Industry Initiative between Ticket Vendors and Railways: completing the Full Service Model

Brussels, 18 January 2011

Industry Initiative

Situation at the end of the TAP TSI Phase 1:

The Full Service Model (FSM) has delivered a high-level requirements document, but there is no regulatory TAP TSI mandate to build on and complete this work. The potential held in FSM may thus not come to fruition.

TAP TSI Phase 1 delivered:

implementation guides, master plan, governance proposal

TAP TSI Phase 2: development

TAP TSI Phase 3: implementation

Full Service Model: high-level

requirements document delivered

during Phase 1

Completing FSM as an industry initiative:- opportunity for RUs and TVs

- Interest expressed

Within the EU regulation

Outside the EU regulation

Industry Initiative

Opportunity:the railways – represented through industry body CER – have responded positively to the Ticket Vendors’ proposal of an Industry Initiative outside the TAP regulation to complete FSM as a joint project (involving ETTSA/ECTAA/GEBTA and leading European railways)

• Objective for the initiative: to establish specifications for the implementation of an innovative rail distribution landscape in a partnership project between Ticket Vendors and Railways.

• Transcend the confines of TAP TSI to create a win-win situation:• provide an improved consumer experience when booking rail• improve multi-channel and international distribution capabilities for Rus• Enable the market place to create and offer efficient distribution solutions on

the basis of standardised rail data and business processes• position railways for effective competition and distribution in a liberalised

European market• improve distribution systems agility and potentially reduce cost of complexity

for all stakeholders

• Key stakeholders and dependencies:• Railways: CER and leading railways DB, SNCF, ATOC, Trenitalia• Ticket Vendors: ETTSA, ECTAA, GEBTA• Commitment by all stakeholders, incl. resources• Outside the EU TAP TSI regulation

Industry Initiative

A first illustration of project governance and resourcing:

The proposed Industry Initiative should be managed and resourced jointly between the Ticket Vendors and the Railways

TAP TSI SteCo under TV/RU

joint leadership

Resource pool TVs

x 3-6 FTEs

Joint project management

TV/RU

Resource pool RUs (incl. UIC)x 3-6 FTEs

• Ticket Vendors and Railways need to be represented at parity in the Steering Committee for the initiative. The committee provides guidance throughout the initiative and is the final arbiter for all critical decisions.

• Project management: given the scale of the project, a full-time resource will be necessary to fill the role.

• Resource pool: jointly staffed by Railways and Ticket Vendors. The initiative may require a total of 6-12 FTEs (full time equivalents) for the duration of the project. Required skillsets: business analysts, architects, commercial analysts. Railways may call on specialist resources already funded in UIC.

Industry Initiative

The Industry Initiative will likely have an amitious duration of 12-18 months from its start. Stakeholders, including the European Commission, would expect to see a tangible result. Work packages should therefore be planned with the aim of producing a master plan which can be implemented by both Railways and Ticket Vendors.

Basis: high-level business process described in FSMJourney planning and shoppingBooking, fulfillment, paymentIn-journey and after-sales service

Proposed work packages:

• Requirements definition Prioritise business process elements Detailed functional requirements for the business process Detailed non-functional requirements

• Initial draft solution and architecture to deliver the requirements

• Impact analysis of draft solution Comparison: status quo vs. proposed solution Gap analysis and evaluation of adaptations to IT systems

• Final scope of solution

• Cost-benefit analysis (CBA)

• Master plan for the implementation of the solution Incl. detailed project plan for phase 1 implementation

Industry Initiative

This indicative project plan proposes an initial phase to structure and initiate the project. Subsequently, work packages would be aligned for delivery within a 12 month project duration. The example below serves as an illustration in order to help the internal consultation and discussion in ETTSA and ECTAA/GEBTA.

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5

Duration

Project initiation

FrameworkResourcingPrioritisationDeliverablesProject charter

Work package

Resources Business analysts

Architects ArchitectsBAsCommercial

Commercial

Requirements definition

Impact analysis

Draft solution

Final scope

CBA

Master plan

Industry Initiative

Call to action:The ETTSA and ECTAA/GEBTA communities need to consult internally and agree the Ticket Vendor position with regard to the open points below. The aim is then to meet with CER and the lead railways in September in order to discuss and agree a project framework, and then launch the Industry Initiative and project.

Internal consultations to define position on:– Structure + framework of initiative and project– Governance of the project– Priorities and deliverables– Resource commitment (see proposed project structure)

By 1st week Sept.