informing african agricultural development planning and implementation in the context of caadp in...

www.iita.org

CONTRACT REVIEW26 April 2012

Informing African Agricultural Development Planning and Implementation in the context of

CAADP in West Africa

By Mbaye Yade

Coordinator ReSAKSS WA

www.iita.org

OUTLINE• SOME BASIS TARGETS AND PRINCIPLES OF CAADP• RESAKSS AS PART OF CAADP IMPLEMENTATION• STRATEGIC ANALYSIS•MONITORING AND EVALUATION•COUNTRY SAKSS ESTABLISHMENT•PROSPECTS

www.iita.org

SOME BASIS TARGETS AND PRINCIPLES OF CAADP

• CAADP as a strategic framework by which to guide country development efforts and partnerships in the agricultural sector:

• agriculture led growth for poverty reduction;

• increased funding of agriculture (10%) and

• at least 6% agriculture growth – all targeted at achieving MGD1 and other welfare targets

www.iita.org

Some basic Targets and Principles of CAADP

– (1) mobilize existing expertise , capacities and knowledge and provide first-rate analytical and advisory services to countries and Regional Economic Communities in the design, implementation, and evaluation of CAADP programs.

– (2) provide assistance to countries in the establishment of national knowledge system nodes to support CAADP implementation

www.iita.org

Some basic Targets and Principles of CAADP

Work with the national nodes to provide relevant and timely information to guide:

– Mutual review at the continental level to review overall progress in the implementation of CAADP

– Peer review at the regional level to promote dialogue and mutual learning around the review of progress and performance

– Progress review at the national level to ensure that country level policies and programs are aligned with CAADP principles and on track to meet the country-specific targets and objectives

www.iita.org

evidence- and outcome-based planning and implementation of agricultural-

sector policies and strategies in Africa

Strategic Analysis and Monitoring of CAADP and Agricultural Performance in Africa

Knowledge Management, Capacity Strengthening, and Policy Communications

support review and dialogue

• 4 nodes: managed by IFPRI, IITA, ILRI and IWMI

• Key partners: AUC/NPCA and RECs

www.iita.org

RESAKSS AS PART OF CAADP IMPLEMENTATION

Regional ReSAKSS nodes to:

– Facilitate access by the RECs and their member states to policy-relevant analyses of the highest quality improve policymaking,

– Track progress, document success, and derive lessons that can feed into the review and learning processes associated with the implementation of the CAADP agenda

www.iita.org


National Nodes:– pursuing the same objectives at national level– ensuring the mobilization and coordination of

knowledge generating and dissemination networks– Comprising of:

• An analytical node bringing together National Agricultural Research Institutes, universities, statistics offices, the technical arms of professional organizations, etc.

• A framework for review, dialogue and advocacy coordinated at high level (Permanent Secretary of Director) including all stakeholders: government institutions, Professional associations, TFP, etc.

www.iita.org


• Generate, compile, and share analyses and data relevant to agricultural and rural development in line with the national objectives; • Perform strategic investment analyses for the agricultural sector, especially for the different sub sectors, providing practical policy and investment options; • Undertake monitoring and evaluation of the Agriculture Sector Plan programmes to facilitate evidence-based planning and implementation; • Produce knowledge products for dissemination and outreach through a combination of real (stakeholder forums) and virtual (interactive multimedia services) mechanisms; • Contribute to fostering constructive, cross-sectoral policy debates and encourage dialogue and the exchange of data and knowledge among the different stakeholders at national, regional, and international levels; • Etc.

www.iita.org

STRATEGIC ANALYSIS CONTRIBUTION TO NAIP AND

RAIP DESIGN

– STOCK TAKING EXERCICE

– MODELING WORK

– Review of the consistency of the NAIP’s vis a vis their growth, poverty and funding targets

www.iita.org

DONOR AND GOV

IMPLEMENT

ROUND TABLESIGNING OFCOMPACT

DRAFTINGOF COUNTRY

CAADP COMPACT

GOV APPOINTFOCAL POINTS

REC&GOVLAUNCH

PROCESS

COUNTRY STEERING & TECHNICALCOMMITTEE

STOCK TAKEGROWTH

INVESTMENTANALYSIS

CABINET MEMO ANDENDORSMENT

START

CAADP COUNTRY PROCESS

www.iita.org

STRATEGIC ANALYSIS CONTRIBUTION TO NAIP AND

RAIP DESIGN

• TREND SCENARIO FOR GROWTH AND POVERTY REDUCTION;

