influence of antioxidative hindered phenols on the taste

8
Food Sci. Technol. Res., 15 (5), 491 – 498, 2009 Influence of Antioxidative Hindered Phenols on the Taste of Beverages in the Presence of Free Chlorine Tetsuya YAMAMOTO 1 , Minoru INAGAKI 2* and Yasuo KAZUMA 1 1 Department of Quality Assurance, Fuji Electric Retail Systems Co., Ltd., Maesuna 160-1, Kounosu, Saitama 369-0198, Japan 2 Department of Life Science, Faculty of Bioresources, Mie University, Kurima-machiya 1577, Tsu, Mie 514-8507, Japan Received September 26, 2008; Accepted May 15, 2009 The taste, as well as odor, of hindered phenols which are commonly used as antioxidants for olefin polymers of cup-type vending machine for beverages was investigated to identify the cause of the in- creasing unpleasant taste of beverages with free chlorine added in the source water for sterilization. The threshold concentration of solutions of mono- and di-substituted hindered phenols were confirmed to de- crease due to free chlorine, while that of tri-substituted hindered phenols with substituents at the 2, 4, and 6 positions were not affected by free chlorine. The magnitude of the decrease in the threshold concentra- tion depended on the number of free 2, 4, and 6 positions on the aromatic ring. The products formed by chlorination, oxidation, ring opening and dimerization of the hindered phenols were identified by GC/MS in the model reaction with free chlorine. Based on the threshold concentrations of some identified prod- ucts, their effects on the increasing unpleasant taste were estimated. Keywords: hindered phenol, free chlorine, chlorination, threshold concentration, taste, beverage, antioxidant, sensory test *To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected] Introduction Ensuring high quality of source water is the most impor- tant factor for serving tasty beverages in cup-type vending machines, cold drink dispensers, and water servers. Unpleas- ant taste, as well as odor, is often the result of problems of the source water in the water tank or piping of these bever- age machines, which contain 0.1-0.6 ppm free chlorine for sterilization. Since chlorine itself lacks taste up to 1.0 ppm, the cause of unpleasant taste may be result from the organic materials used in the beverage machines. The chemical sub- stances eluted from the materials may interact with free chlo- rine to form the unpleasant taste, thus requiring examination of these interactions. In case of free chlorine is incorporated for sterilization in tap water, phenol and its derivatives from industrial drain- age are known to cause unpleasant taste through formation of chlorinated phenols (McGuire et al., 1981; Nyström et al., 1992). Many studies have reported the relationship between these reaction products and the concentration of free chlorine and the reaction time (Eisenhauer, 1964; Ettinger and Ruch- hoft, 1951; Lee and Morris, 1962; Onodera et al., 1998). However, hindered phenols, which have bulky alkyl substitu- ents on their aromatic ring, have yet to be thoroughly exam- ined for their effects on the taste of beverages. Hindered phe- nols, especially those having three alkyl substituents on their aromatic ring, are used as phenolic antioxidants of resin ma- terials everywhere in food and beverage machines to prevent heat deterioration during the molding process. Moreover, such tri-substituted hindered phenols have been reported to be eluted from the resin materials into drinking water (Fors- man, 1967; Gordon and Rothstein, 1967; Kawamura et al., 1997). Therefore, tri-substituted hindered phenols may have their own unpleasant taste or may form substances having unpleasant taste in the presence of free chlorine, as found in other phenols. Furthermore, tri-substituted hindered phenols may deteriorate to produce less substituted derivatives, that is, non-, mono- and di-substituted phenols, during heating in the molding process, leading to derivatives which elute into the water and react with free chlorine to form substances with unpleasant taste. In the present study, unpleasant taste of source water used for beverages was investigated in the absence and presence of free chlorine using many kinds of antioxidative hindered

Upload: others

Post on 18-Dec-2021

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Influence of Antioxidative Hindered Phenols on the Taste

Food Sci. Technol. Res., 15 (5), 491–498, 2009

Influence of Antioxidative Hindered Phenols on the Taste of Beverages in

the Presence of Free Chlorine

Tetsuya YaMaMoto1, Minoru inagaki

2* and Yasuo kazuMa1

1 Department of Quality Assurance, Fuji Electric Retail Systems Co., Ltd., Maesuna 160-1, Kounosu, Saitama 369-0198, Japan2 Department of Life Science, Faculty of Bioresources, Mie University, Kurima-machiya 1577, Tsu, Mie 514-8507, Japan

