1

Internet Assisted ReviewPrototype Demonstration

Review User GroupJuly 11, 2002

2

SRA/GTA Activities Flow

1. Finalize Roster2. Make Application Assignments3. Navigate to IAR Control Center4. Set IAR Specific Dates5. Release Meeting to IAR6. Toggle different Meeting Specific and

Reviewer Specific Options.

3

Peer Review Banner Screen w/ IAR Section

4

IAR Control Center

Click for Reviewer Assignments

5

Control Center – Enter/Update Dates

These dates are pending RPC approval.

6

Control Center – Meeting Wide Options

Default settings

7

Control Center – List of Assigned Applications

8

Control Center – Enable for IAR Confirmation

9

Control Center – Enable for IAR Confirmation

10

IAR Registration and Account Creation

1) The Reviewer will receive an email containing the customized url (unique token identifier for each Reviewer).

2) Reviewer goes to url and enters their full name, phone number, desired username and password and optional fields (ssn, dob, Institution). Account is not yet active.

3) Registration information is electronically provided to OER Data Quality staff who verify that the information entered matches IMPACII data, they may also clean up person data on the Reviewer.

4) Within 1 business day, OER Data Quality staff approve and activate account.

5) Reviewer receives email to let them know their account is active. Email contains url for IAR log on screen.

11

List of Meetings – Same layout for SRAs/GTAs and Reviewers

12

Reviewer – List of Applications – Before SUBMIT Due Date

13

14

Reviewer – Submitting Critique/Score

15

Reviewer – Submitting Critique/Score

16

Reviewer – Critique/Score Submitted Confirmation

17

Reviewer – List of Applications READ Phase – All Applications(Example of unassigned)

If Reviewer is unassigned, assignment role will be blank.

18

Reviewer – List of Applications READ Phase – All Applications(Example of COI and Blocked)

19

Reviewer – Score Matrix View

20

SRA/GTA will log into IAR via the same log in screen. To navigate to that screen, SRA/GTA can either bookmark the IAR Web Site or click on IAR System Log on button on Peer Review Banner Screen.

Once in IAR – SRA/GTA will be presented with a List of Meetings Screen.

Clicking on meeting identifier/title will take users to the List of Applications screen.

SRA/GTA Access to IAR

21

SRA/GTA – List of Applications – View by Appl. – SUBMIT Phase

During Submit Phase, critiques are viewed in PDF format.

22

SRA/GTA – List of Applications – View by Reviewer – SUBMIT Phase

23

SRA/GTA – List of Applications – View by Appl. – READ Phase

During Read Phase, when view is List by Application SRA/GTA may view critiques in PDF or Word format.

24

SRA/GTA – List of Applications – View by Reviewer – READ Phase

When view is List by Reviewer, SRA/GTA may view critiques in PDF format only.

25

Score Matrix – SRA/GTA View

26

Score Matrix – SRA/GTA Edit

27

Score Matrix – SRA/GTA Viewing Lower Half Applications Only

28

Critique Status Report

29

Viewing Submitted Critiques

• Individual Critique (PDF)• A group for a specific application (PDF)• A group from a specific Reviewer (PDF)• All Critiques in a Meeting (PDF)• Pre-Summary Statement Body (MS Word)

30

Viewing Critiques – PDF Example

31

Creating the Pre-Summary Statement Bodies

Critiques will be ordered by assignment priority (Primary, Secondary, Tertiary, Reader, Discussant, Unassigned) with one blank line between critiques.

The first line will contain application number<space>PI last name, PI first name.

Each critique will begin with “Critique (#)” heading where # represents the number of the critique (1, 2, 3, 4, etc.).

If critiques for Primary, Secondary, or Tertiary are missing, pre-Summary Statement body will still contain “Critique” heading with 4 blank lines.

If critiques for Readers, Discussants or Unassigned are missing, “Critique” heading or 4 blank lines will not be included.

32

Creating the Pre-Summary Statement Bodies

for Multi-project Applications

Critiques for subprojects should be included in the parent application pre-summary statement body.

Subprojects should be sorted using the order specified in the Order of Review (in the IMPAC II Peer Review Module).

SRA/GTAs will need to renumber their Order of Review before the pre-summary statement bodies are created.

Within each subproject, critiques will be sorted using the standard order of Primary, Secondary, etc.

33

Pre-Summary Statement Body – MS Word Example

34

IAR Deployment Schedule

October 2002 – Deploy with minimal functionality as pilot to Focus Group Members

Spring 2003 – Full Production Deployment

35

Questions?