internship report

32
DIC PAKISTAN LTD. Internship Report. Research Internee. (LUMS-SSE) Muhammad Yasar Qamar 18th July to 13th August (2011) This report, submitted to Dr. Asad Javaid (Technical Manager, DIC), contains detailed analysis of different instruments and techniques that can be employed by DIC to further improve the Quality and Assurance of manufactured inks. Subjects focused include Viscosity, Lamination Strength in Peel Tests, and Surface Tension.

Upload: yasar-qamar

Post on 28-Nov-2014

175 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Internship Report

DIC PAKISTAN LTD.

Internship Report.

Research Internee. (LUMS-SSE)

Muhammad Yasar Qamar 18th July to 13th August (2011)

This report, submitted to Dr. Asad Javaid (Technical Manager, DIC), contains detailed analysis of different instruments and techniques that can be employed by DIC to further improve the Quality and Assurance of manufactured inks. Subjects focused include Viscosity, Lamination Strength in Peel Tests, and Surface Tension.

Page 2: Internship Report

1 | P a g e

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

Viscosity of Inks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

Viscosity Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

Lloyds Digital Chrono Thermo Viscometer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

Test Certificate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

Lamination Strength Testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

90 & 180 Degree Testing Techniques . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

Experimental Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

Recommendation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

Surface Tension of Inks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

Basic Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

Theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22

Application Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24

Measurement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

Specifications of Delta-8 Analyzer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28

Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30

References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31

Page 3: Internship Report

2 | P a g e

INTRODUCTION & OVERVIEW.

Page 4: Internship Report

3 | P a g e

Introduction

My internship at DIC Pakistan Limited (Dainippon Inks and Chemicals) introduced me to the

world of ink manufacturing. It has been mainly a learning experience for me throughout where I came to

know the different kinds of inks that are produced. The two main types are Liquid based and Oil based

(Offset). I was, also, made aware of the many different techniques that are being used to produce

colored inks as per the requirements of customers.

The first week of my internship was an Orientation of the Chemical Laboratory as well as the

Production Plants. I met a dedicated team of chemists working at the lab who provided me with

firsthand knowledge about their own work.

First of all Muzammil Sb. gave me a detailed background about the history of DIC and its various

branches working all over the world including Pakistan. Along with this he provided me valuable general

information about the work environment in professional jobs. Khalid Sb. taught me the fundamentals of

raw materials used in the making of inks. These are namely pigments, additives, resins and solvents.

Khurram Sb. showed me how shades of customer samples are first prepared and made. He then helped

me in making up different ink samples using recipes contained in the SAP.

Systems and Applications Product (SAP) in Data Processing is a data base containing all the

standard recipes of hundreds of ink samples. I used its CS-13 feature to search for the contents and their

masses that make up Silver ink. Then I weighed these contents using a mass balance and mixed them

using a mechanical stirrer. This ensured a uniform mixing of contents in the bottle. After this I measured

the viscosity of the ink using Zhan cup-2 for flexographic inks and ensured that it was within the

acceptable range of 18 to 19 seconds. This exercise gave me a technical insight into the processes

Page 5: Internship Report

4 | P a g e

through which Quality Checks are ensured so that the manufactured inks fulfill customer and industrial

requirements.

This was followed on the next day by a guided tour of the Offset production plant. Irfan Sb. gave

me a detailed overview of the processes by which inks were being manufactured on a large scale. These

were basically grinding, weighing, mixing and rolling the concentrates from a raw state to a semi-

finished one. Varnishes are also added to give a gloss to inks. Samples of these semi-finished

concentrates are then sent to the Technical Laboratory where different tests are conducted to ensure

Quality assurance. These include testing the color strength, particle size, flow, and viscosity among some

others. Once prepared the concentrates are stored in a semi-finished state for later use. The feature

that impressed me in this section was the Rolling machine which grinds ink particles to a very fine size. I

saw that manual as well as automated machines were being operated which were mainly of a three

cylinder design.

Moving on I proceeded in my internship with a detailed overview of the Laray Viscometer and

learned that it determines the viscosity value in the offset oil inks. I started a mini project with Haider

Sb. regarding viscosity of fluids. I was asked to read about the basics of viscosity including the different

units that are used to measure it and then to compare the merits of both of them. I read from different

resources about viscosity and also frequently discussed it with Haider Sb. These discussions proved to be

extremely useful for me as they helped me to improve my concepts about viscosity, and I am extremely

thankful to Haider Sb. for helping me in learning these concepts.