Received September 26, 2008; Accepted May 15, 2009

The taste, as well as odor, of hindered phenols which are commonly used as antioxidants for olefin polymers of cup-type vending machine for beverages was investigated to identify the cause of the in-creasing unpleasant taste of beverages with free chlorine added in the source water for sterilization. The threshold concentration of solutions of mono- and di-substituted hindered phenols were confirmed to de-crease due to free chlorine, while that of tri-substituted hindered phenols with substituents at the 2, 4, and 6 positions were not affected by free chlorine. The magnitude of the decrease in the threshold concentra-tion depended on the number of free 2, 4, and 6 positions on the aromatic ring. The products formed by chlorination, oxidation, ring opening and dimerization of the hindered phenols were identified by GC/MS in the model reaction with free chlorine. Based on the threshold concentrations of some identified prod-ucts, their effects on the increasing unpleasant taste were estimated.

Keywords: hindered phenol, free chlorine, chlorination, threshold concentration, taste, beverage, antioxidant, sensory test

*To whom correspondence should be addressed.

E-mail: [email protected]

IntroductionEnsuring high quality of source water is the most impor-

tant factor for serving tasty beverages in cup-type vending

machines, cold drink dispensers, and water servers. Unpleas-

ant taste, as well as odor, is often the result of problems of

the source water in the water tank or piping of these bever-

age machines, which contain 0.1-0.6 ppm free chlorine for

sterilization. Since chlorine itself lacks taste up to 1.0 ppm,

the cause of unpleasant taste may be result from the organic

materials used in the beverage machines. The chemical sub-

stances eluted from the materials may interact with free chlo-

rine to form the unpleasant taste, thus requiring examination

of these interactions.

In case of free chlorine is incorporated for sterilization in

tap water, phenol and its derivatives from industrial drain-

age are known to cause unpleasant taste through formation

of chlorinated phenols (McGuire et al., 1981; Nyström et al.,

1992). Many studies have reported the relationship between

these reaction products and the concentration of free chlorine

and the reaction time (Eisenhauer, 1964; Ettinger and Ruch-

hoft, 1951; Lee and Morris, 1962; Onodera et al., 1998).

However, hindered phenols, which have bulky alkyl substitu-

ents on their aromatic ring, have yet to be thoroughly exam-

ined for their effects on the taste of beverages. Hindered phe-

nols, especially those having three alkyl substituents on their

aromatic ring, are used as phenolic antioxidants of resin ma-

terials everywhere in food and beverage machines to prevent

heat deterioration during the molding process. Moreover,

such tri-substituted hindered phenols have been reported to

be eluted from the resin materials into drinking water (Fors-

man, 1967; Gordon and Rothstein, 1967; Kawamura et al.,

1997). Therefore, tri-substituted hindered phenols may have

their own unpleasant taste or may form substances having

unpleasant taste in the presence of free chlorine, as found in

other phenols. Furthermore, tri-substituted hindered phenols

may deteriorate to produce less substituted derivatives, that

is, non-, mono- and di-substituted phenols, during heating in

the molding process, leading to derivatives which elute into

the water and react with free chlorine to form substances

with unpleasant taste.

In the present study, unpleasant taste of source water used

for beverages was investigated in the absence and presence

of free chlorine using many kinds of antioxidative hindered

Page 2: Influence of Antioxidative Hindered Phenols on the Taste

phenols having different numbers of alkyl substituents on

their aromatic ring. The chemical structure of the reaction

products were characterized using model reactions of hin-

dered phenols with free chlorine. The threshold concentra-

tions for taste of some of these products were also deter-

mined to estimate their contribution to unpleasant taste.

Materials and MethodsMaterials Antioxidative hindered phenols, Irganox

1010, 1076, and 1135 were purchased from Chiba Japan

(Tokyo, Japan). 2,2’,6,6’-Tetra-tert-butyl-4,4’-biphenol

was purchased from Apollo Scientific Ltd. (Cheshire, UK).

6-Chloro-2,4-di-tert-butylphenol was synthesized according

to the reported procedure (Tashiro et al., 1981) with some

modifications, and the structural characterization of the ob-

tained compound was performed by 1H- and 13C-NMR and

GC/MS. The other derivatives (Table 1) were purchased

from Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. (Osaka, Japan).

