index [] · 2019-07-08 · index agenda description page no. points 50.1 confirmation ofminutes 1...
TRANSCRIPT
Government of IndiaMinistry of Micro, Small and Medium EnterprisesOffice of Development Commissioner (MSME),
7thFloor, A Wing,Nirman Bhawan, Maulana Azad Road,
New Delhi-ll0l08
Agenda
for
50thMeeting of Steering Committee
of
Micro & Small Enterprises - Cluster Development Programme(MSE-CDP)
Date &Time 02.07.19 at 3.00 PM
Venue New Delhi
INDEX
Agenda Description Page No.Points50.1 Confirmation of Minutes 150.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 250.3 Proposals for In-Principle Approval
Gujarat50.3.1 CFC in Plastic Products Cluster, Surendernagar 3-750.3.2 CFC in Food Processing Cluster, Bhiloda, Sabarkanth 8-1250.3.3 CFC in Packaging Cluster, Kadi, Mehsana 13-1750.3.4 CFC in EngineeringCluster, Surat 18-2450.3.5 CFC in Food ProcessingCluster, Chikhli,Navsari 25-2950.3.6 CFC in DiamondCluster, Saraspur,Ahmedabad 30-34
Jharkhand50.3.7 CFC in Brass and Bronze Cluster, Kariyatpur, Hazaribagh 35-40
Karnataka50.3.8 CFC in Power loom Cluster, Chikkodi, Belgaum 41-4750.3.9 CFC in Copper Utensils Manufacturing Cluster, Raibagh, 48-56
Belgaum50.3.10 CFC in Auto & General Engineering Cluster, Chikkodi, 57-65
Belgaum50.3.11 CFC in Organic Millets Cluster, Davanagere 66-7250.3.12 CFC in Readymade Garment Cluster, Hiriyur, Chitradurga 73-7950.3.13 CFC in Food Cluster, Sirsi, Uttara Kannada 80-87
Mizoram50.3.14 CFC in Carpentry Cluster, Baktwang 88-97
Nagaland50.3.15 CFC in Food Processing Cluster, Mokokchung 98-10550.3.16 CFC in Wood Furniture Cluster, Dimapur 106-11250.3.17 New Industrial Estate at Tuli, Mokokchung 113-117
Punjab50.3.18 Up-gradation of Focal Point, Nabha (Old), Patiala 118-12050.3.19 Up-gradation of Focal Point, Sangrur 121-12350.3.20 Up-gradation of Focal Point, Moga 124-12650.3.21 Up-gradation of Focal Point, Naya Nagnal, Rupnagar 127-130
Rajasthan50.3.22 Upgradation of ID Centre at Malpura, Tonk 131-133
Telangana50.3.23 CFC in Gold Ornaments Cluster, Karimnagar 134-14150.4 Proposals for Final Approval
Delhi50.4.1 Upgradation of Mangolpuri Industrial Area, Phase-II, North 142-145
West Delhi50.4.2 Upgradation of Mayapuri Industrial Area, Phase-I, South West 146-149
Delhi
Agenda Description Page No.Points50.4.3 Upgradation of Infrastructure facilities at Flatted Factory 150-154
Complex, Jhilmil Industrial Area, East Delhi50.4.4 Upgradation of Infrastructure facilities at Flatted Factory 155-158
Complex, Jhandewalan, Central Delhi50.4.5 Upgradation of Infrastructure facilities at Flatted Factory 159-162
Complex, Okhla Industrial Area, South Delhi50.4.6 Upgradation and Redevelopment work in DSIIDC Industrial 163-166
Sheds ,Lawrence Road, Industrial Area, North West Delhi50.4.7 Upgradation and Redevelopment work for Kirti Nagar, 167-170
Industrial Area, South West Delhi50.4.8 Upgradation and Redevelopment work for Patparganj, 171-174
Industrial Area, East DelhiGujarat
50.4.9 CFC in Diamond Cutting & Polishing Cluster, Surat 175-180Kerala
50.4.10 Setting up of New Industrial Estate, KINFRA Spice Park at 181-184Idukki
Madhya Pradesh50.4.11 CFC in Mishthan &Namkeen Cluster, Jabalpur 185-192
Maharashtra50.4.12 CFC in Engineering Cluster, Jalgaon 193-19950.4.13 CFC in Plastic Cluster, Nipani, Aurangabad 200-206
Manipur50.4.14 CFC in Spices and Food Processing Cluster, Churachandpur 207-21550.4.15 CFC in Wood Carpentry Cluster, Churachandpur, Manipur 216-22350.4.16 CFC in Greater Imphal Jewellery Cluster, Imphal, Manipur 224-229
Meghalaya50.4.17 CFC in Cashew Nut Processing Cluster, Selsella, West Garo 230-235
HillsPunjab
50.4.18 Up-gradation of ID Centre at Focal Point, Pathankot 236-23950.4.19 Up-gradation of ID Centre at Focal Point, Goindwal Sahib, 240-243
Tam Taran50.4.20 Up-gradation oflD Centre at Focal Point, Amritsar 244-24850.4.21 Up-gradation of ID Centre at Focal Point, Chanaloan, Kurali 249-25250.4.22 Up-gradation of Industrial Focal Point, Batala, District 253-256
Gurdaspur50.4.23 Up-gradation of Industrial Focal Point, Hoshiarpur 257-26050.4.24 Up-gradation oflndustrial Focal Point, Nawanshahr 261-26550.4.25 Up-gradation of Industrial Focal Point, Kotkapura, District 266-269
FaridkotRajasthan
50.4.26 ID Centre at Sanawar, Udaipur 270-27350.4.27 ID Centre at Ajeetgarh, Sikar 274-276
Sikkim50.4.28 CFC in Okhrey Carpet Making Cluster, West Sikkim 277-283
Agenda Description Page No.Points
Tamil Nadu50.4.29 CFC in Wooden Furniture Cluster, Salem 284-290
Telangana50.4.30 ID Centre at Ravalkole (V), Medchal-Makajgiri 291-29450.5 Ratification of Decisions
Assam50.5.1 New Industrial Estate at Pathsala, District Barpeta, Assam. 29550.5.2 Up-gradation of infrastructure facilities at Amingaon Export 296-297
Promotion Industrial Park (EPIP) in Kamrup (Metro) DistrictChattisgarh
50.5.3 New ID Centre at Kapan Village, District Janjgir Champa 297(a)&(b)Haryana
50.5.4 CFC in Stainless Steel Cluster, Kundli, Sonepat 29850.5.5 CFC in Engineering Cluster, Yamunanagar 29950.5.6 CFC in Plywood Cluster, Yamunanagar 300
Manipur50.5.7 New Industrial Estate at TM Kasom, Ukhrul District 301-30250.5.8 New Industrial Estate at Salemthar, Chandel 303-30450.5.9 New Industrial Estate at Khopuibung, Churachandpur 305-306
Rajasthan50.5.10 CFC in Gota Zari Lace Cluster, Ajmer 307
Telangana50.5.11 New Industrial Estate at Madikonda Village, Warangal District 308-309
Tripura50.5.12 New Industrial Estate at Kumarghat, Unakoti District 310-31150.6 Any Other Points
50.6.1 Dropping of proposal of setting up of new ID centre at 312-313Ibrahimpatnam, Rangareddy District, Telangana
Annexure-I Minutes of 49th SCM 314-323
**********
1
Item No. 50.1. : Confirmation of Minutes of 49th
Meeting of Steering Committee held
on 27.02.2019.
Minutes of 49th
Meeting of Steering Committee held on 27.02.19 were uploaded on the website
and communicated to stakeholders on 07.03.19. Minutes are annexed at Annexure-I. Since no
comments have been received from any of the members, minutes may kindly be confirmed.
******
2
Item No. 50.2 : Action Taken Report on the action points of 49th
Meeting of Steering
Committee
Item No. Item Description Decision Taken Action Taken
49.3.1 to
49.3.7
In-principle approval for various
proposals.
In-principle approval
accorded
Communicated
to all
concerned 49.4.1 to
49.4.7
Final approval for various proposals. Final approval accorded
49.5.1 Time extension for completion of
Projects.
Time extension
accorded.
49.6.1 to
49.6.3
Ratification of decisions taken on
file.
Ratified the decision of
time extension.
49.7 Any Other Points
49.7.1 Request of Government of
Maharashtra to waive off the penalty
of Rs.5.00 lakh imposed by Steering
Committee for delay in
implementation in setting up of CFC
in Readymade Garment Cluster,
Nagpur, Maharashtra.
Committee considered
the request of
Government of
Maharashtra and waived
off the penalty of Rs.5.00
lakh imposed from GoI
grant for delay in
implementation
49.7.2 Request of Government of
Puducherry to allow laying of
Bituminous roads for Up-gradation
of Industrial Estate at Mettupalayam,
Puducherry.
Committee considered
the request of
Government of
Puducherry as a special
case and allowed to lay
Bituminous roads.
49.7.3 MD, PSIEC, requested Steering
Committee to consider the following
3 Up-gradation proposals of the ID
Projects for In-principle approval as
a special case, as these proposals
were received by Office of DC
(MSME) after circulation of the
Agenda of the 49th
SCM.
(a) Up-gradation of Industrial
Focal Point, Batala, District
Gurdaspur, Punjab
(b) Up-gradation of Industrial Focal
Point, Hoshiarpur, Punjab
(c) Up-gradation of Industrial Focal
Point, Nawanshahr, Punjab
Steering Committee
considered the request of
PSIEC and accorded In-
principle approval
subject to submission of
requisite documents prior
to final approval.
*******
50.3 Proposals for In-Principle Approval
-_ .. _---- - ----------------- ----------
3
Agenda No.50.3.1: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up Common Facility
Centre (CFC) in Plastic Products Cluster, Nava Junction Road,
Surendranagar, Gujarat.
Background
The proposal was recommended by State Level Project Steering Committee (SLPSC)
held on 04.05.18.
Proposal was received from Government of Gujarat vide online ref. No. 13141 dated
25.05.18 & recommended by MSME-DI, Ahmedabad.
Proposal along with Focus Report & DPR was forwarded by MSME-DI, Ahmadabad
vide letter dated 28.02.19
Proposal was deliberated by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 64th
& 65th
meetings held on 05.03.19 & 13.06.19 respectively and recommended the same to
place before Steering Committee for In-principle approval.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Basic Information of Cluster
Name of Cluster : Plastic Products Cluster
District : Surendranagar
Location of Cluster : Surendranagar
Lok Sabha Constituency : Surendranagar
Main Product : Plastic Items
No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium) :
Micro : 115
Turnover for the last five years
Year (Rs. in crore) 2012-13 : 29.88 2013-14 : 33.2 2014-15 : 36.89 2015-16 : 43.4 2016-17 : 51.06
Exports(Rs in Crore) for the last five years :
Nil
Employment in Cluster : 920 Nos
Technology Details : Currently units in the cluster are using conventional technology for processing plastic, advance and upgraded technology is required.
Whether DS Conducted : Yes
Main findings of DSR : The diagnostic study recommended the establishment of a common facility centre.
Main Problems of Cluster : Non availability of Advanced Technology High wastage.
Other Information : NA
4
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA)
Remarks
(a.) Justification for CFC To have facilities like Advance
Technology Quality Lab to improve the
final product.
--
(b.) Location of CFC Shree Suraj Mahila Vikas Mandal
Mulchand Road, Opp. ManavMandir,
Surendranagar-363001
--
% age of units in radius of 5km
95 --
% age of units in radius of 10km
5 --
(c.) Land for CFC
i. Whether land acquired Land on lease basis Registered land
document in the
name of SPV for a
minimum period
of 30 years is
required.
ii. Title is in name of Shree Suraj Mahila Vikas Mandal
iii. Valuation and its basis N.A
iv. Land is sufficient Yes
v. Change of land use N.A
vi. If on lease, duration of lease
31 Years
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
Yes
(d.) Total Building area 213.21 sq/mt --
(e.) Rate of construction of building
N.A. --
(f.) Main Facility Proposed Yarn Plant (Monofilament)
Servo Injection Molding
Extrusion blow Molding
Testing Equipment‟s
--
(g.) Prod capacity of CFC 800 Metric Tonns --
(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/ domestic sales and direct /indirect employment, etc.)
Parameter Before
CFC
After
CFC
Units 115 250
Production (Mt.) 2,760 8,250
Turn Over (Rs in
Cr) 51.06 140.25
Employment(No.) 920 2500
Profit (Rs in Cr) 3.45 11.25
--
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
Not Provided Required
(j.) Man Power in CFC 8 Nos --
(k.) Revenue generation Provided --
5
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA)
Remarks
mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied,any other-to be specified)
(l.) N.A --
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Name and Address Shree Suraj Mahila Vikas Mandal Mulchand Road, Opp. ManavMandir, Surendranagar-363001
--
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)
Trust under Article 58(a) --
(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
Yet to done --
(d.) Date of formation of SPV 07.04.17 --
(e.) Number of Members 60 Nos --
(f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted
Provided --
(g.) Authorized Share Capital - --
(h.) Paid up capital as on............ - --
(i.) Shareholding Pattern Not Provided Required
(j.) Commitment letter for contribution
Not Provided Required
(k.) SPV specific A/c Account No: 734201011004089 (Vijaya Bank)
--
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation
Awareness Camp Organized --
(m.) Technical Institution CEPET, Ahmedabad --
(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
Not Provided Required
(o.)
(a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
20KW --
(b) Water 5000 Ltr/ day --
(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities - --
6
4. Implement Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency Center for Entrepreneurship Development CED, Government of Gujarat Gandhinagar
--
(b.) Fund receiving Agency Center for Entrepreneurship Development CED, Government of Gujarat Gandhinagar
--
(c.) Implementation Period 18 Months 24 months from date of issuance of final approval letter.
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
DPR appraised by SLSC meeting held in Gandhi Nagar, Guajarat on 04.05.18 under chairmanship of Commissioner , MSME, Govt. of Gujarat
--
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
- --
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee
- TEAC recommended the proposal
(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:
- --
(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)
- --
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) BEP 31.41% --
(b.) IRR, Payback period 21% --
(c.) DSCR - --
(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
28.43% --
(e.) NPV Rs. 212.55 lakh --
(f.) DER Not Applicable --
(g.) Sensitivity Analysis - --
(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State
This is the first Plastic Processing woman (SC) Cluster which is approved by government of Gujarat.
--
6. Proposed Project Cost:
S. No. Particulars Amount 1 Land and Building --
2 Plant & Machinery including Installation, Taxes/duties, Contingencies, etc.
388.43
3 Misc. Fixed Assets 15.50 4 Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 8.50 5 Margin money for Working Capital 15.00
Total Project Cost 427.43
7
7. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Percentage Amount
1 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 90.00 384.68
2 SPV contribution 10.00 42.75
Total 100.00 427.43
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
(Rs. In Lakh)
SR.NO. Name of Machinery QTY
Unit
Basic
Price
Rate
of
GST
GST Total Cost
1 Yarn Plant (Monofilament) 1 76.50 18% 13.77 90.27
2 Servo Injection Molding 1 17.00 18% 3.06 20.06
3 Extrusion blow molding 1 17.00 18% 3.06 20.06
4 Z lion 6325 cloth brush 1 178.00 18% 32.04 210.04
5 Die and Mold 1 25.00 18% 4.50 29.50
Total 369.93
Contingencies @ 5% 18.50
Total Cost of Equipment 388.43
9. Observations:
(A) Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Registered land document in the name of SPV for a minimum period of 30 years.
(ii) Details of shareholding pattern of SPV members.
(iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(iv) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.
(v) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution.
(vi) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilise at least 60 percent of
installed capacity.
(vii) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the escalation cost, if
any, over and above the approved project cost.
(viii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are
Micro / SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be
(ix) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.
(x) Documentary proof from SPV for utilisation of CFC facilities by at least 51% of
the cluster members.
(B) A minimum of 10% contribution from Government of Gujarat towards the project is
required.
10. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up Common
Facility Centre (CFC) in Plastic Products Cluster, Nava Junction Road, Surendra Nagar, Gujarat.
*********
8
Agenda No.50.3.2: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up of Common Facility
Centre (CFC) in Food Processing, Sabarkanth, Gujarat.
Background
(i) The proposal was recommended by State Level Steering Committee (SLSC) in its
meeting held on 04.05.18.
(ii) Proposal was received from MSME-DI, Ahmedabad, vide online application ref. No.
13958 dated 07.02.19.
(iii) Proposal along with DPR was forwarded by MSME-DI, Ahmadabad vide letter dated
28.02.19
(iv) Proposal was deliberated by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its
64th
& 65th
meetings held on 05.03.19 and 13.06.19 respectively and recommended
the same to place before Steering Committee for In-principle approval.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Basic Information of Cluster
Name of Cluster : Food Processing
District : Sabarkanth
Location of Cluster : Bhiloda, Arvalli
Lok Sabha Constituency : Sabarkantha
Main Product : Khakhra and Papad
No. of Enterprises including
break up (Micro, Small,
Medium):
Micro: 60
Turnover for the last five years
Year (Rs. in crore)
2013-14 : 12.16
2014-15 : 14.30
2015-16 : 16.83
2016-17 : 19.13
2017-18 : 22.50
Exports for the last five years : Nil
Employment in Cluster : 330 Nos
Technology Details : Currently units in the cluster are using conventional
technology and manual process, an upgraded technology is
required.
Whether DS Conducted : Yes
Main findings of DSR : The diagnostic study recommended the establishment of a
common facility centre.
Main Problems of Cluster : Non Availability of Advanced Technology
Non Availability quality control and testing methods as
per international standard
Non Availability of trained manpower.
Other Information : NA
9
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Justification for CFC To have Advance Technology to improve the quality and reduce the cost of final product.
--
(b.) Location of CFC Masota, Ta: Vijaynagar, Sabarkantha
% age of units in radius of 5km
45
% age of units in radius of 10km
15
(c.) Land for CFC
i. Whether land acquired No Registered land document in the name of SPV is required.
ii. Title is in name of Shree Raj Foundation
iii. Valuation and its basis Not Applicable
iv. Land is sufficient Yes
v. Change of land use NA
vi. If on lease, duration of lease
31 Year
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
Yes
(d.) Total Building area 12917 sqft --
(e.) Rate of construction of building
Rs. 2000/ Sq. Ft. --
(f.) Main Facility Proposed Advanced Technology Machines Quality control and Testing Facility
--
(g.) Prod capacity of CFC Provided --
(h.) Major Outputs/Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)
Parameter Before CFC
After CFC
Units (in Nos) 60 175 Production (Kg) 900.00 3500.00 Turn Over (Rs.in Cr)
22.50 87.50
Employment (Nos.)
330 1225
Profit (Rs. In Cr) 1.95 8.75 Export (Rs. In Cr)
0.00 0.20
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
Not Provided Required
(j.) Man Power in CFC - --
(k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
-
--
10
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Name and Address Shree Raj Foundation Address-Pandya Vas, Ta: Bhiloda Dist: Aravalli
--
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)
Trust under Article 58(a) --
(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
Not Provided --
(d.) Date of formation of SPV 09.10.98 -
(e.) Number of Members 40 --
(f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted
Provided -
(g.) Authorized Share Capital Rs. 44,29,200/- --
(h.) Paid up capital - --
(i.) Shareholding Pattern - Required
(j.) Commitment letter for contribution
Not Provided Required
(k.) SPV specific A/c Account Number: 028610009409 (Dena Bank
--
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation
- --
(m.) Technical Institution Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India EDII Gandhinagar
--
(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
Not Provided Required
(o.)
(a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
- --
(b) Water 500 Ltr/day --
(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities - --
4. Implement Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India EDII Gandhinagar
--
(b.) Fund receiving Agency Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India EDII Gandhinagar
--
(c.) Implementation Period 24 Months 24 Months from
11
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
issuance of Final Approval Letter
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
DPR appraised by SLSC meeting held in Gandhi Nagar, Gujarat on 04.05.18 under chairmanship of Commissioner, MSME, Govt. of Gujarat
--
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
- --
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee
- TEAC recommended the proposal
(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:
- --
(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)
Provided --
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) BEP 41.68% --
(b.) IRR, Payback period IRR @ 20.20% Pay Back Period : 4.34 Years
--
(c.) DSCR - --
(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
11.36% --
(e.) NPV 10%, Rs. 150.61 Lakh. --
(f.) DER - --
(g.) Sensitivity Analysis Provided --
(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State
This is the first food Processing CFC Cluster which has already provided in State committee and awaited for approval.
--
6. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Total Cost
1 Land and Building 0.00
2 Plant & Machinery (including Installation, Taxes/duties, Contingencies)
203.60
3 Misc. Fixed Assets 28.30
4 Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 5.00
5 Margin money for Working Capital 15.07
Total Project Cost 251.97
12
7. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars %age Amount
1 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 90.00 226.77
2 SPV contribution 10.00 25.20
Total 100.00 251.97
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Name of Machinery QTY Unit Basic
Price
GST GST Total Cost
1 Papad Machine 1 59.33 18% 10.68 70.01
2 Khakhara Machine 1 80.00 18% 14.40 94.40
3 Packaging Machine 1 15.00 18% 2.70 17.70
4 Testing Equipment 1 10.00 18% 1.80 11.80
Total 193.91
Contingencies @ 5% 9.70
Total Cost of Equipment 203.60
9. Observations:
(A) Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Registered land document in the name of SPV for a minimum period of 30 years.
(ii) Details of shareholding pattern of SPV members.
(iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(iv) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.
(v) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution.
(vi) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilise at least 60 percent of
installed capacity.
(vii) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the escalation cost, if
any, over and above the approved project cost.
(viii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are
Micro / SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
(ix) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.
(x) Documentary proof from SPV for utilisation of CFC facilities by at least 51% of
the cluster members.
(xi) Commitment letter from Government of Gujarat for their contribution.
(B) A minimum of 10% contribution from Government of Gujarat towards the project is
required.
10. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up Common
Facility Centre (CFC) in Food Processing, Sabarkanth, Gujarat.
*********
13
Agenda No.50.3.3: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up Common Facility
Centre (CFC) in Packaging Cluster, Kadi, Mehsana, Gujarat.
Background
The proposal was recommended by State Level Project Steering Committee (SLPSC)
held on 04.05.18.
Proposal was received from Government of Gujarat vide online ref. No. 13826 dated
07.01.19 & recommended by MSME-DI, Ahmedabad.
Proposal along with Focus Report & DPR was forwarded by MSME-DI, Ahmadabad
vide letter dated 28.02.19
Proposal was deliberated by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 64th
& 65th
meetings held on 05.03.19 & 13.06.19 respectively and recommended the same to
place before Steering Committee for In-principle approval.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Basic Information of Cluster
Name of Cluster : Packaging Cluster
District : Mehsana
Location of Cluster : Kadi
Lok Sabha Constituency : Mahesana
Main Product : Corrugated Box Packaging
No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium)
Micro :153 Small : 22 Total : 175
Turnover for the last five years
Year (Rs. in crore) 2012-13 : 66.13 2013-14 : 73.48 2014-15 : 81.64 2015-16 : 90.72 2016-17 : 100.8
Exports for the last five years
Nil
Employment in Cluster : 1750 Nos.
Technology Details : Currently units in the cluster are using conventional technology, advance and upgraded technology is required.
Whether DS Conducted : Yes
Main findings of DSR : Advanced Technology is required.
Main Problems of Cluster :
No availability of Advanced Technology. Micro and Small units have less export opportunity compare
to large and medium units.
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Justification for CFC To have facilities like Advance Technology & higher Export opportunities.
--
14
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(b.) Location of CFC Shrimali vas, Village- Nanikadi, Taluka- Kadi, Dis- Mahesana
--
% age of units in radius of 5km
120 --
% age of units in radius of 10km
80 --
(c.) Land for CFC
i. Whether land acquired Land on Lease basis Registered land document in the name of SPV for a minimum period of 30 years is required.
ii. Title is in name of Madhuram Packaging Cluster
iii. Valuation and its basis
NA
iv. Land is sufficient Yes
v. Change of land use NA
vi. If on lease, duration of lease
31 Year
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
Yes
(d.) Total Building area 1500 sq ft --
(e.) Rate of construction of building
- --
(f.) Main Facility Proposed New Technology Up gradation for 5 ply Corrugated Box Packaging.
--
(g.) Prod capacity of CFC - --
(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/domestic sales and direct/ indirect employment, etc.)
Parameter Before CFC
After CFC
No. of Units 175 540 Production (Mt.) 21,000 84,240 Turn Over ( in Cr) 126.0 463.0 Employment(No.) 1750 6480 Profit (Rs in cr) 7.80 32.40
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
Not Provided Required
(j.) Man Power in CFC 43Nos --
(k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
Provided --
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Name and Address Madhuram Packaging Cluster, Shrimali vas, Village- Nanikadi, Taluka- Kadi, Dis- Mahesana
--
(b.) Nature of Trust under Article 58(a) --
15
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
SPV(company or Society or Trust)
(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
Not Provided --
(d.) Date of formation of SPV
23.10.18 --
(e.) Number of Members 100 Nos --
(f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted
Provided --
(g.) Authorized Share Capital
- --
(h.) Paid up capital - --
(i.) Shareholding Pattern Rs. 82,397 / Member --
(j.) Commitment letter for contribution
Not Provided Required
(k.) SPV specific A/c Account No: 55340200000145 (Bank of Baroda)
--
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation
Not Provided Required
(m.) Technical Institution - -
(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
Not Provided Required
(o.)
(a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
30.0 KW --
(b) Water 2000Ltr/ day --
(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities
- --
4. Implement Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India EDII Gandhinagar
As per guidelines
(b.) Fund receiving Agency
Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India EDII Gandhinagar
(c.) Implementation Period 18 Months 24 Months from issuance
16
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
of Final Approval Letter
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
DPR appraised by SLSC meeting held in Gandhi Nagar, Guajarat on 04.05.18 under chairmanship of Commissioner , MSME, Govt. of Gujarat.
--
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
- --
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee
- TEAC recommended the proposal
(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:
- --
(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)
Provided --
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) BEP 38.25% --
(b.) IRR, Payback period IRR @ 20.56% Pay Back Period comes at 4.3 Years
--
(c.) DSCR - --
(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
28.12% --
(e.) NPV NPV @ 10% , Rs. 397.18 Lakh. --
(f.) DER - --
(g.) Sensitivity Analysis Provided --
(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State
This is the first paper packaging CFC Cluster which has already provided in State committee and awaited for approval
--
6. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in Lakh)
S. No. Particulars Total Cost
1 Land and Building 0.0
2 Plant & Machinery including Installation, Taxes/duties, Contingencies,
etc. 734.11
3 Misc. Fixed Assets 53.61
4 Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 16.25
5 Margin money for Working Capital 20.00
Total Project Cost 823.97
17
7. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars %age Amount
1 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 90.00 741.57
2 SPV contribution 10.00 82.40
Total 100.00 823.97
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
(Rs. in lakh)
SR.NO. Name of Machinery QTY Unit Basic Price
GST+ Import Duties
GST+ Import Duties Cost
Total Cost
1 5 layer corrugated paper board auto machine
1 537.50 18% 96.75 634.25
2 Boiler 1 25.00 18% 4.50 29.50
3 Laboratory Equipment 1 30.00 18% 5.40 35.40
Total 699.15
Contingencies @ 5% 34.96
Total Cost of Equipment 734.11
9. Observations:
(A) Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Registered lease deed in the name of SPV for a minimum period of 30 years.
(ii) Details of shareholding pattern of SPV members.
(iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(iv) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.
(v) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution.
(vi) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilise at least 60 percent of
installed capacity.
(vii) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the escalation cost, if any,
over and above the approved project cost.
(viii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro
/ SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be
(ix) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.
(x) Documentary proof from SPV for utilisation of CFC facilities by at least 51% of the
cluster members.
(B) A minimum of 10% contribution from Government of Gujarat towards the project is
required.
10. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up Common
Facility Centre (CFC) in Packaging Cluster, Kadi, Mehsana, Gujarat.
*********
18
Agenda No.50.3.4: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up Common Facility
Centre (CFC) in Engineering Cluster, Varachha, Surat, Gujarat.
The proposal was recommended by State Level Project Steering Committee in its
meeting held on 30.05.19.
Proposal was received from Government of Gujarat vide online ref. No. 14197 dated
10.04.19 & recommended by MSME-DI, Ahmedabad.
Proposal along with Focus Report & DPR was forwarded by MSME-DI, Ahmadabad
vide letter dated 07.06.19
Proposal was deliberated by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 65th
Meeting held on 13.06.19 and recommended the same to place before Steering Committee
for In-principle approval.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Basic Information of Cluster
Name of Cluster : Engineering Cluster
District : Surat
Location of Cluster : Varachha
Lok Sabha Constituency : Surat
Main Product : Engineering
No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium)
Micro:118 & Small: 32 Total: 150
Turnover for the last five years
Year (Rs. in crore) 2013-14 : 79.72 2014-15 : 88.58 2015-16 : 98.42 2016-17 : 109.35 2017-18 : 121.50
Exports(Rs in Crore) for the last five years
Nil
Employment in Cluster : 1950 nos.
Technology Details : Currently units in the cluster are using conventional technology for processing of Diamond, advance and upgraded technology is required.
Whether DS Conducted : Yes
Main findings of DSR : Advanced Machines and Tarining Centre is required for Cluster Units.
Main Problems of Cluster : No availability of Advanced Machinery. Non availability of Training Centre. Non availability Quality Control Facility.
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Justification for CFC To have facilities like Advance Technology and Training Centre.
--
(b.) Location of CFC 307 Ganganagar Nr Suvidha House Simada
19
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
Nana Varachha Gam, Surat
% age of units in radius of 5km
80
% age of units in radius of 10km
20
(c.) Land for CFC
i. Whether land acquired Yet to acquired Registered land
documents in the
name of SPV, in
case of leased
land, the lease
period should be
for a minimum of
30 years.
ii. Title is in name of Jivandhara Engineering Tool Room Training Centre Foundation
iii. Valuation and its basis NA
iv. Land is sufficient NA
v. Change of land use No
vi. If on lease, duration of lease
NA
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
NA
(d.) Total Building area NA --
(e.) Rate of construction of building
NA --
(f.) Main Facility Proposed Vertical Milling Centre Lathe Machine. Horizontal Milling Centre Training Centre in Tool Engineering,
CAD/CAM Jig Boring etc.
--
(g.) Prod capacity of CFC - --
(h.) Major Outputs /Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/ domestic sales and direct /indirect employment, etc.)
Parameter Before CFC
After CFC
Nos. of units (Numbers) 150 450 Turnover (Rs. in Cr) 121.50 486.00 Profit (Rs. in Cr) 5.25 24.75 Employment (in Nos) 1950 7650
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
Not Provided Required
(j.) Man Power in CFC 62 --
(k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
Provided --
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Name and Address Jivandhara Engineering Tool Room Training Centre Foundation
-
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)
Section 8 Company -
(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
Yet to be decided -
20
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(d.) Date of formation of SPV 30.03.19 -
(e.) Number of Members 115 -
(f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted
Provided -
(g.) Authorized Share Capital Rs. 1,29,26,250/- -
(h.) Paid up capital Rs. 1,29,26,250/- -
(i.) Shareholding Pattern Rs. 112,403/- per unit -
(j.) Commitment letter for contribution
Not Provided Required
(k.) SPV specific A/c Not Provided Required
(l.) Turst Building of SPV,Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to to be highlighted with support documentation
Awareness Camp -
(m.) Technical Institution Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India EDII Gandhinagar
-
(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
Provided -
(o.)
(a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
Provided --
(b) Water 75000 Ltr/Annual --
(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities - --
4. Implement Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency Entrepreneurship Development Institute of
India EDII Gandhinagar
-
(b.) Fund receiving Agency Entrepreneurship Development Institute of
India EDII Gandhinagar
(c.) Implementation Period 18 months 24 Months
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main
Recommendations
DPR appraised by SLSC meeting held in
Gandhi Nagar, Guajarat on 30.05.19 under
chairmanship of Commissioner , MSME,
Govt. of Guajrat
-
(e.) Comments of Technical
Division
- -
(f.) Approval of Technical
Committee
- TEAC
recommended the
proposal
21
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(g.) Comments of Cluster
Development Division:
- -
(h.) Working capital(In-
principle sanction of loan from
a bank, if applicable
arrangement made)
Provided -
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA)
Remarks
(a.) BEP 36.44% --
(b.) IRR, Payback period IRR @ 21.88% Pay Back Period comes at
4.6 Years
--
(c.) DSCR - --
(d.) Return on Capital
employed (ROCE)
31.10% --
(e.) NPV NPV @ 10% ,Rs. 710.20 Lakh --
(f.) DER - --
(g.) Sensitivity Analysis Provided --
(h.) Status of CFCs approved
in the State
- --
6. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Amount
1. Land & Building 0.00
2. Plant & Machinery (including Installation, Taxes/duties,
Contingencies, etc.)
1152.53
3. Misc. fixed assets 92.60
4. Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 27.50
5. Margin money for working capital 20.00
Total 1292.63
7. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Percentage Amount
1 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 90.00 1163.36
2 SPV contribution 10.00 129.27
Total 100.00 1292.63
22
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification
(Rs. in lakh)
S .No. Name of Machinery QTY Unit Basic Price
Rate of
GST GST
Total Cost
1
CNC Vertical Milling Machine -simultaneous 3 axis -table size -600X300 mm -travel - X,Y,Z: 450, 300, 350mm
1 35.59 18% 6.41 42.0
2
CNC Vertical Milling Machine -simultaneous -X,Y & Z travel with CNC rotary table -table size-650X350 mm -travel- X,Y,Z: 500, 350, 400 mm
1 44.07 18% 7.93 52.0
3
CNC Horizontal Machining Centre -Pallet table surface 400X400 mm -Axis travel : *Longitudinal - 500mm *Cross - 400mm *Vertical - 400mm
1 101.69 18% 18.30 120.0
4
CNC High Speed Engraving cum Milling Machine -simultaneous 3 axis -work table : 700X600 mm -Axis travel: X-600mrn,Y-500mm, Z-300mm
1 72.03 18% 12.97 85.0
5
CNC Milling Machine X-250mm, Y-250mm, Z-200mm Table Size : 400 x 200 mm Controller : Fanuc
2 33.05 18% 5.95 78.0
6
CNC Lathe -simultaneous 2 axis -swing over bed :- 300 mm -length ofjob :- 450 mm -travel : X-150 mm, Z- 400 mm -No. of tool on Turret :- l2 -slant bed
4 29.38 18% 5.29 138.7
7 Tools & Cutters For CNC Machines In Lot
1 21.19 18% 3.81 25.0
8 Accessories For CNC Machine In Lot 1 12.71 18% 2.29 15.0
9 Vertical Milling Machine -table size - 1600X300 mm -travel -X,Y,Z: 950,250,400 mm
1 12.71 18% 2.29 15.0
10 Vertical Milling Machine -table size - 1300X250 mm -travel -X,Y,Z: 600,225,350 mm
1 9.32 18% 1.68 11.0
11 Horizontal Milling Machine -table size- 1300 X 250 mm -travel -X,Y,Z: 600,225,350 mm
1 8.47 18% 1.52 10.0
12
Universal Milling Machine with Slotting Attachment -table size- 1300 X 250 mm -travel -X,Y,Z: 600,225,350 mm
1 10.17 18% 1.83 12.0
13 Centre Lathe 8 Feet Bed -centre height- 320 mm -admit between centres :- 1000 mm
2 6.78 18% 1.22 16.0
14 Heavy Duty Lathe 14 Feet Bed-centre height- 320 mm-admit between centres :- 1000 mm
2 11.02 18% 1.98 26.0
23
S .No. Name of Machinery QTY Unit Basic Price
Rate of
GST GST
Total Cost
15
Surface Grinding Machine -table: *working surface : 455X150 mm *longitudinal travel - 460 mm *cross travel - 160 mm -vertical movement of wheel head 280 mm
3 10.17 18% 1.83 36.0
16 Cylindrical Grinding Machine -centre height - 130 mm -centre distance - 500 mm
2 12.71 18% 2.29 30.0
17
Universal Tool & Cutter Grinder -swing with raising block : 300 mm -distance between centres : 700 mm -table travel *longitudinal- 500 mm *cross * 225 mm
2 12.71 18% 2.29 30.0
18
Double Column Hydraulic Press -capacity - 200 T -table size- 750X750 mm -stroke length -275 mm
1 7.63 18% 1.37 9.0
19
Injection Moulding Machine -shot weight - 150 gm -injection pressure - 1800 kglcmz -clamping force - B0 T -distance between tie bars : 380X380 rnm
1 29.66 18% 5.34 35.0
20 CNC Plasma Cutting Machine -105 A Plasma Source -1500 X 3000 Mm2 Bed
1 33.90 18% 6.10 40.0
21
CNC Laser Cutting & Engraving Machine -100 W co2 Reci Brand Tube -1500 X 3000 Mm2 Bed
1 22.03 18% 3.97 26.0
22
Gear Hobbing Machine Max. Dia. of Spur Gear 1/2" - 18" 1" - 30" Max Module 5 8 Max Travel of Hob Side 10" 12"
1 11.86 18% 2.13 14.0
23
Jig Boring Machine Standard Size Table Size - 900 mm x 1000 mm Vertical Travel - 620 mm Voltage 380 V Power 37 - 51 kW Weight 815 kg Automatic Grade
1 15.25 18% 2.75 18.0
24
Hydraulic Shearing Machine Right Squaring arm 600 mm Dimensions : 5100 x 2800 x 3000 mm Left Squaring arm 1000 mm
1 14.41 18% 2.59 17.0
25 Electric Heat Treatment Furnace Material Loading Capacity 0-500 kgMax Temperature (degree Celsius) 1000-1500
1 9.32 18% 1.68 11.0
26 Hydraulic Press 70 Ton 1 7.63 18% 1.37 9.0 27 Mechanical Press 60 Ton 1 10.17 18% 1.83 12.0
24
S .No. Name of Machinery QTY Unit Basic Price
Rate of
GST GST
Total Cost
28
Spot Welding Machine Suitable For Welding Rod <1mm, 1-2mm, 3-4mm, 2-3mm Throat Depth 150 - 200 mm
5 5.93 18% 1.07 35.0
29 Welding Machine ARC Range of Current 30-300 A Insulation Class Class H
5 1.27 18% 0.23 7.5
30 Welding Machine TIG Phase Three Phase Current (Ampere) 300-400
5 2.12 18% 0.38 12.5
31 Welding Machine MIG Open Circuit Voltage 18 - 42 VDC Current 500-600 A
5 2.54 18% 0.46 15.0
32 Diesel Generator (100 KVA) 1 29.66 18% 5.34 35.0 33 Voltage Stabilizer (25 KVA) 15 3.39 18% 0.61 60.0
Total 1097.65 Contingencies @ 5% 54.88 Total Cost of Equipment 1152.53
9. Observations:
(A) Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Registered land documents in the name of SPV, in case of leased land, the lease
period should be for a minimum of 30 years.
(ii) Details of shareholding pattern of SPV members.
(iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(iv) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.
(v) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution.
(vi) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilise at least 60 percent of
installed capacity.
(vii) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the escalation cost, if any,
over and above the approved project cost.
(viii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro
/ SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
(ix) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.
(x) Documentary proof from SPV for utilisation of CFC facilities by at least 51% of the
cluster members.
(B) A minimum of 10% contribution from Government of Gujarat towards the project is
required.
10. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up Common
Facility Centre (CFC) in Engineering Cluster, Varachha, Surat, Gujarat.
*********
25
Agenda No.50.3.5: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up Common Facility
Centre (CFC) in Food Processing, Chikhli, Navsari, Gujarat.
Background
The proposal was recommended by State Level Project Steering Committee in its meeting
held on 30.05.19.
Proposal was received from Government of Gujarat vide online ref. No. 14099 dated
04.03.19 & recommended by MSME-DI, Ahmedabad.
Proposal along with Focus Report & DPR was forwarded by MSME-DI, Ahmadabad
vide letter dated 07.06.19
Proposal was considered by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 65th
Meeting held on 13.06.19 and recommended the same to place before Steering Committee
for In-principle approval.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Basic Information of Cluster
Name of Cluster : Food Processing
District : Navsari
Location of Cluster : Chikhli
Lok Sabha Constituency : Navsari
Main Product : Fruit, Honey and Mahuda Processing
No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium)
Micro : 90
Turnover for the last five years
Year (Rs. in crore) 2013-14 : 53.15 2014-15 : 59.05 2015-16 : 65.61 2016-17 : 72.9 2017-18 : 81.00
Exports(Rs in Crore) for the last five years :
Nil
Employment in Cluster : 750 nos.
Technology Details : Currently units in the cluster are using conventional technology; advance and upgraded technology is required.
Whether DS Conducted : Yes
Main findings of DSR : Advanced Machines and quality control facility is required for purposed CFC
Main Problems of Cluster : Lack of adequate quality control and testing methods as per international standards
Non Availability of Advanced Machinery
Other Information : NA
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Justification for CFC To have facilities like Quality Control Lab and Advance Machinery
--
26
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(b.) Location of CFC Village Godthal Taluka Chikhli, District Navsari
% age of units in radius of 5km
25
% age of units in radius of 10km
75
(c.) Land for CFC
i. Whether land acquired No Registered land
documents in the
name of SPV, in case
of leased land, the
lease period should be
for a minimum of 30
years.
ii. Title is in name of Ukabhai Jerambhai Patel
iii. Valuation and its basis NA
iv. Land is sufficient NA
v. Change of land use NA
vi. If on lease, duration of lease
NA
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
NA
(d.) Total Building area(sq ft) NA --
(e.) Rate of construction of building
NA --
(f.) Main Facility Proposed Filtering Pasteurization Moisture Reducing Processing
--
(g.) Prod capacity of CFC Provided --
(h.) Major Outputs/Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/ domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)
Parameter Before CFC
After CFC
Units 90 275 Turn Over ( in Cr) 81.00 371.25 Employment(Nos.) 750 3025
Profit (Rs in cr) 2.70 13.75 Export (Rs in Cr) - 0.50
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
Not Provided Required
(j.) Man Power in CFC 40 --
(k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
Provided --
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA)
Remarks
(a.) Name and Address Brotherhood Village Godthal Taluka
Chikhli, District Navsari. --
(b.) Nature of SPV (company
or Society or Trust)
Trust under Article 58(a) --
27
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA)
Remarks
(c.) Name of the state Govt.
and MSME officials in SPV
Not Provided --
(d.) Date of formation of
SPV
21.06.99 --
(e.) Number of Members 90 --
(f.) Bye Laws or MA and
AOA submitted
Provided --
(g.) Authorized Share
Capital
- --
(h.) Paid up capital - --
(i.) Shareholding Pattern Rs. 1,08,912/- / member --
(j.) Commitment letter for
contribution
Not Provided Required
(k.) SPV specific A/c Account No: 10692116218 (SBI) --
(l.) Trust Building of SPV,
Previous track record of co-
operative initiatives pursued
by SPV members need to be
highlighted with support
documentation
- --
(m.) Technical Institution Entrepreneurship Development Institute
of India EDII Gandhinagar
-
(n.) CFC may be utilised by
SPV members as also others
in a cluster. However,
evidence should be furnished
with regard to SPV member
ability to utilise at least 60
percent of installed capacity.
Provided -
(o.)
(a) Power requirement for
commercial/domestic
purpose
76 KW --
(b) Water 5000 LTR /day --
(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities - --
4. Implement Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India EDII Gandhinagar
-
28
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(b.) Fund receiving Agency Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India EDII Gandhinagar
(c.) Implementation Period 18 Month 24 Months
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
DPR appraised by SLSC meeting held in Gandhi Nagar, Guajarat on 30.05.19 under chairmanship of Commissioner , MSME, Govt. of Gujarat
-
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
- -
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee
- TEAC recommended the proposal
(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:
- -
(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)
Not required from bank --
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) BEP 37.79% --
(b.) IRR, Payback period IRR @ 18.52% Pay Back Period comes at 4.59Years
--
(c.) DSCR - --
(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
25.23% --
(e.) NPV NPV @ 10% comes Rs. Rs. 184.94 Lakh. --
(f.) DER - --
(g.) Sensitivity Analysis Provided --
(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State
This is the first food processing CFC Cluster by ST/ SC entrepreneurs which has already provided in State committee and awaited for approval.
--
6. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Amount
1 Land and Building --
2 Plant & Machinery including Installation, Taxes/duties,
Contingencies, etc. 429.64
3 Misc. Fixed Assets 26.00
4 Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 14.50
5 Margin money for Working Capital 20.00
Total 490.14
29
7. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Percentage Amount
1 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 90.00 441.12
2 SPV contribution 10.00 49.02
Total 100.00 490.14
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
(Rs. in lakh)
SNO. Name of Machinery QTY Unit Basic Price
Rate of GST
GST Total Cost
1 Multi Fruit Processing Plant 1 218.26 18% 39.29 257.55
2 Honey Processing Plant 1 73.50 18% 13.23 86.73
3 Mahuda Processing Plant 1 20.00 18% 3.60 23.60
4 Testing Equipment 1 10.00 18% 1.80 11.80
5 Cold Storage 1 25.00 18% 4.50 29.50
Total 409.18
Contingencies @ 5% 20.46
Total Cost of Equipments 429.64
9. Observations:
(A) Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Registered land documents in the name of SPV, in case of leased land, the lease
period should be for a minimum of 30 years.
(ii) Details of shareholding pattern of SPV members.
(iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(iv) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.
(v) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution.
(vi) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilise at least 60 percent of
installed capacity.
(vii) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the escalation cost, if any,
over and above the approved project cost.
(viii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro
/ SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be
(ix) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.
(x) Documentary proof from SPV for utilisation of CFC facilities by at least 51% of the
cluster members.
(B) A minimum of 10% contribution from Government of Gujarat towards the project is
required.
10. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up Common
Facility Centre (CFC) in Food Processing, Chikhli, Navsari, Gujarat.
*********
30
Agenda No.50.3.6: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up of Common Facility
Centre (CFC) in Diamond Cluster, Saraspur, Ahmedabad, Gujarat.
Background
The proposal was recommended by State Level Project Steering Committee in its meeting
held on 30.05.19.
Proposal was received from Government of Gujarat vide online ref. No. 14107 dated
05.03.19 & recommended by MSME-DI, Ahmedabad.
Proposal along with Focus Report & DPR was forwarded by MSME-DI, Ahmadabad
vide letter dated 07.06.19
Proposal was deliberated by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 65th
Meeting held on 13.06.19 and recommended the same to place before Steering
Committee for In-principle approval.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Basic Information of Cluster
Name of Cluster : Diamond Cluster
District : Ahmedabad
Location of Cluster : Saraspur
Lok Sabha Constituency : Ahmedabad east
Main Product : Diamond
No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium)
Micro: 110
Turnover for the last five years
Year Amount (Rs. in crore)
2013-14 : 12.48 2014-15 : 13.86 2015-16 : 15.40 2016-17 : 17.11 2017-18 : 19.01
Exports for the last five years :
Year Amount (Rs. in crore)
2013-14 : - 2014-15 : - 2015-16 : - 2016-17 : - 2017-18 : 1.2
Employment in Cluster : 900 Persons
Technology Details : Currently units in the cluster are using conventional technology for processing of Diamond, advance and upgraded technology is required.
Whether DS Conducted : Yes
Main findings of DSR : Advanced Machines for processing of diamond is required for purposed CFC
Main Problems of Cluster :
Non availability of advanced machine for diamond cutting process.
Weak marketing linkages absence of organized marketing channels.
Micro and small units have less export opportunity compare to large and medium units.
