indonesia country report on science,technology, and innovation policy by tatang a taufik

COUNTRY REPORT :STI Indonesia

Dr. Tatang A. TaufikDeputy Chairman

Agency for the Assessment and Application of Technology (BPPT) - Indonesia

ISTIC-KISTEP S&T Policy Training Program for High Level Policy Makers 2012Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 5-9 November 2012

OUTLINE1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 COUNTRY BACKGROUND 3.0 POLICY ON SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION (STI)

3.1 COUNTRY’S POLICY ON STI3.2 STRUCTURE OF COUNTRY’S STI SYSTEM 3.3 FUNDING FOR RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND INNOVATION3.4 STAKEHOLDERS’ INVOLVEMENT IN FORMULATION OF STI POLICY

4.0 FRAMEWORK OF COUNTRY OR ORGANIZATION POLICY 5.0 PROCESS/ACTIVITIES FOR POLICY DEVELOPMENT 6.0 POLICY IMPLEMENTATION

6.1 HOW IT IS IMPLEMENTED AND MONITORED 6.2 CHALLENGES IN POLICY IMPLEMENTATION

7.0 NATIONAL INNOVATION PROGRAMS AND FORESIGHT INITIATIVES7.1 EXAMPLES OF INNOVATION INITIATIVES IN GOVERNMENT 7.2 EXAMPLES OF INNOVATION INITIATIVE IN INDUSTRY

8.0 RECOMMENDATION FOR ENHANCEMENT OF COUNTRY/ ORGANIZATION STI POLICY 9.0 CONCLUSION

OUTLINE

1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 COUNTRY BACKGROUND 3.0 POLICY ON SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION (STI)






1.0 INTRODUCTION

• I hold an engineer degree in Industrial Engineering from Bandung Institute of Technology – Indonesia. I obtained a Master Degree in Industrial and Systems Engineering, and Ph.D. in Resource Economics from the University of Florida - USA.

• I have worked at BPPT since 1986. Prior to the current position, I was a director at some centers at BPPT.

• I have been involved in introducing and initiating national and regional innovation system development, industrial cluster, innovation networks, technopreneurship, regional e-development and competitiveness, including developing regional competitiveness councils, and in various science & technology policy, R&D policy, and innovation policy reform initiatives in Indonesia.

• I was an author and co-author, and editor/co-editor of several books, proceedings, and papers related to the aforementioned topics.

Dr. Tatang A. TaufikDeputy Chairman,

Agency for the Assessment and Application of

Technology (BPPT) - Indonesia

OUTLINE1.0 INTRODUCTION

2.0 COUNTRY BACKGROUND 3.0 POLICY ON SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION (STI)






2.0 COUNTRY BACKGROUND

• South East Asia, Equator, average 27ºC, 90% humidity• Archipelago (stretched 5,200 km East to West, 67% sea)• 1,904,569 square km landmass (13,466 islands ~ 400 inhabited,

main islands : Java, Sumatera, Kalimantan, Sulawesi, Papua, Maluku, Nusa Tenggara)

• ± 108,000 km coastline• ± 257,516,167 people (est. 2012, 4th most populated country, ~

60% in Java)• ± 300 ethnic groups (major ethnics : Javanese, Sundanese,

Melayu, Bugis, Balinese)• 16th largest economy.

OUTLINE1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 COUNTRY BACKGROUND

3.0 POLICY ON SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION (STI) 3.1 COUNTRY’S POLICY ON STI3.2 STRUCTURE OF COUNTRY’S STI SYSTEM 3.3 FUNDING FOR RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND INNOVATION3.4 STAKEHOLDERS’ INVOLVEMENT IN FORMULATION OF STI POLICY





11 National priorities

1. Bureaucracy Reform and Governance2. Education3. Health4. Poverty reduction5. Food security6. Infrastructure7. Investment and business climate8. Energy9. Environment and disaster

management10.Marginal areas, outer

islands/regions, post-conflict ridden areas

11. Culture, creativity and technology innovation

15 President’s specific priorities1. Eradication of court law’s “mafia”2. Revitalization of defense industry3. Terrorism prevention4. Nation-wide electricity availability5. Increased food production and strengthened food

security6. Revitalization of fertilizer and sugar factories7. Regulatory improvement in land-use and regional

planning8. Infrastructure development9. Financial/credit support for SMEs amounted to

~US$ 200 Mio/year10. Financing and investment scheme11. Reformulation of Indonesia’s contribution to

climate change and environmental challenges12. Public health reform13. Harmonization between education and

employment14. Disaster mitigation and management15. Central and provincial/district governments

synergy.