• COMPARE TRENDS WITH CAADP AND MDG-1 TARGETS

• ALTERNATIVE SCENARIOS TO MEET CAADP AND MDG-1 TARGETS ;

• ASSESS FUNDING REQUIREMENTS

www.iita.org

STRATEGIC ANALYSIS CONTRIBUTION TO NAIP AND RAIP

DESIGNContribution of agricultural growth to poverty reduction at the national and rural levels (%)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

BENIN BURKINA FASO

CAPE VERT

GAMBIE GHANA GUINEE CONAKRY

LIBERIA MALI NIGER NIGERIA SENEGAL TOGO

Agriculture Non Agriculture sectors

www.iita.org


DESIGN

Long term contributions of agricultural growth to increases of Agricultural GDP (millions of $US) and Poverty reduction (%)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

Benin Burkina Faso Cape Verde The Gambia Ghana Guinea Liberia Mali Niger Senegal Togo Redu

ctio

n in

the

natio

nal p

over

ty ra

te (%

)

PIB

Ag( M

illion

s de

$US

)

Growth in Agricultural GDP

Reduction in national poverty rate

www.iita.org


DESIGNStrategic agricultural subsectors for agricultural growth and poverty reduction

Benin Food crops (Roots and Tuber)*

Burkina Faso Cattle and Sorghum/millet

Cape Verde Food crops

The Gambia Cereals (millet/Sorghum)* and livestock

Ghana Root crops and fisheries

Guinea Rice

Liberia Food crops

Mali Food crops (Rice; Millet/Sorghum)*

Niger Livestock

Nigeria Cassava, Rice

Senegal Livestock and food crops (millet/sorghum; Rice)*

Sierra Leone Cassava

Togo Food crops

www.iita.org


DESIGN

EXPECTED AG GROWTH IN 2015 UNDER DIFFERENT SCENARIOS

0.02.04.06.08.0

10.012.014.016.0

0.02.04.06.08.010.012.014.016.0

bau national strategies CAADP

www.iita.org


DESIGN

EXPECTED POVERTY REDUCTION BY 2015 UNDER DIFFERENT SCENARIOS

-100.0-80.0-60.0-40.0-20.0

0.020.040.0

bau national strategies CAADP MDG1

www.iita.org


DESIGN

CURRENT AG EXPENDITURE RATIOS REQUIRED AG EXPENDITURE

TO TOTAL EXPENDITURES (%) GROWTH TO MEET 6%

AGRICULTURAL GROWTH

www.iita.org


DESIGN

CURRENT FUNDING EFFICIENCY: ELASTICITY VIS-À-VIS AG GROWTH

www.iita.org

STRATEGIC ANALYSIS MONITORING MDG1

POVERTY INCIDENCE IN WEST AFRICA IN THE 1990’S (%)

www.iita.org


POVERTY TRENDS DURING THE 1990s AND THE 2000s

www.iita.org


Poverty reduction rate required for reaching the MDG1 by 2015 compared to current trends

www.iita.org


REQUIRED POVERTY REDUCTION RATES TO HALVE 1990 POVERTY LEVEL IN 2020 OR 2025

-16.0%

-11.0%

-6.0%

-1.0%

4.0%

Cô

te

d'Iv

oire

Se

ne

ga

l

Be

nin

Nig

er

Ga

mb

ia

Nig

eria

Ma

li

Bu

rkin

a

Faso

Current 2020 2025

www.iita.org

STRATEGIC ANALYSIS FOOD CONSUMPTION DYNAMICS

IN WEST AFRICA

• STUDY ON THE DYNAMICS OF FOOD CONSUMPTION IN WEST AFRICA CONDUCTED JOINTLY WITH MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY IN 7 COUNTRIES: BENIN, BURKINA FASO, COTE D’IVOIRE, MALI, NIGER, SENEGAL, AND TOGO:

