introduction - equality challenge unit home - … · web viewmusic, dance, drama and performing...

Equality Challenge UnitEquality in higher education: statistical report 2014

Part 1: staff

20.1% of vice-chancellors/principals are women

79.9% of vice-chancellors/principals are men

1

http://www.ecu.ac.uk/

The statistic on the cover shows the gender breakdown of heads of institutions (ie vice-chancellors and principals). This information is based on the new contract level field in the 2012/13 HESA staff record.

Written and produced by Equality Challenge Unit (ECU). Data provided by the Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA).

Further information

Stephanie [email protected]

3

mailto:[email protected]

Equality in higher education: Statistical report 2014

Contents

Introduction.............................................................................7

About the data.......................................................................11Academic staff.......................................................................12Professional and support staff...............................................13Location of institution.............................................................13Nationality..............................................................................14Equality areas........................................................................14Mode......................................................................................19Contract type.........................................................................20Contract level.........................................................................20Occupational group................................................................25Academic contract.................................................................27Academic subject area..........................................................28Academic roles......................................................................31Salaries and pay....................................................................33Destination of leavers............................................................35

Overview................................................................................37

1 Age......................................................................................58Age overview.........................................................................59Mode and contract type.........................................................61Occupational group................................................................73Academic contract.................................................................81Academic subject area..........................................................84Academic roles......................................................................96Destination of leavers..........................................................103

4

2 Disability...........................................................................119Disability overview...............................................................120Mode and contract type.......................................................128Contract level.......................................................................131Occupational group..............................................................142Academic contract...............................................................148Academic subject area........................................................150Academic roles....................................................................156Salaries................................................................................162Destination of leavers..........................................................177

3 Ethnicity............................................................................187Ethnicity overview................................................................188Mode and contract type.......................................................195Contract level.......................................................................202Occupational group..............................................................227Academic contract...............................................................245Academic subject area........................................................247Academic roles....................................................................271Salaries................................................................................286Destination of leavers..........................................................322

4 Gender..............................................................................332Gender overview..................................................................333Mode and contract type.......................................................338Contract level.......................................................................343Occupational group..............................................................354Academic contract...............................................................362Academic subject area........................................................363Academic roles....................................................................370Salaries................................................................................376Destination of leavers..........................................................390

5

5 Multiple identities............................................................401Age and disability.................................................................402Age and ethnicity.................................................................404Disability and ethnicity.........................................................411Disability and gender...........................................................413Ethnicity and gender............................................................416Academic roles....................................................................418

6 Other protected characteristics.....................................424Gender identity....................................................................425Religion and belief...............................................................430Sexual orientation................................................................434

Index....................................................................................440

6

Introduction

This is the seventh national staff equality data report for higher education institutions. Its aim is to assist the sector in better understanding the main equality challenges for staff and directing future efforts to overcome them.

This report presents a snapshot of the age, disability, ethnicity and gender of the higher education workforce in the academic year 2012/13.

The report provides national figures which can be used: to consider the diversity and inclusivity of the HE

workforce as a whole to consider change and progress over time by individual institutions for benchmarking purposes

How to use this report

Data and analysis is provided on age, disability, ethnicity and gender, as well as on the interplay of these identities (for example, female black professors and male disabled senior managers). Each section is colour-coded for easier identification, and highlights key information alongside illustrative tables and charts.

A list of definitions and notes about the data precede the body of this report to clarify some of the terms used and how the data has been presented.

What’s new While this report builds upon the coverage of our previous reports, some aspects have been refined. For example, all

7

data tables are now accompanied with explanatory text to assist the user.

In addition, for the first time, our report presents high level findings on institutional collection and return rates of staff gender identity, religion and belief and sexual orientation data. We also include new tables on staff by contract level.

Please note: in 2012/13, a number of fields in the HESA staff record were either modified or discontinued. As a result, data concerning academic and professional and support staff; gender; departments; professorial status; and senior management status are not comparable to data prior to 2012/13. Additional detail is provided in the About the data section.

Online data tables To help users access and analyse our data, all data tables presented in this report are also available for download in Excel format. Where appropriate, these tables provide additional detail to those in this report, such as total counts and percentages. www.ecu.ac.uk/publications/equality-in higher-educationstatistical-report-2014

heidi Extra higher education data can be accessed via ‘heidi,’ a web based management information service for higher education institutions (HEIs) and approved higher education stakeholder organisations run by the Higher Education Statistical Agency (HESA). The database provides easy access to a wide range of national quantitative data about higher education, and functionality for analysis, presentation and comparison of the data with other institutions.

8

The heidi system also allows users to manipulate the data to compare their performance with that of particular groups of institutions, for example within sector groups, national or regional areas.

For further information on heidi, including training materials, see www.heidi.ac.uk.

Additional resources

It is important to note that the monitoring information that institutions supply to HESA is not the only source of equality information within an institution. For example, institutions will also collect information via staff surveys, involvement activities and HR records.

Using the national figures within this report alongside institutional figures and information gathered from these other sources will give institutions a fuller picture of equality in their institution, allowing them to set evidence-based equality outcomes and objectives.

A number of ECU’s publications explore the collection of additional information in further detail:

ECU (2011) Effective equality surveys. www.ecu.ac.uk/ publications/effective-equality-surveys

ECU (2011) Religion and belief in higher education: researching the experiences of staff and students. www.ecu.ac.uk/publications/religion-and-belief-staff-and-students-in-he

ECU (2010) Advancing LGB equality: improving the experience of lesbian, gay and bisexual staff and students in higher education. www.ecu.ac.uk/publications/advancing-lgb-equality

9

ECU (2010) Trans staff and students in higher education: revised 2010. www.ecu.ac.uk/publications/trans-staff-and students-inhe-revised

ECU (2009) Developing staff disclosure: a guide to collecting and using equality data. www.ecu.ac.uk/publications/developingstaff- disclosure

For guidance on using data and evidence, visit: www.ecu.ac.uk/guidance-resources/using-data-and-evidence.

10

About the data

The analysis in this report is based upon data drawn from the HESA staff record 2003/04 to 2012/13.

Due to changes HESA implemented in 2012/13, some information is not comparable to previous reports.

This record covers all academic and professional and support staff holding one or more contracts of employment with a UK higher education institution. The analysis presented here is based on a small selection of the large amount of data available from HESA.

This does not include staff on consultancy contracts or atypical staff. The term ‘atypical’ is used to describe working arrangements that are not permanent, involve complex employment relationships and/or involve work away from the supervision of the normal work provider.

Counts of staff represent counts of full person equivalents (FPE). This is to allow for the fact that individuals can hold more than one contract within an institution and each contract may involve more than one activity. Full person equivalents are calculated by dividing staff counts among their activities in proportion to the declared full-time equivalent for each activity. Staff FPE counts are calculated on the basis of contract activities that were active on 1 December of the reporting period.

All counts of staff have been rounded to the nearest five in accordance with HESA policy in order to protect the confidentiality of individuals. As totals have also been rounded based on unrounded values, some may be higher

11

or lower than the individual count numbers presented in the report.

Percentages are based on known staff data and calculated from unrounded data. Throughout the report, .. represents a percentage calculated on a population of between 0 and 52 inclusive. These percentages have been suppressed to protect against over interpretation of small numbers. Averages based on seven or fewer staff members have also been suppressed for this reason.

Academic staff

2012/13 onwards Academic staff are defined as staff with at least one academic contract of employment and whose contract activity can be categorised as ‘Managers, directors and senior officials’,‘Professional occupations’ or ‘Associate professional and technical occupations’ (defined by the 2010 Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) major groups 1, 2 or 3). This may therefore include vice-chancellors and other senior academic managers, medical practitioners, dentists, veterinarians and other health care professionals whose contract of employment includes an academic function.

The academic employment function may be teaching, research, teaching and research or neither teaching nor research (where an academic professional has taken up a senior administrative responsibility but there is no change to the academic function in their contract of employment).

12

Prior to 2012/13 Academic staff were defined as those staff responsible for planning, directing and undertaking academic research and teaching within higher education institutions. This category may also include vice chancellors, principals, and clinical and healthcare professionals who undertake teaching or research activities.

Professional and support staff

2012/13 onwardsHESA now refers to these staff as ‘non-academic staff,’ and defines them as staff who do not have an academic employment function. They include managers, non academic professionals, student welfare workers, secretaries, caretakers and cleaners. For the purposes of this report, these staff are referred to as professional and support staff.

Prior to 2012/13 Those who did not have an academic employment function, such as managers, non-academic professionals, student welfare workers, cleaners, caterers and secretaries.

Location of institution

The allocation of an institution to a geographical region relates only to the administrative centre of that institution. There may be staff employed at institutions who are working in regions other than that of the administrative centre of the institution.

13

Although the Open University operates throughout the UK, its administrative centre is located in England, and is counted as a wholly English institution.

Nationality

Nationality defines the country of legal nationality. Data is supplied to HESA in the form of country codes.

UK nationality staff are those whose country of legal nationality is the UK, including the Channel Islands and Isle of Man.

Non-UK-nationality staff are those whose country of legal nationality is a country other than the UK.

Equality areas

AgeThis report uses the following age categories and is calculated at 31 August in the reporting year:

25 and under 26 to 30 31 to 35 36 to 40 41 to 45 46 to 50 51 to 55 56 to 60 61 to 65 66 and over

In some cases these categories have been aggregated.

14

BME Black and minority ethnic.

This definition is widely recognised and used to identify patterns of marginalisation and segregation caused by an individual’s ethnicity. ECU recognises the limitations of this definition, particularly the assumption that minority ethnic staff are a homogenous group. Where possible, this report will present data disaggregated by more detailed ethnicity categories in addition to data consolidating BME staff as a group.

Disability Disability is recorded within the HESA staff record on the basis of self-assessment using one of three possible categories:

declared disabled not known to be disabled information not provided

This report uses the term ‘disabled staff’ to refer to staff who were indicated as disabled on their HESA staff record. ‘Non-disabled staff’ is used to refer to staff who have indicated that they are not disabled, or whose disability status is unknown by their institution. This aligns with the new student requirements and HESA reporting standards.

Prior to 2012 ‘Non-disabled staff’ figures did not include staff whose disability status was unknown by their institution; this group therefore constituted a smaller proportion of the staff population and, conversely, ‘disabled staff’ a larger proportion. As a result, the percentage of staff in the disabled category may represent a slight undercount

15

compared with how they were reported prior to our 2012 report.

Ethnicity Ethnicity within the HESA staff record is based upon the 2001 census classification system. For the purposes of this report, the census categories have been aggregated into six groups:

white – all white ethnic groups including white British black – black Caribbean, black African, black British

and black other Asian – Asian Indian, Asian Pakistani, Asian

Bangladeshi, Asian British and Asian other Chinese mixed other ethnic background

Where the numbers are large enough, some analyses are reported in more detailed groupings.

For some analyses the non-white groups have been further aggregated into a single black and minority ethnic (BME) group.

2012/13 onwards From 2012/13 Arab was added to the coding frame for staff ethnicity. Where ethnicity is aggregated as above, Arab has been grouped into other ethnic background

16

Gender

2012/13 onwardsBeginning in 2012/13, the staff record replaced the gender field with a legal sex field, of which the possible options are male and female. Due to the requirement to return this information to HM Revenue and Customs, legal sex information will be known for all staff with the exception of those holding solely non-academic atypical contracts, for whom sex may legitimately not be known.

For the purposes of this report, data from the legal sex field will be referred to as ‘gender.’

Prior to 2012/13 The HESA staff record included a gender field, with the possible options of male, female or indeterminate.

HESA used the category ‘indeterminate’ – which is consistent with the managing information across partnerships (MIAP) common data definitions coding frame – to refer to intersex people. Intersex people are individuals born with anatomy and physiology that differs from contemporary ideals of what constitutes ‘normal’ male and female. It is recognised that some intersex people may find the indeterminate category used by HESA for the previous field offensive. For data return purposes, institutions were able to ask staff about their gender using the intersex terminology and return any positive responses to HESA using the MIAP coding and terminology in 2011/12.

Staff who identified as intersex were excluded in any analysis of 2002/03 to 2011/12 data. This is because any statistics drawn from these small numbers would not give

17

accurate information about the proportion of intersex people in the sector.

ECU recommends when monitoring sex to include categories of ‘other’ and ‘prefer not to say’ alongside male and female. This will allow anyone who associates with terms including intersex, androgyne, intergender, ambigender, gender fluid, polygender and genderqueer to complete the question

Gender identity Gender identity is a person’s internal perception and experience of their gender. Someone’s gender identity does not necessarily have to be the same as the gender they were assigned at birth.

Beginning with the 2012/13 staff record, institutions have the option of returning information to HESA on whether a person’s gender identity is the same as originally assigned at birth. The possible field options are yes, no, and information refused. This information is recorded on the basis of the staff member’s own self-assessment.

For further information on monitoring sex and gender identity, see www.ecu.ac.uk/guidance-resources/using-data andevidence/monitoring-questions.

Religion and belief Religion or belief refers to the full diversity of religious and belief affiliations within the UK, including non-religious and philosophical beliefs such as atheism, agnosticism and humanism.

Beginning with the 2012/13 staff record, institutions now have the option of returning religion and belief data to

18

HESA. This information is recorded on the basis of the staff member’s own self-assessment.

The possible field options are: no religion; Buddhist; Christian (with further denominational options provided in Scotland and Northern Ireland); Hindu; Jewish; Muslim; Sikh; Spiritual; any other religion and belief; and prefer not to say/information refused. For the purposes of this report, all Christian denominational options have been aggregated into a single Christian category.

Sexual orientation Sexual orientation is a person’s sexual orientation towards people of the same sex as him or her, people of the opposite sex from him or her, and people of both sexes. This relates to a person’s feelings rather than their actions.

Beginning with the 2012/13 staff record, institutions have the option of returning sexual orientation data to HESA. The HESA sexual orientation field has the following possible options: bisexual, gay man, gay woman/lesbian, heterosexual, other, information refused. This information is recorded on the basis of the staff member’s own self-assessment.

Mode

Full-time staff are those whose contracts state that their mode of employment is full-time. This includes staff who work full-time for part of the year and term-time only staff who work full-time during the term. Part-time staff are those whose contracts state that their mode of employment is part-time.

19

Please note that the mode of employment is an attribute of the contract, not the person. Therefore, a person will be counted as wholly part-time even if they hold a number of part-time contracts that add up to one full-time equivalent (FTE). The FPE allocated to the full-time category will only reflect the people that hold a part-time contract. This is consistent with the treatment of other attributes of the contract.

Contract type

Permanent staff Those who were employed on a contract of employment that states the member of staff as permanent or on an open-ended contract. This includes term-time-only staff who were employed on an open-ended contract.

Fixed-term contract staff Fixed-term contract staff are those employed for a fixed period or who have an end date on their contract of employment. This includes staff on rolling fixed-term contracts.

Contract level

Contract levels records the UCEA or XpertHR defined level of the contract. Contract levels are used to define professors and senior management (see professorial status and senior management post holder).

Head of institution – vice-chancellor (VC)/principalThe most senior manager within the institution (ie chief executive officer).

20

2A – deputy vice-chancellor (DVC)/pro vice-chancellor (PVC) These roles are the highest level appointments reporting directly to the VC and will have primary responsibility for the organisation’s performance and strategic development. They are responsible for a major part of the academic life of the university and are differentiated from Level 3 by having responsibility across the institution. They may have Dean responsibilities for a specific faculty in addition to their D/PVC responsibilities. Likely to deputise for the VC and likely to apply to a handful of positions in the institution.

2B – chief operating officer, registrar, university secretary These roles are the highest level of appointment reporting directly to the VC and will have primary responsibility for the organisation’s performance and strategic development. They are responsible for, or have an overseeing role over, all/most of the internal professional/administrative services of the institution. They have responsibility for more than one functional area at a strategic rather than an operational level. Likely to apply to a handful of positions in the institution.

3A – head/director of major academic area These roles will be heads of major academic areas where a number of schools/departments/divisions are combined into a small number of larger groupings. These roles have significant management and resource responsibility and will be part of the university’s senior management team (although level 2 roles may meet separately as the ultimate executive decision-makers). Likely to be a very small number in the institution. Likely to be deans/ directors of faculty/ head of academic division.

3B – director of major function/group of functions eg finance, corporate services, human resources (HR)

21

These roles have overall responsibility for matters across a major function or group of functions or defined activity. Will be part of the university’s senior management team (although level 2 roles may meet separately as the ultimate executive decision-makers).

3/4A1 – head of school/division/department/centre size 1 Head of distinct area of academic responsibility, likely to be a school or department. Unlikely to be on the senior management team, unless it is the first level of function head below the role of level 2.

3/4A2 – head of school/division/department/centre size 2 Head of distinct area of academic responsibility, likely to be a school or department and will have responsibility for all staff within the school/department. Unlikely to be on the senior management team, unless it is the first level of function head below the role of level 2.

3/4A3 – head of school/division/department/centre size 3 Head of distinct area of academic responsibility, likely to be a school or department. Unlikely to be on the senior management team, unless it is the first level of function head below the role of level 2.

4A – head of a sub-set of academic area/directors of small centres Will have responsibility for a subset of a division/department/school (eg subject discipline group) or research group, or cross school/ department responsibility (eg director of research). May include professors who head departments/research centres.

4B – senior function head Will have full responsibility for a complete function or activity below senior management team level but will be part of the management team for the overall function.

5A – professor

22

Senior academic appointments which may carry the title of professor but which do not have departmental line management responsibilities.

5B – function head These roles have full managerial responsibility for one or more activities and input into policy formation for those activities. Responsibility for staff within the area of activity.

Level I – non-academic staff section manager, senior lecturer (pre-92), principal lecturer (post-92), reader, principal research fellow To be responsible for the day-to-day management of a significant professional service unit, activity, department or project, with specifically identified responsibilities. Includes academic subject specialists, academic programme coordinators and/or academic staff with high level expertise/knowledge.

Level J – section/team leader (professional, technical, administrative), lecturer B (pre-92), senior lecturer (post-92), senior research fellow Responsible for the day-to-day management of a team of staff. Specialists with experience or seniority but limited management responsibility may be found at this level. In the case of academic staff there may be no responsibility for staff or budgets but substantial responsibility for students.

Level K – senior professional/technical staff, lecturer A (pre-92), lecturer (post-92), research fellow, researcher/senior research assistant, teaching fellow Operates at an experienced, professional level in a single area of work without supervision. Likely to be responsible for less experienced staff at level L and below and may coordinate the activities of a team. In the case of academic staff there may be no responsibility for staff or budgets but significant responsibility for students.

23

Level L – professional/technical/senior administrative staff, research assistant, teaching assistant Operates as a fully competent professional within a single area of work with minimal supervision. This is a standard ‘Officer’ level. For academic jobs this is an assistant or instructor role. In some professional areas this would be the expected entry level.

Level M – assistant professional staff, administrative staff Typically an entry level professional, working under instruction from others within a defined area of work. May be part-qualified in an appropriate professional discipline. May supervise/assist/guide less experienced administrative staff. Would not cover academic roles.

Level N – junior administrative staff, clerical staff, technician/ craftsman, operative Normally working under closer supervision than level M staff but experienced in specific areas of job role. Responsibility mainly for performing a range of simple, routine tasks within basic procedures and under regular supervision. May be a school leaver, trainee or modern apprentice. Would not cover academic roles.

Level O – routine task provider Carrying out a range of simple tasks within a defined routine and where guidance is readily available/under regular supervision. Some planning and organising of own workload will typically be required (largely around the timing and sequencing of assigned tasks to make sure deadlines are met).

Level P – simple task provider Carrying out simple and/or repetitive tasks under close supervision, typically supporting students and staff often as part of a team engaged in the same tasks. These tasks and routines are generally simple and repetitive and are closely supervised.

24

For further information about contract levels, see www.hesa.ac.uk/12025/a/LEVELS.

Occupational group

The standard occupational classification (SOC) provides a national standard for categorising occupational information. SOC forms the basis of occupational classification in a variety of national surveys that collect statistical information such as the Labour force survey and New earnings survey. The utilisation of SOC for classifying occupations within the HE sector therefore both allows for the heterogeneity of occupations that exist and enables comparisons to be made with other sectors of the economy and from a variety of data sources.

2012/13 onwards HESA has used the SOC2010 variant of the SOC coding frame: www.hesa.ac.uk/C12025/A/ACTSOC. This version maintains the same nine major groups used in previous versions of SOC, but it is no longer possible to replicate the variant previously used by HESA for staff in the HE sector, which permitted staff to be grouped into thirteen broad occupational activities. In addition, the association of academic and non-academic activities solely with SOC major groups is no longer possible, due to the incorporation of both types of activities at the sub-major level. Consequently, staff may be pursuing an academic or non academic activity within a given SOC major group, whereas previously certain SOC groups were held to be entirely academic or non-academic in their own right.

The publication of staff activities by SOC major group may therefore now occur with or without reference to the

25

academic nature of that activity, whereas previously this was implicit in the titles of the activities published. Care should be taken when comparing data across years.

For the purposes of this report, only academic staff in SOC groups 1–3 are shown in occupational tables, though a small number of academic staff are in SOC groups outside of these. While these staff are not shown in their respective occupational groups, they are included in the academic total. For this reason, the sum of academic occupational groups is not equal to the academic total presented in all tables relating to occupational group.

Prior to 2012/13

Staff contracts were categorised within the HESA staff record into one of 13 groups derived using the standard occupational classification system:

academic professionals non-academic professionals managers laboratory, engineering, building, IT and medical

technicians (including nurses) student welfare workers, careers advisors, vocational

training instructors, personnel and planning officers artistic, media, public relations, marketing and sports

occupations library assistants, clerks and general administrative

assistants secretaries, typists, receptionists and telephonists chefs, gardeners, electrical, mechanical and

construction trades and printers caretakers, residential wardens, sports and leisure

attendants, nursery nurses and care occupations retail and customer service occupations

26

drivers, maintenance supervisors and plant operatives cleaners, catering assistants, security officers, porters

and maintenance workers

Academic contract

Teaching-only staff Teaching-only staff are those whose contract of employment states that they are employed only to undertake teaching.

Research-only staff Research-only staff are those whose contract of employment states that their primary academic employment function is research only, even though the contract may include a limited number of teaching hours.

Teaching and research staff Teaching and research staff are those whose contract of employment states that they are employed to undertake both teaching and research.

Neither teaching nor research staff Staff whose contracted academic employment function is neither teaching nor research, eg vice-chancellor.

27

Academic subject area

The coding frame for cost centre was revised for the 2012/13 staff record and therefore 2012/13 academic subject area data is not comparable with previous years.

SET Science, engineering and technology.

Departments (SET) This report uses generic classification of academic departments from the HESA staff record.

2012/13 onwards Departments classified as science, engineering and technology (SET) in this report are:

agriculture, forestry and food science anatomy and physiology archaeology architecture, built environment and planning biosciences chemical engineering chemistry civil engineering clinical dentistry clinical medicine earth, marine and environmental sciences electrical, electronic and computer engineering general engineering geography and environmental studies IT, systems sciences and computer software

engineering mathematics mechanical, aero and production engineering

28

mineral, metallurgy and materials engineering nursing and allied health professions pharmacy and pharmacology physics psychology and behavioural sciences veterinary science

Prior to 2012/13 Subject areas classified as SET in previous reports were:

agriculture and forestry anatomy and physiology archaeology architecture, built environment and planning biosciences chemical engineering chemistry civil engineering clinical dentistry clinical medicine earth, marine and environmental sciences electrical, electronic and computer engineering general engineering geography IT and systems sciences, computer software

engineering mathematics mechanical, aero and production engineering mineral, metallurgy and materials engineering nursing and paramedical studies pharmacy and pharmacology physics psychology and behavioural sciences veterinary science

Departments (non-SET)29

2012/13 onwards

This report uses generic classification of academic departments from the HESA staff record.

Departments classified as non-SET (science, engineering and technology) in this report are:

anthropology and development studies area studies art and design business and management studies catering and hospitality management classics continuing education economics and econometrics education English language and literature health and community studies history law media studies modern languages music, dance, drama and performing arts philosophy politics and international studies social work and social policy sociology sports science and leisure studies theology and religious studies total academic services central administration and services premises residences and catering staff and student facilities

30

Prior to 2012/13 Subject areas classified as non-SET in previous reports were:

business and management studies catering and hospitality management central administration and services continuing education design and creative arts education health and community studies humanities and language-based studies media studies modern languages premises residences and catering social studies sports science and leisure studies staff and student facilities total academic services

Academic roles

Professorial status

2012/13 onwards HESA uses data from the contract level field to derive information about staff members’ professorial status. Staff holding a contract which aligns with the Universities and Colleges Employers Association (UCEA) contract level 5A (Professor) are considered to hold professorial status. This level indicates a senior academic appointment which may carry the title of professor but which does not have departmental line management responsibilities. For further guidance on the levels to which contracts can be

31

aligned, see www.hesa.ac.uk/12025/a/LEVELS.

Prior to 2012/13 ‘Professor’ was a term associated with those returned in the HESA staff record as holding a contract which conferred the title of professor to the holder, regardless of whether an institution’s local grade structure contained a professor grade. Data prior to 2012/13 is therefore not comparable to data from 2012/13 onwards.

Senior management post holder 2012/13 onwards HESA uses data from the contract level field to derive information about whether a staff member is a senior manager. Staff holding a contract at contract levels HOI–5B are considered to be a senior manager.

Prior to 2012/13 The HESA staff record included a senior management post holder field, which was used to indicate whether senior management/ administrative responsibilities within the institution were associated with a staff member’s contract. Data prior to 2012/13

32

Salaries and pay

Salaries Salary is based on the contract salary for members of staff at each institution at 31 July in the reporting period, or the end date of the contract if earlier. Members of staff for whom the concept of a per annum contractual salary does not apply (eg staff paid hourly, staff with zero-hour contracts etc) have been excluded from the salary analysis.

Salary range This report presents salary ranges in two ways. Please note that for part-time staff, salary ranges and academic pay spine ranges have been scaled up to a full-time equivalent.

Three salary ranges, consistent with previous reports under £30,000 £30,000 to £50,000 over £50,000

Academic pay spine range This report includes contract salaries grouped into six salary ranges. The upper and lower of each range is aligned with salary spine points used in the framework salary spine. www.hesa.ac.uk/includes/C12025_resources/Single_pay_spine.xlsx

contract salary < £17,503contract salary ≥ £17,503 and < £23,352contract salary ≥ £23,352 and < £31,331contract salary ≥ £31,331 and < £42,055contract salary ≥ £42,055 and < £56,467contract salary ≥ £56,467(< less than, ≥ more than or equal to)

33

Contract salaries reported to HESA based on the framework salary spine or framework clinical spine, plus salaries not set against a nationally negotiated pay spine range, are included in this analysis. Where HESA is provided with both a salary point (within the framework pay spine range or framework clinical spine) and an enhanced salary figure (eg London weighting), the actual enhanced salary is used.

Median salary and median pay gap If all salaries were ordered in a list, the median salary would be the middle salary.

The median pay gap for disability, ethnicity and gender, has been calculated as:

(non-disabled staff median salary – disabled staff median salary) ÷ non-disabled staff median salary

(white staff median salary – BME staff median salary) ÷ white staff median salary

(male staff median salary – female staff median salary) ÷ male staff median salary

Salary is based on the contract salary for members of staff at each institution at 31 July in the reporting period, or the end date of the contract if earlier.

Mean salary and mean pay gap The mean is equal to the sum of the values divided by the number of values.

Mean salary is calculated by multiplying the contract salary by FPE and dividing by the sum of the FPE:

sum (FPE x salary) ÷ sum (FPE) The mean pay gap for disability, ethnicity and gender has been calculated as:

34

(non-disabled staff mean salary – disabled staff mean salary) ÷ non-disabled staff mean salary

(white staff mean salary – BME staff mean salary) ÷ white staff mean salary

(male staff mean salary – female staff mean salary) ÷ male staff mean salary

Salary is based on the contract salary for members of staff at each institution at 31 July in the reporting period, or the end date of the contract if earlier.

Destination of leavers Leavers are academic members of staff for whom all contracts ended on or after 1 December in the previous reporting period and before or on 1 December in the current reporting period.

A staff member who retired prematurely and received a pension is regarded as a leaver and recorded as retiring, unless they are immediately re-employed in an institution’s service. A member of staff whose contract ended but who immediately started another contract, and therefore did not leave the HEI, is not included as a staff leaver. Staff on multiple contracts where one of these contracts came to an end are also not included as a staff leaver if they were still employed in institutional service under one or more other contracts. All data on staff leavers excludes atypical staff.

HESA collects data on the destination of leavers to enable information to be provided about cross-fertilisation between HE and other areas of employment and the migration of HE staff to and from the UK.

Destinations are presented as:

35

UK destinationanother HEI in the UKother education institution in the UKresearch institution in the UKstudent in the UKNHS/general medical or general dental practice in the UKother public sector in the UKother employment in the UK

non-UK destinationHEI in an overseas countryother education institution in an overseas countryresearch institution overseasstudent in an overseas countryhealth service in an overseas countryother employment in an overseas country

no longer in regular employmentno longer in regular employmentretireddeceasednot known/not applicable

36

Overview

In 2012/13, there were 185,585 academic staff working in higher education, representing a 23.5% increase from 2003/04 levels. During this same period, the number of professional and support staff increased by 4.8% (196,935 in 2012/13, compared with 187,875 in 2003/04).

However, professional and support staff still comprised the majority of all staff working in higher education (51.5%).

A higher proportion of part-time staff were on fixed-term contracts than full-time staff. Of those who worked part-time, 55.7% of academic and 20.0% of professional and support staff were on fixed-term contracts, compared with 25.2% of academic and 12.0% of professional and support staff working full-time.

SET academic staff were concentrated in certain subject areas. For example, 21.3% worked in clinical medicine, 12.3% in biosciences and 9.1% in nursing and allied health professions.

Within non-SET subject areas, relatively large proportions of staff worked in business and management studies (15.8%), education (10.9%) and art and design (9.9%).

Overall, 9.6% of academic staff held professorial roles. A higher proportion of SET academic staff were professors (10.9%) than those working in non-SET subject areas (8.2%).

0.8% of academic staff were senior managers, 67.4% of whom worked in non-SET subject areas.

The proportion of senior managers who worked full-time (93.0%) was higher than that of other academic staff (65.8%).

37

A higher proportion of academic staff earned over £50,000 (27.7%) than professional and support staff (5.3%).

Between 2011/12 and 2012/13, 17.8% of academic staff left employment at their institution (15.8% of UK and 22.0% of non-UK academic staff).

Of those with a known leaving destination, 53.3% of UK and 50.0% of non-UK leavers found employment in the UK – for about half of these leavers, within another UK higher education institution.

41.8% of UK leavers were no longer in employment, compared with 26.6% of non-UK leavers, a difference of 15.2%.

The majority of staff in higher education worked in England (82.7%). 10.3% of staff worked in Scotland, 5.2% in Wales and 1.8% in Northern Ireland.

0.1 All staff by country of institution

TotalNo. %

England 316395 82.7Northern Ireland 6790 1.8Scotland 39300 10.3Wales 20030 5.2UK total 382515 100

Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose country of institution is unknown

38

All staff by country of institution

%England 82.7Northern Ireland 1.8Scotland 10.3Wales 5.2UK total 100

In 2012/13, there were 185,585 academic staff working in higher education, representing a 23.5% increase from 2003/04 levels. During this same period, the number of professional and support staff increased by 4.8% (196,935 in 2012/13, compared with 187,875 in 2003/04).

However, professional and support staff still comprised the majority of all staff working in higher education (51.5%).

0.2 Profile of staff over time by activity

Academic Professional and support

All staff

No. % No. % No.2003/04 150230 44.4 187875 55.6 3381052004/05 160655 46.4 185650 53.6 3463052005/06 164875 46.4 190535 53.6 3554102006/07 169995 46.7 194165 53.3 3641602007/08 179940 47.0 197510 53.0 3724552008/09 179035 46.8 203715 53.2 3827552009/10 181590 46.9 205835 53.1 387425

39

2010/11 181180 47.5 200605 52.5 3817852011/12 181385 48.0 196860 52.0 3782452012/13 185585 48.5 196935 51.5 382515Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose activity is unknown.

85.4% of professional and support staff were on open/ permanent contracts, compared with 64.4% of academic staff.

A higher proportion of part-time staff were on fixed-term contracts than full-time staff. Of those who worked part-time, 55.7% of academic and 20.0% of professional and support staff were on fixed-term contracts, compared with 25.2% of academic and 12.0% of professional and support staff working full-time.

0.3 Staff by mode, contract type and activity


All staff

No. %* %^ No. %* %^ No.All staffOpen/permanent

119595

64.4

41.6

168180

85.4

58.4

287770

Fixed-term 65990 35.

669.7 28755 14.

630.3 94745

All staff 185585 100 48.

519693

5100

51.5

382515

Full timeOpen/ 91635 74. 44. 11621 88. 55. 20784

40

permanent 8 1 0 0 9 5


266.2 15785 12.

033.8 46645

All full-time

122500 100 48.

113199

0100

51.9

254490

Part-timeOpen/permanent

27960 44.3

35.0 51970 80.

065.0 79930


773.0 12970 20.

027.0 48100

All part-time 63085 100 49.

3 64940 100

50.7

128025

* within an activity, the percentage of staff in a contract type (compare vertically within a mode)^ within a mode and contract type, the percentage of staff who are academic/professional and support (compare horizontally) Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose mode, contract type or activity is unknown.

Overall, similar proportions of academic (34.0%) and professional and support staff (33.0%) worked part-time, though this varied considerably by occupational group.

For example, 14.3% of academic managers, directors and senior officials worked part-time, compared with 34.1% of academic staff in professional occupations.

Likewise, the proportion of staff who worked part-time on professional and support contracts varied from 11.8% for managers, directors and senior officials to 66.1% for staff in elementary occupations.

41

0.4 Staff by activity, occupational group and mode

Full-time Part-time All staffNo. % No. % No.

Academic contractManagers, directors and senior officials

430 85.7 70 14.3 500

Professional occupations 121085 65.9 62645 34.

1 183730

Associate professional and technical occupations

980 72.8 365 27.2 1345

Total 122500 66.0 63085 34.0 185585

Professional and support contractManagers, directors and senior officials

9750 88.2 1300 11.8 11050

Professional occupations 27695 77.6 7985 22.

4 35680


33365 76.9 10040 23.1 43410

Administrative and secretarial occupations

40880 63.2 23805 36.8 64685

Skilled trades occupations 5410 87.5 770 12.

5 6180

Caring, leisure 3810 54.7 3160 45. 6970

43

and other service occupations

3

Sales and customer services occupations

1035 53.3 905 46.7 1940

Process, plant and machine operatives

1455 85.7 245 14.3 1700

Elementary occupations 8585 33.9 16730 66.

1 25310

Total 131990 67.0 64940 33.0 196935

All staff 254490 66.5 128025

33.5 382515

Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose activity, occupational group or mode is unknown.Academic staff in SOC groups other than 1–3 have been included in the academic total but are not shown in an occupational group. The sum of academic occupational groups therefore is not equal to the academic total in this table.

Staff in occupational groups by mode

Full-time % Part-time %Managers, directors and senior officials 85.7 14.3

Professional occupations 65.9 34.1Associate professional and technical occupations 72.8 27.2

Managers, directors and senior 88.2 11.8

44

officialsProfessional occupations 77.6 22.4Associate professional and technical occupations 76.9 23.1

Administrative and secretarial occupations 63.2 36.8

Skilled trades occupations 87.5 12.5Caring, leisure and other service occupations 54.7 45.3

Sales and customer services occupations 53.3 46.7

Process, plant and machine operatives 85.7 14.3

Elementary occupations 33.9 66.1

The majority of academic staff (51.0%) had teaching and research contracts. 25.2% were on teaching only contracts and 22.8% on research only contracts. 1.0% of staff had neither a teaching nor research contract.

0.5 Academic staff by research/teaching contract type

TotalNo. %

Teaching only 46795 25.2Research only 42350 22.8Teaching and research 94600 51.0Neither teaching nor research 1840 1.0All academic staff 185585 100

Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose research/teaching contract typeis unknown.

45

Academic staff by research/teaching contract type

%

Teaching only 25.2

Research only 22.8

Teaching and research 51.0

Neither teaching nor research 1.0

SET academic staff were concentrated in certain subject areas. For example, 21.3% worked in clinical medicine, 12.3% in biosciences and 9.1% in nursing and allied health professions.

Relatively few academic staff worked in archaeology (0.7%), chemical engineering (0.9%) or mineral, metallurgy and materials engineering (1.1%).

0.6 SET academic staff by subject area

TotalNo. %

Agriculture and forestry and food science 1100 1.1

Anatomy and physiology 1605 1.6Archaeology 665 0.7Architecture, built environment and planning 3760 3.8

Biosciences 12240 12.3

Chemical engineering 875 0.9Chemistry 3755 3.8

47

Civil engineering 1750 1.8Clinical dentistry 1470 1.5

Clinical medicine 21190 21.3

Earth, marine and environmental sciences 3485 3.5

Electrical, electronic and computer engineering 3835 3.8

General engineering 3395 3.4Geography and environmental studies 2130 2.1IT, systems sciences, computer software engineering 6410 6.4

Mathematics 4270 4.3Mechanical, aero and production engineering 4135 4.1

Mineral, metallurgy and materials engineering 1050 1.1

Nursing and allied health professionals 9055 9.1Pharmacy and pharmacology 2025 2.0Physics 4275 4.3Psychology and behavioural sciences 6005 6.0Veterinary science 1160 1.2Total SET 99630 100

Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose subject area is unknown.

Within non-SET subject areas, relatively large proportions of staff worked in business and management studies (15.8%), education (10.9%) and art and design (9.9%).

48

0.7 Non-SET academic staff by subject area

TotalNo. %

Anthropology and development studies 865 1.0Area studies 315 0.4Art and design 8480 9.9Business and management studies 13570 15.8Catering and hospitality management 740 0.9Classics 590 0.7Continuing education 1020 1.2Economics and econometrics 2540 3.0Education 9390 10.9English language and literature 4610 5.4Health and community studies 3555 4.1History 3330 3.9Law 4900 5.7Media studies 3845 4.5Modern languages 5665 6.6Music, dance, drama and performing arts 6765 7.9Philosophy 1085 1.3Politics and international studies 2740 3.2Social work and social policy 2640 3.1Sociology 2730 3.2Sports science and leisure studies 2365 2.8Theology and religious studies 765 0.9Total academic services 1195 1.4Central administration and services 1645 1.9Premises 55 0.1Residences and catering 15 0.0

49

Staff and student facilities 540 0.6Total non-SET 85955 100


Overall, 9.6% of academic staff held professorial roles. A higher proportion of SET academic staff were professors (10.9%) than those working in non-SET subject areas (8.2%).

Within both SET and non-SET subject areas, a higher proportion of full-time than part-time academic staff were professors. The proportion of part-time non-SET academic staff in professorial roles was particularly low (3.3%).

0.8 Academic staff by SET category, mode and professorial category

Professor Non-professorNo. %* %^ No. %* %^

All SET 10840 60.6

10.9 88785 52.

989.1

Full-time SET 9030 50.

512.0 65945 39.

388.0

Part-time SET 1815 10.

1 7.4 22840 13.6

92.6

All non-SET 7040 39.4 8.2 78915 47.

191.8

Full-time non SET 5755 32.

212.1 41770 24.

987.9

Part-time non-SET 1285 7.2 3.3 37145 22.

196.7

Total 17880 100 9.6 16770 100 90.

50

0 4* within a professorial category, the percentage of staff in a SET category and mode (compare vertically)^ within a SET category and mode, the percentage of staff who are professors/non-professors (compare horizontally) Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose SET category, mode or professorial category is unknown.

Professors/non-professors by SET category and mode

Professor % Non-Professor %

Full-time SET 50.5 39.3

Part-time SET 10.1 13.6

Full-time non SET 32.2 24.9

Part-time non-SET 7.2 22.1

0.8% of academic staff were senior managers, 67.4% of whom worked in non-SET subject areas.

The proportion of senior managers who worked full-time (93.0%) was higher than that of other academic staff (65.8%).

0.9 Academic staff by SET category, mode and senior management category

Senior manager Other academicNo. %* %^ No. %* %^

All SET 480 32.6 0.5 99150 53.

999.5

51

Full-time SET 440 29.8 0.6 74535 40.

599.4

Part-time SET 40 2.8 0.2 24615 13.4

99.8

All non-SET 990 67.4 1.2 84965 46.

198.8


2 2.0 46595 25.3

98.0

Part-time non-SET 60 4.1 0.2 38370 20.

899.8

Total 1470 100 0.8 184115 100 99.

2* within a senior management category, the percentage of staff in a SET category and mode (compare vertically)^ within a SET category and mode, the percentage of staff who are senior managers/other academics (compare horizontally) Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose SET category, mode or senior management category is unknown.

Academic senior managers/other academic staff by SET category and mode

Senior Manager %

Other Academic %

Full-time SET 29.8 40.5Part-time SET 2.8 13.4Full-time non SET 63.2 25.3


52

A higher proportion of academic staff earned over £50,000 (27.7%) than professional and support staff (5.3%).

The majority of full-time (58.8%) and part-time (81.6%) professional and support staff earned less than £30,000, compared with 7.8% of full-time and 17.9% of part-time academic staff.

53

0.10 All staff by mode, salary range and activity


No. % No. %

Under £30,000 20895 11.3 130615

66.3

£30,000-£50,000 113375 61.1 55910 28.4Over £50,000 51315 27.7 10405 5.3

Total 185585 100 196935

100

Full-timeUnder £30,000 9585 7.8 77625 58.8£30,000-£50,000 71160 58.1 45135 34.2Over £50,000 41750 34.1 9235 7.0

Total 122500 100 131990

100

Part-timeUnder £30,000 11310 17.9 52995 81.6£30,000-£50,000 42210 66.9 10775 16.6Over £50,000 9565 15.2 1175 1.8Total 63085 100 64940 100

Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose mode, salary range or activity is unknown.

Academic/professional and support staff in modes by salary range

Under £30,000

£30,000-£50,000

Over £50,000

All academic staff 11.3 61.3 27.7

54

Full-time academic staff 7.8 58.1 34.1

Part-time academic staff 17.9 66.9 15.2

All professional and support 66.3 28.4 5.3

Full-time professional and support 58.8 34.2 7.0

Part-time professional and support 81.6 16.6 *

* values less than 5.0 are not displayed

Just over two thirds of academic staff (67.7%) earned between £31,331 and £56,467.

0.4% of academic staff were in the lowest pay spine range (less than £17,503) and 17.1% in the highest (£56,467 or above).

0.11 Academic staff by academic pay spine range

TotalNo. %

<£17,503 665 0.4>£17,503 and <£23,352 2585 1.4>£23,352 and <£31,331 24955 13.4>£31,331 and <£42,055 64910 35.0>£42,055 and <£56,467 60675 32.7>£56,467 31785 17.1Total 185585 100

Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose academic pay spine range is unknown.

55

Academic staff by academic pay spine range

%<£17,503 0.4>£17,503 and <£23,352 1.4>£23,352 and <£31,331 13.4>£31,331 and <£42,055 35.0>£42,055 and <£56,467 32.7>£56,467 17.1

Leavers refers to academic staff who left their HEI between 2011/12 and 2012/13.

Between 2011/12 and 2012/13, 17.8% of academic staff left employment at their institution (15.8% of UK and 22.0% of non-UK academic staff). The leaving destination for the majority of these staff was unknown (60.0%).

The leaving destination was known for a higher proportion of non-UK leavers (44.6%) than UK leavers (40.1%).

0.12 UK/non-UK academic staff by leaving status

TotalNo. %

Total 181385 100Leavers(as a proportion of all staff) 32340 17.8

Known destination(as a proportion of all leavers) 12925 40.0

Unknown destination 19415 60.0

56

(as a proportion of all leavers)UK national

Total 131695 100Leavers(as a proportion of UK staff) 20810 15.8

Known destination(of UK leavers) 8350 40.1

Unknown destination(of UK leavers) 12455 59.9

Non-UK nationalTotal 44175 100Leavers(as a proportion of non-UK staff) 9700 22.0

Known destination(of non-UK leavers) 4325 44.6

Unknown destination(of non-UK leavers) 5370 55.4

Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose leaving status is unknown.

Academic staff by nationality and leaving status

All staff

UK nationals

Non-UK nationals

Academic non-leavers

82.2 84.2 78.0

Known destination 7.1 6.3 9.8Unknown destination

10.7 9.5 12.2

57

Of those with a known leaving destination, 53.3% of UK and 50.0% of non-UK leavers found employment in the UK – for about half of these leavers, within another UK higher education institution.

23.4% of non-UK leavers were employed outside of the UK compared with 4.8% of UK leavers, with 11.7% and 2.3% respectively employed at a non-UK higher education institution.

41.8% of UK leavers were no longer in employment, compared with 26.6% of non-UK leavers, a difference of 15.2%.

0.13 UK and non-UK academic staff leavers by known leaving destination

UK national Non-UK national

No. % No. %UK employmentUK and other HEI 1980 23.7 1035 24.0UK and other education institution 410 4.9 110 2.5

UK student 235 2.8 210 4.8UK research institute 105 1.3 80 1.9UK NHS/medical or dental practice 455 5.4 115 2.7

UK public sector 140 1.7 40 0.9UK private sector 1130 13.5 570 13.2All UK employment 4455 53.3 2165 50.0Non-UK employmentNon-UK HEI 195 2.3 510 11.7

58

Non-UK other education institution 60 0.7 100 2.3

Non-UK student 5 0.1 30 0.7Non-UK research institute 40 0.5 140 3.3

Non-UK health service 15 0.2 10 0.2

Non-UK other employment 90 1.1 220 5.1

All non-UK employment 405 4.8 1010 23.4

No longer in employmentNot in regular employment 2150 25.7 1035 23.9

Retired 1215 14.5 95 2.1Deceased 130 1.5 25 0.6All those no longer in employment 3490 41.8 1150 26.6

Total 8350 100 4325 100Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose leaving destination is unknown.

UK and non-UK academic staff leavers by leaving destination

UK national

Non-UK national

% %UK employmentUK and other HEI 23.7 24.0UK and other education institution 4.9 2.5UK student 2.8 4.8

59

UK research institute 1.3 1.9UK NHS/medical or dental practice 5.4 2.7UK public sector 1.7 0.9UK private sector 13.5 13.2All UK employment 53.3 50.0Non-UK employmentNon-UK HEI 2.3 11.7Non-UK other education institution 0.7 2.3Non-UK student 0.1 0.7Non-UK research institute 0.5 3.3Non-UK health service 0.2 0.2Non-UK other employment 1.1 5.1All non-UK employment 4.8 23.4No longer in employmentNot in regular employment 25.7 23.9Retired 14.5 2.1Deceased 1.5 0.6All those no longer in employment 41.8 26.6

Total 100 100

60

1 Age

The age profile of staff differed slightly across nations. For example, 17.3% of staff in England were aged 30 and under, compared with 11.1% of staff in Northern Ireland.

The proportion of staff on part-time contracts ranged from 26.5% for staff aged 26–30 to 84.0% for those aged 66 and over.

The proportion of academic staff on open/permanent contracts increased with age up to the 56-60 age group, after which it decreased.

Among professional and support staff, the majority in all age groups were on open/permanent contracts.

33.4% of professional and support staff aged 66 and over and 25.1% of those aged 61–65 worked in elementary occupations, compared with 6.6% of professional and support staff aged 31–35.

Academic staff in SET subject areas had a younger profile than those in non-SET areas, with 47.0% aged 40 and under, compared with 34.7% of academic staff in non-SET subject areas. 24.7% of academic staff in chemistry, 22.9% in physics and 20.3% in electrical electronic and computer engineering were aged 30 and under.

3.4% of those in nursing and allied health professions were aged 30 and under, and 44.6% were over the age of 50 – more than double the proportion in chemistry (18.1%).

Part-time professors had an older profile than full-time professors. A majority of professors working part-time in SET departments (50.7%) and non-SET departments (60.4%) were aged 61 and over, compared with 13.6% (SET) and 19.9% (non-SET) of full-time professors.

61

Leaving rates were highest among academic staff from the youngest and oldest age groups. 33.9% of academic staff aged 30 and under and 21.1% of those aged 61 and over left their institution between 2011/12 and 2012/13, compared with 11.6% of those aged 41–50.

The majority of leavers aged 50 and under with a known leaving destination went into UK employment. 31.5% of leavers aged 31–40 and 32.3% of those aged 41–50 left their institution for employment at another UK HEI. This was lower among leavers aged 30 and under (23.5%) and those aged 51–60 (20.2%) and 61 and over (4.3%).

Age overview

The age profile of staff differed slightly across nations. For example, 17.3% of staff in England were aged 30 and under, compared with 11.1% of staff in Northern Ireland.

1.1 Staff by country of institution and age group

25 and under

26-30 31-35

No. % No. % No. %

England 19675

6.2 35080

11.1 44975

14.2

Northern Ireland 205 3.0 550 8.1 880 12.9

Scotland 1750 4.5 3805 9.7 5305 13.5Wales 1270 6.3 2045 10.2 2680 13.4

UK total 22900

6.0 41480

10.8 53835

14.1

62

36-40 41-45 46-50No. % No. % No. %

England 40390

12.8

41350

13.1 42445

13.4

Northern Ireland 955 14.

