industry and academia partnerships: an inside look into ... · • technology and market...

39
Industry and Academia Partnerships: An Inside Look into Technology Transfer Introduction to Tech Transfer May 8, 2014

Upload: others

Post on 23-Aug-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Industry and Academia Partnerships: An Inside Look into ... · • Technology and market opportunity • Corporations vs. Start-ups and Investor types • Researcher engagement and

Industry and Academia Partnerships: An Inside Look into Technology Transfer

Introduction to Tech Transfer

May 8, 2014

Page 2: Industry and Academia Partnerships: An Inside Look into ... · • Technology and market opportunity • Corporations vs. Start-ups and Investor types • Researcher engagement and

Moderator:

Carissa Childs

Intellectual Property Attorney

UR Ventures

University of Rochester

Page 3: Industry and Academia Partnerships: An Inside Look into ... · • Technology and market opportunity • Corporations vs. Start-ups and Investor types • Researcher engagement and

Presenter:

Bill Bond

Director, IP and Tech Transfer

RIT

Page 4: Industry and Academia Partnerships: An Inside Look into ... · • Technology and market opportunity • Corporations vs. Start-ups and Investor types • Researcher engagement and

Presenter:

David Borkholder, PhD

Bausch and Lomb Associate

Professor of Microsystems

Engineering

RIT

Page 5: Industry and Academia Partnerships: An Inside Look into ... · • Technology and market opportunity • Corporations vs. Start-ups and Investor types • Researcher engagement and

Presenter:

Patrick Emmerling, PhD,

MBA

Licensing Manager

UR Ventures

University of Rochester

Page 6: Industry and Academia Partnerships: An Inside Look into ... · • Technology and market opportunity • Corporations vs. Start-ups and Investor types • Researcher engagement and

Presenter:

Alex Zapesochny, Esq.

President, COO

iCardiac

Page 7: Industry and Academia Partnerships: An Inside Look into ... · • Technology and market opportunity • Corporations vs. Start-ups and Investor types • Researcher engagement and

RIT

Industry and Academia

Partnerships:

An Inside Look into RIT

Bill Bond - Director, IP and Tech Transfer, RIT

David Borkholder - Bausch and Lomb Associate Professor of Microsystems Engineering, RIT

7

Page 8: Industry and Academia Partnerships: An Inside Look into ... · • Technology and market opportunity • Corporations vs. Start-ups and Investor types • Researcher engagement and

RIT

Overview of University Tech

Transfer

University research leads to the creation and capture of IP

– Patents; Copyrights, Know-how

We can’t make and sell commercial products (non-profit)

Tech Transfer:

– Provides rights via license or other means to others to commercialize

• NewCo / Start-ups

• Established Companies8

Page 9: Industry and Academia Partnerships: An Inside Look into ... · • Technology and market opportunity • Corporations vs. Start-ups and Investor types • Researcher engagement and

RIT

Tech. Commercialization / Transfer Why should anyone care?

– Possible Qualitative and Quantitative Economic Advantages

• IP enables premium pricing via product differentiation

• Relieves the owner of the cost to create or invent around

• Reduces R&D expenses

• Improves time to market; provides first mover advantage

• Provides freedom to operate to licensee

• Advanced processes

– Lower cost materials or less material

– Eliminate environmental and/or safety hazards

– Improves quality/reduces defects

– Provides economies of scale

9

Page 10: Industry and Academia Partnerships: An Inside Look into ... · • Technology and market opportunity • Corporations vs. Start-ups and Investor types • Researcher engagement and

RIT

RIT at a Glance

RIT Founded: 1829

Students: 15,000 undergrad; 2,900 graduate

1300 Acre Campus

Nine (9) Colleges (Latest is College of Health Sciences opened in Sept. 2011)

Six (6) PhD Programs

Full Time Faculty: 1,032

Number of active funded research awards: 400

Number of grant proposals annually: 700

10

Page 11: Industry and Academia Partnerships: An Inside Look into ... · • Technology and market opportunity • Corporations vs. Start-ups and Investor types • Researcher engagement and

RITLicensing – IP Marketing for Tech

Transfer ID Prospects

– Faculty Connections – Papers; Conferences

– Review patent references for assignee names-target the companies.

