LOGO

New methodologies for assessing “Emotional Perception” as a component

of Emotional Intelligence”

Edgar Breso, PhD. @ebreso

Universitat Jaume I de Castelló www.emotional-apps.com

ICEI 2013. New York, September 8-10 2013

Emotional Perception

None 1 2 3 4 5 Very Much

Happiness Anger Fear

Indicate how much of each emotion is expressed by this face:

Contents

What is the problem 1

How is our proposal 2

What is the difference? 3 3

What is next? 4 4

www.emotional-apps.com

Problems of current surveys

v  Mostly related to the test development itself but not to the theoretical model § Perception: assess the emotion elicited in the

observer instead of the emotion showed. - There is no task for assessing the expression of

emotion

§ Use: connection between performance of these tasks, and the “using emotion” abilities is not clear.

§ Managing: There is not enough evidence for whether and how theoretical knowledge is related to one’s actual ability to manage emotions Further information: Maul, 2012

Contents

1

How is our proposal 2

3 3

4 4

Contents

1

2

What is the difference? 3 3

4 4

Apple store / Google Play www.emtional-apps.com

ww.emotional-apps.com

www.emotional-apps.com

www.emotional-apps.com

What is the difference

First “real MOBILE ability test”

Take advantage of DEVICES’ possibilities

More dynamic experience

Consider TiME as a Variable

Bet/challenge users “gamification”

MEIT

CONCLUSIONS

v  MEIT is not an adaptation of MSCEIT, it is an “evolution” in the EI assessment.

v  MEIT is still “under construction.” We have already done a lot of work but we need your feed-back to carry on the development and improve the final result.

v  We are open to international projects and collaborations with universities and/or companies.

www.emotional-apps.com

LOGO

New methodologies for assessing “Emotional Perception” as a component

of Emotional Intelligence”

Edgar Breso, PhD. @ebreso

Universitat Jaume I de Castelló www.emotional-apps.com

ICEI 2013. New York, September 8-10 2013