01035 15.2 1085 16.0

Scotland 5125 13.0

5480 13.9 5730 14.6

Wales 2560 12.8

2755 13.8 2785 13.9

UK total 49030

12.8

50620

13.2 52045

13.6

51-55 56-60 61-65No. % No. % No. %

England 38465

12.2

31310

9.9 17785

5.6


2705 10.4 375 5.5

Scotland 5455 13.9

4220 10.7 2015 5.1

Wales 2475 12.4

2005 10.0 1120 5.6

UK total 47360

12.4

38240

10.0 21295

5.6

66 and overNo. %

England 4925 1.6Northern Ireland 40 0.6Scotland 420 1.1

63

Wales 330 1.7UK total 5715 1.5

Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose country of institution or age group is unknown.

64

Staff in countries of institution by age group

≤25 26-30 31-35 36-

40 41-45

England 6.2 11.1 14.2 12.8 13.1

Northern Ireland 3.0 8.1 12.9 14.0 15.2

Scotland 4.5 9.7 13.5 13.0 13.9

Wales 6.3 10.2 13.4 12.8 13.8

UK total 6.0 10.8 14.1 12.8 13.2

46-50 51-55 56-60 61-65 ≥66

England 13.4 12.2 9.9 5.6 *

Northern Ireland 16.0 14.2 10.4 5.5

Scotland 14.6 13.9 10.7 5.1

Wales 13.9 12.4 10.0 5.6

UK total 13.6 12.4 10.0 5.6


Mode and contract type

65

The proportion of staff on part-time contracts ranged from 26.5% for staff aged 26–30 to 84.0% for those aged 66 and over.

With the exception of those aged 30 and under or 61 and over, the majority of academic staff in all age groups worked full-time. This was also the case for professional and support staff: in every age group the majority worked full time, except 66 and over, where 75.1% worked part-time.

1.2 Staff by activity, mode and age group

25 and under 26-30 31-35

No. %* %^ No. %* %^ No. %* %^

All staffFull

-time

11360

49.6

4.5

30500

73.5

12.0

39520

73.4

15.5

Part-

time1154 50.

49.0

10980

26.5 8.6 1431

026.

611.

2

Total

22900

100

6.0

41480

100

10.8

53835

100

14.1

36-40 41-45 46-50No. %* %^ No. %* %^ No. %* %^

Full-time

33795

68.9

13.3

34450

68.1

13.5

35695

68.6

14.0

Part-

15230

31.1

11.9

16165

31.9

12.6

16350

31.4

12.8

66

timeAll staff

49030

100

12.8

50620

100

13.2

52045

100

13.6

51-55 56-60 61-65

No. %* %^ No. %* %^ No. %* %^

Full-time

32545

68.7

12.8

24780

64.8 9.7 1092

551.

34.3

Part-time

14815

31.3

11.6

13460

35.2

10.5

10375

48.7

8.1

All staff

47360

100

12.4

38240

100

10.0

21295

100

5.6

67

66 and overNo. %* %^

Full-time 915 16.

0 0.4

Part-time 4800 84.

0 3.7

All staff 5715 100 1.5

25 and under 26-30 31-35

No. %* %^ No. %* %^ No. %* %^

Academic staffFull-time

1940

39.2

1.6

13255

69.2

10.8

20555

74.0

16.8

Part-

time

3015

60.8

4.8 5910 30.

8 9.4 7215 26.0

11.4

Total

4955

100

2.7

19165

100

10.3

27770

100

15.0

36-40 41-45 46-50No. %* %^ No. %* %^ No. %* %^

Full-time

17385

70.2

14.2

17470

68.5

14.3 1800 69.

114.

7Part-time

7370 29.8

11.7 8025 31.

512.

7 8065 30.9

12.8

All staff

24755 100 13.

32550

0 100 13.7

26065 100 14.

0

51-55 56-60 61-6568

No. %* %^ No. %* %^ No. %* %^

Full-time

15655

69.1

12.8

11945

64.6 9.8 5720 48.

04.7

Part-time

7005 30.9

11.1 6540 35.

410.

4 6185 52.0

9.8

All staff

22660

100

12.2

18485

100

10.0

11905

100

6.4


Full-time 570 13.

2 0.5

Part-time 3755 86.

8 5.9

All staff 4325 100 2.3

25 and under 26-30 31-35No. %* %^ No. %* %^ No. %* %^

Professional and support staffFull

-tim

e

9420

52.5 7.1 172

4577.

313.

1189

7072.

814.

4

Part-

8525

47.5

13.1

5070

22.7

7.8 7095

27.2

10.9

69

time

Total

17945

100 9.1 223

1510

011.

3260

6010

013.

2

36-40 41-45 46-50No. %* %^ No. %* %^ No. %* %^

Full-time

16415

67.6

12.4

16980

67.6

12.9

17695

68.1

13.4

Part-time

7860

32.4

12.1

8140

32.4

12.5

8290

31.9

12.8

All staff

24275

100

12.3

25120

100

12.8

25980

100

13.2

51-55 56-60 61-65

No. %* %^ No. %* %^ No. %* %^

Full-time

16890

68.4

12.8

12835

65.0 97 520

555.

43.9

Part-time

7810

31.6

12.0

6925

35.0

10.7

4185

44.6

6.4

All staff

24695

100

12.5

19755

100

10.0

9390

100

4.8


Full- 345 24. 0.3

70

time 9Part-time 1045 75.

1 1.6

All staff 1395 100 0.7

* within an age group, the percentage of staff in a mode (compare vertically within an activity)^ within an activity and mode, the percentage of staff in an age group (compare horizontally)Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose activity, mode or age group is unknown.

71

Staff in age groups by activity and mode

All Staff≤25

26-30

31-35

36-40

41-45

46-50

51-55

56-60

61-65

≥ 66

Full-time

49.6

73.5

73.4

68.9

68.1

68.6

68.7

64.8

51.3

16.0

Part-time

50.4

26.5

26.6

31.1

31.9

31.4

31.3

35.2

48.7

84.0

Academic≤25

26-30

31-35

36-40

41-45

46-50

51-55

56-60

61-65

≥ 66

Full-time

39.2

69.2

74.0

70.2

68.5

69.1

69.1

64.6

48.0

13.2

Part-time

60.8

30.8

26.0

29.8

31.5

30.9

30.9

35.4

52.0

86.8

Professional and support≤25

26-30

31-35

36-40

41-45

46-50

51-55

56-60

61-65

≥ 66

Full-time

52.5

77.3

72.8

67.6

67.6

68.1

68.4

65.0

55.4

24.9

72

Part-time

47.5

22.7

27.2

32.4

32.4

31.9

31.6

35.0

44.6

75.1

Full-time/part-time staff in activities by age group

≤25

26-30

31-35

36-40

41-45

46-50

Full-time 6.0 10.8

14.1

12.8

13.2

13.6

Part-time 4.5 12.0

15.5

13.3

13.5

14.0

All staff 9.0 8.6 11.2

11.9

12.6

12.8

All academic 2.7 10.3

15.0

13.3

13.7

14.0

Full time academic * 10.8

16.8

14.2

14.3

14.7

Part time academic 4.8 9.4 11.4

11.7

12.7

12.8

All professional and support 9.1 11.

313.

212.

312.

813.

2Full time professional and support 7.1 13.

114.

412.

412.

913.

4Part time professional and support

13.1 7.8 10.

912.

112.

512.

8

51-55 56-60 61-65 ≥ 66Full-time 12.4 10.0 5.6Part-time 12.8 9.7 4.3All staff 11.6 10.5 8.1 3.7

73

All academic 12.2 10.0 6.4 2.3Full time academic 12.8 9.8 4.7

Part time academic 11.1 10.4 9.8 4.7

All professional and support 12.5 10.0 4.8

Full time professional and support

12.8 9.7 3.9

Part time professional and support

12.0 10.7 6.7


The proportion of academic staff on open/permanent contracts increased with age up to the 56–60 age group, after which it decreased. 18.3% of academic staff aged 25 and under were on open/permanent contracts, compared with 80.8% of those aged 51–55.

Among professional and support staff the majority in all age groups were on open/permanent contracts, ranging from 52.9% of staff aged 25 and under to 93.8% of those aged 56–60. As was the case for academic staff, the proportions increased with age up to the 56–60 age group.

1.3 Staff by activity, contract type and age group

Academic staff25 and under 26-30

No. %* %^ No. %* %^

Open-ended/ 910 18. 0. 5405 28. 4.5

74

permanent 3 8 2Fixed-term contract 4045 81.

76.1

13760

71.8

20.8

Total 4955 100 2.7

19165 100 10.

3

Academic staff 31-35 36-40No. %* %^ No. %* %^

Open-ended/permanent

13690

49.3

11.4

16650

67.3

13.9

Fixed-term contract

14080

50.7

21.3 8105 32.

712.

3

Total 27770 100 15.

02475

5 100 13.3

Academic staff 41-46 46-50No. %* %^ No. %* %^


19360

75.9

16.2

20660

79.3

17.3

Fixed-term contract 6140 24.

1 9.3 5405 20.7 8.2

Total 25500 100 13.

72606

5 100 14.0

Academic staff51-55 56-60

No. No. No. No. %* %^


18300 80.8 15.3 1460

069.

86.9

Fixed-term contract 4360 19.2 6.6 3885 30.

25.4

Total 2266 100 12.2 1848 100 6.75

0 5 4

Academic staff61-65 61-65

No. %* No. No. %* %^

Open-ended/permanent 8310 69.

8 6.9 1705

39.5

1.4


2 5.4 2615

60.5

4.0

Total 11905 100 6.4 432

5 100 2.3


25 and under 26-30

No. %* %^ No. %* %^

Open-ended/permanent 9495 52.

9 5.6 17305

77.6

10.3


129.

4 5010 22.4

17.4

Total 17945 100 9.1 2231

5 100 11.3


31-35 36-40

No. %* %^ No. %* %^


22185

85.1

13.2

21380

88.1

12.7


913.

5 2890 11.9

10.1

Total 26060 100 13.

22427

5 100 12.3

76


41-45 46-50

No. %* %^ No. %* %^


22690

90.3

13.5

23840

91.8

14.2

Fixed-term contract 2430 9.7 8.4 2140 8.2 7.4

Total 25120 100 12.

82598

0 100 13.2


51-55 56-60

No. %* %^ No. %* %^


23005

93.2

13.7

18540

93.8

11.0

Fixed-term contract 1690 6.8 5.9 1215 6.2 4.2

Total 24695 100 12.

51975

5 100 10.0


61-65 66 and over

No. %* %^ No. %* %

^Open-ended/permanent

8690

92.5

5.2

1040

74.7

0.6

Fixed-term contract 705 7.5 2.4 350 25.

31.2

Total 9390 100 4.

8139

5 100 0.7

* within an age group, the percentage of staff in a contract type (compare vertically within an activity)

77

^ within an activity and contract type, the percentage of staff in an age group (compare horizontally) Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose activity, contract type or age group is unknown.

Academic/professional and support staff in age groups by contract type

Academic

≤25 26-30

31-35

36-40

41-45

Open ended/ permanent 18.3

28.2

49.3

67.3

75.9

Fixed term contract 81.7

71.8

50.7

32.7

24.1

46-50

51-55

56-60

61-65

≥ 66


80.8

79.0

69.8

69.5


19.2

21.0

30.2

60.5

Professional and support

≤25 26-30

31-35

36-40

41-45


77.6

85.1

88.1

90.3


22.4

14.9

11.9 9.7

46-50

51-55

56-60

61-65

≥ 66

78


93.2

93.8

92.5

74.7

Fixed term contract 82.2 6.8 6.2 7.5 25.

3

79

Academic/professional and support staff in contract types by age group

Academic

≤25 26-30

31-35

36-40

41-45

Open ended/ permanent 4.5 11.4

13.9

16.2

Fixed term contract 6.1 20.8

21.3

12.3 9.3

46-50

51-55

56-60

61-65

≥ 66


15.3

12.2 6.9 *

Fixed term contract 8.2 6.6 5.9 5.4 4.0

Professional and support

≤25 26-30

31-35

36-40

41-45

Open ended/ permanent 5.6 10.3

13.2

12.7

13.5


17.4

13.5

10.1 8.4

46-50

51-55

56-60

61-65

≥ 66


13.7

11.0 5.2

Fixed term contract 7.4 5.9 4.2 2.4

80


81

Occupational group

The staff age profile varied by occupational group. For example, caring, leisure and other service occupations and sales and customer service occupations had younger staff profiles, with 32.9% and 31.4%, respectively, aged 30 or under.

A high proportion of managers, directors and senior officials on academic contracts (52.2%) and process, plant and machine operatives (44.8%) were aged 51 or over.

33.4% of professional and support staff aged 66 and over and 25.1% of those aged 61–65 worked in elementary occupations, compared with 6.6% of professional and support staff aged 31–35.

1.4 Staff by activity, occupational group and age group

25 and under 26-30No. %* %^ No. %* %^


0 0.0 0.4 10 0.1 2.4

Professional occupations 4890 98.

7 2.7 19005

99.2

10.3

Associate professional and technical

65 1.3 4.7 150 0.8 11.0

Total 4955 100 2.7 1916

510

010.

3Professional and support contract

82

Managers, directors and senior officials

80 0.4 0.7 400 1.8 3.6

Professional occupations 1345 7.5 3.8 3610 16.

210.

1Associate professional and technical

3925 21.9 9.0 6065 27.

214.

0

Administrative and secretarial 7025 39.

210.

9 8900 39.9

13.8

Skilled trades occupations 465 2.6 7.5 435 1.9 7.0

Caring, leisure and other service 1375 7.7 19.

7 920 4.1 13.2

Sales and customer service occupations

355 2.0 18.3 255 1.1 13.

1

Process, plant and machine operatives 95 0.5 5.6 115 0.5 6.7

Elementary occupations 3275 18.

312.

9 1615 7.2 6.4

Total 17945

100 9.1 2231

510

011.

3

All staff 22900 6.0 4148

010.

8

31-35 36-40No. %* %^ No. %* %^


25 0.1 5.2 45 0.2 9.2

83

Professional occupations

27580

99.3

15.0

24560

99.2

13.4


165 0.6 12.2 150 0.6 11.

3

Total 27770

100

15.0

24755

100

13.3


1165 4.5 10.5 1535 6.3 13.

9


715.

8 5780 23.8

16.2


7015 26.9

16.2 5905 24.

313.

6


513.

9 7695 31.7

11.9

Skilled trades occupations 525 2.0 8.5 620 2.6 10.

0Caring, leisure and other service 650 2.5 9.4 535 2.2 7.7


210 0.8 11.0 175 0.7 9.0

Process, plant and machine operatives 135 0.5 7.8 145 0.6 8.4

Elementary occupations 1710 6.6 6.8 1890 7.8 7.5

Total 26060

100

13.2

24275

100

12.3

All staff 5383 14. 4903 12.

84

5 1 0 8

41-45 46-50No. %* %^ No. %* %^


65 0.2 12.5 90 0.4 18.

2


25265

99.1

13.7

25765

98.9

14.0


170 0.7 12.7 205 0.8 15.

3

Total 25500

100

13.7

26065

100

14.0


1905 7.6 17.2 2115 8.1 19.

1


315.

7 5005 19.3

14.0


5235 20.8

12.1 5150 19.

811.

9


112.

1 7735 29.8

12.0

Skilled trades occupations 835 3.3 13.

5 960 3.7 15.5

Caring, leisure and other service 640 2.6 9.2 810 3.1 11.

6Sales and customer service

160 0.6 8.2 240 0.9 12.3

85

occupationsProcess, plant and machine operatives 200 0.8 11.

6 255 1.0 14.9


810.

8 3720 14.3

14.7

Total 25120

100

12.8

25980

100

13.2

All staff 50620

13.2

52045

13.6

51-55 56-60No. %* %^ No. %* %^


90 0.4 18.2 95 0.5 19.

4


22380

98.8

12.2

18230

98.6 9.9


190 0.8 14.0 160 0.9 11.

8

Total 22660

100

12.2

18485

100

10.0


1925 7.8 17.4 1430 7.2 12.

9


312.

0 3070 15.5 8.6


4780 19.3

11.0 3570 18.

1 8.2

86


211.

5 6090 30.8 9.4


4 825 4.2 13.3


6 715 3.6 10.3


225 0.9 11.5 205 1.0 10.

7

Process, plant and machine operatives 265 1.1 15.

6 245 1.2 14.4


015.

6 3605 18.3

14.2

Total 24695

100

12.5

19755

100

10.0

All staff 47360

12.4

38240

10.0

61-65 66 and over

No. %* %^ No. %* %^

Academic contractManagers, directors and senior officials 60 0.5 12.

2 10 0.3 2.4


11755

98.8 6.4 430

599.

52.3


85 0.7 6.4 10 0.2 0.6

Total 11905

100 6.4 432

510

02.3

Professional and support contract

87

Managers, directors and senior officials 465 4.9 4.2 40 2.8 0.

4Professional occupations 1160 12.

4 3.3 195 13.9

0.5


1580 16.8 3.6 180 12.

90.4


1 4.1 325 23.4

0.5


6Caring, leisure and other service 415 4.4 5.9 95 6.9 1.

4Sales and customer service occupations 100 1.1 5.1 15 1.2 0.

9Process, plant and machine operatives 215 2.3 12.

5 40 2.9 2.3


1 9.3 465 33.4

1.8

Total 9390 100 4.8 139

510

00.7

All staff 21295 5.6 571

51.5

* within an age group, the percentage of staff in an occupational group (compare vertically within an activity)^ within an activity and occupational group, the percentage of staff in an age group (compare horizontally)Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose activity, occupational group or age group is unknown. Academic staff in SOC groups other than 1–3 have been included in the academic total but are not shown in an occupational group.

88

The sum of academic occupational groups therefore is not equal to the academic total in this table.

Academic/professional and support staff in occupational groups by age group

<25 26 -30

31 -35

36 -40

41-45

Academic contractManagers, directors and senior officials 0.4 2.4 5.2 9.2 12.

5Professional occupations 2.7 10.

315.

0 13.4 13.7

Associate professional and technical 4.7 11.

012.

2 11.3 12.7

Professional and support contractManagers, directors and senior officials 0.7 3.6 10.

5 13.9 17.2

Professional occupations 3.8 10.

115.

8 16.2 15.7

Associate professional and technical 9.0 14.

016.

2 13.6 12.1

Administrative and secretarial 10.9 13.

813.

9 11.9 12.1

Skilled trades occupations 7.5 7.0 8.5 10.0 13.

5Caring, leisure and other service 19.7 13.

2 9.4 7.7 9.2

Sales and customer service occupations 18.3 13.

111.

0 9.0 8.2

Process, plant and machine operatives 5.6 6.7 7.8 8.4 11.

6

89

Elementary occupations 12.9 6.4 6.8 7.5 10.8

46 -50

51 -55

56 -60

61 -65

>66

Academic contractManagers, directors and senior officials 18.2 18.2 19.

4 12.2 2.4

Professional occupations 14.0 12.2 9.9 6.4 2.3

Associate professional and technical 15.3 14.0 11.

8 6.4 0.6

Professional and support contractManagers, directors and senior officials 19.1 17.4 12.

9 4.2 0.4

Professional occupations 14.0 12.0 8.6 3.3 0.5

Associate professional and technical 11.9 11.0 8.2 3.6 0.4

Administrative and secretarial 12.0 11.5 9.4 4.1 0.5

Skilled trades occupations 15.5 16.4 13.

3 7.6 0.6

Caring, leisure and other service 11.6 11.6 10.

3 5.9 1.4

Sales and customer service occupations 12.3 11.5 10.

7 5.1 0.9

Process, plant and machine operatives 14.9 15.6 14.

4 12.5 2.3

Elementary occupations 14.7 15.6 14.

2 9.3 1.8


90

Academic contract

The majority of staff in all age groups between 36 and 65 were on teaching and research contracts.

52.0% of academic staff aged 25 and under and 51.1% of those aged 66 and over were on teaching only contracts, compared with 19.2% of staff aged 31–35.

Academic staff from younger age groups were also concentrated in research only roles, with 56.0% of academic staff aged 26–30 and 44.5% of those aged 31–35 on these types of contracts.

1.5 Academic staff by research/teaching contract type and age group

25 and under 26-30

No. %* %^ No. %* %^

Teaching only 2580

52.0

5.5 5025 26.

210.

7

Research only 1825

36.8

4.3

10725

56.0

25.3

Teaching and research 505 10.

20.5 3320 17.

3 3.5

Neither teaching nor research 45 1.0 2.

6 100 0.5 5.3

Total 4955 100 2.

71916

5 100 10.3

31-35 36-40

91

No. %* %^ No. %* %^

Teaching only 5335 19.2

11.4

4995 20.2

10.7

Research only 12365

44.5

29.2

6490 26.2

15.3

Teaching and research

9930 35.8

10.5

13090

52.9

13.8

Neither teaching nor research

145 0.5 7.8 180 0.7 9.7

Total 27770

100 15.0

24755

100 13.3

41-45 46-50No. %* %^ No. %* %^


11.9

5975 22.9

12.8

Research only 3955 15.8

9.3 2900 11.1

6.8


15770

61.8

61.8

16880

64.8

17.8


205 0.8 0.8 310 1.2 16.8

Total 25500

100 100 26065

100 14.0

51-55 56-60No. %* %^ No. %* %^


12.4

5205 28.2

11.1

Research only 1785 7.9 4.2 1245 6.7 2.9Teaching and research

14735

65.0

15.6

11700

63.3

12.4

92


330 1.5 18.0

330 1.8 17.9

Total 22660

100 12.2

18485

100 10.0

61-65 66 and over

No. %* %^ No. %* %^


8.7 2210

51.1

4.7

Research only 670 5.6 1.6 385 8.9 0.9


6970 58.6

7.4 1700

39.3

1.8


165 1.4 9.1 30 0.6 1.5

Total 11905

100 6.4 4325

100 2.3

* within an age group, the percentage of staff in a research/teaching contract type (compare vertically)^ within a research/teaching contract type, the percentage of staff in an age group (compare horizontally)Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose research/teaching contract type or age group is unknown.

Academic staff in age groups by research/teaching contract type

<25 26-30

31-35

36-40

41-45

Teaching only 52.0 26.2

19.2 20.2

21.8

93

Research only 36.8 56.0

44.5 26.2

15.5

Teaching and research 10.2 17.3

35.8 52.9

61.8


1.0 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.8

46-50

51-55

56-60

61-65

>66


28.2 34.4

51.1

Research only 11.1 7.9 6.7 5.6 8.9


63.3 58.6

39.3


1.2 1.5 1.8 1.4 0.6

Academic staff in research/teaching contract types by age group

<25 26-30

31-35

36-40

41-45


11.4 10.7

11.9


29.2 15.3

9.3

Teaching and research 0.5 3.5 10.5 13.8

16.7


2.6 5.3 7.8 9.7 11.2

46- 51- 56- 61- >66

94

50 55 60 65


11.1 8.7 4.7

Research only 6.8 4.2 2.9 1.6 0.9


12.4 7.4 1.8


16.8 18.0

17.9 9.1 1.5


Academic staff in SET subject areas had a younger profile than those in non-SET areas, with 47.0% aged 40 and under, compared with 34.7% of academic staff in non-SET subject areas (see fig. 1.7).

The age profiles of academic staff were younger in certain SET subjects. For example, 24.7% of academic staff in chemistry, 22.9% in physics and 20.3% in electrical, electronic and computer engineering were aged 30 and under.

In contrast, just 3.4% of those in nursing and allied health professions were aged 30 and under, and 44.6% were over the age of 50 – more than double the proportion in chemistry (18.1%).

1.6 SET academic staff by subject area and age group

30 and under

31-40

No. % No. %Agriculture, forestry and food 105 9.8 295 27.

95

science 0

Anatomy and physiology 270 16.9

510 31.7

Archaeology 65 9.7 225 33.9

Architecture, built environment and planning

325 8.6 1060 28.2


4260 34.8

Chemical engineering 165 18.8

295 34.0

Chemistry 925 24.7

1260 33.5

Civil engineering 210 12.1

520 29.8

Clinical dentistry 120 8.0 415 28.2


8060 38.0

Earth, marine and environmental science

550 15.7

1085 31.1

Electrical, electronic and computer engineering

780 20.3

1175 30.6

General engineering 510 15.0

935 27.6

Geography and environmental studies

325 15.3

700 33.0

IT, systems sciences and computer software engineering

995 15.5

1745 27.2

Mathematics 775 18.2

1230 28.8

Mechanical, aero and 735 17. 1150 27.

96

production engineering 8 8Mineral, metallurgy and materials engineering

210 19.8

360 34.3

Nursing and allied health professions

305 3.4 1355 15.0

Pharmacy and pharmacology 335 16.5

695 34.3

Physics 980 22.9

1445 33.8

Psychology and behavioural sciences

990 16.5

1880 31.3

Veterinary science 155 13.5

445 38.6

Total SET 15700

15.8

31100

31.2

41-50 51-60No. % No. %

Agriculture, forestry and food science

335 30.4

270 24.4


290 18.0

Archaeology 180 27.1

145 21.5

Architecture, built environment and planning

1115 29.6

860 22.8


2035 16.6


130 14.7

Chemistry 890 23.7

535 14.2

97


345 19.7

Clinical dentistry 425 29.1

405 27.7


3405 16.1

Earth, marine and environmental science

920 26.3

630 18.1


935 24.4

690 18.0


765 22.5


680 31.9

290 13.6


1800 28.1

1425 22.3


755 17.7

Mechanical, aero and production engineering

1005 24.3

840 20.4

Mineral, metallurgy and materials engineering

225 21.2

180 17.2


3355 37.1

3500 38.6


340 16.9

Physics 1010 23.6

600 14.0


1650 27.5

1100 18.3


170 14.7

98

Total SET 26500

26.6

19695

19.8

61 and overNo. %


95 8.5

Anatomy and physiology 105 6.4Archaeology 50 7.8Architecture, built environment and planning

400 10.7

Biosciences 640 5.2Chemical engineering 60 7.1Chemistry 145 3.9


Clinical dentistry 105 7.0Clinical medicine 960 4.5Earth, marine and environmental science

305 8.8


255 6.7



135 6.3


445 7.0


99


405 9.8


80 7.5


540 6.0

Pharmacy and pharmacology 105 5.3Physics 240 5.6Psychology and behavioural sciences

390 6.5

Veterinary science 45 3.7Total SET 6635 6.7

Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose subject area or age group is unknown.

Across non-SET subjects, the majority of academic staff were between the ages of 31 and 50. 9.8% were aged 30 and under, and 11.2% were aged 61 and over.

Certain non-SET subject areas had a markedly younger age profile than others. For example, 22.8% of academic staff in sports science and leisure studies, 19.0% in economics and econometrics, and 17.7% in philosophy were aged 30 and under, compared with 2.8% of academic staff in education.

Conversely, others had an older age profile. For example, there were particularly high proportions of academic staff aged 51 or over in subject areas such as in education (54.9%), continuing education (46.7%) and central administration and services (45.2%).

1.7 Non-SET academic staff by subject area and age group

100

30 and under

31-40

No. % No. %Anthropology and development studies

100 11.8

295 34.0

Area studies 35 10.9

115 36.7

Art and design 785 9.2 2165 25.5

Business and management studies

1110

8.2 3285 24.2

Catering and hospitality management

45 6.0 170 22.8

Classics 75 12.6

195 32.6

Continuing education 70 6.8 200 19.8

Economics and econometrics 485 19.0

835 32.8

Education 265 2.8 1405 15.0

English language and literature 510 11.1

1220 26.5

Health and community studies 290 8.2 755 21.3

History 470 14.1

970 29.2

Law 520 10.6

1415 28.9

Media studies 325 8.4 900 23.4

Modern languages 595 10. 1570 27.

101

5 8Music, dance, drama and performing arts

650 9.6 1725 25.5

Philosophy 190 17.7

365 33.8

Politics and international studies

465 17.1

925 33.8

Social work and social policy 180 6.8 520 19.6

Sociology 275 10.1

685 25.2

Sports science and leisure studies

540 22.8

815 34.4

Theology and religious studies 55 7.1 175 22.8

Total academic services 90 7.7 280 23.6

Central administration and services

205 12.3

315 19.2

Premises 0 3.7 15 24.8

Residences and catering 0 .. 5 ..

Staff and student facilities 90 16.4

110 20.5

Total non-SET 3420

9.8 21425

24.9

41-50 51-60No. % No. %

Anthropology and development studies

235 26.9

155 17.8

Area studies 75 24. 55 17.

102

5 3

Art and design 2875 33.9

2020 23.8


3895 28.7

3665 27.0


270 36.6

195 26.3

Classics 150 25.3

105 17.9

Continuing education 270 26.7

295 28.9


395 15.6

Education 2565 27.3

3370 35.9


1000 21.7

Health and community studies 1055 29.6

1095 30.8

History 900 27.0

665 19.9

Law 1455 29.7

1070 21.9

Media studies 1265 32.8

965 25.1

Modern languages 1765 31.2

1225 21.7

Music, dance, drama and performing arts

2015 29.8

1570 23.2

Philosophy 265 24.5

160 14.9

Politics and international 720 26. 395 14.

103

studies 2 5

Social work and social policy 790 30.0

815 31.0

Sociology 805 29.4

640 23.4


600 25.3

325 13.8

Theology and religious studies 230 30.0

180 23.5

Total academic services 335 28.0

385 32.1


385 23.3

535 32.5

Premises 15 31.2

15 29.4



140 26.3

Total non-SET 25065

29.2

21450

25.0

61 and overNo. %


80 9.5

Area studies 35 10.5Art and design 640 7.5Business and management studies 1610 11.9Catering and hospitality management

60 8.2

Classics 70 11.7

104

Continuing education 180 17.8Economics and econometrics 250 9.8Education 1785 19.0English language and literature 485 10.5Health and community studies 365 10.2History 325 9.8Law 435 8.9Media studies 395 10.3Modern languages 505 8.9Music, dance, drama and performing arts

810 12.0

Philosophy 100 9.2Politics and international studies 230 8.4Social work and social policy 330 12.6Sociology 325 11.9Sports science and leisure studies 85 3.7


Total academic services 100 8.6Central administration and services

210 12.7

Premises 5 11.0Residences and catering 0 ..Staff and student facilities 50 9.3Total non-SET 9590 11.2

.. Percentages based on totals of 52 or less are not shown.Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose subject area or age group is unknown.

Academic staff in SET subject areas by age group

105

<30 31-40

41-50

51-60

>61


9.8 27.0 30.4 24.4 8.5

Anatomy and physiology

16.9 31.7 26.9 18.0 6.4

Archaeology 9.7 33.9 27.1 21.5 7.8Architecture, built environment and planning

8.6 28.2 29.6 22.8 10.7

Biosciences 18.0 34.8 35.4 16.6 5.2Chemical engineering

18.8 34.0 25.4 14.7 7.1

Chemistry 24.7 33.5 23.7 14.2 *

Civil engineering 12.1 29.8 28.0 19.7 10.5

Clinical dentistry 8.0 28.2 29.1 27.7 7.0Clinical medicine 17.3 38.0 24.1 16.1Earth, marine and environmental science

15.7 31.1 26.3 18.1 8.8


20.3 30.6 24.4 18.0 6.7

General engineering 15.0 27.6 23.7 22.5 11.2


15.3 33.0 31.9 13.6 6.3


15.5 27.2 28.1 22.3 7.0

106

Mathematics 18.2 28.8 21.9 17.7 13.5


17.8 27.8 24.3 20.4 9.8


19.8 34.3 21.2 17.2 7.5


15.0 37.1 38.6 6.0

Pharmacy and pharmacology

16.5 34.3 27.0 16.9 5.3

Physics 22.9 33.8 23.6 14.0 5.6Psychology and behavioural sciences

16.5 31.3 27.5 18.3 6.5

Veterinary science 13.5 38.6 29.4 14.7Total SET 15.8 31.2 26.6 19.8 6.7


Academic staff in non-SET subject areas by age group

<30 31-40

41-50

51-60

>61


11.8 34.0

26.9 17.8

9.5

Area studies 10.9 36.7

24.5 17.3

10.5

Art and design 9.2 25.5

33.9 23.8

7.5

Business and 8.2 24. 28.7 27. 11.

107

management studies 2 0 9


6.0 22.8

36.6 26.3

8.2

Classics 12.6 32.6

25.3 17.9

11.7

Continuing education 6.8 19.8

26.7 28.9

17.8

Economics and econometrics

19.0 32.8

22.9 15.6

9.8

Education * 15.0

27.3 35.9

19.0

English language and literature

11.1 26.5

30.2 21.7

10.5

Health and community studies

8.2 21.3

29.6 30.8

10.2

History 14.1 29.2

27.0 19.9

9.8

Law 10.6 28.9

29.7 21.9

8.9

Media studies 8.4 23.4

32.8 25.1

10.3

Modern languages 10.5 27.8

31.2 21.7

8.9


9.6 25.5

29.8 23.2

12.0

Philosophy 17.7 33.8

24.5 14.9

9.2

108


17.1 33.8

26.2 14.5

8.4

Social work and social policy

6.8 19.6

30.0 31.0

12.6

Sociology 10.1 25.2

29.4 23.4

11.9


22.8 34.4

25.3 13.8

Theology and religious studies

7.1 22.8

30.0 23.5

16.6

Total academic services 7.7 23.6

28.0 32.1

8.6


12.3 19.2

23.3 32.5

12.7

Premises 24.8

31.2 29.4

11.0

Residences and catering ..

Staff and student facilities 16.4 20.5

27.4 26.3

9.3

Total non-SET 9.8 24.9

29.2 25.0

11.2

* values less than 5.0 are not displayed.. percentages based on totals of 52 or less are not shown

Academic roles

The age profiles of both professors and non-professors were younger among academic staff in SET subject areas

109

than non-SET. A higher proportion of SET professors were aged 50 and under (38.3%) compared with non-SET professors (34.8%).

Among non-professorial academic staff, 17.7% in SET were aged 30 and under, compared with 10.7% of those in non-SET.

Part-time professors had an older profile than full-time professors. A majority of professors working part-time in SET departments (50.7%) and non-SET departments (60.4%) were aged 61 and over, compared with 13.6% (SET) and 19.9% (non-SET) of full-time professors.

1.8 Academic staff by professorial and SET categories, mode and age group

30 and under 31-40No. %* %^ No. %* %^

Professors

All SET 0 .. 0.0 505 56.1

4.6

Full-time SET .0 .. 0.0 430 48.2

4.8

Part-time SET 0 .. 0.0 70 7.9 3.9

All non-SET 0 .. 0.0 395 43.9

5.6

Full-time non-SET 0 .. 0.0 360 40.2

6.3

Part-time non-SET

0 .. 0.1 35 3.8 2.6

Total 5 .. 0.0 895 100

5.0

110

Non-professors

All SET 15700

65.1

17.7

30600

59.3

34.5

Full-time SET 11870

49.2

18.0

24610

47.7

37.3

Part-time SET 3825 15.9

16.8

5985 11.6

26.2

All non-SET 8420 34.9

10.7

21035

40.7

26.7

Full-time non-SET 3325 13.8

8.0 12535

24.3

30.0

Part-time non-SET

5095 21.1

13.7

8500 16.5

22.9

Total 24120

100

14.4

51630

100

30.8

41-50 51-60No. %* %^ No. %* %^

Professors

All SET 3650 63.9

33.7

4540 63.0

41.9

Full-time SET 3305 57.9

36.6

4065 56.3

45.0

Part-time SET 345 6.0 19.0

480 6.6 26.4


29.2

2670 37.0

37.9


32.7

2370 32.9

41.2

Part-time non-SET

175 3.1 13.7

300 4.1 23.2

Total 5705 10 31. 7210 10 40.111

0 9 0 3Non-professors

All SET 22850

49.8

25.7

15150

44.7

17.1

Full-time SET 16915

36.9

25.6

10840

31.9

16.4


26.0

4315 12.7

18.9

All non-SET 23005

50.2

29.2

18780

55.3

23.8

Full-time non-SET 13370

29.2

32.0

10330

30.4

24.7

Part-time non-SET

9635 21.0

25.9

8450 24.9

22.8

Total 45855

100

27.3

33935

100

20.2

112

61-65 66 and overNo. %* %^ No. %* %^

Professors

All SET 1520 51.5

14.0

630 56.4

5.8


12.0

140 12.6

1.6


23.8

490 43.8

26.9


20.3

485 43.6

6.9


17.6

130 11.8

2.3

Part-time non-SET

420 14.3

32.8

355 31.9

27.6

Total 2950 100

16.5

1115 100

6.2

Non-professors

All SET 3310 37.0

3.7 1180 36.7

1.3


2.4 125 3.9 0.2


7.5 1055 32.9

4.6


7.2 2030 63.3

2.6


4.9 175 5.4 0.4

Part-time non-SET

3610 40.3

9.7 1855 57.8

5.0

Total 8955 100

5.3 3210 100

1.9

113

* within an age group, the percentage of staff in a SET category and mode (compare vertically within professorial category)^ within a professorial category, SET category and mode, the percentage of staff in an age group (compare horizontally).. Percentages based on totals of 52 or less are not shown. Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose professorial category, SET category, mode or age group is unknown.

Professors/non-professors in modes and SET categories by age group

<30 31-40

41-50

51-60

61-65

>66

Professors

All SET * 33.7

41.9 14.0

5.8

Full-time SET 36.6

45.0 12.0

Part-time SET 19.0

26.4 23.8

26.9

All non-SET 5.6 29.2

37.9 20.3

6.9

Full-time non-SET 6.3 32.7

41.2 17.6

Part-time non-SET

13.7

23.2 32.8

27.6

Total 5.0 31.9

40.3 16.5

6.2

Non-professors

114

All SET 17.7 34.5

25.7

17.1


25.6

16.4


26.0

18.9 7.5


29.2

23.8 7.2


32.0

24.7

Part-time non-SET

13.7 22.9

25.9

22.8 9.7 5.0

Total 14.4 30.8

27.3

20.2 5.3


Academic senior managers had an older age profile than those who were not senior managers, with 68.9% aged 51 and over compared with 30.6% not on senior management contracts.

Among academic staff who were not senior managers, SET subject areas had a younger profile than non-SET, with 47.1% aged 40 and under compared with 35.1% of those in non-SET subject areas.1.9 Academic staff by senior management and SET categories, mode and age group

30 and under 31-40No. %* %^ No. %* %^

Senior managersAll SET 0 .. 0.4 30 .. 6.4

Full-time SET 0 .. 0.5 25 .. 5.6115

Part-time SET 0 .. .. 5 .. ..All non-SET 0 .. 0.0 20 .. 1.9

Full-time non-SET 0 .. 0.0 15 .. 1.7Part-time non-SET

0 .. 0.0 5 ... 4.1

Total 0 .. 0.1 50 .. 3.3Other academic staff

All SET 15695

65.1

15.8

31070

59.2

31.3

Full-time SET 11870

49.2

15.9

25020

47.7

33.6


15.5

6050 11.5

24.6


9.9 21410

40.8

25.2


7.1 12880

24.5

27.6

Part-time non-SET

5095 21.1

13.3

8530 16.3

22.2

Total 24120

100

13.1

52480

100

28.5

41-50 51-60No. %* %^ No. %* %^

Senior managers

All SET 145 35.9

30.3

240 30.5

49.8


30.2

225 28.9

51.6

Part-time SET 15 3.2 .. 15 1.6 ..All non-SET 260 64. 26. 545 69. 54.

116

1 2 5 9


26.4

520 66.3

55.8

Part-time non-SET

15 3.6 23.8

25 3.1 40.5

Total 405 100

27.6

785 100

53.2

Other academic staff

All SET 26350

51.5

26.6

19455

48.2

19.6

Full-time SET 20085

39.3

26.9

14675

36.4

19.7


25.5

4780 11.8

19.4

All non-SET 24805

48.5

29.2

20910

51.8

24.6

Full-time non-SET 15010

29.3

32.2

12180

30.2

26.1

Part-time non-SET

9795 19.1

25.5

8725 21.6

22.7

Total 51155

100

27.8

40365

100

21.9

61-65 66 and overNo. %* %^ No. %* %^

Senior managers

All SET 55 26.2

11.2

10 .. 1.8


10.9

5 .. 1.3

Part-time SET 5 2.9 .. 5 .. ..All non-SET 150 73. 15. 15 .. 1.7

117

8 3


14.8

10 .. 1.2

Part-time non-SET

15 6.7 22.9

5 .. 8.6

Total 205 100

14.0

25 .. 1.7


All SET 4775 40.8

4.8 1795 41.8

1.8


3.5 260 6.0 0.3


8.7 1540 35.8

6.3


8.1 2500 58.2

2.9


6.2 295 6.8 0.6

Part-time non-SET

4015 34.3

10.5

2205 51.3

5.7

Total 11700

100

6.4 4300 100

2.3

* within an age group, the percentage of staff in a SET category and mode (compare vertically within a senior management category)^ within a senior management category, SET category and mode, the percentage of staff in an age group (compare horizontally).. Percentages based on totals of 52 or less are not shown. Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose senior management category, SET category, mode or age group is unknown.

118

Academic senior managers/other academic staff in modes and SET categories by age group

<30 31-40

41-50

51-60

61-65

>66

Senior managers

All SET 6.4 30.3

49.8 11.2


51.6 10.9

Part-time SET ..

All non-SET 26.2

54.9 15.3

Full-time non-SET 26.4

55.8

14.8

Part-time non-SET

23.8

40.5 22.9

8.6

Total * 27.6

53.2 14.0


All SET 15.8 31.3

26.6

19.6


26.9

19.7


25.5

19.4 8.7 6.3


29.2

24.6 8.1


32.2

26.1 6.2

Part-time non-SET

13.3 22.2

25.5

22.7 10.5

5.7

119

Total 13.1 28.5

27.8

21.9 6.4


Destination of leavers

Leavers refers to academic staff who left their HEI between 2011/12 and 2012/13

Leaving rates were highest among academic staff from the youngest and oldest age groups. 33.9% of academic staff aged 30 and under and 21.1% of those aged 61 and over left their institution between 2011/12 and 2012/13, compared with 11.6% of those aged 41–50.

With the exception of academic staff aged 51 and over, in every age group a higher proportion of non-UK academic staff left their institution between 2011/12 and 2012/13 than UK academic staff.

1.10 UK/non-UK academic staff by leaving status and age group

30 and under

31 - 40

No. % No. %

Total 24055

100

51070

100

Leavers (of all staff) 8145 33.9

10130

19.8

Know destination(of all leavers) 3185 39.

1 4320 42.7

120

Unknown destination(of all leavers) 4960 60.

9 5810 57.3

UK national

Total 14330

100

29890

100

Leavers (of all staff) 4535 31.6 5050 16.

9Know destination(of UK leavers) 1815 40.

0 2105 41.7

Unknown destination(of UK leavers) 2720 60.

0 2945 58.3

Non-UK national

Total 8655 100

19520

100


2Know destination(of non-UK leavers) 1300 41.

5 2140 47.2

Unknown destination(of non-UK leavers) 1835 58.

5 2395 52.8

41-50 51-60No. % No. %

Total 50780

100

40110

100


2Know destination(of all leavers) 2140 36.

3 1955 40.0

Unknown destination(of all leavers) 3755 63.

7 2930 60.0

121

UK national

Total 38945

100

34895

100


9Know destination(of UK leavers) 1540 36.

6 1695 40.7

Unknown destination(of UK leavers) 2670 63.

4 2470 59.3

Non-UK national

Total 10555

100 4350 10

0


4Know destination(of non-UK leavers) 565 42.

1 227 45.0

Unknown destination(of non-UK leavers) 775 57.

9 275 55.0

61 and overNo. %

Total 15210 100

Leavers (of all staff) 3215 21.1Know destination(of all leavers) 1320 41.1

Unknown destination(of all leavers) 1895 58.9

UK national

Total 13605 100

Leavers (of all staff) 2835 20.8122

Know destination(of UK leavers) 1195 42.2

Unknown destination(of UK leavers) 1640 57.9

Non-UK nationalTotal 1095 100Leavers (of all staff) 195 18.0

Know destination(of non-UK leavers) 100 51.8

Unknown destination(of non-UK leavers) 95 42.2

Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose leaving status or age group is unknown.

UK/non-UK academic staff in age groups by leaving status

<30 31-40

41-50

51-60

>61

UK nationalsKnow destination 12.7 7.0 4.0 4.9 8.8Unknown destination 19.0 9.9 6.9 7.1 12.

0Academic non-leavers 68.3 83.1 89.1 88.0 79.

2Non-UK national

Know destination 15.0 11.0 5.4 5.1 9.2Unknown destination 21.2 12.2 7.3 6.3 8.8

Academic non-leavers 63.8 76.8 87.3 88.6 82.

0

123

The majority of leavers aged 50 and under with a known leaving destination went into UK employment. 31.5% of leavers aged 31–40 and 32.3% of those aged 41–50 left their institution for employment at another UK HEI. This was lower among leavers aged 30 and under (23.5%) and those aged 51–60 (20.2%) and 61 and over (4.3%).

Rates of leavers entering non-UK employment were relatively similar across all age groups (between 6.1% and 6.7%) except for those aged 51 and over (3.7% and below). 23.9% of leavers aged 31–40 were no longer in employment, compared with 84.9% of leavers aged 61 and over.

124

1.11 UK academic staff leavers by known leaving destination and age group

30 and under 31 – 40No. %* %^ No. %* %^

UK employment

UK other HEI 425 23.5

21.5

665 31.5

33.5

UK other education institution 65 3.5 15.

5125 5.8 29.

7

UK student 155 8.4 65.0

50 2.4 21.1

UK research institute

45 2.6 44.3

25 1.2 24.5

UK NHS/medical or dental practice

75 4.1 16.6

255 12.0

55.9

UK public sector 30 1.8 23.4

35 1.7 26.1

UK private sector 390 21.5

34.4

320 15.3

28.4

All UK employment

1185

65.4

26.6

1475

69.9

33.1

Non-UK employment

Non-UK HEI 55 3.0 28.2

55 2.6 28.0

Non-UK other education institution

10 0.5 14.5

20 0.9 32.3

Non-UK student 5 0.2 .. 0 0.0 ..Non-UK research institute

25 1.4 .. 10 0.5 ..

Non-UK health 0 0.1 .. 10 0.4 ..

125

serviceNon-UK other employment

25 1.4 29.6

35 1.6 39.6

All non-UK employment

120 6.7 29.6

130 6.1 32.0

No longer in employmentNot in regular employment

505 27.8

23.5

490 23.2

22.7

Retired 0 0.1 0.2 5 0.1 0.2

Deceased 0 0.0 0.0 15 0.6 10.1

All those no longer in employment

505 28.0

14.5

505 23.9

14.4

Total 1815 100 21.

7210

5 100 25.2

41-50 51-60No. %* %^ No. %* %^

UK employment


25.1

340 202 17.3


590 5.2 21.

3

UK student 25 1.5 10.1

10 0.5 3.4


20 1.4 19.8

10 0.7 11.3


80 5.3 18.0

40 2.3 8.6


20 1.3 15.4

126


18.7

140 8.3 12.5

All UK employment

980 63.6

22.0

650 38.4

14.6

Non-UK employment

Non-UK HEI 50 3.4 26.8

25 1.6 13.9


15 0.9 22.6

10 0.7 19.4


5 0.4 .. 0 0.0 ..

Non-UK health service

0 0.1 .. 0 0.0 ..

Non-UK other employment

20 1.2 21.7

5 0.4 6.8


95 6.1 23.2

45 2.7 11.1


425 27.8

19.9

470 27.7

21.8

Retired 10 0.8 1.0 470 27.9

38.9

Deceased 25 1.8 21.1

60 3.4 45.4


465 30.3

13.4

1000

58.9

28.6

Total 1540 100 18.

4169

5 100 20.3

127


UK employmentUK other HEI 50 4.3 2.6UK other education institution 30 2.4 7.0UK student 0 0.1 0.4UK research institute 0 0.0 0.0UK NHS/medical or dental practice 5 0.3 0.9


UK private sector 65 5.6 5.9

All UK employment 165 13.9

3.7

Non-UK employmentNon-UK HEI 5 0.5 3.1

Non-UK other education institution 5 0.6 11.3

Non-UK student 0 0.0 ..Non-UK research institute 0 0.0 ..Non-UK health service 0 0.0 ..Non-UK other employment 0 0.2 2.3All non-UK employment 15 1.3 3.7No longer in employment

Not in regular employment 260 21.7

12.1

Retired 725 60.6

59.7

Deceased 30 2.5 23.4

All those no longer in employment 1015

84.9

29.1

128

Total 1195 100 14.

3* within an age group, the percentage of staff in a leaving destination (compare vertically)^ within a leaving destination, the percentage of staff in an age group (compare horizontally).. Percentages based on totals of 52 or less are not shown. Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose leaving destination or age group is unknown.

UK academic staff leavers in age groups by leaving destination

≤ 30 31 – 40

41 – 50

51 – 60

61 – and over

UK employment

65.4 69.9 63.6 38.4 13.9

Non-UK employment

6.7 6.1 6.1 2.7 1.3

No longer in employment

28.0 23.9 30.3 58.9 84.9

Among non-UK leavers with a known leaving destination, the majority of those aged 40 and under left their institution for employment in the UK.

29.1% of non-UK leavers aged 41–50 moved to another UKHEI, which was higher than for leavers aged 30 and under (18.7%) and older leavers (19.7% of those aged 51–60 and 3.9% of those aged 61 and over).

Leaving rates to non-UK employment were relatively high in comparison to UK leavers (see fig. 1.11). Between 20.3% and 26.7% of non-UK leavers aged 50 and under moved to

129

non-UK employment, with the most common destination among these generally being an HEI.

Within every age group, the proportion no longer in employment was lower among non-UK leavers than among UK leavers (see fig. 1.11).

1.12 Non-UK academic staff leavers by known leaving destination and age group

30 and under 31 – 40No. %* %^ No. %* %^

UK employment


23.4 580 27.

256.

1UK other education institution 30 2.2 26.

5 45 2.1 41.6

UK student 140 10.8

67.0 55 2.6 26.

