interconnect devices v. johnstech international

Upload: patentblast

Post on 03-Jun-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/12/2019 Interconnect Devices v. Johnstech International

    1/33

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.Brian G. Arnold, Bar No. [email protected]

    Marjorie A. Witter, Bar No. [email protected] South Grand AvenueSuite 2600Two California PlazaLos Angeles, California 90071Telephone: 213.929.2500Facsimile: 213.929.2525

    Attorneys for PlaintiffINTERCONNECT DEVICES, INC.

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

    SAN JOSE DIVISION

    INTERCONNECT DEVICES, INC.,

    Plaintiff,

    v.

    JOHNSTECH INTERNATIONAL CORP.,

    Defendant.

    Case No.

    COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY

    JUDGMENT

    DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

  • 8/12/2019 Interconnect Devices v. Johnstech International

    2/33

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    Plaintiff Interconnect Devices, Inc. (IDI) brings this Complaint against Defendant

    Johnstech International Corp. (Johnstech) for a Declaratory Judgment that (1) IDI has not

    infringed U.S. Patent Nos. 7,059,866, 7,722,361, and 7,445,465; (2) that U.S. Patent Nos.

    7,059,866, 7,722,361, and 7,445,465 are invalid pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 101, 102, 103 and 112;

    and (3) that this is an exceptional case under 35 U.S.C. 285 and for an award of all of IDIs

    attorneys fees and costs.

    THE PARTIES

    1. Plaintiff Interconnect Devices, Inc. is a Delaware corporation with a principal

    place of business at 5101 Richland Avenue, Kansas City, KS 66106.

    2. Defendant Johnstech International Corporation is a Minnesota corporation with a

    principal place of business at 1210 New Brighton Blvd., Minneapolis, MN 55413.

    JURISDICTION

    3. Plaintiff brings this action under the Federal Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C.

    2201.

    4. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

    1331 (Federal Question) and 1338(a) (Patent).

    5. Upon information and belief, this Court has personal jurisdiction over Johnstech

    because it has established minimum contacts with the forum. Johnstech maintains its Sales,

    Service, & Innovation Center in Santa Clara, California, and, on information and belief, has

  • 8/12/2019 Interconnect Devices v. Johnstech International

    3/33

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    6. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b) and (c), and

    1400(b) because a substantial part of the events giving rise to this action occurred within this

    Judicial District, and because a corporation defendant shall be deemed to reside in any judicial

    district in which it is subject to personal jurisdiction. In addition, Johnstech maintains its Sales,

    Service, & Innovation Center in Santa Clara, California, and, on information and belief, the lead

    inventor of two of the patents-in-suit resides in this district and developed the purported

    inventions described in the patents-in-suit in this district. Further, IDI maintains a sales and

    applications engineering office in this district in Milpitas, California.

    THE PATENTS-IN-SUIT

    7. On June 13, 2006, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

    issued U.S. Patent No. 7,059,866 (the 866 Patent), entitled Integrated Circuit Contact to Test

    Apparatus. Mathew L. Gilk is the named inventor on the face of the 866 Patent. On

    information and belief, the 866 Patent is assigned to Johnstech. A true and correct copy of the

    866 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

    8. On May 25, 2010, the USPTO issued U.S. Patent No. 7,722,361 (the 361

    Patent), entitled Test Socket. Jose E. Lopez, Dennis B. Shell, and Mathew L. Gilk are the

    named inventors on the face of the 361 Patent. On information and belief, the 361 Patent is

    assigned to Johnstech. A true and correct copy of the 361 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit B.

    9. On November 4, 2008, the USPTO issued U.S. Patent No. 7,445,465 (the 465

  • 8/12/2019 Interconnect Devices v. Johnstech International

    4/33

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    11. On February 25, 2014, Johnstechs counsel set a cease and desist letter (the

    Letter) to IDI, alleging that IDIs Archimedes test pin and socket directly infringes Johnstechs

    866 Patent, 361 Patent, and 465 Patent (collectively, the patents-in-suit). A true and correct

    copy of the Letter is attached hereto as Exhibit D.

    12. The Letter stated that its purpose was to advise IDI of the consequences of

    infringement of one or more of these patents. It stated that Johnstech is aware that [IDI] will be

    exhibiting products at the upcoming BITS conference in Phoenix, AZ in March 2014 and

    warned that if IDI exhibits the Archimedes product, Johnstech will consider that an intentional

    infringement.

    13. The Letter demanded a response in less than five business days, and stated that if

    Johnstech do[es] not hear from [IDI] by March 1, 2014, we shall assume that settlement is of no

    interest, and continued infringement will certainly be willful.

    14. By virtue of the foregoing, there is a continuing justiciable controversy between

    the parties as to IDIs right to make, use, offer to sell and sell its Archimedes product, and as to

    the validity, enforceability and scope of the patents in suit.

    FEDERAL DECLARATORY JUDGMENT ACT

    15. Pursuant to the Federal Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. 2201, this Court

    may declare the rights and other legal relations of any interested party.

    16. As set forth in the Letter, Johnstech has asserted that IDI infringes Johnstechs

  • 8/12/2019 Interconnect Devices v. Johnstech International

    5/33

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    21. The relief sought by IDI will resolve the controversy relative to the respective

    interests of IDI and Johnstech.

    COUNT I

    DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT OF THE 866 PATENT

    22. Each of paragraphs 1 through 21 is incorporated herein by reference.

    23. On information and belief, 866 Patent is assigned to Johnstech.

    24. IDI has not infringed and does not infringe any valid claim of the 866 Patent.

    25. There is an actual, substantial and immediate controversy between the adverse

    interests of IDI and Johnstech as to whether IDIs use, making, sale or offering for sale of its

    Archimedes test pin and socket infringes the claims of the 866 Patent.

    26. IDI is entitled to a Judicial Declaration and Order that IDI has not infringed and

    does not infringe, either directly or indirectly, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, any

    valid claim of the 866 Patent.

    COUNT II

    DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY OF THE 866 PATENT

    27. Each of paragraphs 1 through 26 is incorporated herein by reference.

    28. On information and belief, 866 Patent is assigned to Johnstech.

    29. The 866 Patent is invalid for failure to satisfy one or more of the conditions of

    patentability set forth in Title 35 of the United States Code, including, but not limited to, 35

  • 8/12/2019 Interconnect Devices v. Johnstech International

    6/33

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    35. There is an actual, substantial and immediate controversy between the adverse

    interests of IDI and Johnstech as to whether IDIs use, making, sale or offering for sale of its

    Archimedes test pin and socket infringes the claims of the 361 Patent.

    36. IDI is entitled to a Judicial Declaration and Order that IDI has not infringed and

    does not infringe, either directly or indirectly, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, any

    valid claim of the 361 Patent.

    COUNT IV

    DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY OF THE 361 PATENT

    37. Each of paragraphs 1 through 36 is incorporated herein by reference.

    38. On information and belief, the 361 Patent is assigned to Johnstech.

    39. The 361 Patent is invalid for failure to satisfy one or more of the conditions of

    patentability set forth in Title 35 of the United States Code, including, but not limited to, 35

    U.S.C. 101, 102, 103, and 112.

    40. An actual, substantial and immediate controversy exists between IDI and

    Johnstech as to whether the claims of the 361 Patent are valid.

    41. IDI is entitled to a Judicial Declaration and Order that the 361 Patent is invalid.

    COUNT V

    DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT OF THE 465 PATENT

    42. Each of paragraphs 1 through 41 is incorporated herein by reference.

  • 8/12/2019 Interconnect Devices v. Johnstech International

    7/33

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    COUNT VI

    DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY OF THE 465 PATENT

    47. Each of paragraphs 1 through 46 is incorporated herein by reference.

    48. On information and belief, the 465 Patent is assigned to Johnstech.

    49. The 465 Patent is invalid for failure to satisfy one or more of the conditions of

    patentability set forth in Title 35 of the United States Code, including, but not limited to, 35

    U.S.C. 101, 102, 103, and 112.

    50. An actual, substantial and immediate controversy exists between IDI and

    Johnstech as to whether the claims of the 465 Patent are valid.

    51. IDI is entitled to a Judicial Declaration and Order that the 465 Patent is invalid.

    PRAYER FOR RELIEF

    WHEREFORE, IDI respectfully requests that the Court enter judgment in its favor and

    against Johnstech as follows:

    A. The Court enter judgment that the 866 Patent is not infringed by IDI.

    B. The Court enter judgment that the 866 Patent is invalid.

    C. The Court enter judgment that the 361 Patent is not infringed by IDI.

    D. The Court enter judgment that the 361 Patent is invalid.

    E. The Court enter judgment that the 465 Patent is not infringed by IDI.

    F. The Court enter judgment that the 465 Patent is invalid.

  • 8/12/2019 Interconnect Devices v. Johnstech International

    8/33

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    Dated: March 10, 2014 SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.

    By: /s/Brian G. ArnoldBrian G. ArnoldMarjorie A. Witter

    Attorneys for PlaintiffINTERCONNECT DEVICES, INC.

  • 8/12/2019 Interconnect Devices v. Johnstech International

    9/33

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

    IDI hereby demands a jury trial on any issue triable of right by a jury pursuant to Rule 38

    of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

    Dated: March 10, 2014 SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.

    By: /s/Brian G. Arnold

    Brian G. ArnoldMarjorie A. Witter

    Attorneys for PlaintiffINTERCONNECT DEVICES, INC.

  • 8/12/2019 Interconnect Devices v. Johnstech International

    10/33

  • 8/12/2019 Interconnect Devices v. Johnstech International

    11/33

    US007059866B2

    United S t a t e s P a t e n t1 2 ) 1 0 ) P a t e n t N 0 . : US 7,059,866 B 2G i l k ( 4 5 ) Date o f P a t e n t : J u n . 1 3 , 2006

    54) INTEGRATEDCIRCUIT CONTACT TO TEST 5 , 6 3 4 , 8 0 1 A * 6/1997 Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 439/71APPARATUS 5 , 7 4 9 , 7 3 8 A 5 / 1 9 9 8 J o h n s o n e t a 1 . 4 3 9 / 6 6

    6 , 0 1 9 , 6 1 2 A 2 / 2 0 0 0 Hasegawa e t a 1 . 4 3 9 / 7 3( 7 5 ) I n v e n t o r : Ma t h e w L _ G i l k , L a k e v i l l e , MN U s ) 6 , 2 3 1 , 3 5 3 B 1 5 / 2 0 0 1 R a t h b u r n 4 3 9 / 6 6

    6 ,2 4 4 , 87 4 B1 6 / 200 1 Tan . . . . . . . . 4 3 9 / 6 6( 7 3 ) AssigneeZ JohnsTech International Corporation 6 , 5 7 2 , 3 8 8 B1 6 / 2 0 0 3 Lee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3 9 / 7 1

    M i n n e a p o l i s , MN U S ) FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS* ) N o t i c e : S u b j e c t t o any d i s c l a i m e r , t h e t e r m o f t h i s J P 2 0 0 2 ' 0 4 3 0 0 4 A 2 / 2 0 0 2

    . . . y ays B r o c h u r e e n t i t l e d SM y p e L o w - i n d u c t a n c e S o c k e t , [C299( 2 1 ) A p p l , N 0 . : 1 0 / 8 2 9 , 5 7 7 S e r i e s p u b l i s h e d b y Y a m a i c h i E l e c t r o n i c s C o . L t d .( 2 2 ) F i l e d : A p r . 2 2 , 2 0 0 4 * C i t e d b y e x a m i n e r

    _ _ _ Primary Examiner4Chandrika Prasad( 6 5 ) Pnor P u b h c a t l o n D a t a ( 7 4 ) A t t o r n e y , A g e n t , o r F i r m i N a w r o c k i , R o o n e y

    US 2004/0248448 A 1 D e c . 9 , 2004 S i V e I T S O n , P - AR e l a t e d US. A p p l i c a t i o n Data ( 5 7 ) ABSTRACT

