introduction of phylogeography : trends and perspective
DESCRIPTION
Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective. Fang DU [email protected] Beijing Forestry University. Outline. Concept & Development The main scientific questions To infer the demographic history of important species To understand the mechanisms of speciation - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Introduction of Phylogeography: trends
and perspective
Fang [email protected]
Beijing Forestry University
![Page 2: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Outline
Concept & Development
The main scientific questions To infer the demographic history of important species To understand the mechanisms of speciation To identify the different species
Perspectives
![Page 3: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Population genetics: foundation of phylogeography
![Page 4: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
A brief history of Population genetics (1)
Charles Darwin(1809- 1882)
On the Origin of Species (1859)
Gregor J. Mendel (1822 – 1884)
“father of modern genetics”
Alfred Russel Wallace (1823 - 1913)
Father of Biogeography
![Page 5: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Population genetics: reconcile Mendel with Darwin
In the 1920s to 1930s: R.A. Fisher, J.B.S. Haldane and Sewall Wright
“if a given continuous trait, e.g. height, was affected by a large number of Mendelian factors, each of which made a small difference to the trait, then the trait would show an approximately normal distribution in a population. “ ---- R.A. Fisher 1918
R.A. Fisher
![Page 6: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Population geneticsThe study of the amount and distribution of genetic variation in populations and species
The study of the underlying evolutionary processes that determine the patterns of genetic diversity…
Natural selectionMigrationRandom Genetic DriftMutationRecombinationGene flow….Gene…/Genotype (individual)…/populations…/Species…
![Page 7: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Phylogeny: is the study of evolutionary relationships among groups of organisms (e.g. species, populations), which are discovered through molecular sequencing data and morphological data matrices.
Phylogeny tree of life
Limitations:Homoplasy
Horizontal gene transfer
Sampling
…
![Page 8: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Population genetics
Microevolution
PhylogenyMacroevolution
phylogeography
![Page 9: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Phylogeography: recent emergence and rapid development
Phylogeography is a field of study concerned with the principles and processes governing the geographical distributions of genealogical lineages, especially those at the intraspecific level (1987)
As a subdiscipline of biogeography, it emphasizes historical aspects of the contemporary spatial distributions of gene lineages (1996)
Phylogeographic perspectives have consistently challenged conventional genetic and evolutionary paradigms, and they have forged empirical and conceptual bridges between the formerly separate disciplines of population genetics (microevolutionary analysis) and phylogenetic biology (in macroevolution). (2009)
John C. Avise
![Page 10: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Founding father:John C. Avise mtDNA
Phylogeography
![Page 11: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Twenty years of Phylogeography:“Phylogeography has experienced explosive
growth in recent years fulled by developments in
DNA technology, theory and statistical
analysis”….
“the intellectual maturation of the field will
eventually depend not only on these recent
developments, but also on syntheses of
comparative information across different regions
of the globe. ” ---- Beheregaray MolEco 2008
![Page 12: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Phylogeography: 1. infer the demographic history of important species
![Page 13: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Genetic distributionPresent
Evolutionary imprintsPast
![Page 14: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Evolutionary imprints: glacial refugia• Three biggest glacial: 震旦、晚古生代、第四纪 • Last glacial period: Pleistocene 更新世 后期 (110 -12ky)
![Page 15: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
The Global features, Last Glacial Maximum Hewitt 2000 Nature
Godfrey M Hewitt (1940 - 2013)
![Page 16: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Interglacial glacial interglacial glacial interglacial
Inter glacial: Advance
Glacial: Retreat (glacial refugia)
Godfrey M Hewitt (1940 - 2013)
![Page 17: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Genetic consequence of postglacial colonization
Hewitt 1996
Leading range expansion by long distance dispersal Loss of alleles
![Page 18: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Evolutionary imprints: bottleneck
![Page 19: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Evolutionary imprints: founder effect
A new population is founded by a small group of colonists
Founder population
![Page 20: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
North America
First plant examples: the Pacific Northwest Of North America: five angiosperms and one fern Soltis et al. 1997
中北部爱达荷州
温哥华岛
夏洛特皇后群岛
阿拉斯加未被冰覆盖的区域
![Page 21: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Medail & Katia Diadema J. Biogeogr 2009
![Page 22: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Science 2003
![Page 23: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
![Page 24: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
QTP 喜马拉雅地区 中日地区
![Page 25: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Present
LGM
Harrision 2001
Main scenarios:(1)QTP 东南部避难所冰期后回迁(2) 中国西南部群体隔离和特有种物种形成(3) 中国亚热带地区由于长期隔离造成的多个避难所(4) QTP 台面在盛冰期也存在一些高山草本及森林树种(5) 亚热带地区由于长期隔离造成的多个硬叶树种避难所(6) 中国北方存在落叶林“隐形避难所”(7) 中国、日本 / 朝鲜由于海洋变化形成的异域成种事件
![Page 26: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
![Page 27: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Phylogeography 2 : understand the mechanisms of speciation
![Page 28: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Species: A brief history• Prior to Darwin, each species was regarded as a fixed entity, morphologically
distinct from other species• After Darwin, recognizing that species change over time, the biological species
definition (BSD) has become widely accepted• BSD: a group of a potentially interbreeding populations, with a common gene
pool, which are reproductively isolated from other such groups difficulties with the BSD other species concept
![Page 29: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Speciation process
Nosil et al. 2009
![Page 30: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Speciation mode
Rundle & Nosil 2005
![Page 31: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Limitation and caveats for testing parallel speciation
Nosil 2012
均为单次起源但 b, c, 表现为多次起源,假象 ~
![Page 32: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
No Contact (allopatry) Geographical/Ecological Contact (Sympatric-Parapatric; Second Contact)
Speciation with in gene flow
Smadja & Butlin MolEco 2011
![Page 33: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Detecting divergence in the face of gene flow• Difficult to infer confidently that gene flow occurred at any point in the
speciation process.