Solution preparation for sensory test and determination

of compound concentrations Compounds 1-10 were dis-

solved in tap water passed through an activated charcoal

filter, and the other compounds were dissolved in Milli-Q

purified water at room temperature. The concentrations of

compounds 1-3 were 100 mg/L. In the case of poorly soluble

compounds 4-10, the concentrations of the saturated solu-

tions were determined as follows. The saturated solutions

(100 ml) were filtered and extracted by CH2Cl2 (2 × 5 ml).

After evaporation of the solvent of the combined extracts,

the residues were re-dissolved in 10 ml CH2Cl2 using volu-

metric flasks. For volatile compounds 4-8, the concentra-

tions of these CH2Cl2 solutions were determined by GC/MS

using a silicon DB-1 column (0.25 mmf × 30 m), while for

non-volatile compounds 9 and 10, the concentrations were

determined by reversed phase HPLC monitored at 280 nm.

The solutions with fixed concentrations (x) were geometri-

cally diluted with water by five steps and the series of diluted

solutions were submitted to the sensory test. Concentration

x represents the maximum concentration, with a series of of

concentrations geometrically determined using a step factor

of Df: x, x(1/Df), x(1/Df)2, x(1/Df)3, and x(1/Df)4. The range

of concentrations used in sensory test is shown in Table 1.

The dilution factor per step (Df) was 10.0 for phenol (1) and

3.16 for the other compounds. Temperature of the room and

the sample solutions were set at 23℃.

Generation of free chlorine in the solution for sensory

test In solutions of compounds 1-10, 0.3 ppm free chlorine

was generated by electrolysis at a constant current of 400 mA

using a Ti plate electrode sintered with fine particles of Pt

in dozens of nanometers of diameter (Ooe and Kawashima,

1983; Oka et al., 1996), which is used in cup-type vending

machines and drink dispensers.

Sensory test The total taste included taste and odor sen-

sory was measured when a sample solution was placed in the

mouth. The sensory test is based on the method for evaluat-

ing taste differences between the sample solution and the

control water in a plastic cup. The threshold concentrations

of samples were determined using the parameter of best-

estimate threshold (BET) according to the ASTM Practice E

t. YaMaMoto et al.

WMdnuopmoCtnemirepxE

00001-11.49lonehp

03-3.06.821lonehporolhc-2

001-10.361lonehporolhcid-4,2

03-3.00.361lonehporolhcid-6,2

phenol (1 00001-11.49)

2-tert -butylphenol (2 001-12.051)

2-tert -butyl-4-methylphenol (3 001-12.461)

2,4-di-tert -butylphenol (4 00081-0813.602) a

2,6-di-tert -butylphenol (5 051-5.13.602)

3,5-di-tert -butylphenol (6 0001-013.602) a

BHT (7 42-42.04.022) a

Irganox 1135 (8 014-1.40.193) a

Irganox 1076 (9 58-58.09.035) a

Irganox 1010 (10 061-6.17.7711) a

6-chloro-2,4-di-tert 06-6.07.042lonehplytub- a

2,6-di-tert -butyl-1,4-benzoquinone 220.3 0.6-60 a

2,2',6,6'-tetra-tert -butyl-4,4'-biphenol 410.6 3.5-350

aMaximum concentration was the concentration of the saturated solution because of limited solubility to water.

Conc. range used insensory test

Verification of sensory test using compounds ofknown threshold concentrations

Estimation of effect of free chlorine on thresholdconcentrations of hindered phenols

Determination of threshold concentration ofidentified reaction products from model reactions ofhindered phenols with chlorine

(µg/L)

Table 1. Compounds used in sensory test and their concentration range.

492

Page 3: Influence of Antioxidative Hindered Phenols on the Taste

679-04 (ASTM, 2004). The samples were presented to pan-

elists by a three-cup alternative forced choice method (3-AFC

presentations): one cup containing the added sample was

presented along with two identical controls (ANSI, 2002);

samples with the weakest concentrations were presented first.

Among 50 top panelist candidates who had been selected

from 215 employees based on their score on the recognition

sensory test (two-of-five test by Gallagher, 2004) using com-

pounds with five fundamental tastes and chlorophenols, ten

panelists were randomly selected for the sensory test (19-45

years old; average, 28 years old). Selected panelists were

trained periodically by the recognition sensory test using the

five fundamental tastes, chlorophenols, and a water solution

dipped with several kinds of molded resin plates.