    ( 6 0 ) P r o v i s i o n a l a p p l i c a t i o n N O 6 0 / 4 6 5 0 2 2 ? l e d on p r A o n t a c t t e s t s e t f o r u s e i n t e s t i n g i n t e g r a t e d c i r c u i t s . The2 3 2 0 0 3 ' s e t i n c l u d e s a h o u s i n g h a v i n g o p p o s i t e l y - f a c i ng s u r f a c e s a n d

    5 1 I t Cl one o r more l o t s e x t e n d i n g t h r o u g h t h e h o u s i n g between h e) 1 3 0 ? 1 2 / 0 0 2 0 0 6 0 1 s u r f a c e s . A r s t s u r f a c e , d u r i n g u s e o f t h e t e s t s e t , i sH05K1/00 ( 2 0 0 6 ' 0 1 ) a p p r o a c h e d b y a n i n t e g r a t e d c i r c u i t t o b e t e s t e d , a n d a( ) second s u r f a c e i s proximate t h e l o a d board a t a t e s t s i t e . A

    ( 5 2 ) US. l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 439/66 C o n t a c t i s received i n a S l o t , each C o n t a c t h a v i n g a ? r s t e n d( 5 8 ) F i e l d o f C l a s s i ? c a t i o n Search . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3 9 / 6 5 , e n g a g a b l e by a l e a d of t h e i n t e g r a t e d C i r c u i t d e v i c e _ A

    4 3 9 / 6 6 6 8 6 9 7 0 7 1 7 2 7 3 5 9 1 second end of e a c h c o n t a c t i s i n eng agement w i t h a c o r r eS e e aPPhCaUOn ? l e f o r C o m p l e t e S e a r c h h l s t o r y - s p o n d i n g t e r m i n a l . Each c o n t a c t i s movable b e t w e e n a ? r s t( 5 6 ) R Ct d o r i e n t a t i o n , unengaged by a c o r r e s p o n d i n g l e a d o f a n IC a n de erences 1 e

    U . S . PATENTDOCUMENTS5 ,069 ,629 A 1 2 / 1 99 1 J o h n s o n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3 9 / 7 15 , 2 0 7 , 5 8 4 A * 5/1993 Johnson 439/665 , 3 8 8 , 9 9 6 A * 2/1995 Johns on 439/655,437,556 A 8/1995 Bargain e t a 1 . . 439/665,594,355 A 1/19 9 7 Ludwig . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 24 /755

    a s e c o n d o r i e n t a t i o n i n which t h e 1C i s engaged by t h ec o r r e s p o n d i n g l e a d o f a n IC and u r g e d i n t o i t s s l o t . Ane l a s t o m e r b i a s e s t h e c o n t a c t t o i t s ? r s t o r i e n t a t i o n . Thec o n t a c t , w h e n mov e d between i t s ? r s t and s e c o n d o r i e n t at i o n s , does n o t s l i d e a c r o s s a t e r m i n a l of t h e l o a d b o a r d .

    4 C l a i m s , 1 Drawing S h e e t

  • 8/12/2019 Interconnect Devices v. Johnstech International

    12/33

  • 8/12/2019 Interconnect Devices v. Johnstech International

    13/33

    US 7 , 0 5 9 , 8 6 6 B21

    INTEGR TED CIRCUIT CONT CT TO TESTPP R TUS

    T h i s i s a r e g u l a r a p p l i c a t io n ? l e d u n d e r 3 5 U . S . C . l l l a )c l a i m i n g p r i o r i t y , u n d e r 3 5 U . S . C . l l 9 e ) l ) , o f p r o v is i o n a l a p p l i c a t i o n S e r . N o . 6 0 / 4 6 5 , 0 2 2 , p r e v i o u s l y ? l e d A p r .2 3 , 2 0 0 3 u n d e r 3 5 U . S . C . 1 1 1 b ) .

    B CKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

    1 . T e c h n i c a l F i e l dThe p r e s e n t i n v e n t i o n r e l a t e s t o a c o n n e c t o r a p p a r a t u sW h i c h a c c o m p l i s h e s i n t e r f a c i n g o f a n i n t e g r a t e d c i r c u i t W i t h

    an IC e s t a p p a r a t u s . More a r t i c u l a r l y , t h e p r e s e n t i n v e n t i o np r o v i d e s an e l e c t r i c a l c o n n e c t i o n system Which a c i l i t a t e s ap o s i t i v e c o n n e c t i o n betWeen an IC d e v i c e u n d e r t e s t DUT)and a l o a d b o a r d o f t h e t e s t a p p a r a t u s , and o s i t i v e r e s t r a i n tof e r y s m a l l c o n n e c t o r s u t i l i Z e d i n c u r r e n t t e s t a p p a r a t u s .

    2 . D e s c r i p t i o n o f t h e R e l a t e d A r tM a n y i f f e r e n t t e s t s i t e c o n ? g u r a t i o n s h a v e b e e n d e v i s e df o r q u i c k l y a n d t e m p o r a r i l y c o n n e c t i n g i n t e g r a t e d c i r c u i t

    l e a d s of a device t o b e t e s t e d t o a load board of a t e s t e r .Automated e s t a p p a r a t u s i n p a r t i c u l a r u s e a number of suchc o n ? g u r a t i o n s . One a r r a n g e m e n t u s e s f o r c e b r o u g h t t o b e a rupon a c o n t a c t p o s i t i o n e d betWeen a l e a d of h e I C and t h el o a d b o a r d t o deform a p r o b e t i p o f t h e c o n t a c t and engagea pad on t h e l o a d b o a r d . Another arrangement i s t o useeng agement f o r c e a p p l i e d b y t h e IC t o r o t a t e a c o n t a c tmounted W i t h i n a s l o t t o overcome p o s i t i o n a l b i a s imposedby a n e l a s t o m e r i c e l e m e n t t o t h e c o n t a c t . n end o f t h ec o n t a c t o p p o s i t e a n e n d e n g a g e d by h e I C c o n t a c t s a pad ft h e l o a d b o a r d When h e IC and e s t s i t e a r e b r o u g h t t o g e t h e r .

    S u c h c o n ? g u r a t i o ns p r o v i d e f o r p o s i t i v e c o n n e c t i o nbetWeen l e a d s of DUT n d c o r r e s p o n d i n g l e a d s of t e s ta p p a r a t u s a n d r e l y upon h e i n i t i a l e n g a g e m e n t b e t W e e n t h eDUT n d t e s t s i t e t o ensure a p o s i t i v e c o n n e c t i o n .

    I t Would b e d e s i r a b l e t o p r o v i d e a s y s t e m a f f o r d i n ga d d i t i o n a l p r e d e t e r m i n e d f o r c e , i n a d d i t i o n t o t h a t p r o v i d e dby n i t i a l engagement o f t h e DUT nd h e t e s t a p p a r a t u s , t ob e t t e r e n s u r e a p o s i t i v e e l e c t r i c a l c o n n e c t i o n . F u r t h e r , i tWould b e d e s i r a b l e t h a t e x c e s s i v e f o r c e n o t b e r e q u i r e dbetWeen t h e DUT n d e s t s i t e .

    20

    30

    35

    40

    2I n u s e , a l e a d of a n i n t e g r a t e d c i r c u i t W i l l be m a d e t o

    e n g a ge t h e nose of a c o n t a c t a t t h e curved s u r f a c e . Sucha c t i o n w i l l e f f e c t c o m p r e s s i o n o f t h e f r o n t e l a s t o m e r . Thec o n t a c t W i l l r o t a t e a b o u t a curved s u r f a c e de?ned by a n x i st h r o u g h t h e t a i l . i n e a r c o n t a c t s u r f a ce o f t h e t a i l , a d j a c e n tt h e c u r v e d s u r f a c e , i s p a r a l l e l t o a n d i n e n g a g e m e n t W i t h t h et e r m i n a l pad o f t h e l o a d b o a r d . T h i s c o n t a c t c o n ? g u r a t i o nt e n d s t o s u b s t a n t i a l l y e l i m i n a t e s l i d i n g m o t i o n o f t h e c o n t a c ta g a i n s t t h e t e r m i n a l p a d o f t h e l o a d b o a r d . The e n g a g e m e n tp o r t i o n o f t h e c o n t a c t W i t h t h e t e r m i n a l pad moves f o r W a r da s a r e s u l t o f t h e r o l l i n g o f t h e c o n t a c t , s i m u l t a n e o u s l yp r e v e n t i n g s l i d i n g b e t W e e n t h e t a i l a n d t e r m i n a l p a d .

    The t e r m i n u s of t h e c o n t a c t t a i l a l s o h a s a s u r f a c e t h a tengages a W a l l of t h e h o u s i n g . T h i s s u r f a c e s e r v e s t op o s i t i v e l y p r e v e n t t h e c o n t a c t f r o m s l i d i n g a l o n g t h e t e r m in a l o f t h e l o a d b o a r d b y m a i n t a i n i n g t h e p o s i t i o n o f t h ec o n t a c t r e l a t i v e t o t h e h o u s i n g . The f r o n t e l a s t o m e r a l s op l a y s a r o l e i n a c h i e v i n g t h i s b y u r g i n g t h e t a i l o f t h e c o n t a c tt o W a r d t h e h o u s i n g W a l l a n d m a i n t a i n i n g t h e c o n t a c t s e a t e da g a i n s t t h a t W a l l .

    The r e s e n t i n v e n t i o n i s t h u s a c o n t a c t s e t assembly Whichs o l v e s m a n y o f t h e p r o b l e m s o f t h e p r i o r a r t . I t e n a b l e sp o s i t i v e c o n t a c t t o b e e s t a b l i s h e d a l o n g e l e c t r i c a l p a t h s , y e ti t minimiZes e r o s i o n of l e a d of l o a d board 1 2 .

    BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DR WINGThe o b j e c t s a n d f e a t u r e s o f t h e p r e s e n t i n v e n t i o n W i l l

    become more a p p a r e n t t o t h o s e s k i l l e d i n t h e a r t uponr e f e r e n c e t o t h e f o l l o W i n g d e s c r i p t i o n , t a k e n i n c o n j u n c t i o nW i t h t h e a c c o m p a n y i n g d r a W i n g W h e r e i n l i k e r e f e r e n c enumerals r e f e r t o t h e s a m e p a r t o r f e a t u r e , a n d W h e r e i n :

    The FIGURE i s a c r o s s - s e c t i o n vieW of t h e p r e s e n ti n v e n t i o n .