Other Information : NA
31
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Justification for CFC To have facilities like Advance Technology for diamond processing
--
(b.) Location of CFC 6-Pushpdeep Industrial Hub and Arcade, Saraspur, Ahmedabad
% age of units in radius of 5km
95
% age of units in radius of 10km
5
(c.) Land for CFC
i. Whether land acquired Yes Registered land document in the name of SPV is required.
ii. Title is in name of Diamond Trust Ahmedabad
iii. Valuation and its basis Land Purchased at Cost of Rs 50 lakh.
iv. Land is sufficient Yes
v. Change of land use No
vi. If on lease, duration of lease
NA
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
NA
(d.) Total Building area(sq ft) 800 Square feet --
(e.) Rate of construction of building
Rs.1500/sq. feet --
(f.) Main Facility Proposed Planning Scanning. Designing Testing Laser Cutting
--
(g.) Prod capacity of CFC - --
(h.) Major Outputs/Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)
S.
No.
Parameter Before
intervention
After
Intervention
1. Units (Numbers) 110 320
2 Production (carat) 158,400 576,000
3 Turn Over (Rs. In Cr) 19.01 63.36
4 Employment
(Numbers) 900 3250
5 Profit (Rs. In cr) 3.30 16.00
6 Export (Rs. In Lakhs) 1.20 16.00
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
Not Provided Required
(j.) Man Power in CFC 18 --
(k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
Provided --
32
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Name and Address Name- Diamond Trust Ahmedabad ADDRESS-6 pushpdeep Industrial Hub and Arcade, Saraspur, Ahmedabad
--
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)
Trust under Article 58(a) --
(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
Not Provided --
(d.) Date of formation of SPV 21.06.18 -
(e.) Number of Members 55 Persons --
(f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted
Provided -
(g.) Authorized Share Capital - --
(h.) Paid up capital - --
(i.) Shareholding Pattern - Required
(j.) Commitment letter for contribution
Not Provided Required
(k.) SPV specific A/c Account No: 38461381670 (SBI) --
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation
- --
(m.) Technical Institution Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India EDII Gandhinagar
--
(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
- Required
(o.)
(a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
20 KW --
(b) Water 50000 Ltr/ Annum --
(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities NA --
4. Implement Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India EDII Gandhinagar, Guajrat
-
(b.) Fund receiving Agency Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India EDII Gandhinagar, Guajrat
-
(c.) Implementation Period 24 Months 24 Months from
33
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
issuance of Final Approval Letter
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
DPR appraised by SLSC meeting held in Gandhi Nagar, Guajarat on 30.05.19 under chairmanship of Commissioner , MSME, Govt. of Gujarat
Received
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
The Project is Technically feasible and it is considered to be economically viable
--
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee
The project is been approved by technical committee
TEAC recommended the proposal
(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:
The project is been approved by Cluster development division
--
(h.) Working capital (In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)
not Required from Bank --
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) BEP 32.86 %, on third years at 70% of capacity utilization.
--
(b.) IRR, Payback period 17.55% , Pay Back Period : 4.8Years --
(c.) DSCR - --
(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
25.44% --
(e.) NPV 10% (Rs. 166.18 Lakh) --
(f.) DER - --
(g.) Sensitivity Analysis Provided --
(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State
- --
6. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Amount
1. Land and Building 50.00
2. Plant & Machinery including Installation, Taxes/duties,
Contingencies, etc. 414.24
3. Misc. Fixed Assets 11.00
4. Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 11.50
5. Margin money for Working Capital 9.00
Total 495.74
7. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Percentage Amount
1 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 90 446.16
2 SPV contribution 10 49.58
Total 100 495.74
34
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
(Rs. in lakh)
SNO. Name of Machinery QTY Unit Basic
Price Rate of GST
GST Total Cost
1 Diamond Testing and Scanning machine
1 128.52 18% 23.13 151.65
2 Diamond galaxy planning Machine
1 120.00 18% 21.60 141.60
3 Diamond Laser Machine (mini) 1 80.00 18% 14.40 94.40
4 Testing Equipment 1 5.00 18% 0.90 5.90
Total
393.55
Contingencies @ 5%
20.71
Total Cost of Machine & Equipment 414.24
9. Observations:
(A) Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Registered land documents with clear title in the name of SPV.
(ii) Details of shareholding pattern of SPV members.
(iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(iv) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.
(v) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution.
(vi) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilise at least 60 percent of
installed capacity.
(vii) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the escalation cost, if any,
over and above the approved project cost.
(viii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro
/ SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be
(ix) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.
(x) Documentary proof from SPV for utilisation of CFC facilities by at least 51% of the
cluster members.
(B) A minimum of 10% contribution from Government of Gujarat towards the project is
required.
10. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up Common
Facility Centre (CFC) in Diamond Cluster, Saraspur, Ahmedabad, Gujarat.
*********
35
Agenda No. 50.3.7: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up of Common Facility
Centre (CFC) in Brass & Bronze Cluster, Kariyatpur, Hazaribagh,
Jharkhand.
Background
The proposal was approved by State Level Steering Committee (SLSC) of Government
of Jharkhand held on 29.01.19.
The proposal was received from Jharkhand Industrial Infrastructure Development
Corporation (JIIDCO), vide online ref. No:- 13946 dated 03.02.19 & recommended by
MSME-DI, Ranchi.
Vide letter dated 13.03.19, MSME-DI, Ranchi has forwarded the Detailed Project Report
(DPR) along with Focus Report.
Proposal was considered by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 65th
meeting held on 13.06.19 and recommended the proposal to place before Steering
Committee for In-principle approval.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Basic Information of Cluster
Name of Cluster Brass & Bronze Cluster
District Hazaribagh
Location of Cluster Kariyatpur
Lok Sabha Constituency Hazaribagh
Main Product
Bronze Plate, Brass Plate, Bronze Bowl, Brass Ladle (Kalchul), Pan (Kadhai), Brass Mug & Glass, Crock Pot (Dekchi) and other Brass & Bronze Utensils
No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium)
Micro- 61
Turnover for the last five years Year (Rs. in crore) 2013-2014 : Rs. 3.80 2014-2015 : Rs. 4.00 2015-2016 : Rs. 4.40 2016-2017 : Rs. 4.60 2017-2018 : Rs. 5.00
Exports for the last five years Nil
Employment in Cluster Direct- 300 & Indirect- 450
Technology Details Traditional Tools and Techniques
Whether DS Conducted Diagnostic Study was conducted by Directorate of Industries
Main findings of DSR Kariyatpur (located in Aspirational District Hazaribagh) is being the major production center of houseware and artifacts in the state needs to evolve itself as per the changing market conditions and increasing demand of finished products. Therefore, in order to bring about production efficiency and growth across MSEs in the cluster, it is very essential to initiate collective mechanisms not only through soft intervention activities but also by providing them with proper common facilities centers equipped with modern technology
Main Problems of Cluster Low Production capacity Lack of basic Infrastructure Non availability of modern manufacturing facilities and
36
manual designing of products leading to sub optimal quality
Other Information The cluster falls under one the Aspirational district Hazaribagh, as identified by Government think tank NITI Aayog
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Justification for CFC The MSEs in cluster lack advanced production machineries for manufacturing as their investment capacity is limited and awareness level is low. Equipment related to semi automatic processing and better standards, specifications, advance designing are not present even in a single unit in the cluster.
--
(b.) Location of CFC Kariyatpur, Hazaribagh --
% age of units in radius of 5km
70 --
% age of units in radius of 10km
90 --
(c.) Land for CFC
i. Whether land acquired In process of acquiring land Registered land
documents in the
name of SPV, in
case of leased
land, the lease
period should be
for a minimum of
30 years.
ii. Title is in name of Kariyatpur Brass Manufacturing Pvt. Ltd
iii. Valuation and its basis Local administration land price
iv. Land is sufficient Yes
v. Change of land use Not required, it is Industrial land
vi. If on lease, duration of lease
Lease for 15 years; extendable for another 15 years
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
yes
(d.) Total Building area(sq ft) 5000 --
(e.) Rate of construction of building
Rs 800 Sqft --
(f.) Main Facility Proposed In house testing facility Machine & Tool center
Training & Skill Development Center Basic Infrastructure facilities
--
(g.) Prod capacity of CFC -- Required
(h.) Major Outputs/Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)
Parameters Before CFC After CFC No. of units 61 70 Turnover (Rs. in crore) 5.00 8.00 Export (Rs. in crore) Nil 1.00 Employment 300 450
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
Yes. Consent Establish and Consent to operate would be applied after obtaining In- principle approval
Required.
(j.) Man Power in CFC 51 --
37
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets (service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
User charges will be levied Required
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Name and Address Kariyatpur Brass Manufacturing Private
Limited Certificate of
SPV’s formation
is required.
(b.) Nature of SPV (company
or Society or Trust)
Registered under Companies act 2013 --
(c.) Name of the state Govt.
and MSME officials in SPV
Director, Industries cum Managing Director
JIIDCO and Director MSME-DI, Ranchi --
(d.) Date of formation of SPV 28th
January 2019 --
(e.) Number of Members 34
(f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA
submitted
Under preparation Required
(g.) Authorized Share Capital 10,000 --
(h.) Paid up capital 1,00,000 --
(i.) Shareholding Pattern Not more than 10% each Required
(j.) Commitment letter for
contribution
-- Required
(k.) SPV specific A/c To be opened once the In principle approval
obtained Required
(l.) Trust Building of SPV,
Previous track record of co-
operative initiatives pursued by
SPV members need to be
highlighted with support
documentation
Already been done in Soft Intervention
phase
--
(m.) Technical Institution Tool Room Dhanbad --
(n.) CFC may be utilised by
SPV members as also others in
a cluster. However, evidence
should be furnished with
regard to SPV member ability
to utilise at least 60 percent of
installed capacity.
61 cluster members and it will be open for
surrounding industry (All cluster members
have given the written commitment to
utilize the minimum 80% installed capacity
of CFC, once the CFC is operationalized.
Received
(o.)
(a) Power requirement for
commercial/domestic purpose
250 --
(b) Water 15000 --
38
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities 25 liter diesel per day --
4. Implement Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency Jharkhand Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation (JIIDCO)
As per guidelines
(b.) Fund receiving Agency Jharkhand Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation (JIIDCO)
(c.) Implementation Period 24 months --
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
SIDBI appraisal will be done after receiving in principle approval from Ministry of MSME
Required
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
NA --
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee
NA TEAC recommended the proposal.
(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:
NA --
(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)
NA --
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) BEP 45.7% --
(b.) IRR, Payback period 23.51%, 6th year --
(c.) DSCR NA --
(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
124.98%
(e.) NPV 254.13 --
(f.) DER NA --
(g.) Sensitivity Analysis IRR in between 26.11% to 21.00% --
(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State
Two CFCs got in principle approvals --
6. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Total Project Cost
(i) Land 10.00
(ii) Building & other civil works 40.00
(iii) Plant & Machinery (including electrification) 242.74
(iv) Misc. Fixed Assets 12.23
(v) Preliminary expenses 11.50
(vi) Pre-operative expenses 22.10
39
S. No. Particulars Total Project Cost
(vii) Contingency (2% on building & 5% on P&M) 13.55
(viii) Margin money for working capital 2.18
Total Project Cost 354.30
7. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Amount
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 273.87
(ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Jharkhand 41.08
(iii) SPV contribution 39.35
Total 354.30
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Description Quantity Amount
1. Two Hi Hot Rolling Mill Motor 60HP 1 14.52
2. Four Hi Cold Rolling Mill Motor 60HP 1 30.25
3. Deep Drawing Mechanical Press (German Type) Motor
20HP
2 24.20
4. Circle Cutting Machine Motor 5 HP with 30 inch Dia 1 16.94
5. Circle Cutting Machine Motor 5 HP with 36 inch Dia 1 18.15
6. Spinning Lathe Motor 2 HP 1 2.42
7. Spinning Lathe Motor 1 HP 1 2.42
8. General Purpose Lathe Motor 2HP 1 1.82
9. Oil Fired Pit Furnace 1 14.52
10. Electronic Weighing machine with 500kg capacity 1 0.85
11. Hand Tools, Measuring instruments 1 0.18
12. Welding machine 1 1.21
13. DG Set 1 5.45
14. Exhaust Fan & Man Coolers 10 12.10
15. Power Distribution Transformer 1 10.06
16. Wet Lab with XRF metal analyzer 1 16.94
17. Dies of different size - 70.00
18. Ink Stamping (Manual) 1 0.726
Total 242.756
9. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Registered land documents in the name of the SPV (if land is on lease basis,
registered lease deed for a minimum period of 30 years).
(ii) SIDBI Appraisal Report
(iii) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.
(iv) Certificate of SPV‟s formation & share holding pattern.
(v) Copy of Article of Association & Memorandum of Association.
(vi) Details of production capacity of CFC.
40
(vii) Details of Revenue generation mechanism.
(viii) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution.
(ix) Details of SPV‟s bank account/ Mandate form.
(x) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the escalation cost, if
any, over and above the approved project cost.
(xi) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.
(xii) Undertaking from State Government that more than 50% units are Micro/SC-
ST/Women Enterprise, as the case may be.
10. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle approval for setting up of Common
Facility Centre (CFC) in Brass & Bronze Cluster, Kariyatpur, Hazaribagh, Jharkhand.
*****
41
Agenda No.50.3.8: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up of Common Facility
Centre in Power loom Cluster, Chikodi, Belgaum, Karnataka.
Background:
(i) The proposal was recommended by State Level Steering Committee in its meeting held
on 15.11.18.
(ii) The proposal was submitted vide online application Ref. No. 14055 dated 27.02.19,
which was also recommended by MSME-DI, Hubli.
(iii) The proposal was deliberated during 64th
& 65th
meetings of Techno Economic
Appraisal Committee (TEAC) held on 05.03.19 & 13.06.19 respectively and the same
was recommended to place before Steering Committee for In-principle approval.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Basic Information of Cluster
Name of Cluster : Powerloom Cluster District Belagavi Location of Cluster : Chikkodi. Lok Sabha Constituency : Chikkodi Main Product : Cotton Cloth Material, Cotton Mixed Sarees, Cotton based
towels and cotton and silk mixed cloth materials, Cotton and poly cotton suiting and shirting material.
No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium)
Micro 150 Small 0 Medium 0
Turn over for the last five years : (Rs. in Crore)
Year Amount 2013-14 54.00 2014-15 72.00 2015-16 118.00 2016-17 126.00 2017-18 135.00
Exports for the last five years : (Rs. in Crore)
Nil
Employment in Cluster : 6200 Nos. Technology Details : Traditional Power looms Automatic Power looms (Air
jet/Auto loom) Shuttle Looms, Shuttled Saree Making Looms, Rapier Looms are being used by the units. Value addition and the manufacturing of fabrics according to customer‟s compliances, is not possible without introducing modern technology machines.
Whether DS Conducted : Yes. Main findings of DSR : The diagnostic study has found that the cluster needs to
be supported with new technology machineries for the promotion and progress of the cluster.
The diagnostic study recommends the hard interventions for the cluster to overcome the technological backwardness of the cluster.
Main Problems of Cluster : Lack of Proper Raw Material Bank. Lack of Warping and Sizing Facility for Air jet Auto
Looms. Lack of Warping and Sizing Facility for Shuttle and
Rapier Looms. Lack of Warping and Sizing Facility for Saree Processing
Looms. Lack of Design Development Facility. Lack of Post Looming Processing Machineries like
Calendaring, Polishing, Cutting and Folding Machines. Lack of Digital Printing Machine.
42
Poor Quality up-gradation and Lack of Dedicated Training Facility.
Lack of Value Addition and Product Diversification. Other Information : Power loom industry in Nej-Chikodi region is famous for
its cotton and cotton mixed fine fabric cloth, though the cluster is not very old, it has gained regional recognition.
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA) Comments by
Cluster Division (a.) Justification for CFC The Interventions proposed in CFC
will overcome the adversaries in the cloth production.
The raw material procurement and storage intervention will overcome the price fluctuation.
The short comings in the pre looming process like warping, sizing, calendaring and digital printing, will be taken care by the CFC.
The post loom activities like polishing, packing etc. will help the cluster product in marketing.
The product diversification and design center will help the cluster members to venture into newer market areas and will give them necessary support to survive the changing market trends and demands.
The dedicated marketing center with marketing staff will be an added advantage for the cluster members.
--
(b.) Location of CFC The proposed land Nej Village, Chikodi taluk, Belgaum District- 591239.
--
% age of units in radius of 5km 70
% age of units in radius of 10km
100
(c.) Land for CFC i. Whether land acquired Yes. The land is on
lease for 30 years. Registered land documents required from Revenue Department of Government of Karnataka.
ii. Title is in name of SPV. Registered Lease Deed in the name of SPV for 30 years.
iii. Valuation and its basis Land on lease basis for 30 years.
iv. Land is sufficient Yes. The SPV has taken 1 acre of land on lease for 30 years.
--
v. Change of land use Yes -- vi. If on lease, duration of lease Land on lease basis for 30 years. -- vii Whether lease is legally tenable
Yes. --
(d.) Total Building area(sq ft) The SPV proposes to construct the building 19300 sq ft. for CFC
--
(e.) Rate of construction of Building with the estimated cost at Rs. --
43
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Comments by Cluster Division
building 254.60 lakh. (f.) Main Facility Proposed Common Raw Material Bank.
Common Warping and Sizing Facility for Airjet Auto Looms.
Common Warping and Sizing Facility for Shuttle and Rapier Looms.
Common Warping and Sizing Facility for Saree Processing Looms.
Common Design Development Facility.
Common Post Looming Processing Machineries like Calendaring, Polishing, Cutting and Folding Machines
Common Digital Printing Machine Common Finished Product Storage
Facility
--
g.) Prod capacity of CFC Total Proposed Production of CFC =12500 kg of Yarn Processing into beams (single shifts).
(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)
Sl. No.
Parameter Before intervention
After Intervention
1. Nos. of units 150 250 2 Turnover
(Rs. in crore) 135 200
3 Export (Rs. in crore)
Indirect export taking place through traders.
Direct export likely by 5 units Rs. 25 crore.
4 Employment Direct – 1200 Indirect - 5000
Direct – 3000 Indirect – 10000
5 Profit Margins 12% to 14% 25%
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
Yes , No Objection Certificate obtained from State Pollution Board.
Document required.
(j.) Man Power in CFC 52 -- (k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
Details of the User Charges: a. User charge for Plane Cloth Warping and Sizing Setup 340cm Panna: Rs. 28/- per Kg b. User charge for Plane Cloth Warping and Sizing Setup 150cm Panna: Rs. 18/- per Kg c. User charge for Saree Warping and Sizing: Rs. 15 per Kg d. User charge for Digital Fabric Printing: Rs.25 per Meter e. User charge for Fabric/Cloth Calendaring: Rs.8 per Meter f. User charge for Fabric/Cloth Cutting Inspection Rolling Folding Machine: Rs. 2 per meter Expected Revenue/Year: Rs. 850.16 lakhs (75% production capacity) Expected Expenditure: Rs. 595.61 lakhs (variable 117.68 fixed exp 238.98) Balance Revenue Expenditure Rs. 254.55 lakhs Income Tax Rs. 74.09 lakhs Net Profit Rs. 180.46 lakhs (BEP-38% IRR-25% ROCE 30% ) Hence as per guideline the CFC will be self sustainable and will have surplus to self upgrade.
44
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA)
Comments by
Cluster Division
(a.) Name and Address Ideal Hi-Tech Power loom Cluster
Association Hebbal,
Survey No. 41/1, Nej Village, Chikodi
Taluk, Belgaum District
--
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or
Society or Trust)
Society, registered under Karnataka
Society (Registration) Act, 1960.
--
(c.) Name of the state Govt.
and MSME officials in SPV
MD-KCTU, JD-DIC-Belgaum, Director
MSME - DI Hubli.
--
(d.) Date of formation of SPV 27-07-2018 --
(e.) Number of Members 150 (as per revised proposal)
--
(f.) Bye Laws or MoA and
AOA submitted
MOA/ Bye laws of the cluster are
enclosed in section 9.
Received
(g.) Authorized Share Capital Amount in Rs. 149.61 Lakh ( 10% of
Project Cost) --
(h.) Paid up capital Rs. 15 lakh.
(i.) Shareholding Pattern Equal share holding among all members.
Shareholding
pattern of
members
received.
(j.) Commitment letter for
contribution
Submitted. --
(k.) SPV specific A/c Syndicate Bank, Branch: Sankeshwar,
Hebbal, Hukkeri Taluk, Belgaum
Account No. 05773070002400 IFSC
Code: SYNB 0000 577 Account Type:
Current Account.
--
(l.) Trust Building of SPV,
Previous track record of co-
operative initiatives pursued by
SPV members need to be
highlighted with support
documentation.
The SPV has good trust and corporation
among its members details available in
DPR As the cluster members are aware of
their problems and have good unity they
have also visited some of the cluster and
have learned about cluster scheme and
cluster development process. The cluster
members have come forward to prepare
the DSR and DPR by their own
contribution hence the DSR recommends
Hard Interventions for the Cluster.
--
(m.) Technical Institution Intaglio Technical and Business Services,
Bangalore
45
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA)
Comments by
Cluster Division
(n.) CFC may be utilised by
SPV members as also others in
a cluster. However, evidence
should be furnished with
regard to SPV member ability
to utilise at least 60 percent of
installed capacity.
Yes, the SPV has given undertaking for
Capacity Utilization of CFC by SPV
members and non members.
Document
required.
(o)Utilities
(a) Power requirement for
commercial/domestic purpose
250 KW --
(b) Water 10 KLD --
(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities NA --
4. Implement Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA)
Comments by
Cluster Division
(a.) Implementing Agency Karnataka Council for Technological
Upgradation (KCTU), Bangalore, Govt.
of Karnataka.
--
(b.) Fund receiving Agency Karnataka Council for Technological
Upgradation (KCTU), Bangalore, Govt.
of Karnataka.
--
(c.) Implementation Period 19 months 24 Months from
date of final
approval.
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main
Recommendations
DPR will be submitted to SIDBI for
appraisal
Required prior to
final approval.
(e.) Comments of Technical
Division
Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 65th
meeting held on 13.06.19 recommended the proposal to place
before Steering Committee for In-principle approval. (f.) Approval of Technical
Committee
(g.) Comments of Cluster
Development Division:
Recommended for in-principle approval under MSE-CDP.
(h.) Working capital(In-
principle sanction of loan from
a bank, if applicable
arrangement made)
Yes, in principle approval of working
capital letter received.
--
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Comments by Cluster Division
(a.) BEP 38%
As per MSE-CDP guidelines.
(b.) IRR, Payback period 25% (c.) DSCR N/A (d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
30%
(e.) NPV 26% (f.) DER N/A (g.) Sensitivity Analysis Sensitivity analysis is performed for 5%
46
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Comments by Cluster Division
and 10% reduction of capacity or fall in sales and the figures are satisfactory and as per the limits specified in the guidelines.
(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State
a) Cluster Implemented 1. Auto components Cluster, Hubli 2. Readymade Garment Cluster, Hubli 3. Food Cluster, Gulbarga 4. Raisin Processing Cluster, Bijapur. 5. Auto Cluster, Bidar 6. Raisin Processing Cluster, Athani,
Belgaum. 7. ELCIA Cluster, Bangalore. 8. Heat Treatment & Engg Cluster Hubli, b) Clusters Under implementation 1. Printing Cluster Bangalore 2. Utopia Cashew Cluster, Kumta, Uttara
Kannada. 3.Global Puffed Rice Cluster, Chitradurga.
--
6. Proposed project cost (revised):
(Rs. in lakh) S.No. Particulars Amount
1. Land (1 acre on lease for 30 years) 45.00 2. Building Construction with compound and Internal Roads –
19300 sq. ft. built up area 254.60
3. Plant & Machinery (including electrification) 1055.50 4. Misc. fixed assets 15.00 5. Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 15.00 6. Contingencies (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery) 60.41 7. Margin money for working capital 13.28 Total 1458.79
7. Proposed means of finance(revised):
(Rs. in lakh)
S.No. Particulars Percentage Amount
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 80.00 1167.03
(ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Karnataka 10.00 145.88
(iii) SPV contribution 10.00 145.88
Total 100.00 1458.79
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
(Rs. in lakh)
S.No. Description No. Amount
Plane Cloth Sizing and Warping setup
For 340 CM Panna Cloth – Airjet Auto Looms
1. Warping Machine (Yarn to General Beam) 1 332.10
2. Sizing (General Beam to Loom Beam + Ganji) 1 344.40
For 152 CM Panna Cloth – Plain Shuttel Looms
3. Warping Machine (Yarn to General Beam) 1 36.29
4. Sizing (General Beam to Loom Beam + Ganji) 1 56.37
Hillkal Polyester Saree Warping and Sizing setup
47
S.No. Description No. Amount
5. Saree Warping Machine 39.05
6. Saree Sizing Machine 1 9.41
7. Boiler 1 76.69
8. DG Set 1 17.21
9. UPS 1 13.85
10. Overhead Crane 2 19.43
11. Compressor 1 11.69
12. Cloth Rolling + Stretching + Carrier + Inspection Machine 1 14.76
13. Digital Fabric Printing 1 55.35
14. Fabric Calendaring Machine 1 22.14
15. Fabric Cutting + Folding Machine 1 6.765
Total 1055.50
9. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Registered land documents in the name of SPV, in case of leased land, the
lease period should be for a minimum of 30 years.
(ii) SIDBI appraisal report.
(iii) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.
(iv) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution.
(v) Commitment letter with regard to SPV members‟ ability to utilize at least 60
percent of installed capacity.
(vi) Commitment letter from State Government/SPV to meet the escalation cost, if
any, over and above the approved project cost.
(vii) Certificate from State Government stating that more than 50% units in the
cluster are Micro/SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
(viii) Certificate from State Government regarding compliance of GFR/CVC
guidelines.
(ix) Documentary proof from SPV for utilisation of CFC facilities by atleast 51% of the
cluster members.
10. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up of Common
Facility Centre (CFC) in Power loom Cluster, Chikodi District, Belgaum, Karnataka.
*******
48
Agenda No.50.3.9: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up of Common Facility
Centre in Copper Utensils Manufacturing Cluster, Nasalapur, Raibag,
District – Belgaum, Karnataka.
Background:
The proposal was approved by State Level Steering Committee in its meeting held on
15.11.18.
Proposal along with focus report, DPR and recommendations was forwarded by MSME-
DI, Hubli vide letter dated 15.02.19 and 09.05.19. Online application Ref. No. 14053
dated 27.02.19.
The proposal was discussed in detail during 64th meeting of Techno Economic Appraisal
Committee (TEAC) held on 05.03.19 and TEAC in its 65th meeting held on 13.06.19
recommended the proposal to place before Steering Committee for In-principle approval.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Basic Information of Cluster
Name of Cluster : Copper Utensils Manufacturing Cluster
District Belagavi
Location of Cluster : Raibag
Lok Sabha Constituency : Chikkodi
Main Product : Copper Household / Domestic Utensils – Pots, water boilers,
Jug, Tumbler, Glasses, water filter, water bottles, drums.
Cookware’s like - kadai, deg, handi, cooking pans, plates,
hammered muglai kadhal, food serving pans, spoons.
Hotel and Restaurant Accessories – like large cooking pans,
Dining Table accessories, Jugs, Food servicing accessories.
Pooja Articles – Taman plate, Gadwa mug, Pulpatra –
tumbler, pooja thali, Kalas etc.
No. of Enterprises including
break up (Micro, Small,
Medium)
Micro 60 (as per revised report)
Small 0
Medium 0
Turn over for the last five
years : (Rs. in Crore)
Year Amount
2013-14 38.26
2014-15 40.29
2015-16 47.90
2016-17 51.10
2017-18 57.60
Exports for the last five years :
(Rs. in Crore)
Nil
Employment in Cluster : 2314 Nos. (Direct - 461 and Indirect - 1853)
Technology Details : At present the Cluster members are using traditional
methodology to produce manufacture Copper Utensils
with an exception of a few spinning lathe machines.
The cluster is not catering to the present day needs and
demands of the consumers that have changed over a
period of time.
The modern day consumer is very design oriented and
health conscious.
49
Whether DS Conducted : Yes, DSR Conducted By Intaglio Technical and Business
Service.
Main findings of DSR : It is found that the cluster members are using traditional
methods of manufacturing copper utensils and lack major
facilities such as advance reprocessing machinery like the die
press, sheet cutting, heat treatment facilities, Design and
Laser engraving marking machine and post processing
machinery like polishing, buffing, tin steel coating, effluent
treatment plant as a result the cluster members are unable to
compete with the large scale manufacturers and are not able
to cater the demands of the urban national and international
market.
Main Problems of Cluster : Traditional practices of manufacturing have limited the
variety of products manufactured.
Limitations in design due to lack of technological
advancement.
No diversification of product line to suit consumer needs
and preferences.
Stiff Competition from the Big players in the market who
have a major market share.
Lack of post processing machinery like Buffing and
Polishing where the product is given a superior finish and
aesthetically pleasing look.
Lack of coating machinery and techniques, Copper coated
in Steel and Tin.
Lack of new moulding machineries that mould the utensils
into different sizes and shapes.
No marketing taking place through right channels.
There is no branding taking place.
There is no training and skill up-gradation taking place in
the cluster as a result there is continuous migration of
work force.
Other Information : The Utensils made of Copper will have superior heat
conducting ability which is a vital component of high quality
food preparation. Also copper has an even greater value that
other cookware can not match it is naturally antimicrobial.
Research has demonstrated that microbes bacteria or germs
that come into direct contact with copper or certain copper
alloys quickly die, often within hours.
Copper Utensils have a reputed to have healing qualities.
Copper is used to ward off sickness. Hence many people
across the world prefer using copper utensils in the kitchen
for health as well as culinary benefits.
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA)
Comments by
Cluster Division
(a.) Justification for CFC The major facilities proposed in CFC
like advance pre-processing
--
50
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA)
Comments by
Cluster Division
machineries like the die press, sheet
cutting, heat treatment facilities,
Design and Laser engraving marking
machine and post processing
machineries like polishing, buffing,
tin, steel coating, effluent treatment
plant helps the cluster members to
compete with the large scale
manufacturers .
The CFC will enable the cluster
members to cater the demands of the
urban national and international
market.
The CFC will enable the cluster
members to undertake manufacturing
of new designs, addition verities and
product diversification. 4.The facilities
proposed in CFC helps the cluster
members to improve their present
product quality and produce better
quality products.
(b.) Location of CFC #786 bar A, Naslapur, Raibag taluk,
Belgaum District-591213.
--
% age of units in radius of 5km 70 --
% age of units in radius of
10km
100 --
(c.) Land for CFC
i. Whether land acquired Yes. Land is on lease
basis for 30
years. The lease
deed submitted
is not registered
from Revenue
Department of
Government of
Karnataka.
ii. Title is in name of Registered Lease Deed in the name of
SPV.
iii. Valuation and its basis Land on lease basis for 30 years.
iv. Land is sufficient Yes, 10 Guntas (10,000 square feet) of
land.
--
v. Change of land use Land Conversion NA Order Obtained --
vi. If on lease, duration of lease Land on lease basis for 30 years.
--
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
Yes. --
(d.) Total Building area(sq ft) The SPV proposes to construct the building 9045.51 sq ft. for CFC.
--
(e.) Rate of construction of building
Rs. 125.26 lakh. --
(f.) Main Facility Proposed Copper Sheet Flattening and pressing --
51
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA)
Comments by
Cluster Division
setup.
Utensils Moulding / Forging Pressing
Dies Setup
Heat Treatment and Annealing
Chamber Setup
Workshop Machinery.
Copper Utensils Tin / Steel Coating
Setup.
Effluent Treatment Plant.
Design Software for Design and New
Products Development. Office equipments and Training
Setup. g.) Prod capacity of CFC Production Capacity Analysis-Single
Shift basis Total Production of Cluster =
45 units = 5 tons (single shifts) Total
Proposed Production of CFC = 6 tons
(single shifts) Justification of Production
Gap The cluster will be utilizing 83% of
the plant capacity in a single shift
operation at the beginning and this
capacity utilization percentage will
increase gradually over a period of two to
three year of establishment of CFC to
maximum capacity. Initially about 17%
capacity of CFC is reserved to
accommodate the near future demand.
Hence the proposed CFC Capacity will
take care of the present and near future
demand of the cluster.
(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)
Sl. No. Parameter Before intervention
After Intervention
1. Nos. of units 60 95 2 Turnover
(Rs. in crore) 72.61 90.00
3 Export (Rs. in crore)
Indirect export taking place through traders.
Direct export likely by 5 units
4 Employment Direct – 461 Indirect - 1853
Direct – 600 Indirect – 2500
5 Profit Margins 12% to 14% 23% to 25%
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
NOC from Karnataka State Pollution Control Board Obtained.
NOC from PCB is required.
(j.) Man Power in CFC 36 nos. -- (k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
Details of the User Charges:
User charge for Copper Sheet
Flattening and Pressing Setup-Rs.
185.00 per job.
User charge for Heat Treatment and
Annealing Chamber Setup-Rs. 35.00
--
52
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA)
Comments by
Cluster Division
per job.
User charge for workshop machineries
Rs. 410.00- per job.
User charge for Coating Setup:
Rs.105.00 per job.
User charge for Design Product
Development Centre Rs.500.00 per job
User charge for Computerized Laser
Marking-Engraving Machine: Rs.
75.00 per job.
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA)
Comments by
Cluster Division
(a.) Name and Address Siddika Metal Industries Owner‟s Welfare
Association,
#786/A, Naslapur, Raibag Taluk, Belgaum
District – 591213.
--
(b.) Nature of SPV(company
or Society or Trust)
Society, registered under Karnataka
Society.
--
(c.) Name of the state Govt.
and MSME officials in SPV
MD-KCTU, JD, DIC-Belgaum, Director
MSME Hubli.
--
(d.) Date of formation of
SPV
31.08.17
--
(e.) Number of Members 60 nos.
--
(f.) Bye Laws or MoA and
AOA submitted
Yes. --
(g.) Authorized Share Capital Rs. 100.00 lakh
(h.) Paid up capital Rs. 20.00 lakh.
(i.) Shareholding Pattern Submitted. --
(j.) Commitment letter for
contribution
Submitted. --
(k.) SPV specific A/c Name of the Bank: Canara Bank Account
Number: 0541201001337. --
(l.) Trust Building of SPV,
Previous track record of co-
operative initiatives pursued
by SPV members need to be
highlighted with support
documentation.
The diagnostic study found that the cluster
member have conducted majority of the
soft interventions programs such as MSE-
CDP awareness programs, Financial
management, product quality and safety
training programs, visit to other existing
cluster etc. in association with the MSME
DI Hubli KCTU Bangalore and DIC
Belgaum. The cluster members are very
much aware of the problems faced by the
cluster and have identified the required
machinery for the CFC. Hence the
--
53
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA)
Comments by
Cluster Division
Diagnostic Study do not recommend any
Soft Intervention for the cluster. The DSR
recommends Hard Intervention for the
Cluster in terms of establishment of CFC.
(m.) Technical Institution Intaglio Technical and Business Services,
Bangalore
(n.) CFC may be utilised by
SPV members as also others
in a cluster. However,
evidence should be furnished
with regard to SPV member
ability to utilise at least 60
percent of installed capacity.
Yes, the SPV has given undertaking for
Capacity Utilization of CFC by SPV
members and non members.
Document
required.
(o) Utilities
(a) Power requirement for
commercial/domestic
purpose
289.6345 KVA
--
(b) Water 10 KLD --
(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities NA --
4. Implement Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA)
Comments by
Cluster Division
(a.) Implementing Agency Karnataka Council for Technological
Upgradation (KCTU), Bangalore, Govt. of
Karnataka.
--
(b.) Fund receiving Agency Karnataka Council for Technological
Upgradation (KCTU), Bangalore, Govt. of
Karnataka.
--
(c.) Implementation Period 19 months 24 Months from
date of final
approval.
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and
main Recommendations
-- Required prior to
final approval.
(e.) Comments of Technical
Division
The proposal was discussed in detail during 64th meeting of
Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) held on
05.03.19 and TEAC in its 65th meeting held on 13.06.19
recommended the proposal to place before Steering Committee
for In-principle approval.
(f.) Approval of Technical
Committee
(g.) Comments of Cluster
Development Division:
Recommended for in-principle approval under MSE-CDP.
(h.) Working capital(In-
principle sanction of loan
from a bank,if applicable
arrangement made)
Yes, in-principle approval of
working capital. --
54
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA) Comments by
Cluster Division (a.) BEP 44%
As per MSE-CDP guidelines.
(b.) IRR, Payback period 29% (c.) DSCR N/A (d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
31%
(e.) NPV 30% (f.) DER N/A (g.) Sensitivity Analysis Sensitivity analysis is performed for 5%
and 10% reduction of capacity or fall in
sales and the figures are satisfactory and as
per the limits specified in the guidelines. (h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State
a) Cluster Implemented 1. Auto components Cluster, Hubli 2. Readymade Garment Cluster, Hubli 3. Food Cluster, Gulbarga 4. Raisin Processing Cluster, Bijapur. 5. Auto Cluster, Bidar 6. Raisin Processing Cluster, Athani,
Belgaum 7. ELCIA Cluster, Bangalore. 8. Heat Treatment & Engg Cluster Hubli, b) Clusters Under implementation 1. Printing Cluster, Bangalore 2. Utopia Cashew Cluster, Kumta, Uttara
Kannada. 3.Global Puffed Rice Cluster, Chitradurga.
--
6. Proposed project cost:
(Rs. in lakh) S.No. Particulars Amount 1. Land (10 guntas on lease for 30 years) 45.00 2. Building Construction with compound and Internal Roads – 9045.51 sq.
ft. built up area 116.68
3. Plant & Machinery (including electrification) 584.81 4. Misc. fixed assets 16.00 5. Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 16.00 6. Contingencies (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery) 31.57 7. Margin money for working capital 14.00 Total 824.06
7. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Percentage Amount
(iv) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 80 659.24 (v) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Karnataka 10 82.41 (vi) SPV contribution 10 82.41
Total 100 824.06
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
(Rs. in lakh)
S.No. Description No. Amount
A Copper Sheet Flattening and Pressing Setup
1. Heavy Duty Sheet Cutting Machine 1 19.50
55
S.No. Description No. Amount
2. Sheet Flatting and thinning mill 1 65.13
3. Automatic Sheet Cleaning Machine 1 11.378
B Utensils Moulding and Pressing Dies Setup
4. Deep Drawing Power Press - for cook wares 1 64.45
5. Water vessels / pot pressing power press 1 47.00
6. Pressing Dies 1 39.36
C Heat Treatment and Aniling Chamber Setup
7. Heat Treatment Chamber 1 89.18
D Workshop machineries
8. Heavy Duty Shearing Machine for Circle and Patta Cutting 1 22.88
9. Spinning Lathe (centre height – 18 inch, 6 feet bed size, V – Belt motor type).
1 15.07
10 Spinning Lathe (centre height – 14 inch, 6 feet bed size, V – Belt motor type).
1 8.84
11 All Geared Lathe Machine for ring Cutting, Pattern Cutting
1 23.25
12 Die Surface Grinding Machine 1 7.69
13 Turning Machine 1 6.46
14 Polishing Machine 1 8.80
15 Buffing Machine 1 3.84
16 Brass Welding Machine 1 1.51
17 MIG / TIG Welding Machine 1 3.641
18 Seam Welding Machine 1 8.344
E Coating Setup
19 Tin Coating Setup 1 8.36
20 Steel Coating Setup 1 10.09
21 Effluent Treatment Plant 1 34.62
F Design Product Development Centre
22 CAD CAM Design Software 1 7.21
23 Table Top Computerized Laser Marking / Engraving Machine
1 23.061
24 Computers, Windows Software 5 2.77
25 Digital Interactive Classroom Board 1 1.30
26 High Resolution Projector with Auto Lock Screen Projector with Auto Lock Screen
1 0.59655
27 Audio System Amplifier, speakers with cordless and podium Mic-set.
1 0.65
28 All in one laser colour printer scanner and copier 1 0.58
29 Accounting soft-ware Tally 1 3.51
30 Website and ERP Software Design and Development 1 2.28
31 CCT Camera and DVR and EPABX intercom setup 1 0.81
56
S.No. Description No. Amount
32 Fire fighting equipment set 1 0.92
33 Air conditioner A/c 2.0 Ton 2 1.51
34 DG Set 1 17.21
35 Electrical intallation -- 23.06
Total 584.81
9. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Registered lease deed in the name of SPV for a minimum period of 30 years.
(ii) SIDBI appraisal report.
(iii) Commitment letter with regard to SPV members‟ ability to utilize at least 60 percent
of installed capacity.
(iv) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.
(v) Certificate from State Government regarding compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.
(vi) Commitment letter from State Government / IA to meet the cost escalation, if any,
over and above the approved project cost.
(vii) Certificate from State Government stating that more than 50% units in the cluster are
Micro.
(viii) Registered land documents in the name of SPV (if land is on lease basis, registered
lease deed for a minimum period of 30 years).
(ix) English version of formation of SPV and Bye-Laws or MoA & AoA.
(x) Documentary proof from SPV for utilisation of CFC facilities by atleast 51% of the
cluster members.
10. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up of Common
Facility Centre (CFC) in Copper Utensils Manufacturing Cluster, Nasalapur, Raibag, District –
Belgaum, Karnataka.
*******
57
Agenda No.50.3.10: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up of Common Facility
Centre in Auto and General Engineering Cluster, Chikkodi, District – Belgaum,
Karnataka.
Background:
The proposal was approved by State Level Steering Committee in its meeting held on
15.11.18.
Proposal along with focus report, DPR and recommendations was forwarded by MSME-
DI, Hubli vide letter dated 15.02.19 and 09.05.19. Online application Ref. No. 14051
dated 27.02.19.
The proposal was discussed in detail during 64th meeting of Techno Economic Appraisal
Committee (TEAC) held on 05.03.19 and TEAC in its 65th meeting held on 13.06.19
recommended the proposal to place before Steering Committee for In-principle approval.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Basic Information of Cluster
Name of Cluster : Auto & General Engineering Cluster
District Belagavi
Location of Cluster : Chikkodi
Lok Sabha Constituency : Chikkodi
Main Product : Heavy vehicle engine repair work – Lorry, Truck, Bus,
Heavy duty cranes, Earth movers and all other heavy vehicle.
Light vehicles Engine repair work –
Cars, jeep, Mini vans, Buses, Tractors and any other four
wheelers.
Tinkering, body works painting –
Removal of body dents rusted metal and painting of all
automobile vehicle and machineries.
No. of Enterprises including
break up (Micro, Small,
Medium)
Micro 193 (as per revised report)
Small 0
Medium 0
Turn over for the last five
years : (Rs. in Crore)
Year Amount
2013-14 29.75
2014-15 31.80
2015-16 36.50
2016-17 48.90
2017-18 56.25
Exports for the last five years :
(Rs. in Crore)
Nil
Employment in Cluster : 7340 nos. (Direct - 1015 and Indirect - 6325) Technology Details : Average Technological level with conventional repairing
tools, Milling, Lathe machine, Drilling equipment, Metal
cutting equipment, Metal fabrication press, Welding machines
etc. Few units have semi-automatic machines. Whether DS Conducted : Yes. Main findings of DSR : The DSR found that the Cluster has good potential in as
the Chikodi region is a transportation hub between the
58
states of Maharastra and Karnataka with constant
movement of vehicles plying the region.
The service sector is the major allied sector to the
automotive industry.
The cluster members have the technical skill required and
are willing to adapt to new technology. Main Problems of Cluster : Non availability of advanced technology for major repair
work.
Lack of Advance machineries for vehicle body denting
work. Lack of Testing and Calibration Facility.
Lack of Effluent treatment plant.
Lack of Advanced painting machine.
Lack of Skill training facility. Other Information : The Automotive Industry in India is the 7th largest in the
world India is the largest 3 wheeler market in the world India
is the 4th largest passenger car market in Asia and 10th
largest in the world India is the 4th largest tractor market in
the world 5th largest commercial market in the world 5th
largest bus and truck market in the world.
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA)
Comments by
Cluster Division
(a.) Justification for CFC The CFC with advance engine
calibration and re building machinery
will help in avoiding outsourcing of
works from cluster and will improve
the service quality.
The CFC with advance fuel pump
calibration facility will help in
calibration of fuel pumps.
The CFC with Closed chamber paint
booth will help in quality painting of
vehicle and will eliminate the health
hazard faced by the cluster members.
The CFC with machine tool section
will help in processing of automotive
components and agriculture
equipments.
--
(b.) Location of CFC The cluster is located near Chikodi
Bijapur State Highway, the cluster units
are mainly concentrated in Auto Nagar.
--
% age of units in radius of 5km 70
% age of units in radius of 10km
100
(c.) Land for CFC i. Whether land acquired Yes. Land is on lease
basis for 30 years. The lease
ii. Title is in name of Registered Lease Deed in the name of
SPV.
59
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA)
Comments by
Cluster Division iii. Valuation and its basis 2 acres of land on lease for 30 years at
Rs. 45.00 lakh.
deed submitted is not registered from Revenue Department, Government of Karnataka.
iv. Land is sufficient Yes. --
v. Change of land use NA --
vi. If on lease, duration of lease Land on lease basis for 30 years.
--
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
Yes. --
(d.) Total Building area(sq ft) 11,500 sq ft --
(e.) Rate of construction of building
Rs. 166.20 lakh. --
(f.) Main Facility Proposed Physical Inspection and Cleaning
Setup.
Engine Rebuilding Setup.
Fuel Pump Calibration Setup.
Auto Electrical Testing and
Calibration Setup.
Vehicle Body Building and Crash
Repair and Closed Chamber
Painting Setup.
Engineering Workshop Machinery.
Tyre Re-Moulding Setup.
Effluent Treatment Plant.
Office and Training Setup.
--
g.) Prod capacity of CFC Production Capacity Analysis-Single
Shift basis
Total Production of Cluster = 125 units =
8 Engines, Gearbox per day (single
shifts).
Total Proposed Production of CFC = 10
tons (single shifts)
Justification of Production Gap
The cluster will be utilizing 80% of the
plant capacity in a single shift operation
at the beginning and this capacity
utilization percentage will increase
gradually over a period of two to three
year of establishment of CFC to
maximum capacity.
Initially about 20% capacity of CFC is
reserved to accommodate the near future
demand. Hence the proposed CFC
Capacity will take care of the present and
near future demand of the cluster.
(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after
Sl. No.
Parameter Before intervention
After Intervention
1. Nos. of units 193 250
60
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA)
Comments by
Cluster Division proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)
2 Turnover (Rs. in crore)
86.55 100.00
3 Export (Rs. in crore)
Indirect export taking place through traders.
Direct export likely by 5 units Rs. 15 crore.
4 Employment Direct – 1015 Indirect - 6325
Direct – 1500 Indirect – 8000
5 Profit Margins 10% to 15% 20% to 25%
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
Yes. NOC from PCB to be submitted.
(j.) Man Power in CFC 33 nos. -- (k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
Expected Revenue / Year: Rs.
598.63 lakh (75% production capacity).
Expected Expenditure : Rs. 409.95 lakh
(variable 179.74 + fixed exp. 230.21)
Balance=Revenue – Expenditure = Rs.
188.68 lakh.
Income Tax = Rs. 54.54 lakh.
Net Profit = Rs. 134.14 lakh
--
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA)
Comments by
Cluster Division
(a.) Name and Address Tawakkal Auto & General Engineering
Cluster Association,
Tawakkal Plaza, B.K. College Road,
Chikodi Taluk, Chikodi, District
Belagavi, Karnataka - 591201.
--
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or
Society or Trust)
Society, registered under Karnataka
Society. English version
of registration of
SPV is required.
(c.) Name of the state Govt.
and MSME officials in SPV
MD-KCTU, JD, DIC-Belgaum, Director
MSME Hubli.