– Open Innovation Organizations are looking for IP

– Advertise - Flintbox; University web page,

Start-ups vs Established Companies

– Faculty / PI / Inventor Motivation for start-up formation

• Can we help the faculty / PI with start-up guidance

• Evaluate if the IP support a “start-up” initiative

– Can we ID a qualified entrepreneur for a start-up?

– Established Company likely has lower risk for returns

Alternatives include IP sale, brokering, hiring an IP marketing organization or auctioning the IP

11

Page 12: Industry and Academia Partnerships: An Inside Look into ... · • Technology and market opportunity • Corporations vs. Start-ups and Investor types • Researcher engagement and

RIT

General Tech Transfer Items

Evolutionary vs Revolutionary Tech/IP

– Number of applications, market segments, markets drives field(s) of use and IP value (not deal value)

• What the Licensor can “give”

Economic payment and rates by Licensor driven by:

– Exclusive or not, fields of use, payments for IP protection, maturity level of technology

12

Page 13: Industry and Academia Partnerships: An Inside Look into ... · • Technology and market opportunity • Corporations vs. Start-ups and Investor types • Researcher engagement and

RIT

Intellectual Property (IP) Protection

Patents

– United States

• Provisional

• Full application, a.k.a. Non-provisional and Regular

– International

• PCT or direct nationalization (each nation)

Copyrights

Mask Works

Trademarks

– Service Marks

– Trade Name

Trade Secrets

Know how

13

Page 14: Industry and Academia Partnerships: An Inside Look into ... · • Technology and market opportunity • Corporations vs. Start-ups and Investor types • Researcher engagement and

RIT

Possible Rights Granted to Licensee

To make, have made and import

To use

To sell

To distribute

To sub-license

To disclose to others– by publication

– in a marketed product

– in a service manual

To lease

Could be subject to exclusivity and fields of use

14

Page 15: Industry and Academia Partnerships: An Inside Look into ... · • Technology and market opportunity • Corporations vs. Start-ups and Investor types • Researcher engagement and

RIT

Tech Transfer Success Story

Licensor = RIT and Owner of IP*

Licensee = Blackbox Biometrics, Inc (B3)(http://blastgauge.com) **

15

Blast Gauge™ System sales for domestic and international DoD and Law Enforcement for monitoring blast exposure for triage and to guide treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)

Development began – April 2010

License Written- 8/26/2011

Products Sold – Oct 2012

* US Govt. Has rights ** RIT Faculty Start-Up

Page 16: Industry and Academia Partnerships: An Inside Look into ... · • Technology and market opportunity • Corporations vs. Start-ups and Investor types • Researcher engagement and

RIT

Key Terms B3 Deal Licensor-

– Granted exclusive rights to two pending US patents and non-exclusive rights to one pending US patent and some foreign counterparts and included:

• SW, drawings, bills of materials and “tools” used to make earlier prototypes

• Paying patenting expenses

• Opportunity to take space in RIT incubator

– Retained rights for educational and research purposes

16

Page 17: Industry and Academia Partnerships: An Inside Look into ... · • Technology and market opportunity • Corporations vs. Start-ups and Investor types • Researcher engagement and

RIT

Key Terms B3 Deal

Licensee – Provide commercialization plan to licensor to display competence in commercialization of the technology / IP prior to signing the DA

– Provides timely reports regarding

• Running Royalties

• Payments to Licensee

• Updated commercialization plan

May contract for additional research by RIT

Process –

– Term Sheet (TS)

– Definitive Agreement (DA)

Time to deal – TS to DA = 4-5 months

17

Page 18: Industry and Academia Partnerships: An Inside Look into ... · • Technology and market opportunity • Corporations vs. Start-ups and Investor types • Researcher engagement and

RIT

Lessons Learned - B3 Deal

Plan for unforeseen delays in reaching agreement

Balance the deal structure for mutual benefit

Recognize intangible/broader benefits of success for community and economic growth

18

Page 19: Industry and Academia Partnerships: An Inside Look into ... · • Technology and market opportunity • Corporations vs. Start-ups and Investor types • Researcher engagement and