    DET ILED DESCRIPTION OF THEINVENTION

    o n t a c t o r a s s e m b l y 5 , a s shoWn i n t h e FIGURE, i sm o u n t e d i n a h o u s i n g 1 0 . H o u s i n g 1 0 h a s g e n e r a l l y p l a n a r ,p a r a l l e l o p p o s e d s i d e s 2 2 e s s e n t i a l l y a t r i g h t a n g l e s t o p a i r so f o p p o s e d e d g e s . H o u s i n g 1 0 i s c o n ? g u r e d t o e f f e c t e l e c

  • 8/12/2019 Interconnect Devices v. Johnstech International

    14/33

    US 7 , 0 5 9 , 8 6 6 B23

    Nose end 26 h a s a concave i n n e r edge 25 Which engagesa n d b e a r s a g a i n s t f r o n t e l a s t o m e r 3 0 . S i m i l a r l y , t a i l e n d 2 8h a s a concave i n n e r edge 42 Which engages and b e a r sa g a i n s t r e a r e l a s t o m e r 3 2 . F r o n t c h a n n e l 31 and e a r c h a n n e l3 3 h a v e c o r r e s p o n d i n g c o m m u n i c a t i n g a p e r t u r e s 3 3 , 3 5e x t e n d i n g t h r o u g h t o l o a d b o a r d 1 2 P r o x i m a t e s i d e s o fc h a n n e l s 3 3 , 35 a r e spaced c l o s e r t h a n d i s t a n c e s t h e same a st h e d i a m e t e r s o f t h e i r r e s p e c t i v e c h a n n e l s 3 1 , 3 3 . T h i sp e r m i t s i n s e r t i n g e l a s t o m e r s 3 0 a n d 3 2 i n t o c h a n n e l s 3 1 , 3 3b y u r g i n g t h e m t h r o u g h t h e i r r e s p e c t i v e a p e r t u r e s 3 3 , 3 5 .E l a s t o m e r s 3 0 , 3 2 a r e t h e r e b y r e t a i n e d i n p l a c e .

    n l i g n o r 36 e x t e n d s a c r o s s a n o u t e r p o r t i o n o f h o u s i n g1 0 p r o x i m a t e t h e n o s e end 2 6 o f t h e c o n t a c t 1 8 . The o r t i o no f t h e a l i g n o r 2 6 o p p o s i t e c o n t a c t s 1 8 d e ? n e s a s t o p 3 8 . Thea l i g n o r 3 6 l o c a t e s a n e d g e o f DUT 4 s u c h t h a t i t s l e a d s 17a r e o p p o s i t e t he outWard e x t e n s i o n s o f c o r r e s p o n d i n g n o s ee n d s 2 6 o f c o n t a c t s 1 8 , a n d a l s o o r i e n t s t h e l e a d s 1 7 p a r a l l e lt o t h e c o n t a c t s 1 8 . S t o p 38 a l s o l i m i t s t h e outWard e x t e n s i o nof c o n t a c t s 1 8 .DUT 4 i s p o s i t i o n e d p r o x i m a t e h o u si n g 1 0 i n t h e p o s i

    t i o n and o r i e n t a t i o n shoWn i n t h e FIGURE. A p p a r a t u s , n o ts h o W n , d e t e r m i n e s t h e p r e c i s e l o c a t i o n o f d e v i c e 1 4 r e l a t i v et o s u r f a c e 1 9 o f h o u s i n g 1 0 s u c h t h a t e a c h l e a d 1 7 i s d i r e c t l yo p p o s i t e a c o n t a ct 1 8 . DUT 14 i s t h e n moved c l o s e r t oh o u s i n g 1 0 a s shoWn i n t h e FIGURE. T h i s e f f e c t s engagement of h e d e v i c e 14 and h e nose end 26 of c o r r e s p o n d i n gc o n t a c t 1 8 . C o n t a c t s 18 a r e t h u s r o t a t e d , t h e i r nose ends 26e n g a g e d b y o p p o s i n g l e a d s 1 7 a n d t h e i r t a i l e n d s 2 8 e n g a gi n g t e r m i n a l s 1 6 . T h i s r o t a t i o n o f c o n t a c t s 1 8 W i l l a l s o r e s u l ti n ? a t p o r t i o n 29 o f e a c h r i s i n g up s l i g h t l y a t one end a s i t sc o n t a c t r o l l s c o u n t e r c l o c k w i s e , a s shoWn by arroW 44 i n t h eFIGURE.

    Such a c t i o n r e s u l t s i n f r o n t e l a s t o m e r 30 and r e a r e l a st o m e r 3 2 b o t h b e i n g c o m p r e s s e d. S i n c e t h e d i a m e t e r s a n dc h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f t h e e l a s t o m e r s a r e s e l e c t a b l e , t h e amountof f o r c e r e q u i r e d t o compress t h e e l a s t o m e r s can be p r es e l e c t e d . T h i s f o r c e i s chosen s o a s t o be s u f ? c i e n t t o p r o v i d ea good e l e c t r i c a l c o n n e c t i o n betWeen t h e l e a d s and t e r m in a l s .

    I n t h e d u a l e l a s t o m e r c o n ? g u r a t i o n a s p i c t u r e d i n t h eFIGURE t h e f r o n t e l a s t o m e r 3 0 p r o v i d e s ? e x i b i l i t y i nc o n t r o l l i n g c o n t a c t f o r c e by t h e d e v i c e 1 4 i n a d d i t i o n t oa i d i n g i n k e e p i n g t h e c o n t a c t t a i l 2 8 e n g a g e d a g a i n s t a W a l ls u r f a c e 6 . I n h i s c o n ? g u r a t i o n t h e f r o n t e l a s t o m e r 3 0 i s f u l l yi n c o m p r e s s i o n . As h e f r o n t e l a s t o m e r 3 0 i s c o m p r e s s e d , t h e

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    4t o m e r s , t h e p o i n t o f c o n t a c t betWeen t h e l e a d 1 7 and t h ec o n t a c t t a i l 28 Walks o r W a r d on h e l o a d board 12 t r a n s l a t e sh o r i z o n t a l l y ) and t r a v e l s a l o n g t h e l o W e r c o n t a c t a r c 1 3 .The ? a t p o r t i o n 2 9 o f t h e c o n t a c t t a i l d e s i g n 2 8 c o n t r o l sl o c a t i o n of o n t a c t nose 26 While alloWing t h e c o n t a c t nose2 6 t o b e p r e - l o a d e d i n t h e uncompressed t a t e , a s i l l u s t r a t e di n t h e FIGURE. The ? a t p o r t i o n 2 9 o f t h e c o n t a c t t a i l 2 8c o n s t r a i n s t h e c o n t a c t 1 8 from a c h i e v i n g a n u l t i m a t e r o l l i n ge q u i l i b r i u m p o s i t i o n , a n d a l l o W s t h e p a r t i a l c o m p r e s s i o n o ft h e f r o n t e l a s t o m e r 3 0 W i t h o u t s l i d i n g o f t h e t a i l 2 8 W i t hr e s p e c t t o t h e l o a d board 1 2 . T h i s c r e a t e s immediate c o n t a c tf o r c e a t t h e l o a d b o a r d 1 2 , Which i m p r o v e s t h e e f f e c t i v ec o m p l i a n c e r a n g e o p e r a t i n g r a n g e ) o f t h e c o n t a c t o r s y s t e m .

    I n l i e u of a ? a t p o r t i o n 29 on t h e c o n t a c t t a i l 2 8 , t h ea l i g n o r 38 can be used o c o n t r o l t h e c o n t a c t nose 26 o s i t i o na n d p r o v i d e t h e n e c e s s a r y c o n s t r a i n t t o f a c i l i t a t e p r e - l o a d i n gt h e nose 26 of h e c o n t a c t 1 8 .

    T h i s d e s i g n c a n b e a l t e r n a t i v e l y c o n ? g u r e d a s a s i n g l ee l a s t o m e r s y s t e m . I n t h i s c o n ? g u r a t i o n t h e r e a r e l a s t o m e r 32Would de?ne t h e a p p l i c a b l e f o r c e n e c e s s a r y a t b o t h t h ec o n t a c t n o s e 26 and c o n t a c t t a i l 2 8 . The d e s i g n o f h o u s i n g10 and c o n t a c t 18 Would be modi?ed from t h e FIGURE of a c i l i t a t e t h i s c o n ? g u r a t i o n o p t i o n . The r e a r e l a s t o m e r 3 2 ,a g a i n , c a n be p l a c e d i n e i t h e r t e n s i l e e x t e n s i o n o r compression.

    I t W i l l b e u n d e r s t o o d t h a t t h i s d i s c l o s u r e , i n manyr e s p e c t s , i s o n l y i l l u s t r a t i v e . C h a n g e s may b e made i nd e t a i l s , p a r t i c u l a r l y i n m a t t e r s o f s h a p e , s i Z e , m a t e r i a l , a n da r r a n g e m e n t o f p a r t s W i t h o u t e x c e e d i n g t h e s c o p e o f t h ei n v e n t i o n . A c c o r d i n g l y , t h e s c o p e o f t h e i n v e n t i o n i s a sd e ? n e d i n t h e l a n g u a g e o f t h e a p p e n d e d c l a i m s .

    What s c l a i m e d i s :1 . A p p a r a t u s f o r e l e c t r i c a l l y c o n n e c t i n g a l e a d o f t h e

    i n t e g r a t e d c i r c u i t t o be e s t e d t o a c o r r e s p o n d i n g t e r m i n a l o fa l o a d board a t a t e s t s i t e , c o m p r i s i n g :

    a h o u s i n g h a v i n g o p p o s i t e l y f a c i n g s u r f a c e s , a ? r s ta p p r o a c h a b l e by an i n t e g r a t e d c i r c u i t t o be e s t e d and as e c o n d p r o x i m a t e t h e l o a d b o a r d , a s l o t e x t e n d t h r o u g hs a i d h o u s i n g f r o m a ? r s t o f s a i d o p p o s i t e l y f a c i n gs u r f a c e s t o a s e c o n d o f s a i d o p p o s i t e l y f a c in g s u r f a c e s ;

    a c o n t a c t r e c e i v a b l e i n s a i d s l o t having a ? r s t end enga g a b l e by h e l e a d a n d a s e c o n d e n d i n engagement i t ht h e t e r m i n a l , s a i d c o n t a c t b e i n g r o l l a b l e a c r o s s t h et e r m i n a l b e t W e e n a ? r s t o r i e n t a t i o n unengaged by t h e

  • 8/12/2019 Interconnect Devices v. Johnstech International

    15/33

  • 8/12/2019 Interconnect Devices v. Johnstech International

    16/33

    US007722361B2

    ( 1 2 ) Unlted States Patent ( 1 0 ) P a t e n t N 0 . 2 U S 7 , 7 2 2 , 3 6 1 B2Lopez t a ] . ( 4 5 ) D a t e o f P a t e n t : *May 2 5 , 2 0 1 0

    ( 5 4 ) TEST SOCKET 5 , 0 6 9 , 6 2 9 A 1 2 / 1 9 9 1 J o h n s o n5 , 1 8 9 , 3 6 3 A 2 / 1 9 9 3 Bregman t a 1 .

    ( 7 6 ) I n v e n t o r s : Jose E. Lopez, 665 Santa Paula A v e . , 5 , 5 9 4 , 3 5 5 A * 1 / 1 9 9 7 Ludwig . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2 4 / 7 5 5S u n n y v a l e , CA U S ) 9 4 0 4 4 ; Dennis B , 5 , 6 0 9 , 4 8 9 A 3 / 1 9 9 7 B i c k f o r d e t a 1 .S h e l l , 7 2 4 3 4 0 t h S t . W e s t , W e b s t e r , MN 5 , 6 3 4 , 8 0 1 A 6 / 1 9 9 7 J o h n s o n( U S ) 5 5 0 8 8 ; Mathew L . G i l k , 70537 6 , 2 3 1 , 3 5 3 B 1 5 / 2 0 0 1 R a t h b u r nT o l e d o D r . N o r t h , M i n n e a p o l i s , MN U S ) 6 , 2 4 4 , 8 7 4 B 1 6 / 2 0 0 1 T a n554435424 6,572,388 B2 6/2003 Lee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 439/71

    6 , 7 9 4 , 8 9 0 B1 9 / 2 0 0 4 Tokum o( * ) N o t i c e : S u b j e c t t o a n y d i s c l a i m e r , t h e t e r m o f h i s 6 , 8 5 4 , 9 8 1 B 2 2 / 2 0 0 5 N e l s o n _

    p a t e n t i s e x t e n d e d o r a d j u s t e d u n d e r 3 5 * g a g a g t n i e l 4 3 9 / 7 1r n e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .U'S'C' 1 5 4 ( 1 ) ) by 0 days 2004/0067665 A1 * 4/2004 Nakano . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 439/70- - - - - _ 2004/0217771 A 11/2004 Leong

    g l g l i l l g i t e m 1 S S u b l e c t t o a tenmnal d l s 2004/0248448 A1 * 1 2 / 2 0 0 4 G i l k . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3 9 / 2 6 4

    ( 2 1 ) A P P l - N01 1 2 / 2 6 4 0 0 8 FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS( 2 2 ) F i l e d : NOV. 3 , 2008 E P 1 4 8 2 5 9 5 A 1 2 / 2 0 0 4( 6 5 ) P r i o r P u b l i c a t i o n Data

    * t d bUs 2009/0053912 A1 F e b . 2 6 , 2009 C 1 e y exammerP r i m a r y ExamineriT C a t e l

    R e l a t e d US- A p p l i c a t i o n Data A s s i s t a n t ExamineriVladimir l m a s( 6 3 ) C o n t i n u a t i o n o f a p p l i c a t i o n N o . 1 1 / 4 8 2 , 6 4 4 , ? l e d o n A l l o y ; A g e n t o r F l r m i N a w r o c k l R o o n e y

    J u l . 7 , 2006, noW a t . NO. 7,445,465. I v e / S o n , - ~( 6 0 ) P r o v i s i o n a l a p p l i c a t i o n N o . 6 0 / 6 9 7 , 6 9 3 , ? l e d o n J u l . 8 , ( 5 7 ) ABSTRACT

    2 0 0 5 , p r o v i s i o n a l a p p l i c a t i o n N o . 6 0 / 7 7 6 , 6 5 4 , ? l e d o n2 2 3 2 0 1 6 8 1 3 5 8 8 2 5 1 0 1 1 2 1 1 a p p h C a n O n N O 6 0 / 6 9 7 7 2 A n i m p r o v e d t e s t s o c k e t f o r u s e i n t e s t i n g i n t e g r a t e d c i r c u i t s .