In the next half of my internship I was assigned two main projects by Dr. Asad Javaid. The first of

these was testing Lamination Strength using the instrument Lloyds. I was asked to learn its different

functions and, also, to check the effectiveness of the methods currently used at DIC to test lamination

strength of different samples. The second project was an independent study regarding Surface Tension.

Page 6: Internship Report

5 | P a g e

Starting on my first project Ms. Shabana taught me the basic working principles of Lloyds. She

gave a practical demonstration and did a sample test on the machine. She briefed me about the 90

degree peel test method. The Lloyds software gives the user a custom control over different testing

parameters, the values of which can be altered to check variations in the lamination strength value.

Lloyds, also, has a graphic output which is displayed on a computer connected to the machine. Different

samples are tested and the results are stored in the computer which has a database of all the previous

test records. These can be accessed anytime for later reference.

I tested different samples of ‘Capri Soap’ packages for their lamination strengths. Each sample

was tested twice; once before heat seal (Before HS) and the other after heat seal (After HS). This was

done so that the effect of heat on lamination strength can be noted. A number of samples of the same

package were tested so that variations in the complete package roll were accounted for.

For the project part, I tested different samples using two different techniques on each of the

samples. The results and conclusions of this study have been compiled later in this report.

Overall, the experience here at DIC proved to be good for me as I engaged in research over many physics

related concepts. . I enjoyed working on three projects simultaneously which at first seemed difficult but

was made very manageable with help and support by almost everyone involved in the technical

laboratory. This allowed me to learn many different things in my research based internship and provided

an insight into the technical challenges and problems in an industrial set up All in all, I am extremely

thankful to everybody who made my experience memorable.

Page 7: Internship Report

6 | P a g e

VISCOSITY OF INKS.

Page 8: Internship Report

7 | P a g e

Viscosity Analysis.

Definition:

To put simply, viscosity is an internal property of a fluid that offers resistance to flow. A more

formal treatment defines it as the ratio of the shearing stress to the velocity gradient.

Types:

i) - Dynamic viscosity

ii) - Kinematic viscosity

Units:

Pascal second (Pa.s) [S.I. unit for dynamic viscosity]

Poise (P) [cgs unit for dynamic viscosity]

Stokes (St) [cgs unit for kinematic viscosity]

These units are fairly large and are rarely used. In normal practice centipoise, dyne second per

square centimeter and centistokes are used.

Conversion factors:

1 pascal second = 10 poise

1 centipoise = 1 millipascal second

1 cm2/s = 1 stokes

Generally, the cgs units are preferred over the SI units for the measurement of viscosity for two

reasons. Firstly, most scientific and technical publications use cgs units for viscosity because of which

Page 9: Internship Report

8 | P a g e

these units are much more common than the SI units. Secondly, since cgs units are smaller they are

more appropriate for practical measurements of viscosity than SI units.

Instruments at DIC:

Two different instruments are used to measure the viscosities of inks in the lab. at DIC.

Zhan Cups for liquid inks.

Laray Viscometer for oil based inks.

Zahn Cup:

Zahn cup is a cup made of stainless steel with a hole at the bottom of its centre. To measure the

viscosity of the ink, the cup is filled with it and ink is then allowed to flow through the hole. The time

taken for the flow of ink to break is noted using a stopwatch. For different values of viscosities different

standard times are set and the measured times are compared with these to check for the viscosity of the

ink. The typical time which I used was 18 seconds.

Zhan cups also come in different sizes as per the viscosity of the ink measured. For high

viscosities large number cup sizes are used, and for low viscosities low number cup sizes are used.

Laray Viscometer:

The Laray Viscometer determines the viscosity of viscous materials by measuring the

time required for a rod to travel a specified distance. Viscosity is calculated using this time. A heating

system is also attached to the equipment which makes it possible to test the viscosity at different

temperatures. A water circulation jacket is used to provide heat to the ink which is coated on the

testing rod. In the lab at DIC, a water bath is attached to the Laray Viscometer and the temperature is

Page 10: Internship Report

9 | P a g e

set to room temperature i.e. 25 ‘C. Graphical output is displayed by using a computer program. Normally

weights of masses 400g, 600g and 800g are used for high viscosities.

