interpreting safety culture survey results and action planning june 17, 2011 katherine jones, pt,...

51
Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

Upload: thomasine-cummings

Post on 24-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning

June 17, 2011

Katherine Jones, PT, PhD

Anne Skinner, RHIA

Page 2: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

HSOPS

Acronyms

2

AHRQ = Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

HRO = High Reliability Organization

HSOPS = Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture

Page 3: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

HSOPSObjectives1. Define “culture of patient safety” (safety culture)

2. Identify four components of safety culture

3. Use tools and reports from survey results to:

1. Identify change over time associated with patient safety interventions and benchmark results to the national database

2. Identify variation in safety culture by work area and job title in HSOPS results

3. Compare beliefs and behaviors within HSOPS dimensions to identify practices needed to support safety culture

4. Describe key practices that support safety culture

5. Recognize potential for response shift bias among when evaluating impact of patient safety interventions

6. Recognize role of leadership in engineering culture change

7. Develop an action plan to engineer key practices that support safety culture

Page 4: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

HSOPS

“The biggest challenge to moving toward a safer health system is changing the culture from one of blaming individuals for errors to one in which errors are treated not as personal failures, but as opportunities to improve the system and prevent harm.” IOM (2001). Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century, p. 79

The Problem and Challenge…

“The problem is not bad people; the problem is that the system needs to be made safer . . .”

IOM (2000). To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System

Page 5: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

5

Healthcare SystemStructures & Processes

OrganizationalStructures & Processes

Individual ProviderStructures & Processes

Quality at Point of CareInterpersonal

CareTechnical

Care

Chain of Impact at the Point of Care

The quality, safety and value of care can be no better than the structures and processes used by providers in direct contact with the patient. Culture is a lens through which organizations support providers at the point of care.

Nelson et al. (2002) Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, 28, 472-493.

Swuste P. (2008). Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 18, 438-453.

Beliefs -- Culture – Behaviors

Page 6: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

HSOPS

What did you measure with HSOPS? Enduring, shared, LEARNED* beliefs and behaviors

that reflect an organization’s willingness to learn from errors**

Four beliefs present in a safe, informed culture*** Our processes are designed to prevent failure

We are committed to detect and learn from error

We have a just culture that disciplines based on risk

People who work in teams make fewer errors

**Wiegmann. A synthesis of safety culture and safety climate research; 2002. http://www.humanfactors.uiuc.edu/Reports&PapersPDFs/TechReport/02-03.pdf

***Institute of Medicine. Patient safety: Achieving a new standard of care. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2004.

*Schein, E. Organizational Culture and Leadership. 4th ed. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons; 2010.

Page 7: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

HSOPS

Beliefs Assessed with HSOPS Our processes are designed to prevent failure

“Our procedures and systems are good at preventing errors from happening.”—national db 62% - 82%*

We are committed to detect and learn from error “When a mistake is made, but is caught and corrected before affecting the patient, how often

is this reported?”— national db 44% - 67%* “Mistakes have led to positive changes here.”— national db 54% - 74%*

We have a just culture—discipline is based upon risk taking “Staff worry that mistakes they make are kept in their personnel file.”R— national db 25% -

47%*

People who work in teams make fewer errors “People support one another in this department.” – national db79% - 92% “When one area in this department gets really busy, others help out.”— national db 59% -

78%*

*10th%ile and 90th%ile for 1032 hospitals reporting to AHRQ 2011 national comparative database

Page 8: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

HSOPS

Three Levels of Culture

Schein, E.H. Organizational Leadership and Culture 4th ed. San Francisco:John Wiley & Sons; 2010, p.24, 27. 8

“…in many organizations, values reflect desired behavior but are not reflected in observed behavior.”

“…in many organizations, values reflect desired behavior but are not reflected in observed behavior.”