    The e s t socket includes a housing having one o r more l o t s( 5 1 ) I n t Cl formed t h e r e i n . C o n t a c t s c a n b e r e c e i v e d W i t h i n r e s p e c t i v eH 0 ' 1 R 2 / 0 0 ( 2 0 0 6 0 1 ) s l o t s a n d m a i n t a i n e d t h e r e i n W i t h r e a r e n d s o f t h e c o n t a c t s i n( 5 2 ) U Cl 439/72 engagement With r a c e s o n load o a r d . Mounting s acc o m58 F: I d _ 439/72 p l i s h e d by means of a p a i r of l a s t o m e r s , and h e e l a s t o m e r s

    ( ) 1 e 0 a s s l canon e a r c 73 7 5 4 m a i n t a i n each c o n t a c t s u c h t h a t , When t h e f r o n t end of aS 1 , _ ? l f 1 h c o n t a c t i s engaged by h e l e a d o r pad of h e d e v i c e t o be e s t e de e app lcanon e o r C o m p e t e Seam l s t o r y ' and urged i n t o i t s corresponding s l o t , an a r c u a t e s u r f a c e a t a

    ( 5 6 ) References Cited r e a r end of each c o n t a c t r o l l s a c r o s s i t s c o r r e s p o n d i n g t r a c e

  • 8/12/2019 Interconnect Devices v. Johnstech International

    17/33

  • 8/12/2019 Interconnect Devices v. Johnstech International

    18/33

    US. Patent May 5 2 0 1 0 S h e e t 2 o f 2 US 7 7 2 2 3 6 1 B

    11

  • 8/12/2019 Interconnect Devices v. Johnstech International

    19/33

    US 7 , 7 2 2 , 3 6 1 B21

    TEST SOCKET

    CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATEDAPPLICATIONS

    T h i s i s a c o n t i n u a t i o n o f a p p l i c a t i o n S e r . No. 1 1 / 4 8 2 , 6 4 4? l e d o n J u l . 7 , 2006 now US. P a t . N o . 7 , 4 4 5 , 4 6 5 , Whichc l a i m s p r i o r i t y o f h e f o l l o w i n g p r o v i s i o n a l a p p l i c a t i o n s ? l e du n d e r 3 5 U . S . C . 1 1 1 a ) c l a i m i n g p r i o r i t y , u n d e r 3 5 U . S . C . 1 1 9 e ) 1 ) : p r o v i s i o n a l a p p l i c a t i o n S e r . N o . 6 0 / 6 9 7 , 6 9 3 , p r ev i o u s l y ? l e d J u l . 8 , 2 0 0 5 , u n d e r 3 5 U . S . C . 1 1 1 b ) ; p r o v is i o n a l a p p l i c a t i o n S e r . N o . 6 0 / 7 7 6 , 6 5 4 , p r e v i o u s l y ? l e d onF e b . 2 4 , 2 0 0 6 , u n d e r 3 5 U . S . C . 1 1 1 b ) ; a n d p r o v i s i o n a la p p l i c a t i o n S e r . N o . 6 0 / 6 9 7 , 7 2 1 , p r e v i o u s l y ? l e d o n J u l . 8 ,2 0 0 5 , u n d e r 3 5 U . S . C . 1 1 1 b ) .

    TECHNICAL FIELDThe p r e s e n t i n v e n t i o n d e a l s W i t h e l e c t r o n i c componentt e s t i n g t e c h n o l o g i e s . M o r e s p e c i ? c a l l y , h o W e v e r , t h e i n v e n

    t i o n d e a l s W i t h t e s t s o c k e t s Which emplo y o n t a c t s f o r t e s t i n gan e l e c t r o n i c com p onent . e s t s o c k e t i n c l u d e s c o n t a c t sWhich n t e r c o n n e c t and r o v i d e an e l e c t r o n i c p a t h betWeenl e a d o r pad of h e e l e c t r o n i c com p onent t o be t e s t e d and acorresponding t r a c e o n a l o a d b o a r d . T he i n v e n t i o n f o c u s e supon o n t r o l and e g u l a t i o n o f f o r c e s a p p l i e d t o a d e v i c e l e a do r pad and a l o a d board t r a c e b y a c o r r e s p o n d i n g c o n t a c t oft h e t e s t s o c k e t .

    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

    I n t e g r a t e d c i r c u i t d e v i c e t e s t i n g i s a p r o c e d u r e W h i c h h a sb een observed f o r m a n y y e a r s i n o r d e r t o o b t a i n a s high ad e g r e e o f q u a l i t y c o n t r o l a s p o s s i b l e f o r e l ec t r o n i c d e v i c e s . At e s t e r t y p i c a l l y i n c l u d e s a p l u r a l i t y o f c o n d u c t i v e t r a c e sf o r m e d o n l o a d board s s o c i a t e d With h e t e s t e r a p p a r a t u s . I ti s necessary t o i n t e r c o n n e c t a l e a d , of leaded d e v i c e , o r ap a d , of non-leaded d e v i c e , t o a c o r r e s p o n d i n g t r a c e on h el o a d b o a r d i n o r d e r t o e f f e c t u a t e t e s t i n g . A e s t s o c k e t h a v i n ga p l u r a l i t y o f c o n t a c t s i s i n t e r p o s e d betWeen h e d e v i c e u n d e rt e s t and h e l o a d board n o r d e r t o e f f e c t u a t e i n t e r c o n n e c t i o n .One o n t a c t e n g a g e s , a t a f r o n t e n d , t h e l e a d orpad f d e v i c e

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    2SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

    Th e p r e s e n t i n v e n t i o n i s an improved t e s t s o c k e t . I ti n c l u d e s a h o u s i n g Which a s a ? r s t s u r f a c e t h a t i s p l a c e d i n t oenga gement With s u r f a c e o f a t e s t e r l o a d b o a r d . Th e o u s i n gh a s a s e c o n d s u r f a c e Which s g e n e r a l l y a r a l l e l t o , a n d s p a c e df r o m , t h e h o u s i n g ? r s t s u r f a c e . The s e c o n d s u r f a c e o f t h eh o u s i n g f a c e s i n a d i r e c t i o n o p p o s i t e t h a t i n Which t h e ? r s ts u r f a c e f a c e s . A t l e a s t o n e s l o t , e x t e n d i n g t h r o u g h t h e h o u s i n gbetWeen h e ? r s t and e c o n d s u r f a c e s t h e r e o f , i s formed n t h eh o u s i n g . A o n t a c t i s r e c e i v e d i n a c o r r e s p o n d i n g s l o t . Suchc o n t a c t h a s a f r o n t end Which n o r m a l l y e x t e n d s beyond t h es e c o n d s u r f a c e o f t h e h o u s i n g t o b e e n g a g e d by c o r r e s p o n di n g l e a d o r pad of d e v i c e t o be e s t e d . T he o n t a c t f u r t h e r h a sa r e a r e n d Which d e ?n e s an arcuate s u r f a c e , t h e arcuate s u rf a c e e n g a g i n g a c o r r e s p o n d i n g t r a c e f orm ed on h e s u r f a c e oft h e t e s t e r l o a d b o a r d . The o n t a c t i s e l a s t o m e r i c a l l y mountedi n i t s s l o t s u c h t h a t , When t h e f r o n t end o f t h e c o n t a c t i se n g a g e d by h e l e a d o r t h e pad f t h e d e v i c e t o b e t e s t e d a n du r g e d i n t o i t s s l o t , t h e a r c u a t e s u r f a c e o f t h e c o n t a c t r o l l sa c r o s s i t s corresponding r a c e o n h e s u r f a c e of h e t e s t e r l o a db o a r d W i t h v i r t u a l l y no t r a n s l a t i o n a l o r r o t a t i o n a l s l i d i n g .A b r a s i o n b e t W e e n t h e c o n t a c t a n d t h e l o a d b o a r d i s t h e r e b y ,s u b s t a n t i a l l y e l i m i n a t e d .

    I t i s e n v i s i o n e d t h a t t h e r e a r end o f t h e c o n t a c t , i n a d d i t i o nt o d e ? n i n g t h e a r c u a t e s u r f a c e i n engagement W i t h t h e l o a db o a r d , a l s o d e ? n e s a g r a d u a l l y a r c i n g s u r f a c e Which s a n g ul a r l y s p a c e d f r o m t h e a r c u a t e s u r f a c e t h e r e o f . The o u s i n g , i nt h i s embodiment de?nes a W a l l W i t h i n t h e s l o t . Th e W a l l i se n g a g e d b y t h e g r a d u a l l y a r c i n g s u r f a c e o f h e r e a r e n d o f t h ec o n t a c t , a n d t h e s p a t i a l r e l a t i o n s h i p b e t W e e n t h e g r a d u a l l ya r c i n g s u r f a c e a n d t h e W a l l i s s u c h t h a t , a s t h e f r o n t e n d o f h ec o n t a c t i s engaged by h e l e a d o r pad f h e d e v i c e t o b e t e s t e da n d u r g e d i n t o t h e c o r r e s p o n d i n g s l o t , t h e g r a d u a l l y a r c i n gs u r f a c e m o v e s l o n g t h e W a l l and a u s e s t h e a r c u a t e s u r f a c e oft h e c o n t a c t t o r o l l a c r o s s i t s c o r r e s p o n d i n g t r a c e . I t i s e n v is i o n e d t h a t t h e W a l l de?ned by t h e h o u s i n g Would e a n g ul a r l y s p a c e d a t a n a c u t e a n g l e r e l a t i v e t o t h e ? r s t s u r f a c e o f h eh o u s i n g . T h i s Would n a b l e t h e a r c u a t e s u r f a c e o f t h e c o n t a c tt o r o l l a c r o s s t h e t r a c e of h e t e s t e r l o a d board With i r t u a l l yno t r a n s l a t i o n a l o r r o t a t i o n a l s l i d i n g .A r e f e r r e d embodiment f h e i n v e n t i o n e m p l o y s a p a i r o f

    e l a s t o m e r s , c r o s s i n g p e r p e n d i c u l a r l y a c r o s s t h e s l o t s , t o

  • 8/12/2019 Interconnect Devices v. Johnstech International

    20/33

    US 7 , 7 2 2 , 3 6 1 B23

    The r e s e n t i n v e n t i o n s t h u s an improved e s t s o c k e t Whicha d d r e s s e s t h e d i c t a t e s o f t h e p r i o r a r t a n d s o l v e s p r o b l e m st h e r e o f . More s p e c i ? c f e a t u r e s a n d a d v a n t a g e s o b t a i n e d i nvieW f t h o s e f e a t u r e s W i l l become p p a r e n t W i t h r e f e r e n c e t ot h e D e t a i l e d D e s c r i p t i o n o f t h e I n v e n t i o n , a p p e n d e d c l a i m sa n d a c c o m p a n y i n g d r a w i n g ? g u r e s .

    BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGSFIG. 1 i s a s e c t i o n a l v ieW of t e s t s o c k e t i n accordance

    W i t h t h e p r e s e n t i n v e n t i o n s h o W i n g c o n t a c t a n d e l a s t o m e rresponse t o engagement of a c o n t a c t by a l e a d of a d e v i c eu n d e r t e s t ; and

    FIG. 2 i s a p e r s p e c t i v e v ieW of a c o n t a c t f o r use i n t h ep r e s e n t i n v e n t i o n .DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

    R e f e r r i n g n o W t h e d r a W i n g ? g u r e s , W h e r e i n l i k e r e f e re n c e n u m e r a l s d e n o t e l i k e e l e m e n t s t h r o u g h o u t t h e s e v e r a lv i e W s , F I G . 1 i l l u s t r a t e s a t e s t s o c k e t 10 i n a c c o r d a n c e Witht h e p r e s e n t i n v e n t i o n . The e s t s o c k e t 10 s i n t e n d e d f o r u s eW i t h a t e s t e r t y p i c a l l y e m p l o y e d f o r a s c e r t a i n i n g q u a l i t y o fi n t e g r a t e d c i r c u i t d e v i c e s u s e d i n e l e c t r o n i c a p p l i a n c e s . Thet e s t e r i n t e r f a c e s With a t e s t e r l o a d board 12 Which h a s e l e ct r i c a l l y c o n d u c t i v e t r a c e s 14 f or med o n s u r f a c e 16 h e r e o f t oe n a b l e e l e c t r o n i c communication betWeen t h e t e s t e r a n d a ni n t e g r a t e d c i r c u i t d e v i c e 1 8 t o b e t e s t e d . T h a t i s e l e c t r i c a ls i g n a l s a r e t r a n s m i t t e d betWeen h e d e v i c e under e s t 1 8 a n dt h e t e s t a p p a r a t u s t h r o u g h t h e t e s t s o c k e t 1 0 .

    F I G . 1 i l l u s t r a t e s a DUT ackage Which s p r o v i d e d W i t h ap l u r a l i t y o f l e a d s 2 0 , o n l y o n e o f W h i c h i s s h o W n . F I G . 1i l l u s t r a t e s o n l y a p o r t i o n o f t h e d e v i c e u n d e r e s t 1 8 , b u t t W i l lb e u n d e r s t o o d t h a t s u b s t a n t i a l l y i d e n t i c a l l e a d s e x t e n d a l o n gb o t h o f o p p o s i t e s i d e s o f t h e d e v i c e p a c k a g e 1 8 .

    F I G . 1 f u r t h e r i l l u s t r a t e s a l e a d b a c k e r W h i c h , W h e n t h ed e v i c e u n d e r t e s t 1 8 i s b r o u g h t i n t o engagement i t h t s l e a d s20 n c o n t a c t W i t h c o r r e s p o n d i n g c o n t a c t s 24 f t h e t e s t s o c k e t1 0 , d e t e r s b e n d i n g o f t h e l e a d s 2 0 . D oW n W a r d p r e s s u r e i sb r o u g h t t o b e a r upon t h e d e v i c e 1 8 u n d e r t e s t by a p l u n g e rm e c h a n i s m n o t s h o W n . T h e p l u n g e r d e p r e s s e s , W h e n e s t i n gi s t o be c o n d u c t e d , t h e c o n t a c t s 24 t o overcome a n u p W a r db i a s i m p a r t e d b y t h e e l a s t o m e r i c a l l y - m o u n t e d c o n t a c t s 2 4 .

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    4t e s t e r load board 12 o n Which t h e t r a c e s 14 a r e formed. Theh o u s i n g 3 2 h a s a s e c o n d s u r f a c e 3 6 Which s g e n e r a l l y p a r a l l e lt o , a n d s p a c e d f r o m , t h e ? r s t s u r f a c e t h e r e o f . The s e c o n ds u r f a c e 3 6 o f t h e h o u s i n g 3 2 f a c e s o p p o s i t e l y f r o m t h e ? r s ts u r f a c e 3 4 . As r e v i o u s l y d i s c u s s e d , t h e h o u s i n g 3 2 c a r r i e s ap l u r a l i t y o f c o n t a c t s 2 4 . A l u r a l i t y o f s l o t s 3 8 a r e p r o v i d e d ,each s l o t t o r e c e i v e a s i n g l e o n e of h e c o n t a c t s 2 4 .

    F I G . 2 i l l u s t r a t e s , i n p e r s p e c t i v e , an i n d i v i d u a l c o n t a c t i na c c o r d a n c e W i t h t h e p r e s e n t i n v e n t i o n . The c o n t a c t 2 4i n c l u d e s ? r s t , s e c o n d a n d t h i r d p r o t r u s i o n s 4 0 , 4 2 , 4 4 . The? r s t p r o t r u s i o n 40 s de?ned by h e r e a r end 30 o f t h e c o n t a c t24 Which n g a g e s t h e t r a c e 1 4 o f t h e l o a d board 2 . The h i r dp r o t r u s i o n 4 4 i s de?ned by h e f r o n t e n d 2 6 o f t h e c o n t a c t 2 4Which s engaged by l e a d 20 o r pa d f t h e d e v i c e u n d e r t e s t1 8 . The second p r o t r u s i o n 42 s e r v e s t o e n g a g e , W h e nmounted by a p l u r a l i t y o f e l a s t o m e r s 4 6 , 4 8 , a s W i l l b e d i sc u s s e d h e r e i n a f t e r , a s h o u l d e r 4 9 de?ned b y t h e h o u s i n g 3 2 .E n g a g e m e n t o f t h e s h o u l d e r 4 9 b y t h e s e c o n d p r o t r u s i o n 4 2s e r v e s t o l i m i t t h e d e g r e e o f u pW a r d m o v em en t f t h e c o n t a c t24 and t h e d i s t a n c e t h e f r o n t end 26 of h e c o n t a c t 24 W i l le x t e n d beyond h e s e c o n d s u r f a c e 3 6 o f t h e h o u s i n g 3 2 Whent h e c o n t a c t 24 s n o t engaged by a d e v i c e t o be e s t e d .

    R e f e r r i n g a g a i n t o F I G . 1 , t h e t e s t s o c k e t 1 0 h a s a p a i r o fc h a n n e l s 5 0 , 5 2 Which x t e n d a l o n g a x e s g e n e r a l l y t r a n s v e rs et o p l a n e s d e ? n e d by t h e s l o t s 3 8 f o r m e d i n t h e h o u s i n g 3 2 .These c h a n n e l s 5 0 , 5 2 a r e i n t e n d e d t o r e c e i v e e l a s t o m e r s 4 6 ,48 Which e r v e t o m o u n t h e c o n t a c t s 24 n t h e i r s l o t s 3 8 . FIG.1 shoWs a g e n e r a l l y c i r c u l a r c h a n n e l 5 0 r e c e i v i n g a l a r g e r ,f r o n t e l a s t o m e r 4 6 , and r e c t a n g u l a r c h a n n e l 52 r e c e i v i n g as m a l l e r , r e a r e l a s t o m e r 4 8 . The r e a r e l a s t o m e r 48 i s p r el o a d e d a n d , b e c a u s e of h e a r c u a t e s u r f a c e 28 of h e r e a r end3 0 o f t h e c o n t a c t 2 4 b e i n g i n e n g a g e m e n t W i t h t h e l o a d b o a r d1 2 , W i l l engage an upper edge of h e r e a r end 30 of h e c o n t a c t24 a t a l o c a t i o n t o urge t h e f r o n t end 26 of t h e c o n t a c t 24u p W a r d l y . S i m i l a r l y , t h e f r o n t e l a s t o m e r 4 6 i s u n d e r c o m p r e ss i o n a n d l s o s e r v e s t o u r g e t h e c o n t a c t 24 u p W a r d and i a s i tt o a p o i n t of n i t i a l c o n t a c t by l e a d 24 r pa d of n n t e g r a t e dc i r c u i t d e v i c e 18 t o be e s t e d .

    As r e v i o u s l y a l l u d e d t o , t h e a r c u a t e s u r f a c e 2 8 i n e n g a g em e n t With t h e t r a c e 14 o n t h e l o a d board 12 has n o , i f a n y ,a p p r e c i a b l e t r a n s l a t i o n a l o r r o t a t i o n a l s l i d i n g a l o n g t h e t r a c e14 ofthe l o a d board 1 2 . T h i s i s s o because of an n g l e d W a l l5 4 de?ned i t h i n t h e h o u s i n g 3 2 p r o x i m a t e i t s ? r s t s u r f a c e 3 4

  • 8/12/2019 Interconnect Devices v. Johnstech International

    21/33

    US 7 7 2 2 3 6 1 B25

    c a n t d i s t a n c e from h e p o i n t o f engagement f h e r e a r end 3of h e c o n t a c t 24 With h e t r a c e 14 on h e l o a d board 1 2 . T h i sW i l l a u g m e n t t h e b e n e ? c i a l a d v a n t a g e a c h i e v e d b y t h e r o l l i n ga c t i o n t h a t i s m i n i m i z a t i o n o f l i k e l i h o o d o f damage o t h el o a d b o a r d ) .

    F u r t h e r c o n t a c t s m a d e f p r e c i o u s m e t a l s c a n b e employedi n t h e p r e s e n t i n v e n t i o n . Such c o n t a c t s t e n d t o e x t e n d l o a db o a r d l i f e a l s o . A eyoro G o n t a c t Which s a s o l i d g o l da l l o y c o n t a c t n o t h a v i n g a n y p l a t i n g , i s e n v i s i o n e d a s b e i n gu s e d . Such m a t e r i a l i t h a s been o u n d n o t o n l y e x t e n d s t h el i f e o f h e c o n t a c t . I t a l s o , h o W e v e r e x t e n d s l o a d b o a r d l i f e bym i n i m i z i n g damage t o t h e t r a c e s t h e r e o n . I t h a s b e e n f o u n dt h a t load b oa rd i f e can be t l e a s t doubled over mec ha n ismsc o n s t r u c t e d a s kno W n n t h e p r i o r a r t .I t W i l l b e u n d e r s t o o d t h a t t h i s d i s c l o s u r e i n m a n y e s p e c t si s o n l y i l l u s t r a t i v e . C h a n g e s m a y e made n d e t a i l s , p a r t i c ul a r l y i n m a t t e r s o f s h a p e s i Z e , m a t e r i a l , a n d a r r a n g e m e n t o fp a r t s W i t h o u t e x c e e d i n g t h e s c o p e o f t h e i n v e n t i o n . Accordi n g l y , t h e s c o p e o f t h e i n v e n t i o n i s a s de?ned n t h e l a n g u a g eo f t h e a p p e n d e d c l a i m s .