8UK research institute 35 2.5 40.

2 45 2.1 53.7

UK NHS/medical or dental practice 15 1.2 13.

0 75 3.5 65.2

UK public sector 10 0.6 .. 15 0.7 ..


44.1 270 12.

647.

0All UK employment 720 55.

433.

3109

050.

950.

2Non-UK employment

Non-UK HEI 105 8.1 20.7 295 13.

958.

4Non-UK other education

20 1.5 19.0

60 2.7 58.0

130

institutionNon-UK student 25 1.8 .. 5 0.2 ..Non-UK research institute 45 3.3 30.

3 80 3.7 56.3

Non-UK health service 0 0.1 .. 10 0.4 ..

Non-UK other employment 75 5.6 32.

7 120 5.7 55.1

All non-UK employment 265 20.

326.

2 570 26.7

56.4

No longer in employmentNot in regular employment 315 24.

230.

5 475 22.1

45.8

Retired 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 1.1Deceased 0 0.0 .. 5 0.3 ..All those no longer in employment

315 24.2

27.4 480 22.

541.

8

Total 1300 100 30.

0214

0 100 49.4

41-50 51-60No. %* %^ No. %* %^

UK employment


15.8 45 19.

7 4.2


5 5 2.2 4.5

UK student 10 2.0 5.3 0 0.9 1.0UK research institute 5 0.9 6.1 0 0.0 0.0

131


4 5 2.2 4.3

UK public sector 10 1.4 .. 5 2.7 ..UK private sector 35 6.6 6.5 10 5.4 2.1All UK employment 275 48.

512.

6 75 33.2 3.4

Non-UK employment

Non-UK HEI 80 14.0

15.6 20 9.4 4.1


15 2.8 16.0 5 3.1 7.0

Non-UK student 0 0.0 .. 0 0.0 ..Non-UK research institute 10 2.1 8.5 5 2.2 3.5

Non-UK health service 0 0.2 .. 0 0.0 ..

Non-UK other employment 20 3.4 8.6 5 3.1 3.2


612.

6 40 17.9 4.0


014.

7 65 29.8 6.4

Retired 5 0.5 3.2 40 16.8

40.5

Deceased 10 1.4 .. 5 2.2 ..All those no longer in employment

165 29.0

14.2 110 48.

9 9.5

Total 565 100 13.0 225 100 5.2

132


UK employmentUK other HEI 5 3.9 0.4UK other education institution 0 2.0 1.8UK student 0 0.0 0.0UK research institute 0 0.0 0.0UK NHS/medical or dental practice 0 0.0 0.0UK public sector 0 2.0 ..UK private sector 0 2.0 0.3All UK employment 10 9.8 0.5Non-UK employmentNon-UK HEI 5 5.9 1.2Non-UK other education institution 0 0.0 0.0Non-UK student 0 0.0 ..Non-UK research institute 0 2.0 1.4Non-UK health service 0 0.0 ..Non-UK other employment 0 1.0 0.5All non-UK employment 10 8.8 0.9No longer in employment

Not in regular employment 25 26.5 2.6

Retired 50 50.0 55.1

Deceased 5 4.9 ..All those no longer in employment 85 81.

4 7.2

Total 100 100 2.4 * within an age group, the percentage of staff in a leaving destination (compare vertically)

133

^ within a leaving destination, the percentage of staff in an age group (compare horizontally).. Percentages based on totals of 52 or less are not shown. Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose leaving destination or age group is unknown.

Non-UK academic staff leavers in age groups by leaving destination

≤ 30 31 – 40

41 – 50

51 -60 61 – and over

UK employment 55.4 50.9 48.5 33.2 9.8

Non-UK employment 20.3 26.7 22.6 17.9 8.8

No longer in employment 24.2 22.5 29.0 48.9 81.4

UK academic staff leavers in leaving destinations by age group

<30 31-40

41-50

51-60 >61

UK employment

UK other HEI 21.5 33.5

25.1 17.3 *

UK other education institution 15.5 29.

726.

5 21.3 7.0

UK student 65.0 21.1

10.1

UK research institute 44.3 24.

519.

8 11.3

134

UK NHS/medical or dental practice 16.6 55.

918.

0 8.6

UK public sector 23.4 26.1

24.9 15.4 10.2

UK private sector 34.4 28.4

18.7 12.5 5.9

All UK employment 26.6 33.

122.

0 14.6

Non-UK employment

Non-UK HEI 28.2 28.0

26.8 13.9

Non-UK other education institution 14.5 32.

322.

6 19.4 11.3

Non-UK student ..Non-UK research institute ..

Non-UK health service ..

Non-UK other employment 29.6 39.

621.

7 6.8

All non-UK employment 29.9 22.

719.

9 21.8 12.1

No longer in employmentNot in regular employment 23.5 22.

719.

9 21.8 12.1

Retired 38.9 59.7

Deceased 10.1

21.1 45.4 23.4


14.5 14.4

13.4 28.6 29.1

Total 21.7 25. 18. 20.3 14.3135

2 4* values less than 5.0 are not displayed.. percentages based on totals of 52 or less are not shown

Non-UK academic staff leavers in leaving destinations by age group

<30 31-40

41-50

51-60 >61

UK employment

UK other HEI 23.4 56.1

15.8 *

UK other education institution 26.5 41.

625.

5

UK student 67.0 26.8 5.3

UK research institute 40.2 53.

7 6.1

UK NHS/medical or dental practice 13.0 65.

217.

4UK public sector ..

UK private sector 44.1 47.0 6.5

All UK employment 33.3 50.

212.

6Non-UK employment

Non-UK HEI 20.7 58.4

15.6

Non-UK other education institution 19.0 58.

016.

0 7.0

Non-UK student ..Non-UK research 30.3 56. 8.5

136

institute 3Non-UK health service ..

Non-UK other employment 32.7 55.

1 8.6

All non-UK employment 26.2 56.

412.

6No longer in employmentNot in regular employment 30.5 45.

814.

7 6.4

Retired 40.5 55.1Deceased ..All those no longer in employment

27.4 41.8

14.2 9.5 7.2

Total 30.0 49.4

13.0 5.2


137

2 Disability

The proportion of staff disclosing as disabled increased from 2.2% in 2003/04 to 3.9% in 2012/13.

Between 2011/12 and 2012/13 the proportion staff disclosing as disabled increased by 0.5%. This has been the largest annual increase since 2003/04 with the exception of the 2007/08 to 2008/09 period, (an increase of 0.9%).

3.4% of academic staff and 4.5% of professional and support staff disclosed as disabled in 2012/13. These proportions have almost doubled from the 2003/04 figures of 1.8% and 2.4%, respectively.

82.6% of full-time disabled academic staff were on open ended/ permanent contracts compared with 74.6% of full-time non-disabled academic staff, a difference of 8.0%.

Overall, 7.7% of non-disabled staff were in senior contract levels, compared with 5.9% of disabled staff.

5.0% of staff in junior administrative, clerical, technical, craftsmen or operative roles disclosed as disabled, compared with 2.1% of deputy/pro vice-chancellors.

23.1% of non-disabled staff were employed on research only contracts, compared with 15.8% of disabled staff (a difference of 7.3%).

A lower proportion of professors disclosed as disabled (2.7%) than academic staff in non-professorial roles (3.4%).

A higher proportion of non-disabled academic staff were in the highest salary range of over £50,000 than disabled academic staff. Among full-time staff this difference was 0.4%. Among part-time staff the gap was wider, at 4.1%.

Across the UK, the median disability pay gap was 4.8% and the mean pay gap was 6.0%. However, the pay gap varied considerably by nation and employment activity.

138

The largest median pay gap was found among professional and support staff working as process, plant and machine operatives (8.2%). There was no median pay gap for staff working in associate professional and technical occupations (on both academic and professional and support contracts). This was also the case for professional and support staff in professional occupations and in caring, leisure and other service occupations.

Disability overview

Disclosure rates varied between 99.7% in Northern Ireland and 94.3% in Wales. Of those with known disability status, Northern Ireland and Wales had a higher than average proportion of staff disclosing as disabled (5.5% and 5.4% respectively). Scotland had a lower than average proportion of staff who disclosed as disabled (3.4%).

Over a quarter of disabled staff had a long standing illness or health condition (26.0%). 19.3% had an impairment or condition other than those listed and 17.4% had a specific learning difficulty.

Disabled staff have indicated that they are disabled on their HESA staff record. Non-disabled staff have indicated that they are not disabled, or their disability status in unknown by their institution.

2.1 Staff by country of institution and disability status

Non-disabled

Disabled Unknown

No. % No. % No. %

139

England 304140

96.1

12660

3.9

9780 3.1


5375 5.

520 0.3

Scotland 37975 96.6

1325 3.4

1775 4.5

Wales 18955 94.6

1075 5.4

1150 5.7

UK total 367485

96.1

15035

3.9

127725

3.3

Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose country of institution is unknown.

2.2 All and disabled staff by impairment type

No. %* %^

Blind or serious visual impairment 415 2.8 0.1

Communication or social impairment 90 0.6 0.0

Deaf or serious hearing impairment 1040 6.9 0.3

General learning disability 100 0.7 0.0

Long-standing illness or health condition 3910 26.

01.0

Mental health condition 1220 8.1 0.3

Physical impairment or mobility issues 1580 10.5

0.4

Specific learning disability 2615 17.4

0.7

Two or more impairments 1165 7.8 0.140

3

Other impairment 2895 19.3

0.8

Total 15035 100 3.

9* the proportion of disabled staff in an impairment type (compare vertically)^ the proportion of all staff in an impairment type (compare vertically)Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose impairment type is unknown.

Staff in countries of institution by disability status

Non-disabled % Disabled %England 96.1 *Northern Ireland 94.5 5.5Scotland 96.6Wales 94.6 5.4UK total 96.1


Disabled staff by impairment type

%*Blind or serious visual impairment 2.8Communication or social impairment 0.6Deaf or serious hearing impairment 6.9General learning disability 0.7

Long-standing illness or health condition 26.0

Mental health condition 8.1141

Physical impairment or mobility issues 10.5

Specific learning disability 17.4

Two or more impairments 7.8

Other impairment 19.3

Impairment types most commonly reported among both academic and professional and support staff were: long standing illness or health condition; specific learning difficulty; and an impairment other than those listed.

A higher proportion of disabled professional and support staff (27.7%) reported a long-standing illness or health condition than disabled academic staff (23.7%).

In contrast, 11.9% of disabled academic staff disclosed a physical impairment or mobility issue, compared with 9.5% of disabled professional and support staff.

2.3 All and disabled staff by impairment type and activity

No. %* %^Academic staff




General learning disability 25 0.4 0.

142

0Long-standing illness or health condition 1475 23.

70.8


Physical impairment or mobility issues 740 11.9

0.4


0.6



0.7

Total 6220 100 3.4





General learning disability 75 0.8 0.0

Long-standing illness or health condition 2435 27.

71.2


Physical impairment or mobility issues 835 9.5 0.4


0.8

143



0.8

Total 8815 100 4.5

* the proportion of disabled staff in an impairment type (compare vertically within activity)^ the proportion of all staff in an impairment type (compare vertically within activity)Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose impairment type or activity is unknown.

Disabled academic/professional and support staff by impairment type

Academic staff %

Professional and support %

Academic staffBlind or serious visual impairment 3.3 2.4

Communication or social impairment 0.7 0.5

Deaf or serious hearing impairment 7.1 6.8

General learning disability 0.4 0.8

Long-standing illness or health condition 23.7 27.7

Mental health condition 6.8 9.1Physical impairment or mobility issues 11.9 9.5

Specific learning 18.1 16.9144

disabilityTwo or more impairments 7.2 8.2

Other impairment 20.8 18.2

The proportion of staff disclosing as disabled increased from 2.2% in 2003/04 to 3.9% in 2012/13.

Notably, between 2011/12 and 2012/13 the proportion staff disclosing as disabled increased by 0.5%. This was the largest annual increase since 2003/04 with the exception of the 2007/08 to 2008/09 period, (an increase of 0.9%).

3.4% of academic staff and 4.5% of professional and support staff disclosed as disabled in 2012/13. These proportions have almost doubled from the 2003/04 figures of 1.8% and 2.4%, respectively.

2.4 Profile of staff over time by activity and disability status

Non-disabled DisabledNo. % No. %

2003/04 330745 97.8 7360 2.22004/05 338630 97.8 7675 2.22005/06 347565 97.8 7850 2.22006/07 35530 97.6 8630 2.42007/08 363105 97.5 9350 2.52008/09 369720 96.6 13040 3.42009/10 375945 97.0 11485 3.02010/11 369705 96.8 12085 3.22011/12 365280 96.6 12970 3.4

145

2012/13 367485 96.1 15035 3.9Academic staff2003/04 147460 98.2 2770 1.82004/05 157600 98.1 3055 1.92005/06 161680 98.1 3195 1.92006/07 166480 97.9 3515 2.12007/08 171165 98.8 3780 2.22008/09 173980 97.2 5060 2.82009/10 177030 97.5 4565 2.52010/11 176380 97.3 4800 2.72011/12 176140 97.1 5250 2.92012/13 179365 96.6 6220 3.4Professional and support staff2003/04 183285 97.6 4590 2.42004/05 181030 97.5 4620 2.52005/06 185880 97.6 4655 2.42006/07 189050 97.4 5115 2.62007/08 191940 97.2 5570 2.82008/09 195740 96.1 7980 3.92009/10 198915 96.6 6920 3.42010/11 193320 96.4 7280 3.62011/12 189140 96.1 7720 3.92012/13 188120 95.5 8815 4.5

Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose activity is unknown.

146

Staff profile over time by activity and disability status

Non-disabled Disabled

% %

Academic staff

2003/04 98.2 1.8

2004/05 98.1 1.9

2005/06 98.1 1.9

2006/07 97.9 2.1

2007/08 98.8 2.2

2008/09 97.2 2.8

2009/10 97.5 2.5

2010/11 97.3 2.7

2011/12 97.1 2.9

2012/13 96.6 3.4

Professional and support staff2003/04 97.6 2.42004/05 97.5 2.52005/06 97.6 2.42006/07 97.4 2.62007/08 97.2 2.82008/09 96.1 3.92009/10 96.6 3.42010/11 96.4 3.62011/12 96.1 3.9

147

2012/13 95.5 4.5

148


3.9% of part-time academic staff disclosed as disabled, compared with 3.1% of full-time academic staff.

82.6% of full-time disabled academic staff were on open-ended/ permanent contracts compared with 74.6% of full-time non-disabled academic staff, a difference of 8.0%.

However, for part-time academic staff the trend was reversed: a higher proportion of non-disabled staff were on open-ended/permanent contracts than disabled staff (44.4% and 42.5% respectively; a difference of 1.9%).

Among professional and support staff, a higher proportion of disabled staff were employed on open-ended/permanent contracts (87.3%) than non-disabled staff (85.3%).

2.5 Academic staff by mode, contract type and disability status


No. %* %^ No. %* %^

Open/permanent 115430

64.4

96.5

4165 66.9

3.5

Fixed-term 63935 35.6

96.9

2055 33.1

3.1

Total 179365

100

96.6

6220 100

3.4

Full-time

Open/permanent 88505 74.6

96.6

3130 82.6

3.4

149


97.9

655 17.4

2.1

Total 118715

100

96.9

3785 100

3.1

Part-time


96.3

1035 42.5

3.7


96.0

1400 57.5

4.0

Total 60650 100

96.1

2435 100

3.9

* within a disability status, the percentage of staff in a contract type (compare vertically within a mode)^ within a contract type and mode, the percentage of staff who are disabled/non-disabled (compare horizontally)Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose mode or contract type is unknown.

2.6 Professional and support staff by mode, contract type and disability status


No. %* %^ No. %* %^


85.3

95.4

7690 87.3

4.6


96.1

1120 12.7

3.9

Total 188120

100

95.5

8815 100

4.5

Full-time


88.0

95.5

5285 89.8

4.5

150


96.2

600 10.2

3.8

Total 126100

100

95.5

5890 100

4.5

Part-time


95.4

2405 82.2

4.6


96.0

520 17.8

4.0

Total 62015 100

95.5

2925 100

4.5

* within a disability status, the percentage of staff in a contract type (compare vertically within a mode)^ within a contract type and mode, the percentage of staff who are disabled/non-disabled (compare horizontally)Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose mode or contract type is unknown.

Academic/professional and support staff in modes and contract types by disability status

Non-disabled %

Disabled %

All academic open/permanent 96.5 *All academic fixed-term 96.9Full-time academic open/permanent

96.6

Full-time academic fixed-term 97.9Part-time academic open/permanent

96.3

Part-time academic fixed-term 96.0

151

All professional/support open/permanent

95.4

All professional/support fixed-term 96.1Full-time professional/support open/permanent

95.5

Full-time professional/support fixed-term

96.2

Part-time professional/support open/permanent

95.4

Part-time professional/support fixed term

96.0


152

Disabled/non-disabled staff by activity and contract type

Non-disabled %

Disabled %

Open/permanent Academic 64.4 66.9Fixed-term Academic 35.6 33.1Open/permanent professional and support

85.3 87.3

Fixed-term professional and support 14.7 12.7

Contract level

Contract levels are the UCEA or XpertHR defined level of a contract. Those in UCEA levels (HOI–5B) are considered to be senior staff, while those in XpertHR levels (I–P) are considered to be non-senior staff (below professorial level or function head).

Overall, 7.7% of non-disabled staff were in senior contract levels (HOI–5B), compared with 5.9% of disabled staff.

Out of 170 heads of institutions, five disclosed as disabled (2.4%).

5.0% of staff in junior administrative, clerical, technical, craftsmen or operative roles (N) disclosed as disabled, compared with 2.1% of deputy/pro vice chancellors (2A).

153

2.7 Staff by contract level and disability status


No. %* %^ No. %* %^

Head of institution (HOI) 165 0.0 97.

6 5 0.0 2.4

UCEA level 2A 515 0.1 97.9 10 0.1 2.

1

UCEA level 2B 605 0.2 96.8 20 0.1 3.

2

UCEA level 3A 780 0.2 95.9 35 0.2 4.

1

UCEA level 3B 1235 0.3 96.5 45 0.3 3.

5

UCEA level 3/4A1 585 0.2 96.7 20 0.1 3.

3

UCEA level 3/4A2 610 0.2 96.4 20 0.1 3.

6

UCEA level 3/4A3 1135 0.3 97.0 35 0.2 3.

0

UCEA level 4A 1885 0.5 96.0 80 0.5 4.

0

UCEA level 4B 1630 0.4 96.3 65 0.4 3.

7

UCEA level 5A 17410 4.7 97.3 480 3.2 2.

7

UCEA level 5B 2375 0.6 95.8 105 0.7 4.

2

XpertHR level I 30050 8.2 96.6 1070 7.1 3.

4XpertHR level J 64025 17. 96. 2475 16. 3.

154

4 3 5 7

XpertHR level K 8530 23.2

96.4 3225 21.

43.6

XpertHR level L 52135 14.2

96.0 2170 14.

44.0

XpertHR level M 39865 10.8

95.5 1860 12.

44.5

XpertHR level N 30390 8.3 96.0 1605 10.

75.0

XpertHR level O 16925 4.6 95.3 840 5.6 4.

7

XpertHR level P 19840 5.4 95.8 880 5.8 4.

2

Total 367485

100

96.1

15035

100

3.9

* within a disability status, the percentage of staff in a contract level (compare vertically)^ within a contract level, the percentage of staff who are disabled/non-disabled (compare horizontally)Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose contract type is unknown.

Head of institution (HOI) Vice-chancellor/principal

UCEA level 2A Deputy/pro vice-chancellor

UCEA level 2B Chief operating officer, registrar, university secretary

UCEA level 3A Head/director of major academic area

UCEA level 3BDirector of major function/ group of functions eg finance, corporate services, HR

155

UCEA level 3/4A1Head of school/division/department/centre size 1



UCEA level 4A Head of a sub-set of academic area/directors of small centres

UCEA level 4B Senior function headUCEA level 5A ProfessorUCEA level 5B Function head

XpertHR level I

Professional and support staff section manager, senior lecturer (pre-92), principal lecturer (post 92), reader, principal research fellow

XpertHR level J

Section/team leader (professional, technical, administrative), lecturer B (pre 92), senior lecturer (post 92), senior research fellow

XpertHR level K

Senior professional/technical staff, lecturer A (pre-92), lecturer (post-92), research fellow, researcher, senior research assistant, teaching fellow

XpertHR level LProfessional/technical/senior administrative staff, research assistant, teaching assistant

XpertHR level M Assistant professional staff, administrative staff

156

XpertHR level NJunior administrative staff, clerical staff, technician/craftsmen, operative

XpertHR level O Routine task providerXpertHR level P Simple task provider

Staff in contract levels by disability status

Non-disabled % Disabled %Head of institution (HOI) 97.6 2.4UCEA level 2A 97.9 2.1UCEA level 2B 96.8 3.2UCEA level 3A 95.9 4.1UCEA level 3B 96.5 3.5UCEA level 3/4A1 96.7 3.3UCEA level 3/4A2 96.4 3.6UCEA level 3/4A3 97.0 3.0UCEA level 4A 96.0 4.0UCEA level 4B 96.3 3.7UCEA level 5A 97.3 2.7UCEA level 5B 95.8 4.2XpertHR level I 96.6 3.4XpertHR level J 96.3 3.7XpertHR level K 96.4 3.6XpertHR level L 96.0 4.0XpertHR level M 95.5 4.5XpertHR level N 96.0 5.0XpertHR level O 95.3 4.7XpertHR level P 95.8 4.2Total 96.1 3.9

157

Among academic staff, 13.0% of non-disabled staff were in senior contract levels (HOI–5B), compared with 11.3% of disabled staff.

The proportion of academic staff disclosing as disabled was highest among directors of major functions or groups of function (3B; 7.2%) and lowest among those in simple task provider roles (P; 1.5%).

2.8 Academic staff by contract level and disability status


No. %* %^ No. %* %^


7 5 0.0 2.3

UCEA level 2A 430 0.2 98.4 5 0.1 1.

6UCEA level 2B 35 0.0 .. 5 0.0 ..

UCEA level 3A 700 0.4 96.0 30 0.5 4.

0

UCEA level 3B 130 0.1 92.8 10 0.2 7.

2

UCEA level 3/4A1 570 0.3 96.9 20 0.3 3.

1

UCEA level 3/4A2 575 0.3 96.6 20 0.3 3.

4

UCEA level 3/4A3 1055 0.6 96.8 35 0.6 3.

2

UCEA level 4A 1700 0.9 96.0 70 1.1 4.

0UCEA level 4B 135 0.1 95. 5 0.1 4.

158

7 3

UCEA level 5A 17400 9.7 97.3 480 7.8 2.

7

UCEA level 5B 450 0.3 96.2 20 0.3 3.

8

XpertHR level I 25190 14.0

96.6 885 14.

23.4

XpertHR level J 48445 27.0

96.4 1815 29.

13.6


96.7 1965 31.

63.3


96.7 720 11.

63.3

XpertHR level M 2415 1.3 95.5 115 1.8 4.

5

XpertHR level N 600 0.3 96.4 25 0.4 3.

6

XpertHR level O 150 0.1 98.0 5 0.0 2.

0

XpertHR level P 65 0.0 98.5 0 0.0 1.

5

Total 179365

100

96.6 6220 10

03.4

* within a disability status, the percentage of staff in a contract level (compare vertically)^ within a contract level, the percentage of staff who are disabled/non-disabled (compare horizontally).. Percentages based on totals of 52 or less are not shown. Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose contract type is unknown.


159










XpertHR level I


XpertHR level J


XpertHR level K Senior professional/technical staff,

160

lecturer A (pre-92), lecturer (post-92), research fellow, researcher, senior research assistant, teaching fellow





161

Academic staff in contract levels by disability status

Non-disabled % Disabled %Head of institution (HOI) 97.7 2.3UCEA level 2A 98.4 1.6UCEA level 2B .. ..UCEA level 3A 96.0 4.0UCEA level 3B 92.8 7.2UCEA level 3/4A1 96.9 3.1UCEA level 3/4A2 96.6 3.4UCEA level 3/4A3 96.8 3.2UCEA level 4A 96.0 4.0UCEA level 4B 95.7 4.3UCEA level 5A 97.3 2.7UCEA level 5B 96.2 3.8XpertHR level I 96.6 3.4XpertHR level J 96.4 3.6XpertHR level K 96.7 3.3XpertHR level L 96.7 3.3XpertHR level M 95.5 4.5XpertHR level N 96.4 3.6XpertHR level O 98.0 2.0XpertHR level P 98.5 1.5Total 96.6 3.4

The proportion of professional and support staff in senior contract levels (HOI–5B) was slightly higher among non disabled staff (2.8%) than disabled staff (2.3%).

5.0% of professional and support staff in junior administrative, clerical, technical, craftsmen or operative

162

roles (N) disclosed as disabled, compared with 1.3% of heads of size 3 schools, divisions or departments (3/4A3) although numbers in the latter group were small overall.

2.9 Professional and support staff by contract level and disability status


No. %* %^ No. %* %^

Head of institution (HOI) 35 0.0 .. 0 0.0 ..

UCEA level 2A 90 0.0 95.7 5 0.0 4.

3

UCEA level 2B 575 0.3 97.1 15 0.2 2.

9

UCEA level 3A 85 0.0 95.4 5 0.0 4.

6

UCEA level 3B 1105 0.6 96.9 35 0.4 3.

1UCEA level 3/4A1 15 0.0 .. 0 0.0 ..UCEA level 3/4A2 30 0.0 .. 0 0.0 ..

UCEA level 3/4A3 80 0.0 98.7 0 0.0 1.

3

UCEA level 4A 185 0.1 95.8 10 0.1 4.

2

UCEA level 4B 1495 0.8 96.3 55 0.6 3.

7UCEA level 5A 10 0.0 .. 0 0.0 ..

UCEA level 5B 1925 1.0 95.7 85 1.0 4.

3

XpertHR level I 4855 2.6 96.3 185 2.1 3.

7163

XpertHR level J 15585 8.3 95.9 660 7.5 4.

1


95.5 1260 14.

34.5


95.6 1450 16.

44.4


95.5 1745 19.

84.5

XpertHR level N 29790 15.8

95.0 1580 17.

95.0

XpertHR level O 16775 8.9 95.3 835 9.5 4.

7

XpertHR level P 19775 10.5

95.7 880 10.

04.3

Total 188120

100

95.5 8815 10

04.5

* within a disability status, the percentage of staff in a contract level (compare vertically)^ within a contract level, the percentage of staff who are disabled/non-disabled (compare horizontally).. Percentages based on totals of 52 or less are not shown.Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose contract type is unknown.

Head of institution (HOI) Vice-chancellor/principalUCEA level 2A Deputy/pro vice-chancellor




164






XpertHR level I


XpertHR level J


XpertHR level K



XpertHR level M Assistant professional staff, 165

administrative staff



Professional and support staff in contract levels by disability status

Non-disabled % Disabled %Head of institution (HOI) .. *UCEA level 2A 95.7UCEA level 2B 97.1UCEA level 3A 95.4UCEA level 3B 96.9UCEA level 3/4A1 ..UCEA level 3/4A2 ..UCEA level 3/4A3 98.7UCEA level 4A 95.8UCEA level 4B 96.3UCEA level 5A ..UCEA level 5B 95.7XpertHR level I 96.3XpertHR level J 95.9XpertHR level K 95.5XpertHR level L 95.6XpertHR level M 95.5XpertHR level N 95.0 5.0XpertHR level O 95.3XpertHR level P 95.7

166


Occupational group

4.5% of professional and support staff disclosed as disabled, compared with 3.4% of academic staff.

The sales and customer service (5.6%) and associate professional and technical occupational groups on academic contracts (5.2%) had relatively high proportions of staff disclosing as disabled.

In contrast, professional occupations on academic contracts (3.3%) and caring, leisure and other service occupations (3.7%) had relatively low proportions of staff disclosing as disabled.

2.10 Staff by activity, occupational group and disability status


No. %* %^ No. %* %^


480 0.3 95.3

25 0.4 4.7


177605

99.0

96.7

6125 98.5

3.3


1275 0.7 94.8

70 1.1 5.2

Total 1793 10 96. 6220 10 3.

167

65 0 6 0 4Professional and support contractManagers, directors and senior officials

10600

5.6 95.9

450 5.1 4.1


34140

18.1

95.7

1540 17.5

4.3


41425

22.0

95.4

1985 22.5

4.6


61620

32.8

95.3

3065 34.8

4.7

Skilled trades occupations

5945 3.2 96.2

235 2.7 3.8

Caring, leisure and other service occupations

6710 3.6 96.3

260 2.9 3.7


1830 1.0 94.4

110 1.2 5.6


1635 0.9 96.2

65 0.7 3.8

Elementary occupations

24210

12.9

95.6

1105 12.5

4.4

Total 188120

100

95.5

8815 100

4.5

All staff 367485

96.1

15035

3.9

* within a disability status, the percentage of staff in an occupational group (compare vertically within an activity)^ within an activity and occupational group, the percentage of staff who are disabled/non-disabled (compare horizontally)

168

Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose activity or occupational group is unknown.Academic staff in SOC groups other than 1–3 have been included in the academic total but are not shown in an occupational group. The sum of academic occupational groups therefore is not equal to the academic total in this table.

Academic/professional and support staff in occupational groups by disability status

Non-disabled %

Disabled %

AcademicManagers, directors and senior officials

95.3 *

Professional occupations 96.7Associate professional, technical

94.8 5.2

Professional and supportManagers, directors, senior officials

95.9

Professional occupations 95.7Associate professional, technical

95.4

Administrative, secretarial 95.3Skilled trades 96.2Caring, leisure, other service

96.3

Sales, customer service 94.4 5.6Process, plant, machine operatives

96.2

169

Elementary occupations 95.6* values less than 5.0 are not displayed

Among those who worked full-time, 4.5% of professional and support staff disclosed as disabled, compared with 3.1% of academic staff.

The sales and customer service occupational group had the highest proportion of full-time staff disclosing as disabled (5.1%), while full-time academic staff in professional occupations had the lowest (3.1%).

2.11 Full-time staff by activity, occupational group and disability status


No. %* %^ No. %* %^


410 0.3 95.2

20 0.5 4.8


117365

98.9

96.9

3720

98.3

3.1


935 0.8 95.5

45 1.2 4.5

Total 118715

100

96.9

3785

100

3.1


9370 7.4 96.1

380 6.5 3.9


26505

21.0

95.7

1190

20.2

4.3

170


31885

25.3

95.6

1480

25.1

4.4


38920

30.9

95.2

1960

33.3

4.8


5205 4.1 96.2

205 3.5 3.8


3665 2.9 96.1

150 2.5 3.9


980 0.8 94.9

55 0.9 5.1


1400 1.1 96.0

60 1.0 4.0


8170 6.5 95.2

415 7.0 4.8

Total 126100

100

95.5

5890

100

4.5

All staff 244815

96.2

6975

3.8

* within a disability status, the percentage of staff in an occupational group (compare vertically within an activity)^ within an activity and occupational group, the percentage of staff who are disabled/non-disabled (compare horizontally) Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose activity or occupational group is unknown.

Academic staff in SOC groups other than 1–3 have been included in the academic total but are not shown in an occupational group. The sum of academic occupational

171

groups therefore is not equal to the academic total in this table.

4.5% of part-time professional and support staff disclosed as disabled, compared with 3.9% of part-time academic staff. The proportion of part-time academic staff who disclosed as disabled was slightly higher than the proportion of full-time academic staff (3.1%) (see fig. 2.11).

The proportion of staff disclosing as disabled varied more widely by occupational group for part-time staff than full-time staff (see fig. 2.11).

For example, 7.1% of part-time academic staff in associate professional and technical occupations disclosed as disabled, compared with 2.5% of part-time professional and support staff in the process, plant and machine operative group, a difference of 4.6%.

However, the numbers of staff in these occupational groups were small.

2.12 Part-time staff by activity, occupational group and disability status


No. %* %^ No. %* %^


70 0.1 95.8

5 0.1 4.2


60240 99.3

96.2

2405

98.8

3.8

Associate 340 0.6 92. 25 1.1 7.172

professional and technical occupations

9 1

Total 60650 100

96.1

2435

100

3.9


1230 2.0 94.6

70 2.4 5.4


7640 12.3

95.6

350 11.9

4.4


9535 15.4

95.0

505 17.3

5.0


22700 36.6

95.4

1105

37.8

4.6


740 1.2 96.0

30 1.1 4.0


3045 4.9 96.5

110 3.8 3.5


850 1.4 93.9

55 1.9 6.1


235 0.4 97.5

5 0.2 2.5


16035 25.9

95.9

690 23.6

4.1

Total 62015 100

95.5

2925

100

4.5

All staff 122670

95.8

5360

4.2

173

See fig. 2.11 for explanatory text.

Academic contract

Academic staff with research only contracts had the lowest proportion of staff disclosing as disabled (2.3%). Academic staff with neither teaching nor research contracts had the highest proportion of staff disclosing as disabled (4.3%).

23.1% of non-disabled staff were employed on research only contracts, compared with 15.8% of disabled staff (a difference of 7.3%).

2.13 Academic staff by research/teaching contract type and disability status

Non-disabled DisabledNo. %* %^ No. %* %^


96.0

1880 30.2

4.0


97.7

985 15.8

2.3


91325 50.9

96.5

3275 52.7

3.5


1760 1.0 95.7

80 1.3 4.3

Total 179365

100 96.6

6220 100 3.4

* within a disability status, the percentage of staff in a research/teaching contract type (compare vertically)^ within a research/teaching contract type, the percentage of staff who are disabled/non-disabled (compare horizontally)

174

Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose research/teaching contract type is unknown.

Disabled/non-disabled academic staff by research/teaching contract type

Non-disabled %

Disabled %

Teaching only 25.0 30.2Research only 23.1 15.8Teaching and research 50.9 52.7Neither teaching nor research

1.0 1.3

Academic staff in research/teaching contract types by disability status

Non-disabled %

Disabled %

Teaching only 96.0 *Research only 97.7Teaching and research 96.5Neither teaching nor research 95.7



The majority of disabled staff worked in non-SET departments (52.6%). In comparison, the majority of non disabled staff worked in SET departments (53.9%).

175

In SET subject areas, relatively high proportions of academic staff in nursing and allied health professions (5.7%), psychology and behavioural sciences (4.6%) and anatomy and physiology (4.1%) disclosed as disabled.

Disclosure rates were considerably lower among academic staff in veterinary science (1.4%), pharmacy and pharmacology (1.8%) and clinical dentistry (1.9%).

2.14 Academic staff by SET category and disability status

SET Non-SETNo. % No. %

Disabled 2945 47.4

3275 52.6

Non-disabled 96685

53.9

82680

46.1

Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose SET category is unknown.

2.15 SET academic staff by subject area and disability status

Non-disabled

Disabled

No. % No. %Agriculture, forestry and food science

1075 97.6

25 2.4


65 4.1

Archaeology 645 96.6

20 3.4

176

Architecture, built environment, planning

3655 97.2

105 2.8

Biosciences 11925

97.4

315 2.6


20 2.1

Chemistry 3670 97.8

85 2.2


40 2.4

Clinical dentistry 1440 98.1

30 1.9

Clinical medicine 20745

97.9

450 2.1

Earth, marine, environmental sciences

3375 96.8

110 3.2

Electrical electronic and computer engineering

3740 97.6

90 2.4


1250 3.5

Geography, environmental studies

2055 96.5

75 3.5


6175 96.4

230 3.6


115 2.7


4040 97.7

95 2.3


1025 97.8

25 2.2


8540 94.3

515 5.7

177


35 1.8

Physics 4185 97.9

90 2.1


5730 95.4

275 4.6


15 1.4

Total SET 96685

97.0

2945 3.0


Disabled/non-disabled academic staff by SET category

SET % Non-SET %Disabled 47.4 52.6Non-disabled 53.9 46.1

In non-SET subject areas, relatively high proportions of academic staff in sociology (5.9%), health and community studies (5.9%) and staff and student facilities (5.8%) disclosed as disabled.

In contrast, economics and econometrics (2.0%), anthropology and development studies (2.4%), modern languages (2.5%) and music, dance, drama and performing arts (2.5%) had relatively low rates of staff disclosing as disabled.

2.16 Non-SET academic staff by subject area and disability status

Non- Disabled178

disabledNo. % No. %

Anthropology, development studies

845 97.6

20 2.4


10 3.6


355 4.2


13080

96.4

490 3.6

Catering, hospitality management

700 94.9

40 5.1

Classics 570 96.3

20 3.7


25 2.6


50 2.0

Education 9025 96.1

365 3.9


155 3.4


210 5.9

History 3205 96.4

120 3.6

Law 4650 95.0

245 5.0


175 4.5


140 2.5

179

Music, dance, drama, performing arts

6595 97.5

165 2.5

Philosophy 1045 96.1

45 3.9

Politics and international studies 2660 97.1

80 2.9


150 5.7

Sociology 2570 94.1

160 5.9


2295 97.0

70 3.0


25 3.3


60 5.1


1595 96.8

55 3.2

Premises 50 94.5

5 5.5



30 5.8

Total non-SET 82680

96.2

3275 3.8

.. Percentages based on totals of 52 or less are not shown.Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose subject area is unknown

Academic staff in SET subject areas by disability status

Non-disabled Disabled %

180

%Agriculture, forestry and food science

97.6 *

Anatomy and physiology 95.9Archaeology 96.6Architecture, built environment, planning

97.2

Biosciences 97.4Chemical engineering 97.9Chemistry 97.8Civil engineering 97.6Clinical dentistry 98.1Clinical medicine 97.9Earth, marine, environmental sciences

96.8

Electrical electronic and computer engineering

97.6

General engineering 96.5Geography, environmental studies

96.5


96.4

Mathematics 97.3Mechanical, aero and production engineering

97.7


97.8


94.3 5.7

Pharmacy and 98.2

181

pharmacologyPhysics 97.9Psychology and behavioural sciences

95.4

Veterinary science 98.6Total SET 97.0


Academic staff in non-SET subject areas by disability status

Non-disabled %

Disabled %

Anthropology, development studies

97.6 *

Area studies 96.4Art and design 95.8Business and management studies

96.4

Catering, hospitality management

94.9 5.1

Classics 96.3Continuing education 97.4Economics and econometrics

98.0

Education 96.1English language and literature

96.6

Health and community studies

94.1 5.9

History 96.4Law 95.0 5.0

182

Media studies 95.5Modern languages 97.5Music, dance, drama, performing arts

97.5

Philosophy 96.1Politics and international studies

97.1

Social work and social policy

94.3 5.7

Sociology 94.1 5.9Sports science and leisure studies

97.0

Theology and religious studies

96.7

Total academic services 94.9 5.1Central administration and services

96.8

Premises 94.5 5.5Residences and catering ..Staff and student facilities 94.2 5.8Total non-SET 96.2


Academic roles

A lower proportion of professors disclosed as disabled(2.7%) than academic staff in non-professorial roles (3.4%).

A higher proportion of both professors and non-professors in non-SET areas disclosed as disabled than in SET areas. 3.1% of non-SET professors and 3.9% of non-SET non-

183

professors were disabled, compared with 2.4% of SET professors and 3.0% of SET non-professors.

2.17 Academic staff by professorial and SET categories, mode and disability status


Professors

All SET 10580 60.8

97.6

265 54.4

2.4


97.6

220 45.5

2.4


97.6

45 8.9 2.4


96.9

220 45.6

3.1

Full-time non-SET

5575 32.0

96.9

180 37.6

3.1

Part-time non-SET

1245 7.2 97.0

40 8.0 3.0

Total 17400 100

97.3

480 100

2.7

Non-professors

All SET 86105 53.2

97.0

2680

46.8

3.0


97.3

1765

30.8

2.7


96.0

915 16.0

4.0


96.1

3055

53.2

3.9

184

Full-time non-SET

40150 24.8

96.1

1620

28.2

3.9

Part-time non-SET

35710 27.0

96.1

1435

25.0

3.9

Total 161965

100

96.6

5735

100

3.4

* within a disability status, the percentage of staff in a SET category and mode (compare vertically within professorial category)^ within professorial, SET categories and mode, the percentage of staff who are disabled/nondisabled (compare horizontally)Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose professorial, SET category or mode is unknown.

Disabled/non-disabled academic staff by professorial and SET categories and mode

Non-disabled % Disabled %ProfessorsAll SET 60.8 54.4

Full-time SET 50.6 45.5Part-time SET 10.2 8.9

All non-SET 39.2 45.6Full-time non-SET 32.0 37.6Part-time non-SET 7.2 8.0

Non-professorsAll SET 53.2 46.8


All non-SET 46.8 53.2Full-time non-SET 24.8 28.2

185


Professors/non-professors in modes and SET categories by disability status

Non-disabled % Disabled %ProfessorsAll SET 97.6 2.4


All non-SET 96.9 3.1Full-time non-SET

96.9 3.1

Part-time non-SET

97.0 3.0

Total 97.3 2.7Non-professorsAll SET 97.0 3.0



96.1 3.9

Part-time non-SET

96.1 3.9

Total 96.6 3.4

A slightly higher proportion of academic senior managers disclosed as disabled (3.5%) than academic staff who were not senior managers (3.3%).

186

Across senior management and non-senior management contracts, a higher proportion of non-SET staff disclosed as disabled than SET staff. 3.8% of non-SET other academics and 3.6% of non-SET senior managers disclosed as disabled, compared with 3.0% of SET other academics and 3.4% of SET senior managers.

2.18 Academic staff by senior management and SET categories, mode and disability status

Non-disabled DisabledNo. %* %^ No. %* %

^Senior managers

All SET 465 32.7 96.6

15 .. 3.4

Full-time SET 425 29.8 96.5

15 .. 3.5

Part-time SET 40 2.8 .. 0 .. ..

All non-SET 955 67.3 96.4

35 .. 3.6

Full-time non-SET

895 63.1 96.3

35 .. 3.7

Part-time non-SET

60 4.2 98.3

0 .. 1.7

Total 1420 100 96.5

50 .. 3.5


All SET 96220 54.1 97.0

2930

47.5

3.0

Full-time SET 72565 40.8 97.4

1970

31.9

2.6

Part-time SET 23655 13.3 96. 960 15. 3.187

1 5 9

All non-SET 81725 45.9 96.2

3240

52.5

3.8

Full-time non-SET

44830 25.2 96.2

1765

28.6

3.8

Part-time non-SET

36895 20.7 96.2

1475

23.9

3.8

Total 177945

100 96.7

6165

100

3.3

* within a disability status, the percentage of staff in a SET category and mode (compare vertically within senior management category)^ within a senior management, SET category and mode, the percentage of staff who are disabled/ non-disabled (compare horizontally).. Percentages based on totals of 52 or less are not shown. Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose senior management category, SET category or mode is unknown.

Disabled/non-disabled academic staff by senior management and SET categories and mode

Non-disabled % Disabled %ProfessorsAll SET 32.7 ..

Full-time SET 29.8 ..Part-time SET 2.8 ..

All non-SET 67.3 ..Full-time non-SET

63.1 ..

Part-time non-SET

4.2 ..

188

Non-professorsAll SET 54.1 47.5



25.2 28.6

Part-time non-SET

20.7 23.9

Academic senior managers/other academic staff in modes and SET categories by disability status

Non-disabled % Disabled %Senior managersAll SET 96.6 3.4

Full-time SET 96.5 3.5Part-time SET .. ..

All non-SET 96.4 3.6Full-time non-SET 96.3 3.7Part-time non-SET 98.3 1.7Total 96.5 3.5

Other academic staffAll SET 97.0 3.0



Total 96.7 3.3

189

Salaries

A higher proportion of non-disabled academic staff were in the highest salary range of over £50,000 than disabled academic staff. Among full-time staff this difference was 0.4%. Among part-time staff the gap was wider, at 4.1%.

2.19 Academic staff by mode, salary range and disability status


Under £30,000 20165 11.2

96.5

730 11.7

3.5

£30,000 - £50,000 109435

61.0

96.5

3940 63.4

3.5

Over £50,000 49765 27.7

97.0

1550 24.9

3.0

Total 179365

100 96.6

6220 100 3.4

Full-time

Under £30,000 9305 7.8 97.1

280 7.4 2.9

£30,000 - £50,000 68935 58.1

96.9

2225 58.8

3.1

Over £50,000 40475 34.1

96.9

1275 33.7

3.1

Total 118715

100 96.9

3785 100 3.1

Part-time

Under £30,000 10860 17.9

96.0

450 18.4

4.0

190

£30,000 - £50,000 40500 66.8

95.9

1715 70.4

4.1

Over £50,000 9290 15.3

97.2

270 11.2

2.8

Total 60650 100 96.1

2435 100 3.9

* within a disability status, the percentage of staff in a salary range (compare vertically within a mode)^ within a mode and salary range, the percentage of staff who are disabled/non-disabled (compare horizontally)Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose mode or salary range is unknown.

Among full-time professional and support staff, a higher proportion of disabled staff earned less than £30,000 (61.5%) than non-disabled staff (58.7%). The opposite was true of part-time professional and support staff.

There was a 1.3% difference between the proportion of disabled (5.8%) and non-disabled (7.1%) full-time professional and support staff earning over £50,000. Among part-time staff the gap was narrower, at 0.5%.

2.20 Professional and support staff by mode, salary range and disability status


Under £30,000 124645

66.3

95.4

5970 67.8

4.6

£30,000 - £50,000 53445 28.4

95.6

2465 28.0

4.4

Over £50,000 10030 5.3 96.4

375 4.3 3.6

191

Total 188120

100 95.5

8815 100 4.5

Full-time

Under £30,000 7400 58.7

95.3

3620 61.5

4.7

£30,000 - £50,000 43205 34.3

95.7

1930 32.8

4.3

Over £50,000 8895 7.1 96.3

340 5.8 3.7

Total 126100

100 95.5

5890 100 4.5

Part-time

Under £30,000 50645 81.7

95.6

2350 80.4

4.4

£30,000 - £50,000 10240 16.5

95.0

535 18.3

5.0

Over £50,000 1135 1.8 96.8

35 1.3 3.2

Total 62015 100 95.5

2925 100 4.5

See fig. 2.19 for explanatory text.

Academic/professional and support staff in salary ranges by disability status

Non-disabled %

Disabled %

Academic staff under £30,000 96.5 *Academic staff £30,000 - £50,000

96.5

Academic staff over £50,000 97.0

192

Professional/support staff under £30,000

95.4

Professional/support staff £30,000 - £50,000

95.6

Professional/support staff over £50,000

96.4


Disabled/non-disabled staff in activities and modes by salary range

Under £30,000

£30,000-£50,000

Over £50,000

Non-disabled academic 11.2 61.0 27.7Disabled academic 11.7 63.4 24.9FT non-disabled academic 7.8 58.1 34.1FT disabled academic 7.4 58.8 33.7PT non-disabled academic 17.9 66.8 15.3PT disabled academic 18.4 70.4 11.2Non-disabled professional/support staff

66.3 28.4 5.3

Disabled professional/support staff

67.8 28.0 *

FT non-disabled professional/support staff

58.7 34.3 7.1

FT disabled professional/support staff

61.5 32.8 5.8

PT non-disabled professional/support staff

81.7 16.5

PT disabled 80.4 18.3

193

professional/support staff


13.7% of disabled staff received a salary of £56,467 or more, compared with 17.2% of non-disabled staff.

194

2.21 Academic staff by academic pay spine range and disability status


<£17503 650 0.4 97.4 15 0.3 2.6≥ £17,503 and <£23,352

2495 1.4 96.4 95 1.5 3.6

≥ £23,352 and <£31,1331

24125 13.5 96.7 830 13.4 3.3

≥ £31,1331 and <£42,055 62835 35.0 98.8 2075 33.4 3.2

≥ £42,055and < £56,467 58325 32.5 96.1 2350 37.8 3.9

≥ £56,467 30935 17.2 97.3 855 13.7 2.7

Total 179365 100 96.6 6220 100 3.4

* within a disability status, the percentage of staff in an academic pay spine range (compare vertically)^ within an academic pay spine range, the percentage of staff who are disabled/non-disabled (compare horizontally)Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose academic pay spine range is unknown

Academic staff in academic pay spine ranges by disability status

Non-disabled % Disabled %

<£17503 97.4 *≥ £17,503 and 96.4

195

<£23,352≥ £23,352 and <£31,1331 96.7

≥ £31,1331 and <£42,055 96.8

≥ £42,055and < £56,467 96.1≥ £56,467 97.3


Disabled/non-disabled academic staff by academic pay spine ranges

Non-disabled % Disabled %

<£17503 0.4 0.3≥ £17,503 and <£23,352 1.4 1.5

≥ £23,352 and <£31,1331 13.5 13.4

≥ £31,1331 and <£42,055 35.0 33.4

≥ £42,055and < £56,467 32.5 37.8≥ £56,467 17.2 13.7

Across the UK, the median disability pay gap was 4.8% and the mean pay gap was 6.0%. However, the pay gap varied considerably by nation and employment activity.

For both academic and professional and support staff, there were no median pay gaps in Scotland and England excluding London. The highest median pay gaps were found in Wales (-15.8% for academic staff and -3.0% for professional and support staff ).

196

The largest mean pay gap for academic staff was found in Wales (-4.1%) and for professional and support staff in Northern Ireland (7.1%). Scotland had no mean pay gap among academic staff.

