inspector: e. w. k. lee /}.i h - nrc

6
. U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION . OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT REGION III Report Nos. 454/79-16; 455/79-16 Docket Nos. 50-454; 50-455 Iicense Nos. CPPR-130; CPPR-131 Licensee: Commonwealth Edison Company P.O. Box 767 Chicago, IL 60690 Facility Name: Byron Station, Units 1 and 2 Inspection At: Byron Site, Byron, Illinois Inspection Conducted: October 23-25, 1979 /}.I h "/'NY Inspector: E. W. K. Lee Approved by: D. H. Danielson, Chief [77b <""> ' o T' '" ' ' - Engineering Support Section 2 Inspection Summary: Inspection on October 23-25, 1979 (Reports Nos. 50-454/79-16; 50-455/79-16) Areas Inspected: Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary and Safety Related Piping work activity and welding; quality records and procedures. The inspection involved a total of 20 inspector hours on site by one NRC inspector. Results: Of the six areas inspected, no apparent items of noncompliance or deviation were identified in five areas, one apparent item of noncom- pliance was identified in one area (infraction - inadequate procedure, paragraph 3a). . 1630 22 7 E12200 5 [f

Upload: others

Post on 05-May-2022

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Inspector: E. W. K. Lee /}.I h - NRC

.

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION.

OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT

REGION III

Report Nos. 454/79-16; 455/79-16

Docket Nos. 50-454; 50-455 Iicense Nos. CPPR-130; CPPR-131

Licensee: Commonwealth Edison CompanyP.O. Box 767Chicago, IL 60690

Facility Name: Byron Station, Units 1 and 2

Inspection At: Byron Site, Byron, Illinois

Inspection Conducted: October 23-25, 1979

/}.I h "/'NYInspector: E. W. K. Lee

Approved by: D. H. Danielson, Chief [77b <""> ' o T' '" ''-

Engineering Support Section 2

Inspection Summary: Inspection on October 23-25, 1979 (Reports Nos.50-454/79-16; 50-455/79-16)

Areas Inspected: Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary and Safety RelatedPiping work activity and welding; quality records and procedures. Theinspection involved a total of 20 inspector hours on site by one NRCinspector.

Results: Of the six areas inspected, no apparent items of noncomplianceor deviation were identified in five areas, one apparent item of noncom-pliance was identified in one area (infraction - inadequate procedure,paragraph 3a).

.

1630 22

7 E12200 5 [f

Page 2: Inspector: E. W. K. Lee /}.I h - NRC

.

.

DETAILS.

Persons Contacted

Principal Licensee Employees

* S. T. Forsha, Structure QA Coordinator* T. McIntire, QA Supervisor* J. Porter, Mechanical QA Coordinator* G. Sorenson, Project Superintendent* M. Stanish, QA Engineer* R. Tuetkin, Lead Mechanical Engineer

Hunter Corporation

* J. H. Robertson, Welding Engineer* M. Somsag, QA Supervisor

The inspector also contacted and interviewed other licensee and contractorpersonnel, including area superintendents and craftsmen.

* Denotes those present at the exit interview.

Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings,

(Closed) Noncompliance Item (454/79-02-02; 455/79-02-01) - Control ofwelding material: The inspector reviewed the randomly selected weldmaterial issuance slips and determined that returned unused materialswer' marked on the slips.

(Closed) Unresolved Item (454/79-12-01; 455/79-12-01) - Pipe storage: Theinspector reviewed the pipe storage surveillance report which indicatedthat the storage conditions were corrected.

(Closed) Noncompliance Item (454/79-12-01) - Weld data sheet hold point:The inspector reviewed the nonconformance report and determined it wasproperly closed.

(Closed) Noncompliance Item (454/79-12-03; 455/79-12-02) - Control ofDocument: The inspector verified that the procedure supplements havebeen redistributed. The revised procedure was also reviewed.

Functional or Program Areas Inspected

1. Peactor Coolant Pressure Boundary Piping - Observation ofWork and Work Activities (Unit 1)

The inspector observed weld end preparation of Safety InjectionSystem weld No. 122 on Isometric Drawing No. SI-6 and Spool No. SI-1

1630 ''23-2-

Page 3: Inspector: E. W. K. Lee /}.I h - NRC

.

on Isometric Drawing No. SI-1-4. It was determined that work activitieswere performed in accordance with the applicable procedures and gooda

construction practices were adhered to.

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

2. Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary Piping - Review of Quality Records

The inspector reviewed the Westinghouse Corporation Qualitya.Release, ASME data Report and Receiving Inspection Report forthe following piping spools:

(1) QR No. 35627 for spool No. CBE-Loop-1-6

(2) QR No. 35628 for spool No. CBE-Loop-2-1

(3) QR No. 35630 for spool No. CBE-Loop-2-6

(4) QR No. 31246 for spool No. CAE-Loop-2-1

(5) QR No. 31244 for spool No. CAE-Loop-3 f

(6) QR No. 35633 for spool No. CBE-Loop-3-6

(7) QR No. 35634 for spool No. CBE-Loop-4-1

(8) QR No. 35635 for spool No. CBE-Loop-4-6-

It was determined that the documents are legible and acceptable.

b. The inspector reviewed the pipe storage inspection records forthe period between February 1978, and August 1979. It wasdetermined that (1) the records are difficult to retrieve; (2)inspection was performed at the required frequency and (3)storage requirements were met.