Page 9: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

HSOPS

Identify areas of culture in need of improvement

Increase awareness of patient safety concepts

Evaluate effectiveness of patient safety interventions over time

Conduct internal and external benchmarking,

Meet regulatory requirements

Identify discrepancies between beliefs and observed behaviors within subcultures and microcultures

Goals of Culture Assessment…why did you measure safety culture?

9

Nieva, Sorra. (2003). Safety culture assessment: a tool for improving patient safety in healthcare organizations. Qual Saf Health Care, 12(Suppl II), ii17-ii23.

Page 10: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

HSOPS

Regulatory Requirement

Conduct HSOPS to meet Joint Commission Leadership Standards (Standard LD.03.01.01)

http://www.jointcommission.org/NR/rdonlyres/D53206E8-D42B-416B-B887-491B6D5AA163/0/HAP_LD.pdf

Leaders regularly evaluate the culture of safety and quality using valid and reliable tools

Leaders prioritize and implement changes identified by the evaluation

Page 11: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

HSOPS

Four Components of Safety Culture

INDIVIDUALS FEEL VALUED

INDIVIDUALS ARE TREATED WITH RESPECT

INDIVIDUALS FEEL VALUED

INDIVIDUALS ARE TREATED WITH RESPECT

11

A culture of safety is informed. It never forgets to be afraid…

Reason, J. (1997). Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents. Hampshire, England: Ashgate Publishing Limited.

Battles et al. (2006). Sensemaking of patient safety risks and hazards. HSR, 41(4 Pt 2), 1555-1575.

SENSEMAKING

TRUST

= Flexible

Page 12: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

HSOPS

How to Become an HRO: Engage in Continuous Improvement

Page 13: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

HSOPS

Measure Beliefs and Behaviors with HSOPS Developed by AHRQ to provide healthcare organizations with a valid tool

to assess safety culture http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/hospculture/

42 items categorized in 12 dimensions

2 dimensions are outcome measures at dept/unit level

7 dimensions measure culture at dept/unit level

3 dimensions measure culture at hospital level

2 additional items are outcome measures at dept/unit level

Number of Events Reported

Patient Safety Grade

Page 14: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

HSOPSHSOPS

Original AHRQ Survey available http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/patientsafetyculture/

AHRQ Comparative Database for HSOPS 2011 Comparative Database for Benchmarking

1032 hospitals; 472,397 respondents

Stratis will submit your results to database

Report comparing your hospital to national data

Trending hospitals asked to describe interventions

14

Page 15: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

HSOPSUNMC Rural HSOPS

Available at www.unmc.edu/rural/patient-safety

Developed by UNMC as part of AHRQ Partnerships in Implementing Patient Safety Grant 05 -07

Collapses work areas and position to reflect CAH environment

Allows sorting by Work Area/Position if > 5 respondents

Creates valid benchmark data for CAHs

Allows valid tracking of safety culture over time within a CAH to evaluate patient safety interventions

10 additional items added by UNMC to evaluate TeamSTEPPS

15

Page 16: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

16

Original AHRQ HSOPS

Rural-Adapted AHRQ HSOPS

32%

3.3%

Page 17: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

Original AHRQ HSOPS

Rural-Adapted AHRQ HSOPS

21%

3.2%

Page 18: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

Reason’s Components HSOPS Dimensions or Outcome Measures

Reporting Culture - a safe organization is dependent on the willingness of front-line workers to report their errors and near-misses

•Frequency of Events Reported (O)

•Number of Events Reported (O)

Just Culture - management will support and reward reporting; discipline occurs based on risk-taking

•Nonpunitive Response to Error (U)

O = Outcome measureU = Measured at level of unit/departmentH = Measured at level of hospital

Page 19: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

Reason’s Components HSOPS Dimensions or Outcome Measures

Flexible Culture - authority patterns relax when safety information is exchanged because those with authority respect the knowledge of front-line workers

•Teamwork w/in Units (U)

•Staffing (U)

•Communication Openness (U)

•Teamwork ax Units (H)

•Hospital Handoffs (H)

Learning Culture - organization will analyze reported information and then implement appropriate change