--
(d.) Date of formation of SPV 24.07.18
--
(e.) Number of Members 193 nos.
--
(f.) Bye Laws or MoA and
AOA submitted
Yes. English version
of MoA and
AoA is required.
(g.) Authorized Share Capital Rs. 105.85 lakh --
(h.) Paid up capital Rs. 10.00 lakh. --
(i.) Shareholding Pattern Submitted. --
(j.) Commitment letter for
contribution
Submitted. --
(k.) SPV specific A/c Name of the Bank: Axis Bank A/c
918010072205416 --
(l.) Trust Building of SPV,
Previous track record of co-
Trust Building Activities Awareness
Programs on Various Schemes of --
61
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA)
Comments by
Cluster Division
operative initiatives pursued by
SPV members need to be
highlighted with support
documentation.
MSME, Govt. of India and Govt. GoK
Capacity Building Activities Study Tours
and Visit to other Clusters
(m.) Technical Institution Intaglio Technical and Business Services,
Bangalore --
(n.) CFC may be utilised by
SPV members as also others in
a cluster. However, evidence
should be furnished with
regard to SPV member ability
to utilise at least 60 percent of
installed capacity.
Yes, the cluster units will be able to
utilize more than 60% of the proposed
machinery.
Document
required.
(o) Utilities
(a) Power requirement for
commercial/domestic purpose
337 HP
--
(b) Water Groundwater Borewell --
(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities Not required. --
4. Implement Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA) Comments by
Cluster Division (a.) Implementing Agency Karnataka Council for Technological
Upgradation (KCTU), Bangalore, Govt. of Karnataka.
--
(b.) Fund receiving Agency Karnataka Council for Technological Upgradation (KCTU), Bangalore, Govt. of Karnataka.
--
(c.) Implementation Period 18 months 24 Months from date of final approval.
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
-- Required prior to final approval.
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
The proposal was discussed in detail during 64th meeting
of Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) held
on 05.03.19 and TEAC in its 65th meeting held on
13.06.19 recommended the proposal to place before
Steering Committee for In-principle approval.
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee
(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:
Recommended for in-principle approval under MSE-CDP.
(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank,if applicable arrangement made)
Yes, in-principle approval of working capital.
--
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA) Comments by
Cluster Division (a.) BEP 41% As per MSE-CDP
guidelines. (b.) IRR, Payback period 28%; 4 year
62
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Comments by Cluster Division
(c.) DSCR N/A (d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
32%
(e.) NPV 28% (f.) DER N/A (g.) Sensitivity Analysis Sensitivity analysis is performed for 5%
and 10% reduction of capacity or fall in
sales and the figures are satisfactory and as
per the limits specified in the guidelines. (h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State
a) Cluster Implemented 1. Auto components Cluster, Hubli 2. Readymade Garment Cluster, Hubli 3. Food Cluster, Gulbarga 4. Raisin Processing Cluster, Bijapur. 5. Auto Cluster, Bidar 6. Raisin Processing Cluster, Athani,
Belgaum 7. ELCIA Cluster, Bangalore. 8. Heat Treatment & Engg Cluster Hubli, b) Clusters Under implementation 1. Printing Cluster, Bangalore 2. Utopia Cashew Cluster, Kumta, Uttara
Kannada. 3.Global Puffed Rice Cluster, Chitradurga.
--
6. Proposed project cost:
(Rs. in lakh) S.No. Particulars Amount
1. Land (land – 2 acres on lease for 30 years) 45.00 2. Building Construction with compound and Internal Roads – 11500 sq. ft.
built up area 147.70
3. Plant & Machinery (including electrification) 691.25 4. Misc. fixed assets 17.35 5. Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 15.00 6. Contingencies (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery) 38.99 7. Margin money for working capital 11.20 Total 966.49
7. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Percentage Amount
1. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 80.00 773.19
2. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Karnataka 10.00 96.65
3. SPV contribution 10.00 96.65
Total 100.00 966.49
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
(Rs. in lakh)
S.No. Description Quantity (no.)
Amount
A Physical Inspection and Cleaning Setup
1. Magnetic Crack Detection Setup 1 9.04542
2. Profile Projector 1 5.412
63
S.No. Description Quantity (no.)
Amount
3. Cordinate Vision Measuring System 1 8.5485
4. Automatic De-greasing Machine 1 6.7035
B Engine Rebuilding Setup
5. Heavy Duty Cylinder Boring Machine 1 19.21875
6. Bore Honning Machine 1 9.96915
7. Line Boring Machine 1 14.88915
8. Connecting Rod Bush Cutting Machine 1 7.995
9. Crank Shaft Grinding with rail 1 28.167
10 CAM Shaft Bush Boring Machine 1 7.7121
11 Valve Grinding Machine –v-18 1 8.1795
12 Valve Seat Cutting Machine 1 15.8055
13 Head surface grinding machine 1 16.3344
14 Drum Skimming machine 1 5.535
15 Disc Grinding Machine 1 7.257
16 Crank Shaft Straightning Press 1 5.23857
17 Engine Opening and Fitting Tools 1 3.9975
C Fuel Pump Calibration Setup
18 CRDI Pumps Repair and calibration Setup 1 105.042
19 Inline and V-E Pumps Repair and Calibration Setup 1 47.52105
20 Automatic Nozzle and Injector Tester 1 26.568
21 Nozzle Pressurizer and Blower 2 4.7355
22 Ultrasonic Pump Elements Cleaner 1 4.25334
23 Pump Opening and Fitting Tools 1 3.075
D Auto Electrical Testing and Callibration Setup
24 Alternator Testing Setup 1 5.2275
25 Stator Testing Setup 1 4.7355
26 Battery Testing Setup 2 4.6125
27 Engine Leak Detector 1 6.9495
28 Vehicle Engine Scanner 2 6.94950
29 A/C Refilling Setup 1 5.2275
30 Turbo Repair and Calibration Setup 1 4.8585
31 Heavy Vehicles Wheel Alignment Setup 1 13.0995
E Vehicle Body Building and Crash Repair and Closed Chamber Painting Setup
32 Computerized Crash Repair Setup 1 23.20395
33 Vehicle Body Denting Setup 1 4.4895
34 Closed Chamber Vehicle Painting 1 16.605
35 Sheet Cutting Machine 1 5.7195
36 Sheet Folding and Pressing Machine 1 4.2435
37 Pipe Bending Machine 1 4.65309
38 Arc Welding Machine 2 1.5375
64
S.No. Description Quantity (no.)
Amount
39 MIG / TIG Welding Machine 2 3.02
40 Spot Welding Machine 2 6.95
41 Seam Welding Machine 1 7.69
42 Circular Cutting Brand Saw 1 4.00
43 Two Post Lifts 1 1.54
44 Sensor Lift 1 5.72
F Engineering Workshop Machinery
45 Lathe Machine – 20 feet 1 21.25
46 Lathe Machine – 12 feet 1 12.61
47 Universal Milling Machine 1 10.64
48 Surface Grinding Machine 1 9.174
49 Radial Drilling Machine 1 6.16
50 Pillor Drilling Machine 1 1.53
51 Hydraullic Press - 500 tons 1 10.76
52 Power Press – 50 tons 1 8.55
53 Key-Way Cutting Machine 1 12.12
54 Gear Cutting / Tooth Chamferring Machine 1 8.31
55 Double Track Overhead Rail 2 12.92
56 Universal Tyre Re-molding Setup 1 0.00
57 Effluent Treatment Plant –etp-15KLD 1 28.167
G Tyre Re-moulding Setup
58 CAD / C CA Software for Design 5 3.08
59 Computers, Windows software 5 2.77
60 Digital Interactive Classroom Board 1 1.797
61 High Resolution Projector with Auto Lock Screen Projector with Auto Lock Screen
1 0.597
62 Audio System Amplifier, Speakers with Cordless and Podium Mic-set
1 0.65
63 All in One Laser Colour Printer Scanner and Copier 1 0.605
64 Accounting Software-Tally 1 2.28
65 Website and ERP Software Design and Development 1 1.84
66 CCT Camera and DVR and EPABX Intercom Setup 1 2.09
67 Fire Fighting Equipments Set 1 3.44
68 Air conditioner A/C 2.0 Ton 2 0.98
69 DG Set 1 16.73
Total 691.24
65
9. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Registered lease deed in the name of SPV for a minimum period of 30 years.
(ii) SIDBI appraisal report.
(iii) Commitment letter with regard to SPV members‟ ability to utilize at least 60 percent
of installed capacity.
(iv) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.
(v) Certificate from State Government regarding compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.
(vi) Commitment letter from State Government / IA to meet the cost escalation, if any,
over and above the approved project cost.
(vii) Certificate from State Government stating that more than 50% units in the cluster are
Micro.
(viii) Registered land documents in the name of SPV (if land is on lease basis, registered
lease deed for a minimum period of 30 years).
(ix) English version of formation of SPV and Bye-Laws or MoA & AoA.
(x) Documentary proof from SPV for utilisation of CFC facilities by atleast 51% of the
cluster members.
10. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up of Common Facility
Centre (CFC) in Auto and General Engineering Cluster, Chikkodi, District – Belgaum, Karnataka.
*******
66
Agenda No.50.3.11: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up of Common Facility
Centre in Organic Millets Cluster, Davanagere, Karnataka.
Background:
(i) The proposal was recommended by State Level Steering Committee in its meeting held
on 15.06.17 at Bangalore.
(ii) The proposal was received from Government of Karnataka, vide online application Ref.
No. 14057 dated 27.02.19, which was also recommended by MSME-DI, Bangalore.
(iii) The proposal was deliberated during 64th
& 65th
meetings of Techno Economic Appraisal
Committee (TEAC) held on 05.03.19 and 13.06.19 respectively and recommended the
proposal to place before steering committee for In-principle approval.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Basic Information of Cluster
Name of Cluster : Organic Millets Cluster District Davanagere Location of Cluster : Davanagere Lok Sabha Constituency : Davanagere Main Product : Organic Millets whole grains, millet, grinded grain, millet
powdered / flour like Ragi powder, Bajra powder, Rava or semolina material.
No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium)
Micro 67 (as per revised report)
Turn over for the last five years : (Rs. in Crore)
Year Amount 2012-13 24.90 2013-14 25.30 2014-15 27.10 2015-16 28.75 2016-17 31.60
Exports for the last five years : (Rs. in Crore)
Nil
Employment in Cluster : 3482 Nos. (Direct - 577 and Indirect - 2905) Technology Details : Conventional Machines like mechanical graders, Mesh
filtration, De Husking and Hulling Machine, Grinding Machine, Pulverizes for Flour Processing.
Whether DS Conducted : Yes DSR Conducted By Intaglio Technical and Business Service.
Main findings of DSR : The DSR found that the cluster product is very nutritious and has huge market demand.
The DSR found that the cluster members are using traditional methods and conventional machineries for processing the millets.
The cluster members are having good trust and are aware of the cluster development scheme.
The cluster members lack the machineries for pre-processing activities like cleaning, de-stoning machines and Grading Machines.
The cluster members lack post processing machineries like Colour Sorting, Polishing and Packaging Machineries.
There is very little value addition taking place at present hence the cluster require a research development and value addition center for product diversification.
At present the marketing channel is dominated by traders
67
and middlemen. Main Problems of Cluster : The cluster members lack the machineries for pre-
processing activities like cleaning, De-stoning machines and advance steam treatment and automatic Drying facility.
The cluster members lack post processing machinery like Automatic Grading, Colour Sorting, Polishing and Packaging Machinery.
The Cluster Products are of very high nutritious value but require Advance testing technology for determining the nutritious values as per BIS and FSSAI Standards.
There is very little value addition taking place at present hence the cluster require a research development and value addition center for product diversification.
The Cluster members lack skill upgradation and skill development training facility.
The Cluster members need storage facility for raw material and processed products.
At present the marketing channel is dominated by traders and middlemen. The Cluster lack common branding facility and marketing.
Other Information : Millets grow under dry conditions, can cope with relatively poor soils and require few external inputs. They are a staple food with superior nutritional qualities compared to other cereals. Millets are rich in B vitamins, calcium, iron, potassium, magnesium, zinc, also gluten-free and has low-GI (Glycemic index) thus millets are suitable for people allergies/intolerance of wheat and also for diabetic, weight loss millets are excellent.
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA) Comments by
Cluster Division (a.) Justification for CFC The CFC with pre processing
machineries like cleaning, grading will help the cluster members to clean the millets before processing.
The post processing machineries like colour sorting polishing machine will help the cluster members to produce better quality products.
The packaging facilities will help in proper packaging of cluster products.
The value added product development and testing centre will help the cluster members in product diversification and quality certification.
--
(b.) Location of CFC The proposed land Survey No. 10/8, Lakavanahalli Village, Mayakonda Hobbali, Bullapura, Davanagere, Karnataka.
--
% age of units in radius of 5km 70
% age of units in radius of 10km
100
(c.) Land for CFC i. Whether land acquired Yes. Received ii. Title is in name of Registered Lease Deed in the name of
SPV for 30 years.
68
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Comments by Cluster Division
iii. Valuation and its basis Rs. 22.50 lakh as non refundable lease amount.
iv. Land is sufficient Yes. The SPV has taken 1 acre of land on lease for 30 years.
--
v. Change of land use Yes, NA Order Issued. -- vi. If on lease, duration of lease Land on lease basis for 30 years. -- vii Whether lease is legally tenable
Yes.
(d.) Total Building area(sq ft) The SPV proposes to construct the building 10200 sq ft. for CFC
--
(e.) Rate of construction of building
Building with the estimated cost at Rs. 963/- per sq. ft.
--
(f.) Main Facility Proposed 1. Pre processing machineries / Facilities such as: Raw material storage facility. Millets Automatic Fine Cleaning
Machine Setup Millet Automatic De-Stoning
Machine. Millet Steam treatment and Automatic
Dryer 2. Post Processing Machinery / Facilities such as: Millets Automatic Size Grading
Machine Setup Millets Polishing Machine. Millets Automatic Colour Sorter
Machine. Millets Testing Facility. Millets Value Added Products
development & Research Facility. Millets Packaging Machines. Cold Storage Facility.
--
g.) Prod capacity of CFC 12 Tons single shift
(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)
Sl. No.
Parameter Before intervention
After Intervention
1. Nos. of units 67 90 2 Turnover
(Rs. in crore) 47.97 70
3 Export (Rs. in crore)
Indirect export through traders
Direct export likely by 5 units
4 Employment Direct – 577 Indirect – 2905
Direct – 900 Indirect – 4000
5 Profit Margins Inconsistent profit margins due to price fluctuations.
Consistent and 20% to 25% higher profits for producers due to better quality and price and increased production efficiencies.
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
Yes, No Objection Certificate obtained from State Pollution Board.
Document required
(j.) Man Power in CFC 52 -- (k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be
All the SPV members and other principle cluster units would expected utilize the services of various facilities proposed to be established at CFC on user charge basis for sustainability of its operations.
69
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Comments by Cluster Division
specified) Expected Revenue / year: The total revenue generation from user charges of various services is expected to the tune of Rs.241.87 lakh.
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA)
Comments by
Cluster Division
(a.) Name and Address Organic Millets Cluster
No. 1579/2, Opposite Ayyappaswamy
Temple, Near Old RTO Office, MMC B-
Block, Davanagere District, Karnataka.
--
(b.) Nature of SPV(company
or Society or Trust)
Society, registered under Karnataka Society
(Registration) Act, 1960.
--
(c.) Name of the state Govt.
and MSME officials in SPV
MD-KCTU, JD-DIC-Davangere, Director
MSME - DI Bangalore.
--
(d.) Date of formation of
SPV
13.05.16 --
(e.) Number of Members 67
--
(f.) Bye Laws or MoA and
AOA submitted
MOA/ Bye laws of the cluster is enclosed
in section 9.
Received
(g.) Authorized Share Capital Amount in Rs. 73.10 Lakh ( 10% of Project
Cost)
(h.) Paid up capital Rs. 15 lakh.
(i.) Shareholding Pattern Share holding is 1-2%
Received.
(j.) Commitment letter for
contribution
SPV has given the commitment letter Document
required.
(k.) SPV specific A/c Name: Organic Millets Cluster A/C No.:
155300301000137 IFSC Code:
VIJB0001553 Vijaya Bank Vidyanagar,
Davanagere, Karnataka.
--
(l.) Trust Building of SPV,
Previous track record of co-
operative initiatives pursued
by SPV members need to be
highlighted with support
documentation.
The SPV has good trust and corporation
among its member‟s details available in
DPR. The DSR found that the cluster
members are having good trust and
coordination and have made completed
majority of the soft interventions like the
trust building programs, capacity building
programs, exposure visits to other clusters.
Hence the diagnostic study found that the
cluster members are ready for undertaking
hard interventions.
--
(m.) Technical Institution Intaglio Technical and Business Services,
Bangalore
(n.) CFC may be utilised by
SPV members as also others
Yes, the SPV has given undertaking for
Capacity Utilization of CFC by SPV Document
required.
70
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA)
Comments by
Cluster Division
in a cluster. However,
evidence should be furnished
with regard to SPV member
ability to utilise at least 60
percent of installed capacity.
members and non members.
(o) Utilities
(a) Power requirement for
commercial/domestic
purpose
Commercial 200 KVA --
(b) Water 10,000 liters per day. --
(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities Nil. --
4. Implementation Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Comments by Cluster Division
(a.) Implementing Agency Karnataka Council for Technological Upgradation (KCTU), Bangalore, Govt. of Karnataka.
--
(b.) Fund receiving Agency Karnataka Council for Technological Upgradation (KCTU), Bangalore, Govt. of Karnataka.
--
(c.) Implementation Period 19 months 24 Months from date of final approval.
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
DPR will be submitted to SIDBI for appraisal
SIDBI Appraisal required prior to final approval.
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
The proposal was discussed in detail during 64th
meeting of Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) held on 05.03.19 and TEAC in its 65
th meeting held on 13.06.19
recommended the proposal to place before steering committee for In-principle approval.
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee
(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:
Recommended for in-principle approval under MSE-CDP.
(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank,if applicable arrangement made)
Yes, in principle approval of working capital letter attached.
--
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA) Comments by
Cluster Division (a.) BEP 40%
As per MSE-CDP guidelines.
(b.) IRR, Payback period 25%, 4 year (c.) DSCR NA (d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
32%
(e.) NPV 27% (f.) DER NA (g.) Sensitivity Analysis Sensitivity analysis is performed for 5%
and 10% reduction of capacity or fall in sales and the figures are satisfactory and as per the limits specified in the guidelines.
(h.) Status of CFCs approved a) Cluster Implemented --
71
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Comments by Cluster Division
in the State 1. Auto components Cluster, Hubli 2. Readymade Garment Cluster, Hubli 3. Food Cluster, Gulbarga 4. Raisin Processing Cluster, Bijapur. 5. Auto Cluster, Bidar 6. Raisin Processing Cluster, Athani,
Belgaum. 7. ELCIA Cluster, Bangalore. 8. Heat Treatment & Engg Cluster Hubli, b) Clusters Under implementation 1. Printing Cluster Bangalore 2. Utopia Cashew Cluster, Kumta, Uttara
Kannada. 3. Global Puffed Rice Cluster, Chitradurga.
6. Proposed project cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S.No. Particulars Amount
1. Land (1 acres for 30 years lease) 22.50
2. Building 112.85
3. Plant & Machinery (including electrification) 513.24
4. Misc. fixed assets 12.85
5. Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 14.00
6. Contingencies (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery) 27.92
7. Margin money for working capital 12.15
Total 715.51
7. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S.No. Particulars Percentage Amount
1. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 80.00 572.41
2. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Karnataka 10.00 71.55
3. SPV contribution 10.00 71.55
Total 100.00 715.51
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
(Rs. in lakh)
S.No. Description No. Power Requirement (HP/KW)
Cost
1. Millet Cleaning Machine1.5 tons/hour
1 27HP 20.30
2. Millet Steamer and Dryer 1.5 tons/hour
1 9HP 46.11
3. Millet Automatic Polishing Machine 1.5 tons/hour
1 68.5HP 49.70
4. Millet Automatic Colour Sorter 1.5 tons/hour
1 15HP 50.27
5. Millet Packaging with Automatic Weighing, Stitching, Sealing, and Labeling Machine Setup 5 to 25 kg bag size, 20 PPM, Thermal
1 6HP 77.52
72
S.No. Description No. Power Requirement (HP/KW)
Cost
Code Labeler /Printer
6. Pouch Packing Machine 50 gms to 500 gms
1 3.5HP 21.47
7. Value Added Product Development Center Setup Modular Setup
1 3HP 12.96
8. Cold Storage 500 Tons Capacity, 2 to 15 degree Celsius room temperature, 415v/50 hz, 3hp
1 118HP 101.53
9. Weigh Bridge 60 Tons Capacity 1 2HP 7.14
10. Testing Equipment testing setup 1 1HP 26.54
11. DG SET 160 KVA 1 0 10.88
12. ETP 20KLD 1 20 KLD 30.61
13. Rain Water Harvesting Plant 25 KLD
1 25 KLD 10.67
14. Electrical installation & fittings: Wiring, Electrical Installation and Fittings Transformer, Changeover Pannel, Power Management Unit
1 00 29.84
15. Fire Fighting and Safety Equipment's Hand Held and wall mounted cans with Safety equipment
1 00 7.63
16. Office Equipment's and Setup CCTV setup,Computers,Windows and Antivirus Software, Tall Software, Website Development and Hosting MIS Software
1 00 10.07
Total 513.24
9. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) SIDBI appraisal report.
(ii) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.
(iii) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution.
(iv) Commitment letter with regard to SPV members‟ ability to utilize at least 60 percent
of installed capacity.
(v) Commitment letter from State Government/SPV to meet the escalation cost, if any,
over and above the approved project cost.
(vi) Certificate from State Government stating that more than 50% units in the cluster are
Micro/SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
(vii) Certificate from State Government regarding compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.
(viii) Documentary proof from SPV for utilization of CFC facilities by at least 51% of the
cluster members.
10. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up of Common
Facility Centre (CFC) in Organic Millets Cluster, Davanagere, Karnataka.
********
73
Agenda No.50.3.12: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up Common Facility
Centre (CFC) in Readymade Garment & Hosiery Cluster, Hiriyur,
Chitradurga, Karnataka.
Background
The proposal was recommended by State Level Steering Committee (SLSC) of
Government of Karnataka in its meeting held on 15.11.18.
Focus Report was forwarded by MSME-DI, Bengaluru vide letter dated 09.05.19.
Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 65th
meeting held on 13.06.19
recommended the proposal to place before Steering Committee for In-principle approval.
Proposal was received from Karnataka Council for Technological Upgradation vide
online ref. No. 14056 dated 24.06.19 & recommended by MSME-DI, Bengaluru.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Basic Information of Cluster Name of Cluster Readymade Garments Cluster District Chitradurga Location of Cluster Hiriyur Lok Sabha Constituency Chitradurga(SC) Main Product Banians, Undergarments, Petticoat, Kids wear,
Blouses, Shirts and Pants, Frocks, Readymade suit and salwar, other Readymade Garments, Zari Zardozi based suits and sarees, Embroidary Based suits and sarees.
No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium)
85 nos. (Micro – 80% women owned)
Turnover for the last five years Rs. 12.50 crore. Exports for the last five years Nil Employment in Cluster 1840 nos. Technology Details Traditional stitching machines Whether DS Conducted Yes DSR Conducted By Intaglio Technical and
Business Service Main findings of DSR The Hosiery and Garment Cluster in Ikkanur village
consists of 54 micro units with 90% SC/ST owned. The cluster members are involved in two types of activities they produce hosiery and garment products for direct sales in the market and are also active in providing tailoring services to traders and other customers whenever a need arises, for example the women entrepreneurs stitch school uniforms of nearby Govt. Schools at the beginning of the academic year.
Main Problems of Cluster 1. Majority of the cluster units have traditional manual sewing machines. It was observed that the cluster members/units cut the raw material of required size manually by using scissors which sometimes may not be accurate and in case of an error the entire piece is wasted. It is very difficult to achieve standard sizes using manual cutting measures. 2. The cluster members lack knowledge of standard size usually adopted by the readymade garment sellers. As a result the fitness of the cloths has varying impressions. 3. Proper storage of raw materials and finished garment products was not observed in the cluster and due to this the quality of cotton fabrics get deteriorated. 4. The processing time of the products is long and intensive. 5. The cluster
74
members lack packaging knowledge and packaging activities are completely absent. 6. Manual embroidery activities by the cluster members and lack of modern machinery are hindering their quality. 7. The cluster members lack proper marketing strategy and advertisement. They have a stagnant market and limited nearby villages and towns. The urban market is through dealers that is effecting on the cluster profitability. 8. The cluster members manual wash the finished products to remove strains and marking on the cloth. None of the cluster units possess Dry cleaning facility. 9. Product diversification is not taking place. The cluster members lack modern design tools and fashion product development knowledge. 10. No brand identity of the cluster products. 11. Lack of training activities in the cluster is leading to poor quality.
Other Information The cluster region consists of good number of Garment Industry and hence has large Manpower availability. Hosiery and other readymade garments is tailor made to full fill the needs of the village and town folks, customized stitching and fitments are used accordingly.
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Justification for CFC 1. The CFC with advance machinery like
lace pattern designing, lace cutting, and
pressing machine will help the cluster
members in value addition of their hosiery
products. 2. The CFC with advance
machinery for garments design, Finishing
machinery like overlocking, kaja making
and button fixing will help in quality up
gradation and productivity improvement of
cluster members 3. the CFC with
embroidery machine will help in value
addition of cluster ladies wear product like
suits. 4. The CFC with dry cleaning,
pressing will be useful as finishing line of
the cluster products.
--
(b.) Location of CFC Ikkanur village is located in the Hiriyur
taluk of Chitradurga district in Karnataka.
--
% age of units in radius of
5km
70 --
% age of units in radius of
10km
100 --
(c.) Land for CFC
i. Whether land acquired Yes Registered Lease
deed in the name
of SPV for a ii. Title is in name of Registered Lease Deed in the name of SPV
for 30 years
75
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
iii. Valuation and its basis As per the registration documents period of 30 years
is required. iv. Land is sufficient Yes,20Guntas
v. Change of land use Yes, NA Order Issued
vi. If on lease, duration of
lease
30 years
vii Whether lease is legally
tenable
Yes
(d.) Total Building area(sq ft) 4600 --
(e.) Rate of construction of
building
1250 --
(f.) Main Facility Proposed Machinery for hosiery products
finishing like Multi Color Quilting,
ultrasonic lace and pattern cutting and
sewing machine etc.
Machinery for Readymade Ladies suits
finishing section like 10 heads 6 needle
embroidery machines.
Readymade Garments Finishing
Section like Juki Double Needle
sewing machine, over locking, edge
cutting and sewing machine etc.
Machinery for Design Development
and Training Section like cloth cutting
machine, Computer Aided Cloth
Design Machineries and Software,
Fashion Design Tools and Equipments,
Single needle sewing machines and
computers for training.
--
(g.) Prod capacity of CFC 1140 sq Ft of fabric processing Required
(h.) Major Outputs/Deliverables
of CFC, Projected performance
of the cluster after proposed
intervention (in terms of
production, export/domestic
sales and direct/indirect
employment, etc.)
Sl.
No.
Parameter Before
intervention
After
Intervention
1. Nos. of units 85 110
2 Turnover (Rs. in
crore)
12.50 25.50
3 Export (Rs. in crore) Nil 5.00
4 Employment Direct – 340
Indirect - 1500
Direct – 600
Indirect – 2500
(i.) Pollution clearance required
or not
Not applicable Required
(j.) Man Power in CFC 23 --
(k.) Revenue generation
mechanism for sustainability of
assets(service/user charges to
Multi Colour Computerized Quilting
Embroidery Machine 2,160,000.00
Ultrasonic Lace Pattern Cutting And Sewing
Required
76
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
be levied, any other-to be
specified)
Machines 3,456,000.00 Ultrasonic Lace And
Pattern Pressing 2,304,000.00 10 Head Six
Needle Embroidery Machine 4,032,000.00
Readymade Garments Finishing and Sewing
Section 1,800,000.00 Readymade Garments
Cleaning, Pressing and Packing Section
2,880,000.00 Training Section 3,765,000.0
Total 20,397,000.00
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Name and Address Mahalaxmi Readymade Cluster Association. #6/6, Sira Road, Ikkanur, Ikkanur Post, Hiriyur Taluk, Chitradurga - 577511
SPV formed
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)
Society registered under Karnataka Society registration act 1960
--
(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
MD KCTU, JD DIC-Chitradurga, Director MSME - DI Bangalore
--
(d.) Date of formation of SPV 15-09-2018 --
(e.) Number of Members 30 registered and 100 unregistered --
(f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted
Byelaws/MOA of the cluster is enclosed in section 9.
Received
(g.) Authorized Share Capital 29.77 Lakhs 10% % of Project Cost --
(h.) Paid up capital as on............
10 lakhs --
(i.) Shareholding Pattern Equal share holding among all members Details attached in DPR and online application
Required
(j.) Commitment letter for contribution
SPV Commitment letter Received and attached in DPR and Application
Required
(k.) SPV specific A/c Name: M/s Mahalaxmi Readymade Garment Cluster Association (R) A/c: 147001011003209 Bank: Vijaya Bank IFSC Code: VIJB0001470
--
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation
The diagnostics study has found that the cluster needs to be supported with new technology machinery for the promotion and progress of the cluster. The diagnostics study recommends the following hard intervention activities
--
(m.) Technical Institution Intaglio Technical and Business Services --
(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
Yes the SPV has given undertaking for Capacity Utilization of CFC by SPV members and non members. Capacity utilization Letter of SPV attached in DPR and Online Application
Required
77
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(o.) --
(a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
50 KVA --
(b) Water 9,31,950 liters per day --
(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities 00 --
4. Implementation Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency Karnataka Council for Technological Upgradation (KCTU), Bangalore
As per guidelines
(b.) Fund receiving Agency
(c.) Implementation Period 24 months --
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
DPR is examined and recommended by MSME DI Indore
Required
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
Technical Division MSME DI Indore has examined the project and has recommended the project as technically feasible and financially viable
--
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee
DPR Submitted to O/o DC (MSME), GoI for approval.
TEAC recommended the proposal.
(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:
DPR Submitted to O/o DC (MSME), GoI for approval.
--
(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)
Yes, in principle approval of working capital letter attached
--
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) BEP 42% --
(b.) IRR, Payback period 33% --
(c.) DSCR Not applicable, as no loan involved --
(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
35% --
(e.) NPV 32% --
(f.) DER Not applicable --
(g.) Sensitivity Analysis Sensitivity analysis is performed for 5% and 10% reduction of capacity or fall in sale and the figures are satisfactory and as per the limits specified in the guidelines
--
(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State
Clusters Implemented. 1 Auto Cluster Bidar 2 Food Processing Cluster, Gulbarga 3 Auto Component Cluster, Hubli 4 Heat Treatment and Engineering Cluster, Hubli 5 Readymade Garments Cluster, Hubli 6 Raisins Processing Cluster, Bijapur 7 Raisins Processing Cluster,
--
78
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
Belgaum 8. Electronics Industries Cluster (ELCIA), Bangalore 9. Printing Cluster, Bangalore Clusters Under Implementation 1. Utopia Cashew Processing Cluster, Kumta, Uttara Kannada Dist 2. Global Puffed Rice Cluster,Chitradurga
6. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Amount
(i) Land 22.50 (ii) Building 68.95 (iii) Plant & Machinery (including electrification) 176.04 (iv) Misc. fixed assets 6.00 (v) Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 6.00 (vi) Contingencies (2% on building and 5% on plant and machinery) 10.18 (vii) Margin money for working capital 8.00
Total 297.67
7. Proposed means of finance:
Particulars Percentage Amount
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 80.00 238.13
(ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Karnataka 10.00 29.77
(iii) SPV contribution 10.00 29.77
Total 100.00 297.67
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
S. No. Name of the Machine Qty Amount A Hosiery Finishing Section 1. Multi-color computerized quilting machine 1 14.76
2. Ultrasonic Lace Pattern Cutting Machine 1 14.76 3. Ultrasonic lace sewing machine 1 17.22 4. Ultrasonic lace and pattern pressing machine 1 15.44 B Readymade Ladies suits finishing section 1. 10 Head 6 needle embroidery machine 1 32.49 C. Readymade Garments Finishing Section 1. Juki 1560 ¼ Double Needle 1 2.83
2. Juki Model MO-6716 S-over locking sewing machine 1 3.58
3. Juki Model DLM-5200 Edge Cutter sewing machine. 1 3.60
4. Kansai – loop making machine model B2000C 1 2.95
5. Garments Finishing setup – steam pressing, Dry
Cleaning, Folding and Packing 1 17.66
D Design Development and Training Section
1. Cloth cutting machine 1 2.44
2. Computer Aided Cloth Design Machineries and software 1 25.21
3. Fashion Design Tools and Equipments 1 3.44
4. Juki model DDL 8300N Single Needle sewing machine 5 2.20
5. Computers 5 2.33
79
S. No. Name of the Machine Qty Amount 6. DG SET – 125 KVA 1 14.80
7. Software OS Anti Virus 5 0.33
Total 176.04
9. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Registered land documents in the name of SPV (if land is on lease basis, registered
lease deed for a minimum period of 30 years is required).
(ii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(iii) Commitment letter from State Government / IA to meet the cost escalation, if any,
over and above the approved project cost.
(iv) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution.
(v) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilize at least 60 percent of installed
capacity.
(vi) Details of production capacity.
(vii) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.
(viii) Details of Revenue generation mechanism
(ix) Details of shareholding pattern.
(x) Details regarding registration of all units in MSME databank.
(xi) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR / CVC guidelines.
(xii) Documentary proof from SPV for utilization of CFC facilities by at least 51% of the
cluster members.
(xiii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro /
SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
10. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up Common
Facility Center (CFC) in Readymade Garment & Hosiery Cluster, Hiriyur, Chitradurga,
Karnataka.
********
80
Agenda No.50.3.13: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up Common Facility
Centre (CFC) in Food Processing Cluster, Sirsi, Uttara Kannada,
Karnataka.
Background
The proposal was recommended by State Level Steering Committee (SLSC) of
Government of Karnataka in its meeting held on 15.11.18.
Proposal along with Focus Report, Detailed Project Report and recommendation was
forwarded by MSME-DI, Hubli vide letter dated 10.05.19.
Proposal was received from Karnataka Council For Technological Upgradation vide
application ref. No. 13757 dated 11.06.19 & recommended by MSME-DI, Hubli.
Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 65th
meeting held on 13.06.19
recommended the proposal to place before Steering Committee for In-principle approval.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Basic Information of Cluster Name of Cluster Food Processing Cluster District Uttara Kannada Location of Cluster Sirsi Lok Sabha Constituency Uttara Kannada Main Product
Frozen Fruits and Vegetables, Vacuum Fried Chips, Freeze Dried Fruit and Vegetables, Virgin Coconut Oil, Garcinia Indica and Garcinia Cambogia Butter, Canned Fruits and Vegetables, Fruit pulp, Multi Grain Powder, Dehydrated fruits and veget.
No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium)
Units Nos. Micro : 33 Small : 4 Total : 37
Turnover for the last five years Year (Rs. in crore) 2012-13 253.00 2013-14 298.00 2014-15 372.00 2015-16 438.00 2016-17 512.00
Exports for the last five years Nil Employment in Cluster 1852 nos. (Direct – 245 & Indirect – 1607) Technology Details Sterilizing Equipment Advanced Mechanized Dryers
like Freeze Drying & Controlled atmosphere Drying Vacuum Frying Equipment Cold Chain Solutions like IQF, Cold Storage Canning Facilities Oil Extraction Facility Powder Making Grinders: Nitrogen Packaging Machines
Whether DS Conducted Yes Main findings of DSR Even though the Raw materials are available,
new value additions are not taking place. There are many problems in cluster to scale
up. Key technology is missing in processing. Common solutions can be made available to
address major issues. There will be more opportunities if scientific
approach is adapted in Packing, Storing, Branding, Marketing and R&D
Main Problems of Cluster No value additions No advance methods Storage problem of seasonally available raw
81
materials and final products Branding and marketing Short of standard packing
Other Information The cluster members have good local and regional market linkage but the urban market linkage is very week, due to age old methodologies and inadequate infrastructure for advertisement of their products in urban, National and International markets. The processing methodology that the cluster members are following is very labor intensive and time consuming. The fact that they are using open sun drying method is major drawback as this region is a hilly region with frequent rainfalls.
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Justification for CFC The Food cluster at Sirsi produces valuable and non chemical preservative value added fruit/ vegetable products. The style of production is very old fashioned, informal and primitive. They are not able to imply modern equipment even though they know about new technologies due to financial constraints. The CFC that is being proposed at the cluster will bring about holistic changes. It will increase the cluster turnover to 300%-400%. The machineries proposed will increase the productivity, reduces the processing time and will increase the hygienic level and quality of their products.
--
(b.) Location of CFC Plot No: SPL 25, Industrial Area, Banvasi Road, Sirsi, Uttar Kannada District, Karnataka 581401
--
% age of units in radius of 5km
11 --
% age of units in radius of 10km
89 --
(c.) Land for CFC i. Whether land acquired Yes Lease deed for a
period of 30 years received.
ii. Title is in name of Padmanabha V. Bhat iii. Valuation and its basis NA iv. Land is sufficient Yes v. Change of land use NA vi. If on lease, duration of lease
30 Years
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
Yes
(d.) Total Building area(sq ft) 10763 Sqft (e.) Rate of construction of building
NA --
(f.) Main Facility Proposed Common Raw Material Bank Common Processing Final Storage
Post-harvest handling to assure quality and safety of fresh produce: Harvested produce should be placed in a shaded area so as
82
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
to avoid sun damage, if awaiting transportation to the processing plant. Produce must be properly handled to avoid bruising and contamination. (i) Receiving at the processing facility. (ii) Pre-cooling. (iii) Washing and disinfection. (iv) Peeling, trimming and deseeding. (v) Sorting for defects. (vi) Cutting operations. (vii) Rinsing of pre-cut and vegetables. (viii) Cold storage.
(g.) Prod capacity of CFC 30000Kg per Day -- (h.)Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/ domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)
Sl. No.
Parameter Before intervention
After Intervention
1. Nos. of units (nos.)
37 67
2 Turnover (Rs. in crore)
6.493 34.0306
3 Export (Rs. in crore)
Nil 1.50
4 Employment (nos.)
245 1008
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
Required. Consent for Establishment of CFC is obtained from KSPCB on 19.07.2018.
Required
(j.) Man Power in CFC Processing section -46 Administration section - 12
--
(k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
Processing Charges: between Rs.4 to Rs.120 per Kg Raw Material Bank service charges Rs.3 per Kg Cold Storage Rs.350 per ton per day
--
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Name and Address Simha Shakti Okkuta, Food Cluster Sirsi. Plot No. SPL 25, Industrial Area, Banavasi Road, Sirsi, Uttar Kannada District, Karnataka. No. of SPV members – 37 nos.
SPV formed
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)
Registered as Society under Karnataka Society Registration act 1960.
--
(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
Managing Director KCTU and Director, MSME-DI, Hubli
--
(d.) Date of formation of SPV 4-7-2013 --
83
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(e.) Number of Members 37 -- (f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted
Yes Required
(g.) Authorized Share Capital NA -- (h.) Paid up capital as on............
Rs.228500 Total Membership Fees Collected as on 31st March 2018
--
(i.) Shareholding Pattern Submitted Received (j.) Commitment letter for contribution
Submitted Received
(k.) SPV specific A/c Bank Name: Central Bank of India Branch: Sirsi Type of Account: Current A/c No: 3316572980 IFSC: CBIN0283676
Required
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation
1. Training, Workshop and Programme conducted under SPV initiative at Sirsi 2. Undergone 2 days intensive training in CFTRI, Mysore and got Certificate in this regard
--
(m.) Technical Institution CFTRI, Mysore and Karnataka Council for Technological Upgradation (KCTU), Bangalore
--
(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
Yes, Commitment Letter Enclosed Received
(o.) (a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
250KV --
(b) Water The CFC requires 5000 Litre of water per day for processing of Food
--
(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities Diesel for Generator, Fire wood for Boilers, Solar Energy
--
4. Implementation Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA) Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency Karnataka Council for Technological Upgradation (KCTU), Bangalore.
As per guidelines (b.) Fund receiving Agency (c.) Implementation Period 2 Years -- (d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
DPR will be submitted to SIDBI for techno-Economic Appraisal after In Principle Approval.
Required
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
MSME - DI, Hyderabad has submitted the Technical comments on CFC to MSME - DI, Hubli and recommended the CFC proposal for in principle approval vide letter dated 05.04.2019.
--
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee
DPR Submitted to DC MSME Govt. Of India for approval.
TEAC recommended the proposal.
(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:
MSME DI Hubli has submitted the Focus report and recommended the CFC proposal vide letter dated 10.05.2019.
--
(h.) Working capital(In- SPV has taken In Principle approval for --
84
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)
sanction of working capital loan from Central Bank of India, Sirsi Branch, Uttara Kannada dist vide letter dated 10.06.2019.
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA) Remarks
(a.) BEP 27.66% -- (b.) IRR, Payback period 21.37%,.4 Years -- (c.) DSCR 102.34 -- (d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
27.64 % --
(e.) NPV 0.583 -- (f.) DER 9.0 -- (g.) Sensitivity Analysis Reducing the revenue by 10%, ratios are
under acceptable limits. --
(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State
Implemented. 1. Auto Cluster, Hubli 2. Readymade garments cluster, Hubli. 3. Food Cluster, Gulbarga 4. Auto cluster, Bidar 5. Raisin Processing Cluster, Bijapur 6. Heat Treatment & Engg Cluster, Hubli 7. Athani Raisin Processing Cluster, Belagavi. 8. ELCIA Cluster, Bangalore. Under Implementation. 1. Printing Cluster, Bangalore. 2. Uthopia Cashew Cluster, Kumta, Uttara Kannada . In Principle Approved. 1. Belgaum Cashew Processors Cluster Society, Jadhav Nagar, Belagavi Dist. 2. Spices Manufacturing Cluster, Gadag Dist 3. Jaagery Processing Cluster, Raibag, Belagavi Dist 4. Shivashakthy Foundry Cluster , Shivamogga Dist
--
6. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Amount
1. Land 0.00
2. Building 0.00
3. Plant & Machinery (including electrification) 671.50
4. Misc. fixed assets 5.00
5. Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 5.00
6. Contingencies (2% on building and 5% on plant and
machinery)
20.00
7. Margin money for working capital 4.18
Total 705.68
85
7. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Percentage Amount
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 80.00 564.54
(ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Karnataka 10.00 70.57
(iii) SPV contribution 10.00 70.57
Total 100.00 705.68
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Name of the Machine Qty Total Cost with GST and
installation charges A Raw Material Bank 1. Cutting and cubing machine (for vegetables) 1 0.47
2. Fruit and vegetable blanching machine 1 0.89 3. Washer & Blanching machine (for fruits) 1 3.51 4. Fruit washing machine (Manually operating, for
soft fruits) 1 0.85
5. Automatic vegetable cutting machine 1 2.73 6. Cleaning and pealing machine (for root
vegetables) 1 2.28
7 Slicing machine (vegetables) 1 4.49 8. Stainless steel working table 1 2.10 9. Four head jack fruit pealing machine 1 3.44
10. Dehydrate 1 6.46 11. Dryer 1 3.69 12. Special Flour Mill 1 1.21 13. Commercial flour mill 1 1.21 14. Ribbon blender (for mixing grains etc.) 1 1.48 15. Roster 1 3.07 16. Vibro sifter 1 0.71 17. Fruit & Vegetable dicing machine (blade size
5x5 & 10x10) 1 4.02
18. Fruit & vegetable dicing machine (blade size 8x8 & 16x16)
1 4.02
19. Fruit milling machine (250 mm, DIA, Crushing) 1 1.35 20. Fully automatic (sizing, peeling, coring
machine) 1 40.59
21. Horizontal Peeling Coring machine 2 12.73 22. Horizontal Slicing machine (one dia fruit 75-85
MM) 1 4.92
23. Horizontal slicing machine (one dia fruit 87-95
MM) 1 4.86
24. Horizontal TIT-BIT Cutting machine (80-95
MM) 1 2.28
25. Pulping machine (for extraction of fruit pulp) 1 1.33 26. Horizontal TIT-BIT Cutting machine (65-75
MM) 1 2.34
27. Fruit Slicer 1 1.91 28. Cold Storage – 1 1 4.65
86
S. No. Name of the Machine Qty Total Cost with GST and
installation charges B Value Addition Machineries 1. IQF Machine 1 55.86 2. Vacuum Frying Machine 1 7.38 3. Deep Freezer (Blast Freezer) 1 7.98 4. Freez Dryer 1 123.69 5. Agitator Tank 1 2.82 6. Clarifier (for oil) 1 3.69 7. LF DC Discharge conveyor 1 1.49 8. Micro Filter (for virgin coconut oil) 1 3.11 9. Milk extractor machine (for coconut milk) 1 8.52
10. Self priming pump 1 0.68 11. Tabular Centrifuge (for oil) 1 9.74 12. Virgin Oil Collection Tank 1 1.08 13. Coconut Deshelling machine 2 2.46 14. Coconut Grating Machine 1 4.92 15. Micro filter (for seed oil) 1 3.11 16. Oil Expeller 1 4.18 17. Milk collection tank (for coconut milk) 1 0.74 18. Can Handpressure Tester – Foot Operated Pump 1 0.59 19. Can Holing basket 4 7.38 20. Canning retort 2 1.18 21. Double seamer – DS 24 (CAN SEAMER) 2 12.18 22. Inspection Conveyor (for peeled and cored fruit) 1 5.52 23. Inspection cum filling conveyor 1 5.53 24. Machine flange rectifier 1 0.17 25. Material Handling Trolley 6 0.58 26. Material Handling Trolley Heavy Duty 4 0.44 27. Refractometer 0”- 32” (2 nos.), 28” – 62” (1 no.) 3 0.13 28. Retort Basket 12 0.75 29. Steam checking scale guage 2 0.018 30. Spear point guage SS made vaccum tester 1 0.03 31. Stainless Steel Centrifugal Transfer 1 0.77 32. Steam generating boiler 1 22.32 33. Steam jacketed kettle fixed type 1 2.55 34. Steam jacketed kettle tilting type 1 1.35 35. Storing cum feeding table 6 2.10 36. Straight line exhaust box (for canning) 1 7.011 37. Sugar syrup preparation cum holding tank 1 5.09 38. Syrup filling cum storing table 1 2.34 39. Weighing cum storing table 2 0.52 40. Basket lifting electrically operated chain hoist 1 1.97 41. Tubular Centrifuge (for juice extraction) 1 9.74 C Packing Facilities
42. FFS Machine (for semi finished raw material) 1 8.61 43. Single chamber vacuum packing machine (alles
pack – DZ -500/ZE) 1 0.75
44. Band Sealer 2 0.50 45. FFS Multy (for raw vegetables & fruits) 1 5.29 46. Bag Sealerr 1 0.061 47. FFS Machine (for crispy products) 1 17.22 48. FFS Horizontal (for fruit bar) 1 6.46
87
S. No. Name of the Machine Qty Total Cost with GST and
installation charges 49. Centre seal machine (for powder) 1 17.22 50. Double Chamber vacuum packing machine
(model: ALLES Pack – DZ 500/2SB) 1 1.66
D Other supportive Machines and accessories 1. Air conditioner 3 1.99 2. Effluent Treatment plant 1 9.84 3. Micro – Biology Laboratory set 1 11.43 4. Office equipments 1 7.38 5. RO Water purification unit 1 2.46 6. Solar energy system (for office equipments,
lighting and CC TV) 1 6.15
7. Diesel Generator Set (for power back up) 1 17.22
8. Bore well 1 2.46 9. Pressure washer (for floor cleaning) 2 0.25
10. Solar Water Heater 1 1.23 11. Water pump 2 0.61 12. Bin and containers 1 2.46 13. CC TV System 1 1.84 14. Fire Extenguisher 4 0.49 15. Linen (for 60 employees, 2 each) 60 0.74 16. Plant tools and equipments 1 6.16 17. Website 1 1.23 18. Weighing Scale (150KG X 1 No., 50 KG X 2
Nos., 20 KG X 2 Nos.) 5 1.23
E Cold storage – 2 1 4.30
Electrification 1 19.69
Total 612.23
9. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(ii) Commitment letter from State Government / IA to meet the cost escalation, if any,
over and above the approved project cost.