RIT

19

RIT Contacts Bill Bond, MBA; CLP; RTTP

Director, Intellectual Property Management Office, RIT

145 Lomb Memorial Drive (87 (USC) -2469)

Rochester, NY 14623

475-2986

[email protected];

David Borkholder, PhDBausch and Lomb Associate Professor of Microsystems Engineering, RIT

168 Lomb Memorial DriveRochester, NY [email protected]

Page 20: Industry and Academia Partnerships: An Inside Look into ... · • Technology and market opportunity • Corporations vs. Start-ups and Investor types • Researcher engagement and

Industry and Academia

Partnerships: An Inside Look

into U of R

Patrick Emmerling, PhD, MBA

Licensing Manager, UR Ventures

University of Rochester

Alex Zapesochny, Esq.

President, COO

iCardiac

Page 21: Industry and Academia Partnerships: An Inside Look into ... · • Technology and market opportunity • Corporations vs. Start-ups and Investor types • Researcher engagement and

Our Mission

Develop UR Innovations into

valuable products and services

to make the world ever better.

Page 22: Industry and Academia Partnerships: An Inside Look into ... · • Technology and market opportunity • Corporations vs. Start-ups and Investor types • Researcher engagement and

Fundamental ChallengeUniversity Research

Commercial Products/Services

Commercial Interest

• Ground breaking research• Driven by research,

grants, publications• Limited business input

and often no business partner

• Development of solutions valued by the market

• Customer and market driven• Sustainable growth• Seek risk mitigation and

barriers to entry via IP, regulatory, cost advantages

• Risks and interest depend on:

• Proof of concept

• Regulatory hurdles

• Technology and market opportunity

• Corporations vs. Start-ups and Investor

types

• Researcher engagement and team

development

• Limited proof-of-concept investment

Many Technologies get stuck here

Page 23: Industry and Academia Partnerships: An Inside Look into ... · • Technology and market opportunity • Corporations vs. Start-ups and Investor types • Researcher engagement and

Solution and Focus

University Research

Commercial Products/Services

Commercial Interest

• Prove the concept, e.g.

• Prototyping, customer feedback, market

• Earlier clinical-regulatory input

• Researcher engagement and team

development

Page 24: Industry and Academia Partnerships: An Inside Look into ... · • Technology and market opportunity • Corporations vs. Start-ups and Investor types • Researcher engagement and

Requires a Concerted Effort

Just as it takes a village to raise a child, it takes a team working

together efficiently to bring a new and exciting innovation to

market:

• UR Ventures Team

• Licensing and IP Professionals

• Inventors

• Industry Experts

• Licensee

Page 25: Industry and Academia Partnerships: An Inside Look into ... · • Technology and market opportunity • Corporations vs. Start-ups and Investor types • Researcher engagement and

The Commercialization Pathway

Page 26: Industry and Academia Partnerships: An Inside Look into ... · • Technology and market opportunity • Corporations vs. Start-ups and Investor types • Researcher engagement and

UR Ventures Fresh Perspective on Innovation

Commercialization

• Focused, lean, and team oriented approach to the commercialization of UR Innovations.

• Taking Innovations from the Bench-top to the Bedside to make the world ever better.

Page 27: Industry and Academia Partnerships: An Inside Look into ... · • Technology and market opportunity • Corporations vs. Start-ups and Investor types • Researcher engagement and

iCardiac Overview

• Founded in 2006 leveraging world-class cardiovascular research:

– Technologies from the University of Rochester Medical Center and Pfizer

– Raised $7 million capital from Pfizer and venture capital firms

– Management team experienced in clinical trials technologies and strongly aligned

• Better assessment of potential cardiac safety side effects of all new drugs:

– FDA, EU, and others require cardiac safety assessment for all drugs under development

– Historical tools were expensive, cumbersome, and left significant uncertainty

– Most extensively validated cardiac safety technology with FDA, industry, and scientific community

• Strong foundation and key market success: 2006-present

– Established as scientific leader in the most complex cardiac safety studies (TQTs)

– Delivered successful projects for largest pharmaceutical companies and channel partners

– Highly valued for unusually exceptional customer service without sacrificing EBITDA