•Hospital Mgt Support (H)

•Manager Actions (U)

•Feedback & Communication (U)

•Organizational Learning (U)

•Overall Perceptions (O)

•Patient Safety Grade (O)

Page 20: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

HSOPSYour ResultsResource PurposeReports from Excel Tool

ANALYSIS - Contains raw data Generates spreadsheet to upload for national database Instructions for interpretationDemographics of respondentsContains dimension and item level results in the aggregate, by department, position, direct patient care, action planning sheet

Benchmark Tool COMMUNICATIONCompare aggregate results to peer group (external benchmark)Compare aggregate results over time Compare results by work area and job title to the aggregate

Item Level Over Time

COMPARISONS AND COMMUNICATIONCompare item level results over time and to peer groupIncludes responses to teamwork questions

Comments Coded by Theme

CONTEXTOpen ended comments coded by culture-related themes Provides respondents’ direct feedback

Action Plan PLAN - Work sheet to anchor action plan in history, mission and strategic goals; identify practices needed to support safe culture

Page 21: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

HSOPS

Principle-drive NOT event-driven

Planned approach NOT piecemeal

Proactive NOT reactive

Understand latent conditions Anticipate the next error

Focus on performance/behavior

Action Planning: What is needed

Reason, J. (1997). Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents. Hampshire, England: Ashgate Publishing Limited.

Schein, E.H. Organizational Leadership and Culture 4th ed. San Francisco:John Wiley & Sons; 2010.

Page 22: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

HSOPS

Interpreting Results to Develop an Action Plan Anchor plan in history, mission, strategic goals

Understand response rate (> 60% best)…are results generalizable?

Identify organization-wide areas In need of improvement Improved due to specific interventions

Wrap your mind around reverse worded items

Identify gaps between beliefs and behaviors within 4 components

Page 23: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

HSOPS

Interpreting Results to Develop an Action Plan Identify variation in microcultures by work area/job

title Relate open-ended comments to results

Recognize potential for response shift bias in repeat reassessments

Consider how management uses information

Explicit plan to strengthen 4 components within depts by implementing specific practices that close the gap between beliefs and behaviors

Communicate results and plan

Page 24: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

24

Page 25: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

25

Page 26: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

HSOPS

ORGANIZATION WIDE AREAS IN NEED OF IMPROVEMENT

Lowest Scores

Handoffs and Transitions (35%)

Teamwork Ax Depts (40%)

Nonpunitive Response (45%)

Significant Changes

Feedback & Communication about Error (+13%)

Teamwork W/in Units (+10%)

Overall Perceptions (+7%)

Teamwork Ax Units (-5%

Handoffs & Transitions (-5%)

Page 27: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

HSOPS

REVERSE WORDED ITEMSGAPS BETWEEN BELIEFS & BEHAVIORS

Percent Positive 2011 HSOPS Database

(n=1032 Hospitals)

http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/hospsurvey11/hospsurv111.pdf

Page 28: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

Gaps Between Beliefs & BehaviorsPercent Positive 2011 HSOPS Database (n=1032 Hospitals)Reporting Culture

http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/hospsurvey11/hospsurv111.pdf

Just Culture

Page 29: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

Teamwork Culture

Page 30: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

Teamwork Culture

http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/hospsurvey11/hospsurv111.pdf

Page 31: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

Learning Culture

Page 32: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA
Page 33: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

Why are microcultures different?• Quantity, relevance, timeliness of information available

differs due to leadership• Methods of information sharing differ

– Personal– Through standard channels– Teams do whatever it takes to get the right information to the

right people at the right time

• These methods reveal what is important to leaders– My personal power and glory (pathologic)– Maintenance of positions, rules, turf (bureaucratic)– Mission of organization (generative)

Westrum, R. A typology of organizational cultures. Quality and Safety in Healthcare 2004;13:22-27.