197

2.22 Median/mean salary and pay gap by country of institution, activity and disability status

Median Mean

ND D Pay gap ND D

Pay gap

£ £ % £ £ %England

Academic staff 40845

41790 -2.3 4506

04347

7 3.5


24766

24049 2.9 2810

92775

7 3.0

Total 33823

31783 6.0 2648

83407

5 6.6

LondonAcademic staff

41863

44607 -6.6 4716

64639

2 1.6


31331

31911 -1.9 3398

63387

3 0.3

Total 37552

37085 1.2 4132

03944

3 4.5

England (excluding London)Academic staff

40834

40834 0.0 4435

84279

9 3.5


23352

23352 0.0 2668

72589

4 3.0

Total 3226 3042 5.7 3510 3291 6.3

198

7 4 8 0Northern Ireland


45941 -2.9 4595

24698

6-

2.3Professional and support staff

22000

21395 2.8 2674

52484

6 7.1

Total 33230

30440 8.4 3616

53429

1 5.2

Scotland


44607 0.0 4695

34696

6 0.0


23352

23352 0.0 2679

82693

6-

0.5

All staff 33230

31331 5.7 3568

23429

6 3.9

Wales


44607

-15.

8

43620

45425

-4.1


23352

24049 -3.0 2657

62774

2-

2.5

Total 32264

32267 0.0 3480

13432

8 1.4

UK total


42813 -2.4 4517

94397

1 2.7


24235

24049 0.8 2785

82716

6 2.5

199

Total 33258

31675 4.8 3631

23411

8 6.0

ND non-disabledD disabledP&S professional and supportPercentages based on total number of staff minus those whose country of institution or activity is unknown.

Median disability pay gap for all staff by country of institution

%England 6.0

London 1.2England excluding London 5.7

Northern Ireland 8.4Scotland 5.7Wales 0.0UK total 4.8

Mean disability pay gap for all staff by country of institution

%England 6.6



200

The median and mean disability pay gaps were larger among academic staff (-2.4% and 2.7%) than among professional and support staff (0.8% and 2.5%).

The largest positive mean disability pay gap occurred among professional and support staff working as managers, directors and senior officials (5.9%). The lowest mean disability pay gap was found among professional and support staff working in skilled trade occupations (-0.9%).

The largest median pay gap was found among professional and support staff working as process, plant and machine operatives (8.2%). There was no median pay gap for staff working in associate professional and technical occupations (on both academic and professional and support contracts). This was also the case for professional and support staff in professional occupations and in caring, leisure and other service occupations.

2.23 Median/mean salary and pay gap by activity, occupational group and disability status

Median Mean

ND D Pay gap ND D

Pay gap

£ £ % £ £ %Academic contractManagers, directors and senior officials

55173

56467 -2.3 5929

66410

2-

8.1


41972

43312 -3.2 4524

24405

4 2.6

201


29541

29541 0.0 3127

33027

1 3.2

Total 41790

42813 -2.4 4517

94397

1 2.7


47314

45967 2.8 5229

74918

6 5.9


36298

36298 0.0 3788

83686

8 2.7


28685 2885 0.0 2996

42956

8 1.3

Administrative and secretarial

22020

21383 2.9 2323

72288

5 1.5

Skilled trades 22700

22020 3.0 2337

32358

4-

0.9Caring, leisure, other service occupations

17503

17503 0.0 1907

71867

0 2.1


19056

19606 -2.9 2067

82093

8-

1.3


20764

19059 8.2 2104

92054

0 2.4


14520

14905 -2.7 1570

71597

9-

1.7Total 2423 2404 0.8 2785 2716 2.5

202

5 9 8 6

All staff 33258

31675 4.8 3631

23411

8 6.0

ND non-disabledD disabledPercentages based on total number of staff minus those whose salary, activity or occupational group is unknown.Academic staff in SOC groups other than 1–3 have been included in the academic total but are not shown in an occupational group. The sum of academic occupational groups therefore is not equal to the academic total in this table.

Median disability pay gap by occupational group

%Managers, directors and senior officials -2.3Professional occupations -3.2Associate professional and technical 0.0All academic -2.4Managers, directors and senior officials 2.8Professional occupations 0.0Associate professional and technical 0.0Administrative and secretarial 2.9Skilled trades 3.0Caring, leisure, other service occupations 0.0

Sales and customer service occupations -2.9Process, plant and machine operatives 8.2Elementary occupations -2.7All professional and support 0.8

203

Mean disability pay gap by occupational group

%Managers, directors and senior officials -8.1Professional occupations 2.6Associate professional and technical 3.2All academic 2.7Managers, directors and senior officials 5.9Professional occupations 2.7Associate professional and technical 1.3Administrative and secretarial 1.5Skilled trades -0.9Caring, leisure, other service occupations 2.1

Sales and customer service occupations -1.3Process, plant and machine operatives 2.4Elementary occupations -1.7All professional and support 2.5

Among professors, the median disability pay gap was 2.9% and the mean pay gap was 3.2%. Overall, these pay gaps were narrower among non-professors, where the median disability pay gap was -1.0% and the mean pay gap was 0.9%. However, this varied by nation. For example, the median pay gap for non-professors ranged from -19.3% in Wales to no gap in England.

Notably, the median and mean pay gaps for professors were considerably higher in London (8.4% and 8.9% respectively) than in England excluding London (1.0% and 1.9% respectively).

204

2.24 Median/mean salary and pay gap for professors/non-professors by country of institution and disability status

Median Mean

ND D Pay gap ND D Pay

gap£ £ % £ £ %

Professors

England 71489

69410 2.9 7603

07314

4 3.8

London 76917

70474 8.4 8085

47366

9 8.9

England excluding London

70077

69410 1.0 7433

57295

6 1.9

Northern Ireland

69493

67626 2.7 7352

87517

7 -2.2

Scotland 69993

65972 5.7 7501

77363

8 1.8

Wales 74775

70152 6.2 7665

97554

4 1.5

Total 71488

69409 2.9 7590

27348

8 3.2

Non-professors

England 39640

39649 0.0 4185

74121

9 1.5

London 40040

41898 -4.6 4352

74340

4 0.3

England 3852 3846 0.2 4130 4072 1.4

205

excluding London

2 4 3 9

Northern Ireland

40857

45941 -12.4 4260

44449

2 -4.4

Scotland 42055

44607 -6.1 4319

24328

5 -0.2

Wales 36298

43312 -19.3 3961

94170

9 -5.3

Total 39649

40040 -1.0 4187

94148

9 0.9

ND non-disabledD disabledPercentages based on total number of staff minus those whose professorial category, salary or country of institution is unknown.

Median disability pay gap for professors/non-professors in country of institution

%ProfessorEngland 2.9


Northern Ireland 2.7Scotland 5.7Wales 6.2Total 2.9Non professorEngland 0.0

London -4.6

206

England excluding London 0.2Northern Ireland -12.4Scotland -6.1Wales -19.3Total -1.0

Mean disability pay gap for professors/non-professors in country of institution

%ProfessorEngland 3.8


Northern Ireland -2.2Scotland 1.8Wales 1.5Total 3.2Non professorEngland 1.5


Northern Ireland -4.4Scotland -0.2Wales -5.3Total 0.9

207



Overall, a slightly higher proportion of non-disabled staff left their institution between 2011/12 and 2012/13 (17.9%) than disabled staff (16.8%).

A similar trend was found among non-UK nationals, with 22.0% of non-disabled staff leaving their institution in this time period, compared with 19.3% of disabled staff.

However, the trend was reversed for UK national staff, with a higher proportion of disabled staff (16.3%) leaving their institution than

2.25 UK/non-UK academic staff by leaving status and disability status

Non-disabled

Disabled

No. % No. %

Total 176140

100 5250

100

Leavers(as a proportion of all staff)

31460 17.9 880 16.8

Know destination(as a proportion of all leavers)

12555 39.9 370 42.1

Unknown destination(as a proportion of all

18905 60.1 510 57.9

208

leavers)UK national

Total 127125

100 4570

100


20065 15.8 745 16.3


8040 40.1 310 41.6

Unknown destination(as a proportion of all leavers)

12020 59.9 435 58.4

Non-UK national

Total 43565 100 615 100


9580 22.0 120 19.3


4270 44.5 60 49.7


5310 55.5 60 50.3

Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose leaving status is unknown.

Disabled/non-disabled academic staff by nationality and leaving status

Non-disabled %

Disabled %

UK nationals Academic 84.2 83.7209

non-leaversKnown destination

6.3 6.8

Unknown destination

9.5 9.5

Non-UK nationals


78.0 80.6

Known destination

9.8 9.6

Unknown destination

12.2 9.8

Among UK academic staff with a known leaving destination the proportion of disabled staff who went to another UK HEI was 6.9% lower than the proportion of non-disabled staff (17.1% compared with 24.0%).

The proportion of disabled staff who went overseas was slightly lower than the proportion of non-disabled staff (4.2% and 4.9% respectively).

The proportion of disabled staff who were no longer employed (53.2%) was over 10.0% higher than the proportion of non-disabled staff who were no longer employed (41.4%).

The proportion of disabled staff who retired (24.4%) was over 10.0% higher than the proportion of non-disabled

2.26 UK academic staff leavers by known leaving destination and disability status


210

UK employment

UK other HEI 1925

24.0 97.3 55 17.

1 2.7

UK other education institution 395 4.9 96.1 15 5.2 3.9

UU student 225 2.8 95.3 10 3.6 4.7UK research institute 100 1.3 96.2 5 1.3 3.8UK NHS/medical or dental practice 440 5.5 97.6 10 3.6 2.4

UK public sector 130 1.6 95.6 5 1.9 4.4

UK private sector 1100

13.7 97.3 30 9.9 2.7

All UK employment 4325

53.8 97.0 13

042.

6 3.0

Non-UK employmentNon-UK other HEI 185 2.3 96.4 5 2.3 3.6Non-UK other education institution 60 0.8 98.4

7 0 0.3 1.6

Non-UK student 5 0.0 .. 0 0.3 ..Non-UK research institute 40 0.5 .. 0 0.3 ..

Non-UK health service 10 0.1 .. 0 0.3 ..Non-UK other employment 85 1.1 97.7 0 0.6 2.3

All non-UK employment 390 4.9 96.8 15 4.2 3.2


2065

25.7 96.1 85 27.

2 3.9

Retired 1140

14.2 93.8 75 24.

4 6.2

211

Deceased 125 1.5 96.1 5 1.6 3.9All those no longer in employment

3325

41.4 95.3 16

553.

2 4.7

Total 8040

100 96.3 31

010

0 3.7

* within a disability status, the percentage of staff in a leaving destination (compare vertically)^ within a leaving destination, the percentage of staff who are disabled/non-disabled (compare horizontally).. Percentages based on totals of 52 or less are not shown. Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose leaving destination is unknown.

1.4% of non-UK leavers disclosed as disabled, less than half the proportion of UK leavers (3.7%; see fig. 2.26).

Among non-UK academic leavers with a known leaving destination, 33.9% of disabled staff found employment in the UK, compared with 50.3% of non-disabled staff, a difference of 16.4%.

The proportion of disabled non-UK staff who found employment overseas (13.6%) was almost 10.0% lower than the proportion of non-disabled non-UK staff (23.5%).

The proportion of disabled non-UK staff who were no longer employed (52.5%) was twice as high as the proportion of non-disabled non-UK staff who were no longer employed (26.2%).

Please note that the number of non-UK disabled leavers was small.

212

2.27 Non-UK academic staff leavers by known leaving destination and disability status


UK employment

UK other HEI 1025

24.0

98.9 10 18.

7 1.1

UK other education institution 110 2.6 10

0 0 0.0 0.0

UU student 205 4.8 98.1 5 6.8 1.9

UK research institute 80 1.9 100 0 0.0 0.0


1 0 1.7 0.9

UK public sector 40 0.9 .. 0 0.0 ..


99.3 5 6.8 0.7

All UK employment 2145

50.3

99.1 20 33.

9 0.9

Non-UK employment

Non-UK other HEI 505 11.8

99.2 5 6.8 0.8

Non-UK other education institution 100 2.3 99.

0 0 1.7 1.0

Non-UK student 30 0.7 .. 0 0.0 ..Non-UK research institute 140 3.3 10

0 0 0.0 0.0

Non-UK health service 10 0.2 .. 0 0.0 ..Non-UK other employment 220 5.1 98.

6 5 5.1 1.4

213


1005

23.5

99.2 10 13.

6 0.8


1010

23.7

97.9 20 37.

2 2.1

Retired 85 2.0 93.5 5 10.

2 6.5


1120

26.2

97.3 30 52.

5 2.7

Total 4270

100

98.6 60 10

0 1.4

* within a disability status, the percentage of staff in a leaving destination (compare vertically)^ within a leaving destination, the percentage of staff who are disabled/non-disabled (compare horizontally).. Percentages based on totals of 52 or less are not shown. Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose leaving destination is unknown.

214

UK academic staff leavers in leaving destinations by disability status

Non-disabled %

Disabled %

UK other HEI 97.3 2.7UK other education institution 96.1 3.9

UU student 95.3 4.7UK research institute 96.2 3.8UK NHS/medical or dental practice 97.6 2.4

UK public sector 95.6 4.4UK private sector 97.3 2.7All UK employment 97.0 3.0Non-UK other HEI 96.4 3.6Non-UK other education institution 98.47 1.6

Non-UK student .. ..Non-UK research institute .. ..Non-UK health service .. ..Non-UK other employment 97.7 2.3

All non-UK employment 96.8 3.2Not in regular employment 96.1 3.9

Retired 93.8 6.2Deceased 96.1 3.9All those no longer in employment 95.3 4.7

Total 96.3 3.7

215

.. percentages based on totals of 52 or less are not shown

Non-UK academic staff leavers in leaving destinations by disability status

Non-disabled %

Disabled %

UK other HEI 98.9 1.1UK other education institution 100 0.0

UU student 98.1 1.9UK research institute 100 0.0UK NHS/medical or dental practice 99.1 0.9

UK public sector .. ..UK private sector 99.3 0.7All UK employment 99.1 0.9Non-UK other HEI 99.2 0.8Non-UK other education institution 99.0 1.0

Non-UK student .. ..Non-UK research institute 100 0.0

Non-UK health service .. ..Non-UK other employment 98.6 1.4

All non-UK employment 99.2 0.8

Not in regular employment 97.9 2.1

Retired 93.5 6.5Deceased .. ..

216

All those no longer in employment 97.3 2.7

Total 98.6 1.4.. percentages based on totals of 52 or less are not shown

UK disabled/non-disabled academic staff leavers by leaving destination

Non-disabled %

Disabled %

UK other HEI 24.0 17.1UK other education institution 4.9 5.2

UU student 2.8 3.6UK research institute 1.3 1.3UK NHS/medical or dental practice 5.5 3.6


Non-UK student 0.0 0.3Non-UK research institute 0.5 0.3

Non-UK health service 0.1 0.3Non-UK other employment 1.1 0.6

All non-UK employment 4.9 4.2

Not in regular 25.7 27.2217

employmentRetired 14.2 24.4Deceased 1.5 1.6All those no longer in employment 41.4 53.2

218

Non-UK disabled/non-disabled academic staff leavers by leaving destination

Non-disabled %

Disabled %

UK other HEI 24.0 18.7UK other education institution 2.6 0.0UU student 4.8 6.8UK research institute 1.9 0.0UK NHS/medical or dental practice 2.7 1.7


Non-UK student 0.7 0.0Non-UK research institute 3.3 0.0Non-UK health service 0.2 0.0Non-UK other employment 5.1 5.1All non-UK employment 23.5 13.6Not in regular employment 23.7 37.2Retired 2.0 10.2Deceased 0.5 5.1All those no longer in employment 26.2 52.5

Total 100 100

219

3 Ethnicity

Between 2003/04 and 2012/13, the proportion of staff who were UK white decreased among both academic and professional and support staff (by 7.5% and 5.0%, respectively).

Among UK academic staff, a higher proportion of white staff were on open/permanent contracts than BME staff within all modes.

Overall, 8.5% of UK white staff were in senior contract levels, compared with 6.1% of UK BME staff. While this difference was relatively small, very few BME staff were in higher senior contract levels above professor level.

The proportion of UK staff who were BME was markedly lower among managers, directors and senior officials on academic contracts (2.6%) and strikingly higher among professional and support staff in sales and customer service occupations (10.3%).

Within SET subject areas, electrical, electronic and computer engineering (47.6%) and mechanical, aero and production engineering (47.2%) had the highest proportions of non-UK staff who were BME. Archaeology (3.5%) and psychology and behavioural sciences (13.6%) had the lowest.

The proportion of UK black staff who were professors (4.0%) was lower than for any other ethnic group. The proportion of black non-UK academic staff who were professors (2.1%) was also lower than for any other ethnic group.

Around one in five white (19.1%), Asian (20.2%), Chinese (21.8%) and other (20.9%) UK academic staff earned a salary in the highest pay spine range of over £56,467. In contrast, 8.2% of black and 14.2% of mixed UK academic staff were in this pay spine range.

220

Among non-UK academic staff, 14.5% of white staff earned a salary of £56,467 or more, compared with 7.2% of BME staff (a difference of 7.3%).

While a higher proportion of BME UK academic leavers went into employment than white UK academic leavers, a smaller proportion moved to another UK HEI (21.7% compared with 24.0%).

Among UK leavers, 43.3% of white and 34.2% of BME leavers were no longer in employment; 15.7% of white leavers went into retirement compared with 6.0% of BME leavers.

Ethnicity overview

95.2% of UK national and 92.7% of non-UK national staff chose to report their ethnicity.

Of those with known ethnicity, there was a notably higher proportion of BME staff among non-UK staff (28.6%) than UK staff (7.8%).

The proportion of UK and non-UK staff who were BME was highest in England (8.9% and 29.8%, respectively) and lowest in Northern Ireland (1.9% and 9.4%).

3.1 UK/non-UK staff by country of institution and ethnic group

White BME total BlackNo. % No. % No. %

UK national

England 220135

91.1

21520 8.9 5005 2.1

221


1 90 1.9 10 0.2

Scotland 29395 96.9 940 3.1 80 0.3

Wales 16885 96.9 535 3.1 60 0.4

Total 271005

92.2

23085 7.8 5160 1.8

Non-UK national

England 35200 70.2

14910

29.8 2530 5.0


6 185 9.4 10 0.6

Scotland 4335 74.3 1495 25.

7 165 2.8

Wales 1505 72.0 585 28.

0 80 3.9

Total 42805 71.4

17180

28.6 2785 4.6

Asian Chinese MixedNo. % No. % No. %

UK national

England 9345 3.9 2190 0.9 3340 1.4


Scotland 345 1.1 185 0.6 210 0.7Wales 205 1.2 115 0.6 110 0.6

Total 9925 3.4 2515 0.9 3670 1.2

Non-UK national222

England 5680 11.3

3725 7.4 1250 2.5


Scotland 620 10.6 410 7.1 115 2.0

Wales 235 11.1 180 8.6 25 1.1

Total 6615 11.0

4385 7.3 1400 2.3

Other UnknownNo. % No. %

UK national

England 1640 0.7 12305 4.8

Northern Ireland 5 0.1 60 1.3Scotland 120 0.4 2240 6.9Wales 50 0.3 360 2.0

Total 1820 0.6 14970 4.8

Non-UK nationalEngland 1725 3.4 3865 7.2Northern Ireland 15 0.7 30 1.6

Scotland 180 3.1 750 11.4

Wales 70 3.3 85 3.9Total 1990 3.3 4735 7.3

Percentages based on total number of staff minus those= whose country of institution is unknown.

223

UK/non-UK staff in countries of institution by BME/white identity

White BMEUK nationals in England 91.1 8.9

UK nationals in Northern Ireland 98.1UK nationals in Scotland 96.9 *UK nationals in Wales 96.9UK nationals in the UK 92.2 7.8Non- UK nationals in England 70.2 29.8Non- UK nationals in Northern Ireland 90..6 9.4Non- UK nationals in Scotland 74.3 25.7Non- UK nationals in Wales 72.0 28.0Non- UK nationals in the UK 71.4 28.6* values less than 5.0 are not displayed Among all BME staff, the three ethnic groups most represented were Asian: Indian (20.8%), Chinese (17.1%) and Asian other background (12.0%).

22.3% of UK BME staff were black, compared with 16.2% of non-UK BME staff.

25.5% of non-UK BME staff were Chinese, compared with 10.9% of UK BME staff.

3.2 UK/non-UK BME staff by ethnic group

UK national Non-UK national

All staff

No. % No. % No. %Black 5160 22.3 2785 16. 7945 19.

224

2 7Caribbean 2675 11.6 340 2.0 3015 7.5

African 2085 9.0 2130 12.4 4215 10.

5Black other 395 1.7 320 1.9 715 1.8

Asian 9925 43.0 6615 38.5

16540

41.1

Indian 5515 23.9 2865 16.7 8380 20.

8Pakistani 1760 7.6 600 3.5 2360 5.9Bangladeshi 690 3.0 270 1.6 955 2.4

Asian other 1955 8.5 2885 16.8 4840 12.

0

Chinese 2515 10.9 4385 25.5 6900 17.

1

Mixed 3670 15.9 1400 8.2 5070 12.6

White and black Caribbean

700 3.0 75 0.4 775 1.9

White and black African

300 1.3 180 1.0 480 1.2

White and Asian 1210 5.2 265 1.5 1475 3.7

Mixed other 1460 6.3 885 5.2 2345 5.8

Other 1820 7.9 1990 11.6 3810 9.5

Arab 50 0.2 50 0.3 100 0.2

Other 1770 7.7 1940 11.3 3710 9.2

225

BME total 23085 100 17180 100 4026

5 100

Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose ethnic group is unknown.

UK/non-UK BME staff by ethnic group

UK national % Non-UK national %Black 22.3 16.2

Caribbean 11.6 2.0African 9.0 12.4Black other 1.7 1.9

Asian 43.0 38.5Indian 23.9 16.7Pakistani 7.6 3.5Bangladeshi 3.0 1.6Asian other 8.5 16.8

Chinese 10.9 25.5Mixed 15.9 8.2

White and black Caribbean

3.0 0.4

White and black African

1.3 1.0

White and Asian 5.2 1.5

Mixed other 6.3 5.2Other 7.9 11.6

Arab 0.2 0.3Other 7.7 11.3

226

Between 2003/04 and 2012/13, the proportion of staff who were UK white decreased among both academic and professional and support staff (by 7.5% and 5.0%, respectively). Correspondingly, proportions from non-UK backgrounds have increased.

Between 2003/04 and 2012/13, the proportion of staff who were UK BME increased by 1.7%, from 4.8% to 6.5%. In this same period, the proportion of staff who were non-UK BME increased from 3.8% to 4.9%, a difference of 1.1%.

The increase in the proportion of staff who were UK BME was more pronounced among professional and support staff (2.3% increase from 2003/04 to 2012/13) than among academic staff (1.1% increase in the same time period).

In contrast, the proportion of academic staff who were non UK BME rose by 1.3%, compared with 0.6% among professional and support staff.

3.3 Profile of UK/non-UK staff over time by activity and BME/white identity

UK white UK BME Non-UK white

Non-UK BME

No. % No. % No. % No. %2003/04

232240

83.1

13335

4.8

23145 8.3 1071

03.8

2004/05

244825

82.5

14495

4.9

25710 8.7 1175

54.0

2005/06

251370

81.5

15660

5.1

28560 9.3 1291

54.2

2006/0 25809 80. 1667 5. 3198 10. 1417 4.

227

7 0 4 0 2 5 0 5 42007/08

261715

79.4

17750

5.4

34765

10.5

15315

4.6

2008/09

269745

78.9

19245

5.6

36750

10.7

16235

4.7

2009/10

275210

78.5

20460

5.8

38265

10.9

16830

4.8

2010/11

270885

77.8

21090

6.1

39300

11.3

17100

4.9

2011/12

269370

77.2

22020

6.3

40625

11.6

17020

4.9

2012/13

271005

76.5

23085

6.5

42805

12.1

17180

4.9

Academic staff2003/04 96220 76.

3 5995 4.8

16805

13.3

7050 5.6

2004/05

105300

76.4 6425 4.

71860

013.

57575 5.

52005/06

106955

75.1 6735 4.

82059

014.

58115 5.

72006/07

110075

73.7 7195 4.

82312

515.

58905 6.

02007/08

111435

72.4 7610 4.

92517

516.

49645 6.

32008/09

113690

71.9 8155 5.

22627

016.

61007

06.4

2009/10

115945

71.2 8750 5.

42741

016.

81066

06.6

2010/11

114800

70.2 9155 5.

62861

017.

51107

56.8

2011/12

115010

69.5 9545 5.

82967

517.

91121

06.8

228

2012/13

116840

68.8

10055

5.9

31415

18.5

11645

6.9

Professional and support staff2003/04

136020

88.7 7340 4.

8 6340 4.1 3655 2.4

2004/05

139525

87.8 8070 5.

1 7115 4.5 4180 2.6

2005/06

144420

86.9 8925 5.

4 7965 4.8 4800 2.9

2006/07

148015

86.2 9480 5.

5 8860 5.2 5275 3.1

2007/08

150280

85.5

10135

5.8 9590 5.5 5670 3.

22008/09

156060

84.9

11090

6.0

10475 5.7 6165 3.

42009/10

159265

84.7

11710

6.2

10855 5.8 6165 3.

32010/11

156085

84.5

11935

6.5

10690 5.8 6025 3.

32011/12

154360

84.1

12470

6.8

10950 6.0 5815 3.

22012/13

154165

83.7

13030

7.1

11390 6.2 5535 3.

0Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose activity or BME/white identity is unknown.

UK/non-UK staff profile over time by BME/white identity

UK white % UK BME % Non-UK white %

Non-UK BME%

03/04 83.1 4.8 8.3 3.8

229

04/05 82.5 4.9 8.7 4.005/06 81.5 5.1 9.3 4.206/07 80.4 5.2 10.0 4.407/08 79.4 5.4 10.5 4.608/09 78.9 5.6 10.7 4.709/10 78.5 5.8 10.9 4.810/11 77.8 6.1 11.3 4.911/12 77.2 6.3 11.6 4.912/13 76.5 6.5 12.1 4.9


Among UK academic staff, a higher proportion of white staff were on open/permanent contracts than BME staff within all modes. The largest difference (7.3%) was among staff working full-time, where 81.3% of white staff and 74.0% of BME staff were on open/ permanent contracts.

Among part-time UK academic staff, the majority of both white and BME staff were on fixed-term contracts (52.4% and 57.7% respectively).

230

3.4 UK academic staff by mode, contract type and BME/ white identity

White BMENo %* %^ No %* %^

UK open/permanent

80635 69.0 92.6 6460 64.2 7.4

UK fixed-term 36205 31.0 91.0 3595 35.8 9.0

Total 116840 100 92.1 1005

5 100 7.9

Full timeUK open/permanent

60420 81.3 92.1 5155 74.0 7.9

UK fixed-term 13940 18.7 88.5 1815 26.0 11.5

Total 74355 100 91.4 6965 100 8.6Part-timeUK open/permanent

20215 47.6 93.9 1305 42.3 6.1

UK fixed-term 22265 52.4 92.6 1780 57.7 7.4Total 42480 100 93.2 3085 100 6.8

* within a BME/white identity, the percentage of staff in a contract type (compare vertically within a mode)^ within mode and contract type, the percentage of staff who are BME/white (compare horizontally) Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose mode, contract type or BME/white identity is unknown.

231

The same trends were present among non-UK staff. However, in all modes the proportions of white and BME staff on open/ permanent contracts was lower among non UK than UK academic staff.

Among non-UK academic staff overall, 59.0% of white and 49.2% of BME staff were on open/permanent contracts, a difference of 9.8%.

3.5 Non-UK academic staff by mode, contract type and BME/white identity


Non-UK open/permanent

18535 59.0 76.4 5725 49.2 23.6

Non-UK fixed-term 12880 41.0 68.5 5920 50.8 31.5

Total 31415 100 73.0 11645 100 27.0

Full timeNon-UK open/permanent

15510 65.8 75.6 5000 55.8 24.4

Non-UK fixed-term 8055 34.2 67.0 3960 44.2 33.0

Total 23565 100 72.4 8960 100 27.6Part-timeNon-UK open/permanent

3025 38.5 80.7 725 27.0 19.3

232

Non-UK fixed-term 4820 61.5 71.1 1960 73.0 28.9

Total 7845 100 74.5 2680 100 25.5* within a BME/white identity, the percentage of staff in a contract type (compare vertically within a mode)^ within mode and contract type, the percentage of staff who are BME/white (compare horizontally)Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose mode, contract type or BME/white identity is unknown.

UK and non-UK academic staff in modes and contract types by BME/ white identity

White BMEAll UK academic open/permanent 92.6 7.4

All UK academic fixed-term 91.0 9.0Full-time UK academic open/perm. 92.1 7.9

Full-time UK academic fixed-term 88.5 11.5Part-time UK academic open/perm 93.9 6.1Part-time UK academic fixed-term 92.6 7.4

All non-UK academic open/permanent 76.4 23.6All non-UK academic fixed-term 68.5 31.5

Full-time non-UK academic open/perm. 75.6 24.4Full-time non-UK academic fixed-term 67.0 33.0

Part-time non-UK academic open/perm 80.7 19.3Part-time non-UK academic fixed-term 71.1 28.9

UK/non-UK BME/white academic staff by contract type

White %

BME %

233

All UK academic open/permanent 69.0 64.2All UK academic fixed-term 31.0 35.8

All non-UK academic open/permanent 59.0 41.0All non-UK fixed-term 49.2 50.8

Among both full-time and part-time UK professional and support staff, the proportions of staff on fixed-term contracts were higher for BME staff than white staff.

This difference was largest among those working part-time, where 25.7% of BME staff were on fixed-term contracts compared with 16.7% of white staff (a difference of 9.0%).

3.6 UK professional and support staff by mode, contract type and BME/white identity


UK open/permanent

134930 87.5 92.6 1079

0 82.8 7.4

UK fixed-term 19240 12.5 89.6 2245 17.2 10.4

Total 154165 100 92.2 1303

0 100 7.8

Full timeUK open/permanent

94025 89.5 92.4 7750 86.6 7.6

UK fixed-term 11055 10.5 90.2 1195 13.4 9.8

Total 105085 100 92.2 8945 100 7.8

Part-time234

UK open/permanent

40900 83.3 93.1 3035 74.3 6.9

UK fixed-term 8180 16.7 88.6 1050 25.7 11.4

Total 49085 100 92.3 4085 100 7.7* within a BME/white identity, the percentage of staff in a contract type (compare vertically within a mode)^ within mode and contract type, the percentage of staff who are BME/white (compare horizontally) Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose mode, contract type or BME/white identity is unknown.

This was also true for non-UK professional and support staff, with 27.3% of BME staff on fixed-term contracts compared with 23.2% of white staff.

The proportions of non-UK professional and support white and BME staff on fixed-term contracts were higher within full-time and part-time employment than for UK staff (see fig. 3.6).

3.7 Non-UK professional and support staff by mode, contract type and BME/white identity


Non-UK open/permanent

8745 76.8

68.5 4025 72.

7 31.5

Non-UK fixed-term 2645 23.

263.

6 1510 27.3 36.4

Total 11390 100 67. 5535 100 32.7235

3Full timeNon-UK open/permanent

5855 79.7

72.4 2235 76.

5 27.6


368.

5 685 23.5 31.5

Total 7350 100 71.6 2920 100 28.4

Part-timeNon-UK open/permanent

2890 71.5

61.8 1790 68.

4 38.2


558.

3 825 31.6 41.7

Total 4040 100 60.7 2615 100 39.3

* within a BME/white identity, the percentage of staff in a contract type (compare vertically within a mode)^ within mode and contract type, the percentage of staff who are BME/white (compare horizontally) Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose mode, contract type or BME/white identity is unknown.

UK/non-UK professional and support staff in modes and contract types by BME/white identity

White BMEAll UK professional and support open/permanent 92.6 7.4

All UK professional and support fixed-term 89.6 10.4

236

Full-time UK professional and support open/perm. 92.4 7.6

Full-time UK professional and support fixed-term 90.2 9.8

Part-time UK professional and support open/perm 93.1 6.9

Part-time UK professional and support fixed-term 88.6 11.4

All non-UK professional and support open/permanent 68.5 31.5

All non-UK professional and support fixed-term 63.6 36.4

Full-time non-UK professional and support open/perm. 72.4 27.6

Full-time non-UK professional and support fixed-term 68.5 31.5

Part-time non-UK professional and support open/perm 61.8 38.2

Part-time non-UK professional and support fixed-term 58.3 41.7

UK/non-UK professional and support BME/white staff by contract type

White %

BME %

All UK professional and support open/permanent 87.5 82.8

All UK professional and support fixed-term 12.5 17.2

All non-UK professional and support open/permanent 76.8 72.7

237

All non-UK professional and support fixed-term 23.2 27.3

Contract level


Overall, 8.5% of UK white staff were in senior contract levels (HOI–5B), compared with 6.1% of UK BME staff.

While this difference was relatively small, very few BME staff were in higher senior contract levels above professor level (5A). For example, only 2.6% of UK deputy/pro vice chancellors (2A) and none of the 140 UK heads of institutions were BME.

3.8 UK staff by contract level and BME/white identity

White BMENo. %* %^ No. %* %^

Head of institution (HOI) 140 0.1 10

0 0 0.0 0.0

UCEA level 2A 470 0.2 97.4 15 0.1 2.6

UCEA level 2B 545 0.2 97.7 15 0.1 2.3

UCEA level 3A 690 0.3 95.2 35 0.1 4.8

238

UCEA level 3B 1105 0.4 96.7 40 0.2 3.3

UCEA level 3/4A1 495 0.2 94.1 30 0.1 5.9

UCEA level 3/4A2 525 0.2 96.9 15 0.1 3.1

UCEA level 3/4A3 955 0.4 96.4 35 0.2 3.6

UCEA level 4A 1595 0.6 95.3 80 0.3 4.7

UCEA level 4B 1475 0.5 96.4 55 0.2 3.6

UCEA level 5A 12455 4.6 92.9 950 4.1 7.1

UCEA level 5B 2075 0.8 94.1 130 0.6 5.9

XpertHR level I 22300 8.2 93.0 1680 7.3 7.0


92.2 3940 17.

1 7.8


92.2 4890 21.

2 7.8


91.4 3495 15.

1 8.6


91.8 2890 12.

5 8.2

XpertHR level N 25350 9.4 92.6 2040 8.8 7.4

XpertHR level O 13230 4.9 92.1 1130 4.9 7.9

XpertHR level P 13600 5.0 89.3 1630 7.1 10.

7

239

Total 271005

100

92.2

23085

100 7.8

* within a BME/white identity, the percentage of staff in a contract level (compare vertically)^ within a contract level, the percentage of staff who are BME/white (compare horizontally)

Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose contract type or BME/white identity is unknown.










UCEA level 4B Senior function headUCEA level 5A Professor

240

UCEA level 5B Function head

XpertHR level I


XpertHR level J


XpertHR level K






241

UK staff in contract levels by BME/white identity

White % BME %Head of institution (HOI) 100UCEA level 2A 97.4 *UCEA level 2B 97.7UCEA level 3A 95.2UCEA level 3B 96.7UCEA level 3/4A1 94.1 5.9UCEA level 3/4A2 96.9UCEA level 3/4A3 96.4UCEA level 4A 95.3UCEA level 4B 96.4UCEA level 5A 92.9 7.1UCEA level 5B 94.1 5.9XpertHR level I 93.0 7.0XpertHR level J 92.2 7.8XpertHR level K 92.2 7.8XpertHR level L 91.4 8.6XpertHR level M 91.8 8.2XpertHR level N 92.6 7.4XpertHR level O 92.1 7.9XpertHR level P 89.3 10.7


Among UK academic staff, 14.9% of white staff were in senior contract levels (HOI–5B), compared with 11.6% of BME staff.

The largest proportions of both UK white and UK BME academic staff were found in senior professional/technical,

242

researcher/senior research assistant, or research/teaching fellow positions (K; 29.9% and 31.2%, respectively).

3.9 UK academic staff by contract level and BME/white identity


Head of institution (HOI) 115 0.1 10

0 0 0.0 0.0

UCEA level 2A 390 0.3 97.6 10 0.1 2.4

UCEA level 2B 30 0.0 .. 0 0.0 ..

UCEA level 3A 625 0.5 95.5 30 0.3 4.5

UCEA level 3B 105 0.1 93.7 5 0.1 6.3

UCEA level 3/4A1 480 0.4 93.9 30 0.3 6.1

UCEA level 3/4A2 500 0.4 97.1 15 0.1 2.9

UCEA level 3/4A3 890 0.8 96.4 35 0.3 3.6

UCEA level 4A 1420 1.2 95.0 75 0.7 5.0

UCEA level 4B 120 0.1 96.8 3 0.0 3.2

UCEA level 5A 12445 10.7

92.9 950 9.5 7.1

UCEA level 5B 370 0.3 94.9 20 0.2 5.1


92.6 1440 14.

3 7.4

243


91.8 2980 29.

7 8.2


91.8 3135 31.

2 8.2

XpertHR level L 11080 9.5 90.7 1140 11.

3 9.3

XpertHR level M 1365 1.2 91.4 130 1.3 8.6

XpertHR level N 390 0.3 89.7 45 0.4 10.

3

XpertHR level O 110 0.1 96.5 5 0.0 3.5

XpertHR level P 30 0.0 .. 0 0.0 ..

Total 116840

100

92.1

10055

100 7.9

* within a BME/white identity, the percentage of staff in a contract level (compare vertically)^ within a contract level, the percentage of staff who are BME/white (compare horizontally).. Percentages based on totals of 52 or less are not shown.






UCEA level 3B Director of major function/ group of functions eg finance, corporate

244

services, HR






XpertHR level I


XpertHR level J


XpertHR level K



XpertHR level M Assistant professional staff, 245

administrative staff



UK academic staff in contract levels by BME/white identity

White % BME %Head of institution (HOI) 100UCEA level 2A 97.6 *UCEA level 2B ..UCEA level 3A 95.5UCEA level 3B 93.7 6.3UCEA level 3/4A1 93.9 6.1UCEA level 3/4A2 97.1UCEA level 3/4A3 96.4UCEA level 4A 95.0 5.0UCEA level 4B 96.8UCEA level 5A 92.9 7.1UCEA level 5B 94.9 5.1XpertHR level I 92.6 7.4XpertHR level J 91.8 8.2XpertHR level K 91.8 8.2XpertHR level L 90.7 9.3XpertHR level M 91.4 8.6XpertHR level N 89.7 10.3XpertHR level O 96.5XpertHR level P ..

246












XpertHR level I


247

XpertHR level J


XpertHR level K






Among UK professional and support staff, a higher proportion of white staff (3.1%) were in senior contract levels (HOI–5B) than BME staff (1.5%), though these proportions were much lower than for academic staff across both groups (see fig. 3.9).

UK BME staff comprised 10.7% of professional and support staff in simple task provider roles (P), compared with 2.3% of staff in chief operating, registrar or university secretary positions (2B) and heads/ directors of academic sub-sets or small centres (4A).

248

3.10 UK professional and support staff by contract level and BME/white identity



UCEA level 2A 80 0.1 96.4 5 0.0 3.6

UCEA level 2B 515 0.3 97.7 10 0.1 2.3

UCEA level 3A 65 0.0 93.1 5 0.0 6.9

UCEA level 3B 1000 0.6 97.0 30 0.2 3.0

UCEA level 3/4A1 15 0.0 .. 0 0.0 ..UCEA level 3/4A2 30 0.0 .. 0 0.0 ..

UCEA level 3/4A3 70 0.0 97.1 0 0.0 2.9

UCEA level 4A 175 0.1 97.7 5 0.0 2.3

UCEA level 4B 1355 0.9 96.4 50 0.4 3.6

UCEA level 5A 10 0.0 .. 0 0.0 ..

UCEA level 5B 1705 1.1 94.0 110 0.8 6.0

XpertHR level I 4320 2.8 94.7 240 1.8 5.3

XpertHR level J 13355 8.7 93.3 955 7.3 6.7


92.9 1755 13.

5 7.1

249


91.7 2355 18.

1 8.3


91.8 2760 21.

2 8.2


92.6 1995 15.

3 7.4

XpertHR level O 13120 8.5 92.1 1125 8.6 7.9

XpertHR level P 13570 8.8 89.3 1625 12.

510.

7

Total 154165

100

92.2

13030

100 7.8








UCEA level 3/4A1 Head of school/division/department/centre

250

size 1





XpertHR level I


XpertHR level J


XpertHR level K




XpertHR level N Junior administrative staff, clerical staff, technician/craftsmen,

251

operativeXpertHR level O Routine task providerXpertHR level P Simple task provider

252

UK professional and support staff in contract levels by BME/white identity

White % BME %Head of institution (HOI) ..UCEA level 2A 96.4 *UCEA level 2B 97.7UCEA level 3A 93.1 6.9UCEA level 3B 97.0UCEA level 3/4A1 ..UCEA level 3/4A2 ..UCEA level 3/4A3 97.1UCEA level 4A 97.7UCEA level 4B 96.4UCEA level 5A ..UCEA level 5B 94.0 6.0XpertHR level I 94.7 5.3XpertHR level J 93.3 6.7XpertHR level K 92.9 7.1XpertHR level L 91.7 8.3XpertHR level M 91.8 8.2XpertHR level N 92.6 7.4XpertHR level O 92.1 7.9XpertHR level P 89.3 10.7


Overall, 8.3% of non-UK white staff were in senior contract levels (HOI–5B), compared with 3.3% of non-UK BME staff.

253

Relatively high proportions of non-UK staff in simple task provider (P; 49.6%), routine task provider (O; 39.5%) and professional/technical/senior administrative staff, research and teaching assistant roles (L; 31.7%) were BME.

In contrast, BME staff comprised only 9.2% of non-UK staff who were senior function heads (4B).

3.11 Non-UK staff by contract level and BME/white identity



UCEA level 2A 25 0.1 .. 0 0.0 ..UCEA level 2B 35 0.1 .. 5 0.0 ..

UCEA level 3A 45 0.1 80.8 10 0.1 19.

2

UCEA level 3B 65 0.2 86.9 10 0.1 13.

1UCEA level 3/4A1 40 0.1 .. 5 0.0 ..

UCEA level 3/4A2 50 0.1 89.6 5 0.0 10.

4

UCEA level 3/4A3 110 0.3 86.2 15 0.1 13.

8

UCEA level 4A 165 0.4 84.0 30 0.2 16.

0

UCEA level 4B 70 0.2 90.8 5 0.0 9.2

UCEA level 5A 2710 6.3 86.0 445 2.6 14.

0UCEA level 5B 155 0.4 82. 30 0.2 17.

254

7 3


81.4 1015 5.9 18.

6


74.8 2980 17.

425.

2


70.1 5400 31.

429.

9


68.3 3040 17.

731.

7

XpertHR level M 2380 5.6 69.6 1040 6.1 30.

4

XpertHR level N 1760 4.1 69.1 785 4.6 30.

9

XpertHR level O 1050 2.5 60.5 690 4.0 39.

5

XpertHR level P 1680 3.9 50.4 1650 9.6 49.

6

Total 42805 100

71.4

17180

100

28.6






255








XpertHR level I


XpertHR level J


XpertHR level K



256


XpertHR level N Junior administrative staff, clerical staff, technician/craftsmen, operative


Non-UK staff in contract levels by BME/white identity

White % BME %Head of institution (HOI) ..UCEA level 2A ..UCEA level 2B ..UCEA level 3A 80.8 19.2UCEA level 3B 86.9 13.1UCEA level 3/4A1 ..UCEA level 3/4A2 89.6 10.4UCEA level 3/4A3 86.2 13.8UCEA level 4A 84.0 16.0UCEA level 4B 90.8 9.2UCEA level 5A 86.0 14.0UCEA level 5B 82.7 17.3XpertHR level I 81.4 18.6XpertHR level J 74.8 25.2XpertHR level K 70.1 29.9XpertHR level L 68.3 31.7XpertHR level M 69.6 30.4XpertHR level N 69.1 30.9XpertHR level O 60.5 39.5XpertHR level P 50.4 49.6

.. percentages based on totals of 52 or less are not shown257

Among non-UK academic staff, 10.2% of white staff were in senior contract levels (HOI–5B), compared with 4.6% of BME staff. This difference of 5.6% is larger than the one observed among UK academic staff (3.2%, see fig. 3.9).

While the number of non-UK academic staff in senior contract levels was relatively small, the majority of those in these roles were white. For example, 89.0% of non-UK academic heads of size 2 schools, divisions, or departments (3/4A2) and 86.0% of professors (5A) and function heads (5B) were white.

In contrast, over one third of non-UK academic staff in assistant professional and administrative roles (M; 34.1%) and professional, technical or senior administrative and research and teaching assistant roles (L; 33.4%) were BME. A relatively high proportion of academic staff in junior administrative, clerical, technician/craftsmen and operative roles (N; 39.7%) were also BME, though numbers overall were small.

3.12 Non-UK academic staff by contract level and BME/white identity

White BME

No. %* %^ No. %* %^


UCEA level 2A 20 0.1 .. 0 0.0 ..

UCEA level 2B 0 0.0 .. 0 0.0 ..

UCEA level 3A 40 0.1 .. 10 0.1 ..

258

UCEA level 3B 15 0.1 .. 5 0.0 ..

UCEA level 3/4A1 35 0.1 .. 5 0.1 ..

UCEA level 3/4A2 50 0.2 89.0 5 0.1 11.

0

UCEA level 3/4A3 105 0.3 85.8 15 0.1 14.

2

UCEA level 4A 155 0.5 83.4 30 0.3 16.

6

UCEA level 4B 10 0.0 .. 0 0.0 ..

UCEA level 5A 2710 8.6 86.0 445 3.8 14.

0

UCEA level 5B 50 0.2 86.0 10 0.1 14.

0


81.2 970 8.3 18.

8


74.3 2750 23.

625.

7


69.4 4840 41.

630.

6


66.6 2315 19.

933.

4

XpertHR level M 350 1.1 65.9 185 1.6 34.

1

XpertHR level N 75 0.2 60.3 50 0.4 39.

7

XpertHR level O 25 0.1 .. 5 0.0 ..

259

XpertHR level P 20 0.1 .. 5 0.0 ..

Total 31415 100

73.0

11645

100

27.0












260


XpertHR level I


XpertHR level J


XpertHR level K






Non-UK staff in contract levels by BME/white identity

White % BME %Head of institution (HOI) ..UCEA level 2A ..UCEA level 2B ..UCEA level 3A ..

261

UCEA level 3B ..UCEA level 3/4A1 ..UCEA level 3/4A2 89.0 11.0UCEA level 3/4A3 85.8 14.2UCEA level 4A 83.4 16.6UCEA level 4B ..UCEA level 5A 86.0 14.0UCEA level 5B 86.0 14.0XpertHR level I 81.2 18.8XpertHR level J 74.3 25.7XpertHR level K 69.4 30.6XpertHR level L 66.6 33.4XpertHR level M 65.9 34.1XpertHR level N 60.3 39.7XpertHR level O ..XpertHR level P ..


Among non-UK professional and support staff, a higher proportion of white staff (2.3%) were in senior contract levels (HOI–5B) than BME staff (0.7%), though these proportions were much lower than for academic staff across both groups (see fig. 3.12).

The largest proportion of BME non-UK professional and support staff were found in simple task provider roles (P; 29.8), while the largest proportion of white non-UK professional and support staff were in assistant professional and administrative positions (M; 17.8%).

262

3.13 Non-UK professional and support staff by contract level and BME/white identity



UCEA level 2A 5 0.0 .. 0 0.0 ..UCEA level 2B 35 0.3 .. 5 0.1 ..UCEA level 3A 5 0.1 .. 0 0.0 ..

UCEA level 3B 50 0.4 89.4 5 0.1 10.

6UCEA level 3/4A1 0 0.0 .. 0 0.0 ..UCEA level 3/4A2 5 0.0 .. 0 0.0 ..UCEA level 3/4A3 5 0.0 .. 0 0.0 ..UCEA level 4A 10 0.1 .. 0 0.0 ..

UCEA level 4B 60 0.5 89.6 5 0.1 10.

4UCEA level 5A 0 0.0 .. 0 0.0 ..

UCEA level 5B 105 0.9 81.2 25 0.4 18.

8

XpertHR level I 230 2.0 84.6 40 0.8 15.

4

XpertHR level J 905 7.9 79.5 235 4.2 20.

5


74.7 560 10.

125.

3


72.7 725 13.

127.

3


70.3 860 15.

529.

7

263


69.5 740 13.

330.

5

XpertHR level O 1025 9.0 60.0 685 12.

340.

0

XpertHR level P 1660 14.6

50.1 1650 29.

849.

9

Total 11390 100

67.3 5535 10

032.

7* within a BME/white identity, the percentage of staff in a contract level (compare vertically)^ within a contract level, the percentage of staff who are BME/white (compare horizontally).. Percentages based on totals of 52 or less are not shown.









264




XpertHR level I


XpertHR level J


XpertHR level K






265

Non-UK professional and support staff in contract levels by BME/white identity

White % BME %Head of institution (HOI) ..UCEA level 2A ..UCEA level 2B ..UCEA level 3A ..UCEA level 3B 89.4 10.6UCEA level 3/4A1 ..UCEA level 3/4A2 ..UCEA level 3/4A3 ..UCEA level 4A ..UCEA level 4B 89.6 10.4UCEA level 5A ..UCEA level 5B 81.2 18.8XpertHR level I 84.6 15.4XpertHR level J 79.5 20.5XpertHR level K 74.7 25.3XpertHR level L 72.7 27.3XpertHR level M 70.3 29.7XpertHR level N 69.5 30.5XpertHR level O 60.0 40.0XpertHR level P 50.1 49.9


Occupational group

Among UK staff, similar proportions of both academic and professional and support staff were BME (7.9% and 7.8%, respectively).

266

However, the proportion of UK staff who were BME was markedly lower among managers, directors and senior officials on academic contracts (2.6%) and strikingly higher among professional and support staff in sales and customer service occupations (10.3%).