Model reactions of hindered phenol and free chlorine

The solution of 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol (4) or 2,6-di-tert-

butylphenol (5) (100 mg) in ethanol (100 ml) was added to

Milli-Q water (1000 mL) and 5% aqueous NaClO (10 mL),

and incubated at 50℃ for 12 h. After the pH of the solution

was adjusted to 4.0 with acetic acid, the acidified solution

was extracted with benzene (2 × 100 mL). The combined

organic phase was dried with Na2SO4 and evaporated in vac-

uum. The obtained products were analyzed by GC/MS (GC:

Shimadzu GC17, MS: Shimadzu QP5050A) using a silicon

DB-1 capillary column (0.32 mmf × 30 m, thickness 0.25

μm, 100-250℃, He 13 mL/min) and a quadrupole electrode

(1.6 kV) in the positive ion mode at m/z 45-500, and by 1H-

and 13C-NMR (JEOL α-500) in CDCl3. Some products were

isolated by silica gel column chromatography (hexane:ethyl

acetate = 10:1 to 4:1). Three products, 6-chloro-2,4-di-tert-

butylphenol (42), 2,6-di-tert-butyl-1,4-benzoquinone (52),

2,2’,6,6’-tetra-tert-butyl-4,4’-biphenol (55), which were

derived from the model reactions, were identified from the

comparison of relative retentions to phenanthrene-d10 and

mass spectra of standard compounds. Other products were

identified by the comparison of relative retentions to phenan-

threne-d10 and mass spectra of similar standard compounds.

Synthesis of 6-chloro-2,4-di-tert-butylphenol (42) Ac-

cording to the reported method (Tashiro et al., 1981), 6-chlo-

ro-2,4-di-tert-butylphenol was prepared by chlorination of

2,4-di-tert-butylphenol, with slight modification. Briefly,

SO2Cl2 (6 ml, 60.1 mmol) in CCl4 (20 ml) was added drop-

wise to a solution of 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol (4.16 g, 20.2

mmol) in CCl4 (40 ml) at room temperature for over 30 min.

Then the mixture was heated with stirring at 85℃ overnight

and poured onto ice water (200 ml). The CCl4 layer was

separated, dried over Na2SO4, and evaporated to give a crude

oily residue (4.97 g). The residue was chromatographed on

silica gel (Silica gel 60N, Kanto Chemical Co., 63-210 μm)

eluting with hexane:CH2Cl2 = 3:1, to afford a colorless syrup

(4.04 g, 83%). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) d = 1.28 and 1.41

(18H, s, tert-butyl), 5.69 (1H, s, OH), and 7.19 and 7.20 (1H,

d, J = 1.83 Hz, H-3 and 5); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) d =

29.39, 31.43, 34.44, 35.40, 120.30, 122.80, 123.20, 136.62,

143.07, and 147.21; GC/MS (1.6 kV) m/z (relative intensity

%) 240 (M+, 17), 242 ([M+2]+, 5), 225 (100), 227 (33), and

57 (53).

Results and DiscussionEstablishment of the sensory test method for determina-

tion of threshold concentrations of hindered phenols In the

present study, a sensory test was designed and its appropri-

ateness was evaluated by comparing the values of threshold

concentration for phenols and chlorophenols determined

by the test with those previously reported. The threshold

concentrations for taste were determined for phenol, 2-chlo-

rophenol, 2,4-dichlorophenol, and 2,6-dichlorophenol based

on the evaluation of differences in taste including odor of

the sample from the control water when the solutions were

placed in the mouth. Taste and odor were undesirable for

these samples, although these should not have been distin-

guishable in the present sensory test. The threshold concen-

trations of phenol and chlorophenols were represented using

the values of BET, and compared with those previously re-

ported (Burttschel et al., 1959) (Table 2). The aqueous sam-

ple solutions were diluted 4 times with the control water us-

Taste of Hindered Phenols in Beverages

Best-estimatethreshold (BET)

log10 BET Standard logdeviation From the literaturea

7.05.2023lonehp > 1000

2-chlorophenol 2.4 0.4 0.8 4

2,4-dichlorophenol 7.7 0.9 0.6 8

2,6-dichlorophenol 1.4 0.1 0.8 2

a Burttschell et al ., 1959.