33

Page 34: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA
Page 35: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

Action Planning: A Reporting culture is engineered by implementing practices

Practices/Tools

Reporting Form

Near miss log

Chart audit

Secret Shopper

Safety Briefings

Leadership WalkRoundsTM

Bulletin board/ suggestion box/telephone hotline

Successful reporting systems (Leape, 2002)

Nonpunitive

Confidential

Independent

Expert analysis

Timely

Systems-oriented

Responsive

Page 36: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

HSOPS

Reporting Action Plan & AimsWe need to strengthen our REPORTING CULTURE because:

Just 1/3 of all respondents agreed that “near misses” are frequently reported.

Comment: “There is a strong belief by some staff that errors are recorded and held against staff….”

 We can do this by:

(1) educating all employees about the role of near miss reporting—learning about risks and hazards in systems without harming patients; ( 2) implementing use of a “near miss” reporting log in all departments; (3) including discussion of near misses at departmental briefs (including sift change), huddles, and debriefs; and (4) including discussions of near misses in regular Leadership WalkRounds.

Page 37: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

HSOPS

Action Planning: A Just culture is engineered by implementing practices

Practices/Tools Understanding human error (Reason 2003, 2006)

Active errors (sharp end) Latent errors

Just Culture and behavior (Marx, 2001) Conduct: human error, negligence, reckless, intentional rule

violation Disciplinary decision-making: outcome-based, rule-based, risk-

based Unsafe Acts Algorithm Disruptive Behavior Policy/Standards

Page 38: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

Known medicalcondition?

NO NO NO YES

NOYES

YES

YES

YESNO

YES

YES NO

Culpable Gray Area Blameless

NOYES

YESNO

Adapted from James Reason. (1997). Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents.

Execute Just Culture . . . UNSAFE ACTS ALGORITHM

Were the actions as intended?

Evidence of illness or substance use?

Knowingly violated safe procedures?

Pass substitutiontest? (Could someone else have done the same thing)?

History of unsafe acts?

Were the consequencesas intended?

Were proceduresavailable, workable, intelligible, correct and routinely used?

Deficiencies in training, selection, or inexperienced?

Substance abusewithout mitigation

Sabotage, malevolent damage

Substance usewith mitigation

Possible recklessviolation

System inducedviolation

Possible negligentbehavior

System inducederror

Blameless error, corrective training, counseling indicated

Blameless error

NO

Page 39: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

HSOPS

Just Culture Action Plan & AimsWe need to strengthen our JUST CULTURE because:

35% of all respondents DISagreed with the reverse-worded statement, “Staff worry that mistakes they make are kept in their personnel file.”

Comment: “There is a strong belief by some staff that errors are recorded and held against staff….” 

We can do this by:

(1) educating all staff about the impact of human error on patient safety and the role of just and fair culture in patient safety program; (2) implementing the use of the Unsafe Acts Algorithm by all managers to transparently determine individual vs. system accountability in adverse events.

Page 40: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

Action Planning A Flexible culture is engineered by implementing practices

Team Strategies & Tools to Enhance Performance & Patient Safety

http://teamstepps.ahrq.gov

“Could definitely use more TeamSTEPPS training. Some questions difficult to answer.”

“TeamSTEPPS has brought some very positive changes in the hospital…we do Huddle each morning before the hospital Huddle..”

“TeamSTEPPS training has changed the way I think about my job, and the communication processes in my department.”

“TeamSTEPPS and Service Excellence is working. Did create chaos for a short time.”

“I don't feel very comfortable with the TeamSTEPPS program. It’s a great program; we just haven't practiced using it enough to make us comfortable with all the strategies or tools.”

Page 41: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

HSOPS

Flexible Action Plan & AimsWe improved/need to strengthen our FLEXIBLE (Teamwork-Oriented) CULTURE :

91% of acute/skilled respondents agree that they support one another; 71% help each other out when it gets busy

84% of all respondents agree they will speak up but only 53% will do so to those with more authority

23% of all respondents DISagreed with the reverse-worded statement, “Problems often occur in the exchange of information across hospital units.”