(iii) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.
(iv) Bye Laws or MA and AOA.
(v) Details of Revenue generation mechanism
(vi) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR / CVC guidelines.
(vii) Documentary proof from SPV for utilization of CFC facilities by at least 51% of the
cluster members.
10. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up Common
Facility Center (CFC) in Food Processing Cluster, Sirsi, Uttara Kannada, Karnataka.
********
88
Agenda No.50.3.14: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up Common Facility
Centre (CFC) in Wood Carpentry Cluster, Baktawng, Serchip,
Mizoram.
Background
The proposal was recommended by State Level Project Steering Committee in its
meeting held on 04.10.18.
Proposal was received from Government of Mizoram vide online ref. No. 14264 dated
11.06.19 & recommended by MSME-DI, Agartala.
Focus Report was forwarded by MSME-DI, Agartala vide e-mail dated 07.06.19.
MSME-DI, Agartala would make a presentation before Techno Economic Appraisal
Committee (TEAC) on their observations.
Proposal was considered by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 65th
Meeting held on 13.06.19 and TEAC recommended the proposal to place before Steering
Committee for In-principle approval.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Basic Information of Cluster
Name of Cluster : Wood Carpentry Cluster, Baktawng
District : Serchip
Location of Cluster : Baktawng
Lok Sabha Constituency : Mizoram (ST)
Main Product : Bed, Chest of Drawer, Cupboard, Dining Set, Doors, Frames,
Shelf, stand, Tables, Bench, Chokut, Almira, Stair Raylling,
Ventilators and Windows
No. of Enterprises including
break up (Micro, Small,
Medium) (Nos)
Micro: 107
Turnover for the last five years
Year Amount
(Rs. in crore)
2013-14 : 3.80
2014-15 : 4.13
2015-16 : 4.50
2016-17 : 4.90
2017-18 : 5.35
Exports for the last five years :
Nil
Employment in Cluster : 937 Nos.
Technology Details : After gathering the raw material from the forest, the product
goes through primary processing that includes debarking/
seasoning/chemical treatments plank cutting etc, then to
secondary processing that is manual operation with few small
tools, then the tertiary processing that is the manual operation
with few power small tools, then the products are sent for
89
final assembling, the last manual operation includes polishing
and painting, lastly inspection and the product is then
dispatched.
Whether DS Conducted : Yes
Main findings of DSR : Common Facility Center would act as a common ground for the developmental and commercial activities and would ensure the involvement of all the units irrespective of their size of business operation in the cluster development programme. The artisans have not been able to afford some machinery like Width Sizing/Planning/Sizing Machine/Designing machine, Lathe Machine, Hydraulic Machine and other hi-tech and advanced timber working machine etc. Due to improper seasoning, the finished products are having low durability as well as low level of reliability. A seasoning plant is urgently required to be set up. The existing market is not organized well. The artisans are not getting proper exposure for their products. To improve the efficiency of logistics operations as a means to cutting cost, faster supply of goods to the buyers, there is the need of a facilitating agency in the cluster area. Artisans and entrepreneurs who are now earning their livelihood in this sector needs proper training on handling of machinery, time managements, business managements, waste management etc. CFC may act as training centre for them. The chain of raw material suppliers and artisans is not well organized. CFC may function as common raw material/ Sales depot to remove the hurdles of sales and raw material procurement. R and D center: The CFC is required for undertaking Research & Development on wood related technology.
Main Problems of Cluster : High Raw Material Procurement Cost Outdated machines
Under developed Marketing System Lack of proper working
place or go down Lack of social capital Lack of proper
management system of the cluster units Weak Linkage
Other Information : Nil
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Justification for CFC Process study carried out in units in the cluster, involves processes as shown in the above flow chart and interactive discussions with the concerned artisans consequently dug out several critical problems being faced by them, as mentioned earlier. The problems exist in every stage right from raw material availability/Seasoning/chemical treatment through low value primary processes, and wastage of both raw material and energy to the final manufacturing step of polishing/finish, such problems are impossible to be solved without modern implements and machines. they are not enough capable of purchasing such high tech machines on to their individual levels. Thus the setting up of the CFC is very crucial for their development.
--
(b.) Location of CFC The Common Facility Centre is planned to be
90
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
located in the central area of the cluster so as to enable all unit owners to avail of the proposed modern woodworking facilities without incurring handling cost for the heavy and bulky lumberers/planks/panels.
% age of units in radius of 5km
100
% age of units in radius of 10km
0
(c.) Land for CFC
i. Whether land acquired
Yes Received
ii. Title is in name of SPV --
iii. Valuation and its basis
Please see Annexure I --
iv. Land is sufficient Yes --
v. Change of land use Done --
vi. If on lease, duration of lease
Yes, 25 years --
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
NA --
(d.) Total Building area 8000 sq. ft. --
(e.) Rate of construction of building
Rs 750 --
(f.) Main Facility Proposed
Seasoning Facility. Chemical Treatment Facility. Debarking of logs. Modern Joint Making Facilities. Panel Saw, Cross Cut Saw, Band Saw
Facility. Automatic Sanding. Mortise, Tenoner Facility. Modern Edge Banding Facility. High Frequency Plank Joining. Powered Small Tools. Finishing Facilities. Laminating Facility. Quality Control Service. Skill Upgradation Facility. Marketing network through optional
common branding.
--
(g.) Prod capacity of CFC
CFC will be Capable of processing 10000 to 10500 cft of raw wood per month in 200 hours/month of operation hours
--
(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/ domestic sales and direct /indirect employment, etc.)
Sl. No.
Parameters Before interventions
After Interventions
1 Total no. of units 107 130-150 2 Total annual
turnover (Rs. in lakh)
535 Around Rs. 800.00 lakh after two years.
3 Export Nil Expected Rs. 100.00 lakh
4 Investment (Rs. in lakh)
154 Expected Rs. 250.00 lakh
91
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
5 Profitability (percentage)
15-20% 20-25%
6 Employment generation (Direct & Indirect)
937 Nos. Expected 1450-1500 Nos.
7 ISO & Other certification
NA Expected to be introduced
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
Yes Required.
(j.) Man Power in CFC 55 --
(k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets (service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
Rs. 361.01 Lac --
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Name and Address Baktawng Carpentry Industrial Co-operative
Society (Registered under the Mizoram Co-
operative Societies Act 1991 under
Registration Number AE 233 or 96-97)
Baktawng, Tlangnuam, Mizoram, Pin- 796161
--
(b.) Nature of
SPV(company or Society
or Trust)
Registered Industrial Cooperative Society --
(c.) Name of the state Govt.
and MSME officials in
SPV
Pi Elizabeth Lalremthangi , Functional
Manager, DIC, Serchhip
--
(d.) Date of formation of
SPV
2.3.2017 --
(e.) Number of Members 107 --
(f.) Bye Laws or MA and
AOA submitted
Submitted Received
(g.) Authorized Share
Capital
-- --
(h.) Paid up capital -- --
(i.) Shareholding Pattern Submitted Received
(j.) Commitment letter for
contribution
Submitted Received
(k.) SPV specific A/c State Bank of India Account Number:
36462418039
--
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, SPV in the names of Baktawng Carpentry --
92
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
Previous track record of co-
operative initiatives
pursued by SPV members
need to be highlighted with
support documentation
Industrial Cooperative Society has been
formed and. A copy of the registration
certificate is enclosed at Annexure III. A land
measuring 13.50 bighas has been acquired by
the SPV in the closed proximity of the
Baktawng village. Prepared and submitted by
SPV . The members of SPV is expected to
have equal number of shares in the CFC as far
as the contribution of the shareholder is
concerned. Project specific account with State
Bank of India, Khumtung Branch. Several
meetings have been held for awareness
regading the MSECDP scheme, technology
and implements selected and the process of the
CFC.
(m.) Technical Institution NIT Mizoram/ NID --
(n.) CFC may be utilised by
SPV members as also
others in a cluster.
However, evidence should
be furnished with regard to
SPV member ability to
utilise at least 60 percent of
installed capacity.
Submitted Received
(o.)
(a) Power requirement for
commercial/domestic
purpose
Yes, 150 kw --
(b) Water Yes --
(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities Yes, Disel --
4. Implement Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency Indian Institute of Entrepreneurship,
Guwahati, Ministry of Skill Development
and Entrepreneurship, Govt. of India
As per guidelines.
(b.) Fund receiving Agency Indian Institute of Entrepreneurship,
Guwahati, Ministry of Skill Development
and Entrepreneurship, Govt. of India
(c.) Implementation Period 18 months 24 months
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and
main Recommendations
To be submitted Required
(e.) Comments of Technical -- --
93
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
Division
(f.) Approval of Technical
Committee
Pending TEAC has
recommended the
proposal.
(g.) Comments of Cluster
Development Division:
-- --
(h.) Working capital(In-
principle sanction of loan
from a bank, if applicable
arrangement made)
NA --
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) BEP 56.66% (of installed capacity) --
(b.) IRR, Payback period 15.82 % after tax 22.85% before tax Pay
Back Period 4 Years 5 Months
--
(c.) DSCR NA --
(d.) Return on Capital
employed (ROCE)
30.80% before tax --
(e.) NPV Positive --
(f.) DER NA --
(g.) Sensitivity Analysis Positive --
(h.) Status of CFCs approved
in the State
NA --
6. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Amount
1. Land & site development (land leased) 25.41 2. Building 60.00 3. Plant & Machinery (including electrification) 390.63 4. Misc. fixed assets 8.09 5. Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 11.80 6. Contingencies (2% on building and 5% on plant and
machinery) 20.73
7. Margin money for working capital 18.34 Total 535.00
7. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Percentage (%) Amount
1 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 83.46 446.50
2 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Mizoram 10.00 53.50
3 SPV contribution 6.54 35.00
Total 100.00 535.00
94
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Nos. Power,
kW Total Cost
A Main Equipments
1 SCM MINIMAX Band Saw S400 P (Non CE) 1 1.50 2.50 2 SCM sSliding Table Panel Saw 400 Nova 1 7.50 5.50
3 SCM Cut-off Saw 1 5.00 4.10
4 SCM, SPINDLE MOULDER WITH TILTING SPINDLE & LL Version
1 10.00 9.20
5 FEED 44, SCM Feeder STANDARD MACHINE 1 1.00 0.80
6 CMS Balestrini, Automatic Twin Table Round-End Tenoner
1 2.55 17.00
7 MICRON - CMS BALESTRINI, Automatic Twin Table Slot Mortiser MICRON
1 2.55 9.35
8 NOVA-F-(x) - SCM SURFACE PLANER STANDARD MACHINE
1 2.00 6.15
9 SCM THICKNESSING PLANER - STANDARD MACHINE
1 3.00 6.15
10 SCM SANDYA AUTOMATIC WIDE BELT SANDER S600 RCS 135 - STANDARD EQUIPMENT
1 15.00 36.60
11 SCM Universal Belt Sanding Centre - with Oscillating Belt BASIC MACHINE
1 3.00 6.95
12 SCM, Automatic Throughfeed Planer Moulder, PROFISET 40CE. STANDARD MACHINE
1 5.00 15.30
13 Festool Domino Joining Machine Domino Df 500 Q 1 1.00 1.18
14 Festool Domino Assortment Box DE - Beechwood Domino Assortment Ds 4/5/6/8/10 1060Xbu Assortment Sys Sort-Sys Domino
1 0.32
15 Festool Mobile Dust Extractor Ctl Midi Fitted Filter Bag
1 1.00 0.57
16 Festool Domino Joining Machine Df 700 Eq Plus Domino Cutter
1 1.00 1.50
17 Festool Beechwood Domino x1 Assortment Ds/Xl D12/D14 128X Bu Dowel Range
1 0.25
18 Festool Beechwood Domino x1 Assortment Ds/Xl D8/D10 306X Bu Dowel Range Domino
1 0.29
19 Festool Pendulum Jigsaw Carvex Ps420 1 0.50 0.76 20 Festool Jig Saw Blades HS 75/3 Bi 5X 1 0.03
21 Festool Jig Saw Blades S 105/4 5X 1 0.02
22 Festool Jig Saw Blades HS 75/25 Bi 5X 1 0.03
23 Festool Jig Saw Blades HS 75/25 Bi R 5X 1 0.03 24 Festool Planer H1 850 Eb-Plus Parallel Side Fence
Rebate Depth Stop Extraction Adapter Operation Tool In A Sysytainer Sys 3 T - Loc
1 0.75 0.75
25 Festool Planer Head Hk 82 Sd Rustic Design Fine With Spiral Blade Hs 82 Rf
1 0.22
26 Festool Planer Head Hk 82 Sd Rustic Design Coarse With Spiral Blade Hs 82 Rf With Spiral Blade Hs 82 Rg Depth Limiter
1 0.21
27 Festool Planer Head Hk 82 Sd Rustic Design Undulating With Hs Spiral Blade Hs 82 Rw Depth Limiter
1 0.22
28 Festool Dove Tail Kit Vs600 1 0.26
95
S. No. Particulars Nos. Power, kW
Total Cost
29 Festool Cutt. Template Vs 600 Sz 14 copying ring Ø 17 mm (for OF 1010)
1 0.11
30 Festool Cutters Hw S8 D138/135/15◦ 0.05
31 Festool Copy Ring Kr-D 17/Of1400/Vs 600 1 0.03
32 Festool Cutt. Template Vs 600 Szo 20 copying ring Ø 13.8 mm (for OF 1010). copying ring Ø 24 mm (for OF 1010)
1 0.22
33 Festool Dovetail Cutter Hw Vs600 D20X26X8 Z2 Rl 1 0.07
34 119,750 Festool Mobile Dust Extractor Cleantec Ctm 36 E Selfclean Filter Bag Suction Hose Ø 27 Mm X 35 M-As End Cap For Intake Adapter Hose Holder Sys Dock Cable Holder In A Carton
3 1.00 3.50
35 67,750 Festool Eccentric Sander Ets Ec 150/3 Eq StickFix sanding pad Ø 150 mm FUSION-TEC (extra-soft). operation tool
3 1.50 2.03
36 Festool Eccentric Sander Ets Ec 150/5 Eq StickFix sanding pad Ø 150 mm FUSION-TEC (soft HT). operation tool
3 1.50 2.03
37 Festool Suction Hose D 27 22X3 5M As Gq Ct "Bleeder resistor (DIN IEC 312) <1 m?/m Diameter 27/22 mm Length 3 5 m"
3 0.72
38 Festool Workcenter Wcr 1000 3 2.91
39 Festool Holder For Spra Wcr 1000 Lph 2x screw. 2x square nut
3 0.12
40 Festool Dry Guide Coat Hb-Set hand sanding block. 2 guide control black powder cartridges (each 30 g)
1 0.04
41 Festool Systainer Sys-Stf D 150 4S 3 0.29 42 Festool Sanding Discs Stf D150/16 P80 Gr/50 Sanding
Discs Stf D150/16 P80 Gr/50 1 0.04
43 Festool Sanding Discs Stf D150/16 P180 Gr/100 1 0.07
44 Festool Sanding Discs Stf D150/16 P280 Gr/100 1 0.07
45 Festool Stickfix Qty. Stf 115X228 P400 Gr 100X NA 1 0.08 46 Festool Cleaning Cloth Rt Premium 240X380/200 Ideal
In Sanding Preparation 1 0.07
47 Rotary Polisher SHINEX Wood Set Shinex RAP 150-21 FE Additional Side-Mounted Hand Grip Stickfix Polishing Pad Ø 150
3 3.05
48 Festool Swirl Mark Set Ro150/Mpa/Ps/Mf Set 2 1.34
49 Festool Sliding Compound Mitre Saw Kapex Ks 120 Ug-Set Items Included 561283
1 1.00 3.24
50 Festool Circular Saw Ts 55 Rebq-Plus-Fs Fine Tooth Saw Blade Hw W48 Guide Rail Fs 1400/2 - 491498
1 0.50 0.77
51 Festool Multifunction Table Mft/3 Table With Perforated Top And Foldway Legs Swivel Unit Support Unit Angle Stop Adjustable Stop Guide Rail Fs1080/2 Deflector Fs-Aw Additional Clamp In A Carton
1 1.15
52 Festool Rustofix BMS 180 E Ld 85 Brush Kb 80 Brush Extractor Hood With Handle Tool Arbour Clamping Flange Operationg Tools In Carrying Case.
1 1.38
53 Festool Orbital Sander Rutscher Rs 200 Eq-Plus StickFix sanding pad 115 x 225 mm. filter cartridge
1 0.67
54 Festool Compressed Air Eccentric Sander Lex 3 77/25 Set Stickfix Sanding Pad Ø 77 Mm W-Ht (Soft) Ias-Connection Ias 3-Sd Compressed-Air Hose Ø 124X 5M Interface Pad Ø 77 Mm Operation Tool In A Systainer Sys 2 T-Loc
2 1.40
96
S. No. Particulars Nos. Power, kW
Total Cost
55 82,000 Festool Oscillator Vecturo Os 400 Eq-Set Wood Saw Blade Hsb 50/35/J Wood Saw Blade Hsb 100/Hcs Universal Saw Blade Usb 78/32/Bi Positioning Aid/Depth Stop Set Os-Ah/Ta Set In A Systainer Sys 2 T-Loc Df
1 0.82
56 Festool Laminate Trimmer OFK 700 Eq-Plus 8Mm Clamping Collet Extraction Hood Edge Trimming Cutter D19X16 Operation Tool In Asystainer Sys 2 T - Loc
1 0.78
57 Festool Hole Drilling Set Lr 32-Sys • Guide Plate • Centring Mandrel • Operation Tool • Hinge Location Cutter Hm Ø 35 Mm • Dowel Drill Hw Ø 5 Mm (V-Shaped Tip) • Dowel Drill Hm Ø 5 Mm (With Centring Bit And Pre-Cutter) • 2 Parallel Side Fences With Adjustable Stop • 2 Clamps Fsz 120 • 2 Longitudinal Stops
1 0.59
58 Festool Routing Template Mfs 400 • 2 Angle Stops • Tilt Protection • Circle Routing Insert • Operation Tool
1 0.33
59 Festool Routing Template Mfs 700 2 Angle Stops Tilt Protection Circle Routing Insert Operation Tool
1 0.52
60 Festool Bench-Mounted Router Tf 2200-Set Router Of 2200 Eb-Plus Basic Unit With Foldaway Legs Module Support Router Stop Guard Press-Down Fixture Assembly Lugs Ø 8 Mm Clamping Collet Ø 12 Mm Clamping Collet Copying Ring Ø 30 Mm Extraction Hood Chip Deflector Operation Tool
1 2.88
61 Festool Cordless Drills Txs Li 26 Plus Eu 230V 2 0.62
62 Bessey K Body Revo Kr 600/95 10 0.58 63 Bessey Band Clamp Ban700 3 0.12
64 Bessey Malleable Cast Iron Screw Clamp Tg-2K 200/100
10 0.31
65 Bessey Malleable Cast Iron Screw Clamp Tg-2K 300/120
10 0.40
66 Bessey Malleable Cast Iron Screw Clamp Tg-2K 1000/140
10 0.79
67 Bessey Deep Throat Clamp Tgnt 400/30 10 0.98 68 Bessey Heavy Duty Malleable Cast Iron Screw Clamp
Tgk 1500/120 10 0.88
69 Bessey Malleable Cast Iron Screw Clamp Tpn-Be-2K 200/100
10 0.24
70 Bessey Kikilamp Kli 200/80 10 0.22 71 Bessey Die-Cast Zinc Screw Clamp Lm 200/100 10 0.23
72 Bessey Angle Clamps Ws6 4 0.29
73 Bessey Mitre Clamp Gall 10 2.10
74 Bessey Angle Clamps Ws1 10 0.08 75 Bessey K Body Revo Kr 800/95 10 0.67
76 Bessey K Body Revo Kr 1250/95 10 0.83
77 Bessey K Body Revo Kr 1500/95 10 0.90
78 Bessey Angle Clamps Ws3 10 0.51 79 Bessey Kliklamp Kli 120/80 10 0.21
80 Bessey Heavy Duty Malleable Cast Iron Screw Clamp Tgk-2K 600/120
10 0.60
81 Bessey Heavy Duty Malleable Cast Iron Screw Clamp Tgk-K 1000/120
10 0.76
82 Bessey One-Handed Clamp Ezs 150/80 10 0.28
83 Bessey One-Handed Clamp EZS 300/80 10 0.31
97
S. No. Particulars Nos. Power, kW
Total Cost
84 Bessey One-Handed Clamp EZS 600/80 10 0.38
85 Seasoning Kiln,700 1 11.23 86 Chemical Treatment Plant 1 7.75 87 Norwood LumberPro HD 36 Saw mill machine 1 38.90 88 Integrated Dust Collection and Recycling System 1 23.73 Support Service Equipment
Water Supply system 1 2.00 12.00
Fire Prevention system 1 8.00
Pollution Control System 1 2.00 7.08 Air Compressor 1 5.00 10.50
Captive D G set, Transformer and other electricals 1 15.31
Sub-Total 305.34
Extra Cost for GST, P&F, Insurance, Installation etc. 67.17 Power Connection 18.12 Grand Total 390.63
9. Observations:
(A) Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(ii) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.
(iii) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the escalation cost, if any,
over and above the approved project cost.
(iv) Documentary proof from SPV for utilisation of CFC facilities by at least 51% of the
cluster members.
(B) As State Govt. has proposed 10% contribution and GoI grant is <90% i.e. 83.46%; SPV
contribution of 6.54% as against 10% as per provisions of the scheme may be considered as a
special case for North Eastern Region
10. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up Common
Facility Centre (CFC) in Wood Carpentry Cluster, Baktawng, Serchip, Mizoram.
*********
98
Agenda No.50.3.15: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up of Common Facility
Centre in Food Processing Cluster, Mokokchung, Nagaland.
Background:
The proposal was recommended by State Level Project Steering Committee in its
meeting held on 21.02.19.
Proposal along with focus report, DPR and recommerndations was forwarded by MSME-
DI, Dimapur vide mail dated 28.02.19. Online application vide Ref. No: 14084 dated
05.03.19.
The proposal was discussed in detail during 64th
meeting of Techno Economic Appraisal
Committee (TEAC) held on 05.03.19 and TEAC in its 65th
meeting held on 13.06.19
recommended the proposal to place before Steering Committee for In-principle approval.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Basic Information of Cluster Name of Cluster : Food Processing Cluster District Mokokchung. Location of Cluster : Alimang-Changtongya Sub Division Lok Sabha Constituency : Nagaland Main Product : Fruits Processing: Jackfruit, Pomegranate, Mango,
Pineapple, Berries, Figs, Papaya, Banana, Orange, Grapes).
(i) Packed Juices. (ii) Pickles (iii) Pulp, Jam, Jelly, Candy Bars. (iv) Snacks. (v) Wines.
Vegetable Processing: (i) Pickles-mango, Lemon, Mixed Veg. (ii) Garlic Paste. (iii) Ready to Cook & Eat Salad. (iv) Snacks items. (v) Sauces. Spices Processing: (i) Black Pepper Powder (ii) Red Chilli Powder (iii) Turmeric Powder (iv) Kokum (v) Dry Mace / Powdered Mace. Coffee Seeds Processing. Preserved Fish products. Honey Processing
No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium)
Micro 110 Small 0 Medium 0
Turn over for the last five years : (Rs. in Crore)
Rs. 36.40 crore (2016-17)
Exports for the last five years : (Rs. in Crore)
Nil
Employment in Cluster : 2550 nos. (Direct – 550 & Indirect – 2000)
99
Technology Details : Cluster units are house hold units and are
adopting conventional age old processing techniques in their production process. It has been noted that the cluster members use traditional methods and almost every step of the process is done manually.
Whether DS Conducted : Yes, DSR Conducted By Intaglio Technical and Business Service.
Main findings of DSR : Lack of Proper Raw Material Cold Storage Facility
Lack of Automatic Cleaning, Grading, Sorting Facility for Spices
Lack of Automatic Electric/Microwave Dryer Lack of Vacuum Frying technology Automatic Honey Filtering Machine
Lack of Sterilizing Machine Lack of Pasteurization Setup Lack of Automatic Nitrogenous Grinding
for Spices. Lack of Packaging Facility Nitrogenous
Pouches, Bottle filling, Sachets packing, Labeling, Bar-coding Machine.
Lack of FSSAI standard based Testing and Certification Setup Lack of RO Plant
Lack of ETP /STP plant Lack of Cold Storage
Main Problems of Cluster : Lack of Proper Raw Material Cold Storage Facility
Lack of Automatic Cleaning, Grading, Sorting Facility for Spices
Lack of Automatic Electric/Microwave Dryer Lack of Vacuum Frying technology Automatic Honey Filtering Machine
Lack of Sterilizing Machine Lack of Pasteurization Setup Lack of Automatic Nitrogenous Grinding
for Spices. Lack of Packaging Facility Nitrogenous
Pouches, Bottle filling, Sachets packing, Labeling, Bar-coding Machine.
Lack of FSSAI standard based Testing and Certification Setup Lack of RO Plant
Lack of ETP /STP plant Lack of Cold Storage. Lack of Material Handling Equipments Poor
Quality upgradation and Lack of Dedicated Training Facility.
Lack of Value Addition and Product Diversification.
Other Information : The Indian food industry is poised for huge growth, increasing its contribution to world food trade every year. In India, the food sector has emerged as a high-growth and high-profit sector due to its immense potential for value addition, particularly within the food processing industry.
100
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Comments by Cluster Division
(a.) Justification for CFC
The Food cluster at Mokokchung produces
valuable and non chemical preservative
value added fruit products.
The style of production is very old
fashioned and informal and primitive.
They are not able to imply modern
equipments even though they know about
new technologies due to financial
constraints.
The CFC that is being purposed at the
cluster will bring about holistic changes. It
will increase the cluster turnover to 30%-
40%.
The machineries purposed will increase the
productivity reduce the processing time and
will increase the hygienic level and quality
of their products.
The machineries will help cluster members
to develop newer innovative value added
products which will help the cluster
members to export their products.
The CFC will create additional
employment in the.
The CFC will generate revenue in form of
taxes to the government.
--
(b.) Location of CFC Mokokchung District, Nagaland
--
% age of units in radius of 5km
70
% age of units in radius of 10km
100
(c.) Land for CFC i. Wheather land acquired
Yes. Land is on lease
basis for 30 years.
The lease deed not
submitted. The
lease deed should
be in the name of
SPV and registered
from Revenue
Department of
Government of
Nagaland. The
lease period should
be fairly long
duration of 30 years
or more.
101
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Comments by Cluster Division
ii. Title is in name of SPV. Registered Lease Deed in the name of
SPV for 30 years
-
iii. Valuation and its basis
As per the registration documents. -
iv. Land is sufficient 0.25 acre. -- v. Change of land use Yes. NA order issued. -- vi. If on lease, duration of lease
30 years --
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
Yes. --
(d.) Total Building area(sq ft)
15000 sq ft
--
(e.) Rate of construction of building
9500 per sq ft
--
(f.) Main Facility Proposed
Common Raw Material Bank.
Common Cold Storage Facility.
Common Spice Processing Setup with
Automatic Cleaning, Grading, Sorting,
Packaging.
Common Fruits Processing Setup with
Automatic.
Common Vegetable processing facility.
--
g.) Prod capacity of CFC Presently, the production capacity of CFC is 4 to 6 tons.
--
(h.) Major Outputs/Deliverables of CFC,Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production,export/domestic sales and direct/indirect employment,etc.)
Sl. No.
Parameter Before intervention
After Intervention
1. No. of units 110 150 2. Employment Direct:550
Indirect:2000 Direct:800 Indirect:3000
3 Turnover (Rs. in crore)
36.40 50.00
4. Export Indirect export
Direct Export Likely By 5 Units
5 Profit Margins 12% - 14% 25%
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
No Objection Certificate obtained from State
Pollution Board
Copy of NOC from PCB is to be submitted.
(j.) Man Power in CFC 34 - (k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied,any other-to be specified)
Total revenue generation from training section is Rs. 41.20 lakh from 125 participants.
-
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Comments by
Cluster Division
(a.) Name and Address Changtongya and Yongyimsen Agro
Processors Association, Mokokchung District,
Nagaland , Contact: Akhum: 7005129868.
--
(b.) Nature of Society registered. --
102
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Comments by
Cluster Division
SPV(company or
Society or Trust)
(c.) Name of the state
Govt. and MSME
officials in SPV
Dept of Industries and Commerce Govt. of
Nagaland
--
(d.) Date of formation of
SPV
17/02/2014 --
(e.) Number of Members 77 units have joined the SPV
--
(f.) Bye Laws or MoA
and AOA submitted
Submitted with DPR and attached in online
application.
MoA and AoA is not
submitted.
(g.) Authorized Share
Capital
Rs. 103.72 lakh. --
(h.) Paid up capital Rs. 15.00 lakh --
(i.) Shareholding Pattern Equal share holding among all members.
Shreholding pattern of
77 members is to be
submitted.
(j.) Commitment letter
for contribution
SPV Commitment letter Received and
attached.
Commitment letter for
upfront contribution
from SPV is to be
submitted.
(k.) SPV specific A/c State Bank of Mysore
SPVs bank account
detail not submitted.
(l.) Turst Building of
SPV,Previous track
record of co-operative
initiatives pursued by
SPV members need to to
be highlighted with
support documentation.
The SPV has good trust and corporation
among its member‟s details available in DPR
As the cluster members are aware of their
problems and have good unity they have also
visited some of the cluster and have learned
about cluster scheme and cluster development
process. The cluster members have come
forward to prepare the DPR by their own
contribution hence Hard Interventions for the
Cluster are recommended.
--
(m.) Technical
Institution
Intaglio Technical and Business Services,
Bangalore
(n.) CFC may be utilised
by SPV members as also
others in a
cluster.However,
evidence should be
furnished with regard to
SPV member ability to
utilise at least 60 percent
of installed capacity.
Yes, the SPV has given undertaking for
Capacity Utilization of CFC by SPV members
and non members. Capacity utilization Letter
of SPV attached in DPR and Online
Application
--
(o) Utilities
(a) Power 242 KW --
103
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Comments by
Cluster Division
requirement for
commercial/domestic
purpose
(b) Water 10000 per day. --
(c) Gas/Oil/Other
Utilities
Not required --
4. Implement Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA) Comments by
Cluster Division (a.) Implementing Agency IIE, Guwahati Nomination letter from
State Govt. required. (b.) Fund receiving Agency IIE, Guwahati (c.) Implementation Period 18 months 24 Months from date
of final approval as per guideines.
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
--
Required prior to final approval.
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
The proposal was discussed in detail during 64th
meeting of
Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) held on
05.03.19 and TEAC in its 65th
meeting held on 13.06.19
recommended the proposal to place before Steering
Committee for In-principle approval.
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee (g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:
(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)
Under process. --
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA) Comments by
Cluster Division (a.) BEP 40% As per MSE-CDP
guidelines. (b.) IRR, Payback period 29% -- (c.) DSCR N/A -- (d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
33% --
(e.) NPV 28% -- (f.) DER NA -- (g.) Sensitivity Analysis Positive for both 5% and 10% reduction
in capacity and sales.
--
(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State
Nil. --
6. Proposed project cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S.No. Particulars Amount
(i) Land -1acre on Lease for 30 years 30.00
(ii) Building Construction with Compound and Internal Roads – 9500 106.11
104
S.No. Particulars Amount
square feet built-up area
(iii) Plant & Machinery (including electrification) 633.67
(iv) Miscellaneous Fixed Assets 10.00
(v) Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 12.00
(vi) Contingency (2% on building & 5% on P&M) 33.81
(vii) Margin money for working capital 14.00
Total Project Cost 839.59
7. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh) S.
No. Particulars Percentage Amount
1. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 80 671.67 2. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Nagaland 10 83.96 3. SPV contribution 10 83.96 Total 100 839.59
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
(Rs. in lakh)
Sl.
No.
Particulars Specification Qty. Amou
nt
1- Spices Processing Setup (Red Chilli, Black Pepper, Cardamoms, Turmeric, Kokum,
Zeera)
1 Automatic Chilly and Spices Cleaning Plant 0.5Tonns/Hour Dust
& Stone Cleaning
1 5.53
2 Automatic Drying Machine Spices Hot
Air+Micro Wave Tunnel Dryers/Sterlizer
0.1 Tonns/Hour 1 60.62
3 Automatic Chilly and Spices Sorting Plant 0.5 Tonns/Hour 1 26.40
4 Automatic Chilly De-steming/Tail Removing &
De Stoning Plant
0.5 Tonns/Hour 1 7.20
5 Packaging Machine (Powdered) 50-100gms Pouch 1 17.65
6 Packaging Machine Solid/Whole Chilly 500 grams Pouch 1 9.11
2- Fruits Processing Setup (Mango, Pineapple, passion fruit, Gauva, avocado,
Jackfruit, Banana, Orange, Papaya, Berries)
Pulp Preparation Technology
7 Pulp Extractor-for Non-Seeded fruits 0.5 tons/Hour 1 9.29
8 Juice Clarifier 0.5 tons/Hour 1 5.53
9 Pasteuriser/Retort of Pulp 0.5 tons/Hour 1 10.15
10 Storage Tank/ Balance tank with Pumps and
interconnected filters
0.5 tons/Hour 1 4.39
Jam/Jelly Processing
11 Syrup Preparation Setup 500ltr/Hour 1 4.30
12 Filter Press 500ltr/Hour 1 9.78
13 Homogenizer 500ltr/Hour 1 10.45
105
Sl.
No.
Particulars Specification Qty. Amou
nt
14 UHT Sterilizer 500ltr/Hour 1 18.76
15 Jam Kettle 500ltr/Hour 1 9.22
16 Pet Bittle filling line 500ml 1 8.30
17 Jam/Jelly Packing Machine 100kg/hour 1 18.45
3- Fruits Vegetable-Snacks and Pickles Processing Machinery
18 Vacuum Fryer and Accessories 50kg/Hour 1 22.14
19 Pickle Bottle Packing Machine 500grams bottle 1 18.45
20 Nitrogenous Snacks Packing Machine 50grms-100grams 1 19.43
21 Cauchep Sachets Packing Machine 10 to 20 grams 1 20.30
4- Storage, Material Handeling and Allide Machinery
22 Cold Storage Facility/Clean Room Facility 100 tons 1 264.45
23 Material Handeling Equipments, Weighing
Scales, Storage Containers
LS 1 10.45
24 DG Set 125 KVA 1 13.52
25 UPS 100KVA 1 10.16
26 Computers i7 Processor 5 2.15
27 Compressor 10hp 1 11.68
28 Training Infrastructure - 1 11.01
29 Testing Machinery FSSAI Lab - 1 13.23
9. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) SIDBI appraisal report.
(ii) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.
(iii) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution.
(iv) Commitment letter with regard to SPV members‟ ability to utilize at least 60 percent of
installed capacity.
(v) Commitment letter from State Government/SPV to meet the escalation cost, if any, over and
above the approved project cost.
(vi) Certificate from State Government regarding compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines
(vii) Proof of SPV Formation and By Laws.
(viii) List of SPV members along with Shareholding Pattern.
(ix) SPVs bank account details.
(x) Registered Land document in the name of SPV.
(xi) Documentary proof from SPV for utilisation of CFC facilities by atleast 51% of the
cluster members.
(xii) Letter from State Govt. nominating the implementing agency and fund receiving
agency.
10. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up of Common Facility
Centre (CFC) in Food Processing Cluster, Mokokchung, Nagaland.
*******
106
Agenda No.50.3.16: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up of Common Facility
Centre in Wooden Furniture Cluster, Dimapur, Nagaland.
Background
The proposal was recommended by State Level Project Steering Committee of
Government of Nagaland in its meeting held on 21.02.19.
Proposal was received from Department of Industries and Commerce, Government of
Nagaland & recommended by MSME-DI, Dimapur.
Proposal along with Detailed Project Report (DPR) was forwarded by MSME-DI,
Dimapur vide e-mail dated 27.02.19.
Proposal was received from Directorate of Industries & Commerce, Government of
Nagaland vide application ref. No. 14103 dated 05.03.19 & recommended by MSME-DI,
Imphal.
Revised Focus Report was forwarded by MSME-DI, Dimapur vide e-mail dated 03.06.19.
Proposal was considered by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 64th
meeting held on 05.03.19 and TEAC in its 65th
meeting held on 13.06.19 recommended
the proposal to place before Steering Committee for In-principle approval.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Basic Information of Cluster Name of Cluster Wooden Furniture Cluster District Dimapur Location of Cluster Dimapur Circle Lok Sabha Constituency Nagaland Main Product Wood based furniture products like Almirah,
Tables, cots, sofa, wooden sports, equipments, wooden toys, wooden industrial and commercial furniture etc.
No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium)
Micro- 90
Turnover for the last five years Rs. 56.00 crore Exports for the last five years Nil Employment in Cluster 2450 nos. (Direct – 450 & Indirect – 2000) Technology Details : Average Technology Level with Conventional
carpentry tools, Lathe Machineries, Drilling equipments, metal cutting equipments etc.
Whether DS Conducted : Yes DSR Conducted By Intaglio Technical and Business Service
Main findings of DSR : The furniture industry in India is highly fragmented with 85% of the manufacturing units belonging to the unorganized sector. Majority of micro units produce traditional designs while contemporary styles form only a small percentage of the total output. Nagaland is one of the larger furniture manufacturing states in the country.
Main Problems of Cluster : Lack of Wood Seasoning Equipment. Non Practice of Chemical Impregnation of Wood. Lack of Advanced Machinery Poor Integration of Newer Designs Prolonged Production Process Lack of Quality Furniture Poor Market Reach
Other Information : The Indian furniture industry is estimated at around Rs 35,000 crores (350 billion) Industrial wood products is expected to grow an average of 7
107
percent annually from 2013 to 2018 to $8.8 billion, world Available of Deciduous evergreen forests The furniture market is the second largest wood processing segment after logs The branded (higher quality) wooden furniture industry is growing at 15% annually. Western India has emerged as the leader in the particle board segment. Wooden furniture finds great demand due to its elegant appearance, attractive designs durability and low maintenance cost
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA)
Remarks
(a.) Justification for CFC The wooden Furniture cluster Dimapur
consists of 90 micro owned units providing
employment to 450 rural people producing
wooden products and furniture and the
cluster has an annual turnover of Rs. 5600
lakhs. The cluster produces their products
using traditional wood processing
techniques, which are labour and energy
intensive. The cluster units have basic hand
held tools like saws, chisels, hammers and
a few units have conventional motorized
cutters. The furniture market is the second
largest wood processing segment after
logs, making India a fast emerging market
for high-end, value-added imported
products. The manufacture of pre-
fabricated doors and windows is relatively
new and the current market is growing at
10% per annum. The total annual market
for furniture in India is estimated to be
US$ 1.25 billion about 90% of which is for
wooden products. The branded (higher
quality) wooden furniture industry is
growing at 15% annually. The cluster units
lack critical machines and have not been
able to keep in pace with changing
furniture industry processing, machines
and trends due to their financial
constraints.
--
(b.) Location of CFC Tulovi, Dimapur City Nagaland
% age of units in radius of
5km
70
% age of units in radius of
10km
100
(c.) Land for CFC
108
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA)
Remarks
i. whether land acquired Yes Registered Lease
deed in the name of
SPV for a period of
30 years is
required.
ii. Title is in name of Registered Lease Deed in the name of SPV
iii. Valuation and its basis As per the registration documents
iv. Land is sufficient Yes,2 Acre
v. Change of land use Yes, NA Order Issued
vi. If on lease, duration of
lease
30 years
vii Whether lease is legally
tenable
Yes
(d.) Total Building area(sq ft) 12400.00 --
(e.) Rate of construction of
building
1,318.75 --
(f.) Main Facility Proposed Common Facility Centre with
Seasoning Facilities
Common Facility Centre chemical
impregnation Facility
Common Facility Centre with
CAD/CAM Designing
CFC with Advance modern
machineries like CNC Engraving,
CNC Edge Cutting, Automatic
Polishing, Paper Laminate Vacuum
Press etc.
Common Training and Skill Up
gradation Facility Centre
Common Export infrastructure.
--
(g.) Prod capacity of CFC 5 tons wood per day Required
(h.) Major
Outputs/Deliverables of CFC,
Projected performance of the
cluster after proposed
intervention (in terms of
production, export/domestic
sales and direct/indirect
employment, etc.)
Sl.
No.
Parameter Before
intervention
After
Intervention
1. Nos. of units 90 130
2. Employment Direct:450
Indirect:2000
Direct:750
Indirect:3500
3 Turnover
(Rs. in crore)
56.00 72.00
4. Export Indirect export
taking place
through traders
Direct Export
Likely By 5 Units
to neighbouring
nations like
Myanmar
5 Profit Margins 10% to 15% 25%-30%
(i.) Pollution clearance
required or not
No Serious pollution related activities were
found. Required
(j.) Man Power in CFC 30 --
109
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA)
Remarks
(k.) Revenue generation
mechanism for sustainability
of assets(service/user charges
to be levied, any other-to be
specified)
Expected Machinery Utilization: Studying
the Need of the Cluster and the Well
established Market of the cluster guaranties
100% utilization of machineries of the
CFC. The SPV has already given
undertaking that it will be able to utilize at
least 60% of the machinery. The financial
computations are done considering 75%
average capacity utilization for the first
three years and about 90% average
capacity utilization is considered for the
rest of the years. The financial parameters
achieved with these values of capacity
utilization are satisfactory and as per the
requirement of the guidelines.
Required
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Name and Address Country Craft Development Society Name of Promoter: Aolemba Longkumer: 7005129868 [email protected]
Certificate of SPV formation is required
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)
Society Registered --
(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
Department of Industries and Commerce, Govt of Nagaland District Industries Centre, Govt of Nagaland
--
(d.) Date of formation of SPV -- --
(e.) Number of Members 72 --
(f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted
Submitted with DPR and attached in online application
Required
(g.) Authorized Share Capital 149.51 lakhs --
(h.) Paid up capital as on............
15 lakhs --
(i.) Shareholding Pattern Equal share holding amoung all members Details attached in DPR and online application
Required
(j.) Commitment letter for contribution
SPV commitment letter received and attached in DPR and Application
Required
(k.) SPV specific A/c -- Required
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to to be highlighted with support documentation
The SPV has good trust and corporation among its members details available in DPR The cluster members are found to have mutual trust and cooperation among each other. The cluster members are educated and are practicing necessary business strategies and are aware of technological development in the industry.
--
110
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
The cluster members are also visited the nearby implemented clusters to understand more about cluster formation, CFC implementation, CFC functioning, about the scheme and benefits of CFC.
(m.) Technical Institution Intaglio Technical and Business Services --
(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
Yes the SPV has given undertaking for Capacity Utilization of CFC by SPV members and non members. Capacity utilization Letter of SPV attached in DPR and Online Application
--
(o.)
(a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
350 KW --
(b) Water 10000 per day --
(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities 0.0
4. Implementation Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency Indian Institute of Entrepreneurship (IIE), Guwahati
--
(b.) Fund receiving Agency --
(c.) Implementation Period 24 months --
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
DPR is examined and Recommended by MSME DI Goa/IIE Gauwahati
Required
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
The Technical Division of MSME DI Goa/IIE Gauwahati has examined the project and has recommended the project
--
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee
DPR Submitted to O/o DC (MSME), GoI for Approval
TEAC recommended the proposal.
(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:
DPR Submitted to O/o DC (MSME), GoI for Approval
--
(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)
under process --
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) BEP 37 % --
(b.) IRR, Payback period 26 % --
(c.) DSCR Not applicable, as no loan involved --
(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
31% --
(e.) NPV 25% --
111
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(f.) DER Not applicable, as no loan involved --
(g.) Sensitivity Analysis Sensitivity analysis is performed for 5% and 10% reduction of capacity or fall in sales and the figures are satisfactory and as per the limits specified in the guidelines
--
(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State
Nil --
6. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No Particulars Amount
(i) Land -2 acre on Lease for 30 years 60.00
(ii) Building 137.70
(iii) Plant & Machinery (including electrification) 735.60
(iv) Miscellaneous Fixed Assets 15.00
(v) Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 15.00
(vi) Contingency (2% on building & 5% on P&M) 39.53
(vii) Margin money for working capital 14.00
Total Project Cost 1016.83
7. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Percentage Amount
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 1196.08 (80%) 813.47
(ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Nagaland 149.51(10%) 101.68
(iii) SPV contribution 149.51 (10%) 101.68
Total 1495.10 1016.83
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
(Rs. in lakh) Sl. No. Particulars of Machine Quantity Amount
1 Wood Seasoning Kiln drying 1 115.00 2 Chemical Impregnation 1 98.25 3 CNC router Machine 1 113.00 4 Furniture engraving machine 1 85.00 5 Door vacuum Membrane press machine 1 78.00 6 Automatic Edge Bending Machine 1 32.00 7 CAD/CAM Set up 0 0 8 Multi Spindle Moulder 2 36.00 9 2 head finger shaper 2 52.00 10 Sliding table panel saw 2 56.60 11 Wide belt sander 1 15.00 12 Wood Carving Machine 2 15.00 13 Diesel generator 250kv, 1 18.00 14 Painting and sewage treatment plant. 1 20.00 15 Computers(admin) 5 1.75 Total 735.60
112
9. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Registered land documents in the name of SPV (if land is on lease basis, registered
lease deed for a minimum period of 30 years is required).
(ii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(iii) Commitment letter from State Government / IA to meet the cost escalation, if any,
over and above the approved project cost.
(iv) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution.
(v) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilize at least 60 percent of installed
capacity.
(vi) Details of production capacity.
(vii) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.
(viii) Details of Revenue generation mechanism
(ix) Certificate of SPV formation is required.
(x) Details of shareholding pattern.
(xi) Details of SPV bank account.
(xii) Bye Laws or MA and AOA.
(xiii) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR / CVC guidelines.
(xiv) Documentary proof from SPV for utilization of CFC facilities by at least 51% of the
cluster members.
(xv) Letter from State Govt. nominating the implementing agency and fund receiving
agency.
10. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up of Common
Facility Centre in Wooden Furniture Cluster, Dimapur, Nagaland.
*******
113
Agenda No.50.3.17: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up of new Industrial
Estate at Tuli, Mokokchung District, Nagaland.
Background
(i) The proposal was recommended by State Level Steering Committee (SLSC) in its
meeting held on 21.02.19.
(ii) Proposal was received from Industries and Commerce Department, Government of
Nagaland vide application ref. No. 14059 dated 23.02.19 & recommended by
MSME-DI, Imphal.
(iii) Proposal along with recommendations was forwarded by MSME-DI, Imphal vide
letter dated 23.02.19.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Imphal
State : Nagaland
District : Mokokchung
Industrial Estate : New Industrial Estate at Tuli, Mokokchung, District.-
Nagaland.
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan received or not.
