index [] · 2019-07-08 · index agenda description page no. points 50.1 confirmation ofminutes 1...

333
Government of India Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Office of Development Commissioner (MSME), 7thFloor, A Wing, Nirman Bhawan, Maulana Azad Road, New Delhi-ll0l08 Agenda for 50thMeeting of Steering Committee of Micro & Small Enterprises - Cluster Development Programme (MSE-CDP) Date &Time 02.07.19 at 3.00 PM Venue New Delhi

Upload: others

Post on 16-May-2020

10 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

Government of IndiaMinistry of Micro, Small and Medium EnterprisesOffice of Development Commissioner (MSME),

7thFloor, A Wing,Nirman Bhawan, Maulana Azad Road,

New Delhi-ll0l08

Agenda

for

50thMeeting of Steering Committee

of

Micro & Small Enterprises - Cluster Development Programme(MSE-CDP)

Date &Time 02.07.19 at 3.00 PM

Venue New Delhi

Page 2: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

INDEX

Agenda Description Page No.Points50.1 Confirmation of Minutes 150.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 250.3 Proposals for In-Principle Approval

Gujarat50.3.1 CFC in Plastic Products Cluster, Surendernagar 3-750.3.2 CFC in Food Processing Cluster, Bhiloda, Sabarkanth 8-1250.3.3 CFC in Packaging Cluster, Kadi, Mehsana 13-1750.3.4 CFC in EngineeringCluster, Surat 18-2450.3.5 CFC in Food ProcessingCluster, Chikhli,Navsari 25-2950.3.6 CFC in DiamondCluster, Saraspur,Ahmedabad 30-34

Jharkhand50.3.7 CFC in Brass and Bronze Cluster, Kariyatpur, Hazaribagh 35-40

Karnataka50.3.8 CFC in Power loom Cluster, Chikkodi, Belgaum 41-4750.3.9 CFC in Copper Utensils Manufacturing Cluster, Raibagh, 48-56

Belgaum50.3.10 CFC in Auto & General Engineering Cluster, Chikkodi, 57-65

Belgaum50.3.11 CFC in Organic Millets Cluster, Davanagere 66-7250.3.12 CFC in Readymade Garment Cluster, Hiriyur, Chitradurga 73-7950.3.13 CFC in Food Cluster, Sirsi, Uttara Kannada 80-87

Mizoram50.3.14 CFC in Carpentry Cluster, Baktwang 88-97

Nagaland50.3.15 CFC in Food Processing Cluster, Mokokchung 98-10550.3.16 CFC in Wood Furniture Cluster, Dimapur 106-11250.3.17 New Industrial Estate at Tuli, Mokokchung 113-117

Punjab50.3.18 Up-gradation of Focal Point, Nabha (Old), Patiala 118-12050.3.19 Up-gradation of Focal Point, Sangrur 121-12350.3.20 Up-gradation of Focal Point, Moga 124-12650.3.21 Up-gradation of Focal Point, Naya Nagnal, Rupnagar 127-130

Rajasthan50.3.22 Upgradation of ID Centre at Malpura, Tonk 131-133

Telangana50.3.23 CFC in Gold Ornaments Cluster, Karimnagar 134-14150.4 Proposals for Final Approval

Delhi50.4.1 Upgradation of Mangolpuri Industrial Area, Phase-II, North 142-145

West Delhi50.4.2 Upgradation of Mayapuri Industrial Area, Phase-I, South West 146-149

Delhi

Page 3: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

Agenda Description Page No.Points50.4.3 Upgradation of Infrastructure facilities at Flatted Factory 150-154

Complex, Jhilmil Industrial Area, East Delhi50.4.4 Upgradation of Infrastructure facilities at Flatted Factory 155-158

Complex, Jhandewalan, Central Delhi50.4.5 Upgradation of Infrastructure facilities at Flatted Factory 159-162

Complex, Okhla Industrial Area, South Delhi50.4.6 Upgradation and Redevelopment work in DSIIDC Industrial 163-166

Sheds ,Lawrence Road, Industrial Area, North West Delhi50.4.7 Upgradation and Redevelopment work for Kirti Nagar, 167-170

Industrial Area, South West Delhi50.4.8 Upgradation and Redevelopment work for Patparganj, 171-174

Industrial Area, East DelhiGujarat

50.4.9 CFC in Diamond Cutting & Polishing Cluster, Surat 175-180Kerala

50.4.10 Setting up of New Industrial Estate, KINFRA Spice Park at 181-184Idukki

Madhya Pradesh50.4.11 CFC in Mishthan &Namkeen Cluster, Jabalpur 185-192

Maharashtra50.4.12 CFC in Engineering Cluster, Jalgaon 193-19950.4.13 CFC in Plastic Cluster, Nipani, Aurangabad 200-206

Manipur50.4.14 CFC in Spices and Food Processing Cluster, Churachandpur 207-21550.4.15 CFC in Wood Carpentry Cluster, Churachandpur, Manipur 216-22350.4.16 CFC in Greater Imphal Jewellery Cluster, Imphal, Manipur 224-229

Meghalaya50.4.17 CFC in Cashew Nut Processing Cluster, Selsella, West Garo 230-235

HillsPunjab

50.4.18 Up-gradation of ID Centre at Focal Point, Pathankot 236-23950.4.19 Up-gradation of ID Centre at Focal Point, Goindwal Sahib, 240-243

Tam Taran50.4.20 Up-gradation oflD Centre at Focal Point, Amritsar 244-24850.4.21 Up-gradation of ID Centre at Focal Point, Chanaloan, Kurali 249-25250.4.22 Up-gradation of Industrial Focal Point, Batala, District 253-256

Gurdaspur50.4.23 Up-gradation of Industrial Focal Point, Hoshiarpur 257-26050.4.24 Up-gradation oflndustrial Focal Point, Nawanshahr 261-26550.4.25 Up-gradation of Industrial Focal Point, Kotkapura, District 266-269

FaridkotRajasthan

50.4.26 ID Centre at Sanawar, Udaipur 270-27350.4.27 ID Centre at Ajeetgarh, Sikar 274-276

Sikkim50.4.28 CFC in Okhrey Carpet Making Cluster, West Sikkim 277-283

Page 4: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

Agenda Description Page No.Points

Tamil Nadu50.4.29 CFC in Wooden Furniture Cluster, Salem 284-290

Telangana50.4.30 ID Centre at Ravalkole (V), Medchal-Makajgiri 291-29450.5 Ratification of Decisions

Assam50.5.1 New Industrial Estate at Pathsala, District Barpeta, Assam. 29550.5.2 Up-gradation of infrastructure facilities at Amingaon Export 296-297

Promotion Industrial Park (EPIP) in Kamrup (Metro) DistrictChattisgarh

50.5.3 New ID Centre at Kapan Village, District Janjgir Champa 297(a)&(b)Haryana

50.5.4 CFC in Stainless Steel Cluster, Kundli, Sonepat 29850.5.5 CFC in Engineering Cluster, Yamunanagar 29950.5.6 CFC in Plywood Cluster, Yamunanagar 300

Manipur50.5.7 New Industrial Estate at TM Kasom, Ukhrul District 301-30250.5.8 New Industrial Estate at Salemthar, Chandel 303-30450.5.9 New Industrial Estate at Khopuibung, Churachandpur 305-306

Rajasthan50.5.10 CFC in Gota Zari Lace Cluster, Ajmer 307

Telangana50.5.11 New Industrial Estate at Madikonda Village, Warangal District 308-309

Tripura50.5.12 New Industrial Estate at Kumarghat, Unakoti District 310-31150.6 Any Other Points

50.6.1 Dropping of proposal of setting up of new ID centre at 312-313Ibrahimpatnam, Rangareddy District, Telangana

Annexure-I Minutes of 49th SCM 314-323

**********

Page 5: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

1

Item No. 50.1. : Confirmation of Minutes of 49th

Meeting of Steering Committee held

on 27.02.2019.

Minutes of 49th

Meeting of Steering Committee held on 27.02.19 were uploaded on the website

and communicated to stakeholders on 07.03.19. Minutes are annexed at Annexure-I. Since no

comments have been received from any of the members, minutes may kindly be confirmed.

******

Page 6: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

2

Item No. 50.2 : Action Taken Report on the action points of 49th

Meeting of Steering

Committee

Item No. Item Description Decision Taken Action Taken

49.3.1 to

49.3.7

In-principle approval for various

proposals.

In-principle approval

accorded

Communicated

to all

concerned 49.4.1 to

49.4.7

Final approval for various proposals. Final approval accorded

49.5.1 Time extension for completion of

Projects.

Time extension

accorded.

49.6.1 to

49.6.3

Ratification of decisions taken on

file.

Ratified the decision of

time extension.

49.7 Any Other Points

49.7.1 Request of Government of

Maharashtra to waive off the penalty

of Rs.5.00 lakh imposed by Steering

Committee for delay in

implementation in setting up of CFC

in Readymade Garment Cluster,

Nagpur, Maharashtra.

Committee considered

the request of

Government of

Maharashtra and waived

off the penalty of Rs.5.00

lakh imposed from GoI

grant for delay in

implementation

49.7.2 Request of Government of

Puducherry to allow laying of

Bituminous roads for Up-gradation

of Industrial Estate at Mettupalayam,

Puducherry.

Committee considered

the request of

Government of

Puducherry as a special

case and allowed to lay

Bituminous roads.

49.7.3 MD, PSIEC, requested Steering

Committee to consider the following

3 Up-gradation proposals of the ID

Projects for In-principle approval as

a special case, as these proposals

were received by Office of DC

(MSME) after circulation of the

Agenda of the 49th

SCM.

(a) Up-gradation of Industrial

Focal Point, Batala, District

Gurdaspur, Punjab

(b) Up-gradation of Industrial Focal

Point, Hoshiarpur, Punjab

(c) Up-gradation of Industrial Focal

Point, Nawanshahr, Punjab

Steering Committee

considered the request of

PSIEC and accorded In-

principle approval

subject to submission of

requisite documents prior

to final approval.

*******

Page 7: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

50.3 Proposals for In-Principle Approval

-_ .. _---- - ----------------- ----------

Page 8: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

3

Agenda No.50.3.1: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up Common Facility

Centre (CFC) in Plastic Products Cluster, Nava Junction Road,

Surendranagar, Gujarat.

Background

The proposal was recommended by State Level Project Steering Committee (SLPSC)

held on 04.05.18.

Proposal was received from Government of Gujarat vide online ref. No. 13141 dated

25.05.18 & recommended by MSME-DI, Ahmedabad.

Proposal along with Focus Report & DPR was forwarded by MSME-DI, Ahmadabad

vide letter dated 28.02.19

Proposal was deliberated by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 64th

& 65th

meetings held on 05.03.19 & 13.06.19 respectively and recommended the same to

place before Steering Committee for In-principle approval.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Basic Information of Cluster

Name of Cluster : Plastic Products Cluster

District : Surendranagar

Location of Cluster : Surendranagar

Lok Sabha Constituency : Surendranagar

Main Product : Plastic Items

No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium) :

Micro : 115

Turnover for the last five years

Year (Rs. in crore) 2012-13 : 29.88 2013-14 : 33.2 2014-15 : 36.89 2015-16 : 43.4 2016-17 : 51.06

Exports(Rs in Crore) for the last five years :

Nil

Employment in Cluster : 920 Nos

Technology Details : Currently units in the cluster are using conventional technology for processing plastic, advance and upgraded technology is required.

Whether DS Conducted : Yes

Main findings of DSR : The diagnostic study recommended the establishment of a common facility centre.

Main Problems of Cluster : Non availability of Advanced Technology High wastage.

Other Information : NA

Page 9: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

4

2. Information about Proposed CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA)

Remarks

(a.) Justification for CFC To have facilities like Advance

Technology Quality Lab to improve the

final product.

--

(b.) Location of CFC Shree Suraj Mahila Vikas Mandal

Mulchand Road, Opp. ManavMandir,

Surendranagar-363001

--

% age of units in radius of 5km

95 --

% age of units in radius of 10km

5 --

(c.) Land for CFC

i. Whether land acquired Land on lease basis Registered land

document in the

name of SPV for a

minimum period

of 30 years is

required.

ii. Title is in name of Shree Suraj Mahila Vikas Mandal

iii. Valuation and its basis N.A

iv. Land is sufficient Yes

v. Change of land use N.A

vi. If on lease, duration of lease

31 Years

vii Whether lease is legally tenable

Yes

(d.) Total Building area 213.21 sq/mt --

(e.) Rate of construction of building

N.A. --

(f.) Main Facility Proposed Yarn Plant (Monofilament)

Servo Injection Molding

Extrusion blow Molding

Testing Equipment‟s

--

(g.) Prod capacity of CFC 800 Metric Tonns --

(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/ domestic sales and direct /indirect employment, etc.)

Parameter Before

CFC

After

CFC

Units 115 250

Production (Mt.) 2,760 8,250

Turn Over (Rs in

Cr) 51.06 140.25

Employment(No.) 920 2500

Profit (Rs in Cr) 3.45 11.25

--

(i.) Pollution clearance required or not

Not Provided Required

(j.) Man Power in CFC 8 Nos --

(k.) Revenue generation Provided --

Page 10: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

5

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA)

Remarks

mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied,any other-to be specified)

(l.) N.A --

3. Information about SPV

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(a.) Name and Address Shree Suraj Mahila Vikas Mandal Mulchand Road, Opp. ManavMandir, Surendranagar-363001

--

(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)

Trust under Article 58(a) --

(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV

Yet to done --

(d.) Date of formation of SPV 07.04.17 --

(e.) Number of Members 60 Nos --

(f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted

Provided --

(g.) Authorized Share Capital - --

(h.) Paid up capital as on............ - --

(i.) Shareholding Pattern Not Provided Required

(j.) Commitment letter for contribution

Not Provided Required

(k.) SPV specific A/c Account No: 734201011004089 (Vijaya Bank)

--

(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation

Awareness Camp Organized --

(m.) Technical Institution CEPET, Ahmedabad --

(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.

Not Provided Required

(o.)

(a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose

20KW --

(b) Water 5000 Ltr/ day --

(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities - --

Page 11: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

6

4. Implement Arrangements

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(a.) Implementing Agency Center for Entrepreneurship Development CED, Government of Gujarat Gandhinagar

--

(b.) Fund receiving Agency Center for Entrepreneurship Development CED, Government of Gujarat Gandhinagar

--

(c.) Implementation Period 18 Months 24 months from date of issuance of final approval letter.

(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations

DPR appraised by SLSC meeting held in Gandhi Nagar, Guajarat on 04.05.18 under chairmanship of Commissioner , MSME, Govt. of Gujarat

--

(e.) Comments of Technical Division

- --

(f.) Approval of Technical Committee

- TEAC recommended the proposal

(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:

- --

(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)

- --

5. Financial Analysis of CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(a.) BEP 31.41% --

(b.) IRR, Payback period 21% --

(c.) DSCR - --

(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)

28.43% --

(e.) NPV Rs. 212.55 lakh --

(f.) DER Not Applicable --

(g.) Sensitivity Analysis - --

(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State

This is the first Plastic Processing woman (SC) Cluster which is approved by government of Gujarat.

--

6. Proposed Project Cost:

S. No. Particulars Amount 1 Land and Building --

2 Plant & Machinery including Installation, Taxes/duties, Contingencies, etc.

388.43

3 Misc. Fixed Assets 15.50 4 Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 8.50 5 Margin money for Working Capital 15.00

Total Project Cost 427.43

Page 12: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

7

7. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Percentage Amount

1 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 90.00 384.68

2 SPV contribution 10.00 42.75

Total 100.00 427.43

8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)

(Rs. In Lakh)

SR.NO. Name of Machinery QTY

Unit

Basic

Price

Rate

of

GST

GST Total Cost

1 Yarn Plant (Monofilament) 1 76.50 18% 13.77 90.27

2 Servo Injection Molding 1 17.00 18% 3.06 20.06

3 Extrusion blow molding 1 17.00 18% 3.06 20.06

4 Z lion 6325 cloth brush 1 178.00 18% 32.04 210.04

5 Die and Mold 1 25.00 18% 4.50 29.50

Total 369.93

Contingencies @ 5% 18.50

Total Cost of Equipment 388.43

9. Observations:

(A) Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:

(i) Registered land document in the name of SPV for a minimum period of 30 years.

(ii) Details of shareholding pattern of SPV members.

(iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.

(iv) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.

(v) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution.

(vi) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilise at least 60 percent of

installed capacity.

(vii) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the escalation cost, if

any, over and above the approved project cost.

(viii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are

Micro / SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be

(ix) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.

(x) Documentary proof from SPV for utilisation of CFC facilities by at least 51% of

the cluster members.

(B) A minimum of 10% contribution from Government of Gujarat towards the project is

required.

10. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up Common

Facility Centre (CFC) in Plastic Products Cluster, Nava Junction Road, Surendra Nagar, Gujarat.

*********

Page 13: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

8

Agenda No.50.3.2: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up of Common Facility

Centre (CFC) in Food Processing, Sabarkanth, Gujarat.

Background

(i) The proposal was recommended by State Level Steering Committee (SLSC) in its

meeting held on 04.05.18.

(ii) Proposal was received from MSME-DI, Ahmedabad, vide online application ref. No.

13958 dated 07.02.19.

(iii) Proposal along with DPR was forwarded by MSME-DI, Ahmadabad vide letter dated

28.02.19

(iv) Proposal was deliberated by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its

64th

& 65th

meetings held on 05.03.19 and 13.06.19 respectively and recommended

the same to place before Steering Committee for In-principle approval.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Basic Information of Cluster

Name of Cluster : Food Processing

District : Sabarkanth

Location of Cluster : Bhiloda, Arvalli

Lok Sabha Constituency : Sabarkantha

Main Product : Khakhra and Papad

No. of Enterprises including

break up (Micro, Small,

Medium):

Micro: 60

Turnover for the last five years

Year (Rs. in crore)

2013-14 : 12.16

2014-15 : 14.30

2015-16 : 16.83

2016-17 : 19.13

2017-18 : 22.50

Exports for the last five years : Nil

Employment in Cluster : 330 Nos

Technology Details : Currently units in the cluster are using conventional

technology and manual process, an upgraded technology is

required.

Whether DS Conducted : Yes

Main findings of DSR : The diagnostic study recommended the establishment of a

common facility centre.

Main Problems of Cluster : Non Availability of Advanced Technology

Non Availability quality control and testing methods as

per international standard

Non Availability of trained manpower.

Other Information : NA

Page 14: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

9

2. Information about Proposed CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(a.) Justification for CFC To have Advance Technology to improve the quality and reduce the cost of final product.

--

(b.) Location of CFC Masota, Ta: Vijaynagar, Sabarkantha

% age of units in radius of 5km

45

% age of units in radius of 10km

15

(c.) Land for CFC

i. Whether land acquired No Registered land document in the name of SPV is required.

ii. Title is in name of Shree Raj Foundation

iii. Valuation and its basis Not Applicable

iv. Land is sufficient Yes

v. Change of land use NA

vi. If on lease, duration of lease

31 Year

vii Whether lease is legally tenable

Yes

(d.) Total Building area 12917 sqft --

(e.) Rate of construction of building

Rs. 2000/ Sq. Ft. --

(f.) Main Facility Proposed Advanced Technology Machines Quality control and Testing Facility

--

(g.) Prod capacity of CFC Provided --

(h.) Major Outputs/Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)

Parameter Before CFC

After CFC

Units (in Nos) 60 175 Production (Kg) 900.00 3500.00 Turn Over (Rs.in Cr)

22.50 87.50

Employment (Nos.)

330 1225

Profit (Rs. In Cr) 1.95 8.75 Export (Rs. In Cr)

0.00 0.20

(i.) Pollution clearance required or not

Not Provided Required

(j.) Man Power in CFC - --

(k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)

-

--

Page 15: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

10

3. Information about SPV

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(a.) Name and Address Shree Raj Foundation Address-Pandya Vas, Ta: Bhiloda Dist: Aravalli

--

(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)

Trust under Article 58(a) --

(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV

Not Provided --

(d.) Date of formation of SPV 09.10.98 -

(e.) Number of Members 40 --

(f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted

Provided -

(g.) Authorized Share Capital Rs. 44,29,200/- --

(h.) Paid up capital - --

(i.) Shareholding Pattern - Required

(j.) Commitment letter for contribution

Not Provided Required

(k.) SPV specific A/c Account Number: 028610009409 (Dena Bank

--

(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation

- --

(m.) Technical Institution Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India EDII Gandhinagar

--

(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.

Not Provided Required

(o.)

(a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose

- --

(b) Water 500 Ltr/day --

(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities - --

4. Implement Arrangements

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(a.) Implementing Agency Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India EDII Gandhinagar

--

(b.) Fund receiving Agency Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India EDII Gandhinagar

--

(c.) Implementation Period 24 Months 24 Months from

Page 16: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

11

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

issuance of Final Approval Letter

(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations

DPR appraised by SLSC meeting held in Gandhi Nagar, Gujarat on 04.05.18 under chairmanship of Commissioner, MSME, Govt. of Gujarat

--

(e.) Comments of Technical Division

- --

(f.) Approval of Technical Committee

- TEAC recommended the proposal

(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:

- --

(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)

Provided --

5. Financial Analysis of CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(a.) BEP 41.68% --

(b.) IRR, Payback period IRR @ 20.20% Pay Back Period : 4.34 Years

--

(c.) DSCR - --

(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)

11.36% --

(e.) NPV 10%, Rs. 150.61 Lakh. --

(f.) DER - --

(g.) Sensitivity Analysis Provided --

(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State

This is the first food Processing CFC Cluster which has already provided in State committee and awaited for approval.

--

6. Proposed Project Cost:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Total Cost

1 Land and Building 0.00

2 Plant & Machinery (including Installation, Taxes/duties, Contingencies)

203.60

3 Misc. Fixed Assets 28.30

4 Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 5.00

5 Margin money for Working Capital 15.07

Total Project Cost 251.97

Page 17: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

12

7. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars %age Amount

1 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 90.00 226.77

2 SPV contribution 10.00 25.20

Total 100.00 251.97

8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Name of Machinery QTY Unit Basic

Price

GST GST Total Cost

1 Papad Machine 1 59.33 18% 10.68 70.01

2 Khakhara Machine 1 80.00 18% 14.40 94.40

3 Packaging Machine 1 15.00 18% 2.70 17.70

4 Testing Equipment 1 10.00 18% 1.80 11.80

Total 193.91

Contingencies @ 5% 9.70

Total Cost of Equipment 203.60

9. Observations:

(A) Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:

(i) Registered land document in the name of SPV for a minimum period of 30 years.

(ii) Details of shareholding pattern of SPV members.

(iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.

(iv) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.

(v) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution.

(vi) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilise at least 60 percent of

installed capacity.

(vii) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the escalation cost, if

any, over and above the approved project cost.

(viii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are

Micro / SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be.

(ix) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.

(x) Documentary proof from SPV for utilisation of CFC facilities by at least 51% of

the cluster members.

(xi) Commitment letter from Government of Gujarat for their contribution.

(B) A minimum of 10% contribution from Government of Gujarat towards the project is

required.

10. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up Common

Facility Centre (CFC) in Food Processing, Sabarkanth, Gujarat.

*********

Page 18: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

13

Agenda No.50.3.3: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up Common Facility

Centre (CFC) in Packaging Cluster, Kadi, Mehsana, Gujarat.

Background

The proposal was recommended by State Level Project Steering Committee (SLPSC)

held on 04.05.18.

Proposal was received from Government of Gujarat vide online ref. No. 13826 dated

07.01.19 & recommended by MSME-DI, Ahmedabad.

Proposal along with Focus Report & DPR was forwarded by MSME-DI, Ahmadabad

vide letter dated 28.02.19

Proposal was deliberated by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 64th

& 65th

meetings held on 05.03.19 & 13.06.19 respectively and recommended the same to

place before Steering Committee for In-principle approval.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Basic Information of Cluster

Name of Cluster : Packaging Cluster

District : Mehsana

Location of Cluster : Kadi

Lok Sabha Constituency : Mahesana

Main Product : Corrugated Box Packaging

No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium)

Micro :153 Small : 22 Total : 175

Turnover for the last five years

Year (Rs. in crore) 2012-13 : 66.13 2013-14 : 73.48 2014-15 : 81.64 2015-16 : 90.72 2016-17 : 100.8

Exports for the last five years

Nil

Employment in Cluster : 1750 Nos.

Technology Details : Currently units in the cluster are using conventional technology, advance and upgraded technology is required.

Whether DS Conducted : Yes

Main findings of DSR : Advanced Technology is required.

Main Problems of Cluster :

No availability of Advanced Technology. Micro and Small units have less export opportunity compare

to large and medium units.

2. Information about Proposed CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(a.) Justification for CFC To have facilities like Advance Technology & higher Export opportunities.

--

Page 19: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

14

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(b.) Location of CFC Shrimali vas, Village- Nanikadi, Taluka- Kadi, Dis- Mahesana

--

% age of units in radius of 5km

120 --

% age of units in radius of 10km

80 --

(c.) Land for CFC

i. Whether land acquired Land on Lease basis Registered land document in the name of SPV for a minimum period of 30 years is required.

ii. Title is in name of Madhuram Packaging Cluster

iii. Valuation and its basis

NA

iv. Land is sufficient Yes

v. Change of land use NA

vi. If on lease, duration of lease

31 Year

vii Whether lease is legally tenable

Yes

(d.) Total Building area 1500 sq ft --

(e.) Rate of construction of building

- --

(f.) Main Facility Proposed New Technology Up gradation for 5 ply Corrugated Box Packaging.

--

(g.) Prod capacity of CFC - --

(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/domestic sales and direct/ indirect employment, etc.)

Parameter Before CFC

After CFC

No. of Units 175 540 Production (Mt.) 21,000 84,240 Turn Over ( in Cr) 126.0 463.0 Employment(No.) 1750 6480 Profit (Rs in cr) 7.80 32.40

(i.) Pollution clearance required or not

Not Provided Required

(j.) Man Power in CFC 43Nos --

(k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)

Provided --

3. Information about SPV

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(a.) Name and Address Madhuram Packaging Cluster, Shrimali vas, Village- Nanikadi, Taluka- Kadi, Dis- Mahesana

--

(b.) Nature of Trust under Article 58(a) --

Page 20: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

15

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

SPV(company or Society or Trust)

(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV

Not Provided --

(d.) Date of formation of SPV

23.10.18 --

(e.) Number of Members 100 Nos --

(f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted

Provided --

(g.) Authorized Share Capital

- --

(h.) Paid up capital - --

(i.) Shareholding Pattern Rs. 82,397 / Member --

(j.) Commitment letter for contribution

Not Provided Required

(k.) SPV specific A/c Account No: 55340200000145 (Bank of Baroda)

--

(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation

Not Provided Required

(m.) Technical Institution - -

(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.

Not Provided Required

(o.)

(a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose

30.0 KW --

(b) Water 2000Ltr/ day --

(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities

- --

4. Implement Arrangements

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(a.) Implementing Agency Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India EDII Gandhinagar

As per guidelines

(b.) Fund receiving Agency

Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India EDII Gandhinagar

(c.) Implementation Period 18 Months 24 Months from issuance

Page 21: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

16

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

of Final Approval Letter

(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations

DPR appraised by SLSC meeting held in Gandhi Nagar, Guajarat on 04.05.18 under chairmanship of Commissioner , MSME, Govt. of Gujarat.

--

(e.) Comments of Technical Division

- --

(f.) Approval of Technical Committee

- TEAC recommended the proposal

(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:

- --

(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)

Provided --

5. Financial Analysis of CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(a.) BEP 38.25% --

(b.) IRR, Payback period IRR @ 20.56% Pay Back Period comes at 4.3 Years

--

(c.) DSCR - --

(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)

28.12% --

(e.) NPV NPV @ 10% , Rs. 397.18 Lakh. --

(f.) DER - --

(g.) Sensitivity Analysis Provided --

(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State

This is the first paper packaging CFC Cluster which has already provided in State committee and awaited for approval

--

6. Proposed Project Cost:

(Rs. in Lakh)

S. No. Particulars Total Cost

1 Land and Building 0.0

2 Plant & Machinery including Installation, Taxes/duties, Contingencies,

etc. 734.11

3 Misc. Fixed Assets 53.61

4 Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 16.25

5 Margin money for Working Capital 20.00

Total Project Cost 823.97

Page 22: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

17

7. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars %age Amount

1 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 90.00 741.57

2 SPV contribution 10.00 82.40

Total 100.00 823.97

8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)

(Rs. in lakh)

SR.NO. Name of Machinery QTY Unit Basic Price

GST+ Import Duties

GST+ Import Duties Cost

Total Cost

1 5 layer corrugated paper board auto machine

1 537.50 18% 96.75 634.25

2 Boiler 1 25.00 18% 4.50 29.50

3 Laboratory Equipment 1 30.00 18% 5.40 35.40

Total 699.15

Contingencies @ 5% 34.96

Total Cost of Equipment 734.11

9. Observations:

(A) Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:

(i) Registered lease deed in the name of SPV for a minimum period of 30 years.

(ii) Details of shareholding pattern of SPV members.

(iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.

(iv) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.

(v) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution.

(vi) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilise at least 60 percent of

installed capacity.

(vii) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the escalation cost, if any,

over and above the approved project cost.

(viii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro

/ SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be

(ix) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.

(x) Documentary proof from SPV for utilisation of CFC facilities by at least 51% of the

cluster members.

(B) A minimum of 10% contribution from Government of Gujarat towards the project is

required.

10. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up Common

Facility Centre (CFC) in Packaging Cluster, Kadi, Mehsana, Gujarat.

*********

Page 23: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

18

Agenda No.50.3.4: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up Common Facility

Centre (CFC) in Engineering Cluster, Varachha, Surat, Gujarat.

The proposal was recommended by State Level Project Steering Committee in its

meeting held on 30.05.19.

Proposal was received from Government of Gujarat vide online ref. No. 14197 dated

10.04.19 & recommended by MSME-DI, Ahmedabad.

Proposal along with Focus Report & DPR was forwarded by MSME-DI, Ahmadabad

vide letter dated 07.06.19

Proposal was deliberated by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 65th

Meeting held on 13.06.19 and recommended the same to place before Steering Committee

for In-principle approval.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Basic Information of Cluster

Name of Cluster : Engineering Cluster

District : Surat

Location of Cluster : Varachha

Lok Sabha Constituency : Surat

Main Product : Engineering

No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium)

Micro:118 & Small: 32 Total: 150

Turnover for the last five years

Year (Rs. in crore) 2013-14 : 79.72 2014-15 : 88.58 2015-16 : 98.42 2016-17 : 109.35 2017-18 : 121.50

Exports(Rs in Crore) for the last five years

Nil

Employment in Cluster : 1950 nos.

Technology Details : Currently units in the cluster are using conventional technology for processing of Diamond, advance and upgraded technology is required.

Whether DS Conducted : Yes

Main findings of DSR : Advanced Machines and Tarining Centre is required for Cluster Units.

Main Problems of Cluster : No availability of Advanced Machinery. Non availability of Training Centre. Non availability Quality Control Facility.

2. Information about Proposed CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

(a.) Justification for CFC To have facilities like Advance Technology and Training Centre.

--

(b.) Location of CFC 307 Ganganagar Nr Suvidha House Simada

Page 24: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

19

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

Nana Varachha Gam, Surat

% age of units in radius of 5km

80

% age of units in radius of 10km

20

(c.) Land for CFC

i. Whether land acquired Yet to acquired Registered land

documents in the

name of SPV, in

case of leased

land, the lease

period should be

for a minimum of

30 years.

ii. Title is in name of Jivandhara Engineering Tool Room Training Centre Foundation

iii. Valuation and its basis NA

iv. Land is sufficient NA

v. Change of land use No

vi. If on lease, duration of lease

NA

vii Whether lease is legally tenable

NA

(d.) Total Building area NA --

(e.) Rate of construction of building

NA --

(f.) Main Facility Proposed Vertical Milling Centre Lathe Machine. Horizontal Milling Centre Training Centre in Tool Engineering,

CAD/CAM Jig Boring etc.

--

(g.) Prod capacity of CFC - --

(h.) Major Outputs /Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/ domestic sales and direct /indirect employment, etc.)

Parameter Before CFC

After CFC

Nos. of units (Numbers) 150 450 Turnover (Rs. in Cr) 121.50 486.00 Profit (Rs. in Cr) 5.25 24.75 Employment (in Nos) 1950 7650

(i.) Pollution clearance required or not

Not Provided Required

(j.) Man Power in CFC 62 --

(k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)

Provided --

3. Information about SPV

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

(a.) Name and Address Jivandhara Engineering Tool Room Training Centre Foundation

-

(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)

Section 8 Company -

(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV

Yet to be decided -

Page 25: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

20

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

(d.) Date of formation of SPV 30.03.19 -

(e.) Number of Members 115 -

(f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted

Provided -

(g.) Authorized Share Capital Rs. 1,29,26,250/- -

(h.) Paid up capital Rs. 1,29,26,250/- -

(i.) Shareholding Pattern Rs. 112,403/- per unit -

(j.) Commitment letter for contribution

Not Provided Required

(k.) SPV specific A/c Not Provided Required

(l.) Turst Building of SPV,Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to to be highlighted with support documentation

Awareness Camp -

(m.) Technical Institution Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India EDII Gandhinagar

-

(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.

Provided -

(o.)

(a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose

Provided --

(b) Water 75000 Ltr/Annual --

(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities - --

4. Implement Arrangements

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

(a.) Implementing Agency Entrepreneurship Development Institute of

India EDII Gandhinagar

-

(b.) Fund receiving Agency Entrepreneurship Development Institute of

India EDII Gandhinagar

(c.) Implementation Period 18 months 24 Months

(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main

Recommendations

DPR appraised by SLSC meeting held in

Gandhi Nagar, Guajarat on 30.05.19 under

chairmanship of Commissioner , MSME,

Govt. of Guajrat

-

(e.) Comments of Technical

Division

- -

(f.) Approval of Technical

Committee

- TEAC

recommended the

proposal

Page 26: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

21

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

(g.) Comments of Cluster

Development Division:

- -

(h.) Working capital(In-

principle sanction of loan from

a bank, if applicable

arrangement made)

Provided -

5. Financial Analysis of CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA)

Remarks

(a.) BEP 36.44% --

(b.) IRR, Payback period IRR @ 21.88% Pay Back Period comes at

4.6 Years

--

(c.) DSCR - --

(d.) Return on Capital

employed (ROCE)

31.10% --

(e.) NPV NPV @ 10% ,Rs. 710.20 Lakh --

(f.) DER - --

(g.) Sensitivity Analysis Provided --

(h.) Status of CFCs approved

in the State

- --

6. Proposed Project Cost:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Amount

1. Land & Building 0.00

2. Plant & Machinery (including Installation, Taxes/duties,

Contingencies, etc.)

1152.53

3. Misc. fixed assets 92.60

4. Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 27.50

5. Margin money for working capital 20.00

Total 1292.63

7. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Percentage Amount

1 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 90.00 1163.36

2 SPV contribution 10.00 129.27

Total 100.00 1292.63

Page 27: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

22

8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification

(Rs. in lakh)

S .No. Name of Machinery QTY Unit Basic Price

Rate of

GST GST

Total Cost

1

CNC Vertical Milling Machine -simultaneous 3 axis -table size -600X300 mm -travel - X,Y,Z: 450, 300, 350mm

1 35.59 18% 6.41 42.0

2

CNC Vertical Milling Machine -simultaneous -X,Y & Z travel with CNC rotary table -table size-650X350 mm -travel- X,Y,Z: 500, 350, 400 mm

1 44.07 18% 7.93 52.0

3

CNC Horizontal Machining Centre -Pallet table surface 400X400 mm -Axis travel : *Longitudinal - 500mm *Cross - 400mm *Vertical - 400mm

1 101.69 18% 18.30 120.0

4

CNC High Speed Engraving cum Milling Machine -simultaneous 3 axis -work table : 700X600 mm -Axis travel: X-600mrn,Y-500mm, Z-300mm

1 72.03 18% 12.97 85.0

5

CNC Milling Machine X-250mm, Y-250mm, Z-200mm Table Size : 400 x 200 mm Controller : Fanuc

2 33.05 18% 5.95 78.0

6

CNC Lathe -simultaneous 2 axis -swing over bed :- 300 mm -length ofjob :- 450 mm -travel : X-150 mm, Z- 400 mm -No. of tool on Turret :- l2 -slant bed

4 29.38 18% 5.29 138.7

7 Tools & Cutters For CNC Machines In Lot

1 21.19 18% 3.81 25.0

8 Accessories For CNC Machine In Lot 1 12.71 18% 2.29 15.0

9 Vertical Milling Machine -table size - 1600X300 mm -travel -X,Y,Z: 950,250,400 mm

1 12.71 18% 2.29 15.0

10 Vertical Milling Machine -table size - 1300X250 mm -travel -X,Y,Z: 600,225,350 mm

1 9.32 18% 1.68 11.0

11 Horizontal Milling Machine -table size- 1300 X 250 mm -travel -X,Y,Z: 600,225,350 mm

1 8.47 18% 1.52 10.0

12

Universal Milling Machine with Slotting Attachment -table size- 1300 X 250 mm -travel -X,Y,Z: 600,225,350 mm

1 10.17 18% 1.83 12.0

13 Centre Lathe 8 Feet Bed -centre height- 320 mm -admit between centres :- 1000 mm

2 6.78 18% 1.22 16.0

14 Heavy Duty Lathe 14 Feet Bed-centre height- 320 mm-admit between centres :- 1000 mm

2 11.02 18% 1.98 26.0

Page 28: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

23

S .No. Name of Machinery QTY Unit Basic Price

Rate of

GST GST

Total Cost

15

Surface Grinding Machine -table: *working surface : 455X150 mm *longitudinal travel - 460 mm *cross travel - 160 mm -vertical movement of wheel head 280 mm

3 10.17 18% 1.83 36.0

16 Cylindrical Grinding Machine -centre height - 130 mm -centre distance - 500 mm

2 12.71 18% 2.29 30.0

17

Universal Tool & Cutter Grinder -swing with raising block : 300 mm -distance between centres : 700 mm -table travel *longitudinal- 500 mm *cross * 225 mm

2 12.71 18% 2.29 30.0

18

Double Column Hydraulic Press -capacity - 200 T -table size- 750X750 mm -stroke length -275 mm

1 7.63 18% 1.37 9.0

19

Injection Moulding Machine -shot weight - 150 gm -injection pressure - 1800 kglcmz -clamping force - B0 T -distance between tie bars : 380X380 rnm

1 29.66 18% 5.34 35.0

20 CNC Plasma Cutting Machine -105 A Plasma Source -1500 X 3000 Mm2 Bed

1 33.90 18% 6.10 40.0

21

CNC Laser Cutting & Engraving Machine -100 W co2 Reci Brand Tube -1500 X 3000 Mm2 Bed

1 22.03 18% 3.97 26.0

22

Gear Hobbing Machine Max. Dia. of Spur Gear 1/2" - 18" 1" - 30" Max Module 5 8 Max Travel of Hob Side 10" 12"

1 11.86 18% 2.13 14.0

23

Jig Boring Machine Standard Size Table Size - 900 mm x 1000 mm Vertical Travel - 620 mm Voltage 380 V Power 37 - 51 kW Weight 815 kg Automatic Grade

1 15.25 18% 2.75 18.0

24

Hydraulic Shearing Machine Right Squaring arm 600 mm Dimensions : 5100 x 2800 x 3000 mm Left Squaring arm 1000 mm

1 14.41 18% 2.59 17.0

25 Electric Heat Treatment Furnace Material Loading Capacity 0-500 kgMax Temperature (degree Celsius) 1000-1500

1 9.32 18% 1.68 11.0

26 Hydraulic Press 70 Ton 1 7.63 18% 1.37 9.0 27 Mechanical Press 60 Ton 1 10.17 18% 1.83 12.0

Page 29: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

24

S .No. Name of Machinery QTY Unit Basic Price

Rate of

GST GST

Total Cost

28

Spot Welding Machine Suitable For Welding Rod <1mm, 1-2mm, 3-4mm, 2-3mm Throat Depth 150 - 200 mm

5 5.93 18% 1.07 35.0

29 Welding Machine ARC Range of Current 30-300 A Insulation Class Class H

5 1.27 18% 0.23 7.5

30 Welding Machine TIG Phase Three Phase Current (Ampere) 300-400

5 2.12 18% 0.38 12.5

31 Welding Machine MIG Open Circuit Voltage 18 - 42 VDC Current 500-600 A

5 2.54 18% 0.46 15.0

32 Diesel Generator (100 KVA) 1 29.66 18% 5.34 35.0 33 Voltage Stabilizer (25 KVA) 15 3.39 18% 0.61 60.0

Total 1097.65 Contingencies @ 5% 54.88 Total Cost of Equipment 1152.53

9. Observations:

(A) Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:

(i) Registered land documents in the name of SPV, in case of leased land, the lease

period should be for a minimum of 30 years.

(ii) Details of shareholding pattern of SPV members.

(iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.

(iv) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.

(v) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution.

(vi) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilise at least 60 percent of

installed capacity.

(vii) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the escalation cost, if any,

over and above the approved project cost.

(viii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro

/ SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be.

(ix) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.

(x) Documentary proof from SPV for utilisation of CFC facilities by at least 51% of the

cluster members.

(B) A minimum of 10% contribution from Government of Gujarat towards the project is

required.

10. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up Common

Facility Centre (CFC) in Engineering Cluster, Varachha, Surat, Gujarat.

*********

Page 30: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

25

Agenda No.50.3.5: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up Common Facility

Centre (CFC) in Food Processing, Chikhli, Navsari, Gujarat.

Background

The proposal was recommended by State Level Project Steering Committee in its meeting

held on 30.05.19.

Proposal was received from Government of Gujarat vide online ref. No. 14099 dated

04.03.19 & recommended by MSME-DI, Ahmedabad.

Proposal along with Focus Report & DPR was forwarded by MSME-DI, Ahmadabad

vide letter dated 07.06.19

Proposal was considered by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 65th

Meeting held on 13.06.19 and recommended the same to place before Steering Committee

for In-principle approval.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Basic Information of Cluster

Name of Cluster : Food Processing

District : Navsari

Location of Cluster : Chikhli

Lok Sabha Constituency : Navsari

Main Product : Fruit, Honey and Mahuda Processing

No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium)

Micro : 90

Turnover for the last five years

Year (Rs. in crore) 2013-14 : 53.15 2014-15 : 59.05 2015-16 : 65.61 2016-17 : 72.9 2017-18 : 81.00

Exports(Rs in Crore) for the last five years :

Nil

Employment in Cluster : 750 nos.

Technology Details : Currently units in the cluster are using conventional technology; advance and upgraded technology is required.

Whether DS Conducted : Yes

Main findings of DSR : Advanced Machines and quality control facility is required for purposed CFC

Main Problems of Cluster : Lack of adequate quality control and testing methods as per international standards

Non Availability of Advanced Machinery

Other Information : NA

2. Information about Proposed CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(a.) Justification for CFC To have facilities like Quality Control Lab and Advance Machinery

--

Page 31: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

26

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(b.) Location of CFC Village Godthal Taluka Chikhli, District Navsari

% age of units in radius of 5km

25

% age of units in radius of 10km

75

(c.) Land for CFC

i. Whether land acquired No Registered land

documents in the

name of SPV, in case

of leased land, the

lease period should be

for a minimum of 30

years.

ii. Title is in name of Ukabhai Jerambhai Patel

iii. Valuation and its basis NA

iv. Land is sufficient NA

v. Change of land use NA

vi. If on lease, duration of lease

NA

vii Whether lease is legally tenable

NA

(d.) Total Building area(sq ft) NA --

(e.) Rate of construction of building

NA --

(f.) Main Facility Proposed Filtering Pasteurization Moisture Reducing Processing

--

(g.) Prod capacity of CFC Provided --

(h.) Major Outputs/Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/ domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)

Parameter Before CFC

After CFC

Units 90 275 Turn Over ( in Cr) 81.00 371.25 Employment(Nos.) 750 3025

Profit (Rs in cr) 2.70 13.75 Export (Rs in Cr) - 0.50

(i.) Pollution clearance required or not

Not Provided Required

(j.) Man Power in CFC 40 --

(k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)

Provided --

3. Information about SPV

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA)

Remarks

(a.) Name and Address Brotherhood Village Godthal Taluka

Chikhli, District Navsari. --

(b.) Nature of SPV (company

or Society or Trust)

Trust under Article 58(a) --

Page 32: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

27

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA)

Remarks

(c.) Name of the state Govt.

and MSME officials in SPV

Not Provided --

(d.) Date of formation of

SPV

21.06.99 --

(e.) Number of Members 90 --

(f.) Bye Laws or MA and

AOA submitted

Provided --

(g.) Authorized Share

Capital

- --

(h.) Paid up capital - --

(i.) Shareholding Pattern Rs. 1,08,912/- / member --

(j.) Commitment letter for

contribution

Not Provided Required

(k.) SPV specific A/c Account No: 10692116218 (SBI) --

(l.) Trust Building of SPV,

Previous track record of co-

operative initiatives pursued

by SPV members need to be

highlighted with support

documentation

- --

(m.) Technical Institution Entrepreneurship Development Institute

of India EDII Gandhinagar

-

(n.) CFC may be utilised by

SPV members as also others

in a cluster. However,

evidence should be furnished

with regard to SPV member

ability to utilise at least 60

percent of installed capacity.

Provided -

(o.)

(a) Power requirement for

commercial/domestic

purpose

76 KW --

(b) Water 5000 LTR /day --

(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities - --

4. Implement Arrangements

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(a.) Implementing Agency Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India EDII Gandhinagar

-

Page 33: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

28

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(b.) Fund receiving Agency Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India EDII Gandhinagar

(c.) Implementation Period 18 Month 24 Months

(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations

DPR appraised by SLSC meeting held in Gandhi Nagar, Guajarat on 30.05.19 under chairmanship of Commissioner , MSME, Govt. of Gujarat

-

(e.) Comments of Technical Division

- -

(f.) Approval of Technical Committee

- TEAC recommended the proposal

(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:

- -

(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)

Not required from bank --

5. Financial Analysis of CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(a.) BEP 37.79% --

(b.) IRR, Payback period IRR @ 18.52% Pay Back Period comes at 4.59Years

--

(c.) DSCR - --

(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)

25.23% --

(e.) NPV NPV @ 10% comes Rs. Rs. 184.94 Lakh. --

(f.) DER - --

(g.) Sensitivity Analysis Provided --

(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State

This is the first food processing CFC Cluster by ST/ SC entrepreneurs which has already provided in State committee and awaited for approval.

--

6. Proposed Project Cost:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Amount

1 Land and Building --

2 Plant & Machinery including Installation, Taxes/duties,

Contingencies, etc. 429.64

3 Misc. Fixed Assets 26.00

4 Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 14.50

5 Margin money for Working Capital 20.00

Total 490.14

Page 34: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

29

7. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Percentage Amount

1 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 90.00 441.12

2 SPV contribution 10.00 49.02

Total 100.00 490.14

8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)

(Rs. in lakh)

SNO. Name of Machinery QTY Unit Basic Price

Rate of GST

GST Total Cost

1 Multi Fruit Processing Plant 1 218.26 18% 39.29 257.55

2 Honey Processing Plant 1 73.50 18% 13.23 86.73

3 Mahuda Processing Plant 1 20.00 18% 3.60 23.60

4 Testing Equipment 1 10.00 18% 1.80 11.80

5 Cold Storage 1 25.00 18% 4.50 29.50

Total 409.18

Contingencies @ 5% 20.46

Total Cost of Equipments 429.64

9. Observations:

(A) Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:

(i) Registered land documents in the name of SPV, in case of leased land, the lease

period should be for a minimum of 30 years.

(ii) Details of shareholding pattern of SPV members.

(iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.

(iv) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.

(v) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution.

(vi) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilise at least 60 percent of

installed capacity.

(vii) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the escalation cost, if any,

over and above the approved project cost.

(viii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro

/ SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be

(ix) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.

(x) Documentary proof from SPV for utilisation of CFC facilities by at least 51% of the

cluster members.

(B) A minimum of 10% contribution from Government of Gujarat towards the project is

required.

10. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up Common

Facility Centre (CFC) in Food Processing, Chikhli, Navsari, Gujarat.

*********

Page 35: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

30

Agenda No.50.3.6: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up of Common Facility

Centre (CFC) in Diamond Cluster, Saraspur, Ahmedabad, Gujarat.

Background

The proposal was recommended by State Level Project Steering Committee in its meeting

held on 30.05.19.

Proposal was received from Government of Gujarat vide online ref. No. 14107 dated

05.03.19 & recommended by MSME-DI, Ahmedabad.

Proposal along with Focus Report & DPR was forwarded by MSME-DI, Ahmadabad

vide letter dated 07.06.19

Proposal was deliberated by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 65th

Meeting held on 13.06.19 and recommended the same to place before Steering

Committee for In-principle approval.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Basic Information of Cluster

Name of Cluster : Diamond Cluster

District : Ahmedabad

Location of Cluster : Saraspur

Lok Sabha Constituency : Ahmedabad east

Main Product : Diamond

No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium)

Micro: 110

Turnover for the last five years

Year Amount (Rs. in crore)

2013-14 : 12.48 2014-15 : 13.86 2015-16 : 15.40 2016-17 : 17.11 2017-18 : 19.01

Exports for the last five years :

Year Amount (Rs. in crore)

2013-14 : - 2014-15 : - 2015-16 : - 2016-17 : - 2017-18 : 1.2

Employment in Cluster : 900 Persons

Technology Details : Currently units in the cluster are using conventional technology for processing of Diamond, advance and upgraded technology is required.

Whether DS Conducted : Yes

Main findings of DSR : Advanced Machines for processing of diamond is required for purposed CFC

Main Problems of Cluster :

Non availability of advanced machine for diamond cutting process.

Weak marketing linkages absence of organized marketing channels.

Micro and small units have less export opportunity compare to large and medium units.

Other Information : NA

Page 36: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

31

2. Information about Proposed CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(a.) Justification for CFC To have facilities like Advance Technology for diamond processing

--

(b.) Location of CFC 6-Pushpdeep Industrial Hub and Arcade, Saraspur, Ahmedabad

% age of units in radius of 5km

95

% age of units in radius of 10km

5

(c.) Land for CFC

i. Whether land acquired Yes Registered land document in the name of SPV is required.

ii. Title is in name of Diamond Trust Ahmedabad

iii. Valuation and its basis Land Purchased at Cost of Rs 50 lakh.

iv. Land is sufficient Yes

v. Change of land use No

vi. If on lease, duration of lease

NA

vii Whether lease is legally tenable

NA

(d.) Total Building area(sq ft) 800 Square feet --

(e.) Rate of construction of building

Rs.1500/sq. feet --

(f.) Main Facility Proposed Planning Scanning. Designing Testing Laser Cutting

--

(g.) Prod capacity of CFC - --

(h.) Major Outputs/Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)

S.

No.

Parameter Before

intervention

After

Intervention

1. Units (Numbers) 110 320

2 Production (carat) 158,400 576,000

3 Turn Over (Rs. In Cr) 19.01 63.36

4 Employment

(Numbers) 900 3250

5 Profit (Rs. In cr) 3.30 16.00

6 Export (Rs. In Lakhs) 1.20 16.00

(i.) Pollution clearance required or not

Not Provided Required

(j.) Man Power in CFC 18 --

(k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)

Provided --

Page 37: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

32

3. Information about SPV

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(a.) Name and Address Name- Diamond Trust Ahmedabad ADDRESS-6 pushpdeep Industrial Hub and Arcade, Saraspur, Ahmedabad

--

(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)

Trust under Article 58(a) --

(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV

Not Provided --

(d.) Date of formation of SPV 21.06.18 -

(e.) Number of Members 55 Persons --

(f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted

Provided -

(g.) Authorized Share Capital - --

(h.) Paid up capital - --

(i.) Shareholding Pattern - Required

(j.) Commitment letter for contribution

Not Provided Required

(k.) SPV specific A/c Account No: 38461381670 (SBI) --

(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation

- --

(m.) Technical Institution Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India EDII Gandhinagar

--

(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.

- Required

(o.)

(a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose

20 KW --

(b) Water 50000 Ltr/ Annum --

(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities NA --

4. Implement Arrangements

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(a.) Implementing Agency Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India EDII Gandhinagar, Guajrat

-

(b.) Fund receiving Agency Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India EDII Gandhinagar, Guajrat

-

(c.) Implementation Period 24 Months 24 Months from

Page 38: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

33

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

issuance of Final Approval Letter

(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations

DPR appraised by SLSC meeting held in Gandhi Nagar, Guajarat on 30.05.19 under chairmanship of Commissioner , MSME, Govt. of Gujarat

Received

(e.) Comments of Technical Division

The Project is Technically feasible and it is considered to be economically viable

--

(f.) Approval of Technical Committee

The project is been approved by technical committee

TEAC recommended the proposal

(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:

The project is been approved by Cluster development division

--

(h.) Working capital (In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)

not Required from Bank --

5. Financial Analysis of CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(a.) BEP 32.86 %, on third years at 70% of capacity utilization.

--

(b.) IRR, Payback period 17.55% , Pay Back Period : 4.8Years --

(c.) DSCR - --

(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)

25.44% --

(e.) NPV 10% (Rs. 166.18 Lakh) --

(f.) DER - --

(g.) Sensitivity Analysis Provided --

(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State

- --

6. Proposed Project Cost:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Amount

1. Land and Building 50.00

2. Plant & Machinery including Installation, Taxes/duties,

Contingencies, etc. 414.24

3. Misc. Fixed Assets 11.00

4. Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 11.50

5. Margin money for Working Capital 9.00

Total 495.74

7. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Percentage Amount

1 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 90 446.16

2 SPV contribution 10 49.58

Total 100 495.74

Page 39: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

34

8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)

(Rs. in lakh)

SNO. Name of Machinery QTY Unit Basic

Price Rate of GST

GST Total Cost

1 Diamond Testing and Scanning machine

1 128.52 18% 23.13 151.65

2 Diamond galaxy planning Machine

1 120.00 18% 21.60 141.60

3 Diamond Laser Machine (mini) 1 80.00 18% 14.40 94.40

4 Testing Equipment 1 5.00 18% 0.90 5.90

Total

393.55

Contingencies @ 5%

20.71

Total Cost of Machine & Equipment 414.24

9. Observations:

(A) Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:

(i) Registered land documents with clear title in the name of SPV.

(ii) Details of shareholding pattern of SPV members.

(iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.

(iv) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.

(v) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution.

(vi) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilise at least 60 percent of

installed capacity.

(vii) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the escalation cost, if any,

over and above the approved project cost.

(viii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro

/ SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be

(ix) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.

(x) Documentary proof from SPV for utilisation of CFC facilities by at least 51% of the

cluster members.

(B) A minimum of 10% contribution from Government of Gujarat towards the project is

required.

10. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up Common

Facility Centre (CFC) in Diamond Cluster, Saraspur, Ahmedabad, Gujarat.

*********

Page 40: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

35

Agenda No. 50.3.7: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up of Common Facility

Centre (CFC) in Brass & Bronze Cluster, Kariyatpur, Hazaribagh,

Jharkhand.

Background

The proposal was approved by State Level Steering Committee (SLSC) of Government

of Jharkhand held on 29.01.19.

The proposal was received from Jharkhand Industrial Infrastructure Development

Corporation (JIIDCO), vide online ref. No:- 13946 dated 03.02.19 & recommended by

MSME-DI, Ranchi.

Vide letter dated 13.03.19, MSME-DI, Ranchi has forwarded the Detailed Project Report

(DPR) along with Focus Report.

Proposal was considered by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 65th

meeting held on 13.06.19 and recommended the proposal to place before Steering

Committee for In-principle approval.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Basic Information of Cluster

Name of Cluster Brass & Bronze Cluster

District Hazaribagh

Location of Cluster Kariyatpur

Lok Sabha Constituency Hazaribagh

Main Product

Bronze Plate, Brass Plate, Bronze Bowl, Brass Ladle (Kalchul), Pan (Kadhai), Brass Mug & Glass, Crock Pot (Dekchi) and other Brass & Bronze Utensils

No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium)

Micro- 61

Turnover for the last five years Year (Rs. in crore) 2013-2014 : Rs. 3.80 2014-2015 : Rs. 4.00 2015-2016 : Rs. 4.40 2016-2017 : Rs. 4.60 2017-2018 : Rs. 5.00

Exports for the last five years Nil

Employment in Cluster Direct- 300 & Indirect- 450

Technology Details Traditional Tools and Techniques

Whether DS Conducted Diagnostic Study was conducted by Directorate of Industries

Main findings of DSR Kariyatpur (located in Aspirational District Hazaribagh) is being the major production center of houseware and artifacts in the state needs to evolve itself as per the changing market conditions and increasing demand of finished products. Therefore, in order to bring about production efficiency and growth across MSEs in the cluster, it is very essential to initiate collective mechanisms not only through soft intervention activities but also by providing them with proper common facilities centers equipped with modern technology

Main Problems of Cluster Low Production capacity Lack of basic Infrastructure Non availability of modern manufacturing facilities and

Page 41: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

36

manual designing of products leading to sub optimal quality

Other Information The cluster falls under one the Aspirational district Hazaribagh, as identified by Government think tank NITI Aayog

2. Information about Proposed CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

(a.) Justification for CFC The MSEs in cluster lack advanced production machineries for manufacturing as their investment capacity is limited and awareness level is low. Equipment related to semi automatic processing and better standards, specifications, advance designing are not present even in a single unit in the cluster.

--

(b.) Location of CFC Kariyatpur, Hazaribagh --

% age of units in radius of 5km

70 --

% age of units in radius of 10km

90 --

(c.) Land for CFC

i. Whether land acquired In process of acquiring land Registered land

documents in the

name of SPV, in

case of leased

land, the lease

period should be

for a minimum of

30 years.

ii. Title is in name of Kariyatpur Brass Manufacturing Pvt. Ltd

iii. Valuation and its basis Local administration land price

iv. Land is sufficient Yes

v. Change of land use Not required, it is Industrial land

vi. If on lease, duration of lease

Lease for 15 years; extendable for another 15 years

vii Whether lease is legally tenable

yes

(d.) Total Building area(sq ft) 5000 --

(e.) Rate of construction of building

Rs 800 Sqft --

(f.) Main Facility Proposed In house testing facility Machine & Tool center

Training & Skill Development Center Basic Infrastructure facilities

--

(g.) Prod capacity of CFC -- Required

(h.) Major Outputs/Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)

Parameters Before CFC After CFC No. of units 61 70 Turnover (Rs. in crore) 5.00 8.00 Export (Rs. in crore) Nil 1.00 Employment 300 450

(i.) Pollution clearance required or not

Yes. Consent Establish and Consent to operate would be applied after obtaining In- principle approval

Required.

(j.) Man Power in CFC 51 --

Page 42: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

37

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

(k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets (service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)

User charges will be levied Required

3. Information about SPV

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

(a.) Name and Address Kariyatpur Brass Manufacturing Private

Limited Certificate of

SPV’s formation

is required.

(b.) Nature of SPV (company

or Society or Trust)

Registered under Companies act 2013 --

(c.) Name of the state Govt.

and MSME officials in SPV

Director, Industries cum Managing Director

JIIDCO and Director MSME-DI, Ranchi --

(d.) Date of formation of SPV 28th

January 2019 --

(e.) Number of Members 34

(f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA

submitted

Under preparation Required

(g.) Authorized Share Capital 10,000 --

(h.) Paid up capital 1,00,000 --

(i.) Shareholding Pattern Not more than 10% each Required

(j.) Commitment letter for

contribution

-- Required

(k.) SPV specific A/c To be opened once the In principle approval

obtained Required

(l.) Trust Building of SPV,

Previous track record of co-

operative initiatives pursued by

SPV members need to be

highlighted with support

documentation

Already been done in Soft Intervention

phase

--

(m.) Technical Institution Tool Room Dhanbad --

(n.) CFC may be utilised by

SPV members as also others in

a cluster. However, evidence

should be furnished with

regard to SPV member ability

to utilise at least 60 percent of

installed capacity.

61 cluster members and it will be open for

surrounding industry (All cluster members

have given the written commitment to

utilize the minimum 80% installed capacity

of CFC, once the CFC is operationalized.

Received

(o.)

(a) Power requirement for

commercial/domestic purpose

250 --

(b) Water 15000 --

Page 43: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

38

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities 25 liter diesel per day --

4. Implement Arrangements

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

(a.) Implementing Agency Jharkhand Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation (JIIDCO)

As per guidelines

(b.) Fund receiving Agency Jharkhand Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation (JIIDCO)

(c.) Implementation Period 24 months --

(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations

SIDBI appraisal will be done after receiving in principle approval from Ministry of MSME

Required

(e.) Comments of Technical Division

NA --

(f.) Approval of Technical Committee

NA TEAC recommended the proposal.