Page 28: Industry and Academia Partnerships: An Inside Look into ... · • Technology and market opportunity • Corporations vs. Start-ups and Investor types • Researcher engagement and

Initial Relationship

Worldwide leader in the science of heart arrhythmias

30+ years of cardiology/ECG research

World’s largest International Registry for congenital LQTS

Holter based techniques for studying drugs that change heart rate (QTbtb)

15+ years, 150 INDs and 4 marketed products supported with QTbtb

High Precision QT (HPQT)

T-wave Morphology Analysis

QT beat-to-beat (QTbtb) Analysis

Restitution Analysis

Page 29: Industry and Academia Partnerships: An Inside Look into ... · • Technology and market opportunity • Corporations vs. Start-ups and Investor types • Researcher engagement and

Key Lessons

• The relationship with the scientists is key

• We spent months with Drs. Couderc and

Zareba before the deal

• Can you work together, even through the

difficult times?

Page 30: Industry and Academia Partnerships: An Inside Look into ... · • Technology and market opportunity • Corporations vs. Start-ups and Investor types • Researcher engagement and

Key Lessons

• UR tech transfer is flexible and fair

• Make sure milestones are realistic and

achievable within timeframes

• Try to minimize early payments

Page 31: Industry and Academia Partnerships: An Inside Look into ... · • Technology and market opportunity • Corporations vs. Start-ups and Investor types • Researcher engagement and

Key Lessons

• Commercialization is a long process

• You will near certainly need a Plan B (and a

Plan C, D, etc.)

• Your sellable technology may bear little

resemblance to what you initially licensed

Page 32: Industry and Academia Partnerships: An Inside Look into ... · • Technology and market opportunity • Corporations vs. Start-ups and Investor types • Researcher engagement and

Key Lessons

• The university relationship will evolve

• It starts off providing credibility and a way to

stand out

• It can become an engine for further research

and even help to validate your product ideas

Page 33: Industry and Academia Partnerships: An Inside Look into ... · • Technology and market opportunity • Corporations vs. Start-ups and Investor types • Researcher engagement and

Questions to Consider (Team)

• What is the motivation of the scientists?

• Will they be there for the long run, even if their initial research doesn’t win out?

• Will you enjoy their company, and will they enjoy yours, over the long run?

Page 34: Industry and Academia Partnerships: An Inside Look into ... · • Technology and market opportunity • Corporations vs. Start-ups and Investor types • Researcher engagement and

Questions to Consider (Tech)

• Do you have validation beyond academia about the need for the solution?

• What will it take to get the technology customer-ready? (usually a lot)

• Does the technology (and your license) provide you with the flexibility to pivot?

Page 35: Industry and Academia Partnerships: An Inside Look into ... · • Technology and market opportunity • Corporations vs. Start-ups and Investor types • Researcher engagement and

Questions to Consider (About You)

• Will you feel comfortable being an innovator and a thought partner to the scientists?

• Most academic commercialization is a very long haul. Is that for you?

• Can you always remember that it’s rarely about the science or the technology?

Page 36: Industry and Academia Partnerships: An Inside Look into ... · • Technology and market opportunity • Corporations vs. Start-ups and Investor types • Researcher engagement and

Contact InformationPatrick Emmerling, PhD, MBA

Licensing Manager

UR Ventures

University of Rochester

(585) 273-3250

[email protected]

Alex Zapesochny, Esq.

President, COO

iCardiac Technologies, Inc.

(585) 295-7610 X102

[email protected]

Page 37: Industry and Academia Partnerships: An Inside Look into ... · • Technology and market opportunity • Corporations vs. Start-ups and Investor types • Researcher engagement and

Questions?

Page 38: Industry and Academia Partnerships: An Inside Look into ... · • Technology and market opportunity • Corporations vs. Start-ups and Investor types • Researcher engagement and

Next Webinars in Series

• May 20 – Tech Transfer Innovation

• June 5 – Non-Traditional Funding of Tech Transfer

Register online: http://www.medtech.org/events

Page 39: Industry and Academia Partnerships: An Inside Look into ... · • Technology and market opportunity • Corporations vs. Start-ups and Investor types • Researcher engagement and

Thank you for your

time!