IndonesiaWater Resources and Irrigation Sector

Management Program (WISMP)

Paul van Hofwegen – Ilham Abla(EASIS – Jakarta )

1998 – Financial Crisis

DemocratizationDecentralization

Reform Water Resources and Irrigation Sector- WATSAL LOSP- Pilots (IWIRIP - Dutch funded)- New Law on Water Resources (2004)- New Sector Government Regulations and

Ministerial Decrees (2006 – 2010)IWRMBasin Based MgtParticipatory MgtNo ISF

WISMP (APL : 2005-2016) (WB, EU,Netherlands)Support MoHA, MoPW and MoA in the implementation of the Reform Agenda in 14 provinces and 100 districts

A. River Basin ManagementB. Participatory Irrigation Management

Principle of PIM Partnership for Management Government Irrigation Systems

PP20/2006, PERMEN PU 31-32-33/2007

WUAF (300-1000 ha)

WUAF

WUAFWUAF

Irrigation Commission

50% Govt – 50% WUAF

Irrigation Service

Agricultural Service

Head of District/Province

Participatory O&M, Design, Construction

Irrigated Agriculture

Improvement

ProposalsProposals + Verification

Priorities for funding

Budget APBD

Local Parliament

Participatory O&M

Water Source Protection

Service AgreementsWalk through - preparation proposals/designWater Distribution Canal Cleaning - Repairs

Participatory Construction

Model 1: Joint Operation: Contractor - WUAF as subcontractor for “easy” parts- WUAF as observer in tender process

Model 2: Force Account:- Service Provides materials - WUAF provides labor

Model 3: Direct Contract to concerned WUAF. - WUAF Contribution in terms of labor and materials available nearby.

Contractor The Irrigation Service The WUAF

Strong support from the community during construction

Minimized pressure from outsiders during tender process

The community easily adjust their planting schedule to construction schedule

Reduce overhead cost Better quality of works (longer life of the constructed works)

Opportunity for the community to supervise / watch the quality of parts done by the contractor.

Reduced a lot of lost/stolen materials in the field

Appreciation of the community for the Irrigation Service

Community’s voice was heard before and during construction

More output per input Stronger cohesiveness amongst WUAF members

Irrigated Agriculture Improvement:

Use critical mass and official status of WUAFs (1000-3000 farme to :

- improve bargaining position, - create access to finance, access to markets- linkages with private sector- Improve Resilience SRI- Enhance Value Chain

-Supporting Activities-Post Harvest Processing

Lokasi : Amaq Johariah, Gerantung (Hasil : 12,96 ton/ha)

Method

Price Unhusked

Rice(Rp/kg)

Cost Inputs(Rp/ha.)

Yield(kg/ha)

Gross Income (Rp)

Nett Income(Rp)

1 SRI 2,500 6.123.332 7.863 19.658.315 13.534.984

2 Non SRI 2,500 5.794.650 5.049 12.621.502 6.826.852

SRI UPTAKE 2008 - 2010

Area Farmers yield SRI Yield Non-SRI increase

(ha) no ton/ha ton/ha %

2008 Demplot 200 342 7.15 4.83 48.1

2008/09 992 1500 8.54 5.35 59.5

2009 1487 2116 7.78 4.98 56.3

2009/10 1859 2831 8 5.02 59.1

2010 2167 3548 7.86 5.05 55.2

Development of SRI in NTB

Production Organic Fertilizer (WUA Sumber Hikmah, Lombok Barat)

Cooperation WUAF with private sector

No Komodity Bentuk yang dipasarkan

Harga pasar

(Rp/kg)

Modal usaha Per luas lahan

usaha (Rp)

Modal Usaha/ha (Rp/ha)

1 Mentimun biji 180.000 36 - 40 / 10 are 3.000.000 64.800.000 - 72.000.000 30.000.000 34.800.000 - 42.000.000 2 Cabe biji 450.000 20 - 25 / 10 are 5.000.000 90.000.000 - 112.500.000 50.000.000 40.000.000 - 62.500.000 3 Semangka biji 890.000 5 - 10 / 20 are 2.000.000 22.250.000 - 44.500.000 10.000.000 12.250.000 - 34.500.000 4 Kacang Panjang sayuran 1.500 1.500 - 2.000 / 10 are 1.000.000 22.500.000 - 30.000.000 10.000.000 12.500.000 - 20.000.000 5 Buncis sayuran 1.500 1.000 - 1.500 / 10 are 1.000.000 15.000.000 - 22.500.000 10.000.000 5.000.000 - 12.500.000 6 Tomat buah 2.000 2.000 - 2.500 / 10 are 2.000.000 40.000.000 - 50.000.000 20.000.000 20.000.000 - 30.000.000

Kisaran Hasil Kotor Per hektar (Rp/ha)

Kisaran Hasil Bersih Per hektar (Rp/ha)

Produksi Per luas lahan usaha

(kg/are)

Example Cooperation “WUAF Sidemen” and “PT Bisi Tanindo” for seed production though facilitation of agriculture service in various horticulture commodities.

Conclusion

• The partnership model for management of government irrigation systems provides a good alternative for full management transfer (IMT) and irrigation service fees (ISF).

• The integration of WUAF and farmer groups provides new opportunities for value chain enhancement operations by the WUAF.

Thank You