influence of h2 formation on pdr model results

24
Influence of H2 formation on PDR model results M. Röllig V. Ossenkopf, C. Glück Universität zu Köln, Germany CO Ladder Workshop - Leiden 2012

Upload: lidia

Post on 22-Feb-2016

35 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Influence of H2 formation on PDR model results. M. Röllig V. Ossenkopf, C. Glück Universität zu Köln, Germany . Outline. H 2 formation on grain surfaces chemisorption vs. physisorption H 2 formation efficiencies on different dust sorts chemical H 2 heating & cooling - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Influence of H2 formation on PDR model results

CO Ladder Workshop - Leiden 2012

Influence of H2 formation on PDR model results

M. Röllig V. Ossenkopf, C. Glück

Universität zu Köln, Germany

Page 2: Influence of H2 formation on PDR model results

CO Ladder Workshop - Leiden 2012

Outline

• H2 formation on grain surfaces– chemisorption vs. physisorption– H2 formation efficiencies on different dust sorts– chemical H2 heating & cooling– effects on clump structure

Page 3: Influence of H2 formation on PDR model results

CO Ladder Workshop - Leiden 2012

IntroductionNumerical PDR models of proved to be a valuable tools in analyzing and understanding the local conditions in massive star forming regions.

Ossenkopf et al, 2010, A&A 518, L79v

Hollenbach & Tielens, 1999, R.o.m.P., 71

Page 4: Influence of H2 formation on PDR model results

CO Ladder Workshop - Leiden 2012

Introduction

Yet, here be dragons...• complex physics /

chemistry

• complex/unknown local conditions

Röllig et al. 2007, A&A, 467

θ1Ori C (O6)

Page 5: Influence of H2 formation on PDR model results

CO Ladder Workshop - Leiden 2012

Introduction

and unfortunately, deficient input data

• missing experimental data

• inter/extrapolation

Page 6: Influence of H2 formation on PDR model results

CO Ladder Workshop - Leiden 2012

H2 formation on grain surfaces

Page 7: Influence of H2 formation on PDR model results

CO Ladder Workshop - Leiden 2012

H2 formation on grain surfaces

• H atoms hitting grain surfaces can stick weakly (physisorption) or strongly (chemisorption) bound.

• Td>100 K desorption overcomes binding and H2 formation efficiency →0

• Chemisorbed H atoms can effectively form H2 up to Td>500K

• we implemented the formalism presented by Cazaux & Tielens (2002,2004) in the KOSMA- chemistry.

Page 8: Influence of H2 formation on PDR model results

CO Ladder Workshop - Leiden 2012

H2 formation efficiency

Cazaux & Tielens 2004, ApJ 604

Page 9: Influence of H2 formation on PDR model results

CO Ladder Workshop - Leiden 2012

H2 formation efficiency

Cazaux & Tielens 2004, ApJ 604

Page 10: Influence of H2 formation on PDR model results

CO Ladder Workshop - Leiden 2012

H2 formation efficiency

Cazaux & Tielens 2004, ApJ 604

Page 11: Influence of H2 formation on PDR model results

CO Ladder Workshop - Leiden 2012

H2 formation efficiency

Cazaux & Tielens 2004, ApJ 604

Page 12: Influence of H2 formation on PDR model results

CO Ladder Workshop - Leiden 2012

H2 formation ratetotal formation ratedepends on total dustsurface

Page 13: Influence of H2 formation on PDR model results

CO Ladder Workshop - Leiden 2012

H2 formation rate

Weingartner and Draine, 2001, ApJ 548

Page 14: Influence of H2 formation on PDR model results

CO Ladder Workshop - Leiden 2012

H2 formation rate

100 101 102 103

10 18

10 17

10 16

T d K

R ds1 W D 0107

W D 0121

W D 0125

w ith P A H s

no P A H s

T g 50 K

Page 15: Influence of H2 formation on PDR model results

CO Ladder Workshop - Leiden 2012

H2 heating/cooling

• H2 binding energy 4.5 eV → H2 formation heating

• kinetic H2 dissociation cooling (Lepp & Shull, 1983, ApJ 270, 578)

H2 + H → H + H + H - 4.5eVH2 + H2 → H2 + H + H - 4.5eV

Alternatively: sticking coeff.

Page 16: Influence of H2 formation on PDR model results

CO Ladder Workshop - Leiden 2012

H2 heating/cooling

Le Bourlot et al. 2012

Page 17: Influence of H2 formation on PDR model results

CO Ladder Workshop - Leiden 2012

H2 heating/cooling

Le Bourlot et al. 2012

Page 18: Influence of H2 formation on PDR model results

CO Ladder Workshop - Leiden 2012

H2 heating/cooling

Le Bourlot et al. 2012A: R=const, B: only LH, C=LH+ER

Page 19: Influence of H2 formation on PDR model results

CO Ladder Workshop - Leiden 2012

H2 heating/cooling

Le Bourlot et al. 2012A: R=const, B: only LH, C=LH+ER

Page 20: Influence of H2 formation on PDR model results

CO Ladder Workshop - Leiden 2012

Dust influence

Page 21: Influence of H2 formation on PDR model results

CO Ladder Workshop - Leiden 2012

Dust influence

radiative transfer effect H2 chemistry effect

Page 22: Influence of H2 formation on PDR model results

CO Ladder Workshop - Leiden 2012

Dust influence

• H2 binding energy 4.5 eV → H2 formation heating

• kinetic H2 dissociation cooling (Lepp & Shull, 1983, ApJ 270, 578)

H2 + H → H + H + H - 4.5eVH2 + H2 → H2 + H + H - 4.5eV

• large effect on H-H2 transition region chemistry

Page 23: Influence of H2 formation on PDR model results

CO Ladder Workshop - Leiden 2012

Dust influence• H2 binding energy 4.5 eV

→ H2 formation heating

• kinetic H2 dissociation cooling (Lepp & Shull, 1983, ApJ 270, 578)

H2 + H → H + H + HH2 + H2 → H2 + H + H

• large effect on H-H2 transition region chemistry

• chemistry physics

Page 24: Influence of H2 formation on PDR model results

CO Ladder Workshop - Leiden 2012

Summary

• Great need for reliable (astrochemistry) data• Lab results need to be robust against different

modeling applications• Growing understanding of dust properties and

H2 formation process dramatically influences model results

• chemistry and physics strongly connected to each other