individual capital assessment –setting solvency capital levels
DESCRIPTION
ICA Individual Capital Assessment analysis as presented at Milliman\'s 2005 Casualty Consultants ForumTRANSCRIPT
Milliman Limited registered in England and Wales under Company Number 4076731
Individual Capital Assessment –Individual Capital Assessment –Setting Solvency Capital LevelsSetting Solvency Capital Levels2005 Casualty Consultants’ Forum2005 Casualty Consultants’ Forum
Presented byPresented by
Kyle Mrotek Kyle Mrotek 1616thth June 2005 June 2005
Milliman
Agenda
Components of ICAComponents of ICA Approach to ICAApproach to ICA Modelled RisksModelled Risks Consideration of Capital RequirementConsideration of Capital Requirement Added Value Beyond Regulatory Added Value Beyond Regulatory
RequirementsRequirements
Milliman
Components of ICA
Milliman
Capital
Credit
Market
LiquidityGroup
Insurance
Operational
FSA Risk Types - Defining Capital Requirements
Milliman
• Insurance Risk:Insurance Risk: Adequate premiums, pricing methodology, deterioration of Adequate premiums, pricing methodology, deterioration of
reserves, catastrophes reserves, catastrophes
• Market Risk:Market Risk: Adverse movements in assets (both capital & interest)Adverse movements in assets (both capital & interest)
• Credit Risk:Credit Risk: Reinsurance, intermediaries, quality of counterparties and off Reinsurance, intermediaries, quality of counterparties and off
balance sheet transactionsbalance sheet transactions
• Liquidity Risk: Liquidity Risk: Low liquidity of assets when required Low liquidity of assets when required
• Operational Risk:Operational Risk: Administration, compliance, event, fraud, governance, strategic and Administration, compliance, event, fraud, governance, strategic and
technological riskstechnological risks
• Group Risk: Group Risk: Insolvency/credit downgrading of parent, removal of guarantee, Insolvency/credit downgrading of parent, removal of guarantee,
compulsory dividends, performance guarantees, contagion … compulsory dividends, performance guarantees, contagion …
Risk Assessment for ICA Purposes
Milliman
Approach to ICA
Milliman
Overview
• Probability of insolvency over a 1 year time Probability of insolvency over a 1 year time horizon is no greater than 1 in 200horizon is no greater than 1 in 200
• Dynamic Risk Model (DRM) of 2 of the Dynamic Risk Model (DRM) of 2 of the major risks – Insurance and Market risksmajor risks – Insurance and Market risks
• Non-modelled (excluded) risks need to be Non-modelled (excluded) risks need to be assessed separatelyassessed separately
• Combine capital requirements for risk Combine capital requirements for risk factors allowing for diversification benefitsfactors allowing for diversification benefits
Milliman
Estimate correlations between risk areas and determine aggregate capital requirement
Dynamic Risk Model
Individual Capital Assessment
Determining the ICA based on Risk Assessment
InsuranceRisk
CreditRisk
MarketRisk
OperationalRisk
LiquidityRisk
GroupRisk
AdditionalRisk
Consider
Benchmarks
Loss History
Consider
MaximumCash-flow
ContingencyPlans
Consider
CapitalStructure
ContagionRisk
Consider
ConcentrationRisk
SystemControls
Capital requirement for Insurance and
Market Risk
Consider
Counterparties
Off BalanceSheet Items
Milliman
Modelled Risks
Milliman
DRM Overview• Excel spreadsheet with VB add-insExcel spreadsheet with VB add-ins
• Projects on a stochastic basis expected cash-flows Projects on a stochastic basis expected cash-flows for 5 years from the valuation date in respect of:for 5 years from the valuation date in respect of:
– business in-force and asset holdingsbusiness in-force and asset holdings
– planned future business (for next 5 years)planned future business (for next 5 years)
• DRM is run for (say) 5,000 scenarios based on DRM is run for (say) 5,000 scenarios based on realistic assumptions for the mean and variance realistic assumptions for the mean and variance of loss ratios, claim payment patterns, future of loss ratios, claim payment patterns, future investment returns and expensesinvestment returns and expenses
• Additional assets required to cover liabilities and Additional assets required to cover liabilities and deficits emerging at the 99.5deficits emerging at the 99.5thth percentile (over 1 percentile (over 1 year) is the required capital for that scenarioyear) is the required capital for that scenario
Milliman
Outline of Process
SimulateResults
Sample fromDistributions
Model Insuranceand AssetPortfolio
Gross, and Net Results, in Financial Accounting Framework
Loss distributions
Premiums
Balance Sheet
Generate random number
Obtain value from distribution
Milliman
DRM Flow
LOB 1Business characteristics
and patterns
LOB 3Business characteristics
and patterns
LOB 2Business characteristics