Compound

Thereshold concentration (µg/L)

Table 2. Threshold concentrations of phenol and chlorophenols.

493

Page 4: Influence of Antioxidative Hindered Phenols on the Taste

t. YaMaMoto et al.

Fig. 1. Hindered phenols 1-10 used in the sensory test in the presence and absence of free chlorine.Phenols were classified into four groups: non-substituted, phenol (1); mono-substituted, 2-tert-butylphenol (2); di-substituted, 2-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol (3), 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol (4), 2,6-di-tert-butylphenol (5), and 3,5-di-tert-butylphenol (6); and tri-substituted, 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol (7), Irganox 1135 (8), Irganox 1076 (9), and Irganox 1010 (10).

OH OH OH OH

OHOH OH

HO

O

O C18H37

HO

O

O C8H17

1 23

4

5 67

8 9

10

O

OH

O

O

OH

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

ing fixed dilution factors (Df) (Table 1). The series of diluted

samples were presented to ten panelists by 3-AFC presenta-

tions, where the samples were presented in the order from

smaller to larger concentrations. The BET values for each

panelist was determined by calculating the average between

the concentration at which the last incorrect choice was

made and the next higher concentration at which a correct

choice was made, and the BET value of the compound and

its standard log deviation was statistically calculated from

log10BET values of all panelists to allow the individual varia-

tion in sensitivity of preferences and strength of taste. Table

2 showed that phenol was almost tasteless (BET = 320 μg/L),

and that the chlorinated derivatives, especially 2,6-dichloro-

phenol, had a very strong taste (BET = 1.4 μg/L). Absolute

BET values and their magnitude of difference between the

samples were quite consistent with those previously reported

(Burttschel et al., 1959). Consequently, the present sensory

test method was confirmed to be effective and appropriate.

Decrease in threshold concentrations of hindered phenol

by reaction with free chlorine To test the situation within

the water tank of the beverage machines, taste of phenol

(1) and hindered phenols 2-10 (Fig. 1) combined with free

chlorine (0.3 mg/L) was examined by the sensory test. The

494

Page 5: Influence of Antioxidative Hindered Phenols on the Taste

phenols having bulky substituents 2-10 corresponded to the

hindered phenols, and tri-substituted hindered phenols 7-10

having substituents on the 2,4,6 positions, are widely used

as antioxidants for resin materials. To begin with the test,

the control water was tested to confirm it had no taste in the

absence and presence of free chlorine (0.3 mg/L). Tap water

rather than deionized or distilled water was needed in this

experiment, because some degree of electric conductivity

was required to generate free chlorine by electrolysis.

The BET values of each phenol solution before and af-

ter treatment with free chlorine are shown in Table 3. The

parameters calculated by log[BET(+Cl2)/BET(-Cl2)] were

the logarithmic ratio of threshold concentrations in the BET

value, and were used for estimation of the magnitude of the

change in the BET by free chlorine. For example, the value

-3.0 for phenol (1) indicated that the threshold concentration

of phenol solution remarkably decreased in three logarithmic

orders (10-3) by free chlorine addition. In the cases of solu-

tions with non-, mono-, and di-substituted phenols 1-6, the

threshold concentrations decreased in one logarithmic order

by free chlorine addition. This is the first experimental proof

that hindered phenols generate compounds having more in-

tense taste by free chlorine treatment. However, in the case

of solutions with tri-substituted phenols 7-10, the threshold

concentrations did not change after free chlorine treatment.

Figure 2 clearly shows that the number of free 2, 4, and 6

positions on the aromatic ring is strongly correlated with the

magnitude of decrease in threshold concentrations, shown by

log[BET(+Cl2)/BET(-Cl2)]. This correlation is attributable

to the fact that the ortho and para positions (2, 4, and 6) of

phenols are susceptible to electrophilic substitution rather

than the meta position (3 and 5). Antioxidative hindered phe-

nols having alkyl substituents to protect these positions were

unaffected by free chlorine treatment. The bulky tert-butyl

substituent partly contributed to the suppressed reactivity,

because less reactivity observed for 3,5-di-tert-butylphenol

(6) than the non-substituted phenol (1).