- ANALYSIS OF HOUSEHOLD EXPENDITURE SURVEYS

- ANALYSIS OF NATIONAL FOOD BALANCES

- REGRESSION ANALYSIS => MARGINAL BUDGET SHARES/DEMAND ELASTICITIES

– REGIONAL SYNTHESIS REPORT

• IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS UNDER FAO CONTRACT INCLUDING GHANA:

- REVENU TRENDS

- DYNAMICS AND DETERMINANTS OF FOOD CONSUMPTION

- FOOD DEMAND PROSPECTS

www.iita.org


IN WEST AFRICA

INCOME TRENDS DISAGREGATED BY QUINTILES

Country Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 National

Burkina Faso 4.1% 4.2% 4.1% 3.7% 2.9% 3.4%

Côte d'Ivoire -3.1% -2.5% -2.4% -2.5% -2.7% -2.6%

Ghana 1.4% 2.1% 2.3% 2.3% 2.3% 2.2%

Mali -2.5% -2.2% -2.2% -1.9% -0.6% -1.4%

Sénégal 1.0% 0.7% 0.8% 1.2% 0.9% 0.9%

www.iita.org


IN WEST AFRICA

CALORIFIC CONSUMPTION SHARES IN % (2004-2008)Food product Burkina Faso Senegal Niger Togo Côte

d'Ivoire

Cereals 65.1 63.4 62.9 48.4 31.3

Roots and tubers 0.3 1.9 1.7 24.9 32.6

Legumes 10.1 0.8 14.1 3.7 0.7

Oil and Fats 11.9 17.0 8.8 14.2 13.0

Fruits and vegetables 2.1 2,5 2.9 1.2 8.0

Sugar and sweeteners 2.4 4.6 2.9 3.8

Alcoholic drinks 3.2 0.2 0.0 0.7 2.0

Animal products 4.1 8.2 9.5 3.5 4.6

Others 0.8 1.5 0.0 0.4 4.2

Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

www.iita.org

STRATEGIC ANALYSIS FOOD CONSUMPTION

DYNAMICS IN WEST AFRICA

Country Carbohydrate Proteins Lipids

Burkina Faso 68.0 12.0 20.0

Côte d‘Ivoire 73.2 8.3 18.6

Niger 68.2 13.1 18.7

Senegal 65.1 10.4 24.5

Togo 71.2 9.1 19.7

Recommended Ratios

Minimum 50 11 30

Maximum 55 15 35

Calorific contribution of macro nutrients in % (2004-2008)

www.iita.org



Absolute budget share by food product group Food Product group Benin Burkina

FasoCote d’Ivoire

Ghana

Mali Niger Senegal Togo

2007 2009 2008 2006 2006 2005 2002 2006

Cereals 22.5 55.1 25.7 22.8 44.5 60.9 28.9 20.8

Roots, Tubers and Plantain 10.2 0.6 16.8 15.0 1.9 0.8 2.3 8.0

Légumineuses 3.7 3.6 1.6 1.8 2.7

Fats and vegetal oils and fats 8.6 4.9 6.9 5.1 6.5 3.3 8.6 6.4

Fruits and vegetables 11.6 6.1 15.7 13.9 9.9 4.8 11.9 14.9

Animal products and fish 30.1 10.0 22.6 29.2 22.2 12.1 26.8 17.8

Beverage and Stimulants 6.7 8.1 2.4 6.6 6.9 4.2 6.2

Other food products 6.7 11.5 10.0 7.4 6.4 12.0 21.5 23.2

Ratio of food expenditures to total expenditures

61.7 53.6 38.6 51.0 43.4 60.1 50.8 51.6

www.iita.org


IN WEST AFRICA

Food expenditures concentration ratio

www.iita.org



www.iita.org



Marginal budget shares of selected food products in rural areas

www.iita.org


IN WEST AFRICA

Marginal budget shares of selected food products in urban areas

www.iita.org

MONITORING AND EVALUATION CAADP M&E FRAMEWORK

• Request from AU/NEPAD addressed to ReSAKSS• Validation of the Framework March 2010