(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:

NA --

(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)

NA --

5. Financial Analysis of CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

(a.) BEP 45.7% --

(b.) IRR, Payback period 23.51%, 6th year --

(c.) DSCR NA --

(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)

124.98%

(e.) NPV 254.13 --

(f.) DER NA --

(g.) Sensitivity Analysis IRR in between 26.11% to 21.00% --

(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State

Two CFCs got in principle approvals --

6. Proposed Project Cost:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Total Project Cost

(i) Land 10.00

(ii) Building & other civil works 40.00

(iii) Plant & Machinery (including electrification) 242.74

(iv) Misc. Fixed Assets 12.23

(v) Preliminary expenses 11.50

(vi) Pre-operative expenses 22.10

Page 44: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

39

S. No. Particulars Total Project Cost

(vii) Contingency (2% on building & 5% on P&M) 13.55

(viii) Margin money for working capital 2.18

Total Project Cost 354.30

7. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Amount

(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 273.87

(ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Jharkhand 41.08

(iii) SPV contribution 39.35

Total 354.30

8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Description Quantity Amount

1. Two Hi Hot Rolling Mill Motor 60HP 1 14.52

2. Four Hi Cold Rolling Mill Motor 60HP 1 30.25

3. Deep Drawing Mechanical Press (German Type) Motor

20HP

2 24.20

4. Circle Cutting Machine Motor 5 HP with 30 inch Dia 1 16.94

5. Circle Cutting Machine Motor 5 HP with 36 inch Dia 1 18.15

6. Spinning Lathe Motor 2 HP 1 2.42

7. Spinning Lathe Motor 1 HP 1 2.42

8. General Purpose Lathe Motor 2HP 1 1.82

9. Oil Fired Pit Furnace 1 14.52

10. Electronic Weighing machine with 500kg capacity 1 0.85

11. Hand Tools, Measuring instruments 1 0.18

12. Welding machine 1 1.21

13. DG Set 1 5.45

14. Exhaust Fan & Man Coolers 10 12.10

15. Power Distribution Transformer 1 10.06

16. Wet Lab with XRF metal analyzer 1 16.94

17. Dies of different size - 70.00

18. Ink Stamping (Manual) 1 0.726

Total 242.756

9. Observations:

Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:

(i) Registered land documents in the name of the SPV (if land is on lease basis,

registered lease deed for a minimum period of 30 years).

(ii) SIDBI Appraisal Report

(iii) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.

(iv) Certificate of SPV‟s formation & share holding pattern.

(v) Copy of Article of Association & Memorandum of Association.

(vi) Details of production capacity of CFC.

Page 45: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

40

(vii) Details of Revenue generation mechanism.

(viii) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution.

(ix) Details of SPV‟s bank account/ Mandate form.

(x) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the escalation cost, if

any, over and above the approved project cost.

(xi) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.

(xii) Undertaking from State Government that more than 50% units are Micro/SC-

ST/Women Enterprise, as the case may be.

10. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle approval for setting up of Common

Facility Centre (CFC) in Brass & Bronze Cluster, Kariyatpur, Hazaribagh, Jharkhand.

*****

Page 46: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

41

Agenda No.50.3.8: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up of Common Facility

Centre in Power loom Cluster, Chikodi, Belgaum, Karnataka.

Background:

(i) The proposal was recommended by State Level Steering Committee in its meeting held

on 15.11.18.

(ii) The proposal was submitted vide online application Ref. No. 14055 dated 27.02.19,

which was also recommended by MSME-DI, Hubli.

(iii) The proposal was deliberated during 64th

& 65th

meetings of Techno Economic

Appraisal Committee (TEAC) held on 05.03.19 & 13.06.19 respectively and the same

was recommended to place before Steering Committee for In-principle approval.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Basic Information of Cluster

Name of Cluster : Powerloom Cluster District Belagavi Location of Cluster : Chikkodi. Lok Sabha Constituency : Chikkodi Main Product : Cotton Cloth Material, Cotton Mixed Sarees, Cotton based

towels and cotton and silk mixed cloth materials, Cotton and poly cotton suiting and shirting material.

No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium)

Micro 150 Small 0 Medium 0

Turn over for the last five years : (Rs. in Crore)

Year Amount 2013-14 54.00 2014-15 72.00 2015-16 118.00 2016-17 126.00 2017-18 135.00

Exports for the last five years : (Rs. in Crore)

Nil

Employment in Cluster : 6200 Nos. Technology Details : Traditional Power looms Automatic Power looms (Air

jet/Auto loom) Shuttle Looms, Shuttled Saree Making Looms, Rapier Looms are being used by the units. Value addition and the manufacturing of fabrics according to customer‟s compliances, is not possible without introducing modern technology machines.

Whether DS Conducted : Yes. Main findings of DSR : The diagnostic study has found that the cluster needs to

be supported with new technology machineries for the promotion and progress of the cluster.

The diagnostic study recommends the hard interventions for the cluster to overcome the technological backwardness of the cluster.

Main Problems of Cluster : Lack of Proper Raw Material Bank. Lack of Warping and Sizing Facility for Air jet Auto

Looms. Lack of Warping and Sizing Facility for Shuttle and

Rapier Looms. Lack of Warping and Sizing Facility for Saree Processing

Looms. Lack of Design Development Facility. Lack of Post Looming Processing Machineries like

Calendaring, Polishing, Cutting and Folding Machines. Lack of Digital Printing Machine.

Page 47: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

42

Poor Quality up-gradation and Lack of Dedicated Training Facility.

Lack of Value Addition and Product Diversification. Other Information : Power loom industry in Nej-Chikodi region is famous for

its cotton and cotton mixed fine fabric cloth, though the cluster is not very old, it has gained regional recognition.

2. Information about Proposed CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA) Comments by

Cluster Division (a.) Justification for CFC The Interventions proposed in CFC

will overcome the adversaries in the cloth production.

The raw material procurement and storage intervention will overcome the price fluctuation.

The short comings in the pre looming process like warping, sizing, calendaring and digital printing, will be taken care by the CFC.

The post loom activities like polishing, packing etc. will help the cluster product in marketing.

The product diversification and design center will help the cluster members to venture into newer market areas and will give them necessary support to survive the changing market trends and demands.

The dedicated marketing center with marketing staff will be an added advantage for the cluster members.

--

(b.) Location of CFC The proposed land Nej Village, Chikodi taluk, Belgaum District- 591239.

--

% age of units in radius of 5km 70

% age of units in radius of 10km

100

(c.) Land for CFC i. Whether land acquired Yes. The land is on

lease for 30 years. Registered land documents required from Revenue Department of Government of Karnataka.

ii. Title is in name of SPV. Registered Lease Deed in the name of SPV for 30 years.

iii. Valuation and its basis Land on lease basis for 30 years.

iv. Land is sufficient Yes. The SPV has taken 1 acre of land on lease for 30 years.

--

v. Change of land use Yes -- vi. If on lease, duration of lease Land on lease basis for 30 years. -- vii Whether lease is legally tenable

Yes. --

(d.) Total Building area(sq ft) The SPV proposes to construct the building 19300 sq ft. for CFC

--

(e.) Rate of construction of Building with the estimated cost at Rs. --

Page 48: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

43

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Comments by Cluster Division

building 254.60 lakh. (f.) Main Facility Proposed Common Raw Material Bank.

Common Warping and Sizing Facility for Airjet Auto Looms.

Common Warping and Sizing Facility for Shuttle and Rapier Looms.

Common Warping and Sizing Facility for Saree Processing Looms.

Common Design Development Facility.

Common Post Looming Processing Machineries like Calendaring, Polishing, Cutting and Folding Machines

Common Digital Printing Machine Common Finished Product Storage

Facility

--

g.) Prod capacity of CFC Total Proposed Production of CFC =12500 kg of Yarn Processing into beams (single shifts).

(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)

Sl. No.

Parameter Before intervention

After Intervention

1. Nos. of units 150 250 2 Turnover

(Rs. in crore) 135 200

3 Export (Rs. in crore)

Indirect export taking place through traders.

Direct export likely by 5 units Rs. 25 crore.

4 Employment Direct – 1200 Indirect - 5000

Direct – 3000 Indirect – 10000

5 Profit Margins 12% to 14% 25%

(i.) Pollution clearance required or not

Yes , No Objection Certificate obtained from State Pollution Board.

Document required.

(j.) Man Power in CFC 52 -- (k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)

Details of the User Charges: a. User charge for Plane Cloth Warping and Sizing Setup 340cm Panna: Rs. 28/- per Kg b. User charge for Plane Cloth Warping and Sizing Setup 150cm Panna: Rs. 18/- per Kg c. User charge for Saree Warping and Sizing: Rs. 15 per Kg d. User charge for Digital Fabric Printing: Rs.25 per Meter e. User charge for Fabric/Cloth Calendaring: Rs.8 per Meter f. User charge for Fabric/Cloth Cutting Inspection Rolling Folding Machine: Rs. 2 per meter Expected Revenue/Year: Rs. 850.16 lakhs (75% production capacity) Expected Expenditure: Rs. 595.61 lakhs (variable 117.68 fixed exp 238.98) Balance Revenue Expenditure Rs. 254.55 lakhs Income Tax Rs. 74.09 lakhs Net Profit Rs. 180.46 lakhs (BEP-38% IRR-25% ROCE 30% ) Hence as per guideline the CFC will be self sustainable and will have surplus to self upgrade.

Page 49: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

44

3. Information about SPV

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA)

Comments by

Cluster Division

(a.) Name and Address Ideal Hi-Tech Power loom Cluster

Association Hebbal,

Survey No. 41/1, Nej Village, Chikodi

Taluk, Belgaum District

--

(b.) Nature of SPV(company or

Society or Trust)

Society, registered under Karnataka

Society (Registration) Act, 1960.

--

(c.) Name of the state Govt.

and MSME officials in SPV

MD-KCTU, JD-DIC-Belgaum, Director

MSME - DI Hubli.

--

(d.) Date of formation of SPV 27-07-2018 --

(e.) Number of Members 150 (as per revised proposal)

--

(f.) Bye Laws or MoA and

AOA submitted

MOA/ Bye laws of the cluster are

enclosed in section 9.

Received

(g.) Authorized Share Capital Amount in Rs. 149.61 Lakh ( 10% of

Project Cost) --

(h.) Paid up capital Rs. 15 lakh.

(i.) Shareholding Pattern Equal share holding among all members.

Shareholding

pattern of

members

received.

(j.) Commitment letter for

contribution

Submitted. --

(k.) SPV specific A/c Syndicate Bank, Branch: Sankeshwar,

Hebbal, Hukkeri Taluk, Belgaum

Account No. 05773070002400 IFSC

Code: SYNB 0000 577 Account Type:

Current Account.

--

(l.) Trust Building of SPV,

Previous track record of co-

operative initiatives pursued by

SPV members need to be

highlighted with support

documentation.

The SPV has good trust and corporation

among its members details available in

DPR As the cluster members are aware of

their problems and have good unity they

have also visited some of the cluster and

have learned about cluster scheme and

cluster development process. The cluster

members have come forward to prepare

the DSR and DPR by their own

contribution hence the DSR recommends

Hard Interventions for the Cluster.

--

(m.) Technical Institution Intaglio Technical and Business Services,

Bangalore

Page 50: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

45

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA)

Comments by

Cluster Division

(n.) CFC may be utilised by

SPV members as also others in

a cluster. However, evidence

should be furnished with

regard to SPV member ability

to utilise at least 60 percent of

installed capacity.

Yes, the SPV has given undertaking for

Capacity Utilization of CFC by SPV

members and non members.

Document

required.

(o)Utilities

(a) Power requirement for

commercial/domestic purpose

250 KW --

(b) Water 10 KLD --

(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities NA --

4. Implement Arrangements

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA)

Comments by

Cluster Division

(a.) Implementing Agency Karnataka Council for Technological

Upgradation (KCTU), Bangalore, Govt.

of Karnataka.

--

(b.) Fund receiving Agency Karnataka Council for Technological

Upgradation (KCTU), Bangalore, Govt.

of Karnataka.

--

(c.) Implementation Period 19 months 24 Months from

date of final

approval.

(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main

Recommendations

DPR will be submitted to SIDBI for

appraisal

Required prior to

final approval.

(e.) Comments of Technical

Division

Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 65th

meeting held on 13.06.19 recommended the proposal to place

before Steering Committee for In-principle approval. (f.) Approval of Technical

Committee

(g.) Comments of Cluster

Development Division:

Recommended for in-principle approval under MSE-CDP.

(h.) Working capital(In-

principle sanction of loan from

a bank, if applicable

arrangement made)

Yes, in principle approval of working

capital letter received.

--

5. Financial Analysis of CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Comments by Cluster Division

(a.) BEP 38%

As per MSE-CDP guidelines.

(b.) IRR, Payback period 25% (c.) DSCR N/A (d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)

30%

(e.) NPV 26% (f.) DER N/A (g.) Sensitivity Analysis Sensitivity analysis is performed for 5%

Page 51: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

46

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Comments by Cluster Division

and 10% reduction of capacity or fall in sales and the figures are satisfactory and as per the limits specified in the guidelines.

(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State

a) Cluster Implemented 1. Auto components Cluster, Hubli 2. Readymade Garment Cluster, Hubli 3. Food Cluster, Gulbarga 4. Raisin Processing Cluster, Bijapur. 5. Auto Cluster, Bidar 6. Raisin Processing Cluster, Athani,

Belgaum. 7. ELCIA Cluster, Bangalore. 8. Heat Treatment & Engg Cluster Hubli, b) Clusters Under implementation 1. Printing Cluster Bangalore 2. Utopia Cashew Cluster, Kumta, Uttara

Kannada. 3.Global Puffed Rice Cluster, Chitradurga.

--

6. Proposed project cost (revised):

(Rs. in lakh) S.No. Particulars Amount

1. Land (1 acre on lease for 30 years) 45.00 2. Building Construction with compound and Internal Roads –

19300 sq. ft. built up area 254.60

3. Plant & Machinery (including electrification) 1055.50 4. Misc. fixed assets 15.00 5. Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 15.00 6. Contingencies (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery) 60.41 7. Margin money for working capital 13.28 Total 1458.79

7. Proposed means of finance(revised):

(Rs. in lakh)

S.No. Particulars Percentage Amount

(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 80.00 1167.03

(ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Karnataka 10.00 145.88

(iii) SPV contribution 10.00 145.88

Total 100.00 1458.79

8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)

(Rs. in lakh)

S.No. Description No. Amount

Plane Cloth Sizing and Warping setup

For 340 CM Panna Cloth – Airjet Auto Looms

1. Warping Machine (Yarn to General Beam) 1 332.10

2. Sizing (General Beam to Loom Beam + Ganji) 1 344.40

For 152 CM Panna Cloth – Plain Shuttel Looms

3. Warping Machine (Yarn to General Beam) 1 36.29

4. Sizing (General Beam to Loom Beam + Ganji) 1 56.37

Hillkal Polyester Saree Warping and Sizing setup

Page 52: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

47

S.No. Description No. Amount

5. Saree Warping Machine 39.05

6. Saree Sizing Machine 1 9.41

7. Boiler 1 76.69

8. DG Set 1 17.21

9. UPS 1 13.85

10. Overhead Crane 2 19.43

11. Compressor 1 11.69

12. Cloth Rolling + Stretching + Carrier + Inspection Machine 1 14.76

13. Digital Fabric Printing 1 55.35

14. Fabric Calendaring Machine 1 22.14

15. Fabric Cutting + Folding Machine 1 6.765

Total 1055.50

9. Observations:

Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:

(i) Registered land documents in the name of SPV, in case of leased land, the

lease period should be for a minimum of 30 years.

(ii) SIDBI appraisal report.

(iii) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.

(iv) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution.

(v) Commitment letter with regard to SPV members‟ ability to utilize at least 60

percent of installed capacity.

(vi) Commitment letter from State Government/SPV to meet the escalation cost, if

any, over and above the approved project cost.

(vii) Certificate from State Government stating that more than 50% units in the

cluster are Micro/SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be.

(viii) Certificate from State Government regarding compliance of GFR/CVC

guidelines.

(ix) Documentary proof from SPV for utilisation of CFC facilities by atleast 51% of the

cluster members.

10. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up of Common

Facility Centre (CFC) in Power loom Cluster, Chikodi District, Belgaum, Karnataka.

*******

Page 53: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

48

Agenda No.50.3.9: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up of Common Facility

Centre in Copper Utensils Manufacturing Cluster, Nasalapur, Raibag,

District – Belgaum, Karnataka.

Background:

The proposal was approved by State Level Steering Committee in its meeting held on

15.11.18.

Proposal along with focus report, DPR and recommendations was forwarded by MSME-

DI, Hubli vide letter dated 15.02.19 and 09.05.19. Online application Ref. No. 14053

dated 27.02.19.

The proposal was discussed in detail during 64th meeting of Techno Economic Appraisal

Committee (TEAC) held on 05.03.19 and TEAC in its 65th meeting held on 13.06.19

recommended the proposal to place before Steering Committee for In-principle approval.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Basic Information of Cluster

Name of Cluster : Copper Utensils Manufacturing Cluster

District Belagavi

Location of Cluster : Raibag

Lok Sabha Constituency : Chikkodi

Main Product : Copper Household / Domestic Utensils – Pots, water boilers,

Jug, Tumbler, Glasses, water filter, water bottles, drums.

Cookware’s like - kadai, deg, handi, cooking pans, plates,

hammered muglai kadhal, food serving pans, spoons.

Hotel and Restaurant Accessories – like large cooking pans,

Dining Table accessories, Jugs, Food servicing accessories.

Pooja Articles – Taman plate, Gadwa mug, Pulpatra –

tumbler, pooja thali, Kalas etc.

No. of Enterprises including

break up (Micro, Small,

Medium)

Micro 60 (as per revised report)

Small 0

Medium 0

Turn over for the last five

years : (Rs. in Crore)

Year Amount

2013-14 38.26

2014-15 40.29

2015-16 47.90

2016-17 51.10

2017-18 57.60

Exports for the last five years :

(Rs. in Crore)

Nil

Employment in Cluster : 2314 Nos. (Direct - 461 and Indirect - 1853)

Technology Details : At present the Cluster members are using traditional

methodology to produce manufacture Copper Utensils

with an exception of a few spinning lathe machines.

The cluster is not catering to the present day needs and

demands of the consumers that have changed over a

period of time.

The modern day consumer is very design oriented and

health conscious.

Page 54: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

49

Whether DS Conducted : Yes, DSR Conducted By Intaglio Technical and Business

Service.

Main findings of DSR : It is found that the cluster members are using traditional

methods of manufacturing copper utensils and lack major

facilities such as advance reprocessing machinery like the die

press, sheet cutting, heat treatment facilities, Design and

Laser engraving marking machine and post processing

machinery like polishing, buffing, tin steel coating, effluent

treatment plant as a result the cluster members are unable to

compete with the large scale manufacturers and are not able

to cater the demands of the urban national and international

market.

Main Problems of Cluster : Traditional practices of manufacturing have limited the

variety of products manufactured.

Limitations in design due to lack of technological

advancement.

No diversification of product line to suit consumer needs

and preferences.

Stiff Competition from the Big players in the market who

have a major market share.

Lack of post processing machinery like Buffing and

Polishing where the product is given a superior finish and

aesthetically pleasing look.

Lack of coating machinery and techniques, Copper coated

in Steel and Tin.

Lack of new moulding machineries that mould the utensils

into different sizes and shapes.

No marketing taking place through right channels.

There is no branding taking place.

There is no training and skill up-gradation taking place in

the cluster as a result there is continuous migration of

work force.

Other Information : The Utensils made of Copper will have superior heat

conducting ability which is a vital component of high quality

food preparation. Also copper has an even greater value that

other cookware can not match it is naturally antimicrobial.

Research has demonstrated that microbes bacteria or germs

that come into direct contact with copper or certain copper

alloys quickly die, often within hours.

Copper Utensils have a reputed to have healing qualities.

Copper is used to ward off sickness. Hence many people

across the world prefer using copper utensils in the kitchen

for health as well as culinary benefits.

2. Information about Proposed CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA)

Comments by

Cluster Division

(a.) Justification for CFC The major facilities proposed in CFC

like advance pre-processing

--

Page 55: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

50

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA)

Comments by

Cluster Division

machineries like the die press, sheet

cutting, heat treatment facilities,

Design and Laser engraving marking

machine and post processing

machineries like polishing, buffing,

tin, steel coating, effluent treatment

plant helps the cluster members to

compete with the large scale

manufacturers .

The CFC will enable the cluster

members to cater the demands of the

urban national and international

market.

The CFC will enable the cluster

members to undertake manufacturing

of new designs, addition verities and

product diversification. 4.The facilities

proposed in CFC helps the cluster

members to improve their present

product quality and produce better

quality products.

(b.) Location of CFC #786 bar A, Naslapur, Raibag taluk,

Belgaum District-591213.

--

% age of units in radius of 5km 70 --

% age of units in radius of

10km

100 --

(c.) Land for CFC

i. Whether land acquired Yes. Land is on lease

basis for 30

years. The lease

deed submitted

is not registered

from Revenue

Department of

Government of

Karnataka.

ii. Title is in name of Registered Lease Deed in the name of

SPV.

iii. Valuation and its basis Land on lease basis for 30 years.

iv. Land is sufficient Yes, 10 Guntas (10,000 square feet) of

land.

--

v. Change of land use Land Conversion NA Order Obtained --

vi. If on lease, duration of lease Land on lease basis for 30 years.

--

vii Whether lease is legally tenable

Yes. --

(d.) Total Building area(sq ft) The SPV proposes to construct the building 9045.51 sq ft. for CFC.

--

(e.) Rate of construction of building

Rs. 125.26 lakh. --

(f.) Main Facility Proposed Copper Sheet Flattening and pressing --

Page 56: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

51

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA)

Comments by

Cluster Division

setup.

Utensils Moulding / Forging Pressing

Dies Setup

Heat Treatment and Annealing

Chamber Setup

Workshop Machinery.

Copper Utensils Tin / Steel Coating

Setup.

Effluent Treatment Plant.

Design Software for Design and New

Products Development. Office equipments and Training

Setup. g.) Prod capacity of CFC Production Capacity Analysis-Single

Shift basis Total Production of Cluster =

45 units = 5 tons (single shifts) Total

Proposed Production of CFC = 6 tons

(single shifts) Justification of Production

Gap The cluster will be utilizing 83% of

the plant capacity in a single shift

operation at the beginning and this

capacity utilization percentage will

increase gradually over a period of two to

three year of establishment of CFC to

maximum capacity. Initially about 17%

capacity of CFC is reserved to

accommodate the near future demand.

Hence the proposed CFC Capacity will

take care of the present and near future

demand of the cluster.

(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)

Sl. No. Parameter Before intervention

After Intervention

1. Nos. of units 60 95 2 Turnover

(Rs. in crore) 72.61 90.00

3 Export (Rs. in crore)

Indirect export taking place through traders.

Direct export likely by 5 units

4 Employment Direct – 461 Indirect - 1853

Direct – 600 Indirect – 2500

5 Profit Margins 12% to 14% 23% to 25%

(i.) Pollution clearance required or not

NOC from Karnataka State Pollution Control Board Obtained.

NOC from PCB is required.

(j.) Man Power in CFC 36 nos. -- (k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)

Details of the User Charges:

User charge for Copper Sheet

Flattening and Pressing Setup-Rs.

185.00 per job.

User charge for Heat Treatment and

Annealing Chamber Setup-Rs. 35.00

--

Page 57: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

52

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA)

Comments by

Cluster Division

per job.

User charge for workshop machineries

Rs. 410.00- per job.

User charge for Coating Setup:

Rs.105.00 per job.

User charge for Design Product

Development Centre Rs.500.00 per job

User charge for Computerized Laser

Marking-Engraving Machine: Rs.

75.00 per job.

3. Information about SPV

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA)

Comments by

Cluster Division

(a.) Name and Address Siddika Metal Industries Owner‟s Welfare

Association,

#786/A, Naslapur, Raibag Taluk, Belgaum

District – 591213.

--

(b.) Nature of SPV(company

or Society or Trust)

Society, registered under Karnataka

Society.

--

(c.) Name of the state Govt.

and MSME officials in SPV

MD-KCTU, JD, DIC-Belgaum, Director

MSME Hubli.

--

(d.) Date of formation of

SPV

31.08.17

--

(e.) Number of Members 60 nos.

--

(f.) Bye Laws or MoA and

AOA submitted

Yes. --

(g.) Authorized Share Capital Rs. 100.00 lakh

(h.) Paid up capital Rs. 20.00 lakh.

(i.) Shareholding Pattern Submitted. --

(j.) Commitment letter for

contribution

Submitted. --

(k.) SPV specific A/c Name of the Bank: Canara Bank Account

Number: 0541201001337. --

(l.) Trust Building of SPV,

Previous track record of co-

operative initiatives pursued

by SPV members need to be

highlighted with support

documentation.

The diagnostic study found that the cluster

member have conducted majority of the

soft interventions programs such as MSE-

CDP awareness programs, Financial

management, product quality and safety

training programs, visit to other existing

cluster etc. in association with the MSME

DI Hubli KCTU Bangalore and DIC

Belgaum. The cluster members are very

much aware of the problems faced by the

cluster and have identified the required

machinery for the CFC. Hence the

--

Page 58: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

53

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA)

Comments by

Cluster Division

Diagnostic Study do not recommend any

Soft Intervention for the cluster. The DSR

recommends Hard Intervention for the

Cluster in terms of establishment of CFC.

(m.) Technical Institution Intaglio Technical and Business Services,

Bangalore

(n.) CFC may be utilised by

SPV members as also others

in a cluster. However,

evidence should be furnished

with regard to SPV member

ability to utilise at least 60

percent of installed capacity.

Yes, the SPV has given undertaking for

Capacity Utilization of CFC by SPV

members and non members.

Document

required.

(o) Utilities

(a) Power requirement for

commercial/domestic

purpose

289.6345 KVA

--

(b) Water 10 KLD --

(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities NA --

4. Implement Arrangements

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA)

Comments by

Cluster Division

(a.) Implementing Agency Karnataka Council for Technological

Upgradation (KCTU), Bangalore, Govt. of

Karnataka.

--

(b.) Fund receiving Agency Karnataka Council for Technological

Upgradation (KCTU), Bangalore, Govt. of

Karnataka.

--

(c.) Implementation Period 19 months 24 Months from

date of final

approval.

(d.) Appraisal of DPR and

main Recommendations

-- Required prior to

final approval.

(e.) Comments of Technical

Division

The proposal was discussed in detail during 64th meeting of

Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) held on

05.03.19 and TEAC in its 65th meeting held on 13.06.19

recommended the proposal to place before Steering Committee

for In-principle approval.

(f.) Approval of Technical

Committee

(g.) Comments of Cluster

Development Division:

Recommended for in-principle approval under MSE-CDP.

(h.) Working capital(In-

principle sanction of loan

from a bank,if applicable

arrangement made)

Yes, in-principle approval of

working capital. --

Page 59: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

54

5. Financial Analysis of CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA) Comments by

Cluster Division (a.) BEP 44%

As per MSE-CDP guidelines.

(b.) IRR, Payback period 29% (c.) DSCR N/A (d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)

31%

(e.) NPV 30% (f.) DER N/A (g.) Sensitivity Analysis Sensitivity analysis is performed for 5%

and 10% reduction of capacity or fall in

sales and the figures are satisfactory and as

per the limits specified in the guidelines. (h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State

a) Cluster Implemented 1. Auto components Cluster, Hubli 2. Readymade Garment Cluster, Hubli 3. Food Cluster, Gulbarga 4. Raisin Processing Cluster, Bijapur. 5. Auto Cluster, Bidar 6. Raisin Processing Cluster, Athani,

Belgaum 7. ELCIA Cluster, Bangalore. 8. Heat Treatment & Engg Cluster Hubli, b) Clusters Under implementation 1. Printing Cluster, Bangalore 2. Utopia Cashew Cluster, Kumta, Uttara

Kannada. 3.Global Puffed Rice Cluster, Chitradurga.

--

6. Proposed project cost:

(Rs. in lakh) S.No. Particulars Amount 1. Land (10 guntas on lease for 30 years) 45.00 2. Building Construction with compound and Internal Roads – 9045.51 sq.

ft. built up area 116.68

3. Plant & Machinery (including electrification) 584.81 4. Misc. fixed assets 16.00 5. Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 16.00 6. Contingencies (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery) 31.57 7. Margin money for working capital 14.00 Total 824.06

7. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Percentage Amount

(iv) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 80 659.24 (v) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Karnataka 10 82.41 (vi) SPV contribution 10 82.41

Total 100 824.06

8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)

(Rs. in lakh)

S.No. Description No. Amount

A Copper Sheet Flattening and Pressing Setup

1. Heavy Duty Sheet Cutting Machine 1 19.50

Page 60: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

55

S.No. Description No. Amount

2. Sheet Flatting and thinning mill 1 65.13

3. Automatic Sheet Cleaning Machine 1 11.378

B Utensils Moulding and Pressing Dies Setup

4. Deep Drawing Power Press - for cook wares 1 64.45

5. Water vessels / pot pressing power press 1 47.00

6. Pressing Dies 1 39.36

C Heat Treatment and Aniling Chamber Setup

7. Heat Treatment Chamber 1 89.18

D Workshop machineries

8. Heavy Duty Shearing Machine for Circle and Patta Cutting 1 22.88

9. Spinning Lathe (centre height – 18 inch, 6 feet bed size, V – Belt motor type).

1 15.07

10 Spinning Lathe (centre height – 14 inch, 6 feet bed size, V – Belt motor type).

1 8.84

11 All Geared Lathe Machine for ring Cutting, Pattern Cutting

1 23.25

12 Die Surface Grinding Machine 1 7.69

13 Turning Machine 1 6.46

14 Polishing Machine 1 8.80

15 Buffing Machine 1 3.84

16 Brass Welding Machine 1 1.51

17 MIG / TIG Welding Machine 1 3.641

18 Seam Welding Machine 1 8.344

E Coating Setup

19 Tin Coating Setup 1 8.36

20 Steel Coating Setup 1 10.09

21 Effluent Treatment Plant 1 34.62

F Design Product Development Centre

22 CAD CAM Design Software 1 7.21

23 Table Top Computerized Laser Marking / Engraving Machine

1 23.061

24 Computers, Windows Software 5 2.77

25 Digital Interactive Classroom Board 1 1.30

26 High Resolution Projector with Auto Lock Screen Projector with Auto Lock Screen

1 0.59655

27 Audio System Amplifier, speakers with cordless and podium Mic-set.

1 0.65

28 All in one laser colour printer scanner and copier 1 0.58

29 Accounting soft-ware Tally 1 3.51

30 Website and ERP Software Design and Development 1 2.28

31 CCT Camera and DVR and EPABX intercom setup 1 0.81

Page 61: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

56

S.No. Description No. Amount

32 Fire fighting equipment set 1 0.92

33 Air conditioner A/c 2.0 Ton 2 1.51

34 DG Set 1 17.21

35 Electrical intallation -- 23.06

Total 584.81

9. Observations:

Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:

(i) Registered lease deed in the name of SPV for a minimum period of 30 years.

(ii) SIDBI appraisal report.

(iii) Commitment letter with regard to SPV members‟ ability to utilize at least 60 percent

of installed capacity.

(iv) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.

(v) Certificate from State Government regarding compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.

(vi) Commitment letter from State Government / IA to meet the cost escalation, if any,

over and above the approved project cost.

(vii) Certificate from State Government stating that more than 50% units in the cluster are

Micro.

(viii) Registered land documents in the name of SPV (if land is on lease basis, registered

lease deed for a minimum period of 30 years).

(ix) English version of formation of SPV and Bye-Laws or MoA & AoA.

(x) Documentary proof from SPV for utilisation of CFC facilities by atleast 51% of the

cluster members.

10. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up of Common

Facility Centre (CFC) in Copper Utensils Manufacturing Cluster, Nasalapur, Raibag, District –

Belgaum, Karnataka.

*******

Page 62: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

57

Agenda No.50.3.10: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up of Common Facility

Centre in Auto and General Engineering Cluster, Chikkodi, District – Belgaum,

Karnataka.

Background:

The proposal was approved by State Level Steering Committee in its meeting held on

15.11.18.

Proposal along with focus report, DPR and recommendations was forwarded by MSME-

DI, Hubli vide letter dated 15.02.19 and 09.05.19. Online application Ref. No. 14051

dated 27.02.19.

The proposal was discussed in detail during 64th meeting of Techno Economic Appraisal

Committee (TEAC) held on 05.03.19 and TEAC in its 65th meeting held on 13.06.19

recommended the proposal to place before Steering Committee for In-principle approval.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Basic Information of Cluster

Name of Cluster : Auto & General Engineering Cluster

District Belagavi

Location of Cluster : Chikkodi

Lok Sabha Constituency : Chikkodi

Main Product : Heavy vehicle engine repair work – Lorry, Truck, Bus,

Heavy duty cranes, Earth movers and all other heavy vehicle.

Light vehicles Engine repair work –

Cars, jeep, Mini vans, Buses, Tractors and any other four

wheelers.

Tinkering, body works painting –

Removal of body dents rusted metal and painting of all

automobile vehicle and machineries.

No. of Enterprises including

break up (Micro, Small,

Medium)

Micro 193 (as per revised report)

Small 0

Medium 0

Turn over for the last five

years : (Rs. in Crore)

Year Amount

2013-14 29.75

2014-15 31.80

2015-16 36.50

2016-17 48.90

2017-18 56.25

Exports for the last five years :

(Rs. in Crore)

Nil

Employment in Cluster : 7340 nos. (Direct - 1015 and Indirect - 6325) Technology Details : Average Technological level with conventional repairing

tools, Milling, Lathe machine, Drilling equipment, Metal

cutting equipment, Metal fabrication press, Welding machines

etc. Few units have semi-automatic machines. Whether DS Conducted : Yes. Main findings of DSR : The DSR found that the Cluster has good potential in as

the Chikodi region is a transportation hub between the

Page 63: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

58

states of Maharastra and Karnataka with constant

movement of vehicles plying the region.

The service sector is the major allied sector to the

automotive industry.

The cluster members have the technical skill required and

are willing to adapt to new technology. Main Problems of Cluster : Non availability of advanced technology for major repair

work.

Lack of Advance machineries for vehicle body denting

work. Lack of Testing and Calibration Facility.

Lack of Effluent treatment plant.

Lack of Advanced painting machine.

Lack of Skill training facility. Other Information : The Automotive Industry in India is the 7th largest in the

world India is the largest 3 wheeler market in the world India

is the 4th largest passenger car market in Asia and 10th

largest in the world India is the 4th largest tractor market in

the world 5th largest commercial market in the world 5th

largest bus and truck market in the world.

2. Information about Proposed CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA)

Comments by

Cluster Division

(a.) Justification for CFC The CFC with advance engine

calibration and re building machinery

will help in avoiding outsourcing of

works from cluster and will improve

the service quality.

The CFC with advance fuel pump

calibration facility will help in

calibration of fuel pumps.

The CFC with Closed chamber paint

booth will help in quality painting of

vehicle and will eliminate the health

hazard faced by the cluster members.

The CFC with machine tool section

will help in processing of automotive

components and agriculture

equipments.

--

(b.) Location of CFC The cluster is located near Chikodi

Bijapur State Highway, the cluster units

are mainly concentrated in Auto Nagar.

--

% age of units in radius of 5km 70

% age of units in radius of 10km

100

(c.) Land for CFC i. Whether land acquired Yes. Land is on lease

basis for 30 years. The lease

ii. Title is in name of Registered Lease Deed in the name of

SPV.

Page 64: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

59

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA)

Comments by

Cluster Division iii. Valuation and its basis 2 acres of land on lease for 30 years at

Rs. 45.00 lakh.

deed submitted is not registered from Revenue Department, Government of Karnataka.

iv. Land is sufficient Yes. --

v. Change of land use NA --

vi. If on lease, duration of lease Land on lease basis for 30 years.

--

vii Whether lease is legally tenable

Yes. --

(d.) Total Building area(sq ft) 11,500 sq ft --

(e.) Rate of construction of building

Rs. 166.20 lakh. --

(f.) Main Facility Proposed Physical Inspection and Cleaning

Setup.

Engine Rebuilding Setup.

Fuel Pump Calibration Setup.

Auto Electrical Testing and

Calibration Setup.

Vehicle Body Building and Crash

Repair and Closed Chamber

Painting Setup.

Engineering Workshop Machinery.

Tyre Re-Moulding Setup.

Effluent Treatment Plant.

Office and Training Setup.

--

g.) Prod capacity of CFC Production Capacity Analysis-Single

Shift basis

Total Production of Cluster = 125 units =

8 Engines, Gearbox per day (single

shifts).

Total Proposed Production of CFC = 10

tons (single shifts)

Justification of Production Gap

The cluster will be utilizing 80% of the

plant capacity in a single shift operation

at the beginning and this capacity

utilization percentage will increase

gradually over a period of two to three

year of establishment of CFC to

maximum capacity.

Initially about 20% capacity of CFC is

reserved to accommodate the near future

demand. Hence the proposed CFC

Capacity will take care of the present and

near future demand of the cluster.

(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after

Sl. No.

Parameter Before intervention

After Intervention

1. Nos. of units 193 250

Page 65: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

60

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA)

Comments by

Cluster Division proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)

2 Turnover (Rs. in crore)

86.55 100.00

3 Export (Rs. in crore)

Indirect export taking place through traders.

Direct export likely by 5 units Rs. 15 crore.

4 Employment Direct – 1015 Indirect - 6325

Direct – 1500 Indirect – 8000

5 Profit Margins 10% to 15% 20% to 25%

(i.) Pollution clearance required or not

Yes. NOC from PCB to be submitted.

(j.) Man Power in CFC 33 nos. -- (k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)

Expected Revenue / Year: Rs.

598.63 lakh (75% production capacity).

Expected Expenditure : Rs. 409.95 lakh

(variable 179.74 + fixed exp. 230.21)

Balance=Revenue – Expenditure = Rs.

188.68 lakh.

Income Tax = Rs. 54.54 lakh.

Net Profit = Rs. 134.14 lakh

--

3. Information about SPV

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA)

Comments by

Cluster Division

(a.) Name and Address Tawakkal Auto & General Engineering

Cluster Association,

Tawakkal Plaza, B.K. College Road,

Chikodi Taluk, Chikodi, District

Belagavi, Karnataka - 591201.

--

(b.) Nature of SPV(company or

Society or Trust)

Society, registered under Karnataka

Society. English version

of registration of

SPV is required.

(c.) Name of the state Govt.

and MSME officials in SPV

MD-KCTU, JD, DIC-Belgaum, Director

MSME Hubli.

--

(d.) Date of formation of SPV 24.07.18

--

(e.) Number of Members 193 nos.

--

(f.) Bye Laws or MoA and

AOA submitted

Yes. English version

of MoA and

AoA is required.

(g.) Authorized Share Capital Rs. 105.85 lakh --

(h.) Paid up capital Rs. 10.00 lakh. --

(i.) Shareholding Pattern Submitted. --

(j.) Commitment letter for

contribution

Submitted. --

(k.) SPV specific A/c Name of the Bank: Axis Bank A/c

918010072205416 --

(l.) Trust Building of SPV,

Previous track record of co-

Trust Building Activities Awareness

Programs on Various Schemes of --

Page 66: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

61

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA)

Comments by

Cluster Division

operative initiatives pursued by

SPV members need to be

highlighted with support

documentation.

MSME, Govt. of India and Govt. GoK

Capacity Building Activities Study Tours

and Visit to other Clusters

(m.) Technical Institution Intaglio Technical and Business Services,

Bangalore --

(n.) CFC may be utilised by

SPV members as also others in

a cluster. However, evidence

should be furnished with

regard to SPV member ability

to utilise at least 60 percent of

installed capacity.

Yes, the cluster units will be able to

utilize more than 60% of the proposed

machinery.

Document

required.

(o) Utilities

(a) Power requirement for

commercial/domestic purpose

337 HP

--

(b) Water Groundwater Borewell --

(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities Not required. --

4. Implement Arrangements

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA) Comments by

Cluster Division (a.) Implementing Agency Karnataka Council for Technological

Upgradation (KCTU), Bangalore, Govt. of Karnataka.

--

(b.) Fund receiving Agency Karnataka Council for Technological Upgradation (KCTU), Bangalore, Govt. of Karnataka.

--

(c.) Implementation Period 18 months 24 Months from date of final approval.

(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations

-- Required prior to final approval.

(e.) Comments of Technical Division

The proposal was discussed in detail during 64th meeting

of Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) held

on 05.03.19 and TEAC in its 65th meeting held on

13.06.19 recommended the proposal to place before

Steering Committee for In-principle approval.

(f.) Approval of Technical Committee

(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:

Recommended for in-principle approval under MSE-CDP.

(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank,if applicable arrangement made)

Yes, in-principle approval of working capital.

--

5. Financial Analysis of CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA) Comments by

Cluster Division (a.) BEP 41% As per MSE-CDP

guidelines. (b.) IRR, Payback period 28%; 4 year

Page 67: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

62

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Comments by Cluster Division

(c.) DSCR N/A (d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)

32%

(e.) NPV 28% (f.) DER N/A (g.) Sensitivity Analysis Sensitivity analysis is performed for 5%

and 10% reduction of capacity or fall in

sales and the figures are satisfactory and as

per the limits specified in the guidelines. (h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State

a) Cluster Implemented 1. Auto components Cluster, Hubli 2. Readymade Garment Cluster, Hubli 3. Food Cluster, Gulbarga 4. Raisin Processing Cluster, Bijapur. 5. Auto Cluster, Bidar 6. Raisin Processing Cluster, Athani,

Belgaum 7. ELCIA Cluster, Bangalore. 8. Heat Treatment & Engg Cluster Hubli, b) Clusters Under implementation 1. Printing Cluster, Bangalore 2. Utopia Cashew Cluster, Kumta, Uttara

Kannada. 3.Global Puffed Rice Cluster, Chitradurga.

--

6. Proposed project cost:

(Rs. in lakh) S.No. Particulars Amount

1. Land (land – 2 acres on lease for 30 years) 45.00 2. Building Construction with compound and Internal Roads – 11500 sq. ft.

built up area 147.70

3. Plant & Machinery (including electrification) 691.25 4. Misc. fixed assets 17.35 5. Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 15.00 6. Contingencies (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery) 38.99 7. Margin money for working capital 11.20 Total 966.49

7. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Percentage Amount

1. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 80.00 773.19

2. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Karnataka 10.00 96.65

3. SPV contribution 10.00 96.65

Total 100.00 966.49

8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)

(Rs. in lakh)

S.No. Description Quantity (no.)

Amount

A Physical Inspection and Cleaning Setup

1. Magnetic Crack Detection Setup 1 9.04542

2. Profile Projector 1 5.412

Page 68: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

63

S.No. Description Quantity (no.)

Amount

3. Cordinate Vision Measuring System 1 8.5485

4. Automatic De-greasing Machine 1 6.7035

B Engine Rebuilding Setup

5. Heavy Duty Cylinder Boring Machine 1 19.21875

6. Bore Honning Machine 1 9.96915

7. Line Boring Machine 1 14.88915

8. Connecting Rod Bush Cutting Machine 1 7.995

9. Crank Shaft Grinding with rail 1 28.167

10 CAM Shaft Bush Boring Machine 1 7.7121

11 Valve Grinding Machine –v-18 1 8.1795

12 Valve Seat Cutting Machine 1 15.8055

13 Head surface grinding machine 1 16.3344

14 Drum Skimming machine 1 5.535

15 Disc Grinding Machine 1 7.257

16 Crank Shaft Straightning Press 1 5.23857

17 Engine Opening and Fitting Tools 1 3.9975

C Fuel Pump Calibration Setup

18 CRDI Pumps Repair and calibration Setup 1 105.042

19 Inline and V-E Pumps Repair and Calibration Setup 1 47.52105

20 Automatic Nozzle and Injector Tester 1 26.568

21 Nozzle Pressurizer and Blower 2 4.7355

22 Ultrasonic Pump Elements Cleaner 1 4.25334

23 Pump Opening and Fitting Tools 1 3.075

D Auto Electrical Testing and Callibration Setup

24 Alternator Testing Setup 1 5.2275

25 Stator Testing Setup 1 4.7355

26 Battery Testing Setup 2 4.6125

27 Engine Leak Detector 1 6.9495

28 Vehicle Engine Scanner 2 6.94950

29 A/C Refilling Setup 1 5.2275

30 Turbo Repair and Calibration Setup 1 4.8585

31 Heavy Vehicles Wheel Alignment Setup 1 13.0995

E Vehicle Body Building and Crash Repair and Closed Chamber Painting Setup

32 Computerized Crash Repair Setup 1 23.20395

33 Vehicle Body Denting Setup 1 4.4895

34 Closed Chamber Vehicle Painting 1 16.605

35 Sheet Cutting Machine 1 5.7195

36 Sheet Folding and Pressing Machine 1 4.2435

37 Pipe Bending Machine 1 4.65309

38 Arc Welding Machine 2 1.5375

Page 69: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

64

S.No. Description Quantity (no.)

Amount

39 MIG / TIG Welding Machine 2 3.02

40 Spot Welding Machine 2 6.95

41 Seam Welding Machine 1 7.69

42 Circular Cutting Brand Saw 1 4.00

43 Two Post Lifts 1 1.54

44 Sensor Lift 1 5.72

F Engineering Workshop Machinery

45 Lathe Machine – 20 feet 1 21.25

46 Lathe Machine – 12 feet 1 12.61

47 Universal Milling Machine 1 10.64

48 Surface Grinding Machine 1 9.174

49 Radial Drilling Machine 1 6.16

50 Pillor Drilling Machine 1 1.53

51 Hydraullic Press - 500 tons 1 10.76

52 Power Press – 50 tons 1 8.55

53 Key-Way Cutting Machine 1 12.12

54 Gear Cutting / Tooth Chamferring Machine 1 8.31

55 Double Track Overhead Rail 2 12.92

56 Universal Tyre Re-molding Setup 1 0.00

57 Effluent Treatment Plant –etp-15KLD 1 28.167

G Tyre Re-moulding Setup

58 CAD / C CA Software for Design 5 3.08

59 Computers, Windows software 5 2.77

60 Digital Interactive Classroom Board 1 1.797

61 High Resolution Projector with Auto Lock Screen Projector with Auto Lock Screen

1 0.597

62 Audio System Amplifier, Speakers with Cordless and Podium Mic-set

1 0.65

63 All in One Laser Colour Printer Scanner and Copier 1 0.605

64 Accounting Software-Tally 1 2.28

65 Website and ERP Software Design and Development 1 1.84

66 CCT Camera and DVR and EPABX Intercom Setup 1 2.09

67 Fire Fighting Equipments Set 1 3.44

68 Air conditioner A/C 2.0 Ton 2 0.98

69 DG Set 1 16.73

Total 691.24

Page 70: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

65

9. Observations:

Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:

(i) Registered lease deed in the name of SPV for a minimum period of 30 years.

(ii) SIDBI appraisal report.

(iii) Commitment letter with regard to SPV members‟ ability to utilize at least 60 percent

of installed capacity.

(iv) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.

(v) Certificate from State Government regarding compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.

(vi) Commitment letter from State Government / IA to meet the cost escalation, if any,

over and above the approved project cost.

(vii) Certificate from State Government stating that more than 50% units in the cluster are

Micro.

(viii) Registered land documents in the name of SPV (if land is on lease basis, registered

lease deed for a minimum period of 30 years).

(ix) English version of formation of SPV and Bye-Laws or MoA & AoA.

(x) Documentary proof from SPV for utilisation of CFC facilities by atleast 51% of the

cluster members.

10. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up of Common Facility

Centre (CFC) in Auto and General Engineering Cluster, Chikkodi, District – Belgaum, Karnataka.

*******

Page 71: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

66

Agenda No.50.3.11: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up of Common Facility

Centre in Organic Millets Cluster, Davanagere, Karnataka.

Background:

(i) The proposal was recommended by State Level Steering Committee in its meeting held

on 15.06.17 at Bangalore.

(ii) The proposal was received from Government of Karnataka, vide online application Ref.

No. 14057 dated 27.02.19, which was also recommended by MSME-DI, Bangalore.

(iii) The proposal was deliberated during 64th

& 65th

meetings of Techno Economic Appraisal

Committee (TEAC) held on 05.03.19 and 13.06.19 respectively and recommended the

proposal to place before steering committee for In-principle approval.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Basic Information of Cluster

Name of Cluster : Organic Millets Cluster District Davanagere Location of Cluster : Davanagere Lok Sabha Constituency : Davanagere Main Product : Organic Millets whole grains, millet, grinded grain, millet

powdered / flour like Ragi powder, Bajra powder, Rava or semolina material.

No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium)

Micro 67 (as per revised report)

Turn over for the last five years : (Rs. in Crore)

Year Amount 2012-13 24.90 2013-14 25.30 2014-15 27.10 2015-16 28.75 2016-17 31.60

Exports for the last five years : (Rs. in Crore)

Nil

Employment in Cluster : 3482 Nos. (Direct - 577 and Indirect - 2905) Technology Details : Conventional Machines like mechanical graders, Mesh

filtration, De Husking and Hulling Machine, Grinding Machine, Pulverizes for Flour Processing.

Whether DS Conducted : Yes DSR Conducted By Intaglio Technical and Business Service.

Main findings of DSR : The DSR found that the cluster product is very nutritious and has huge market demand.

The DSR found that the cluster members are using traditional methods and conventional machineries for processing the millets.

The cluster members are having good trust and are aware of the cluster development scheme.

The cluster members lack the machineries for pre-processing activities like cleaning, de-stoning machines and Grading Machines.

The cluster members lack post processing machineries like Colour Sorting, Polishing and Packaging Machineries.

There is very little value addition taking place at present hence the cluster require a research development and value addition center for product diversification.

At present the marketing channel is dominated by traders

Page 72: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

67

and middlemen. Main Problems of Cluster : The cluster members lack the machineries for pre-

processing activities like cleaning, De-stoning machines and advance steam treatment and automatic Drying facility.

The cluster members lack post processing machinery like Automatic Grading, Colour Sorting, Polishing and Packaging Machinery.

The Cluster Products are of very high nutritious value but require Advance testing technology for determining the nutritious values as per BIS and FSSAI Standards.

There is very little value addition taking place at present hence the cluster require a research development and value addition center for product diversification.

The Cluster members lack skill upgradation and skill development training facility.

The Cluster members need storage facility for raw material and processed products.

At present the marketing channel is dominated by traders and middlemen. The Cluster lack common branding facility and marketing.

Other Information : Millets grow under dry conditions, can cope with relatively poor soils and require few external inputs. They are a staple food with superior nutritional qualities compared to other cereals. Millets are rich in B vitamins, calcium, iron, potassium, magnesium, zinc, also gluten-free and has low-GI (Glycemic index) thus millets are suitable for people allergies/intolerance of wheat and also for diabetic, weight loss millets are excellent.

2. Information about Proposed CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA) Comments by

Cluster Division (a.) Justification for CFC The CFC with pre processing

machineries like cleaning, grading will help the cluster members to clean the millets before processing.

The post processing machineries like colour sorting polishing machine will help the cluster members to produce better quality products.

The packaging facilities will help in proper packaging of cluster products.

The value added product development and testing centre will help the cluster members in product diversification and quality certification.

--

(b.) Location of CFC The proposed land Survey No. 10/8, Lakavanahalli Village, Mayakonda Hobbali, Bullapura, Davanagere, Karnataka.

--

% age of units in radius of 5km 70

% age of units in radius of 10km

100

(c.) Land for CFC i. Whether land acquired Yes. Received ii. Title is in name of Registered Lease Deed in the name of

SPV for 30 years.

Page 73: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

68

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Comments by Cluster Division

iii. Valuation and its basis Rs. 22.50 lakh as non refundable lease amount.

iv. Land is sufficient Yes. The SPV has taken 1 acre of land on lease for 30 years.

--

v. Change of land use Yes, NA Order Issued. -- vi. If on lease, duration of lease Land on lease basis for 30 years. -- vii Whether lease is legally tenable

Yes.

(d.) Total Building area(sq ft) The SPV proposes to construct the building 10200 sq ft. for CFC

--

(e.) Rate of construction of building

Building with the estimated cost at Rs. 963/- per sq. ft.

--

(f.) Main Facility Proposed 1. Pre processing machineries / Facilities such as: Raw material storage facility. Millets Automatic Fine Cleaning

Machine Setup Millet Automatic De-Stoning

Machine. Millet Steam treatment and Automatic

Dryer 2. Post Processing Machinery / Facilities such as: Millets Automatic Size Grading

Machine Setup Millets Polishing Machine. Millets Automatic Colour Sorter

Machine. Millets Testing Facility. Millets Value Added Products

development & Research Facility. Millets Packaging Machines. Cold Storage Facility.

--

g.) Prod capacity of CFC 12 Tons single shift

(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)

Sl. No.

Parameter Before intervention

After Intervention

1. Nos. of units 67 90 2 Turnover

(Rs. in crore) 47.97 70

3 Export (Rs. in crore)

Indirect export through traders

Direct export likely by 5 units

4 Employment Direct – 577 Indirect – 2905

Direct – 900 Indirect – 4000

5 Profit Margins Inconsistent profit margins due to price fluctuations.

Consistent and 20% to 25% higher profits for producers due to better quality and price and increased production efficiencies.

(i.) Pollution clearance required or not

Yes, No Objection Certificate obtained from State Pollution Board.

Document required

(j.) Man Power in CFC 52 -- (k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be

All the SPV members and other principle cluster units would expected utilize the services of various facilities proposed to be established at CFC on user charge basis for sustainability of its operations.

Page 74: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

69

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Comments by Cluster Division

specified) Expected Revenue / year: The total revenue generation from user charges of various services is expected to the tune of Rs.241.87 lakh.

3. Information about SPV

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA)

Comments by

Cluster Division

(a.) Name and Address Organic Millets Cluster

No. 1579/2, Opposite Ayyappaswamy

Temple, Near Old RTO Office, MMC B-

Block, Davanagere District, Karnataka.

--

(b.) Nature of SPV(company

or Society or Trust)

Society, registered under Karnataka Society

(Registration) Act, 1960.

--

(c.) Name of the state Govt.

and MSME officials in SPV

MD-KCTU, JD-DIC-Davangere, Director

MSME - DI Bangalore.

--

(d.) Date of formation of

SPV

13.05.16 --

(e.) Number of Members 67

--

(f.) Bye Laws or MoA and

AOA submitted

MOA/ Bye laws of the cluster is enclosed

in section 9.

Received

(g.) Authorized Share Capital Amount in Rs. 73.10 Lakh ( 10% of Project

Cost)

(h.) Paid up capital Rs. 15 lakh.

(i.) Shareholding Pattern Share holding is 1-2%

Received.

(j.) Commitment letter for

contribution

SPV has given the commitment letter Document

required.

(k.) SPV specific A/c Name: Organic Millets Cluster A/C No.:

155300301000137 IFSC Code:

VIJB0001553 Vijaya Bank Vidyanagar,

Davanagere, Karnataka.

--

(l.) Trust Building of SPV,

Previous track record of co-

operative initiatives pursued

by SPV members need to be

highlighted with support

documentation.

The SPV has good trust and corporation

among its member‟s details available in

DPR. The DSR found that the cluster

members are having good trust and

coordination and have made completed

majority of the soft interventions like the

trust building programs, capacity building

programs, exposure visits to other clusters.

Hence the diagnostic study found that the

cluster members are ready for undertaking

hard interventions.

--

(m.) Technical Institution Intaglio Technical and Business Services,

Bangalore

(n.) CFC may be utilised by

SPV members as also others

Yes, the SPV has given undertaking for

Capacity Utilization of CFC by SPV Document

required.

Page 75: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

70

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA)

Comments by

Cluster Division

in a cluster. However,

evidence should be furnished

with regard to SPV member

ability to utilise at least 60

percent of installed capacity.

members and non members.

(o) Utilities

(a) Power requirement for

commercial/domestic

purpose

Commercial 200 KVA --

(b) Water 10,000 liters per day. --

(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities Nil. --

4. Implementation Arrangements

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Comments by Cluster Division

(a.) Implementing Agency Karnataka Council for Technological Upgradation (KCTU), Bangalore, Govt. of Karnataka.

--

(b.) Fund receiving Agency Karnataka Council for Technological Upgradation (KCTU), Bangalore, Govt. of Karnataka.

--

(c.) Implementation Period 19 months 24 Months from date of final approval.

(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations

DPR will be submitted to SIDBI for appraisal

SIDBI Appraisal required prior to final approval.

(e.) Comments of Technical Division

The proposal was discussed in detail during 64th

meeting of Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) held on 05.03.19 and TEAC in its 65

th meeting held on 13.06.19

recommended the proposal to place before steering committee for In-principle approval.

(f.) Approval of Technical Committee

(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:

Recommended for in-principle approval under MSE-CDP.

(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank,if applicable arrangement made)

Yes, in principle approval of working capital letter attached.

--

5. Financial Analysis of CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA) Comments by

Cluster Division (a.) BEP 40%

As per MSE-CDP guidelines.

(b.) IRR, Payback period 25%, 4 year (c.) DSCR NA (d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)

32%

(e.) NPV 27% (f.) DER NA (g.) Sensitivity Analysis Sensitivity analysis is performed for 5%

and 10% reduction of capacity or fall in sales and the figures are satisfactory and as per the limits specified in the guidelines.

(h.) Status of CFCs approved a) Cluster Implemented --

Page 76: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

71

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Comments by Cluster Division

in the State 1. Auto components Cluster, Hubli 2. Readymade Garment Cluster, Hubli 3. Food Cluster, Gulbarga 4. Raisin Processing Cluster, Bijapur. 5. Auto Cluster, Bidar 6. Raisin Processing Cluster, Athani,

Belgaum. 7. ELCIA Cluster, Bangalore. 8. Heat Treatment & Engg Cluster Hubli, b) Clusters Under implementation 1. Printing Cluster Bangalore 2. Utopia Cashew Cluster, Kumta, Uttara

Kannada. 3. Global Puffed Rice Cluster, Chitradurga.

6. Proposed project cost:

(Rs. in lakh)

S.No. Particulars Amount

1. Land (1 acres for 30 years lease) 22.50

2. Building 112.85

3. Plant & Machinery (including electrification) 513.24

4. Misc. fixed assets 12.85

5. Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 14.00

6. Contingencies (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery) 27.92

7. Margin money for working capital 12.15

Total 715.51

7. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)

S.No. Particulars Percentage Amount

1. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 80.00 572.41

2. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Karnataka 10.00 71.55

3. SPV contribution 10.00 71.55

Total 100.00 715.51

8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)

(Rs. in lakh)

S.No. Description No. Power Requirement (HP/KW)

Cost

1. Millet Cleaning Machine1.5 tons/hour

1 27HP 20.30

2. Millet Steamer and Dryer 1.5 tons/hour

1 9HP 46.11

3. Millet Automatic Polishing Machine 1.5 tons/hour

1 68.5HP 49.70

4. Millet Automatic Colour Sorter 1.5 tons/hour

1 15HP 50.27

5. Millet Packaging with Automatic Weighing, Stitching, Sealing, and Labeling Machine Setup 5 to 25 kg bag size, 20 PPM, Thermal

1 6HP 77.52

Page 77: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

72

S.No. Description No. Power Requirement (HP/KW)

Cost

Code Labeler /Printer

6. Pouch Packing Machine 50 gms to 500 gms

1 3.5HP 21.47

7. Value Added Product Development Center Setup Modular Setup

1 3HP 12.96

8. Cold Storage 500 Tons Capacity, 2 to 15 degree Celsius room temperature, 415v/50 hz, 3hp

1 118HP 101.53

9. Weigh Bridge 60 Tons Capacity 1 2HP 7.14

10. Testing Equipment testing setup 1 1HP 26.54

11. DG SET 160 KVA 1 0 10.88

12. ETP 20KLD 1 20 KLD 30.61

13. Rain Water Harvesting Plant 25 KLD

1 25 KLD 10.67

14. Electrical installation & fittings: Wiring, Electrical Installation and Fittings Transformer, Changeover Pannel, Power Management Unit

1 00 29.84

15. Fire Fighting and Safety Equipment's Hand Held and wall mounted cans with Safety equipment

1 00 7.63

16. Office Equipment's and Setup CCTV setup,Computers,Windows and Antivirus Software, Tall Software, Website Development and Hosting MIS Software

1 00 10.07

Total 513.24

9. Observations:

Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:

(i) SIDBI appraisal report.

(ii) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.

(iii) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution.

(iv) Commitment letter with regard to SPV members‟ ability to utilize at least 60 percent

of installed capacity.

(v) Commitment letter from State Government/SPV to meet the escalation cost, if any,

over and above the approved project cost.

(vi) Certificate from State Government stating that more than 50% units in the cluster are

Micro/SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be.

(vii) Certificate from State Government regarding compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.

(viii) Documentary proof from SPV for utilization of CFC facilities by at least 51% of the

cluster members.

10. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up of Common

Facility Centre (CFC) in Organic Millets Cluster, Davanagere, Karnataka.

********

Page 78: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

73

Agenda No.50.3.12: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up Common Facility

Centre (CFC) in Readymade Garment & Hosiery Cluster, Hiriyur,

Chitradurga, Karnataka.

Background

The proposal was recommended by State Level Steering Committee (SLSC) of

Government of Karnataka in its meeting held on 15.11.18.

Focus Report was forwarded by MSME-DI, Bengaluru vide letter dated 09.05.19.

Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 65th

meeting held on 13.06.19

recommended the proposal to place before Steering Committee for In-principle approval.