The inspector reviewed the following CECO audit reports:c.

(1) CECO Audit Reports No. 6-79-201, No. 6-79-215, No. 6-79-180and No. 6-78-160.

(2) CECO reports of audit performed at Westinghouse Corporation,Monroeville for years 1977, 1978.

It was determined that the records are acceptable and findingswere closed out in a timely manner. However, the audits atWestinghouse were performed by CECO home office personnel hencenot all the supporting documents, such as follow-up actions,checklists used during the audits, were available on site. Thelicensee stated those documents can be made available, includingthe 1979 audit report, on site. This matter is considered unre-

1630 324-3-

Page 4: Inspector: E. W. K. Lee /}.I h - NRC

.

solved pending a review during a subsequent inspection.(454/79-16-01)>

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

3. Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary Piping - Observation ofWelding Activities (Unit 1)

The inspector observed the followlag welding activities:a.

(1) Reactor Coolant System, Weld No. 219 on isometric drawingNo. RC-1-1, Welds No. 82 and 83 on isometric drawingNo. RC-1

(2) Safety Injection System, Weld No. 109 on isometric drawingNo. SI-1.

It was determined that (1) work was conducted in accordincewith traveler; (2) proper welding materials were used; (3)welding procedure requirements were met; (4) work area was freeof welding rod-stubs; (5) physical appearance was acceptableand (6) weld end detail for weld No. 219 on isometric drawingNo. RC-1-1 was not specified and accepted by QC inspector basedon no acceptance criteria. This condition is an item of noncom-pliance identified in Appendix A. (454/79-16-02)

b. The inspector observed liquid penetrant examination of Safety.

Injection System, Weld No. 141 on isometric drawing No. SI-5and weld No. 111 on isometric drawing No. SI-1. It was determinedthat: (1) surface condition was acceptable; (2) procedurerequirements were met and (3) personnel were properly qualified.

Except as noted, no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

4. Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary and Safety Related Piping -Welding Material Control (Units 1 and 2)

a. Review of Documents

(1) The inspector established that Hunter Corporation procedurefor welding material control has not been revised sincethe last review (IE inspection Reports No. 50-454/79-12and No. 50-455/79-12, paragraph 3a) except procedureNo. 5.101. The current revision of this procedure isrevision 6. The revision was reviewed.

(2) Receiving Inspection Report, Material Certification andPurchase Order for ER 308L welding rod with heats No. 741403and No. 741573 and ERNicr-3 welding rod with heats No. 762453and No. 760460.

1630 325

-4-

Page 5: Inspector: E. W. K. Lee /}.I h - NRC

.

It was determined that the above documents met the PSAR, 10 CFR,

50, Appendix B and the applicable code requirements.

b. Control of Materials

The inspector toured welding material issuing stations No. 3and No. 5. It was determined that (1) the welding materials areproperly identified and segregated; (2) the temperature of therod oven is maintained; (3) records are properly kept; and (4)issuance and return of welding materials are controlled inaccordance with approved procedures.

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

5. Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary and Safety Related Piping -Welder Qualification (Unit 1)

The inspector reviewed the following documents:

Ilunter Corporation Site Implementing Procedure No. 5-301,a.Revision 6, " Welder Qualification."

b. Qualification records of welders who performed welding of weldsidentified in paragraphs 3a and 7 of this report).

The inspector determined that the above documents met the requirements of,

ASME B & PV Code Section IX.

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

6. Safety Related Piping - Observation of Work and Work Activities(Unit 1)

The inspector observed weld end preparation of Safety Injection System,Spool No. SI-13-10 on isometric drawing No. SI-13. It was determinedthat work activities were performed in accordance with the applicableprocedures and good construction practices were adhered to.

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

7. Safety Related Piping - Observation of Welding' Activities(Unit 1)

The inspector observed the following welding activities:

Component Cooling Water System, Weld No. 689 on isometric drawinga.No. CC-48, Weld No. 28B on isometric drawing No. CC-1 and WeldNo. 93 on isometric drawing No. CC-5.

b. Containment Spray System, weld No. 282 on isometric drawingNo. CS-23.

1630 326-5-

Page 6: Inspector: E. W. K. Lee /}.I h - NRC

.

c. Residual Heat Removal System, weld No. 181 on isometric No. RH-7.,

d. Safety Injection System, Weld No. 342 on isometric drawingNo. SI-13-13

It was determined that (1) work was conducted in accordance withtraveler; (2) proper welding materials were used; (3) welding proce-dure requirements were met; (4) work area was free of weld rod-stubs;(5) physical appearance was aedeptable and (6) weld No. 28B onisometric drawing No. CC-1 was rejected by the QC inspector becauseof bad fit-up.

Unresolved Items

Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required inorder to ascertain whether they are acceptable items, items of noncompliance,or deviations. Unresolved items disclosed during the inspection are discussedin paragraph 2c.

Exit Interview

The inspector met with licensee representatives (denoted under PersonsContacted) at the conclusion of the inspection on October 25, 1979. Theinspector summarized the purpose and findings of the inspection. Thelicensee acknowledged the findings reported herein.

.

1630 a27

.

-6-