www.iita.org


Institutional Capacity Strengthening

Poverty

Hunger

Information, Knowledge, and Technologies

Prices

Human Capital

Marketing infrastructureRural roads

Agricultural Production & Food Supply

Sustainable Land Management

Agricultural Trade

Rural Infras. and Trade-Related Market Access

Land Management and Water Control Systems

Agricultural Research and Technology Dev’t

Food Security and Safety Nets

Income

1 2 43

Food reserve facilities

Investments (Presented here to reflect the four CAADP pillars)

Physical Capital

Goal Level Household assets and endowments Natural disasters Conflict

Intermediate-Goal Level Non-agricultural production Employment Rural wages InflationOutcome Level Resources Rainfall Natural disasters Trade policies Exchange rate Prices

Output Level Initial conditions of capital Social services (education, health, social security)

Input Level Political economy Governance Institutions Total government revenue Private-sector investments/FDI ODA (and harmonization)

Irrigation systems

CONDITIONING FACTORS

www.iita.org


MAIN QUESTIONS ADDRESSED: 1. ENABLING ENVIRONMENT

What policies, institutions and mechanisms are in place to enhance economic management e.g. political and economic governance, private sector development, and equity?

How credible and relevant has the evidence used in the process of designing the investment programs been?

Have the processes been inclusive of all stakeholders, and are investment programs aligned with the CAADP principles and targets?

Are mechanisms in place for implementing the investment and monitoring and evaluating its impacts?

www.iita.org


2. DELIVERING ON COMMITMENTS AND ACHIEVING STATED TARGETS

• Are development partners making good on their financial commitments to support CAADP?

• Are governments allocating 10 percent (or other share as stated in their investment plans) of their total budgetary resources to the agricultural sector?

• Have expectations in terms of being on track to achieving the CAADP growth and reducing poverty, hunger, and food and nutrition insecurity been met so far?

www.iita.org


3. EFFECTIVENESS OF INTERVENTIONS (PROCESSES, POLICIES, INVESTMENTS)

• How effective have different types of interventions been in the achievements realized so far?• What factors have shaped the level of impact that has been achieved?• What are the trade-offs and complementarities, if any, among different types of interventions?

www.iita.org


4. CONSISTENCY OF PLANNED INTERVENTIONS WITH INITIAL TARGETS

• What are the projected impacts if interventions proceed as currently planned?

• Are these projected impacts compatible with the CAADP growth and goals on reducing poverty, hunger, and food and nutrition insecurity?

www.iita.org


5. EXPLORING INTERVENTIONS WITH GREATER OR BETTER DISTRIBUTED

IMPACTS• Could greater or better distributed impacts be obtained by reconfiguring the interventions?• What are the different or new interventions that can lead to greater and more sustainable growth as well as greater and better distributed impacts?• What are the new targets that can be set for implementing these new types of interventions?• What are the resources needed for implementing these new interventions to achieve the desired impacts?

www.iita.org


INDICATORS

SMART: Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic and Timely:• 13 Process indicators (M&E of CAADP Design)• 4 Input Indicators (Agricultural Funding: Maputo Declaration)• 22 Output and Outcome Indicators (Agricultural Performance)• 8 Impact Indicators (CAADP Goals: poverty, hunger, malnutrition, etc.)

www.iita.org

MONITORING AND EVALUATION ANNUAL TRENDS AND OUTLOOK REPORTS (ATOR)

PROCESSES AND PRINCIPLES

FRAMEWORK– (POLICY/PRIMARY FACTOR ENDOWMENT)– FUNDING– AGRICULTURAL PERFORMANCE– TRADE PERFORMANCE– POVERTY, HUNGER, CHILD MALNUTRITION– LINKAGES BETWEEN FUNDING, PERFORMANCE, AND LIVELIHOODS

