown behavior is important to model