influence of scion defoliation time

7/13/2019 Influence of Scion Defoliation Time

1/26

The Efect o Scion DeoliationTimes on the Growth and

Success o Durian Grating(Durio zibethinus Murray).

Aminatus Sholikah

115040213111035

Supervisor :

Prof. Ir. Sumeru Ashari,

M.Agr.Sc.,Ph.D.


2/26

As the king o ruits durian has a high economic

alue.

As one o the durian !roducing countries" #ndonesia still cannotmanage well durian.

$ocal durian can %e a king in his own country when the local ruit

hae good &uality.As we know that durian is cross'!ollinated!lants

ne o egetatie !ro!agation that can %edone is grating.

ne o grating !ro%lem is low !ercentage o grating success.

Scion

deoliation

*+

SES#S

AE A/D T#ME +ESEA+,

T$S A/D MATE+#A$S

+ESEA+,MET,DS

S0ET,/D


3/26

The !ur!ose o this research is toget the %est scion deoliation time

to increase the growth rate andthe success o durian grating.

S#S

AE A/D T#ME +ESEA+,

T$S A/D MATE+#A$S

+ESEA+,MET,DS

S0ET,*+S

E

1A0G+*/D

G


4/26

There scion deoliation time thatmost a!!ro!riate to increase the

growth rate and the success odurian grating

*+

SE

AE A/D T#ME +ESEA+,

T$S A/D MATE+#A$S

+ESEA+,MET,DS

S0ET,

,-T,ES#S

1A0G+*/D


5/26

This research was conducted at,orticulture /ursery Association"

2onosalam Su%district" in3e%ruary ' 4une 5678.

*+

SES#S

T$S A/D MATE+#A$S

+ESEA+,MET,DS

S0ET,$AE A/DT#ME

+ESEA+,

1A0G+*


6/26

TOOL

S : Grating tools 9 cutting

scissors" la%el" ruler" ra:or%lade" !lastic ro!e" %agtrans!arent !lastic as

coer" !oly %ag andshading.

Maintain tools 9 ra:or%lades" watering can ands!rayer.

%seration tools 9 7; Mdigital camera"microsco!e" ruler"stationery and note%ook.

MATERIA

LS :

1ranch o 1ido durianas scion" Montongdurian seedling as

rootstock" manure"soil" /0 (7;97;97;) asertili:er" and li&uidTrichoderma

harzianum to avoidPhytophtora palmivora1.attack.

*+

SES#S

AE A/D T#ME +ESEA+,

T$S A/D MATE+#A$S

+ESEA+,MET,DS

S0ET,

T$S A/DMATE+#A$S

1A0G+*/D

1A0G+*


7/26

Scion defoliation timesScion defoliation times

Defoliation at the time of grafting ( 0 DBG)

3 days before grafting (3 DBG)

6 days before grafting (6 DBG)

Randomized Block Design

he e!"eriment #as re"eated 3 times$

so there #as %& 'nits e!"eriment ach

of e!"erimental 'nit #as 'sed %0 seed

* days before grafting (* DBG)

%+ days before grafting (%+ DBG)

*+

SES#S

AE A/D T#ME +ESEA+,T$S A/D MATE+#A$S

+ESEA+,MET,DS

S0ET,+ESEA+,MET,DS

1A0G+*/D

1A0G+*


8/26

*+

SES#S

AE A/D T#ME +ESEA+,T$S A/D MATE+#A$S

+ESEA+,MET,DS

S0ET,S0ET

,

1A0G+*/D


9/26

Non destructive :

Time to %ud


10/26

Data analysis in this research wasused 3 test. # 3 test shows signi>cantefect will %e ollowed %y $east

Signi>cant Diference ($SD) at 8?leel.