As part of my research, I looked up for other viscometers available in the market. I found a much

better one in the Lloyds Product Catalogue.

Page 11: Internship Report

10 | P a g e

Lloyds Digital Chrono Thermo Viscometer.

Purpose:

To measure accurate Viscosity and Yield Value of inks, Varnishes and other viscous materials in

the development of ink formulation.

Method:

Falling Bar Principle (Larry Method).

Range:

40 – 2500 poises.

Model 92N:

Featuring advanced microprocessor based electronic with infrared control. Lloyds Viscometer

provides the highest accuracy and efficiency for research and development, quality control and process

Page 12: Internship Report

11 | P a g e

evaluation. A most important instrument used in the manufacturing of high quality printing inks and

varnishes to control viscosity and yield values at various stages of production, and accurate quality

control of production batches without any chances of rejection or reworking.

Advance Features:

• Confirms to ASTM D4040

• Microprocessor based electronics for high reliability and accuracy

• Simple and fast method of test and easy to operate

• Only 2 cc of test sample required

• Steel Viscobar and glass Viscobar (for low viscosity i.e. liquid ink, etc.)

• Failsafe auto manual electronic design with auto zero for minimum testing time

• Nil or Minimum maintenance needed

• Best for regular production and for developing accurate formulations and R & D work

LLOYDS Viscosoft Software:

Lloyds Viscometer is further backed by specially designed Lloyds Viscosoft

software that will directly calculate without the need of manually plotting Larry Viscosity Graph the

accurate viscosity, yield value and shortness ratio or S.R.index of an ink with test certificate for achieving

perfect formulation. A very important tool for quality control and R & D laboratory.

Page 13: Internship Report

12 | P a g e

Advance Features of the LLOYDS Viscosoft Software:

• Accurate, Instant and repeatable test results of viscosity, yield value and shortness ratio of an ink with

test certificate without manually plotting the Larry Graph

• Can recalculate Viscosity, yield value and shortness ratio at any other given temperature without the

need to perform the test at that temperature

• Advance inbuilt features to measure viscosity under temperature variations with correction factor

• Online comparisons of test results or with set standards

• Calibration through software require only dimension of orifice and Viscobar. No special standard

tested fluid or representative ink required to calibrate the viscometer. Simple Calibration technique in

software to maintain instrument consistency and takes care of Viscometer wear and tear.

Accessories:

• Glass Viscobar for low viscosity measurement with calibrated weights for low viscosity i.e. liquid ink,

resins etc.

• Viscosoft software for calculating viscosity, yield value and shortness ratio without plotting the graph

manually

• Refrigerated water bath for maintaining accurate test temperature of viscometer

Electrical characteristics:

• 230/110 Volts 50/60 Hz

• Less than 10 Watts power consumption

Page 14: Internship Report

13 | P a g e

Dimension & Weight Details:

• Unit physical dimension -12”W X 6”D X 15”H - Net Weight 23 Kgs

• Shipping Dimension - 21”W X 12”D X 19”H - Gross Weight 40 Kgs

Conclusion:

Lloyds Viscometer is one of the best instruments to test the viscosities of inks and varnishes

in laboratory. It gives the user enhanced control over many features that can be used to set parameters

under which a sample of ink is to be tested. Since these parameters can be changed easily, the Lloyds

Viscometer can also be used for research and development regarding the manufacture of better quality

inks. Moreover, the comprehensive result output gives a detailed overview of the test conducted. A

sample of a Test Certificate has been copied on the next page:

Page 15: Internship Report

14 | P a g e

Page 16: Internship Report

15 | P a g e

LAMINATION STRENGTH TESTING.

Page 17: Internship Report

16 | P a g e

Peel Strength Testing using Lloyds LRX Plus with 90 and 180 degrees.

Lloyds LRX Plus:

It is a materials testing machine that can be used to perform various tests on inks

related products. It is capable of tensile, compression, flexural, peel, shear, friction testing and more up

to a load limit of 5 KN. The LRX in the laboratory at DIC is used to check the lamination strength of inks

and adhesives on different market products. The instrument is fully PC-integrated and results are

calculated and displayed on a computer using the NEXYGEN™ MT Materials Test and Data Analysis

Software.

Differences in Results between 90 and 180 degrees techniques:

Peel adhesion is defined as the force

required to remove pressure sensitive coated material under specified conditions from a film at a

specified angle and speed.