3.0 CURRENT GOVERNMENT DEVELOPMENT POLICY (2010-2014)

3.1 NATIONAL POLICY ON STI : INNOVATION SYSTEM AS NATIONAL COMMITMENT

• PERISKOP study - 2001, BMBF – MRT• BPPT study since 2004• National Long Term Development Plan 2005 – 2025 (includes

strengthening the National Innovation System/NIS to support knowledge-based economy development)

• National Coordination Meeting on Research and Technology, 2008

• National Medium Term Development Plan, 2010-2014• National Innovation Committee, along with National

Economic Committee, 2010• Master Plan for the Acceleration and Extention of the

Indonesian Economic Development (MP3EI), 2011.

3.2 STRUCTURE OF THE STI SYSTEM

Coord. Min of Economy

House of Reps.

Min. Just & HR

NRC

10 Previous State-owned Co’s (Strategic Industries) :

1. PT. DI2. PT. PAL3. PT. PINDAD4. PT. K. STEEL5. PT. INKA6. Perum Dahana7. PT. INTI8. PT. BHARATA9. PT. BBI10. PT. LEN

Finance-related SOCs

Other SOCs

Other Ministries

Ministrerial R&D Organizations

Industrial R&D Agency

Agr. R&D Agency

NM Organizations

BPPT

LAPAN

BSN

BAKOSURTANAL

LIPI

BATAN

BAPETEN

Extention Services

Extention Services

Extention Services

Min. of Finance

Academy of Sc. Ind.

Private Univs.

Private R&D Insts.

Min. Of Educ. & Cult.

Ed. R&D Org.

State Univs.

Other R&D Organizations

Extention Services

PRESIDENT

S&T Park

Other Coord. Min.

Nat. Dev. Planning

Min. of SOC

Oth

er

Min

istr

ies

MRT

NIC & NEC

3.3a NATIONAL BUDGET 2011

10 STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES 1.Higher economic growth2.Fewer unemployment and better job3.Reduced poverty4.Increased income/capita5.Maintained economic stability6.More significant domestic financing7.Improved food and water security8.Improved energy security9.Higher economic competitiveness10.Greener development.

BUDGET• Rp.1,086.4 Trillion (120.67 Bio US $ at

9000/USD)• Loan interests, domestic Rp.80.4, foreign

Rp.36 T (10.7%)• Central government Rp.401.4 Trillion

(37%)• Regional government total Rp.409.4

trillions (37.7%)– Disbursed to 524 autonomous regions; 33

provinces, 398 Districts, 93 Municipalities - Rp. 378.4 Trillion

– Special autonomy regions- Papua and Aceh- Rp. 10.3 T

– Shared revenue to regions- tax, natural resources, Rp. 82 T

– Adjustment for school grant/BOS and civil servant Rp. 39 T

Presidential Remarks, 16 August 2010

GERD Rp. 4,720,341,818,344

GDP Rp. 5,613,441,700,000,000

GERD/GDP 0.08%

National GERD and GERD/GDP Ratio, 2009

Higher Education Manufacturing Industry Government 0.00%

0.02%

0.04%

0.06%

0.03%

0.02%

0.04%

GERD/GDP, 2009

Source: LIPI (Dec, 2011) based on R&D survey in University sector (2009), Industry sector (2010), and Government sector (2006)

Note:1) Based on R&D Survey in University Sector, 20102) Based on R&D Survey in Industry Sector, 20103) Based on R&D Survey in Government Sector, 2008*

* the estimates with an average growth rate Goverment R&D budget since 2005-2008.

Shows the breakdowon of R&D expenditure by sector in 2009. Government and Higher Education shares to the R&D expenditure were higher (with ratio of GERD 0,04% for Government and 0,03% for Higher Education) compared to that of Manufacturing industry (0.02%).

3.3b FUNDING FOR RD&I :GROSS EXPENDITURE ON R&D (GERD)

GERD INDONESIA

Source: UIS, August 2010 Note: +1 = 2008, -1 = 2006, -2 = 2005, -3 = 2004, -5 = 2002.