NO OR LIMITED PRIMARY DATA COLLECTION

CHALLENGES– DATA QUALITY– CONTINUITY– DATA FORMAT COMPATIBILITY– SUSTAINABILITY

www.iita.org



TEAM: CORE COUNTRY ACTORS – Planning and statistics unit of MINAGRI (PSU) as

coordinator– National Institute of Statistics (poverty unit, national

accounting unit)– Budget unit in Ministries of Finance– Professional think tanks– Market information systems– M&E units in other relevant ministries such as

livestock, environment, fisheries, trade, etc– NARS including Universities– Poverty Reduction Strategy (PRSP) unit

www.iita.org



ACTIVITIES: REGIONAL – Drafting of terms of reference: list and

specification of indicators, rationale, definitions, computation, sources and links to policy targets; profile of collaborators

– Methodology workshops , quality review, technical backstopping

– Regional synthesis of each component by ReSAKSS in collaboration with lead experts

– Regional validation and dissemination workshop

– Finalization of regional trends and outlook report

www.iita.org



ACTIVITIES AT NATIONAL LEVEL– PSU as coordinator develops operational plan and

monitors execution– Data collection and analysis by different subgroups

following the components– Subgroup reports submitted to the planning unit with

data sheets as annexes – Planning unit consolidates subgroup reports and

submits to ReSAKSS with all data sheets for review– Technical meetings and national validation

workshops– Finalization of national trends and outlook report

www.iita.org


2011 ATOR – SELECTED MACRO ECONOMIC INDICATORS

annual GDP growth Current account balance (% of GDP) Inflation rate

Country 20102007/08-2009/10 20102008-2010 20102008-2010

Benin 2.60% 3.40% -4.20% -14.80% 1.90% 3.70%

Burkina Faso 8.70% 5.70% -3.30% -6.50% -0.60% 4.20%Cape Verde 5.40% 5.10% -11.20% -13.20% 2.10% 3.30%Cote d'Ivoire 1.10% 2.60% 43.00% 26.40% 1.80% 3.00%

Gambia 6.10% 6.00% -17.10% -12.10% 5.80% 5.10%

Ghana 6.60% 6.60% -8.60% -9.10% 10.70% 15.50%Guinea 1.90% 2.20% -7.20% -9.50% 15.50% 12.80%Guinea Bissau 3.50% 3.20% 0.00% -4.50% 2.50% 3.80%

Liberia (1) 5.50% 5.70% -42.20% -38.60% 7.40% 12.50%

Mali 5.80% 5.10% -7.80% -9.10% 1.20% 4.20%

Niger (1) 8.50% 5.60% -20.70% -18.60% 0.90% 4.90%

Nigeria 7.90% 6.90% 1.30% 7.60% 13.70% 12.60%Senegal 4.10% 3.30% -7.00% -10.20% 1.20% 2.00%Sierra Leone 4.90% 4.60% -16.80% -12.90% 16.60% 13.60%

Togo (2) 3.70% 3.20% -5.60% -6.30% 2.10% 4.20%

median ECOWAS 5.40% 5.10% -7.20% -9.50% 2.10% 4.20%Median WAEMU 3.90% 3.40% -4.90% -7.80% 1.50% 4.00%median non WAEMU 5.50% 5.70% -11.20% -12.10% 10.70% 12.60%diff. WAEMU 1.60% 2.40% -6.30% -4.30% 9.20% 8.60%Sahelian countries 5.80% 5.10% -7.80% -10.20% 1.20% 4.20%Coastal Countries 4.30% 4.00% -6.40% -9.30% 9.10% 12.50%ECOWAS without Nigeria 5.20% 4.80% -7.50% -9.90% 2.10% 4.20%