Proposal was received from Karnataka Council for Technological Upgradation vide

online ref. No. 14056 dated 24.06.19 & recommended by MSME-DI, Bengaluru.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Basic Information of Cluster Name of Cluster Readymade Garments Cluster District Chitradurga Location of Cluster Hiriyur Lok Sabha Constituency Chitradurga(SC) Main Product Banians, Undergarments, Petticoat, Kids wear,

Blouses, Shirts and Pants, Frocks, Readymade suit and salwar, other Readymade Garments, Zari Zardozi based suits and sarees, Embroidary Based suits and sarees.

No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium)

85 nos. (Micro – 80% women owned)

Turnover for the last five years Rs. 12.50 crore. Exports for the last five years Nil Employment in Cluster 1840 nos. Technology Details Traditional stitching machines Whether DS Conducted Yes DSR Conducted By Intaglio Technical and

Business Service Main findings of DSR The Hosiery and Garment Cluster in Ikkanur village

consists of 54 micro units with 90% SC/ST owned. The cluster members are involved in two types of activities they produce hosiery and garment products for direct sales in the market and are also active in providing tailoring services to traders and other customers whenever a need arises, for example the women entrepreneurs stitch school uniforms of nearby Govt. Schools at the beginning of the academic year.

Main Problems of Cluster 1. Majority of the cluster units have traditional manual sewing machines. It was observed that the cluster members/units cut the raw material of required size manually by using scissors which sometimes may not be accurate and in case of an error the entire piece is wasted. It is very difficult to achieve standard sizes using manual cutting measures. 2. The cluster members lack knowledge of standard size usually adopted by the readymade garment sellers. As a result the fitness of the cloths has varying impressions. 3. Proper storage of raw materials and finished garment products was not observed in the cluster and due to this the quality of cotton fabrics get deteriorated. 4. The processing time of the products is long and intensive. 5. The cluster

Page 79: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

74

members lack packaging knowledge and packaging activities are completely absent. 6. Manual embroidery activities by the cluster members and lack of modern machinery are hindering their quality. 7. The cluster members lack proper marketing strategy and advertisement. They have a stagnant market and limited nearby villages and towns. The urban market is through dealers that is effecting on the cluster profitability. 8. The cluster members manual wash the finished products to remove strains and marking on the cloth. None of the cluster units possess Dry cleaning facility. 9. Product diversification is not taking place. The cluster members lack modern design tools and fashion product development knowledge. 10. No brand identity of the cluster products. 11. Lack of training activities in the cluster is leading to poor quality.

Other Information The cluster region consists of good number of Garment Industry and hence has large Manpower availability. Hosiery and other readymade garments is tailor made to full fill the needs of the village and town folks, customized stitching and fitments are used accordingly.

2. Information about Proposed CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

(a.) Justification for CFC 1. The CFC with advance machinery like

lace pattern designing, lace cutting, and

pressing machine will help the cluster

members in value addition of their hosiery

products. 2. The CFC with advance

machinery for garments design, Finishing

machinery like overlocking, kaja making

and button fixing will help in quality up

gradation and productivity improvement of

cluster members 3. the CFC with

embroidery machine will help in value

addition of cluster ladies wear product like

suits. 4. The CFC with dry cleaning,

pressing will be useful as finishing line of

the cluster products.

--

(b.) Location of CFC Ikkanur village is located in the Hiriyur

taluk of Chitradurga district in Karnataka.

--

% age of units in radius of

5km

70 --

% age of units in radius of

10km

100 --

(c.) Land for CFC

i. Whether land acquired Yes Registered Lease

deed in the name

of SPV for a ii. Title is in name of Registered Lease Deed in the name of SPV

for 30 years

Page 80: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

75

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

iii. Valuation and its basis As per the registration documents period of 30 years

is required. iv. Land is sufficient Yes,20Guntas

v. Change of land use Yes, NA Order Issued

vi. If on lease, duration of

lease

30 years

vii Whether lease is legally

tenable

Yes

(d.) Total Building area(sq ft) 4600 --

(e.) Rate of construction of

building

1250 --

(f.) Main Facility Proposed Machinery for hosiery products

finishing like Multi Color Quilting,

ultrasonic lace and pattern cutting and

sewing machine etc.

Machinery for Readymade Ladies suits

finishing section like 10 heads 6 needle

embroidery machines.

Readymade Garments Finishing

Section like Juki Double Needle

sewing machine, over locking, edge

cutting and sewing machine etc.

Machinery for Design Development

and Training Section like cloth cutting

machine, Computer Aided Cloth

Design Machineries and Software,

Fashion Design Tools and Equipments,

Single needle sewing machines and

computers for training.

--

(g.) Prod capacity of CFC 1140 sq Ft of fabric processing Required

(h.) Major Outputs/Deliverables

of CFC, Projected performance

of the cluster after proposed

intervention (in terms of

production, export/domestic

sales and direct/indirect

employment, etc.)

Sl.

No.

Parameter Before

intervention

After

Intervention

1. Nos. of units 85 110

2 Turnover (Rs. in

crore)

12.50 25.50

3 Export (Rs. in crore) Nil 5.00

4 Employment Direct – 340

Indirect - 1500

Direct – 600

Indirect – 2500

(i.) Pollution clearance required

or not

Not applicable Required

(j.) Man Power in CFC 23 --

(k.) Revenue generation

mechanism for sustainability of

assets(service/user charges to

Multi Colour Computerized Quilting

Embroidery Machine 2,160,000.00

Ultrasonic Lace Pattern Cutting And Sewing

Required

Page 81: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

76

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

be levied, any other-to be

specified)

Machines 3,456,000.00 Ultrasonic Lace And

Pattern Pressing 2,304,000.00 10 Head Six

Needle Embroidery Machine 4,032,000.00

Readymade Garments Finishing and Sewing

Section 1,800,000.00 Readymade Garments

Cleaning, Pressing and Packing Section

2,880,000.00 Training Section 3,765,000.0

Total 20,397,000.00

3. Information about SPV

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(a.) Name and Address Mahalaxmi Readymade Cluster Association. #6/6, Sira Road, Ikkanur, Ikkanur Post, Hiriyur Taluk, Chitradurga - 577511

SPV formed

(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)

Society registered under Karnataka Society registration act 1960

--

(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV

MD KCTU, JD DIC-Chitradurga, Director MSME - DI Bangalore

--

(d.) Date of formation of SPV 15-09-2018 --

(e.) Number of Members 30 registered and 100 unregistered --

(f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted

Byelaws/MOA of the cluster is enclosed in section 9.

Received

(g.) Authorized Share Capital 29.77 Lakhs 10% % of Project Cost --

(h.) Paid up capital as on............

10 lakhs --

(i.) Shareholding Pattern Equal share holding among all members Details attached in DPR and online application

Required

(j.) Commitment letter for contribution

SPV Commitment letter Received and attached in DPR and Application

Required

(k.) SPV specific A/c Name: M/s Mahalaxmi Readymade Garment Cluster Association (R) A/c: 147001011003209 Bank: Vijaya Bank IFSC Code: VIJB0001470

--

(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation

The diagnostics study has found that the cluster needs to be supported with new technology machinery for the promotion and progress of the cluster. The diagnostics study recommends the following hard intervention activities

--

(m.) Technical Institution Intaglio Technical and Business Services --

(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.

Yes the SPV has given undertaking for Capacity Utilization of CFC by SPV members and non members. Capacity utilization Letter of SPV attached in DPR and Online Application

Required

Page 82: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

77

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(o.) --

(a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose

50 KVA --

(b) Water 9,31,950 liters per day --

(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities 00 --

4. Implementation Arrangements

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(a.) Implementing Agency Karnataka Council for Technological Upgradation (KCTU), Bangalore

As per guidelines

(b.) Fund receiving Agency

(c.) Implementation Period 24 months --

(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations

DPR is examined and recommended by MSME DI Indore

Required

(e.) Comments of Technical Division

Technical Division MSME DI Indore has examined the project and has recommended the project as technically feasible and financially viable

--

(f.) Approval of Technical Committee

DPR Submitted to O/o DC (MSME), GoI for approval.

TEAC recommended the proposal.

(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:

DPR Submitted to O/o DC (MSME), GoI for approval.

--

(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)

Yes, in principle approval of working capital letter attached

--

5. Financial Analysis of CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

(a.) BEP 42% --

(b.) IRR, Payback period 33% --

(c.) DSCR Not applicable, as no loan involved --

(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)

35% --

(e.) NPV 32% --

(f.) DER Not applicable --

(g.) Sensitivity Analysis Sensitivity analysis is performed for 5% and 10% reduction of capacity or fall in sale and the figures are satisfactory and as per the limits specified in the guidelines

--

(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State

Clusters Implemented. 1 Auto Cluster Bidar 2 Food Processing Cluster, Gulbarga 3 Auto Component Cluster, Hubli 4 Heat Treatment and Engineering Cluster, Hubli 5 Readymade Garments Cluster, Hubli 6 Raisins Processing Cluster, Bijapur 7 Raisins Processing Cluster,

--

Page 83: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

78

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

Belgaum 8. Electronics Industries Cluster (ELCIA), Bangalore 9. Printing Cluster, Bangalore Clusters Under Implementation 1. Utopia Cashew Processing Cluster, Kumta, Uttara Kannada Dist 2. Global Puffed Rice Cluster,Chitradurga

6. Proposed Project Cost:

(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Amount

(i) Land 22.50 (ii) Building 68.95 (iii) Plant & Machinery (including electrification) 176.04 (iv) Misc. fixed assets 6.00 (v) Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 6.00 (vi) Contingencies (2% on building and 5% on plant and machinery) 10.18 (vii) Margin money for working capital 8.00

Total 297.67

7. Proposed means of finance:

Particulars Percentage Amount

(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 80.00 238.13

(ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Karnataka 10.00 29.77

(iii) SPV contribution 10.00 29.77

Total 100.00 297.67

8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)

S. No. Name of the Machine Qty Amount A Hosiery Finishing Section 1. Multi-color computerized quilting machine 1 14.76

2. Ultrasonic Lace Pattern Cutting Machine 1 14.76 3. Ultrasonic lace sewing machine 1 17.22 4. Ultrasonic lace and pattern pressing machine 1 15.44 B Readymade Ladies suits finishing section 1. 10 Head 6 needle embroidery machine 1 32.49 C. Readymade Garments Finishing Section 1. Juki 1560 ¼ Double Needle 1 2.83

2. Juki Model MO-6716 S-over locking sewing machine 1 3.58

3. Juki Model DLM-5200 Edge Cutter sewing machine. 1 3.60

4. Kansai – loop making machine model B2000C 1 2.95

5. Garments Finishing setup – steam pressing, Dry

Cleaning, Folding and Packing 1 17.66

D Design Development and Training Section

1. Cloth cutting machine 1 2.44

2. Computer Aided Cloth Design Machineries and software 1 25.21

3. Fashion Design Tools and Equipments 1 3.44

4. Juki model DDL 8300N Single Needle sewing machine 5 2.20

5. Computers 5 2.33

Page 84: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

79

S. No. Name of the Machine Qty Amount 6. DG SET – 125 KVA 1 14.80

7. Software OS Anti Virus 5 0.33

Total 176.04

9. Observations:

Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:

(i) Registered land documents in the name of SPV (if land is on lease basis, registered

lease deed for a minimum period of 30 years is required).

(ii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.

(iii) Commitment letter from State Government / IA to meet the cost escalation, if any,

over and above the approved project cost.

(iv) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution.

(v) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilize at least 60 percent of installed

capacity.

(vi) Details of production capacity.

(vii) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.

(viii) Details of Revenue generation mechanism

(ix) Details of shareholding pattern.

(x) Details regarding registration of all units in MSME databank.

(xi) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR / CVC guidelines.

(xii) Documentary proof from SPV for utilization of CFC facilities by at least 51% of the

cluster members.

(xiii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro /

SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be.

10. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up Common

Facility Center (CFC) in Readymade Garment & Hosiery Cluster, Hiriyur, Chitradurga,

Karnataka.

********

Page 85: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

80

Agenda No.50.3.13: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up Common Facility

Centre (CFC) in Food Processing Cluster, Sirsi, Uttara Kannada,

Karnataka.

Background

The proposal was recommended by State Level Steering Committee (SLSC) of

Government of Karnataka in its meeting held on 15.11.18.

Proposal along with Focus Report, Detailed Project Report and recommendation was

forwarded by MSME-DI, Hubli vide letter dated 10.05.19.

Proposal was received from Karnataka Council For Technological Upgradation vide

application ref. No. 13757 dated 11.06.19 & recommended by MSME-DI, Hubli.

Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 65th

meeting held on 13.06.19

recommended the proposal to place before Steering Committee for In-principle approval.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Basic Information of Cluster Name of Cluster Food Processing Cluster District Uttara Kannada Location of Cluster Sirsi Lok Sabha Constituency Uttara Kannada Main Product

Frozen Fruits and Vegetables, Vacuum Fried Chips, Freeze Dried Fruit and Vegetables, Virgin Coconut Oil, Garcinia Indica and Garcinia Cambogia Butter, Canned Fruits and Vegetables, Fruit pulp, Multi Grain Powder, Dehydrated fruits and veget.

No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium)

Units Nos. Micro : 33 Small : 4 Total : 37

Turnover for the last five years Year (Rs. in crore) 2012-13 253.00 2013-14 298.00 2014-15 372.00 2015-16 438.00 2016-17 512.00

Exports for the last five years Nil Employment in Cluster 1852 nos. (Direct – 245 & Indirect – 1607) Technology Details Sterilizing Equipment Advanced Mechanized Dryers

like Freeze Drying & Controlled atmosphere Drying Vacuum Frying Equipment Cold Chain Solutions like IQF, Cold Storage Canning Facilities Oil Extraction Facility Powder Making Grinders: Nitrogen Packaging Machines

Whether DS Conducted Yes Main findings of DSR Even though the Raw materials are available,

new value additions are not taking place. There are many problems in cluster to scale

up. Key technology is missing in processing. Common solutions can be made available to

address major issues. There will be more opportunities if scientific

approach is adapted in Packing, Storing, Branding, Marketing and R&D

Main Problems of Cluster No value additions No advance methods Storage problem of seasonally available raw

Page 86: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

81

materials and final products Branding and marketing Short of standard packing

Other Information The cluster members have good local and regional market linkage but the urban market linkage is very week, due to age old methodologies and inadequate infrastructure for advertisement of their products in urban, National and International markets. The processing methodology that the cluster members are following is very labor intensive and time consuming. The fact that they are using open sun drying method is major drawback as this region is a hilly region with frequent rainfalls.

2. Information about Proposed CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(a.) Justification for CFC The Food cluster at Sirsi produces valuable and non chemical preservative value added fruit/ vegetable products. The style of production is very old fashioned, informal and primitive. They are not able to imply modern equipment even though they know about new technologies due to financial constraints. The CFC that is being proposed at the cluster will bring about holistic changes. It will increase the cluster turnover to 300%-400%. The machineries proposed will increase the productivity, reduces the processing time and will increase the hygienic level and quality of their products.

--

(b.) Location of CFC Plot No: SPL 25, Industrial Area, Banvasi Road, Sirsi, Uttar Kannada District, Karnataka 581401

--

% age of units in radius of 5km

11 --

% age of units in radius of 10km

89 --

(c.) Land for CFC i. Whether land acquired Yes Lease deed for a

period of 30 years received.

ii. Title is in name of Padmanabha V. Bhat iii. Valuation and its basis NA iv. Land is sufficient Yes v. Change of land use NA vi. If on lease, duration of lease

30 Years

vii Whether lease is legally tenable

Yes

(d.) Total Building area(sq ft) 10763 Sqft (e.) Rate of construction of building

NA --

(f.) Main Facility Proposed Common Raw Material Bank Common Processing Final Storage

Post-harvest handling to assure quality and safety of fresh produce: Harvested produce should be placed in a shaded area so as

Page 87: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

82

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

to avoid sun damage, if awaiting transportation to the processing plant. Produce must be properly handled to avoid bruising and contamination. (i) Receiving at the processing facility. (ii) Pre-cooling. (iii) Washing and disinfection. (iv) Peeling, trimming and deseeding. (v) Sorting for defects. (vi) Cutting operations. (vii) Rinsing of pre-cut and vegetables. (viii) Cold storage.

(g.) Prod capacity of CFC 30000Kg per Day -- (h.)Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/ domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)

Sl. No.

Parameter Before intervention

After Intervention

1. Nos. of units (nos.)

37 67

2 Turnover (Rs. in crore)

6.493 34.0306

3 Export (Rs. in crore)

Nil 1.50

4 Employment (nos.)

245 1008

(i.) Pollution clearance required or not

Required. Consent for Establishment of CFC is obtained from KSPCB on 19.07.2018.

Required

(j.) Man Power in CFC Processing section -46 Administration section - 12

--

(k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)

Processing Charges: between Rs.4 to Rs.120 per Kg Raw Material Bank service charges Rs.3 per Kg Cold Storage Rs.350 per ton per day

--

3. Information about SPV

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(a.) Name and Address Simha Shakti Okkuta, Food Cluster Sirsi. Plot No. SPL 25, Industrial Area, Banavasi Road, Sirsi, Uttar Kannada District, Karnataka. No. of SPV members – 37 nos.

SPV formed

(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)

Registered as Society under Karnataka Society Registration act 1960.

--

(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV

Managing Director KCTU and Director, MSME-DI, Hubli

--

(d.) Date of formation of SPV 4-7-2013 --

Page 88: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

83

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(e.) Number of Members 37 -- (f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted

Yes Required

(g.) Authorized Share Capital NA -- (h.) Paid up capital as on............

Rs.228500 Total Membership Fees Collected as on 31st March 2018

--

(i.) Shareholding Pattern Submitted Received (j.) Commitment letter for contribution

Submitted Received

(k.) SPV specific A/c Bank Name: Central Bank of India Branch: Sirsi Type of Account: Current A/c No: 3316572980 IFSC: CBIN0283676

Required

(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation

1. Training, Workshop and Programme conducted under SPV initiative at Sirsi 2. Undergone 2 days intensive training in CFTRI, Mysore and got Certificate in this regard

--

(m.) Technical Institution CFTRI, Mysore and Karnataka Council for Technological Upgradation (KCTU), Bangalore

--

(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.

Yes, Commitment Letter Enclosed Received

(o.) (a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose

250KV --

(b) Water The CFC requires 5000 Litre of water per day for processing of Food

--

(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities Diesel for Generator, Fire wood for Boilers, Solar Energy

--

4. Implementation Arrangements

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA) Remarks

(a.) Implementing Agency Karnataka Council for Technological Upgradation (KCTU), Bangalore.

As per guidelines (b.) Fund receiving Agency (c.) Implementation Period 2 Years -- (d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations

DPR will be submitted to SIDBI for techno-Economic Appraisal after In Principle Approval.

Required

(e.) Comments of Technical Division

MSME - DI, Hyderabad has submitted the Technical comments on CFC to MSME - DI, Hubli and recommended the CFC proposal for in principle approval vide letter dated 05.04.2019.

--

(f.) Approval of Technical Committee

DPR Submitted to DC MSME Govt. Of India for approval.

TEAC recommended the proposal.

(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:

MSME DI Hubli has submitted the Focus report and recommended the CFC proposal vide letter dated 10.05.2019.

--

(h.) Working capital(In- SPV has taken In Principle approval for --

Page 89: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

84

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)

sanction of working capital loan from Central Bank of India, Sirsi Branch, Uttara Kannada dist vide letter dated 10.06.2019.

5. Financial Analysis of CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA) Remarks

(a.) BEP 27.66% -- (b.) IRR, Payback period 21.37%,.4 Years -- (c.) DSCR 102.34 -- (d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)

27.64 % --

(e.) NPV 0.583 -- (f.) DER 9.0 -- (g.) Sensitivity Analysis Reducing the revenue by 10%, ratios are

under acceptable limits. --

(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State

Implemented. 1. Auto Cluster, Hubli 2. Readymade garments cluster, Hubli. 3. Food Cluster, Gulbarga 4. Auto cluster, Bidar 5. Raisin Processing Cluster, Bijapur 6. Heat Treatment & Engg Cluster, Hubli 7. Athani Raisin Processing Cluster, Belagavi. 8. ELCIA Cluster, Bangalore. Under Implementation. 1. Printing Cluster, Bangalore. 2. Uthopia Cashew Cluster, Kumta, Uttara Kannada . In Principle Approved. 1. Belgaum Cashew Processors Cluster Society, Jadhav Nagar, Belagavi Dist. 2. Spices Manufacturing Cluster, Gadag Dist 3. Jaagery Processing Cluster, Raibag, Belagavi Dist 4. Shivashakthy Foundry Cluster , Shivamogga Dist

--

6. Proposed Project Cost:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Amount

1. Land 0.00

2. Building 0.00

3. Plant & Machinery (including electrification) 671.50

4. Misc. fixed assets 5.00

5. Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 5.00

6. Contingencies (2% on building and 5% on plant and

machinery)

20.00

7. Margin money for working capital 4.18

Total 705.68

Page 90: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

85

7. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Percentage Amount

(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 80.00 564.54

(ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Karnataka 10.00 70.57

(iii) SPV contribution 10.00 70.57

Total 100.00 705.68

8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Name of the Machine Qty Total Cost with GST and

installation charges A Raw Material Bank 1. Cutting and cubing machine (for vegetables) 1 0.47

2. Fruit and vegetable blanching machine 1 0.89 3. Washer & Blanching machine (for fruits) 1 3.51 4. Fruit washing machine (Manually operating, for

soft fruits) 1 0.85

5. Automatic vegetable cutting machine 1 2.73 6. Cleaning and pealing machine (for root

vegetables) 1 2.28

7 Slicing machine (vegetables) 1 4.49 8. Stainless steel working table 1 2.10 9. Four head jack fruit pealing machine 1 3.44

10. Dehydrate 1 6.46 11. Dryer 1 3.69 12. Special Flour Mill 1 1.21 13. Commercial flour mill 1 1.21 14. Ribbon blender (for mixing grains etc.) 1 1.48 15. Roster 1 3.07 16. Vibro sifter 1 0.71 17. Fruit & Vegetable dicing machine (blade size

5x5 & 10x10) 1 4.02

18. Fruit & vegetable dicing machine (blade size 8x8 & 16x16)

1 4.02

19. Fruit milling machine (250 mm, DIA, Crushing) 1 1.35 20. Fully automatic (sizing, peeling, coring

machine) 1 40.59

21. Horizontal Peeling Coring machine 2 12.73 22. Horizontal Slicing machine (one dia fruit 75-85

MM) 1 4.92

23. Horizontal slicing machine (one dia fruit 87-95

MM) 1 4.86

24. Horizontal TIT-BIT Cutting machine (80-95

MM) 1 2.28

25. Pulping machine (for extraction of fruit pulp) 1 1.33 26. Horizontal TIT-BIT Cutting machine (65-75

MM) 1 2.34

27. Fruit Slicer 1 1.91 28. Cold Storage – 1 1 4.65

Page 91: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

86

S. No. Name of the Machine Qty Total Cost with GST and

installation charges B Value Addition Machineries 1. IQF Machine 1 55.86 2. Vacuum Frying Machine 1 7.38 3. Deep Freezer (Blast Freezer) 1 7.98 4. Freez Dryer 1 123.69 5. Agitator Tank 1 2.82 6. Clarifier (for oil) 1 3.69 7. LF DC Discharge conveyor 1 1.49 8. Micro Filter (for virgin coconut oil) 1 3.11 9. Milk extractor machine (for coconut milk) 1 8.52

10. Self priming pump 1 0.68 11. Tabular Centrifuge (for oil) 1 9.74 12. Virgin Oil Collection Tank 1 1.08 13. Coconut Deshelling machine 2 2.46 14. Coconut Grating Machine 1 4.92 15. Micro filter (for seed oil) 1 3.11 16. Oil Expeller 1 4.18 17. Milk collection tank (for coconut milk) 1 0.74 18. Can Handpressure Tester – Foot Operated Pump 1 0.59 19. Can Holing basket 4 7.38 20. Canning retort 2 1.18 21. Double seamer – DS 24 (CAN SEAMER) 2 12.18 22. Inspection Conveyor (for peeled and cored fruit) 1 5.52 23. Inspection cum filling conveyor 1 5.53 24. Machine flange rectifier 1 0.17 25. Material Handling Trolley 6 0.58 26. Material Handling Trolley Heavy Duty 4 0.44 27. Refractometer 0”- 32” (2 nos.), 28” – 62” (1 no.) 3 0.13 28. Retort Basket 12 0.75 29. Steam checking scale guage 2 0.018 30. Spear point guage SS made vaccum tester 1 0.03 31. Stainless Steel Centrifugal Transfer 1 0.77 32. Steam generating boiler 1 22.32 33. Steam jacketed kettle fixed type 1 2.55 34. Steam jacketed kettle tilting type 1 1.35 35. Storing cum feeding table 6 2.10 36. Straight line exhaust box (for canning) 1 7.011 37. Sugar syrup preparation cum holding tank 1 5.09 38. Syrup filling cum storing table 1 2.34 39. Weighing cum storing table 2 0.52 40. Basket lifting electrically operated chain hoist 1 1.97 41. Tubular Centrifuge (for juice extraction) 1 9.74 C Packing Facilities

42. FFS Machine (for semi finished raw material) 1 8.61 43. Single chamber vacuum packing machine (alles

pack – DZ -500/ZE) 1 0.75

44. Band Sealer 2 0.50 45. FFS Multy (for raw vegetables & fruits) 1 5.29 46. Bag Sealerr 1 0.061 47. FFS Machine (for crispy products) 1 17.22 48. FFS Horizontal (for fruit bar) 1 6.46

Page 92: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

87

S. No. Name of the Machine Qty Total Cost with GST and

installation charges 49. Centre seal machine (for powder) 1 17.22 50. Double Chamber vacuum packing machine

(model: ALLES Pack – DZ 500/2SB) 1 1.66

D Other supportive Machines and accessories 1. Air conditioner 3 1.99 2. Effluent Treatment plant 1 9.84 3. Micro – Biology Laboratory set 1 11.43 4. Office equipments 1 7.38 5. RO Water purification unit 1 2.46 6. Solar energy system (for office equipments,

lighting and CC TV) 1 6.15

7. Diesel Generator Set (for power back up) 1 17.22

8. Bore well 1 2.46 9. Pressure washer (for floor cleaning) 2 0.25

10. Solar Water Heater 1 1.23 11. Water pump 2 0.61 12. Bin and containers 1 2.46 13. CC TV System 1 1.84 14. Fire Extenguisher 4 0.49 15. Linen (for 60 employees, 2 each) 60 0.74 16. Plant tools and equipments 1 6.16 17. Website 1 1.23 18. Weighing Scale (150KG X 1 No., 50 KG X 2

Nos., 20 KG X 2 Nos.) 5 1.23

E Cold storage – 2 1 4.30

Electrification 1 19.69

Total 612.23

9. Observations:

Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:

(i) SIDBI Appraisal Report.

(ii) Commitment letter from State Government / IA to meet the cost escalation, if any,

over and above the approved project cost.

(iii) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.

(iv) Bye Laws or MA and AOA.

(v) Details of Revenue generation mechanism

(vi) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR / CVC guidelines.

(vii) Documentary proof from SPV for utilization of CFC facilities by at least 51% of the

cluster members.

10. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up Common

Facility Center (CFC) in Food Processing Cluster, Sirsi, Uttara Kannada, Karnataka.

********

Page 93: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

88

Agenda No.50.3.14: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up Common Facility

Centre (CFC) in Wood Carpentry Cluster, Baktawng, Serchip,

Mizoram.

Background

The proposal was recommended by State Level Project Steering Committee in its

meeting held on 04.10.18.

Proposal was received from Government of Mizoram vide online ref. No. 14264 dated

11.06.19 & recommended by MSME-DI, Agartala.

Focus Report was forwarded by MSME-DI, Agartala vide e-mail dated 07.06.19.

MSME-DI, Agartala would make a presentation before Techno Economic Appraisal

Committee (TEAC) on their observations.

Proposal was considered by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 65th

Meeting held on 13.06.19 and TEAC recommended the proposal to place before Steering

Committee for In-principle approval.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Basic Information of Cluster

Name of Cluster : Wood Carpentry Cluster, Baktawng

District : Serchip

Location of Cluster : Baktawng

Lok Sabha Constituency : Mizoram (ST)

Main Product : Bed, Chest of Drawer, Cupboard, Dining Set, Doors, Frames,

Shelf, stand, Tables, Bench, Chokut, Almira, Stair Raylling,

Ventilators and Windows

No. of Enterprises including

break up (Micro, Small,

Medium) (Nos)

Micro: 107

Turnover for the last five years

Year Amount

(Rs. in crore)

2013-14 : 3.80

2014-15 : 4.13

2015-16 : 4.50

2016-17 : 4.90

2017-18 : 5.35

Exports for the last five years :

Nil

Employment in Cluster : 937 Nos.

Technology Details : After gathering the raw material from the forest, the product

goes through primary processing that includes debarking/

seasoning/chemical treatments plank cutting etc, then to

secondary processing that is manual operation with few small

tools, then the tertiary processing that is the manual operation

with few power small tools, then the products are sent for

Page 94: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

89

final assembling, the last manual operation includes polishing

and painting, lastly inspection and the product is then

dispatched.

Whether DS Conducted : Yes

Main findings of DSR : Common Facility Center would act as a common ground for the developmental and commercial activities and would ensure the involvement of all the units irrespective of their size of business operation in the cluster development programme. The artisans have not been able to afford some machinery like Width Sizing/Planning/Sizing Machine/Designing machine, Lathe Machine, Hydraulic Machine and other hi-tech and advanced timber working machine etc. Due to improper seasoning, the finished products are having low durability as well as low level of reliability. A seasoning plant is urgently required to be set up. The existing market is not organized well. The artisans are not getting proper exposure for their products. To improve the efficiency of logistics operations as a means to cutting cost, faster supply of goods to the buyers, there is the need of a facilitating agency in the cluster area. Artisans and entrepreneurs who are now earning their livelihood in this sector needs proper training on handling of machinery, time managements, business managements, waste management etc. CFC may act as training centre for them. The chain of raw material suppliers and artisans is not well organized. CFC may function as common raw material/ Sales depot to remove the hurdles of sales and raw material procurement. R and D center: The CFC is required for undertaking Research & Development on wood related technology.

Main Problems of Cluster : High Raw Material Procurement Cost Outdated machines

Under developed Marketing System Lack of proper working

place or go down Lack of social capital Lack of proper

management system of the cluster units Weak Linkage

Other Information : Nil

2. Information about Proposed CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

(a.) Justification for CFC Process study carried out in units in the cluster, involves processes as shown in the above flow chart and interactive discussions with the concerned artisans consequently dug out several critical problems being faced by them, as mentioned earlier. The problems exist in every stage right from raw material availability/Seasoning/chemical treatment through low value primary processes, and wastage of both raw material and energy to the final manufacturing step of polishing/finish, such problems are impossible to be solved without modern implements and machines. they are not enough capable of purchasing such high tech machines on to their individual levels. Thus the setting up of the CFC is very crucial for their development.

--

(b.) Location of CFC The Common Facility Centre is planned to be

Page 95: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

90

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

located in the central area of the cluster so as to enable all unit owners to avail of the proposed modern woodworking facilities without incurring handling cost for the heavy and bulky lumberers/planks/panels.

% age of units in radius of 5km

100

% age of units in radius of 10km

0

(c.) Land for CFC

i. Whether land acquired

Yes Received

ii. Title is in name of SPV --

iii. Valuation and its basis

Please see Annexure I --

iv. Land is sufficient Yes --

v. Change of land use Done --

vi. If on lease, duration of lease

Yes, 25 years --

vii Whether lease is legally tenable

NA --

(d.) Total Building area 8000 sq. ft. --

(e.) Rate of construction of building

Rs 750 --

(f.) Main Facility Proposed

Seasoning Facility. Chemical Treatment Facility. Debarking of logs. Modern Joint Making Facilities. Panel Saw, Cross Cut Saw, Band Saw

Facility. Automatic Sanding. Mortise, Tenoner Facility. Modern Edge Banding Facility. High Frequency Plank Joining. Powered Small Tools. Finishing Facilities. Laminating Facility. Quality Control Service. Skill Upgradation Facility. Marketing network through optional

common branding.

--

(g.) Prod capacity of CFC

CFC will be Capable of processing 10000 to 10500 cft of raw wood per month in 200 hours/month of operation hours

--

(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/ domestic sales and direct /indirect employment, etc.)

Sl. No.

Parameters Before interventions

After Interventions

1 Total no. of units 107 130-150 2 Total annual

turnover (Rs. in lakh)

535 Around Rs. 800.00 lakh after two years.

3 Export Nil Expected Rs. 100.00 lakh

4 Investment (Rs. in lakh)

154 Expected Rs. 250.00 lakh

Page 96: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

91

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

5 Profitability (percentage)

15-20% 20-25%

6 Employment generation (Direct & Indirect)

937 Nos. Expected 1450-1500 Nos.

7 ISO & Other certification

NA Expected to be introduced

(i.) Pollution clearance required or not

Yes Required.

(j.) Man Power in CFC 55 --

(k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets (service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)

Rs. 361.01 Lac --

3. Information about SPV

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

(a.) Name and Address Baktawng Carpentry Industrial Co-operative

Society (Registered under the Mizoram Co-

operative Societies Act 1991 under

Registration Number AE 233 or 96-97)

Baktawng, Tlangnuam, Mizoram, Pin- 796161

--

(b.) Nature of

SPV(company or Society

or Trust)

Registered Industrial Cooperative Society --

(c.) Name of the state Govt.

and MSME officials in

SPV

Pi Elizabeth Lalremthangi , Functional

Manager, DIC, Serchhip

--

(d.) Date of formation of

SPV

2.3.2017 --

(e.) Number of Members 107 --

(f.) Bye Laws or MA and

AOA submitted

Submitted Received

(g.) Authorized Share

Capital

-- --

(h.) Paid up capital -- --

(i.) Shareholding Pattern Submitted Received

(j.) Commitment letter for

contribution

Submitted Received

(k.) SPV specific A/c State Bank of India Account Number:

36462418039

--

(l.) Trust Building of SPV, SPV in the names of Baktawng Carpentry --

Page 97: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

92

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

Previous track record of co-

operative initiatives

pursued by SPV members

need to be highlighted with

support documentation

Industrial Cooperative Society has been

formed and. A copy of the registration

certificate is enclosed at Annexure III. A land

measuring 13.50 bighas has been acquired by

the SPV in the closed proximity of the

Baktawng village. Prepared and submitted by

SPV . The members of SPV is expected to

have equal number of shares in the CFC as far

as the contribution of the shareholder is

concerned. Project specific account with State

Bank of India, Khumtung Branch. Several

meetings have been held for awareness

regading the MSECDP scheme, technology

and implements selected and the process of the

CFC.

(m.) Technical Institution NIT Mizoram/ NID --

(n.) CFC may be utilised by

SPV members as also

others in a cluster.

However, evidence should

be furnished with regard to

SPV member ability to

utilise at least 60 percent of

installed capacity.

Submitted Received

(o.)

(a) Power requirement for

commercial/domestic

purpose

Yes, 150 kw --

(b) Water Yes --

(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities Yes, Disel --

4. Implement Arrangements

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

(a.) Implementing Agency Indian Institute of Entrepreneurship,

Guwahati, Ministry of Skill Development

and Entrepreneurship, Govt. of India

As per guidelines.

(b.) Fund receiving Agency Indian Institute of Entrepreneurship,

Guwahati, Ministry of Skill Development

and Entrepreneurship, Govt. of India

(c.) Implementation Period 18 months 24 months

(d.) Appraisal of DPR and

main Recommendations

To be submitted Required

(e.) Comments of Technical -- --

Page 98: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

93

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

Division

(f.) Approval of Technical

Committee

Pending TEAC has

recommended the

proposal.

(g.) Comments of Cluster

Development Division:

-- --

(h.) Working capital(In-

principle sanction of loan

from a bank, if applicable

arrangement made)

NA --

5. Financial Analysis of CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

(a.) BEP 56.66% (of installed capacity) --

(b.) IRR, Payback period 15.82 % after tax 22.85% before tax Pay

Back Period 4 Years 5 Months

--

(c.) DSCR NA --

(d.) Return on Capital

employed (ROCE)

30.80% before tax --

(e.) NPV Positive --

(f.) DER NA --

(g.) Sensitivity Analysis Positive --

(h.) Status of CFCs approved

in the State

NA --

6. Proposed Project Cost:

(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Amount

1. Land & site development (land leased) 25.41 2. Building 60.00 3. Plant & Machinery (including electrification) 390.63 4. Misc. fixed assets 8.09 5. Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 11.80 6. Contingencies (2% on building and 5% on plant and

machinery) 20.73

7. Margin money for working capital 18.34 Total 535.00

7. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Percentage (%) Amount

1 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 83.46 446.50

2 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Mizoram 10.00 53.50

3 SPV contribution 6.54 35.00

Total 100.00 535.00

Page 99: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

94

8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)

(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Nos. Power,

kW Total Cost

A Main Equipments

1 SCM MINIMAX Band Saw S400 P (Non CE) 1 1.50 2.50 2 SCM sSliding Table Panel Saw 400 Nova 1 7.50 5.50

3 SCM Cut-off Saw 1 5.00 4.10

4 SCM, SPINDLE MOULDER WITH TILTING SPINDLE & LL Version

1 10.00 9.20

5 FEED 44, SCM Feeder STANDARD MACHINE 1 1.00 0.80

6 CMS Balestrini, Automatic Twin Table Round-End Tenoner

1 2.55 17.00

7 MICRON - CMS BALESTRINI, Automatic Twin Table Slot Mortiser MICRON

1 2.55 9.35

8 NOVA-F-(x) - SCM SURFACE PLANER STANDARD MACHINE

1 2.00 6.15

9 SCM THICKNESSING PLANER - STANDARD MACHINE

1 3.00 6.15

10 SCM SANDYA AUTOMATIC WIDE BELT SANDER S600 RCS 135 - STANDARD EQUIPMENT

1 15.00 36.60

11 SCM Universal Belt Sanding Centre - with Oscillating Belt BASIC MACHINE

1 3.00 6.95

12 SCM, Automatic Throughfeed Planer Moulder, PROFISET 40CE. STANDARD MACHINE

1 5.00 15.30

13 Festool Domino Joining Machine Domino Df 500 Q 1 1.00 1.18

14 Festool Domino Assortment Box DE - Beechwood Domino Assortment Ds 4/5/6/8/10 1060Xbu Assortment Sys Sort-Sys Domino

1 0.32

15 Festool Mobile Dust Extractor Ctl Midi Fitted Filter Bag

1 1.00 0.57

16 Festool Domino Joining Machine Df 700 Eq Plus Domino Cutter

1 1.00 1.50

17 Festool Beechwood Domino x1 Assortment Ds/Xl D12/D14 128X Bu Dowel Range

1 0.25

18 Festool Beechwood Domino x1 Assortment Ds/Xl D8/D10 306X Bu Dowel Range Domino

1 0.29

19 Festool Pendulum Jigsaw Carvex Ps420 1 0.50 0.76 20 Festool Jig Saw Blades HS 75/3 Bi 5X 1 0.03

21 Festool Jig Saw Blades S 105/4 5X 1 0.02

22 Festool Jig Saw Blades HS 75/25 Bi 5X 1 0.03

23 Festool Jig Saw Blades HS 75/25 Bi R 5X 1 0.03 24 Festool Planer H1 850 Eb-Plus Parallel Side Fence

Rebate Depth Stop Extraction Adapter Operation Tool In A Sysytainer Sys 3 T - Loc

1 0.75 0.75

25 Festool Planer Head Hk 82 Sd Rustic Design Fine With Spiral Blade Hs 82 Rf

1 0.22

26 Festool Planer Head Hk 82 Sd Rustic Design Coarse With Spiral Blade Hs 82 Rf With Spiral Blade Hs 82 Rg Depth Limiter

1 0.21

27 Festool Planer Head Hk 82 Sd Rustic Design Undulating With Hs Spiral Blade Hs 82 Rw Depth Limiter

1 0.22

28 Festool Dove Tail Kit Vs600 1 0.26

Page 100: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

95

S. No. Particulars Nos. Power, kW

Total Cost

29 Festool Cutt. Template Vs 600 Sz 14 copying ring Ø 17 mm (for OF 1010)

1 0.11

30 Festool Cutters Hw S8 D138/135/15◦ 0.05

31 Festool Copy Ring Kr-D 17/Of1400/Vs 600 1 0.03

32 Festool Cutt. Template Vs 600 Szo 20 copying ring Ø 13.8 mm (for OF 1010). copying ring Ø 24 mm (for OF 1010)

1 0.22

33 Festool Dovetail Cutter Hw Vs600 D20X26X8 Z2 Rl 1 0.07

34 119,750 Festool Mobile Dust Extractor Cleantec Ctm 36 E Selfclean Filter Bag Suction Hose Ø 27 Mm X 35 M-As End Cap For Intake Adapter Hose Holder Sys Dock Cable Holder In A Carton

3 1.00 3.50

35 67,750 Festool Eccentric Sander Ets Ec 150/3 Eq StickFix sanding pad Ø 150 mm FUSION-TEC (extra-soft). operation tool

3 1.50 2.03

36 Festool Eccentric Sander Ets Ec 150/5 Eq StickFix sanding pad Ø 150 mm FUSION-TEC (soft HT). operation tool

3 1.50 2.03

37 Festool Suction Hose D 27 22X3 5M As Gq Ct "Bleeder resistor (DIN IEC 312) <1 m?/m Diameter 27/22 mm Length 3 5 m"

3 0.72

38 Festool Workcenter Wcr 1000 3 2.91

39 Festool Holder For Spra Wcr 1000 Lph 2x screw. 2x square nut

3 0.12

40 Festool Dry Guide Coat Hb-Set hand sanding block. 2 guide control black powder cartridges (each 30 g)

1 0.04

41 Festool Systainer Sys-Stf D 150 4S 3 0.29 42 Festool Sanding Discs Stf D150/16 P80 Gr/50 Sanding

Discs Stf D150/16 P80 Gr/50 1 0.04

43 Festool Sanding Discs Stf D150/16 P180 Gr/100 1 0.07

44 Festool Sanding Discs Stf D150/16 P280 Gr/100 1 0.07

45 Festool Stickfix Qty. Stf 115X228 P400 Gr 100X NA 1 0.08 46 Festool Cleaning Cloth Rt Premium 240X380/200 Ideal

In Sanding Preparation 1 0.07

47 Rotary Polisher SHINEX Wood Set Shinex RAP 150-21 FE Additional Side-Mounted Hand Grip Stickfix Polishing Pad Ø 150

3 3.05

48 Festool Swirl Mark Set Ro150/Mpa/Ps/Mf Set 2 1.34

49 Festool Sliding Compound Mitre Saw Kapex Ks 120 Ug-Set Items Included 561283

1 1.00 3.24

50 Festool Circular Saw Ts 55 Rebq-Plus-Fs Fine Tooth Saw Blade Hw W48 Guide Rail Fs 1400/2 - 491498

1 0.50 0.77

51 Festool Multifunction Table Mft/3 Table With Perforated Top And Foldway Legs Swivel Unit Support Unit Angle Stop Adjustable Stop Guide Rail Fs1080/2 Deflector Fs-Aw Additional Clamp In A Carton

1 1.15

52 Festool Rustofix BMS 180 E Ld 85 Brush Kb 80 Brush Extractor Hood With Handle Tool Arbour Clamping Flange Operationg Tools In Carrying Case.

1 1.38

53 Festool Orbital Sander Rutscher Rs 200 Eq-Plus StickFix sanding pad 115 x 225 mm. filter cartridge

1 0.67

54 Festool Compressed Air Eccentric Sander Lex 3 77/25 Set Stickfix Sanding Pad Ø 77 Mm W-Ht (Soft) Ias-Connection Ias 3-Sd Compressed-Air Hose Ø 124X 5M Interface Pad Ø 77 Mm Operation Tool In A Systainer Sys 2 T-Loc

2 1.40

Page 101: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

96

S. No. Particulars Nos. Power, kW

Total Cost

55 82,000 Festool Oscillator Vecturo Os 400 Eq-Set Wood Saw Blade Hsb 50/35/J Wood Saw Blade Hsb 100/Hcs Universal Saw Blade Usb 78/32/Bi Positioning Aid/Depth Stop Set Os-Ah/Ta Set In A Systainer Sys 2 T-Loc Df

1 0.82

56 Festool Laminate Trimmer OFK 700 Eq-Plus 8Mm Clamping Collet Extraction Hood Edge Trimming Cutter D19X16 Operation Tool In Asystainer Sys 2 T - Loc

1 0.78

57 Festool Hole Drilling Set Lr 32-Sys • Guide Plate • Centring Mandrel • Operation Tool • Hinge Location Cutter Hm Ø 35 Mm • Dowel Drill Hw Ø 5 Mm (V-Shaped Tip) • Dowel Drill Hm Ø 5 Mm (With Centring Bit And Pre-Cutter) • 2 Parallel Side Fences With Adjustable Stop • 2 Clamps Fsz 120 • 2 Longitudinal Stops

1 0.59

58 Festool Routing Template Mfs 400 • 2 Angle Stops • Tilt Protection • Circle Routing Insert • Operation Tool

1 0.33

59 Festool Routing Template Mfs 700 2 Angle Stops Tilt Protection Circle Routing Insert Operation Tool

1 0.52

60 Festool Bench-Mounted Router Tf 2200-Set Router Of 2200 Eb-Plus Basic Unit With Foldaway Legs Module Support Router Stop Guard Press-Down Fixture Assembly Lugs Ø 8 Mm Clamping Collet Ø 12 Mm Clamping Collet Copying Ring Ø 30 Mm Extraction Hood Chip Deflector Operation Tool

1 2.88

61 Festool Cordless Drills Txs Li 26 Plus Eu 230V 2 0.62

62 Bessey K Body Revo Kr 600/95 10 0.58 63 Bessey Band Clamp Ban700 3 0.12

64 Bessey Malleable Cast Iron Screw Clamp Tg-2K 200/100

10 0.31

65 Bessey Malleable Cast Iron Screw Clamp Tg-2K 300/120

10 0.40

66 Bessey Malleable Cast Iron Screw Clamp Tg-2K 1000/140

10 0.79

67 Bessey Deep Throat Clamp Tgnt 400/30 10 0.98 68 Bessey Heavy Duty Malleable Cast Iron Screw Clamp

Tgk 1500/120 10 0.88

69 Bessey Malleable Cast Iron Screw Clamp Tpn-Be-2K 200/100

10 0.24

70 Bessey Kikilamp Kli 200/80 10 0.22 71 Bessey Die-Cast Zinc Screw Clamp Lm 200/100 10 0.23

72 Bessey Angle Clamps Ws6 4 0.29

73 Bessey Mitre Clamp Gall 10 2.10

74 Bessey Angle Clamps Ws1 10 0.08 75 Bessey K Body Revo Kr 800/95 10 0.67

76 Bessey K Body Revo Kr 1250/95 10 0.83

77 Bessey K Body Revo Kr 1500/95 10 0.90

78 Bessey Angle Clamps Ws3 10 0.51 79 Bessey Kliklamp Kli 120/80 10 0.21

80 Bessey Heavy Duty Malleable Cast Iron Screw Clamp Tgk-2K 600/120

10 0.60

81 Bessey Heavy Duty Malleable Cast Iron Screw Clamp Tgk-K 1000/120

10 0.76

82 Bessey One-Handed Clamp Ezs 150/80 10 0.28

83 Bessey One-Handed Clamp EZS 300/80 10 0.31

Page 102: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

97

S. No. Particulars Nos. Power, kW

Total Cost

84 Bessey One-Handed Clamp EZS 600/80 10 0.38

85 Seasoning Kiln,700 1 11.23 86 Chemical Treatment Plant 1 7.75 87 Norwood LumberPro HD 36 Saw mill machine 1 38.90 88 Integrated Dust Collection and Recycling System 1 23.73 Support Service Equipment

Water Supply system 1 2.00 12.00

Fire Prevention system 1 8.00

Pollution Control System 1 2.00 7.08 Air Compressor 1 5.00 10.50

Captive D G set, Transformer and other electricals 1 15.31

Sub-Total 305.34

Extra Cost for GST, P&F, Insurance, Installation etc. 67.17 Power Connection 18.12 Grand Total 390.63

9. Observations:

(A) Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:

(i) SIDBI Appraisal Report.

(ii) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.

(iii) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the escalation cost, if any,

over and above the approved project cost.

(iv) Documentary proof from SPV for utilisation of CFC facilities by at least 51% of the

cluster members.

(B) As State Govt. has proposed 10% contribution and GoI grant is <90% i.e. 83.46%; SPV

contribution of 6.54% as against 10% as per provisions of the scheme may be considered as a

special case for North Eastern Region

10. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up Common

Facility Centre (CFC) in Wood Carpentry Cluster, Baktawng, Serchip, Mizoram.

*********

Page 103: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

98

Agenda No.50.3.15: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up of Common Facility

Centre in Food Processing Cluster, Mokokchung, Nagaland.

Background:

The proposal was recommended by State Level Project Steering Committee in its

meeting held on 21.02.19.

Proposal along with focus report, DPR and recommerndations was forwarded by MSME-

DI, Dimapur vide mail dated 28.02.19. Online application vide Ref. No: 14084 dated

05.03.19.

The proposal was discussed in detail during 64th

meeting of Techno Economic Appraisal

Committee (TEAC) held on 05.03.19 and TEAC in its 65th

meeting held on 13.06.19

recommended the proposal to place before Steering Committee for In-principle approval.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Basic Information of Cluster Name of Cluster : Food Processing Cluster District Mokokchung. Location of Cluster : Alimang-Changtongya Sub Division Lok Sabha Constituency : Nagaland Main Product : Fruits Processing: Jackfruit, Pomegranate, Mango,

Pineapple, Berries, Figs, Papaya, Banana, Orange, Grapes).

(i) Packed Juices. (ii) Pickles (iii) Pulp, Jam, Jelly, Candy Bars. (iv) Snacks. (v) Wines.

Vegetable Processing: (i) Pickles-mango, Lemon, Mixed Veg. (ii) Garlic Paste. (iii) Ready to Cook & Eat Salad. (iv) Snacks items. (v) Sauces. Spices Processing: (i) Black Pepper Powder (ii) Red Chilli Powder (iii) Turmeric Powder (iv) Kokum (v) Dry Mace / Powdered Mace. Coffee Seeds Processing. Preserved Fish products. Honey Processing

No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium)

Micro 110 Small 0 Medium 0

Turn over for the last five years : (Rs. in Crore)

Rs. 36.40 crore (2016-17)

Exports for the last five years : (Rs. in Crore)

Nil

Employment in Cluster : 2550 nos. (Direct – 550 & Indirect – 2000)

Page 104: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

99

Technology Details : Cluster units are house hold units and are

adopting conventional age old processing techniques in their production process. It has been noted that the cluster members use traditional methods and almost every step of the process is done manually.

Whether DS Conducted : Yes, DSR Conducted By Intaglio Technical and Business Service.

Main findings of DSR : Lack of Proper Raw Material Cold Storage Facility

Lack of Automatic Cleaning, Grading, Sorting Facility for Spices

Lack of Automatic Electric/Microwave Dryer Lack of Vacuum Frying technology Automatic Honey Filtering Machine

Lack of Sterilizing Machine Lack of Pasteurization Setup Lack of Automatic Nitrogenous Grinding

for Spices. Lack of Packaging Facility Nitrogenous

Pouches, Bottle filling, Sachets packing, Labeling, Bar-coding Machine.

Lack of FSSAI standard based Testing and Certification Setup Lack of RO Plant

Lack of ETP /STP plant Lack of Cold Storage

Main Problems of Cluster : Lack of Proper Raw Material Cold Storage Facility

Lack of Automatic Cleaning, Grading, Sorting Facility for Spices

Lack of Automatic Electric/Microwave Dryer Lack of Vacuum Frying technology Automatic Honey Filtering Machine

Lack of Sterilizing Machine Lack of Pasteurization Setup Lack of Automatic Nitrogenous Grinding

for Spices. Lack of Packaging Facility Nitrogenous

Pouches, Bottle filling, Sachets packing, Labeling, Bar-coding Machine.

Lack of FSSAI standard based Testing and Certification Setup Lack of RO Plant

Lack of ETP /STP plant Lack of Cold Storage. Lack of Material Handling Equipments Poor

Quality upgradation and Lack of Dedicated Training Facility.

Lack of Value Addition and Product Diversification.

Other Information : The Indian food industry is poised for huge growth, increasing its contribution to world food trade every year. In India, the food sector has emerged as a high-growth and high-profit sector due to its immense potential for value addition, particularly within the food processing industry.

Page 105: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

100

2. Information about Proposed CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Comments by Cluster Division

(a.) Justification for CFC

The Food cluster at Mokokchung produces

valuable and non chemical preservative

value added fruit products.

The style of production is very old

fashioned and informal and primitive.

They are not able to imply modern

equipments even though they know about

new technologies due to financial

constraints.

The CFC that is being purposed at the

cluster will bring about holistic changes. It

will increase the cluster turnover to 30%-

40%.

The machineries purposed will increase the

productivity reduce the processing time and

will increase the hygienic level and quality

of their products.

The machineries will help cluster members

to develop newer innovative value added

products which will help the cluster

members to export their products.

The CFC will create additional

employment in the.

The CFC will generate revenue in form of

taxes to the government.

--

(b.) Location of CFC Mokokchung District, Nagaland

--

% age of units in radius of 5km

70

% age of units in radius of 10km

100

(c.) Land for CFC i. Wheather land acquired

Yes. Land is on lease

basis for 30 years.

The lease deed not

submitted. The

lease deed should

be in the name of

SPV and registered

from Revenue

Department of

Government of

Nagaland. The

lease period should

be fairly long

duration of 30 years

or more.

Page 106: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

101

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Comments by Cluster Division

ii. Title is in name of SPV. Registered Lease Deed in the name of

SPV for 30 years

-

iii. Valuation and its basis

As per the registration documents. -

iv. Land is sufficient 0.25 acre. -- v. Change of land use Yes. NA order issued. -- vi. If on lease, duration of lease

30 years --

vii Whether lease is legally tenable

Yes. --

(d.) Total Building area(sq ft)

15000 sq ft

--

(e.) Rate of construction of building

9500 per sq ft

--

(f.) Main Facility Proposed

Common Raw Material Bank.

Common Cold Storage Facility.

Common Spice Processing Setup with

Automatic Cleaning, Grading, Sorting,

Packaging.

Common Fruits Processing Setup with

Automatic.

Common Vegetable processing facility.

--

g.) Prod capacity of CFC Presently, the production capacity of CFC is 4 to 6 tons.

--

(h.) Major Outputs/Deliverables of CFC,Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production,export/domestic sales and direct/indirect employment,etc.)

Sl. No.

Parameter Before intervention

After Intervention

1. No. of units 110 150 2. Employment Direct:550

Indirect:2000 Direct:800 Indirect:3000

3 Turnover (Rs. in crore)

36.40 50.00

4. Export Indirect export

Direct Export Likely By 5 Units

5 Profit Margins 12% - 14% 25%

(i.) Pollution clearance required or not

No Objection Certificate obtained from State

Pollution Board

Copy of NOC from PCB is to be submitted.

(j.) Man Power in CFC 34 - (k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied,any other-to be specified)

Total revenue generation from training section is Rs. 41.20 lakh from 125 participants.

-

3. Information about SPV

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Comments by

Cluster Division

(a.) Name and Address Changtongya and Yongyimsen Agro

Processors Association, Mokokchung District,

Nagaland , Contact: Akhum: 7005129868.

--

(b.) Nature of Society registered. --

Page 107: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

102

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Comments by

Cluster Division

SPV(company or

Society or Trust)

(c.) Name of the state

Govt. and MSME

officials in SPV

Dept of Industries and Commerce Govt. of

Nagaland

--

(d.) Date of formation of

SPV

17/02/2014 --

(e.) Number of Members 77 units have joined the SPV

--

(f.) Bye Laws or MoA

and AOA submitted

Submitted with DPR and attached in online

application.

MoA and AoA is not

submitted.

(g.) Authorized Share

Capital

Rs. 103.72 lakh. --

(h.) Paid up capital Rs. 15.00 lakh --

(i.) Shareholding Pattern Equal share holding among all members.

Shreholding pattern of

77 members is to be

submitted.

(j.) Commitment letter

for contribution

SPV Commitment letter Received and

attached.

Commitment letter for

upfront contribution

from SPV is to be

submitted.

(k.) SPV specific A/c State Bank of Mysore

SPVs bank account

detail not submitted.

(l.) Turst Building of

SPV,Previous track

record of co-operative

initiatives pursued by

SPV members need to to

be highlighted with

support documentation.

The SPV has good trust and corporation

among its member‟s details available in DPR

As the cluster members are aware of their

problems and have good unity they have also

visited some of the cluster and have learned

about cluster scheme and cluster development

process. The cluster members have come

forward to prepare the DPR by their own

contribution hence Hard Interventions for the

Cluster are recommended.

--

(m.) Technical

Institution

Intaglio Technical and Business Services,

Bangalore

(n.) CFC may be utilised

by SPV members as also

others in a

cluster.However,

evidence should be

furnished with regard to

SPV member ability to

utilise at least 60 percent

of installed capacity.

Yes, the SPV has given undertaking for

Capacity Utilization of CFC by SPV members

and non members. Capacity utilization Letter

of SPV attached in DPR and Online

Application

--

(o) Utilities

(a) Power 242 KW --

Page 108: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

103

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Comments by

Cluster Division

requirement for

commercial/domestic

purpose

(b) Water 10000 per day. --

(c) Gas/Oil/Other

Utilities

Not required --

4. Implement Arrangements

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA) Comments by

Cluster Division (a.) Implementing Agency IIE, Guwahati Nomination letter from

State Govt. required. (b.) Fund receiving Agency IIE, Guwahati (c.) Implementation Period 18 months 24 Months from date

of final approval as per guideines.

(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations

--

Required prior to final approval.

(e.) Comments of Technical Division

The proposal was discussed in detail during 64th

meeting of

Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) held on

05.03.19 and TEAC in its 65th

meeting held on 13.06.19

recommended the proposal to place before Steering

Committee for In-principle approval.

(f.) Approval of Technical Committee (g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:

(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)

Under process. --

5. Financial Analysis of CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA) Comments by

Cluster Division (a.) BEP 40% As per MSE-CDP

guidelines. (b.) IRR, Payback period 29% -- (c.) DSCR N/A -- (d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)

33% --

(e.) NPV 28% -- (f.) DER NA -- (g.) Sensitivity Analysis Positive for both 5% and 10% reduction

in capacity and sales.

--

(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State

Nil. --

6. Proposed project cost:

(Rs. in lakh)

S.No. Particulars Amount

(i) Land -1acre on Lease for 30 years 30.00

(ii) Building Construction with Compound and Internal Roads – 9500 106.11

Page 109: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

104

S.No. Particulars Amount

square feet built-up area

(iii) Plant & Machinery (including electrification) 633.67

(iv) Miscellaneous Fixed Assets 10.00

(v) Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 12.00

(vi) Contingency (2% on building & 5% on P&M) 33.81

(vii) Margin money for working capital 14.00

Total Project Cost 839.59

7. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh) S.

No. Particulars Percentage Amount

1. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 80 671.67 2. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Nagaland 10 83.96 3. SPV contribution 10 83.96 Total 100 839.59

8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)

(Rs. in lakh)

Sl.

No.

Particulars Specification Qty. Amou

nt

1- Spices Processing Setup (Red Chilli, Black Pepper, Cardamoms, Turmeric, Kokum,

Zeera)

1 Automatic Chilly and Spices Cleaning Plant 0.5Tonns/Hour Dust

& Stone Cleaning

1 5.53

2 Automatic Drying Machine Spices Hot

Air+Micro Wave Tunnel Dryers/Sterlizer

0.1 Tonns/Hour 1 60.62

3 Automatic Chilly and Spices Sorting Plant 0.5 Tonns/Hour 1 26.40

4 Automatic Chilly De-steming/Tail Removing &

De Stoning Plant

0.5 Tonns/Hour 1 7.20

5 Packaging Machine (Powdered) 50-100gms Pouch 1 17.65

6 Packaging Machine Solid/Whole Chilly 500 grams Pouch 1 9.11

2- Fruits Processing Setup (Mango, Pineapple, passion fruit, Gauva, avocado,

Jackfruit, Banana, Orange, Papaya, Berries)

Pulp Preparation Technology

7 Pulp Extractor-for Non-Seeded fruits 0.5 tons/Hour 1 9.29

8 Juice Clarifier 0.5 tons/Hour 1 5.53

9 Pasteuriser/Retort of Pulp 0.5 tons/Hour 1 10.15

10 Storage Tank/ Balance tank with Pumps and

interconnected filters

0.5 tons/Hour 1 4.39

Jam/Jelly Processing

11 Syrup Preparation Setup 500ltr/Hour 1 4.30

12 Filter Press 500ltr/Hour 1 9.78

13 Homogenizer 500ltr/Hour 1 10.45

Page 110: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

105

Sl.

No.