A higher proportion of UK staff working in professional and support occupations were black (2.2%) than in academic occupations (1.2%). The inverse was true of Chinese staff (1.3% compared with 0.6%).

267

3.14 UK staff by activity, occupational group and ethnic group



425 0.4 97.4 10 0.1 2.6


115365

98.7

92.1 9965 99.

1 7.9


1040 0.9 93.0 80 0.8 7.0

Total 116840

100

92.1

10055

100 7.9


9615 6.2 95.0 3.9 3.9 5.0


092.

4 2270 17.4 7.6


33930 22.0

91.2 3255 25.

0 8.8


591.

9 4530 34.8 8.1


3 200 1.5 3.7


0 405 3.1 7.0

Sales and 1470 1.0 89. 170 1.3 10.

268

customer service occupations 7 3


1225 0.8 96.5 45 0.3 3.5


791.

6 1655 12.7 8.4

Total 154165

100

92.2

13030

100 7.8

All staff 271005

92.2

23085 7.8

Black AsianNo. %* %^ No. %* %^


0 0.1 0.3 5 0.1 1.1


2 1.2 4095 98.8 3.3


10 0.7 1.0 45 1.1 4.0

Total 1475 100 1.2 4145 10

0 3.3


130 3.6 1.3 235 4.1 2.3


4 1.6 1080 18.7 3.6

Associate 790 21. 2.1 1545 26. 4.2

269

professional and technical 4 7


9 2.2 2010 34.8 3.6


Caring, leisure and other service 175 4.7 3.0 130 2.3 2.3


70 1.8 4.1 70 1.2 4.2


20 0.6 1.6 10 0.2 0.8


9 3.4 645 11.2 3.3

Total 3680 100 2.2 5780 10

0 3.5

All staff 5160 1.8 9925 3.4

Chinese MixedNo. %* %^ No. %* %^


0 0.1 0.2 0 0.1 0.3


6 1.3 1645 99.1 1.3


5 0.3 0.5 15 0.8 1.3

Total 1595 10 1.3 1660 10 1.3

270

0 0Professional and support contractManagers, directors and senior officials

30 3.1 0.3 75 3.8 0.8


8 0.8 345 17.1 1.1


250 27.0 0.7 515 25.

7 1.4


1 0.6 725 36.2 1.3




0 0.2 0.1 20 0.9 1.1


0 0.1 0.1 10 0.4 0.7

Elementary occupations 60 6.3 0.3 225 11.

3 1.2

Total 920 100 0.6 2010 10

0 1.2

All staff 2515 0.9 3670 1.2

OtherNo. %* %^

Academic contractManagers, directors and senior 0 0.2 0.5

271

officials

Professional occupations 1170 99.6 0.9

Associate professional and technical 0 0.2 0.2

Total 1175 100 0.9Professional and support contractManagers, directors and senior officials 35 5.2 0.3


Associate professional and technical 155 24.

3 0.4

Administrative and secretarial 210 32.9 0.4

Skilled trades occupations 15 2.5 0.3Caring, leisure and other service 25 3.9 0.4Sales and customer service occupations 10 1.7 0.7

Process, plant and machine operatives 5 0.6 0.3

Elementary occupations 60 9.7 0.3Total 640 100 0.4All staff 1820 0.6

* within an ethnic group, the percentage of staff in an occupational group (compare vertically within an activity)^ within an activity and occupational group, the percentage of staff in an ethnic group (compare horizontally)Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose activity, occupational group or ethnic group is unknown.

272

Academic staff in SOC groups other than 1–3 have been included in the academic total but are not shown in an occupational group. The sum of academic occupational groups therefore is not equal to the academic total in this table.

Among non-UK staff, a higher proportion on professional and support contracts were BME (32.7%) than those on academic contracts (27.0%).

The ethnic profiles of non-UK professional and support staff vary by occupational group. For example, 51.0% of those in elementary occupations were BME, compared with 14.3% of those working as managers, directors and senior officials.

Within every occupational group, a higher proportion of non UK staff were BME than UK staff (see fig. 3.14).

273

3.15 Non-UK staff by activity, occupational group and ethnic group

White BME totalNo. %* %^ No. %* %^


40 0.1 .. 10 0.1 ..


572.

91159

099.

627.

1Associate professional and technical

120 0.4 73.5 45 0.4 26.

5

Total 31415 100

73.0

11645

100

27.0


470 4.1 85.7 80 1.4 14.

3


873.

7 885 16.0

26.3


2340 20.5

68.4 1080 19.

531.

6


172.

4 1390 25.2

27.6


5 105 1.9 32.5


5 180 3.2 33.5

Sales and 120 1.1 73. 45 0.8 27.

274

customer service occupations 0 0


80 0.7 73.4 30 0.5 26.

6


749.

0 1740 31.5

51.0

Total 11390 100

67.3 5535 10

032.

7

All staff 42805 71.4

17180

28.6



0 0.2 .. 5 0.1 ..


4 2.8 4445 99.5

10.4


5 0.5 3.4 20 0.5 12.9

Total 1195 100 2.8 4470 10

010.

4Professional and support contractManagers, directors and senior officials

15 1.1 3.1 20 1.0 4.0

Professional occupation 140 8.9 4.2 420 19.

512.

4Associate 200 12. 5.8 455 21. 13.

275

professional and technical 5 2 3


0 6.9 490 22.9 9.7


4Caring, leisure and other service 75 4.8 14.

4 45 2.2 8.6


15 1.1 10.6 15 0.7 8.5


5 0.3 4.6 10 0.6 11.0


322.

1 650 30.2

19.0

Total 1590 100 9.4 2145 10

012.

7

All staff 2785 4.6 6615 11.0



0 0.0 .. 0 0.1 ..


7 8.2 955 99.6 2.2


10 0.2 4.9 5 0.3 1.9

276

Total 3520 100 8.2 960 10

0 2.2


20 2.3 3.7 10 2.0 1.6


1 5.4 85 18.8 2.5


220 25.6 6.5 110 24.

5 3.2


4 5.4 130 29.5 2.6




0 0.2 1.2 5 1.1 3.0


10 0.9 7.3 0 0.2 0.9


4 3.9 80 17.9 2.3

Total 865 100 5.1 445 10

0 2.6

All staff 4385 7.3 1400 2.3

OtherNo. %* %^

Academic contract

277

Managers, directors and senior officials 0 0.1 ..


Associate professional and technical 5 0.4 3.4

Total 1500 100 3.5Professional and support contractManagers, directors and senior officials 10 2.1 1.9


Associate professional and technical 95 19.

7 2.8

Administrative and secretarial 150 30.3 2.9

Skilled trades occupations 15 3.3 4.9Caring, leisure and other service 20 4.4 4.0Sales and customer service occupations 5 1.2 3.7

Process, plant and machine operatives 5 0.6 2.7

Elementary occupations 125 26.0 3.7

Total 490 100 2.9All staff 1990 3.3

* within an ethnic group, the percentage of staff in an occupational group (compare vertically within an activity)^ within an activity and occupational group, the percentage of staff in an ethnic group (compare horizontally) .. Percentages based on totals of 52 or less are not shown. Percentages based on total number of staff minus those

278

whose activity, occupational group or ethnic group is unknown.Academic staff in SOC groups other than 1–3 have been included in the academic total but are not shown in an occupational group. The sum of academic occupational groups therefore is not equal to the academic total in this table.

UK academic/professional and support staff in occupational groups by BME/white identity

White %

BME %

Academic contractManagers, directors and senior officials 97.4 *

Professional occupations 92.1 7.9Associate professional and technical 93.0 7.0

Professional and support contractManagers, directors and senior officials 95.0 5.0


Administrative and secretarial 91.9 8.1Skilled trades occupations 96.3Caring, leisure and other service 93.0 7.0Sales and customer service occupations 89.7 10.3

Process, plant and machine operatives 96.5

279

Elementary occupations 91.6 8.4* values less than 5.0 are not displayed

Non-UK academic/professional and support staff in occupational groups by BME/white identity

White %

BME %

Academic contractManagers, directors and senior officials ..




Administrative and secretarial 72.4 27.6Skilled trades occupations 67.5 32.5Caring, leisure and other service 66.5 33.5Sales and customer service occupations 73.0 27.0


Elementary occupations 49.0 51.0* values less than 5.0 are not displayed.. percentages based on totals of 52 or less are not shown

280

Among those working full-time, 8.1% of UK staff were BME compared with 27.8% of non-UK staff.

12.6% of non-UK BME professional and support staff were in elementary occupations, more than double the proportion of UK white and UK BME professional and support staff (6.2% and 5.7% respectively).

3.16 Full-time staff by activity, UK/non-UK nationality, occupational group and BME/white identity

UK white UK BMENo. %* %^ No. %* %^


370 0.5 97.2 10 0.2 2.8


591.

4 6900 99.1 8.6


760 1.0 93.4 55 0.8 6.6

Total 74355 100

91.4 6965 10

0 8.6


8460 8.0 94.7 470 5.2 5.3


692.

0 1890 21.1 8.0


26180 24.9

91.1 2560 28.

6 8.9

281


191.

4 3065 34.2 8.6


6 160 1.8 3.4


7 175 1.9 5.3


805 0.8 90.6 85 0.9 9.4


1040 1.0 96.4 40 0.4 3.6

Elementary occupations 6525 6.2 92.

8 505 5.7 7.2

Total 105085

100

92.2 8945 10

0 7.8

All staff 179440

91.9

15915 8.1

Non-UK white Non-UK BMENo. %* %^ No. %* %^


30 0.1 .. 5 0.1 ..


572.

4 8925 99.6

27.6


85 0.4 72.3 30 0.4 27.

7

Total 23565 100

72.4 8960 10

027.

6

282


410 5.6 84.5 75 2.6 15.

5


372.

3 740 25.4

27.7


1780 24.2

69.4 785 26.

930.

6


374.

4 770 26.3

25.6


0 70 2.4 29.0


7 60 2.1 26.3


55 0.8 71.2 25 .8 28.

8


65 0.9 72.0 25 0.9 28.

0


0 365 12.6

41.0

Total 7350 100

71.6 2920 10

028.

4

All staff 30915 72.2

11880

27.8

* within a UK/non-UK and BME/white identity, the percentage of staff in an occupational group (compare vertically within an activity)^ within an activity and occupational group, the percentage of staff who are UK/non-UK and BME/white (compare horizontally)

283

.. Percentages based on totals of 52 or less are not shown. Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose activity, UK/non-UK nationality, occupational group or BME/white identity is unknown.Academic staff in SOC groups other than 1–3 have been included in the academic total but are not shown in an occupational group. The sum of academic occupational groups therefore is not equal to the academic total in this table.

Of those working part-time, 7.3% of UK and 30.8% of non UK staff were BME.

The proportions of staff in the managers, directors and senior officials occupational group were lower among part time staff than full-time staff across activities, nationalities and ethnic groups.

5 out of 1260 professional and support managers, directors and senior officials working part-time were non-UK BME staff (0.3%).

3.17 Part-time staff by activity, UK/non-UK nationality, occupational group and BME/white identity

UK white UK BMENo. %* %^ No. %* %^


55 0.1 99.1 0 0.0 0.9


293.

2 3060 99.2 6.8

Associate 280 0.7 92. 25 0.8 7.8

284

professional and technical 2

Total 42480 100

93.2 3085 10

0 6.8


1155 2.4 96.8 40 0.9 3.2


494.

1 380 9.4 5.9


7750 15.8

91.8 695 17.

0 8.2


592.

8 1470 35.9 7.2


0 35 0.9 6.0


8 230 5.7 9.2


665 1.4 88.7 85 2.1 11.

3


185 0.4 97.4 5 0.1 2.6


490.

9 1145 28.1 9.1

Total 49085 100

92.3 4085 10

0 7.7

All staff 91565 92.7 7170 7.3

285

Non-UK white Non-UK BMENo. %* %^ No. %* %^


10 0.1 .. 5 0.1 ..


574.

5 2670 99.5

25.5


35 0.4 .. 10 0.4 ..

Total 7845 100

74.5 2680 10

025.

5Professional and support contractManagers, directors and senior officials

60 1.5 94.9 5 0.1 5.1


579.

2 145 5.5 20.8


560 13.8

65.6 290 11.

234.

4


469.

6 625 23.9

30.4


8 35 1.3 43.2


9 120 4.5 39.1


65 1.6 74.6 20 0.8 25.

4

286


15 0.3 .. 5 0.1 ..


345.

4 1375 52.6

54.6

Total 4040 100

60.7 2615 10

039.

3

All staff 11890 69.2 5295 30.

8* within a UK/non-UK and BME/white identity, the percentage of staff in an occupational group (compare vertically within an activity)^ within an activity and occupational group, the percentage of staff who are UK/non-UK and BME/white (compare horizontally).. Percentages based on totals of 52 or less are not shown.Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose activity, UK/non-UK nationality, occupational group or BME/white identity is unknown. Academic staff in SOC groups other than 1–3 have been included in the academic total but are not shown in an occupational group. The sum of academic occupational groups therefore is not equal to the academic total in this table.

Academic contract

Among both UK and non-UK academic staff, a higher proportion of white staff were on teaching and research contracts than BME staff.

25.3% of UK and 41.8% of non-UK BME staff were on research only contracts, compared with 17.2% of UK and 33.6% non-UK white staff.

287

3.18 UK/non-UK academic staff by research/teaching contract type and BME/white identity


UK national


93.3 2300 22.

9 6.7


88.8 2540 25.

311.

2Teaching and research 63225 54.

192.

5 5135 51.1 7.5


1535 1.3 95.3 75 0.8 4.7

Total 116840 100 92.

11005

5 100 7.9

Non-UK national


72.0 2260 19.

428.

0


68.4 4870 41.

831.

6Teaching and research 14915 47.

576.

8 4495 38.6

23.2


150 0.5 87.6 20 0.2 12.

4

Total 31415 100 73.0

11645 100 27.

0* within a BME/white identity, the percentage of staff in a contract type (compare vertically within a nationality)

288

^ within a nationality and contract type, the percentage of staff who are BME/white (compare horizontally)Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose contract type or BME/white identity is unknown

UK/non-UK white/BME academic staff by research/teaching contract type

UK academic

White BMETeaching only 27.4 22.9Research only 17.2 25.3Teaching and research 54.1 51.1Neither teaching nor research 1.3 0.8

Non-UK academic

Teaching only 18.5 19.4Research only 33.6 41.8Teaching and research 47.5 38.6Neither teaching nor research 0.5 0.2

UK/non-UK academic staff in research/teaching contract types by BME/white identity

UK

White

BME




Neither teaching nor research 95.3 *

Non-UK Teaching only 72.0 28.0



289

Neither teaching nor research 87.6 12.4* values less than 5.0 are not displayed


A higher proportion of UK academic staff from all ethnic groups worked in SET departments than in non-SET departments, with the exception of black staff (48.4% in SET). This was particularly pronounced among Chinese (77.0%) and Asian (68.3%) UK academic staff.

3.19 UK academic staff by SET category and ethnic group

SET Non-SETNo. % No. %

White 59885 51.3 56955

48.7

BME total 6265 62.3 3790 37.7

Black 715 48.4 760 51.6

Asian 2830 68.3 1315 31.7

Chinese 1230 77.0 365 23.0

Mixed 840 50.5 825 49.5

Other 655 55.6 520 44.4

Total 66150 52.1 60745

47.9

290

Percentages based on total number of staff minus those SET category or ethnic group is unknown

UK academic staff in ethnic groups by SET category

SET% Non-SET %

White 51.3 48.7BME total 62.3 37.7

Black 48.4 51.6Asian 68.3 31.7Chinese 77.0 23.0Mixed 50.5 49.5Other 55.6 44.4

Total 52.1 47.9

Among SET subject areas, chemical engineering (17.8%) and clinical dentistry (17.5%) had the highest proportions of UK staff who were BME, while archaeology (2.0%) and earth, marine and environmental sciences (2.8%) had the lowest.

291

3.20 UK SET academic staff by subject area and ethnic group

White BME total

No. % No. %Agriculture and forestry and food science 840 96.

4 30 3.6

Anatomy and physiology 985 86.9 150 13.

1

Archaeology 425 98.0 10 2.0

Architecture, built environment and planning 2415 92.

3 200 7.7

Biosciences 7095 92.1 610 7.9

Chemical engineering 330 82.2 70 17.

8

Chemistry 2115 92.8 165 7.2

Civil engineering 925 86.1 150 13.

9

Clinical dentistry 945 82.5 200 17.

5

Clinical medicine 12085

86.3

1915

13.7

Earth, marine and environmental sciences 2355 97.

2 65 2.8

Electrical, electronic and computer engineering 1720 93.

4 345 16.6

General engineering 1975 89.9 220 10.

1

292

Geography and environmental studies 1500 95.

9 65 4.1

IT, systems sciences, computer software engineering 3525 89.

1 435 10.9

Mathematics 2165 93.5 150 6.5

Mechanical, aero and production engineering 2235 88.

0 305 12.0

Mineral, metallurgy and materials engineering 505 87.

2 75 12.8

Nursing and allied health professionals 7515 94.

0 480 6.0

Pharmacy and pharmacology 1240 86.7 190 13.

3

Physics 2180 96.6 150 6.4

Psychology and behavioural sciences 4045 94.

2 245 5.8

Veterinary science 750 94.5 45 5.5

Total SET 59885

90.5

6265 9.5

Black AsianNo. % No. %

Agriculture and forestry and food science 5 0.6 15 1.5

Anatomy and physiology 10 1.1 100 8.8Archaeology 0 0.5 0 0.1Architecture, built environment and planning 40 1.5 55 2.1

Biosciences 60 0.8 260 3.4

293

Chemical engineering 10 3.0 30 7.5Chemistry 10 0.5 70 3.2Civil engineering 15 1.6 55 4.9


Clinical medicine 160 1.1 1050 7.5

Earth, marine and environmental sciences 5 0.2 20 0.9

Electrical, electronic and computer engineering 15 0.8 120 5.8

General engineering 20 1.0 90 4.2Geography and environmental studies 10 0.6 25 1.5

IT, systems sciences, computer software engineering 50 1.2 185 4.7

Mathematics 5 0.3 60 2.5Mechanical, aero and production engineering 30 1.1 120 4.7

Mineral, metallurgy and materials engineering 5 0.7 25 4.7

Nursing and allied health professionals 180 2.2 160 2.0

Pharmacy and pharmacology 25 1.6 100 7.1Physics 5 0.3 60 2.7Psychology and behavioural sciences 35 0.8 75 1.8


Total SET 715 1.1 2830 4.3

294

Chinese Mixed

No. % No. %




Chemical engineering 20 4.9 5 1.3Chemistry 40 1.7 25 1.2Civil engineering 50 4.5 10 0.9Clinical dentistry 25 2.0 10 1.0








295




Total SET 1230 1.9 840 1.3

Other

No. %Agriculture and forestry and food science 5 0.5Anatomy and physiology 5 0.3Archaeology 5 0.8Architecture, built environment and planning 35 1.3Biosciences 70 0.9Chemical engineering 5 1.0Chemistry 15 0.7Civil engineering 20 2.0Clinical dentistry 20 1.9Clinical medicine 145 1.0Earth, marine and environmental sciences 10 0.4Electrical, electronic and computer engineering 60 3.0


Mathematics 25 1.2

296

Mechanical, aero and production engineering 35 1.4Mineral, metallurgy and materials engineering 5 0.8Nursing and allied health professionals 40 0.5Pharmacy and pharmacology 20 1.5Physics 15 0.6Psychology and behavioural sciences 35 0.8Veterinary science 5 0.6Total SET 655 1.0Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose subject area or ethnic group is unknown.

Among non-SET subject areas, economics and econometrics (11.1%) and modern languages (10.5%) had the highest proportions of UK staff who were BME, while classics (1.7%) and sports science and leisure studies (2.5%) had the lowest.

3.21 UK non-SET academic staff by subject area and ethnic

White BMENo. % No. %


400 91.1

40 8.9


15 10.3


295 4.7


7885 90.2

855 9.8


560 92.4

45 7.6

297

Classics 345 98.3

5 1.7


35 5.5


110 11.1

Education 7790 96.0

325 4.0


160 4.6


240 8.2

History 2150 96.3

80 3.7

Law 3120 91.5

290 8.5


145 4.9


280 10.5


4980 96.3

195 3.7

Philosophy 595 95.3

30 4.7


105 6.8


160 7.5

Sociology 1895 92.3

160 7.7


1970 97.5

50 2.5

298


50 9.5


60 6.6


1285 96.9

40 3.1

Premises 50 .. 5 ..Residences and catering 15 .. 0 ..


20 4.9

Total non-SET 56955

93.8

3790

6.2



0 0.5 15 3.9

Area studies 0 0.3 5 2.7Art and design 65 1.1 80 1.3Business and management studies

180 2.1 355 4.1


15 2.4 15 2.5

Classics 0 0.0 5 0.9Continuing education 5 0.9 10 1.3Economics and econometrics 15 1.5 55 5.6Education 80 1.0 100 1.3English language and literature 20 0.6 55 1.5Health and community studies 70 2.4 100 3.4History 5 0.2 30 1.3Law 70 2.1 115 3.4

299

Media studies 35 1.2 40 1.3Modern languages 20 0.8 50 2.0Music, dance, drama and performing arts

50 1.0 30 0.6

Philosophy 5 0.5 10 1.4Politics and international studies 5 0.3 45 3.0Social work and social policy 50 2.4 50 2.4Sociology 30 1.4 65 3.1Sports science and leisure studies

10 0.6 15 0.7

Theology and religious studies 5 0.7 20 3.8Total academic services 10 1.2 25 2.8Central administration and services

5 0.2 15 1.1

Premises 0 .. 0 ..Residences and catering 0 .. 0 ..Staff and student facilities 5 0.8 10 2.4

Total non-SET 760 1.3 1315

2.2

Chinese MixedNo. % No. %


0 0.5 10 2.0


135 1.6 85 0.9


5 0.7 10 1.8

Classics 0 0.2 0 0.6

300

Continuing education 5 0.6 5 0.9Economics and econometrics 10 1.1 15 1.5Education 20 0.2 75 0.9English language and literature 5 0.2 55 1.6Health and community studies 10 0.3 40 1.3History 0 0.1 30 1.3Law 15 0.5 60 1.7Media studies 5 0.2 45 1.5Modern languages 70 2.5 60 2.2Music, dance, drama and performing arts

15 0.3 70 1.4


0 0.0 20 1.1


5 0.5 15 1.1

Premises 0 .. 0 ..Residences and catering 0 .. 0 ..Staff and student facilities 0 0.0 5 0.9Total non-SET 365 0.6 825 1.4

OtherNo. %

Anthropology and development studies 10 1.9Area studies 5 3.3

301

Art and design 40 0.6Business and management studies 95 1.1Catering and hospitality management 0 0.2Classics 0 0.0Continuing education 10 1.8Economics and econometrics 15 1.4Education 55 0.6English language and literature 25 0.7Health and community studies 20 0.7History 20 0.8Law 25 0.7Media studies 15 0.6Modern languages 80 3.0Music, dance, drama and performing arts 25 0.5Philosophy 5 1.0Politics and international studies 20 1.3Social work and social policy 10 0.5Sociology 10 0.6Sports science and leisure studies 0 0.1Theology and religious studies 10 2.3Total academic services 10 1.2Central administration and services 5 0.3Premises 0 ..Residences and catering 0 ..Staff and student facilities 5 0.8Total non-SET 520 0.9

.. Percentages based on totals of 52 or less are not shown.Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose subject area or ethnic group is unknown.

302

UK academic staff in SET subject areas by BME/white identity

White

BME

Agriculture and forestry and food science 96.4 *Anatomy and physiology 86.9 13.1Archaeology 98.0Architecture, built environment and planning 92.3 7.7Biosciences 92.1 7.9Chemical engineering 82.2 17.8Chemistry 92.8 7.2Civil engineering 86.1 13.9Clinical dentistry 82.5 17.5Clinical medicine 86.3 13.7Earth, marine and environmental sciences 97.2Electrical, electronic and computer engineering 83.4 16.6

General engineering 89.9 10.1Geography and environmental studies 95.9IT, systems sciences, computer software engineering 89.1 10.9

Mathematics 93.5 6.5Mechanical, aero and production engineering 88.0 12.0Mineral, metallurgy and materials engineering 87.2 12.8

Nursing and allied health professionals 94.0 6.0Pharmacy and pharmacology 86.7 13.3Physics 93.6 6.4Psychology and behavioural sciences 94.2 5.8Veterinary science 94.5 5.5

303

Total SET 90.5 9.5* values less than 5.0 are not displayed

UK academic staff in non-SET subject areas by BME/white identity

White

BME

Anthropology and development studies 91.1 8.9Area studies 89.7 10.3Art and design 85.3 *Business and management studies 90.2 9.8Catering and hospitality management 92.4 7.6Classics 98.3Continuing education 94.5 5.5Economics and econometrics 88.9 11.1Education 96.0English language and literature 95.4Health and community studies 91.8 8.2History 96.3Law 91.5 8.5Media studies 95.1Modern languages 89.5 10.5Music, dance, drama and performing arts

96.3

Philosophy 95.3Politics and international studies 93.2 6.8Social work and social policy 92.5 7.5Sociology 92.3 7.7Sports science and leisure studies 97.5Theology and religious studies 90.5 9.5

304

Total academic services 93.4 6.6Central administration and services 96.9Premises ..Residences and catering ..Staff and student facilities 95.1Total non-SET 93.8 6.2


Within SET subject areas, electrical, electronic and computer engineering (47.6%) and mechanical, aero and production engineering (47.2%) had the highest proportions of non-UK staff who were BME, while archaeology (3.5%) and psychology and behavioural sciences (13.6%) had the lowest.

3.22 Non-UK SET academic staff by subject area and ethnic group

White BME total

No. % No. %Agriculture and forestry and food science 135 79.2 35 20.

8

Anatomy and physiology 280 76.8 85 23.2

Archaeology 155 96.5 5 3.5Architecture, built environment and planning 555 69.9 240 30.

1

Biosciences 2680 76.3 835 23.7

Chemical engineering 245 59.8 165 40.2

305

Chemistry 820 72.7 305 27.3

Civil engineering 320 59.0 220 41.0


Clinical medicine 3840 72.2 1480

27.8

Earth, marine and environmental sciences 650 81.7 145 18.

3Electrical, electronic and computer engineering 755 52.4 685 47.

6

General engineering 520 53.2 455 46.8

Geography and environmental studies 335 78.9 90 21.

1IT, systems sciences, computer software engineering 1225 61.8 755 38.

2

Mathematics 1180 77.5 345 22.5

Mechanical, aero and production engineering 670 52.8 595 47.

2Mineral, metallurgy and materials engineering 185 53.5 160 46.

5Nursing and allied health professionals 515 74.9 175 25.

1

Pharmacy and pharmacology 310 64.8 165 35.2

Physics 1155 79.2 305 20.8

Psychology and behavioural sciences 1135 86.4 180 13.

6

306


Total SET 18040 70.5 755

529.

5

Black Asian No. % No. %



Archaeology 0 0.0 0 1.4Architecture, built environment and planning 50 6.2 85 10.

7


Chemical engineering 10 2.5 50 12.2

Chemistry 20 1.8 120 10.5

Civil engineering 25 4.8 80 14.8




Electrical, electronic and computer engineering 40 2.8 235 16.

2

General engineering 35 3.7 175 18.0

307

Geography and environmental studies 10 2.5 40 9.6

IT, systems sciences, computer software engineering 55 2.8 280 14.

1Mathematics 25 1.7 110 7.3Mechanical, aero and production engineering 35 2.8 245 19.

4Mineral, metallurgy and materials engineering 5 0.9 70 20.

7Nursing and allied health professionals 45 6.5 65 9.3


Physics 5 0.4 140 9.4Psychology and behavioural sciences 25 1.8 50 3.9


Total SET 630 2.5 2970

11.6




Biosciences 225 6.4 85 2.3Chemical engineering 80 19.9 10 2.7Chemistry 130 11.6 10 1.0

308

Civil engineering 85 15.5 10 2.1Clinical dentistry 10 5.5 5 2.3Clinical medicine 430 8.1 125 2.4Earth, marine and environmental sciences 45 5.7 10 1.2








Veterinary science 10 3.6 5 2.5Total SET 2555 10.0 545 2.1

OtherNo. %

Agriculture and forestry and food science 5 4.0Anatomy and physiology 10 3.3Archaeology 0 1.5

309

Architecture, built environment and planning 35 4.3Biosciences 90 2.5Chemical engineering 10 2.9Chemistry 30 2.5Civil engineering 20 3.8Clinical dentistry 15 6.4Clinical medicine 175 3.2Earth, marine and environmental sciences 25 3.0Electrical, electronic and computer engineering 85 6.0


Mathematics 50 3.1Mechanical, aero and production engineering 50 4.1Mineral, metallurgy and materials engineering 10 2.5Nursing and allied health professionals 20 2.9Pharmacy and pharmacology 20 4.7Physics 30 2.0Psychology and behavioural sciences 35 2.5Veterinary science 15 4.6Total SET 855 3.3Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose subject area or ethnic group is unknown.

Within non-SET subject areas, anthropology and development studies (29.0%) and economics and econometrics (29.0%) had the highest proportions of non UK staff who were BME, while philosophy (8.2%) and classics (8.7%) had the lowest.

310

3.23 Non-UK non-SET academic staff by subject area and ethnic group

White BME total

No. % No. %Anthropology and development studies

245 71.0

100 29.0


30 24.8


150 17.3


2290 61.4

1440

38.6


80 76.5

25 23.5

Classics 170 91.3

15 8.7


40 19.5


385 29.0

Education 555 81.6

125 18.4


95 12.2


105 27.2

History 655 86.7

100 13.3

Law 845 76.8

255 23.2

311


110 22.1


495 20.5


860 86.7

130 13.3

Philosophy 310 91.8

30 8.2


160 16.6


65 20.0

Sociology 420 82.8

85 17.2


215 87.2

30 12.8


35 16.6


25 16.7


125 75.8

40 24.2

Premises 0 .. 0 ..Residences and catering 0 .. 0 ..Staff and student facilities 35 .. 10 ..

Total non-SET 13370

76.6

4090

23.4



15 4.2 40 11.2

312


225 6.0 550 14.8


5 3.3 15 11.9

Classics 0 0.0 5 1.4Continuing education 0 0.8 15 7.9

Economics and econometrics 45 3.4 180 13.6

Education 20 2.9 35 5.0English language and literature 10 1.5 35 4.2Health and community studies 30 8.3 35 8.9History 10 1.2 45 6.3Law 75 6.7 60 5.4Media studies 25 4.5 40 7.7Modern languages 25 0.9 150 6.1Music, dance, drama and performing arts

10 1.2 45 4.8


5 1.4 10 4.8


0 0.9 15 10.4

Premises 0 .. 0 ..Residences and catering 0 .. 0 ..

313

Staff and student facilities 0 .. 5 ..

Total non-SET 565 3.2 1500

8.6



10 2.5 15 4.8


415 11.1

80 2.1


5 5.8 0 0.2

Classics 5 2.8 5 1.4Continuing education 15 7.2 5 2.9Economics and econometrics 90 6.6 25 1.8Education 30 4.1 10 1.6English language and literature 20 2.5 15 1.9Health and community studies 20 5.5 5 1.9History 15 2.1 10 1.5Law 45 3.9 40 3.4Media studies 15 2.5 15 3.3Modern languages 155 6.3 50 2.2Music, dance, drama and performing arts

15 1.8 30 3.1

Philosophy 0 0.7 10 3.1Politics and international studies 25 2.6 20 2.2Social work and social policy 5 2.0 10 3.4Sociology 5 1.5 15 3.4Sports science and leisure 5 2.5 5 1.6

314

studiesTheology and religious studies 5 1.5 5 2.9Total academic services 5 1.9 5 1.9Central administration and services

10 7.2 10 4.6

Premises 0 .. 0 ..Residences and catering 0 .. 0 ..Staff and student facilities 0 .. 0 ..Total non-SET 965 5.5 410 2.4

OtherNo. %

Anthropology and development studies 20 6.3Area studies 5 4.9Art and design 30 3.4Business and management studies 170 4.6Catering and hospitality management 0 2.2Classics 5 3.1Continuing education 0 0.6Economics and econometrics 50 3.7Education 30 4.7English language and literature 15 2.0Health and community studies 10 2.6History 15 2.2Law 40 3.8Media studies 20 4.1Modern languages 120 5.0Music, dance, drama and performing arts 25 2.4Philosophy 5 0.9Politics and international studies 35 3.8

315

Social work and social policy 5 1.7Sociology 15 3.2Sports science and leisure studies 5 2.4Theology and religious studies 5 3.0Total academic services 5 2.3Central administration and services 0 1.2Premises 0 ..Residences and catering 0 ..Staff and student facilities 0 ..Total non-SET 645 3.7

.. Percentages based on totals of 52 or less are not shown. Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose subject area or ethnic group is unknown.

Non-UK academic staff in SET subject areas by BME/white identity

White

BME

Agriculture and forestry and food science 79.2 20.8Anatomy and physiology 76.8 23.2Archaeology 96.5 *Architecture, built environment and planning 69.9 30.1Biosciences 76.3 23.7Chemical engineering 59.8 40.2Chemistry 72.7 27.3Civil engineering 59.0 41.0Clinical dentistry 66.7 33.3Clinical medicine 72.2 27.8Earth, marine and environmental sciences 81.7 18.3Electrical, electronic and computer 52.4 47.6

316

engineeringGeneral engineering 53.2 46.8Geography and environmental studies 78.9 21.1IT, systems sciences, computer software engineering 61.8 38.2

Mathematics 77.5 22.5Mechanical, aero and production engineering 52.8 47.2Mineral, metallurgy and materials engineering 53.5 46.5

Nursing and allied health professionals 74.9 25.1Pharmacy and pharmacology 64.8 35.2Physics 79.2 20.8Psychology and behavioural sciences 86.4 13.6Veterinary science 81.9 18.1Total SET 70.5 29.5* values less than 5.0 are not displayed

Non-UK academic staff in non-SET subject areas by BME/white identity

White

BME

Anthropology and development studies 71.0 29.0Area studies 75.2 24.8Art and design 82.7 17.3Business and management studies 61.4 38.6Catering and hospitality management 76.5 23.5Classics 91.3 8.7Continuing education 80.5 19.5Economics and econometrics 71.0 29.0Education 81.6 18.4

317

English language and literature 87.8 12.2Health and community studies 72.8 27.2History 86.7 13.3Law 76.8 23.2Media studies 77.9 22.1Modern languages 79.5 20.5Music, dance, drama and performing arts

86.7 13.3

Philosophy 91.8 8.2Politics and international studies 83.4 16.6Social work and social policy 80.0 20.0Sociology 82.8 17.2Sports science and leisure studies 87.2 12.8Theology and religious studies 83.4 16.6Total academic services 83.3 16.7Central administration and services 75.8 24.2Premises ..Residences and catering ..Staff and student facilities ..Total non-SET 76.6 23.4


Academic roles

10.7% of white academic staff were professors compared with 9.5% of BME academic staff. However, the proportions varied among BME ethnic groups.

The proportion of UK black staff who were professors (4.0%) was lower than for any other ethnic group. In

318

contrast, 13.5% of UK Chinese and 13.0% of UK other ethnicity academic staff were professors.

3.24 UK academic staff by professorial category and ethnic group

Professors Non-professors

No. %* %^ No. %* %^

White 12445

92.9

10.7

104395

92.0

89.3

BME total 950 7.1 9.5 9100 8.0 90.5

Black 60 0.4 4.0 1415 1.2 96.0

Asian 410 3.1 9.9 3735 3.3 90.1

Chinese 215 1.6 13.

5 1380 1.2 86.5

Mixed 115 0.9 7.0 1545 1.4 93.0

Other 155 1.1 13.0 1025 0.9 87.

0

Total 13395 100 10.

611349

5 100 89.4

* within a professorial category, the percentage of staff in an ethnic group (compare vertically)^ within an ethnic group, the percentage of staff who are professors/non-professors (compare horizontally)Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose professorial category or ethnic group is unknown.

319

UK academic staff by professorial category and ethnic group

Professors % Non-professors %White 92.9 92.0


UK academic staff in ethnic groups by professorial category

Professor % Non-professor%UK White 10.7 89.3UK BME total 9.5 90.5UK Black 4.0 96.0UK Asian 9.9 90.1UK Chinese 13.5 86.5UK Mixed 7.0 93.0UK Other 13.0 87.0

8.6% of white non-UK academic staff were professors, compared with 3.8% of BME non-UK academic staff.

As with UK academic staff, the proportion of black non-UK academic staff who were professors (2.1%) was lower than for any other ethnic group.

321

3.25 Non-UK academic staff by professorial category and ethnic group

Professors Non-professorsNo. %* %^ No. %* %^

White 2710 86.0

8.6 28700 71.9

91.4

BME total 445 14.0

3.8 11200 28.1

96.2

Black 25 0.8 2.1 1170 2.9 97.9

Asian 190 6.1 4.3 4280 10.7

95.7

Chinese 135 4.2 3.8 3385 8.5 96.

2

Mixed 30 1.0 3.3 925 2.3 96.7

Other 60 1.9 4.1 1440 3.6 95.9

Total 3155 100 7.3 39900 100 92.7

* within a professorial category, the percentage of staff in an ethnic group (compare vertically)^ within an ethnic group, the percentage of staff who are professors/non-professors (compare horizontally)Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose professorial category or ethnic group is unknown

Non-UK academic staff by professorial category and ethnic group

Professors % Non-professors %White 86.0 71.9

322


Non-UK academic staff in ethnic groups by professorial category

Professors % Non-professor %White 8.6 91.4BME total 3.8 96.2Black 2.1 97.9Asian 4.3 95.7Chinese 3.8 96.2Mixed 3.3 96.7Other 4.1 95.9

7.9% of UK professors working in SET subject areas were BME, compared with 5.9% of those working in non-SET subject areas. With the exception of black professors, a larger proportion of UK professors within every ethnic group were in SET subject areas than non-SET subject areas. This was particularly pronounced among Chinese professors, of whom 84.0% worked in SET subject areas.

There was greater variation among non-professors. While a higher proportion of Chinese (76.0%), Asian (67.9%) and other (55.5%) academic staff were in SET subject areas than non-SET subject areas, there were roughly equal proportions of white and mixed UK non-professors in each subject area. A slightly higher proportion of black UK non-

323

professors were in non-SET subjects (51.4%) than SET subjects.

324

3.26 UK academic staff by professorial and SET categories, mode and ethnic group


Professors

All SET 7640 61.4

92.1 655 68.

6 7.9


891.5 585 61.

4 8.5


695.0 70 7.2 5.0


94.1 300 31.

4 5.9


593.8 260 27.

4 6.2

Part-time non-SET 880 7.1 95.

8 40 4.0 4.2

All professors 12445 100 92.

9 950 100 7.1

Non-professors

All SET 52240 50.0

90.3 5610 61.

7 9.7


189.7 4220 46.

410.3


991.8 1390 15.

3 8.2


93.7 3490 38.

3 6.3


393.5 1900 20.

9 6.5

Part-time 24685 23. 94. 1590 17. 6.0

325

non-SET 6 0 4All non-professors

104395 100 92.

0 9100 100 8.0


Professors

All SET 25 45.4 0.3 290 71.

4 3.5


5 0.3 250 61.4 3.6

Part-time SET 5 5.9 0.3 40 10.

0 3.0

All non-SET 35 54.6 0.6 115 28.

6 2.3


9 0.7 100 24.9 2.4

Part-time non-SET 5 6.7 0.4 15 3.6 1.6

All professors 60 100 0.4 410 100 3.1

Non-professors

All SET 690 48.6 1.2 2535 67.

9 4.4


6 1.2 1840 49.3 4.5


9 1.1 695 18.6 4.1

All non-SET 730 51.4 1.3 1200 32.

1 2.2


7 1.3 700 18.7 2.4

326

Part-time non-SET 350 24.

7 1.3 500 13.4 1.9

All non-professors 1415 100 1.2 3735 100 3.3


Professors

All SET 180 84.0 2.2 70 58.

5 0.8


0 2.5 60 52.7 0.9

Part-time SET 10 4.0 0.6 5 5.8 0.5

All non-SET 35 16.0 0.7 50 41.

5 0.9


9 0.8 45 37.2 1.0

Part-time non-SET 5 1.2 0.3 5 4.3 0.5

All professors 215 100 1.6 115 100 0.9

Non-professors

All SET 1050 76.0 1.8 770 49.

9 1.3


4 2.2 545 35.2 1.3

Part-time SET 135 9.6 0.8 225 14.

7 1.3

All non-SET 330 24.0 0.6 775 50.

1 1.4

Full-time 205 15. 0.7 390 25. 1.3

327

non SET 0 4Part-time non-SET 125 9.0 0.5 385 24.

8 1.5

All non-professors 1380 100 1.2 1545 100 1.4

328

OtherNo. %* %^

ProfessorsAll SET 85 56.2 1.0

Full-time SET 75 50.4 1.1Part-time SET 10 5.9 0.6

All non-SET 65 43.8 1.3Full-time non SET 55 35.9 1.3Part-time non-SET 10 7.8 1.3

All professors 155 100 1.1Non-professorsAll SET 570 55.5 1.0

Full-time SET 415 40.5 1.0Part-time SET 155 15.0 0.9

All non-SET 455 44.5 0.8Full-time non SET 225 22.0 0.8Part-time non-SET 230 22.5 0.9

All non-professors 1025 100 0.9* within an ethnic group, the percentage of staff in a SET category and mode (compare vertically within a professorial category)^ within a professorial, SET category and mode, the percentage of staff in an ethnic group (compare horizontally)Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose professorial category, SET category, mode or ethnic group is unknown.

329

Academic staff in ethnic groups by professorial and SET categories and mode

White

Black

Asian

Chinese

Mixed

Other

ProfessorsFull-time SET 50.8 39.5 61.4 80.0 52.7 50.4

Part-time SET 10.6 5.9 10.0 4.0 5.8 5.9

Full-time non SET 31.5 47.9 24.9 14.9 37.2 35.9

Part-time non-SET

7.1 6.7 3.6 1.2 4.3 7.8

Non-professorsFull-time SET 35.1 35.6 49.3 66.4 35.2 40.5

Part-time SET 14.9 12.9 18.6 9.6 14.7 15.0

Full-time non SET 26.3 26.7 18.4 15.0 25.4 22.0

Part-time non-SET

26.6 24.7 13.4 9.0 24.8 22.5

BME academic staff comprised 8.0% of UK academic staff who were not senior managers but only 3.6% of those who were senior managers.

330

1.1% of UK white academic staff were senior managers, compared with between 0.3% and 0.6% of UK academic staff from other ethnic groups.

3.27 UK academic staff by senior management category and ethnic group

Senior manager Other academicsNo. %* %^ No. %* %^

White 1265 96.4

1.1 115575

92.0

98.9

BME total 45 3.6 0.5 100005

8.0 99.5

Black 5 0.4 0.3 1470 1.2 99.7

Asian 20 1.7 0.5 4120 3.3 99.5

Chinese 5 0.5 0.4 1590 1.3 99.6

Mixed 5 0.5 0.4 1655 1.3 99.6

Other 5 0.5 0.6 1170 0.9 99.4

Total 1310 100

1.0 125580

100

99.0

* within a senior management category, the percentage of staff in an ethnic group (compare vertically)^ within an ethnic group, the percentage of staff who are senior managers/other academics (compare horizontally)Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose senior management category or ethnic group is unknown.

331

UK academic staff by senior management category and ethnic group

Senior Managers % Other academics %White 96.4 92.0BME total

3.6 8.0


UK academic staff in ethnic groups by senior management category

Senior manager % Other academic%White 1.1 98.9BME total

0.5 99.5


14.9% of non-UK academic senior managers were BME, compared with 27.1% of those who were not senior managers.

332

However, the proportions of non-UK academic staff who were senior managers were low across all ethnic groups (between 0.0 and 0.3%).

3.28 Non-UK academic staff by senior management category and ethnic group

Senior manager Other academicsNo. %* %^ No. %* %^

White 85 85.1

0.3 31330 72.9

99.7

BME total 15 14.9

0.1 11630 27.1

99.9

Black 0 0.0 0.0 1195 2.8 100

Asian 10 9.0 0.2 4460 10.4

99.8

Chinese 0 2.0 0.1 3515 8.2 99.9

Mixed 0 1.0 0.1 960 2.2 99.9

Other 5 3.0 0.2 1500 3.5 99.8

Total 100 100

0.2 42955 100

99.8

* within a senior management category, the percentage of staff in an ethnic group (compare vertically)^ within an ethnic group, the percentage of staff who are senior managers/other academics (compare horizontally)Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose senior management category or ethnic group is unknown

333

Non-UK academic staff by senior management category and ethnic group

Senior managers % Other academics %White 85.1 72.9BME total

14.9 27.1


Non-UK academic staff in ethnic groups by senior management category

Senior managers % Other academics %White 0.3 99.7BME total

0.1 99.9

Black 0.0 100Asian 0.2 99.8Chinese 0.1 99.9Mixed 0.1 99.9Other 0.2 99.8

Total 0.2 99.8

3.6% of UK academic senior managers were BME. The proportion of UK academic senior managers who were BME was higher among SET subject areas (5.2%) than non-SET subject areas (2.8%).

334

Similarly, a higher proportion of other academic staff in SET subject areas were BME (9.5%) than in non-SET subject areas (6.3%).

3.29 UK academic staff by senior management and SET categories, mode and BME/white identity


Senior managers

All SET 400 31.6

94.8

20 .. 5.2


94.5

20 .. 5.5

Part-time SET 35 2.9 .. 0 .. ..


97.2

25 .. 2.8

Full-time non-SET

815 64.5

97.4

20 .. 2.6

Part-time non-SET

50 3.9 93.8

5 .. 6.2

Total 1265 100

96.4

45 .. 3.6


All SET 59485 51.5

90.5

6245 62.4

9.5


89.9

4785 48.8

10.1


92.0

1460 14.6

8.0


93.7

3765 37.6

6.3

335

Full-time non-SET

30575 26.5

93.5

2140 21.4

6.5

Part-time non-SET

25515 22.1

94.0

1625 16.2

6.0

Total 115575

100

92.0

10005

100

8.0

* within a BME/white identity, the percentage of staff in a SET category and mode (compare vertically within a senior management category)^ within a senior management, SET category and mode, the percentage of staff who are BME/white (compare horizontally).. Percentages based on totals of 52 or less are not shown. Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose senior management category, SET category, mode or BME/white identity is unknown

White/BME UK academic staff by senior management and SET categories and mode#

White %

BME %

Senior managerFull-time SET 28.7 ..Part-time SET 2.9 ..Full-time non-SET 64.5 ..Part-time non-SET 3.9 ..

Other academicFull-time SET 36.9 47.8 Part-time SET 14.6 14.6Full-time non-SET 26.5 21.4Part-time non-SET 22.1 16.2

336

UK academic senior managers/other academic staff in modes and SET categories by BME/white identity

White % BME %Senior managersAll SET 94.8 5.2



Total 96.4 3.6Other academic staffAll SET 90.5 9.5



Total 92.0 8.0* values less than 5.0 are not displayed.. percentages based on totals of 52 or less are not shown

Salaries

A higher proportion of white academic staff earned over £50,000 than BME academic staff. 30.7% of UK and 24.1% of non-UK white academic staff earned a salary in this range, compared with 28.0% of UK and 13.3% of non-UK BME academic staff.

337

However, the proportions varied between BME ethnic groups. For example, 34.0% of UK Chinese academic staff earned over £50,000, compared with 17.4% of UK black academic staff.

3.30 UK/non-UK academic staff by salary range and ethnic group


UK nationals

Under £30,000 11295 9.7 91.8

1005 10.0

8.2

£30,000 - £50,000

69695 59.7

91.8

6235 62.0

8.2

Over £50,000 35850 30.7

92.7

2815 28.0

7.3

Total 116840

100 92.1

10055

100 7.9

Non-UK nationals

Under £30,000 3940 12.5

63.5

2260 19.4

36.5

£30,000 - £50,000

19915 63.4

71.8

7840 67.3

28.2

Over £50,000 7560 24.1

83.0

1545 13.3

17.0

Total 31415 100 73.0

11645

100 27.0


UK nationals

338

Under £30,000 155 10.4

1.2 455 10.9

3.7

£30,000 - £50,000 1065 72.2

1.4 2470 59.7

3.3

Over £50,000 255 17.4

0.7 1220 29.4

3.1

Total 1475 100 1.2 4145 100 3.3Non-UK nationals

Under £30,000 265 22.3

4.3 920 20.6

14.9

£30,000 - £50,000 805 67.3

2.9 2900 64.8

10.4

Over £50,000 125 10.5

1.4 650 14.5

7.1

Total 1195 100 2.8 4470 100 10.4


UK nationals

Under £30,000 110 6.8 0.9 180 10.7

1.4

£30,000 - £50,000 945 59.2

1.2 1085 65.3

1.4

Over £50,000 545 34.0

1.4 400 24.0

1.0

Total 1595 100 1.3 1660 100 1.3Non-UK nationals

Under £30,000 605 17.1

9.7 195 20.2

3.1

£30,000 - £50,000 2505 71.2

9.0 640 67.0

2.3

339

Over £50,000 410 11.7

4.5 125 12.8

1.4

Total 3520 100 8.2 960 100 2.2

OtherNo. %* %^

UK nationalsUnder £30,000 110 9.3 0.9

£30,000 - £50,000 670 56.9

0.9

Over £50,000 395 33.7

1.0

Total 1175 100 0.9Non-UK nationals

Under £30,000 275 18.3

4.4

£30,000 - £50,000 990 66.1

3.6

Over £50,000 235 15.7

2.6

Total 1500 100 3.5* within an ethnic group, the percentage of staff in a salary range (compare vertically within a nationality)^ within a nationality and salary range, the percentage of staff in an ethnic group (compare horizontally)Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose salary range or ethnic group is unknown.

