innovative partnerships: institutional strategies · •innovation networks / clusters ≠ bricks...

12
Innovative partnerships: institutional strategies P. Van Dun November 7, 2016

Upload: others

Post on 30-Apr-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Innovative partnerships: institutional strategies · •Innovation networks / clusters ≠ bricks & mortar • Full (and active!) endorsement of the university top • Incubation/Proof-of-concept

Innovative partnerships: institutional strategies

P. Van Dun November 7, 2016

Page 2: Innovative partnerships: institutional strategies · •Innovation networks / clusters ≠ bricks & mortar • Full (and active!) endorsement of the university top • Incubation/Proof-of-concept

KU Leuven Research & Development (LRD)

• Founded in 1972; currently 90 employees • Three activity areas:

o Contract & collaborative research: • >2000 new agreements / year • 55% of turnover

o Intellectual property: • > 200 invention disclosures / year • > 100 mio euro royalty income / year

o Spinning out companies: • > 110 spin-offs so far; 4200 direct employees • 7 IPO’s

Page 3: Innovative partnerships: institutional strategies · •Innovation networks / clusters ≠ bricks & mortar • Full (and active!) endorsement of the university top • Incubation/Proof-of-concept

Impact of U-I interaction

• Empirical research shows that collaboration with universities significantly impacts upon the % of turnover from novel products; whereas collaboration with suppliers and customers significantly impacts upon % turnover from improved products

• Results --- summary:

% TURNOVER

Collaboration Collaboration suppliers & customers universities

Novel products

Improved products

Source: Faems, Van Looy & Debackere, 2005; based on CIS-data

Page 4: Innovative partnerships: institutional strategies · •Innovation networks / clusters ≠ bricks & mortar • Full (and active!) endorsement of the university top • Incubation/Proof-of-concept

Impact of U-I interaction (2)

• Empirical research shows that collaboration with functionally diverse partners significantly impacts upon the % of turnover from novel products; whereas collaboration with geographically diverse partners significantly impacts upon % turnover from improved products

• Results --- summary:

% TURNOVER

Collaboration Collaboration Geographical diversity Functional diversity

Novel products

Improved products

Source: JPIM, 2011; based on CIS-data

Page 5: Innovative partnerships: institutional strategies · •Innovation networks / clusters ≠ bricks & mortar • Full (and active!) endorsement of the university top • Incubation/Proof-of-concept

A wide range of possibilities

• Gatekeeping (two way street) • Use of infrastructure & facilities • Consultancy: expert opinions / analysis • Feasibility studies / simulations • (Clinical) trials • Joint R&D: bi- or multilateral • Licensing: patents, software, materials, … • Spin-offs, joint ventures, …

Page 6: Innovative partnerships: institutional strategies · •Innovation networks / clusters ≠ bricks & mortar • Full (and active!) endorsement of the university top • Incubation/Proof-of-concept

Major challenges - how to deal with them?

• Visible support from the top • Importance of IP? • Exclusivity • Term of collaboration? • The best way to move technology is to move a human carrier!

Page 7: Innovative partnerships: institutional strategies · •Innovation networks / clusters ≠ bricks & mortar • Full (and active!) endorsement of the university top • Incubation/Proof-of-concept

The importance of IP?

2010

Page 8: Innovative partnerships: institutional strategies · •Innovation networks / clusters ≠ bricks & mortar • Full (and active!) endorsement of the university top • Incubation/Proof-of-concept

Major challenges - how to deal with them?

• Visible support (and investment …) from the top • Importance of IP? • Exclusivity • Term of collaboration? • The best way to move technology is to move a human carrier!

Page 9: Innovative partnerships: institutional strategies · •Innovation networks / clusters ≠ bricks & mortar • Full (and active!) endorsement of the university top • Incubation/Proof-of-concept

Major challenges - how to deal with them (2)?

• One stop shop • Interdisciplinary research vs. “walls” of faculties • Flexible terms and constructions: may very over time

(content, volume, …) BUT continuity required regarding the university policies & strategy!

• More and more: concentration of research partners

Page 10: Innovative partnerships: institutional strategies · •Innovation networks / clusters ≠ bricks & mortar • Full (and active!) endorsement of the university top • Incubation/Proof-of-concept

Biotech

CD3 partnership

Early Drug Discovery Engine

Pharma Research Group X

Research Group Y

Spin-off Company Z

Pharma

TTO

TTO Spin-off

Biotech

30-40 collaborators

on a constant

basis

• Investment 60 mio euro: 50/50 university/EIF • No cure no pay • Fair return to all parties who contributed

Shared risk – reward model

Page 11: Innovative partnerships: institutional strategies · •Innovation networks / clusters ≠ bricks & mortar • Full (and active!) endorsement of the university top • Incubation/Proof-of-concept

Features that have proven to be important to us …

• Innovation networks / clusters ≠ bricks & mortar • Full (and active!) endorsement of the university top • Incubation/Proof-of-concept investments (policy choice!) • Reality check: vast majority of partnerships find their origin at

researchers’ level – but you can help to create opportunities • Access to early stage breakthroughs: close relationship • Key words: flexibility AND stability + “skin in the game”

Page 12: Innovative partnerships: institutional strategies · •Innovation networks / clusters ≠ bricks & mortar • Full (and active!) endorsement of the university top • Incubation/Proof-of-concept

KU Leuven Research & Development (LRD) Waaistraat 6 – box 5105 3000 Leuven – Belgium +32 (0)16 32 65 00 [email protected] lrd.kuleuven.be