• Difficult to infer timing of gene flow during divergence.
![Page 34: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Detecting divergence in the face of gene flow:comparative geographic approaches
Premise: Shared ancestral polymorphism affects both allopatric and sym/para-patric populations, whereas gene flow affects only sympatric populations.
Thus, genetic divergence should be consistently greater for comparisons between allopatric populations.
![Page 35: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Drawback: Requiring the existence of multiple population pairs for study, and ones that differ in their geographic arrangement.
![Page 36: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Detecting divergence in the face of gene flow:coalescent approachesPremise: Gene flow varies widely across the genomic regions. In contrast, genetic drift might act more uniformly across the genome.
Thus, a history of gene flow is generally indicated if some loci show little divergence and others show strong divergence, such that variation among loci is greater than expected under a model with no gene flow and divergence solely by drift.
![Page 37: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
“Isolation with migration” (IM) modelJody Hey
![Page 38: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Detecting divergence in the face of gene flow:genomic approaches• Premise: Using population genomic methods examining thousands of
loci can infer “outliner loci” whose genetic differentiation statistically exceeds background neutral expectations.
• Thus, such outliner loci differentiate between populations more strongly, and introgress less freely, than neutrally evolving regions, and are putatively affected by divergent selection.
![Page 39: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Nosil 2012
![Page 40: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Phylogeography:
3. Identify different species
![Page 41: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
How to distinguishspecies?-the foremost question in biology
?
![Page 42: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Gene flow & species definition• Mayr (1942): species are 'groups of actually or potentially
interbreeding natural populations, which are reproductively isolated from other such groups’
low interspecific gene flow
• Mayr (1963) '[t]he steady and high genetic input caused by gene flow is the main factor responsible for genetic cohesion among the populations of a species’
high intraspecific gene flow
![Page 43: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Two main reasons of shared polymorphisms
![Page 44: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Parent B
F1 hybrid
Backcross 1 to A
Backcross 2...
Parent A
Backcross 3...
Backcross 4...
The introgression processnuclear genome♀ ♂
![Page 45: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Parent B
F1 hybrid
Backcross 1 to A
Backcross 2...
Parent A
Backcross 3...
Backcross 4...
The introgression processmaternally inherited genome♀ ♂
![Page 46: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Parent B
F1 hybrid
Backcross 1 to A
Backcross 2...
Parent A
Backcross 3...
Backcross 4...
The introgression processpaternally inherited genome♀ ♂
![Page 47: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Retention of ancestral polymorphism
weak shorter higherhighM 2
Species X
Coalescent timegeneticstructure
Hoelzer 1997, Wright 1943
Gene flow
strong longer LowerlowM1
Taxonomic resolution
High gene flow markers better to delimitate species
![Page 48: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
‘no way out’ once introgression has taken placeHigh gene flow markers better to delimitate species
Introgression
Introgression more frequent for low gene flow markers than for high gene flow markers
Introgression more likely from local species to the invading one
“…we detect gene flow from Neandertals into modern humans but not reciprocal gene flow from modern humans into Neandertals gene flow from Neandertals into modern humans but not reciprocal gene flow from modern humans into Neandertals”.
![Page 49: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
In conifers, mtDNA is maternally inherited and transmitted by seeds only low gene flow
In conifers, cpDNA is paternally inherited and transmitted by pollen high gene flow
+»
mNF
eST 41
1
gene flow hinders differentiation
![Page 50: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Research questions
• Which marker is better for species delimitation?
- evidence from the Picea asperata complex
• If introgression occurs, can we predict in which direction?
- evidence from the Picea likiangensis and Picea purpurea
![Page 51: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Wright (1955) Florin (1963)Farjon (1990)Li (1995)
Sigurgeirsson & Szmidt (1993)Ran et al. (2006)Du et al. unpublished
![Page 52: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
P. koranensisP. jezoensis
P. meyri
1
P. crassifoliaP. asperataP. retroflexa
P. obovata
P. schrenkiana
P. spinulosaP. smithiana
P. neoveitchiiP. wilsoniiP. purpureaP. likiangensisP. brachytyra
![Page 53: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
P. crassifolia in the “holly” mountain in QTP
P. crassifolia in the Qilian Mountain
![Page 54: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Picea in XinJiang, Central Asia
![Page 55: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
The only Picea species distributed
in the desert of Inner Mongolia
![Page 56: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
strong geographic pattern little relationship with taxonomy
mtDNA: nad1 intron b/c and nad5 intron1 (1674bp)
Du et al. Mol Ecol 2009
Results GST =0.90
459 individuals from 46 populations
![Page 57: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
divided into four groups on the basis of cpDNA variation in relation with species or species groups
cpDNA: trnL-F + trnS-G + ndhK-C (2051bp)
GST = 0.56Results
Du et al. Mol Ecol 2009
![Page 58: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Conclusion
More interspecific sharing for mtDNA than for cpDNA (also true in other conifers):
13 of 14 conifer complex studied where cpDNA markers are more or less species-specific
8 of 11 conifer complex studied where mtDNA markers are not species-specific
mtDNA markers are not helpful to distinguish species!
‘Better’ species delimitation with cpDNA than with mtDNA markers
![Page 59: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Naciri et al., 2012
![Page 60: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Perspectives
![Page 61: Introduction of Phylogeography : trends and perspective](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081505/56816752550346895ddc0426/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Future directions• Ecological niche models (ENM)
• Studies of natural selection
• Ecological speciation
• Next- generation technique