www.iita.org


2011 ATOR – Agricultural Funding

Agricultural expenditures ratio Agricultural expenditures trends

www.iita.org



Country Crop production Livestock

Fisheries

Forestry

% ag. Expenditure % ag GDP




Benin 70.80% 72.60% 4.00% 15.40% 9.90% 6.80% 15.30% 5.20%

Burkina Faso 71.20% 52.90% 20.50% 35.40% 8.30% 11.70%

Côte d'Ivoire 82.20% 89.90% 12.00% 7.70% 1.30% 0.40% 4.50% 2.00%

Mali 65.30% 61.80% 24.80% 27.90% 10.00% 10.30%

Senegal 71.80% 57.20% 7.80% 29.30% 8.60% 8.90% 11.80% 4.50%

Sectoral distribution of agricultural expenditure over the period 2008-2010

www.iita.org



Breakdown of agricultural expenditure by function for 2008-2010

www.iita.org


2011 ATOR – AGRICULTURAL PERFORMANCE

Country 2008 2009 2010 AAGRBenin 3.60% 2.50% 1.40% 2.50%Burkina Faso 8.10% -4.10% 9.00% 3.30%Cape Verde 16.10% 0.40% 4.50% 6.20%Côte d'Ivoire -1.00% 5.40% 4.90% 3.30%The Gambia 28.60% 13.50% 12.10% 17.40%Ghana 7.40% 7.20% 5.30% 6.70%Guinea 3.60% 3.20% 3.20% 3.30%Bissau-Guinea 5.60% 9.60% 3.30% 6.50%Liberia 7.20% 6.50% 5.20% 6.30%Mali 13.20% 5.60% 7.70% 8.50%Niger 16.20% -9.50% 16.30% 5.20%Nigeria 6.30% 5.90% 5.70% 5.90%Senegal 19.70% 11.40% 4.90% 11.80%Sierra Leone 4.50% 4.00% 4.10% 4.20%Togo 4.00% 8.30% 3.10% 5.40%ECOWAS 6.60% 5.50% 5.80% 5.90%coastal countries 6.10% 6.00% 5.50% 5.90%

Sahelian countries 13.00% -0.60% 9.70% 6.40%

Agricultural Growth in 2008-2010

www.iita.org



Country 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010Benin 5.10% 5.70% 9.40% 19.00% 1.40%Burkina Faso 0.90% -16.10% 41.10% -16.60% 25.50%Cap Vert 12.80% -25.50% 277.60% -36.30% -4.60%Côte d'Ivoire 1.40% -15.00% 15.20% 1.30% 1.80%Gambia 4.70% -30.20% 60.50% 29.00% 16.90%Ghana 1.10% -17.50% 45.10% 13.80% 11.30%Guinea 6.70% 6.30% 1.20% 4.20% 6.60%Guinea Bissau 6.00% -18.50% 18.20% -4.40% 14.40%Liberia 5.90% 41.30% 20.40% 5.00% 1.10%Mali 8.70% 5.20% 6.00% 53.80% 1.30%Niger 10.80% -4.90% 27.00% -27.90% 45.90%Nigeria 6.60% 6.60% 6.60% 5.50% 4.80%Senegal -28.40% -22.60% 99.30% 7.40% -5.40%Sierra Leone 4.50% 15.60% 29.70% 17.60% 15.20%Togo 6.90% -1.30% 6.60% 13.40% -1.50%

West Africa 5.20% 2.00% 12.80% 5.30% 7.80%

RECENT TRENDS IN CEREAL PRODUCTION IN WEST AFRICA

www.iita.org



Country 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Benin -11.20% -9.40% 54.20% 3.50% 11.80%