Particulars Specification Qty. Amou

nt

14 UHT Sterilizer 500ltr/Hour 1 18.76

15 Jam Kettle 500ltr/Hour 1 9.22

16 Pet Bittle filling line 500ml 1 8.30

17 Jam/Jelly Packing Machine 100kg/hour 1 18.45

3- Fruits Vegetable-Snacks and Pickles Processing Machinery

18 Vacuum Fryer and Accessories 50kg/Hour 1 22.14

19 Pickle Bottle Packing Machine 500grams bottle 1 18.45

20 Nitrogenous Snacks Packing Machine 50grms-100grams 1 19.43

21 Cauchep Sachets Packing Machine 10 to 20 grams 1 20.30

4- Storage, Material Handeling and Allide Machinery

22 Cold Storage Facility/Clean Room Facility 100 tons 1 264.45

23 Material Handeling Equipments, Weighing

Scales, Storage Containers

LS 1 10.45

24 DG Set 125 KVA 1 13.52

25 UPS 100KVA 1 10.16

26 Computers i7 Processor 5 2.15

27 Compressor 10hp 1 11.68

28 Training Infrastructure - 1 11.01

29 Testing Machinery FSSAI Lab - 1 13.23

9. Observations:

Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:

(i) SIDBI appraisal report.

(ii) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.

(iii) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution.

(iv) Commitment letter with regard to SPV members‟ ability to utilize at least 60 percent of

installed capacity.

(v) Commitment letter from State Government/SPV to meet the escalation cost, if any, over and

above the approved project cost.

(vi) Certificate from State Government regarding compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines

(vii) Proof of SPV Formation and By Laws.

(viii) List of SPV members along with Shareholding Pattern.

(ix) SPVs bank account details.

(x) Registered Land document in the name of SPV.

(xi) Documentary proof from SPV for utilisation of CFC facilities by atleast 51% of the

cluster members.

(xii) Letter from State Govt. nominating the implementing agency and fund receiving

agency.

10. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up of Common Facility

Centre (CFC) in Food Processing Cluster, Mokokchung, Nagaland.

*******

Page 111: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

106

Agenda No.50.3.16: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up of Common Facility

Centre in Wooden Furniture Cluster, Dimapur, Nagaland.

Background

The proposal was recommended by State Level Project Steering Committee of

Government of Nagaland in its meeting held on 21.02.19.

Proposal was received from Department of Industries and Commerce, Government of

Nagaland & recommended by MSME-DI, Dimapur.

Proposal along with Detailed Project Report (DPR) was forwarded by MSME-DI,

Dimapur vide e-mail dated 27.02.19.

Proposal was received from Directorate of Industries & Commerce, Government of

Nagaland vide application ref. No. 14103 dated 05.03.19 & recommended by MSME-DI,

Imphal.

Revised Focus Report was forwarded by MSME-DI, Dimapur vide e-mail dated 03.06.19.

Proposal was considered by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 64th

meeting held on 05.03.19 and TEAC in its 65th

meeting held on 13.06.19 recommended

the proposal to place before Steering Committee for In-principle approval.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Basic Information of Cluster Name of Cluster Wooden Furniture Cluster District Dimapur Location of Cluster Dimapur Circle Lok Sabha Constituency Nagaland Main Product Wood based furniture products like Almirah,

Tables, cots, sofa, wooden sports, equipments, wooden toys, wooden industrial and commercial furniture etc.

No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium)

Micro- 90

Turnover for the last five years Rs. 56.00 crore Exports for the last five years Nil Employment in Cluster 2450 nos. (Direct – 450 & Indirect – 2000) Technology Details : Average Technology Level with Conventional

carpentry tools, Lathe Machineries, Drilling equipments, metal cutting equipments etc.

Whether DS Conducted : Yes DSR Conducted By Intaglio Technical and Business Service

Main findings of DSR : The furniture industry in India is highly fragmented with 85% of the manufacturing units belonging to the unorganized sector. Majority of micro units produce traditional designs while contemporary styles form only a small percentage of the total output. Nagaland is one of the larger furniture manufacturing states in the country.

Main Problems of Cluster : Lack of Wood Seasoning Equipment. Non Practice of Chemical Impregnation of Wood. Lack of Advanced Machinery Poor Integration of Newer Designs Prolonged Production Process Lack of Quality Furniture Poor Market Reach

Other Information : The Indian furniture industry is estimated at around Rs 35,000 crores (350 billion) Industrial wood products is expected to grow an average of 7

Page 112: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

107

percent annually from 2013 to 2018 to $8.8 billion, world Available of Deciduous evergreen forests The furniture market is the second largest wood processing segment after logs The branded (higher quality) wooden furniture industry is growing at 15% annually. Western India has emerged as the leader in the particle board segment. Wooden furniture finds great demand due to its elegant appearance, attractive designs durability and low maintenance cost

2. Information about Proposed CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA)

Remarks

(a.) Justification for CFC The wooden Furniture cluster Dimapur

consists of 90 micro owned units providing

employment to 450 rural people producing

wooden products and furniture and the

cluster has an annual turnover of Rs. 5600

lakhs. The cluster produces their products

using traditional wood processing

techniques, which are labour and energy

intensive. The cluster units have basic hand

held tools like saws, chisels, hammers and

a few units have conventional motorized

cutters. The furniture market is the second

largest wood processing segment after

logs, making India a fast emerging market

for high-end, value-added imported

products. The manufacture of pre-

fabricated doors and windows is relatively

new and the current market is growing at

10% per annum. The total annual market

for furniture in India is estimated to be

US$ 1.25 billion about 90% of which is for

wooden products. The branded (higher

quality) wooden furniture industry is

growing at 15% annually. The cluster units

lack critical machines and have not been

able to keep in pace with changing

furniture industry processing, machines

and trends due to their financial

constraints.

--

(b.) Location of CFC Tulovi, Dimapur City Nagaland

% age of units in radius of

5km

70

% age of units in radius of

10km

100

(c.) Land for CFC

Page 113: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

108

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA)

Remarks

i. whether land acquired Yes Registered Lease

deed in the name of

SPV for a period of

30 years is

required.

ii. Title is in name of Registered Lease Deed in the name of SPV

iii. Valuation and its basis As per the registration documents

iv. Land is sufficient Yes,2 Acre

v. Change of land use Yes, NA Order Issued

vi. If on lease, duration of

lease

30 years

vii Whether lease is legally

tenable

Yes

(d.) Total Building area(sq ft) 12400.00 --

(e.) Rate of construction of

building

1,318.75 --

(f.) Main Facility Proposed Common Facility Centre with

Seasoning Facilities

Common Facility Centre chemical

impregnation Facility

Common Facility Centre with

CAD/CAM Designing

CFC with Advance modern

machineries like CNC Engraving,

CNC Edge Cutting, Automatic

Polishing, Paper Laminate Vacuum

Press etc.

Common Training and Skill Up

gradation Facility Centre

Common Export infrastructure.

--

(g.) Prod capacity of CFC 5 tons wood per day Required

(h.) Major

Outputs/Deliverables of CFC,

Projected performance of the

cluster after proposed

intervention (in terms of

production, export/domestic

sales and direct/indirect

employment, etc.)

Sl.

No.

Parameter Before

intervention

After

Intervention

1. Nos. of units 90 130

2. Employment Direct:450

Indirect:2000

Direct:750

Indirect:3500

3 Turnover

(Rs. in crore)

56.00 72.00

4. Export Indirect export

taking place

through traders

Direct Export

Likely By 5 Units

to neighbouring

nations like

Myanmar

5 Profit Margins 10% to 15% 25%-30%

(i.) Pollution clearance

required or not

No Serious pollution related activities were

found. Required

(j.) Man Power in CFC 30 --

Page 114: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

109

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA)

Remarks

(k.) Revenue generation

mechanism for sustainability

of assets(service/user charges

to be levied, any other-to be

specified)

Expected Machinery Utilization: Studying

the Need of the Cluster and the Well

established Market of the cluster guaranties

100% utilization of machineries of the

CFC. The SPV has already given

undertaking that it will be able to utilize at

least 60% of the machinery. The financial

computations are done considering 75%

average capacity utilization for the first

three years and about 90% average

capacity utilization is considered for the

rest of the years. The financial parameters

achieved with these values of capacity

utilization are satisfactory and as per the

requirement of the guidelines.

Required

3. Information about SPV

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(a.) Name and Address Country Craft Development Society Name of Promoter: Aolemba Longkumer: 7005129868 [email protected]

Certificate of SPV formation is required

(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)

Society Registered --

(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV

Department of Industries and Commerce, Govt of Nagaland District Industries Centre, Govt of Nagaland

--

(d.) Date of formation of SPV -- --

(e.) Number of Members 72 --

(f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted

Submitted with DPR and attached in online application

Required

(g.) Authorized Share Capital 149.51 lakhs --

(h.) Paid up capital as on............

15 lakhs --

(i.) Shareholding Pattern Equal share holding amoung all members Details attached in DPR and online application

Required

(j.) Commitment letter for contribution

SPV commitment letter received and attached in DPR and Application

Required

(k.) SPV specific A/c -- Required

(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to to be highlighted with support documentation

The SPV has good trust and corporation among its members details available in DPR The cluster members are found to have mutual trust and cooperation among each other. The cluster members are educated and are practicing necessary business strategies and are aware of technological development in the industry.

--

Page 115: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

110

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

The cluster members are also visited the nearby implemented clusters to understand more about cluster formation, CFC implementation, CFC functioning, about the scheme and benefits of CFC.

(m.) Technical Institution Intaglio Technical and Business Services --

(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.

Yes the SPV has given undertaking for Capacity Utilization of CFC by SPV members and non members. Capacity utilization Letter of SPV attached in DPR and Online Application

--

(o.)

(a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose

350 KW --

(b) Water 10000 per day --

(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities 0.0

4. Implementation Arrangements

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(a.) Implementing Agency Indian Institute of Entrepreneurship (IIE), Guwahati

--

(b.) Fund receiving Agency --

(c.) Implementation Period 24 months --

(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations

DPR is examined and Recommended by MSME DI Goa/IIE Gauwahati

Required

(e.) Comments of Technical Division

The Technical Division of MSME DI Goa/IIE Gauwahati has examined the project and has recommended the project

--

(f.) Approval of Technical Committee

DPR Submitted to O/o DC (MSME), GoI for Approval

TEAC recommended the proposal.

(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:

DPR Submitted to O/o DC (MSME), GoI for Approval

--

(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)

under process --

5. Financial Analysis of CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(a.) BEP 37 % --

(b.) IRR, Payback period 26 % --

(c.) DSCR Not applicable, as no loan involved --

(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)

31% --

(e.) NPV 25% --

Page 116: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

111

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(f.) DER Not applicable, as no loan involved --

(g.) Sensitivity Analysis Sensitivity analysis is performed for 5% and 10% reduction of capacity or fall in sales and the figures are satisfactory and as per the limits specified in the guidelines

--

(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State

Nil --

6. Proposed Project Cost:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No Particulars Amount

(i) Land -2 acre on Lease for 30 years 60.00

(ii) Building 137.70

(iii) Plant & Machinery (including electrification) 735.60

(iv) Miscellaneous Fixed Assets 15.00

(v) Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 15.00

(vi) Contingency (2% on building & 5% on P&M) 39.53

(vii) Margin money for working capital 14.00

Total Project Cost 1016.83

7. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Percentage Amount

(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 1196.08 (80%) 813.47

(ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Nagaland 149.51(10%) 101.68

(iii) SPV contribution 149.51 (10%) 101.68

Total 1495.10 1016.83

8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)

(Rs. in lakh) Sl. No. Particulars of Machine Quantity Amount

1 Wood Seasoning Kiln drying 1 115.00 2 Chemical Impregnation 1 98.25 3 CNC router Machine 1 113.00 4 Furniture engraving machine 1 85.00 5 Door vacuum Membrane press machine 1 78.00 6 Automatic Edge Bending Machine 1 32.00 7 CAD/CAM Set up 0 0 8 Multi Spindle Moulder 2 36.00 9 2 head finger shaper 2 52.00 10 Sliding table panel saw 2 56.60 11 Wide belt sander 1 15.00 12 Wood Carving Machine 2 15.00 13 Diesel generator 250kv, 1 18.00 14 Painting and sewage treatment plant. 1 20.00 15 Computers(admin) 5 1.75 Total 735.60

Page 117: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

112

9. Observations:

Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:

(i) Registered land documents in the name of SPV (if land is on lease basis, registered

lease deed for a minimum period of 30 years is required).

(ii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.

(iii) Commitment letter from State Government / IA to meet the cost escalation, if any,

over and above the approved project cost.

(iv) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution.

(v) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilize at least 60 percent of installed

capacity.

(vi) Details of production capacity.

(vii) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.

(viii) Details of Revenue generation mechanism

(ix) Certificate of SPV formation is required.

(x) Details of shareholding pattern.

(xi) Details of SPV bank account.

(xii) Bye Laws or MA and AOA.

(xiii) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR / CVC guidelines.

(xiv) Documentary proof from SPV for utilization of CFC facilities by at least 51% of the

cluster members.

(xv) Letter from State Govt. nominating the implementing agency and fund receiving

agency.

10. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up of Common

Facility Centre in Wooden Furniture Cluster, Dimapur, Nagaland.

*******

Page 118: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

113

Agenda No.50.3.17: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up of new Industrial

Estate at Tuli, Mokokchung District, Nagaland.

Background

(i) The proposal was recommended by State Level Steering Committee (SLSC) in its

meeting held on 21.02.19.

(ii) Proposal was received from Industries and Commerce Department, Government of

Nagaland vide application ref. No. 14059 dated 23.02.19 & recommended by

MSME-DI, Imphal.

(iii) Proposal along with recommendations was forwarded by MSME-DI, Imphal vide

letter dated 23.02.19.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Pre-registration Information

Name of Organization : Imphal

State : Nagaland

District : Mokokchung

Industrial Estate : New Industrial Estate at Tuli, Mokokchung, District.-

Nagaland.

2. Basic Information about Proposal:

Particulars Description

Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan received or not.

No

Total Area of Industrial Estate/ area 50 acres

Area to be developed 50 acres

Number and sizes of plots to be developed

107 plots

Implementing Period 15 months

Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up etc.

-

Performance of ID projects in State -

3. Details about proposal:

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency

(IA)

Remarks

Implementing Agency (IA) Nagaland Industrial Development

Cooperation Ltd (NIDC) Dimapur,

Nagaland.

As per MSE-CDP

guidelines

Page 119: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

114

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency

(IA)

Remarks

Track Record of the IA Industrial Growth Centre at Kriuphema

Kohima and Ganesh Nagar Industrial

Growth center, Dimapur Nagaland.

--

Appraisal by SIDBI

(Observations and

recommendations).

Attach SIDBI report.

This Proposal is being submitted for 'in-

principle' approval. After getting the 'in-

principle' approval, SIDBI shall be

approached for Appraisal.

--

Whether sufficient facilities

available at site. (Proximity

to railway stations / state

highways, availability of

water supply, adequate

power supply, telecom

facilities, dwelling places

of workers)

Mokokchung‟s central location has

helped it to be the converging point of

maximum number of highways and

hence it is better connected to most areas

of Nagaland, when compared to Kohima

and Dimapur. Besides, every village and

settlement of the district is well linked to

the town by district and community

roads. A railway line connects Tuli paper

mill to Amguri in neighbouring Assam.

--

Whether land is in

possession in the name of

IA with Clear Title

The land is not yet transferred to the IA. As per land

document, land is

in the name of

Department of

Industries &

Commerce,

Government of

Nagaland. Land

document in the

name of IA with

clear title is

required.

Whether Zoning

regulations and non-

agricultural conversion etc

complied with):

Yes Land document

with Zoning

regulations and

non-agricultural

conversion in the

name of NIDC is

required.

Whether State Level

Committee to coordinate

and monitor progress has

been Constituted

Yes, State level Project Steering

committee is constituted

and is headed by Secretary (I&C),

Government of Nagaland, GM, DICs,

Paren, Mokokchung & Mon and Dy.

Secretary, Finance Department to

coordinate and monitor progress of .

Constituted

Whether confirmation Not yet received from the IA. Commitment letter

Page 120: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

115

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency

(IA)

Remarks

received form IA that it

will meet the cost in excess

of approved project cost

and any escalation in cost

required from IA

to meet the cost

escalation, if any,

over and above the

approved project

cost.

Basis of elements of project

Cost (i) Land Development and other

overhead Infrastructure -

Cost of land filling and Boundary

wall.

Formation of Concrete pavement

approach and internal roads (CC

roads).

Road side greenery & social forestry.

Water supply including tank / sump

and pump houses.

Water harvesting.

Drainage.

Power-distribution net-work including

street light for complete layout and

electrical infrastructure for

administrative building etc.

Other (sanitary conveniences etc.)

(ii) Administrative and Other Services

Complex -

Administrative Office Building.

Telecommunication / Cyber Centre /

Documentation Centre.

Conference Hall & Meeting Hall

Bank & Post Office

Information Centre

First Aid Centre, Creche, Canteen

facilities.

(iii) Effluent Treatment Facilities.

(iv)Contingencies & pre-operative

expenses.

All above mentioned component are

considered for calculating project cost.

--

Tangible Outcomes of the

project Particulars Present

situation

After establishment of women

entrepreneurship park

Spinoff

(Units)/Growth

in cluster

NA 107 units will be established.

Aggregate 47.80 (within 2 years of

Page 121: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

116

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency

(IA)

Remarks

Investment by

Cluster Firms

(cr.)

establishment)

Aggregate

employment in

the cluster (no.)

NA 1034

Indirect

employment

expected to be

triggered (no.)

NA 5000

Justification of the Proposal The Government of Nagaland has focused on the development

of agro-processing units like extraction of fibres from pineapple

leaves, dehydration unit for ginger and cardamom, extraction of

citronella oil are some potentials nonfarm activities, which can

be developed in the district. New Scheme are patchouli

cultivation, tea garden and vanilla cultivation in the district. On

the basis of availability of raw material, labour and other

infrastructure, non-farm sector investment in the district. The

type of Industries expected to establish :

(i) Food processing.

(ii) Textile and Garments.

(iii) IT / ITES

(iv) Cement Products

(v) Fabrication and Engineering

(vi) Printing

The proposed Industrial Park will help in realizing the dream of

empowering rural population of the Mokokchung district for

socio economic development.

4. Proposed Project Cost:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA

1. Land Development and other overhead Infrastructure

(i) Cost of Land filling (50 acres) and boundary wall for 1 acres Administrative and amenity area.

98.00

(ii) Cost of laying CC-roads 30 mtr., 18 mtr., 15 mtr. Wide road for – 50 acres land

196.00

(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00

(iv) Water supply including tank / Sump, and pump houses 105.00

(v) Water harvesting 10.00

(vi) Drainage – construction of RCC Drains, Box Culverts, Storm Water drains

60.00

(vii) Power distribution net-work including street light for 247.00

Page 122: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

117

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA

complete layout and electrical infrastructure for administrative building etc.

(viii) Other (Sanitary Conveniences etc.) 10.00

2. Administrative and Other Services Complex

(i) Administrative Office building 18.40

(ii) Telecommunication /Cyber Centre/ Documentation Centre 15.00

(iii) Conference Hall / Meeting Hall 30.00

(iv) Bank & Post Office 15.00

(v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets 40.00

(vi) First Aid Centre, Crèche, Canteen facilities 20.00

3. Effluent Treatment Facilities 78.00

4. Contingencies & Pre operative expenses 20.00

Total 972.40

5. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Percentage As per IA

(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 80% 777.92

(ii) Government of Nagaland 20% 194.48

Total 100% 972.40

6. Observations:

Following documents are to be submitted prior to final approval:

(i) Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency i.e. NIDC with

clear title, complying zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc..

(ii) Copy of approved layout plan.

(iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.

(iv) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the

approved project cost.

(v) Status of completed ID projects in the State and details of operating units in

prescribed format.

(vi) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.

(vii) IA should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous

and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for

relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne

by the Government of Nagaland / NIDC.

7. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up of new Industrial

Estate at Tuli, Mokokchung District, Nagaland.

******

Page 123: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

118

Agenda No.50.3.18: Proposal for In-principle approval for upgradation of Industrial

Focal Point, Nabha (Old), District Patiala, Punjab.

Background

(i) The proposal was recommended by State Level Steering Committee (SLSC) of Punjab

in its meeting held on 16.10.18.

(ii) Proposal was received from Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation (PSIEC)

vide application ref. No. 14122 dated 08.03.19 & recommended by MSME-DI,

Ludhiana.

(iii) Proposal along with recommendations was forwarded by MSME-DI, Ludhiana vide

letter dated 08.03.19.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Pre-registration Information

Name of Organization : Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation

State : Punjab

District : Patiala

Industrial Estate : Focal Point Nabha (Old)

2. Basic Information about Proposal:

Particulars Description

Whether appraised DPR with approved

layout plan

No

Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 50.57 acres

Area to be developed (acre) 31.57 acres

Number and sizes of plots developed 128 plots with 52 units (out of which more than

50% units are micro)

Implementing Period 24 months

Other ID projects sanctioned in same district:

year of sanction, number of plots allotted,

units set up, etc.

Nil

Performance of ID projects in State Satisfactory

3. Details about Proposal:

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks

Implementing Agency (IA) Punjab Small Industries & Export

Corporation (PSIEC) Limited

As per MSECDP

guidelines

Track Record of the IA Satisfactory. Punjab Small Industries &

Export Corporation limited was setup in

1962 with the objective of supporting the

individuals to establish their own

industrial units in Punjab.

--

Appraisal by SIDBI

(Observations and

recommendations). Attach

SIDBI report.

Report will be submitted to SIDBI after

In-principle approval. Required

Whether sufficient facilities

available at site. (Proximity to

railway stations / state

Industrial area is located close to NH-7 &

12A. Nabha railway station is around 5

km. Nearest Airport- Chandigarh

--

Page 124: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

119

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks

highways, availability of

water supply, adequate power

supply, telecom facilities,

dwelling places of workers)

International Airport is 125kms away.

There is presence of adequate power

supply in the Industrial Focal Point.

Whether land is in possession

in the name of IA with Clear

Title

Punjab Small Scale Industries & Export

Corporation Ltd. (PSIEC) was the original

owner of the land. When the focal point

Nabha was developed, the entire land was

allotted to the unit

holders present in the focal point. PSIEC

is still responsible for operation and

maintenance of focal point.

Registered land

documents in the

name of

Implementing

Agency is

required

Whether Zoning regulations

and non-agricultural

conversion etc complied

with)

State Government i.e. PSIEC has procured

the land before the Industrial area was

developed.

Whether State Level

Committee to coordinate and

monitor progress has been

Constituted

Yes, the Committee has been formed

which includes officials from PSIEC,

Industry Department, MSME-DI,

Ludhiana

Constituted

Whether confirmation

received form IA that it will

meet the cost in excess of

approved project cost and any

escalation in cost

The contribution will be made as per the

means of finance mentioned in the report.

State Govt. along with the other

stakeholders will take care for any

escalation in the project cost.

Confirmation from PSIEC is mentioned in

the covering letter.

Received

Basis of elements of project

Cost

The cost estimates have been made as per

Common Schedule Rates – 2010 of

Government of Punjab and in some cases,

market rates are used for reference.

--

Tangible Outcomes of the

project

Up-gradation of Industrial area will

provide support to industries present in the

industrial area in terms of better

connectivity, minimum wear and tear,

better transport facilities, proper drainage

system that will further lead to

development of Industrial Estate.

--

Justification of the Proposal The focal point was developed in early

1990s with all infrastructure facilities

required for upgradation. However, with

time, basic infrastructure in the focal point

has been deteriorated and requires

upgradation. The proposal will cater to the

basic need of maintenance of road,

drainage system, power, administrative

and other services

complex etc. Further, due to deteriorated

infrastructure, industries in the focal point

--

Page 125: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

120

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks

are bearing wear and tear cost. Transport

companies are also charging higher tariffs

in return which are increasing the overall

production cost.

4. Proposed Project Cost:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Estimated by IA

(i) Cost of Land filling/leveling including boundary wall and fencing 58.14

(ii) Cost of Laying roads 134.92

(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00

(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses 20.23

(v) Water harvesting 6.48

(vi) Drainage 10.75

(vii) Power (Sub-station, Distribution Network, including Street light

etc.) Generation of Non-Conventional Energy

32.81

(viii) Administrative Office Building 15.79

(ix) Telecommunication/Cyber/Documentation centre 15.79

(x) Conference Hall/Exhibition centre 23.68

(xi) Bank/Post office 15.79

(xii) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets 31.58

(xiii) First aid centre, Creche Canteen Facilities 15.79

(xiv) Effluent Treatment Facilities 80.00

(xv) Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 9.63

(xvi) Others (Sanitary Conveniences) 10.00

Total 491.38

5. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Percentage Proposed by IA

(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 80 393.10

(ii) State Government 20 98.28

Total 100 491.38

6. Observations:

Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:

(i) Registered land documents with clear title, in the name of Implementing Agency.

(ii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.

(iii) Status of completed ID projects in the State as per format provided and details of

operating units in present project.

(iv) PSIEC should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of

Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the

purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account

shall be borne by the Government of Punjab / PSIEC.

7. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for up-gradation of Industrial

Focal Point, Nabha (Old), District Patiala, Punjab.

*****

Page 126: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

121

Agenda No.50.4.19: Proposal for In-principle approval for upgradation of Industrial

Focal Point, Sangrur, Punjab.

Background

(i) The proposal was recommended by State Level Steering Committee (SLSC) of

Punjab in its meeting held on 16.10.18.

(ii) Proposal was received from Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation (PSIEC)

vide application ref. No. 13862 dated 08.03.19.

(iii) MSME-DI, Ludhiana vide letter dated 08.03.19 forwarded the proposal along with

their recommendations.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Pre-registration Information

Name of Organization : Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation

State : Punjab

District : Sangrur

Industrial Estate : Focal Point Sangrur

2. Basic Information about Proposal:

Particulars Description

Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan

No

Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 58.65 acres Area to be developed (acre) 43.00 acres Number and sizes of plots developed 125 plots with 97 units (out of which more than

50% units are micro) Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.

Nil

Performance of ID projects in State Satisfactory

3. Details about Proposal:

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)

Remarks

Implementing Agency (IA) Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation (PSIEC) Limited

As per MSECDP guidelines

Track Record of the IA Satisfactory. Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation limited was setup in 1962 with the objective of supporting the individuals to establish their own industrial units in Punjab.

--

Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.

Report will be submitted to SIDBI after In-principle approval

Required

Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)

Industrial area is located close to NH-11. Sangrur railway station is around 2-3 km. Nearest Airport- Chandigarh International Airport is 125kms away. There is presence of adequate power supply in the Industrial Focal Point.

--

Whether land is in possession Punjab Small Scale Industries & Export Registered land

Page 127: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

122

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)

Remarks

in the name of IA with Clear Title

Corporation Ltd. (PSIEC) was the original owner of the land. When the focal point Sangrur was developed, the entire land was allotted to the unit holders present in the focal point. PSIEC is still responsible for operation and maintenance of focal point.

documents in the name of Implementing Agency is required.

Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)

State Government i.e. PSIEC has procured the land before the industrial area was developed

Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted

Yes, the Committee has been formed which includes officials from PSIEC, Industry Department, MSME-DI, Ludhiana

Constituted

Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost

The contribution will be made by PSIEC as per the means of finance mentioned in the report. Escalation in the project cost shall be met by PSIEC out of its own sources.

Received

Basis of elements of project Cost

The cost estimates have been made as per Common Schedule Rates – 2010 of Government of Punjab and in some cases, market rates are used for reference.

--

Tangible Outcomes of the project

Up-gradation of Industrial area will provide support to industries present in the industrial area in terms of better connectivity, minimum wear and tear, better transport facilities, proper drainage system that will further lead to development of Industrial Estate.

--

Justification of the Proposal The focal point was developed in 1980s with all infrastructure facilities required for upgradation. However, with time basic infrastructures in the focal point has been deteriorated and require upgradation. The proposal will cater to the basic need of maintenance of road, drainage system, power, administrative and other services complex etc. Further, due to deteriorated infrastructure, industries in the focal point are bearing wear and tear cost. Transport companies are also charging higher tariffs in return which are increasing the overall production cost.

--

4. Proposed Project Cost:

(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Estimated by IA

(i) Cost of Land filling/leveling including boundary wall and fencing

42.03

(ii) Cost of Laying roads 135.12 (iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00 (iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses 85.20 (v) Water harvesting 6.48 (vi) Drainage 5.00 (vii) Power (Sub-station, Distribution Network, including Street

light etc.) Generation of Non-Conventional Energy 46.31

(viii) Administrative Office Building 15.79

Page 128: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

123

S. No. Particulars Estimated by IA (ix) Telecommunication/Cyber/Documentation centre 15.79 (x) Conference Hall/Exhibition centre 23.68 (xi) Bank/Post office 15.79 (xii) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets 31.58 (xiii) First aid centre, Creche Canteen 15.79 (xiv) Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 9.17 (xv) Others (Sanitary Conveniences) 10.00

Total 467.73

5. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Percentage Proposed by IA

(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 80 374.18

(ii) State Government 20 93.55

Total 100 467.73

6. Observations:

Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:

(i) Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency.

(ii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.

(iii) Status of completed ID projects in the State as per format provided and details of

operating units in present project.

(iv) PSIEC should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of

Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the

purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account

shall be borne by the Government of Punjab / PSIEC.

7. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for up-gradation of Industrial

Focal Point, Sangrur, Punjab.

*****

Page 129: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

124

Agenda No.50.3.20: Proposal for In-principle approval for upgradation of Industrial

Focal Point, Moga, Punjab.

Background

(i) The proposal was recommended by State Level Steering Committee (SLSC) of

Punjab in its meeting held on 16.10.18.

(ii) Proposal was received from Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation (PSIEC)

vide application ref. No. 13860 dated 20.02.19.

(iii) MSME-DI, Ludhiana forwarded the proposal along with their recommendations vide

letter dated 01.03.19.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Pre-registration Information

Name of Organization : Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation

State : Punjab

District : Moga

Industrial Estate : Focal Point Moga

2. Basic Information about Proposal:

Particulars Description

Whether appraised DPR with approved

layout plan

No

Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 108.29 acres

Area to be developed (acre) 73.43 acres

Number and sizes of plots developed 213 plots with 120 units (out of which more than

50% units are micro)

Implementing Period 24 months

Other ID projects sanctioned in same

district: year of sanction, number of plots

allotted, units set up, etc.

Nil

Performance of ID projects in State Satisfactory

3. Details about Proposal:

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks

Implementing Agency (IA) Punjab Small Industries & Export

Corporation (PSIEC) Limited

As per MSECDP

guidelines

Track Record of the IA Satisfactory. Punjab Small Industries &

Export Corporation limited was setup in

1962 with the objective of supporting the

individuals to establish their own

industrial units in Punjab.

--

Appraisal by SIDBI

(Observations and

recommendations). Attach

SIDBI report.

Report will be submitted to SIDBI after

In-principle approval Required

Whether sufficient facilities

available at site. (Proximity to

railway stations / state

highways, availability of

water supply, adequate power

Industrial Area is located close to NH-71.

Nearest Airport- Amritsar Airport is 121

kms away. There is presence of adequate

power supply. There is good connectivity

of roadway and railway.

--

Page 130: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

125

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks

supply, telecom facilities,

dwelling places of workers)

Whether land is in possession

in the name of IA with Clear

Title

Punjab Small Scale Industries & Export

Corporation Ltd. (PSIEC) was the original

owner of the land. When the focal point

Moga was developed the entire land was

allotted to the unit holders present in the

focal point. PSIEC is still responsible for

operation and maintenance of focal point.

Registered land

documents in the

name of

Implementing

Agency is

required.

Whether Zoning regulations

and non-agricultural

conversion etc complied

with)

State Government i.e. PSIEC has procured

the land before the industrial area was

developed.

Whether State Level

Committee to coordinate and

monitor progress has been

Constituted

Yes, the Committee has been formed

which includes officials from PSIEC,

Industry Department, MSME-DI,

Ludhiana

Constituted

Whether confirmation

received form IA that it will

meet the cost in excess of

approved project cost and any

escalation in cost

The contribution will be made by PSIEC

as per the means of finance mentioned in

the report.

Escalation in the project cost shall be met

by PSIEC out of its own sources.

Received

Basis of elements of project

Cost

The cost estimates have been made as per

Common Schedule Rates – 2010 of

Government of Punjab and in some cases,

market rates are used for reference.

--

Tangible Outcomes of the

project

Up-gradation of Industrial area will

provide support to industries present in the

industrial area in terms of better

connectivity, minimum wear and tear,

better transport facilities, proper drainage

system that will further lead to

development of Industrial Estate.

--

Justification of the Proposal The focal point was developed in

early1990s with all infrastructure facilities

required for upgradation. However, with

time basic infrastructures in the focal point

has been deteriorated and require

upgradation. The proposal will cater to the

basic need of maintenance of road,

drainage system, power, administrative

and other services complex etc. Further,

due to deteriorated infrastructure,

industries in the focal point are bearing

wear and tear cost. Transport companies

are also charging higher tariffs in return

which are increasing the overall

production cost.

--

Page 131: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

126

4. Proposed Project Cost:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Estimated by IA

(i) Cost of Land filling/leveling including boundary wall and

fencing

67.26

(ii) Cost of Laying roads 192.35

(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 13.54

(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses 20.23

(v) Water harvesting 6.48

(vi) Drainage 10.75

(vii) Power (Sub-station, Distribution Network, including Street

light etc.) Generation of Non-Conventional Energy

245.71

(viii) Administrative Office Building 15.79

(ix) Telecommunication/Cyber/Documentation centre 15.79

(x) Conference Hall/Exhibition centre 23.68

(xi) Bank/Post office 15.79

(xii) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets 31.58

(xiii) First aid centre, Creche Canteen 15.79

(xiv) Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 13.69

(xv) Others (Sanitary Conveniences) 10.00

Total 698.43

5. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Percentage Proposed by IA

(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 80 555.91

(ii) State Government 20 142.52

Total 100 698.43

6. Observations: Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:

(i) Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency.

(ii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.

(iii) Status of completed ID projects in the State as per format provided and details of

operating units in present project.

(iv) PSIEC should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of

Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the

purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account

shall be borne by the Government of Punjab / PSIEC.

7. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for upgradation of Industrial

Focal Point, Moga, Punjab.

*****

Page 132: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

127

Agenda No.50.3.21: Proposal for In-principle approval for upgradation of Industrial

Focal Point, Naya Nangal, District Rupnagar, Punjab.

Background

(i) The proposal was recommended by State Level Steering Committee (SLSC) of Punjab

in its meeting held on 16.10.18.

(ii) Proposal was received from Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation (PSIEC)

vide application ref. No. 14212 dated 12.04.19 & recommended by MSME-DI,

Ludhiana.

(iii) MSME-DI, Ludhiana forwarded the proposal along with their recommendations vide

letter dated 01.03.19.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Pre-registration Information

Name of Organization : Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation

State : Punjab

District : Rupnagar

Industrial Estate : Focal Point Nangal

2. Basic Information about Proposal:

Particulars Description

Whether appraised DPR with approved

layout plan

No

Total Area of industrial estate/ area

(acre)

50 acres (200279.60 sq.mt)

Area to be developed (acre) 25.79 acres(104379 sq.mt)

Number and sizes of plots developed 60 plots with 16 units (out of which more than 50%

units are micro)

Implementing Period 24 months

Other ID projects sanctioned in same

district: year of sanction, number of

plots allotted, units set up, etc.

Nil

Performance of ID projects in State Satisfactory

3. Details about Proposal:

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency

(IA)

Remarks

Implementing Agency (IA) Punjab Small Industries & Export

Corporation (PSIEC) Limited

As per MSECDP

guidelines

Track Record of the IA Satisfactory. Punjab Small Industries &

Export Corporation limited was setup in

1962 with the objective of supporting

the individuals to establish their own

industrial units in Punjab.

--

Appraisal by SIDBI

(Observations and

Report will be submitted to SIDBI after

In-principle approval. Required

Page 133: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

128

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency

(IA)

Remarks

recommendations). Attach

SIDBI report.

Whether sufficient facilities

available at site. (Proximity

to railway stations / state

highways, availability of

water supply, adequate

power supply, telecom

facilities, dwelling places of

workers)

Industrial Focal Point Naya Nangal

which is 4.2 km away from Naya

Nangal Railway Station.

Naya Nangal Industrial Focal Point

is properly linked with Chandigarh

International Airport which is

around 118 kms away from the

focal point.

There is adequate availability of

water, power supply etc. in

Industrial Focal Point.

Industrial area is well connected

through NH-503.

--

Whether land is in

possession in the name of

IA with Clear Title

Punjab Small Scale Industries & Export

Corporation Ltd. (PSIEC) was the

original owner of the land. When the

focal point Naya Nangal was

developed, the entire land was allotted

to the unit

holders present in the focal point.

PSIEC is still responsible for operation

and maintenance of focal point.

Registered land

documents in the

name of

Implementing

Agency is required.

Whether Zoning regulations

and non-agricultural

conversion etc complied

with)

State Government i.e. PSIEC has

procured the land before the industrial

area was developed.

Whether State Level

Committee to coordinate

and monitor progress has

been constituted

Yes, the Committee has been formed

which includes officials from PSIEC,

Industry Department, MSME-DI,

Ludhiana

Constituted

Whether confirmation

received form IA that it will

meet the cost in excess of

approved project cost and

any escalation in cost

The contribution will be made by

PSIEC as per the means of finance

mentioned in the report. Escalation in

the project cost shall be met by

PSIEC out of its own sources.

Received

Basis of elements of project

Cost

The cost estimates have been made by

internal engineering wing of PSIEC.

--

Tangible Outcomes of the

project

Up-gradation of Industrial area will

provide support to industries present in

the industrial area in terms of better

connectivity, minimum wear and tear,

better transport facilities, proper

drainage system that will further lead to

development of Industrial Estate.

--

Justification of the Proposal The focal point was developed in 1980s

with all infrastructure facilities required

--

Page 134: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

129

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency

(IA)

Remarks

for upgradation. However, with time,

basic infrastructure in the focal point

has been deteriorated and requires

upgradation. The proposal will cater to

the basic need of maintenance of road,

drainage system, power, administrative

and other services complex etc. Further,

due to deteriorated infrastructure,

industries in the focal point are bearing

wear and tear cost. Transport

companies are also charging higher

tariffs in return which are increasing the

overall production cost.

4. Proposed Project Cost:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Estimated by IA

(i) Cost of Land filling/leveling including boundary wall and

fencing

57.62

(ii) Cost of Laying roads 161.08

(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 11.22

(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses 70.00

(v) Water harvesting 18.00

(vi) Drainage 32.00

(vii) Power (Sub-station, Distribution Network, including Street

light etc.) Generation of Non-Conventional Energy

247.10

(viii) Administrative Office Building 20.00

(ix) Conference Hall/Exhibition centre 20.00

(x) First aid centre,Creche Canteen 20.00

(xi) Effluent Treatment Facilities 130.00

(xii) Contingencies & Pre operative expenses 15.90

(xiii) Other (Sanitary Conveniences) 8.00

Total 810.92

5. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)

S.

No.

Particulars Percentage Proposed by IA

(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 74.16 601.36

(ii) State Government 25.84 209.56

Total 100 810.92

6. Observations:

Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:

(i) Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency.

(ii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.

Page 135: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

130

(iii) Status of completed ID projects in the State as per format provided and details of

operating units in present project.

(iv) PSIEC should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of

Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the

purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account

shall be borne by the Government of Punjab / PSIEC.

(v) Justification from MSME-DI, Ludhiana for recomending the project when only 16

units are operating out of the allotted 60 plots.

7. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for upgradation of Industrial

Focal Point, Naya Nangal, District Rupnagar, Punjab.

*****

Page 136: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

131

Agenda No.50.3.22: Proposal for In-principle approval for up-gradation of Industrial

Estate at Malpura, Tonk, Rajasthan.

Background

The proposal was recommended by State Level Steering Committee (SLSC) of

Government of Rajasthan in its meeting held on 20.02.19.

Proposal along with Detailed Project Report was forwarded by Government of Rajasthan

vide letter dated 22.04.19 & 25.04.19.

Proposal was received from Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment

Corporation Ltd. vide application ref. No. 14209 dated 24.04.19 & recommended by

MSME-DI, Jaipur.

MSME-DI, Jaipur vide letter dated 03.06.19 forwarded the proposal along with their

recommendations.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Pre-registration Information

Name of Organization : Rajasthan State Industrial Development and

Investment Corporation Ltd.

State : Rajasthan

District : Tonk

Industrial Estate : Industrial Area Malpura

2. Basic Information about Proposal:

Particulars Description

Whether appraised DPR with approved

layout plan

No

Total Area of industrial estate/ area

(acre)

101.91 acres

Area to be developed (acre) 101.91 acres

Number and sizes of plots to be

developed

Area (sq. mtr.) No. of plots

2000 21

1000 77

700 32

500 40

3000 2

Total 172

Implementing Period 24 months

Other ID projects sanctioned in same IID Newai was sanctioned on 31.03.98

Page 137: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

132

district: year of sanction, number of

plots allotted, units set up, etc.

Performance of ID projects in State 15 projects completed out of total 17 sanctioned.

3. Details about Proposal:

Description Proposal by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks

Implementing Agency (IA) Rajasthan State Industrial Development &

Investment Corporation Ltd. (RIICO),

Jaipur

As per MSE-CDP

guidelines.

Track Record of the IA Satisfactory --

Appraisal by SIDBI

(Observations and

recommendations). Attach

SIDBI report.

DPR will be appraised from SIDBI after

getting In Principle approval from GoI Required

Whether sufficient facilities

available at site. (Proximity

to railway stations / state

highways, availability of

water supply, adequate

power supply, telecom

facilities, dwelling places of

workers)

The Industrial Area Malpura is located

approx. 800 meters away from State

Highway No. 12 on Jaipur-Malpura-

Bhilwara- Rajsamand & 1.10 kms from

State Highway 37A Chaan- Todaraisingh-

Malpura- Dudu, which is also link NH-12

& NH-8.

--

Whether land is in

possession in the name of IA

with Clear Title

Yes Document

required.

Whether Zoning regulations

and non-agricultural

conversion etc complied

with)

Not applicable

Whether State Level

Committee to coordinate and

monitor progress has been

Constituted

State Level Committee to coordinate and

monitor progress has been constituted

Constituted

Whether confirmation

received form IA that it will

meet the cost in excess of

approved project cost and

any escalation in cost

Yes Required

Basis of elements of project

Cost

The detailed estimates for the proposal have

been prepared on the basis of Basic

Schedule of Rates of PWD Tonk circle

BSR (Road) 2016, (Building) 2013 & PWD

Electrical BSR2013.

Page 138: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

133

Description Proposal by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks

Tangible Outcomes of the

project

Up-gradation of Infrastructure facilities will

cater more investment by the existing units

and will also increase the employment.

--

Justification of the Proposal Industrial Area Malpura was developed by

RIICO on 101.91 acres of land to promote

artisans and small enterprises in the year

1984. The basic infra facilities have already

been made available since 1984, declared

saturated on dated 20.01.07. The Industries

Association and District Collector have

been pressing hard for improvement of the

existing infrastructure.

--

4. Proposed Project Cost:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Estimated by IA

(i) Cost of land filling/levelling including boundary wall and

fencing

98.95

(ii) Cost of laying roads 359.39

(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 8.82

(iv) Power distribution, Street light arrangements, etc. 210.11

Total 677.27

5. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA

(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 414.30

(ii) State Government 262.97

Total 677.27

6. Observations:

Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:

(i) Land documents in the name of Implementing Agency.

(ii) Copy of approved Layout plan.

(iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.

(iv) Commitment letter from State Government / IA to meet the escalation cost, if any,

over and above the approved project cost.

(v) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.

(vi) RIICO, Jaipur should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of

Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose

for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne

by the Government of Rajasthan / RIICO, Jaipur.

7. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for up-gradation of Industrial

Estate at Malpura, Tonk, Rajasthan.

*****

Page 139: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

134

Agenda No. 50.3.23: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up of Common Facility

Centre in Gold Ornament Cluster, Karimnagar, Telangana.

Background:

The proposal was approved by State Level Steering Committee (SLSC) in its meeting held

on 28.12.18.

The proposal was received from Government of Telangana, vide online application Ref.

No. 13856 dated 12.01.19.

MSME-DI, Hyderabad vide letter dated 08.02.19 forwarded the proposal along with

Detailed Project Report (DPR) & Focus Report.

The proposal was deliberated during 64th

meeting of Techno Economic Appraisal

Committee (TEAC) held on 05.03.19 and committee advised MSME-DI, Hyderabad to

revise the proposal and rope in more units as SPV members.

Based on the revised report, TEAC in its 65th

meeting held on 13.06.19 recommended the

proposal to place before steering committee for In-principle approval.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Basic Information of Cluster

Name of Cluster : Gold Ornament Cluster,

District Karimnagar

Location of Cluster : Karimnagar

Lok Sabha Constituency : Karimnagar

Main Product : Manufacturing of Gold Ornaments like chains, Rings,

Bangles, Bracelets, Long Chains, Necklace, Black Beat

Chains, Studs, Matties, Ear Chains, Tikkas, Lockets, Belts,

Baju Bandies, Nosepins etc.

No. of Enterprises including

break up (Micro, Small,

Medium)

Micro 232

Small 61

Medium 7

Turn over for the last five

years : (Rs. in Crore)

Year Amount

2013-14 7.60

2014-15 7.80

2015-16 8.00

2016-17 8.40

2017-18 8.93

Exports for the last five years :

(Rs. in Crore)

Nil

Employment in Cluster : 355 Nos.

Technology Details : Traditionally skilled goldsmiths employing craft skills and

simple hand tools have made Jewellery and even

nowadays, worldwide, much is still made in basic

workshops using manual metalworking skills and only

limited use of machines.

Whether DS Conducted : Yes.

Main findings of DSR : BIS has made it mandatory for Jewellery Industry to

follow hall mark norms and maintain the specified purity,

majority of the cluster firms are finding it tough to know

Page 140: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

135

purity of the ornament they make.

Artisans (Organized and Unorganized) lack basic

infrastructure facilities and proper equipment in the cluster

and are depending on part manufacturing firms for making

of various types of gold ornaments. Hence there is a need

for establishment of Common Processing plant in the

cluster.

The estimated cost of the proposed Common Processing

Plant is Rs. 3.4 crore. This is resulting in higher rejection

rates and dent in profit margins. Further non availability of

forces the artisan to send jewellery far off distance to

comply with the norms, which is costing them higher than

the standard industry norms.

Thus there is definite need to establish a common testing

cum 3D laser Hall Mark Facility in the cluster to

overcome the gap. The estimated cost of the proposed

Common Processing Plant is Rs. 1.5 crores.

Main Problems of Cluster : After a careful diagnosis of the cluster, the following key

issues have been identified:

Inability to keep abreast of modern trends in product

design, fashion and technological development.

Closed marketing behavior.

Household type of venture.

Dominance of few leading traders and wholesalers.

Lack of in-house testing-cum-hallmarking facilities.

Large scale production of identical and homogenous

products.

Poor R&D back up.

Low product diversification.

Poor backward and forward integration with market.

Poor marketing tie-ups.

Other Information : DSR recommended for establishment of CFC for over all

development of the Cluster with facilities of common process

com center and testing cum hall marking center

2. Information about Proposed CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA)

Comments by

Cluster Division

(a.) Justification for CFC There is a need to improve the

quality of the finished products

through establishment of a testing

lab to know the purity of the gold

and gold alloy used so as to expand

cluster market and make it export

driven. High Technology machines

like CNC, Faceting & Milling,

Bangle Design, Fly Press, Gold

Melting & Refinery, Chain making,

Hydraulic coin press are required to

establish a common model

processing centre in order to combat

--

Page 141: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

136

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA)

Comments by

Cluster Division

with branded outlets and to make

goldsmiths and part manufacturing

firms self-sustainable.

The individual entrepreneurs cannot

afford to buy the above said

machines due to financial constraints

and lack of enough space. To

capture organized market like retail

outlets the cluster needs to establish

a common hall mark facility centre.

(b.) Location of CFC Karimnagar Town, Karimnagar District,

Telangana.

--

% age of units in radius of 5km 30

% age of units in radius of

10km

70

(c.) Land for CFC

i. Whether land acquired Yes. Area of 2000sq Feet space has

been acquired by SPV for a period of 18

yrs at 2nd floor of the commercial

complex on lease rent of Rs. 20000/-

per month.

Registered lease

deed on the name

of SPV is required

ii. Title is in name of

iii. Valuation and its basis --

iv. Land is sufficient Yes.

v. Change of land use NA

vi. If on lease, duration of lease Land on lease basis for 18 years.

vii Whether lease is legally

tenable

Land and building has been identified

and SPV has under taken the Leased

agreement with owner

(d.) Total Building area(sq ft) 2000 sq ft --

(e.) Rate of construction of

building

NA --

(f.) Main Facility Proposed Common Processing Centre

Common Testing cum Hallmark

facilities

--

g.) Prod capacity of CFC The processing center will have an

installed capacity of 16500 Jobs per

annum. The hall marking facility can

take up 54000 jobs per annum and

testing center can take up 36000 jobs

per annum.

--

(h.) Major Outputs/

Deliverables of CFC, Projected

performance of the cluster after

proposed intervention (in terms

of production, export/domestic

Sl. No. Parameter Before

intervention

After

Intervention

1. Nos. of units 300 310

2 Turnover Rs. 9.5 crore Rs. 10.00 crore

Page 142: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

137

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA)

Comments by

Cluster Division

sales and direct/indirect

employment, etc.) (crore)

3 Export (cr.) 0.00

Marginal

increase from 3rd

year onwards

after setting up

of CFC.

4 Employment 355 375

5 Production (increase) 1100 kgs. 1150 kgs.

(i.) Pollution clearance required

or not NA

NOC from PCB is

required.

(j.) Man Power in CFC 17 members per Shift --

(k.) Revenue generation

mechanism for sustainability of

assets(service/user charges to

be levied, any other-to be

specified)

All the SPV members and other principle cluster firms are

expected to utilise the services of various facilities

proposed to be established at CFC on user charge basis for

sustainability of its operations.

Projected Profit : First year 156.06 Lakhs, Second year

172.05 lakhs, Third year 189.43 Lakhs and 207.02 in

Fourth Year

3. Information about SPV

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Comments by

Cluster Division

(a.) Name and Address M/s Somnath Vishwakarma Karimnagar

Goldsmith Association H.No: 3-27, Bejjanki

Mandal, Gunkulkondapur, KARIMNAGAR,

Karimnagar, Telangana, India, 505530

--

(b.) Nature of SPV(company

or Society or Trust)

Special Purpose Vehicle (Section 8, Indian

Companies Act 2013) Not for Profit

Company3

--

(c.) Name of the state Govt.

and MSME officials in SPV

State Govt. and MSME DI will appoint the

their officials after final approval.

--

(d.) Date of formation of

SPV

25.04.2018

--

(e.) Number of Members 27 nos.

--

(f.) Bye Laws or MoA and

AOA submitted

Submitted. --

(g.) Authorized Share Capital Rs. 10.00 lakh

(h.) Paid up capital Rs. 06.00 lakh.

(i.) Shareholding Pattern 108 Nos. @54,658/- --

(j.) Commitment letter for

contribution

Submitted --

(k.) SPV specific A/c SPV has taken initiative to open new Bank

Account with nationalized bank. Required

(l.) Trust Building of SPV,

Previous track record of co-

operative initiatives pursued

by SPV members need to be

SPV have already organized trust building

programs like awareness workshop of CDP,

Exposer visit to Vijayawada Gold Cluster,

visited Jewellery Expo in Chennai and New

--

Page 143: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

138

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Comments by

Cluster Division

highlighted with support

documentation.

Delhi, and conducted Skill development

program. Approach and SPV formation with

the help of MSME-DI Hyderabad and DIC,

Karim Nagar.

(m.) Technical Institution The SPV is taking support from Gold

Ornament Clusters at Vijayawada, for setting

of the CFC. There are several institution that

are supporting SPV viz. Commissioner of

Industries, MSME DI, Hyderabad, DIC etc.

--

(n.) CFC may be utilised by

SPV members as also others

in a cluster. However,

evidence should be furnished

with regard to SPV member

ability to utilise at least 60

percent of installed capacity.

Undertaking submitted by the SPV assuring

that 60% capacity of plant and machinery will

be utilised by the Cluster Firms.

--

(o) Utilities

(a) Power requirement for

commercial/domestic

purpose

28.50 HP --

(b) Water 500 ltr per day --

(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities NA --

4. Implement Arrangements

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Comments by

Cluster Division

(a.) Implementing Agency Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure

Corporation Limited (TSIIC), Hyderabad

--

(b.) Fund receiving Agency Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure

Corporation Limited (TSIIC), Hyderabad

--

(c.) Implementation Period 12 months 24 Months from

date of final

approval.

(d.) Appraisal of DPR and

main Recommendations

The AIA, MSME-DI, Hyderabad has

recommended the proposal.

--

(e.) Comments of Technical

Division

The proposal was deliberated during 64th

& 65th

meetings of

Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) held on 05.03.19

& 13.06.19 respectively and committee recommended the proposal

to place before steering committee for In-principle approval. (f.) Approval of Technical

Committee

(g.) Comments of Cluster

Development Division:

Recommended for in-principle approval under MSE-CDP.

(h.) Working capital (In-

principle sanction of loan

from a bank, if applicable

arrangement made)

NA. --

Page 144: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

139

5. Financial Analysis of CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA)

Comments by

Cluster Division

(a.) BEP 51.71%

As per MSE-CDP

guidelines.

(b.) IRR, Payback period 13.50%

(c.) DSCR NA

(d.) Return on Capital

employed (ROCE)

30.78%

(e.) NPV Rs. 94.34 lakh

(f.) DER NA

(g.) Sensitivity Analysis Sensitivity analysis calculated on decrease

in Sales by 10%, decrease in Capacity

utilization by 10% and combination of

both. Under above sensitive scenarios, the

key financial indicators like BEP, IRR,

ROCE are within the limits.

(h.) Status of CFCs

approved in the State

-- --

6. Proposed project cost:

(Rs. in lakh)

S.No. Particulars As proposed by IA

1. Land and its Development 0.00

2. Building and other Civil constructions 21.31

3. Plant & Machinery (including electrification) 495.53

4. Misc. fixed assets 9.15

5. Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 23.25

6. Contingencies (2% building and 5% on plant and

machinery)

25.20

7. Margin money for working capital 5.00

Total 579.44

7. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)

S.

No.

Particulars Percentage As proposed by IA

1 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 90.00 520.41

2 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Telangana 0.00 0.00*

3 SPV contribution 10.00 59.03

Total 100.00 579.44

* As per recommendation of TEAC;

(i) Government of Telangana is to contribute a minimum 10% towards the project and

accordingly GoI contribution would be reduced.

(ii) One each of Mesh Chain Machine and Wire drawing Machine at S.No.14 & 17 of the Agenda

may be deleted.

Page 145: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

140

8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)

(Rs. in lakh)

S.No. Description No. Power Requirement

(HP/KW)

Cost

1. Faceting & Milling Machine (CNC Machine) for bangles & wedding bands Double Head with variable speed control, computerized 6 axis system

1 .5 42.35

2. Bangle & Ring turning Machine 1.5� to 3� 1 1 3.47

3. Bangle & Ring Profiling Machine 2� to 3� No 17 to 49

1 1 0.91

4. Lazer Engraving Machine Speed 12000mm/s, Cooling system

1 .5 45.98

5. Digital Weighing Machine 1 .5 8.35

6. Ball Making Machine with Full Setup of Sheet Drawing of Pipe Making, Soldering, Sheet Striping Machine, Hammering with All Standard Accessories

1 3 41.14

7. Welding Machine 130 Joule capacity 1 1 18.15

8. CNC Router Machine Jewelers Engraving 3-4 Axis 1 5 22.38

9. Gold & Silve Dyes sizes starting from 15 x 1 to 15.3/4X1

1200 0 58.08

10. Digital Vaccume Pressure Casting Gold Melting Machine With Digital Diaply & Colling System

1 2 18.75

11. Gold Melting Machine with Digital display and cooling system

1 1 3.33

12. Gold Refinery Machine 2 KG charge up to 6 KG per day

1 1 3.33

13. Hydraulic Dai Cutting Machine 150 MM stock cylinders, 20 MM/ Sec Fast forward Speed

1 1.5 4.60

14. MESH CHAIN MACHINE with standard accessories 1 2 10.28

15. Box Chain Making Machine with standard accessories 1 1 14.52

16. V Chain Making Machine with standard accessories 1 1 16.34

17. Wire Drawing Machine with standard accessories 1 1 5.14

18. Sheet and Wire Drawing Machine with standard accessories

1 2 5.57

19. Laser Marking Machine Karat Mark 1 1 28.13

20. XRF Machine MISTRAL SDD 1 2 71.39

21. Assay Balance 0.001 Mg accuracy 1 .5 11.69

22. Sartorius Analytical Balance Machine 1 .5 1.51

23. Sartorius Precision Balance Machine 2 .5 2.057

24. 50 Gm, 100 Gm, 200 Gm, E2 Classs Wire Weigh with display attachment

1 .5 0.35

25. Tools & Equipment for sampling Balling Pliers, couples, scrapping tools, tongs, forceps, rolling ill etc

1 0 8.47

26. Furnaces, Scrubber, Parting Tray etc. 1 0 9.075

27. Safety Equipment CCTV system, Air Conditioning Unit, Computer & UPS system, Generator etc.

1 0 10.28

Page 146: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

141

28. Accessories for operation of the CFC 1 0 6.00

9. Observations:

(A) Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:

(i) Registered lease deed for the premises for a period of 15 years on the name of SPV.

(ii) SIDBI appraisal report.

(iii) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.

(iv) Certificate from State Government regarding compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.

(v) Certificate from State Government stating that more than 50% units in the cluster are

Micro.

(B) As recommended by 65th

Committee of TEAC,

(i) One each of Mesh Chain Machine and Wire drawing Machine at S.No.14 & 17 of DPR

respectively may be deleted.

(ii) Government of Telangana should contribute a minimum 10% towards the project and

accordingly GoI contribution would be reduced.

(iii) More units may be included as SPV members.

(C) Necessary amendments, as mentioned in (B) above, may be made in DPR and the DPR may be duly

vetted by MSME-DI, Hyderabad. Accordingly the changes may be communicated to SIDBI for

appraisal.

10. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up of Common Facility

Centre (CFC) in Gold Ornament Cluster, Karimnagar, Telangana.

.*******

Page 147: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle
Page 148: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

142

Agenda No. 50.4.1: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Mangolpuri Industrial

Estate, Phase-II, North West District, Delhi.

Background

(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 47th

SCM held on 12.11.18,

subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.

(ii) Vide letter dated 07.06.19; Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development

Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd. submitted the following documents and requested to

consider the proposal for final approval.

Documents required Status

(i) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Received

(ii) Land document with clear title

(signed by Competent Authority) in

the name of Implementing Agency

A copy of “The Delhi Industrial

Development Operation and

Maintenance (DIDOM) Act, 2010” has

been received in this regard.

(iii) Commitment letter from IA to meet

the cost escalation, if any, over and

above the approved project cost.

Received

(iv) Undertaking from State Government

that more than 50% units in the

Industrial Estate are (a) Micro (b)

SC/ST& (c) Women owned, as the

case may be, in case Gol assistance

is more than 60% of Project Cost or

Rs. 10.00 crore, whichever is less.

The industrial area has 1249 MSEs. Of

these, 863 units are micro accounting for

around 69% of the total units. Hence, the

project shall be eligible for grant of 80%

of eligible project cost, which comes out

at Rs. 704.91 lakh.

Undertaking from State Government

that more than 50% units in the

Industrial Estate are micro has been

received.

(v) Details of Industries operating in the

Industrial Estate.

Received

(vi) Certificate from State Government

for compliance of GFR/CVC

guidelines.

Received

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Pre-registration Information

Name of Organization : Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development

Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd.

State : Delhi

District : North West Delhi

Industrial Estate : Mangolpuri Industrial Area Ph-II

Page 149: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

143

2. Basic Information about Proposal:

Particulars Description

Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan

Yes

Total Area of Industrial Estate/ area (acre)

78.18 acres

Area to be developed (acre) 78.18 acres

Number and sizes of plots 1249 units (863 no. of units are micro) Each unit has an area of 100-600 sq. mtrs. depending on the size and scale of operation.

Implementing Period 16 months from the date of sanction of MSE-CDP grant to IA

Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up etc.

Nil

Performance of ID projects in State

N/A

3. Details about Proposal:

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA

Remarks

Implementing Agency (IA) Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd.

As per MSE-CDP guidelines

Track Record of the IA Satisfactory. There are 33 notified Industrial areas in Delhi of which 21 are being maintained by Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd. DSIIDC is also entrusted with redevelopment and maintenance of industrial areas transferred from Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Department of Industries. DSIIDC has also been involved in implementing Government of Delhi‟s scheme of relocation to shift industries operating in various non-conforming/residential areas to planned industrial areas.

--

Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.

Submitted Received

Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)

The industrial area is easily accessible from New Delhi Railway Station, (18 km away) Airport as well as Delhi Metro. The industrial area has water supply from Delhi Jal Board and has adequate facilities for supply to various units.

--

Page 150: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

144

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA

Remarks

Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title

After implementation of “The Delhi Industrial Development Operation and Maintenance (DIDOM) Act, 2010” the land had been transferred to DSIIDC. The said industrial area is one of the 33 notified and planned industrial areas in Delhi of which 24, including 04 flatted factory complexes are maintained by DSIIDC.

A copy of DIDOM Act, 2010 has been submitted by IA.

Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)

Yes, the proposed project is for upgradation and no additional land is to be acquired for the project.

Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted

Yes Constituted

Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost

Yes Received

Basis of elements of project Cost All cost estimates have been drawn by DSIIDC engineers. Specifications are submitted and are generally found to be reasonable.

--

Tangible Outcomes of the project The proposed project will improve operational convenience for existing users in terms of better roads, better drainage facilities, improved power supply etc. Better roads will reduce time for movement of materials and final products by units and thereby increase their profitability. Better drainage will prevent inundation during rains and ensure longer life for roads and other infrastructure.

--

Justification of the Proposal The industrial area is existing. However, due to heavy use and movement of traffic, roads and drains needs to be maintained. Further, upgradation will add to the lifespan of the available infrastructure and improve the productivity of the units.

--

4. Proposed Project Cost:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA

As per MSE-CDP/ Recommended by SIDBI

(i) Cost of land filling/levelling including boundary wall and fencing

148.00 100.00

(ii) Cost of laying roads 295.00 200.00

Page 151: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

145

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA

As per MSE-CDP/ Recommended by SIDBI

(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00 10.00

(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses

125.00 110.00

(v) Water harvesting 11.86 10.00

(vi) Drainage 119.00 60.00

(vii) Power (Sub-station and distribution network including street light etc.), Generation of non-conventional energy

250.00 250.00

(viii) Other (Sanitary conveniences etc.) 10.00 10.00

(ix) Administrative /Office Building 20.00 20.00

(x) Telecommunication/Cyber centre/Documentation centre

20.00 20.00

(xi) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 30.00 30.00

(xii) Raw material storage facility, marketing outlets

21.14 21.14

(xiii) First Aid Centre, Creche, Canteen facilities 20.00 20.00

(xiv) Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 20.00 20.00

Total 1100.00 881.14

5. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA As per MSE-CDP

(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 800.00 704.91*

(ii) DSIIDC contribution 300.00 395.09

Total 1100.00 1100.00

*SIDBI recommended GoI grant of Rs. 704.91 lakh as 80% of total eligible Project cost of Rs.

881.14 lakh.

6. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Mangolpuri

Industrial Estate, Phase-II, North West District, Delhi at a total project cost of Rs.1100.00 lakh

with GoI assistance of Rs.704.91 lakh and DSIIDC contribution of Rs.395.09 lakh.

*******

Page 152: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

146

Agenda No. 50.4.2: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Mayapuri Industrial

Estate, Phase-I, South West District, Delhi.

Background

(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 47th

SCM held on 12.11.18,

subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.

(ii) Vide letter dated 07.06.19; Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development

Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd. submitted the following documents and requested to

consider the proposal for final approval.

Documents required Status (vii) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Received (viii) Land document with clear title

(signed by Competent Authority) in the name of Implementing Agency

A copy of “The Delhi Industrial Development Operation and Maintenance (DIDOM) Act, 2010” has been received in this regard.

(ix) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost.

Received

(x) Undertaking from State Government that more than 50% units in the Industrial Estate are (a) Micro (b) SC/ST& (c) Women owned, as the case may be, in case Gol assistance is more than 60% of Project Cost or Rs.l 0.00 crore, whichever is less.

The industrial area has 330 MSEs. Of these, 201 units are micro accounting for around 60% of the total units. Hence, the project shall be eligible for grant of 80% of eligible project cost, which comes out at Rs. 704.91 lakh. Undertaking from State Government that more than 50% units in the Industrial Estate are micro has been received.

(xi) Details of Industries operating in the Industrial Estate.

Received

(xii) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.

Received

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Pre-registration Information

Name of Organization : Delhi

State : Delhi

District : South West Delhi

Industrial Estate : Mayapuri Industrial Area Ph-I

2. Basic Information about Proposal:

Particulars Description

Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan

Yes

Total Area of Industrial Estate/ area (acre)

148 acres

Area to be developed (acre) 148 acres

Page 153: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

147

Number and sizes of plots to be developed

330 plots with 330 units operating (201 no. of units are micro) Each unit has an area of 100-2400 sq. mtrs. depending on the size and scale of operation.

Implementing Period 16 months from the date of sanction of MSE-CDP grant to IA

Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up etc.

Nil

Performance of ID projects in State

N/A

3. Details about Proposal:

Description Proposed by IA Remarks

Implementing Agency (IA) Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd.

As per MSE-CDP guidelines

Track Record of the IA Satisfactory. There are 33 notified Industrial areas in Delhi of which 21 are being maintained by Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd. DSIIDC is also entrusted with redevelopment and maintenance of industrial areas transferred from Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Department of Industries. DSIIDC has also been involved in implementing Government of Delhi‟s scheme of relocation to shift industries operating in various non-conforming/residential areas to planned industrial areas.

--

Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.

Submitted Received.

Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)

The industrial area is easily accessible from New Delhi Railway Station, (13 km away) Airport as well as Delhi Metro. The industrial area has water supply from Delhi Jal Board and has adequate facilities for supply to various units.

--

Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title

After implementation of “The Delhi Industrial Development Operation and Maintenance (DIDOM) Act, 2010” the land had been transferred to DSIIDC. The said industrial area is one of the 33 notified and planned industrial areas in Delhi of which 24, including 04 flatted factory complexes are maintained by DSIIDC.

A copy of DIDOM Act, 2010 has been submitted by IA.

Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)

Yes, the proposed project is for upgradation and no additional land is to be acquired for the project.

Page 154: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

148

Description Proposed by IA Remarks

Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted

Yes Constituted

Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost

Yes Received

Basis of elements of project Cost All cost estimates have been drawn by DSIIDC engineers.

--

Tangible Outcomes of the project The proposed project will improve operational convenience for existing users in terms of better roads, better drainage facilities, improved power supply etc. Better roads will reduce time for movement of materials and final products by units and thereby increase their profitability. Better drainage will prevent inundation during rains and ensure longer life for roads and other infrastructure.

--

Justification of the Proposal The industrial area is existing. However, due to heavy use and movement of traffic, roads and drains needs to be maintained. Further, upgradation will add to the lifespan of the available infrastructure and improve the productivity of the units.

--

4. Proposed Project Cost:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA

As per MSE-CDP/Recommended by SIDBI

(i) Cost of land filling/levelling including boundary wall and fencing

148.00 100.00

(ii) Cost of laying roads 295.00 200.00

(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00 10.00

(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses

125.00 110.00

(v) Water harvesting 11.86 10.00

(vi) Drainage 114.00 60.00

(vii) Power (Sub-station and distribution network including street light etc.), Generation of non-conventional energy

250.00 250.00

(viii) Other (Sanitary conveniences etc.) 10.00 10.00

(ix) Administrative /Office Building 20.00 20.00

Page 155: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

149

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA

As per MSE-CDP/Recommended by SIDBI

(x) Telecommunication/Cyber centre/Documentation centre

20.00 20.00

(xi) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 30.00 30.00

(xii) Raw material storage facility, marketing outlets 21.14 21.14

(xiii) First Aid Centre, Creche, Canteen facilities 20.00 20.00

(xiv) Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 20.00 20.00

Total 1095.00 881.14

5. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA As per MSE-CDP

(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 800.00 704.91*

(ii) DSIIDC contribution 295.00 390.09

Total 1095.00 1095.00

*SIDBI recommended GoI grant of Rs. 704.91 lakh as 80% of total eligible Project cost of Rs.

881.14 lakh.

6. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Mayapuri

Industrial Estate, Phase-I, South West District, Delhi at a total project cost of Rs.1095.00 lakh

with GoI assistance of Rs.704.91 lakh and DSIIDC contribution of Rs.390.09 lakh.

*******

Page 156: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

150

Agenda No.50.4.3: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Infrastructure

Facilities at Flatted Factory Complex, Jhilmil Industrial Area, East

Delhi, Delhi.

Background

(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 47th

SCM held on 12.11.18,

subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.

(ii) Vide letter dated 07.06.19; Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development

Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd. submitted the following documents and requested to

consider the proposal for final approval.

Documents required Status

(i) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Received

(ii) Land document with clear title

(signed by Competent Authority) in

the name of Implementing Agency

A copy of “The Delhi Industrial

Development Operation and Maintenance

(DIDOM) Act, 2010” has been received in

this regard.

(iii) Commitment letter from IA to meet

the cost escalation, if any, over and

above the approved project cost.

Received

(iv) Undertaking from State Government

that more than 50% units in the

Industrial Estate are (a) Micro (b)

SC/ST& (c) Women owned, as the

case may be, in case Gol assistance is

more than 60% of Project Cost or Rs.

l 0.00 crore, whichever is less.

The industrial area has 378 MSEs. Out of

which 245 are micro units (64.81% of total

units). However, Jhilmil FFC operates in

the larger Jhilmil Industrial Area and as

MSE-CDP considers the entire industrial

area for purpose of grant, micro units will

be lower than 50%. Hence, the project shall

be eligible for grant of 60% against eligible

project cost, which comes out at Rs. Rs.

497.92 lakh.

Therefore, condition for submission of

certificate/ undertaking from State

Government that more than 50% units in

the Industrial Estate are (a) Micro (b)

SC/ST& (c) Women owned, as the case

may be, is not stipulated.

(v) Details of Industries operating in the

Industrial Estate.

Received

(vi) Certificate from State Government for

compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.

Received

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Pre-registration Information

Name of Organization : Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development

Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd.

State : Delhi

District : East Delhi

Page 157: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

151

Industrial Estate : Flatted Factory Complex, Jhilmil Industrial Area

2. Basic Information about Proposal:

Particulars Description

Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan

Yes

Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre)

4.97 acres

Area to be developed (acre) 4.97 acres

Number and sizes of plots to be developed

378 units (245 nos. of units are micro) Each unit has an area of 27-54 sq. mtrs. depending on the size and scale of operation.

Implementing Period 16 months from the date of sanction of MSE-CDP grant to IA

Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.

Nil

Performance of ID projects in State N/A

3. Details about Proposal:

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)

Remarks

Implementing Agency (IA) Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd.

As per MSE-CDP guidelines

Track Record of the IA Satisfactory. There are 33 notified Industrial areas in Delhi of which 21 are being maintained by Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd. DSIIDC is also entrusted with redevelopment and maintenance of industrial areas transferred from Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Department of Industries. DSIIDC has also been involved in implementing Government of Delhi‟s scheme of relocation to shift industries operating in various non-conforming/residential areas to planned industrial areas.

--

Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.

Submitted Received.

Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of

The industrial area is easily accessible from Jhilmil Railway Station (2-3 kms away) and approx. 7-8kms from Anand Vihar Railway Station and Bus Terminal. The industrial area has water

--

Page 158: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

152

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)

Remarks

workers) supply from Delhi Jal Board and has adequate facilities for supply to various units.

Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title

After implementation of “The Delhi Industrial Development Operation and Maintenance (DIDOM) Act, 2010” the land had been transferred to DSIIDC. The said industrial area is one of the 33 notified and planned industrial areas in Delhi of which 24, including 04 flatted factory complexes are maintained by DSIIDC.

A copy of “The Delhi Industrial Development Operation and Maintenance (DIDOM) Act, 2010” has been submitted by IA.

Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with):

Yes, the proposed project is for upgradation and no additional land is to be acquired for the project.

Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted

Yes Constituted

Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost

Yes Received

Basis of elements of project Cost All cost estimates have been drawn by DSIIDC engineers.

--

Tangible Outcomes of the project The proposed project will improve operational convenience for existing users in terms of better roads, better drainage facilities etc. Better roads will reduce time for movement of materials and final products by units and thereby increase their profitability. Better drainage will prevent inundation during rains and ensure longer life for roads and other infrastructure.

--

Justification of the Proposal The industrial area is existing. However, due to heavy use and movement of traffic, roads and drains needs to be maintained. Further, upgradation will add to the lifespan of the available infrastructure and improve the productivity of the units.

--

4. Proposed Project Cost:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA

As per MSE-CDP/Recommended by SIDBI

(i) Cost of land filling/levelling including 54.98 54.98

Page 159: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

153

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA

As per MSE-CDP/Recommended by SIDBI

boundary wall and fencing

(ii) Cost of laying roads 229.79 200.00

(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00 10.00

(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses

202.84 110.00

(v) Water harvesting 11.68 10.00

(vi) Drainage 61.36 60.00

(vii) Power (Sub-station and distribution network including street light etc.), Generation of non-conventional energy

226.83 226.83

(viii) Other (Sanitary conveniences etc.) 65.76 10.00

(ix) Administrative /Office Building 28.00 20.00

(x) Telecommunication/Cyber centre/Documentation centre

20.00 20.00

(xi) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 37.00 30.00

(xii) Raw material storage facility, marketing outlets 40.00 40.00

(xiii) First Aid Centre, Creche, Canteen facilities 20.28 20.00

(xiv) Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 18.06 18.06

Total 1026.58 829.87

5. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA

As per MSE-CDP

(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 800.00 497.92*

(ii) DSIIDC contribution 226.58 528.66

Total 1026.58 1026.58

*SIDBI recommended GoI grant of Rs. 497.92 lakh as 60% of total eligible Project cost of Rs.

829.87 lakh.

6. Observations:

Following documents are required to be submitted prior to issue of final approval.

(i) As per SIDBI appraisal report, the Industrial Estate has 378 operational units with

245 micro units; whereas, as per the documents submitted by DSIIDC, the

Industrial Estate has 378 units with 225, 14, 1 & 138 number of micro, women

owned, SC/ST & others units respectively.

(ii) The industrial area has 378 MSEs. Out of which 245 are micro units (64.81% of

total units). However, Jhilmil Flatted Factory Complex (FFC) operates in the

larger Jhilmil Industrial Area and as MSE-CDP considers the entire industrial area

for purpose of grant, micro units will be lower than 50%. Hence, the project shall

be eligible for grant of 60% against eligible project cost, which comes out at Rs.

Rs. 497.92 lakh.

Page 160: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

154

7. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Infrastructure

Facilities at Flatted Factory Complex, Jhilmil Industrial Area, East Delhi, Delhi at a total project

cost of Rs.1026.58 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs.497.92 lakh and DSIIDC contribution of

Rs.528.66 lakh.

******

Page 161: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

155

Agenda No.50.4.4: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Infrastructure

Facilities at Flatted Factory Complex, Jhandewalan, Central Delhi,

New Delhi

Background

(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 47th

SCM held on 12.11.18,

subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.

(ii) Vide letter dated 07.06.19; Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development

Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd. submitted the following documents and requested to

consider the proposal for final approval.

Documents required Status (i) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Received (ii) Land document with clear title

(signed by Competent Authority) in the name of Implementing Agency

A copy of “The Delhi Industrial Development Operation and Maintenance (DIDOM) Act, 2010” has been received in this regard.

(iii) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost.

Received

(iv) Undertaking from State Government that more than 50% units in the Industrial Estate are (a) Micro (b) SC/ST& (c) Women owned, as the case may be, in case Gol assistance is more than 60% of Project Cost or Rs. l 0.00 crore, whichever is less.

The industrial area has 570 MSEs. Out of which 333 are micro units (more than 58.42% of total units). Hence, the project shall be eligible for grant of 80% against eligible project cost, which comes out at Rs. 728.91 lakh. Therefore, condition for submission of certificate/ undertaking from State Government that more than 50% units in the Industrial Estate are (a) Micro (b) SC/ST& (c) Women owned, as the case may be, has been received.

(v) Details of Industries operating in the Industrial Estate.

Details of only micro units have been submitted.

(vi) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.

Received

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Pre-registration Information

Name of Organization : Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development

Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd.

State : Delhi

District : Central Delhi

Industrial Estate : Flatted Factory Complex, Jhandewalan

2. Basic Information about Proposal:

Particulars Description

Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan

Yes

Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre)

8.75 acres

Page 162: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

156

Particulars Description

Area to be developed (acre) 8.75 acres

Number and sizes of plots to be developed

570 units (333 nos. of units are micro) Each unit has an area of 23-56 sq. mtrs. depending on the size and scale of operation.

Implementing Period 16 months from the date of sanction of MSE-CDP grant to IA

Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.

Nil

Performance of ID projects in State

N/A

3. Details about Proposal:

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)

Remarks

Implementing Agency (IA): Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd.

As per MSE-CDP guidelines

Track Record of the IA Satisfactory. There are 33 notified Industrial areas in Delhi of which 21 are being maintained by Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd. DSIIDC is also entrusted with redevelopment and maintenance of industrial areas transferred from Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Department of Industries. DSIIDC has also been involved in implementing Government of Delhi‟s scheme of relocation to shift industries operating in various non-conforming/residential areas to planned industrial areas.

--

Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.

Submitted Received.

Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)

The industrial area is easily accessible from New Delhi Railway Station (4 kms away), Air port as well as Delhi Metro. The industrial area has water supply from Delhi Jal Board and has adequate facilities for supply to various units.

--

Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title

After implementation of “The Delhi Industrial Development Operation and Maintenance (DIDOM) Act, 2010” the land had been transferred to DSIIDC. The said industrial area is one of the 33 notified and planned industrial areas in Delhi of which 24, including 04 flatted factory

A copy of “The Delhi Industrial Development Operation and Maintenance (DIDOM) Act, 2010” has been submitted by IA.

Page 163: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

157

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)

Remarks

complexes are maintained by DSIIDC.

Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with):

Yes, the proposed project is for upgradation and no additional land is to be acquired for the project.

Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted

Yes Constituted

Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost

Yes Received

Basis of elements of project Cost All cost estimates have been drawn by DSIIDC engineers.

--

Tangible Outcomes of the project The proposed project will improve operational convenience for existing users in terms of better roads, better drainage facilities etc. Better roads will reduce time for movement of materials and final products by units and thereby increase their profitability. Better drainage will prevent inundation during rains and ensure longer life for roads and other infrastructure.

--

Justification of the Proposal The industrial area is existing. However, due to heavy use and movement of traffic, roads and drains needs to be maintained. Further, upgradation will add to the lifespan of the available infrastructure and improve the productivity of the units.

--

4. Proposed Project Cost:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA

As per MSE-CDP/Recommended by SIDBI

(i) Cost of land filling/levelling including boundary wall and fencing

228.00 100.00

(ii) Cost of laying roads 220.00 200.00

(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00 10.00

(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses

125.00 110.00

(v) Water harvesting 11.86 10.00

(vi) Drainage 120.00 60.00

(vii) Power (Sub-station and distribution network 250.00 250.00

Page 164: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

158

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA

As per MSE-CDP/Recommended by SIDBI

including street light etc.), Generation of non-conventional energy

(viii) Other (Sanitary conveniences etc.) 10.00 10.00

(ix) Administrative /Office Building 32.00 20.00

(x) Telecommunication/Cyber centre/Documentation centre

25.00 20.00

(xi) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 30.00 30.00

(xii) Bank / Post Office 32.00 20.00

(xiii) Raw material storage facility, marketing outlets 31.14 31.14

(xiv) First Aid Centre, Creche, Canteen facilities 25.00 20.00

(xv) Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 25.00 20.00

Total 1175.00 911.14

5. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA

As per MSE-CDP

(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 800.00 728.91*

(ii) DSIIDC contribution 375.00 446.09

Total 1175.00 1175.00

*SIDBI recommended GoI grant of Rs. 728.91 lakh as 80% of total eligible Project cost of Rs.

911.14 lakh.

6. Observations:

Following documents are required to be submitted prior to issue of final approval.

(i) As per SIDBI appraisal report, the Industrial Estate has 570 operational units with

333 micro units, whereas, as per the documents submitted by DSIIDC, the

Industrial Estate has 333 operational units with 274, 4 & 55 number of micro,

women owned & others units respectively.

(ii) Details of units operating in the Industrial Estate, in light of the variations as

mentioned in Point (ii) above.

7. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Infrastructure

Facilities at Flatted Factory Complex, Jhandewalan, Central Delhi, New Delhi at a total project

cost of Rs. 1175.00 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 728.91 lakh and DSIIDC contribution of Rs.

446.09 lakh.

*****

Page 165: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

159

Agenda No.50.4.5: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Infrastructure

Facilities at Flatted Factory Complex, Okhla Industrial Area, South

Delhi, Delhi.

Background

(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 47th

SCM held on 12.11.18,

subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.

(ii) Vide letter dated 07.06.19; Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development

Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd. submitted the following documents and requested to

consider the proposal for final approval.

Documents required Status

(i) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Received

(ii) Land document with clear title

(signed by Competent Authority) in

the name of Implementing Agency

A copy of “The Delhi Industrial

Development Operation and Maintenance

(DIDOM) Act, 2010” along with land

transfer order has been received in this

regard.

(iii) Commitment letter from IA to meet

the cost escalation, if any, over and

above the approved project cost.

Received

(iv) Undertaking from State Government

that more than 50% units in the

Industrial Estate are (a) Micro (b)

SC/ST& (c) Women owned, as the

case may be, in case Gol assistance is

more than 60% of Project Cost or Rs.l

0.00 crore, whichever is less.

The industrial area has 294 MSEs. Out of

which 251 are micro units (more than 85%

of total units). Hence, the project shall be

eligible for grant of 80% against eligible

project cost, which comes out at Rs. 674.95

lakh.

Therefore, condition for submission of

certificate/ undertaking from State

Government that more than 50% units in

the Industrial Estate are (a) Micro (b)

SC/ST& (c) Women owned, as the case

may be, is stipulated.

(v) Details of Industries operating in the

Industrial Estate.

Received

(vi) Certificate from State Government for

compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.

Received

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Pre-registration Information

Name of Organization : Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development

Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd.

State : Delhi

District : South Delhi

Industrial Estate : Flatted Factory Complex, Okhla Industrial Area

Page 166: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

160

2. Basic Information about Proposal:

Particulars Description

Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan

No

Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre)

3.75 acres

Area to be developed (acre) 3.75 acres

Number and sizes of plots to be developed

294 units Units Nos. Micro : 251 SC/ST : 2 Women owned : 9 Others : 32 Total : 294

Each unit has an area of 21-46 sq. mtrs. depending on the size and scale of operation.

Implementing Period 16 months from the date of sanction of MSE-CDP grant to IA

Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.

Nil

Performance of ID projects in State

N/A

3. Details about Proposal:

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)

Remarks

Implementing Agency (IA) Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd.

As per MSE-CDP guidelines

Track Record of the IA Satisfactory. There are 33 notified Industrial areas in Delhi of which 21 are being maintained by Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd. DSIIDC is also entrusted with redevelopment and maintenance of industrial areas transferred from Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Department of Industries. DSIIDC has also been involved in implementing Government of Delhi‟s scheme of relocation to shift industries operating in various non-conforming/residential areas to planned industrial areas.

--

Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.

Report submitted after In-principle approval.

Received.

Page 167: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

161

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)

Remarks

Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)

The industrial area is easily accessible from New Delhi Railway Station, (17 km away) Airport as well as Okhla NSIC Metro. The industrial area has water supply from Delhi Jal Board and has adequate facilities for supply to various units.

--

Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title

After implementation of “The Delhi Industrial Development Operation and Maintenance (DIDOM) Act, 2010” the land had been transferred to DSIIDC. The said industrial area is one of the 33 notified and planned industrial areas in Delhi of which 24, including 04 flatted factory complexes are maintained by DSIIDC.

A copy of “The Delhi Industrial Development Operation and Maintenance (DIDOM) Act, 2010” along with land transfer order has been submitted by IA.

Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)

Yes, the proposed project is for upgradation and no additional land is to be acquired for the project.

Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted

Yes Constituted

Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost

Yes Received

Basis of elements of project Cost All cost estimates have been drawn by DSIIDC engineers.

--

Tangible Outcomes of the project The proposed project will improve operational convenience for existing users in terms of better roads, better drainage facilities etc. Better roads will reduce time for movement of materials and final products by units and thereby increase their profitability. Better drainage will prevent inundation during rains and ensure longer life for roads and other infrastructure.

--

Justification of the Proposal The industrial area is existing. However, due to heavy use and movement of traffic, roads and drains needs to be maintained. Further, upgradation will add to the lifespan of the available infrastructure and improve the productivity of the units.

--

Page 168: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

162

4. Proposed Project Cost:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA

As per MSE-CDP/Recommended by SIDBI

(i) Cost of land filling/levelling including boundary wall and fencing

58.36 58.36

(ii) Cost of laying roads 223.36 200.00

(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00 10.00

(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses

95.33 95.33

(v) Water harvesting 11.68 10.00

(vi) Drainage 60.36 60.00

(vii) Power (street light network, lamps, lamp masts etc.)

334.27 250.00

(viii) Other (Sanitary conveniences etc.) 52.91 10.00

(ix) Administrative /Office Building 28.00 20.00

(x) Telecommunication/Cyber centre/Documentation centre

20.00 20.00

(xi) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 37.00 30.00

(xii) Raw material storage facility, marketing outlets

40.00 40.00

(xiii) First Aid Centre, Creche, Canteen facilities 20.28 20.00

(xiv) Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 20.00 20.00

Total 1011.55 843.69

5. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Proposed by

IA

As per MSE-CDP

(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 809.24 674.95 *

(ii) DSIIDC contribution 202.31 336.60

Total 1011.55 1011.55

*SIDBI recommended GoI grant of Rs. 674.95 lakh as 80% of total eligible Project cost of Rs.

843.69 lakh.

6. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Infrastructure

Facilities at Flatted Factory Complex, Okhla Industrial Area, South Delhi, Delhi at a total project

cost of Rs.1011.55 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs.674.95 lakh and DSIIDC contribution of

Rs.336.60lakh.

*******

Page 169: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

163

Agenda No. 50.4.6: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Infrastructure

Facilities at Lawrence Road Industrial Area, North West Delhi, Delhi.

Background

(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 47th

SCM held on 12.11.18,

subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.

(ii) Vide letter dated 07.06.19; Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development

Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd. submitted the following documents and requested to

consider the proposal for final approval.

Documents required Status

(i) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Received (ii) Land document with clear title

(signed by Competent Authority) in the name of Implementing Agency

A copy of “The Delhi Industrial Development Operation and Maintenance (DIDOM) Act, 2010” has been received in this regard.

(iii) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost.

Received

(iv) Undertaking from State Government that more than 50% units in the Industrial Estate are (a) Micro (b) SC/ST& (c) Women owned, as the case may be, in case Gol assistance is more than 60% of Project Cost or Rs. 10.00 crore, whichever is less.

The industrial area has 90 MSEs in the industrial sheds, of which 73 are micro units. The industrial area is spread across 309 acres of land, the work sheds for MSEs are located in a pocket of 4.57 acres. DSIIDC is looking at upgradation of this area alone under the project. Further, the work sheds are demarcated with separate boundary and segregated from the remaining industrial area. Hence, the project shall be eligible for grant of 60% of eligible project cost, which comes out at Rs. 552.00 lakh. Therefore, condition for submission of certificate/ undertaking from State Government that more than 50% units in the Industrial Estate are (a) Micro (b) SC/ST & (c) Women owned, as the case may be, is not stipulated.

(v) Details of Industries operating in the Industrial Estate.

Received

(vi) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.

Received

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Pre-registration Information

Name of Organization : Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd.

State : Delhi

District : North West Delhi

Industrial Estate : Lawrence Road Industrial Area

Page 170: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

164

2. Basic Information about Proposal:

Particulars Description

Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan

Yes

Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre)

309 acres

Area to be developed (acre) 4.57 acres

Number and sizes of plots to be developed

90 units (73 no. of units are micro) Each unit has an area of 135-189 sq. mtrs. depending on the size and scale of operation.

Implementing Period 16 months from the date of sanction of MSE-CDP grant to IA

Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.

Nil

Performance of ID projects in State

N/A

3. Details about Proposal:

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)

Remarks

Implementing Agency (IA) Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd.

As per MSE-CDP guidelines

Track Record of the IA Satisfactory. There are 33 notified Industrial areas in Delhi of which 21 are being maintained by Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd. DSIIDC is also entrusted with redevelopment and maintenance of industrial areas transferred from Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Department of Industries. DSIIDC has also been involved in implementing Government of Delhi‟s scheme of relocation to shift industries operating in various non-conforming/residential areas to planned industrial areas.

--

Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.

Submitted Received

Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply,

The industrial area is easily accessible from New Delhi Railway Station, (10 km away) Airport as well as Delhi Metro.

--

Page 171: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

165

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)

Remarks

adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)

The industrial area has water supply from Delhi Jal Board and has adequate facilities for supply to various units.

Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title

After implementation of “The Delhi Industrial Development Operation and Maintenance (DIDOM), Act, 2010” the land had been transferred to DSIIDC. The said industrial area is one of the 33 notified and planned industrial areas in Delhi of which 24, including 04 flatted factory complexes are maintained by DSIIDC.

A copy of DIDOM Act, 2010 has been submitted by IA.

Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with):

Yes, the proposed project is for upgradation and no additional land is to be acquired for the project.

Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted

Yes Constituted

Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost

Yes Received

Basis of elements of project Cost All cost estimates have been drawn by DSIIDC engineers.

--

Tangible Outcomes of the project The proposed project will improve operational convenience for existing users in terms of better roads, better drainage facilities, improved power supply etc. Better roads will reduce time for movement of materials and final products by units and thereby increase their profitability. Better drainage will prevent inundation during rains and ensure longer life for roads and other infrastructure.

--

Justification of the Proposal The industrial area is existing. However, due to heavy use and movement of traffic, roads and drains needs to be maintained. Further, upgradation will add to the lifespan of the available infrastructure and improve the productivity of the units.

--

Page 172: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

166

4. Proposed Project Cost:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA

As per MSE-CDP/ SIDBI

(i) Cost of land filling/levelling including boundary wall and fencing

194.35 100.00

(ii) Cost of laying roads 210.00 200.00

(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00 10.00

(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses

125.31 110.00

(v) Water harvesting 11.86 10.00

(vi) Drainage 74.75 60.00

(vii) Power (Sub-station and distribution network including street light etc.), Generation of non-conventional energy

250.00 250.00

(viii) Other (Sanitary conveniences etc.) 10.00 10.00

(ix) Administrative /Office Building 28.00 20.00

(x) Telecommunication/Cyber centre/Documentation centre 20.00 20.00

(xi) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 37.00 30.00

(xii) Raw material storage facility, marketing outlets 40.00 40.00

(xiii) First Aid Centre, Creche, Canteen facilities 20.00 20.00

(xiv) Effluent Treatment facilities (Cost of improvement of existing STP)

80.00 20.00

(xv) Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 20.00 20.00

Total 1131.27 920.00

5. Proposed Means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA As per MSE-CDP

(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 800.00 552.00*

(ii) DSIIDC contribution 331.27 579.27

Total 1131.27 1131.27

*SIDBI recommended GoI grant of Rs. 552.00 lakh as 60% of total eligible Project cost of Rs.

920.00 lakh.

6. Observations:

(A) As per SIDBI appraisal report, the Industrial Estate has 90 units with 73 micro units

whereas as per the documents submitted by DSIIDC, the Industrial Estate has 90 units

with 70, 3 & 17 number of units are micro, women owned & others respectively.

7. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Infrastructure

Facilities at Lawrence Road Industrial Area, North West Delhi, Delhi at a total project cost of

Rs.1131.27 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs.552.00 lakh and DSIIDC contribution of

Rs.579.27lakh.

*******

Page 173: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

167

Agenda No. 50.4.7: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Infrastructure

Facilities at Kirti Nagar Industrial Area, District West Delhi, Delhi.

Background

(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 47th

SCM held on 12.11.18,

subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.

(ii) Vide letter dated 07.06.19; Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development

Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd. submitted the following documents and requested to

consider the proposal for final approval.

Documents required Status

(i) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Received (ii) Land document with clear title

(signed by Competent Authority) in the name of Implementing Agency

A copy of “The Delhi Industrial Development Operation and Maintenance (DIDOM) Act, 2010” has been received in this regard.

(iii) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost.

Received

(iv) Undertaking from State Government that more than 50% units in the Industrial Estate are (a) Micro (b) SC/ST& (c) Women owned, as the case may be, in case Gol assistance is more than 60% of Project Cost or Rs. l 0.00 crore, whichever is less.

The industrial area has 926 MSEs. Out of which 501 are micro units (54% of total units). The industrial area is spread across 220 acres, of which 146 acres are already developed. Out of these 146 acres, 23 acres are occupied by 926 MSEs in two pockets of 6 acres and 17 acres respectively. DSIIDC is focusing on developing these 23 acres related infrastructure. However, some of these MSEs are spread over and not exactly demarcated. The proportion of micro units in overall units will therefore be below 50% (as micro is only 54% of MSEs itself, as a much larger area is occupied by other units, micro will be below 50%). Further, there is no clear demarcation of these pockets. Hence, the project shall be eligible for grant of 60% against eligible expenditure within the cap of Rs. 600.00 lakh, which comes out at Rs. 528.68 lakh. Therefore, condition for submission of certificate/ undertaking from State Government that more than 50% units in the Industrial Estate are (a) Micro (b) SC/ST& (c) Women owned, as the case may be, is not stipulated.

(v) Details of Industries operating in the Industrial Estate.

Details of only micro units have been submitted.

(vi) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.

Received

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Pre-registration Information

Name of Organization : Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd.

State : : Delhi

District : : West Delhi

Industrial Estate : : Kirti Nagar Industrial Area Delhi

Page 174: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

168

2. Basic Information about Proposal:

Particulars Description

Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan

Yes

Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre)

220.00 acres of which 146 acres are already developed.

Area to be developed (acre) 74 acres

Number and sizes of plots to be developed

983 plots/sheds with 926 units operating (501 no. of units are micro) Each unit has an area of 56-188 sq. mtrs. depending on the size and scale of operation.

Implementing Period 16 months from the date of sanction of MSE-CDP grant to IA

Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up etc.

Nil

Performance of ID projects in State NA

3. Details about Proposal:

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)

Remarks

Implementing Agency (IA) Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd.

As per MSE-CDP guidelines

Track Record of the IA Satisfactory. There are 33 notified Industrial areas in Delhi of which 21 are being maintained by Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd. DSIIDC is also entrusted with redevelopment and maintenance of industrial areas transferred from Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Department of Industries. DSIIDC has also been involved in implementing Government of Delhi‟s scheme of relocation to shift industries operating in various non-conforming/residential areas to planned industrial areas.

--

Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.

Submitted Received.

Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)

The industrial area is easily accessible from New Delhi Railway Station, (8 km away) Airport as well as Delhi Metro. The industrial area has water supply from Delhi Jal Board and has adequate facilities for supply to

--

Page 175: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

169

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)

Remarks

various units.

Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title

After implementation of “The Delhi Industrial Development Operation and Maintenance (DIDOM) Act, 2010” the land had been transferred to DSIIDC. The said industrial area is one of the 33 notified and planned industrial areas in Delhi of which 24, including 04 flatted factory complexes are maintained by DSIIDC.

A copy of DIDOM Act, 2010 has been submitted by IA.

Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc. complied with)

Yes, the proposed project is for upgradation and no additional land is to be acquired for the project.

Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted

Yes Constituted

Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost

Yes Received

Basis of elements of project Cost All cost estimates have been drawn by DSIIDC engineers.

--

Tangible Outcomes of the project The proposed project will improve operational convenience for existing users in terms of better roads, better drainage facilities etc. Better roads will reduce time for movement of materials and final products by units and thereby increase their profitability. Better drainage will prevent inundation during rains and ensure longer life for roads and other infrastructure.

--

Justification of the Proposal The industrial area is existing. However, due to heavy use and movement of traffic, roads and drains needs to be maintained. Further, upgradation will add to the lifespan of the available infrastructure and improve the productivity of the units.

--

4. Proposed Project Cost:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA

As per MSE-CDP/Recommended by SIDBI

(i) Cost of land filling/levelling including boundary wall and fencing

110.00 100.00

Page 176: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

170

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA

As per MSE-CDP/Recommended by SIDBI

(ii) Cost of laying roads 290.00 200.00

(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00 10.00

(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses

125.00 110.00

(v) Water harvesting 11.86 10.00

(vi) Drainage 135.00 60.00

(vii) Power (Sub-station and distribution network including street light etc.), Generation of non-conventional energy

250.00 250.00

(viii) Other (Sanitary conveniences etc.) 10.00 10.00

(ix) Administrative /Office Building 20.00 20.00

(x) Telecommunication/Cyber centre/Documentation centre

20.00 20.00

(xi) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 30.00 30.00

(xii) Raw material storage facility, marketing outlets 21.14 21.14

(xiii) First Aid Centre, Creche, Canteen facilities 20.00 20.00

(xiv) Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 32.00 20.00

Total 1085.00 881.14

5. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA

As per MSE-CDP

(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 800.00 528.68*

(ii) DSIIDC contribution 285.00 556.32

Total 1085.00 1085.00

*SIDBI recommended GoI grant of Rs. 528.68 lakh as 60% of total eligible Project cost of Rs.

881.14 lakh.

6. Observations:

(A) As per SIDBI appraisal report, the Industrial Estate has 926 units with 501 micro units

whereas as per the documents submitted by DSIIDC, the Industrial Estate has 559 units

with 499, 2 & 58 number of units are micro, women owned & others respectively.

(B) Details of Industries operating in the Industrial Estate are required to be submitted.

7. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Infrastructure

Facilities at Kirti Nagar Industrial Area, District West Delhi, Delhi at a total project cost of

Rs.1085.00 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs.528.68 lakh and DSIIDC contribution of Rs.556.32

lakh.

*****

Page 177: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

171

Agenda No.50.4.8: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Infrastructure

Facilities at Patparganj Industrial Area, District East Delhi.

Background

(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 47th

SCM held on 12.11.18,

subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.

(ii) Vide letter dated 07.06.19; Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development

Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd. submitted the following documents and requested to

consider the proposal for final approval.

Documents required Status

(i) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Received

(ii) Land document with clear title

(signed by Competent Authority) in

the name of Implementing Agency

A copy of “The Delhi Industrial

Development Operation and Maintenance

(DIDOM) Act, 2010” has been received in

this regard.

(iii) Commitment letter from IA to meet

the cost escalation, if any, over and

above the approved project cost.

Received

(iv) Undertaking from State Government

that more than 50% units in the

Industrial Estate are (a) Micro (b)

SC/ST& (c) Women owned, as the

case may be, in case Gol assistance is

more than 60% of Project Cost or Rs.

l 0.00 crore, whichever is less.

The industrial area has 603 MSEs. Of these,

no micro units are there. However,

considering the facts that micro units are

less than 50% thus GoI grant will be

restricted to 60% of the eligible project

cost, which comes out at Rs. 540.00 lakh.

Therefore, condition for submission of

certificate/ undertaking from State

Government that more than 50% units in

the Industrial Estate are (a) Micro (b)

SC/ST& (c) Women owned, as the case

may be, is not stipulated.

(v) Details of Industries operating in the

Industrial Estate.

Not submitted

(vi) Certificate from State Government for

compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.

Received

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Pre-registration Information

Name of Organization : Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development

Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd.

State : Delhi

District : East Delhi

Industrial Estate : Patparganj Industrial Area

Page 178: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

172

2. Basic Information about Proposal:

Particulars Description

Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan

Yes

Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre):

125.99 acres

Area to be developed (acre) 125.99 acres

Number and sizes of plots to be developed :

603 units (No micro units) Each unit has an area of 150-450 sq. mtrs. depending on the size and scale of operation.

Implementing Period 16 months from the date of sanction of MSE-CDP grant to IA

Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.

Nil

Performance of ID projects in state. N/A

3. Details about Proposal:

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks

Implementing Agency (IA) Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd.

As per MSE-CDP guidelines

Track Record of the IA Satisfactory. There are 33 notified Industrial areas in Delhi of which 21 are being maintained by Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd. DSIIDC is also entrusted with redevelopment and maintenance of industrial areas transferred from Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Department of Industries. DSIIDC has also been involved in implementing Government of Delhi‟s scheme of relocation to shift industries operating in various non-conforming/residential areas to planned industrial areas.

--

Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.

Submitted Received.

Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)

The industrial area is easily accessible from Anand Vihar Railway Station, (2-3 kms away), Bus Terminal as well as Delhi Metro. The industrial area has water supply from Delhi Jal Board and has adequate facilities for supply to various units.

--

Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title

After implementation of “The Delhi Industrial Development Operation and Maintenance (DIDOM) Act, 2010” the land had been transferred to DSIIDC. The said

A copy of “The Delhi Industrial Development

Page 179: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

173

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks

industrial area is one of the 33 notified and planned industrial areas in Delhi of which 24, including 04 flatted factory complexes are maintained by DSIIDC.

Operation and Maintenance (DIDOM) Act, 2010” has been submitted by IA. Whether Zoning regulations

and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)

Yes, the proposed project is for upgradation and no additional land is to be acquired for the project.

Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted

Yes Constituted

Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost

Yes Received

Basis of elements of project Cost

All cost estimates have been drawn by DSIIDC engineers.

--

Tangible Outcomes of the project

The proposed project will improve operational convenience for existing users in terms of better roads, better drainage facilities etc. Better roads will reduce time for movement of materials and final products by units and thereby increase their profitability. Better drainage will prevent inundation during rains and ensure longer life for roads and other infrastructure.

--

Justification of the Proposal The industrial area is existing. However, due to heavy use and movement of traffic, roads and drains needs to be maintained. Further, upgradation will add to the lifespan of the available infrastructure and improve the productivity of the units.

--

4. Proposed Project Cost:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA

As per MSE-CDP/Recommended by SIDBI

(i) Cost of land filling/leveling including boundary wall and fencing

171.15 100.00

(ii) Up-gradation of laying of internal roads 270.10 200.00

(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00 10.00

(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks and pump houses

175.00 110.00

(v) Rain water harvesting 11.86 10.00

(vi) Drainage 75.00 60.00

(vii) Power (Sub-station and distribution network 250.00 250.00

Page 180: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

174

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA

As per MSE-CDP/Recommended by SIDBI

including street light etc.) Generation of non-conventional energy

(viii) Others construction (Parking lots etc.) 262.87 10.00

(ix) Administrative /Office Building (up-gradation of entrance / exits, corridors and staircase)

20.00 20.00

(x) Telecommunication/Cyber centre/ Documentation centre

20.00 20.00

(xi) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 30.00 30.00

(xii) Raw material storage facility, marketing outlets

40.00 40.00

(xiii) First Aid Centre, Creche, Canteen facilities 20.00 20.00

(xiv) Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 25.00 20.00

Total 1380.98 900.00

5. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA

As per MSE-CDP

(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 800.00 540.00*

(ii) DSIIDC contribution 580.98 840.98

Total 1380.98 1380.98

*SIDBI recommended GoI grant of Rs. 540.00 lakh as 60% of total eligible Project cost of Rs.

900.00 lakh.

6. Observations:

Following documents are required to be submitted prior to issue of final approval:

(i) As per SIDBI appraisal report, the Industrial Estate has 603 operational units with no

micro unit, whereas, as per the documents submitted by DSIIDC, the Industrial

Estate has 612 units with 448 micro, 2 women owned & 162 others operational units

(ii) In light of the discrepancies as mentioned in Point No.(ii) above, clarification is

required from DSIIDC regarding details of operational units in the Industrial Estate.

7. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Infrastructure

Facilities at Patparganj Industrial Area, District East Delhi, Delhi at a total project cost of Rs.

1380.98 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 540.00 lakh and DSIIDC contribution of Rs. 840.98

lakh.

*****

Page 181: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

175

Agenda No.50.4.9: Proposal for Final approval for setting up of Common Facility

Centre (CFC) in Diamond Cutting & Polishing Cluster, Varachha,

Surat, Gujarat.

Background

Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 49th

SCM held on 27.02.19,

subject to submission of following documents prior to Final approval.

(i) Registered lease deed in the name of SPV in respect of the premises.

(ii) Confirmation Letter from Government of Gujarat for their contribution towards

project.

(iii) Details of shareholding pattern of SPV members.

(iv) SIDBI Appraisal Report.

(v) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.

(vi) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution.

(vii) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilise at least 60% of installed

capacity.

(viii) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the escalation cost, if

any, over and above the approved project cost.

(ix) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are

Micro / SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be.

(x) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.

(xi) Documentary proof from SPV for utilisation of CFC facilities by at least 51% of

the cluster members.

Vide email dated 20.06.19, MSME-DI, Ahmedabad has forwarded the following

documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval:

(i) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are

Micro / SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be.

(ii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.

(iii) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Basic Information of Cluster

Name of Cluster : Diamond Cutting & Polishing Cluster, Surat

District : Surat

Location of Cluster : Varachha

Lok Sabha Constituency : Surat

Main Product : Diamond

No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium) :

Micro : 81 & Small : 19 ( SPV Members – 100 Nos) Micro : 378 & Small : 23 ( non SPV Members – 401 Nos)

Turnover for the last five years :

Year : Amount (Rs. in crore)

2012-13 : 8.80 2013-14 : 10.01 2014-15 : 11.10 2015-16 : 12.78

Page 182: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

176

2016-17 : 14.19

Exports for the last five years :

Nil

Employment in Cluster : 1648 persons

Technology Details : Currently units in the cluster are using conventional technology for Cutting and Polishing of Diamond, advance and upgraded technology is required.

Whether DS Conducted : Yes

Main findings of DSR : Advanced Machine for cutting & polishing of diamond is required for purposed CFC

Main Problems of Cluster :

Non availability of advanced machine for diamond cutting process.

Weak marketing linkages – absence of organized marketing channels.

Micro and Small units have lower export in comparison to to large and medium units.

2. Information about Proposed CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

(a.) Justification for CFC

To have facilities like Advance Technology for diamond processing and quality control

--

(b.) Location of CFC 207, Savani Industries Co-Op Society , Kohinoor Road, Opp Hotel Oasis Lane, Varachha, Surat, Gujarat - 395006

--

% age of units in radius of 5km

95 --

% age of units in radius of 10km

5 --

(c.) Land for CFC

i. Whether land acquired

Rented Building for 31 years Registered lease document in the name of SPV is required

ii. Title is in name of Surat Diamond Cutting & Polishing Cluster SPV Trust

iii. Valuation and its basis

NA

iv. Land is sufficient Yes

v. Change of land use NA

vi. If on lease, duration of lease

Rented Building for 31 years

vii Whether lease is legally tenable

Yes

(d.) Total Building area 1080 Sq Feet --

(e.) Rate of construction of building

NA --

(f.) Main Facility Proposed

Planning of Diamond Cleaving of Diamond. Inspection of Diamond

--

Page 183: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

177

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

Grading Report Generation

(g.) Prod capacity of CFC Production p.a. @ 45% capacity utilization- 104461.00 carats

--

(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/ domestic sales and direct /indirect employment, etc.)

S. No.

Particulars Before After

(i) No. of units 501 1200 (ii) Production

(Carat) 2,71,244 8,13,732

(iii) Turnover (Rs. in cr)

56.76 170.28

(iv) Employment (in Nos.)

1,648 4,944

(v) Export (Rs. in Cr)

Nil 7.95

--

(i.) Pollution clearance required or not

Not Provided Required

(j.) Man Power in CFC 13 Persons --

(k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets (service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)

Provided --

3. Information about SPV

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

(a.) Name and Address Surat Diamond Cutting & Polishing Cluster 207, Savani Industries Co-Op Society , Kohinoor Road, Opp Hotel Oasis Lane, Varachha, Surat, Gujarat - 395006

--

(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)

Trust --

(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV

Not Provided --

(d.) Date of formation of SPV

28.03.18 --

(e.) Number of Members 100 --

(f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted

Provided --

(g.) Authorized Share Capital

Rs.1,45,00,000/- . --

(h.) Paid up capital - --

(i.) Shareholding Pattern Not Provided Required

(j.)Commitment letter for contribution

Not Provided Required

(k.) SPV specific A/c Account No: 0051102000117920 (IDBI Bank)

--

(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track

- --

Page 184: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

178

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation

(m.) Technical Institution - --

(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.

Not Provided Required.

(o.)

(a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose

4.45 KW -

(b) Water - -

(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities

NA -

4. Implement Arrangements

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

(a.) Implementing Agency

Center for Entrepreneurship Development, Govt. of Gujarat, Gandhinagar

-

(b.) Fund receiving Agency

Center for Entrepreneurship Development, Govt. of Gujarat, Gandhinagar

(c.) Implementation Period

18 Months 24 Months from issuance of Final Approval Letter

(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations

The proposal was recommended by State Level Steering Committee (SLSC) in its meeting held on 04.05.18.

-

(e.) Comments of Technical Division

- --

(f.) Approval of Technical Committee

- Recommended the proposal

(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:

NA --

(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)

NA --

5. Financial Analysis of CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

(a.) BEP 40.00 % --

(b.) IRR, Payback period 15.85 % --

(c.) DSCR - --

Page 185: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

179

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)

13.82% --

(e.) NPV Rs. 416.35 lac @ 10% --

(f.) DER - --

(g.) Sensitivity Analysis Provided --

(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State

This is the first Diamond Processing CFC Cluster which has already been approved by Govt. of Gujarat

--

6. Proposed Project Cost is as follow:

(Rs. in Lakh)

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA

Recommended by SIDBI/ As per MSE-CDP

(i) Land and Building 0.00 0.00

(ii) Plant & Machinery 1303.04 1380.33

(iii) Misc. fixed assets 16.57 16.57

(iv) Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 29.00 29.08

(v) Contingency 26.06 69.02

(vi) Margin money for Working Capital 10.00 10.00

Total Project Cost 1384.67 1505.00

7. Proposed means of finance are as follows:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Amount

Recommended by SIDBI/ As per MSE-

CDP

(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 1246.20 1350.00

(ii) SPV contribution 138.47 155.00

Total 1384.67 1505.00

8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Description No. Power Requirement (HP/KW)

Cost

1. Fiberjet Diamond Laser Cutting Machine (HLJ 300) (Including GST & Import Duties Cost)

1 4.50 1380.33

Total 1380.33

9. Observations:

(A) Following documents are required to be submitted prior to issue of final approval:

(i) Registered lease deed in the name of SPV in respect of the premises.

(ii) Details of shareholding pattern of SPV members.

(iii) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.

(iv) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution.

Page 186: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

180

(v) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilise at least 60% of installed

capacity.

(vi) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the cost escalation, if any,

over and above the approved project cost.

(vii) Documentary proof from SPV for utilization of CFC facilities by at least 51% of the

cluster members.

(viii) Compliance of terms & conditions as mentioned in SIDBI Appraisal Report.

(ix) Major Outputs / Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster units after

proposed intervention (in terms of production, exports / domestic sales and direct /

indirect employment, etc.).

(B) As recommended by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC), a clause would be

added in the Sanction Order “In case of any deviation from the agreed principles of

utilization and denial of fair access to the eligible stakeholders, assets created would be

handed over to another SPV through a transparent procedure for smooth and effective

operationalization of the facilities”.

10. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting of Common Facility Centre

(CFC) in Diamond Cutting & Polishing Cluster, Varachha, Surat, Gujarat at a total project cost of

Rs.1505.00 lakh with Gol assistance of Rs. 1350.00 lakh and SPV contribution of Rs.155.00 lakh.

***********

Page 187: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

181

Agenda No.50.4.10: Proposal for Final approval for setting up New Industrial Estate

(KINFRA Spice Park) at Idukki, Kerala.

Background

(i) Proposal was accorded In-principal approval during 46th

SCM held on 09.02.18

subject to submission of following documents prior to final approval.

(ii) Vide letter dated 18.06.19 Government of Kerala has submitted the requisite

documents & requested to consider the proposal for final approval

Documents required Status

(i) SIDBI Appraisal Report Received (ii) Commitment letter from State Government / IA to meet the cost

escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost.

Received

(iii) Land documents with clear title, signed by Competent Authority, complying with zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc.

Yet to be Received

(iv) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.

Received

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Pre-registration Information:

Name of Organization : Kerala Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation

State : Kerala

District : Idukki

Industrial Estate : Kerala Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation

(KINFRA) Spices Park.

2. Basic Information about Proposal:

Particulars Description

Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan :

Yes.

Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre):

15.43 acres.

Area to be developed (acre) 15.43 acres.

Number and sizes of plots to be developed :

20 plots (28.56-113.98 cent)

Implementing Period : 21 months

Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc. :

No project is sanctioned in Idukki district.

Performance of ID projects in state. :

KINFRA has a successful track record in setting up of 22 industrial parks across Kerala for facilitating development of the industry in the State.

Page 188: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

182

3. Details about Proposal:

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency(IA)

Remarks

Implementing Agency (IA): Kerala Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation (KINFRA), Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala.

-

Track Record of the IA Kerala Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation (KINFRA) is a statutory body formed by the Government of Kerala. KINFRA has a successful track record in setting up 22 industrial parks across Kerala for facilitating development of the industry in the State

-

Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.

Submitted Received

Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)

Yes. -

Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title

Vide order dated 25.04.2008, Govt. of Kerala has recommended to transfer the possession of land in the name of KINFRA

Document required.

Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with):

Yes. Document required.

Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted :

Yes Received

Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost :

Yes. Received

Basis of elements of project Cost : Common Infrastructure facilities such as Compound wall & fencing, Internal roads & drains, Rain water harvesting, Water distribution, Power distribution, ETP etc. Along with Administrative and other service complex facilities.

-

Tangible Outcomes of the project The project will add employment to the state by more than 300 in terms of direct and more than 500 indirect openings. The units will generate export as well as domestic turnover, yielding tax revenues to the exchequer.

-

Page 189: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

183

4. Proposed project cost:

(Rs. in lakh)

Particulars Proposed by IA

As per MSE-CDP /Recommended by SIDBI

Land filling/leveling including boundary wall and fencing:

102.16 100.00

Laying roads 133.79 200.00

Road Side Greenery & Social Forestry - 10.00

Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses

93.36 107.07

Water harvesting 50.00 10.00

Drainage 78.43 60.00

Power distribution, Street light arrangements, etc. 250.00 250.00

Administrative and Other Services Complex 298.72 133.53

Effluent Treatment Facilities 150.00 60.99

Contingencies & Pre operative expenses : 83.54 20.00

Other (Sanitary Convenience): 10.00 10.00

Total 1250.00 961.59

5. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Proposed

by IA

As per MSE-CDP

/Recommended by SIDBI

1 GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 600.00 576.95*

2 State Government 650.00 673.05

Total 1250.00 1250.00

*60% of eligible project cost of Rs. 961.59 lakh.

Justification of the Proposal The proposed Spices Park is a well-conceived approach to have an integrated operation for cultivation, post harvesting, processing for value addition, packaging, storage and exports of spices and spice products by meeting the quality specifications. Currently the raw products are exported from Kerala in bulk and if the products are properly processed according to the international standards, it will give more value addition to the products having large scale demand all over the world.

--

Page 190: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

184

6. Observations:

Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:

(i) Land documents with clear title, signed by Competent Authority, complying with

zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc.

(ii) Compliance of terms & conditions as mentioned in SIDBI appraisal report.

(iii) State Government should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of

Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner. The additional cost,

if any, on this account shall be borne by the State Government.

7. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of New Industrial

Estate (KINFRA Spice Park) at Idukki, Kerala at a total project cost of Rs. 1250.00 Lakh with

GoI assiatance of Rs. 576.95 Lakh and State Government contribution of Rs. 673.05 Lakh.

************

Page 191: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

185

Agenda No.50.4.11: Proposal for Final approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre

(CFC) in Mishthan and Namkeen Manufacturing Cluster, Jabalpur,

Madhya Pradesh.

Background

(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 47th

SCM held on

25.07.18 subject to submission of the following documents prior to final approval.

(ii) Vide letter dated 20.05.19, Principal Secretary, Department of MSME,

Government of Madhya Pradesh and vide email dated 06.06.19, MSME-DI,

Indore has submitted the documents and requested to consider the proposal for

final approval:

Documents required Status

(i) Registered land documents in the name

of SPV (If land is on lease basis,

registered lease deed for a minimum

period of 30 years is required).

Yet to be submitted by Government

of Madhya Pradesh / Implementing

Agency

(ii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.

Received

(iii) Share holding pattern of SPV members.

Received

(iv) Commitment letter from State

Government / IA to meet the cost

escalation, if any, over and above the

approved project cost.

Received

(v) Certificate from State Government that

more than 50% units are

Micro/SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the

case may be.

Received

(vi) Commitment letter from SPV members

to utilize at least 60 percent of installed

capacity.

Received

(vii) Certificate from State Government for

compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.

Received

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Basic Information of Cluster

Name of Cluster Mishthan and Namkeen Manufacturing Cluster

District Jabalpur

Location of Cluster Jabalpur and adjacent blocks

Lok Sabha Constituency Jabalpur

Main Product Mishthan and Namkeen

No. of Enterprises including break

up (Micro, Small, Medium)

Micro 33

Small 1

Total 34+200 Units in organization sector

Turnover for the last five years

(Rs. in Crore)

Year Amount

2011-12 5.20

Page 192: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

186

2012-13 5.40

2013-14 5.70

2014-15 6.00

2015-16 7.59

Exports for the last five years (Rs.

in Crore)

Nil

Employment in Cluster Direct: 181 & Indirect: 245

Technology Details The cluster units are using old and traditional technology for

processing.

Whether DS Conducted Yes, Diagnostic Study conducted by MSME Department of

GoMP and validated by the Cluster Members, DTIC

Jabalpur, and Representative from MSME-DI Indore,

Managing Director and Manager of M P Audyogik Kendra

Vikas Nigam (Jabalpur) Ltd.

Main findings of DSR The DSR recommends the necessary Hard Intervention for

the cluster.

Main Problems of Cluster Non-availability of proper storage facilities for highly

perishable raw material.

Non-availability of testing facilities for testing of quality

of ingredients and logistic support.

The technology in the cluster is age old and obsolete and

requires modernization.

Unclean and costly fuel of boilers

Other Information The cluster is 80 years old and about 200 cluster units of

unorganized sector are producing Sweets and Namkeen

traditionally in the Jabalpur region. The average turnover of

the cluster is Rs.35 crore. The cluster gives direct

employment to 1500 persons and indirect employment to

3000 persons.

2. Information about Proposed CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

(a.) Justification for CFC Jabalpur Mishthan and Namkeen cluster are

spread throughout the Jabalpur district. The

units and their workshops are very old and

have been in the area for very long.

Therefore, the hard interventions needed for

this cluster is in form of Common Facility

Centre. The CFC will help the cluster

members to increase their production

capacity, quality and aesthetic packing. The

CFC can bring about total change in the

cluster.

--

(b.) Location of CFC The proposed CFC will be located in the

Industrial Area Richhai Phase-II, Jabalpur.

--

% age of units in radius of 100 --

Page 193: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

187

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

5km

% age of units in radius of

10km

100 --

(c.) Land for CFC

i. Whether land acquired The Land for the CFC is located in Industrial

Area Richhai Phase-II, Jabalpur Registered lease

deed of land in the

name of SPV for a

minimum period of

30 years with its

valuation is

required.

ii. Title is in name of Jabalpur Mishthan and Namkeen Pvt. Ltd.

Jabalpur

iii. Valuation and its basis Rs 465.00 lakh. The land is a State

Government‟s contribution for the project

iv. Land is sufficient Yes

v. Change of land use The land is for Industrial use

vi. If on lease, duration of

lease

--

vii Whether lease is

legally tenable

--

(d.) Total Building area(sq

ft)

34,955 sq ft. --

(e.) Rate of construction of

building

Rs. 277.65 lakh consisting of development of

factory shed estimated at Rs. 215.58 lakh and

support infrastructure estimated at Rs. 62.07

lakh.

--

(f.) Main Facility Proposed Milk Processing,

Dry Fruit Processing,

Processing of Pulses and Spices

Blending,

Effluent Treatment Plant,

Raw Material Bank,

Testing Facility,

Cold Storage Unit,

Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration Plant.

--

(g.) Prod capacity of CFC Milk Processing Line 3000 Kg/day,

Processing of Pulses and Spices Blending

11.5 ton/day

--

(h.) Major

Outputs/Deliverables of

CFC, Projected

performance of the cluster

after proposed intervention

(in terms of production,

export/domestic sales and

direct/indirect employment

etc.)

Annual growth rate of the cluster is expected

to increase from 5% to at least 10% and

increase in cluster output by 25-30% in next 3

years and by implementation (to Rs. 100 cr.)

Particulars Existing Expected

No. of units 34 units About 200

units

Employment 181 directly

& 245

1500 directly

and 3000

--

Page 194: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

188

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

indirectly indirectly

Output 800 MT

average per

annum

1800 MT

average per

annum

Export Nil Cluster will

be able to

export with

a common

brand

(i.) Pollution clearance

required or not

No --

(j.) Man Power in CFC Total manpower required for the cluster CFC

is around 50-55 people, including 1 Director

(President, 4 Management Staff, 5 Support

Staff, 3 Supervisors, 2 Engineers, 10 Skilled

Workers and 30 Unskilled Workers to operate

the CFC.

--

(k.) Revenue generation

mechanism for

sustainability of

assets(service/user charges

to be levied, any other-to be

specified)

The total income estimated for first year as

per current demand in this cluster is Rs.

783.68 lakh.

--

3. Information about SPV

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

(a.) Name and Address Jabalpur Mishthan and Namkeen Private Limited, 1092, Napier Town, Near Shastri Bridge, Jabalpur (M.P.)

Certificate of incorporation received.

(b.) Nature of SPV (Company or Society or Trust)

Registered as Private Limited under Section 7 of Companies Act 2013

(c.) Name of the State Govt. and MSME officials in SPV

Article of Association of the SPV mentioned vide Clause No. 07 (under the Head Members and Utilisation of Facilities) that One member of Cluster Development Executive Cluster Development Agent (CDE_CDA), one member of State Govt official and one Member of Mishthan Vikreta Sangh, Jabalpur will be member in the company

--

(d.) Date of formation of SPV

28th

day of July 2015 --

(e.) Number of Members 24 members --

(f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted

Submitted Received.