No
Total Area of Industrial Estate/ area 50 acres
Area to be developed 50 acres
Number and sizes of plots to be developed
107 plots
Implementing Period 15 months
Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up etc.
-
Performance of ID projects in State -
3. Details about proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency
(IA)
Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Nagaland Industrial Development
Cooperation Ltd (NIDC) Dimapur,
Nagaland.
As per MSE-CDP
guidelines
114
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency
(IA)
Remarks
Track Record of the IA Industrial Growth Centre at Kriuphema
Kohima and Ganesh Nagar Industrial
Growth center, Dimapur Nagaland.
--
Appraisal by SIDBI
(Observations and
recommendations).
Attach SIDBI report.
This Proposal is being submitted for 'in-
principle' approval. After getting the 'in-
principle' approval, SIDBI shall be
approached for Appraisal.
--
Whether sufficient facilities
available at site. (Proximity
to railway stations / state
highways, availability of
water supply, adequate
power supply, telecom
facilities, dwelling places
of workers)
Mokokchung‟s central location has
helped it to be the converging point of
maximum number of highways and
hence it is better connected to most areas
of Nagaland, when compared to Kohima
and Dimapur. Besides, every village and
settlement of the district is well linked to
the town by district and community
roads. A railway line connects Tuli paper
mill to Amguri in neighbouring Assam.
--
Whether land is in
possession in the name of
IA with Clear Title
The land is not yet transferred to the IA. As per land
document, land is
in the name of
Department of
Industries &
Commerce,
Government of
Nagaland. Land
document in the
name of IA with
clear title is
required.
Whether Zoning
regulations and non-
agricultural conversion etc
complied with):
Yes Land document
with Zoning
regulations and
non-agricultural
conversion in the
name of NIDC is
required.
Whether State Level
Committee to coordinate
and monitor progress has
been Constituted
Yes, State level Project Steering
committee is constituted
and is headed by Secretary (I&C),
Government of Nagaland, GM, DICs,
Paren, Mokokchung & Mon and Dy.
Secretary, Finance Department to
coordinate and monitor progress of .
Constituted
Whether confirmation Not yet received from the IA. Commitment letter
115
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency
(IA)
Remarks
received form IA that it
will meet the cost in excess
of approved project cost
and any escalation in cost
required from IA
to meet the cost
escalation, if any,
over and above the
approved project
cost.
Basis of elements of project
Cost (i) Land Development and other
overhead Infrastructure -
Cost of land filling and Boundary
wall.
Formation of Concrete pavement
approach and internal roads (CC
roads).
Road side greenery & social forestry.
Water supply including tank / sump
and pump houses.
Water harvesting.
Drainage.
Power-distribution net-work including
street light for complete layout and
electrical infrastructure for
administrative building etc.
Other (sanitary conveniences etc.)
(ii) Administrative and Other Services
Complex -
Administrative Office Building.
Telecommunication / Cyber Centre /
Documentation Centre.
Conference Hall & Meeting Hall
Bank & Post Office
Information Centre
First Aid Centre, Creche, Canteen
facilities.
(iii) Effluent Treatment Facilities.
(iv)Contingencies & pre-operative
expenses.
All above mentioned component are
considered for calculating project cost.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the
project Particulars Present
situation
After establishment of women
entrepreneurship park
Spinoff
(Units)/Growth
in cluster
NA 107 units will be established.
Aggregate 47.80 (within 2 years of
116
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency
(IA)
Remarks
Investment by
Cluster Firms
(cr.)
establishment)
Aggregate
employment in
the cluster (no.)
NA 1034
Indirect
employment
expected to be
triggered (no.)
NA 5000
Justification of the Proposal The Government of Nagaland has focused on the development
of agro-processing units like extraction of fibres from pineapple
leaves, dehydration unit for ginger and cardamom, extraction of
citronella oil are some potentials nonfarm activities, which can
be developed in the district. New Scheme are patchouli
cultivation, tea garden and vanilla cultivation in the district. On
the basis of availability of raw material, labour and other
infrastructure, non-farm sector investment in the district. The
type of Industries expected to establish :
(i) Food processing.
(ii) Textile and Garments.
(iii) IT / ITES
(iv) Cement Products
(v) Fabrication and Engineering
(vi) Printing
The proposed Industrial Park will help in realizing the dream of
empowering rural population of the Mokokchung district for
socio economic development.
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
1. Land Development and other overhead Infrastructure
(i) Cost of Land filling (50 acres) and boundary wall for 1 acres Administrative and amenity area.
98.00
(ii) Cost of laying CC-roads 30 mtr., 18 mtr., 15 mtr. Wide road for – 50 acres land
196.00
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00
(iv) Water supply including tank / Sump, and pump houses 105.00
(v) Water harvesting 10.00
(vi) Drainage – construction of RCC Drains, Box Culverts, Storm Water drains
60.00
(vii) Power distribution net-work including street light for 247.00
117
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
complete layout and electrical infrastructure for administrative building etc.
(viii) Other (Sanitary Conveniences etc.) 10.00
2. Administrative and Other Services Complex
(i) Administrative Office building 18.40
(ii) Telecommunication /Cyber Centre/ Documentation Centre 15.00
(iii) Conference Hall / Meeting Hall 30.00
(iv) Bank & Post Office 15.00
(v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets 40.00
(vi) First Aid Centre, Crèche, Canteen facilities 20.00
3. Effluent Treatment Facilities 78.00
4. Contingencies & Pre operative expenses 20.00
Total 972.40
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Percentage As per IA
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 80% 777.92
(ii) Government of Nagaland 20% 194.48
Total 100% 972.40
6. Observations:
Following documents are to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency i.e. NIDC with
clear title, complying zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc..
(ii) Copy of approved layout plan.
(iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(iv) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the
approved project cost.
(v) Status of completed ID projects in the State and details of operating units in
prescribed format.
(vi) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.
(vii) IA should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous
and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for
relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne
by the Government of Nagaland / NIDC.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up of new Industrial
Estate at Tuli, Mokokchung District, Nagaland.
******
118
Agenda No.50.3.18: Proposal for In-principle approval for upgradation of Industrial
Focal Point, Nabha (Old), District Patiala, Punjab.
Background
(i) The proposal was recommended by State Level Steering Committee (SLSC) of Punjab
in its meeting held on 16.10.18.
(ii) Proposal was received from Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation (PSIEC)
vide application ref. No. 14122 dated 08.03.19 & recommended by MSME-DI,
Ludhiana.
(iii) Proposal along with recommendations was forwarded by MSME-DI, Ludhiana vide
letter dated 08.03.19.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation
State : Punjab
District : Patiala
Industrial Estate : Focal Point Nabha (Old)
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved
layout plan
No
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 50.57 acres
Area to be developed (acre) 31.57 acres
Number and sizes of plots developed 128 plots with 52 units (out of which more than
50% units are micro)
Implementing Period 24 months
Other ID projects sanctioned in same district:
year of sanction, number of plots allotted,
units set up, etc.
Nil
Performance of ID projects in State Satisfactory
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Punjab Small Industries & Export
Corporation (PSIEC) Limited
As per MSECDP
guidelines
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory. Punjab Small Industries &
Export Corporation limited was setup in
1962 with the objective of supporting the
individuals to establish their own
industrial units in Punjab.
--
Appraisal by SIDBI
(Observations and
recommendations). Attach
SIDBI report.
Report will be submitted to SIDBI after
In-principle approval. Required
Whether sufficient facilities
available at site. (Proximity to
railway stations / state
Industrial area is located close to NH-7 &
12A. Nabha railway station is around 5
km. Nearest Airport- Chandigarh
--
119
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
highways, availability of
water supply, adequate power
supply, telecom facilities,
dwelling places of workers)
International Airport is 125kms away.
There is presence of adequate power
supply in the Industrial Focal Point.
Whether land is in possession
in the name of IA with Clear
Title
Punjab Small Scale Industries & Export
Corporation Ltd. (PSIEC) was the original
owner of the land. When the focal point
Nabha was developed, the entire land was
allotted to the unit
holders present in the focal point. PSIEC
is still responsible for operation and
maintenance of focal point.
Registered land
documents in the
name of
Implementing
Agency is
required
Whether Zoning regulations
and non-agricultural
conversion etc complied
with)
State Government i.e. PSIEC has procured
the land before the Industrial area was
developed.
Whether State Level
Committee to coordinate and
monitor progress has been
Constituted
Yes, the Committee has been formed
which includes officials from PSIEC,
Industry Department, MSME-DI,
Ludhiana
Constituted
Whether confirmation
received form IA that it will
meet the cost in excess of
approved project cost and any
escalation in cost
The contribution will be made as per the
means of finance mentioned in the report.
State Govt. along with the other
stakeholders will take care for any
escalation in the project cost.
Confirmation from PSIEC is mentioned in
the covering letter.
Received
Basis of elements of project
Cost
The cost estimates have been made as per
Common Schedule Rates – 2010 of
Government of Punjab and in some cases,
market rates are used for reference.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the
project
Up-gradation of Industrial area will
provide support to industries present in the
industrial area in terms of better
connectivity, minimum wear and tear,
better transport facilities, proper drainage
system that will further lead to
development of Industrial Estate.
--
Justification of the Proposal The focal point was developed in early
1990s with all infrastructure facilities
required for upgradation. However, with
time, basic infrastructure in the focal point
has been deteriorated and requires
upgradation. The proposal will cater to the
basic need of maintenance of road,
drainage system, power, administrative
and other services
complex etc. Further, due to deteriorated
infrastructure, industries in the focal point
--
120
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
are bearing wear and tear cost. Transport
companies are also charging higher tariffs
in return which are increasing the overall
production cost.
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Estimated by IA
(i) Cost of Land filling/leveling including boundary wall and fencing 58.14
(ii) Cost of Laying roads 134.92
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses 20.23
(v) Water harvesting 6.48
(vi) Drainage 10.75
(vii) Power (Sub-station, Distribution Network, including Street light
etc.) Generation of Non-Conventional Energy
32.81
(viii) Administrative Office Building 15.79
(ix) Telecommunication/Cyber/Documentation centre 15.79
(x) Conference Hall/Exhibition centre 23.68
(xi) Bank/Post office 15.79
(xii) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets 31.58
(xiii) First aid centre, Creche Canteen Facilities 15.79
(xiv) Effluent Treatment Facilities 80.00
(xv) Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 9.63
(xvi) Others (Sanitary Conveniences) 10.00
Total 491.38
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Percentage Proposed by IA
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 80 393.10
(ii) State Government 20 98.28
Total 100 491.38
6. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Registered land documents with clear title, in the name of Implementing Agency.
(ii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(iii) Status of completed ID projects in the State as per format provided and details of
operating units in present project.
(iv) PSIEC should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of
Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the
purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account
shall be borne by the Government of Punjab / PSIEC.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for up-gradation of Industrial
Focal Point, Nabha (Old), District Patiala, Punjab.
*****
121
Agenda No.50.4.19: Proposal for In-principle approval for upgradation of Industrial
Focal Point, Sangrur, Punjab.
Background
(i) The proposal was recommended by State Level Steering Committee (SLSC) of
Punjab in its meeting held on 16.10.18.
(ii) Proposal was received from Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation (PSIEC)
vide application ref. No. 13862 dated 08.03.19.
(iii) MSME-DI, Ludhiana vide letter dated 08.03.19 forwarded the proposal along with
their recommendations.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation
State : Punjab
District : Sangrur
Industrial Estate : Focal Point Sangrur
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
No
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 58.65 acres Area to be developed (acre) 43.00 acres Number and sizes of plots developed 125 plots with 97 units (out of which more than
50% units are micro) Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
Nil
Performance of ID projects in State Satisfactory
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation (PSIEC) Limited
As per MSECDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory. Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation limited was setup in 1962 with the objective of supporting the individuals to establish their own industrial units in Punjab.
--
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Report will be submitted to SIDBI after In-principle approval
Required
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
Industrial area is located close to NH-11. Sangrur railway station is around 2-3 km. Nearest Airport- Chandigarh International Airport is 125kms away. There is presence of adequate power supply in the Industrial Focal Point.
--
Whether land is in possession Punjab Small Scale Industries & Export Registered land
122
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
in the name of IA with Clear Title
Corporation Ltd. (PSIEC) was the original owner of the land. When the focal point Sangrur was developed, the entire land was allotted to the unit holders present in the focal point. PSIEC is still responsible for operation and maintenance of focal point.
documents in the name of Implementing Agency is required.
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
State Government i.e. PSIEC has procured the land before the industrial area was developed
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes, the Committee has been formed which includes officials from PSIEC, Industry Department, MSME-DI, Ludhiana
Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
The contribution will be made by PSIEC as per the means of finance mentioned in the report. Escalation in the project cost shall be met by PSIEC out of its own sources.
Received
Basis of elements of project Cost
The cost estimates have been made as per Common Schedule Rates – 2010 of Government of Punjab and in some cases, market rates are used for reference.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project
Up-gradation of Industrial area will provide support to industries present in the industrial area in terms of better connectivity, minimum wear and tear, better transport facilities, proper drainage system that will further lead to development of Industrial Estate.
--
Justification of the Proposal The focal point was developed in 1980s with all infrastructure facilities required for upgradation. However, with time basic infrastructures in the focal point has been deteriorated and require upgradation. The proposal will cater to the basic need of maintenance of road, drainage system, power, administrative and other services complex etc. Further, due to deteriorated infrastructure, industries in the focal point are bearing wear and tear cost. Transport companies are also charging higher tariffs in return which are increasing the overall production cost.
--
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Estimated by IA
(i) Cost of Land filling/leveling including boundary wall and fencing
42.03
(ii) Cost of Laying roads 135.12 (iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00 (iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses 85.20 (v) Water harvesting 6.48 (vi) Drainage 5.00 (vii) Power (Sub-station, Distribution Network, including Street
light etc.) Generation of Non-Conventional Energy 46.31
(viii) Administrative Office Building 15.79
123
S. No. Particulars Estimated by IA (ix) Telecommunication/Cyber/Documentation centre 15.79 (x) Conference Hall/Exhibition centre 23.68 (xi) Bank/Post office 15.79 (xii) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets 31.58 (xiii) First aid centre, Creche Canteen 15.79 (xiv) Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 9.17 (xv) Others (Sanitary Conveniences) 10.00
Total 467.73
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Percentage Proposed by IA
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 80 374.18
(ii) State Government 20 93.55
Total 100 467.73
6. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency.
(ii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(iii) Status of completed ID projects in the State as per format provided and details of
operating units in present project.
(iv) PSIEC should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of
Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the
purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account
shall be borne by the Government of Punjab / PSIEC.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for up-gradation of Industrial
Focal Point, Sangrur, Punjab.
*****
124
Agenda No.50.3.20: Proposal for In-principle approval for upgradation of Industrial
Focal Point, Moga, Punjab.
Background
(i) The proposal was recommended by State Level Steering Committee (SLSC) of
Punjab in its meeting held on 16.10.18.
(ii) Proposal was received from Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation (PSIEC)
vide application ref. No. 13860 dated 20.02.19.
(iii) MSME-DI, Ludhiana forwarded the proposal along with their recommendations vide
letter dated 01.03.19.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation
State : Punjab
District : Moga
Industrial Estate : Focal Point Moga
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved
layout plan
No
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 108.29 acres
Area to be developed (acre) 73.43 acres
Number and sizes of plots developed 213 plots with 120 units (out of which more than
50% units are micro)
Implementing Period 24 months
Other ID projects sanctioned in same
district: year of sanction, number of plots
allotted, units set up, etc.
Nil
Performance of ID projects in State Satisfactory
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Punjab Small Industries & Export
Corporation (PSIEC) Limited
As per MSECDP
guidelines
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory. Punjab Small Industries &
Export Corporation limited was setup in
1962 with the objective of supporting the
individuals to establish their own
industrial units in Punjab.
--
Appraisal by SIDBI
(Observations and
recommendations). Attach
SIDBI report.
Report will be submitted to SIDBI after
In-principle approval Required
Whether sufficient facilities
available at site. (Proximity to
railway stations / state
highways, availability of
water supply, adequate power
Industrial Area is located close to NH-71.
Nearest Airport- Amritsar Airport is 121
kms away. There is presence of adequate
power supply. There is good connectivity
of roadway and railway.
--
125
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
supply, telecom facilities,
dwelling places of workers)
Whether land is in possession
in the name of IA with Clear
Title
Punjab Small Scale Industries & Export
Corporation Ltd. (PSIEC) was the original
owner of the land. When the focal point
Moga was developed the entire land was
allotted to the unit holders present in the
focal point. PSIEC is still responsible for
operation and maintenance of focal point.
Registered land
documents in the
name of
Implementing
Agency is
required.
Whether Zoning regulations
and non-agricultural
conversion etc complied
with)
State Government i.e. PSIEC has procured
the land before the industrial area was
developed.
Whether State Level
Committee to coordinate and
monitor progress has been
Constituted
Yes, the Committee has been formed
which includes officials from PSIEC,
Industry Department, MSME-DI,
Ludhiana
Constituted
Whether confirmation
received form IA that it will
meet the cost in excess of
approved project cost and any
escalation in cost
The contribution will be made by PSIEC
as per the means of finance mentioned in
the report.
Escalation in the project cost shall be met
by PSIEC out of its own sources.
Received
Basis of elements of project
Cost
The cost estimates have been made as per
Common Schedule Rates – 2010 of
Government of Punjab and in some cases,
market rates are used for reference.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the
project
Up-gradation of Industrial area will
provide support to industries present in the
industrial area in terms of better
connectivity, minimum wear and tear,
better transport facilities, proper drainage
system that will further lead to
development of Industrial Estate.
--
Justification of the Proposal The focal point was developed in
early1990s with all infrastructure facilities
required for upgradation. However, with
time basic infrastructures in the focal point
has been deteriorated and require
upgradation. The proposal will cater to the
basic need of maintenance of road,
drainage system, power, administrative
and other services complex etc. Further,
due to deteriorated infrastructure,
industries in the focal point are bearing
wear and tear cost. Transport companies
are also charging higher tariffs in return
which are increasing the overall
production cost.
--
126
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Estimated by IA
(i) Cost of Land filling/leveling including boundary wall and
fencing
67.26
(ii) Cost of Laying roads 192.35
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 13.54
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses 20.23
(v) Water harvesting 6.48
(vi) Drainage 10.75
(vii) Power (Sub-station, Distribution Network, including Street
light etc.) Generation of Non-Conventional Energy
245.71
(viii) Administrative Office Building 15.79
(ix) Telecommunication/Cyber/Documentation centre 15.79
(x) Conference Hall/Exhibition centre 23.68
(xi) Bank/Post office 15.79
(xii) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets 31.58
(xiii) First aid centre, Creche Canteen 15.79
(xiv) Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 13.69
(xv) Others (Sanitary Conveniences) 10.00
Total 698.43
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Percentage Proposed by IA
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 80 555.91
(ii) State Government 20 142.52
Total 100 698.43
6. Observations: Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency.
(ii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(iii) Status of completed ID projects in the State as per format provided and details of
operating units in present project.
(iv) PSIEC should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of
Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the
purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account
shall be borne by the Government of Punjab / PSIEC.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for upgradation of Industrial
Focal Point, Moga, Punjab.
*****
127
Agenda No.50.3.21: Proposal for In-principle approval for upgradation of Industrial
Focal Point, Naya Nangal, District Rupnagar, Punjab.
Background
(i) The proposal was recommended by State Level Steering Committee (SLSC) of Punjab
in its meeting held on 16.10.18.
(ii) Proposal was received from Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation (PSIEC)
vide application ref. No. 14212 dated 12.04.19 & recommended by MSME-DI,
Ludhiana.
(iii) MSME-DI, Ludhiana forwarded the proposal along with their recommendations vide
letter dated 01.03.19.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation
State : Punjab
District : Rupnagar
Industrial Estate : Focal Point Nangal
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved
layout plan
No
Total Area of industrial estate/ area
(acre)
50 acres (200279.60 sq.mt)
Area to be developed (acre) 25.79 acres(104379 sq.mt)
Number and sizes of plots developed 60 plots with 16 units (out of which more than 50%
units are micro)
Implementing Period 24 months
Other ID projects sanctioned in same
district: year of sanction, number of
plots allotted, units set up, etc.
Nil
Performance of ID projects in State Satisfactory
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency
(IA)
Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Punjab Small Industries & Export
Corporation (PSIEC) Limited
As per MSECDP
guidelines
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory. Punjab Small Industries &
Export Corporation limited was setup in
1962 with the objective of supporting
the individuals to establish their own
industrial units in Punjab.
--
Appraisal by SIDBI
(Observations and
Report will be submitted to SIDBI after
In-principle approval. Required
128
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency
(IA)
Remarks
recommendations). Attach
SIDBI report.
Whether sufficient facilities
available at site. (Proximity
to railway stations / state
highways, availability of
water supply, adequate
power supply, telecom
facilities, dwelling places of
workers)
Industrial Focal Point Naya Nangal
which is 4.2 km away from Naya
Nangal Railway Station.
Naya Nangal Industrial Focal Point
is properly linked with Chandigarh
International Airport which is
around 118 kms away from the
focal point.
There is adequate availability of
water, power supply etc. in
Industrial Focal Point.
Industrial area is well connected
through NH-503.
--
Whether land is in
possession in the name of
IA with Clear Title
Punjab Small Scale Industries & Export
Corporation Ltd. (PSIEC) was the
original owner of the land. When the
focal point Naya Nangal was
developed, the entire land was allotted
to the unit
holders present in the focal point.
PSIEC is still responsible for operation
and maintenance of focal point.
Registered land
documents in the
name of
Implementing
Agency is required.
Whether Zoning regulations
and non-agricultural
conversion etc complied
with)
State Government i.e. PSIEC has
procured the land before the industrial
area was developed.
Whether State Level
Committee to coordinate
and monitor progress has
been constituted
Yes, the Committee has been formed
which includes officials from PSIEC,
Industry Department, MSME-DI,
Ludhiana
Constituted
Whether confirmation
received form IA that it will
meet the cost in excess of
approved project cost and
any escalation in cost
The contribution will be made by
PSIEC as per the means of finance
mentioned in the report. Escalation in
the project cost shall be met by
PSIEC out of its own sources.
Received
Basis of elements of project
Cost
The cost estimates have been made by
internal engineering wing of PSIEC.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the
project
Up-gradation of Industrial area will
provide support to industries present in
the industrial area in terms of better
connectivity, minimum wear and tear,
better transport facilities, proper
drainage system that will further lead to
development of Industrial Estate.
--
Justification of the Proposal The focal point was developed in 1980s
with all infrastructure facilities required
--
129
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency
(IA)
Remarks
for upgradation. However, with time,
basic infrastructure in the focal point
has been deteriorated and requires
upgradation. The proposal will cater to
the basic need of maintenance of road,
drainage system, power, administrative
and other services complex etc. Further,
due to deteriorated infrastructure,
industries in the focal point are bearing
wear and tear cost. Transport
companies are also charging higher
tariffs in return which are increasing the
overall production cost.
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Estimated by IA
(i) Cost of Land filling/leveling including boundary wall and
fencing
57.62
(ii) Cost of Laying roads 161.08
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 11.22
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses 70.00
(v) Water harvesting 18.00
(vi) Drainage 32.00
(vii) Power (Sub-station, Distribution Network, including Street
light etc.) Generation of Non-Conventional Energy
247.10
(viii) Administrative Office Building 20.00
(ix) Conference Hall/Exhibition centre 20.00
(x) First aid centre,Creche Canteen 20.00
(xi) Effluent Treatment Facilities 130.00
(xii) Contingencies & Pre operative expenses 15.90
(xiii) Other (Sanitary Conveniences) 8.00
Total 810.92
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S.
No.
Particulars Percentage Proposed by IA
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 74.16 601.36
(ii) State Government 25.84 209.56
Total 100 810.92
6. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency.
(ii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
130
(iii) Status of completed ID projects in the State as per format provided and details of
operating units in present project.
(iv) PSIEC should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of
Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the
purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account
shall be borne by the Government of Punjab / PSIEC.
(v) Justification from MSME-DI, Ludhiana for recomending the project when only 16
units are operating out of the allotted 60 plots.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for upgradation of Industrial
Focal Point, Naya Nangal, District Rupnagar, Punjab.
*****
131
Agenda No.50.3.22: Proposal for In-principle approval for up-gradation of Industrial
Estate at Malpura, Tonk, Rajasthan.
Background
The proposal was recommended by State Level Steering Committee (SLSC) of
Government of Rajasthan in its meeting held on 20.02.19.
Proposal along with Detailed Project Report was forwarded by Government of Rajasthan
vide letter dated 22.04.19 & 25.04.19.
Proposal was received from Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment
Corporation Ltd. vide application ref. No. 14209 dated 24.04.19 & recommended by
MSME-DI, Jaipur.
MSME-DI, Jaipur vide letter dated 03.06.19 forwarded the proposal along with their
recommendations.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Rajasthan State Industrial Development and
Investment Corporation Ltd.
State : Rajasthan
District : Tonk
Industrial Estate : Industrial Area Malpura
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved
layout plan
No
Total Area of industrial estate/ area
(acre)
101.91 acres
Area to be developed (acre) 101.91 acres
Number and sizes of plots to be
developed
Area (sq. mtr.) No. of plots
2000 21
1000 77
700 32
500 40
3000 2
Total 172
Implementing Period 24 months
Other ID projects sanctioned in same IID Newai was sanctioned on 31.03.98
132
district: year of sanction, number of
plots allotted, units set up, etc.
Performance of ID projects in State 15 projects completed out of total 17 sanctioned.
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposal by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Rajasthan State Industrial Development &
Investment Corporation Ltd. (RIICO),
Jaipur
As per MSE-CDP
guidelines.
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory --
Appraisal by SIDBI
(Observations and
recommendations). Attach
SIDBI report.
DPR will be appraised from SIDBI after
getting In Principle approval from GoI Required
Whether sufficient facilities
available at site. (Proximity
to railway stations / state
highways, availability of
water supply, adequate
power supply, telecom
facilities, dwelling places of
workers)
The Industrial Area Malpura is located
approx. 800 meters away from State
Highway No. 12 on Jaipur-Malpura-
Bhilwara- Rajsamand & 1.10 kms from
State Highway 37A Chaan- Todaraisingh-
Malpura- Dudu, which is also link NH-12
& NH-8.
--
Whether land is in
possession in the name of IA
with Clear Title
Yes Document
required.
Whether Zoning regulations
and non-agricultural
conversion etc complied
with)
Not applicable
Whether State Level
Committee to coordinate and
monitor progress has been
Constituted
State Level Committee to coordinate and
monitor progress has been constituted
Constituted
Whether confirmation
received form IA that it will
meet the cost in excess of
approved project cost and
any escalation in cost
Yes Required
Basis of elements of project
Cost
The detailed estimates for the proposal have
been prepared on the basis of Basic
Schedule of Rates of PWD Tonk circle
BSR (Road) 2016, (Building) 2013 & PWD
Electrical BSR2013.
133
Description Proposal by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
Tangible Outcomes of the
project
Up-gradation of Infrastructure facilities will
cater more investment by the existing units
and will also increase the employment.
--
Justification of the Proposal Industrial Area Malpura was developed by
RIICO on 101.91 acres of land to promote
artisans and small enterprises in the year
1984. The basic infra facilities have already
been made available since 1984, declared
saturated on dated 20.01.07. The Industries
Association and District Collector have
been pressing hard for improvement of the
existing infrastructure.
--
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Estimated by IA
(i) Cost of land filling/levelling including boundary wall and
fencing
98.95
(ii) Cost of laying roads 359.39
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 8.82
(iv) Power distribution, Street light arrangements, etc. 210.11
Total 677.27
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 414.30
(ii) State Government 262.97
Total 677.27
6. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Land documents in the name of Implementing Agency.
(ii) Copy of approved Layout plan.
(iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(iv) Commitment letter from State Government / IA to meet the escalation cost, if any,
over and above the approved project cost.
(v) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.
(vi) RIICO, Jaipur should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of
Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose
for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne
by the Government of Rajasthan / RIICO, Jaipur.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for up-gradation of Industrial
Estate at Malpura, Tonk, Rajasthan.
*****
134
Agenda No. 50.3.23: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up of Common Facility
Centre in Gold Ornament Cluster, Karimnagar, Telangana.
Background:
The proposal was approved by State Level Steering Committee (SLSC) in its meeting held
on 28.12.18.
The proposal was received from Government of Telangana, vide online application Ref.
No. 13856 dated 12.01.19.
MSME-DI, Hyderabad vide letter dated 08.02.19 forwarded the proposal along with
Detailed Project Report (DPR) & Focus Report.
The proposal was deliberated during 64th
meeting of Techno Economic Appraisal
Committee (TEAC) held on 05.03.19 and committee advised MSME-DI, Hyderabad to
revise the proposal and rope in more units as SPV members.
Based on the revised report, TEAC in its 65th
meeting held on 13.06.19 recommended the
proposal to place before steering committee for In-principle approval.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Basic Information of Cluster
Name of Cluster : Gold Ornament Cluster,
District Karimnagar
Location of Cluster : Karimnagar
Lok Sabha Constituency : Karimnagar
Main Product : Manufacturing of Gold Ornaments like chains, Rings,
Bangles, Bracelets, Long Chains, Necklace, Black Beat
Chains, Studs, Matties, Ear Chains, Tikkas, Lockets, Belts,
Baju Bandies, Nosepins etc.
No. of Enterprises including
break up (Micro, Small,
Medium)
Micro 232
Small 61
Medium 7
Turn over for the last five
years : (Rs. in Crore)
Year Amount
2013-14 7.60
2014-15 7.80
2015-16 8.00
2016-17 8.40
2017-18 8.93
Exports for the last five years :
(Rs. in Crore)
Nil
Employment in Cluster : 355 Nos.
Technology Details : Traditionally skilled goldsmiths employing craft skills and
simple hand tools have made Jewellery and even
nowadays, worldwide, much is still made in basic
workshops using manual metalworking skills and only
limited use of machines.
Whether DS Conducted : Yes.
Main findings of DSR : BIS has made it mandatory for Jewellery Industry to
follow hall mark norms and maintain the specified purity,
majority of the cluster firms are finding it tough to know
135
purity of the ornament they make.
Artisans (Organized and Unorganized) lack basic
infrastructure facilities and proper equipment in the cluster
and are depending on part manufacturing firms for making
of various types of gold ornaments. Hence there is a need
for establishment of Common Processing plant in the
cluster.
The estimated cost of the proposed Common Processing
Plant is Rs. 3.4 crore. This is resulting in higher rejection
rates and dent in profit margins. Further non availability of
forces the artisan to send jewellery far off distance to
comply with the norms, which is costing them higher than
the standard industry norms.
Thus there is definite need to establish a common testing
cum 3D laser Hall Mark Facility in the cluster to
overcome the gap. The estimated cost of the proposed
Common Processing Plant is Rs. 1.5 crores.
Main Problems of Cluster : After a careful diagnosis of the cluster, the following key
issues have been identified:
Inability to keep abreast of modern trends in product
design, fashion and technological development.
Closed marketing behavior.
Household type of venture.
Dominance of few leading traders and wholesalers.
Lack of in-house testing-cum-hallmarking facilities.
Large scale production of identical and homogenous
products.
Poor R&D back up.
Low product diversification.
Poor backward and forward integration with market.
Poor marketing tie-ups.
Other Information : DSR recommended for establishment of CFC for over all
development of the Cluster with facilities of common process
com center and testing cum hall marking center
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA)
Comments by
Cluster Division
(a.) Justification for CFC There is a need to improve the
quality of the finished products
through establishment of a testing
lab to know the purity of the gold
and gold alloy used so as to expand
cluster market and make it export
driven. High Technology machines
like CNC, Faceting & Milling,
Bangle Design, Fly Press, Gold
Melting & Refinery, Chain making,
Hydraulic coin press are required to
establish a common model
processing centre in order to combat
--
136
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA)
Comments by
Cluster Division
with branded outlets and to make
goldsmiths and part manufacturing
firms self-sustainable.
The individual entrepreneurs cannot
afford to buy the above said
machines due to financial constraints
and lack of enough space. To
capture organized market like retail
outlets the cluster needs to establish
a common hall mark facility centre.
(b.) Location of CFC Karimnagar Town, Karimnagar District,
Telangana.
--
% age of units in radius of 5km 30
% age of units in radius of
10km
70
(c.) Land for CFC
i. Whether land acquired Yes. Area of 2000sq Feet space has
been acquired by SPV for a period of 18
yrs at 2nd floor of the commercial
complex on lease rent of Rs. 20000/-
per month.
Registered lease
deed on the name
of SPV is required
ii. Title is in name of
iii. Valuation and its basis --
iv. Land is sufficient Yes.
v. Change of land use NA
vi. If on lease, duration of lease Land on lease basis for 18 years.
vii Whether lease is legally
tenable
Land and building has been identified
and SPV has under taken the Leased
agreement with owner
(d.) Total Building area(sq ft) 2000 sq ft --
(e.) Rate of construction of
building
NA --
(f.) Main Facility Proposed Common Processing Centre
Common Testing cum Hallmark
facilities
--
g.) Prod capacity of CFC The processing center will have an
installed capacity of 16500 Jobs per
annum. The hall marking facility can
take up 54000 jobs per annum and
testing center can take up 36000 jobs
per annum.
--
(h.) Major Outputs/
Deliverables of CFC, Projected
performance of the cluster after
proposed intervention (in terms
of production, export/domestic
Sl. No. Parameter Before
intervention
After
Intervention
1. Nos. of units 300 310
2 Turnover Rs. 9.5 crore Rs. 10.00 crore
137
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA)
Comments by
Cluster Division
sales and direct/indirect
employment, etc.) (crore)
3 Export (cr.) 0.00
Marginal
increase from 3rd
year onwards
after setting up
of CFC.
4 Employment 355 375
5 Production (increase) 1100 kgs. 1150 kgs.
(i.) Pollution clearance required
or not NA
NOC from PCB is
required.
(j.) Man Power in CFC 17 members per Shift --
(k.) Revenue generation
mechanism for sustainability of
assets(service/user charges to
be levied, any other-to be
specified)
All the SPV members and other principle cluster firms are
expected to utilise the services of various facilities
proposed to be established at CFC on user charge basis for
sustainability of its operations.
Projected Profit : First year 156.06 Lakhs, Second year
172.05 lakhs, Third year 189.43 Lakhs and 207.02 in
Fourth Year
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Comments by
Cluster Division
(a.) Name and Address M/s Somnath Vishwakarma Karimnagar
Goldsmith Association H.No: 3-27, Bejjanki
Mandal, Gunkulkondapur, KARIMNAGAR,
Karimnagar, Telangana, India, 505530
--
(b.) Nature of SPV(company
or Society or Trust)
Special Purpose Vehicle (Section 8, Indian
Companies Act 2013) Not for Profit
Company3
--
(c.) Name of the state Govt.
and MSME officials in SPV
State Govt. and MSME DI will appoint the
their officials after final approval.
--
(d.) Date of formation of
SPV
25.04.2018
--
(e.) Number of Members 27 nos.
--
(f.) Bye Laws or MoA and
AOA submitted
Submitted. --
(g.) Authorized Share Capital Rs. 10.00 lakh
(h.) Paid up capital Rs. 06.00 lakh.
(i.) Shareholding Pattern 108 Nos. @54,658/- --
(j.) Commitment letter for
contribution
Submitted --
(k.) SPV specific A/c SPV has taken initiative to open new Bank
Account with nationalized bank. Required
(l.) Trust Building of SPV,
Previous track record of co-
operative initiatives pursued
by SPV members need to be
SPV have already organized trust building
programs like awareness workshop of CDP,
Exposer visit to Vijayawada Gold Cluster,
visited Jewellery Expo in Chennai and New
--
138
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Comments by
Cluster Division
highlighted with support
documentation.
Delhi, and conducted Skill development
program. Approach and SPV formation with
the help of MSME-DI Hyderabad and DIC,
Karim Nagar.
(m.) Technical Institution The SPV is taking support from Gold
Ornament Clusters at Vijayawada, for setting
of the CFC. There are several institution that
are supporting SPV viz. Commissioner of
Industries, MSME DI, Hyderabad, DIC etc.
--
(n.) CFC may be utilised by
SPV members as also others
in a cluster. However,
evidence should be furnished
with regard to SPV member
ability to utilise at least 60
percent of installed capacity.
Undertaking submitted by the SPV assuring
that 60% capacity of plant and machinery will
be utilised by the Cluster Firms.
--
(o) Utilities
(a) Power requirement for
commercial/domestic
purpose
28.50 HP --
(b) Water 500 ltr per day --
(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities NA --
4. Implement Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Comments by
Cluster Division
(a.) Implementing Agency Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure
Corporation Limited (TSIIC), Hyderabad
--
(b.) Fund receiving Agency Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure
Corporation Limited (TSIIC), Hyderabad
--
(c.) Implementation Period 12 months 24 Months from
date of final
approval.
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and
main Recommendations
The AIA, MSME-DI, Hyderabad has
recommended the proposal.
--
(e.) Comments of Technical
Division
The proposal was deliberated during 64th
& 65th
meetings of
Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) held on 05.03.19
& 13.06.19 respectively and committee recommended the proposal
to place before steering committee for In-principle approval. (f.) Approval of Technical
Committee
(g.) Comments of Cluster
Development Division:
Recommended for in-principle approval under MSE-CDP.
(h.) Working capital (In-
principle sanction of loan
from a bank, if applicable
arrangement made)
NA. --
139
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA)
Comments by
Cluster Division
(a.) BEP 51.71%
As per MSE-CDP
guidelines.
(b.) IRR, Payback period 13.50%
(c.) DSCR NA
(d.) Return on Capital
employed (ROCE)
30.78%
(e.) NPV Rs. 94.34 lakh
(f.) DER NA
(g.) Sensitivity Analysis Sensitivity analysis calculated on decrease
in Sales by 10%, decrease in Capacity
utilization by 10% and combination of
both. Under above sensitive scenarios, the
key financial indicators like BEP, IRR,
ROCE are within the limits.
(h.) Status of CFCs
approved in the State
-- --
6. Proposed project cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S.No. Particulars As proposed by IA
1. Land and its Development 0.00
2. Building and other Civil constructions 21.31
3. Plant & Machinery (including electrification) 495.53
4. Misc. fixed assets 9.15
5. Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 23.25
6. Contingencies (2% building and 5% on plant and
machinery)
25.20
7. Margin money for working capital 5.00
Total 579.44
7. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S.
No.
Particulars Percentage As proposed by IA
1 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 90.00 520.41
2 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Telangana 0.00 0.00*
3 SPV contribution 10.00 59.03
Total 100.00 579.44
* As per recommendation of TEAC;
(i) Government of Telangana is to contribute a minimum 10% towards the project and
accordingly GoI contribution would be reduced.
(ii) One each of Mesh Chain Machine and Wire drawing Machine at S.No.14 & 17 of the Agenda
may be deleted.
140
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
(Rs. in lakh)
S.No. Description No. Power Requirement
(HP/KW)
Cost
1. Faceting & Milling Machine (CNC Machine) for bangles & wedding bands Double Head with variable speed control, computerized 6 axis system
1 .5 42.35
2. Bangle & Ring turning Machine 1.5� to 3� 1 1 3.47
3. Bangle & Ring Profiling Machine 2� to 3� No 17 to 49
1 1 0.91
4. Lazer Engraving Machine Speed 12000mm/s, Cooling system
1 .5 45.98
5. Digital Weighing Machine 1 .5 8.35
6. Ball Making Machine with Full Setup of Sheet Drawing of Pipe Making, Soldering, Sheet Striping Machine, Hammering with All Standard Accessories
1 3 41.14
7. Welding Machine 130 Joule capacity 1 1 18.15
8. CNC Router Machine Jewelers Engraving 3-4 Axis 1 5 22.38
9. Gold & Silve Dyes sizes starting from 15 x 1 to 15.3/4X1
1200 0 58.08
10. Digital Vaccume Pressure Casting Gold Melting Machine With Digital Diaply & Colling System
1 2 18.75
11. Gold Melting Machine with Digital display and cooling system
1 1 3.33
12. Gold Refinery Machine 2 KG charge up to 6 KG per day
1 1 3.33
13. Hydraulic Dai Cutting Machine 150 MM stock cylinders, 20 MM/ Sec Fast forward Speed
1 1.5 4.60
14. MESH CHAIN MACHINE with standard accessories 1 2 10.28
15. Box Chain Making Machine with standard accessories 1 1 14.52
16. V Chain Making Machine with standard accessories 1 1 16.34
17. Wire Drawing Machine with standard accessories 1 1 5.14
18. Sheet and Wire Drawing Machine with standard accessories
1 2 5.57
19. Laser Marking Machine Karat Mark 1 1 28.13
20. XRF Machine MISTRAL SDD 1 2 71.39
21. Assay Balance 0.001 Mg accuracy 1 .5 11.69
22. Sartorius Analytical Balance Machine 1 .5 1.51
23. Sartorius Precision Balance Machine 2 .5 2.057
24. 50 Gm, 100 Gm, 200 Gm, E2 Classs Wire Weigh with display attachment
1 .5 0.35
25. Tools & Equipment for sampling Balling Pliers, couples, scrapping tools, tongs, forceps, rolling ill etc
1 0 8.47
26. Furnaces, Scrubber, Parting Tray etc. 1 0 9.075
27. Safety Equipment CCTV system, Air Conditioning Unit, Computer & UPS system, Generator etc.
1 0 10.28
141
28. Accessories for operation of the CFC 1 0 6.00
9. Observations:
(A) Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Registered lease deed for the premises for a period of 15 years on the name of SPV.
(ii) SIDBI appraisal report.
(iii) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.
(iv) Certificate from State Government regarding compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.
(v) Certificate from State Government stating that more than 50% units in the cluster are
Micro.
(B) As recommended by 65th
Committee of TEAC,
(i) One each of Mesh Chain Machine and Wire drawing Machine at S.No.14 & 17 of DPR
respectively may be deleted.
(ii) Government of Telangana should contribute a minimum 10% towards the project and
accordingly GoI contribution would be reduced.
(iii) More units may be included as SPV members.
(C) Necessary amendments, as mentioned in (B) above, may be made in DPR and the DPR may be duly
vetted by MSME-DI, Hyderabad. Accordingly the changes may be communicated to SIDBI for
appraisal.
10. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up of Common Facility
Centre (CFC) in Gold Ornament Cluster, Karimnagar, Telangana.
.*******
142
Agenda No. 50.4.1: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Mangolpuri Industrial
Estate, Phase-II, North West District, Delhi.
Background
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 47th
SCM held on 12.11.18,
subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 07.06.19; Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development
Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd. submitted the following documents and requested to
consider the proposal for final approval.
Documents required Status
(i) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Received
(ii) Land document with clear title
(signed by Competent Authority) in
the name of Implementing Agency
A copy of “The Delhi Industrial
Development Operation and
Maintenance (DIDOM) Act, 2010” has
been received in this regard.
(iii) Commitment letter from IA to meet
the cost escalation, if any, over and
above the approved project cost.
Received
(iv) Undertaking from State Government
that more than 50% units in the
Industrial Estate are (a) Micro (b)
SC/ST& (c) Women owned, as the
case may be, in case Gol assistance
is more than 60% of Project Cost or
Rs. 10.00 crore, whichever is less.
The industrial area has 1249 MSEs. Of
these, 863 units are micro accounting for
around 69% of the total units. Hence, the
project shall be eligible for grant of 80%
of eligible project cost, which comes out
at Rs. 704.91 lakh.
Undertaking from State Government
that more than 50% units in the
Industrial Estate are micro has been
received.
(v) Details of Industries operating in the
Industrial Estate.
Received
(vi) Certificate from State Government
for compliance of GFR/CVC
guidelines.
Received
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development
Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd.
State : Delhi
District : North West Delhi
Industrial Estate : Mangolpuri Industrial Area Ph-II
143
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
Yes
Total Area of Industrial Estate/ area (acre)
78.18 acres
Area to be developed (acre) 78.18 acres
Number and sizes of plots 1249 units (863 no. of units are micro) Each unit has an area of 100-600 sq. mtrs. depending on the size and scale of operation.
Implementing Period 16 months from the date of sanction of MSE-CDP grant to IA
Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up etc.
Nil
Performance of ID projects in State
N/A
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA
Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd.
As per MSE-CDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory. There are 33 notified Industrial areas in Delhi of which 21 are being maintained by Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd. DSIIDC is also entrusted with redevelopment and maintenance of industrial areas transferred from Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Department of Industries. DSIIDC has also been involved in implementing Government of Delhi‟s scheme of relocation to shift industries operating in various non-conforming/residential areas to planned industrial areas.
--
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Submitted Received
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
The industrial area is easily accessible from New Delhi Railway Station, (18 km away) Airport as well as Delhi Metro. The industrial area has water supply from Delhi Jal Board and has adequate facilities for supply to various units.
--
144
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA
Remarks
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
After implementation of “The Delhi Industrial Development Operation and Maintenance (DIDOM) Act, 2010” the land had been transferred to DSIIDC. The said industrial area is one of the 33 notified and planned industrial areas in Delhi of which 24, including 04 flatted factory complexes are maintained by DSIIDC.
A copy of DIDOM Act, 2010 has been submitted by IA.
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
Yes, the proposed project is for upgradation and no additional land is to be acquired for the project.
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Yes Received
Basis of elements of project Cost All cost estimates have been drawn by DSIIDC engineers. Specifications are submitted and are generally found to be reasonable.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project The proposed project will improve operational convenience for existing users in terms of better roads, better drainage facilities, improved power supply etc. Better roads will reduce time for movement of materials and final products by units and thereby increase their profitability. Better drainage will prevent inundation during rains and ensure longer life for roads and other infrastructure.
--
Justification of the Proposal The industrial area is existing. However, due to heavy use and movement of traffic, roads and drains needs to be maintained. Further, upgradation will add to the lifespan of the available infrastructure and improve the productivity of the units.
--
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
As per MSE-CDP/ Recommended by SIDBI
(i) Cost of land filling/levelling including boundary wall and fencing
148.00 100.00
(ii) Cost of laying roads 295.00 200.00
145
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
As per MSE-CDP/ Recommended by SIDBI
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00 10.00
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses
125.00 110.00
(v) Water harvesting 11.86 10.00
(vi) Drainage 119.00 60.00
(vii) Power (Sub-station and distribution network including street light etc.), Generation of non-conventional energy
250.00 250.00
(viii) Other (Sanitary conveniences etc.) 10.00 10.00
(ix) Administrative /Office Building 20.00 20.00
(x) Telecommunication/Cyber centre/Documentation centre
20.00 20.00
(xi) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 30.00 30.00
(xii) Raw material storage facility, marketing outlets
21.14 21.14
(xiii) First Aid Centre, Creche, Canteen facilities 20.00 20.00
(xiv) Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 20.00 20.00
Total 1100.00 881.14
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA As per MSE-CDP
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 800.00 704.91*
(ii) DSIIDC contribution 300.00 395.09
Total 1100.00 1100.00
*SIDBI recommended GoI grant of Rs. 704.91 lakh as 80% of total eligible Project cost of Rs.
881.14 lakh.
6. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Mangolpuri
Industrial Estate, Phase-II, North West District, Delhi at a total project cost of Rs.1100.00 lakh
with GoI assistance of Rs.704.91 lakh and DSIIDC contribution of Rs.395.09 lakh.
*******
146
Agenda No. 50.4.2: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Mayapuri Industrial
Estate, Phase-I, South West District, Delhi.
Background
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 47th
SCM held on 12.11.18,
subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 07.06.19; Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development
Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd. submitted the following documents and requested to
consider the proposal for final approval.