1SE+=AT#/=A+#A1$ES

+ES*$T A/DD#S*SS#/DATA

A/A$-S#S


11/26

Variable Observation time F table! DA" # DA" $% DA" &' DA" $( )(

*ime to bu+ flushing %,&! -,!# &,')

ength of bu+ )#,/) ),$$ ns ns -,!# &,')

0umber of leaves 1 1 ns ns -,!# &,')

Success grafting percentage $,#! ns %,-# ns -,!# &,')

0ote : 2 significant +ifference at $( level

2 significant +ifference at )( level

ns 2 non significant +ifference

1 2 the leaves have not gro3n

1SE+=AT#/=A+#A1$ES +ES*$T

A/D

D#S*SS#/

DATAA/A$-S#S


12/26

*reatmentAverage of bu+ flushing time 4DA"5

' D6" #',--c

- D6" -%,#-bc

% D6" -,)$ab

/ D6" -','!ab

) D6" $,!'a

SD $( &,'#

+ES*$T A/DD#S*SS#/Time %ud


13/26

*reatment Average of bu+ length 4cm5 at all of observation times 4DA"5! DA" # DA" $% DA" &' DA"

' D6" ','# a ',' a ), a ),#! a

- D6" ','& a ',$) a ',/) a ),$' a

% D6" ',)# a ',! a ),- a ),$$ a

/ D6" ',% a ),'' a ),-! a ),#% a

) D6" ',#/ b ),-& b ),%# a ,% a

SD $( ','!& ',)!/ ',%%- ',&/%

+ES*$T A/DD#S*SS#/1ud


14/26

*reatment Average of number of leaves at each observation times 4DA"5

! DA" # DA" $% DA" &' DA"

' D6" ','' ','' ),)& a-,'' a

- D6" ','' ','' ',!) a,!- a

% D6" ','' ','' ,) a-,$' a

/ D6" ','' ','' ,'% a#,&& a

) D6" ','' ','' -,)/ a#,!- a

SD $( 1 1 ',!%- ,/#&



15/26

*reatment

Average of percentage of grafting success 4(5 at

each observation 4DA"5

!DA" # DA" $% DA" &' DA"

' D6" #','' a -','' a ','' a )%,%& a

- D6" $%,%& b #-,-- a -%,%& b -,-- a

% D6" %','' b #%,%& a #-,-- b -','' a

/ D6" $-,-- b $','' a --,-- b -,-- a) D6" #%,%& a #%,%& a #','' b -,-- a

SD $( ',&/ ),)) ),'% ,'/



16/26

T,E T#SS*ES */#/

6D1G

@D1G

;D1G

D1G

75 D1G

/otes 9A Scion" 1 +ootstock" allus" D

Fylem" E hloem


17/26

T,E T#SS*ES */#/

6D1G

@D1G

;D1G

D1G

75D1G


Fylem" E hloem

T,E T#SS*ES */#/


18/26

T,E T#SS*ES */#/

6D1G

@D1G

;D1G

D1G

75D1G


Fylem" E hloem

T,E T#SS*ES */#/


19/26

T,E T#SS*ES */#/

6D1G

@D1G

;D1G

D1G

75D1G


Fylem" E hloem

T,E T#SS*ES */#/


20/26

T,E T#SS*ES */#/

6D1G

@D1G

;D1G

D1G

75D1G


Fylem" E hloem


21/26

#n this research can %e concludedthat the %est scion deoliation time is75 D1G" %ased on the growth o

!lants and tissues union that has!roduced

/$*S#

/

D*ME/TAT#/S 3


22/26

D*ME/TAT#/S 3+EA+AT#/

D*ME/TAT#/S 3 G+A3T#/G


23/26

D*ME/TAT#/S 3 G+A3T#/G

D*ME/TAT#/S 3 S#/S


24/26

D*ME/TAT#/S 3 S#/SD#33E+E/E

75,1G ,1G ;,1G @,1G @,1G

D*ME/TAT#/S 3


25/26

D*ME/TAT#/S 3D*+#A/ G+A3T#/G +ES*$T

75,1G

,1G

;,1G

@,1G

6,1G


26/26

Thank -ou3 *1HT,*+SDA-

H55I6CI5678H76AM

influence of scion defoliation time

Documents