institute of management accountants receivables management: cash, profit, and shareholder value las...
TRANSCRIPT
Institute of Management Accountants
Receivables Management: Cash, Profit, and Shareholder Value Las VegasJune 19, 2006
2
© 2006 Parson Consulting All rights reserved Reference code
• Introduction
• Benefits of Excellence in Receivables Management
• Cost of Poor Management of Receivables
• Key Drivers of Excellence
• Conclusion
Agenda
3
© 2006 Parson Consulting All rights reserved Reference code
Did you know:
• Receivables are among the three largest assets of 75% of the Fortune 500?
• Receivables are a “free” quality measure of your customer service?
• Credit and collection are the most customer-centric activities in Finance?
Does your company or your client have a strategy for the receivables asset?
• Competitive advantage (financing)
• Necessary evil (minimize investment and cost)
• No strategy
Who authorizes increases in the receivables investment?
Introduction
4
© 2006 Parson Consulting All rights reserved Reference code
The benefits are many:
• Cash generation– repay debt, raise dividend, repurchase shares, invest in R&D, acquisitions
• Bad debt risk and expense reduction
• Concessions reduction – merit not age
• Administrative cost reduction throughout revenue cycle
• Customer service and satisfaction enhancement
• Revenue increases from:
• sales to weak customers with risk controlled and managed
• reducing administrative burden on sales force
Benefits of Excellence in Receivables Management
5
© 2006 Parson Consulting All rights reserved Reference code
Examples:
• Generated $66 million of cash from receivables for a $1 billion Mid-Atlantic medical device manufacturer, reducing DSO from 63 to 41.
• Decreased DSO from 72 to 38 for a $100 million Northeast software firm, generating $10 million of cash.
• Reduced DSO from 120 to 90 in three months for a $12 million New England disease management company. Client’s DSO is now in the 40’s. Total cash generated is $2.5 million.
• Reduced delinquency by 43% in three months for a $130 million East Coast medical equipment manufacturer, generating $5 million of cash.
• Reduced bad debt by $2 million by collecting 65% of over-one year-old maintenance receivables for an Eastern high tech firm.
• Recovered from bad debt over $300,000 of over-one-year-old receivables for a $12 million Southwestern home health care provider.
• Increased cash receipts for a West Coast orthotics manufacturer by $11 million in three months.
Benefits of Excellence in Receivables Management
6
© 2006 Parson Consulting All rights reserved Reference code
Medical Products DSO
40.0
45.0
50.0
55.0
60.0
65.0
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep Oct
Nov
Dec Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep Oct
Nov
Dec Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May Jun
Jul
Day
s Sa
les
Out
stan
ding
20012000 2002
7
© 2006 Parson Consulting All rights reserved Reference code
Medical Products - Eligible Receivables Ratio
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
Dec-99
J an-00
Feb-00
Mar-00
Apr-00
May-00
J un-00
J ul-00
Aug-00
Sep-00
Oct-00
Nov-00
Dec-00
J an-01
Feb-01
Mar-01
Apr-01
May-01
J un-01
J ul-01
Aug-01
Sep-01
Oct-01
Nov-01
Dec-01
J an-02
Feb-02
Mar-02
Apr-02
May-02
J un-02
J ul-02
Company Internal Benchmark
Eligible Receivables Ratio = Eligible Receivables / Gross Receivables
8
© 2006 Parson Consulting All rights reserved Reference code
CRM Software Provider
56
50
60
40
47
23 23
20
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
DSO
DSO
2001 2002
9
© 2006 Parson Consulting All rights reserved Reference code
The costs can be hidden and devastating:
• Cash drain – increased investment in receivables asset for what return?
• Example: $2 billion manufacturer saw receivables increase $110 million in nine months with only modest revenue growth
• Bad debt expense – a dollar for dollar reduction of profit
• Example: a jet engine repair firm which dealt mainly with government, lost $1.1 million by failing to secure letter of credit from private sector customer in Egypt.
• Example: a large services company that had large, “blue chip” clients and no credit controls, lost millions when Kmart, US Airways, etc. filed bankruptcy.
• Example: a $3 billion distributor lost 33% or $16 million of an acquired firm’s receivables through poor integration execution.
Cost of Poor Management of Receivables
10
© 2006 Parson Consulting All rights reserved Reference code
Lab Supplies - Merger/acquisition integration case study
16
48
36
28
21
16
1210
7
30
25
50
I I+6 I+7 I+8 I+9 I+10 I+11 I+12 I+13 I+14
I = Integration
$ M
illio
n
Receivables > 150 days past due
11
© 2006 Parson Consulting All rights reserved Reference code
• Concessions – invalid disputes and deductions written off because of age, not merit. May be hidden in charges to bad debt reserve, discounts, returns, & allowances, or other expense category
• Example: $400 million distributor with a 6% gross margin, lost over $1 million annually from concessions.
• Example: $350 million food manufacturer lost over $2 million in invalid deductions from delay in challenging them.
• Administrative cost – excess staff cost to manage the asset
• Example: a $2 billion services firm employed 18% more staff than needed because of a lack of standards, metrics, and supervision.
• Example: a $1 billion medical products firm’s staff cost was 12% higher than required from having high cost collectors performing clerical work.
Cost of Poor Management of Receivables (cont.)
12
© 2006 Parson Consulting All rights reserved Reference code
• Customer service and satisfaction – your reputation as a quality supplier can be hurt by inaccurate invoices and statements of account, unprofessional customer contact, etc.
• Example: $400 million distributor lost a bid on a contract even though they had the lowest price. Reason: lack of administrative quality.
• Revenue – restrictive credit policy can constrain profitable sales to thinly capitalized customers. Excessive involvement of sales force in dispute resolution can divert time from selling.