UK/non-UK academic staff in ethnic groups by salary range

Under £ Over

340

£30,000

30,000-£50,000

£50,000

UK white academic staff 9.5 59.7 30.7UK BME academic staff 10.0 62.0 28.0UK black academic staff 10.4 72.2 17.4UK Asian academic staff 10.9 59.7 29.4UK Chinese academic staff 6.8 59.2 34.0UK mixed academic staff 10.7 65.3 24.0UK other academic staff 9.3 56.9 33.7Non-UK white academic staff 12.5 63.4 24.1Non-UK BME academic staff 19.4 67.3 13.3Non-UK black academic staff 22.3 67.3 10.5Non-UK Asian academic staff

20.6 64.8 14.5

Non-UK Chinese academic staff

17.1 71.2 11.7

Non-UK mixed academic staff

20.2 67.0 12.8

Non-UK other academic staff 18.3 66.1 15.7

Among professional and support staff, a higher proportion of UK black staff (70.7%) earned less than £30,000 than UK Chinese staff (58.9%), a difference of 11.8%.

The salary range gap between black professional and support staff and those for other ethnic groups was even wider among non-UK staff.

87.1% of non-UK black professional and support staff earned less than £30,000, compared with 65.6% of non-UK white professional and support staff (a difference of 21.5%).

341

3.31 UK/non-UK professional and support staff by salary range and ethnic group


UK nationals

Under £30,000 100760

65.4

92.1

8680 66.6 7.9

£30,000 - £50,000

44570 28.9

92.0

3885 29.8 8.0

Over £50,000 8835 5.7 95.0

465 3.6 5.0

Total 154165

100 92.2

13030

100 7.8

Non-UK nationals

Under £30,000 7480 65.6

63.2

4350 4350

36.8

£30,000 - £50,000

3400 25.9

75.6

1095 1095

24.4

Over £50,000 510 4.5 85.6

85 85 14.4

Total 11390 100 67.3

5535 5535

32.7


UK nationals

Under £30,000 2605 70.7

2.4 3755

65.0

3.4

£30,000 - £50,000 975 26.5

2.0 1785

30.9

3.7

342

Over £50,000 105 2.8 1.1 240 4.1 2.6

Total 3680 100 2.2 5780

100 3.5

Non-UK nationals

Under £30,000 1390 87.1

11.7

1665

77.5

14.1

£30,000 - £50,000 190 11.8

4.2 445 20.8

9.9

Over £50,000 15 1.1 2.8 35 1.7 6.0

Total 1590 100 9.4 2145

100 12.7


UK nationals

Under £30,000 545 58.9

0.5 1380

68.8

1.3

£30,000 - £50,000 350 37.9

0.7 560 27.8

1.2

Over £50,000 30 3.1 0.3 70 3.4 0.7

Total 920 100 0.6 2010

100 1.2

Non-UK nationals

Under £30,000 600 69.4

5.1 330 74.1

2.8

£30,000 - £50,000 250 28.8

5.5 110 24.5

2.4

Over £50,000 15 1.7 2.5 5 1.4 1.0Total 865 100 5.1 445 100 2.6

Other

343

No. %* %^UK nationals

Under £30,000 395 61.8

0.4

£30,000 - £50,000 215 33.5

0.4

Over £50,000 30 4.6 0.3Total 640 100 0.4Non-UK nationals

Under £30,000 375 76.4

3.2

£30,000 - £50,000 105 21.1

2.3

Over £50,000 10 2.5 2.0Total 490 100 2.9

* within an ethnic group, the percentage of staff in a salary range (compare vertically within a nationality)^ within a nationality and salary range, the percentage of staff in an ethnic group (compare horizontally)Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose salary range or ethnic group is unknown.

UK/non-UK professional and support staff in ethnic groups by salary range

Under £30,000

£30,000-£50,000

Over £50,000

UK white professional/support 65.4 28.9 5.7UK BME professional/support 66.6 29.8 5.0UK black professional/support 70.7 26.5 *

344

UK Asian professional/support 65.0 30.9UK Chinese professional/support

58.9 37.9

UK mixed professional/support 68.8 27.8UK other professional/support 61.8 33.5Non-UK white professional/support

65.6 29.9

Non-UK BME professional/support

78.6 19.8

Non-UK black professional/support

87.1 11.2

Non-UK Asian professional/support

77.5 20.8

Non-UK Chinese professional/support

69.4 28.8

Non-UK mixed professional/support

74.1 24.5

Non-UK other professional/support

76.4 21.1


While higher proportions of both UK and non-UK white academic staff earned over £50,000 than UK and non-UK BME academic staff, this gap was larger among full-time staff than part-time staff.

39.0% of full-time and 16.2% of part-time UK white academic staff earned over £50,000 compared with 33.5% of full-time and 15.6% of part-time UK BME academic staff (a difference of 5.5% and 0.6%, respectively).

27.4% of full time and 13.9% of part-time non-UK white academic staff earned over £50,000, compared with 15.2%

345

of full-time and 6.9% of part-time non-UK BME academic staff (a difference of 12.2% and 7.0%, respectively).

3.32 UK/non-UK academic staff by mode, salary range and BME/white identity


Full-timeUK nationals

Under £30,000 4970 6.7 91.0

490 7.1 9.0

£30,000 - £50,000

40405 54.3

90.7

4145 59.5 9.3

Over £50,000 28985 39.0

92.6

2330 33.5 7.4

Total 74355 100 91.4

6965 100 8.6

Non-UK nationals

Under £30,000 1970 8.4 62.7

1170 13.1 37.3

£30,000 - £50,000

15135 64.2

70.2

6430 71.8 29.8

Over £50,000 6465 27.4

82.6

1360 15.2 17.4

Total 23565 100 72.4

8960 100 27.6

Part-timeUK nationals

Under £30,000 6325 14.9

92.5

510 16.6 7.5

£30,000 - 29290 69. 93. 2095 67.8 6.7

346

£50,000 0 3

Over £50,000 6860 16.2

93.4

480 15.6 6.6

Total 42480 100 93.2

3085 100 6.8

Non-UK nationals

Under £30,000 1970 25.1

64.4

1090 40.6 35.6

£30,000 - £50,000

4785 61.0

77.2

1410 52.6 22.8

Over £50,000 1095 13.9

85.6

185 6.9 14.4

Total 7845 100 74.5

2680 100 25.5

* within a BME/white identity, the percentage of staff in a salary range (compare vertically within a mode and nationality)^ within mode, nationality and salary range, the percentage of staff who are BME/white (compare horizontally)Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose mode, salary range or BME/white identity is unknown.

Among part-time professional and support staff, a higher proportion of UK BME (86.4%) than UK white staff (79.9%) earned less than £30,000, a difference of 6.5%. This difference widens to 12.3% for non-UK staff (81.8% of white and 94.1% of BME staff).

3.33 UK/non-UK professional and support staff by mode, salary range and BME/white identity

White BME total

347

No. %* %^ No. %* %^Full-timeUK nationals

Under £30,000 61565 58.6

92.3

5150 57.5 7.7

£30,000 - £50,000

35680 34.0

91.4

3375 37.7 8.6

Over £50,000 7835 7.5 94.9

425 4.7 5.1

Total 105085

100 92.2

8945 100 7.8

Non-UK nationals

Under £30,000 4170 56.7

68.8

1890 64.8 31.2

£30,000 - £50,000

2715 37.0

74.1

950 32.5 25.9

Over £50,000 465 6.3 85.6

80 2.7 14.4

Total 7350 100 71.6

2920 100 28.4

Part-timeUK nationals

Under £30,000 39195 79.9

91.7

3530 86.4 8.3

£30,000 - £50,000

8885 18.1

94.6

510 12.5 5.4

Over £50,000 1000 2.0 95.9

45 1.0 4.1

Total 49085 100 92.3

4085 100 7.7

Non-UK nationals

348

Under £30,000 3310 81.8

57.3

2460 94.1 42.7

£30,000 - £50,000

685 16.9

82.5

145 5.6 17.5

Over £50,000 50 1.2 85.4

10 0.3 14.6

Total 4040 100 60.7

2615 100 39.3

* within a BME/white identity, the percentage of staff in a salary range (compare vertically within a mode and nationality)^ within mode, nationality and salary range, the percentage of staff who are BME/white (compare horizontally) Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose mode, salary range or BME/white identity is unknown.

Around one in five white (19.1%), Asian (20.2%), Chinese (21.8%) and other (20.9%) UK academic staff earned a salary in the highest pay spine range of over £56,467. In contrast, 8.2% of black and 14.2% of mixed UK academic staff were in this pay spine range.

349

3.34 UK academic staff by academic pay spine range and ethnic group


<£17,503 485 0.4 97.5 10 0.1 2.5≥ £17,503 and <£23,352

1485 1.3 90.7 150 1.5 9.3

≥ £23,352 and <£31,331 13380 11.4 91.8 1200 11.9 8.2

≥ £31,331 and <£42,055 37320 31.9 91.5 3460 34.4 8.5

≥ £42,055 and < £56,467

41895 35.9 92.4 3440 34.2 7.6

≥ £56,467 22270 19.1 92.6 1785 17.8 7.4

Total 116840 100 92.1 1005

5 100 7.9


<£17,503 0 0.1 0.2 5 0.2 1.5≥ £17,503 and <£23,352

35 2.4 2.1 65 1.5 3.9

≥ £23,352 and <£31,331 175 11.9 1.2 525 12.6 3.6

≥ £31,331 and <£42,055 545 37.0 1.3 1380 33.3 3.4

≥ £42,055 and <

600 40.5 1.3 1330 32.2 2.9

350

£56,467≥ £56,467 120 8.2 0.5 835 20.2 3.5Total 1475 100 1.2 4145 100 3.3


<£17,503 0 0.0 0.0 5 0.2 0.6≥ £17,503 and <£23,352

10 0.6 0.6 30 1.7 1.7

≥ £23,352 and <£31,331 145 9.0 1.0 220 13.3 1.5

≥ £31,331 and <£42,055 500 31.4 1.2 665 39.9 1.6

≥ £42,055 and < £56,467

595 37.2 1.3 510 30.7 1.1

≥ £56,467 350 21.8 1.4 235 14.2 1.0Total 1595 100 1.3 1660 100 1.3

OtherNo. %* %^

<£17,503 0 0.1 0.2≥ £17,503 and <£23,352 15 1.3 0.9

≥ £23,352 and <£31,331 135 11.6 0.9

≥ £31,331 and <£42,055 375 31.7 0.9

≥ £42,055 and < £56,467 405 34.5 0.9

351

≥ £56,467 245 20.9 1.0Total 1175 100 0.9

* within an ethnic group, the percentage of staff in an academic pay spine range (compare vertically)^ within an academic pay spine range, the percentage of staff in an ethnic group (compare horizontally)Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose academic pay spine range or ethnic group is unknown.

UK academic staff by academic pay spine ranges and ethnic group

White

Black

Asian

Chinese

Mixed

Other

<£17,503 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.1≥ £17,503 and <£23,352

1.3 2.4 1.5 0.6 1.7 1.3

≥ £23,352 and <£31,331

11.4 11.9 12.6 9.0 13.3 11.6

≥ £31,331 and <£42,055

31.9 37.0 33.3 31.4 39.9 31.7

≥ £42,055 and < £56,467

35.9 40.5 32.2 37.2 30.7 34.5

≥ £56,467 19.1 8.2 20.2 21.8 14.2 20.9

Among non-UK academic staff, 14.5% of white staff earned a salary of £56,467 or more, compared with 7.2% of BME staff (a difference of 7.3%).

352

The proportions of staff within this pay spine range were particularly low among black (4.9%) and Chinese (5.9%) non-UK academic staff.

3.35 Non-UK academic staff by academic pay spine range and ethnic group


<£17,503 75 0.2 72.2 30 0.2 27.8

≥ £17,503 and <£23,352

340 1.1 53.2 300 2.6 46.8

≥ £23,352 and <£31,331 4870 15.5 65.3 2585 22.2 34.

7≥ £31,331 and <£42,055 12430 39.6 70.5 5190 44.6 29.

5≥ £42,055 and < £56,467

9160 29.2 77.2 2700 23.2 22.8

≥ £56,467 4540 14.5 84.4 840 7.2 15.6

Total 31415 100 73.0 11645 100 27.

0


<£17,503 5 0.3 4.0 5 0.1 6.0≥ £17,503 and <£23,352

55 4.5 8.4 150 3.4 23.4

353

≥ £23,352 and <£31,331 270 22.7 3.6 1020 22.8 13.

7≥ £31,331 and <£42,055 500 41.8 2.8 1945 43.5 11.

0≥ £42,055 and < £56,467

310 25.8 2.6 975 21.8 8.2

≥ £56,467 60 4.9 1.1 375 8.4 7.0

Total 1195 100 2.8 4470 100 10.4


<£17,503 10 0.2 7.9 5 0.5 5.0≥ £17,503 and <£23,352

50 1.5 8.0 15 1.7 2.6

≥ £23,352 and <£31,331 760 21.6 10.2 225 23.6 3.0

≥ £31,331 and <£42,055 1675 47.5 9.5 430 45.0 2.4

≥ £42,055 and < £56,467

820 23.4 6.9 215 22.5 1.8

≥ £56,467 205 5.9 3.8 65 6.7 1.2Total 3520 100 8.2 960 100 2.2

OtherNo. %* %^

<£17,503 5 0.3 5.0≥ £17,503 and <£23,352 30 1.9 4.5

354

≥ £23,352 and <£31,331 310 20.5 4.1

≥ £31,331 and <£42,055 645 42.8 3.6

≥ £42,055 and < £56,467 385 25.5 3.2

≥ £56,467 135 9.0 2.5Total 1500 100 3.5

* within an ethnic group, the percentage of staff in an academic pay spine range (compare vertically)^ within an academic pay spine range, the percentage of staff in an ethnic group (compare horizontally)Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose academic pay spine range or ethnic group is unknown.

Non-UK academic staff by academic pay spine ranges and ethnic group

White

Black

Asian

Chinese

Mixed

Other

<£17,503 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.3≥ £17,503 and <£23,352

1.1 4.5 3.4 1.5 1.7 1.9

≥ £23,352 and <£31,331

15.5 22.7 22.8 21.6 23.6 20.5

≥ £31,331 and <£42,055

39.6 41.8 43.5 47.5 45.0 42.8

≥ £42,055 and <

29.2 25.8 21.8 23.4 22.5 25.5

355

£56,467≥ £56,467 14.5 4.9 8.4 5.9 6.7 9.0

Among UK academic staff, the median salary for white staff (£44,607) was higher than the median salary for BME staff (£43,312). However, it was equal to the median salaries for Chinese and other staff (both £44,607).

In contrast, among UK professional and support staff, the median salary of BME staff (£24,834) was higher than for white staff.

Among non-UK staff, the median salaries of white staff were higher than for BME staff in both academic and professional and support roles. The gap in median salaries was particularly large between white (£24,766) and black professional and support staff (£16,653).

3.36 Median salaries of UK/non-UK staff by activity and ethnic group

Academic staff

Professional, support staff

All staff

£ £ £UK nationalWhite 44,607 24,766 33,230BME total 43,312 24,834 32,267

Black 40,834 24,049 28,685Asian 43,312 25,504 32,267Chinese 44,607 27,854 37,822Mixed 39,649 24,425 32,267Other 44,607 26,413 37,057

Total 44,607 24,766 33,230356

Non-UK nationalWhite 39,163 24,766 36,298BME total 36,064 20,172 32,267


Total 37,570 23,352 35,244Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose activity or ethnic group is unknown.

Median salaries of UK staff by activity and ethnic group

Academic staff

Professional, support staff

All staff

£ £ £UK nationalWhite 44,607 24,766 33,230BME total 43,312 24,834 32,267


Total 44,607 24,766 33,230Non-UK nationalWhite 39,163 24,766 36,298BME total 36,064 20,172 32,267

Black 5,877 16,653 26,107Asian 35,244 20,764 32,267

357

Chinese 35,620 24,049 34,223Mixed 35,739 22,292 32,641Other 36,298 21,336 34,223

Total 37,570 23,352 35,244

Overall, the median and mean ethnicity pay gaps for UK staff at the national level were 2.9% and 2.4% respectively.

In England, the median and mean salaries of white staff were 3.0% and 3.9% higher than those of BME staff; the median ethnicity pay gap was particularly large among academic staff in England (5.7%).

London had considerably higher median and mean ethnicity pay gaps than England as a whole (13.8% and 14.4% respectively).

In contrast, the median and mean ethnicity gaps in Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales were negative. These ranged from a median ethnicity pay gap of -12.5% (mean: -9.7%) for all staff in Scotland to -46.5% (mean: -26.5%) for all staff in Northern Ireland.

3.37 Median/mean salary and pay gap for UK staff by

Median MeanWhite BME Pay

gapWhite BME Pay

gap£ £ % £ £ %

England


42055 5.7 4633

54534

7 2.1

Professional 2476 2497 -0.8 2852 2730 4.3

358

and support staff 6 3 4 1

Total 33258

32267 3.0 3633

43493

0 3.9


44607

43312 2.9 4996

44633

9 7.3


33230

29541 11.1 3617

93122

1 13.7

Total 39649

34165 13.8 4328

43704

2 14.4


43312

42055 2.9 4543

34477

3 1.5


24049

21685 9.8 2721

42435

7 10.5

Total 31475

30424 3.3 3491

73350

8 4.0

Northern Ireland


47341 -3.0 4654

85128

6-

10.2Professional and support staff

21395

18790 12.2 2650

62193

4 17.2

Total 30440

44607

-46.5

34814

44030

-26.5

Scotland


44607 0.0 4904

94737

2 3.4

Professional 2404 2335 2.9 2745 2656 3.2

359

and support staff 9 2 5 9

Total 32267

36298

-12.5

35560

39001 -9.7

Wales


44607

-12.5

44121

47850 -8.5


23352

22020 5.7 2687

42573

9 4.2

Total 31331

36298

-15.9

34411

39172

-13.8

UK total


43312 2.9 4645

54558

1 1.9


24766

24834 -0.3 2826

02724

6 3.6

Total 33230

32267 2.9 3610

43523

0 2.4

P&S professional and supportPercentages based on total number of staff minus those whose country of institution, activity orBME/white identity is unknown.

Median ethnicity pay gap for UK staff in country of institution

%England 3.0


360

Northern Ireland -46.5Scotland -12.5Wales -15.9UK total 2.9

Mean ethnicity pay gap for UK staff in country of institution

%England 3.9


Northern Ireland -26.5Scotland -9.7Wales -13.8UK total 2.4

Overall, the median and mean ethnicity pay gaps for non UK staff were 11.1% and 14.3% respectively. The median and mean ethnicity pay gaps were higher among professional and support staff (18.5% and 16.9%) than academic staff (7.9% and 10.9%).

In England, the median and mean salaries of white staff were 11.1% and 15.2% higher than those of BME staff. But, unlike UK staff, the ethnicity pay gaps for non-UK staff were similar for London and the rest of England (see fig. 3.37).

The lowest median and mean pay gaps for non-UK staff occurred in Northern Ireland, (0.1% and 4.2%, respectively), and the highest median and mean pay gaps for non-UK staff occurred in England excluding London (13.7% and 15.1%, respectively).

361

3.38 Median/mean salary and pay gap for non-UK staff by country of institution, activity and BME/white identity


gapWhite BME Pay

gap£ £ % £ £ %

England


36064 7.8 4375

03902

2 10.8


25504

20172 20.9 2804

12290

9 18.3

Total 36298

32267 11.1 3969

83367

3 15.2


40040

37382 6.6 4603

64108

0 10.8


30177

25785 14.6 3215

42747

3 14.6

Total 37638

34165 9.2 4206

93603

7 14.3


38522

35244 8.5 4254

53813

6 10.4


22020

16540 24.9 2533

12037

8 19.6

Total 36298

31331 13.7 3837

33256

2 15.1

Northern Ireland

362


37382 13.7 4528

33944

9 12.9


22700

18523 18.4 2780

22148

4 22.7

Total 36318

36298 0.1 3862

13700

8 4.2

Scotland


36298 5.8 4297

73866

4 10.0


20764

19414 6.5 2410

12217

3 8.0

Total 35952

33230 7.6 3743

73458

8 7.6

Wales


34223 8.5 4204

33708

0 11.8


20764

18523 10.8 2359

52160

1 8.5

Total 35244

31930 9.4 3752

33208

5 14.5

UK total


36064 7.9 4366

63892

7 10.9


24766

20172 18.5 2744

32280

8 16.9

Total 36298

32267 11.1 3934

83373

4 14.3

P&S professional and support

363

Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose country of institution, activity orBME/white identity is unknown.

364

Median ethnicity pay gap for non-UK staff in country of institution

%England 11.1



Mean ethnicity pay gap for non-UK staff in country of institution

%England 15.2


Northern Ireland 4.2Scotland 7.6Wales 14.5UK Total 14.3

Among UK staff, the highest positive ethnicity median pay gap was found among professional and support staff in the caring, leisure and other service occupations group (5.5%), while the highest positive ethnicity mean pay gap occurred among professional and support staff in the managers, directors and senior officials group (6.7%).

365

3.39 Median/mean salary and pay gap for UK staff by activity, occupational group and BME/white identity


gapWhite BME Pay

gap£ £ % £ £ %


55173

63535

-15.2

59650

70223

-17.7


44607

43312 2.9 4654

24566

5 1.9


29544

29541 0.0 3145

73135

2 0.3

Total 44607

43312 2.9 4645

54558

1 1.9


47314

45941 2.9 5211

24862

1 6.7


36298

36298 0.0 3831

53675

6 4.1


29541

28685 2.9 3019

82957

8 2.0

Administrative and

22020

23352

-6.0 23283

23807

-2.3

366

secretarialSkilled trades

22700

22011 3.0 2349

12299

3 2.1

Caring, leisure, other service occupations

18005

17014 5.5 1929

41830

4 5.1


19373

18523 4.4 2095

32037

0 2.8


20172

22803

-13.0

20746

22696 -9.4


14863

14892 -0.2 1581

71598

3 -1.0

Total 24766

24834 -0.3 2826

02724

6 3.6

All UK staff 33230

32267 2.9 3610

43523

0 2.4

Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose occupational group or BME/ white identity is unknown.Academic staff in SOC groups other than 1–3 have been included in the academic total but are not shown in an occupational group. The sum of academic occupational groups therefore is not equal to the academic total in this table.

Median ethnicity pay gap for UK staff by activity and occupational group

367

%Managers, directors and senior officials -15.2Professional occupations 2.9Associate professional and technical 0.0All academic 2.9Managers, directors and senior officials 2.9Professional occupations 0.0Associate professional and technical 2.9Administrative and secretarial -6.0Skilled trades 3.0Caring, leisure, other service occupations 5.5Sales and customer service occupations 4.4Process, plant and machine operatives -13.0Elementary occupations -0.2Total -0.3

Mean ethnicity pay gap for UK staff by activity and occupational group

%Managers, directors and senior officials -17.7Professional occupations 1.9Associate professional and technical 0.3All academic 1.9Managers, directors and senior officials 6.7Professional occupations 4.1Associate professional and technical 2.0Administrative and secretarial -2.3Skilled trades 2.1Caring, leisure, other service occupations 5.1Sales and customer service occupations 2.8

368

Process, plant and machine operatives -9.4Elementary occupations -1.0Total 3.6

For both academic and professional and support staff, the ethnicity pay gaps were larger among non-UK staff than UK staff (see fig. 3.39).

Among non-UK staff, the highest positive ethnicity median pay gap occurred among academic staff in the managers, directors and senior officials group (33.6%), and the lowest among professional and support staff in the elementary occupations group (2.2%).

Similarly, the highest positive ethnicity mean pay gap occurred among academic staff in the managers, directors and senior officials group (28.4%), and the lowest among staff on professional and support contracts in the elementary occupations group (3.5%).

3.40 Median/mean salary and pay gap for non-UK staff by activity, occupational group and BME/white identity


gapWhite BME Pay

gap£ £ % £ £ %


54828

36140 33.6 5991

04291

5 28.4


39276

36064 8.2 4370

03894

5 10.9

369


28950

29988 -3.6 2933

73310

1-

12.8

Total 39163

36064 7.9 4366

63892

7 10.9


47314

43312 8.5 5451

54347

8 20.2


35553

33230 6.5 3643

43396

6 6.8


28685

26264 8.4 2968

42741

5 7.6


22023

20764 5.7 2339

82163

2 7.5

Skilled trades

21383

17014 20.4 2261

62019

8 10.7


17014

15846 6.9 1857

31758

5 5.3


18015

17014 5.6 1973

51806

2 8.5

Process, plant and machine

19606

22700

-15.8

19769

21132

-6.9

370

operativesElementary occupations

14520

14202 2.2 1567

91513

5 3.5

Total 24766

20172 18.5 2744

32280

8 16.9

All UK staff 36298

32267 11.1 3934

83373

4 14.3

All non-UK staff 36298 32267 11.1 39348 33734 14.3Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose occupational group or BME/ white identity is unknown.Academic staff in SOC groups other than 1–3 have been included in the academic total but are not shown in an occupational group. The sum of academic occupational groups therefore is not equal to the academic total in this table.

Median ethnicity pay gap for non-UK staff by activity and occupational group

%Managers, directors and senior officials 33.6Professional occupations 8.2Associate professional and technical -3.6All academic 7.9Managers, directors and senior officials 8.5Professional occupations 6.5Associate professional and technical 8.4Administrative and secretarial 5.7Skilled trades 20.4Caring, leisure, other service occupations 6.9Sales and customer service occupations 5.6

371

Process, plant and machine operatives -15.8Elementary occupations 2.2Total 18.5

Mean ethnicity pay gap for non-UK staff by activity and occupational group

%Managers, directors and senior officials 28.4Professional occupations 10.9Associate professional and technical -12.8All academic 10.9Managers, directors and senior officials 20.2Professional occupations 6.8Associate professional and technical 7.6Administrative and secretarial 7.5Skilled trades 10.7Caring, leisure, other service occupations 5.3Sales and customer service occupations 8.5Process, plant and machine operatives -6.9Elementary occupations 3.5Total 16.9

The ethnicity pay gap varied across the nations. For professors, the highest ethnicity median and mean pay gaps were found in Scotland (7.3% and 7.8% respectively). There was a negative ethnicity median pay gap in Wales (-2.1%), while the lowest mean pay gap occurred in England (0.2%).

For non-professors, the highest positive ethnicity median and mean pay gaps were found in London (4.2% and 4.7%

372

respectively). Negative ethnicity median pay gaps occurred in Wales (-9.2%) and in Northern Ireland (-3.0%).

3.41 Median/mean salary and pay gap for UK professors/ non-professors by country of institution and BME/ white identity

Median Mean

White BME

Pay gap

White BME Pay

gap

£ £ % £ £ %Professors

England 71488

71350 0.2 7530

37515

8 0.2

London 76970

74553 3.1 7932

67830

4 1.3


70070

69725 0.5 7402

17364

5 0.5

Northern Ireland

67626

64838 4.1 7250

67221

0 0.4

Scotland 69450

64354 7.3 7480

36897

1 7.8

Wales 75390

76984

-2.1

76877

75498 1.8

Total 71488

71075 0.6 7530

17466

7 0.8

Non-professors

England 41312

40595 1.7 4300

34243

3 1.3

London 4315 4135 4.2 4575 4360 4.7373

7 6 8 3England excluding London

40834

39649 2.9 4234

04174

4 1.4

Northern Ireland

44607

45941

-3.0

43331

46721 -7.8

Scotland 44607

44607 0.0 4512

44415

0 2.2

Wales 36298

39649

-9.2

40034

41997 -4.9

Total 41785

40720 2.5 4301

64253

9 1.1

Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose salary, professorial category, country of institution or BME/white identity is unknown.

Median ethnicity pay gap for UK professors/non-professors in country of institution

%Professor in England 0.2

Professor in London 3.1Professor in England excluding London 0.5

Professor in Northern Ireland 4.1Professor in Scotland 7.3Professor in Wales -2.1Professor in the UK 0.6Non-professor in England 1.7

Non-professor London 4.2Non-professor England excluding London 2.9

Non-professor Northern Ireland -3.0Non-professor Scotland 0.0

374

Non-professor Wales -9.2Non-professor in the UK 2.5

Mean ethnicity pay gap for UK professors/non-professors in country of institution


Professor in London 1.3Professor in England excluding London 0.5

Professor in Northern Ireland 0.4Professor in Scotland 7.8Professor in Wales 1.8Professor in the UK 0.8Non-professor in England 1.3


Non-professor Northern Ireland -7.8Non-professor Scotland 2.2Non-professor Wales -4.9Non-professor in the UK 1.1

Generally, the ethnicity pay gaps for professors and non-professors were larger between non-UK staff than UK staff (see fig. 3.41).

Among non-UK professors, the highest ethnicity median pay gap was found in Scotland (8.6%), while the highest mean pay gap was found in Northern Ireland (5.6%). There were negative ethnicity median and mean pay gaps in Wales ( 5.6% and -3.9% respectively).

375

Among non-UK non-professors, the highest ethnicity median and mean pay gaps occurred in Northern Ireland (11.1% and 10.0%). The lowest ethnicity median and mean pay gaps occurred in Scotland (4.3% and 5.5%).

3.42 Median/mean salary and pay gap for non-UK professors/non-professors by country of institution and BME/white identity

Median Mean

White BME

Pay gap

White BME Pay

gap

£ £ % £ £ %Professors

England 72043

70545 2.1 7835

97787

6 0.6

London 77314

78207

-1.2

86137

88298 -2.5


69412

68665 1.1 7437

87322

2 1.6

Northern Ireland

69493

64937 6.6 7459

67042

8 5.6

Scotland 70321

64289 8.6 7557

87268

7 3.8

Wales 71081

75039

-5.6

74521

77454 -3.9

Total 71573

70067 2.1 7775

07721

4 0.7

Non-professorsEngland 3738 3524 5.7 4057 3748 7.6

376

6 4 1 5

London 39132

36610 6.4 4243

03916

3 7.7


36298

34223 5.7 3959

03676

4 7.1

Northern Ireland

40834

36318

11.1

42031

37808 10.0

Scotland 36840

35244 4.3 3946

13728

1 5.5

Wales 36298

33532 7.6 3865

23582

3 7.3

Total 37382

35244 5.7 4044

63741

2 7.5

Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose salary, professorial category, country of institution or BME/white identity is unknown

Median ethnicity pay gap for non-UK professors/non-professors in country of institution


Professor in London -1.2Professor in England excluding London 1.1



377

Non-professor Northern Ireland 11.1Non-professor Scotland 4.3Non-professor Wales 7.6Non-professor in the UK 5.7

Mean ethnicity pay gap for non-UK professors/non-professors in country of institution


Professor in London -2.5Professor in England excluding London 1.6



Non-professor Northern Ireland 10.0Non-professor Scotland 5.5Non-professor Wales 7.3Non-professor in the UK 7.5

378



22.0% of BME academic staff left their institution between 2011/12 and 2012/13, compared with 16.3% of white academic staff.

Leaving rates were higher among non-UK staff than UK staff, with 25.4% of BME and 20.1% of white non-UK academic staff leaving their institution between 2011/12 and 2012/13, compared with 17.8% of BME and 15.2% of white UK academic staff.

3.43 Academic staff by leaving status and BME/white identity

White BMENo. % No. %

Total 146100

100

21125

100


23860

16.3

4640 22.0

Known destination(as a proportion of all leavers)

9960 41.7

2065 44.5


13900

58.3

2575 55.5

UK national

Total 115010

100

9545 100

379


17515

15.2

1695 17.8


7180 41.0

715 42.2


10335

59.0

980 57.8

Non-UK national

Total 29675

100

11210

100


5955 20.1

2845 25.4


2700 45.4

1340 47.1


3255 54.6

1505 52.9

Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose leaving status or BME/white identity is unknown.

UK/non-UK white/BME academic staff by leaving status

White % BME %

UK nationals


84.8 82.2

Known destination 6.2 7.5Unknown destination 9.0 10.3

Non-UK nationals


79.9 74.6

380

Known destination 9. 12.0Unknown destination 11.0 13.4

While a higher proportion of BME UK academic leavers went into employment than white UK academic leavers, a smaller proportion moved to another UK HEI (21.7% compared with 24.0%).

Among UK academic leavers, 43.3% of white and 34.2% of BME leavers were no longer in employment; 15.7% of white leavers went into retirement compared with 6.0% of BME leavers.3.44 UK academic staff leavers by known leaving destination and BME/white identity


UK employment

UK other HEI 1725

24.0

91.7

155 21.7

8.3


730 4.1 7.3

UK student 190 2.6 87.9

25 3.7 12.1


95 1.3 92.2

10 1.1 7.8


320 4.5 77.1

95 13.3

22.9


15 2.1 11.3


90.2

100 14.0

9.8

All UK 374 52. 89. 430 59. 10.381

employment 0 1 7 9 3Non-UK employment

Non-UK other HEI 165 2.3 87.4

25 3.3 12.6


55 0.8 94.7

5 0.4 5.3


30 0.4 .. 10 1.1 .


10 0.1 .. 5 0.4 ..


75 1.0 94.9

5 0.6 5.1


335 4.7 88.7

45 5.9 11.3


1865

26.0

90.7

190 26.8

9.3

Retired 1125

15.7

96.3

45 6.0 3.7

Deceased 115 1.6 91.9

10 1.4 8.1


3105

43.3

92.7

245 34.2

7.3

All UK leavers 7180

100 90.9

715 100 9.1

* within a BME/white identity, the percentage of staff in a leaving destination (compare vertically)^ within a leaving destination, the percentage of staff who are BME/white (compare horizontally)

382

.. Percentages based on totals of 52 or less are not shown. Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose leaving destination or BME/ white identity is unknown.

The proportions of white and BME non-UK academic leavers moving to UK and non-UK employment, or who were no longer in employment, were broadly similar.

However, leaving destinations varied. For example, white non-UK leavers had higher rates of moving to another HEI or other education institution (both UK and non-UK based), whereas BME non-UK academic leavers had higher rates of moving to the UK private sector (16.5% compared with 11.9%).

383

3.45 Non-UK academic staff leavers by known leaving destination and BME/white identity


UK employment


70.5

285 21.4

29.5


130 2.3 29.

9

UK student 120 4.5 63.0

70 5.4 37.0


55 2.1 73.1

20 1.6 26.9


55 2.1 53.3

50 3.7 46.7

UK public sector 25 1.0 .. 10 0.8 ..


59.3

220 16.5

40.7

All UK employment

1345

49.8

66.0

695 51.7

34.0

Non-UK employment

Non-UK other HEI 330 12.3

71.0

135 10.1

29.0


60 2.2 68.6

25 2.0 31.4


95 3.5 71.2

40 2.8 28.8


10 0.3 .. 0 0.1 ..

384


120 4.4 58.2

85 6.3 41.8


630 23.3

68.1

295 22.0

31.9


650 24.0

66.3

330 24.6

33.7

Retired 60 2.3 75.5

20 1.5 24.5


725 26.9

67.3

355 26.3

32.7

All UK leavers 2700

100 66.8

1340

100 33.2

* within a BME/white identity, the percentage of staff in a leaving destination (compare vertically)^ within a leaving destination, the percentage of staff who are BME/white (compare horizontally).. Percentages based on totals of 52 or less are not shown. Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose leaving destination or BME/ white identity is unknown

385

UK academic staff leavers in leaving destinations by BME/white identity

White % BME %UK employmentUK other HEI 91.7 8.3UK other education 92.7 7.3UK student 87.9 12.1UK research institute 92.2 7.8UK NHS/medical 77.1 22.9UK public sector 88.7 11.3UK private sector 90.2 9.8All UK employment 89.7 10.3Non-UKNon-UK other HEI 87.4 12.6Non-UK other education 94.7 5.3Non-UK student ..Non-UK research institute ..Non-UK health service ..Non-UK other employment 94.9 5.1All non-UK employment 88.7 11.3Not employedNot in regular employment 90.7 9.3Retired 96.3 *Deceased 91.9 8.1All those no longer in employment

92.7 7.3

All UK leavers 90.9 9.1


386

Non-UK academic staff leavers in leaving destinations by BME/white identity

White % BME %UK employmentUK other HEI 70.5 29.5UK other education 70.1 29.9UK student 63.0 37.0UK research institute 73.1 26.9UK NHS/medical 53.3 46.7UK public sector ..UK private sector 59.3 40.7All UK employment 66.0 34.0Non-UKNon-UK other HEI 71.0 29.0Non-UK other education 68.6 31.4Non-UK student ..Non-UK research institute 71.2 28.8Non-UK health service ..Non-UK other employment 58.2 41.8All non-UK employment 68.1 31.9Not employedNot in regular employment 66.3 33.7Retired 75.5 24.5Deceased ..All those no longer in employment

67.3 32.7

All UK leavers 66.8 33.2.. percentages based on totals of 52 or less are not shown

387

UK BME/white academic staff leavers by leaving destinations

White

BME

UK employmentUK other HEI 24.0 21.7UK other education institution 5.1 4.1UK student 2.6 3.7UK research institute 1.3 1.1UK NHS/medical or dental practice 4.5 13.3UK public sector 1.6 2.1UK private sector 12.9 14.0All UK employment 52.1 59.9Non-UK employmentNon-UK other HEI 2.3 3.3Non-UK other education institution 0.8 0.4Non-UK student 0.1 0.1Non-UK research institute 0.4 1.1Non-UK health service 0.1 0.4Non-UK other employment 1.0 0.6All non-UK employment 4.7 5.9No longer in employmentNot in regular employment 26.0 26.8Retired 15.7 6.0Deceased 1.6 1.4All those no longer in employment 43.3 34.2All UK leavers 100 100

388

Non-UK BME/white academic staff leavers by leaving destinations

White BME

UK employmentUK other HEI 25.5 21.4UK other education institution 2.7 2.3UK student 4.5 5.4UK research institute 2.1 1.6UK NHS/medical or dental practice 2.1 3.7UK public sector 1.0 0.8UK private sector 11.9 16.5All UK employment 49.8 51.7Non-UK employmentNon-UK other HEI 12.3 10.1Non-UK other education institution 2.2 2.0Non-UK student 0.7 0.6Non-UK research institute 3.5 2.8Non-UK health service 0.3 0.1Non-UK other employment 4.4 6.3All non-UK employment 23.3 22.0No longer in employmentNot in regular employment 24.0 24.6Retired 2.3 1.5Deceased 0.6 0.2All those no longer in employment 26.9 26.3All UK leavers 100 100

389

4 Gender

Beginning in 2012/13, the staff record replaced the gender field with a legal sex field, of which the possible options are male and female (see page 8 for more information).

For the purposes of this report, data from the legal sex field is referred to as gender.

The majority of professional and support staff were women (62.6%), whereas the majority of academic staff were men (55.5%).

Women comprised the majority of both part-time academic staff (54.7%) and part-time professional and support staff (79.5%).

Overall, a higher proportion of male academic staff were on open-ended/permanent contracts (66.8%) than female academic staff (61.5%), a difference of 5.3%.

11.8% of male staff were in senior contract levels, nearly three times the proportion of female staff (4.3%).

Women comprised the majority of academic staff in routine task provider roles (69.3%), assistant professional and administrative staff (54.5%), and professional/technical/senior administrative staff, research assistant and teaching assistant roles (52.5%).

For all other contract levels, men were in the majority among academic staff. This was most stark at the professorial and head of institution levels, where 78.3% and 81.2%, respectively, were men.

70.0% of professional and support staff working in assistant professional or administrative roles were women, compared with 40.6% of those in deputy and pro vice-chancellor positions.

390

The majority of all professors were men (78.3%). This gender difference was most notable among full-time professors working in SET subject areas, where 82.8% were men.

Overall, the median gender pay gap in the UK was 16.2% and the mean gender pay gap was 19.0%.

Gender overview

53.9% of staff working in UK HEIs were women.

The proportion of staff who were women in Northern Ireland was 0.8% lower than the national average of 53.9%. In England, Scotland and Wales the proportion of staff who were women was within 0.1% of the national average.

4.1 Staff by country of institution and gender

Female MaleNo. % No. %

England 170415

53.9

145980 46.1


1 3185 46.9

Scotland 21240 54.0 18060 46.0

Wales 10780 53.8 92550 46.2

Total 206040

53.9

176475 46.1

Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose country of institution or gender is unknown.

391

Between 2003/04 and 2012/13, the gap in female and male representation widened from 4.8% to 7.8%, with the proportion of staff who were women increasing by 1.5%.4.2 Profile of staff over time by gender


2003/04 177045

52.4

161060 47.6

2004/05 182630

52.7

163675 47.3

2005/06 188270

53.0

167140 47.0

2006/07 193500

53.1

170660 46.9

2007/08 198185

53.2

174265 46.8

2008/09 205010

53.6

177745 46.4

2009/10 208390

53.8

179035 46.2

2010/11 205195

53.7

176590 46.3

2011/12 203420

53.8

174825 46.2

2012/13 206040

53.9

176475 46.1

Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose gender is unknown.

Staff in countries of institution by gender

Female % Male %392

England 53.9 46.1Northern Ireland 53.1 46.9

Scotland 54.0 46.0Wales 53.8 46.2Total 53.9 46.1

393

Staff profile over time by gender

All female staff % All male staff %2003/04 52.4 47.62004/05 52.7 47.32005/06 53.0 47.02006/07 53.1 46.92007/08 53.2 46.82008/09 53.6 46.42009/10 53.8 46.22010/11 53.7 46.32011/12 53.8 46.22012/13 53.9 46.1

In 2012/13, the majority of professional and support staff were women (62.6%), whereas the majority of academic staff were men (55.5%).

However, the proportion of academic staff who were women has seen a 4.5% increase, from 40.0% in 2003/04 to 44.5% in 2012/13.

In contrast, the gender composition of professional and support staff has remained relatively static in this time. In 2003/04, 62.2% of professional and support staff were female, compared with 62.6% in 2012/13 (a 0.4% increase).

394

4.3 Profile of staff over time by activity and gender


Academic staff

2003/04 60145 40.0 90085 60.

0

2004/05 66220 41.2 94435 58.

8

2005/06 69125 41.9 95750 58.

1

2006/07 71920 42.3 98075 57.

7

2007/08 74590 42.6

100355

57.4

2008/09 77745 43.4

101290

56.6

2009/10 79900 44.0

101690

56.0

2010/11 80090 44.2

101090

55.8

2011/12 80775 44.5

100610

55.5

2012/13 82670 44.5

102915

55.5


2003/04 116900

62.2 70975 37.

8

2004/05 116410

62.7 69240 37.

3

2005/06 119145

62.5 71390 37.

5

395

2006/07 121585

62.6 72585 37.

4

2007/08 123600

62.6 73915 37.

4

2008/09 127260

62.5 76455 37.

5

2009/10 128490

62.4 77345 37.

6

2010/11 125105

62.4 75500 37.

6

2011/12 122645

62.3 74215 37.

7

2012/13 123375

62.6 73560 37.

4Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose activity or gender is unknown.

Staff profile over time by activity and gender

Female %

Male %

Academic staff2003/04 40.0 60.02004/05 41.2 58.82005/06 41.9 58.12006/07 42.3 57.72007/08 42.6 57.42008/09 43.4 56.62009/10 44.0 56.02010/11 44.2 55.8

396

2011/12 44.5 55.52012/13 44.5 55.5Professional and support staff2003/04 62.2 37.82004/05 62.7 37.32005/06 62.5 37.52006/07 62.6 37.42007/08 62.6 37.42008/09 62.5 37.52009/10 62.4 37.62010/11 62.4 37.62011/12 62.3 37.72012/13 62.6 37.4


76.3% of male staff worked full-time compared with 58.2% of female staff, a difference of 18.1%.

Women comprised the majority of both part-time academic staff (54.7%) and part-time professional and support staff (79.5%).

4.4 Staff by activity, mode and gender

Female MaleNo. %* %^ No. %* %^

Full-time 119915

58.2

47.1

134575

76.3

52.9

397

Part-time 86130 41.8

67.3 41900 23.

732.

7

Total 206040 100 53.

917647

5 100 46.1

Academic staff

Full-time 48155 58.3

39.3 74345 72.

260.

7


54.7 28575 27.

845.

3

Total 82670 100 44.5

102915 100 55.

5Professional and support staff

Full-time 71760 58.2

54.4 60235 81.

945.

6


79.5 13325 18.

120.

5

Total 123375 100 62.

6 73560 100 37.4

* within a gender, the percentage of staff in a mode (compare vertically within an activity)^ within an activity and mode, the percentage of staff who are female/male (compare horizontally)Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose activity, mode or gender is unknown.

Full-time/part-time staff in activities by gender

Female

Male

% %All staff 53.9 46.1Part-time 47.1 52.9

398

Full-time 67.3 32.7All academic staff 44.5 55.5Full-time academic staff 39.3 60.7Part-time academic staff 54.7 45.3All professional and support staff 62.6 37.4

Full-time professional and support staff 54.4 45.6

Part-time professional and support staff 79.5 20.5

Female/male staff by activity and mode

Female

Male

% %Academic full-time 58.3 72.2Academic part-time 41.7 27.8Professional and support full-time 58.2 81.9Professional and support part-time 41.8 18.1

Overall, a higher proportion of male academic staff were on open-ended/permanent contracts (66.8%) than female academic staff (61.5%), a difference of 5.3%.

Among full-time academic staff, higher proportions of men (76.6%) were on open/ permanent contracts than women (72.0%).

399

However, the inverse was true of part-time academic staff, with 46.8% of women on open/permanent contracts compared with 41.3% of men.

4.5 Academic staff by mode, contract type and gender


Academic staffOpen/permanent

50820

61.5

42.5 68770 66.

857.5

Fixed-term 31845

38.5

48.3 34145 33.

251.7

Total 28670 100 44.

510291

5 100 55.5

Full timeOpen/permanent

34655

72.0

37.8 56980 76.

662.2

Fixed-term 13500

28.0

43.7 17365 23.

456.3

Total 48155 100 39.

3 74345 100 60.7

Part-timeOpen/permanent

16165

46.8

57.8 11795 41.

342.2

Fixed-term 18345

53.2

52.2 16780 58.

747.8

Total 34515 100 54.

7 28575 100 45.3

* within a gender, the percentage of staff in a contract type (compare vertically within a mode)^ within mode and contract type, the percentage of staff who are female/male (compare horizontally)

400

Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose mode, contract type or gender is unknown.

Among full-time professional and support staff, a higher proportion of men were on open-ended/permanent contracts than women: this difference, however, was small (2.8%).

There was a wide gap among part-time professional and support staff, with 83.0% of women on open-ended/ permanent contracts compared with 68.6% of men (a difference of 14.4%).

4.6 Professional and support staff by mode, contract type and gender


Open/permanent

105090

85.2

62.5

63090

85.8

37.5


63.6

10470

14.2

36.4

Total 123375 100 62.

67356

0 100 37.4

Full timeOpen/permanent 62260 86.

853.6

53950

89.6

46.4


60.2 6285 10.

439.8

Total 71760 100 54.4

60235 100 45.

6Part-timeOpen/ 42830 83. 82. 9140 68. 17.

401

permanent 0 4 6 6


67.7 4185 31.

432.3

Total 51615 100 79.5

13325 100 20.

5* within a gender, the percentage of staff in a contract type (compare vertically within a mode)^ within mode and contract type, the percentage of staff who are female/male (compare horizontally)Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose mode, contract type or gender is unknown.

Academic/professional and support staff in modes and contract types by gender

Female

Male

% %All academic open/permanent 42.5 57.5All academic fixed-term 48.3 51.7Full-time academic open/permanent 37.8 62.2Full-time academic fixed-term 43.7 56.3Part-time academic open/permanent 57.8 42.2Part-time academic fixed-term 52.2 47.8All professional/support open/permanent 62.5 3.5All professional/support fixed-term 63.6 36.4Full-time professional/support open/Permanent 53.6 46.4

Full-time professional/support fixed-term 60.2 39.8Part-time professional/support open/permanent 82.4 17.6

Part-time professional/support fixed- 67.7 32.3

402

term

403

Female/male staff by activity and contract type

Female Male% %

Academic staffOpen/permanent 61.5 66.8Fixed-term 38.5 33.2Professional and support staffOpen/permanent 85.2 85.8Fixed-term 14.8 14.2

Contract level


11.8% of male staff were in senior contract levels (HOI–5B), nearly three times the proportion of female staff (4.3%).

Women were most starkly underrepresented at the head of institution level: only 20.1% of all heads of institutions were women.

67.6% of junior administrative, clerical, technical/craftsmen and operative staff were women (N).

404

4.7 Staff by contract level and gender



1 135 0.1 79.9

UCEA level 2A 160 0.1 30.5 365 0.2 69.

5

UCEA level 2B 270 0.1 43.2 355 0.2 56.

8

UCEA level 3A 240 0.1 29.7 575 0.3 70.

3

UCEA level 3B 520 0.3 40.5 765 0.4 59.

5UCEA level 3/4A1 170 0.1 27.

7 435 0.2 72.3

UCEA level 3/4A2 190 0.1 30.

5 440 0.2 69.5

UCEA level 3/4A3 410 0.2 35.

2 490 0.4 64.8

UCEA level 4A 745 0.4 38.0 1215 0.7 62.

0

UCEA level 4B 735 0.4 43.5 955 0.5 56.

5

UCEA level 5A 3875 1.9 21.7 14020 7.9 78.