and patterns
FinancialCalculator
Starting Balance Sheet
Corporate Elements
Reinsurance Investment
Capital Mix Taxes
Years 1-5 Financial Results
•Balance Sheet•Income Statement
AnalyserMeasures of
•Risk•Return
Capital Requirement
Milliman
Existing Business Assumptions
ClassTraditional Middle Market
Financial Products
Australia Large Risk
Expected Gross OS 5,976 3,899 940 63 33,872CoV 31% 31% 31% 31% 50%Expected ceded OS 2,099 2,817 - 48 22,407CoV 31% 31% 31% 31% 50%Correlation to gross 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%Payout 1 81% 35% 81% 81% 99%Payout 2 96% 64% 96% 96% 100%Payout 3 99% 83% 99% 99% 100%Payout 4 100% 92% 100% 100% 100%Payout 5 100% 96% 100% 100% 100%Payout CofV 50% 75% 50% 50% 75%Loss distrns LogNormal LogNormal LogNormal LogNormal LogNormal
Milliman
Future Business Assumptions
ClassTraditional Middle Market
Financial Products
Australia Large Risk
EPI 1 21,543 10,126 1,213 2,550 134EPI 2 25,178 12,968 1,668 4,196 134EPI 3 27,721 13,617 2,146 5,224 0EPI 4 30,738 14,298 2,647 6,306 0EPI 5 34,027 15,013 2,265 7,042 0Commission 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%ULR attnl 43% 48% 116% 55% 70%StdDev 13% 15% 36% 17% 22%Payout 1 53% 6% 53% 53% 14%Payout 2 91% 35% 91% 91% 55%Payout 3 98% 64% 98% 98% 81%Payout 4 100% 83% 100% 100% 93%Payout 5 100% 92% 100% 100% 97%Payout CofV 50% 75% 50% 50% 75%
Net Premium 10,511 3,421 1,213 1,244 67Net ULR 43% 48% 116% 55% 70%Premium Cession 51% 66% 0% 51% 66%Ceded ULR 43% 48% 0% 55% 70%StdDev 13% 15% 36% 17% 22%Correl to gross 70% 80% 70% 70% 90%Loss distrns LogNormal LogNormal LogNormal LogNormal LogNormal
Milliman
Marketing Surplus Assumptions
Cat 1Type Middle Market
Exposure splitFrequency 0%Loss size 100%
Expected FrequencyExp'd freq 0.63
Expected SeverityMean 337 St Dev 130 Distribution LogNormal
Attritional R/I%age inuring r/i 0%
Payout patternPayout 1 6%Payout 2 35%Payout 3 64%Payout 4 83%Payout 5 92%Payout CofV 75%
Milliman
Economic Assumptions
Hull-White Parametersalpha 50.22%sigma 2.11%V(r) 0.0281%
Black-Scholes Parametersrho (Bond-Equity) -40%Index 4,476.9
Wilkie Parameters InflationQMU 0.035QA 0.58QSD 0.02Current 2.50%
t= 0 1 2 3 4 5 Inv %ageInflation 2.50% 2.81% 2.43% 1.75% 1.52% 1.08%Cash 3.00% 4.31% 3.93% 3.25% 3.02% 2.58% 90.00%1 year bond 3.50% 6.18% 9.12% 10.03% 6.07% 6.13% 0.00%5 year bond 4.00% -0.09% 4.30% 14.59% 5.23% 9.23% 0.00%Equity 6.00% -3.71% 3.05% -12.76% 24.96% -11.01% 10.00%Zero return 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%Overall 3.51% 3.84% 1.65% 5.21% 1.22%Exp'd infl 2.50% 2.92% 3.16% 3.30% 3.39% 3.43%
Models UsedModels Used
Hull-White for BondsHull-White for Bonds Black-Scholes for Black-Scholes for
EquitiesEquities Wilkie for InflationWilkie for Inflation Models simulate future Models simulate future
returns (capital and returns (capital and interest)interest)
Milliman
Correlation Matrix
Tra
ditio
nal
Mid
dle
Mar
ket
Fin
anci
al P
rodu
cts
Aus
tral
ia
Larg
e R
isk
Traditional-H 100% 20% 20% 20% 20%Middle Market 20% 100% 20% 0% 20%Financial Products-H 20% 20% 100% 20% 20%Australia-H 20% 0% 20% 100% 0%Large Risk 20% 20% 20% 0% 100%
Milliman
Capital Requirements
Milliman
Indicative Capital Requirement
Capital required aims to be sufficient to Capital required aims to be sufficient to reduce the probability of insolvency on a reduce the probability of insolvency on a realistic basis in the next 12 months to no realistic basis in the next 12 months to no more than 1 in 200 more than 1 in 200
Emerging as an industry-wide minimum Emerging as an industry-wide minimum standard (although other probabilities of standard (although other probabilities of insolvency over different time horizons can insolvency over different time horizons can be considered)be considered)
Milliman
Draft Results for DGI
Indicative Capital Requirements (£000s)
* excludes non-insurance liabilities
Assets 130,927 130,849 129,322 124,163 122,168
Liabilities*
- UPR 129,176 133,696 138,440 143,461 148,833
- Claims O/S 8,779 9,239 10,199 10,956 12,253
Surplus Emerging -7,027 -12,085 -19,318 -30,254 -38,918
Total Required Assets 137,955 142,934 148,640 154,417 161,086
Capital Required 7,027 12,085
19,318 30,254 38,918
End of Year 5
(2009)
End of Year 3
(2007)
End of Year 1
(2005)
End of Year 2
(2006)
End of Year 4
(2008)
Milliman
Draft Results for DGS
£1.9 million in year 1 with 10% volatility £1.9 million in year 1 with 10% volatility £11.4 million in year 1 with 15% volatility£11.4 million in year 1 with 15% volatility £3.5 million in year 1 with 10% volatility & £3.5 million in year 1 with 10% volatility &
URRURR £22.8 million in year 1 with 15% volatility & £22.8 million in year 1 with 15% volatility &
URRURR
Milliman
Added Value BeyondAdded Value BeyondRegulatory RequirementsRegulatory Requirements
Milliman
Any Other Business?