Peel strength testing or De-lamination strength testing is basically carried out using two

angle-based techniques, 90 and 180 degrees. I carried out a number of tests on different samples under

the supervision of Ms. Shabana using both of these techniques. The results of these experiments are

tabulated on the following page:

Page 18: Internship Report

17 | P a g e

DIC PAKISTAN LTD

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ISSUED BY: LAB

CC: I/C Lab Dated: 05.08.2011

SUBJECT: Lamination Strength Results of Lifebuoy 155g & Knorr Garlic Sauce 10g using

90 degree and 180 degree peel-test angle techniques

Identification Key:

CIT: Complete Ink Transfer Blue: Lifebouy Sample

PIT: Partial Ink Transfer Green: Knorr Sample

FT: Film Tear

PET: Poly-Ester

MPET: Metalized Poly-Ester

Reel# Description Lamination

Structure

Lamination Strength(g/cm)

90

Degree

180

Degree

Comments

90 Degree 180 Degree

142 Blue Area PET+PAPER 93.144 164.54 50% IT FT

58 Blue Area PET+PAPER 79.645 140.10 50% IT FT

18 Green Area PET+MPET 69.776 98.402 CIT CIT

43 Green Area PET+MPET 108.30 141.46 CIT CIT

Page 19: Internship Report

18 | P a g e

Results:

Based on the data acquired, two major observations are:

The 90 degree peel-test gives a lower value of lamination strength than the 180 degree

test.

The 180 degree peel-test often produces a Film Tear (FT) in the sample. This can be

seen in the case of Lifebouy sample.

Conclusions:

There are various reasons that give rise to an anomaly in the values for 180 degree peel test

compared to the 90 degree peel test. One of the major reason is that using a 180 degree technique on

the Lloyds instrument requires the strip to be bent using your hand. This increases the load to be pulled

by the upper jaw, hence increasing the value for lamination strength. Moreover, there can be human

error involved in this technique too since the increase in load value varies from user to user. The 90

degree method does not require the use of hand which eliminates any possibility of human error in the

readings.

180 degree peel tests often give a film tear (FT). The Lloyds Data Acquisition Software

NEXYGEN calculates an average value of lamination strength based on the readings throughout the peel

time. When a film tear is produced the reading drops to zero and stays constant there onwards. This

leads to an incorrect value for lamination strength to be calculated because the average value also takes

into account the zero reading.

Nevertheless, in some countries 180 degree peel test technique is being used to test the

adhesive strength between inks and lamination structures. For instance, at DIC Japan both 90 and 180

degree angles are popularly used. But this is done as per the demands of the customers who require the

Page 20: Internship Report

19 | P a g e

samples to be specifically tested either for the 180 degree or 90 degree peel. At DIC Pakistan the

customers do not have any specific requirement for the angle to be used for peel test. Hence it is

entirely up to the technicians to test the sample with an angle that gives the most suitable results.

Recommendation:

Lamination Strength is a very important factor for Quality Assurance and Maintenance

as well as Research and Development regarding ink manufacture. The 90 degree (T-shape) peel test is

the most suitable angle test for testing lamination strength at DIC Pakistan Limited. This is because the

90 degree method gives precise measurements and allows values to be measured for materials normally

giving film tear.

Page 21: Internship Report

20 | P a g e

SURFACE TENSION OF INKS.

Page 22: Internship Report

21 | P a g e

Surface Tension: Basic Overview

The content for this section has been drawn from a technical report in the Research Section of CFFA

(Chemical Fabrics And Film Association).

Introduction:

Wetting is a phenomenon that we see every day. In simple terms, it is the ability of a liquid

to spread across the surface of a solid to produce a uniform, continuous surface. How a solid is wetted

by a liquid is measured by the surface tension of the liquid relative to the surface tension of the solid.

For a coating, adhesive or ink to be usable it must a) wet and adhere to the substrate, b) cure, and c)

exhibit excellent enduse properties. The surface tension of solid, also, has important influence on these

properties. A solid surface with intimate coverage of a liquid is necessary to produce a strong uniform

adhesive, coating or ink bond.

Units:

S.I. Unit – Newton per meter (N/m).

CGS Unit – dynes per centimeter (dyn/cm).

It is usually measured in the cgs unit of dyn/cm (dyne per centimeter).