We can continue to improve by: Ensuring consistent use of briefs, huddles, debriefs and seeking/offering task assistance within departments; use of the Two Challenge Rule and CUS to make it psychologically safe for staff to speak up to those with more authority; and use of structured communication during hand-offs and transitions (SBAR, I PASS the BATON) across hospital departments.

Page 42: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

Action Planning: Reporting, Just, and Flexible practices support Learning

Ultimately, the willingness of workers to report depends on their belief that the organization will analyze reported information and then implement appropriate change—organizational practices support a learning culture.

Practices/Tools Individual RCA

Aggregate RCA

FMEA

Safety Briefings

Leadership WalkRoundsTM

Close the loop with reporting…feedback

Page 43: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

HSOPS

Learning Action Plan & AimsWe improved/need to strengthen our LEARNING CULTURE

61% of all respondents agree they are given feedback about changes put into place based upon event reports

70% agree that “Mistakes have led to positive changes here.”

We can continue to improve by :(1) including front line staff in retrospective (root cause analysis) and prospective (failure mode and effect analysis) organizational learning, (2) conducting Leadership WalkRounds focused on proactive discussion of risks and hazards, (3) use of briefs, huddles, and debriefs in all departments to integrate organizational learning into daily work.

Page 44: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

HSOPSResponse Shift Bias

Definition: tendency for an individual to overestimate their knowledge, skills, and behaviors in a pretest because their understanding of a concept is limited prior to the program intervention.

We have patient safety problems in this department. (73% before TS “shift” to 67% after)

(R)Problems often occur in the exchange of information across hospital departments. (45% before TS “shift” to 36% after)

44

Page 45: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

45

SENSEMAKING

TRUST

Conclusion: HSOPS Guides Implementation of an Infrastructure for Patient Safety

Interaction between effective practices results in sensemaking

Sensemaking requires data, which is interpreted within the context of the experiences of those in direct contact with patients*

Sensemaking can not occur without data, trust and teamwork

Leaders drive sensemaking *Battles et al. (2006). Sensemaking of patient safety risks and hazards. HSR, 41(4 Pt 2), 1555-1575.

Page 46: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

HSOPS

Shift Towards a Culture of Safety

Page 47: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

HSOPSLessons Learned

Behaviors support an informed safe culture Measure safety culture using appropriate survey and

effective data collection methods

Create an infrastructure that supports reporting

Adhere to principles of just culture

Implement team training to support a flexible culture

Learn from error in the context of daily work (Safety Briefings and Leadership WalkRounds)

Teams must systematically learn from events using individual RCA and aggregate RCA to learn from multiple non-harmful errors

47

Page 48: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

HSOPS

Leaders manage culture or it manages them….Create a compelling positive vision

Define the change goal as solving a performance problem…not “changing culture”

Provide formal training in groups

Ensure new behaviors lead to success, satisfaction Provide opportunities for practice, coaching, feedback

Provide positive role models

Provide support groups for learning problems

Create structures consistent with new way of thinking/working/behaving

Schein, E.H. Organizational Leadership and Culture 4th ed. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons; 2010.

Lessons Learned

Page 49: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

HSOPS

Diffusion of Innovations…

“Getting a new idea adopted, even when it has obvious advantages, is difficult. Many innovations require a lengthy period of many years from the time when they become available to the time when they are widely adopted.” – Rogers in Diffusion of Innovations, p. 1

49

Page 50: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

HSOPS

The Responsibility of Leadership

“Our systems are too complex to expect merely extraordinary people to perform perfectly 100% of the time. We as leaders have a responsibility to put in place systems to support safe practice.”

James Conway,

former VP and COO Dana Farber Cancer Institute

Page 51: Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Results and Action Planning June 17, 2011 Katherine Jones, PT, PhD Anne Skinner, RHIA

HSOPS

Contact Information

Katherine Jones, PT, PhD

[email protected]

Anne Skinner

[email protected]

Web site where tools are posted

www.unmc.edu/rural/patient-safety