    W h a t s c l a i m e d i s :1 . A e s t s o c k e t c o m p r i s i n g :a h o u s i n g h a v i n g a ? r s t s u r f a c e g e n e r a l l y i n e n g a g e m e n t

    W i t h a s u r f a c e of t e s t e r l o a d b o a r d s a i d h o u s i n g f u r t h e rh a v i n g a s e c o n d s u r f a c e , g e n e r a l l y p a r a l l e l t o , s p a c e df r o m a n d f a c i n g o p p o s i t e l y f r o m s a i d ? r s t s u r f a c e , a n da t l e a s t o n e s l o t formed i n s a i d h o u s i n g e x t e n d i n gt h r o u g h s a i d h o u s i n g b e t W e e n s a i d ? r s t s u r f a c e a n d s a i ds e c o n d s u r f a c e ;

    a c o n t a c t r e c e i v e d i n a c o r r e s p o n d i n g s l o t and having af r o n t e n d e x t e n d i n g b e y o n d s a i d s e c o n d s u r f a c e f o re n g a g e m e n t b y a c o r r e s p o n d i n g l e a d o r pad f a d e v i c et o be t e s t e d and having a r e a r e n d de?ning an a r c u a t es u r f a c e i n e n g a g e me n t With a c o r r e s p o n d i n g t r a c e o ns a i d s u r f a c e o f t h e t e s t e r l o a d b o a r d and d e ? n i n g ag r a d u a l l y a r c i n g s u r f a c e , a n g u l a r l y s p a c e d f r o m s a i d

    1 5

    2

    6a r c u a t e s u r f a c e , a n d s a i d h o u s i n g d e ? n i n g W i t h i n t h es l o t , a W a l l , e n g a g e d b y s a i d g r a d u a l l y a r c i n g s u r f a c e o fs a i d r e a r e n d f s a i d c o n t a c t s u c h t h a t , a s s a i d f r o n t e n do f s a i d c o n t a c t i s e n g a g e d by h e l e a d o r p a d o f t h e d e v i c et o b e t e s t e d a n d u r g e d i n t o t h e c o r r e s p o n d i n g s l o t , s a i dg r a d u a l l y a r c i n g s u r f a c e o f s a i d c o n t a c t moves a l o n gs a i d W a l l a n d causes s a i d a r c u a t e s u r f a c e t o r o l l a c r o s st h e c o r r e s p o n d i n g t r a c e ; a n d

    means f o r e l a s t o m e r i c a l l y mounting s a i d c o n t a c t i n s a i dc o r r e s p o n d i n g s l o t , W h e r e i n W h e n a i d f r o n t e n d o f a i dc o n t a c t i s engaged by h e l e a d o r pad f t h e d e v i c e t o b et e s t e d a n d u r g e d i n t o t h e c o r r e s p o n d i n g s l o t , s a i d a r c u a t es u r f a c e r o l l s a c r o s s s a i d c o r r e s p o n d i n g t r a c e W i t h v i r t ua l l y no t r a n s l a t i o n a l o r r o t a t i o n a l s l i d i n g .2 . A e s t s o c k e t i n a c c o r d a n c e W i t h c l a i m 1 , Wherein s a i d

    W a l l i s a n g u l a r l y s p a c e d a t a n a r c u a t e a n g l e r e l a t i v e t o s a i d? r s t s u r f a c e o f s a i d h o u s i n g .

    3 . A e s t s o c k e t i n a c c o r d a n c e W i t h c l a i m 1 Wherein s a i dmeans f o r e l a s t o m e r i c a l l y mounting a i d c o n t a c t c o m p r i s e s af r o n t e l a s t o m e r p r e c o m p r e s s e d by t h e c o n t a c t and c o mp r e s s e d f u r t h e r by h e c o n t a c t a s s a i d f r o n t end f s a i d c o n t a c ti s e n g a g e d by t h e l e a d o r pad o f t h e d e v i c e t o b e t e s t e d a n du r g e d i n t o t h e s l o t .

    4 . A e s t s o c k e t i n a c c o r d a n c e W i t h c l a i m 3 Wherein s a i dmeans o r e l a s t o m e r i c a l l y mount in g a i d c o n t a c t f u r t h e r c o mp r i s e s a r e a r e l a s t o m e r t h a t p r e l o a d s t h e r e a r e n d of h e c o n t a c ta g a i n s t a c o r r e s p o n d i n g t r a c e on h e s u r f a c e of h e t e s t e r l o a db o a r d .

    5 . A e s t s o c k e t i n accordance With claim 4 f u r t h e r comp r i s i n g a s h o u l d e r d e ? n e d b y s a i d h o u s i n g f o r e n g a g i n g t h ec o n t a c t a n d l i m i t i n g t h e d i s t a n c e t h e c o n t a c t e x t e n d s beyonds a i d s e c o n d s u r f a c e o f s a i d h o u s i n g .

    6 . A e s t s o c k e t i n a c c o r d a n c e W i t h c l a i m 1 Wherein s a i dc o n t a c t s a r e m a d e of Neyoro G .

  • 8/12/2019 Interconnect Devices v. Johnstech International

    22/33

  • 8/12/2019 Interconnect Devices v. Johnstech International

    23/33

    US007445465B2

    1 2 ) United States Patent 1 0 ) P a t e n t N o . : U S 7 , 4 4 5 , 4 6 5 B2Lopez t a ] . ( 4 5 ) Date o f P a t e n t : N o v . 4 , 2008

    54) TESTSOCKET 5,189,363 A * 2/1993 Bregman e t a 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 324/7545 , 60 9 , 4 89 A * 3/1997 Bickford e t a 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3 9 / 7 2

    7 5 ) I n v e n t o r s : g) ] I ; I s l e l Z l l S 1 \ 1 V n n g ; a 1 e h g N A $ S S ) ) ; 5 , 6 3 4 , 8 0 1 A * 6 / 1 9 9 7 J o h n s o n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3 9 / 7 1ennls . e e ser, ; *

    MathewL ilkMinneaPOhsMN Us) 6 , 2 3 1 , 3 5 3 B1 5 / 2 0 0 1 Rathburn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 439/666 , 244 , 874 B1* 6 /200 1 Tan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3 9 / 6 6

    7 3 ) Assignee; Johnstech International Corporation, 6 , 5 7 2 , 3 8 8 B2* 6 / 2 0 0 3 Lee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3 9 / 7 1Minneapolis, MN US) 6 , 8 5 4 , 9 8 1 B2* 2/2005 Nelson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 439/66

    * _ _ _ _ _ 2003/0068908 A1 4/2003 Brandtetal. .................439/71( ) Nome S u b l e c t _ t any d l s c l a l m e r i t h e t e r m O f t h l s 2 0 0 4 / 0 0 6 7 6 6 5 Al* 4 / 2 0 0 4 N a k a n o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3 9 / 7 0

    patent 1 s extended or adju sted under 35 2004/0248448 A1* 1 2 / 2004 G 1 1 1 < ......................... . . 439/264U . S . C . 1 5 4 b ) b y 0 d a y s .( 2 1 ) A p p l . N o . : 1 1 / 4 8 2 , 6 4 42 2 ) F i l e d : J u l . 7 , 2 0 0 66 5 ) P r i o r P u b l i c a t i o n Data

    US 007/0032128 A1 F e b . 8 , 2007R e l a t e d US. p p l i c a t i o n Data

    6 0 ) P r o v i s i o n a l a p p l i c a t i o n N o . 6 0 / 7 7 6 , 6 5 4 , ? l e d o n F e b .2 4 , 2 0 0 6 , p r o v i s i o n a l a p p l i c a t i o n N o . 6 0 / 6 9 7 , 7 2 1 ,? l e d o n J u l . 8 , 2 0 0 5 , p r o v i s i o n a l a p p l i c a t i o n N o .6 0 / 6 9 7 , 6 9 3 , ? l e d on u l . 8 , 2 0 0 5 .

    5 1 ) I n t . C l .H01R 1 2 / 0 0 2 0 0 6 . 0 1 )52) US. l. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 439/7258) Field o f Class i?cation Search . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 439/72,

    4 3 9 / 7 0 , 7 1 , 7 3 ; 3 2 4 / 7 5 4S e e a p p l i c a t i o n ? l e f o r c o m p l e t e s e a r c h h i s t o r y .

    5 6 ) R e f e r e n c e s C i t e dU . S . PATENT DOCUMENTS

    4 , 9 8 0 , 2 4 5 A * 1 2 / 1 9 9 0 Marino ..................... . . 428/6715 , 0 6 9 , 6 2 9 A * 1 2 / 1 9 9 1 Johnson ..................... .. 4 3 9 / 7 1

    * c i t e d b y examinerP r i m a r y E x a m i n e r i T u l s i d a s C . P a t e lA s s i s t a n t ExamineriVladimir Imas( 7 4 ) A t t o r n e y , A g e n t , o r F i r m i N a W r o c k i , R o o n e yS i v e r t s o n , P . A .( 5 7 ) ABSTRACT

    An i m p r o v e d t e s t s o c k e t f o r u s e i n t e s t i n g i n t e g r a t e d c i r c u i t s .The t e s t s o c k e t i n c l u d e s a ho us ing hav ing one o r more s l o t sformed t h e r e i n . C o n t a c t s c a n be r e c e i v e d W it h i n r e s p e c t i v es l o t s and m a i n t a i n e d t h e r e i n W i t h r e a r e n d s o f t h e c o n t a c t s i nengagement With r a c e s on l o a d b o a r d . Mounting s accomp l i s h e d by means o f a p a i r o f e l a s t o m e r s , a n d t h e e l a s t o m e r sm a i n t a i n each c o n t a c t s u c h t h a t , When t h e f r o n t end of ac o n t a c t i s engaged b y h e l e a d o r pad f h e d e v i c e t o b e t e s t e dand u r g e d i n t o i t s c o r r e s p o n d i n g s l o t , an a r c u a t e s u r f a c e a t ar e a r end of each c o n t a c t r o l l s a c r o s s i t s corresponding t r a c eW i t h v i r t u a l l y no t r a n s l a t i o n a l o r r o t a t i o n a l s l i d i n g .

    4 C l a i m s , 2 Drawing S h e e t s

  • 8/12/2019 Interconnect Devices v. Johnstech International

    24/33

    US Patent N o v 4 2 0 0 8 S h e e t o f 2

  • 8/12/2019 Interconnect Devices v. Johnstech International

    25/33

    US Patent N o v . 4 2 0 0 8 S h e e t 2 o f 2 US 4 4 5 4 6 5 B2

    l l: 3 :

  • 8/12/2019 Interconnect Devices v. Johnstech International

    26/33

    US 7 4 4 5 4 6 5 B21

    TEST SOCKET

    CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATEDAPPLICATIONS

    T h i s i s a r e g u l a r a p p l i c a t i o n ? l e d u n d e r 3 5 U . S . C . 1 l 1 a )c l a i m i n g r i o r i t y , u n d e r 3 5 U . S . C . 1 1 9 e ) l , o f r o v i s i o n a la p p l i c a t i o n S e r . N o . 6 0 / 9 7 6 9 3 p r e v i o u s l y ? l e d u l . 8 , 2 0 0 5u n d e r 3 5 U . S . C . l l l b ) .

    T h i s i s f u r t h e r a r e g u l a r a p p l i c a t i o n ? l e d u n d e r 3 5 U . S . C . 1 1 1 a ) c l a i m i n g p r i o r i t y , u n d e r 3 5 U . S . C . 1 1 9 e ) l ) o fp r o v i s i o n a l a p p l i c a t i o n S e r . N o . 6 0 / 7 7 6 6 5 4 p r e v i o u s l y ? l e don F e b . 2 4 2 0 0 6 .

    T h i s i s f u r t h e r a r e g u l a r a p p l i c a t i o n ? l e d u n d e r 3 5 U . S . C . 1 1 1 a ) c l a i m i n g p r i o r i t y , u n d e r 3 5 U . S . C . 1 1 9 e ) l ) o fp r o v i s i o n a l a p p l i c a t i o n S e r . N o . 6 0 / 9 7 7 2 1 p r e v i o u s l y ? l e don u l . 8 , 2 0 0 5 .

    TECHNICAL FIELDThe p r e s e n t i n v e n t i o n d e a l s W i t h e l e c t r o n i c componentt e s t i n g t e c h n o l o g i e s . M o r e s p e c i ? c a l l y , h o W e v e r t h e i n v e n

    t i o n d e a l s W i t h e s t s o c k e t s Which employ o n t a c t s f o r t e s t i n gan e l e c t r o n i c component. e s t s o c k e t i n c l u d e s c o n t a c t sWhich n t e r c o n n e c t and r o v i d e an l e c t r o n i c p a t h betWeenl e a d o r pad of h e e l e c t r o n i c component t o be t e s t e d and acorresponding t r a c e on a l o a d b o a r d . T h e i n v e n t i o n f o c u s e supon o n t r o l and e g u l a t i o n o f f o r c e s a p p l i e d t o a d e v i c e l e a do r pad and a l o a d board r a c e b y a c o r r e s p o n d i n g c o n t a c t oft h e t e s t s o c k e t .