Documents required Status (vii) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Received (viii) Land document with clear title
(signed by Competent Authority) in the name of Implementing Agency
A copy of “The Delhi Industrial Development Operation and Maintenance (DIDOM) Act, 2010” has been received in this regard.
(ix) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost.
Received
(x) Undertaking from State Government that more than 50% units in the Industrial Estate are (a) Micro (b) SC/ST& (c) Women owned, as the case may be, in case Gol assistance is more than 60% of Project Cost or Rs.l 0.00 crore, whichever is less.
The industrial area has 330 MSEs. Of these, 201 units are micro accounting for around 60% of the total units. Hence, the project shall be eligible for grant of 80% of eligible project cost, which comes out at Rs. 704.91 lakh. Undertaking from State Government that more than 50% units in the Industrial Estate are micro has been received.
(xi) Details of Industries operating in the Industrial Estate.
Received
(xii) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.
Received
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Delhi
State : Delhi
District : South West Delhi
Industrial Estate : Mayapuri Industrial Area Ph-I
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
Yes
Total Area of Industrial Estate/ area (acre)
148 acres
Area to be developed (acre) 148 acres
147
Number and sizes of plots to be developed
330 plots with 330 units operating (201 no. of units are micro) Each unit has an area of 100-2400 sq. mtrs. depending on the size and scale of operation.
Implementing Period 16 months from the date of sanction of MSE-CDP grant to IA
Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up etc.
Nil
Performance of ID projects in State
N/A
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposed by IA Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd.
As per MSE-CDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory. There are 33 notified Industrial areas in Delhi of which 21 are being maintained by Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd. DSIIDC is also entrusted with redevelopment and maintenance of industrial areas transferred from Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Department of Industries. DSIIDC has also been involved in implementing Government of Delhi‟s scheme of relocation to shift industries operating in various non-conforming/residential areas to planned industrial areas.
--
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Submitted Received.
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
The industrial area is easily accessible from New Delhi Railway Station, (13 km away) Airport as well as Delhi Metro. The industrial area has water supply from Delhi Jal Board and has adequate facilities for supply to various units.
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
After implementation of “The Delhi Industrial Development Operation and Maintenance (DIDOM) Act, 2010” the land had been transferred to DSIIDC. The said industrial area is one of the 33 notified and planned industrial areas in Delhi of which 24, including 04 flatted factory complexes are maintained by DSIIDC.
A copy of DIDOM Act, 2010 has been submitted by IA.
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
Yes, the proposed project is for upgradation and no additional land is to be acquired for the project.
148
Description Proposed by IA Remarks
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Yes Received
Basis of elements of project Cost All cost estimates have been drawn by DSIIDC engineers.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project The proposed project will improve operational convenience for existing users in terms of better roads, better drainage facilities, improved power supply etc. Better roads will reduce time for movement of materials and final products by units and thereby increase their profitability. Better drainage will prevent inundation during rains and ensure longer life for roads and other infrastructure.
--
Justification of the Proposal The industrial area is existing. However, due to heavy use and movement of traffic, roads and drains needs to be maintained. Further, upgradation will add to the lifespan of the available infrastructure and improve the productivity of the units.
--
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
As per MSE-CDP/Recommended by SIDBI
(i) Cost of land filling/levelling including boundary wall and fencing
148.00 100.00
(ii) Cost of laying roads 295.00 200.00
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00 10.00
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses
125.00 110.00
(v) Water harvesting 11.86 10.00
(vi) Drainage 114.00 60.00
(vii) Power (Sub-station and distribution network including street light etc.), Generation of non-conventional energy
250.00 250.00
(viii) Other (Sanitary conveniences etc.) 10.00 10.00
(ix) Administrative /Office Building 20.00 20.00
149
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
As per MSE-CDP/Recommended by SIDBI
(x) Telecommunication/Cyber centre/Documentation centre
20.00 20.00
(xi) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 30.00 30.00
(xii) Raw material storage facility, marketing outlets 21.14 21.14
(xiii) First Aid Centre, Creche, Canteen facilities 20.00 20.00
(xiv) Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 20.00 20.00
Total 1095.00 881.14
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA As per MSE-CDP
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 800.00 704.91*
(ii) DSIIDC contribution 295.00 390.09
Total 1095.00 1095.00
*SIDBI recommended GoI grant of Rs. 704.91 lakh as 80% of total eligible Project cost of Rs.
881.14 lakh.
6. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Mayapuri
Industrial Estate, Phase-I, South West District, Delhi at a total project cost of Rs.1095.00 lakh
with GoI assistance of Rs.704.91 lakh and DSIIDC contribution of Rs.390.09 lakh.
*******
150
Agenda No.50.4.3: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Infrastructure
Facilities at Flatted Factory Complex, Jhilmil Industrial Area, East
Delhi, Delhi.
Background
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 47th
SCM held on 12.11.18,
subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 07.06.19; Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development
Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd. submitted the following documents and requested to
consider the proposal for final approval.
Documents required Status
(i) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Received
(ii) Land document with clear title
(signed by Competent Authority) in
the name of Implementing Agency
A copy of “The Delhi Industrial
Development Operation and Maintenance
(DIDOM) Act, 2010” has been received in
this regard.
(iii) Commitment letter from IA to meet
the cost escalation, if any, over and
above the approved project cost.
Received
(iv) Undertaking from State Government
that more than 50% units in the
Industrial Estate are (a) Micro (b)
SC/ST& (c) Women owned, as the
case may be, in case Gol assistance is
more than 60% of Project Cost or Rs.
l 0.00 crore, whichever is less.
The industrial area has 378 MSEs. Out of
which 245 are micro units (64.81% of total
units). However, Jhilmil FFC operates in
the larger Jhilmil Industrial Area and as
MSE-CDP considers the entire industrial
area for purpose of grant, micro units will
be lower than 50%. Hence, the project shall
be eligible for grant of 60% against eligible
project cost, which comes out at Rs. Rs.
497.92 lakh.
Therefore, condition for submission of
certificate/ undertaking from State
Government that more than 50% units in
the Industrial Estate are (a) Micro (b)
SC/ST& (c) Women owned, as the case
may be, is not stipulated.
(v) Details of Industries operating in the
Industrial Estate.
Received
(vi) Certificate from State Government for
compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.
Received
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development
Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd.
State : Delhi
District : East Delhi
151
Industrial Estate : Flatted Factory Complex, Jhilmil Industrial Area
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
Yes
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre)
4.97 acres
Area to be developed (acre) 4.97 acres
Number and sizes of plots to be developed
378 units (245 nos. of units are micro) Each unit has an area of 27-54 sq. mtrs. depending on the size and scale of operation.
Implementing Period 16 months from the date of sanction of MSE-CDP grant to IA
Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
Nil
Performance of ID projects in State N/A
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd.
As per MSE-CDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory. There are 33 notified Industrial areas in Delhi of which 21 are being maintained by Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd. DSIIDC is also entrusted with redevelopment and maintenance of industrial areas transferred from Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Department of Industries. DSIIDC has also been involved in implementing Government of Delhi‟s scheme of relocation to shift industries operating in various non-conforming/residential areas to planned industrial areas.
--
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Submitted Received.
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of
The industrial area is easily accessible from Jhilmil Railway Station (2-3 kms away) and approx. 7-8kms from Anand Vihar Railway Station and Bus Terminal. The industrial area has water
--
152
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
workers) supply from Delhi Jal Board and has adequate facilities for supply to various units.
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
After implementation of “The Delhi Industrial Development Operation and Maintenance (DIDOM) Act, 2010” the land had been transferred to DSIIDC. The said industrial area is one of the 33 notified and planned industrial areas in Delhi of which 24, including 04 flatted factory complexes are maintained by DSIIDC.
A copy of “The Delhi Industrial Development Operation and Maintenance (DIDOM) Act, 2010” has been submitted by IA.
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with):
Yes, the proposed project is for upgradation and no additional land is to be acquired for the project.
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Yes Received
Basis of elements of project Cost All cost estimates have been drawn by DSIIDC engineers.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project The proposed project will improve operational convenience for existing users in terms of better roads, better drainage facilities etc. Better roads will reduce time for movement of materials and final products by units and thereby increase their profitability. Better drainage will prevent inundation during rains and ensure longer life for roads and other infrastructure.
--
Justification of the Proposal The industrial area is existing. However, due to heavy use and movement of traffic, roads and drains needs to be maintained. Further, upgradation will add to the lifespan of the available infrastructure and improve the productivity of the units.
--
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
As per MSE-CDP/Recommended by SIDBI
(i) Cost of land filling/levelling including 54.98 54.98
153
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
As per MSE-CDP/Recommended by SIDBI
boundary wall and fencing
(ii) Cost of laying roads 229.79 200.00
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00 10.00
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses
202.84 110.00
(v) Water harvesting 11.68 10.00
(vi) Drainage 61.36 60.00
(vii) Power (Sub-station and distribution network including street light etc.), Generation of non-conventional energy
226.83 226.83
(viii) Other (Sanitary conveniences etc.) 65.76 10.00
(ix) Administrative /Office Building 28.00 20.00
(x) Telecommunication/Cyber centre/Documentation centre
20.00 20.00
(xi) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 37.00 30.00
(xii) Raw material storage facility, marketing outlets 40.00 40.00
(xiii) First Aid Centre, Creche, Canteen facilities 20.28 20.00
(xiv) Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 18.06 18.06
Total 1026.58 829.87
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
As per MSE-CDP
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 800.00 497.92*
(ii) DSIIDC contribution 226.58 528.66
Total 1026.58 1026.58
*SIDBI recommended GoI grant of Rs. 497.92 lakh as 60% of total eligible Project cost of Rs.
829.87 lakh.
6. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to issue of final approval.
(i) As per SIDBI appraisal report, the Industrial Estate has 378 operational units with
245 micro units; whereas, as per the documents submitted by DSIIDC, the
Industrial Estate has 378 units with 225, 14, 1 & 138 number of micro, women
owned, SC/ST & others units respectively.
(ii) The industrial area has 378 MSEs. Out of which 245 are micro units (64.81% of
total units). However, Jhilmil Flatted Factory Complex (FFC) operates in the
larger Jhilmil Industrial Area and as MSE-CDP considers the entire industrial area
for purpose of grant, micro units will be lower than 50%. Hence, the project shall
be eligible for grant of 60% against eligible project cost, which comes out at Rs.
Rs. 497.92 lakh.
154
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Infrastructure
Facilities at Flatted Factory Complex, Jhilmil Industrial Area, East Delhi, Delhi at a total project
cost of Rs.1026.58 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs.497.92 lakh and DSIIDC contribution of
Rs.528.66 lakh.
******
155
Agenda No.50.4.4: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Infrastructure
Facilities at Flatted Factory Complex, Jhandewalan, Central Delhi,
New Delhi
Background
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 47th
SCM held on 12.11.18,
subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 07.06.19; Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development
Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd. submitted the following documents and requested to
consider the proposal for final approval.
Documents required Status (i) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Received (ii) Land document with clear title
(signed by Competent Authority) in the name of Implementing Agency
A copy of “The Delhi Industrial Development Operation and Maintenance (DIDOM) Act, 2010” has been received in this regard.
(iii) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost.
Received
(iv) Undertaking from State Government that more than 50% units in the Industrial Estate are (a) Micro (b) SC/ST& (c) Women owned, as the case may be, in case Gol assistance is more than 60% of Project Cost or Rs. l 0.00 crore, whichever is less.
The industrial area has 570 MSEs. Out of which 333 are micro units (more than 58.42% of total units). Hence, the project shall be eligible for grant of 80% against eligible project cost, which comes out at Rs. 728.91 lakh. Therefore, condition for submission of certificate/ undertaking from State Government that more than 50% units in the Industrial Estate are (a) Micro (b) SC/ST& (c) Women owned, as the case may be, has been received.
(v) Details of Industries operating in the Industrial Estate.
Details of only micro units have been submitted.
(vi) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.
Received
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development
Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd.
State : Delhi
District : Central Delhi
Industrial Estate : Flatted Factory Complex, Jhandewalan
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
Yes
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre)
8.75 acres
156
Particulars Description
Area to be developed (acre) 8.75 acres
Number and sizes of plots to be developed
570 units (333 nos. of units are micro) Each unit has an area of 23-56 sq. mtrs. depending on the size and scale of operation.
Implementing Period 16 months from the date of sanction of MSE-CDP grant to IA
Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
Nil
Performance of ID projects in State
N/A
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA): Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd.
As per MSE-CDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory. There are 33 notified Industrial areas in Delhi of which 21 are being maintained by Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd. DSIIDC is also entrusted with redevelopment and maintenance of industrial areas transferred from Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Department of Industries. DSIIDC has also been involved in implementing Government of Delhi‟s scheme of relocation to shift industries operating in various non-conforming/residential areas to planned industrial areas.
--
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Submitted Received.
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
The industrial area is easily accessible from New Delhi Railway Station (4 kms away), Air port as well as Delhi Metro. The industrial area has water supply from Delhi Jal Board and has adequate facilities for supply to various units.
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
After implementation of “The Delhi Industrial Development Operation and Maintenance (DIDOM) Act, 2010” the land had been transferred to DSIIDC. The said industrial area is one of the 33 notified and planned industrial areas in Delhi of which 24, including 04 flatted factory
A copy of “The Delhi Industrial Development Operation and Maintenance (DIDOM) Act, 2010” has been submitted by IA.
157
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
complexes are maintained by DSIIDC.
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with):
Yes, the proposed project is for upgradation and no additional land is to be acquired for the project.
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Yes Received
Basis of elements of project Cost All cost estimates have been drawn by DSIIDC engineers.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project The proposed project will improve operational convenience for existing users in terms of better roads, better drainage facilities etc. Better roads will reduce time for movement of materials and final products by units and thereby increase their profitability. Better drainage will prevent inundation during rains and ensure longer life for roads and other infrastructure.
--
Justification of the Proposal The industrial area is existing. However, due to heavy use and movement of traffic, roads and drains needs to be maintained. Further, upgradation will add to the lifespan of the available infrastructure and improve the productivity of the units.
--
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
As per MSE-CDP/Recommended by SIDBI
(i) Cost of land filling/levelling including boundary wall and fencing
228.00 100.00
(ii) Cost of laying roads 220.00 200.00
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00 10.00
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses
125.00 110.00
(v) Water harvesting 11.86 10.00
(vi) Drainage 120.00 60.00
(vii) Power (Sub-station and distribution network 250.00 250.00
158
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
As per MSE-CDP/Recommended by SIDBI
including street light etc.), Generation of non-conventional energy
(viii) Other (Sanitary conveniences etc.) 10.00 10.00
(ix) Administrative /Office Building 32.00 20.00
(x) Telecommunication/Cyber centre/Documentation centre
25.00 20.00
(xi) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 30.00 30.00
(xii) Bank / Post Office 32.00 20.00
(xiii) Raw material storage facility, marketing outlets 31.14 31.14
(xiv) First Aid Centre, Creche, Canteen facilities 25.00 20.00
(xv) Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 25.00 20.00
Total 1175.00 911.14
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
As per MSE-CDP
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 800.00 728.91*
(ii) DSIIDC contribution 375.00 446.09
Total 1175.00 1175.00
*SIDBI recommended GoI grant of Rs. 728.91 lakh as 80% of total eligible Project cost of Rs.
911.14 lakh.
6. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to issue of final approval.
(i) As per SIDBI appraisal report, the Industrial Estate has 570 operational units with
333 micro units, whereas, as per the documents submitted by DSIIDC, the
Industrial Estate has 333 operational units with 274, 4 & 55 number of micro,
women owned & others units respectively.
(ii) Details of units operating in the Industrial Estate, in light of the variations as
mentioned in Point (ii) above.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Infrastructure
Facilities at Flatted Factory Complex, Jhandewalan, Central Delhi, New Delhi at a total project
cost of Rs. 1175.00 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 728.91 lakh and DSIIDC contribution of Rs.
446.09 lakh.
*****
159
Agenda No.50.4.5: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Infrastructure
Facilities at Flatted Factory Complex, Okhla Industrial Area, South
Delhi, Delhi.
Background
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 47th
SCM held on 12.11.18,
subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 07.06.19; Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development
Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd. submitted the following documents and requested to
consider the proposal for final approval.
Documents required Status
(i) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Received
(ii) Land document with clear title
(signed by Competent Authority) in
the name of Implementing Agency
A copy of “The Delhi Industrial
Development Operation and Maintenance
(DIDOM) Act, 2010” along with land
transfer order has been received in this
regard.
(iii) Commitment letter from IA to meet
the cost escalation, if any, over and
above the approved project cost.
Received
(iv) Undertaking from State Government
that more than 50% units in the
Industrial Estate are (a) Micro (b)
SC/ST& (c) Women owned, as the
case may be, in case Gol assistance is
more than 60% of Project Cost or Rs.l
0.00 crore, whichever is less.
The industrial area has 294 MSEs. Out of
which 251 are micro units (more than 85%
of total units). Hence, the project shall be
eligible for grant of 80% against eligible
project cost, which comes out at Rs. 674.95
lakh.
Therefore, condition for submission of
certificate/ undertaking from State
Government that more than 50% units in
the Industrial Estate are (a) Micro (b)
SC/ST& (c) Women owned, as the case
may be, is stipulated.
(v) Details of Industries operating in the
Industrial Estate.
Received
(vi) Certificate from State Government for
compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.
Received
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development
Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd.
State : Delhi
District : South Delhi
Industrial Estate : Flatted Factory Complex, Okhla Industrial Area
160
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
No
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre)
3.75 acres
Area to be developed (acre) 3.75 acres
Number and sizes of plots to be developed
294 units Units Nos. Micro : 251 SC/ST : 2 Women owned : 9 Others : 32 Total : 294
Each unit has an area of 21-46 sq. mtrs. depending on the size and scale of operation.
Implementing Period 16 months from the date of sanction of MSE-CDP grant to IA
Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
Nil
Performance of ID projects in State
N/A
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd.
As per MSE-CDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory. There are 33 notified Industrial areas in Delhi of which 21 are being maintained by Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd. DSIIDC is also entrusted with redevelopment and maintenance of industrial areas transferred from Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Department of Industries. DSIIDC has also been involved in implementing Government of Delhi‟s scheme of relocation to shift industries operating in various non-conforming/residential areas to planned industrial areas.
--
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Report submitted after In-principle approval.
Received.
161
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
The industrial area is easily accessible from New Delhi Railway Station, (17 km away) Airport as well as Okhla NSIC Metro. The industrial area has water supply from Delhi Jal Board and has adequate facilities for supply to various units.
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
After implementation of “The Delhi Industrial Development Operation and Maintenance (DIDOM) Act, 2010” the land had been transferred to DSIIDC. The said industrial area is one of the 33 notified and planned industrial areas in Delhi of which 24, including 04 flatted factory complexes are maintained by DSIIDC.
A copy of “The Delhi Industrial Development Operation and Maintenance (DIDOM) Act, 2010” along with land transfer order has been submitted by IA.
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
Yes, the proposed project is for upgradation and no additional land is to be acquired for the project.
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Yes Received
Basis of elements of project Cost All cost estimates have been drawn by DSIIDC engineers.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project The proposed project will improve operational convenience for existing users in terms of better roads, better drainage facilities etc. Better roads will reduce time for movement of materials and final products by units and thereby increase their profitability. Better drainage will prevent inundation during rains and ensure longer life for roads and other infrastructure.
--
Justification of the Proposal The industrial area is existing. However, due to heavy use and movement of traffic, roads and drains needs to be maintained. Further, upgradation will add to the lifespan of the available infrastructure and improve the productivity of the units.
--
162
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
As per MSE-CDP/Recommended by SIDBI
(i) Cost of land filling/levelling including boundary wall and fencing
58.36 58.36
(ii) Cost of laying roads 223.36 200.00
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00 10.00
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses
95.33 95.33
(v) Water harvesting 11.68 10.00
(vi) Drainage 60.36 60.00
(vii) Power (street light network, lamps, lamp masts etc.)
334.27 250.00
(viii) Other (Sanitary conveniences etc.) 52.91 10.00
(ix) Administrative /Office Building 28.00 20.00
(x) Telecommunication/Cyber centre/Documentation centre
20.00 20.00
(xi) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 37.00 30.00
(xii) Raw material storage facility, marketing outlets
40.00 40.00
(xiii) First Aid Centre, Creche, Canteen facilities 20.28 20.00
(xiv) Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 20.00 20.00
Total 1011.55 843.69
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by
IA
As per MSE-CDP
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 809.24 674.95 *
(ii) DSIIDC contribution 202.31 336.60
Total 1011.55 1011.55
*SIDBI recommended GoI grant of Rs. 674.95 lakh as 80% of total eligible Project cost of Rs.
843.69 lakh.
6. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Infrastructure
Facilities at Flatted Factory Complex, Okhla Industrial Area, South Delhi, Delhi at a total project
cost of Rs.1011.55 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs.674.95 lakh and DSIIDC contribution of
Rs.336.60lakh.
*******
163
Agenda No. 50.4.6: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Infrastructure
Facilities at Lawrence Road Industrial Area, North West Delhi, Delhi.
Background
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 47th
SCM held on 12.11.18,
subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 07.06.19; Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development
Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd. submitted the following documents and requested to
consider the proposal for final approval.
Documents required Status
(i) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Received (ii) Land document with clear title
(signed by Competent Authority) in the name of Implementing Agency
A copy of “The Delhi Industrial Development Operation and Maintenance (DIDOM) Act, 2010” has been received in this regard.
(iii) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost.
Received
(iv) Undertaking from State Government that more than 50% units in the Industrial Estate are (a) Micro (b) SC/ST& (c) Women owned, as the case may be, in case Gol assistance is more than 60% of Project Cost or Rs. 10.00 crore, whichever is less.
The industrial area has 90 MSEs in the industrial sheds, of which 73 are micro units. The industrial area is spread across 309 acres of land, the work sheds for MSEs are located in a pocket of 4.57 acres. DSIIDC is looking at upgradation of this area alone under the project. Further, the work sheds are demarcated with separate boundary and segregated from the remaining industrial area. Hence, the project shall be eligible for grant of 60% of eligible project cost, which comes out at Rs. 552.00 lakh. Therefore, condition for submission of certificate/ undertaking from State Government that more than 50% units in the Industrial Estate are (a) Micro (b) SC/ST & (c) Women owned, as the case may be, is not stipulated.
(v) Details of Industries operating in the Industrial Estate.
Received
(vi) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.
Received
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd.
State : Delhi
District : North West Delhi
Industrial Estate : Lawrence Road Industrial Area
164
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
Yes
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre)
309 acres
Area to be developed (acre) 4.57 acres
Number and sizes of plots to be developed
90 units (73 no. of units are micro) Each unit has an area of 135-189 sq. mtrs. depending on the size and scale of operation.
Implementing Period 16 months from the date of sanction of MSE-CDP grant to IA
Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
Nil
Performance of ID projects in State
N/A
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd.
As per MSE-CDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory. There are 33 notified Industrial areas in Delhi of which 21 are being maintained by Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd. DSIIDC is also entrusted with redevelopment and maintenance of industrial areas transferred from Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Department of Industries. DSIIDC has also been involved in implementing Government of Delhi‟s scheme of relocation to shift industries operating in various non-conforming/residential areas to planned industrial areas.
--
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Submitted Received
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply,
The industrial area is easily accessible from New Delhi Railway Station, (10 km away) Airport as well as Delhi Metro.
--
165
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
The industrial area has water supply from Delhi Jal Board and has adequate facilities for supply to various units.
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
After implementation of “The Delhi Industrial Development Operation and Maintenance (DIDOM), Act, 2010” the land had been transferred to DSIIDC. The said industrial area is one of the 33 notified and planned industrial areas in Delhi of which 24, including 04 flatted factory complexes are maintained by DSIIDC.
A copy of DIDOM Act, 2010 has been submitted by IA.
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with):
Yes, the proposed project is for upgradation and no additional land is to be acquired for the project.
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Yes Received
Basis of elements of project Cost All cost estimates have been drawn by DSIIDC engineers.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project The proposed project will improve operational convenience for existing users in terms of better roads, better drainage facilities, improved power supply etc. Better roads will reduce time for movement of materials and final products by units and thereby increase their profitability. Better drainage will prevent inundation during rains and ensure longer life for roads and other infrastructure.
--
Justification of the Proposal The industrial area is existing. However, due to heavy use and movement of traffic, roads and drains needs to be maintained. Further, upgradation will add to the lifespan of the available infrastructure and improve the productivity of the units.
--
166
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
As per MSE-CDP/ SIDBI
(i) Cost of land filling/levelling including boundary wall and fencing
194.35 100.00
(ii) Cost of laying roads 210.00 200.00
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00 10.00
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses
125.31 110.00
(v) Water harvesting 11.86 10.00
(vi) Drainage 74.75 60.00
(vii) Power (Sub-station and distribution network including street light etc.), Generation of non-conventional energy
250.00 250.00
(viii) Other (Sanitary conveniences etc.) 10.00 10.00
(ix) Administrative /Office Building 28.00 20.00
(x) Telecommunication/Cyber centre/Documentation centre 20.00 20.00
(xi) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 37.00 30.00
(xii) Raw material storage facility, marketing outlets 40.00 40.00
(xiii) First Aid Centre, Creche, Canteen facilities 20.00 20.00
(xiv) Effluent Treatment facilities (Cost of improvement of existing STP)
80.00 20.00
(xv) Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 20.00 20.00
Total 1131.27 920.00
5. Proposed Means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA As per MSE-CDP
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 800.00 552.00*
(ii) DSIIDC contribution 331.27 579.27
Total 1131.27 1131.27
*SIDBI recommended GoI grant of Rs. 552.00 lakh as 60% of total eligible Project cost of Rs.
920.00 lakh.
6. Observations:
(A) As per SIDBI appraisal report, the Industrial Estate has 90 units with 73 micro units
whereas as per the documents submitted by DSIIDC, the Industrial Estate has 90 units
with 70, 3 & 17 number of units are micro, women owned & others respectively.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Infrastructure
Facilities at Lawrence Road Industrial Area, North West Delhi, Delhi at a total project cost of
Rs.1131.27 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs.552.00 lakh and DSIIDC contribution of
Rs.579.27lakh.
*******
167
Agenda No. 50.4.7: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Infrastructure
Facilities at Kirti Nagar Industrial Area, District West Delhi, Delhi.
Background
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 47th
SCM held on 12.11.18,
subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 07.06.19; Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development
Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd. submitted the following documents and requested to
consider the proposal for final approval.
Documents required Status
(i) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Received (ii) Land document with clear title
(signed by Competent Authority) in the name of Implementing Agency
A copy of “The Delhi Industrial Development Operation and Maintenance (DIDOM) Act, 2010” has been received in this regard.
(iii) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost.
Received
(iv) Undertaking from State Government that more than 50% units in the Industrial Estate are (a) Micro (b) SC/ST& (c) Women owned, as the case may be, in case Gol assistance is more than 60% of Project Cost or Rs. l 0.00 crore, whichever is less.
The industrial area has 926 MSEs. Out of which 501 are micro units (54% of total units). The industrial area is spread across 220 acres, of which 146 acres are already developed. Out of these 146 acres, 23 acres are occupied by 926 MSEs in two pockets of 6 acres and 17 acres respectively. DSIIDC is focusing on developing these 23 acres related infrastructure. However, some of these MSEs are spread over and not exactly demarcated. The proportion of micro units in overall units will therefore be below 50% (as micro is only 54% of MSEs itself, as a much larger area is occupied by other units, micro will be below 50%). Further, there is no clear demarcation of these pockets. Hence, the project shall be eligible for grant of 60% against eligible expenditure within the cap of Rs. 600.00 lakh, which comes out at Rs. 528.68 lakh. Therefore, condition for submission of certificate/ undertaking from State Government that more than 50% units in the Industrial Estate are (a) Micro (b) SC/ST& (c) Women owned, as the case may be, is not stipulated.
(v) Details of Industries operating in the Industrial Estate.
Details of only micro units have been submitted.
(vi) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.
Received
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd.
State : : Delhi
District : : West Delhi
Industrial Estate : : Kirti Nagar Industrial Area Delhi
168
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
Yes
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre)
220.00 acres of which 146 acres are already developed.
Area to be developed (acre) 74 acres
Number and sizes of plots to be developed
983 plots/sheds with 926 units operating (501 no. of units are micro) Each unit has an area of 56-188 sq. mtrs. depending on the size and scale of operation.
Implementing Period 16 months from the date of sanction of MSE-CDP grant to IA
Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up etc.
Nil
Performance of ID projects in State NA
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd.
As per MSE-CDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory. There are 33 notified Industrial areas in Delhi of which 21 are being maintained by Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd. DSIIDC is also entrusted with redevelopment and maintenance of industrial areas transferred from Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Department of Industries. DSIIDC has also been involved in implementing Government of Delhi‟s scheme of relocation to shift industries operating in various non-conforming/residential areas to planned industrial areas.
--
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Submitted Received.
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
The industrial area is easily accessible from New Delhi Railway Station, (8 km away) Airport as well as Delhi Metro. The industrial area has water supply from Delhi Jal Board and has adequate facilities for supply to
--
169
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
various units.
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
After implementation of “The Delhi Industrial Development Operation and Maintenance (DIDOM) Act, 2010” the land had been transferred to DSIIDC. The said industrial area is one of the 33 notified and planned industrial areas in Delhi of which 24, including 04 flatted factory complexes are maintained by DSIIDC.
A copy of DIDOM Act, 2010 has been submitted by IA.
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc. complied with)
Yes, the proposed project is for upgradation and no additional land is to be acquired for the project.
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Yes Received
Basis of elements of project Cost All cost estimates have been drawn by DSIIDC engineers.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project The proposed project will improve operational convenience for existing users in terms of better roads, better drainage facilities etc. Better roads will reduce time for movement of materials and final products by units and thereby increase their profitability. Better drainage will prevent inundation during rains and ensure longer life for roads and other infrastructure.
--
Justification of the Proposal The industrial area is existing. However, due to heavy use and movement of traffic, roads and drains needs to be maintained. Further, upgradation will add to the lifespan of the available infrastructure and improve the productivity of the units.
--
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
As per MSE-CDP/Recommended by SIDBI
(i) Cost of land filling/levelling including boundary wall and fencing
110.00 100.00
170
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
As per MSE-CDP/Recommended by SIDBI
(ii) Cost of laying roads 290.00 200.00
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00 10.00
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses
125.00 110.00
(v) Water harvesting 11.86 10.00
(vi) Drainage 135.00 60.00
(vii) Power (Sub-station and distribution network including street light etc.), Generation of non-conventional energy
250.00 250.00
(viii) Other (Sanitary conveniences etc.) 10.00 10.00
(ix) Administrative /Office Building 20.00 20.00
(x) Telecommunication/Cyber centre/Documentation centre
20.00 20.00
(xi) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 30.00 30.00
(xii) Raw material storage facility, marketing outlets 21.14 21.14
(xiii) First Aid Centre, Creche, Canteen facilities 20.00 20.00
(xiv) Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 32.00 20.00
Total 1085.00 881.14
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
As per MSE-CDP
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 800.00 528.68*
(ii) DSIIDC contribution 285.00 556.32
Total 1085.00 1085.00
*SIDBI recommended GoI grant of Rs. 528.68 lakh as 60% of total eligible Project cost of Rs.
881.14 lakh.
6. Observations:
(A) As per SIDBI appraisal report, the Industrial Estate has 926 units with 501 micro units
whereas as per the documents submitted by DSIIDC, the Industrial Estate has 559 units
with 499, 2 & 58 number of units are micro, women owned & others respectively.
(B) Details of Industries operating in the Industrial Estate are required to be submitted.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Infrastructure
Facilities at Kirti Nagar Industrial Area, District West Delhi, Delhi at a total project cost of
Rs.1085.00 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs.528.68 lakh and DSIIDC contribution of Rs.556.32
lakh.
*****
171
Agenda No.50.4.8: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Infrastructure
Facilities at Patparganj Industrial Area, District East Delhi.
Background
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 47th
SCM held on 12.11.18,
subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 07.06.19; Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development
Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd. submitted the following documents and requested to
consider the proposal for final approval.
Documents required Status
(i) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Received
(ii) Land document with clear title
(signed by Competent Authority) in
the name of Implementing Agency
A copy of “The Delhi Industrial
Development Operation and Maintenance
(DIDOM) Act, 2010” has been received in
this regard.
(iii) Commitment letter from IA to meet
the cost escalation, if any, over and
above the approved project cost.
Received
(iv) Undertaking from State Government
that more than 50% units in the
Industrial Estate are (a) Micro (b)
SC/ST& (c) Women owned, as the
case may be, in case Gol assistance is
more than 60% of Project Cost or Rs.
l 0.00 crore, whichever is less.
The industrial area has 603 MSEs. Of these,
no micro units are there. However,
considering the facts that micro units are
less than 50% thus GoI grant will be
restricted to 60% of the eligible project
cost, which comes out at Rs. 540.00 lakh.
Therefore, condition for submission of
certificate/ undertaking from State
Government that more than 50% units in
the Industrial Estate are (a) Micro (b)
SC/ST& (c) Women owned, as the case
may be, is not stipulated.
(v) Details of Industries operating in the
Industrial Estate.
Not submitted
(vi) Certificate from State Government for
compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.
Received
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development
Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd.
State : Delhi
District : East Delhi
Industrial Estate : Patparganj Industrial Area
172
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
Yes
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre):
125.99 acres
Area to be developed (acre) 125.99 acres
Number and sizes of plots to be developed :
603 units (No micro units) Each unit has an area of 150-450 sq. mtrs. depending on the size and scale of operation.
Implementing Period 16 months from the date of sanction of MSE-CDP grant to IA
Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
Nil
Performance of ID projects in state. N/A
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd.
As per MSE-CDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory. There are 33 notified Industrial areas in Delhi of which 21 are being maintained by Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (DSIIDC) Ltd. DSIIDC is also entrusted with redevelopment and maintenance of industrial areas transferred from Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Department of Industries. DSIIDC has also been involved in implementing Government of Delhi‟s scheme of relocation to shift industries operating in various non-conforming/residential areas to planned industrial areas.
--
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Submitted Received.
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
The industrial area is easily accessible from Anand Vihar Railway Station, (2-3 kms away), Bus Terminal as well as Delhi Metro. The industrial area has water supply from Delhi Jal Board and has adequate facilities for supply to various units.
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
After implementation of “The Delhi Industrial Development Operation and Maintenance (DIDOM) Act, 2010” the land had been transferred to DSIIDC. The said
A copy of “The Delhi Industrial Development
173
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
industrial area is one of the 33 notified and planned industrial areas in Delhi of which 24, including 04 flatted factory complexes are maintained by DSIIDC.
Operation and Maintenance (DIDOM) Act, 2010” has been submitted by IA. Whether Zoning regulations
and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
Yes, the proposed project is for upgradation and no additional land is to be acquired for the project.
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Yes Received
Basis of elements of project Cost
All cost estimates have been drawn by DSIIDC engineers.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project
The proposed project will improve operational convenience for existing users in terms of better roads, better drainage facilities etc. Better roads will reduce time for movement of materials and final products by units and thereby increase their profitability. Better drainage will prevent inundation during rains and ensure longer life for roads and other infrastructure.
--
Justification of the Proposal The industrial area is existing. However, due to heavy use and movement of traffic, roads and drains needs to be maintained. Further, upgradation will add to the lifespan of the available infrastructure and improve the productivity of the units.
--
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
As per MSE-CDP/Recommended by SIDBI
(i) Cost of land filling/leveling including boundary wall and fencing
171.15 100.00
(ii) Up-gradation of laying of internal roads 270.10 200.00
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00 10.00
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks and pump houses
175.00 110.00
(v) Rain water harvesting 11.86 10.00
(vi) Drainage 75.00 60.00
(vii) Power (Sub-station and distribution network 250.00 250.00
174
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
As per MSE-CDP/Recommended by SIDBI
including street light etc.) Generation of non-conventional energy
(viii) Others construction (Parking lots etc.) 262.87 10.00
(ix) Administrative /Office Building (up-gradation of entrance / exits, corridors and staircase)
20.00 20.00
(x) Telecommunication/Cyber centre/ Documentation centre
20.00 20.00
(xi) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 30.00 30.00
(xii) Raw material storage facility, marketing outlets
40.00 40.00
(xiii) First Aid Centre, Creche, Canteen facilities 20.00 20.00
(xiv) Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 25.00 20.00
Total 1380.98 900.00
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
As per MSE-CDP
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 800.00 540.00*
(ii) DSIIDC contribution 580.98 840.98
Total 1380.98 1380.98
*SIDBI recommended GoI grant of Rs. 540.00 lakh as 60% of total eligible Project cost of Rs.
900.00 lakh.
6. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to issue of final approval:
(i) As per SIDBI appraisal report, the Industrial Estate has 603 operational units with no
micro unit, whereas, as per the documents submitted by DSIIDC, the Industrial
Estate has 612 units with 448 micro, 2 women owned & 162 others operational units
(ii) In light of the discrepancies as mentioned in Point No.(ii) above, clarification is
required from DSIIDC regarding details of operational units in the Industrial Estate.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Infrastructure
Facilities at Patparganj Industrial Area, District East Delhi, Delhi at a total project cost of Rs.
1380.98 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 540.00 lakh and DSIIDC contribution of Rs. 840.98
lakh.
*****
175
Agenda No.50.4.9: Proposal for Final approval for setting up of Common Facility
Centre (CFC) in Diamond Cutting & Polishing Cluster, Varachha,
Surat, Gujarat.
Background
Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 49th
SCM held on 27.02.19,
subject to submission of following documents prior to Final approval.
(i) Registered lease deed in the name of SPV in respect of the premises.
(ii) Confirmation Letter from Government of Gujarat for their contribution towards
project.
(iii) Details of shareholding pattern of SPV members.
(iv) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(v) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.
(vi) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution.
(vii) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilise at least 60% of installed
capacity.
(viii) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the escalation cost, if
any, over and above the approved project cost.
(ix) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are
Micro / SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
(x) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.
(xi) Documentary proof from SPV for utilisation of CFC facilities by at least 51% of
the cluster members.
Vide email dated 20.06.19, MSME-DI, Ahmedabad has forwarded the following
documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval:
(i) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are
Micro / SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
(ii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(iii) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Basic Information of Cluster
Name of Cluster : Diamond Cutting & Polishing Cluster, Surat
District : Surat
Location of Cluster : Varachha
Lok Sabha Constituency : Surat
Main Product : Diamond
No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium) :
Micro : 81 & Small : 19 ( SPV Members – 100 Nos) Micro : 378 & Small : 23 ( non SPV Members – 401 Nos)
Turnover for the last five years :
Year : Amount (Rs. in crore)
2012-13 : 8.80 2013-14 : 10.01 2014-15 : 11.10 2015-16 : 12.78
176
2016-17 : 14.19
Exports for the last five years :
Nil
Employment in Cluster : 1648 persons
Technology Details : Currently units in the cluster are using conventional technology for Cutting and Polishing of Diamond, advance and upgraded technology is required.
Whether DS Conducted : Yes
Main findings of DSR : Advanced Machine for cutting & polishing of diamond is required for purposed CFC
Main Problems of Cluster :
Non availability of advanced machine for diamond cutting process.
Weak marketing linkages – absence of organized marketing channels.
Micro and Small units have lower export in comparison to to large and medium units.
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Justification for CFC
To have facilities like Advance Technology for diamond processing and quality control
--
(b.) Location of CFC 207, Savani Industries Co-Op Society , Kohinoor Road, Opp Hotel Oasis Lane, Varachha, Surat, Gujarat - 395006
--
% age of units in radius of 5km
95 --
% age of units in radius of 10km
5 --
(c.) Land for CFC
i. Whether land acquired
Rented Building for 31 years Registered lease document in the name of SPV is required
ii. Title is in name of Surat Diamond Cutting & Polishing Cluster SPV Trust
iii. Valuation and its basis
NA
iv. Land is sufficient Yes
v. Change of land use NA
vi. If on lease, duration of lease
Rented Building for 31 years
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
Yes
(d.) Total Building area 1080 Sq Feet --
(e.) Rate of construction of building
NA --
(f.) Main Facility Proposed
Planning of Diamond Cleaving of Diamond. Inspection of Diamond
--
177
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
Grading Report Generation
(g.) Prod capacity of CFC Production p.a. @ 45% capacity utilization- 104461.00 carats
--
(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/ domestic sales and direct /indirect employment, etc.)
S. No.
Particulars Before After
(i) No. of units 501 1200 (ii) Production
(Carat) 2,71,244 8,13,732
(iii) Turnover (Rs. in cr)
56.76 170.28
(iv) Employment (in Nos.)
1,648 4,944
(v) Export (Rs. in Cr)
Nil 7.95
--
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
Not Provided Required
(j.) Man Power in CFC 13 Persons --
(k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets (service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
Provided --
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Name and Address Surat Diamond Cutting & Polishing Cluster 207, Savani Industries Co-Op Society , Kohinoor Road, Opp Hotel Oasis Lane, Varachha, Surat, Gujarat - 395006
--
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)
Trust --
(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
Not Provided --
(d.) Date of formation of SPV
28.03.18 --
(e.) Number of Members 100 --
(f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted
Provided --
(g.) Authorized Share Capital
Rs.1,45,00,000/- . --
(h.) Paid up capital - --
(i.) Shareholding Pattern Not Provided Required
(j.)Commitment letter for contribution
Not Provided Required
(k.) SPV specific A/c Account No: 0051102000117920 (IDBI Bank)
--
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track
- --
178
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation
(m.) Technical Institution - --
(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
Not Provided Required.
(o.)
(a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
4.45 KW -
(b) Water - -
(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities
NA -
4. Implement Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency
Center for Entrepreneurship Development, Govt. of Gujarat, Gandhinagar
-
(b.) Fund receiving Agency
Center for Entrepreneurship Development, Govt. of Gujarat, Gandhinagar
(c.) Implementation Period
18 Months 24 Months from issuance of Final Approval Letter
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
The proposal was recommended by State Level Steering Committee (SLSC) in its meeting held on 04.05.18.
-
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
- --
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee
- Recommended the proposal
(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:
NA --
(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)
NA --
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) BEP 40.00 % --
(b.) IRR, Payback period 15.85 % --
(c.) DSCR - --
179
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
13.82% --
(e.) NPV Rs. 416.35 lac @ 10% --
(f.) DER - --
(g.) Sensitivity Analysis Provided --
(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State
This is the first Diamond Processing CFC Cluster which has already been approved by Govt. of Gujarat
--
6. Proposed Project Cost is as follow:
(Rs. in Lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
Recommended by SIDBI/ As per MSE-CDP
(i) Land and Building 0.00 0.00
(ii) Plant & Machinery 1303.04 1380.33
(iii) Misc. fixed assets 16.57 16.57
(iv) Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 29.00 29.08
(v) Contingency 26.06 69.02
(vi) Margin money for Working Capital 10.00 10.00
Total Project Cost 1384.67 1505.00
7. Proposed means of finance are as follows:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Amount
Recommended by SIDBI/ As per MSE-
CDP
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 1246.20 1350.00
(ii) SPV contribution 138.47 155.00
Total 1384.67 1505.00
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Description No. Power Requirement (HP/KW)
Cost
1. Fiberjet Diamond Laser Cutting Machine (HLJ 300) (Including GST & Import Duties Cost)
1 4.50 1380.33
Total 1380.33
9. Observations:
(A) Following documents are required to be submitted prior to issue of final approval:
(i) Registered lease deed in the name of SPV in respect of the premises.
(ii) Details of shareholding pattern of SPV members.
(iii) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.
(iv) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution.
180
(v) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilise at least 60% of installed
capacity.
(vi) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the cost escalation, if any,
over and above the approved project cost.
(vii) Documentary proof from SPV for utilization of CFC facilities by at least 51% of the
cluster members.
(viii) Compliance of terms & conditions as mentioned in SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(ix) Major Outputs / Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster units after
proposed intervention (in terms of production, exports / domestic sales and direct /
indirect employment, etc.).
(B) As recommended by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC), a clause would be
added in the Sanction Order “In case of any deviation from the agreed principles of
utilization and denial of fair access to the eligible stakeholders, assets created would be
handed over to another SPV through a transparent procedure for smooth and effective
operationalization of the facilities”.
10. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting of Common Facility Centre
(CFC) in Diamond Cutting & Polishing Cluster, Varachha, Surat, Gujarat at a total project cost of
Rs.1505.00 lakh with Gol assistance of Rs. 1350.00 lakh and SPV contribution of Rs.155.00 lakh.
***********
181
Agenda No.50.4.10: Proposal for Final approval for setting up New Industrial Estate
(KINFRA Spice Park) at Idukki, Kerala.
Background
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principal approval during 46th
SCM held on 09.02.18
subject to submission of following documents prior to final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 18.06.19 Government of Kerala has submitted the requisite
documents & requested to consider the proposal for final approval
Documents required Status
(i) SIDBI Appraisal Report Received (ii) Commitment letter from State Government / IA to meet the cost
escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost.
Received
(iii) Land documents with clear title, signed by Competent Authority, complying with zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc.
Yet to be Received
(iv) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.
Received
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information:
Name of Organization : Kerala Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation
State : Kerala
District : Idukki
Industrial Estate : Kerala Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation
(KINFRA) Spices Park.
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan :
Yes.
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre):
15.43 acres.
Area to be developed (acre) 15.43 acres.
Number and sizes of plots to be developed :
20 plots (28.56-113.98 cent)
Implementing Period : 21 months
Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc. :
No project is sanctioned in Idukki district.
Performance of ID projects in state. :
KINFRA has a successful track record in setting up of 22 industrial parks across Kerala for facilitating development of the industry in the State.
182
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency(IA)
Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA): Kerala Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation (KINFRA), Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala.
-
Track Record of the IA Kerala Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation (KINFRA) is a statutory body formed by the Government of Kerala. KINFRA has a successful track record in setting up 22 industrial parks across Kerala for facilitating development of the industry in the State
-
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Submitted Received
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
Yes. -
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Vide order dated 25.04.2008, Govt. of Kerala has recommended to transfer the possession of land in the name of KINFRA
Document required.
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with):
Yes. Document required.
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted :
Yes Received
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost :
Yes. Received
Basis of elements of project Cost : Common Infrastructure facilities such as Compound wall & fencing, Internal roads & drains, Rain water harvesting, Water distribution, Power distribution, ETP etc. Along with Administrative and other service complex facilities.
-
Tangible Outcomes of the project The project will add employment to the state by more than 300 in terms of direct and more than 500 indirect openings. The units will generate export as well as domestic turnover, yielding tax revenues to the exchequer.
-
183
4. Proposed project cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
Particulars Proposed by IA
As per MSE-CDP /Recommended by SIDBI
Land filling/leveling including boundary wall and fencing:
102.16 100.00
Laying roads 133.79 200.00
Road Side Greenery & Social Forestry - 10.00
Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses
93.36 107.07
Water harvesting 50.00 10.00
Drainage 78.43 60.00
Power distribution, Street light arrangements, etc. 250.00 250.00
Administrative and Other Services Complex 298.72 133.53
Effluent Treatment Facilities 150.00 60.99
Contingencies & Pre operative expenses : 83.54 20.00
Other (Sanitary Convenience): 10.00 10.00
Total 1250.00 961.59
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed
by IA
As per MSE-CDP
/Recommended by SIDBI
1 GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 600.00 576.95*
2 State Government 650.00 673.05
Total 1250.00 1250.00
*60% of eligible project cost of Rs. 961.59 lakh.
Justification of the Proposal The proposed Spices Park is a well-conceived approach to have an integrated operation for cultivation, post harvesting, processing for value addition, packaging, storage and exports of spices and spice products by meeting the quality specifications. Currently the raw products are exported from Kerala in bulk and if the products are properly processed according to the international standards, it will give more value addition to the products having large scale demand all over the world.