Taste of Hindered Phenols in Beverages

Starting hindered phenol

log10 BET Standard logdeviation

log10 BET Standard logdeviation

phenol (1) none-substituted 320 2.5 0.7 0.3 -0.5 0.7 -3.0

2-tert -butylphenol (2) mono-substituted 50 1.7 0.8 2.0 0.3 0.8 -1.4

2-tert -butyl-4-methylphenol (3) 75 1.9 0.5 10 1.0 1.2 -0.9

2,4-di-tert -butylphenol (4) 4400 3.6 0.3 290 2.5 1.3 -1.2

2,6-di-tert -butylphenol (5) 30 1.5 0.8 7.5 0.9 1.1 -0.6

3,5-di-tert -butylphenol (6) 1300 3.1 0.7 100 2.0 1.2 -1.1

BHT (7) 13 1.1 0.8 13 1.1 0.8 0.0

Irganox 1135 (8) 52 1.7 1.3 41 1.6 1.1 -0.1

Irganox 1076 (9) 54 1.7 0.8 43 1.6 0.8 -0.1

Irganox 1010 (10) 140 2.2 0.9 300 2.5 0.4 0.3

log10

[BET(+Cl2)

/BET(-Cl2)]

Before treatment (-Cl 2 lC+(tnemtaertretfA) 2)

Best-estimatethreshold (BET)

Best-estimatethreshold (BET)

Classification

Thereshold concentration (µg/L)

di-substituted

tri-substituted

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

0 1 2 3

Number of free 2,4,6 positionson the aromatic ring

)/B

ET

(-C

l)] 2

Lo

g[B

ET

(+C

l 2

Table 3. Threshold concentrations of hinderd phenol solutions before and after treatment with free chlorine.

Fig. 2. Relationship between the magnitude of decrease in threshold concentrations of hindered phenols by free chlorine and the number of free 2,4,6 positions on the aromatic ring.

BET(-Cl2): Threshold concentrations before the addition of free chlorine, BET(+Cl2): Threshold concentrations after the addition of free chlorine, ■: phenol (1), ●: 2-tert-butylphenol (2), □: 2-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol (3), ○: 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol (4), ◆: 2,6-di-tert-butylphenol (5), ×: 3,5-di-tert-butylphenol (6), ◇: 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol (7), △: Irganox 1135 (8), —: Irganox 1076 (9), ▲: Irganox 1010 (10).

495

Page 6: Influence of Antioxidative Hindered Phenols on the Taste

Structural characterization and threshold concentration

of reaction products of hindered phenols with free chlorine

Among hindered phenols with decreased threshold concen-

trations by free chlorine treatment, 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol

(4) and 2,6-di-tert-butylphenol (5) were further subjected to

the model reaction with free chlorine derived from sodium

hypochlorite (equivalent to 0.5 mg/L free chlorine). The re-

sulted reaction mixtures were analyzed by GC/MS. Various

reaction products were produced through chlorination (42-45,

51, 53), ring-opening (41, 43, 45, 54), oxidation (44, 52, 55),

and dimerization (55), as summarized in Table 4. Chlorina-

tion was estimated based on the presence and intensity of

the peaks for [M+2]+ and [M+4]+ in the mass spectra. Ring-

opening, oxidation, and dimerization were estimated by the

t. YaMaMoto et al.

Reactionproduct

Adjusted retention time (min)

Relative retention to phenanthrene-d10

Compound M+ (m/z)TIC

Intensityb

41 -)gninepo-gnir(nwonknu36.08.6 ++

42f 8.5 0.79 6-chloro-2,4-di-tert -butylphenol 240 ++

43 9.4 0.88 unknown (chlorination, ring-opening) - +++

44e,h 9.9 0.92 4-chloro-2.6-di-tert -butylphenol 240 ++

45 10.7 1.00 unknown (chlorination, ring-opening) - ++

51e,g 5.7 0.53 2-tert -butyl-6-chlorophenol 184 +

52c,f 8.2 0.76 2,6-di-tert -butyl-1,4-benzoquinone 220 +++

53e,h 9.9 0.92 4-chloro-2,6-di-tert -butylphenol 240 +

54 -)gninepo-gnir(nwonknu70.15.11 ++

55d,f 17.4 1.62 2,2',6,6'-tetra-tert -butyl-4,4'-biphenol 410 +++

a GC/MS conditions: Shimadzu GC-17, Column Silicon DB-1 (ID 0.32 mm, 0.25 mm, 30 m),Injection oven, 250°C; column oven, 100°C (kept for 5 min) to 250°C (15°C/min).