3

UCEA level 5B 1235 0.6 49.7 1245 0.7 50.

3

XpertHR level I 12300 6.0 39.5 18820 10.

760.

5


48.9 34010 19.

351.

1

405


52.5 42095 23.

947.

5


58.4 22580 12.

841.

6


69.0 12915 7.3 31.

0


67.6 10360 5.9 32.

4

XpertHR level O 10240 5.0 57.7 7520 4.3 42.

3

XpertHR level P 13815 6.7 66.7 6905 3.9 33.

3

Total 206040

100

53.9

176475

100

46.1

* within a gender, the percentage of staff in a contract level (compare vertically)^ within a contract level, the percentage of staff who are male/female (compare horizontally)

Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose contract type or gender is unknown.






UCEA level 3/4A1 Head of school/division/department/centre size

406

1





XpertHR level I


XpertHR level J


XpertHR level K





XpertHR level O Routine task provider

407

XpertHR level P Simple task provider

Staff in contract levels by gender

Female % Male %Head of institution (HOI) 20.1 79.9UCEA level 2A 30.5 69.5UCEA level 2B 43.2 56.8UCEA level 3A 29.7 70.3UCEA level 3B 40.5 59.5UCEA level 3/4A1 27.7 72.3UCEA level 3/4A2 30.5 69.5UCEA level 3/4A3 35.2 64.8UCEA level 4A 38.0 62.0UCEA level 4B 43.5 56.5UCEA level 5A 21.7 78.3UCEA level 5B 49.7 50.3XpertHR level I 39.5 60.5XpertHR level J 48.9 51.1XpertHR level K 52.5 47.5XpertHR level L 58.4 41.6XpertHR level M 69.0 31.0XpertHR level N 67.6 32.4XpertHR level O 57.7 42.3XpertHR level P 66.7 33.3

7.1% of female academic staff were in senior contract levels (HOI–5B), compared with 17.6% of male academic staff.

408

Women comprised the majority of academic staff in routine task provider roles (O; 69.3%), assistant professional and administrative staff (M; 54.5%), and professional, technical/ senior administrative staff, research assistant and teaching assistant roles (L; 52.5%).

For all other contract levels, men were in the majority among academic staff. This was most stark at the professorial (5A) and head of institution levels, where 78.3% and 81.2%, respectively, were men.

4.8 Academic staff by contract level and gender



8 110 0.1 81.2

UCEA level 2A 125 0.1 28.3 310 0.3 71.

7UCEA level 2B 10 0.0 .. 25 0.0 ..

UCEA level 3A 200 0.2 27.6 525 0.5 72.

4

UCEA level 3B 50 0.1 36.3 90 0.1 63.

7UCEA level 3/4A1 160 0.2 27.

4 425 0.4 72.6

UCEA level 3/4A2 175 0.2 29.

4 420 0.4 70.6

UCEA level 3/4A3 370 0.5 34.

1 720 0.7 65.9

UCEA level 4A 650 0.8 36.9 1115 1.1 63.

1UCEA level 4B 45 0.1 32. 95 0.1 67.

409

2 8

UCEA level 5A 3870 4.7 21.7 14010 136.

678.

3

UCEA level 5B 190 0.2 40.8 280 0.3 59.

2


37.6 16260 15.8 62.

4

XpertHR level J 23880

28.9

47.5 26375 25.6 52.

5

XpertHR level K 29990

36.3

49.7 30335 29.5 50.

3

XpertHR level L 11310

13.7

52.5 10240 10.0 47.

5

XpertHR level M 1380 1.7 54.5 1150 1.1 45.

5

XpertHR level N 280 0.3 44.6 345 0.3 55.

4

XpertHR level O 105 0.1 69.3 45 0.0 30.

7

XpertHR level P 30 0.0 43.3 35 0.0 56.

7

Total 82670

100

44.5

102915 100 55.

5* within a gender, the percentage of staff in a contract level (compare vertically)^ within a contract level, the percentage of staff who are male/female (compare horizontally).. Percentages based on totals of 52 or less are not shown.


Head of institution Vice-chancellor/principal410

(HOI)UCEA level 2A Deputy/pro vice-chancellor









XpertHR level I


XpertHR level J Section/team leader (professional, technical, administrative), lecturer B (pre 92), senior lecturer (post 92),

411

senior research fellow

XpertHR level K






Academic staff in contract levels by gender

Female % Male %Head of institution (HOI) 18.8 81.2UCEA level 2A 28.3 71.7UCEA level 2B ..UCEA level 3A 27.6 72.4UCEA level 3B 36.3 63.7UCEA level 3/4A1 27.4 72.6UCEA level 3/4A2 29.4 70.6UCEA level 3/4A3 34.1 65.9UCEA level 4A 36.9 63.1UCEA level 4B 32.2 67.8UCEA level 5A 21.7 78.3

412

UCEA level 5B 40.8 59.2XpertHR level I 37.6 62.4XpertHR level J 47.5 52.5XpertHR level K 49.7 50.3XpertHR level L 52.5 477.5XpertHR level M 54.5 45.5XpertHR level N 44.6 55.4XpertHR level O 69.3 30.7XpertHR level P 43.3 56.7


Among professional and support staff, a higher proportion of men (4.3%) were in senior contract levels (HOI–5B) than women (2.1%), though these proportions were much lower than for academic staff across both genders (see fig. 4.8).

70.0% of professional and support staff working in assistant professional or administrative roles (M) were women, compared with 40.6% of those in deputy and pro vice-chancellor positions (2A).

4.9 Professional and support staff by contract level and gender



UCEA level 2A 35 0.0 40.6 55 0.1 59.

4

UCEA level 2B 260 0.2 44.0 330 0.5 56.

0

413

UCEA level 3A 40 0.0 47.3 45 0.1 52.

7

UCEA level 3B 470 0.4 41.0 675 0.9 59.

0UCEA level 3/4A1 5 0.0 .. 10 0.0 ..

UCEA level 3/4A2 15 0.0 .. 15 0.0 ..

UCEA level 3/4A3 40 0.0 49.

4 40 0.1 50.6

UCEA level 4A 95 0.1 48.8 100 0.1 51.

2

UCEA level 4B 690 0.6 44.5 860 1.2 55.

5UCEA level 5A 0 0.0 .. 10 0.0 ..

UCEA level 5B 1040 0.8 51.8 970 1.3 48.

2

XpertHR level I 2485 2.0 49.3 2560 3.5 50.

7

XpertHR level J 8605 7.0 53.0 7640 10.4 47.

0


58.3 11760 16.0 41.

7


62.3 12340 16.8 37.

7


70.0 11765 16.0 30.

0


68.1 10015 13.6 31.

9

XpertHR level O 10135 8.2 57.6 7475 10.2 42.

4XpertHR level P 13785 11. 66. 6870 9.3 33.

414

2 7 3

Total 123375

100

62.6 73560 100 37.

4* within a gender, the percentage of staff in a contract level (compare vertically)^ within a contract level, the percentage of staff who are male/female (compare horizontally).. Percentages based on totals of 52 or less are not shown.







UCEA level 3/4A1

Head of school/division/department/centre size 1

UCEA level 3/4A2


UCEA level 3/4A3




415

XpertHR level I


XpertHR level J


XpertHR level K






Professional and support staff in contract levels by gender

Female % Male %Head of institution (HOI) ..UCEA level 2A 40.6 59.4UCEA level 2B 44.0 56.0UCEA level 3A 47.3 52.7UCEA level 3B 41.0 59.0UCEA level 3/4A1 ..

416

UCEA level 3/4A2 ..UCEA level 3/4A3 49.4 50.6UCEA level 4A 48.8 51.2UCEA level 4B 44.5 55.5UCEA level 5A ..UCEA level 5B 51.8 48.2XpertHR level I 49.3 50.7XpertHR level J 53.0 47.0XpertHR level K 58.3 41.7XpertHR level L 62.3 37.7XpertHR level M 70.0 30.0XpertHR level N 68.1 31.9XpertHR level O 57.6 42.4XpertHR level P 66.7 33.3


Occupational group

Men comprised the majority of staff on academic contracts (55.5%). The underrepresentation of women was most stark among academic managers, directors and senior officials, where they made up 38.2% of staff.

In contrast, the majority of staff on professional and support contracts were women (62.6%). This was true for all professional and support roles with the exception of those working as process, plant and machine operatives and in skilled trades occupations (18.9%).

Administrative and secretarial occupations had the highest proportion of women (81.9%).

417

4.10 Staff by activity, occupational group and gender



190 0.2 38.2 310 0.3 61.

8

Professional occupations 81895 99.1 44.

610183

098.

955.

4Associate professional and technical occupations

575 0.7 42.8 770 0.7 57.

2

Total 82670 100 44.5

102915 100 55.



5850 4.7 52.9 5205 7.1 47.

1


8 15425 21.0

43.2


22775 18.5 52.5 20635 28.

147.

5


52975 42.9 81.9 11715 15.

918.

1

Skilled trades 1170 0.9 18. 5015 6.8 81.418

occupations 9 1Caring, leisure and other service occupations

3950 3.2 56.7 3020 4.1 43.

3


1410 1.1 72.7 530 0.7 27.

3


320 0.3 18.9 1380 1.9 81.

1


0 10640 14.5

42.0

Total 123375 100 62.6 73560 100 37.

4

All staff 206040 53.9

176475

46.1

* within a gender, the percentage of staff in an occupational group (compare vertically within an activity)^ within an activity and occupational group, the percentage of staff who are female/male (compare horizontally)Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose activity, occupational group or gender is unknown.Academic staff in SOC groups other than 1–3 have been included in the academic total but are not shown in an occupational group. The sum of academic occupational groups therefore is not equal to the academic total in this table.

Staff in occupational groups and activity by gender

Female % Male %

419

Academic contractManagers, directors and senior officials 38.2 61.8




Administrative and secretarial occupations 81.9 18.1

Skilled trades occupations 18.9 81.1Caring, leisure and other service occupations 56.7 43.3

Sales and customer service occupations 72.7 27.3


Elementary occupations 58.0 42.0

When part-time staff were excluded from the occupational classification data, the proportion of staff who were women decreased in every occupational group (see fig. 4.10). The proportion of full-time academic staff who were women was 5.2% lower than for all academic staff. Similarly, the proportion of full-time professional and support staff who were women was 8.2% lower than for all professional and support staff.

420

This was particularly stark among professional and support staff in elementary occupations, where the proportion of full time staff who were women was more than half that of the proportion of all staff in elementary occupations (25.4% compared with 58.0%; see fig. 4.10).

Men comprised the majority of managers, directors and senior officials on both academic (62.5%) and professional and support full-time contracts (50.6%).

4.11 Full-time staff by activity, occupational group and gender



160 0.3 37.5 270 0.4 62.

5


3 73445 98.8

60.7


355 0.7 36.3 625 0.8 63.

7

Total 48155 100 39.3 74345 100 60.



4815 6.7 49.4 4935 8.2 50.

6

421


6 13670 22.7

49.4


15145 21.1 45.4 18220 30.

354.

6


32240 44.9 78.9 8640 14.

321.

1


1 4705 7.8 86.9


1725 2.4 45.2 2090 3.5 54.

8


690 1.0 66.9 340 0.6 33.

1


225 0.3 15.4 1230 2.0 84.

6


4 6400 10.6

74.6

Total 71760 100 54.4 60235 100 45.

6

All staff 119915 47.1

134575

52.9

* within a gender, the percentage of staff in an occupational group (compare vertically within an activity)^ within an activity and occupational group, the percentage of staff who are female/male (compare horizontally)

422

Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose activity, occupational group or gender is unknown.Academic staff in SOC groups other than 1–3 have been included in the academic total but are not shown in an occupational group. The sum of academic occupational groups therefore is not equal to the academic total in this table.

Among part-time staff, women were in the majority for all occupational groups except for process, plant and machine operatives on professional and support contracts (39.7%) and managers, directors and senior officials on academic contracts (42.5%).

The proportion of part-time staff working in skilled trade occupations who were women (60.0%) was over four and a half times the proportion of full-time staff who were women in this occupational group (13.1%; see fig. 4.11).

4.12 Part-time staff by activity, occupational group and gender



30 0.1 42.5 40 0.1 57.

5


7 28385 99.3

45.3


220 0.6 60.2

145 0.5 39.8

423

occupations

Total 34515 100 54.7 28575 100 45.



1030 2.0 79.4 270 2.0 20.

6


0 1755 13.2

22.0


7630 14.8 76.0 2415 18.

124.

0


20735 40.2 87.1 3075 23.

112.

9


0 310 2.3 40.0


2225 4.3 70.4 935 7.0 29.

6


720 1.4 79.3 185 1.4 20.

7


95 0.2 39.7 145 1.1 60.

3


7 4240 31.8

25.3

424

Total 51615 100 79.5 13325 100 20.

5

All staff 86130 67.3 41900 32.

7See fig. 4.11 for explanatory text.

425

Academic contract

With the exception of teaching only positions, where 51.7% of staff were women, men made up the majority of academic staff across all contract types.

55.3% of male academic staff were on teaching and research contracts, compared with 45.5% of female academic staff.

4.13 Academic staff by research/teaching contract type and gender


Teaching only 24200

29.3

51.7 22595 22.

048.

3

Research only 19945

24.1

47.1 22405 21.

852.

9Teaching and research

37645

45.5

39.8 56950 55.

360.

2Neither teaching nor research

875 1.1 47.6 965 0.9 52.

4

TOTAL 82670 100 44.

510291

5 100 55.5

* within a gender, the percentage of staff in a research/teaching contract type (compare vertically)^ within a research/teaching contract type, the percentage of staff who are female/male (compare horizontally)Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose research/teaching contract type or gender is unknown.

426

Female/male academic staff by research/teaching contract type

Female %

Male %


Academic staff in research/teaching contract types by gender

Female %

Male %



The majority of female academic staff (51.0%) worked in non-SET areas whereas 57.4% of male academic staff worked in SET subject areas.

4.14 Academic staff by SET category and gender

SET Non-SET

427

No. % No. %

Female 40540 49.0 42130

51.0

Male 59090 57.4 43825

42.6

Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose SET category or gender is unknown.

Overall, 59.3% of academic staff in SET subject areas were men.

There were particularly high proportions of staff who were men in electrical, electronic and computer engineering (86.2%), mechanical, aero and production engineering (83.9%), physics (82.5%) and general engineering (80.1%).

Women comprised the majority of academic staff in four of 23 SET subject areas.

The largest gender difference was within nursing and allied health professions, where 74.6% of academic staff were women and 25.4% were men, a difference of 49.2%. A higher proportion of staff who were women can also be seen in psychology and behavioural sciences (59.9%), veterinary science (53.0%) and clinical medicine (52.1%).

4.15 SET academic staff by subject area and gender

Female Male

No. % No. %Agriculture and forestry and food science 490 44.5 610 55.5


428

Archaeology 285 42.7 380 57.3Architecture, built environment and planning 1165 31.0 2595 69.0

Biosciences 5345 43.7 6895 56.3Chemical engineering 235 27.0 640 73.0Chemistry 1015 27.0 2740 73.0Civil engineering 360 20.7 1385 79.3Clinical dentistry 635 43.1 835 56.9

Clinical medicine 11040 52.1 1015

5 47.9




IT, systems sciences, computer software engineering

1375 21.5 5030 78.5





Physics 745 17.5 3525 82.5Psychology and 3595 59.9 2410 40.1

429

behavioural sciencesVeterinary science 615 53.0 545 47.0

Total SET 40540 40.7 5909

0 59.3

Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose subject area or gender is unknown

430

Female/male academic staff by SET category

SET % Non-SET%Female 49.0 51.0Male 57.4 42.6

Overall, 51.0% of academic staff in non-SET areas were men. However, female staff comprised the majority of academic staff in a third of non-SET subject areas.

There were particularly high proportions of staff who were women in health and community studies (65.2%), education (64.8%), modern languages (64.2%) and social work and social policy (64.0%).

In contrast, economics and econometrics (71.9%), premises (71.6%) and philosophy (71.2%) had particularly high proportions of staff who were men.

4.16 Non-SET academic staff by subject area and gender



410 47.2

455 52.8


180 57.7


4370 51.5


5475 40.4

8090 59.6

Catering and hospitality 370 49. 370 50.

431

management 8 2

Classics 285 47.9

310 52.1


415 40.9


1830 71.9

Education 6080 64.8

3310 35.2


2060 44.7


1240 34.8

History 1280 38.5

2045 61.5

Law 2430 49.6

2470 50.4


2275 59.1


2030 35.8


2830 41.9

3930 58.1

Philosophy 315 28.8

775 71.2


960 35.1

1780 64.9


950 36.0

Sociology 1380 50.5

1350 49.5

Sports science and leisure 910 38. 1455 61.

432

studies 4 6


500 65.5


510 42.6


795 48.1

855 51.9

Premises 15 28.4

40 71.6



225 41.2

Total non-SET 42130

49.0

43825

51.0

.. Percentages based on totals of 52 or less are not shown.Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose subject area or gender is unknown.

433

Academic staff in SET subject areas by gender

Female % Male %

Agriculture and forestry and food science 44.5 55.5

Anatomy and physiology 49.3 50.7Archaeology 42.7 57.3Architecture, built environment and planning 31.0 69.0

Biosciences 43.7 56.3Chemical engineering 27.0 73.0Chemistry 27.0 73.0Civil engineering 20.7 79.3Clinical dentistry 43.1 56.9Clinical medicine 52.1 47.9Earth, marine and environmental sciences 33.9 66.1

Electrical, electronic and computer engineering 13.8 86.2

General engineering 19.9 80.1Geography and environmental studies 37.2 62.8

IT, systems sciences, computer software engineering 21.5 78.5

Mathematics 23.3 76.7Mechanical, aero and production engineering 16.1 83.9

Mineral, metallurgy and materials engineering 25.7 74.3

Nursing and allied health 74.6 25.4

434

professionalsPharmacy and pharmacology 48.5 51.5Physics 17.5 82.5Psychology and behavioural sciences 59.9 40.1Veterinary science 53.0 47.0Total SET 40.7 59.3

Academic staff in non-SET subject areas by gender

Female % Male %Anthropology and development studies

47.2 52.8

Area studies 42.3 57.7Art and design 48.5 51.5Business and management studies

40.4 59.6


49.8 50.2

Classics 47.9 52.1Continuing education 59.1 40.9Economics and econometrics 28.1 71.9Education 64.8 35.2English language and literature 55.3 44.7Health and community studies 65.2 34.8History 38.5 61.5Law 49.6 50.4Media studies 40.9 59.1Modern languages 64.2 35.8Music, dance, drama and performing arts

41.9 58.1

Philosophy 28.8 71.2

435

Politics and international studies 35.1 64.9Social work and social policy 64.0 36.0Sociology 50.5 49.5Sports science and leisure studies

38.4 61.6

Theology and religious studies 34.5 65.5Total academic services 57.4 42.6Central administration and services

48.1 51.9

Premises 28.4 71.6Residences and catering .. ..Staff and student facilities 58.8 41.2Total non-SET 49.0 51.0


Academic roles

The majority of all professors were men (78.3%). This was true across SET and non-SET subject areas and full- and part-time employment.

This gender difference was most notable among full-time professors working in SET subject areas, where 82.8% were men.

Women comprised the majority of part-time non-professorial staff within both SET and non-SET subject areas (56.8% and 56.1% respectively).

436

4.17 Academic staff by professorial and SET category, mode and gender


Professors

All SET 1925 49.7 17.7 8920 63.

782.3

Full-time SET 1550 40.1 17.

2 7475 53.4

82.8

Part-time SET 370 9.6 20.

5 1445 10.3

79.5

All non-SET 1950 50.3 27.7 5090 36.

372.3

Full-time non SET 1620 41.9 28.

2 4135 29.5

71.8


5 955 6.8 74.5

Total 3870 100 21.7

14010 100 78.

3Non-professors

All SET 38615 49.0 43.5

50175

56.4

56.5

Full-time SET 25645 32.5 38.

94030

045.3

61.1

Part-time SET 12970 16.5 56.

8 9875 11.1

43.2

All non-SET 40180 51.0 50.9

38735

43.6

49.1

Full-time non SET 19335 24.5 46.

32243

525.2

53.7

Part-time 20845 26.5 56. 1630 18. 43.

437

non-SET 1 0 3 9

Total 78795 100 47.0

88905 100 53.

0* within a gender, the percentage of staff in a SET category and mode (compare vertically within a professorial category)^ within professorial, SET category and mode, the percentage of staff who are female/male (compare horizontally)Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose professorial, SET category, mode or gender is unknown.

Female/male academic staff by professorial and SET categories and mode

Female % Male %ProfessorsAll SET 49.7 63.7


All non-SET 50.3 36.3Full-time non SET 41.9 29.5Part-time non-SET 8.5 6.8

Total 100 100Non-professorsAll SET 49.0 56.4



Total 100 100438

Professors/non-professors in modes and SET categories by gender

Female % Male %ProfessorsAll SET 17.7 82.3



Total 21.7 78.3Non-professorsAll SET 43.5 56.5



Total 47.0 53.0

Men made up the majority of academic senior management roles across all modes of employment and SET and non SET subject areas.

The gender difference was most prominent within full-time SET subject areas, where 78.1% of academic senior managers were men and 21.9% were women.

Women comprised the majority of part-time other academic staff within both SET and non-SET subject areas (54.1% and 55.1% respectively).

440

4.18 Academic staff by senior management and SET category, mode and gender

Female Male

No. %* %^ No. %* %^Senior managers

All SET 110 26.4

22.6 370 35.

077.4


421.9 345 32.

378.1

Part-time SET 10 3.0 .. 30 2.7 ..


30.5 690 65.

069.5


331.0 640 60.

569.0


3 45 4.4 77.7

Total 410 100 27.9 1060 100 72.

1Other academic staff

All SET 40430 49.2

40.8 58720 57.

659.2


936.4 47430 46.

663.6


254.1 11285 11.

145.9


49.2 43135 42.

450.8


144.4 25925 25.

555.6

441

Part-time non-SET 21160 25.

755.1 17210 16.

944.9

Total 82255 100 44.7

101855 100 55.

3* within a gender, the percentage of staff in a SET category and mode (compare vertically within a senior management category)^ within a senior management, SET category and mode, the percentage of staff who are female/ male (compare horizontally).. Percentages based on totals of 52 or less are not shown. Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose senior management, SET category, mode or gender is unknown.

Female/male academic staff by senior management and SET categories and mode

Female

Male

All SET 26.4 35.0Full-time SET 23.4 32.3Part-time SET 3.0 2.7Full-time non SET 70.3 60.5


Other academic staffAll SET 49.2 57.6

Full-time SET 32.9 46.6Part-time SET 16.2 11.1Full-time non SET 25.1 25.5

442


443

Academic senior managers/other academic staff in modes and SET categories by gender

No. %Senior managersAll SET 22.6 77.4



Total 27.9 72.1Other academic staffAll SET 40.8 59.2



Total 44.7 55.3

Salaries

34.2% of male academic staff earned over £50,000, compared with 19.5% of female academic staff.

Among both full-time and part-time academic staff, a higher proportion of women earned under £30,000 than men.

444

4.19 Academic staff by mode, salary range and gender


Under £30,000 11040 13.4 52.

8 9855 9.6 47.2

£30,000-£50,000 55545 67.2 49.

0 57830 56.2

51.0

Over £50,000 16080 19.5 31.3 35235 34.

268.7

Total 82670 100 44.5

102915 100 55.

5Full-timeUnder £30,000 4685 9.7 48.

9 4900 6.6 51.1

£30,000-£50,000 31270 64.9 43.

9 39890 53.7

56.1

Over £50,000 12195 25.3 29.2 29555 39.

870.8

Total 48155 100 39.3 74345 100 60.

7Part-timeUnder £30,000 6355 18.4 56.

2 4955 17.3

43.8

£30,000-£50,000 24275 70.3 57.

5 17935 62.8

42.5

Over £50,000 3885 11.3 40.6 5680 19.

959.4

Total 34515 100 54.7 28575 100 45.

3* within a gender, the percentage of staff in a salary range (compare vertically within a mode)

445

^ within mode and salary range, the percentage of staff who are female/male (compare horizontally)Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose mode, salary range or gender is unknown.

The majority of all professional and support staff earned less than £30,000 (70.4% of women and 59.5% of men).

Overall, 54.9% of those earning £50,000 and over were men. However, among part-time professional and support staff 69.8% of those earning this salary were women.

4.20 Professional and support staff by mode, salary range and gender


Under £30,000 86815 70.4 66.

5 43800 59.5

33.5

£30,000-£50,000 31865 25.8 57.

0 24045 32.7

43.0

Over £50,000 4690 3.8 45.

1 5715 7.8 54.9

Total 123375 100 62.6 73560 100 37.

4Full-timeUnder £30,000 44925 62.6 57.

9 32695 54.3

42.1

£30,000-£50,000 22960 32.0 50.

9 22175 36.8

49.1

Over £50,000 3870 5.4 41.

9 5360 8.9 58.1

Total 71760 100 54. 60235 100 45.

446

4 6Part-timeUnder £30,000 41890 81.2 79.

0 11105 83.3

21.0

£30,000-£50,000 8905 17.3 82.

7 1870 14.0

17.3

Over £50,000 820 1.6 69.

8 355 2.7 30.2

Total 51615 100 79.5 13325 100 20.

5See fig. 4.19 for explanatory text.

Academic/professional and support staff in salary ranges by gender

Female % Male %Academic staffUnder £30,000 52.8 47.2£30,000-£50,000 49.0 51.0Over £50,000 31.3 68.7Professional and support staffUnder £30,000 66.5 33.5£30,000-£50,000 57.0 43.0Over £50,000 45.1 54.9

Female/male staff in activities and modes by salary range

Under £30,000

£30,000 - £50,000

Over 50,000

Academic staff

447

Female 13.4 67.2 19.5Male 9.6 56.2 34.2Full-time female 9.7 64.9 25.3Full-time male 6.6 53.7 39.8Part-time female 18.4 70.3 11.3Part-time male 17.3 62.8 19.9Professional and support staffFemale 70.4 25.8 *Male 59.5 32.7 7.8Full-time female 62.6 32.0 5.4Full-time male 54.3 36.8 8.9Part-time female 81.2 17.3Part-time male 83.3 14.0


Men were in the majority across all pay spine ranges except for the ≥23,352 and <£31,331 pay spine range, which had a higher proportion of staff who were women (52.6%).

Men were particularly overrepresented in the highest pay spine range (≥£56,467), comprising 73.1% of staff in this pay spine range.

4.21 Academic staff by academic pay spine range and gender

Female Male

No. %* %^ No. %* %^

<£17,503 290 0.4 43.6 375 0.4 56.

4>£17,503 and 1225 1.5 47. 1365 1.3 52.

448

<£23,352 3 7>£23,352 and <£31,331 13135 15.

952.6 11825 11.

547.4

>£31,331 and <£42,055 32215 39.

049.6 32700 31.

850.4

>£42,055 and <56,467 27250 33.

044.9 33425 32.

555.1

>£56,467 8555 10.3

26.9 23235 22.

673.1

Total 82670 100 44.5

102915 100 55.

5* within a gender, the percentage of staff in an academic pay spine range (compare vertically)^ within academic pay spine range, the percentage of staff who are female/male (compare horizontally)Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose academic pay spine range or gender is unknown.

Academic staff in academic pay spine ranges by gender

Female % Female %<£17,503 43.6 56.4>£17,503 and <£23,352 47.3 52.7>£23,352 and <£31,331 52.6 47.4>£31,331 and <£42,055 49.6 50.4>£42,055 and <56,467 44.9 55.1>£56,467 26.9 73.1

Female/male academic staff by academic pay spine ranges

Female % Male %

449

<£17,503 0.4 0.4>£17,503 and <£23,352 1.5 1.3>£23,352 and <£31,331 15.9 11.5>£31,331 and <£42,055 39.0 31.8>£42,055 and <56,467 33.0 32.5>£56,467 10.3 22.6

Overall, the median gender pay gap in the UK was 16.2% and the mean gender pay gap was 19.0%. However, the size of the gap varied across nations and employment activities.

The median gender pay gap was highest in Northern Ireland (21.0%), while the mean gender pay gap was highest in Scotland (21.6%).

The lowest median and mean gender pay gaps were in England (13.9% and 18.6%, respectively). However, London’s pay gap figures were substantially lower than average, at 11.1% (median) and 15.2% (mean). When London was excluded, England’s figures were broadly in line with the other nations.

4.22 Median/mean salary and pay gap by country of institution, activity and gender

Median Mean

F M Pay gap F M Pay

gap£ £ % £ £ %

EnglandAcademic staff

38522

44607

13.6

41738

47657

12.4

450


24049

27047

11.1

26845

30131

10.9

Total 31250

36298

13.9

32926

40443

18.6


39705

44607

11.0

43655

50049

12.8


30688

32930 6.8 3265

735943 9.1

Total 35244

39653

11.1

37988

44777

15.2


37382

44607

16.2

41094

46880

12.3


22701

24766 8.3 2552

928594

10.7

Total 29541

36298

18.6

31565

39146

19.4

Northern IrelandAcademic staff

40857

45941

11.1

42701

48491

11.9


21395

25504

16.1

25282

28894

12.5

Total 29559

37403

21.0

32145

40501

20.6

Scotland

451

Academic staff

40834

44607 8.5 4319

149780

13.2


22700

25504

11.0

25447

29087

12.5

Total 29541

36298

18.6

31620

40357

21.6

WalesAcademic staff

36298

43312

16.2

39886

46767

14.7


23352

24766 5.7 2558

328323 9.7

Total 29541

35906

17.7

31243

38891

19.7

UK totalAcademic staff

38526

44607

13.6

41789

47830

12.6


24049

27022

11.0

26593

29895

11.0

Total 30424

36298

16.2

32690

40354

19.0

P&S professional and supportPercentages based on total number of staff minus those whose country of institution, activity or gender is unknown

Median gender pay gap for all staff in country of institution

England 13.9London 11.1

452

England excluding London 18.6Northern Ireland 21.0Scotland 18.6Wales 17.7UK total 16.2

Mean gender pay gap for all staff in country of institution

England 18.6London 15.2England excluding London 19.4


Among academic staff, the median gender pay gap was 13.6%, while the mean gender pay gap was 12.6%. The median gap was highest among academic staff working in professional occupations (13.4%) and the mean gap was highest among managers, directors and senior officials (14.8%).

However, there were negative median (-3.0%) and mean ( 1.3%) gender pay gaps for associate and technical academic professionals, meaning that women were paid, on average, slightly more than men in these occupations.

Among professional and support staff, the overall median and mean gender pay gaps were 11.0% each, though these varied widely by occupational activity.

453

For example, there was a median gender pay gap of 18.4% among professional and support staff in skilled trades, but a negative gap of -3.0% among those in administrative and secretarial occupations.

4.23 Median/mean salary and pay gap by activity, occupational group and gender

Median Mean

F MPay Gap

F MPay Gap

£ £ % £ £ %Academic contractManagers, directors and senior officials

53233

57393 7.2 5376

56308

514.8


38621

44607

13.4

41834

47911

12.7


30424

29541 -3.0 3144

93105

1 -1.3

Total 38526

44607

13.6

41789

47830

12.6


45941

51682

11.1

48754

56010

13.0


36298

37382 2.9 3632

33984

0 8.8

Associate 2868 2954 2.9 2967 3024 1.9454

professional and technical 5 1 3 6


22020

21383 -3.0 2320

52328

7 0.4

Skilled trades 19056

23352

18.4

20866

23967

12.9


17964

17503 -2.6 1924

01883

0 -2.2


19056

19056 0.0 2068

62071

1 0.1


20764

20764 0.0 2131

02096

4 -1.7


14202

15658 9.3 1490

21684

411.5

Total 24049

27022

11.0

26593

29895

11.0

All staff 30424

36298

16.2

32690

40354

19.0

Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose occupational group or gender is unknown.Academic staff in SOC groups other than 1–3 have been included in the academic total but are not shown in an occupational group. The sum of academic occupational groups therefore is not equal to the academic total in this table.

455

Median gender pay gap by activity and occupational group

Median MeanAcademic contractManagers, directors and senior officials 7.2 14.8

Professional occupations 13.4 12.7Associate professional and technical -3.0 -1.3

Total 13.6 12.6Professional and support contractManagers, directors and senior officials 11.1 13.0


Administrative and secretarial -3.0 0.4Skilled trades 18.4 12.9Caring, leisure, other service occupations -2.6 -2.2

Sales and customer service occupations 0.0 0.1

Process, plant and machine operatives 0.0 -1.7

Elementary occupations 9.3 11.5Total 11.0 11.0

For professors, the highest median and mean gender pay gaps were in Northern Ireland (11.3% and 9.3% respectively).

456

Among non-professorial academic roles, the highest median gender pay gaps were found in Northern Ireland and Scotland (both 11.1%). The highest mean gap was in Wales (7.5%).

4.24 Median/mean salary and pay gap for professors/non-professors by country of institution and gender

Median Mean

F M Pay gap F M Pay

gap£ £ % £ £ %

ProfessorsEngland 68270 72781 6.2 72216 77010 6.2

London 71877 78454 8.4 75859 82219 7.7England excluding London

67392 71352 5.5 70738 75254 6.0

Northern Ireland 62155 70067 11.3 68177 75198 9.3

Scotland 65927 70735 6.8 71414 75877 5.9Wales 80315 73540 -9.2 75701 76833 1.5Total 68067 72657 6.3 72230 76833 6.0Non-professorsEngland 37552 40834 8.0 40281 43219 6.8

London 39649 41356 4.1 41877 45024 7.0England excluding London

37012 39693 6.8 39749 42636 6.8

Northern Ireland 39672 44607 11.1 41161 43976 6.4

457

Scotland 39649 44602 11.1 41528 44610 6.9Wales 36298 37382 2.9 38082 41189 7.5Total 37570 40834 8.0 40293 43259 6.9Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose country of institution or gender is unknown.

Median gender pay gap for professors/non-professors in country of institution

%ProfessorsEngland 6.2


Northern Ireland 11.3Scotland 6.8Wales -9.2UK 6.3Non-professorsEngland 8.0


Northern Ireland 11.1Scotland 11.1Wales 2.9UK 8.0

Mean gender pay gap for professors/non-professors in country of institution

%

458

ProfessorsEngland 6.2


Northern Ireland 9.3Scotland 5.9Wales 1.5UK 6.0Non-professorsEngland 6.8


Northern Ireland 6.4Scotland 6.9Wales 7.5UK 6.9



Turnover among female academic staff was higher than among male academic staff, with 19.1% of women leaving their HE institution in 2012/13 compared with 16.8% of men. Among UK nationals, 17.1% of female staff left their institution compared with 14.8% of male staff, a difference of 2.3%.

For both genders, the proportion of leavers was higher among non-UK nationals than for UK nationals. 23.0% of non-UK female and 21.1% of male staff left their institution

459

in 2012/13, a difference of 5.9% and 6.3% respectively compared with UK staff.

4.25 Academic staff by leaving status and gender

Female Male

No. % No. %

Total 80775 100 10061

0 100


15400

19.1 16940 16.

8Known destination (as a proportion of all leavers) 5810 37.

7 7115 42.0

Unknown destination (as a proportion of all leavers)

9585 62.3 9825 58.

0

UK national

Total 58405 100 73290 100

Leavers(as a proportion of all staff) 9975 17.

1 10835 14.8

Known destination (of UK leavers) 3790 38.

0 4560 42.1

Unknown destination (of UK leavers) 6185 62.

0 6275 57.9

Non-UK national

Total 19785 100 24390 100


4550 23.0 5150 21.

1

460

Known destination (of non-UK leavers) 1900 41.

8 2425 47.1

Unknown destination (of non-UK leavers) 2650 58.

2 2725 52.9

Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose leaving status or gender is unknown.

Female/male academic staff by nationality and leaving status

UK nationals Non-UK nationals

Female Male Female MaleAcademic non-leavers 82.9 85.2 77.0 78.9

Known destination 6.5 6.2 9.6 9.9Unknown destination 10.6 8.6 13.4 11.2

Among UK leavers with a known leaving destination, 24.4% of male leavers and 22.8% of female leavers found employment at another UK HEI. Male leavers also had slightly higher rates of moving to the UK private sector (14.1%) than female leavers (12.8%).

65.1% of those leaving for employment overseas were men.

Similar proportions of male (41.7%) and female (41.9%) leavers were no longer in employment. However, of these a higher proportion of male leavers retired than female (41.2% and 27.0% respectively). 4.26 UK academic staff leavers by known leaving destination and gender

461


UK employment

UK other HEI 865 22.8 43.7 1115 24.4 56.3

UK other education institution

220 5.7 52.8 195 4.3 47.2



230 6.0 50.6 225 4.9 49.4

UK public sector 75 2.0 55.5 60 1.3 44.5

UK private sector 485 12.

8 43.0 645 14.1 57.0

All UK employment 2060 54.

4 46.2 2395 52.5 53.8

Non-UK employmentNon-UK HEI 70 1.9 36.3 125 2.7 63.7Non-UK other education institution

15 0.4 22.6 50 1.1 77.4

Non-UK student 5 0.1 .. 0 0.0 ..

Non-UK research institute

15 0.4 .. 25 0.6 ..

Non-UK 5 0.2 .. 5 0.2 ..

462

health serviceNon-UK other employment 30 0.8 35.9 55 1.2 64.1

All non-UK employment 140 3.7 34.9 265 5.8 65.1


4 51.9 1035 22.7 48.1

Retired 430 11.4 35.4 785 17.2 64.6

Deceased 45 1.1 33.3 85 1.9 66.7All those no longer in employment

1590 41.9 45.5 1905 41.7 54.5

All UK leavers 3790 100 45.4 4560 100 54.6

* within a gender, the percentage of staff in a leaving destination (compare vertically)^ within a leaving destination, the percentage of staff who are female/male (compare horizontally).. Percentages based on totals of 52 or less are not shown. Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose leaving destination or gender is unknown

Among non-UK national leavers with a known leaving destination, 24.7% of male leavers and 23.1% of female leavers found employment at another UK HEI.

61.7% of those leaving for employment overseas were men.

26.2% of female leavers were not in regular employment, compared with 22.1% of male leavers, a difference of 4.1%.

463

4.27 Non-UK academic staff leavers by known leaving destination and gender


UK employment

UK other HEI 440 23.1 42.3 600 24.7 57.7

UK other education institution

60 3.0 52.4 50 2.2 47.6



55 2.9 47.8 60 2.5 52.2

UK public sector 20 0.9 .. 20 0.9 ..

UK private sector 245 12.

8 42.5 330 13.6 57.5

All UK employment 960 50.

5 44.3 1205 49.7 55.7

Non-UK employmentNon-UK HEI 180 9.5 35.4 330 13.5 64.6Non-UK other education institution

35 1.9 36.0 65 2.6 64.0

Non-UK student 20 1.0 .. 10 0.4 ..

Non-UK 50 2.5 33.8 95 3.9 66.2

464

research instituteNon-UK health service 5 0.3 .. 5 0.2 ..

Non-UK other employment 100 5.2 44.8 120 5.0 55.2


4 38.3 625 25.7 61.7


2 48.1 535 22.1 51.9

Retired 50 2.6 53.5 45 1.8 46.5Deceased 5 0.4 .. 15 0.7 ..All those no longer in employment

555 29.1 48.1 595 24.6 51.9

All non-UK leavers 1900 100 43.9 2425 100 56.1

* within a gender, the percentage of staff in a leaving destination (compare vertically)^ within a leaving destination, the percentage of staff who are female/male (compare horizontally).. Percentages based on totals of 52 or less are not shown. Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose leaving destination or gender is unknown.

UK academic leavers in leaving destinations by gender

Female MaleUK and other HEI 43.7 56.3UK and other education institution 52.8 47.2UK student 57.2 42.8

465

UK research institute 48.1 51.9UK NHS/medical or dental practice 50.6 49.4UK public sector 55.5 44.5UK private sector 43.0 57.0All UK employment 46.2 53.8Non-UK HEI 36.3 63.7Non-UK other education institution 22.6 77.4Non-UK student ..Non-UK research institute ..Non-UK health service ..Non-UK other employment 35.9 64.1All non-UK employment 34.9 65.1Not in regular employment 51.9 48.1Retired 35.4 64.6Deceased 33.3 66.7All those no longer in employment 45.5 54.5All UK leavers 45.4 54.6


Non-UK academic leavers in leaving destinations by gender

Female MaleUK and other HEI 42.3 57.7UK and other education institution 52.4 47.6UK student 52.3 47.7UK research institute 46.3 53.7UK NHS/medical or dental practice 47.8 52.2UK public sector ..UK private sector 42.5 57.5All UK employment 44.3 55.7

466

Non-UK HEI 35.4 64.6Non-UK other education institution 36.0 64.0Non-UK student ..Non-UK research institute 33.8 66.2Non-UK health service ..Non-UK other employment 44.8 55.2All non-UK employment 38.3 61.7Not in regular employment 48.1 51.9Retired 53.5 46.5Deceased ..All those no longer in employment 48.1 51.9All UK leavers 43.9 56.1


Female/male UK academic staff leavers by leaving destinations

Female

Male

UK employmentUK other HEI 22.8 24.4UK other education institution 5.7 4.3UK student 3.5 2.2UK research institute 1.3 1.2UK NHS/medical or dental practice 6.0 4.9

UK public sector 2.0 1.3UK private sector 12.8 14.1All UK employment 54.4 52.5Non-UK employmentNon-UK HEI 1.9 2.7

467

Non-UK other education institution 0.4 1.1Non-UK student 0.1 0.0Non-UK research institute 0.4 0.6Non-UK health service 0.2 0.2Non-UK other employment 0.8 1.2All non-UK employment 3.7 5.8No longer in employmentNot in regular employment 29.4 22.7Retired 11.4 17.2Deceased 1.1 1.9All those no longer in employment 41.9 41.7

All UK leavers 100 100

Female/male non-UK academic staff leavers by leaving destinations

Female

Male

UK employmentUK other HEI 23.1 24.7UK other education institution 3.0 2.2UK student 5.7 4.1UK research institute 2.0 1.8UK NHS/medical or dental practice 2.9 2.5UK public sector 0.9 0.9UK private sector 12.8 13.6All UK employment 50.5 49.7Non-UK employmentNon-UK HEI 9.5 13.5Non-UK other education institution 1.9 2.6

468

Non-UK student 1.0 0.4Non-UK research institute 2.5 3.9Non-UK health service 0.3 0.2Non-UK other employment 5.2 5.0All non-UK employment 20.4 25.7No longer in employmentNot in regular employment 26.2 22.1Retired 2.6 1.8Deceased 0.4 0.7All those no longer in employment 29.1 24.6All non-UK leavers 100 100

469

5 Multiple identities

Between 3.2% and 3.7% of staff aged 45 and under disclosed as disabled. For staff aged 46 and over, the proportion of staff who disclosed as disabled in each age group was between 4.0% and 5.0%.

In every age group but 25 and under, the majority of academic staff were men.

4.6% of UK staff disclosed as disabled, compared with 1.9% of non-UK staff.

4.1% of female staff disclosed as disabled, compared with 3.8% of male staff. Of disabled staff, 55.8% were women and 44.2% were men.

The largest gender gap was found among UK black staff, where 60.6% were women and 39.4% were men (a difference of 21.2%).

White male staff accounted for 72.5% of UK and 66.0% of non-UK professors, while one in five were white women (20.4% and 20.0%, respectively).

5.8% of UK professors were BME men and 1.3% BME women (a gap of 4.5%). The gender gap was larger among non-UK professors, where 11.2% were BME men compared with 2.8% BME women (a gap of 8.4%).

Among UK academic staff, white men accounted for 69.8% of senior managers, though they made up only 50.5% of those who were not senior managers. In contrast, 26.6% were white women, 2.9% were BME men and 0.7% were BME women.

470

Age and disability

Between 3.2% and 3.7% of staff aged 45 and under disclosed as disabled. For staff aged 46 and over, the proportion of staff who disclosed as disabled in each age group was between 4.0% and 5.0%.

The age group with the highest proportion of staff who disclosed as disabled was 56–60 (5.0%), while the age group with the lowest proportion was 31–35 (3.2%).

5.1 Staff by age group and disability status


25 years and under 22050 6.0 96.3 850 5.7 3.7

26 to 30 years 40080 10.9

96.6 1400 9.3 3.4

31 to 35 years 52095 14.2

96.8 1740 11.6

3.2

36 to 40 years 47390 12.9

96.7 1640 10.9

3.3

41 to 45 years 48785 13.3

96.4 1830 12.2

3.6

46 to 50 years 49955 13.6

96.0 2090 13.9

4.0

51 to 55 years 45070 12.3

95.2 2285 15.2

4.8

56 to 60 years 36310 9.9 95.0 1930 12.8

5.0

61 to 65 years 20260 5.5 95.1 1040 6.9 4.9

471

66 years and over

5490 1.5 96.0 225 1.5 4.0

Total 367485

100

96.1 15035

100

3.9

* within a disability status, the percentage of staff in an age group (compare vertically)^ within an age group, the percentage of staff who are disabled/non-disabled (compare horizontally) Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose age group is unknown.

Disabled/non-disabled staff by age group

Non-disabled % Disabled %25 years and under 6.0 5.726 to 30 years 10.9 9.331 to 35 years 14.2 11.636 to 40 years 12.9 10.941 to 45 years 13.3 12.246 to 50 years 13.6 13.951 to 55 years 12.3 15.256 to 60 years 9.9 12.861 to 65 years 5.5 6.966 years and over 1.5 1.5

Staff in age groups by disability status

Non-disabled % Disabled %25 years and under 96.3 *26 to 30 years 96.631 to 35 years 96.8

472

36 to 40 years 96.741 to 45 years 96.446 to 50 years 96.051 to 55 years 95.256 to 60 years 95.0 5.061 to 65 years 95.166 years and over 96.0


Age and ethnicity

Among both UK and non-UK staff, BME staff had a younger profile than white staff.

For example, 8.4% of UK and 6.8% of non-UK BME staff were aged 25 and under compared with 5.6% of UK and 4.7% of non-UK white staff.

5.2 UK/non-UK staff by age group and BME/white identity


25 years and under 15125 5.6 88.6 1945 8.4 11.

4

26 to 30 years 25380 9.4 90.5 2675 11.6

9.5

31 to 35 years 31730 11.7

90.1 3475 15.1

9.9

36 to 40 years 31340 11.6

90.7 3200 13.9

9.3

41 to 45 years 35970 13. 91.4 3370 14. 8.6

473

3 6

46 to 50 years 39240 14.5

92.0 3405 14.8

8.0

51 to 55 years 37985 14.0

93.6 2605 11.3

6.4

56 to 60 years 31800 11.7

95.4 1520 6.6 4.6

61 to 65 years 17805 6.6 96.2 705 3.0 3.866 years and over

4625 1.7 96.1 190 0.8 3.9

Total 271005

100

92.2 23085

100

7.8

Non-UK national25 years and under 1990 4.7 63.0 1170 6.8 37.

0

26 to 30 years 6440 15.0

66.2 3290 19.1

33.8

31 to 35 years 10035 23.4

69.8 4350 25.3

30.2

36 to 40 years 7865 18.4

71.4 3155 18.4

28.6

41 to 45 years 5905 13.8

74.4 2030 11.8

25.6

46 to 50 years 4395 10.3

73.9 1550 9.0 26.1

51 to 55 years 2960 6.9 77.2 875 5.1 22.8

56 to 60 years 1930 4.5 79.1 510 3.0 20.9

61 to 65 years 1000 2.3 82.7 210 1.2 17.3

66 years and 285 0.7 88.2 40 0.2 11.

474

over 8

Total 42805 100

71.4 17180

100

28.6

* within a BME/white identity, the percentage of staff in an age group (compare vertically within a nationality)^ within a nationality and age group, the percentage of staff who are BME/white (compare horizontally)Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose age group or BME/white identity is unknown.

BME/white staff in nationality categories by age group

White BME

25 years and under 5.6 8.426 to 30 years 9.4 11.6

31 to 35 years 11.7 15.136 to 40 years 11.6 13.941 to 45 years 13.3 14.646 to 50 years 14.5 14.851 to 55 years 14.0 11.356 to 60 years 11.7 6.661 to 65 years 6.6 3.066 years and over 1.7 0.8Non-UK national25 years and under 4.7 6.826 to 30 years 15.0 19.1

31 to 35 years 23.4 25.336 to 40 years 18.4 18.441 to 45 years 13.8 11.846 to 50 years 10.3 9.0

475

51 to 55 years 6.9 5.156 to 60 years 4.5 3.061 to 65 years 2.3 1.266 years and over 0.7 0.2

UK/non-UK staff in age groups by BME/white identity

White

BME

25 years and under 88.6 11.426 to 30 years 90.5 9.5

31 to 35 years 90.1 9.936 to 40 years 90.7 9.341 to 45 years 91.4 8.646 to 50 years 92.0 8.051 to 55 years 93.6 6.456 to 60 years 95.4 *61 to 65 years 96.266 years and over 96.1Non-UK national25 years and under 63.0 37.026 to 30 years 66.2 33.8

31 to 35 years 69.8 30.236 to 40 years 71.4 28.641 to 45 years 74.4 25.646 to 50 years 73.9 26.151 to 55 years 77.2 22.856 to 60 years 79.1 20.961 to 65 years 82.7 17.366 years and over 88.2 11.8

476


Age and gender

In every age group but 25 and under, the majority of academic staff were men.

The proportion of academic staff who were men increased with age. For example, 52.1% of academic staff aged 26–30 were men, compared with 73.1% of those aged 66 and over.

Among professional and support staff, women were in the majority for all age groups aside from the 66 and over group (49.8%).

5.3 Staff by activity, age and gender


25 years and under 13390 6.5 58.