(g.) Authorized Share Capital

Rs 5,00,000 (will be increase by more than 10% of project cost as new members joined or/and share allotment to existing members in due course of time)

--

Page 195: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

189

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

(h.) Paid up capital as on............

Rs. 3,60,000/- --

(i.) Shareholding Pattern Equity Share of Rs. 10 each. No member of the company will hold more than 10% (or equivalent capital) in the equity capital of the company

Received.

(j.) Commitment letter for contribution

Submitted Received.

(k.) SPV specific A/c SPV opened Specific Bank account in the name of M/s Jabalpur Mishthan and Namkeen Pvt Ltd bearing SB Account No: 5086201000068 in Canara Bank Branch (005086), Medical College Road, Jabalpur (M P). Ph No. 0761-2423105, Email: [email protected] IFSC: CNRB0005086

--

(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation

SPV promoted by Mishthan Vikreta Sangh, Jabalpur. The Mishthan Vikreta Sangh registered on 11th Feb 1980, and doing various activities of trust building since its registration.

--

(m.) Technical Institution Central Food Technological Research Institute Mysore (CFTRI)

--

(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.

CFC will be setup under MSE-CDP may be utilized by the members of the company and also other in the Mishthan, Namkeen and other Food cluster of Jabalpur region on chargeable basis. The members of the company will utilize at least 60% (sixty Percent) of installed capacity of CFC.

Received.

(o.)

(a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose

Commercial 500 KVA --

(b) Water 13000 Litres/day --

(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities 250 litres of diesel per day. --

4. Implement Arrangements

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

(a.) Implementing Agency Madhya Pradesh Industrial Development

Corporation (MPIDC) Limited, Jabalpur

As per guidelines

(b.) Fund receiving Agency

(c.) Implementation Period 24 months As per guidelines

(d.) Appraisal of DPR and

main Recommendations

Submitted Received.

(e.) Comments of Technical

Division

Submitted Received.

(f.) Approval of Technical

Committee

Submitted Recommended by

Technical

Committee.

Page 196: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

190

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

(g.) Comments of Cluster

Development Division:

-- --

(h.) Working capital(In-

principle sanction of loan

from a bank, if applicable

arrangement made)

Bank letter for working capital obtained and

enclosed

Letter received.

5. Financial Analysis of CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA)

Remarks

(a.) BEP Average BEP for projected 10 years

60.00% Cash BEP 52.20%

--

(b.) IRR, Payback period Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 26.81%

Payback period 5.74 year

--

(c.) DSCR Not Applicable --

(d.) Return on Capital

employed (ROCE)

28.52% --

(e.) NPV 537.52 --

(f.) DER Not Applicable --

(g.) Sensitivity Analysis IRR is above 15% and makes the project

sustainable

--

(h.) Status of CFCs approved

in the State

Plastic Packaging Cluster, Ujjain - under

implementation

--

6. Proposed Project Cost:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA

Revised cost as per SIDBI / As per MSE-CDP

(i) Land 41.85 465.00

(ii) Land Development 26.25

(iii) Building and other civil construction 277.65 277.65

(iv) Plant & Machinery (including electrification) 978.69 978.69

(v) Misc. fixed assets 18.43 18.43

(vi) Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 14.33 14.33

(vii) Contingency (2% on building & 5% on P&M) 49.85 65.04

(viii) Margin money for working capital 33.45 27.28

1414.25 1872.67

Page 197: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

191

7. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)

S.

No.

Particulars Proposed by

IA

As per SIDBI /

MSE-CDP

(i) GoI grant under MSE-CDP 1156.82 1050.00*

(ii) State Government‟s Grant 15.60 465.00

(iii) SPV‟s contribution 241.83 357.67

Total 1414.25 1872.67

* 70% of eligible project cost i.e. Rs. 1500.00 lakh

8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No.

Description No. Power Requirement

(HP/KW)

Cost

1. Cost of Line 1 - Milk Processing Line & Dry Fruits Paste Line

1 365/272.18 703.95

2. Cost of Line 2 - Pulses Processing Line 1 46/34.30 16.37

3. Cost of Line 3 - Spice Processing Line 1 95/70.84 46.83

4. Cost of Line 4 - Turmeric Processing Line 1 71/52.94 21.04

5. Cost of Line 5 - Chilly Processing Line 1 80/59.66 35.89

6. Utilities required including for the lines A. Electrical - Transformer, LT Panel, DG set, cabling etc.

1 --

44.50

B. Other Essential Units- CCTV, CIP, Refrigerated Van, Milk Tanker, Raw and Finished goods Storage Equipment, etc

1 -- 95.11

7. Installation and Erection 1 -- 10.00

8. Packing & Forwarding, Freight and Transit Insurance

1 -- 5.00

Total 978.69

9. Observations:

(A) Following documents are required to be submitted prior to issue of final approval:

(i) Registered land lease deed in the name of SPV for a minimum period of 30

years.

(B) The location of the CFC has been changed from village Pipariya (Pariyat) Patwari Halka

No. 63 (Urdua Khurd) RIC Maharajpur Tehsil Panager District Jabalpur to Industrial

Area Richhai Phase-II, Jabalpur and the cost of land has also been enhanced from

Rs.41.85 lakh to Rs.465.00 lakh with land development cost of Rs.26.25 lakh over and

above the land cost. Government of Madhya Pradesh is providing the land to SPV

towards their contribution.

(C) As recommended by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC), a clause would be

added in the Sanction Order “In case of any deviation from the agreed principles of

utilization and denial of fair access to the eligible stakeholders, assets created would be

handed over to another SPV through a transparent procedure for smooth and effective

operationalization of the facilities”.

Page 198: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

192

(D) SPV/ IA needs to organized a workshop for creating awareness among the 200 units

functioning in unorganized sector in order to make them avail the facilities of CFC.

(E) Efforts should be made by SPV to bring those 200 units to organized sector by registering

them with Udyog Aadhar Memorandum (UAM) in cordinaiton with MSME-DI, Indore.

10. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of CFC in Mishthan and

Namkeen Manufacturing Cluster, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh at a total project cost of Rs.1872.67

lakh, with GoI assistance of Rs.1050.00 lakh, Government of Madhya Pradesh contribution of

Rs.465.00 lakh and SPV contribution of Rs. 357.67 lakh.

******

Page 199: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

193

Agenda No. 50.4.12: Proposal for final approval for setting up Common Facility Centre

(CFC) in Engineering Cluster, Jalgaon, Maharashtra.

Background:

(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 43rd

SCM held on 09.03.17,

subject to submission of following documents prior to Final approval.

(a) SIDBI Appraisal Report.

(b) Undertaking from State Government that more than 50% units are micro in cluster.

(ii) Vide letter dated 05.03.19; Government of Maharashtra submitted the above documents

and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Basic Information of Cluster

Name of Cluster : Engineering Cluster

District : Jalgaon

Location of Cluster : Jalgaon

Lok Sabha Constituency : Jalgaon-Raver

Main Product : Auto parts, Dies and Moulds, Fabrication and Job Work

No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium) :

Micro 100 Small 30 Total 130

Turnover for the last five years :

Year Amount (Rs in Crore) 2011-2012 360.00 2012-2013 380.00 2013-2014 420.00 2014-2015 440.00 2015-2016 480.00

Exports for the last five years :

Year Amount (Rs in Crore) 2011-2012 10.80 2012-2013 15.00 2013-2014 18.00 2014-2015 22.00 2015-2016 25.00

Employment in Cluster : 4500 Persons (Direct : 1500 & Indirect : 3000) (Includes 300 Women & 80:SC/ST Persons)

Technology Details : Traditional Machinery

Whether DSR Conducted : Yes

Main findings of DSR : The diagnostic study recommended the establishment of a common facility centre.

Main Problems of Cluster : (i) Low Quality Product (ii) No testing & Calibration Facility (iii) High product cost (iv) Lack of advance Technology

Page 200: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

194

Other Information : Need of Technology Up-gradation for product processing activities

2. Information about Proposed CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

(a.) Justification for CFC To have following facilities like Modern Technology, Tool Room, Testing & Calibration Lab, Quality Lab to improve the final product

-

(b.) Location of CFC Engineering Cluster, Jalgaon. -

% age of units in radius of 5km

20 -

% age of units in radius of 10km

75 -

(c.) Land for CFC

i. Whether land acquired

Conformation letter received from MIDC Mumbai Received

ii. Title is in name of Shree Sai Engineering Cluster, Jalgaon -

iii. Valuation and its basis

Land on lease basis at the cost of Rs.55.00 Lakh. -

iv. Land is sufficient Yes. -

v. Change of land use NA -

vi. If on lease, duration of lease

99 -

vii Whether lease is legally tenable

Yes -

(d.) Total Building Area 18000 sq. ft. -

(e.) Rate of construction of building

Rs.952.29 / Sq.ft. Building cost : Rs. 171.41 Lakh

-

(f.) Main Facility Proposed

Advance Technology Machines Testing & Calibration Lab Design Centre Tool Room Training Centre

-

(g.) Prod capacity of CFC - -

(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (production, employment, etc.)

Parameters Before CFC After CFC Employment (in Nos)

Direct: 1500 Indirect: 3000

Direct: 1900 Indirect: 3800

Profit (Rs in Cr)

36.00 40.00

Turnover (Rs in Cr)

360.00 450.00

Received

(i.) Pollution clearance required or not

- Required

(j.) Man Power in CFC 22 Nos. -

Page 201: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

195

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

(k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets (service/ user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)

- -

3. Information about SPV

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

(a.) Name and Address Shree Sai Engineering Cluster Jalgaon, C/o M/S. Dwarka Industries E-27/2, MIDC Area Jalgaon Maharashtra. 425003

-

(b.) Nature of SPV (company or Society or Trust)

Private Limited Company under section 25, of the Companies Act, 1956.

-

(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV

Yet to be nominated. Required

(d.) Date of formation of SPV

11.02.2012. -

(e.) Number of Members 35 Members. -

(f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted

Yes. -

(g.) Authorized Share Capital

Rs. 5.00 Lakh -

(h.) Paid up capital Rs. 3.00 Lakh -

(i.) Shareholding Pattern - Received

(j.) Commitment letter for contribution

- Received

(k.) SPV specific A/c Account No: 32214263370 (SBI) -

(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation

Awareness Camps, Visits etc conducted -

(m.) Technical Institution 1. Government Polytechnic, Jalgaon. 2. College of Engineering, Jalgaon 3. Bhagirathi ITI, Jalgaon

-

(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.

- Required

Page 202: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

196

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

(o.)

(a) Power requirement for commercial/ domestic purpose

143.99 KW. -

(b) Water 400 Cubic Mtrs. per month. -

(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities

- -

4. Implement Arrangements

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

(a.) Implementing Agency

CEO, MIDC, Mumbai, Govt. of Maharashtra As per guidelines.

(b.) Fund receiving Agency

CEO, MIDC, Mumbai, Govt. of Maharashtra -do-

(c.) Implementation Period

12 Months. 24 months from the date of issue of final approval.

(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations

DPR appraised by SLSC meeting held in Mumbai on 13.02.15 under chairmanship of Development Commissioner (Industries), Govt. of Maharashtra

Received

(e.) Comments of Technical Division

- -

(f.) Approval of Technical Committee

- Recommended the Proposal

(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank ,if applicable arrangement made)

-

-

5. Financial Analysis of CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

(a.) BEP 9.32 % -

(b.) IRR, Payback period 13% -

(c.) DSCR 9.65 -

(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)

32.54% -

(e.) NPV Rs.305.25 Lakh -

(f.) DER - -

(g.) Sensitivity Analysis S. No. Particulars Estimate

1 BEP 9.32%

2 ROC 32.54%

3 NPV Rs.305.25 Lakh

6 IRR 13%

-

Page 203: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

197

6. Proposed Project Cost is as follow:-

(Rs. in Lakh)

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA

Recommended by SIDBI

As per MSE-CDP

1 Land and its Development 58.43 65.90 65.90

2 Building and other Civil Constructions 171.41 171.41 171.41

3 Plant & Machinery(including electrification)

1343.94 1264.80 1264.80

4 Misc. fixed assets 74.00 129.75 129.75

5 Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses, maximum 2% of project cost

58.75 23.30 23.30

6 Contingency (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery)

0.00 31.32 31.32

7 Margin money for Working Capital 1.96 23.52 23.52

Total Project Cost 1708.49 1710.00 1710.00

7. Proposed Means of Finance are as follows:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Proposed

by IA

Recommende

d by SIDBI

As per

MSE-CDP

1. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 1350.00 1350.00 1350.00

2. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Maharashtra 0.00 189.00 189.00

3. SPV contribution 170.85 171.00 171.00

4. Bank loan 187.64 -- --

Total 1708.49 1710.00 1710.00

8. Plant and machinery

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars of Plant and Machinery No. Cost

1. CNC Lathe 1 54.93

2. CNC Turret Punching 1 217.62

3. VMC 1 65.65

4. Hydraullic Shearing Machine 1 17.51

5. Press Brake NC 1 24.06

6. Surface Grinder Hydraulic 1 25.40

7. Cylindrical Grinder 1 31.29

8. Radial Drilling Machine 1 11.04

9. Spark Errosion 1 28.34

10. EDM Wire Cutting Machine 1 161.20

11. WATERJET 1 55.43

12. Profile Projector 1 9.89

13. CNC Tool & Cutter 1 189.20

14. Tooling & jigs fixtures , Grinding wheel etc 1 33.75

15. Heat Treatment Hardening Furnace 1 20.22

Page 204: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

198

S. No. Particulars of Plant and Machinery No. Cost

16. Metrology Lab- Coordinate Measuring M/c 1 35.01

17. Measuring inst. & gauges 1 5.63

18. Chemical and Physical Lab- Rockwell Hardness Tester 1 1.96

19. Vicker Hardness Tester 1 5.79

20. Brinell Hardness tester 1 4.63

21. Lab Apparatus Analytical Balance & Samples preparation equipments

1 7.50

22. Surface Roughness Tester 1 20.85

23. Flaw Detector 1 3.57

24. Inverted Microscope 1 4.05

25. Optical Emption Spectrometer 1 74.96

26. FLEX MILL 1 17.72

27. Electrical Test Lab- Vibration System 1 55.80

28. Programmable Climatic Environmental Chamber 1 21.83

29. Training Centre- CNC Demo Machine 1 15.43

30. DG set 1 10.71

31. Compressor 1 15.00

32. Transformer 1 8.00

33. Overhead Crane 1 25.00

34. Stacker 1 1.00

35. Computers with Software (CAD/CAM) 1 15.00

Total 1294.94

9. Observations:

(A) Following documents are required to be submitted prior to issue of final approval:

(i) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.

(ii) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the cost escalation, if any,

over and above the approved project cost.

(iii) Documentary proof from SPV for utilization of CFC facilities by at least 51% of the

cluster members.

(iv) Compliance of terms & conditions as mentioned in SIDBI Appraisal Report.

(v) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.

(vi) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilize at least 60% of installed capacity.

(vii) Major Outputs / Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster units after

proposed intervention (in terms of production, exports / domestic sales and direct /

indirect employment, etc.).

(B) As recommended by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC), a clause would be

added in the Sanction Order “In case of any deviation from the agreed principles of

utilization and denial of fair access to the eligible stakeholders, assets created would be

handed over to another SPV through a transparent procedure for smooth and effective

operationalization of the facilities”.

Page 205: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

199

10. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting of Common Facility Centre

(CFC) in Engineering Cluster, Jalgaon, Maharashtra at a total project cost of Rs.1710.00 lakh

with Gol assistance of Rs. 1350.00 lakh, State Govt. contribution of Rs. 189.00 lakh and SPV

contribution of Rs.171.00 lakh.

***********

Page 206: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

200

Agenda No. 50.4.13: Proposal for final approval for setting up Common Facility Centre

(CFC) in Plastic Cluster, Nipani (Bhalgaon), Aurangabad,

Maharashtra.

Background:

Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 44th

SCM held on 05.09.17,

subject to submission of following documents prior to Final approval.

(i) Registered Land document in English version.

(ii) NOC from Pollution Control Board.

(iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.

(iv) Major Outputs / Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster units

after proposed intervention (in terms of production, exports / domestic sales and

direct / indirect employment, etc.)

(v) Commitment letter from Bank to sanction loan

(vi) Commitment from State Government regarding contribution of their share (at

least 10% of Project cost).

(vii) Undertaking from State Government / SPV that they will not sell the produced

yarn in the open market

(viii) Undertaking from SPV that CFC will not manufacture woven sacks.

(ix) Requirement of yarn from Cluster units by SPV

(x) Undertaking from State Government that CFC will not hamper business of local

MSMEs engaged in manufacturing of Yarn / Woven Sacks.

Vide letter dated 12.02.19, Government of Maharashtra, Mumbai has submitted the

following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval:

(i) Notarized Land document in English version (However Registered land

Document in Marathi Language Received)

(ii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.

(iii) Commitment letter from Bank to sanction loan

(iv) Commitment from State Government regarding contribution of their share (at

least 10% of Project cost).

(v) Undertaking from State Government / SPV that they will not sell the produced

yarn in the open market

(vi) Undertaking from SPV that CFC will not manufacture woven sacks.

(vii) Requirement of yarn from Cluster units by SPV

(viii) Undertaking from State Government that CFC will not hamper business of local

MSMEs engaged in manufacturing of Yarn / Woven Sacks.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Basic Information of Cluster

Name of Cluster : Ex-servicemen Plastic Cluster Foundation

District : Aurangabad

Location of Cluster : Nipani (Bhalgaon)

Lok Sabha Constituency : Aurangabad

Page 207: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

201

Main Product :

(i) Plastic coated & Printed Fabrics (ii) Plastic Coated paper Dishes (iii)Plastic Mats & carpets (iv) Plastic Printed Films & Bags (v) Plastic woven laminated & Printed Products

No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium) :

Micro 115 Small 30

Medium 15 Total 160

Turnover for the last five years :

Year Amount (Rs. in crore)

2011-12 60.00 2012-13 62.50 2013-14 64.00 2014-15 66.50 2015-16 71.82

Exports for the last five years :

Year

Amount (Rs. in crore)

2011-12 - 2012-13 - 2013-14 2.50 2014-15 3.00 2015-16 3.50

Employment in Cluster : 1500 Persons

Technology Details : (i) Tape/Yarn/Thread extrusion Machine (ii) Lamination/coating Machine (iii) Printing Machine

Whether DS Conducted : Yes

Main findings of DSR : The diagnostic study recommended the establishment of a common facility centre

Main Problems of Cluster : No advance Technology

Other Information : Need of Technology Up-gradation for product processing activities

2. Information about Proposed CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA)

Remarks

(a.) Justification for CFC To have advance technology & raw

material bank

-

(b.) Location of CFC Gut no: 111, Village Nipani Tal & dist :

Aurangabad.

-

% age of units in radius of 5km 5 -

% age of units in radius of

10km

5 -

(c.) Land for CFC

i. Whether land acquired Yes -

ii. Title is in name of Ex-servicemen Plastic Cluster Received

Page 208: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

202

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA)

Remarks

Foundation (Registered Land

document in

Marathi

Language),

However notarized

copy of English

Version Provided

iii. Valuation and its basis Land Acquired at the cost of

Rs. 57,37,500/- -

iv. Land is sufficient Yes -

v. Change of land use NA -

vi. If on lease, duration of lease NA -

vii Whether lease is legally

tenable

NA -

(d.) Total Building area 10097 sq ft -

(e.) Rate of construction of

building

Rs.1002/ sqft -

(f.) Main Facility Proposed (i) R&D Centre

Advance Machinery

(ii) Raw Material Bank

(iii) Training centre.

-

(g.) Prod capacity of CFC (i) Extrusion line: 350 kgs/hr

(ii) Plastic Coating :250 kgs/hr

(iii) Printing : 6000 mtr/hr.

-

(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables

of CFC, Projected performance of

the cluster after proposed

intervention (in terms of

production, export/ domestic sales

and direct /indirect employment,

etc.)

- Required

(i.) Pollution clearance required or

not

- Required

(j.) Man Power in CFC 28 Nos -

(k.) Revenue generation

mechanism for sustainability of

assets (service/user charges to be

levied, any other-to be specified)

(i) 1st year : Rs. 0.9cr

(ii) 2nd yr : Rs. 1.23cr

(iii) 3rd yr: Rs. 1.55cr

(iv) 4th yr : Rs.1.85

(v) 5th yr : Rs. 2.12cr

(vi) 6th yr: Rs.2.44cr

(vii) 7th yr: Rs.2.51cr

(viii) 8th yr : Rs.2.57

(ix) 9th yr : Rs.2.62

-

Page 209: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

203

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA)

Remarks

(x) 10th year: Rs.2.67cr.

3. Information about SPV

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(a.) Name and Address Ex-Servicemen Plastic Cluster Foundation, Gut No. 111, village: Nipani, Tal. and Dist. Aurangabad.

-

(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)

Company registered under section 25 of the Companies Act 1956.

-

(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV

Govt. of Maharashtra and Director of MSME, Mumbai

-

(d.) Date of formation of SPV 25.09.13 -

(e.) Number of Members 31 Members -

(f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted

Yes -

(g.) Authorized Share Capital Rs. 1 cr -

(h.) Paid up capital Rs. 31 lacs -

(i.) Shareholding Pattern Rs. 31 lacs -

(j.)Commitment letter for contribution

Yes Received

(k.) SPV specific A/c Account No: 33849438467 (SBI) -

(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation

- -

(m.) Technical Institution Central Institute of Plastics Engineering and Technology. Aurangabad. (CIPET)

-

(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.

Yes Received

(o.)

(a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose

600 KW -

(b) Water 50 cubic ltr / day -

(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities - -

4. Implement Arrangements

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(a.) Implementing Agency Development Commissioner of Industries, Govt. of Maharashtra

-

(b.) Fund receiving Agency CEO, MIDC, Mumbai, Govt. of -

Page 210: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

204

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

Maharashtra

(c.) Implementation Period 18 months 24 Months

(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations

DPR Appraised by SLSC meeting held in Mumbai on 25.05.16 under chairmanship of DC industries, Govt. of Maharashtra.

Received.

(e.) Comments of Technical Division

-- -

(f.) Approval of Technical Committee

- Recommend the Proposal

(g.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)

Commitment Letter from Bank of Maharashtra, Aurangabad Provided

Received

5. Financial Analysis of CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(a.) BEP 23.4% -

(b.) IRR, Payback period Before Tax: 18.41% After Tax: 14.63%

-

(c.) DSCR 1st yr: 11.32 Lakh 2nd yr: 12.92 Lakh 3rd yr: 14.94 Lakh 4th yr: 33.99 Lakh

-

(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)

30.53% -

(e.) NPV Positive , Rs 1725.71 lakh Post Tax -

(f.) DER - -

(g.) Sensitivity Analysis S. No.

Particulars Estimate

1 Break Even Point

23.40%

2 Return on Capital Employed

30.53%

3 Net Present Value

Positive , Rs 1725.71 lakh Post Tax

4 Payback period

Payback period of the project 7 years

5 DSCR NA

6 IRR Before Tax: 18.41% After Tax: 14.63%

-

Page 211: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

205

6. Proposed Project Cost is as follow:

(Rs. in Lakh)

S.

No.

Particulars Proposed

by IA

As per SIDBI/

MSE-CDP

1. Land and its Development 30.00 30.00

2. Building and other Civil Constructions 70.00 70.00

3. Plant & Machinery(including electrification) 923.01 923.01

4. Misc. fixed assets 89.47 92.35

5. Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses, maximum 2% of

project cost

26.94 24.10

6. Contingency (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery) 47.55 47.55

7. Margin money for Working Capital 59.61 18.29

Total Project Cost 1246.58 1205.30

7. Proposed Means of Finance are as follows:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Proposed

by IA

As per SIDBI/

MSE-CDP

1. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 1050.00 964.24

2. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Maharashtra 0.00 120.53

3 SPV contribution 118.95 120.53

4. Bank Loan/others 77.63 0.00

Total 1246.58 1205.30

8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)

(Rs. in lakh)

Sr. No. Particulars of Plant and

Machinery

No. Power Requirement

(HP/KW)

Cost

1 Tape Extrusion Line Lorex 1 230 400.77

2 Extrusion Coating Match 1 373 307.68

3 Rotogravure Printing M 1 121 214.56

Total 923.01

9. Observations:

(A) Following documents are required to be submitted prior to issue of final approval:

(i) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.

(ii) Revised share holding pattern in respect of the members whose shareholding is

more than 10%.

(iii) Certificate stating that more than 50% units in the cluster are micro / women

owned / SC-ST owned as the case may be.

(iv) Documentary proof from SPV for utilization of CFC facilities by at least 51% of

the cluster members.

Page 212: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

206

(v) Compliance of terms & conditions as mentioned in SIDBI Appraisal Report.

(vi) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.

(vii) Major Outputs / Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster units

after proposed intervention (in terms of production, exports / domestic sales and

direct / indirect employment, etc.).

(B) As recommended by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC), a clause would be

added in the Sanction Order “In case of any deviation from the agreed principles of

utilization and denial of fair access to the eligible stakeholders, assets created would be

handed over to another SPV through a transparent procedure for smooth and effective

operationalization of the facilities”.

10. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting of Common Facility Centre

(CFC) in Plastic Cluster, Nipani (Bhalgaon), Aurangabad, Maharashtra at a total project cost of

Rs.1205.30 lakh with Gol assistance of Rs. 964.24 lakh, State Govt. contribution of Rs. 120.53

lakh and SPV contribution of Rs.120.53 lakh.

***********

Page 213: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

207

Agenda No.50.4.14: Proposal for Final approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre

(CFC) in Spice & Food Processing Cluster, Churachandpur,

Manipur. Background:

Proposal was discussed during 47th

Steering Committee Meeting held on 25.07.18 and

the Committee accorded In-principle approval subject to submission of the following

documents prior to Final approval:

Vide letter dated 23.02.19, IIE, Guwahati and MSME-DI, Imphal has submitted the

documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval:

S. No. Documents required Status

(A)

(i)

SIDBI appraisal report.

Vide letter dated 27.02.19, IIE,

Guwahati has forwarded the

SIDBI Appraisal Report.

(ii) List of SPV members with unit address &

other details and shareholding pattern.

Awaited.

(iii) Commitment letter from SPV regarding their

contribution.

Received.

(iv) Commitment letter from State Government /

SPV to meet the cost escalation, if any, over

and above the approved project cost.

Received.

(v) Commitment letter from SPV members to

utilize at least 60 percent of installed capacity.

Received.

(vi) NOC from PCB. Received.

(vii) Certificate from State Government regarding

compliance of GFR / CVC guidelines.

Received.

(viii) Certificate regarding composition of cluster

units (more than 50% of ST or SC units)

Received.

(ix) Letter from Government of Manipur

nominating lIE, Guwahati as Implementing

Agency & Fund Receiving Agency.

Received.

(x) Registration of SPV members in MSME

databank.

Received.

(B)

(i)

Details of machinery for Masala Tea, Potato

& Banana chip making along with

specifications to be provided in the DPR.

Received.

(ii) Details of Laboratory & Packaging

Equipment along with specifications to be

provided in the DPR.

Received.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Basic Information of Cluster

Name of Cluster : Spice & Food Processing Cluster

District : Churachandpur

Location of Cluster : Churachandpur town and surrounding.

Lok Sabha Constituency : Outer Manipur(ST)

Main Product : Spices :- Ginger, Turmeric, Cinamom, Ushinga (pepper),

Page 214: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

208

Aijungam, Wild cardamom, Tejpata, Nathakga, Bird Eye Chill, King Chilli, Chengpilmalcha (Chili). Fruits and others:- Pine apple, Banana, Bamboo shoots, Casava, Orange, Lemon, Sweet Potato, Passion Fruit, Amla, Black Rice, Sticky Rice, Tree Bean. Various spice powder and paste, Juice, Sauce etc.

No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium) :

Micro - 50 Small - 0 Medium - 0 All the cluster units belongs to ST community.

Turnover(Rs in Crore) for the last five years :

Year Amount 2012-13 2.11 2013-14 2.19 2014-15 2.28 2015-16 2.38 2016-17 2.50

Exports(Rs in Crore) for the last five years :

Nil

Employment in Cluster : 900 nos. (Direct & Indirect)

Technology Details : The CFC would be using the latest and established technology in the CFC. The CFC would be setting up automatic / semi – automatic spice processing line and food processing line.

Whether DS Conducted : Yes conducted by IIE, Guwahati

Main findings of DSR : The unit owners of the cluster depends for raw materials on agriculture yield as well as yields from surrounding areas.

Success spice and food processing industries. Particularly involves in highly competitive prices. Depends mainly on the cost of inputs like raw materials

and consumables. Availability of local raw materials provides a genuine

edge. The primary stakeholders of the cluster arrange the

manufacturing implements mostly manual from Imphal, Guwahati etc.

The unit owners are partially aware of technology behind modern food processing/manufacturing.

Lacks Quality Assurance and packaging technology.

Main Problems of Cluster : Exploitation by middleman. Traditional methods. No proper storage. No proper machines. No facility for export. No quality control. Lack of capital etc.

Other Information : Location disadvantages, Transportation bottleneck high cost of materials like packaging, other like chemicals, preservatives etc.

Non-availability of sugar at low cost for food processing industries.

Lack of processing infrastructure including cold storage, pre cooling chamber, refrigerated vans etc.

No separate policy for food processing industries. Shortage of technical man power. High competitiveness in the market. Lack of marketing agency.

Page 215: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

209

2. Information about proposed CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Comments by Cluster Division

(a.) Justification for CFC

The spice and food processing units of cluster are mostly tiny in size of operation and found to be lacking in awareness about modern process/implements and quality control standards.

The requirement for implementing standard quality level are hardly affordable for these unit owners.

Most important need of the hour is setting up of Common Facility Center comprising of process implements and quality assurance instruments.

The services can be availed by primary stakeholders against suitably fixed conversion charges

The tiny local units can never afford heavy machinery at their own.

-

(b.) Location of CFC The CFC is proposed to be set up in TN Vaison village, Tuibong, Churachandpur District, Manipur – 795182.

-

% age of units in radius of 5km

70

% age of units in radius of 10km

30

(c.) Land for CFC

i. Wheather land acquired

Yes.

ii. Title is in name of Land is in the name of Natural Agrotech Research and Processing Service (NARPS) –SPV.

-

iii. Valuation and its basis

Rs. 50,000/-

iv. Land is sufficient Yes

v. Change of land use SPV -

vi. If on lease, duration of lease

- -

vii Whether lease is legally tenable

- -

(d.) Total Building area(sq ft)

6000 sq. ft. -

(e.) Rate of construction of building

PWD rate of Government of Manipur -

(f.) Main Facility Proposed

Washing / Cleaning / Drying Facility. Peeling/ Slicing Facility. Paste / Powder Making Facility. Sauce / Ketchup / Juice / pulp / jam/ jelly making

facility. Quality Control Facility. Storage Facility. Modern Packaging Facility. Training Facility to make the local educationally

backward stakeholders aware of current developments in technology and future developments.

Page 216: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

210

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Comments by Cluster Division

(g.) Prod capacity of CFC

Enclosed

(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)

Sl. No.

Parameters Before intervention

After Intervention

1 Total no. of units 50 80-100 2 Turnover (crore) 2.50 3.50 3. Exports No direct export. Expected 0.50

crore. 4. Investment (crore) 0.50 1.00 5. Profitability (%) 15-20 Expected 20-25 6. Employment generation Around 900 Expected 1450-

1500

(i.) Pollution clearance required or not

Yes, A moderate size affluent treatment plant has been considered as support service

Received.

(j.) Man Power in CFC Approximately 47 to 50

(k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets (service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)

1st year at Rs. 4 crore,2nd year at Rs. 4.5 crore,

3rd year at Rs.5.11 Crore 4th year at Rs. 5.87 Crore and 5th year at Rs.6.85 Crore. etc

3. Information about SPV

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Comments by Cluster Division

(a.) Name and Address Natural Agrotech Research & Processing Service (NARPS) L. Molvom Village, P.O. Churachandpur, Churachandpur District, Manipur-795128

-

(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)

Registered under societies Registration Act 1860.

-

(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV

Yes -

(d.) Date of formation of SPV

26.07.1995 -

(e.) Number of Members

20 nos. As per DPR there are 20 members units in the SPV.

(f.) Bye Laws or MoA and AoA submitted

Bye-laws of the Society have been submitted. -

(g.) Authorized Share Capital

Rs. 21800.00 -

(h.) Paid up capital Rs. 1,00,000.00 -

(i.) Shareholding Pattern

Shareholding for 20 members provided. -

(j.) Commitment letter for contribution

- Received.

(k.) SPV specific A/c State Bank of India A/c No.- 37812330829

-

Page 217: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

211

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Comments by Cluster Division

(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation

The trust building activities have already been proposed under soft interventions. The SPV has undertaken various training programmes under soft interventions such as two days training on sustainable farming on food and spices, tend days training on plantation of food and spices, one day training on capacity building.

-

(m.) Technical Institution

IIE Guwahati, CARI Imphal, MSME-DI, Imphal and other institute

-

(n.) CFC may be utilized by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilize at least 60 percent of installed capacity.

Submitted. Received.

(o.)

(a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose

200 KW -

(b) Water Bore well water -

(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities

- -

4. Implement Arrangements

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Comments by Cluster Division

(a.) Implementing Agency Indian Institute of Entrepreneurship, Guwahati As per MSE-CDP guidelines. (b.) Fund receiving

Agency Indian Institute of Entrepreneurship, Guwahati

(c.) Implementation Period

12 Months 24 Months from date of final approval.

(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations

As per SIDBI appraisal report the project is technically feasible and financially viable. The proposed performance indicators and financial position are satisfactory.

Received.

(e.) Comments of Technical Division

Technical Committee in its meeting held on 13.07.18 recommended the proposal for in-principle approval of Steering Committee subject to following: (i) Details of machinery for Masala Tea, Potato & Banana chip

making along with specifications to be provided in the DPR. (ii) Details of Laboratory & Packaging Equipment along with

specifications to be provided in the DPR.

(f.) Approval of Technical Committee

(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:

Recommended for final approval under MSE-CDP.

(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)

NA -

Page 218: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

212

5. Financial Analysis of CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Comments by Cluster Division

(a.) BEP 38.78% As per MSE-CDP guidelines.

(b.) IRR, Payback period Before tax - 18.98% After tax – 14.06%

-

(c.) DSCR not applicable

(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)

26% in optimum year 2025. 25% is desirable.

(e.) NPV 141.89 (after tax) -

(f.) DER NA -

(g.) Sensitivity Analysis Sensitivity analysis at 5%. Case BEP ROCE IRR

(Post tax)

NPV (Post tax)

Base Case 38.78% 26.00% 14.06% 14.89 5% decreasing sales & job income by

41.30% 22.48% 12.43% 83.63

5% increasing raw material cost by

38.78% 26.00% 14.06% 141.89

5% fall in capacity utilisation

38.67% 22.05% 12.10% 72.02

(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State

Approved CFC Nil. -

6. Project cost:

(Rs. in Lakh)

S. No. Particulars Proposed

by IA

Recommended

by SIDBI

As per

MSE-CDP

(i) Land and its Development 30.00 30.00 30.00

(ii) Building and other Civil Constructions 75.00 75.00 75.00

(iii) Plant & Machinery(cost of plant &

machinery, 10% installation, electrification

and commissioning)

499.29 499.29 499.29

(iv) Misc. fixed assets 12.00 12.00 12.00*

(v) Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses,

maximum 2% of project cost

14.00 14.00 14.00

(vi) Contingency (2% building and 5% on plant

and machinery)

26.46 26.46 26.46

(vii) Margin money for Working Capital 9.33 0.00 0.00

Total Project Cost 666.08 656.75 656.75

Page 219: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

213

7. Means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Proposed

by IA

Revised cost

proposed by IA

Recommende

d by SIDBI

As per MSE-

CDP

(i) Grant-in-aid from

Govt. of India

561.00 561.08 551.75 551.75

(ii) Grant-in-aid from

Govt. of Manipur

0.00 33.31 0.00 33.31

(iii) SPV contribution 105.00 71.69 105.00 71.69

Total 666.08 666.08 656.75 656.75

8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Description No. Amount (as per SIDBI)

A Spice Processing Facility

1. Hopper of 200 liters volume fitted with vibratory motor. 1 4.24

2. Bucket elevator for feeding the whole chilly into the chilly cleaning system

1 5.24

3. Chilly drum cleaner consisting of triple deck screen with suitable screens, mounting structures & standards accessories.

1 8.22

4. Chilly De-stoning system consisting of cascading hopper, valve & closed type dust collection unit pneumatic conveying system, rotary air lock

1 9.72

5. Screw conveyor model MSC-150 with Std. accessories. 1 4.44

6. Air cleaner with pre and post aspirator system. 1 7.72

7. Pressure Type De-Stoner model MDT1 1 6.84

8. Chopper Model MCH – 16 with mounting structure & std accessories.

1 4.96

9. 96 Tray Dryer with 96 nos of stainless steel trays standard 1 9.20

10. Set of spare trolleys along with set of 96 trays 1 5.24

11. Hopper of 300 liters volume fitted with vibratory 1 4.24

12. "Z" type bucket elevator for feeding the spices into the spice mill. 1 5.24

13. Spice Mill Model MC – 1512 with std. accessories 2 39.44

14 Pneumatic conveying system Model PCS-150 with standard accessories.

2

15 Rotary Air Lock Valve Model RALV – 200 2

16 Closed Type Dust Collector with Reverse Pulse jet arrangement & inbuilt Blower unit, mounting structure.

2

17 Screw conveyor Model MSE-150 with std. accessories. 1

18. Screw conveyor model MSC-150 2 5.88

19. Ribbon blender model MRB-250 with mounting structure & std accessories.

2 8.08

20. Gyro vibratory sieve separator model MGS-1500 with single deck arrangement having 2 mm screen std.

1 4.80

21. Rotary roaster model MRR-250 with 250 stainless steel rotary 1 6.14

Page 220: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

214

S. No. Description No. Amount (as per SIDBI)

A Spice Processing Facility

drum, std accessories

22. Centralized control panel with interlocking arrangement and other safety features suitable for controlling.

1 5.88

23. Motors extra 7 nos. 1 3.52

24. Masala tea (lemon grass/ginger/Cardamom flavour) line 1 41.88

Sub Total 190.92

B Food / Fruit Processing Facility

1 Sugar Syrup preparation tank 500 ltrs 1 7.45

2 Duplex filer 1 1.30

3 Centrifugal Pump 5000 Lph for Syrup Transfer 1 0.65

4 Sugar syrup plate filter press 14" with Hy flow system 1 5.10

5 Sugar syrup holding tank 500 ltrs 1 2.75

6. Dump tank 300 ltrs 1 1.50

7. Process pump 1 1.35

8. Blending tank 500 ltrs 2 8.20

9. Centrifugal pump 5000 LPH for product transfer 1 0.95

10. Inline magnetic trap 1 1.25

11. Homoginiser 750 LPH 1 8.50

12. Tube pasturiser 500 LPH 1 12.70

13. Homoginished juice tank 1000 ltrs 1 4.50

14. Turn table for empty bottle feeding 1 2.35

15. Filling machine four head- Semi automatic paddle operated machine

1 16.20

16. Slant chain conveyor 1.8 Mtr. 1 2.20

17. cooling tunnel 1 7.90

18. Bottle dryer with air knife 1 5.80

19. Ink jet printer 1 4.15

20. Electrical control panel 1 6.60

21. Product pipeline & Fitting with labour 1 5.90

22. Potato and banana chips line 1 31.33

Sub Total 138.63

C Laboratory Equipment 1 11.80

D Packaging equipment 1 54.78

E. Support Service

1 Water supply system 5 12.00

2 Fire prevention system 1 4.00

3 Captive DG set and other electrical 1 16.00

4 Pollution control set-up 1 4.00

5 Transformer 1 7.00

Sub Total 43.00

Page 221: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

215

S. No. Description No. Amount (as per SIDBI)

A Spice Processing Facility

Add GST,P&F, Installation and commissioning charges at 18% and 4 %

1 85.71

Expenses towards power supply connection 1 24.00

Total 499.29

9. Observations:

(A) As recommended by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC), a clause would be

added in the Sanction Order “In case of any deviation from the agreed principles of

utilization and denial of fair access to the eligible stakeholders, assets created would be

handed over to another SPV through a transparent procedure for smooth and effective

operationalization of the facilities”.

10. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of Common Facility

Centre (CFC) in Spice & Food Processing Cluster, Churachandpur, Manipur at a total project

cost of Rs. 656.75 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs.551.75 lakh, Government of Manipur

contribution of Rs.33.31 lakh & SPV contribution of Rs.71.69 lakh.

***********

Page 222: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

216

Agenda No.50.4.15: Proposal for Final approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre

(CFC) in Wood Carpentry Cluster, Churachandpur, Manipur.

Background:

(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 48th

SCM held on 12.11.18,

subject to submission of following documents prior to Final approval.

(ii) Vide letter dated 09.04.19, IIE, Guwahati (Implementing Agency) has submitted the

documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.

Documents required Status

(i) SIDBI appraisal report Received

(ii) NOC from State Pollution Control Board Received

(iii) Certificate from State Government regarding compliance of

GFR/ CVC guidelines

Received

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Basic Information of Cluster

Name of Cluster : Wood Carpentry Cluster District Churachandpur Location of Cluster : Churachandpur town area and surrounding Lok Sabha Constituency : Outer Manipur(St) Main Product : Tables, Bed (Normal), Bed, Sofa Set, Cup Board,

Almirah (small), Almirah (Large) & Others. No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium)

Micro 31 Small 0 Medium 0

Turn over for the last five years : (Rs. in Crore)

Year Amount 2012-13 3.00 2013-14 3.70 2014-15 4.50 2015-16 5.40 2016-17 6.20

Exports for the last five years : (Rs. in Crore)

Nil

Employment in Cluster : 155 Nos. (Direct – 125 and Indirect – 30) Technology Details : All the implements installed in different units in

individual level are traditional type in operative nature. Any sort of setback due to malfunction / breakage of component of those implements lead to serious implications on the output performance of the processing units.

Whether DS Conducted : Yes, the DSR is conducted by Indian Institute of Entrepreneurship Guwahati.

Main findings of DSR : Wood is directly procured from hills and local market.

Wood is dried / seasoned for a period of time. When wood is dried, carpenter begins the

process of making it as per demand. Sanding is done using both manual and power

tool like orbital sander. Golden chapra or sanding sealer is applied to

make the wood into a finishing stage when colour can be applied.

Golden chapra or melamine paint with wood stain colour is used according to the choice of the customer or demand in the market.

Page 223: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

217

Main Problems of Cluster : The artisans are still practicing the old method of wood working with traditional tools.

Low productivity due to absence of modern implements.

Non-availability of proper timber treatment. Non-availability of bulk planning / sawing /

edge banding techniques / implements. Lack of Joint making techniques / implements. Lack of finishing implements. Lack of proper storage.

Other Information : Location disadvantages. Transportation bottleneck. Lack of processing infrastructure. No separate policy for furniture industries. High competitiveness in the market. Lack of marketing agency.

2. Information about Proposed CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(a.) Justification for CFC Presently using traditional technology.

The problems exist in every stage right from raw material availability, Seasoning, chemical treatment through low value primary processes.

Wastage of both raw material and energy to the final manufacturing step of polishing / finishing & Quality assurance.

Inherent problem of inconsistent power supply.

--

(b.) Location of CFC Lighthouse lane, Tedim Road, Zouveng, Churachandpur, Manipur.

--

% age of units in radius of 5km

90

% age of units in radius of 10km

10

(c.) Land for CFC i. Whether land acquired Yes Land is on lease

basis for 25 years. The lease deed has submitted.

ii. Title is in name of Title is in name of the SPV i.e. Churachandpur Area Carpenters Association (CACA).

iii. Valuation and its basis Rs. 5.00 lakhs for 25 years lease. - iv. Land is sufficient Yes -- v. Change of land use Yes. -- vi. If on lease, duration of lease

25 years --

vii Whether lease is legally tenable

Yes. --

(d.) Total Building area(sq ft)

8000 sq. ft. --

(e.) Rate of construction of building

Rs. 5 lakh a total approximate for the repairing and renovation of the building.

--

(f.) Main Facility Proposed

Seasoning Facility. Chemical Treatment facility. Debarking of logs.

--

Page 224: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

218

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

Modern Joint Making Facilities. Panel saw, cross cut saw, band

saw facility. Automatic Sanding. Mortise, Tanner facility. Modern Edge Banding Facility. High Frequency Plank Joining. Powered Small Tools. Finishing Facilities. Laminating Facility. Quality Control Service. Skill up-gradation facility. Marketing network through

optional common branding. g.) Prod capacity of CFC The Churachandpur Carpentry Cluster

as a whole process approximately 3000 c. ft. to 3500 c. ft. of raw wood. Considering the growth of the cluster the CFC has been planned with plant and machinery in such a manner that this CFC will be capable of processing 6000 to 6500 c. ft. of raw wood per month in 300 hrs / month of operation hours.

--

(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/ domestic sales and direct/ indirect employment, etc.)

Sl. No.

Parameters Present intervention

After Intervention

1. Units 31 units 50 units 2 Employment 155 350 3 Exports Nil Will be able to ensure quality

products for export. 4 Total sales Rs. 620.00 lakh Rs. 1040.00 lakh 5 Profits 12-15% 20-25% 6 Investment Rs. 150.00 lakh Rs. 350.00 lakh.

(i.) Pollution clearance required or not

Yes. A moderate size Effluent Treatment Plant has been considered as support service.

Received

(j.) Man Power in CFC 44 persons (k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)

The revenue generation for various services, which will be charges as conversion cost to the cluster members (with certain discounts for the SPV members), will be as listed below: Particulars Qty. Unit Rate

(Rs.) At full capacity

Capacity utilization Estimated working (240 hrs at 100%)

100.00% 2400

Service Charge Various Service 55200 Cft. 550 303.60 Sub Total (I) 303.60 Other revenues from Training 12.00 Sub Total (II) 12.00 Gross revenue (sub I+ II)

315.60

10% Discount to SPV members #

2.84

Net Revenue 312.76 # it is assumed that 90% of the facilities will be utilised by the cluster units

Page 225: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

219

3. Information about SPV

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(a.) Name and Address Churachandpur Area Carpenters Association (CACA)

-

(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)

The SPV is a registered industrial cooperative society.

-

(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV

- -

(d.) Date of formation of SPV

22.03.2017 -

(e.) Number of Members 31 nos.

-

(f.) Bye Laws or MoA and AOA submitted

Yes. -

(g.) Authorized Share Capital

Rs. 3.00 lakh -

(h.) Paid up capital Rs. 10.00 lakh. - (i.) Shareholding Pattern Submitted. - (j.) Commitment letter for contribution

Submitted. -

(k.) SPV specific A/c Vijaya Bank : A/c No: 860400301000176

-

(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation.

SPV namely Churachandpur Area Carpenters Association (CACA). The registered society to function as a Special Purpose Vehicle for setting up and running the proposed Common Facility Centre.

-

(m.) Technical Institution IIE, Guwahati - (n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.

CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV members ability to utilise at least 60% installed capacity.

-

(o) (a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose

170 KW -

(b) Water 2 Cubic litters - (c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities Not required -

4. Implementation Arrangements

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(a.) Implementing Agency Indian Institute of Entrepreneurship (IIE) (autonomous organisation under Ministry of Skill Development & Entrepreneurship), Guwahati

-- (b.) Fund receiving Agency

--

(c.) Implementation Period 12 months 24 Months from date of final approval as per guidelines.

(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations

Submitted Received

Page 226: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

220

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(e.) Comments of Technical Division

Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 59th

meeting held on 31.07.18, recommended the proposal for placing before Steering Committee for in-principle approval. MSME-DI, Imphal was advised to ensure that brand names should not be mentioned along with specification of machinery, while floating tenders.

(f.) Approval of Technical Committee

(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:

-- --

(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)

-- --

5. Financial Analysis of CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency Remarks (a.) BEP 47.06% As per MSE-CDP

guidelines. (b.) IRR, Payback period 27.78% (Before Tax)

21.71% (After Tax) 3 years 10 months

--

(c.) DSCR N/A -- (d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)

36.66% (Before Tax) 27.91% (After Tax)

25% is desirable.

(e.) NPV Positive -- (f.) DER Not Applicable -- (g.) Sensitivity Analysis Yes, the figures are positive as required

by guidelines: a) IRR 27.78% b)NPV – positive c)Breakeven Point 47.08% d)ROCE 36.66%.

--

(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State

Approved CFC Nil. --

6. Proposed project cost:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA

Proposed by SIDBI

As per MSE-CDP

(i) Land and its Development 0.00 0.00 0.00

(ii) Building and other Civil Constructions 5.00 5.00 5.00

(iii) Plant & Machinery 389.53 389.53 389.53

(iv) Misc. fixed assets 14.50 14.50 14.50

(v) Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses, maximum 2% of project cost

8.00 8.00 8.00

(vi) Contingency (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery)

19.58 19.58 19.58

(vii) Margin money for Working Capital 1.94 0.00 0.00

Total Project Cost 438.55 436.61 436.61

7. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars

Proposed by IA

Proposed by SIDBI

As per MSE-CDP

(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 371.10 391.09 369.16*

(ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Manipur 21.93 0.00 21.93

Page 227: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

221

S. No. Particulars

Proposed by IA

Proposed by SIDBI

As per MSE-CDP

(iii) SPV contribution 45.52 45.52 45.52

Total 438.55 436.61 436.61

* 84.55% of eligible project cost i.e. Rs. 436.61 lakh.

8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Description No. Power Requirement (HP/KW)

Cost

1. SCM MINIMAX Band Saw S400 P (Non CE) 2 1.5 5.25

2. SCM Band Saw S 45 N (CE) 2 1.5 4.10

3. Altendorf table panel saw with Tilt 1 2.75 6.95

4. SCM Cut-off Saw 1 3 4.31

5. SCM, Spindle Moulder With Tilting Spindle & LL Version

1 9 9.66

6. SCM Feeder 1 0.75 0.84

7. CMS Balestrini, Automatic TWIN TABLE ROUND-END TENONER

1 205 17.85

8. CMS Balestrini, Automatic Twin Table Slot Mortiser MICRON

1 2.5 9.82

9. SCM Surface Planer 1 2.1 6.46

10. SCM Thicknessing Planer 1 3.5 6.46

11. SCM Sandya Automatic Wide Belt Sander 1 11 19.03

12. SCM Universal Belt Sanding Centre with Oscillating Belt

1 3 7.30

13. SCM, Automatic Throughfeed Planer Moulder, PROFISET 40 CE

1 17 16.07

14. Multifunction wood l 4/4 axis CNC Router 1 7.5 19.95

15. CNC Router 2 704 18.80

16. Finger Jointer- semi Automatic 1 10.5 4.73

17. Multi head 4 axis latheEksen 1 14 38.33

Sub Total 195.91

18. Festool Domino Joining Machine Domino Df 500 Q-Set

1 0 1.23

19. Festool Domino Assortment Box Ds 1 0 0.34

20. Festool Domino Joining Machine Df 700 Eq Plus 1 0 1.58

21. Festool Beechwood Domino Xl Assortment Ds/Xl D12/D14 128X Bu

1 0 0.26

22. Festool Beechwood Domino Xl Assortment Ds/Xl D8/D10 306X Bu

1 0 0.30

23. Festool Planer Hl 850 Eb-Plus 1 0 0.78

24. Festool Planer Head Hk 82 Sd Rustic Design Fine with spiral blade Hs 82 Rf

1 0 0.23

25. Festool Planer Head Hk 82 Sd Rustic Design Coarse with Spiral blade HS 82 Rf with spiral blade Hs 82 Rg Depth Limiter

1 0 0.23

Page 228: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

222

S. No. Description No. Power Requirement (HP/KW)

Cost

26. Festool Planer Head Hk 82 Sd Rustic Design Undulating with Hs spiral blade Hs 82 Rw Depth Limiter

1 0 0.23

27. Festool Dove Tail Kit Vs 600 1 0 0.58

28. Festool Cutt. Template Vs 600 Sz 14 1 0 0.11

29. Festool Cutters Hw S8 D138/135/15° 1 0 0.06

30. Festool Copy Ring Kr-D 17/Of1400/Vs 600 1 0 0.03

31. Festool Cutt. Template Vs 600 Szo 20 1 0 0.19

32 Festool Dovetail Cutter Hw Vs600 D20X26X8 Z2 Rl

1 0 0.07

33. Festool Eccentric Sander Ets Ec 150/3 Eq 3 0 2.13

34. Festool Eccentric Sander Ets Ec 150/5 Eq 3 0 2.13

35. Festool Suction Hose D 27 22X3 5M As Gq Ct 3 0 0.76

36. Festool Workcenter Wcr 1000 3 0 3.06

37. Festool Sliding Compound Mitre Saw Kapex Ks 120 Ug-Set

1 0 3.40

38. Festool Circular Saw Ts 55 Rebq-Plus-Fs 1 0 0.80

39. Festool Multifunction Table Mft/3 1 0 1.21

40. Festool Rotary Sander Ras 180 E 1 0 1.03

41. Festool Orbital Sander Rutscher Rs 200 Eq-Plus 1 0 0.71

42. Festool Compressed Air Eccentric Sander Lex 3 77/25 Set

2 0 1.46

43. Festool Oscillator Vecturo Os 400 Eq-Set 1 0 0.86

44. Festool Hole Drilling Set Lr 32-Sys 1 0 0.62

45. Festool Routing Template Mfs 400 1 0 0.35

46. Festool Routing Template Mfs 700 1 0 0.54

47. Festool Bench-Mounted Router Tf 2200-Set 1 0 3.02

48. Festool Cordless Drills Txs Li 26 Plus Eu 230V 5 0 1.61

49. Bessey K Body Revo Kr 600/95 10 0 0.61

50. Bessey Band Clamp Ban700 3 0 0.13

51. Bessey Malleable Cast Iron Screw Clamp Tg-2K 200/100

10 0 0.33

52. Bessey Malleable Cast Iron Screw Clamp Tg-2K 300/120

10 0 0.42

53. Bessey Malleable Cast Iron Screw Clamp Tg-2K 1000/140

10 0 0.82

54. Bessey Heavy Duty Malleable Cast Iron Screw Clamp Tgk 1500/120

10 0 0.92

55. Bessey Malleable Cast Iron Screw Clamp Tpn-Be-2K 200/100

10 0 0.25

56. Bessey Heavy Duty Malleable Cast Iron Screw Clamp Tgk-2K 600/120

10 0 0.63

57. Bessey Heavy Duty Malleable Cast Iron Screw Clamp Tgk-K 1000/120

10 0 0.79

58. Bessey One-Handed Clamp Ezs 150/80 10 0 0.29

Page 229: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

223

S. No. Description No. Power Requirement (HP/KW)

Cost

59. Bessey One-Handed Clamp Ezs 300/80 10 0 0.33

60. Bessey One-Handed Clamp Ezs 600/80 10 0 0.39

Sub Total 35.82

61. Sawing Machine 2 0.5 5.25

62. Pllet Truck 2000 1800mm 2 0 0.63

63. Seasoning Klin Electric 1 22 15.75

64. Air compressor + Receiver + Drier Atlas Copco 1 300000 5.00

1 7.5 3.15

65. Compressed Air Pneumatic lines John Guest 1 0 2.63

66. Dust Collector 12 16 6.30

67. Paint Booth 1 11 14.70

68. Tooling for Machines 1 0 5.25

Sub Total 53.66

Packaging + forwarding (Freight)+ insurance @ 4%

9.99

Installation & Training @ 5% 14.27

Maximum tax component @ 18% 51.37

69. Captive DG Set and related Electricals 1 0 12.00

70. Transformer and Switchgear 1 0 7.50

71. Fire Fighting System 1 0 6.00

72. Pollution Control System 1 0 3.00

9. Observation:

(A) Following document is required to be submitted prior to issue of final approval:

(i) The land lease deed is for a period of 25 years only. Committee may like to take a

view on the same.

(B) As recommended by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC), a clause would be

added in the Sanction Order “In case of any deviation from the agreed principles of

utilization and denial of fair access to the eligible stakeholders, assets created would be

handed over to another SPV through a transparent procedure for smooth and effective

operationalization of the facilities”.

10. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre

(CFC) in Wood Carpentry Cluster, Churachandpur, Manipur at a total project cost of Rs.436.61 lakh

with GoI grant of Rs.369.16 lakh, State Government‟s contribution of Rs.21.93 lakh and SPV‟s

contribution of Rs.45.52 lakh.

*******

Page 230: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

224

Agenda No.50.4.16: Proposal for Final approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre

(CFC) in Greater Imphal Jewellery Cluster, Imphal, Manipur.

Background:

(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 48th

SCM held on 12.11.18,

subject to submission of following documents prior to Final approval.

(ii) Vide letter dated 16.04.19, IIE, Guwahati has submitted the documents and requested to

consider the proposal for final approval.

Documents required Status

(i) SIDBI appraisal report Received

(ii) List of SPV members (with units address) along with

shareholding pattern

Received

(iii) Details of production capacity of CFC Received

(iv) Name of the State Govt. and MSME officials in SPV Received

(v) NOC from State Pollution Control Board Received

(vi) Certificate from State Government regarding compliance of

GFR/ CVC guidelines

Received

(vii) Registered land document in the name of SPV (if land is on

lease basis, registered lease deed for a minimum period of

30 years)

Received

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Basic Information of Cluster

Name of Cluster : Greater Imphal Jewellery Cluster District Imphal East Location of Cluster : Porompat, Greater Imphal Lok Sabha Constituency : Inner Manipur

Main Product : Ring, Ear ring, Chain, Necklace, Bracelet, Bangles, Diamond and Gemstones and all other jewelleries.

No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium)

Micro 70 Small - Medium -

Turn over for the last five years : (Rs. in Crore)

Year Amount 2013-14 10.80

2014-15 11.90 2015-16 13.10 2016-17 14.30 2017-18 15.60

Exports for the last five years : (Rs. in Crore)

Nil.

Employment in Cluster : 1305 nos. (Direct – 505 and Indirect – 800) Technology Details : Traditional processes of metal manufacturing-

Designing, Tool making, Melting and alloying, Casting, Sheet rolling, Wire rolling Wire Drawing, Manual Blanking, piercing.

Whether DS Conducted : Yes. Main findings of DSR : Ornaments are intricately and traditionally

designed for religious occasions. Ornaments are also made from an alloy (mixture of copper

Page 231: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

225

and brass). The major stakeholders of the cluster are the 70

units operating within the cluster. Out of the total investment, 95 per cent is on

raw material and the rest on equipments and work sheds. Raw material absorbs the maximum investment.

Main Problems of Cluster : Lack of working Capital Lack of modern design. Obsolete and traditional Technology. Lack of Product Diversification. Lack of quality certification.

Other Information : --

2. Information about Proposed CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks (a.) Justification for CFC The present units are using traditional and

obsolete methods of manufacturing. The proposed CFC will facilitate manufacturing with modern technology.

The proposed CFC may function as modern design centre for up-gradation of the existing design in the cluster and introduce new and diversified designs.

The CFC could be utilized as a gemstone cutting and polishing centre.

Other than gold, the CFC can act as a raw material bank for molten copper with art of the machinery installed.

A testing unit with modern tools and technology is necessary for testing the purity of the gold.

--

(b.) Location of CFC Greater Imphal District which is 3 km from Imphal, the capital city of Manipur, the eastern most state of India.

--

% age of units in radius of 5km

40 --

% age of units in radius of 10km

60 --

(c.) Land for CFC i. Whether land acquired Yes leased. Lease deed in

the name of SPV for a period of 25 years received.

ii. Title is in name of SPV, Jewellery Common Facility Centre, Imphal, Manipur.

iii. Valuation and its basis

Land on lease basis for 25 years.

iv. Land is sufficient Yes v. Change of land use Yes vi. If on lease, duration of lease

Land on lease basis for 25 years.

vii Whether lease is legally tenable

Yes.

(d.) Total Building area(sq ft)

1800 sq. ft.

--

(e.) Rate of construction of building

Rs 2250/sq.ft. --

(f.)Main Facility Proposed

Jewellery CAD All modern processing for gold / silver

jewellery. Captive Tool Room Hallmarking and assaying

--

Page 232: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

226

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks g.) Prod capacity of CFC --- Received (h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/ domestic sales and direct /indirect employment, etc.)

Sl. No.

Parameter Before Intervention

After Intervention

1. Total No. of units 70 175 2 Total sales (Rs. in lakh) 1560.00 3800.00 3 Investment (Rs. in lakh) 175.00 400.00 4 Profit (%) 15-20 20-25 5 Employment 505 1200 6 Exports (Rs. in lakh) Nil 190.00

(i.) Pollution clearance required or not

Yes. Received

(j.) Man Power in CFC 28 nos. (at first year). -- (k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)

The total Revenue per year (at 100% capacity utilization) will be Rs 180.76 Lakh.

--

3. Information about SPV

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks (a.) Name and Address Jewellery Common Facility Centre, Imphal,

Manipur, Palace Compound, Imphal East, Manipur.

--

(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)

Registered Society. --

(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV

-- Received

(d.) Date of formation of SPV

15.07.14 --

(e.) Number of Members 70 nos.