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

So

uth

Afr

ica

Su

dan

-2

Mo

rocco

-1

Bo

tsw

an

a -

2

Tu

nis

ia -

2

Zam

bia

-2

Ug

an

da

Seych

ell

es -

2

Eth

iop

ia

Bu

rkin

a F

aso

Mad

ag

ascar

Sen

eg

al

-2

Mala

ysia

-1

Isra

el

+1

Jap

an

Rep

. o

f K

ore

a

Ch

ina

Sin

gap

ore

Ph

ilip

pin

es -

2

Ho

ng

Ko

ng

-1

Kazakh

sta

n +

1

Th

ail

an

d -

2

Lao

PD

R -

5

Ind

ia

Kyrg

yzsta

n

Azerb

aij

an

Sri

Lan

ka -

1

Vie

t N

am

-5

Iran

-1

Cam

bo

dia

-5

Ind

on

esia

-2

Mo

ng

oli

a

Arm

en

ia

Taji

kis

tan

-2

Bru

nei

-3

Pakis

tan

Geo

rgia

-2

Au

str

ali

a -

1

New

Zeala

nd

Business enterprise Government Higher education Private non-profit Unknown

www.uis.unesco.org

A breakdown of R&D investment in Africa, Asia and the Pacific. GERD by sector of performance, 2007 or latest available year

Program Administration/ Implementation

3.4a STAKEHOLDERS’ INVOLVEMENT IN FORMULATION OF STI POLICY :INNOVATION GOVERNANCE

High Level Policy Design/

Decisions

Program Design

Program Management

Level 1High Level Cross-sectoral Policies

Level 1High Level Cross-sectoral Policies

Level 2Coordination Centered on Ministerial’s Mission

Level 2Coordination Centered on Ministerial’s Mission

Level 3More Detail Policy Coordination & Development

Level 3More Detail Policy Coordination & Development

Level 4R&D, and Innovation Actors

Level 4R&D, and Innovation Actors

Government Policy Councils

Research Councils/

Institutes and Academies

Innovation and Technology

Agency

Other Supporting Program

Organizations

Producers:Company,

Farms,Hospitals, etc..

Universities

R&D Institutions

Program Contractors

Ministry of Industry

Ministry of Research & Technology

Other Ministries

BPPT’s Strategic Role

NIC

BPPT’s Relationships with Key Stakeholders

STI Partnerships

Universities/HEs, Other R&D

Organizations, Associations

Private Companies

Consulting

Policy Recommendations &Technology Audit (by

requests)

Program Implementations

Ministries & Government Institutions

State owned Companies

Audit & STI Partnerships/

Services

Program Inputs

MRT

Reports

President

BPPT

Reports & Policy Recommendations/

Assignments

3.4b STAKEHOLDERS’ INVOLVEMENT : ORGANIZATIONAL LEVEL

House of Representative

STI PartnershipsSTI

Partnerships/Services

Foreign STI Organizations

3.4c ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

3.4d THE ROLE OF BPPT

Intermediary

Technology Solution

Technology Clearing House

Assessment

Technology Audit

Tech Stateof the Art

Self-reliance

Competitiveness

Wealth, Prosperity,

Sustainability, CivilizationTECH. SERVICES ROLES VALUE

PROPOSITIONS1. Recommendation

2. Advocacy

3. Tech. Transfer

4. Consulting

5. MSTQ

6. Operational Serv.

7. Pilot Project

8. Pilot Plant

9. Prototype

10. Survey

11. Technical Reference

12. Tech. Audit

13. New Startup

1. Food Technology2. Health and Medicine Technology3. Energy Technology4. Earth & Environmental Technology5. Disaster Early Warning & Mitigation Technology6. Advanced Material Technology7. Information and Communication Technology8. Transportation Technology9. Security and Defence Technology10.Manufacturing Technology11.Innovation System