59510 5.4 41.

5

26 to 30 years 23370 11.3

56.3

18110 10.3

43.7

31 to 35 years 29740 14.4

55.2

24095 13.7

44.8

36 to 40 years 26930 13.1

54.9

22100 12.5

45.1

41 to 45 years 27600 13.4

54.5

23015 13.0

45.5

46 to 50 years 28610 13.9

55.0

23435 13.3

45.0

51 to 55 years 25825 12.5

54.5

21535 12.2

45.5

477

56 to 60 years 20000 9.7 52.3

18240 10.3

47.7

61 to 65 years 8720 4.2 41.0

12575 7.1 59.0

66 years and over

1860 0.9 32.5

3860 2.2 67.5

Total 206040

100

53.9

176475

100

46.1

Academic25 years and under 2485 3.0 50.

12475 2.4 49.

9

26 to 30 years 9185 11.1

47.9

9980 9.7 52.1

31 to 35 years 13245 16.0

47.7

14525 14.1

52.3

36 to 40 years 11620 14.1

46.9

13135 12.8

53.1

41 to 45 years 11640 14.1

45.7

13860 13.5

54.3

46 to 50 years 11840 14.3

45.4

14225 13.8

54.6

51 to 55 years 10055 12.2

44.4

12605 12.2

55.6

56 to 60 years 7690 9.3 41.6

10795 10.5

58.4

61 to 65 years 3740 4.5 31.4

8160 7.9 68.6

66 years and over

1165 1.4 26.9

3160 3.1 73.1

Total 82670 100

44.5

102915

100

55.5

Profession and support

478

25 years and under 10905 8.8 60.

87040 9.6 39.

2

26 to 30 years 14185 11.5

63.6

8130 11.1

36.4

31 to 35 years 16495 13.4

63.3

9565 13.0

36.7

36 to 40 years 15310 12.4

63.1

8965 12.2

36.9

41 to 45 years 15960 12.9

63.5

9160 12.5

36.5

46 to 50 years 16770 13.6

64.5

9210 12.5

35.5

51 to 55 years 15765 12.8

63.8

8930 12.1

36.2

56 to 60 years 12310 10.0

62.3

7445 10.1

37.7

61 to 65 years 4980 4.0 53.0

4415 6.0 47.0

66 years and over

695 0.6 49.8

700 1.0 50.2

Total 123375

100

62.6

73560 100

37.4

* within a gender, the percentage of staff in an age group (compare vertically within an activity)^ within an activity and age group, the percentage of staff who are female/male (compare horizontally)Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose activity, age or gender is unknown.

Female/male staff in activities by age group

Female Mal

479

eAll25 years and under 6.5 5.4

26 to 30 years 11.3 10.331 to 35 years 14.4 13.736 to 40 years 13.1 12.541 to 45 years 13.4 13.046 to 50 years 13.9 13.351 to 55 years 12.5 12.256 to 60 years 9.7 10.361 to 65 years 4.2 7.166 years and over 0.9 2.2Academic25 years and under 3.0 2.4

26 to 30 years 11.1 9.731 to 35 years 16.0 14.136 to 40 years 14.1 12.841 to 45 years 14.1 13.546 to 50 years 14.3 13.851 to 55 years 12.2 12.256 to 60 years 9.3 10.561 to 65 years 4.5 7.966 years and over 1.4 3.1Profession and support25 years and under 8.8 9.6

26 to 30 years 11.5 11.1480

31 to 35 years 13.4 13.036 to 40 years 12.4 12.241 to 45 years 12.9 12.546 to 50 years 13.6 12.551 to 55 years 12.8 12.156 to 60 years 10.0 10.161 to 65 years 4.0 6.066 years and over 0.6 1.0

Staff in age groups by gender

Female Male25 years and under 58.5 41.5

26 to 30 years 56.3 43.731 to 35 years 55.2 44.836 to 40 years 54.9 45.141 to 45 years 54.5 45.546 to 50 years 55.0 45.051 to 55 years 54.5 45.556 to 60 years 52.3 47.761 to 65 years 41.0 59.066 years and over 32.5 67.5

Disability and ethnicity

4.6% of UK staff disclosed as disabled, compared with 1.9% of non-UK staff. A higher proportion of mixed staff disclosed as disabled than any other ethnic group across both UK (5.0%) and non-UK (2.6%) nationalities.

481

Chinese staff had the lowest proportion of any ethic group to disclose as disabled (1.1% of UK Chinese nationals and 0.4% of non-UK Chinese nationals).

5.4 UK/non-UK staff by ethnic group and disability status


White 300310

88.4

95.7

13500 92.8

4.3

BME total 39220 11.6

97.4

1045 7.2 2.6

Black 7650 2.3 96.3

295 2 3.7

Asian 16155 4.8 97.7

385 2.6 2.3

Chinese 6855 2 99.3

45 0.3 0.7

Mixed 4850 1.4 95.6

220 1.5 4.4

Other 3710 1.1 97.4

100 0.7 2.6

Total 339530

100

95.9

14545 100

4.1

UK national

White 258410

92.1

95.4

12595 93.8

4.6

BME total 22255 7.9 96.4

830 6.2 3.6

Black 4925 1.8 95. 235 1.7 4.5

482

5

Asian 9610 3.4 96.9

310 2.3 3.1

Chinese 2490 0.9 98.9

30 0.2 1.1

Mixed 3485 1.2 95.0

185 1.4 5.0

Other 1745 0.6 96.0

70 0.5 4.0

Total 280665

100

95.4

13425 100

4.6

Non-UK national

White 41900 71.2

97.9

905 80.9

2.1


98.8

215 19.1

1.2

Black 2725 4.6 97.8

60 5.5 2.2

Asian 6545 11.1

98.9

70 6.3 1.1

Chinese 4365 7.4 99.6

15 1.5 0.4

Mixed 1365 2.3 97.4

35 3.2 2.6

Other 1960 3.3 98.6

30 2.5 1.4

Total 58865 100

98.1

1120 100

1.9

* within a disability status, the percentage of staff in an ethnic group (compare vertically within a nationality)^ within a nationality and ethnic group, the percentage of staff who are disabled/non-disabled (compare horizontally)

483

Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose ethnic group is unknown.

Disabled/non-disabled staff by nationality category and ethnic group

Non-disable

d

Disabled

All staffWhite 88.4 92.8BME total 11.6 7.2

Black 2.3 2Asian 4.8 2.6Chinese 2 0.3Mixed 1.4 1.5Other 1.1 0.7

UK nationals

White 92.1 93.8

BME total 7.9 6.2

Black 1.8 1.7

Asian 3.4 2.3

Chinese 0.9 0.2

Mixed 1.2 1.4

Other 0.6 0.5

Non-UK nationals

White 71.2 80.9

484

BME total 28.8 19.1

Black 4.6 5.5

Asian 11.1 6.3

Chinese 7.4 1.5

Mixed 2.3 3.2

Other 3.3 2.5

Disability and gender

4.1% of female staff disclosed as disabled, compared with 3.8% of male staff. Of disabled staff, 55.8% were women and 44.2% were men.

The gender profile of disabled staff varied by impairment type. For example, 61.6% of those disclosing a mental health condition and 60.3% with a physical impairment or mobility issues were women. In contrast, 69.2% of staff disclosing a communication or social impairment were men.

20.4% of male disabled staff disclosed a specific learning difficulty, compared with 15.0% of female disabled staff (a difference of 5.4%).5.5 Staff by disability status, impairment type and gender


Disabled 8380 4.1 55.8 6650 3.8 44.

2Blind or serious 195 2.3 46. 225 3.4 53.

485

visual impairment 5 5

Communication or social impairment

30 0.3 30.8 65 0.9 69.

2

Deaf or serious hearing impairment

590 7.0 56.6 450 6.8 43.

4

General learning disability 45 0.5 45.

0 55 0.8 55.0

Long-standing illness or health condition

2225 26.6

57.0 1685 25.

343.

0

Mental health condition 755 9.0 61.

6 470 7.1 38.4

Physical impairment or mobility issues

950 11.4

60.3 625 9.4 39.

7

Specific learning disability 1255 15.

048.

1 1355 20.4

51.9

Two or more impairments 675 8.1 57.

9 490 7.4 42.1


57.4 1235 18.

642.

6

Non-disabled 197660

95.9

53.8

169825

96.2

46.2

* within a gender, the percentage of staff in a disability status and impairment type (compare vertically)^ within a disability status and impairment type, the percentage of staff who are female/male (compare horizontally)Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose impairment type or gender is unknown.

486

Disabled staff in impairment types by gender

Female %

Male %

Blind or serious visual impairment 46.5 53.5Communication or social impairment 30.8 69.2Deaf or serious hearing impairment 56.6 43.4General learning disability 45.0 55.0Long-standing illness or health condition 57.0 43.0

Mental health condition 61.6 38.4Physical impairment or mobility issues 60.3 39.7

Specific learning disability 48.1 51.9Two or more impairments 57.9 42.1Other impairment 57.4 42.6Non-disabled 53.8 46.2

Female/male disabled staff by impairment type

Female %

Male %

Blind or serious visual impairment 2.3 3.4Communication or social impairment 0.3 0.9Deaf or serious hearing impairment 7.0 6.8General learning disability 0.5 0.8Long-standing illness or health condition 26.6 25.3

Mental health condition 9.0 7.1Physical impairment or mobility 11.4 9.4

487

issuesSpecific learning disability 15.0 20.4Two or more impairments 8.1 7.4Other impairment 19.8 18.6Non-disabled 95.9 96.2

Ethnicity and gender

Among UK staff, women comprised the majority of staff in all ethnic groups apart from the other category (45.8%).

Among non-UK staff, men comprised the majority in all ethnic groups apart from white (46.6%) and mixed (48.0%) staff.

The largest gender gap was found among UK black staff, where 60.6% were women and 39.4% were men (a difference of 21.2%).

5.6 UK/non-UK staff by ethnic group and gender


White 172150

89.3

54.9

141660

87.8

45.1


51.1

19685 12.2

48.9

Black 4310 2.2 54.2

3635 2.3 45.8

Asian 8270 4.3 50.0

8270 5.1 50.0

Chinese 3360 1.7 48. 3540 2.2 51.

488

7 3

Mixed 2900 1.5 57.2

2170 1.3 42.8

Other 1740 .9 45.7

2065 1.3 54.3

Total 192730

100

54.4

161345

100

45.6

UK national

White 149275

92.1

55.1

121730

92.3

44.9

BME total 12875 7.9 55.8

10210 7.7 44.2

Black 3125 1.9 60.6

2030 1.5 39.4

Asian 5425 3.3 54.7

4500 3.4 45.3

Chinese 1320 0.8 52.5

1195 0.9 47.5

Mixed 2170 1.3 59.2

1500 1.1 40.8

Other 830 0.5 45.8

985 0.7 54.2

Total 162150

100

55.1

131940

100

44.9

Non-UK national

White 22875 74.8

53.4

19930 67.8

46.6

BME total 7705 25.2

44.9

9475 32.2

55.1

Black 1185 3.9 42.5

1605 5.5 57.5

Asian 2845 9.3 43. 3770 12. 57.

489

0 8 0

Chinese 2040 6.7 46.5

2345 8.0 53.5

Mixed 730 2.4 52.0

675 2.3 48.0

Other 910 3.0 45.7

1080 3.7 54.3

Total 30580 100

51.0

29405 100

49.0

* within a gender, the percentage of staff in an ethnic group (compare vertically within a nationality)^ within an ethnic group, the percentage of staff who are female/male (compare horizontally)Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose ethnic group or gender is unknown.

Female/male staff by nationality category and ethnic group

Female % Male %All staffWhite 89.3 87.8BME total 10.7 12.2

Black 2.2 2.3Asian 4.3 5.1Chinese 1.7 2.2Mixed 1.5 1.3Other .9 1.3

UK nationalsWhite 92.1 92.3BME total 7.9 7.7

Black 1.9 1.5

490

Asian 3.3 3.4Chinese 0.8 0.9Mixed 1.3 1.1Other 0.5 0.7

Non-UK nationalsWhite 74.8 67.8BME total 25.2 32.2


Academic roles

White male staff accounted for 72.5% of UK and 66.0% of non-UK professors, while one in five were white women (20.4% and 20.0%, respectively).

5.8% of UK professors were BME men and 1.3% BME women (a gap of 4.5%). The gender gap was larger among non-UK professors, where 11.2% were BME men compared with 2.8% BME women (a gap of 8.4%).

5.7 UK/non-UK academic staff by professorial category, gender and BME/white identity

Professor Non-professorNo. %* %^ No. %* %^

White female 3365 20.3

5.0 63930 41.7

95.0

White male 1179 71. 14. 69165 45. 85.491

0 2 6 1 4

BME female 270 1.6 3.0 8760 5.7 97.0

BME male 1125 6.8 8.9 11545 7.5 91.1

Total 16550

100

9.7 153395

100

90.3

UK national


5.2 49715 43.8

94.8

White male 9710 72.5

15.1

54680 48.2

84.9

BME female 180 1.3 4.0 4315 3.8 96.0

BME male 770 5.8 13.9

4785 4.2 86.1

Total 13395

100

10.6

113495

100

89.4

Non-UK national


4.2 14220 35.6

95.8

White male 2080 66.0

12.6

14480 36.3

87.4

BME female 90 2.8 2.0 4440 11.1

98.0

BME male 355 11.2

5.0 6760 16.9

95.0

Total 3155 100

7.3 39900 100

92.7

* within a professorial category, the percentage of staff in a gender and BME/white identity (compare vertically within a nationality)

492

^ within a nationality, gender and BME/white identity, the percentage of staff who are professors/ non-professors (compare horizontally)Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose professorial category, gender or BME/white identity is unknown.

UK/non-UK staff in gender and BME/white identity categories by professorial category

Professor % Non professor %UK White female 5.2 94.8UK White male 15.1 84.9UK BME female * 96.0UK BME male 13.9 86.1Non-UK White female 95.8Non-UK White male 12.6 87.4Non-UK BME female 98.0Non-UK BME male 5.0 95.0


UK/non-UK academic staff by professorial category, gender and BME/white identity

Professor %. Non-professor %White female 20.3 41.7White male 71.2 45.1BME female 1.6 5.7BME male 6.8 7.5UK nationalWhite female 20.4 43.8White male 72.5 48.2

493

BME female 1.3 3.8BME male 5.8 4.2Non-UK nationalWhite female 20.0 35.6White male 66.0 36.3BME female 2.8 11.1BME male 11.2 16.9

Among UK academic staff, white men accounted for 69.8% of senior managers, though they made up only 50.5% of those who were not senior managers. In contrast, 26.6% were white women, 2.9% were BME men and 0.7% were BME women.

Only 7.1% of academic senior managers were non-UK nationals, though they comprised 25.3% of the academic workforce. 3.0% of the non-UK academic senior managers were BME women, compared with 56.8% white men.

5.8 UK/non-UK academic staff by senior management category, gender and BME/white identity

Senior manager Other academicNo. %* %^ No. %* %^


0.6 66920 39.7

99.4

White male 970 68.9

1.2 79980 47.5

98.8

BME female 10 0.9 0.1 9015 5.3 99.9

BME male 50 3.6 0.4 12620 7.5 99.6

Total 1410 100 0.8 16853 10 99.494

5 0 2UK national


0.7 52100 41.5

99.3

White male 915 69.8

1.4 63475 50.5

98.6

BME female 10 0.7 0.2 4490 3.6 99.8

BME male 40 2.9 0.7 5520 4.4 99.3

Total 1310 1000

1.0 125580

100

99.0

Non-UK national


0.2 14820 34.5

99.8

White male 55 56.8

0.3 16505 38.4

99.7

BME female 5 3.0 0.1 4530 10.5

99.9

BME male 10 12.0

0.2 7100 16.5

99.8

Total 100 100 0.2 42955 100

99.8

* within a senior management category, the percentage of staff in a gender and BME/white identity (compare vertically within a nationality)^ within a nationality, gender and BME/white identity, the percentage of staff who are senior managers/other academics (compare horizontally) Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose senior management category, gender or BME/white identity is unknown.

495

UK/non-UK academic staff by senior management category, gender and BME/white identity

Senior manager Other academicWhite female 26.7 39.7White male 68.9 47.5BME female 0.9 5.3BME male 3.6 7.5UK nationalWhite female 26.6 41.5White male 69.8 50.5BME female 0.7 3.6BME male 2.9 4.4Non-UK nationalWhite female 28.2 34.5White male 56.8 38.4BME female 3.0 10.5BME male 12.0 16.5

496

6 Other protected characteristics

The Equality Act 2010 extended the number of protected characteristics to cover new areas including gender identity, religion and belief and sexual orientation.

Changes to the HESA staff record for 2012/13 allowed institutions to return this information on an optional basis. This section presents high level findings on collection and monitoring rates. Because data is currently voluntary to return, we do not yet have a national demographic picture of the HE staff population in relation to gender identity, religion and belief, or sexual orientation.

ECU encourages institutions to collect and return these data where appropriate. Once the data begins to be captured and the numbers become reliable, ECU hopes to provide further detail on these characteristics in future reports.

Further guidance can be found at: www.ecu.ac.uk/guidance-resources/using-data-and-

evidence/collecting-data www.ecu.ac.uk/guidance-resources/using-data-and-

evidence/introducing-new-categories www.ecu.ac.uk/guidance-resources/using-data-and-

evidence/encouraging-disclosure-equality-info www.ecu.ac.uk/publications/developing-staff-disclosure

About this data Data on a staff record is said to be returned if the institution provided any information to HESA about gender identity, religion and belief or sexual orientation. This includes where a staff member selected prefer not to say or refused to provide information about the characteristic in question.

497

Where a staff record was returned to HESA without data, this section reports it as blank.

It is not possible to determine from the data presented whether the blank staff records were due to the question being unanswered or unasked.

Gender identity A small number of institutions reported a much higher than average proportion of their staff to have disclosed a gender identity different to the gender they were assigned at birth. This suggests that there may have been some data collection issues (ie the question could have been phrased in a way that led to confusion among participants).

Gender identity

Overall, 79 of 162 institutions (48.8%) returned staff data on gender identity to HESA.

Relatively high rates of Welsh (70.0%) and Scottish (66.7%) institutions returned this data, compared with 46.2% of English institutions and no Northern Irish institutions.

6.1 Institutional returns for gender identity information by country of institution

Returned data

Did not return data

Total

No.HEI

% No.HEI

% No.HEI

England 60 46.2

70 53.8

130

Northern Ireland 0 0.0 4 100 4498

Scotland 12 66.7

6 33.3

18

Wales 7 70.0

3 30.0

10

All institutions 79 48.8

83 51.2

162

HEI higher education institution

Institutional returns for gender identity by country of institution

Returned data Did not return data% %

England 46.2 53.8Northern Ireland 0.0 100Scotland 66.7 33.3Wales 70.0 30.0All institutions 48.8 51.2

It is clear from the data that institutions have taken different approaches to monitoring staff gender identity, with institutional return rates concentrated on either extreme of the scale.

Of the 79 institutions who returned this data to HESA, 29.1% had returned data for up to 10% of their staff while 43.0% had done so for 90% or more of their staff.

6.2 Institutional return rates on gender identity

InstitutionsNo. %* %^

0% (no returns) 83 51. n/a

499

2

Up to 10% 23 14.2

29.1

10-20% 5 3.1 6.320-30% 2 1.2 2.530-40% 4 2.5 5.140-50% 3 1.9 3.850-60% 5 3.1 6.360-70% 1 0.6 1.370-80% 2 1.2 2.580-90% 0 0.0 0.0

Over 90% 34 21.0

43.0

All institutions 162 100 100* within all HEIs the percentage of HEIs in each return rate band (compared vertically)^ within HEIs that returned gender identity data, the percentage of HEIs in each return rate band (compare vertically)

Institutional return rates on gender identity

No.0% (no returns) 83Up to 10% 2310-20% 520-30% 230-40% 440-50% 350-60% 560-70% 1

500

70-80% 280-90% 0Over 90% 34

It is not possible to determine from the data presented whether staff for whom there is no information (blank) were asked the question and did not provide a response or were not asked the question.

Of the staff in institutions that monitored gender identity, 34.5% provided information, 10.8% refused and 54.6% of returns were blank. This means that among staff in institutions that returned gender identity data to HESA, at least 45.3% of staff were given the option to return data on their gender identity.

6.3 Gender identity disclosure rates in institutions monitoring for gender identity

StaffNo. %

Provided information 55555 34.5Refused to provide 17430 10.8Blank 87875 54.6

Total 160860

100

Gender identity disclosure rates in institutions monitoring for gender identity

%Provided information 34.5Refused to provide 10.8

501

Blank 54.6

Gender identity data was returned to HESA for 19.2% of staff. However, a small number of institutions reported a much higher than average proportion of their staff disclosed a gender identity different to the one they were assigned at birth. This suggests there may have been some issues with data collection. For example, the question could have been phrased in a way that led to confusion among participants.

While the relatively low return rate alongside possible data anomalies means that we do not yet have an accurate picture of gender identity in the staff population, the data is presented in order to give a sense of the question asked and possible responses.

6.4 All staff by gender identity

ResponseNo. %

Gender identity is the same 54560 14.3Gender identity is different 995 0.3Information refused 17430 4.6

Blank 309535

80.9

Total 382515

100

All staff by gender identity

%Blank 80.9Same 14.3

502

Information refused 4.6Different 0.3

503

Religion and belief

95 out of 162 institutions returned religion and belief data on staff to HESA (58.6%).

Return rates were markedly higher among English institutions (61.5%) and in Wales (60.0%) than in Scotland (44.4%) and Northern Irish (25.0%) institutions.

6.5 Institutional returns for religion and belief information by country of institution

Returned data

Did not return data

Total

No.HEI

% No.HEI

% No.HEI

England 80 61.5

50 38.5

130

Northern Ireland 1 25.0

3 75.0

4

Scotland 8 44.4

10 55.6

18

Wales 6 60.0

4 40.0

10


67 41.4

162


Institutional returns for religion and belief by country of institution


504

England 61.5 38.5Northern Ireland 25.0 75.0Scotland 44.4 55.6Wales 60.0 40.0All institutions 58.6 41.4

Some institutions returned religion and belief data for the majority of their staff, while others provided information for only a small proportion, indicating that monitoring approaches varied by institution.

Of the 95 institutions who returned staff religion and belief data to HESA, 20 institutions (21.1%) returned data on this characteristic for up to 10% of their staff, while 31 institutions (32.6%) returned data for 90% or more of their staff.

6.6 Institutional return rates on religion and belief


0% (no returns) 67 41.4

n/a

Up to 10% 20 12.3

21.1

10-20% 8 4.9 8.420-30% 4 2.5 4.230-40% 8 4.9 8.440-50% 4 2.5 4.250-60% 7 4.3 7.460-70% 5 3.1 5.370-80% 6 3.7 6.3

505

80-90% 2 1.2 2.1

Over 90% 31 19.1

32.6

All institutions 162 100 100* within all HEIs the percentage of HEIs in each return rate band (compared vertically)^ within HEIs that returned religion and belief data, the percentage of HEIs in each return rate band (compare vertically)

Institutional return rates on religion and belief

No.0% (no returns) 67Up to 10% 2010-20% 820-30% 430-40% 840-50% 450-60% 760-70% 570-80% 680-90% 2Over 90% 31

Of the staff in institutions that monitored religion and belief, 28.1% provided information, 14.1% refused and 57.9% of returns were blank. This means that among staff in institutions that returned gender identity data to HESA, at least 42.2% of staff were given the option to return data on their religion and belief.

506

6.7 Religion and belief disclosure rates in institutions monitoring for religion and belief

StaffNo. %

Provided information 68545 28.1Refused to provide 34310 14.1

Blank 141275

57.9

Total 244130

100

Religion and belief disclosure rates in institutions monitoring for religion and belief

%Provided information 28.1Refused to provide 14.1Blank 57.9

Overall, religion and belief information is unknown (blank) for 73.1% of staff working in higher education.

The data at present therefore is not indicative of numbers and trends in staff religion and belief, but is presented in order to give a sense of the question asked and possible responses.

6.8 All staff by religion and belief

ResponseNo. %

No religion 28520 7.5508

Buddhist 645 0.2Christian 31735 8.3Hindu 955 0.3Jewish 510 0.1Muslim 1535 0.4Sikh 300 0.1Spiritual 295 0.1Any other religion or belief 4050 1.1Information refused 34310 9.0

Blank 279660

73.1

Total 382515

100

All staff by religion and belief

%No religion 7.5Buddhist 0.2Christian 8.3Hindu 0.3Jewish 0.1Muslim 0.4Sikh 0.1Spiritual 0.1Any other religion or belief 1.1Information refused 9.0Blank 73.1

Sexual orientation

509

Overall, 101 of 162 institutions (62.3%) returned staff data on sexual orientation to HESA. Data return rates varied by country: 63.8% of English institutions returned this data to HESA, compared with one Northern Irish institution (constituting 25.0% of Northern Irish HEIs).

6.9 Institutional returns for sexual orientation information by country of institution

Returned data

Did not return data

Total

No.HEI

% No.HEI

% No.HEI

England 83 63.8

47 36.2

130

Northern Ireland 1 25.0

3 75.0

4

Scotland 11 58.8

7 41.2

18

Wales 6 60.0

4 40.0

10


61 37.7

162


Institutional returns for religion and belief by country of institution


England 63.8 36.2Northern Ireland 25.0 75.0Scotland 58.8 41.2

510

Wales 60.0 40.0All institutions 62.3 37.7

It is clear from the data that institutions have taken different approaches to monitoring staff sexual orientation, with some institutions returning data for a small proportion of their staff and others returning data for close to 100% of their staff.

Of the 101 institutions who returned staff sexual orientation data to HESA, 22 institutions (21.8%) returned data on this characteristic for up to 10% of their staff, while 25 institutions (24.8%) returned data for 90% or more of their staff.

6.10 Institutional return rates on sexual orientation


0% (no returns) 61 37.7

n/a

Up to 10% 22 13.6

21.8

10-20% 10 6.2 9.920-30% 8 4.9 7.930-40% 8 4.9 7.940-50% 4 2.5 4.050-60% 7 4.3 6.960-70% 6 3.7 5.970-80% 8 4.9 7.980-90% 3 1.9 3.0

Over 90% 25 15.4

24.8

511

All institutions 162 100 100* within all HEIs the percentage of HEIs in each return rate band (compared vertically)^ within HEIs that returned sexual orientation data, the percentage of HEIs in each return rate band (compare vertically)

512

Institutional return rates on sexual orientation

No.0% (no returns) 61Up to 10% 2210-20% 1020-30% 830-40% 840-50% 450-60% 760-70% 670-80% 880-90% 3Over 90% 25

Of the staff in institutions that monitored for sexual orientation, 25.3% provided information, 13.3% refused and 61.4% of returns were blank. This means that among staff in institutions that returned sexual orientationdata to HESA, at least 38.6% of staff were given the option to return data on their sexual orientation.

6.11 Sexual orientation disclosure rates in institutions monitoring for sexual orientation

StaffNo. %

Provided information 65135 25.3Refused to provide 34400 13.3

Blank 158195

61.4

Total 25773 100

513

0

Sexual orientation disclosure rates in institutions monitoring for sexual orientation

%Provided information 25.3Refused to provide 13.3Blank 61.4

Data on sexual orientation was returned to HESA for 26.0% of all staff. For this reason, no accurate conclusions can be drawn about the number of, or trends amongst, staff who identify as bisexual, gay, heterosexual, lesbian or other, as yet.

The data is presented in order to give a sense of the question asked and possible responses.

6.12 All staff by sexual orientation

ResponseNo. %

Bisexual 810 0.2Gay man 1335 0.3Gay woman/lesbian 770 0.2Heterosexual 61920 16.2Other 295 0.1Information refused 34400 9.0

Blank 282980

74.0

Total 382515

100

514

All staff by sexual orientation

%Bisexual 0.2Gay man 0.3Gay woman/lesbian 0.2Heterosexual 16.2Other 0.1Information refused 9.0Blank 74.0Total 100

516

Index

Overview

0.1 All staff by country of institution................................38All staff by country of institution............................................390.2 Profile of staff over time by activity............................390.3 Staff by mode, contract type and activity..................400.4 Staff by activity, occupational group and mode.......42Staff in occupational groups by mode..................................430.5 Academic staff by research/teaching contract type

44Academic staff by research/teaching contract type..............450.6 SET academic staff by subject area...........................450.7 Non-SET academic staff by subject area...................460.8 Academic staff by SET category, mode and professorial category.........................................................48Professors/non-professors by SET category and mode......490.9 Academic staff by SET category, mode and senior management category.......................................................49Academic senior managers/other academic staff by SET category and mode...............................................................500.10 All staff by mode, salary range and activity............51Academic/professional and support staff in modes by salary range..........................................................................510.11 Academic staff by academic pay spine range.........52Academic staff by academic pay spine range......................520.12 UK/non-UK academic staff by leaving status..........53Academic staff by nationality and leaving status..................540.13 UK and non-UK academic staff leavers by known leaving destination.............................................................55UK and non-UK academic staff leavers by leaving destination............................................................................56

517

1 Age

1.1 Staff by country of institution and age group...........59Staff in countries of institution by age group........................611.2 Staff by activity, mode and age group.......................62Staff in age groups by activity and mode.............................66Full-time/part-time staff in activities by age group................661.3 Staff by activity, contract type and age group..........68Academic/professional and support staff in age groups by contract type.........................................................................71Academic/professional and support staff in contract types by age group........................................................................721.4 Staff by activity, occupational group and age group

73Academic/professional and support staff in occupational groups by age group............................................................791.5 Academic staff by research/teaching contract type and age group.....................................................................81Academic staff in age groups by research/teaching contract type.......................................................................................83Academic staff in research/teaching contract types by age group....................................................................................841.6 SET academic staff by subject area and age group

851.7 Non-SET academic staff by subject area and age group...................................................................................89Academic staff in SET subject areas by age group.............93Academic staff in non-SET subject areas by age group......941.8 Academic staff by professorial and SET categories, mode and age group..........................................................96Professors/non-professors in modes and SET categories by age group........................................................................99

518

1.9 Academic staff by senior management and SET categories, mode and age group....................................100Academic senior managers/other academic staff in modes and SET categories by age group......................................1021.10 UK/non-UK academic staff by leaving status and age group..........................................................................103UK/non-UK academic staff in age groups by leaving status

1061.11 UK academic staff leavers by known leaving destination and age group..............................................107UK academic staff leavers in age groups by leaving destination..........................................................................1101.12 Non-UK academic staff leavers by known leaving destination and age group..............................................111Non-UK academic staff leavers in age groups by leaving destination..........................................................................115UK academic staff leavers in leaving destinations by age group..................................................................................115Non-UK academic staff leavers in leaving destinations by age group...........................................................................116

2 Disability

2.1 Staff by country of institution and disability status121

2.2 All and disabled staff by impairment type...............121Staff in countries of institution by disability status..............122Disabled staff by impairment type......................................1222.3 All and disabled staff by impairment type and activity...............................................................................123Disabled academic/professional and support staff by impairment type..................................................................1242.4 Profile of staff over time by activity and disability status.................................................................................125Staff profile over time by activity and disability status........127

519

2.5 Academic staff by mode, contract type and disability status................................................................1282.6 Professional and support staff by mode, contract type and disability status................................................129Academic/professional and support staff in modes and contract types by disability status.......................................130Disabled/non-disabled staff by activity and contract type. .1312.7 Staff by contract level and disability status............132Staff in contract levels by disability status..........................1342.8 Academic staff by contract level and disability status.................................................................................135Academic staff in contract levels by disability status..........1382.9 Professional and support staff by contract level and disability status................................................................139Professional and support staff in contract levels by disability status...................................................................1412.10 Staff by activity, occupational group and disability status.................................................................................143Academic/professional and support staff in occupational groups by disability status..................................................1442.11 Full-time staff by activity, occupational group and disability status................................................................1452.12 Part-time staff by activity, occupational group and disability status................................................................1472.13 Academic staff by research/teaching contract type and disability status.........................................................149Disabled/non-disabled academic staff by research/teaching contract type.......................................................................149Academic staff in research/teaching contract types by disability status...................................................................1502.14 Academic staff by SET category and disability status.................................................................................1502.15 SET academic staff by subject area and disability status.................................................................................151Disabled/non-disabled academic staff by SET category....152

520

2.16 Non-SET academic staff by subject area and disability status................................................................152Academic staff in SET subject areas by disability status. . .154Academic staff in non-SET subject areas by disability status..................................................................................1552.17 Academic staff by professorial and SET categories, mode and disability status..........................157Disabled/non-disabled academic staff by professorial and SET categories and mode..................................................158Professors/non-professors in modes and SET categories by disability status..............................................................1582.18 Academic staff by senior management and SET categories, mode and disability status..........................160Disabled/non-disabled academic staff by senior management and SET categories and mode.....................161Academic senior managers/other academic staff in modes and SET categories by disability status.............................1612.19 Academic staff by mode, salary range and disability status................................................................1622.20 Professional and support staff by mode, salary range and disability status..............................................163Academic/professional and support staff in salary ranges by disability status..............................................................164Disabled/non-disabled staff in activities and modes by salary range.......................................................................1652.21 Academic staff by academic pay spine range and disability status................................................................166Academic staff in academic pay spine ranges by disability status..................................................................................166Disabled/non-disabled academic staff by academic pay spine ranges.......................................................................1672.22 Median/mean salary and pay gap by country of institution, activity and disability status........................168Median disability pay gap for all staff by country of institution............................................................................169

521

Mean disability pay gap for all staff by country of institution170

2.23 Median/mean salary and pay gap by activity, occupational group and disability status......................171Median disability pay gap by occupational group...............172Mean disability pay gap by occupational group.................1732.24 Median/mean salary and pay gap for professors/non-professors by country of institution and disability status.........................................................174Median disability pay gap for professors/non-professors in country of institution...........................................................175Mean disability pay gap for professors/non-professors in country of institution...........................................................1762.25 UK/non-UK academic staff by leaving status and disability status................................................................177Disabled/non-disabled academic staff by nationality and leaving status.....................................................................1782.26 UK academic staff leavers by known leaving destination and disability status.....................................1792.27 Non-UK academic staff leavers by known leaving destination and disability status.....................................181UK academic staff leavers in leaving destinations by disability status...................................................................183Non-UK academic staff leavers in leaving destinations by disability status...................................................................184UK disabled/non-disabled academic staff leavers by leaving destination.............................................................185Non-UK disabled/non-disabled academic staff leavers by leaving destination.............................................................186

3 Ethnicity

3.1 UK/non-UK staff by country of institution and ethnic group......................................................................188

522

UK/non-UK staff in countries of institution by BME/white identity................................................................................1903.2 UK/non-UK BME staff by ethnic group.....................191UK/non-UK BME staff by ethnic group...............................1923.3 Profile of UK/non-UK staff over time by activity and BME/white identity...........................................................193UK/non-UK staff profile over time by BME/white identity. . .1953.4 UK academic staff by mode, contract type and BME/ white identity..........................................................1963.5 Non-UK academic staff by mode, contract type and BME/white identity...........................................................197UK and non-UK academic staff in modes and contract types by BME/ white identity..............................................198UK/non-UK BME/white academic staff by contract type....1983.6 UK professional and support staff by mode, contract type and BME/white identity............................1993.7 Non-UK professional and support staff by mode, contract type and BME/white identity............................200UK/non-UK professional and support staff in modes and contract types by BME/white identity.................................201UK/non-UK professional and support BME/white staff by contract type.......................................................................2023.8 UK staff by contract level and BME/white identity

203Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose contract type or BME/white identity is unknown.... .204UK staff in contract levels by BME/white identity...............2063.9 UK academic staff by contract level and BME/white identity...............................................................................207Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose contract type or BME/white identity is unknown.... .208UK academic staff in contract levels by BME/white identity

2093.10 UK professional and support staff by contract level and BME/white identity...........................................212

523

Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose contract type or BME/white identity is unknown.... .213UK professional and support staff in contract levels by BME/white identity..............................................................2153.11 Non-UK staff by contract level and BME/white identity...............................................................................216Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose contract type or BME/white identity is unknown.... .217Non-UK staff in contract levels by BME/white identity.......2183.12 Non-UK academic staff by contract level and BME/white identity...........................................................220Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose contract type or BME/white identity is unknown.... .221Non-UK staff in contract levels by BME/white identity.......2223.13 Non-UK professional and support staff by contract level and BME/white identity...........................................224Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose contract type or BME/white identity is unknown.... .225Non-UK professional and support staff in contract levels by BME/white identity..............................................................2263.14 UK staff by activity, occupational group and ethnic group.................................................................................2283.15 Non-UK staff by activity, occupational group and ethnic group......................................................................233UK academic/professional and support staff in occupational groups by BME/white identity.............................................237Non-UK academic/professional and support staff in occupational groups by BME/white identity........................2383.16 Full-time staff by activity, UK/non-UK nationality, occupational group and BME/white identity..................2393.17 Part-time staff by activity, UK/non-UK nationality, occupational group and BME/white identity..................2423.18 UK/non-UK academic staff by research/teaching contract type and BME/white identity............................245

524

UK/non-UK white/BME academic staff by research/teaching contract type.........................................2463.19 UK academic staff by SET category and ethnic group.................................................................................247UK academic staff in ethnic groups by SET category........2483.20 UK SET academic staff by subject area and ethnic group.................................................................................2493.21 UK non-SET academic staff by subject area and ethnic.................................................................................253UK academic staff in SET subject areas by BME/white identity................................................................................258UK academic staff in non-SET subject areas by BME/white identity................................................................................2593.22 Non-UK SET academic staff by subject area and ethnic group......................................................................2603.23 Non-UK non-SET academic staff by subject area and ethnic group..............................................................265Non-UK academic staff in SET subject areas by BME/white identity................................................................................269Non-UK academic staff in non-SET subject areas by BME/white identity..............................................................2703.24 UK academic staff by professorial category and ethnic group......................................................................272UK academic staff by professorial category and ethnic group..................................................................................273UK academic staff in ethnic groups by professorial category

2733.25 Non-UK academic staff by professorial category and ethnic group..............................................................274Non-UK academic staff by professorial category and ethnic group..................................................................................274Non-UK academic staff in ethnic groups by professorial category.............................................................................2753.26 UK academic staff by professorial and SET categories, mode and ethnic group................................276

525

Academic staff in ethnic groups by professorial and SET categories and mode..........................................................2803.27 UK academic staff by senior management category and ethnic group..............................................281UK academic staff by senior management category and ethnic group.......................................................................281UK academic staff in ethnic groups by senior management category.............................................................................2823.28 Non-UK academic staff by senior management category and ethnic group..............................................282Non-UK academic staff by senior management category and ethnic group................................................................283Non-UK academic staff in ethnic groups by senior management category.......................................................2833.29 UK academic staff by senior management and SET categories, mode and BME/white identity.....................284White/BME UK academic staff by senior management and SET categories and mode#................................................285UK academic senior managers/other academic staff in modes and SET categories by BME/white identity............2863.30 UK/non-UK academic staff by salary range and ethnic group......................................................................287UK/non-UK academic staff in ethnic groups by salary range

2893.31 UK/non-UK professional and support staff by salary range and ethnic group........................................290UK/non-UK professional and support staff in ethnic groups by salary range...................................................................2923.32 UK/non-UK academic staff by mode, salary range and BME/white identity....................................................2933.33 UK/non-UK professional and support staff by mode, salary range and BME/white identity..................2943.34 UK academic staff by academic pay spine range and ethnic group..............................................................296

526

UK academic staff by academic pay spine ranges and ethnic group.......................................................................2983.35 Non-UK academic staff by academic pay spine range and ethnic group...................................................299Non-UK academic staff by academic pay spine ranges and ethnic group.......................................................................3013.36 Median salaries of UK/non-UK staff by activity and ethnic group......................................................................302Median salaries of UK staff by activity and ethnic group....3033.37 Median/mean salary and pay gap for UK staff by

304Median ethnicity pay gap for UK staff in country of institution............................................................................306Mean ethnicity pay gap for UK staff in country of institution

3063.38 Median/mean salary and pay gap for non-UK staff by country of institution, activity and BME/white identity...............................................................................307Median ethnicity pay gap for non-UK staff in country of institution............................................................................309Mean ethnicity pay gap for non-UK staff in country of institution............................................................................3093.39 Median/mean salary and pay gap for UK staff by activity, occupational group and BME/white identity...310Median ethnicity pay gap for UK staff by activity and occupational group.............................................................311Mean ethnicity pay gap for UK staff by activity and occupational group.............................................................3123.40 Median/mean salary and pay gap for non-UK staff by activity, occupational group and BME/white identity

313Median ethnicity pay gap for non-UK staff by activity and occupational group.............................................................315Mean ethnicity pay gap for non-UK staff by activity and occupational group.............................................................315

527

3.41 Median/mean salary and pay gap for UK professors/ non-professors by country of institution and BME/ white identity...................................................316Median ethnicity pay gap for UK professors/non-professors in country of institution.......................................................317Mean ethnicity pay gap for UK professors/non-professors in country of institution...........................................................3183.42 Median/mean salary and pay gap for non-UK professors/non-professors by country of institution and BME/white identity....................................................319Median ethnicity pay gap for non-UK professors/non-professors in country of institution......................................320Mean ethnicity pay gap for non-UK professors/non-professors in country of institution......................................3213.43 Academic staff by leaving status and BME/white identity...............................................................................322UK/non-UK white/BME academic staff by leaving status...3233.44 UK academic staff leavers by known leaving destination and BME/white identity................................3243.45 Non-UK academic staff leavers by known leaving destination and BME/white identity................................326UK academic staff leavers in leaving destinations by BME/white identity..............................................................328Non-UK academic staff leavers in leaving destinations by BME/white identity..............................................................329UK BME/white academic staff leavers by leaving destinations........................................................................330Non-UK BME/white academic staff leavers by leaving destinations........................................................................331

4 Gender

4.1 Staff by country of institution and gender...............3334.2 Profile of staff over time by gender..........................334

528

Staff in countries of institution by gender...........................334Staff profile over time by gender........................................3354.3 Profile of staff over time by activity and gender.....336Staff profile over time by activity and gender.....................3374.4 Staff by activity, mode and gender...........................338Full-time/part-time staff in activities by gender...................339Female/male staff by activity and mode.............................3394.5 Academic staff by mode, contract type and gender

3404.6 Professional and support staff by mode, contract type and gender................................................................341Academic/professional and support staff in modes and contract types by gender....................................................342Female/male staff by activity and contract type.................3434.7 Staff by contract level and gender...........................344Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose contract type or gender is unknown........................345Staff in contract levels by gender.......................................3464.8 Academic staff by contract level and gender..........347Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose contract type or gender is unknown........................348Academic staff in contract levels by gender.......................3504.9 Professional and support staff by contract level and gender...............................................................................351Percentages based on total number of staff minus those whose contract type or gender is unknown........................352Professional and support staff in contract levels by gender

3534.10 Staff by activity, occupational group and gender

355Staff in occupational groups and activity by gender...........3564.11 Full-time staff by activity, occupational group and gender...............................................................................3584.12 Part-time staff by activity, occupational group and gender...............................................................................360

529

4.13 Academic staff by research/teaching contract type and gender........................................................................362Female/male academic staff by research/teaching contract type.....................................................................................363Academic staff in research/teaching contract types by gender................................................................................3634.14 Academic staff by SET category and gender........3634.15 SET academic staff by subject area and gender...364Female/male academic staff by SET category...................3664.16 Non-SET academic staff by subject area and gender...............................................................................366Academic staff in SET subject areas by gender................368Academic staff in non-SET subject areas by gender.........3694.17 Academic staff by professorial and SET category, mode and gender.............................................................371Female/male academic staff by professorial and SET categories and mode..........................................................372Professors/non-professors in modes and SET categories by gender...........................................................................3734.18 Academic staff by senior management and SET category, mode and gender............................................374Female/male academic staff by senior management and SET categories and mode..................................................375Academic senior managers/other academic staff in modes and SET categories by gender...........................................3764.19 Academic staff by mode, salary range and gender

3774.20 Professional and support staff by mode, salary range and gender.............................................................378Academic/professional and support staff in salary ranges by gender...........................................................................379Female/male staff in activities and modes by salary range

3794.21 Academic staff by academic pay spine range and gender...............................................................................380

530

Academic staff in academic pay spine ranges by gender381

Female/male academic staff by academic pay spine ranges381

4.22 Median/mean salary and pay gap by country of institution, activity and gender.......................................382Median gender pay gap for all staff in country of institution

384Mean gender pay gap for all staff in country of institution

3844.23 Median/mean salary and pay gap by activity, occupational group and gender......................................385Median gender pay gap by activity and occupational group

3874.24 Median/mean salary and pay gap for professors/non-professors by country of institution and gender........................................................................388Median gender pay gap for professors/non-professors in country of institution...........................................................389Mean gender pay gap for professors/non-professors in country of institution...........................................................3904.25 Academic staff by leaving status and gender.......391Female/male academic staff by nationality and leaving status..................................................................................3924.26 UK academic staff leavers by known leaving destination and gender....................................................3934.27 Non-UK academic staff leavers by known leaving destination and gender....................................................395UK academic leavers in leaving destinations by gender....396Non-UK academic leavers in leaving destinations by gender................................................................................397Female/male UK academic staff leavers by leaving destinations........................................................................398Female/male non-UK academic staff leavers by leaving destinations........................................................................399

531

5 Multiple identities

5.1 Staff by age group and disability status..................402Disabled/non-disabled staff by age group..........................403Staff in age groups by disability status...............................4035.2 UK/non-UK staff by age group and BME/white identity...............................................................................404BME/white staff in nationality categories by age group......405UK/non-UK staff in age groups by BME/white identity.......4065.3 Staff by activity, age and gender..............................407Female/male staff in activities by age group......................409Staff in age groups by gender............................................4105.4 UK/non-UK staff by ethnic group and disability status.................................................................................411Disabled/non-disabled staff by nationality category and ethnic group.......................................................................4125.5 Staff by disability status, impairment type and gender...............................................................................414Disabled staff in impairment types by gender....................415Female/male disabled staff by impairment type.................4155.6 UK/non-UK staff by ethnic group and gender.........416Female/male staff by nationality category and ethnic group

4175.7 UK/non-UK academic staff by professorial category, gender and BME/white identity......................419UK/non-UK staff in gender and BME/white identity categories by professorial category...................................420UK/non-UK academic staff by professorial category, gender and BME/white identity.......................................................4205.8 UK/non-UK academic staff by senior management category, gender and BME/white identity......................421UK/non-UK academic staff by senior management category, gender and BME/white identity...........................422

532

6 Other protected characteristics

6.1 Institutional returns for gender identity information by country of institution..................................................425Institutional returns for gender identity by country of institution............................................................................4266.2 Institutional return rates on gender identity............426Institutional return rates on gender identity........................4276.3 Gender identity disclosure rates in institutions monitoring for gender identity........................................428Gender identity disclosure rates in institutions monitoring for gender identity..............................................................4286.4 All staff by gender identity........................................429All staff by gender identity..................................................4296.5 Institutional returns for religion and belief information by country of institution.............................430Institutional returns for religion and belief by country of institution............................................................................4306.6 Institutional return rates on religion and belief.......431Institutional return rates on religion and belief...................4326.7 Religion and belief disclosure rates in institutions monitoring for religion and belief...................................433Religion and belief disclosure rates in institutions monitoring for religion and belief........................................4336.8 All staff by religion and belief...................................433All staff by religion and belief.............................................4346.9 Institutional returns for sexual orientation information by country of institution.............................435Institutional returns for religion and belief by country of institution............................................................................4356.10 Institutional return rates on sexual orientation.....436Institutional return rates on sexual orientation...................437

533

6.11 Sexual orientation disclosure rates in institutions monitoring for sexual orientation...................................437Sexual orientation disclosure rates in institutions monitoring for sexual orientation..........................................................4386.12 All staff by sexual orientation.................................438All staff by sexual orientation.............................................439

534

Equality Challenge Unit

ECU works to further and support equality and diversity for staff and students in higher education across all four nations of the UK, and in colleges in Scotland.

ECU works closely with colleges and universities to seek to ensure that staff and students are not unfairly excluded, marginalised or disadvantaged because of age, disability, gender identity, marital or civil partnership status, pregnancy or maternity status, race, religion or belief, sex, sexual orientation or through any combination of these characteristics or other unfair treatment.

Providing a central source of expertise, research, advice and leadership, we support institutions in building a culture that provides equality of both opportunity and outcome, promotes good relations, values the benefits of diversity and provides a model of equality for the wider UK society.

Did you find this publication useful?Your feedback will help us to improve and develop our publications and resources, and help us to ensure that we produce materials that support your work.

Please take a few minutes to complete our publications feedback survey: www.surveymonkey.com/s/ecupublications-feedback

You can also email us with your feedback: [email protected]

535


Equality Challenge Unit

7th floor, Queen’s House55/56 Lincoln’s Inn FieldsLondon, WC2A 3LJT 020 7438 1010F 020 7438 1011E [email protected]

© Equality Challenge Unit 2014ECU’s publications are produced free of charge to the UK HE sector and also for colleges in Scotland. Information can be reproduced as long as it is accurate, the source is identified and it will not be used for profit. Alternative formats are available: E [email protected]

Company limited by guarantee. Registered in England and Wales, No. 05689975.

Charity no. 1114417 (England and Wales) and SC043601 (Scotland).

This version of ‘Equality in higher education: statistical report 2014 - Part 1: staff’ has been formatted for use with an On-Screen-Reader (OSR). Although every effort is made to ensure an exact transcript of the original document some data may appear differently in this transcribed version.

536



introduction - equality challenge unit home - … · web viewmusic, dance, drama and performing...

Documents