--

(f.) Bye Laws or MoA and AOA submitted

Yes, submitted. --

(g.)Authorized Share Capital

Rs. 2.50 lakh. --

(h.) Paid up capital Rs. 70,000/- (i.) Shareholding Pattern Submitted. Received (j.) Commitment letter for contribution

- --

(k.) SPV specific A/c Name of the Bank: Punjab National Bank Account Number: 1067000108175727

--

(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation.

Already done. --

(m.) Technical Institution

IIE, Guwahati --

(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member

Submitted. --

Page 233: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

227

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity. (o) (a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose

93.24 KW --

(b) Water Yes. -- (c)Gas/Oil/Other Utilities

Yes. --

4. Implement Arrangements

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

(a.) Implementing Agency

Indian Institute of Entrepreneurship (IIE) (autonomous organisation under Ministry of Skill Development & Entrepreneurship), Guwahati

As per MSE-CDP guidelines.

(b.) Fund receiving Agency (c.) Implementation Period

12 months 24 Months from date of final approval as per MSE-CDP.

(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations

Submitted Received

(e.) Comments of Technical Division

Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 62nd

meeting held on 05.11.18, recommended the proposal for placing before Steering Committee for in-principle approval.

(f.) Approval of Technical Committee (g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:

-- --

(h.) Working capital (In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)

-- --

5. Financial Analysis of CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks (a.) BEP 61.60 % As per SIDBI,

39.55% (b.) IRR, Payback period 15.35% after tax

21.44% before tax. 4 years 7 months

As per SIDBI IRR before tax – 18.45% IRR after tax – 15.92%

(c.) DSCR N/A

(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)

21.37% after tax 28.26 % before tax

As per SIDBI 32.29%

(e.) NPV Positive -- (f.) DER N/A (g.) Sensitivity Analysis Yes, the figures are positive as required by

guidelines. (h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State

-- --

Page 234: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

228

6. Proposed project cost:

(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed by

IA As per MSE-CDP/ Recommended by

SIDBI (i) Building & Civil Works 24.78 24.78 (ii) Plant & Machinery 277.75 277.75 (iii) Miscellaneous Fixed Assets 6.00 6.00 (iv) Preliminary Expenses & Pre-operative

expenses 5.00 6.50

(v) Provision for contingencies 14.39 14.39 (vi) Margin money for working capital 1.16 1.17

Total 329.08 330.59

7. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA As per MSE-CDP

(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 271.40 271.40

(ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Manipur 32.90 32.90

(iii) SPV contribution 24.78 26.29*

Total 329.08 330.59

* As approved in 48th

SCM, SPV contribution is <10%.

8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)

(Rs in lakh) S. No. Description No. Power

requirement (HP/KW)

Cost

CAD Service 1. Complete CAD centre and 3D Model Making set-up

complete with all hardware and software. 1 2.5 9.67

Manufacturing Service 1. Melting Furnace, 1 kg capacity. 2 3 0.32 2. Melting Furnace, 2 kg capacity 2 4.5 0.44 3. Vacuum Casting Plant – 3 kg 1 5 7.97 4. Sheet Rolling Unit – 24” sheet 1 7.5 2.67 5. Sheet Rolling Unit – 8” sheet 1 5.5 2.48 6. Wire Rolling Unit 1 5 2.67 7. Wire Drawing Machine 1 1 1.82 8. Annealing set-up 1 5 3.62 9. Chain Making set-up 1 4 11.73 10. Facetting Machine-vertical-horizontal combined. 1 1 1.76 11. Laser Soldering 1 3 6.93 12. Jewellery Hydraulic Press 25 T 1 1.5 1.89 13. Ball Making Machine, 2mm to 5mm balls 1 0.5 3.36 14. Electronic Weighting 1 0.2 0.96 15. Ultrasonic Cleaning Machine, 25 l capacity 2 1 1.32 16. Magnetic Polisher 2 kg capacity 2 1.5 1.36 17. Gold Plating Unit 1 5 1.42 18. Silver Plating Unit 1 5 3.73 19. Metal Refinery 1 3 6.21 20 Complete Hallmarking setup 1 3 90.63 Tool Room Service 1. Centre Lathe Machine with Grainding attachment, 1000

ABD, 300 sweep with grinding attachment. 1 1.5 1.92

2. Cone pulley type shaping machine with accessories, 18 inch stroke

1 1.5 1.83

Page 235: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

229

S. No. Description No. Power requirement

(HP/KW)

Cost

3. Universal Milling Machine 42”x9” with accessories 1 1.5 2.84 4. Drilling Machine up to 25 mm dia capacity with

accessories 2 2 1.16

5. Pantograph Milling Machine 1 1 1.48 6. Surface Grinder Machine, 550mm x 200mm with

accessories 1 2 3.54

7. Cylindrical Grinding Machine, 300mm x102mm 1 2 3.76 8. Tool Grinder with accessories 1 0.5 0.28 9. Mechanical power saw machine with accessories 1 1 0.72 10. Cutting Tools, Cutters, Drills, Measuring Instruments

including Vernier Calipers, Digital Cerniers, Digital Micrometer, Height Gauge, Surface plate, Depth Gauge, Radius Gauge, Centre Gauge, Bore Dial, Bore Micrometer, Dial Gauge.

1 set 7.03

11 Heat Treatment Unit 1 7.5 5.29 Support Service Water Supply System 1 set 2 7.00 Fire Prevention System 1 set 4.00 Captive DG Set 1 set 8.50 Transformer and other controls 1 set 5.60 Pollution Control System 1 set 2 8.00 Above rates are inclusive of all taxes 0.00 Expenses towards Power Supply System 10.00 Extra cost towards GST, P&F, installation 47.44

9. Observations:

(A) Following document is required to be submitted prior to issue of final approval:

(i) Lease deed in the name of SPV has been provided for a period of 25 years.

Committee may like to take a view on lease period.

(B) As recommended by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC), a clause would be

added in the Sanction Order “In case of any deviation from the agreed principles of

utilization and denial of fair access to the eligible stakeholders, assets created would be

handed over to another SPV through a transparent procedure for smooth and effective

operationalization of the facilities”.

10. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of Common Facility

Centre (CFC) in Greater Imphal Jewellery Cluster, Imphal, Manipur at a total project cost of Rs.

330.59 lakh with GoI grant of Rs. 271.40 lakh, State Government‟s contribution of Rs. 32.90

lakh and SPV‟s contribution of Rs. 26.29 lakh.

*******

Page 236: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

230

Agenda No.50.4.17: Proposal for Final approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre

(CFC) in Cashew Nut Processing Cluster, Selsella, West Garo Hills,

Meghalaya.

Background:

(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 48th

SCM held on 12.11.18,

subject to submission of following documents prior to Final approval.

(ii) Vide letter dated 16.04.19, IIE, Guwahati (Implementing Agency) has submitted the

documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.

Documents required Status

(viii) SIDBI appraisal report Received

(ix) List of SPV members (with units address) along with

shareholding pattern

Received

(x) NOC from State Pollution Control Board Received

(xi) Certificate from State Government regarding compliance of

GFR/ CVC guidelines

Received

(xii) Registered land document in the name of SPV (if land is on

lease basis, registered lease deed for a minimum period of

30 years)

Yet to be

received

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Basic Information of Cluster

Name of Cluster : Cashew Nut Processing Cluster District West Garo Hills Location of Cluster : Selsella Block, West Garo Hills District,

Meghalaya. Lok Sabha Constituency : Tura Main Product : Three grades of Cashew Nut No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium)

Micro 50

Turn over for the last five years : (Rs. in Crore)

Year Amount 2012-13 26.59 2013-14 29.23 2014-15 32.95 2015-16 37.12 2016-17 42.15

Exports for the last five years : (Rs. in Crore)

Nil

Employment in Cluster : 950 nos. (Direct – 600-650 and Indirect – 300) Technology Details : The cashew nut processors of the cluster

follow traditional Indian processes and technology. Farmers of the thirteen villages of Selsella

block of West Garo hills district are, in general, highly skilled and devoid of using automatic modern machinery.

The manufacturing process followed by 300+ skilled farmers of this cluster is largely dependent on age-old technology comprising major labour intensive and less productive activities.

Few of them is equipped with few semi-automatic attachments.

Page 237: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

231

Whether DS Conducted : Yes. Main findings of DSR : To understand status of the Cashew Nut

production system. To know how raw cashew nut products are

marketed. To know the measures initiated by the

various agencies to start cluster for cashew nut processing and marketing.

To identify the problems and reasons for not making cluster functioning very effectively.

To suggest interventions and action plan how to make cashew nut processing cluster more effective.

Main Problems of Cluster : Lack of storage facility. Absence of market centre. Absence of infrastructure like electricity,

permanent sheds Lack of working capital Insufficient training and knowledge. Unorganised way of selling raw cashew. Exploitation by the traders. Lack of credit facility. Lack of marketing orientation of farmers. Lack of social mobilization among farmers

and SHGs. Lack of basic infrastructures for installing

MCPUs in the cluster. Other Information : Value added by-products like juice, alcoholic

drinks and shell oil can be manufactured from waste of the cashew fruit and the cashew shell.

2. Information about Proposed CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(a.) Justification for CFC This CFC has been designed and planned so that the cashew growers can bring their raw produce, either in raw or shell-cut condition for further processing up to packaging level and can take back the finished product from CFC after payment of suitably fixed conversion charge.

Although the CFC has to be designed to help the local cashew growers by providing them with suitable processing facilities at various stages of processed Cashew manufacturing, but this CFC can better not be termed as a production centre as the implements proposed will be used by the cashew growers optionally as will be evident in the flow chart.

--

(b.) Location of CFC Village – Baklagne, P.O. Haldibari, Block – Selsella, District – West Garo Hills, Meghalaya.

--

% age of units in radius of 5km

65 --

% age of units in radius of 10km

35 --

(c.) Land for CFC

Page 238: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

232

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

i. Whether land acquired Yes. Registered land document in the name of SPV (if land is on lease basis, registered lease deed for a minimum period of 30 years) is required.

ii. Title is in name of SPV, Cluster Cashew Nut Producer Association of Baklagne.

iii. Valuation and its basis Land on lease basis for 20 years. iv. Land is sufficient Yes v. Change of land use Yes vi. If on lease, duration of lease

Land on lease basis for 20 years.

vii Whether lease is legally tenable

Yes.

(d.) Total Building area(sq ft)

The SPV proposes to construct the building 2000 sq ft. for CFC.

--

(e.) Rate of construction of building

1500 sq. ft. --

(f.)Main Facility Proposed Cashew cooking system. Automatic Cashew Shell Cutting. Conveyor System Electrical Oven. Humidifying System. Separating System. Grading System. Packing System. Quality Control and Laboratory

equipments service.

--

g.) Prod capacity of CFC --- -- (h.) Major Outputs / Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/ domestic sales and direct /indirect employment, etc.)

S. No.

Parameter Before Intervention

After Intervention

1. Total No. of units 50 300 2 Total sales (Rs. in lakh) 4200.00 6900.00 3 Investment (Rs. in lakh) 65.00 450.00 4 Profit (%) 15-20 30-40 5 Employment 900-950 1600-1800

(i.)Pollution clearance required or not

Yes. Received

(j.) Man Power in CFC 46 nos. -- (k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets (service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)

The total revenue per year (at 100% capacity utilisation) will be Rs. 215.48 lakh.

--

3. Information about SPV Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA) Remarks

(a.) Name and Address Cluster Cashew Nut Producers Association of Baklagne, Sesella Block, West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya

--

(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)

Registered Society. --

(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV

GM-DIC, Tura Meghalaya. --

(d.) Date of formation of SPV

07.01.16. --

(e.) Number of Members 50 nos.

--

(f.) Bye Laws or MoA and Yes. --

Page 239: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

233

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

AOA submitted (g.)Authorized Share Capital

Rs. 50,000/- -

(h.) Paid up capital Rs. 3.5 lakh (i.) Shareholding Pattern Submitted. -- (j.) Commitment letter for contribution

- --

(k.) SPV specific A/c Name of the Bank: State Bank of India Account Number: 37244652525

--

(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation.

Already done. --

(m.) Technical Institution IIE, Guwahati -- (n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.

-- --

(o) (a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose

42 KW --

(b) Water Yes -- (c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities

Oil --

4. Implementation Arrangements

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(a.) Implementing Agency Indian Institute of Entrepreneurship (IIE) (autonomous organisation under Ministry of Skill Development & Entrepreneurship), Guwahati

As per MSE-CDP guidelines.

(b.) Fund receiving Agency

--

(c.) Implementation Period 12 months 24 Months from date of final approval as per MSE-CDP.

(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations

Submitted Received

(e.) Comments of Technical Division

Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 62nd

meeting held on 05.11.18, recommended the proposal for placing before Steering Committee for in-principle approval.

(f.) Approval of Technical Committee (g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:

-- --

(h.) Working capital (In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)

-- --

Page 240: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

234

5. Financial Analysis of CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(a.) BEP 54.20 %

As per MSE-CDP guidelines.

(b.) IRR, Payback period 21.56% after tax. 30.73% before tax. 3 years 6 months

(c.) DSCR N/A (d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)

28.20% after tax 39.76 % before tax

(e.) NPV Positive (f.) DER N/A (g.) Sensitivity Analysis Yes, the figures are positive as required

by guidelines a) IRR- 30.73% b) NPV - Positive c)Breakeven Point – 54.20 %

(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State

Approved CFC Nil. --

6. Proposed project cost:

(Rs. in lakh)

7. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA

As per MSE-CDP

(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 149.37 142.38

(ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Meghalaya 18.90 18.16

(iii) SPV contribution 21.10 21.10

Total 189.37 181.64

* 78.38% of eligible project cost i.e. Rs. 181.64 lakh.

8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)

(Rs in lakh) S. No. Description No. Power

requirement (HP/KW)

Cost

A Main Equipments 1. Cooking system capacity: 1000 kg raw cashew /

Batch Steam cooker with steam generator wood fire complete set valves, gauges, meter, chimney and necessary fittings.

1 1.85

2. Cashew Shell Cutting Machine – (four cutter) capacity 40-50 KG/HR Gear Motor Power – 1 HP phase – Three. Number of cutter – 4 nos. All parts in

10 8 13.50

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA

As per MSE-CDP/ Recommended by

SIDBI (i) Land & Site Development (land leased) 10.00 10.00 (ii) Building & Civil Works 30.00 30.00 (iii) Plant & Machinery 120.13 120.13 (iv) Miscellaneous Fixed Assets 5.50 5.50 (v) Preliminary Expenses 4.60 4.60 (vi) Pre-operative expenses 4.80 4.80

(vii) Provision for contingencies 6.61 6.61 (viii) Margin money for working

capital 7.73 0.00

Total 189.37 181.64

Page 241: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

235

S. No. Description No. Power requirement

(HP/KW)

Cost

SS and AI 3. Cashew Shell Cutting tools and accessories Set 3.60 4. Conveyor System – To carry the material after shell

cutting to scooping line. 1 1 2.90

5. Vibrator (Automatic Total Scooping Solution). Capacity 300 – 350 kg/hr. Vibrator (SS) – 2 nos., Shell blower – 2 nos. scooping machine – 1, nos. blower – 1 nos.

1 4 3.80

6. Electrical Oven – To dry the kernels of 500 kegs at 55-60º C in 5 to 6 hrs. No. of Trays : 100 nos. Tray size : 32” x 16” x 1¼”

1 15 5.80

7. Humidifier with extra trays and trolleys 1 set 2 2.10 8. Cashew Nut Peeling Machine 1 1 1.85 9. Air Compressor 1 12 3.20 10. Kernel Seperator 1 - 0.80 11. Finished Cashew Grader 1 - 1.35 12 Pieces Grading Machine 1 1 0.75 13. Brocks vacuum packing machine 1 1 2.50 14. Cutting Table 1 0.10 15. Grading Table 7 - 0.85 16. Moisture Meter 1 0.05 Sub Total - - 45.00 B Support Service Water Supply system 1 set 10.00 Fire Prevention System 1 set 6.00 Pollution Control System 1 set 7.36 Captive D. G. Set, Transformer and other electricals 1 set 14.00 Sub Total 37.36 Extra cost for P&F, GST, Insurance etc. 19.77 Power connection 18.00 Grand Total 120.13

9. Observations:

(A) Following document is required to be submitted prior to issue of final approval:

(i) Registered land document in the name of SPV (if land is on lease basis, registered lease

deed for a minimum period of 30 years is required).

(B) As recommended by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC), a clause would be

added in the Sanction Order “In case of any deviation from the agreed principles of

utilization and denial of fair access to the eligible stakeholders, assets created would be

handed over to another SPV through a transparent procedure for smooth and effective

operationalization of the facilities”.

10. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of Common Facility

Centre (CFC) in Cashew Nut Processing Cluster, Selsella, West Garo Hills, Meghalaya at a total

project cost of Rs. 181.64 lakh with GoI grant of Rs. 142.38 lakh, State Government‟s

contribution of Rs. 18.16 lakh and SPV‟s contribution of Rs. 21.10 lakh.

*******

Page 242: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

236

Agenda No.50.4.18: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate at

Focal Point, Pathankot, Punjab.

Background

(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 48th

SCM held on 12.11.18,

subject to submission of the requisite documents prior to final approval.

(ii) Vide letter dated 15.02.19, Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation (PSIEC)

Ltd., Chandigarh submitted the following documents and requested to consider the

proposal for final approval:

Documents required Status

(i) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Received. (ii) Copy of approved layout plan signed by Competent

Authority Received.

(iii) Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency

Undertaking from PSIEC that land is in possession of PSIEC, Notification of land from Government of Punjab and Jamabandi in English have been received in this regard.

(iv) Details of Industries operating in the Industrial Estate.

Received.

(v) PSIEC, Chandigarh should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Punjab/ PSIEC, Chandigarh

As per SIDBI appraisal report, road will be laid with cement concrete.

(vi) MSME-DI, Ludhiana should undertake visit to proposed ID Project along with representative of Government of Punjab (GM, DIC), Industries Associations and submit a Report justifying up-gradation in view of limited occupancy. The reason for low occupancy should also be reported.

Report submitted by MSME-DI, Ludhiana justifying upgradation in view of limited occupancy.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Pre-registration Information

Name of Organization : Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation

State : Punjab

District : Pathankot

Industrial Estate : Upgradation of Industrial Focal Point Pathankot

2. Basic Information about Proposal:

Particulars Description

Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan

Yes

Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre)

399.46 acres

Area to be developed (acre) 399.46 acres Number and sizes of plots to be developed

370 plots with 16 units (out of which more than 50% units are micro)

Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in Following two projects have been completed

Page 243: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

237

Particulars Description same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up etc.

successfully: New Dhanchala of Jhans, Distt. Hoshiarpur and New Malaout Distt. Muktsar. In both the cases, PSIEC was the Implementing Agency.

Performance of ID projects in State Satisfactory

3. Details about proposal:

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)

Remarks

Implementing Agency (IA) Punjab Small Industries and Export Corporation (a Government of Punjab undertaking)

As per MSE-CDP guidelines

Track Record of the IA Satisfactory -- Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report

Submitted Received

Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)

The Focal Point, Pathankot is located close to NH-44. Industrial units located in focal point are using ground water for their water requirements. Electricity is available through connection from Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd (PSPCL). The existing roads were developed by PSIEC at the time of allotment of plots. Amenities such as administrative office, banking facilities and public toilets are also available. The workers are from the surrounding rural and urban areas.

--

Whether land in possession is in the name of IA with Clear Title

Punjab Small Scale Industries & Export Corporation Ltd. (PSIEC) was the original owner of the land. When the focal point Pathankot was developed, the entire land was allotted to the unit holders present in the focal point. PSIEC is still responsible for operation and maintenance of focal point.

Undertaking from PSIEC that land is in possession of PSIEC received.

Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)

Project is about upgradation of Industrial Focal Point

Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been constituted

Yes Constituted

Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost

Mentioned in Cover letter (Signed by MD)

Received

Basis of elements of project Cost The cost and specifications have been given in the DPR. The cost estimates have been signed by the Executive Engineer and Sub-Divisional Engineer of PSIEC.

--

Tangible Outcomes of the project Better roads will improve connectivity/ accessibility to Industrial Focal Point.

Proper usage of water will have

--

Page 244: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

238

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)

Remarks

a positive impact on the environment and thus improve the access to water supply.

With the upgradation of basic infrastructure, employment opportunities (direct & indirect) will increase.

The increase in manufacturing activity in the region will further result in ignition of support services, thereby leading to the overall development in the region.

Increased investments due to development of the infrastructure will also improve the occupancy of Focal Point.

Justification of the proposal The focal point was developed in 1990s with all infrastructure facilities required for upgradation. However, with time basic infrastructures in the focal point has been deteriorated and require upgradation. The proposal will cater to the basic need of maintenance of road, drainage system, power, administrative and other services complex etc. Further, due to deteriorated infrastructure, industries in the focal point are bearing wear and tear cost. Transport companies are also charging higher tariffs in return which are increasing the overall production cost. Currently, there are only 16 units in Industrial Focal Point, Pathankot due to deteriorated condition of the focal point. Upgradation of Industrial focal Point will help in attracting the more and more investors/unit holders to establish their units.

--

4. Proposed Project Cost:

(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed

by IA As per MSE-CDP / Recommended

by SIDBI (i) Cost of Land filling/leveling including boundary

wall and fencing 101.94 100.00

(ii) Cost of laying roads 201.14 200.00 (iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 9.46 9.46 (iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and

pump houses 109.98 109.98

(v) Water harvesting 8.48 8.48 (vi) Drainage 59.96 59.96 (vii) Power (Sub-station, Distribution Network,

including Street light etc.) Generation of Non-Conventional Energy

207.25 207.25

(viii) Administrative and Other Services Complex 20.00 20.00

Page 245: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

239

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA

As per MSE-CDP / Recommended

by SIDBI (ix) Telecom/Cyber/Documentation centre 20.00 20.00 (x) Conference Hall/Exhibition centre 30.00 30.00 (xi) Bank/Post office 20.00 20.00 (xii) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets 26.22 26.22 (xiii) First aid centre, Creche Canteen facilities 20.00 20.00 (xiv) Effluent Treatment Facilities (Cost of

improvement of existing STP) 150.00 80.00

(xv) Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 20.00 20.00 (xvi) Others (Sanitary convenience ) 10.25 10.00 Total 1014.68 941.35

5. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA As per MSE-CDP

(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 753.08 753.08* (ii) Contribution from PSIEC 261.60 261.60

Total 1014.68 1014.68

*SIDBI recommended GoI grant of Rs. 753.08 lakh as 80% of total eligible Project cost of

Rs.941.35 lakh.

6. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate

at Focal Point, Pathankot, Punjab at a total project cost of Rs. 1014.68 lakh with GoI assistance

of Rs. 753.08 lakh and contribution from PSIEC of Rs. 261.60 lakh.

********

Page 246: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

240

Agenda No.50.4.19: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate at

Focal Point, Goindwal Sahib, District Tarn Taran, Punjab.

Background

(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 48th

SCM held on 12.11.18

subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.

(ii) Vide letter dated 15.02.19, Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation (PSIEC)

Ltd., Chandigarh submitted the following documents and requested to consider the

proposal for final approval.

Documents required Status (i) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Received (ii) Copy of approved layout plan signed by

Competent Authority. Received

(iii) Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency

Undertaking from PSIEC that land is in possession of PSIEC, Notification of land from Government of Punjab and Jamabandi in English have been received in this regard.

(iv) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% of units in the Industrial Estate are micro.

Received

(v) Details of Industries operating in the Industrial Estate.

Received

(vi) PSIEC, Chandigarh should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Punjab/ PSIEC, Chandigarh.

Request received from PSIEC to consider laying of road with bituminous in place of Cement Concrete.

(vii) MSME-DI, Ludhiana should undertake visit to proposed ID Project along with representative of Government of Punjab (GM, DIC), Industries Associations and submit a Report justifying up-gradation in view of limited occupancy. The reason for low occupancy should also be reported.

Report submitted by MSME-DI, Ludhiana justifying upgradation in view of limited occupancy.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Pre-registration Information

Name of Organization : Punjab Small Industries & Export

Corporation

State : Punjab

District : Tarn Taran

Industrial Estate : Upgradation of Focal Point Goindwal Sahib

Page 247: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

241

2. Basic Information about Proposal:

Particulars Description

Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan

Yes

Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre)

907.00 acres (Phase 1- 473 acres and Phase 2- 434 acres)

Area to be developed (acre) 825.00 acres

Number and sizes of plots to be developed

56 units (out of which 47 units are micro)

Implementing Period 24 months

Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up etc.

N/A

Performance of ID projects in State

Projects which were successfully completed under IID scheme are New Dhanchala of Jhans, Distt. Hoshiarpur, New Malaout Distt. Muktsar. In both the cases PSIEC was the implementing agency.

3. Details about proposal:

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)

Remarks

Implementing Agency (IA) Punjab Small Industries and Export Corporation (Government of Punjab undertaking)

As per MSE-CDP guidelines

Track Record of the IA Satisfactory --

Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.

SIDBI report submitted Received

Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)

Industrial area is located close to NH-54. Goindwal railway station is around 4 km away from Industrial Focal Point. Being an existing industrial area, basic infrastructure facilities such as roads, power, water supply and telecom facilities are available.

--

Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title

Punjab Small Scale Industries & Export Corporation Ltd. (PSIEC) was the original owner of the land. When the focal point Goindwal was developed, the entire land was allotted to the unit holders present in the focal point. PSIEC is still responsible for operation and maintenance of focal point.

Received

Whether Zoning regulations and State Government i.e. PSIEC had

Page 248: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

242

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)

Remarks

non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)

procured the land before the industrial area was developed.

Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted

Yes, the Committee has been formed which includes officials from PSIEC, Industry Department, MSME-DI, Ludhiana

Constituted

Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost

The contribution will be made as per the means of finance mentioned in the report. State Govt. along with the other stakeholders will take care for any escalation in the project cost. Confirmation from PSIEC is mentioned in the covering letter.

Received

Basis of elements of project Cost PSIEC has informed that all the rates are in line with Punjab Common Schedule of Rates. The cost estimates have been signed by the Executive Engineer and Sub-Divisional Engineer of PSIEC.

--

Tangible Outcomes of the project Up-gradation of Industrial area will provide support to industries present in the industrial area in terms of better connectivity, minimum wear and tear, better transport facilities, proper drainage system that will further lead to development of Industrial Estate.

--

Justification of the Proposal The focal point was developed in late 1980s with all infrastructure facilities required for upgradation. However, with time basic infrastructures in the focal point has been deteriorated and require upgradation. The proposal will cater to the basic need of maintenance of road, drainage system, power, administrative and other services complex etc.

--

4. Proposed Project Cost:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA

As per MSE-CDP / Recommended by

SIDBI

(i) Cost of land filling/leveling including boundary wall and fencing

100.00 100.00

(ii) Cost of laying roads 200.00 200.00

(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 9.87 9.87

Page 249: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

243

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA

As per MSE-CDP / Recommended by

SIDBI

(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses

107.80 107.80

(v) Water harvesting 12.96 10.00

(vi) Drainage 59.11 59.11

(vii) Power (Sub-station and Distribution Network, including street lighting etc. Generation of Non-conventional energy)

225.00 225.00

(viii) Others (Sanitary Conveniences etc.) 10.25 10.00

(ix) Telecommunication/Cyber/Documentation centre

20.00 20.00

(x) Effluent Treatment Facilities 150.00 80.00

(xi) Contingencies & Pre operative expenses 17.90 17.90

Total 912.89 839.68

5. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Proposed

per IA

As per MSE-CDP /

Recommended by

SIDBI

(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 671.74 671.74*

(ii) Contribution from PSIEC 241.15 241.15

Total 912.89 912.89

*SIDBI recommended GoI grant of Rs. 671.74 lakh as 80% of total eligible Project cost of Rs.

839.68 lakh.

6. Observations:

Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:

(i) Based on the request made by PSIEC, Competent Authority has given consent for

laying of Bituminous roads in place of Cement Concrete.

(ii) As per the letter submitted by GM, DIC, Goindwal, there are 60 operational units in

the Industrial Focal Point, out of which, more than 50% are micro units, whereas, as

per SIDBI appraisal report, 56 units are operating in the Industrial Estate.

(iii) Clarification regarding no. of operational units in the Industrial Estate including

micro units in light of Point No. (ii).

7. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate

at Focal Point, Goindwal Sahib, District Tarn Taran, Punjab at a total project cost of Rs.912.89

lakh with GoI assistance of Rs.671.74 lakh and contribution from PSIEC of Rs.241.15 lakh.

********

Page 250: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

244

Agenda No.50.4.20: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate at

Focal Point, Amritsar, Punjab.

Background

(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 48th

SCM held on 12.11.18

subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.

(ii) Vide letter dated 05.02.19 & 30.05.19, Punjab Small Industries & Export

Corporation (PSIEC) Ltd., Chandigarh submitted the following documents and

requested to consider the proposal for final approval.

Documents required Status

(i) SIDBI Appraisal Report Fresh SIDBI appraisal report

has been received after

incorporating the revised (due

to cement concrete)

component-wise project cost

and revised means of finance.

(ii) Registered land documents in the name of

Implementing Agency

Undertaking from PSIEC that

land is in possession of PSIEC,

Notification of land from

Government of Punjab and

Jamabandi in English have been

received in this regard.

(iii) Copy of approved layout plan signed by

Competent Authority.

Received

(iv) Certificate from State Government that more

than 50% of units in the Industrial Estate are

micro.

Received

(v) Details of Industries operating in the Industrial

Estate.

Received

(vi) PSIEC, Chandigarh should consider laying of

roads with Cement Concrete in place of

Bituminous and proper drainages built in a

professional manner to serve the purpose for

relatively longer period of time. The additional

cost on this account shall be borne by the

Government of Punjab/ PSIEC, Chandigarh

Undertaking received from

PSIEC to consider laying of

road with Cement Concrete in

place of bituminous.

(vii) MSME-DI, Ludhiana should undertake visit to

proposed ID Project along with representative of

Government of Punjab (GM, DIC), Industries

Associations and submit a Report justifying up-

gradation in view of limited occupancy. The

reason for low occupancy should also be

reported.

Report submitted by MSME-

DI, Ludhiana justifying

upgradation in view of limited

occupancy.

Page 251: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

245

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Pre-registration Information

Name of Organization : Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation

State : Punjab

District : Amritsar

Industrial Estate : Upgradation of Focal Point Amritsar

2. Basic Information about Proposal:

Particulars Description

Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan

Yes

Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre)

184.04 acres

Area to be developed (acre) 184.04 acres

Number and sizes of plots to be developed

460 plots with 115 operational units (out of which most of the units are micro).

Implementing Period 24 months

Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up etc.

N/A

Performance of ID projects in State

Projects which were successfully completed under IID scheme are New Dhanchala of Jhans, Distt. Hoshiarpur, New Malaout Distt. Muktsar. In both the cases PSIEC was the implementing agency.

3. Details about proposal:

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)

Remarks

Implementing Agency (IA) Punjab Small Industries and Export Corporation (a Government of Punjab undertaking)

As per MSE-CDP guidelines

Track Record of the IA Satisfactory --

Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report

Submitted Received

Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)

The Focal Point, Amritsar is located close to NH-1 and is around 12 km from Amritsar Railway Station. Being an existing industrial area, basic infrastructure facilities viz. roads, power, water supply and telecom

--

Page 252: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

246

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)

Remarks

facilities are available.

Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title

Punjab Small Scale Industries & Export Corporation Ltd. (PSIEC) was the original owner of the land. When the focal point Amritsar was developed, the entire land was allotted to the unit holders present in the focal point. PSIEC is still responsible for operation and maintenance of focal point.

Undertaking from PSIEC that land is in possession of PSIEC received.

Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)

Project is about upgradation of Industrial Focal Point

Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been constituted

Yes Constituted

Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost

Mentioned in Cover letter (Signed by MD)

Received

Basis of elements of project Cost The cost and specifications have been given in the DPR. The cost estimates have been signed by the Executive Engineer and Sub-Divisional Engineer of PSIEC.

--

Tangible Outcomes of the project Better roads will improve connectivity/ accessibility to Industrial Focal Point.

Proper usage of water will have a positive impact on the environment and thus improve the access to water supply.

With the upgradation of basic infrastructure, employment opportunities (direct & indirect) will increase.

The increase in manufacturing activity in the region will further result in ignition of support services, thereby leading to the overall development in the region.

Increased investments due to development of the infrastructure will also improve the occupancy of Focal Point.

--

Justification of the proposal The focal point was developed during late 2002 with all infrastructure facilities required for upgradation. However, with time basic infrastructures in the

--

Page 253: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

247

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)

Remarks

focal point has been deteriorated and require upgradation. The proposal will cater to the basic need of maintenance of road, drainage system, power, administrative and other services complex etc. Upgradation of Industrial focal Point will help in attracting the more and more investors/unit holders to establish their units.

4. Proposed Project Cost:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA Recommended

by SIDBI /

As per MSE-

CDP

Approved

project cost

Revised

Project

cost

(i) Cost of land filling/leveling including

boundary wall and fencing:

108.88 108.88 100.00

(ii) Cost of laying roads 205.03 489.40 200.00

(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 9.86 9.86 9.86

(iv) Water supply including overhead

tanks, and pump houses

101.61 101.61 101.61

(v) Water harvesting 12.96 12.96 10.00

(vi) Drainage 58.31 58.31 58.31

(vii) Power distribution, Street light

arrangements, etc.

231.57 231.47 231.47

(viii) Administrative and Other Services

Complex

46.22 46.22 20.00

(ix) Telecom/Cyber/Documentation

centre

20.00 20.00 20.00

(x) Conference Hall/Exhibition centre 30.00 30.00 30.00

(xi) Bank/Post office 20.00 20.00 20.00

(xii) First aid centre, Creche Canteen 20.00 20.00 20.00

(xiii) Effluent Treatment Facilities 150.00 150.00 80.00

(xiv) Contingencies & Pre operative

expenses

14.81 20.00 20.00

(xv) Other (Sanitary Convenience ) 10.15 10.25 10.00

Total 1039.40 1328.96 931.25

Page 254: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

248

5. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Approved

Amount

Revised

Amount

As per MSE-

CDP

(i) GoI grant under MSE-CDP 740.81* 745.00 745.00**

(ii) Contribution from PSIEC 298.59 583.96 583.96

Total 1039.40 1328.96 1328.96

* 80% of eligible project cost i.e. Rs. 926.06 lakh.

** 80% of eligible project cost i.e. Rs. 931.25 lakh.

6. Observations: (i) As per the letter submitted by GM, DIC, Amritsar, there are 137 nos. of units

working in the Industrial Focal Point whereas as per SIDBI report, there are 115

operational units in the Industrial Estate.

(ii) On examination of submitted documents and revised DPR, it is noted that PSIEC

have made certain changes to the costs of the components due to which approved

project cost has also been revised by PSIEC from Rs. 1039.40 lakhs to Rs. 1328.96

lakhs.

(iii) Clarification regarding the no. of units operating in the Industrial Estate including

micro units is required to be submitted.

7. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate

at Focal Point, Amritsar, Punjab at a total project cost of Rs. 1328.96 lakh with GoI assistance of

Rs. 745.00 lakh and contribution from PSIEC of Rs. 583.96 lakh.

*****

Page 255: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

249

Agenda No.50.4.21: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate

at Focal Point, Chanalon, District SAS Nagar, Punjab.

Background

(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 48th

SCM held on 12.11.18

subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.

(ii) Vide letter dated 15.02.19 & 15.05.19, Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation

(PSIEC) Ltd., Chandigarh submitted the following documents and requested to

consider the proposal for final approval.

Documents required Status

(i) SIDBI Appraisal Report Received

(ii) Registered land documents in the name of

Implementing Agency

Undertaking from PSIEC that land is in

possession of PSIEC, Notification of

land from Government of Punjab and

Jamabandi in English have been

received in this regard.

(iii) Certificate from State Government that more

than 50% of units in the Industrial Estate are

micro.

Received

(iv) Details of Industries operating in the

Industrial Estate.

Received

(v) PSIEC, Chandigarh should consider laying

of roads with Cement Concrete in place of

Bituminous and proper drainages built in a

professional manner to serve the purpose for

relatively longer period of time. The

additional cost on this account shall be borne

by the Government of Punjab/ PSIEC,

Chandigarh

Undertaking received from PSIEC to

consider laying of road with Cement

Concrete in place of bituminous.

(vi) MSME-DI, Ludhiana should undertake visit

to proposed ID Project along with

representative of Government of Punjab

(GM, DIC), Industries Associations and

submit a Report justifying up-gradation in

view of limited occupancy. The reason for

low occupancy should also be reported.

Report submitted by MSME-DI,

Ludhiana justifying upgradation in view

of limited occupancy.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Pre-registration Information

Name of Organization : Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation

State : Punjab

District : S.A.S NAGAR

Industrial Estate : Upgradation of Industrial Focal Point Chanalon

Page 256: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

250

2. Basic Information about Proposal:

Particulars Description

Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan

Yes

Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre)

150.58 acres

Area to be developed (acre) 150.58 acres

Number and sizes of plots developed

338 plots with 152 operational units (out of which 101 units are micro).

Implementing Period 24 months

Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up etc.

N/A

Performance of ID projects in State

Projects which were successfully completed under IID scheme are New Dhanchala of Jhans, Distt. Hoshiarpur, New Malaout Distt. Muktsar. In both the cases PSIEC was the implementing agency.

3. Details about proposal:

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)

Remarks

Implementing Agency (IA) Punjab Small Industries and Export Corporation (a Government of Punjab undertaking)

As per MSE-CDP guidelines

Track Record of the IA Satisfactory -- Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report

Submitted Received

Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)

The Focal Point, Chanalon is located besides NH-21. Being an existing industrial area, basic infrastructure facilities viz. roads, power, water supply and telecom facilities are available.

--

Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title

Punjab Small Scale Industries & Export Corporation Ltd. (PSIEC) was the original owner of the land. When the focal point Chanalon was developed, the entire land was allotted to the unit holders present in the focal point. PSIEC is still responsible for operation and maintenance of focal point.

Undertaking from PSIEC that land is in possession of PSIEC received.

Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)

Project is about upgradation of Industrial Focal Point

Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been constituted

Yes Constituted

Page 257: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

251

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)

Remarks

Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost

Mentioned in Cover letter (Signed by MD)

Received

Basis of elements of project Cost The cost and specifications have been given in the DPR. The cost estimates have been signed by the Executive Engineer and Sub-Divisional Engineer of PSIEC.

--

Tangible Outcomes of the project Better roads will improve connectivity/ accessibility to Industrial Focal Point.

Proper usage of water will have a positive impact on the environment and thus improve the access to water supply.

With the upgradation of basic infrastructure, employment opportunities (direct & indirect) will increase.

The increase in manufacturing activity in the region will further result in ignition of support services, thereby leading to the overall development in the region.

Increased investments due to development of the infrastructure will also improve the occupancy of Focal Point.

--

Justification of the proposal The focal point was developed during 1986 with all infrastructure facilities required for upgradation. However, with time basic infrastructures in the focal point has been deteriorated and require upgradation. The proposal will cater to the basic need of maintenance of road, drainage system, power, administrative and other services complex etc. Upgradation of Industrial focal Point will help in attracting the more and more investors/unit holders to establish their units.

--

4. Proposed Project Cost:

(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA As per MSE-

CDP Approved project cost

Revised Project cost

(i) Cost of land filling/leveling including boundary wall and fencing

103.87 103.87 100.00

(ii) Cost of laying roads 250.73 480.62 200.00 (iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 8.00 8.00 8.00 (iv) Water supply including overhead

tanks, and pump houses 115.76 115.76 110.00

Page 258: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

252

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA As per MSE-CDP Approved

project cost Revised

Project cost (v) Water harvesting 8.00 8.00 8.00 (vi) Drainage 56.00 56.00 56.00 (vii) Power (Sub-station and distribution

network) 99.92 99.92 99.92

(viii) Other (Sanitary Conveniences etc.) 8.00 8.00 8.00 (ix) Administrative Office Building 21.52 21.52 20.00 (x) Cyber Centre/Documentation centre/

Telecommunication 20.00 20.00 20.00

(xi) Conference Hall/Exhibition centre 20.00 20.00 20.00 (xii) Bank/Post office 20.00 20.00 20.00 (xiii) First aid centre, Creche Canteen

facilities 19.89 19.89 19.89

(xiv) Effluent Treatment Facilities / Sewerage Treatment Plant

94.00 94.00 80.00

(xv) Contingencies & Pre operative expenses

16.71 21.51 20.00

Total 862.40 1097.09 789.81

5. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Approved

Amount

Revised

Amount

As per MSE-

CDP

(i) GoI grant under MSE-CDP 629.22* 631.85** 631.85

(ii) Contribution from PSIEC 233.18 465.24 465.24

Total 862.40 1097.09 1097.09

* 80% of eligible project cost i.e. Rs. 786.52 lakh.

** 80% of eligible project cost i.e. Rs. 789.81 lakh.

6. Observations:

(i) As per letter submitted by DIC, SAS Nagar, there are 150 operational units in the

Industrial Estate, whereas, as per SIDBI appraisal report, there are 152 operational

units in the Industrial Estate.

(ii) On examination of submitted documents and revised DPR, it is noted that PSIEC has

the costs of certain components, due to which the total approved project cost has been

revised by PSIEC from Rs. 862.40 lakhs to Rs. 1097.09 lakhs.

(iii) Clarification regarding the no. of units operating in the Industrial Estate including

micro units is required to be submitted.

7. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate

at Focal Point, Chanalon, District SAS Nagar, Punjab at a total project cost of Rs.1097.09 lakh

with GoI assistance of Rs.631.85 lakh and contribution from PSIEC of Rs.465.24 lakh.

******

Page 259: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

253

Agenda No.50.4.22: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate at

Focal Point, Batala, Gurdaspur, Punjab.

Background

(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during 49th

SCM held on 27.02.19,

subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.

(ii) Vide letter dated 30.05.19; Punjab Small Industries and Export Corporation

(PSIEC) Ltd., Chandigarh submitted the following documents and requested to

consider the proposal for final approval:

Documents required Status (i) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Received (ii) Registered land documents with clear title, in

the name of Implementing Agency Undertaking from PSIEC that land is in possession of PSIEC.

(iii) Status of completed ID projects in the State as per format provided and details of Industries operating in the Industrial Estate.

Received

(iv) PSIEC, Chandigarh should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Punjab/ PSIEC, Chandigarh

As per SIBDI, the internal roads will be laid with concrete, laying of roads have been designed as per standards stipulated in MoRTH specifications (4

th

revision and guidelines of IRC 37-2001).

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Pre-registration Information

Name of Organization : Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation

State : Punjab

District : Gurdaspur

Industrial Estate : Batala

2. Basic Information about Proposal:

Particulars Description

Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan

Yes

Total Area of Industrial Estate/ Area (acre)

104.00 acres

Area to be developed (acre) 66.09 acres Number and sizes of plots to be developed

154 plots with 83 operational units (out of which 62 units are micro and rest 21 units are small units). Details of plots: Category of plots No. of

plots Area

(in acres) 4.0 acres and above plots 2 10.85 1.0 acres and above plots 10 12.20 ½ acres plots 46 25.18 ¼ acres plots 80 15.98 500 sq. yards plots 16 01.66

Total 154 65.87

Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.

Nil

Performance of ID projects in State : Satisfactory

Page 260: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

254

3. Details about proposal:

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency

(IA) Remarks

Implementing Agency (IA): Punjab Small Industries and Export Corporation (a Government of Punjab undertaking)

As per MSE-CDP guidelines

Track Record of the IA Satisfactory -- Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.

Submitted Received

Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)

The Focal Point, Batala is located on Aliwal- Batala road, close to NH-54 and Batala – Amritsar road and is around 2 km away from Batala Railway Station. Being an existing industrial area, basic infrastructure facilities viz. roads, power, water supply and telecom facilities are available.

--

Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title

Punjab Small Scale Industries & Export Corporation Ltd. (PSIEC) was the original owner of the land. When the focal point Batala was developed, the entire land was allotted to the unit holders present in the focal point. PSIEC is still responsible for operation and maintenance of focal point.

Undertaking from PSIEC that land is in possession of PSIEC received.

Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with):

Project is about upgradation of Industrial Focal Point

Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted :

Yes Constituted

Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost :

Mentioned in Cover letter (Signed by MD)

Received

Basis of elements of project Cost :

The cost and specifications have been given in the DPR. The cost estimates have been signed by the Executive Engineer and Sub-Divisional Engineer of PSIEC.

--

Tangible Outcomes of the project

Better roads will improve connectivity/ accessibility to Industrial Focal Point.

Proper usage of water will have a positive impact on the environment and thus improve the access to water supply.

With the upgradation of basic infrastructure, employment opportunities (direct & indirect) will increase.

The increase in manufacturing activity in the region will further

--

Page 261: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

255

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)

Remarks

result in ignition of support services, thereby leading to the overall development in the region.

Increased investments due to development of the infrastructure will also improve the occupancy of Focal Point.

Justification of the Proposal The focal point was developed during late 1970s with all infrastructure facilities required for upgradation. However, with time basic infrastructures in the focal point has been deteriorated and require upgradation. The proposal will cater to the basic need of maintenance of road, drainage system, power, administrative and other services complex etc. Upgradation of Industrial focal Point will help in attracting the more and more investors/unit holders to establish their units.

--

4. Proposed Project Cost:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA Recommended by SIDBI /

As per MSE-CDP

Approved project

cost

Revised Project cost

(i) Cost of land filling / leveling including boundary wall/ fencing

47.76 47.76 47.76

(ii) Cost of laying roads 252.45 252.45 200.00

(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry

10.84 10.84 10.00

(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks and pump houses

94.18 94.18 94.18

(v) Water harvesting 6.48 6.48 6.48

(vi) Drainage 34.90 34.90 34.90

(vii) Power (Sub-station and distribution network, including street lighting etc., Generation of non-conventional energy)

218.27 229.00 229.00

(viii) Other (Sanitary conveniences etc.)

10.25 10.25 10.00

(ix) Administrative office building 20.00 20.00 20.00

(x) Telecommunication/Cyber Centre/ Documentation Centre

19.42 0.00 0.00

(xi) Conference Hall/Exhibition Centre

29.30 29.30 29.30

(xii) Bank/Post Office 28.65 0.00 0.00

Page 262: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

256

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA Recommended by SIDBI /

As per MSE-CDP

Approved project

cost

Revised Project cost

(xiii) Raw material storage facility, marketing outlets

18.85 0.00 0.00

(xiv) First Aid centre, crèche, canteen facilities

20.00 0.00 0.00

(xv) Contingencies and pre-operative expenses

16.23 16.30 16.30

(xvi) Effluent Treatment Facilities 0.00 80.00 80.00

Total 827.58 831.46 777.92

5. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Approved

Amount

Revised

Amount

As per MSE-

CDP

(i) GoI grant under MSE-CDP 612.31* 622.34** 622.34

(ii) Contribution from PSIEC 215.27 209.12 209.12

Total 827.58 831.46 831.46

* 80% of eligible project cost i.e. Rs. 765.39 lakh.

** 80% of eligible project cost i.e. Rs. 777.92 lakh.

6. Observations:

(i) PSIEC has requested to adjust the funds for the component “Cost of laying roads”

from the savings from the other component “Cost of land filling/leveling including

boundary wall/fencing”. (As per the shcmee guidelines this is not permissible).

(ii) PSIEC has revised the costs of the components due to which approved project cost

has changed from Rs.827.58 lakhs to Rs. 831.46 lakhs.

7. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate

at Focal Point, Batala, Gurdaspur, Punjab at a total project cost of Rs. 831.46 lakh with GoI

assistance of Rs. 622.34 lakh and contribution from PSIEC of Rs. 209.12 lakh.

****

Page 263: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

257

Agenda No.50.4.23: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate at

Focal Point, District Hoshiarpur, Punjab.

Background

(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during 49th

SCM held on 27.02.19,

subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.

(ii) Vide letter dated 30.05.19, Punjab Small Industries and Export Corporation (PSIEC)

Ltd., Chandigarh submitted the following documents and requested to consider the

proposal for final approval.

Documents required Status

(i) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Received (ii) Registered land documents with clear title, in

the name of Implementing Agency Undertaking from PSIEC that land is in possession of PSIEC, Notification of land from Government of Punjab and Jamabandi in English have been received in this regard.

(iii) Status of completed ID projects in the State as per format provided and details of Industries operating in the Industrial Estate.

Received

(iv) PSIEC, Chandigarh should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Punjab/ PSIEC, Chandigarh

Request received from PSIEC to consider laying of road with bituminous in place of Cement Concrete.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Pre-registration Information

Name of Organization : Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation

State : Punjab

District : Hoshiarpur

Industrial Estate : Focal Point Hoshiarpur

2. Basic Information about Proposal:

Particulars Description

Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan

Yes

Total Area of Industrial Estate/ Area (acre)

82 acres

Area to be developed (acre) 82 acres Number and sizes of plots to be developed

127 plots with 72 units (out of which more than 50% units are micro).

Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.

New Dhanchala of Jhans, Distt. Hoshiarpur

Performance of ID projects in State Satisfactory

Page 264: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

258

3. Details about proposal:

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency

(IA) Remarks

Implementing Agency (IA): Punjab Small Industries and Export Corporation (Government of Punjab undertaking)

As per MSE-CDP guidelines

Track Record of the IA Satisfactory -- Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.

Report submitted Received

Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)

The Focal Point, Hoshiarpur is located close to NH-103A. Being an existing industrial area, basic infrastructure facilities viz. roads, power, water supply and telecom facilities are available.

--

Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title

Punjab Small Scale Industries & Export Corporation Ltd. (PSIEC) was the original owner of the land. When the focal point Hoshiarpur was developed, the entire land was allotted to the unit holders present in the focal point. PSIEC is still responsible for operation and maintenance of focal point.

Undertaking from PSIEC that land is in possession of PSIEC received.

Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with):

Project is about upgradation of Industrial Focal Point

Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted :

Yes, constituted Constituted

Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost :

Mentioned in Cover letter (Signed by MD)

Received

Basis of elements of project Cost :

The cost and specifications have been given in the DPR. The cost estimates have been signed by the Executive Engineer and Sub-Divisional Engineer of PSIEC.

--

Tangible Outcomes of the project

Better roads will improve connectivity/ accessibility to Industrial Focal Point.

Proper usage of water will have a positive impact on the environment and thus improve the access to water supply.

With the upgradation of basic infrastructure, employment opportunities (direct & indirect) will increase.

The increase in manufacturing activity in the region will further result in ignition of support services, thereby leading to the overall development in the region.

--

Page 265: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

259

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)

Remarks

Increased investments due to development of the infrastructure will also improve the occupancy of Focal Point.

Justification of the Proposal The focal point was developed during late 1970s with all infrastructure facilities required for upgradation. However, with time basic infrastructures in the focal point has been deteriorated and require upgradation. The proposal will cater to the basic need of maintenance of road, drainage system, power, administrative and other services complex etc. Upgradation of Industrial focal Point will help in attracting the more and more investors/unit holders to establish their units.

--

4. Proposed Project Cost:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA Recommended by SIDBI /

As per MSE-CDP Approved project cost

Revised Project cost

(i) Cost of land filling / leveling including boundary wall/ fencing

16.06 16.06

16.06

(ii) Cost of laying roads 237.77 237.77 200.00

(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry

13.02 13.02 10.00

(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks and pump houses

56.51 56.51 56.51

(v) Water harvesting 0.00 0.00 0.00

(vi) Drainage 49.60 49.60 49.60

(vii) Power (Sub-station and distribution network, including street lighting etc., Generation of non-conventional energy)

200.26 220.47 220.47

(viii) Other (Sanitary conveniences etc.)

10.25 10.25 10.00

(ix) Administrative office building 0.00 0.00 0.00

(x) Telecommunication/Cyber Centre/ Documentation Centre

0.00 0.00 0.00

(xi) Conference Hall/Exhibition Centre

14.28 14.28 14.28

(xii) Bank/Post Office 0.00 0.00 0.00

(xiii) Raw material storage facility, 33.41 33.41 33.41

Page 266: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

260

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA Recommended by SIDBI /

As per MSE-CDP Approved project cost

Revised Project cost

marketing outlets

(xiv) First Aid centre, crèche, canteen facilities

0.00 0.00 0.00

(xv) Effluent Treatment Facilities 0.00 0.00 0.00

(xvi) Contingencies and pre-operative expenses

12.87 13.02 13.02

Total 644.03 664.39 623.35

5. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Approved

Amount

Revised

Amount

As per

MSE-CDP

(i) GoI grant under MSE-CDP 482.39* 498.68** 498.68

(ii) Contribution from PSIEC 161.64 165.71 165.71

Total 644.03 664.39 664.39

* 80% of eligible project cost i.e. Rs.602.99 lakh.

** 80% of eligible project cost i.e. Rs. 623.35 lakh.

6. Observations:

(i) While seeking final approval, PSIEC has requested to consider laying of roads with

bituminous in place of Cement Concrete.

(ii) PSIEC has also requested to adjust the funds for the component “Cost of laying

roads” from the savings under the component “Cost of land filling/leveling including

boundary wall/fencing”. The estimated cost of „laying of roads‟ and „land

filling/leveling including boundary wall/fencing‟ are Rs.237.77 lakh and Rs.16.06

lakh respectively. The maximum GoI grant permissible on the component „Cost of

laying roads‟ and „Cost of land filling/leveling including boundary wall/fencing‟ are

Rs. 200 lakh and Rs. 100 lakh respectively. PSIEC has requested to adjust the saving

amount of Rs. 83.94 lakh (Rs.100.00 lakhs-16.06 lakh) which will remain un-availed

from the estimated cost of „land filling/leveling including boundary wall/fencing‟.

(As per the shcmee guidelines this is not permissible). (iii) PSIEC has made changes to the costs of certain components, due to which approved

project cost has changed from Rs. 644.03 lakh to Rs. 664.39 lakh.

7. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate

at Focal Point, District Hoshiarpur, Punjab at a total project cost of Rs. 664.39 lakh with GoI

assistance of Rs. 498.68 lakh and contribution from PSIEC of Rs. 165.71 lakh.

*****

Page 267: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

261

Agenda No.50.4.24: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate at

Focal Point, Nawanshahr, Punjab.

Background

(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during 49th

SCM held on 27.02.19,

subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.

(ii) Vide letter dated 30.05.19; Punjab Small Industries and Export Corporation

(PSIEC) Ltd., Chandigarh submitted the following documents and requested to

consider the proposal for final approval:

Documents required Status

(i) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Received (ii) Registered land documents with clear title, in

the name of Implementing Agency Undertaking from PSIEC that land is in possession of PSIEC and Jamabandi in English have been received in this regard.

(iii) Status of completed ID projects in the State as per format provided and details of Industries operating in the Industrial Estate.

Received

(iv) PSIEC, Chandigarh should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Punjab/ PSIEC, Chandigarh

As per SIBDI, the internal roads will be laid with concrete, laying of roads have been designed as per standards stipulated in MoRTH specifications (4

th

revision and guidelines of IRC 37-2001).

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Pre-registration Information

Name of Organization : Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation

State : Punjab

District : Nawanshahr

Industrial Estate : Focal Point Nawanshahr

2. Basic Information about Proposal:

Particulars Description

Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan :

Yes

Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre):

50.70 acres

Area to be developed (acre) 34.73 acres

Number and sizes of plots to be developed :

116 plots with 34 operational units (out of which 28 units are micro). Details of plots: Category of plots No. of plots 1½ acres plots 1 1 acres plots 3

Page 268: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

262

¾ acres plots 5 ½ acres plots 14 3 Kanal plots 15 ¼ acres plots 26 500 sq. yards plots 52

Total 116

Implementing Period : 24 months

Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.:

Nil

Performance of ID projects in State: Satisfactory

3. Details about proposal:

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)

Remarks

Implementing Agency (IA): Punjab Small Industries and Export Corporation (a Government of Punjab undertaking)

As per MSE-CDP guidelines

Track Record of the IA Satisfactory. --

Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.

Submitted Received

Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)

The Focal Point, Nawanshahr is well connected to NH-18 & NH-103A. Nawanshahr Railway Station is present in Industrial focal point, which is 4.2 kms away. Being an existing industrial area, basic infrastructure facilities viz. roads, power, water supply and telecom facilities are available.

--

Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title

Punjab Small Scale Industries & Export Corporation Ltd. (PSIEC) was the original owner of the land. When the focal point Batala was developed, the entire land was allotted to the unit holders present in the focal point. PSIEC is still responsible for operation and maintenance of focal point.

Undertaking from PSIEC that land is in possession of PSIEC received.

Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with):

Project is about upgradation of Industrial Focal Point

--

Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted:

Yes Constituted

Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost:

Mentioned in Cover letter (Signed by MD)

Received

Page 269: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

263

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)

Remarks

Basis of elements of project Cost: The cost and specifications have been given in the DPR. The cost estimates have been signed by the Executive Engineer and Sub-Divisional Engineer of PSIEC.

--

Tangible Outcomes of the project: Better roads will improve connectivity/ accessibility to Industrial Focal Point.

Proper usage of water will have a positive impact on the environment and thus improve the access to water supply.

With the upgradation of basic infrastructure, employment opportunities (direct & indirect) will increase.

The increase in manufacturing activity in the region will further result in ignition of support services, thereby leading to the overall development in the region.

Increased investments due to development of the infrastructure will also improve the occupancy of Focal Point.

--

Justification of the Proposal: The focal point was developed during 1978 with all infrastructure facilities required for upgradation. However, with time basic infrastructures in the focal point has been deteriorated and require upgradation. The proposal will cater to the basic need of maintenance of road, drainage system, power, administrative and other services complex etc. Upgradation of Industrial focal Point will help in attracting the more and more investors/unit holders to establish their units.

--

4. Proposed Project Cost:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA Recommended by SIDBI/ As per

MSE-CDP Approved project cost

Revised Project cost

(i) Cost of land filling / leveling including boundary wall/ fencing

28.50 28.50

28.50

(ii) Cost of laying roads 205.92 205.92 200.00

(iii) Road side greenery & social 4.43 4.43 4.43

Page 270: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

264

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA Recommended by SIDBI/ As per

MSE-CDP Approved project cost

Revised Project cost

forestry

(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks and pump houses

113.34 113.34 110.00

(v) Water harvesting 0.00 0.00 0.00

(vi) Drainage 28.83 28.83 28.83

(vii) Power (Sub-station and distribution network, including street lighting etc., Generation of non-conventional energy)

170.70 193.13 193.13

(viii) Other (Sanitary conveniences etc.)

10.25 10.25 10.00

(ix) Administrative office building

0.00 0.00 0.00

(x) Telecommunication/Cyber Centre/ Documentation Centre

0.00 0.00 0.00

(xi) Conference Hall/Exhibition Centre

14.28 14.28 14.28

(xii) Bank/Post Office 0.00 0.00 0.00

(xiii) Raw material storage facility, marketing outlets

33.41 33.41 33.41

(xiv) First Aid centre, crèche, canteen facilities

0.00 0.00 0.00

(xv) Effluent Treatment Facilities

150.00 150.00 80.00

(xvi) Contingencies and pre-operative expenses

12.43 15.64 15.64

Total 772.09 797.73 718.22

5. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)

S.

No.

Particulars Approved

Amount

Revised

Amount

As per MSE-

CDP

(i) GoI grant under MSE-CDP 554.06* 574.58** 574.58

(ii) Contribution from PSIEC 218.03 223.15 223.15

Total 772.09 797.73 797.73

* 80% of eligible project cost i.e. Rs.692.58 lakh.

** 80% of eligible project cost i.e. Rs. 718.22 lakh.

Page 271: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

265

6. Observations:

(i) PSIEC has requested to adjust the funds for the component “Effluent treatment

facilities” from the savings under the component “Drainage”. The estimated cost of

„Effluent treatment facilities‟ and „Drainage‟ are Rs. 150.00 lakh and Rs. 28.83 lakh

respectively. The maximum GoI grant permissible on the component „Effluent

treatment facilities‟ and „Drainage‟ are Rs. 80.00 lakh and Rs. 60.00 lakh

respectively. PSIEC has requested to adjust the saving amount of Rs. 31.17 lakh

(Rs.60.00 lakhs-28.83 lakh) which will remain un-availed from the estimated cost of

Drainage and also requested O/o DC, MSME to provide excess amount of Rs. 70.00

lakh (150.00 lakh-80.00 lakh) of Effluent treatment facilities. (As per the shcmee

guidelines this is not permissible).

(ii) PSIEC has made certain changes to the costs of the components due to which

approved project cost has also changed from 772.09 lakhs to Rs. 797.73 lakhs.

(iii) As per letter submitted by DIC, SBS Nagar, there are 42 operational units in the

Industrial Estate, whereas, as per the details submitted by PSIEC (verified by GM,

DIC), 35 units are operating in the Industrial Estate.

(iv) In light of point No.(iii) above, clarification regarding the no. of units operating in the

Industrial Estate including micro units is required to be submitted.

7. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate

at Focal Point, Nawanshahr, Punjab at a total project cost of Rs. 797.73 lakh with GoI assistance

of Rs. 574.58 lakh and contribution from PSIEC of Rs. 223.15 lakh.

********

Page 272: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

266

Agenda No.50.4.25: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Industrial Focal

Point, Kotkapura, District Faridkot, Punjab.

Background

(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 49th

SCM held on 27.02.19,

subject to submission of the requisite documents prior to final approval.