Burkina Faso 16.20% -21.20% 42.80% 39.40% 17.10%

Cap Vert 14.30% 6.30% 0.00% 53.50% 3.50%

Côte d'Ivoire 6.40% 0.20% 8.00% -10.60% 1.70%

Gambia 0.00% 4.00% 0.00% -5.50% 3.10%

Ghana 2.70% 4.50% 5.80% 13.30% 6.70%

Guinea 4.90% 2.50% 2.40% 1.40% 2.80%

Guinea Bissau 5.30% 8.50% 10.00% 138.80% 10.30%

Liberia 2.00% 8.60% -7.50% -12.80% -0.50%

Mali 39.30% 52.60% 2.50% -12.90% -13.40%

Niger 35.60% 16.80% -33.30% -9.40% -63.50%

Nigeria 8.70% 6.60% 7.70% 6.40% 6.00%

Senegal -57.10% 155.10% 211.70% -66.10% -22.80%

Sierra Leone 28.30% 4.90% 42.30% 15.40% 15.50%

Togo 9.90% 0.20% 5.30% 10.80% 1.30%

West Africa 6.80% 5.30% 10.00% 5.60% 6.10%

RECENT TRENDS IN ROOTS AND TUBERS PRODUCTION IN WEST AFRICA

www.iita.org


2011 ATOR – AGRICULTURAL TRADE

AGRICULTURAL EXPORTS VALUE BY PRODUCT

www.iita.org



•AGRICULTURAL EXPORTS VALUE BY COUNTRY

www.iita.org



FOOD AND AGRICULTURAL TRADE BALANCE (RATIO EXPORTS/IMPORTS)

www.iita.org



FOOD TRADE BALANCE (RATIO EXPORTS/IMPORTS)

www.iita.org


2011 ATOR - POVERTY

NATIONAL POVERTY LINE BASED POVERTY INCIDENCE

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

Benin BurkinaFaso

CapeVerde

Coted'Ivoire

Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau

Liberia Mali Niger Nigeria Senegal SierraLeone

Togo

1990s

2000s

www.iita.org


2011 ATOR - POVERTY

POVERTY GAP RATIO

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

Benin BurkinaFaso

CapeVerde

Coted'Ivoire



Togo

1990s2000s

www.iita.org


2011 ATOR - POVERTY

SHARE OF POOREST QUINTILE IN NATIONAL CONSUMPTION

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

Benin BurkinaFaso

CapeVerde

Coted'Ivoire



Togo

1990s

2000s

www.iita.org


2011 ATOR – CHILD MALNUTRITION

STUNTING

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

Benin BurkinaFaso

Coted'Ivoire



Togo

1990s2000s

www.iita.org


2011 ATOR - HUNGER

PERCENTAGE OF POPULATION UNDERNOURISHED

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Benin BurkinaFaso

CapeVerde

Côted'Ivoire



Togo

1990s 2000s

www.iita.org


2011 ATOR -HUNGER

GLOBAL HUNGER INDEX

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Benin BurkinaFaso

Coted'Ivoire



Togo

1990 2009

www.iita.org

ESTABLISHMENT OF COUNTRY SAKSS

• Guidelines for the establishment of CAADP Country Team, including the SAKSS node

• Support to Ghana, Mali, Nigeria, Senegal, and Togo to implement the guidelines and set up the national SAKSS node

• Support to the agricultural statistics unit of Togo to :

– harmonize CAADP M&E framework with M&E needs for NAIP

– conduct the baseline study for the implementation of Togo NAIP.

www.iita.org

PROSPECTS• SUPPORT TO NATIONAL ATOR AND PRODUCTION OF REGIONAL ATOR•TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TO SET UP/STRENGTHEN COUNTRY SAKSS NODES IN “SAKSS READY COUNTRIES”•CAPACITY STRENGTHENING OF ECOWAS AND OTHER REGIONAL INSTITUTIONS•STRATEGIC ANALYSIS: ATOR FEATURE THEMES:

2012: FLOWS AND IMPACT OF AGRICULTURAL INVESTMENTS (PUBLIC AND PRIVATE; FDI IN LAND)

2013: AGRICULTURE AND VULNERABILITY AND SOCIAL PROTECTION STRATEGIES IN AFRICA

2014: MDG ACHIEVEMENT STATUS IN AFRICA

2015: POST MDG GROWTH AND POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGIES IN AFRICA

www.iita.org

THANK YOU

informing african agricultural development planning and implementation in the context of caadp in...

Business

principles of caadp

caadp principles

monitoring of caadp

review of progress

evaluation of caadp

agriculture growth

mutual review

performance progress