Carrier gas He (13 mL/min), Shimadzu QP5050A, 1.6 kV, Mass range < 500.b Intensity of total ion chlomatogram; +++: strong, ++: medium, +: weak.c

3, 500 MHz) d = 1.28 (18H, s, tert-butyl), and 6.51 (2H, s, H-3 and 5).d 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) d = 1.37 (36H, s, tert -butyl), 4.12 (2H, s, OH), and 7.71 (4H, s, H-3, 3’, 5, 5’)

13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) d = 29.40, 35.58, 130.16, 157.93, 187.82, and 189.12.e The structures were tentatively identified with MS.f The relative retention of the compounds were confirmed by comparing with those of the standard compounds.g This compound showed a similar mass spectrum, but a different relative retention with the standard compound 4-chloro-2- tert -butylphenol.h This compound showed a similar mass spectrum, but a different relative retention with the standard compound 6-chloro-2,4-di- tert -butylphenol.

1H NMR (CDCl

Table 4. Summary of characterization of GC/MS analysis of reaction products of hindered phenols 4 and 5 with free chlorinea.

OH

Cl

O

O

OH

OH

42 52

55

Fig. 3. Compounds determined by their threshold concentrations to be reaction products of hindered phenols 4 and 5 with free chlorine: 6-chloro-2,4-di-tert-butylphenol (42), 2,6-di-tert-butyl-1,4-benzoquinone (52), 2,2’,6,6’-tetra-tert-butyl-4,4’-biphenol (55).

496

Page 7: Influence of Antioxidative Hindered Phenols on the Taste

fragment ions in the mass spectra. The products reasonably

identified by mass spectrometry and the relative retention to

phenanthrene-d10 in gas chromatography are listed by name

in Table 4.

The threshold concentrations of three compounds,

6-chloro-2,4-di-tert-butylphenol (42), 2,6-di-tert-butyl-1,4-

benzoquinone (52), 2,2’,6,6’-tetra-tert-butyl-4,4’-biphenol

(55), showing relatively strong intensity in the TIC of the

resulting reaction mixtures, were determined by the sensory

test (Fig. 3, Table 5). These compounds were formed by dif-

ferent reaction pathways, including chlorination, oxidation,

and dimerization (Table 4). The significance of contribution

of each compound could be estimated, when the BET values

of the compounds were smaller than those of the resulting

reaction mixture of 4 and 5 with free chlorine. The logarith-

mic values of BET for compounds 42 (1.0), 52 (0.0), and 55

(0.4) were significantly smaller compared to those for 4 (2.5)

and 5 (0.9). The values of log[BET(compound)/BET(starting

material + Cl2)] ranged from -1.5 to -0.5, thus confirming the

individual contribution of compounds 42, 52, and 55 to the

increasing taste of solution 4 and 5 after treatment with free

chlorine.

The present study confirmed for the first time that hin-

dered phenols with substitutions at the 2, 4, and 6 positions

generate compounds having more intense taste when reacted

with free chlorine. The less substitutions at 2, 4, and 6 po-

sitions (0 to 3) on the phenolic aromatic ring, the greater

magnitude of decrease in the threshold concentrations in the

presence of free chlorine. Thus, the magnitude of decrease in

the threshold concentrations for the antioxidative hindered

phenols was very small in the presence of free chlorine. Ac-

cordingly, the antioxidative hindered phenols themselves

showed almost no contribution to the unpleasant taste caused

by free chlorine. However, it has been recognized that resin

materials containing antioxidative hindered phenols which

had reacted with free chlorine resulted in unpleasant taste

after heating during the molding process (Yamamoto et al.,

unpublished data). If less substituted phenols were derived

from antioxidative hindered phenols by heating, they may

generate compounds having more intense taste under the

influence of free chlorine. Further studies are thus needed to

investigate the effect of heating on taste of antioxidative hin-

dered phenols.

ReferencesAmerican National Standards Institute, (2002). Sensory analysis

– methodology – general guidance for measuring odour, flavor

and taste detection thresholds by a three alternative forced choice

(3-AFC) procedure. ISO 13301, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10036,

USA.

American Society for Testing and Materials, (2004). Standard prac-

tice for determination of odor and taste thresholds by a forced-

choice ascending concentration series method of limits. E679-04,

West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, USA.

Burttschell, R. H., Rosen, A. A., Middleton, F. M. and Ettinger, M.