BPPT’s Priorities:

http://www.bppt.go.id



4.0 FRAMEWORK OF COUNTRY OR ORGANIZATION POLICY

5.0 PROCESS/ACTIVITIES FOR POLICY DEVELOPMENT 6.0 POLICY IMPLEMENTATION




Advanced Material

Food Security

Health & Medicine

ConstitutionUUD -1945

Act No. 18/2002National System on S&T

Act No. 17/2007NLTDP 2005 - 2025

S&T Vision2005 - 2025

Defence & Security

Information & Communication

Transportation

New and Renewable Energy

White Papers2005 - 2025

NMTDP 2010-2014 S&T National Strategic Policy

KIB II (Cabinet)Vision & Mission

Regional Strategic Policy

Ministerial Agency’s SP

Non-Min. Agency’s SP

MRT’s Strategic Plan

ABP of Regional R&Ds

ABP of MAs

ABP of NMAs

ABP of MRT

AB of Regional R&Ds

AB of MAs

AB of NMAs

AB MRT

NRA 2010-2014

National Innovation System

4.0 COUNTRY POLICY FRAMEWORK ON STI An

nual

Gov

t. Bu

dget

Annu

al G

ovt.

Avtiv

ity &

Bu

dget

Pla

n

4a. FRAMEWORK OF POLICY ON STI (BPPT)

1. Develop conducive general framework/conditions for inovation and business.

2. Strengthen knowledge institutions and S&T supports, and enhance absorptive capacity of industry (esp. SMEs).

3. Develop synergetic collaboration for innovation and its diffusion, and increase knowledge-/ technology-based services.

4. Foster innovation culture.5. Develop and strengthen integrated efforts of

innovation system and industrial cluster development (at the national and regional levels).

6. Develop and adapt strategic responses to global changes and challenges.

Innovation Policy Framework : The Hexagon

• National R&T Coord. Meeting 2008• Strategic Plan of MRT 2010-2014

Academic Draft of the White Paper on the National Innovation System

1. Strengthening Regional Innovation System (RIS) : as a vehicle to strengthen pillars for fostering creativity-innovation at regional levels (as an integral part of the National Innovation System).

2. Industrial Cluster Development : as a vehicle to develop the best potencies and to enhance industrial competitiveness.

3. Innovation Network Development : as a vehicle to develop linkages and partnerships among actors, and dynamizing the flow of knowledge, innovation, diffusion, and learning.

4. Technopreneurship Development : as a vehicle to modernize business/economy & society, and to develop innovation culture.

5. Strengthening Thematic Pilars : as a vehicle to improve the thematic and contextual elements of the innovation system.

45

16 2

3

Strategic Initiatives:

Vision & Missionsof the National & Regional Sustainable Development

4b. INNOVATION POLICY FRAMEWORKAND STRATEGIC INITIATIVES

Flagship Programs

InnovationPolicy Framework

Strategic Initiatives RIS

IndustrialCluster

InnovationNetwork

Techno-preneurship

General conditions

Institution, S&T support, Absorptive cap

Interaction, knowlegde-based services

Innovation Culture

Focus & Coherences

Adaptability to global changes

ThematicPilars

Academic Draft of the White Paper on the National Innovation System



4.0 FRAMEWORK OF COUNTRY OR ORGANIZATION POLICY

5.0 PROCESS/ACTIVITIES FOR POLICY DEVELOPMENT 6.0 POLICY IMPLEMENTATION




THE POLICY CYCLE

Agenda Purpose

Assessment/ Analysis

Formulation(Reformulation)Implementation

Monitoring & Evaluation

Participation of Key

Stakeholders

Policy Instruments

Control

Key Performance

Indicators

• Data• Good Practice• Analysis, etc.

Policymaking

STAGES IN PROGRAM/ACTIVITY PLANNING (MINISTRY/ORGANIZATION LEVELS)

IDENTIFYINGVISION,

MISSION AND

STRATEGIC GOALS

OF MIN./ AGENCIES

FORMULATING

INDICATORS OF

STRATEGIC GOALS

(IMPACTS)

FORMULATING

INDICATORS OF

PROGRAMS(OUTCOMES)

PROGRAM FORMULATIO

N

FORMULATING

INDICATORS OF ACTIVITIES

(OUTPUTS)