Page 23: Internship Report

22 | P a g e

Theory

Surface Tension:

The interactions at the interface between a liquid and solid are complex but have

practical importance. For a drop of liquid to spread across the surface of a solid (wet the surface) work

occurs to change the shape of the liquid drop. Surface tension is the work per unit area to reshape the

liquid. It is measured in dynes/cm. For a liquid to wet the surface of a solid, the surface tension of the

liquid must be lower than the solid surface tension.

Contact Angle:

A useful measurement of the ability of a liquid to wet a surface is contact angle. Contact

angle is the angle between the solid surface and the tangent to the liquid surface at the angle of contact.

If the contact angle is greater than 90 degrees, the liquid tends to bead up. Liquids having contact angles

less than 90 degrees tend to wet surfaces. A contact angle of 0 degrees indicates a liquid will completely

cover a surface, while a contact angle of 180 degrees indicates the liquid beads up on a surface.

Dynamic Surface Tension:

The surface tension of inks and coatings on press do not necessarily stay

constant. The values can change during the printing process as ink splits from one surface and then wets

down another. The primary reason for this is the ink or coating is a mixture of various components, and

Page 24: Internship Report

23 | P a g e

during the dynamic printing process these components rearrange themselves every time the ink is split

and creates a new surface.

Most inks fall into the range of 25-40 dynes/cm. Obviously, the lower the surface tension

number, the better the surface wetting. However, since the ink is a mixture of components, during the

printing process these components change position due to ink splitting and need to reposition

themselves at the new ink/substrate interface. As the ink is split, a new ink surface is created, and the

ink's components must re-establish their positions with respect to the surface in contact.

Since the components of the ink or coating come in different sizes and shapes, they don't

re-establish their positions at the same speed. So, if a given surfactant is in the ink, its ability to reduce

the surface tension depends on how quickly it can reposition itself to reduce the surface tension. Not all

surfactants behave equally when it comes to this task. In general, the larger the molecule, the slower it

is to respond and the higher its dynamic surface tension.

Therefore, an ink can have a surface tension of 25 dynes/cm, but when it is subject to a

dynamic condition, such as a printing press, its “dynamic” surface tension behaves like it has a value of

40 dynes/cm. The faster the press speed, the more demanding is this effect on wettability and print

quality.

There are some separate techniques that are used to measure dynamic surface tension which are

different from those used to measure the normal surface tension of the inks. These will be mentioned

later in this report.

Page 25: Internship Report

24 | P a g e

Application: Parameters

Surface tension measurements are useful to predict surface wetting, however, they are not

the only criteria for good print acceptance or adhesion. Each printing, coating, or adhesive application is

unique and is affected by many process and material variables. Several factors may affect any individual

application.

Climatic Conditions:

Temperature and humidity affect how a solid and liquid interact. Surface wetting

characteristics may be significantly different winter to summer or dependent on

humidity.

Liquid Consideration:

High surface tension liquids have more difficulty wetting the surface of solids than

low surface tension liquids. Waterborne inks and coatings have higher surface

tensions than most solvent systems. Surfactants and solvents are useful in lowering

surface tensions.

The viscosity, drying time and solvency (“bite”) of the liquid will affect how an ink or

coating wets a surface. Changing the solvent in the ink or coating can improve

surface wetting.

Heating the ink or coating can favorably affect application.

It is important to remember that the surface tension of an ink, coating, or adhesive

must be lower than that of the surface to which it is applied to achieve good wet

out.

Page 26: Internship Report

25 | P a g e

Solid Considerations:

Surface tension is affected by material composition. Selection of plasticizer,

lubricants, stabilizer, and process aids contributes to surface tension.

Surface roughness can affect ink and coating wetting. Rougher surfaces allow ink

and coating “dive in” and promote mechanical bonding.

Moderate heating of the film can increase surface tension and receptivity.

Surface contamination or surface exudate will adversely affect ink and coating

acceptance. It is also important to consider sources of contamination which may

affect surface tension during printing and coating operations.

Surface tension of a solid surface must be higher than the liquid applied to achieve

acceptable wet out.

Page 27: Internship Report

26 | P a g e

Measurement.

Kibron DyneScan: high throughput screening of surface tension

The Kibron DyneScan performs high throughput screening of surface tension, the key

parameter determining the performance of ink.

Individual surface tension values of 96 samples (50 microliters each) can be measured in 2

to 20 minutes (depending on the application), allowing for truly cost-efficient high content screening of

ink samples.