B. (1959). Chlorine derivatives of phenol causing taste and odor. J.

Am. Water Works Asso., 51, 205-214.

Eisenhauer, H. R. (1964). Oxidation of phenolic wastes. J. Water

Pollution Control Federation, 36, 1116-1128.

Ettinger, M. B. and Ruchhoft, C. C. (1951). Effect of stepwise chlo-

rination on taste- and odor-producing intensity of some phenolic

compounds. J. Am. Water Works Asso., 43, 561-567.

Forsman, J. P. (1967). Measurement of polypropylene oxidative sta-

bility. Mod. Plast., 44, 155-158, 244, 246.

Gallagher, D. L. (2004). Statistical comparison of the triangle test

and the two-of-five test for taste and odor evaluation. Water Sci.

Technol., 49, 107-114.

Gordon, D. A. and Rothstein, E. C. (1967). Stabilization of polypro-

goletamitse-tseBgnitratSdnuopmoC 10 BET Standard log log10 [BET(compounds) /

materiala threshold (BET) deviation BET(starting material + Cl2)]c

42 6-chloro-2,4-di-tert -butylphenol 4 10 1.0 0.7 -1.5 ++

52 2,6-di-tert -butyl-1,4-benzoquinone 5 1.1 0.0 1.6 -0.8 +

55 2,2',6,6'-tetra-tert -butyl-4,4'-biphenol 5 2.4 0.4 1.3 -0.5 +

a The thereshold concentrations of the starting material after the reaction with free chlorine were 290 µg/L for 4 and 7.5 µg/L for 5 (see Table 3).b Compounds 52 and 55 were commercially available. Compound 42 was synthesized by chemical reaction of 2,4-di-tert -butylphenol with SO2Cl2 (Tashiro et al ., 1981).

c The logarithmic ratio of threshold concentration of starting compound with free chlorine and that of the reaction product. A small value indicates a large free chlorine effect on the threshold concentration of the identified reaction product.

d The contributiuon of the compound to taste was estimated when the threshold concentraion of the compound was smaller than that of the starting material after the reation with free chlorine.

Thereshold concentration (µg/L)b

Contribution of reaction

products to tasted

Table 5. Threshold concentrations of identified reaction products of hinderd phenol with free chlorine.

Taste of Hindered Phenols in Beverages 497

Page 8: Influence of Antioxidative Hindered Phenols on the Taste

pylene. Rubber Digest, b, 81, 61-68 (in Japanese).

Kawamura, Y., Miura, M., Sugita, T. and Yamada, T. (1997). Resi-

due and release of antioxidants and ultraviolet stabilizers in poly-

ethylene products in contact with foodstuffs. Shokuhin Eiseigaku

Zasshi, 38, 27-33.

Lee, F. G. and Morris, C. J. (1962). Kinetics of chlorination of

phenol-chlorophenolic tastes and odors. Int. J. Air Water. Poll., 6,

419-431.

McGuire, M. J., Krasner, S. W., Hwang, C. J. and Izaguirre, G.

(1981). Closed-loop stripping analysis as a tool for solving taste

and odor problems. J. Am. Water Works Asso., 73, 530-537.

Nyström, A., Grimvall, A., Krantz-Rülcker, C., Sävenhed, R. and

Akerstrand, K. (1992). Drinking water off-flavour caused by

2,4,6-trichloroanisol. Water Sci. Tech., 25, 241-249.

Oka, Y., Tsuruta, K. and Nakakubo, J. (1996). Chlorine generating

electrode for sterilization of drinking water. Japan Kokai Tokkyo

Koho, 2564943. Oct. 3.

Onodera, S., Yoshimatsu, K., Saitoh, H. and Uchida, A. (1998).

Behavior of mutagenic formation from phenolic compounds in

water disinfection with chlorine and their mutagenic potential

formation. Jpn. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health, 44, 289-299 (in Japa-

nese).

Ooe, K. and Kawashima, Y. (1983). Electrode for electrolysis of

diluted saline. Japan Kokai Tokkyo Koho, 1143521. Apr. 26.

Tashiro, M., Yoshiya, H. and Fukata, G. (1981). Selective prepara-

tion 31. Oxidative coupling of 2-halo-4,6-di-tert-butylphenols

with potassium hexacyanoferrate (III) in benzene. J. Org. Chem.,

46, 3784-3789.

t. YaMaMoto et al.498