--
184
6. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Land documents with clear title, signed by Competent Authority, complying with
zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc.
(ii) Compliance of terms & conditions as mentioned in SIDBI appraisal report.
(iii) State Government should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of
Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner. The additional cost,
if any, on this account shall be borne by the State Government.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of New Industrial
Estate (KINFRA Spice Park) at Idukki, Kerala at a total project cost of Rs. 1250.00 Lakh with
GoI assiatance of Rs. 576.95 Lakh and State Government contribution of Rs. 673.05 Lakh.
************
185
Agenda No.50.4.11: Proposal for Final approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre
(CFC) in Mishthan and Namkeen Manufacturing Cluster, Jabalpur,
Madhya Pradesh.
Background
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 47th
SCM held on
25.07.18 subject to submission of the following documents prior to final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 20.05.19, Principal Secretary, Department of MSME,
Government of Madhya Pradesh and vide email dated 06.06.19, MSME-DI,
Indore has submitted the documents and requested to consider the proposal for
final approval:
Documents required Status
(i) Registered land documents in the name
of SPV (If land is on lease basis,
registered lease deed for a minimum
period of 30 years is required).
Yet to be submitted by Government
of Madhya Pradesh / Implementing
Agency
(ii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
Received
(iii) Share holding pattern of SPV members.
Received
(iv) Commitment letter from State
Government / IA to meet the cost
escalation, if any, over and above the
approved project cost.
Received
(v) Certificate from State Government that
more than 50% units are
Micro/SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the
case may be.
Received
(vi) Commitment letter from SPV members
to utilize at least 60 percent of installed
capacity.
Received
(vii) Certificate from State Government for
compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.
Received
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Basic Information of Cluster
Name of Cluster Mishthan and Namkeen Manufacturing Cluster
District Jabalpur
Location of Cluster Jabalpur and adjacent blocks
Lok Sabha Constituency Jabalpur
Main Product Mishthan and Namkeen
No. of Enterprises including break
up (Micro, Small, Medium)
Micro 33
Small 1
Total 34+200 Units in organization sector
Turnover for the last five years
(Rs. in Crore)
Year Amount
2011-12 5.20
186
2012-13 5.40
2013-14 5.70
2014-15 6.00
2015-16 7.59
Exports for the last five years (Rs.
in Crore)
Nil
Employment in Cluster Direct: 181 & Indirect: 245
Technology Details The cluster units are using old and traditional technology for
processing.
Whether DS Conducted Yes, Diagnostic Study conducted by MSME Department of
GoMP and validated by the Cluster Members, DTIC
Jabalpur, and Representative from MSME-DI Indore,
Managing Director and Manager of M P Audyogik Kendra
Vikas Nigam (Jabalpur) Ltd.
Main findings of DSR The DSR recommends the necessary Hard Intervention for
the cluster.
Main Problems of Cluster Non-availability of proper storage facilities for highly
perishable raw material.
Non-availability of testing facilities for testing of quality
of ingredients and logistic support.
The technology in the cluster is age old and obsolete and
requires modernization.
Unclean and costly fuel of boilers
Other Information The cluster is 80 years old and about 200 cluster units of
unorganized sector are producing Sweets and Namkeen
traditionally in the Jabalpur region. The average turnover of
the cluster is Rs.35 crore. The cluster gives direct
employment to 1500 persons and indirect employment to
3000 persons.
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Justification for CFC Jabalpur Mishthan and Namkeen cluster are
spread throughout the Jabalpur district. The
units and their workshops are very old and
have been in the area for very long.
Therefore, the hard interventions needed for
this cluster is in form of Common Facility
Centre. The CFC will help the cluster
members to increase their production
capacity, quality and aesthetic packing. The
CFC can bring about total change in the
cluster.
--
(b.) Location of CFC The proposed CFC will be located in the
Industrial Area Richhai Phase-II, Jabalpur.
--
% age of units in radius of 100 --
187
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
5km
% age of units in radius of
10km
100 --
(c.) Land for CFC
i. Whether land acquired The Land for the CFC is located in Industrial
Area Richhai Phase-II, Jabalpur Registered lease
deed of land in the
name of SPV for a
minimum period of
30 years with its
valuation is
required.
ii. Title is in name of Jabalpur Mishthan and Namkeen Pvt. Ltd.
Jabalpur
iii. Valuation and its basis Rs 465.00 lakh. The land is a State
Government‟s contribution for the project
iv. Land is sufficient Yes
v. Change of land use The land is for Industrial use
vi. If on lease, duration of
lease
--
vii Whether lease is
legally tenable
--
(d.) Total Building area(sq
ft)
34,955 sq ft. --
(e.) Rate of construction of
building
Rs. 277.65 lakh consisting of development of
factory shed estimated at Rs. 215.58 lakh and
support infrastructure estimated at Rs. 62.07
lakh.
--
(f.) Main Facility Proposed Milk Processing,
Dry Fruit Processing,
Processing of Pulses and Spices
Blending,
Effluent Treatment Plant,
Raw Material Bank,
Testing Facility,
Cold Storage Unit,
Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration Plant.
--
(g.) Prod capacity of CFC Milk Processing Line 3000 Kg/day,
Processing of Pulses and Spices Blending
11.5 ton/day
--
(h.) Major
Outputs/Deliverables of
CFC, Projected
performance of the cluster
after proposed intervention
(in terms of production,
export/domestic sales and
direct/indirect employment
etc.)
Annual growth rate of the cluster is expected
to increase from 5% to at least 10% and
increase in cluster output by 25-30% in next 3
years and by implementation (to Rs. 100 cr.)
Particulars Existing Expected
No. of units 34 units About 200
units
Employment 181 directly
& 245
1500 directly
and 3000
--
188
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
indirectly indirectly
Output 800 MT
average per
annum
1800 MT
average per
annum
Export Nil Cluster will
be able to
export with
a common
brand
(i.) Pollution clearance
required or not
No --
(j.) Man Power in CFC Total manpower required for the cluster CFC
is around 50-55 people, including 1 Director
(President, 4 Management Staff, 5 Support
Staff, 3 Supervisors, 2 Engineers, 10 Skilled
Workers and 30 Unskilled Workers to operate
the CFC.
--
(k.) Revenue generation
mechanism for
sustainability of
assets(service/user charges
to be levied, any other-to be
specified)
The total income estimated for first year as
per current demand in this cluster is Rs.
783.68 lakh.
--
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Name and Address Jabalpur Mishthan and Namkeen Private Limited, 1092, Napier Town, Near Shastri Bridge, Jabalpur (M.P.)
Certificate of incorporation received.
(b.) Nature of SPV (Company or Society or Trust)
Registered as Private Limited under Section 7 of Companies Act 2013
(c.) Name of the State Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
Article of Association of the SPV mentioned vide Clause No. 07 (under the Head Members and Utilisation of Facilities) that One member of Cluster Development Executive Cluster Development Agent (CDE_CDA), one member of State Govt official and one Member of Mishthan Vikreta Sangh, Jabalpur will be member in the company
--
(d.) Date of formation of SPV
28th
day of July 2015 --
(e.) Number of Members 24 members --
(f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted
Submitted Received.
(g.) Authorized Share Capital
Rs 5,00,000 (will be increase by more than 10% of project cost as new members joined or/and share allotment to existing members in due course of time)
--
189
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(h.) Paid up capital as on............
Rs. 3,60,000/- --
(i.) Shareholding Pattern Equity Share of Rs. 10 each. No member of the company will hold more than 10% (or equivalent capital) in the equity capital of the company
Received.
(j.) Commitment letter for contribution
Submitted Received.
(k.) SPV specific A/c SPV opened Specific Bank account in the name of M/s Jabalpur Mishthan and Namkeen Pvt Ltd bearing SB Account No: 5086201000068 in Canara Bank Branch (005086), Medical College Road, Jabalpur (M P). Ph No. 0761-2423105, Email: [email protected] IFSC: CNRB0005086
--
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation
SPV promoted by Mishthan Vikreta Sangh, Jabalpur. The Mishthan Vikreta Sangh registered on 11th Feb 1980, and doing various activities of trust building since its registration.
--
(m.) Technical Institution Central Food Technological Research Institute Mysore (CFTRI)
--
(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
CFC will be setup under MSE-CDP may be utilized by the members of the company and also other in the Mishthan, Namkeen and other Food cluster of Jabalpur region on chargeable basis. The members of the company will utilize at least 60% (sixty Percent) of installed capacity of CFC.
Received.
(o.)
(a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
Commercial 500 KVA --
(b) Water 13000 Litres/day --
(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities 250 litres of diesel per day. --
4. Implement Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency Madhya Pradesh Industrial Development
Corporation (MPIDC) Limited, Jabalpur
As per guidelines
(b.) Fund receiving Agency
(c.) Implementation Period 24 months As per guidelines
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and
main Recommendations
Submitted Received.
(e.) Comments of Technical
Division
Submitted Received.
(f.) Approval of Technical
Committee
Submitted Recommended by
Technical
Committee.
190
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(g.) Comments of Cluster
Development Division:
-- --
(h.) Working capital(In-
principle sanction of loan
from a bank, if applicable
arrangement made)
Bank letter for working capital obtained and
enclosed
Letter received.
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA)
Remarks
(a.) BEP Average BEP for projected 10 years
60.00% Cash BEP 52.20%
--
(b.) IRR, Payback period Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 26.81%
Payback period 5.74 year
--
(c.) DSCR Not Applicable --
(d.) Return on Capital
employed (ROCE)
28.52% --
(e.) NPV 537.52 --
(f.) DER Not Applicable --
(g.) Sensitivity Analysis IRR is above 15% and makes the project
sustainable
--
(h.) Status of CFCs approved
in the State
Plastic Packaging Cluster, Ujjain - under
implementation
--
6. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
Revised cost as per SIDBI / As per MSE-CDP
(i) Land 41.85 465.00
(ii) Land Development 26.25
(iii) Building and other civil construction 277.65 277.65
(iv) Plant & Machinery (including electrification) 978.69 978.69
(v) Misc. fixed assets 18.43 18.43
(vi) Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 14.33 14.33
(vii) Contingency (2% on building & 5% on P&M) 49.85 65.04
(viii) Margin money for working capital 33.45 27.28
1414.25 1872.67
191
7. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S.
No.
Particulars Proposed by
IA
As per SIDBI /
MSE-CDP
(i) GoI grant under MSE-CDP 1156.82 1050.00*
(ii) State Government‟s Grant 15.60 465.00
(iii) SPV‟s contribution 241.83 357.67
Total 1414.25 1872.67
* 70% of eligible project cost i.e. Rs. 1500.00 lakh
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No.
Description No. Power Requirement
(HP/KW)
Cost
1. Cost of Line 1 - Milk Processing Line & Dry Fruits Paste Line
1 365/272.18 703.95
2. Cost of Line 2 - Pulses Processing Line 1 46/34.30 16.37
3. Cost of Line 3 - Spice Processing Line 1 95/70.84 46.83
4. Cost of Line 4 - Turmeric Processing Line 1 71/52.94 21.04
5. Cost of Line 5 - Chilly Processing Line 1 80/59.66 35.89
6. Utilities required including for the lines A. Electrical - Transformer, LT Panel, DG set, cabling etc.
1 --
44.50
B. Other Essential Units- CCTV, CIP, Refrigerated Van, Milk Tanker, Raw and Finished goods Storage Equipment, etc
1 -- 95.11
7. Installation and Erection 1 -- 10.00
8. Packing & Forwarding, Freight and Transit Insurance
1 -- 5.00
Total 978.69
9. Observations:
(A) Following documents are required to be submitted prior to issue of final approval:
(i) Registered land lease deed in the name of SPV for a minimum period of 30
years.
(B) The location of the CFC has been changed from village Pipariya (Pariyat) Patwari Halka
No. 63 (Urdua Khurd) RIC Maharajpur Tehsil Panager District Jabalpur to Industrial
Area Richhai Phase-II, Jabalpur and the cost of land has also been enhanced from
Rs.41.85 lakh to Rs.465.00 lakh with land development cost of Rs.26.25 lakh over and
above the land cost. Government of Madhya Pradesh is providing the land to SPV
towards their contribution.
(C) As recommended by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC), a clause would be
added in the Sanction Order “In case of any deviation from the agreed principles of
utilization and denial of fair access to the eligible stakeholders, assets created would be
handed over to another SPV through a transparent procedure for smooth and effective
operationalization of the facilities”.
192
(D) SPV/ IA needs to organized a workshop for creating awareness among the 200 units
functioning in unorganized sector in order to make them avail the facilities of CFC.
(E) Efforts should be made by SPV to bring those 200 units to organized sector by registering
them with Udyog Aadhar Memorandum (UAM) in cordinaiton with MSME-DI, Indore.
10. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of CFC in Mishthan and
Namkeen Manufacturing Cluster, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh at a total project cost of Rs.1872.67
lakh, with GoI assistance of Rs.1050.00 lakh, Government of Madhya Pradesh contribution of
Rs.465.00 lakh and SPV contribution of Rs. 357.67 lakh.
******
193
Agenda No. 50.4.12: Proposal for final approval for setting up Common Facility Centre
(CFC) in Engineering Cluster, Jalgaon, Maharashtra.
Background:
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 43rd
SCM held on 09.03.17,
subject to submission of following documents prior to Final approval.
(a) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(b) Undertaking from State Government that more than 50% units are micro in cluster.
(ii) Vide letter dated 05.03.19; Government of Maharashtra submitted the above documents
and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Basic Information of Cluster
Name of Cluster : Engineering Cluster
District : Jalgaon
Location of Cluster : Jalgaon
Lok Sabha Constituency : Jalgaon-Raver
Main Product : Auto parts, Dies and Moulds, Fabrication and Job Work
No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium) :
Micro 100 Small 30 Total 130
Turnover for the last five years :
Year Amount (Rs in Crore) 2011-2012 360.00 2012-2013 380.00 2013-2014 420.00 2014-2015 440.00 2015-2016 480.00
Exports for the last five years :
Year Amount (Rs in Crore) 2011-2012 10.80 2012-2013 15.00 2013-2014 18.00 2014-2015 22.00 2015-2016 25.00
Employment in Cluster : 4500 Persons (Direct : 1500 & Indirect : 3000) (Includes 300 Women & 80:SC/ST Persons)
Technology Details : Traditional Machinery
Whether DSR Conducted : Yes
Main findings of DSR : The diagnostic study recommended the establishment of a common facility centre.
Main Problems of Cluster : (i) Low Quality Product (ii) No testing & Calibration Facility (iii) High product cost (iv) Lack of advance Technology
194
Other Information : Need of Technology Up-gradation for product processing activities
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Justification for CFC To have following facilities like Modern Technology, Tool Room, Testing & Calibration Lab, Quality Lab to improve the final product
-
(b.) Location of CFC Engineering Cluster, Jalgaon. -
% age of units in radius of 5km
20 -
% age of units in radius of 10km
75 -
(c.) Land for CFC
i. Whether land acquired
Conformation letter received from MIDC Mumbai Received
ii. Title is in name of Shree Sai Engineering Cluster, Jalgaon -
iii. Valuation and its basis
Land on lease basis at the cost of Rs.55.00 Lakh. -
iv. Land is sufficient Yes. -
v. Change of land use NA -
vi. If on lease, duration of lease
99 -
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
Yes -
(d.) Total Building Area 18000 sq. ft. -
(e.) Rate of construction of building
Rs.952.29 / Sq.ft. Building cost : Rs. 171.41 Lakh
-
(f.) Main Facility Proposed
Advance Technology Machines Testing & Calibration Lab Design Centre Tool Room Training Centre
-
(g.) Prod capacity of CFC - -
(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (production, employment, etc.)
Parameters Before CFC After CFC Employment (in Nos)
Direct: 1500 Indirect: 3000
Direct: 1900 Indirect: 3800
Profit (Rs in Cr)
36.00 40.00
Turnover (Rs in Cr)
360.00 450.00
Received
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
- Required
(j.) Man Power in CFC 22 Nos. -
195
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets (service/ user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
- -
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Name and Address Shree Sai Engineering Cluster Jalgaon, C/o M/S. Dwarka Industries E-27/2, MIDC Area Jalgaon Maharashtra. 425003
-
(b.) Nature of SPV (company or Society or Trust)
Private Limited Company under section 25, of the Companies Act, 1956.
-
(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
Yet to be nominated. Required
(d.) Date of formation of SPV
11.02.2012. -
(e.) Number of Members 35 Members. -
(f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted
Yes. -
(g.) Authorized Share Capital
Rs. 5.00 Lakh -
(h.) Paid up capital Rs. 3.00 Lakh -
(i.) Shareholding Pattern - Received
(j.) Commitment letter for contribution
- Received
(k.) SPV specific A/c Account No: 32214263370 (SBI) -
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation
Awareness Camps, Visits etc conducted -
(m.) Technical Institution 1. Government Polytechnic, Jalgaon. 2. College of Engineering, Jalgaon 3. Bhagirathi ITI, Jalgaon
-
(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
- Required
196
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(o.)
(a) Power requirement for commercial/ domestic purpose
143.99 KW. -
(b) Water 400 Cubic Mtrs. per month. -
(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities
- -
4. Implement Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency
CEO, MIDC, Mumbai, Govt. of Maharashtra As per guidelines.
(b.) Fund receiving Agency
CEO, MIDC, Mumbai, Govt. of Maharashtra -do-
(c.) Implementation Period
12 Months. 24 months from the date of issue of final approval.
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
DPR appraised by SLSC meeting held in Mumbai on 13.02.15 under chairmanship of Development Commissioner (Industries), Govt. of Maharashtra
Received
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
- -
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee
- Recommended the Proposal
(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank ,if applicable arrangement made)
-
-
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) BEP 9.32 % -
(b.) IRR, Payback period 13% -
(c.) DSCR 9.65 -
(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
32.54% -
(e.) NPV Rs.305.25 Lakh -
(f.) DER - -
(g.) Sensitivity Analysis S. No. Particulars Estimate
1 BEP 9.32%
2 ROC 32.54%
3 NPV Rs.305.25 Lakh
6 IRR 13%
-
197
6. Proposed Project Cost is as follow:-
(Rs. in Lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
Recommended by SIDBI
As per MSE-CDP
1 Land and its Development 58.43 65.90 65.90
2 Building and other Civil Constructions 171.41 171.41 171.41
3 Plant & Machinery(including electrification)
1343.94 1264.80 1264.80
4 Misc. fixed assets 74.00 129.75 129.75
5 Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses, maximum 2% of project cost
58.75 23.30 23.30
6 Contingency (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery)
0.00 31.32 31.32
7 Margin money for Working Capital 1.96 23.52 23.52
Total Project Cost 1708.49 1710.00 1710.00
7. Proposed Means of Finance are as follows:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed
by IA
Recommende
d by SIDBI
As per
MSE-CDP
1. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 1350.00 1350.00 1350.00
2. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Maharashtra 0.00 189.00 189.00
3. SPV contribution 170.85 171.00 171.00
4. Bank loan 187.64 -- --
Total 1708.49 1710.00 1710.00
8. Plant and machinery
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars of Plant and Machinery No. Cost
1. CNC Lathe 1 54.93
2. CNC Turret Punching 1 217.62
3. VMC 1 65.65
4. Hydraullic Shearing Machine 1 17.51
5. Press Brake NC 1 24.06
6. Surface Grinder Hydraulic 1 25.40
7. Cylindrical Grinder 1 31.29
8. Radial Drilling Machine 1 11.04
9. Spark Errosion 1 28.34
10. EDM Wire Cutting Machine 1 161.20
11. WATERJET 1 55.43
12. Profile Projector 1 9.89
13. CNC Tool & Cutter 1 189.20
14. Tooling & jigs fixtures , Grinding wheel etc 1 33.75
15. Heat Treatment Hardening Furnace 1 20.22
198
S. No. Particulars of Plant and Machinery No. Cost
16. Metrology Lab- Coordinate Measuring M/c 1 35.01
17. Measuring inst. & gauges 1 5.63
18. Chemical and Physical Lab- Rockwell Hardness Tester 1 1.96
19. Vicker Hardness Tester 1 5.79
20. Brinell Hardness tester 1 4.63
21. Lab Apparatus Analytical Balance & Samples preparation equipments
1 7.50
22. Surface Roughness Tester 1 20.85
23. Flaw Detector 1 3.57
24. Inverted Microscope 1 4.05
25. Optical Emption Spectrometer 1 74.96
26. FLEX MILL 1 17.72
27. Electrical Test Lab- Vibration System 1 55.80
28. Programmable Climatic Environmental Chamber 1 21.83
29. Training Centre- CNC Demo Machine 1 15.43
30. DG set 1 10.71
31. Compressor 1 15.00
32. Transformer 1 8.00
33. Overhead Crane 1 25.00
34. Stacker 1 1.00
35. Computers with Software (CAD/CAM) 1 15.00
Total 1294.94
9. Observations:
(A) Following documents are required to be submitted prior to issue of final approval:
(i) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.
(ii) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the cost escalation, if any,
over and above the approved project cost.
(iii) Documentary proof from SPV for utilization of CFC facilities by at least 51% of the
cluster members.
(iv) Compliance of terms & conditions as mentioned in SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(v) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.
(vi) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilize at least 60% of installed capacity.
(vii) Major Outputs / Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster units after
proposed intervention (in terms of production, exports / domestic sales and direct /
indirect employment, etc.).
(B) As recommended by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC), a clause would be
added in the Sanction Order “In case of any deviation from the agreed principles of
utilization and denial of fair access to the eligible stakeholders, assets created would be
handed over to another SPV through a transparent procedure for smooth and effective
operationalization of the facilities”.
199
10. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting of Common Facility Centre
(CFC) in Engineering Cluster, Jalgaon, Maharashtra at a total project cost of Rs.1710.00 lakh
with Gol assistance of Rs. 1350.00 lakh, State Govt. contribution of Rs. 189.00 lakh and SPV
contribution of Rs.171.00 lakh.
***********
200
Agenda No. 50.4.13: Proposal for final approval for setting up Common Facility Centre
(CFC) in Plastic Cluster, Nipani (Bhalgaon), Aurangabad,
Maharashtra.
Background:
Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 44th
SCM held on 05.09.17,
subject to submission of following documents prior to Final approval.
(i) Registered Land document in English version.
(ii) NOC from Pollution Control Board.
(iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(iv) Major Outputs / Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster units
after proposed intervention (in terms of production, exports / domestic sales and
direct / indirect employment, etc.)
(v) Commitment letter from Bank to sanction loan
(vi) Commitment from State Government regarding contribution of their share (at
least 10% of Project cost).
(vii) Undertaking from State Government / SPV that they will not sell the produced
yarn in the open market
(viii) Undertaking from SPV that CFC will not manufacture woven sacks.
(ix) Requirement of yarn from Cluster units by SPV
(x) Undertaking from State Government that CFC will not hamper business of local
MSMEs engaged in manufacturing of Yarn / Woven Sacks.
Vide letter dated 12.02.19, Government of Maharashtra, Mumbai has submitted the
following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval:
(i) Notarized Land document in English version (However Registered land
Document in Marathi Language Received)
(ii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(iii) Commitment letter from Bank to sanction loan
(iv) Commitment from State Government regarding contribution of their share (at
least 10% of Project cost).
(v) Undertaking from State Government / SPV that they will not sell the produced
yarn in the open market
(vi) Undertaking from SPV that CFC will not manufacture woven sacks.
(vii) Requirement of yarn from Cluster units by SPV
(viii) Undertaking from State Government that CFC will not hamper business of local
MSMEs engaged in manufacturing of Yarn / Woven Sacks.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Basic Information of Cluster
Name of Cluster : Ex-servicemen Plastic Cluster Foundation
District : Aurangabad
Location of Cluster : Nipani (Bhalgaon)
Lok Sabha Constituency : Aurangabad
201
Main Product :
(i) Plastic coated & Printed Fabrics (ii) Plastic Coated paper Dishes (iii)Plastic Mats & carpets (iv) Plastic Printed Films & Bags (v) Plastic woven laminated & Printed Products
No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium) :
Micro 115 Small 30
Medium 15 Total 160
Turnover for the last five years :
Year Amount (Rs. in crore)
2011-12 60.00 2012-13 62.50 2013-14 64.00 2014-15 66.50 2015-16 71.82
Exports for the last five years :
Year
Amount (Rs. in crore)
2011-12 - 2012-13 - 2013-14 2.50 2014-15 3.00 2015-16 3.50
Employment in Cluster : 1500 Persons
Technology Details : (i) Tape/Yarn/Thread extrusion Machine (ii) Lamination/coating Machine (iii) Printing Machine
Whether DS Conducted : Yes
Main findings of DSR : The diagnostic study recommended the establishment of a common facility centre
Main Problems of Cluster : No advance Technology
Other Information : Need of Technology Up-gradation for product processing activities
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA)
Remarks
(a.) Justification for CFC To have advance technology & raw
material bank
-
(b.) Location of CFC Gut no: 111, Village Nipani Tal & dist :
Aurangabad.
-
% age of units in radius of 5km 5 -
% age of units in radius of
10km
5 -
(c.) Land for CFC
i. Whether land acquired Yes -
ii. Title is in name of Ex-servicemen Plastic Cluster Received
202
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA)
Remarks
Foundation (Registered Land
document in
Marathi
Language),
However notarized
copy of English
Version Provided
iii. Valuation and its basis Land Acquired at the cost of
Rs. 57,37,500/- -
iv. Land is sufficient Yes -
v. Change of land use NA -
vi. If on lease, duration of lease NA -
vii Whether lease is legally
tenable
NA -
(d.) Total Building area 10097 sq ft -
(e.) Rate of construction of
building
Rs.1002/ sqft -
(f.) Main Facility Proposed (i) R&D Centre
Advance Machinery
(ii) Raw Material Bank
(iii) Training centre.
-
(g.) Prod capacity of CFC (i) Extrusion line: 350 kgs/hr
(ii) Plastic Coating :250 kgs/hr
(iii) Printing : 6000 mtr/hr.
-
(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables
of CFC, Projected performance of
the cluster after proposed
intervention (in terms of
production, export/ domestic sales
and direct /indirect employment,
etc.)
- Required
(i.) Pollution clearance required or
not
- Required
(j.) Man Power in CFC 28 Nos -
(k.) Revenue generation
mechanism for sustainability of
assets (service/user charges to be
levied, any other-to be specified)
(i) 1st year : Rs. 0.9cr
(ii) 2nd yr : Rs. 1.23cr
(iii) 3rd yr: Rs. 1.55cr
(iv) 4th yr : Rs.1.85
(v) 5th yr : Rs. 2.12cr
(vi) 6th yr: Rs.2.44cr
(vii) 7th yr: Rs.2.51cr
(viii) 8th yr : Rs.2.57
(ix) 9th yr : Rs.2.62
-
203
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA)
Remarks
(x) 10th year: Rs.2.67cr.
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Name and Address Ex-Servicemen Plastic Cluster Foundation, Gut No. 111, village: Nipani, Tal. and Dist. Aurangabad.
-
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)
Company registered under section 25 of the Companies Act 1956.
-
(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
Govt. of Maharashtra and Director of MSME, Mumbai
-
(d.) Date of formation of SPV 25.09.13 -
(e.) Number of Members 31 Members -
(f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted
Yes -
(g.) Authorized Share Capital Rs. 1 cr -
(h.) Paid up capital Rs. 31 lacs -
(i.) Shareholding Pattern Rs. 31 lacs -
(j.)Commitment letter for contribution
Yes Received
(k.) SPV specific A/c Account No: 33849438467 (SBI) -
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation
- -
(m.) Technical Institution Central Institute of Plastics Engineering and Technology. Aurangabad. (CIPET)
-
(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
Yes Received
(o.)
(a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
600 KW -
(b) Water 50 cubic ltr / day -
(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities - -
4. Implement Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency Development Commissioner of Industries, Govt. of Maharashtra
-
(b.) Fund receiving Agency CEO, MIDC, Mumbai, Govt. of -
204
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
Maharashtra
(c.) Implementation Period 18 months 24 Months
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
DPR Appraised by SLSC meeting held in Mumbai on 25.05.16 under chairmanship of DC industries, Govt. of Maharashtra.
Received.
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
-- -
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee
- Recommend the Proposal
(g.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)
Commitment Letter from Bank of Maharashtra, Aurangabad Provided
Received
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) BEP 23.4% -
(b.) IRR, Payback period Before Tax: 18.41% After Tax: 14.63%
-
(c.) DSCR 1st yr: 11.32 Lakh 2nd yr: 12.92 Lakh 3rd yr: 14.94 Lakh 4th yr: 33.99 Lakh
-
(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
30.53% -
(e.) NPV Positive , Rs 1725.71 lakh Post Tax -
(f.) DER - -
(g.) Sensitivity Analysis S. No.
Particulars Estimate
1 Break Even Point
23.40%
2 Return on Capital Employed
30.53%
3 Net Present Value
Positive , Rs 1725.71 lakh Post Tax
4 Payback period
Payback period of the project 7 years
5 DSCR NA
6 IRR Before Tax: 18.41% After Tax: 14.63%
-
205
6. Proposed Project Cost is as follow:
(Rs. in Lakh)
S.
No.
Particulars Proposed
by IA
As per SIDBI/
MSE-CDP
1. Land and its Development 30.00 30.00
2. Building and other Civil Constructions 70.00 70.00
3. Plant & Machinery(including electrification) 923.01 923.01
4. Misc. fixed assets 89.47 92.35
5. Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses, maximum 2% of
project cost
26.94 24.10
6. Contingency (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery) 47.55 47.55
7. Margin money for Working Capital 59.61 18.29
Total Project Cost 1246.58 1205.30
7. Proposed Means of Finance are as follows:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed
by IA
As per SIDBI/
MSE-CDP
1. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 1050.00 964.24
2. Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Maharashtra 0.00 120.53
3 SPV contribution 118.95 120.53
4. Bank Loan/others 77.63 0.00
Total 1246.58 1205.30
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
(Rs. in lakh)
Sr. No. Particulars of Plant and
Machinery
No. Power Requirement
(HP/KW)
Cost
1 Tape Extrusion Line Lorex 1 230 400.77
2 Extrusion Coating Match 1 373 307.68
3 Rotogravure Printing M 1 121 214.56
Total 923.01
9. Observations:
(A) Following documents are required to be submitted prior to issue of final approval:
(i) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.
(ii) Revised share holding pattern in respect of the members whose shareholding is
more than 10%.
(iii) Certificate stating that more than 50% units in the cluster are micro / women
owned / SC-ST owned as the case may be.
(iv) Documentary proof from SPV for utilization of CFC facilities by at least 51% of
the cluster members.
206
(v) Compliance of terms & conditions as mentioned in SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(vi) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.
(vii) Major Outputs / Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster units
after proposed intervention (in terms of production, exports / domestic sales and
direct / indirect employment, etc.).
(B) As recommended by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC), a clause would be
added in the Sanction Order “In case of any deviation from the agreed principles of
utilization and denial of fair access to the eligible stakeholders, assets created would be
handed over to another SPV through a transparent procedure for smooth and effective
operationalization of the facilities”.
10. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting of Common Facility Centre
(CFC) in Plastic Cluster, Nipani (Bhalgaon), Aurangabad, Maharashtra at a total project cost of
Rs.1205.30 lakh with Gol assistance of Rs. 964.24 lakh, State Govt. contribution of Rs. 120.53
lakh and SPV contribution of Rs.120.53 lakh.
***********
207
Agenda No.50.4.14: Proposal for Final approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre
(CFC) in Spice & Food Processing Cluster, Churachandpur,
Manipur. Background:
Proposal was discussed during 47th
Steering Committee Meeting held on 25.07.18 and
the Committee accorded In-principle approval subject to submission of the following
documents prior to Final approval:
Vide letter dated 23.02.19, IIE, Guwahati and MSME-DI, Imphal has submitted the
documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval:
S. No. Documents required Status
(A)
(i)
SIDBI appraisal report.
Vide letter dated 27.02.19, IIE,
Guwahati has forwarded the
SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(ii) List of SPV members with unit address &
other details and shareholding pattern.
Awaited.
(iii) Commitment letter from SPV regarding their
contribution.
Received.
(iv) Commitment letter from State Government /
SPV to meet the cost escalation, if any, over
and above the approved project cost.
Received.
(v) Commitment letter from SPV members to
utilize at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
Received.
(vi) NOC from PCB. Received.
(vii) Certificate from State Government regarding
compliance of GFR / CVC guidelines.
Received.
(viii) Certificate regarding composition of cluster
units (more than 50% of ST or SC units)
Received.
(ix) Letter from Government of Manipur
nominating lIE, Guwahati as Implementing
Agency & Fund Receiving Agency.
Received.
(x) Registration of SPV members in MSME
databank.
Received.
(B)
(i)
Details of machinery for Masala Tea, Potato
& Banana chip making along with
specifications to be provided in the DPR.
Received.
(ii) Details of Laboratory & Packaging
Equipment along with specifications to be
provided in the DPR.
Received.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Basic Information of Cluster
Name of Cluster : Spice & Food Processing Cluster
District : Churachandpur
Location of Cluster : Churachandpur town and surrounding.
Lok Sabha Constituency : Outer Manipur(ST)
Main Product : Spices :- Ginger, Turmeric, Cinamom, Ushinga (pepper),
208
Aijungam, Wild cardamom, Tejpata, Nathakga, Bird Eye Chill, King Chilli, Chengpilmalcha (Chili). Fruits and others:- Pine apple, Banana, Bamboo shoots, Casava, Orange, Lemon, Sweet Potato, Passion Fruit, Amla, Black Rice, Sticky Rice, Tree Bean. Various spice powder and paste, Juice, Sauce etc.
No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium) :
Micro - 50 Small - 0 Medium - 0 All the cluster units belongs to ST community.
Turnover(Rs in Crore) for the last five years :
Year Amount 2012-13 2.11 2013-14 2.19 2014-15 2.28 2015-16 2.38 2016-17 2.50
Exports(Rs in Crore) for the last five years :
Nil
Employment in Cluster : 900 nos. (Direct & Indirect)
Technology Details : The CFC would be using the latest and established technology in the CFC. The CFC would be setting up automatic / semi – automatic spice processing line and food processing line.
Whether DS Conducted : Yes conducted by IIE, Guwahati
Main findings of DSR : The unit owners of the cluster depends for raw materials on agriculture yield as well as yields from surrounding areas.
Success spice and food processing industries. Particularly involves in highly competitive prices. Depends mainly on the cost of inputs like raw materials
and consumables. Availability of local raw materials provides a genuine
edge. The primary stakeholders of the cluster arrange the
manufacturing implements mostly manual from Imphal, Guwahati etc.
The unit owners are partially aware of technology behind modern food processing/manufacturing.
Lacks Quality Assurance and packaging technology.
Main Problems of Cluster : Exploitation by middleman. Traditional methods. No proper storage. No proper machines. No facility for export. No quality control. Lack of capital etc.
Other Information : Location disadvantages, Transportation bottleneck high cost of materials like packaging, other like chemicals, preservatives etc.
Non-availability of sugar at low cost for food processing industries.
Lack of processing infrastructure including cold storage, pre cooling chamber, refrigerated vans etc.
No separate policy for food processing industries. Shortage of technical man power. High competitiveness in the market. Lack of marketing agency.
209
2. Information about proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Comments by Cluster Division
(a.) Justification for CFC
The spice and food processing units of cluster are mostly tiny in size of operation and found to be lacking in awareness about modern process/implements and quality control standards.
The requirement for implementing standard quality level are hardly affordable for these unit owners.
Most important need of the hour is setting up of Common Facility Center comprising of process implements and quality assurance instruments.
The services can be availed by primary stakeholders against suitably fixed conversion charges
The tiny local units can never afford heavy machinery at their own.
-
(b.) Location of CFC The CFC is proposed to be set up in TN Vaison village, Tuibong, Churachandpur District, Manipur – 795182.
-
% age of units in radius of 5km
70
% age of units in radius of 10km
30
(c.) Land for CFC
i. Wheather land acquired
Yes.
ii. Title is in name of Land is in the name of Natural Agrotech Research and Processing Service (NARPS) –SPV.
-
iii. Valuation and its basis
Rs. 50,000/-
iv. Land is sufficient Yes
v. Change of land use SPV -
vi. If on lease, duration of lease
- -
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
- -
(d.) Total Building area(sq ft)
6000 sq. ft. -
(e.) Rate of construction of building
PWD rate of Government of Manipur -
(f.) Main Facility Proposed
Washing / Cleaning / Drying Facility. Peeling/ Slicing Facility. Paste / Powder Making Facility. Sauce / Ketchup / Juice / pulp / jam/ jelly making
facility. Quality Control Facility. Storage Facility. Modern Packaging Facility. Training Facility to make the local educationally
backward stakeholders aware of current developments in technology and future developments.
210
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Comments by Cluster Division
(g.) Prod capacity of CFC
Enclosed
(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)
Sl. No.
Parameters Before intervention
After Intervention
1 Total no. of units 50 80-100 2 Turnover (crore) 2.50 3.50 3. Exports No direct export. Expected 0.50
crore. 4. Investment (crore) 0.50 1.00 5. Profitability (%) 15-20 Expected 20-25 6. Employment generation Around 900 Expected 1450-
1500
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
Yes, A moderate size affluent treatment plant has been considered as support service
Received.
(j.) Man Power in CFC Approximately 47 to 50
(k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets (service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
1st year at Rs. 4 crore,2nd year at Rs. 4.5 crore,
3rd year at Rs.5.11 Crore 4th year at Rs. 5.87 Crore and 5th year at Rs.6.85 Crore. etc
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Comments by Cluster Division
(a.) Name and Address Natural Agrotech Research & Processing Service (NARPS) L. Molvom Village, P.O. Churachandpur, Churachandpur District, Manipur-795128
-
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)
Registered under societies Registration Act 1860.
-
(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
Yes -
(d.) Date of formation of SPV
26.07.1995 -
(e.) Number of Members
20 nos. As per DPR there are 20 members units in the SPV.
(f.) Bye Laws or MoA and AoA submitted
Bye-laws of the Society have been submitted. -
(g.) Authorized Share Capital
Rs. 21800.00 -
(h.) Paid up capital Rs. 1,00,000.00 -
(i.) Shareholding Pattern
Shareholding for 20 members provided. -
(j.) Commitment letter for contribution
- Received.
(k.) SPV specific A/c State Bank of India A/c No.- 37812330829
-
211
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Comments by Cluster Division
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation
The trust building activities have already been proposed under soft interventions. The SPV has undertaken various training programmes under soft interventions such as two days training on sustainable farming on food and spices, tend days training on plantation of food and spices, one day training on capacity building.
-
(m.) Technical Institution
IIE Guwahati, CARI Imphal, MSME-DI, Imphal and other institute
-
(n.) CFC may be utilized by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilize at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
Submitted. Received.
(o.)
(a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
200 KW -
(b) Water Bore well water -
(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities
- -
4. Implement Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Comments by Cluster Division
(a.) Implementing Agency Indian Institute of Entrepreneurship, Guwahati As per MSE-CDP guidelines. (b.) Fund receiving
Agency Indian Institute of Entrepreneurship, Guwahati
(c.) Implementation Period
12 Months 24 Months from date of final approval.
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
As per SIDBI appraisal report the project is technically feasible and financially viable. The proposed performance indicators and financial position are satisfactory.
Received.
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
Technical Committee in its meeting held on 13.07.18 recommended the proposal for in-principle approval of Steering Committee subject to following: (i) Details of machinery for Masala Tea, Potato & Banana chip
making along with specifications to be provided in the DPR. (ii) Details of Laboratory & Packaging Equipment along with
specifications to be provided in the DPR.
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee
(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:
Recommended for final approval under MSE-CDP.
(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)
NA -
212
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Comments by Cluster Division
(a.) BEP 38.78% As per MSE-CDP guidelines.
(b.) IRR, Payback period Before tax - 18.98% After tax – 14.06%
-
(c.) DSCR not applicable
(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
26% in optimum year 2025. 25% is desirable.
(e.) NPV 141.89 (after tax) -
(f.) DER NA -
(g.) Sensitivity Analysis Sensitivity analysis at 5%. Case BEP ROCE IRR
(Post tax)
NPV (Post tax)
Base Case 38.78% 26.00% 14.06% 14.89 5% decreasing sales & job income by
41.30% 22.48% 12.43% 83.63
5% increasing raw material cost by
38.78% 26.00% 14.06% 141.89
5% fall in capacity utilisation
38.67% 22.05% 12.10% 72.02
(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State
Approved CFC Nil. -
6. Project cost:
(Rs. in Lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed
by IA
Recommended
by SIDBI
As per
MSE-CDP
(i) Land and its Development 30.00 30.00 30.00
(ii) Building and other Civil Constructions 75.00 75.00 75.00
(iii) Plant & Machinery(cost of plant &
machinery, 10% installation, electrification
and commissioning)
499.29 499.29 499.29
(iv) Misc. fixed assets 12.00 12.00 12.00*
(v) Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses,
maximum 2% of project cost
14.00 14.00 14.00
(vi) Contingency (2% building and 5% on plant
and machinery)
26.46 26.46 26.46
(vii) Margin money for Working Capital 9.33 0.00 0.00
Total Project Cost 666.08 656.75 656.75
213
7. Means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed
by IA
Revised cost
proposed by IA
Recommende
d by SIDBI
As per MSE-
CDP
(i) Grant-in-aid from
Govt. of India
561.00 561.08 551.75 551.75
(ii) Grant-in-aid from
Govt. of Manipur
0.00 33.31 0.00 33.31
(iii) SPV contribution 105.00 71.69 105.00 71.69
Total 666.08 666.08 656.75 656.75
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Description No. Amount (as per SIDBI)
A Spice Processing Facility
1. Hopper of 200 liters volume fitted with vibratory motor. 1 4.24
2. Bucket elevator for feeding the whole chilly into the chilly cleaning system
1 5.24
3. Chilly drum cleaner consisting of triple deck screen with suitable screens, mounting structures & standards accessories.
1 8.22
4. Chilly De-stoning system consisting of cascading hopper, valve & closed type dust collection unit pneumatic conveying system, rotary air lock
1 9.72
5. Screw conveyor model MSC-150 with Std. accessories. 1 4.44
6. Air cleaner with pre and post aspirator system. 1 7.72
7. Pressure Type De-Stoner model MDT1 1 6.84
8. Chopper Model MCH – 16 with mounting structure & std accessories.
1 4.96
9. 96 Tray Dryer with 96 nos of stainless steel trays standard 1 9.20
10. Set of spare trolleys along with set of 96 trays 1 5.24
11. Hopper of 300 liters volume fitted with vibratory 1 4.24
12. "Z" type bucket elevator for feeding the spices into the spice mill. 1 5.24
13. Spice Mill Model MC – 1512 with std. accessories 2 39.44
14 Pneumatic conveying system Model PCS-150 with standard accessories.
2
15 Rotary Air Lock Valve Model RALV – 200 2
16 Closed Type Dust Collector with Reverse Pulse jet arrangement & inbuilt Blower unit, mounting structure.
2
17 Screw conveyor Model MSE-150 with std. accessories. 1
18. Screw conveyor model MSC-150 2 5.88
19. Ribbon blender model MRB-250 with mounting structure & std accessories.
2 8.08
20. Gyro vibratory sieve separator model MGS-1500 with single deck arrangement having 2 mm screen std.
1 4.80
21. Rotary roaster model MRR-250 with 250 stainless steel rotary 1 6.14
214
S. No. Description No. Amount (as per SIDBI)
A Spice Processing Facility
drum, std accessories
22. Centralized control panel with interlocking arrangement and other safety features suitable for controlling.
1 5.88
23. Motors extra 7 nos. 1 3.52
24. Masala tea (lemon grass/ginger/Cardamom flavour) line 1 41.88
Sub Total 190.92
B Food / Fruit Processing Facility
1 Sugar Syrup preparation tank 500 ltrs 1 7.45
2 Duplex filer 1 1.30
3 Centrifugal Pump 5000 Lph for Syrup Transfer 1 0.65
4 Sugar syrup plate filter press 14" with Hy flow system 1 5.10
5 Sugar syrup holding tank 500 ltrs 1 2.75
6. Dump tank 300 ltrs 1 1.50
7. Process pump 1 1.35
8. Blending tank 500 ltrs 2 8.20
9. Centrifugal pump 5000 LPH for product transfer 1 0.95
10. Inline magnetic trap 1 1.25
11. Homoginiser 750 LPH 1 8.50
12. Tube pasturiser 500 LPH 1 12.70
13. Homoginished juice tank 1000 ltrs 1 4.50
14. Turn table for empty bottle feeding 1 2.35
15. Filling machine four head- Semi automatic paddle operated machine
1 16.20
16. Slant chain conveyor 1.8 Mtr. 1 2.20
17. cooling tunnel 1 7.90
18. Bottle dryer with air knife 1 5.80
19. Ink jet printer 1 4.15
20. Electrical control panel 1 6.60
21. Product pipeline & Fitting with labour 1 5.90
22. Potato and banana chips line 1 31.33
Sub Total 138.63
C Laboratory Equipment 1 11.80
D Packaging equipment 1 54.78
E. Support Service
1 Water supply system 5 12.00
2 Fire prevention system 1 4.00
3 Captive DG set and other electrical 1 16.00
4 Pollution control set-up 1 4.00
5 Transformer 1 7.00
Sub Total 43.00
215
S. No. Description No. Amount (as per SIDBI)
A Spice Processing Facility
Add GST,P&F, Installation and commissioning charges at 18% and 4 %
1 85.71
Expenses towards power supply connection 1 24.00
Total 499.29
9. Observations:
(A) As recommended by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC), a clause would be
added in the Sanction Order “In case of any deviation from the agreed principles of
utilization and denial of fair access to the eligible stakeholders, assets created would be
handed over to another SPV through a transparent procedure for smooth and effective
operationalization of the facilities”.
10. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of Common Facility
Centre (CFC) in Spice & Food Processing Cluster, Churachandpur, Manipur at a total project
cost of Rs. 656.75 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs.551.75 lakh, Government of Manipur
contribution of Rs.33.31 lakh & SPV contribution of Rs.71.69 lakh.
***********
216
Agenda No.50.4.15: Proposal for Final approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre
(CFC) in Wood Carpentry Cluster, Churachandpur, Manipur.
Background:
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 48th
SCM held on 12.11.18,
subject to submission of following documents prior to Final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 09.04.19, IIE, Guwahati (Implementing Agency) has submitted the
documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.
Documents required Status
(i) SIDBI appraisal report Received
(ii) NOC from State Pollution Control Board Received
(iii) Certificate from State Government regarding compliance of
GFR/ CVC guidelines
Received
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Basic Information of Cluster
Name of Cluster : Wood Carpentry Cluster District Churachandpur Location of Cluster : Churachandpur town area and surrounding Lok Sabha Constituency : Outer Manipur(St) Main Product : Tables, Bed (Normal), Bed, Sofa Set, Cup Board,
Almirah (small), Almirah (Large) & Others. No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium)
Micro 31 Small 0 Medium 0
Turn over for the last five years : (Rs. in Crore)
Year Amount 2012-13 3.00 2013-14 3.70 2014-15 4.50 2015-16 5.40 2016-17 6.20
Exports for the last five years : (Rs. in Crore)
Nil
Employment in Cluster : 155 Nos. (Direct – 125 and Indirect – 30) Technology Details : All the implements installed in different units in
individual level are traditional type in operative nature. Any sort of setback due to malfunction / breakage of component of those implements lead to serious implications on the output performance of the processing units.
Whether DS Conducted : Yes, the DSR is conducted by Indian Institute of Entrepreneurship Guwahati.
Main findings of DSR : Wood is directly procured from hills and local market.