Kibron Dynescan

The Kibron DyneScan comprises the use of the Kibron Delta-8 analyzer, DyneScan

software and a kit of Kibron 96-well Dyneplates, sensor Dyneprobes, and automatic cleaning

furnace Dyneclean.

Page 28: Internship Report

27 | P a g e

Kibron Delta-8

Basic features of Kibron Delta-8 are:

standard 96-well platform Dyneplates

sample volume only 50 microliters/well

simultaneous equilibration of 96 samples

measurement time of one plate 2 - 20 minutes, depending on the application

8 parallel high-precision microbalances and wire probes

automatic probe cleaning after each assay

integration possibility to robotics and automatic liquid handling systems

robust and compact construction

easy-to-use and minimal maintenance required

Page 29: Internship Report

28 | P a g e

Specifications of Delta-8 Analyzer.

The Delta-8 analyzer and Kibron Dyneplates are the platform for Kibron DyneScan.

Performance

Temperature range 18–30°C

Measurement volume 50 μl/well

Surface tension range 10-100 mN/m

Resolution 0.01 mN/m

Balance resolution 0.050 μgrams

Precision 0.2 mN/m

Method Maximum pull force/du Nouy

Measurement time (96-well plate) 3 minutes

Probe lifetime 100 plates

Cleaning of probes eClean (automatic Joule heating)

eClean cassette Lifetime 400 plates

DyneSearch - 96-well plates

Dimensions 127.8 × 85.5 mm (standard footprint)

Volume per well 50 μl

Type Disposable

Page 30: Internship Report

29 | P a g e

Software

Supported OS NT4.0 /2000/XP

Min. requirements PII266 MHz, 64 MB memory, CDROM-drive,

SVGA display, one free COM port, 25 MB disk space

Communication RS-232

Physical dimensions

Weight 24 kg / 52,911 lbs.

Height 405 mm / 15,945 in.

Width 770 mm / 30,315 in.

Depth 380 mm / 14,961 in.

Power supply

Input 100 –120/200 –240 V, 47– 63 Hz.

Output 12 V DC, 10.8 A.

Power max. 120 W

CE-approved

One INKscreen kit includes 100 Dyneplates, one cleaning furnace and 1 set of probes, allowing surface

tension measurement for 9600 samples.

The Kibron INKscreen is operated with dedicated and easy-to-use software for screening of surface

tension.

Page 31: Internship Report

30 | P a g e

Conclusion.

Surface tension determines the performance of inks

Surfactants are the key constituents in printing inks, their correct choice and concentration being critical

factors to product performance. There is currently an increasing demand to improve print quality on a

range of segments such as industrial inkjets, textiles, lithography, screen printing, and printing on more

diverse and complex media, including a variety of plastics.

High throughput determination of surface tension

The Kibron DyneScan allows for cost effective high throughput experimenting of a vast number of

surfactants and their combinations, yielding key parameters by which you can optimize and improve

your product formulations.

Surface tension can be measured 100 times faster compared to conventional methods, using a fraction

of sample material. Dynescan also allows measurement of 96 samples simultaneously and thus can

prove to be time saving when the workload is high.

The INKscreen allows you to reduce the design time of your products, reduce labor expenses and

material costs to facilitate early pipeline products. This all adds up to better products and

competitiveness.

Page 32: Internship Report

31 | P a g e

References.

1. Lloyds Research Foundation. Web. July-Aug. 2011. <•

http://www.lloydsresearch.com/pdf/All%20Product%20Leaflet.PDF>.

2. "Viscosity." The Physics Hypertextbook. Web. 05 Aug. 2011. <http://physics.info/viscosity/>.

3. Chemical Fabrics and Film. Web. 08 Aug. 2011.

<http://www.chemicalfabricsandfilm.com/research.html>.

4. "Some Things to Remember About Dynamic Surface Tension." Paper, Film & Foil Converter

Magazine | Converting Industry, Flexible Packaging, Slitting and Rewinding, Coating and

Laminating, Substrates, Synthetic Paper, Transdermal Patches, Atmospheric Plasma,

Coextrusion, Doctor Blade, Active Packaging. Web. 10 Aug. 2011. <http://pffc-

online.com/mag/paper_things_remember_dynamic/>.

5. Kibron DyneScan. Web. 12 Aug. 2011. <http://www.kibron.com/cmceeker/kibron-dynescan/>.