FORMULATING

ACTIVITIES

RECAPITULATING

PROGRAMS, ACTIVITIES

ANDINDICATORS OF

MIN./AGENCIES

STEP 1 STEP 2 STEP 3 STEP 4 STEP 5 STEP 6 STEP 7

MAIN TASKS OF

ECHELON 1

MAIN TASKS OF

ECHELON 2

PROGRAM PLANNING STAGE ACTIVITY PLANNING STAGERECAPITULATING

STAGE



4.0 FRAMEWORK OF COUNTRY OR ORGANIZATION POLICY 5.0 PROCESS/ACTIVITIES FOR POLICY DEVELOPMENT

6.0 POLICY IMPLEMENTATION 6.1 HOW IT IS IMPLEMENTED AND MONITORED 6.2 CHALLENGES IN POLICY IMPLEMENTATION



Important considerations

Generic Strategy Priority SettingFocus

Significant contributions

in “strengthening

innovation system” in Indonesia

National Innovation Policy Reforms

Legal Reference (incl. assessment, technology audits,

policy recommendations, academic drafts, etc.)

Capacity building & Building community of practice

Regional Pilot Projects as Success Stories

Learning, Good/Best Practices, Difussion, Scalability

IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGYIN STRENGTHENING INNOVATION SYSTEM

KPIs

6.1 HOW IT IS IMPLEMENTED & MONITORED (1)

1. A Deputy Chairman propose the main themes of priority programs to the Chairman. Based on the Chairman’s approval, the programs (subprograms) are assigned to the centers/implementing units (IUs). Centers/IUs can also propose the programs to the Chairman, through the Deputy Chairman.

2. Every program (subprogram) is designed in more detail (by the “troika” : Program Head, Chief Engineer & Program Manager) & should be documented in a Program Manual.

3. Deputy Chairman is responsible for programs assigned/approved by the Chairman, and proposed Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to the Chairman.

4. Directors are responsible for program (sub-program) & activity implementation, and proposed KPIs to the Deputy Chairman.

5. Participatory planning (with partners & key stakeholders), such FGDs, workshops, etc. are conducted for detail activities.

6.1 HOW IT IS IMPLEMENTED & MONITORED (2)

6. BPPT & Regional partners assign :a. “Points of Contacts”/PoCs (Liasson Officers/LOs) to facilitate coordination &

communicationb. Implementation Teams/ITs (for particular programs/activities).

7. Monthly Individual Performance Targets (IPTs) are assigned hierarchically. IPTs are used to monitor/evaluate individual achievements.

8. Activities are directed to contribute to the improvement of the Innovation Policy Framework (IPF) relevant to the region. In some cases, regulatory impact assessments are carried out in the program/activity implementation.

9. Program/Activity Monitoring Process :1. Internal Ad hoc Monitoring/Evaluation Teams (led by Directors and/or the

Deputy Chairman)2. Independent Monitoring/Evaluation Teams :

• Inspectorate Team (Reports directly to BPPT Chairman)• Bureau of Planning Team (reports to BPPT Chairman through the Principal

Secretary).

• 10• 20• 30

INITIATIVE 5 TAHUN 2012

• 10• 20• 30


• 10• 20• 30


• 10• 20• 30


AN EXAMPLE OF A SIMPLIFIED ROADMAP IN STRENGTHENING INNOVATION SYSTEM IN A REGION 2012 - 2015

• 10• 20• 30• 40• 50• 60

INITIATIVE 1 2012

• 1B• 2B• 3B• 4B• 5B• 6B.

2014• 1C• 2C• 3C• 4C• 5C• 6C.

2015

ESTABLISH & REVITALIZE THE PILARS OF INNOVATION SYSTEM THROUGH STRATEGIC INITIATIVES

• 1A• 2A• 3A• 4A• 5A• 6A

2013

INITIATION UPGRADING EXTENTION RESTRENGTHENING

AN EXAMPLE OF PERFORMANCE INFORMATION IN BPPT’S PROGRAM ARCHITECTUREFOR A PILOT PROJECT IN A REGION 2012

RISI – Stage 11. Revitalisze IPF to

support creative city (regional development)

2. Improvement of Regional Innovation Infra & Suprastructures

Regional Innovation System Initiative

1. Knowledge Transfer2. Policy/Technical

Assistance3. Fora4. Other Technology

Services

• Teams• Legal Documents• Budget, etc.