    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

    I n t e g r a t e d c i r c u i t d e v i c e t e s t i n g i s a p r o c e d u r e W h i c h h a sbeen observed f o r m a n y y e a r s i n o r d e r t o o b t a i n a s high ad e g r e e o f q u a l i t y c o n t r o l a s p o s s i b l e f o r e l e c t r o n i c d e v i c e s . At e s t e r t y p i c a l l y i n c l u d e s a p l u r a l i t y o f c o n d u c t i v e t r a c e sf o r m e d on l o a d board s s o c i a t e d Wit h h e t e s t e r a p p a r a t u s . I ti s necessary t o i n t e r c o n n e c t a l e a d of leaded d e v i c e o r ap a d of non leaded d e v i c e t o a c o r r e s p o n d i n g t r a c e on h el o a d b o a r d i n o r d e r t o e f f e c t u a t e t e s t i n g . A e s t s o c k e t h a v i n ga p l u r a l i t y o f c o n t a c t s i s i n t e r p o s e d betWeen h e d e v i c e u n d e r

    20

    30

    35

    40

    2t i o n , D e t a i l e d D e s c r i p t i o n o f h e I n v e n t i o n , a p p e n d e d c l a i m sa n d a c c o m p a n y i n g d r a W i n g ? g u r e s .

    SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

    T h e p r e s e n t i n v e n t i o n i s an improved t e s t s o c k e t . I ti n c l u d e s a h o u s i n g Which a s a ? r s t s u r f a c e t h a t i s p l a c e d i n t oen ga gemen t With s u r f a c e o f a t e s t e r l o a d b o a r d . The o u s i n gh a s a s e c o n d s u r f a c e Which s g e n e r a l l y a r a l l e l t o , a n d s p a c e df r o m t h e h o u s i n g ? r s t s u r f a c e . The s e c o n d s u r f a c e o f t h eh o u s i n g f a c e s i n a d i r e c t i o n o p p o s i t e t h a t i n Which t h e ? r s ts u r f a c e f a c e s . A t e a s t o n e l o t , e x t e n d i n g t h r o u g h t h e h o u s i n gbetWeen h e ? r s t and e c o n d s u r f a c e s t h e r e o f i s formed n t h eh o u s i n g . A o n t a c t i s r e c e i v e d i n a c o r r e s p o n d i n g s l o t . Suchc o n t a c t h a s a f r o n t end Which n o r m a l l y e x t e n d s beyond t h es e c o n d s u r f a c e o f t h e h o u s i n g t o b e e n g a g e d by c o r r e s p o n di n g l e a d o r pad of d e v i c e t o be e s t e d . T h e o n t a c t f u r t h e r h a sa r e a r en d W h i c h d e ?n e s an arcuate s u r f a c e t h e arcuate s u rf a c e e n g a g i n g a c o r r e s p o n d i n g t r a c e formed on h e s u r f a c e oft h e t e s t e r l o a d b o a r d . The o n t a c t i s e l a s t o m e r i c a l l y mountedi n i t s s l o t s u c h t h a t , W h e n t h e f r o n t end o f t h e c o n t a c t i se n g a g e d by h e l e a d o r t h e pad f t h e d e v i c e t o b e t e s t e d a n du r g e d i n t o i t s s l o t , t h e a r c u a t e s u r f a c e o f t h e c o n t a c t r o l l sa c r o s s i t s corresponding r a c e on h e s u r f a c e of h e t e s t e r l o a db o a r d W i t h v i r t u a l l y no t r a n s l a t i o n a l o r r o t a t i o n a l s l i d i n g .A b r a s i o n b e t W e e n t h e c o n t a c t a n d t h e l o a d b o a r d i s , t h e r e b ys u b s t a n t i a l l y e l i m i n a t e d .

    I t i s e n v i s i o n e d t h a t t h e r e a r end f t h e c o n t a c t i n a d d i t i o nt o d e ? n i n g t h e a r c u a t e s u r f a c e i n engagement W i t h t h e l o a db o a r d a l s o d e ? n e s a g r a d u a l l y a r c i n g s u r f a c e Which s a n g ul a r l y s p a c e d f r o m t h e a r c u a t e s u r f a c e t h e r e o f . The o u s i n g i nt h i s e m b o d i m e n t d e ? n e s a W a l l W i t h i n t h e s l o t . The W a l l i se n g a g e d b y t h e g r a d u a l l y a r c i n g s u r f a c e o f h e r e a r e n d o f t h ec o n t a c t , a n d t h e s p a t i a l r e l a t i o n s h i p b e t W e e n t h e g r a d u a l l ya r c i n g s u r f a c e and h e W a l l i s s u c h h a t , a s t h e f r o n t end f h ec o n t a c t i s engaged by h e l e a d o r pad f h e d e v i c e t o b e t e s t e da n d u r g e d i n t o t h e c o r r e s p o n d i n g s l o t , t h e g r a d u a l l y a r c i n gs u r f a c e m o v e s l o n g t h e W a l l and a u s e s t h e a r c u a t e s u r f a c e oft h e c o n t a c t t o r o l l a c r o s s i t s c o r r e s p o n d i n g t r a c e . I t i s e n v is i o n e d t h a t t h e W a l l de?ned by t h e h o u s i n g Would b e a n g ul a r l y s p a c e d a t a n a c u t e a n g l e r e l a t i v e t o t h e ? r s t s u r f a c e o f h eh o u s i n g . T h i s Would n a b l e t h e a r c u a t e s u r f a c e o f t h e c o n t a c tt o r o l l a c r o s s t h e t r a c e of h e t e s t e r l o a d board With i r t u a l l y

  • 8/12/2019 Interconnect Devices v. Johnstech International

    27/33

    US 7 , 4 4 5 , 4 6 5 B23

    m a t e r i a l f o r t h e c o n t a c t s , l o a d b o a r d l i f e c a n , i t h a s beenf o u n d , be t l e a s t doubled v e r l o a d board i f e i n mechanismsknoWn n t h e p r i o r a r t .

    The r e s e n t i n v e n t i o n s t h u s an improved e s t s o c k e t Whicha d d r e s s e s t h e d i c t a t e s o f t h e p r i o r a r t a n d s o l v e s p r o b l e m st h e r e o f . M o re s p e c i ? c f e a t u r e s a n d a d v a n t a g e s o b t a i n e d i nvieW f t h o s e f e a t u r e s W i l l b e co me p p a r e n t W i t h r e f e r e n c e t ot h e D e t a i le d D e s c r i p t i o n o f t h e I n v e n t i o n , a p p e n d e d c l a i m sa n d a c c o m p a n y i n g d r a w i n g ? g u r e s .

    BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGSFIG. 1 i s a s e c t i o n a l vieW of t e s t s o c k e t i n accordance

    W i t h t h e p r e s e n t i n v e n t i o n s h o W i n g c o n t a c t a n d e l a s t o m e rresponse t o e ngagement of a c o n t a c t b y a l e a d of a d e v i c eu n d e r t e s t ; and

    FIG. 2 i s a p e r s p e c t i v e vieW of a c o n t a c t f o r use i n t h ep r e s e n t i n v e n t i o n .

    DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

    R e f e r r i n g noW t h e d r a W i n g ? g u r e s , W h e r e i n l i k e r e f e re n c e n u m e r a l s d e n o t e l i k e e l e m e n t s t h r o u g h o u t t h e s e v e r a lv i e W s , F I G . 1 i l l u s t r a t e s a t e s t s o c k e t 10 i n a c c o r d a n c e Witht h e p r e s e n t i n v e n t i o n . The e s t s o c k e t 10 s i n t e n d e d f o r u s eW i t h a t e s t e r t y p i c a l l y e m p l o y e d f o r a s c e r t a i n i n g q u a l i t y o fi n t e g r a t e d c i r c u i t d e v i c e s u s e d i n e l e c t r o n i c a p p l i a n c e s . Thet e s t e r i n t e r f a c e s With a t e s t e r l o a d board 12 Which a s e l e ct r i c a l l y c o n d u c t i v e t r a c e s 14 f o r m e d o n s u r f a c e 16 h e r e o f oe n a b l e e l e c t r o n i c communication betWeen t h e t e s t e r a n d a ni n t e g r a t e d c i r c u i t d e v i c e 1 8 t o b e t e s t e d . T h a t i s e l e c t r i c a ls i g n a l s a r e t r a n s m i t t e d betWeen h e d e v i c e under e s t 1 8 andt h e t e s t a p p a r a t u s t h r o u g h t h e t e s t s o c k e t 1 0 .

    F I G . 1 i l l u s t r a t e s a DUT ackage Which s p r o v i d e d W i t h ap l u r a l i t y o f l e a d s 2 0 , o n l y o n e o f Which i s s h o W n . F I G . 1i l l u s t r a t e s o n l y a p o r t i o n o f h e d e v i c e u n d e r e s t 1 8 , b u t t W i l lb e u n d e r s t o o d t h a t s u b s t a n t i a l l y i d e n t i c a l l e a d s e x t e n d a l o n gb o t h o f o p p o s i t e s i d e s o f t h e d e v i c e p a c k a g e 1 8 .

    F I G . 1 f u r t h e r i l l u s t r a t e s a l e a d b a c k e r W h i c h , W h e n t h ed e v i c e u n d e r t e s t 1 8 i s b r o u g h t i n t o engagement i t h t s l e a d s20 n c o n t a c t W i t h c o r r e s p o n d i n g c o n t a c t s 24 f h e t e s t s o c k e t1 0 , d e t e r s b e n d i n g o f t h e l e a d s 2 0 . DoWnWar d p r e s s u r e i s

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    4F o r e x a m p l e , i n one embodiment o f t h e i n v e n t i o n , t h e t r a n sl a t i o n a l s l i d i n g i s o n a n order of .041 n h e device 1 8 .

    Th e e s t s o c k e t 10 i n c l u d e s a housing 32 Which a s a ? r s ts u r f a c e 3 4 g e n e r a l l y i n engagement i t h t h e s u r f a c e 1 6 o f h et e s t e r load bo a r d 12 o n Which h e t r a c e s 14 a r e formed. T h eh o u s i n g 3 2 h a s a s e c o n d s u r f a c e 3 6 Which s g e n e r a l l y p a r a l l e lt o , a n d s p a c e d f r o m , t h e ? r s t s u r f a c e t h e r e o f . The s e c o n ds u r f a c e 3 6 o f t h e h o u s i n g 3 2 f a c e s o p p o s i t e l y f r o m t h e ? r s ts u r f a c e 3 4 . As r e v i o u s l y d i s c u s s e d , t h e h o u s i n g 3 2 c a r r i e s ap l u r a l i t y o f c o n t a c t s 2 4 . A l u r a l i t y o f s l o t s 3 8 a r e p r o v i d e d ,each s l o t t o r e c e i v e a s i n g l e o n e of h e c o n t a c t s 2 4 .

    F I G . 2 i l l u s t r a t e s , i n p e r s p e c t i v e , an i n d i v i d u a l c o n t a c t i na c c o r d a n c e W i t h t h e p r e s e n t i n v e n t i o n . The c o n t a c t 2 4i n c l u d e s ? r s t , s e c o n d a n d t h i r d p r o t r u s i o n s 4 0 , 4 2 , 4 4 . The? r s t p r o t r u s i o n 40 s de?ned by h e r e a r end 30 f t h e c o n t a c t24 Which n g a g e s t h e t r a c e 1 4 o f t h e l o a d board 2 . The h i r dp r o t r u s i o n 4 4 i s de?ned by h e f r o n t e n d 2 6 o f t h e c o n t a c t 2 4Which s engaged by l e a d 20 o r pad f t h e d e v i c e u n d e r t e s t1 8 . The second p r o t r u s i o n 42 s e r v e s t o e n g a g e , W h e nmounted by a p l u r a l i t y o f e l a s t o m e r s 4 6 , 4 8 , a s W i l l b e d i sc u s s e d h e r e i n a f t e r , a s h o u l d e r 4 9 de?ned b y t h e h o u s i n g 3 2 .E n g a g e m e n t o f t h e s h o u l d e r 4 9 b y t h e s e c o n d p r o t r u s i o n 4 2s e r v e s t o l i m i t t h e d e g r e e o f upWard mo v e me nt f t h e c o n t a c t24 and t h e d i s t a n c e t h e f r o n t end 26 of h e c o n t a c t 24 W i l le x t e n d beyond h e s e c o n d s u r f a c e 3 6 o f t h e h o u s i n g 3 2 Whent h e c o n t a c t 24 s n o t engaged by a d e v i c e t o be e s t e d .