• Cash and cost
• Example: $200 million apparel firm misapplied cash. Angry customers stopped paying until their accounts were corrected. Result: low cash receipts, high temp help expense for several months.
Cost of Poor Management of Receivables (cont.)
13
© 2006 Parson Consulting All rights reserved Reference code
There are many practices, tools, and techniques that are a part of effective and efficient receivables management. Among these are:
• credit risk evaluation and control
• technology
• proper metrics
• management support
These elements must be utilized and performed well every day over many months to achieve excellence.
However, the three major drivers of excellence in receivables management are:
• Accurate order fulfillment and invoicing
• A well defined portfolio strategy
• A formal dispute resolution process
Key Drivers of Excellence
14
© 2006 Parson Consulting All rights reserved Reference code
Accurate order fulfillment and invoicing
Delivering exactly the high quality product or service that the customer ordered, and billing it with an invoice that is accurate and meets customer requirements will:
• pre-empt disputes
• avoid providing a legitimate reason for delaying or shorting payment
• enhance your image as a total quality supplier
• improve productivity throughout the revenue cycle
Example: a Baldridge award winning manufacturer with a 2% Billing Quality Index enjoyed a DSO in the low to mid-thirties selling on Net 30 day terms.
Key Drivers of Excellence
15
© 2006 Parson Consulting All rights reserved Reference code
A well defined portfolio strategy
Just like a marketing strategy segments customer groups to customize the sales pitch, a portfolio strategy segments customers into groups which merit a customized collection approach. Common customer segments are:
• private vs. government sector
• domestic vs. export
• national account vs. smaller customer
• high margin vs. low margin
• low risk vs. high risk
The collection process and organization are tailored to the segment.
Key Drivers of Excellence
16
© 2006 Parson Consulting All rights reserved Reference code
A WELL DEFINED PORTFOLIO STRATEGY
Example: a medical products manufacturer had over 5000 customers. The Credit department treated all with the same approach. Large customers received inadequate attention, sacrificing cash flow. Many customers were rarely contacted because of the huge workload. DSO was 60% above Best Possible DSO.
Example: a manufacturer assigned collectors with the same skill sets to National Accounts and to small accounts. Higher cost staff who were skilled in collection contact spent much of their time reconciling accounts and resolving deductions of National Accounts (who normally paid within terms). Their collection skills and premium cost were wasted.
Key Drivers of Excellence
17
© 2006 Parson Consulting All rights reserved Reference code
A formal dispute resolution process
A dispute is any reason (other than cash constraints) for a customer to delay or short pay (aka, take a “deduction”) an invoice. Most disputes are administrative in nature (price, missing P.O. number, etc.). The key attributes of a formal dispute resolution process are:
• prompt identification of disputes
• routing to “best positioned” resolver
• clearly defined workflows for resolution and clearing
• tracking of every dispute until cleared
• proper metrics
• culture of customer satisfaction
Key Drivers of Excellence
18
© 2006 Parson Consulting All rights reserved Reference code
Dispute Management – Cycle Times
Illustration of Dispute Resolution Improvement
240
200
160
0
40
80
120
238
216
100
86
January March June September
Days from Inv. Date to Clearing
19
© 2006 Parson Consulting All rights reserved Reference code
Dispute Management – Cash flow ImprovementYear to Year Improvement
Illustration of Actual Client Performance - % Improvement
75
48
24
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Aged Items
Over 90
Delinquency
20
© 2006 Parson Consulting All rights reserved Reference code
Dispute Management
Customer Satisfaction Questions
• Overall satisfaction with administrative support (+3 points)
• Quick and effective response (+3 points)
• Effective two way communication (+2 points)
• Accurate and timely invoices (+2 points)
21
© 2006 Parson Consulting All rights reserved Reference code
Dispute Management – Productivity Improvements
4340
3033
0
10
20
30
40
50
January March June September
Note: Overtime Improvement = 40%
% Improvement
Outstanding Case StudiesReceivables Management
23
© 2006 Parson Consulting All rights reserved Reference code
Software Firm DSO vs. Cash BalanceSoftware Firm DSO vs. Cash Balance
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
DSO
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
Cash Balance $M
DSO
Cash Balance $M
24
© 2006 Parson Consulting All rights reserved Reference code
Software Solutions Provider
101105
101
93
80
74
61 62
3032
30
26
38
54
37
57
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Dec-00 Mar-01 Jun-01 Sep-01 Dec-01 Mar-02 Sep-02 12/31/02
DSO
5
15
25
35
45
55
65
STOCK PRICE
DSO
STOCK PRICE
Software Solutions Provider
25
© 2006 Parson Consulting All rights reserved Reference code
Cash Flow Enterprises
CASH FLOW ENTERPRISESDSO
35
40
45
50
55
60
Jan. Feb. March April May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec.
Time Period
Da
ys
2004
2005
26
© 2006 Parson Consulting All rights reserved Reference code
Receivables Cycle Management (RCM) Practice
Specializes in helping clients convert orders into cash as quickly and efficiently as possible.
• We enable clients to realize significant savings in interest, bad debt, deduction, administrative, and concessions costs, while releasing, on average, 15 to 25% of the cash invested in receivables.
• The practice has helped over 100 clients realize the benefits of improved order-to-cash functions.
• Our hands-on, real world experience assures pragmatic recommendations and establishes credibility with client staff, which accelerates their adoption of new tools and techniques.
• Industry experience is broad with concentration in:• Medical products• Software• Professional services• Publishing
27
© 2006 Parson Consulting All rights reserved Reference code
Parson Consulting has partnered with over one hundred clients to establish new capabilities and improve existing capabilities along the Order To Cash spectrum.
• Track record
• Specialized expertise
• Objective view
• Pragmatic approach
• Field tested techniques
Why Parson?