NATIONAL PILOT PROJECTS IN AN AUTONOMOUS REGION (CITY/REGENCY)

TI – Stage 1

Industrial Cluster InitiativeInnovation Network

InitiativeTechnopreneurship

Initiative

IMPACTS

OUTCOME

OUTPUT

ACTIVITY

INPUT

PROGRAM

ACTIVITY

SUB ACTIVITY

Centers/Implementing Units

ECHELON 1

INI – Stage 1ICI – Stage 1

STRENGTHENING THE INNOVATION SYSTEM IN INDONESIA

Thematic Initiative

Them. I – Stage 1





6.2 CHALLENGES IN POLICY IMPLEMENTATION

• Political related issues• Leadership – short-sighted vision/interests• Capability - Human resource related issues (incl. regional

brain drain phenomenon)• Bureaucratic system• Very limited budget supports• Limited basic infrastructures• Limited involvement of local universities/HEs & business

communities

7.1 EXAMPLES OF INNOVATION INITIATIVES IN GOVERNMENT

The Minister of Home Affairsand the Chairman of BPPT

REFERENCE MODELCOMPACT E-ID READER

ISO/IEC 14443

TESTING THE SMART CARDISO/IEC 7810, ISO/IEC 7816,

ISO/IEC 14443

E-ID AND COMPACT CARD READER

Current Status : • Model integration of

electronic components and data reading of e-ID.

• Component integration to verify finger prints.

• An initial compact model of the e-ID reader.A National Dialog on e-ID 2012

34

DRE (Direct Recording Electronic) System with an activation by a smart card.

E-VOTING

VVPAT (Verified Voter Paper Audit Trail) or audit paper with a barcode security contains voice, Vtoken, and digital signature.

STRENGTHENING INNOVATION SYSTEM IN THE CITY OF PEKALONGAN

Strengthening RIS Innovation Network

Batik Industrial ClusterTechnopreneurship Development

7.2 EXAMPLES OF INNOVATION INITIATIVES IN INDUSTRY

‘Speech-to-Text’ technology (“Perisalah”®) as a “Bahasa

Indonesia” speech recognition system to produce documents &

meeting summaries automatically and in a real time. The prototype

was introduced by BPPT.

Partner : PT. INTI (Limited)

• Was tested in various organizations• Current progress : technology & product

development for various applications

FORESIGHT INITIATIVES

• Still very limited• Some initiatives : energy, herbal medicine• Midterm ~ Technology roadmap initiatives (in BPPT’s

technology programs) :– ICT– Energy– Food– New/advanced materials– Etc.






8.0 RECOMMENDATION FOR ENHANCEMENT OF COUNTRY/ORGANIZATION STI POLICY

9.0 CONCLUSION

8.0 RECOMMENDATION FOR ENHANCEMENT OF COUNTRY STI POLICY

1. A clear & formal comprehensive innovation policy framework to address the most essential systemic failures and to lead STI advancement and utilization to contribute to high economic growth, inclusiveness, and green/sustainable development.

2. Significant improvements in budgeting system :a. Improvements in government budget mechanisms & supportsb. Better funding supports for STI advancement & utilization

(including effective incentive schemes).3. Strong commitment to support innovation in

– industries important to enhancing competitive advantages, – regional & the youth creativity-innovation development.

4. STI human resource development.5. Better coordination & collaboration among key stakeholders.






8.0 RECOMMENDATION FOR ENHANCEMENT OF COUNTRY/ORGANIZATION STI POLICY

9.0 CONCLUSION

CONCLUSION

• Indonesia as a large country is moving forward, but needs to move faster & in a much better pattern

• Significant improvements in STI policy are required• Strong commitment & consistency to invest in innovation

may be among the most leveraging factors• Collaboration/partnership within the country and

internationally is a must.

Dr. Tatang A. TaufikDeputy Chairman

Agency for the Assessment and Application of Technology Badan Pengkajian dan Penerapan Teknologi (BPPT)

Gedung II BPPT, Lt 13Jl. MH. Thamrin 8, Jakarta 10340 - INDONESIA

Telp. (021)-316 9441 / 9442Fax. (021)-319 24127

E-mail: [email protected]

... in harmony we progress ...

Thank You

Gerakan Membangun Sistem Inovasi, Daya Saing dan Kohesi Sosial di seluruh Wilayah Nusantara

(National movement to develop innovation system, competitiveness, and social cohesion

through out the Country)

indonesia country report on science,technology, and innovation policy by tatang a taufik

Technology

policy development

countrys policy

policy implementation

organization policy

innovation sti

formulation of sti policy

rd policy

sti indonesia