    R e f e r r i n g a g a i n t o F I G . 1 , t h e t e s t s o c k e t 1 0 h a s a p a i r o fc h a n n e l s 5 0 , 5 2 Which x t e n d a l o n g a x e s g e n e r a l l y t r a n s v e r s et o p l a n e s d e ? n e d by t h e s l o t s 3 8 f o r m e d i n t h e h o u s i n g 3 2 .T h e s e c h a n n e l s 5 0 , 5 2 a r e i n t e n d e d t o r e c e i v e e l a s t o m e r s 4 6 ,48 Which e r v e t o m o u n t h e c o n t a c t s 24 n t h e i r s l o t s 3 8 . FIG.1 shoWs a g e n e r a l l y c i r c u l a r c h a n n e l 5 0 r e c e i v i n g a l a r g e r ,f r o n t e l a s t o m e r 4 6 , and r e c t a n g u l a r c h a n n e l 52 r e c e i v i n g as m a l l e r , r e a r e l a s t o m e r 4 8 . The r e a r e l a s t o m e r 48 i s p r el o a d e d a n d , b e c a u s e of h e a r c u a t e s u r f a c e 28 of h e r e a r end3 0 o f t h e c o n t a c t 2 4 b e i n g i n engagement i t h t h e l o a d b o a r d1 2 , W i l l engage an upper edge o f h e r e a r end 30 o f h e c o n t a c t24 a t a l o c a t i o n t o urge t h e f r o n t e n d 26 of t h e c o n t a c t 24u p W a r d l y . S i m i l a r l y , t h e f r o n t e l a s t o m e r 4 6 i s u n d e r c o m p r e ss i o n and l s o s e r v e s t o u r g e t h e c o n t a c t 24 u p W a r d a nd i a s i tt o a p o i n t o f n i t i a l c o n t a c t by l e a d 24 r p a d o f n n t e g r a t e d

  • 8/12/2019 Interconnect Devices v. Johnstech International

    28/33

    US 7 4 4 5 4 6 5 B25

    As p r e v i o u s l y d i s c u s s e d a s W i t h d r a W a l o f t h e d e v i c eo c c u r s t h e s e c o n d p r o j e c t i o n 42 W i l l e n g a g e t h e s h o u l d e r 49de?ned by h e h o u s i n g 3 2 i n o r d e r t o l i m i t upward movementof h e c o n t a c t s 2 4 .

    I t W i l l a l s o b e n o t e d h a t t h e p o i n t o f p p l i c a t i o n o f f o r c e b ya d e v i c e u n d e r t e s t 1 8 i s s p a c e d l a t e r a l l y a r e l a t i v e l y s i g n i ?c a n t d i s t a n c e from h e p o i n t o f engagement f t h e r e a r end 3of h e c o n t a c t 24 With t h e t r a c e 14 on h e l o a d board 1 2 . T h i sW i l l a u g m e n t t h e b e n e ? c i a l a d v a n t a g e a c h i e v e d b y t h e r o l l i n ga c t i o n t h a t i s m i n i m i Z a t i o n o f l i k e l i h o o d o f damage o t h el o a d b o a r d ) .

    F u r t h e r c o n t a c t s m a d e f p r e c i o u s m e t a l s c a n b e employedi n t h e p r e s e n t i n v e n t i o n . Such c o n t a c t s t e n d t o e x t e n d l o a db o a r d l i f e a l s o . A eyoro G o n t a c t Which s a s o l i d g o l da l l o y c o n t a c t n o t h a v i n g a n y p l a t i n g , i s e n v i s i o n e d a s b e i n gu s e d . Such m a t e r i a l i t h a s been o u n d n o t o n l y e x t e n d s t h el i f e o f t h e c o n t a c t . I t a l s o , h o W e v e r e x t e n d s l o a d b o a r d l i f e bym i n i m i z i n g damage t o t h e t r a c e s t h e r e o n . I t h a s b e e n f o u n dt h a t load board i f e can b e t l e a s t d oub le d over mechan ismsc o n s t r u c t e d a s kno W n n t h e p r i o r a r t .

    I t W i l l b e u n d e r s t o o d t h a t t h i s d i s c l o s u r e i n m a n y e s p e c t si s o n l y i l l u s t r a t i v e . C h a n g e s m a y e made n d e t a i l s , p a r t i c ul a r l y i n m a t t e r s o f s h a p e s i Z e , m a t e r i a l , a n d a r r a n g e m e n t o fp a r t s W i t h o u t e x c e e d i n g t h e s c o p e o f t h e i n v e n t i o n . Accordi n g l y , t h e s c o p e o f t h e i n v e n t i o n i s a s de?ned n t h e l a n g u a g eo f t h e a p p e n d e d c l a i m s .

    W h a t s c l a i m e d i s :1 . A e s t s o c k e t c o m p r i s i n g :a h o u s i n g h a v i n g a ? r s t s u r f a c e g e n e r a l l y i n e n g a g e m e n t

    W i t h a s u r f a c e of t e s t e r l o a d b o a r d s a i d h o u s i n g f u r t h e rh a v i n g a s e c o n d s u r f a c e , g e n e r a l l y p a r a l l e l t o , s p a c e df r o m a n d f a c i n g o p p o s i t e l y f r o m s a i d ? r s t s u r f a c e , a n da t l e a s t o n e s l o t formed i n s a i d h o u s i n g e x te n d i n gt h r o u g h s a i d h o u s i n g b e t W e e n s a i d ? r s t s u r f a c e a n d s a i ds e c o n d s u r f a c e ;

    a c o n t a c t r e c e i v e d i n a c o r r e s p o n d i n g s l o t a n d having af r o n t e n d e x t e n d i n g b e y o n d s a i d s e c o n d s u r f a c e f o rengagement by c o r r e s p o n d i n g l e a d o r pad f a d e v i c e

    2

    25

    3

    35

    6t o be t e s t e d an d having a r e a r e n d de?ning a n a r c u a t es u r f a c e i n e ng ag eme nt With a c o r r e s p o n d i n g t r a c e ons a i d s u r f a c e o f t h e t e s t e r l o a d b o a r d ;

    means f o r e l a s t o m e r i c a l l y mounting s a i d c o n t a c t i n s a i dc o r r e s p o n d i n g s l o t , W h e r e i n W h e n a i d f r o n t e n d o f s a i dc o n t a c t i s engaged by h e l e a d o r pad f t h e d e v i c e t o b et e s t e d a n d u r g e d i n t o t h e c o r r e s p o n d i n g s l o t , s a i d a r c u a t es u r f a c e r o l l s a c r o s s s a i d c o r r e s p o n d i n g t r a c e W i t h v i r t ua l l y n o t r a n s l a t i o n a l o r r o t a t i o n a l s l i d i n g and

    W h e re i n s a i d r e a r e n d of s a i d c o n t a c t f u r t h e r d e ? n es ag r a d u a l l y a r c i n g s u r f a c e , a n g u l a r l y s p a c e d f r o m s a i da r c u a t e s u r f a c e , a n d s a i d h o u s i n g d e ? n e s W i t h i n t h e s l o t ,a W a l l a n g u l a r l y s p a c e d r e l a t i v e t o s a i d ? r s t s u r f a c e o fs a i d h o u s i n g a n d e n g a g e d b y s a i d g r a d u a l l y a r c i n g s u rf a c e of a i d r e a r e n d of s a i d c o n t a c t s u c h t h a t , a s s a i df r o n t e n d o f s a i d c o n t a c t i s e n g a g e d by h e l e a d o r pad ft h e d e v i c e t o b e t e s t e d a n d u r g e d i n t o t h e c o r r e s p o n d i n gs l o t , s a i d g r a d u a l l y a r c i n g s u r fa c e o f s a i d c o n t a c t movesa l o n g s a i d W a l l i n c o n s t a n t e n g a g e m e n t t h e r e W i t h a n dc a u s e s s a i d a r c u a t e s u r f a c e t o r o l l a c r o s s t h e correspondi n g t r a c e .

    2 . A e s t s o c k e t i n a c c o r d a n c e W i t h c l a i m 1 Wherein s a i dmeans f o r e l a s t o m e r i c a l l y mounting a i d c o n t a c t c o m p r i s e s af r o n t e l a s t o m e r p r e - c o m p r e s s e d by t h e c o n t a c t and comp r e s s e d f u r t h e r b y h e c o n t a c t a s s a i d f r o n t end f s a i d c o n t a c ti s e n g a g e d by t h e l e a d o r pad o f t h e d e v i c e t o b e t e s t e d a n du r g e d i n t o t h e s l o t .

    3 . A e s t s o c k e t i n a c c o r d a n c e W i t h c l a i m 2 Wherein s a i dmeans o r e l a s t o m e r i c a l l y mounting a i d c o n t a c t f u r t h e r c o mp r i s e s a r e a r e l a s t o m e r t h a t p r e - l o a d s t h e r e a r e n d of t h ec o n t a c t a g a i n s t a c o r r e s p o n d i n g t r a c e on t h e s u r f a c e o f t h et e s t e r l o a d b o a r d .

    4 . A e s t s o c k e t i n accordance With claim 3 f u r t h e r comp r i s i n g a s h o u l d e r d e ? n e d b y s a i d h o u s i n g f o r e n g a g i n g t h ec o n t a c t a n d l i m i t i n g t h e d i s t a n c e t h e c o n t a c t e x t e n d s beyonds a i d s e c o n d s u r f a c e o f s a i d h o u s i n g .

  • 8/12/2019 Interconnect Devices v. Johnstech International

    29/33

  • 8/12/2019 Interconnect Devices v. Johnstech International

    30/33

    120 South Sixth Street, Suite 1700, Minneapolis, MN 55402 USA

    Direct Dial: (952) 253-4106E-Mail: [email protected]

    25 February 2014

    Gabriel Guglielmi, PresidentInterconnect Devices, Inc. and Smiths Connectors5101 Richland AveKansas City, KS 66106

    By email: [email protected] certified mail

    Re: Our Reference: 04210.0018-US-ABInfringement of US Patents 7 059 866, 7 722 361, 7 445 465

    Dear Sirs:

    We are Intellectual Property counsel for Johnstech International of Minneapolis, MN, amaker of patented test sockets and pins. We are sure you are familiar with Johnstechand its products.

    It has come to our attention that your company is advertising a test pin and socketunder the Archemedes name (see attached).

    Our review of this product indicates that it is a direct infringement of the following USPatents, namely7 059 866, 7 722 361 and 7 445 465.

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 8/12/2019 Interconnect Devices v. Johnstech International

    31/33

    If your company exhibits this product at the BITS conference, we will consider that anintentional infringement

    Under 35 United States Code Sections 284-285, intentional/willful infringement issubject to tripling of damages and Johnstechs attorneys fees in pursing theinfringement.

    Without waiving any rights to obtaining an injunction against your company or its clients,we invite you to contact us to see if an amicable solution can be quickly achieved. If wedo not hear from you by March 1, 2014, we shall assume that settlement is of nointerest, and continued infringement will certainly be willful. .

    Very truly yours,s/Michael B. Lasky/Michael B. Lasky

    Attorney

    MBL/jsa

  • 8/12/2019 Interconnect Devices v. Johnstech International

    32/33

  • 8/12/2019 Interconnect Devices v. Johnstech International

    33/33