(ii) Vide letter dated 30.05.19, Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation (PSIEC)

Ltd., Chandigarh submitted the following documents and requested to consider the

proposal for final approval.

Documents required Status (i) Registered land documents with clear title

in the name of Implementing Agency Undertaking from PSIEC that land is in possession of PSIEC, Notification of land from Government of Punjab along with copy of layout plan received.

(ii) Copy of approved layout plan Received (iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Received (iv) Certificate from State Government for

compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines. Received

(v) Status of Completed ID Projects in the State as per format provided and details of operating units in present project.

Received

(vi) Undertaking from State Government that more than 50% units are micro units.

As per the letter dated 15.10.18 by GM, DIC, Faridkot, there are 98 units, out of which, more than 50% are micro units whereas as per the details of industries operating in the Industrial Estate submitted by PSIEC vide letter dated 07.05.19 (verified by GM, DIC) and SIDBI appraisal report, 47 units are operating in the Industrial Estate.

(vii) PSIEC, Chandigarh should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Punjab/ PSIEC, Chandigarh

The roads will be laid with cement concrete, laying of roads have been designed as per standards stipulated in MoRTH specifications (4th revision and guidelines of IRC 37-2001) as mentioned in Detailed project report and SIDBI appraisal report.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Pre-registration Information

Name of Organization : Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation

State : Punjab

District : Faridkot

Industrial Estate : Focal Point Kotkapura

2. Basic Information about Proposal:

Particulars Description Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan

Yes

Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre)

53.25 acres

Page 273: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

267

Particulars Description Area to be developed (acre) 35.28 acres Number and sizes of plots developed 111 plots with 47 operational units.

Category of plots No. of plots

Area (in acres)

A:- Irregular plots 05 6.50 B:- ½ acres plots 10 5.80 C:- ¼ acres and above plots

16 22

4.56 4.78

D:- 500 sq. yards plots 32 2.97 “C” Type Plots C-12 to C-37 along with road allotted

26 6.05

Total 111 30.66

Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.

Nil

Performance of ID projects in State Satisfactory

3. Details about Proposal:

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks Implementing Agency (IA) Punjab Small Industries and Export

Corporation (Government of Punjab undertaking)

As per MSE-CDP guidelines

Track Record of the IA Satisfactory -- Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.

Report submitted Received

Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)

The Focal Point, Kotkapura is located close to NH-54. Being an existing industrial area, basic infrastructure facilities viz. roads, power, water supply and telecom facilities are available.

--

Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title

Punjab Small Scale Industries & Export Corporation Ltd. (PSIEC) was the original owner of the land. When the focal point Kotkapura was developed, the entire land was allotted to the unit holders present in the focal point. PSIEC is still responsible for operation and maintenance of focal point.

Undertaking from PSIEC that land is in possession of PSIEC received.

Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)

Project is about upgradation of Industrial Focal Point

Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been constituted

Yes, constituted Constituted

Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost

Mentioned in Cover letter (Signed by MD) Received

Basis of elements of project Cost

The cost and specifications have been given in the DPR. The cost estimates have been signed by the Executive Engineer and Sub-

--

Page 274: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

268

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks Divisional Engineer of PSIEC.

Tangible Outcomes of the project

Better roads will improve connectivity/ accessibility to Industrial Focal Point.

Proper usage of water will have a positive impact on the environment and thus improve the access to water supply.

With the upgradation of basic infrastructure, employment opportunities (direct & indirect) will increase.

The increase in manufacturing activity in the region will further result in ignition of support services, thereby leading to the overall development in the region.

Increased investments due to development of the infrastructure will also improve the occupancy of Focal Point.

--

Justification of the Proposal The focal point was developed during 1990s with all infrastructure facilities required for upgradation. However, with time basic infrastructures in the focal point has been deteriorated and require upgradation. The proposal will cater to the basic need of maintenance of road, drainage system, power, administrative and other services complex etc. Upgradation of Industrial focal Point will help in attracting more and more investors/unit holders to establish their units.

--

4. Proposed Project Cost:

(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA As per MSE-

CDP / Recommended

by SIDBI

Approved project

cost

Revised Project cost

(i) Cost of land filling / leveling including boundary wall/ fencing

21.10 25.50 25.50

(ii) Cost of laying roads 107.92 165.00 165.00 (iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 4.69 4.69 4.69 (iv) Water supply including overhead tanks

and pump houses 10.00 47.52 47.52

(v) Water harvesting 6.48 6.48 6.48 (vi) Drainage 5.68 5.68 5.68

(vii) Power (Sub-station and distribution network, including street lighting etc., Generation of non-conventional energy)

248.20 248.20 248.20

(viii) Other (Sanitary conveniences etc.) 10.00 10.00 10.00 (ix) Administrative office building 0.00 21.52 20.00 (x) Telecommunication/Cyber Centre/

Documentation Centre 0.00 20.00 20.00

(xi) Conference Hall/Exhibition Centre 0.00 30.00 30.00 (xii) Bank/Post Office 0.00 20.00 20.00

(xiii) Raw material storage facility, marketing outlets

0.00 0.00 0.00

(xiv) First Aid centre, crèche, canteen facilities

0.00 19.89 19.89

(xv) Effluent Treatment Facilities 0.00 165.00 80.00 (xvi) Contingencies and pre-operative

expenses 8.28 15.79 15.79

Total 422.35 805.27 718.75

Page 275: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

269

5. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Approved Amount Revised Amount

(i) GoI grant under MSE-CDP 337.88* 575.00**

(ii) Contribution from PSIEC 84.47 230.27

Total 422.35 805.27

* 80% of eligible project cost i.e. Rs.422.35 lakh (as per DPR).

** 80% of eligible project cost i.e. Rs. 718.75 lakh (as per SIDBI Appraisal Report)

6. Observations:

(i) PSIEC has requested to adjust the funds for the component “Effluent treatment

facilities” from the savings under the component “Drainage”. The estimated cost of

„Effluent treatment facilities‟ and „Drainage‟ are Rs. 165.00 lakh and Rs. 5.68 lakh

respectively. The maximum GoI grant permissible on the component „Effluent

treatment facilities‟ and „Drainage‟ are Rs. 80.00 lakh and Rs. 60.00 lakh

respectively. PSIEC has requested to adjust the saving amount of Rs. 54.32 lakh

(Rs.60.00 lakhs-5.68 lakh) which will remain un-availed from the estimated cost of

Drainage and also requested O/o DC, MSME to provide excess amount of Rs.

85.00 lakh (165.00 lakh-80.00 lakh) of Effluent treatment facilities. (As per the

shcmee guidelines this is not permissible).

(ii) On examination of submitted documents and revised DPR, it is noted that PSIEC

have made certain changes to the costs of the components due to which approved

project cost has been changed from Rs. 422.35 lakh to Rs. 805.27 lakh.

(iii) Clarification regarding the no. of units operating in the Industrial Estate including

micro units is required to be submitted.

7. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate

at Focal Point, Kotkapura, District Faridkot, Punjab at a total project cost of Rs. 805.27 lakh with

GoI assistance of Rs. 575.00 lakh and contribution from PSIEC of Rs. 230.27 lakh.

*********

Page 276: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

270

Agenda No.50.4.26: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate at

Sanwar, Udaipur, Rajasthan.

Background

(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 48th

SCM held on 12.11.18

subject to submission of following documents prior to Final approval.

(ii) Vide letter dated 19.03.19, Commissioner, Industries & Corporate Social

Responsibility, Government of Rajasthan submitted the documents and requested to

consider the proposal for final approval:

S. No. Documents required Status

(i) SIDBI appraisal report. Received

(ii) Copy of approved layout plan signed by

Competent Authority.

Received

(iii) Registered land documents in the name of

Implementing Agency.

Received

(iv) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost

escalation, if any, over and above the approved

project cost.

Received

(v) Status of completed ID projects in the State as

per format to be provided by Office of DC

(MSME).

Received

(vi) Certificate from State Government for

compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.

Received

(vii) Certificate from State Government that more

than 50% of units in the Industrial Estate are

micro.

Received

(viii) RIICO, Jaipur should consider laying of roads

with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous

and proper drainages built in a professional

manner to serve the purpose for relatively

longer period of time. The additional cost on

this account shall be borne by the Government

of Rajasthan / RIICO, Jaipur.

As SIDBI appraisal report,

construction of cement

roads is necessary to

withstand heavy loads.

The project involves

construction of cement

concrete road of 1.75 km.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Pre-registration Information

Name of Organization: Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment Corporation Ltd.

State: Rajasthan

District: Udaipur

Industrial Estate: Industrial Area Sanwar

Page 277: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

271

2. Basic Information about Proposal:

Particulars Description

Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan

Yes

Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 129.18 acres

Area to be developed (acre) 129.18 acres

Number and sizes of plots developed Size of plots (m)

No. of plots

30x65 : 36 30x50 : 36 25x40 : 74 20x50 : 23 20x25 : 14

Total : 183

Implementing Period 24 months

Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up etc.

IID Kaladwas in Udaipur District was sanctioned on 09.11.98

Performance of ID projects in State Satisfactory

3. Details about Proposal:

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)

Remarks

Implementing Agency (IA) Rajasthan State Industrial Development & Investment Corporation (RIICO) Ltd., Jaipur

As per guidelines

Track Record of the IA Satisfactory --

Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report

Submitted Received

Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)

Sanwar Industrial Area is situated in the Udaipur district of Rajasthan. The Industrial Area is easily accessible through all modes of transport and is situated near Udaipur-Chittaurgarh road and is located 2 kms from main National Highway. Nearest bus stand is a distance of about 3km from the Industrial Area. Nearest Railway Station, Fatehnagar is also situated at a distance of about 3 kms and nearest Airport is Udaipur is situated at a distance of 45km.

--

Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title

Yes Received

Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc

Already existing Industrial Estate

Page 278: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

272

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)

Remarks

complied with)

Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted

Yes Constituted

Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost

Yes Received

Basis of elements of project Cost As per DPR, the estimates have been prepared on the basis of schedules of rates as per PWD BSR-2016 for road and BSR-2013 building works (Udaipur Circle).

--

Tangible Outcomes of the project Some of the benefits of the proposed project are: The proposed development shall also increase the employment generation both direct & indirect and economic status. Presently, there are around 1095 direct and indirect employees and it is expected that there would be an increase of employment generation by 41% i.e. 450 new employment shall be generated.

--

Justification of the Proposal The said Industrial Area was set up during 1998 by RIICO and most of the infrastructure facilities have become obsolete. There is sever need for up-gradation of infrastructure in the area specially the roads and drainage system.

--

4. Proposed Project Cost:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars As per IA As per MSE-CDP/ Recommended by SIDBI

(i) Cost of land filling/levelling including boundary wall and fencing

28.33 28.33

(ii) Cost of laying roads 251.43 200.00

(iii) Drainage 60.02 60.00

(iv) Power (Sub-station & distribution network including street lights etc.)

79.45 79.45

Total 419.23 367.78

5. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars As per IA As per SIDBI / MSE-CDP

(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 294.22 294.22*

Page 279: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

273

S. No. Particulars As per IA As per SIDBI / MSE-CDP

(ii) Contribution form RIICO 125.01 125.01

Total 419.23 419.23

*SIDBI recommended GoI grant of Rs. 294.22 lakh as 80% of eligible project cost of Rs. 367.78

lakh.

6. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate

at Sanwar, Udaipur, Rajasthan at a total project cost of Rs.419.23 lakh with GoI grant of

Rs.294.22 lakh and RIICO‟s contribution of Rs.125.01 lakh.

*******

Page 280: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

274

Agenda No.50.4.27: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate at

Ajeetgarh, Sikar, Rajasthan.

Background

(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 48th

SCM held on 12.11.18

subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.

(ii) Vide letter dated 21.02.19, RIICO, Jaipur submitted the following documents and

requested to consider the proposal for final approval.

S. No. Documents required Status (i) SIDBI appraisal report. Received (ii) Copy of approved layout plan signed by Competent

Authority. Received

(iii) Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency.

Received

(iv) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost.

Received

(v) Status of completed ID projects in the State as per format to be provided by Office of DC (MSME).

Received

(vi) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.

Received

(vii) RIICO, Jaipur should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Rajasthan / RIICO, Jaipur.

As per SIBDI report, the roads will be laid down with Cement concrete.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Pre-registration Information

Name of Organization: Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment

Corporation Ltd.

State: Rajasthan

District: Sikar

Industrial Estate: Industrial Area Ajeetgarh

2. Basic Information about Proposal:

Particulars Description

Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan

Yes

Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre)

142.56 acres

Area to be developed (acre) 142.56 acres

Number and sizes of plots developed

Size of plots (m)

No. of plots

80x100 : 14 50x100 : 4 50x80 : 24 30x65 : 34 30x50 : 31

Page 281: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

275

Particulars Description

25x40 : 6 20x35 : 30 20x25 : 33

Total : 176

Implementing Period 24 months

Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.

Yes, IID centre Palsana was sanctioned by GoI on 09.02.11 and completed on 31.03.15.

Performance of ID projects in State Satisfactory

3. Details about Proposal:

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)

Remarks

Implementing Agency (IA) Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment Corporation (RIICO) Ltd., Jaipur

As per guidelines

Track Record of the IA Satisfactory --

Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.

Submitted Received

Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)

The Industrial Area is easily accessible through all modes of transport and is located at Shahpura-Sikar road. It is just 2km from main Ajeetgarh Town. Nearest Bus stand is at a distance of about 2km, Nearest Railway station is Shri Madhopur at a distance of about 30km and nearest Airport is at Jaipur which is at a distance of 85km.

--

Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title

Yes Received

Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)

Already existing Industrial Estate

Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted

Yes Constituted

Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost

Yes Received

Basis of elements of project Cost The detailed estimates for up-gradation of Infrastructural facilities have been prepared on the basis of basic schedule of rates of PWD Sikar circle BSR (Road) 2016 & its corrigendum for road.

--

Tangible Outcomes of the project Up-gradation will provide support to --

Page 282: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

276

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)

Remarks

industry as a whole. The project will have significant socio-economic benefit to the region in terms of the employment generation, improvement in quality of life of the workers, reducing congestion, competitiveness to existing units and development of infrastructure.

Justification of the Proposal The Industrial area was set up during the year 2005-06 and needs up-gradation. The up-gradation of the infrastructure facility will not only give face lift but also increase the production of the industrial estate by attracting investors and collaborators with modern technology.

--

4. Proposed Project Cost:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA

As per MSE-CDP/ Recommended by

SIDBI

(i) Cost of land filling/levelling including boundary wall and fencing:

11.06 11.06

(ii) Cost of laying roads 394.44 200.00

(iii) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses

12.62 12.62

(iv) Water harvesting 10.64 10.00

(v) Drainage 59.38 59.38

(vi) Power distribution, Street light arrangements, etc. 26.76 26.76

Total 514.90 319.82

5. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA As per SIDBI / MSE-CDP

(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 255.86 255.86*

(ii) Contribution from RIICO 259.04 259.04

Total 514.90 514.90

*SIDBI recommended GoI grant of Rs. 255.86 lakh as 80% of eligible project cost of Rs. 319.82

lakh.

6. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate

at Ajeetgarh, Sikar, Rajasthan at a total project cost of Rs. 514.90 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs.

255.86 lakh and RIICO‟s contribution of Rs. 259.04 lakh.

*****

Page 283: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

277

Agenda No.50.4.28: Proposal for Final approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre

in Okhrey Carpet Making Cluster, West Sikkim.

Background:

(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 48th

SCM held on 12.11.18,

subject to submission of following documents prior to Final approval.

(ii) Vide letter dated 10.04.19, IIE, Guwahati (Implementing Agency) has submitted the

documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.

Documents required Status

(i) SIDBI appraisal report Received (ii) List of SPV members (with units address) along with

shareholding pattern Received

(iii) NOC from State Pollution Control Board Received (iv) Certificate from State Government regarding compliance of

GFR/ CVC guidelines Received

(v) Registered land deed in the name of SPV (if land is on lease basis, registered lease deed for a minimum period of 30 years)

Received

(vi) Name of the State Govt. and MSME officials in SPV Received

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Basic Information of Cluster

Name of Cluster: Okhrey Carpet Making Cluster District: West Sikkim Location of Cluster: Okhrey, West Sikkim Lok Sabha Constituency: Sikkim Main Product: Sofa Set Carpet (5‟x2‟ one no. & 2‟x2‟ two nos.), Single

Bed Carpet (6‟x3‟), Diwan Carpet (6‟x2‟), Car Carpet (4‟x1.5‟ & 1.5‟x1.5‟ two nos.).

No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium)

Micro 40 Small - Medium -

Turn over for the last five years (Rs. in lakh):

Year Amount 2013-14 68.00 2014-15 74.00 2015-16 81.00 2016-17 89.00 2017-18 98.50

Exports for the last five years (Rs. in crore):

Nil

Employment in Cluster: 800 nos. (Direct – 300 & Indirect – 500) Technology Details: The weavers of Okhrey Carpet Making Cluster have

inherited the skill from their ancestors and use traditional Indian carpet making processes with age old type of implements and tools.

Whether DS Conducted: Yes. Main findings of DSR: The Diagnostic study was conducted over Lower

Okhrey, Bhareng, Saprey Nagi, Latteytar, Pureytar and Ribdi.

Total no. of carpet weaving units in Okhrey is 106. Most of the unit stakeholders are women. They all

belong to the ST category. 40 No. of units have already being registered and is a part of the SPV at present.

There are 4 major varieties of products they produce

Page 284: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

278

at present- Sofa Set Carpet, Single Bed Carpet, Divan Carpet and Car Carpet.

They use Wool, Cotton String and Thin cotton string as raw materials for the production of the carpets.

The artisans get the raw material from the local markets like Sombaria and Jorethang. Lack of proper supply of raw materials is also a serious setback faced by the stakeholders.

Main Problems of Cluster : The artisans or weavers in the Okhrey carpet making cluster has limited access to Institutional services due to their low level of information process capacity and knowledge.

Due to poor economic status, access to technological advancement among the core cluster actors is poor.

The educational attainment in respect of qualification and technical skills is limited and becomes barrier for developing business orientation among the artisans weavers.

Due to socioeconomic status of low income segment, the credit assistance to Carpet Artisan or weavers is totally absent.

Study reveals that rarely the support institutions provide technical, marketing, training, advisory services to the artisans weavers of the cluster.

2. Information about Proposed CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks (a.) Justification for CFC

The growth of this cluster has been sluggish, in spite of high level skill of the artisans due to the following reasons: They are making smaller carpets with the

help of traditional and cheap wooden carpet weaving looms due to their inability to procure metallic looms required for floor carpets, larger carpets.

They cannot afford buying, using high end hardware, software for modern carpet design.

They are little aware about Tufted Carpets they cannot afford to procure Tufting Machines.

Moreover they cannot afford latex application, secondary backing machines

Their basic inability to afford the facilities, mentioned above, has turned the cluster growth inconsistent and sluggish.

--

(b.) Location of CFC Village : Latteytar, Okhrey, West Sikkim. -- % age of units in radius of 5km

100 --

% age of units in radius of 10km

0 --

(c.) Land for CFC i. Whether land acquired Yes on lease. Lease deed in the

name of SPV for a period of 30 years received.

ii. Title is in name of Title is in name of the SPV i.e. Okhrey Carpet Making Cluster Cooperative Society Ltd.

iii. Valuation and its basis

Rs. 5.00 lakhs for 20 years lease.

iv. Land is sufficient Yes v. Change of land use Yes.

Page 285: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

279

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks vi. If on lease, duration of lease

30 years

vii Whether lease is legally tenable

Yes.

(d.) Total Building area(sq ft)

3000 sq. ft. --

(e.) Rate of construction of building

-- --

(f.) Main Facility Proposed

Carpet Design CAD and Compatible printing facility.

Metallic looms of various sizes for production of floor carpets up to 18‟ X 18‟ Size.

Tufted Carpet Making. Latex and Backing application. Spooling facility. Carpet washing and Drying.

--

g.) Prod capacity of CFC The member stakeholders will bring woolen yarns, thick cotton and thin cotton yarn of required quantity to the CFC for making woven knotted carpets in the metallic looms (for bigger size only). They will continue to manufacture carpets up to 6/3 ft sizes in their home based units. However, they will start weaving carpets up to 18‟x18‟ with the help of big metallic looms in the CFC.

The stakeholders will bring necessary raw materials to manufacture tufted carpets from the machine commissioned in the CFC. The CFC is planned in such a way that the stakeholders can get all required services to produce a. Woven Carpet 3000 sq m per yr b. Tufted Carpet - 6000sq m peryr The above two figures are for 100percent capacity utilization of the CFC as well as the individual units of the Cluster.

--

(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)

S. No. Parameter Before Intervention

After Intervention

1. Total No. of units 40 200 2 Total sales

(Rs. in lakh) 98.50

174.00

3 Investment (Rs. in lakh)

15.00 30.00

4 Profit (%) 8-10 20-25 5 Employment

Direct – 300 Indirect – 500

Direct – 600 Indirect – 1000

(i.) Pollution clearance required or not

Not required.

Received

(j.) Man Power in CFC 25 nos. -- (k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)

The total revenue per year (at 100% capacity utilisation) will be Rs. 123.13 lakh. The revenue generation includes another small channel for generation of income through training.

Page 286: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

280

3. Information about SPV

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency

(IA) Remarks

(a.) Name and Address Okhrey Carpet Making Cluster Cooperative Society Ltd., P.O. – Okhrey, West Sikkim – 737122.

--

(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)

The SPV is a registered society. --

(c.) Name of the State Govt. and MSME officials in SPV

- Received

(d.) Date of formation of SPV

26.07.13 --

(e.) Number of Members 40 nos.

--

(f.) Bye Laws or MoA and AOA submitted

Yes. --

(g.) Authorized Share Capital

Rs. 1.50 lakh --

(h.) Paid up capital Rs. 0.40 lakh. -- (i.) Shareholding Pattern Submitted. Received (j.) Commitment letter for contribution

Submitted. --

(k.) SPV specific A/c Sikkim State Co-operative Bank Ltd : A/c No: 101334004100038

--

(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation.

-- --

(m.) Technical Institution IIE, Guwahati (n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.

Submitted. --

(o) (a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose

40 KW --

(b) Water Local supply -- (c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities

Not required --

4. Implementation Arrangements

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(a.) Implementing Agency

Indian Institute of Entrepreneurship (IIE) (autonomous organisation under Ministry of Skill Development & Entrepreneurship), Guwahati

As per MSE-CDP guidelines.

(b.) Fund receiving Agency (c.) Implementation 12 months 24 Months from

Page 287: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

281

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

Period date of final approval as per guidelines.

(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations

Submitted Received

(e.) Comments of Technical Division

Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 62nd

meeting held on 05.11.18, recommended the proposal for placing before Steering Committee for in-principle approval. (f.) Approval of Technical

Committee (g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:

-- --

(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)

-- -

5. Financial Analysis of CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency Remarks

(a.) BEP 56.77% As per SIDBI

55.03%

(b.) IRR, Payback period 19.19% (Before Tax)

14.37% (After Tax)

5 years

As per SIDBI

IRR before tax –

9.90%

IRR after tax –

9.90 %

(c.) DSCR N/A --

(d.) Return on Capital

employed (ROCE)

26.76% (Before Tax)

21.34% (After Tax)

As per SIDBI

16.45 %

(e.) NPV Positive --

(f.) DER Not Applicable --

(g.) Sensitivity Analysis Yes, the figures are positive as required

by guidelines: a) NPV – positive

c)Breakeven Point 56.77%

--

(h.) Status of CFCs

approved in the State

Nil --

6. Proposed project cost:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA As per MSE-CDP/

Recommended by

SIDBI

(i) Building & Civil Works 32.00 32.00

(ii) Plant & Machinery 218.88 218.88

(iii) Miscellaneous Fixed Assets 2.45 2.45

(iv) Preliminary Expenses 1.48 1.48

(v) Pre-operative expenses 3.00 3.00

(vi) Provision for contingencies 11.58 11.58

(vii) Margin money for working

capital

0.87 0.87

Total 270.26 270.26

Page 288: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

282

7. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars % Proposed by

IA

As per MSE-

CDP

(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 88.16 238.26 238.26

(ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Sikkim 9.99 27.00 27.00

(iii) SPV contribution 1.85 5.00 5.00*

Total 100.00 270.26 270.26

As approved in 48th

SCM, SPV contribution is <10%

8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Description No. Cost

A Main Equipments

1. Computer, Plotter for Carpet Cad 1 2.50

2. Carpet Cad Software 1 5.00

3. Metallic Loom, 6m X 6m 1 0.80

4. Metallic Loom, 6m X 4m 5 3.50

5. Metallic Loom, 15 ft X 10 ft 8 3.60

6. Jacquard Loom 1 2.00

7. Powered Charkha/spool making/weft making machine 10 1.22

8. Tufted Carpet making Machine 1 set 68.00

9. Powered Designing Scissor 10 0.30

10. Carpet Leveling Machine 2 0.14

11. Carpet Washing Machine 1 0.25

12. Carpet Drying Machine 1 0.25

13. Carpet Backing Machine - Small 2 9.90

14. Carpet Backing Machine - Medium 1 8.00

15. Carpet Backing Machine - Big 1 11.40

16. Shuttle 120 0.68

17. Measuring Tape 40 0.19

18. Toolkit for Weavers 40 1.58

19. Knife 40 0.80

20 Yarn stand 20 0.17

21. Weighing Balance (10 Kg) 1 0.08

22 Weighing Balance (100 Kg) 1 0.25

23 Low Pressure Steam generator 1 2.00

24 Other Miscellaneous Hand Tools 10 sets 1.50

25 Water Supply system 1 set 9.20

26 Fire Prevention system 1 set 6.00

27. Transformer 1 2.39

28. Captive D G set and other electrical 1 set 9.50

Page 289: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

283

S. No. Description No. Cost

29. Cost towards GST, P&F, Transit Insurance etc. 35.93

30. Cost towards GST, P&F, Transit Insurance, Sea Freight, duties, clearing charges etc.

25.00

31. Power connection 14.25

Total 218.88

9. Observation:

(i) As recommended by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC), a clause would be

added in the Sanction Order “In case of any deviation from the agreed principles of

utilization and denial of fair access to the eligible stakeholders, assets created would be

handed over to another SPV through a transparent procedure for smooth and effective

operationalization of the facilities”.

10. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of Common Facility

Centre (CFC) in Okhrey Carpet Making Cluster, West Sikkim at a total project cost of Rs.270.26

lakh with GoI grant of Rs.238.26 lakh, State Government‟s contribution of Rs.27.00 lakh and

SPV‟s contribution of Rs.5.00 lakh.

*******

Page 290: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

284

Agenda No.50.4.29: Proposal for final approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre

(CFC) in Wooden Furniture Cluster, Salem, Tamil Nadu.

Background:

(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 48th SCM held on

12.11.18, subject to submission of following documents prior to Final approval:

(i) Confirmation from State Government regarding enhancement of

their contribution towards the project.

(ii) Registered land documents in the name of SPV (If land is on lease

basis, registered lease deed for a minimum period of 30 years is

required).

(iii) Tangible outcomes such as number of units, turnover, export,

employment etc.

(iv) Certificate from State Pollution Control Board.

(v) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution.

(vi) SIDBI Appraisal Report.

(vii) Details of SPV bank account.

(viii) Commitment letter from State Government / IA to meet the cost

escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost.

(ix) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the

cluster are Micro/SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be.

(x) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC

guidelines.

(ii) Vide PUC dated 09.04.19, General Manager (Admin), TANSIDCO, Chennai

submitted above documents and requested to consider the proposal for final

approval:

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Basic Information of Cluster

Name of Cluster : Wooden Furniture Cluster

District : Salem

Location of Cluster : Salem

Lok Sabha Constituency : Dharamapuri, Kallakurichi, Namakkal, Salem

Main Product :

(i) Finger Joint Board Development.

(ii) Raw Material Primary Processing

(iii)Seasoning of Wood

(iv) Value Added Components Development

No. of Enterprises including break

up (Micro, Small, Medium) :

Micro 250

Small 50

Total 300

Page 291: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

285

Turnover for the last five years :

Year Amount

(Rs. in crore)

2010-11 195.00

2011-12 215.00

2012-13 240.00

2013-14 270.00

2014-15 300.00

Exports for the last five years : Nil

Employment in Cluster : 9600 Persons (Direct – 3600 & Indirect – 6000)

Technology Details : (i) Govt. College of Engineering Salem,

(ii) Thyiagarajar Polytechnic College, Salem,

(iii) Govt. ITI, Salem

Whether DS Conducted : Yes

Main findings of DSR : The diagnostic study recommended the establishment of a

common facility centre

Main Problems of Cluster : No facility to process wood

Other Information : -

2. Information about Proposed CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

(a.) Justification for CFC To have facilities like wood processing, Quality enhancement etc.

--

(b.) Location of CFC Salem --

% age of units in radius of 5km 20

% age of units in radius of 10km

50 --

(c.) Land for CFC

i. Whether land acquired Leased land for 33 years Received

ii. Title is in name of Salem Furniture Cluster India Private Limited

iii. Valuation and its basis Land on lease basis at the cost of Rs.1.37 cr

iv. Land is sufficient Yes

v. Change of land use NA

vi. If on lease, duration of lease 33 Years

vii Whether lease is legally tenable

Yes

(d.) Total Building area 25100 sq ft --

(e.) Rate of construction of building

Rs. 125.5 lakh --

(f.) Main Facility Proposed (i) Primary processing of Raw material (ii) seasoning of soft and hard wood (iii) Finger joint board development

--

(g.) Prod capacity of CFC (i) Wood Seasoning - 7500 cft pm b) finger joint - 4200 boards pm

--

(h.) Major Outputs / Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of

Parameters Before CFC After CFC Employme 9600 11500

Received

Page 292: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

286

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks

the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/ domestic sales and direct/ indirect employment, etc.)

nt (in Nos) Export (Rs in Cr)

- 10.00

Turnover (Rs in Cr)

300.00 500.00

(i.) Pollution clearance required or not

Provided Received

(j.) Man Power in CFC 101 Nos --

(k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)

Provided Received

3. Information about SPV

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(a.) Name and Address Salem Furniture Cluster India Private Limited, 58, AKM Complex, Brindhavan Road, Fairlands , Salem -16, Tamil Nadu

--

(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)

Company under act 2013 Rule 8 --

(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV

- --

(d.) Date of formation of SPV 29.01.16 --

(e.) Number of Members 30 Members

(f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted

Yes --

(g.) Authorized Share Capital - --

(h.) Paid up capital - --

(i.) Shareholding Pattern Provided Received.

(j.) Commitment letter for contribution

Provided Received.

(k.) SPV specific A/c Account No: 819020110000626 (Bank of India)

Received.

(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation

- --

(m.) Technical Institution (i) Government College of Engineering , Salem (ii) Tyagarajar Polytechnic College, Salem (iii) Government ITI, Salem

--

(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.

- Required

(o.)

Page 293: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

287

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose

815 KVA --

(b) Water 20000 Ltr/Day --

(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities - --

4. Implement Arrangements

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(a.) Implementing Agency Tamilnadu Small Industries Development Corporation Limited (TANSIDCO), Chennai

As per MSE-CDP guidelines

(b.) Fund receiving Agency Tamilnadu Small Industries Development Corporation Limited (TANSIDCO), Chennai

(c.) Implementation Period 2 Years

(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations

DPR Appraised by SLSC meeting held in Salem on 10.11.16 under chairmanship of Principal Secretary, MSME, Govt. of Tamil Nadu

Received

(e.) Comments of Technical Division

- --

(f.) Approval of Technical Committee

- Recommended the Proposal

(g.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)

- --

5. Financial Analysis of CFC:

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)

Remarks

(a.) BEP 27% --

(b.) IRR, Payback period 23.14% --

(c.) DSCR Not Applicable --

(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)

28.96% --

(e.) NPV - --

(f.) DER - --

(g.) Sensitivity Analysis - --

6. Proposed Project Cost is as follow:

(Rs. in Lakh)

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA

As per SIDBI/ MSE-CDP

1 Land and its Development 15.00 15.00

2 Building and other Civil Constructions 125.50 125.50

3 Plant & Machinery(including electrification) 1197.00 1197.00

Page 294: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

288

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA

As per SIDBI/ MSE-CDP

4 Misc. fixed assets 10.00 10.00

5 Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses, maximum 2% of project cost

28.00 28.00

6 Contingency (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery)

62.36 62.36

7 Margin money for Working Capital 8.47 8.47

Total Project Cost 1446.33 1446.33

7. Proposed means of finance are as follows:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Proposed

by IA

As per SIDBI/

MSE-CDP

(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 1112.22 1112.22

(ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Tamil Nadu 144.63 144.63

(iii) SPV contribution 189.48 189.48

Total 1446.33 1446.33

8. Plant and Machinery (with brief specification) –

(Rs. in lakh)

S.

No.

Description No. Power Requirement

(HP/KW)

Cost

1. Server 1 0 1.00

2. Work Station Computer CPU 4 1 1.46

3. Work Station Monitor 4 1 0.42

4. UPS for Work Station Computers 1 0 0.32

5. Battery for Work Station Computer Ups 6 0 0.82

6. All in one printer 1 1 0.54

8. LCD Projector 1 1 0.45

9. Projector Screen 1 0 0.22

10. WIFI Networking 1 0 0.04

11. Plotter 1 0 1.15

12. Softwares for Design Studio and CNC

Machines

1 0 5.25

14. Chemical Treatment Plant 1 20 10.46

15. Wood Seasoning Klin 5 60 34.56

16. Boiler 1 30 25.34

17. Mother Trolley 1 0 1.28

18. Klin Trolley 10 0 10.24

19. CTP Trolley 6 0 3.84

Page 295: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

289

S.

No.

Description No. Power Requirement

(HP/KW)

Cost

20. Track Prallel Line 1 0 12.50

21. Thin Kerf Band Saw with Tool Grinding

Accessories and Related Equipment

1 25 41.30

22. Multi Rip Saw 1 50 47.20

23. Six Side Moulder 1 60 35.40

24. Pneumatic Cross Cut Saw 1 12 5.56

25. Sliding Table Panel Saw 1 10 7.80

26. Finger Joint Machine 1 50 154.07

27. CNC Master Cut ( templating solutions ) 1 30 123.90

29. auto copy lathe 1 12 47.00

30. wide belt sander with spiral cutter head 1 70 47.40

31. rotary composer 1 12 64.90

32. rectangular twin tabel tennoner 1 8 21.24

33. twin table motiser 1 4 11.32

34. multi functional cnc router 1 25 82.40

35. wide belt sander ( smooth sanding) 1 60 47.20

36. auto copy shaper 1 22 29.50

37. double end tenoner 1 34 88.50

38. dust extraction system provision 1 25 53.10

39. air compressor 1 45 5.90

40. pneumatic lines 1 0 9.44

41. universal tool grinder 1 6 11.80

42. tooling for various machine 1 0 29.50

43. dg sets 2 0 30.30

44. transformer 1 0 21.24

45. fork lift 2 0 14.16

Total 1140.00

9. Observations:

(A) Following documents are required to be submitted prior to issue of final approval:

(i) Documentary proof from SPV for utilization of CFC facilities by at least 51% of the

cluster members.

(ii) Compliance of terms & conditions as mentioned in SIDBI Appraisal Report.

(iii) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilize at least 60% of installed capacity.

Page 296: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

290

(B) As recommended by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC), a clause would be

added in the Sanction Order “In case of any deviation from the agreed principles of

utilization and denial of fair access to the eligible stakeholders, assets created would be

handed over to another SPV through a transparent procedure for smooth and effective

operationalization of the facilities”.

9. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of CFC in Wooden

Furniture Cluster, Salem, Tamil Nadu at a total project cost of Rs. 1446.33 lakh with GoI

assistance of Rs. 1112.22 lakh, State Government contribution of Rs.144.63 lakh and SPV

contribution of Rs. 189.48 lakh.

*******

Page 297: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

291

Agenda No.50.4.30: Proposal for Final approval for setting up of New Industrial Estate at

Ravalkole (V), Malkajgiri District, Telangana.

Background:

(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 44th

SCM held on 05.09.17, subject

to submission of following documents prior to Final approval.

(ii) MSME-DI, Hyderabad vide letter dated 15.02.19, forwarded the documents and requested

to consider the proposal for final approval:

Documents required Status

(i) Land documents on the name of IA complying with Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion.

Received

(ii) SIDBI appraisal report with revised funding pattern as mentioned above

Received

(iii) Commitment letter from IA that it will meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost.

Received

(iv) Status of completed ID projects in the State including achievements vis-à-vis projected targets, as per format to be provided by Office of DC (MSME).

Received

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Pre-registration Information

Name of Organization : Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited

Hyderabad

State : Telangana

District : Medchal

Industrial Estate : Setting up of New Industrial Park at Ravalkole (V), Medchal-

Malkajgiri District, Telangana.

2. Basic Information about Proposal:

Particulars Description

Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan :

Yes

Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre):

44.09 Acres

Area to be developed (acre) 44.09 Acres

Number and sizes of plots to be developed :

No. of plots – 159 Size of the plots: 540 sq. yds to 1111 sq. yds.

Implementing Period : 24 Months

Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc. :

Nil.

Performance of ID projects in state. : Satisfactory.

Page 298: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

292

3. Details about Proposal:

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency(IA)

Remarks

Implementing Agency (IA): Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited (TSIIC).Hyderabad.

As per MSE-CDP guidelines.

Track Record of the IA TSIIC is a State Owned Undertaking developed more than 300 Industrial Parks in the State of Telangana.

--

Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.

Submitted SIDBI appraisal received.

Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)

Yes --

Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title

Yes Land documents received.

Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with):

Yes --

Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted :

Yes Constituted.

Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost :

Yes Received

Basis of elements of project Cost :

As per Standard Schedule Rates (SSR).

--

Tangible Outcomes of the

project S.No. Parameters Infrastructure Development

Before After

1. No. of units 159 159

2. Turnover 92.35 cr. 102.00 cr.

3. Employment

(Direct)

1877 2000

4. Employment

(Indirect)

1000 2000

Justification of the Proposal The main objective of the proposed

ID project is to develop a dedicated

industrial area for the engineering

--

Page 299: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

293

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency(IA)

Remarks

units operating in the residential

areas adjacent to Balanagar /

Sanathnagar / Jeedimetla Industrial

areas.

Operating from a dedicated

industrial area will help them

eliminate the operational hurdles

emanating from the objections

raised by increasing residents in the

Balanagar, Sanathnagar, Jeedimetla

areas, where the units are currently

operating.

The proposed project infrastructure

Development includes development

of internal roads, water and power

supply, drainage system and

administrative facility.

4. Proposed Project Cost:

(Rs. in lakh)

S.No. Particulars Proposed by IA

As per SIDBI

As per MSE-CDP

1. Land Development and other overhead infrastructure

(i) Cost of land filling/levelling including boundary wall /fencing:

184.43 100.00 100.00

(ii) Cost of laying roads 211.12 200.00 200.00

(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00 10.00 10.00

(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses

88.51 88.51 88.51

(v) Water harvesting 10.00 10.00 10.00

(vi) Drainage 87.01 60.00 60.00

(vii) Power (sub-station and distribution net-work including street light etc), generation of non-conventional energy

271.00 250.00 250.00

(viii) Others (sanitary conveniences etc.) 11.38 10.00 10.00

2. Administrative and Other Services Complex

153.12

(i) Administrative Office Building 20.00 20.00

(ii) Telecommunication / Cyber Centre / Documentation Centre

20.00 20.00

(iii) Conference Hall / Exhibition Centre 30.00 30.00

Page 300: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

294

S.No. Particulars Proposed by IA

As per SIDBI

As per MSE-CDP

1. Land Development and other overhead infrastructure

(iv) Bank / Post Office 20.00 20.00

(v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets.

40.00 40.00

(vi) First Aid Centre, Creche, Canteen Facilities.

20.00 20.00

3. Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses

10.00 10.00 10.00

Total 1036.57 888.51 888.51

5. Proposed Means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA As per MSE-CDP

(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP: 800.00 444.00*

(ii) State Government Contribution 236.57 592.57

Total 1036.57 1036.57

* As per the recommendations of SIDBI, the eligible project cost is Rs.888.51lakh and GoI

assistance is Rs. 444.00 Lakh (50% of eligible cost)

6. Observations:

(i) Compliance of terms and conditions as mentioned in SIDBI Appraisal Report.

(ii) TSIIC should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and

proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period

of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Telangana.

7. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of New Industrial Estate at

Ravalkole (V), Malkajgiri District, Telangana, at a total project of Rs. 1036.57 lakh with GoI grant of

Rs.444.00 lakh and Govt. of Telangana/TSIIC contribution of Rs. 592.57 lakh.

*****

Page 301: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle
Page 302: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

295

Agenda Item No. 50.5.1: Ratification of Time Extension granted for setting up of new

Industrial Estate at Pathsala, District Barpeta, Assam.

S. No. Description Status

1 Name of the proposal

and location

Setting up of new Industrial Estate at Pathsala,

District Barpeta, Assam.

2 Approval accorded 30th

SCM held on 19.06.12

3 Final approval order

issued on

24.09.12

4 Name of the IA Assam Industrial Development Corporation Ltd.

(AIDC), Guwahati.

5 Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh)

Govt. of India Grant : 584.00

Govt. of Assam : 145.44

Total : 729.44

6 Project Costs and

component wise

details

(Rs. in lakh)

S. No Particulars Approve

d cost

(i) Land filling/leveling including

boundary wall and fencing

100.00

(ii) Laying roads 199.98

(iii) Road side greenery & social

forestry

7.10

(iv) Water supply including overhead

tanks, and pump houses

70.98

(v) Drainage 52.48

(vi) Power distribution, Street light

arrangements, etc.

208.01

(vii) Administrative and Other Services

Complex

76.59

(viii) Contingencies & Pre operative

expenses

14.30

Total 729.44

7 Total GoI grant released Installment & Date (Rs. in

lakh)

1st on 28.03.14 : 65.00

2nd

on 24.08.16 : 95.568

3rd

on 15.03.18 : 230.00

Total : 390.568

8 Validity upto 30.06.18

9 Time extension

accorded on file up to

31.01.20

10 Proposal for Steering

Committee

Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time

extension accorded on file.

*********

Page 303: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

296

Agenda Item No. 50.5.2: Ratification of Time Extension granted for upgradation of

infrastructure facilities at Amingaon Export Promotion Industrial

Park (EPIP) in Kamrup (Metro) District, Assam.

S. No. Description Status

1 Name of the

proposal and

location

Upgradation of infrastructure facilities at Amingaon Export

Promotion Industrial Park (EPIP) in Kamrup (Metro) District,

Assam.

2 Approval accorded 38th

SCM held on 28.07.15

3 Final approval

order issued on

19.07.16

4 Name of the IA Assam Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. (AIDC),

Guwahati.

5 Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh)

Govt. of India Grant : 474.56

Govt. of Assam : 118.64

Total : 593.20

6 Project Costs and

component wise

details

(Rs. in lakh)

S.N

o.

Particulars Approved

Cost

1 Land Development and Other Overhead Infrastructure

(i) Land filling/leveling including boundary wall

and fencing:

70.82

(ii) Laying roads 200.00

(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 7.10

(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and

pump houses

0.00

(v) Water harvesting 9.64

(vi) Drainage 59.98

(vii) Power distribution, Street light arrangements,

etc.

82.73

(viii

)

Other (Sanitary Convenience): 0.00

Sub Total 430.27

2 Administrative and Other Services Complex

(i) Administrative Office building 150.00

(ii) Telecom/Cyber/Documentation centre

(iii) Conference Hall/Exhibition centre

(iv) Bank/Post office

Page 304: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

297

S. No. Description Status

(v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing

outlets

(vi) First aid centre, Creche, Canteen

Sub Total 150.00

3 Effluent Treatment Facilities 0.00

4 Contingencies & Pre operative expenses 12.93

Grand Total 593.20

7 Total GoI grant

released Installment & Date (Rs. in lakh)

1st on 25.04.17 : 200.00

Total : 200.00

8 Validity upto 28.02.19

9 Time extension

accorded on file up

to

31.12.19

10 Proposal for

Steering

Committee

Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time extension

accorded on file.

**********

Page 305: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle
Page 306: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle
Page 307: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

298

Agenda Item No.50.5.4: Ratification of Time Extension granted for setting up of CFC

in Stainless Steel Utensils Cluster, Kundli, Sonepat, Haryana.

S.

No.

Description Status

1. Name of the proposal

and location

Setting up of CFC in Stainless Steel Utensils Cluster,

Kundli, Sonepat, Haryana

2. Approval accorded 33rd

SCM held on 14.06.13

3. Final approval order

issued on

09.09.13

4. Name of the IA Bureau of Industrial Policy and Promotion (BIPP),

Chandigarh (then Investment Promotion Centre)

5. Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh)

Govt. of India Grant : 1022.54

Govt. of Haryana Grant : 150.00

SPV contribution : 530.78

Total : 1703.32

6. Project Costs and

component wise details

(Rs. in lakh)

(i) Land and its Development 283.50

(ii) Building and other Civil Constructions 216.27

(iii) Plant & Machinery(including

electrification)

(list of plant and machinery with

tentative cost – Annexed)

1076.91

(iv) Misc. fixed assets 20.00

(v) Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses,

maximum 2% of project cost

34.06

(vi) Contingency (2% building and 5% on

plant and machinery)

58.16

(vii) Margin money for Working Capital 14.42

Total 1703.32

7. Total GoI grant

released

Nil

8. Validity upto 31.03.18

9. Time extension

accorded on file up to

31.01.20

10. Proposal for Steering

Committee

Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time extension

accorded on file.

*********

Page 308: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

299

Agenda Item No.50.5.5: Ratification of Time Extension granted for setting up of CFC

in Engineering Cluster, Yamunanagar, Haryana.

S. No. Description Status

1. Name of the proposal

and location

Setting up of CFC in Engineering Cluster, Yamunanagar,

Haryana

2. Approval accorded 40th

SCM held on 02.07.16

3. Final approval order

issued on

06.10.16

4. Name of the IA Bureau of Industrial Policy and Promotion (BIPP),

Chandigarh (then Investment Promotion Centre)

5. Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh)

Govt. of India Grant : 1199.45

Govt. of Haryana Grant : 150.00

SPV contribution : 208.00

Total : 1557.45

6. Project Costs and

component wise

details

(Rs. in lakh)

(i) Land and its Development 50.00

(ii) Building and other Civil

Constructions

150.00

(iii) Plant & Machinery (including

electrification) (Annexure)

1295.58

(iv) Misc. fixed assets 10.00

(v) Preliminary & Pre-operative

expenses, maximum 2% of project

cost

30.00

(vi) Contingency (2% building and 5%

on plant and machinery)

15.87

(vii) Margin money for Working Capital 6.00

Total 1557.45

7. Total GoI grant

released

Nil

8. Validity upto 05.10.18

9. Time extension

accorded on file up to

31.03.20

10. Proposal for Steering

Committee

Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time extension

accorded on file.

*****

Page 309: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

300

Agenda Item No.50.5.6: Ratification of Time Extension granted for setting up of CFC in

Plywood Cluster, Yamunanagar, Haryana.

S. No. Description Status

1. Name of the proposal

and location

Setting up of CFC in Plywood Cluster, Yamunanagar,

Haryana

2. Approval accorded 43rd

SCM held on 09.03.17

3. Final approval order

issued on

04.05.17

4. Name of the IA Bureau of Industrial Policy and Promotion (BIPP),

Chandigarh (then Investment Promotion Centre)

5. Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh)

Govt. of India Grant : 1319.00

Govt. of Haryana Grant : 150.00

SPV contribution : 171.00

Total : 1640.00

6. Project Costs and

component wise details

(Rs. in lakh)

(i) Land and its Development 113.20

(ii) Building and other Civil Constructions 67.30

(iii) Plant & Machinery (including

electrification)

1410.43

(iv) Misc. fixed assets 10.00

(v) Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses,

maximum 2% of project cost

10.00

(vi) Contingency (2% building and 5% on

plant and machinery)

29.07

Total Project Cost 1640.00

7. Total GoI grant

released

Nil

8. Validity upto 03.05.19

9. Time extension

accorded on file up to

04.05.20

10. Proposal for Steering

Committee

Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time extension

accorded on file.

*******

Page 310: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

301

Agenda Item No. 50.5.7: Ratification of Time Extension granted for setting up of new

Industrial Estate at TM Kasom, Ukhrul District, Manipur.

S. No. Description Status

1 Name of the

proposal and

location

Setting up of new Industrial Estate at TM Kasom, Ukhrul

District, Manipur.

2 Approval

accorded

38th

SCM held on 28.07.15

3 Final approval

order issued on

30.09.15

4 Name of the IA Directorate of Commerce & Industries, Department of

Commerce & Industries, Govt. of Manipur.

5 Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh)

Govt. of India Grant : 759.35

Govt. of Manipur : 189.84

Total : 949.19

6 Project Costs and

component wise

details

(Rs. in lakh)

S.No. Particulars Approved

Cost

1 (i) Land filling, site development & compound

wall

100.00

(ii) Laying of internal roads 200.00

(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00

(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and

pump houses

110.00

(v) Water harvesting 10.00

(vi) Drainage 60.00

(vii) Power distribution, Street light

arrangements, etc.

250.00

(viii) Sanitary Convenience 10.00

2 (i) Administrative office building 20.00

(ii) Telecom/ Documentation centre 19.35

(iii) Conference Hall/Exhibition centre 28.15

(iv) Bank/Post office 20.00

(v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing

outlets

40.00

(vi) First aid centre, Creche Canteen 20.00

3. Effluent Treatment Facilities 41.69

4. Contingencies 10.00

Total 949.19

7 Total GoI grant

released Installment & Date (Rs. in lakh)

1st on 31.12.15 : 200.00

Page 311: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

302

S. No. Description Status

2nd

on 18.04.17

3rd

on 06.03.19

:

:

300.00

259.35

Total : 759.35

8 Validity upto 31.03.18

9 Time extension

accorded on file

up to

31.12.18 (Project completed)

10 Proposal for

Steering

Committee

Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time extension

accorded on file.

********

Page 312: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

303

Agenda Item No. 50.5.8: Ratification of Time Extension granted for setting up of new Industrial

Estate at Salemthar, Chandel, Manipur.

S. No. Description Status

1 Name of the proposal

and location

Setting up of new Industrial Estate at Salemthar,

Chandel, Manipur.

2 Approval accorded 38th

SCM held on 28.07.15

3 Final approval order

issued on

11.12.15

4 Name of the IA Directorate of Commerce & Industries, Department

of Commerce & Industries, Govt. of Manipur.

5 Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh)

Govt. of India Grant : 725.24

Govt. of Manipur : 181.31

Total : 906.55

6 Project Costs and

component wise

details

(Rs. in lakh)

S.No. Particulars Approved Cost

1.(i) Land filling/leveling including boundary wall

100.00

(ii) Laying of roads 197.00

(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry

10.00

(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses

108.05

(v) Water harvesting 10.00

(vi) Drainage 59.00

(vii) Power distribution, Street light arrangements, etc.

250.00

(viii) Public Convenience 10.00

2. (i) Administrative office building

132.00

(ii) Telecom/Cyber/Documentation centre

(iii) Conference Hall/Exhibition centre

(iv) Bank/Post office

(v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets

(vi) First aid centre, Creche Canteen

3. Effluent Treatment Facilities

20.00

Page 313: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

304

4. Contingencies 10.50

Total 906.55

7 Total GoI grant released Installment & Date (Rs. in lakh)

1st on 28.04.16 : 200.00

2nd

on 25.04.17

3rd

on 06.03.19

:

:

300.00

225.19

Total

:

725.19

8 Validity upto 31.03.18

9 Time extension

accorded on file up to

30.11.18 (Project completed)

10 Proposal for Steering

Committee

Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time

extension accorded on file.

**********

Page 314: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

305

Agenda Item No. 50.5.9: Ratification of Time Extension granted for setting up of new

Industrial Estate at Khopuibung, Churachandpur, Manipur.

S. No. Description Status

1 Name of the

proposal and

location

Setting up of new Industrial Estate at Khopuibung,

Churachandpur, Manipur.

2 Approval accorded 38th

SCM held on 28.07.15

3 Final approval order

issued on

30.09.15

4 Name of the IA Directorate of Commerce & Industries, Department of

Commerce & Industries, Govt. of Manipur.

5 Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh)

Govt. of India Grant : 759.35

Govt. of Manipur : 189.84

Total : 949.19

6 Project Costs and

component wise

details

(Rs. in lakh)

S.No. Particulars Approve

d Cost

1 (i) Land filling, site development & compound

wall

100.00

(ii) Laying of internal roads 200.00

(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00

(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and

pump houses

110.00

(v) Water harvesting 10.00

(vi) Drainage 60.00

(vii) Power distribution, Street light arrangements,

etc.

250.00

(viii) Sanitary Convenience 10.00

2 (i) Administrative office building 20.00

(ii) Telecom/ Documentation centre 19.35

(iii) Conference Hall/Exhibition centre 28.15

(iv) Bank/Post office 20.00

(v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing

outlets

40.00

(vi) First aid centre, Creche Canteen 20.00

3. Effluent Treatment Facilities 41.69

4. Contingencies 10.00

Total 949.19

7 Total GoI grant

released Installment & Date (Rs. in lakh)

1st on 31.12.15 : 200.00

2nd

on 17.02.17

3rd

on 11.03.19

:

:

200.00

359.35

Page 315: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

306

S. No. Description Status

Total

:

759.35

8 Validity upto 31.03.18

9 Time extension

accorded on file up

to

31.05.18 (Project completed)

10 Proposal for

Steering Committee

Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time

extension accorded on file.

******

Page 316: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

307

Agenda No. 50.5.10: Ratification of Time Extension granted for setting up of Common

Facility Centre (CFC) in Gota Zari Lace Cluster, Ajmer, Rajasthan.

S. No. Description Status

1. Name of the proposal and

Location

Setting up of CFC in Gota Zari Lace Cluster, Ajmer,

Rajasthan

2. Approval accorded 38th

SCM held on 28.07.15

3. Final approval order issued

on

04.03.16

4. Name of the Implementing

Agency

Udhyam Prothsahan Sansthan, Ajmer

5. Means of Finance

(Rs. in lakh)

Govt. of India grant : 217.24

SPV contribution : 24.14

Total : 241.38

6. Project Cost and component-

wise details

(Rs. in lakh)

i) Land & its Development 0.00

ii) Building and other civil

construction

0.00

iii) Plant & Machinery 205.06

iv) Misc. Fixed Asset 13.56

v) Preliminary & Pre-operative

expenses, Provision of

contingency @5% on P&M

10.76

vii) Margin money for working

capital

12.00

Total 241.38

7. Total GoI grant released

Instalment & Date (Rs. in lakh)

1st on 07.02.18 : 86.89

Total : 86.89

8. Validity upto 30.09.18

9. Time extension accorded on

file upto

31.03.20

10. Proposal for Steering

Committee

Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time

extension accorded on file.

*****

Page 317: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

308

Agenda Item No. 50.5.11: Ratification of Time Extension granted for setting up new

Industrial Estate at Madikonda Village, Warangal District,

Telangana.

S. No. Description Status

1 Name of the proposal

and location

Setting up new Industrial Estate at Madikonda Village,

Warangal District, Telangana.

2 Approval accorded 35th

SCM held on 15.01.14.

3 Final approval order

issued on

28.03.14.

4 Name of the IA Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation

(TSIIC) Ltd., Hyderabad.

5 Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh)

Govt. of India Grant : 735.60*

Govt. of Telangana Grant : 325.59

Total : 1061.19

* 80% of the total eligible cost as per MSE-CDP i.e.

Rs.919.50 lakhs.

6 Project Costs and

component wise

details

(Rs. in lakh)

S.

No.

Particulars Estimated by

IA

As per

MSE-CDP

1. Land filling /leveling

including boundary wall

and fencing

101.87 100.00

2. Laying roads 323.59 200.00

3. Road side greenery &

social forestry

10.19 10.00

4. Water supply including

overhead tanks and pump

houses

112.72 110.00

5. Water harvesting 10.48 10.00

6. Drainage 60.09 60.00

7. Power distribution, street

lights etc.

250.14 250.00

8. Sanitary conveniences 10.41 10.00

9. Admin. & other services

complex

21.52 20.00

10. Telecom/cyber/document

ation centre

20.00 20.00

11. Conference hall/

Exhibition centre

30.00 30.00

12. Bank /Post office 20.37 20.00

13. First aid centre, Creche

centre

19.89 19.89

14. Raw material storage

facility, marketing outlets

39.61 39.61

15. Contingencies & pre-

operative exp.

30.31 20.00

Total 1061.19 919.50

Page 318: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

309

7 Total GoI grant

released Installment & Date (Rs. in lakh)

1st on 27.02.15 : 200.00

2nd

on 03.08.17 : 236.00

3rd

on 02.05.19 : 226.00

Total : 662.00

8 Validity upto 30.06.18

9 Time extension

accorded on file up to

30.09.19

10 Proposal for Steering

Committee

Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time

extension accorded on file.

*******

Page 319: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

310

Agenda Item No. 50.5.12: Ratification of Time Extension granted for setting up of new

Industrial Estate at Kumarghat, Unakoti District, Tripura.

S. No. Description Status

1 Name of the

proposal and

location

Setting up of new Industrial Estate at Kumarghat, Unakoti District,

Tripura.

2 Approval accorded 40th

SCM held on 02.07.16

3 Final approval order

issued on

19.01.17

4 Name of the IA Tripura Industrial Development Corporation (TIDC), Agartala.

5 Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh)

Govt. of India Grant : 638.48

Govt. of Tripura : 326.79

Total : 965.27

6 Project Costs and

component wise

details

(Rs. in lakh)

S.

No.

Particulars Approved

cost

1 Land filling/leveling including boundary wall

and fencing:

98.14

2 Laying roads 224.20

3 Road side greenery & social forestry 9.92

4 Water supply including overhead tanks, and

pump houses

187.91

5 Water harvesting 9.94

6 Drainage 115.99

7 Power (substation and distribution network

including street lights).

133.50

Sub total 779.60

8 Administrative and Other Services Complex

9 Repairing, renovation works of existing

structure and other services

13.13

10 Telecom/Cyber/Documentation centre 12.68

11 Conference Hall/Exhibition centre 9.86

12 Bank/Post office 6.33

13 Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets 25.56

14 First aid centre, Creche Canteen 18.61

Sub total 86.17

15 Effluent Treatment Facilities 79.50

16 Contingencies & Pre operative expenses : 20.00

Sub total 99.50

Total 965.27

7 Total GoI grant Installment & Date (Rs. in lakh)

Page 320: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

311

released 1st on 25.04.17 : 200.00

2nd

on 29.05.19 : 342.00

Total : 542.00

8 Validity upto 18.01.19

9 Time extension

accorded on file up

to

30.06.19

10 Proposal for

Steering Committee

Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time extension

accorded on file.

*******

Page 321: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

50.6 Any Other Points

Page 322: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

Agenda No. 50.6.1: Dropping of proposal of setting up of new ID centre atIbrahimpatnam, Rangareddy District, Telangana.

S. Description StatusNo.1. Name of the proposal Setting up of new ID centre at Ibrahimpatnam, Rangareddy

and Location District, Telangana.2. Approval accorded 44m SCM held on 05.09.173. Final approval Letter 12.10.17

issued on4. Name of the Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation (TSIIC)

Implementing Ltd. Hyderabad.Agency

5. Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh)Particulars : Approved CostGovt. of India grant 741.05Govt. of Telangana 4826.45Total : 5567.50

6. Project Cost and (Rs. in lakh)component-wise S. Particulars Proposed As perdetails No. by IA MSE-

CDPi) Land compensation cost 676.50 0.00ii) Land filling/levelling including 397.25 100.00

boundary wall and fencingiii) Laying roads 1855.50 200.00iv) Road side greenery &social forestry 15.00 10.00v) Water supply including overhead 317.86 110.00

tanks and pump housevi) Drainage 1086.98 70.00vii) Power distribution, Street lights etc. 433.67 250.00viii) Administrative and other services 44.55 20.00

complexes.ix) Telecom/cyber/documentation 7.00 7.00

centrex) Conference hall/exhibition centre 15.30 15.30xi) Bank/Post Office 6.10 6.10xii) Raw material storage 25.60 25.60

facilities/marketing outletsxiii) First aid centre/creche canteen 12.32 12.32xiv) Effluent Treatment facilities 329.97 80.00xv) Contingencies &preoperative 343.90 20.00

expencesTotal 5567.50 926.32

312

Page 323: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

7. Total Gol grant No Gol grant has been released till date.released

8. Validity up to 12.10.19

» Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation (TSIIC) Ltd. vide their letter dated28.05.19 informed that during the 5th State Level project Steering Committee (SLPSC)meeting held on 26.03.19 decided to withdraw the proposal.

» As requested by Government of Telangana, proposal is being placed before SteeringCommittee to deliberate on dropping the proposal.

9. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Steering Committee may consider dropping the proposal of setting up of new ID centre atIbrahimpatnam, Rangareddy District, Telangana

********

313

Page 324: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

312

Page 325: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

313

Page 326: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

314

Page 327: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

315

Page 328: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

316

Page 329: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

317

Page 330: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

318

Page 331: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

319

Page 332: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

320

Page 333: INDEX [] · 2019-07-08 · INDEX Agenda Description Page No. Points 50.1 Confirmation ofMinutes 1 50.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 50.3 Proposals for In-Principle

321