international law: unit 7 environmental law mr. morrison fall 2005

21
International Law: Unit 7 Environmental Law Mr. Morrison Fall 2005

Upload: myrtle-garrett

Post on 04-Jan-2016

217 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: International Law: Unit 7 Environmental Law Mr. Morrison Fall 2005

International Law: Unit 7Environmental Law

Mr. MorrisonFall 2005

Page 2: International Law: Unit 7 Environmental Law Mr. Morrison Fall 2005

Law of the Sea

Page 3: International Law: Unit 7 Environmental Law Mr. Morrison Fall 2005

Fall 2005 International Law: Unit 7 Environmental Law

3

Law of the Sea

Traditional law was customary Freedom of the High Seas 3 (or 12) mile limit for territorial

waters Issues regarding fisheries Continental shelf claims

Page 4: International Law: Unit 7 Environmental Law Mr. Morrison Fall 2005

Fall 2005 International Law: Unit 7 Environmental Law

4

Law of the Sea

1958 Geneva Conventions on the Law of the Sea Left many questions unanswered

1960 Conference failed Law of the Sea Conference, 1971-

82

Page 5: International Law: Unit 7 Environmental Law Mr. Morrison Fall 2005

Fall 2005 International Law: Unit 7 Environmental Law

5

Law of the Sea Convention

Waters Internal (inside base lines)

Coastal State has same rights as on land Territorial (up to 12 miles from base

lines) Coastal State has sovereignty Right of innocent passage

Page 6: International Law: Unit 7 Environmental Law Mr. Morrison Fall 2005

Fall 2005 International Law: Unit 7 Environmental Law

6

Law of the Sea Convention

Exclusive Economic Zone (200 miles) Coastal State has economic rights over

fisheries, etc. Otherwise High Seas rules apply

High Seas Only “flag State” controls ships

Special rules for straits and archipelagos

Page 7: International Law: Unit 7 Environmental Law Mr. Morrison Fall 2005

Fall 2005 International Law: Unit 7 Environmental Law

7

Subsurface

Under territorial waters—sovereignty

Continental shelf Out to 200+ miles Coastal State has control of resources

Beyond Continental Shelf Seabed authority

This was “sticking point” for US

Page 8: International Law: Unit 7 Environmental Law Mr. Morrison Fall 2005

Fall 2005 International Law: Unit 7 Environmental Law

8

Law of the Sea Convention

Rules for States with neighboring or opposite coasts

Page 9: International Law: Unit 7 Environmental Law Mr. Morrison Fall 2005

Fall 2005 International Law: Unit 7 Environmental Law

9

Law of the Sea Convention Provisions for environmental protection

Adoption of environmental treaties by reference

Provisions for fisheries conservation Straddling stocks and Highly Migratory

Species Dispute resolution

International Tribunal on Law of the Sea Other dispute resolution mechanisms

Page 10: International Law: Unit 7 Environmental Law Mr. Morrison Fall 2005

Environmental Law

Page 11: International Law: Unit 7 Environmental Law Mr. Morrison Fall 2005

Fall 2005 International Law: Unit 7 Environmental Law

11

Traditional environmental law

A State may not allow its territory to be used to cause significant environmental harm to another State

Trail Smelter arbitration

Based on principles of State Responsibility

Page 12: International Law: Unit 7 Environmental Law Mr. Morrison Fall 2005

Fall 2005 International Law: Unit 7 Environmental Law

12

Problems with traditional approach

Only remedies point-to-point problems (e.g., smoke), not “global” problems (affecting all parties)

Doesn’t provide standards

Page 13: International Law: Unit 7 Environmental Law Mr. Morrison Fall 2005

Fall 2005 International Law: Unit 7 Environmental Law

13

Modern approach

Two major declarations Stockholm Declaration on the Human

Environment (1972) Rio Declaration on Environment and

Development (1992)

Page 14: International Law: Unit 7 Environmental Law Mr. Morrison Fall 2005

Fall 2005 International Law: Unit 7 Environmental Law

14

Principles of international environmental law Good neighborliness Preventive Precautionary Best available practices Polluter pays Sustainable development Common, but differentiated,

responsibility

Page 15: International Law: Unit 7 Environmental Law Mr. Morrison Fall 2005

Fall 2005 International Law: Unit 7 Environmental Law

15

Treaties to implement these principles in various areas

Air Convention on Long Range

Transboundary Air Pollution (European) Protocols on SO2, Heavy metals, NOxides,

etc.

Atmosphere Vienna Convention on the Ozone Layer

Montreal and other Protocols

Page 16: International Law: Unit 7 Environmental Law Mr. Morrison Fall 2005

Fall 2005 International Law: Unit 7 Environmental Law

16

Treaties (cont’d)

Atmosphere (cont’d) Framework Convention on Climate

Change Kyoto protocol

Wildlife and biodiversity Whaling Convention Convention on International Trade in

Endangered Species (CITES)

Page 17: International Law: Unit 7 Environmental Law Mr. Morrison Fall 2005

Fall 2005 International Law: Unit 7 Environmental Law

17

Treaties (cont’d) Wildlife and biodiversity

Biodiversity Convention Cartenaga Protocol on Biohazards

Deserts UN Framework Convention on

Desertification Wetlands

Ramsar Convention

Page 18: International Law: Unit 7 Environmental Law Mr. Morrison Fall 2005

Fall 2005 International Law: Unit 7 Environmental Law

18

Treaties (cont’d)

Hazardous Wastes and Activities Basel Convention on Hazardous

Waste Convention on Industrial Accidents

Procedural treaties

Page 19: International Law: Unit 7 Environmental Law Mr. Morrison Fall 2005

Fall 2005 International Law: Unit 7 Environmental Law

19

Common elements of treaties Framework conventions

First step is identify problem and committing to study and remedy it

Implementation through Protocols Second step is to make specific rules Ratified like a convention

Technical Annexes (Appendices, Schedules) Note method of adoption

Page 20: International Law: Unit 7 Environmental Law Mr. Morrison Fall 2005

Fall 2005 International Law: Unit 7 Environmental Law

20

Common aspects of treaties (cont’d)

Institutionalization Meetings of parties (MOPs and COPs) Secretariats

Compliance Use of “compliance” not

“enforcement” Financial incentives for compliance

Page 21: International Law: Unit 7 Environmental Law Mr. Morrison Fall 2005

Fall 2005 International Law: Unit 7 Environmental Law

21

Major issues

Trade-off between environment and development (the Rio Conference issue)

Trade-off between environment and economic interests (the Kyoto issue)