Wood is dried / seasoned for a period of time. When wood is dried, carpenter begins the
process of making it as per demand. Sanding is done using both manual and power
tool like orbital sander. Golden chapra or sanding sealer is applied to
make the wood into a finishing stage when colour can be applied.
Golden chapra or melamine paint with wood stain colour is used according to the choice of the customer or demand in the market.
217
Main Problems of Cluster : The artisans are still practicing the old method of wood working with traditional tools.
Low productivity due to absence of modern implements.
Non-availability of proper timber treatment. Non-availability of bulk planning / sawing /
edge banding techniques / implements. Lack of Joint making techniques / implements. Lack of finishing implements. Lack of proper storage.
Other Information : Location disadvantages. Transportation bottleneck. Lack of processing infrastructure. No separate policy for furniture industries. High competitiveness in the market. Lack of marketing agency.
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Justification for CFC Presently using traditional technology.
The problems exist in every stage right from raw material availability, Seasoning, chemical treatment through low value primary processes.
Wastage of both raw material and energy to the final manufacturing step of polishing / finishing & Quality assurance.
Inherent problem of inconsistent power supply.
--
(b.) Location of CFC Lighthouse lane, Tedim Road, Zouveng, Churachandpur, Manipur.
--
% age of units in radius of 5km
90
% age of units in radius of 10km
10
(c.) Land for CFC i. Whether land acquired Yes Land is on lease
basis for 25 years. The lease deed has submitted.
ii. Title is in name of Title is in name of the SPV i.e. Churachandpur Area Carpenters Association (CACA).
iii. Valuation and its basis Rs. 5.00 lakhs for 25 years lease. - iv. Land is sufficient Yes -- v. Change of land use Yes. -- vi. If on lease, duration of lease
25 years --
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
Yes. --
(d.) Total Building area(sq ft)
8000 sq. ft. --
(e.) Rate of construction of building
Rs. 5 lakh a total approximate for the repairing and renovation of the building.
--
(f.) Main Facility Proposed
Seasoning Facility. Chemical Treatment facility. Debarking of logs.
--
218
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
Modern Joint Making Facilities. Panel saw, cross cut saw, band
saw facility. Automatic Sanding. Mortise, Tanner facility. Modern Edge Banding Facility. High Frequency Plank Joining. Powered Small Tools. Finishing Facilities. Laminating Facility. Quality Control Service. Skill up-gradation facility. Marketing network through
optional common branding. g.) Prod capacity of CFC The Churachandpur Carpentry Cluster
as a whole process approximately 3000 c. ft. to 3500 c. ft. of raw wood. Considering the growth of the cluster the CFC has been planned with plant and machinery in such a manner that this CFC will be capable of processing 6000 to 6500 c. ft. of raw wood per month in 300 hrs / month of operation hours.
--
(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/ domestic sales and direct/ indirect employment, etc.)
Sl. No.
Parameters Present intervention
After Intervention
1. Units 31 units 50 units 2 Employment 155 350 3 Exports Nil Will be able to ensure quality
products for export. 4 Total sales Rs. 620.00 lakh Rs. 1040.00 lakh 5 Profits 12-15% 20-25% 6 Investment Rs. 150.00 lakh Rs. 350.00 lakh.
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
Yes. A moderate size Effluent Treatment Plant has been considered as support service.
Received
(j.) Man Power in CFC 44 persons (k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
The revenue generation for various services, which will be charges as conversion cost to the cluster members (with certain discounts for the SPV members), will be as listed below: Particulars Qty. Unit Rate
(Rs.) At full capacity
Capacity utilization Estimated working (240 hrs at 100%)
100.00% 2400
Service Charge Various Service 55200 Cft. 550 303.60 Sub Total (I) 303.60 Other revenues from Training 12.00 Sub Total (II) 12.00 Gross revenue (sub I+ II)
315.60
10% Discount to SPV members #
2.84
Net Revenue 312.76 # it is assumed that 90% of the facilities will be utilised by the cluster units
219
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Name and Address Churachandpur Area Carpenters Association (CACA)
-
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)
The SPV is a registered industrial cooperative society.
-
(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
- -
(d.) Date of formation of SPV
22.03.2017 -
(e.) Number of Members 31 nos.
-
(f.) Bye Laws or MoA and AOA submitted
Yes. -
(g.) Authorized Share Capital
Rs. 3.00 lakh -
(h.) Paid up capital Rs. 10.00 lakh. - (i.) Shareholding Pattern Submitted. - (j.) Commitment letter for contribution
Submitted. -
(k.) SPV specific A/c Vijaya Bank : A/c No: 860400301000176
-
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation.
SPV namely Churachandpur Area Carpenters Association (CACA). The registered society to function as a Special Purpose Vehicle for setting up and running the proposed Common Facility Centre.
-
(m.) Technical Institution IIE, Guwahati - (n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV members ability to utilise at least 60% installed capacity.
-
(o) (a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
170 KW -
(b) Water 2 Cubic litters - (c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities Not required -
4. Implementation Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency Indian Institute of Entrepreneurship (IIE) (autonomous organisation under Ministry of Skill Development & Entrepreneurship), Guwahati
-- (b.) Fund receiving Agency
--
(c.) Implementation Period 12 months 24 Months from date of final approval as per guidelines.
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
Submitted Received
220
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 59th
meeting held on 31.07.18, recommended the proposal for placing before Steering Committee for in-principle approval. MSME-DI, Imphal was advised to ensure that brand names should not be mentioned along with specification of machinery, while floating tenders.
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee
(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:
-- --
(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)
-- --
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency Remarks (a.) BEP 47.06% As per MSE-CDP
guidelines. (b.) IRR, Payback period 27.78% (Before Tax)
21.71% (After Tax) 3 years 10 months
--
(c.) DSCR N/A -- (d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
36.66% (Before Tax) 27.91% (After Tax)
25% is desirable.
(e.) NPV Positive -- (f.) DER Not Applicable -- (g.) Sensitivity Analysis Yes, the figures are positive as required
by guidelines: a) IRR 27.78% b)NPV – positive c)Breakeven Point 47.08% d)ROCE 36.66%.
--
(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State
Approved CFC Nil. --
6. Proposed project cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
Proposed by SIDBI
As per MSE-CDP
(i) Land and its Development 0.00 0.00 0.00
(ii) Building and other Civil Constructions 5.00 5.00 5.00
(iii) Plant & Machinery 389.53 389.53 389.53
(iv) Misc. fixed assets 14.50 14.50 14.50
(v) Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses, maximum 2% of project cost
8.00 8.00 8.00
(vi) Contingency (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery)
19.58 19.58 19.58
(vii) Margin money for Working Capital 1.94 0.00 0.00
Total Project Cost 438.55 436.61 436.61
7. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars
Proposed by IA
Proposed by SIDBI
As per MSE-CDP
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 371.10 391.09 369.16*
(ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Manipur 21.93 0.00 21.93
221
S. No. Particulars
Proposed by IA
Proposed by SIDBI
As per MSE-CDP
(iii) SPV contribution 45.52 45.52 45.52
Total 438.55 436.61 436.61
* 84.55% of eligible project cost i.e. Rs. 436.61 lakh.
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Description No. Power Requirement (HP/KW)
Cost
1. SCM MINIMAX Band Saw S400 P (Non CE) 2 1.5 5.25
2. SCM Band Saw S 45 N (CE) 2 1.5 4.10
3. Altendorf table panel saw with Tilt 1 2.75 6.95
4. SCM Cut-off Saw 1 3 4.31
5. SCM, Spindle Moulder With Tilting Spindle & LL Version
1 9 9.66
6. SCM Feeder 1 0.75 0.84
7. CMS Balestrini, Automatic TWIN TABLE ROUND-END TENONER
1 205 17.85
8. CMS Balestrini, Automatic Twin Table Slot Mortiser MICRON
1 2.5 9.82
9. SCM Surface Planer 1 2.1 6.46
10. SCM Thicknessing Planer 1 3.5 6.46
11. SCM Sandya Automatic Wide Belt Sander 1 11 19.03
12. SCM Universal Belt Sanding Centre with Oscillating Belt
1 3 7.30
13. SCM, Automatic Throughfeed Planer Moulder, PROFISET 40 CE
1 17 16.07
14. Multifunction wood l 4/4 axis CNC Router 1 7.5 19.95
15. CNC Router 2 704 18.80
16. Finger Jointer- semi Automatic 1 10.5 4.73
17. Multi head 4 axis latheEksen 1 14 38.33
Sub Total 195.91
18. Festool Domino Joining Machine Domino Df 500 Q-Set
1 0 1.23
19. Festool Domino Assortment Box Ds 1 0 0.34
20. Festool Domino Joining Machine Df 700 Eq Plus 1 0 1.58
21. Festool Beechwood Domino Xl Assortment Ds/Xl D12/D14 128X Bu
1 0 0.26
22. Festool Beechwood Domino Xl Assortment Ds/Xl D8/D10 306X Bu
1 0 0.30
23. Festool Planer Hl 850 Eb-Plus 1 0 0.78
24. Festool Planer Head Hk 82 Sd Rustic Design Fine with spiral blade Hs 82 Rf
1 0 0.23
25. Festool Planer Head Hk 82 Sd Rustic Design Coarse with Spiral blade HS 82 Rf with spiral blade Hs 82 Rg Depth Limiter
1 0 0.23
222
S. No. Description No. Power Requirement (HP/KW)
Cost
26. Festool Planer Head Hk 82 Sd Rustic Design Undulating with Hs spiral blade Hs 82 Rw Depth Limiter
1 0 0.23
27. Festool Dove Tail Kit Vs 600 1 0 0.58
28. Festool Cutt. Template Vs 600 Sz 14 1 0 0.11
29. Festool Cutters Hw S8 D138/135/15° 1 0 0.06
30. Festool Copy Ring Kr-D 17/Of1400/Vs 600 1 0 0.03
31. Festool Cutt. Template Vs 600 Szo 20 1 0 0.19
32 Festool Dovetail Cutter Hw Vs600 D20X26X8 Z2 Rl
1 0 0.07
33. Festool Eccentric Sander Ets Ec 150/3 Eq 3 0 2.13
34. Festool Eccentric Sander Ets Ec 150/5 Eq 3 0 2.13
35. Festool Suction Hose D 27 22X3 5M As Gq Ct 3 0 0.76
36. Festool Workcenter Wcr 1000 3 0 3.06
37. Festool Sliding Compound Mitre Saw Kapex Ks 120 Ug-Set
1 0 3.40
38. Festool Circular Saw Ts 55 Rebq-Plus-Fs 1 0 0.80
39. Festool Multifunction Table Mft/3 1 0 1.21
40. Festool Rotary Sander Ras 180 E 1 0 1.03
41. Festool Orbital Sander Rutscher Rs 200 Eq-Plus 1 0 0.71
42. Festool Compressed Air Eccentric Sander Lex 3 77/25 Set
2 0 1.46
43. Festool Oscillator Vecturo Os 400 Eq-Set 1 0 0.86
44. Festool Hole Drilling Set Lr 32-Sys 1 0 0.62
45. Festool Routing Template Mfs 400 1 0 0.35
46. Festool Routing Template Mfs 700 1 0 0.54
47. Festool Bench-Mounted Router Tf 2200-Set 1 0 3.02
48. Festool Cordless Drills Txs Li 26 Plus Eu 230V 5 0 1.61
49. Bessey K Body Revo Kr 600/95 10 0 0.61
50. Bessey Band Clamp Ban700 3 0 0.13
51. Bessey Malleable Cast Iron Screw Clamp Tg-2K 200/100
10 0 0.33
52. Bessey Malleable Cast Iron Screw Clamp Tg-2K 300/120
10 0 0.42
53. Bessey Malleable Cast Iron Screw Clamp Tg-2K 1000/140
10 0 0.82
54. Bessey Heavy Duty Malleable Cast Iron Screw Clamp Tgk 1500/120
10 0 0.92
55. Bessey Malleable Cast Iron Screw Clamp Tpn-Be-2K 200/100
10 0 0.25
56. Bessey Heavy Duty Malleable Cast Iron Screw Clamp Tgk-2K 600/120
10 0 0.63
57. Bessey Heavy Duty Malleable Cast Iron Screw Clamp Tgk-K 1000/120
10 0 0.79
58. Bessey One-Handed Clamp Ezs 150/80 10 0 0.29
223
S. No. Description No. Power Requirement (HP/KW)
Cost
59. Bessey One-Handed Clamp Ezs 300/80 10 0 0.33
60. Bessey One-Handed Clamp Ezs 600/80 10 0 0.39
Sub Total 35.82
61. Sawing Machine 2 0.5 5.25
62. Pllet Truck 2000 1800mm 2 0 0.63
63. Seasoning Klin Electric 1 22 15.75
64. Air compressor + Receiver + Drier Atlas Copco 1 300000 5.00
1 7.5 3.15
65. Compressed Air Pneumatic lines John Guest 1 0 2.63
66. Dust Collector 12 16 6.30
67. Paint Booth 1 11 14.70
68. Tooling for Machines 1 0 5.25
Sub Total 53.66
Packaging + forwarding (Freight)+ insurance @ 4%
9.99
Installation & Training @ 5% 14.27
Maximum tax component @ 18% 51.37
69. Captive DG Set and related Electricals 1 0 12.00
70. Transformer and Switchgear 1 0 7.50
71. Fire Fighting System 1 0 6.00
72. Pollution Control System 1 0 3.00
9. Observation:
(A) Following document is required to be submitted prior to issue of final approval:
(i) The land lease deed is for a period of 25 years only. Committee may like to take a
view on the same.
(B) As recommended by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC), a clause would be
added in the Sanction Order “In case of any deviation from the agreed principles of
utilization and denial of fair access to the eligible stakeholders, assets created would be
handed over to another SPV through a transparent procedure for smooth and effective
operationalization of the facilities”.
10. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre
(CFC) in Wood Carpentry Cluster, Churachandpur, Manipur at a total project cost of Rs.436.61 lakh
with GoI grant of Rs.369.16 lakh, State Government‟s contribution of Rs.21.93 lakh and SPV‟s
contribution of Rs.45.52 lakh.
*******
224
Agenda No.50.4.16: Proposal for Final approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre
(CFC) in Greater Imphal Jewellery Cluster, Imphal, Manipur.
Background:
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 48th
SCM held on 12.11.18,
subject to submission of following documents prior to Final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 16.04.19, IIE, Guwahati has submitted the documents and requested to
consider the proposal for final approval.
Documents required Status
(i) SIDBI appraisal report Received
(ii) List of SPV members (with units address) along with
shareholding pattern
Received
(iii) Details of production capacity of CFC Received
(iv) Name of the State Govt. and MSME officials in SPV Received
(v) NOC from State Pollution Control Board Received
(vi) Certificate from State Government regarding compliance of
GFR/ CVC guidelines
Received
(vii) Registered land document in the name of SPV (if land is on
lease basis, registered lease deed for a minimum period of
30 years)
Received
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Basic Information of Cluster
Name of Cluster : Greater Imphal Jewellery Cluster District Imphal East Location of Cluster : Porompat, Greater Imphal Lok Sabha Constituency : Inner Manipur
Main Product : Ring, Ear ring, Chain, Necklace, Bracelet, Bangles, Diamond and Gemstones and all other jewelleries.
No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium)
Micro 70 Small - Medium -
Turn over for the last five years : (Rs. in Crore)
Year Amount 2013-14 10.80
2014-15 11.90 2015-16 13.10 2016-17 14.30 2017-18 15.60
Exports for the last five years : (Rs. in Crore)
Nil.
Employment in Cluster : 1305 nos. (Direct – 505 and Indirect – 800) Technology Details : Traditional processes of metal manufacturing-
Designing, Tool making, Melting and alloying, Casting, Sheet rolling, Wire rolling Wire Drawing, Manual Blanking, piercing.
Whether DS Conducted : Yes. Main findings of DSR : Ornaments are intricately and traditionally
designed for religious occasions. Ornaments are also made from an alloy (mixture of copper
225
and brass). The major stakeholders of the cluster are the 70
units operating within the cluster. Out of the total investment, 95 per cent is on
raw material and the rest on equipments and work sheds. Raw material absorbs the maximum investment.
Main Problems of Cluster : Lack of working Capital Lack of modern design. Obsolete and traditional Technology. Lack of Product Diversification. Lack of quality certification.
Other Information : --
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks (a.) Justification for CFC The present units are using traditional and
obsolete methods of manufacturing. The proposed CFC will facilitate manufacturing with modern technology.
The proposed CFC may function as modern design centre for up-gradation of the existing design in the cluster and introduce new and diversified designs.
The CFC could be utilized as a gemstone cutting and polishing centre.
Other than gold, the CFC can act as a raw material bank for molten copper with art of the machinery installed.
A testing unit with modern tools and technology is necessary for testing the purity of the gold.
--
(b.) Location of CFC Greater Imphal District which is 3 km from Imphal, the capital city of Manipur, the eastern most state of India.
--
% age of units in radius of 5km
40 --
% age of units in radius of 10km
60 --
(c.) Land for CFC i. Whether land acquired Yes leased. Lease deed in
the name of SPV for a period of 25 years received.
ii. Title is in name of SPV, Jewellery Common Facility Centre, Imphal, Manipur.
iii. Valuation and its basis
Land on lease basis for 25 years.
iv. Land is sufficient Yes v. Change of land use Yes vi. If on lease, duration of lease
Land on lease basis for 25 years.
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
Yes.
(d.) Total Building area(sq ft)
1800 sq. ft.
--
(e.) Rate of construction of building
Rs 2250/sq.ft. --
(f.)Main Facility Proposed
Jewellery CAD All modern processing for gold / silver
jewellery. Captive Tool Room Hallmarking and assaying
--
226
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks g.) Prod capacity of CFC --- Received (h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/ domestic sales and direct /indirect employment, etc.)
Sl. No.
Parameter Before Intervention
After Intervention
1. Total No. of units 70 175 2 Total sales (Rs. in lakh) 1560.00 3800.00 3 Investment (Rs. in lakh) 175.00 400.00 4 Profit (%) 15-20 20-25 5 Employment 505 1200 6 Exports (Rs. in lakh) Nil 190.00
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
Yes. Received
(j.) Man Power in CFC 28 nos. (at first year). -- (k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
The total Revenue per year (at 100% capacity utilization) will be Rs 180.76 Lakh.
--
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks (a.) Name and Address Jewellery Common Facility Centre, Imphal,
Manipur, Palace Compound, Imphal East, Manipur.
--
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)
Registered Society. --
(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
-- Received
(d.) Date of formation of SPV
15.07.14 --
(e.) Number of Members 70 nos.
--
(f.) Bye Laws or MoA and AOA submitted
Yes, submitted. --
(g.)Authorized Share Capital
Rs. 2.50 lakh. --
(h.) Paid up capital Rs. 70,000/- (i.) Shareholding Pattern Submitted. Received (j.) Commitment letter for contribution
- --
(k.) SPV specific A/c Name of the Bank: Punjab National Bank Account Number: 1067000108175727
--
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation.
Already done. --
(m.) Technical Institution
IIE, Guwahati --
(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member
Submitted. --
227
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity. (o) (a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
93.24 KW --
(b) Water Yes. -- (c)Gas/Oil/Other Utilities
Yes. --
4. Implement Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency
Indian Institute of Entrepreneurship (IIE) (autonomous organisation under Ministry of Skill Development & Entrepreneurship), Guwahati
As per MSE-CDP guidelines.
(b.) Fund receiving Agency (c.) Implementation Period
12 months 24 Months from date of final approval as per MSE-CDP.
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
Submitted Received
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 62nd
meeting held on 05.11.18, recommended the proposal for placing before Steering Committee for in-principle approval.
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee (g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:
-- --
(h.) Working capital (In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)
-- --
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks (a.) BEP 61.60 % As per SIDBI,
39.55% (b.) IRR, Payback period 15.35% after tax
21.44% before tax. 4 years 7 months
As per SIDBI IRR before tax – 18.45% IRR after tax – 15.92%
(c.) DSCR N/A
(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
21.37% after tax 28.26 % before tax
As per SIDBI 32.29%
(e.) NPV Positive -- (f.) DER N/A (g.) Sensitivity Analysis Yes, the figures are positive as required by
guidelines. (h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State
-- --
228
6. Proposed project cost:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed by
IA As per MSE-CDP/ Recommended by
SIDBI (i) Building & Civil Works 24.78 24.78 (ii) Plant & Machinery 277.75 277.75 (iii) Miscellaneous Fixed Assets 6.00 6.00 (iv) Preliminary Expenses & Pre-operative
expenses 5.00 6.50
(v) Provision for contingencies 14.39 14.39 (vi) Margin money for working capital 1.16 1.17
Total 329.08 330.59
7. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA As per MSE-CDP
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 271.40 271.40
(ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Manipur 32.90 32.90
(iii) SPV contribution 24.78 26.29*
Total 329.08 330.59
* As approved in 48th
SCM, SPV contribution is <10%.
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
(Rs in lakh) S. No. Description No. Power
requirement (HP/KW)
Cost
CAD Service 1. Complete CAD centre and 3D Model Making set-up
complete with all hardware and software. 1 2.5 9.67
Manufacturing Service 1. Melting Furnace, 1 kg capacity. 2 3 0.32 2. Melting Furnace, 2 kg capacity 2 4.5 0.44 3. Vacuum Casting Plant – 3 kg 1 5 7.97 4. Sheet Rolling Unit – 24” sheet 1 7.5 2.67 5. Sheet Rolling Unit – 8” sheet 1 5.5 2.48 6. Wire Rolling Unit 1 5 2.67 7. Wire Drawing Machine 1 1 1.82 8. Annealing set-up 1 5 3.62 9. Chain Making set-up 1 4 11.73 10. Facetting Machine-vertical-horizontal combined. 1 1 1.76 11. Laser Soldering 1 3 6.93 12. Jewellery Hydraulic Press 25 T 1 1.5 1.89 13. Ball Making Machine, 2mm to 5mm balls 1 0.5 3.36 14. Electronic Weighting 1 0.2 0.96 15. Ultrasonic Cleaning Machine, 25 l capacity 2 1 1.32 16. Magnetic Polisher 2 kg capacity 2 1.5 1.36 17. Gold Plating Unit 1 5 1.42 18. Silver Plating Unit 1 5 3.73 19. Metal Refinery 1 3 6.21 20 Complete Hallmarking setup 1 3 90.63 Tool Room Service 1. Centre Lathe Machine with Grainding attachment, 1000
ABD, 300 sweep with grinding attachment. 1 1.5 1.92
2. Cone pulley type shaping machine with accessories, 18 inch stroke
1 1.5 1.83
229
S. No. Description No. Power requirement
(HP/KW)
Cost
3. Universal Milling Machine 42”x9” with accessories 1 1.5 2.84 4. Drilling Machine up to 25 mm dia capacity with
accessories 2 2 1.16
5. Pantograph Milling Machine 1 1 1.48 6. Surface Grinder Machine, 550mm x 200mm with
accessories 1 2 3.54
7. Cylindrical Grinding Machine, 300mm x102mm 1 2 3.76 8. Tool Grinder with accessories 1 0.5 0.28 9. Mechanical power saw machine with accessories 1 1 0.72 10. Cutting Tools, Cutters, Drills, Measuring Instruments
including Vernier Calipers, Digital Cerniers, Digital Micrometer, Height Gauge, Surface plate, Depth Gauge, Radius Gauge, Centre Gauge, Bore Dial, Bore Micrometer, Dial Gauge.
1 set 7.03
11 Heat Treatment Unit 1 7.5 5.29 Support Service Water Supply System 1 set 2 7.00 Fire Prevention System 1 set 4.00 Captive DG Set 1 set 8.50 Transformer and other controls 1 set 5.60 Pollution Control System 1 set 2 8.00 Above rates are inclusive of all taxes 0.00 Expenses towards Power Supply System 10.00 Extra cost towards GST, P&F, installation 47.44
9. Observations:
(A) Following document is required to be submitted prior to issue of final approval:
(i) Lease deed in the name of SPV has been provided for a period of 25 years.
Committee may like to take a view on lease period.
(B) As recommended by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC), a clause would be
added in the Sanction Order “In case of any deviation from the agreed principles of
utilization and denial of fair access to the eligible stakeholders, assets created would be
handed over to another SPV through a transparent procedure for smooth and effective
operationalization of the facilities”.
10. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of Common Facility
Centre (CFC) in Greater Imphal Jewellery Cluster, Imphal, Manipur at a total project cost of Rs.
330.59 lakh with GoI grant of Rs. 271.40 lakh, State Government‟s contribution of Rs. 32.90
lakh and SPV‟s contribution of Rs. 26.29 lakh.
*******
230
Agenda No.50.4.17: Proposal for Final approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre
(CFC) in Cashew Nut Processing Cluster, Selsella, West Garo Hills,
Meghalaya.
Background:
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 48th
SCM held on 12.11.18,
subject to submission of following documents prior to Final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 16.04.19, IIE, Guwahati (Implementing Agency) has submitted the
documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.
Documents required Status
(viii) SIDBI appraisal report Received
(ix) List of SPV members (with units address) along with
shareholding pattern
Received
(x) NOC from State Pollution Control Board Received
(xi) Certificate from State Government regarding compliance of
GFR/ CVC guidelines
Received
(xii) Registered land document in the name of SPV (if land is on
lease basis, registered lease deed for a minimum period of
30 years)
Yet to be
received
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Basic Information of Cluster
Name of Cluster : Cashew Nut Processing Cluster District West Garo Hills Location of Cluster : Selsella Block, West Garo Hills District,
Meghalaya. Lok Sabha Constituency : Tura Main Product : Three grades of Cashew Nut No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium)
Micro 50
Turn over for the last five years : (Rs. in Crore)
Year Amount 2012-13 26.59 2013-14 29.23 2014-15 32.95 2015-16 37.12 2016-17 42.15
Exports for the last five years : (Rs. in Crore)
Nil
Employment in Cluster : 950 nos. (Direct – 600-650 and Indirect – 300) Technology Details : The cashew nut processors of the cluster
follow traditional Indian processes and technology. Farmers of the thirteen villages of Selsella
block of West Garo hills district are, in general, highly skilled and devoid of using automatic modern machinery.
The manufacturing process followed by 300+ skilled farmers of this cluster is largely dependent on age-old technology comprising major labour intensive and less productive activities.
Few of them is equipped with few semi-automatic attachments.
231
Whether DS Conducted : Yes. Main findings of DSR : To understand status of the Cashew Nut
production system. To know how raw cashew nut products are
marketed. To know the measures initiated by the
various agencies to start cluster for cashew nut processing and marketing.
To identify the problems and reasons for not making cluster functioning very effectively.
To suggest interventions and action plan how to make cashew nut processing cluster more effective.
Main Problems of Cluster : Lack of storage facility. Absence of market centre. Absence of infrastructure like electricity,
permanent sheds Lack of working capital Insufficient training and knowledge. Unorganised way of selling raw cashew. Exploitation by the traders. Lack of credit facility. Lack of marketing orientation of farmers. Lack of social mobilization among farmers
and SHGs. Lack of basic infrastructures for installing
MCPUs in the cluster. Other Information : Value added by-products like juice, alcoholic
drinks and shell oil can be manufactured from waste of the cashew fruit and the cashew shell.
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Justification for CFC This CFC has been designed and planned so that the cashew growers can bring their raw produce, either in raw or shell-cut condition for further processing up to packaging level and can take back the finished product from CFC after payment of suitably fixed conversion charge.
Although the CFC has to be designed to help the local cashew growers by providing them with suitable processing facilities at various stages of processed Cashew manufacturing, but this CFC can better not be termed as a production centre as the implements proposed will be used by the cashew growers optionally as will be evident in the flow chart.
--
(b.) Location of CFC Village – Baklagne, P.O. Haldibari, Block – Selsella, District – West Garo Hills, Meghalaya.
--
% age of units in radius of 5km
65 --
% age of units in radius of 10km
35 --
(c.) Land for CFC
232
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
i. Whether land acquired Yes. Registered land document in the name of SPV (if land is on lease basis, registered lease deed for a minimum period of 30 years) is required.
ii. Title is in name of SPV, Cluster Cashew Nut Producer Association of Baklagne.
iii. Valuation and its basis Land on lease basis for 20 years. iv. Land is sufficient Yes v. Change of land use Yes vi. If on lease, duration of lease
Land on lease basis for 20 years.
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
Yes.
(d.) Total Building area(sq ft)
The SPV proposes to construct the building 2000 sq ft. for CFC.
--
(e.) Rate of construction of building
1500 sq. ft. --
(f.)Main Facility Proposed Cashew cooking system. Automatic Cashew Shell Cutting. Conveyor System Electrical Oven. Humidifying System. Separating System. Grading System. Packing System. Quality Control and Laboratory
equipments service.
--
g.) Prod capacity of CFC --- -- (h.) Major Outputs / Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/ domestic sales and direct /indirect employment, etc.)
S. No.
Parameter Before Intervention
After Intervention
1. Total No. of units 50 300 2 Total sales (Rs. in lakh) 4200.00 6900.00 3 Investment (Rs. in lakh) 65.00 450.00 4 Profit (%) 15-20 30-40 5 Employment 900-950 1600-1800
(i.)Pollution clearance required or not
Yes. Received
(j.) Man Power in CFC 46 nos. -- (k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets (service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
The total revenue per year (at 100% capacity utilisation) will be Rs. 215.48 lakh.
--
3. Information about SPV Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA) Remarks
(a.) Name and Address Cluster Cashew Nut Producers Association of Baklagne, Sesella Block, West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya
--
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)
Registered Society. --
(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
GM-DIC, Tura Meghalaya. --
(d.) Date of formation of SPV
07.01.16. --
(e.) Number of Members 50 nos.
--
(f.) Bye Laws or MoA and Yes. --
233
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
AOA submitted (g.)Authorized Share Capital
Rs. 50,000/- -
(h.) Paid up capital Rs. 3.5 lakh (i.) Shareholding Pattern Submitted. -- (j.) Commitment letter for contribution
- --
(k.) SPV specific A/c Name of the Bank: State Bank of India Account Number: 37244652525
--
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation.
Already done. --
(m.) Technical Institution IIE, Guwahati -- (n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
-- --
(o) (a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
42 KW --
(b) Water Yes -- (c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities
Oil --
4. Implementation Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency Indian Institute of Entrepreneurship (IIE) (autonomous organisation under Ministry of Skill Development & Entrepreneurship), Guwahati
As per MSE-CDP guidelines.
(b.) Fund receiving Agency
--
(c.) Implementation Period 12 months 24 Months from date of final approval as per MSE-CDP.
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
Submitted Received
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 62nd
meeting held on 05.11.18, recommended the proposal for placing before Steering Committee for in-principle approval.
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee (g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:
-- --
(h.) Working capital (In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)
-- --
234
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) BEP 54.20 %
As per MSE-CDP guidelines.
(b.) IRR, Payback period 21.56% after tax. 30.73% before tax. 3 years 6 months
(c.) DSCR N/A (d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
28.20% after tax 39.76 % before tax
(e.) NPV Positive (f.) DER N/A (g.) Sensitivity Analysis Yes, the figures are positive as required
by guidelines a) IRR- 30.73% b) NPV - Positive c)Breakeven Point – 54.20 %
(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State
Approved CFC Nil. --
6. Proposed project cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
7. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
As per MSE-CDP
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 149.37 142.38
(ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Meghalaya 18.90 18.16
(iii) SPV contribution 21.10 21.10
Total 189.37 181.64
* 78.38% of eligible project cost i.e. Rs. 181.64 lakh.
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
(Rs in lakh) S. No. Description No. Power
requirement (HP/KW)
Cost
A Main Equipments 1. Cooking system capacity: 1000 kg raw cashew /
Batch Steam cooker with steam generator wood fire complete set valves, gauges, meter, chimney and necessary fittings.
1 1.85
2. Cashew Shell Cutting Machine – (four cutter) capacity 40-50 KG/HR Gear Motor Power – 1 HP phase – Three. Number of cutter – 4 nos. All parts in
10 8 13.50
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
As per MSE-CDP/ Recommended by
SIDBI (i) Land & Site Development (land leased) 10.00 10.00 (ii) Building & Civil Works 30.00 30.00 (iii) Plant & Machinery 120.13 120.13 (iv) Miscellaneous Fixed Assets 5.50 5.50 (v) Preliminary Expenses 4.60 4.60 (vi) Pre-operative expenses 4.80 4.80
(vii) Provision for contingencies 6.61 6.61 (viii) Margin money for working
capital 7.73 0.00
Total 189.37 181.64
235
S. No. Description No. Power requirement
(HP/KW)
Cost
SS and AI 3. Cashew Shell Cutting tools and accessories Set 3.60 4. Conveyor System – To carry the material after shell
cutting to scooping line. 1 1 2.90
5. Vibrator (Automatic Total Scooping Solution). Capacity 300 – 350 kg/hr. Vibrator (SS) – 2 nos., Shell blower – 2 nos. scooping machine – 1, nos. blower – 1 nos.
1 4 3.80
6. Electrical Oven – To dry the kernels of 500 kegs at 55-60º C in 5 to 6 hrs. No. of Trays : 100 nos. Tray size : 32” x 16” x 1¼”
1 15 5.80
7. Humidifier with extra trays and trolleys 1 set 2 2.10 8. Cashew Nut Peeling Machine 1 1 1.85 9. Air Compressor 1 12 3.20 10. Kernel Seperator 1 - 0.80 11. Finished Cashew Grader 1 - 1.35 12 Pieces Grading Machine 1 1 0.75 13. Brocks vacuum packing machine 1 1 2.50 14. Cutting Table 1 0.10 15. Grading Table 7 - 0.85 16. Moisture Meter 1 0.05 Sub Total - - 45.00 B Support Service Water Supply system 1 set 10.00 Fire Prevention System 1 set 6.00 Pollution Control System 1 set 7.36 Captive D. G. Set, Transformer and other electricals 1 set 14.00 Sub Total 37.36 Extra cost for P&F, GST, Insurance etc. 19.77 Power connection 18.00 Grand Total 120.13
9. Observations:
(A) Following document is required to be submitted prior to issue of final approval:
(i) Registered land document in the name of SPV (if land is on lease basis, registered lease
deed for a minimum period of 30 years is required).
(B) As recommended by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC), a clause would be
added in the Sanction Order “In case of any deviation from the agreed principles of
utilization and denial of fair access to the eligible stakeholders, assets created would be
handed over to another SPV through a transparent procedure for smooth and effective
operationalization of the facilities”.
10. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of Common Facility
Centre (CFC) in Cashew Nut Processing Cluster, Selsella, West Garo Hills, Meghalaya at a total
project cost of Rs. 181.64 lakh with GoI grant of Rs. 142.38 lakh, State Government‟s
contribution of Rs. 18.16 lakh and SPV‟s contribution of Rs. 21.10 lakh.
*******
236
Agenda No.50.4.18: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate at
Focal Point, Pathankot, Punjab.
Background
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 48th
SCM held on 12.11.18,
subject to submission of the requisite documents prior to final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 15.02.19, Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation (PSIEC)
Ltd., Chandigarh submitted the following documents and requested to consider the
proposal for final approval:
Documents required Status
(i) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Received. (ii) Copy of approved layout plan signed by Competent
Authority Received.
(iii) Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency
Undertaking from PSIEC that land is in possession of PSIEC, Notification of land from Government of Punjab and Jamabandi in English have been received in this regard.
(iv) Details of Industries operating in the Industrial Estate.
Received.
(v) PSIEC, Chandigarh should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Punjab/ PSIEC, Chandigarh
As per SIDBI appraisal report, road will be laid with cement concrete.
(vi) MSME-DI, Ludhiana should undertake visit to proposed ID Project along with representative of Government of Punjab (GM, DIC), Industries Associations and submit a Report justifying up-gradation in view of limited occupancy. The reason for low occupancy should also be reported.
Report submitted by MSME-DI, Ludhiana justifying upgradation in view of limited occupancy.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation
State : Punjab
District : Pathankot
Industrial Estate : Upgradation of Industrial Focal Point Pathankot
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
Yes
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre)
399.46 acres
Area to be developed (acre) 399.46 acres Number and sizes of plots to be developed
370 plots with 16 units (out of which more than 50% units are micro)
Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in Following two projects have been completed
237
Particulars Description same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up etc.
successfully: New Dhanchala of Jhans, Distt. Hoshiarpur and New Malaout Distt. Muktsar. In both the cases, PSIEC was the Implementing Agency.
Performance of ID projects in State Satisfactory
3. Details about proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Punjab Small Industries and Export Corporation (a Government of Punjab undertaking)
As per MSE-CDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory -- Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report
Submitted Received
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
The Focal Point, Pathankot is located close to NH-44. Industrial units located in focal point are using ground water for their water requirements. Electricity is available through connection from Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd (PSPCL). The existing roads were developed by PSIEC at the time of allotment of plots. Amenities such as administrative office, banking facilities and public toilets are also available. The workers are from the surrounding rural and urban areas.
--
Whether land in possession is in the name of IA with Clear Title
Punjab Small Scale Industries & Export Corporation Ltd. (PSIEC) was the original owner of the land. When the focal point Pathankot was developed, the entire land was allotted to the unit holders present in the focal point. PSIEC is still responsible for operation and maintenance of focal point.
Undertaking from PSIEC that land is in possession of PSIEC received.
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
Project is about upgradation of Industrial Focal Point
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been constituted
Yes Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Mentioned in Cover letter (Signed by MD)
Received
Basis of elements of project Cost The cost and specifications have been given in the DPR. The cost estimates have been signed by the Executive Engineer and Sub-Divisional Engineer of PSIEC.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project Better roads will improve connectivity/ accessibility to Industrial Focal Point.
Proper usage of water will have
--
238
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
a positive impact on the environment and thus improve the access to water supply.
With the upgradation of basic infrastructure, employment opportunities (direct & indirect) will increase.
The increase in manufacturing activity in the region will further result in ignition of support services, thereby leading to the overall development in the region.
Increased investments due to development of the infrastructure will also improve the occupancy of Focal Point.
Justification of the proposal The focal point was developed in 1990s with all infrastructure facilities required for upgradation. However, with time basic infrastructures in the focal point has been deteriorated and require upgradation. The proposal will cater to the basic need of maintenance of road, drainage system, power, administrative and other services complex etc. Further, due to deteriorated infrastructure, industries in the focal point are bearing wear and tear cost. Transport companies are also charging higher tariffs in return which are increasing the overall production cost. Currently, there are only 16 units in Industrial Focal Point, Pathankot due to deteriorated condition of the focal point. Upgradation of Industrial focal Point will help in attracting the more and more investors/unit holders to establish their units.
--
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed
by IA As per MSE-CDP / Recommended
by SIDBI (i) Cost of Land filling/leveling including boundary
wall and fencing 101.94 100.00
(ii) Cost of laying roads 201.14 200.00 (iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 9.46 9.46 (iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and
pump houses 109.98 109.98
(v) Water harvesting 8.48 8.48 (vi) Drainage 59.96 59.96 (vii) Power (Sub-station, Distribution Network,
including Street light etc.) Generation of Non-Conventional Energy
207.25 207.25
(viii) Administrative and Other Services Complex 20.00 20.00
239
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
As per MSE-CDP / Recommended
by SIDBI (ix) Telecom/Cyber/Documentation centre 20.00 20.00 (x) Conference Hall/Exhibition centre 30.00 30.00 (xi) Bank/Post office 20.00 20.00 (xii) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets 26.22 26.22 (xiii) First aid centre, Creche Canteen facilities 20.00 20.00 (xiv) Effluent Treatment Facilities (Cost of
improvement of existing STP) 150.00 80.00
(xv) Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 20.00 20.00 (xvi) Others (Sanitary convenience ) 10.25 10.00 Total 1014.68 941.35
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA As per MSE-CDP
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 753.08 753.08* (ii) Contribution from PSIEC 261.60 261.60
Total 1014.68 1014.68
*SIDBI recommended GoI grant of Rs. 753.08 lakh as 80% of total eligible Project cost of
Rs.941.35 lakh.
6. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate
at Focal Point, Pathankot, Punjab at a total project cost of Rs. 1014.68 lakh with GoI assistance
of Rs. 753.08 lakh and contribution from PSIEC of Rs. 261.60 lakh.
********
240
Agenda No.50.4.19: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate at
Focal Point, Goindwal Sahib, District Tarn Taran, Punjab.
Background
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 48th
SCM held on 12.11.18
subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 15.02.19, Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation (PSIEC)
Ltd., Chandigarh submitted the following documents and requested to consider the
proposal for final approval.
Documents required Status (i) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Received (ii) Copy of approved layout plan signed by
Competent Authority. Received
(iii) Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency
Undertaking from PSIEC that land is in possession of PSIEC, Notification of land from Government of Punjab and Jamabandi in English have been received in this regard.
(iv) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% of units in the Industrial Estate are micro.
Received
(v) Details of Industries operating in the Industrial Estate.
Received
(vi) PSIEC, Chandigarh should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Punjab/ PSIEC, Chandigarh.
Request received from PSIEC to consider laying of road with bituminous in place of Cement Concrete.
(vii) MSME-DI, Ludhiana should undertake visit to proposed ID Project along with representative of Government of Punjab (GM, DIC), Industries Associations and submit a Report justifying up-gradation in view of limited occupancy. The reason for low occupancy should also be reported.
Report submitted by MSME-DI, Ludhiana justifying upgradation in view of limited occupancy.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Punjab Small Industries & Export
Corporation
State : Punjab
District : Tarn Taran
Industrial Estate : Upgradation of Focal Point Goindwal Sahib
241
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
Yes
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre)
907.00 acres (Phase 1- 473 acres and Phase 2- 434 acres)
Area to be developed (acre) 825.00 acres
Number and sizes of plots to be developed
56 units (out of which 47 units are micro)
Implementing Period 24 months
Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up etc.
N/A
Performance of ID projects in State
Projects which were successfully completed under IID scheme are New Dhanchala of Jhans, Distt. Hoshiarpur, New Malaout Distt. Muktsar. In both the cases PSIEC was the implementing agency.
3. Details about proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Punjab Small Industries and Export Corporation (Government of Punjab undertaking)
As per MSE-CDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory --
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
SIDBI report submitted Received
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
Industrial area is located close to NH-54. Goindwal railway station is around 4 km away from Industrial Focal Point. Being an existing industrial area, basic infrastructure facilities such as roads, power, water supply and telecom facilities are available.
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Punjab Small Scale Industries & Export Corporation Ltd. (PSIEC) was the original owner of the land. When the focal point Goindwal was developed, the entire land was allotted to the unit holders present in the focal point. PSIEC is still responsible for operation and maintenance of focal point.
Received
Whether Zoning regulations and State Government i.e. PSIEC had
242
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
procured the land before the industrial area was developed.
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes, the Committee has been formed which includes officials from PSIEC, Industry Department, MSME-DI, Ludhiana
Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
The contribution will be made as per the means of finance mentioned in the report. State Govt. along with the other stakeholders will take care for any escalation in the project cost. Confirmation from PSIEC is mentioned in the covering letter.
Received
Basis of elements of project Cost PSIEC has informed that all the rates are in line with Punjab Common Schedule of Rates. The cost estimates have been signed by the Executive Engineer and Sub-Divisional Engineer of PSIEC.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project Up-gradation of Industrial area will provide support to industries present in the industrial area in terms of better connectivity, minimum wear and tear, better transport facilities, proper drainage system that will further lead to development of Industrial Estate.
--
Justification of the Proposal The focal point was developed in late 1980s with all infrastructure facilities required for upgradation. However, with time basic infrastructures in the focal point has been deteriorated and require upgradation. The proposal will cater to the basic need of maintenance of road, drainage system, power, administrative and other services complex etc.
--
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
As per MSE-CDP / Recommended by
SIDBI
(i) Cost of land filling/leveling including boundary wall and fencing
100.00 100.00
(ii) Cost of laying roads 200.00 200.00
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 9.87 9.87
243
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
As per MSE-CDP / Recommended by
SIDBI
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses
107.80 107.80
(v) Water harvesting 12.96 10.00
(vi) Drainage 59.11 59.11
(vii) Power (Sub-station and Distribution Network, including street lighting etc. Generation of Non-conventional energy)
225.00 225.00
(viii) Others (Sanitary Conveniences etc.) 10.25 10.00
(ix) Telecommunication/Cyber/Documentation centre
20.00 20.00
(x) Effluent Treatment Facilities 150.00 80.00
(xi) Contingencies & Pre operative expenses 17.90 17.90
Total 912.89 839.68
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed
per IA
As per MSE-CDP /
Recommended by
SIDBI
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 671.74 671.74*
(ii) Contribution from PSIEC 241.15 241.15
Total 912.89 912.89
*SIDBI recommended GoI grant of Rs. 671.74 lakh as 80% of total eligible Project cost of Rs.
839.68 lakh.
6. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Based on the request made by PSIEC, Competent Authority has given consent for
laying of Bituminous roads in place of Cement Concrete.
(ii) As per the letter submitted by GM, DIC, Goindwal, there are 60 operational units in
the Industrial Focal Point, out of which, more than 50% are micro units, whereas, as
per SIDBI appraisal report, 56 units are operating in the Industrial Estate.
(iii) Clarification regarding no. of operational units in the Industrial Estate including
micro units in light of Point No. (ii).
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate
at Focal Point, Goindwal Sahib, District Tarn Taran, Punjab at a total project cost of Rs.912.89
lakh with GoI assistance of Rs.671.74 lakh and contribution from PSIEC of Rs.241.15 lakh.
********
244
Agenda No.50.4.20: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate at
Focal Point, Amritsar, Punjab.
Background
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 48th
SCM held on 12.11.18
subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 05.02.19 & 30.05.19, Punjab Small Industries & Export
Corporation (PSIEC) Ltd., Chandigarh submitted the following documents and
requested to consider the proposal for final approval.
Documents required Status
(i) SIDBI Appraisal Report Fresh SIDBI appraisal report
has been received after
incorporating the revised (due
to cement concrete)
component-wise project cost
and revised means of finance.
(ii) Registered land documents in the name of
Implementing Agency
Undertaking from PSIEC that
land is in possession of PSIEC,
Notification of land from
Government of Punjab and
Jamabandi in English have been
received in this regard.
(iii) Copy of approved layout plan signed by
Competent Authority.
Received
(iv) Certificate from State Government that more
than 50% of units in the Industrial Estate are
micro.
Received
(v) Details of Industries operating in the Industrial
Estate.
Received
(vi) PSIEC, Chandigarh should consider laying of
roads with Cement Concrete in place of
Bituminous and proper drainages built in a
professional manner to serve the purpose for
relatively longer period of time. The additional
cost on this account shall be borne by the
Government of Punjab/ PSIEC, Chandigarh
Undertaking received from
PSIEC to consider laying of
road with Cement Concrete in
place of bituminous.
(vii) MSME-DI, Ludhiana should undertake visit to
proposed ID Project along with representative of
Government of Punjab (GM, DIC), Industries
Associations and submit a Report justifying up-
gradation in view of limited occupancy. The
reason for low occupancy should also be
reported.
Report submitted by MSME-
DI, Ludhiana justifying
upgradation in view of limited
occupancy.
245
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation
State : Punjab
District : Amritsar
Industrial Estate : Upgradation of Focal Point Amritsar
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
Yes
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre)
184.04 acres
Area to be developed (acre) 184.04 acres
Number and sizes of plots to be developed
460 plots with 115 operational units (out of which most of the units are micro).
Implementing Period 24 months
Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up etc.
N/A
Performance of ID projects in State
Projects which were successfully completed under IID scheme are New Dhanchala of Jhans, Distt. Hoshiarpur, New Malaout Distt. Muktsar. In both the cases PSIEC was the implementing agency.
3. Details about proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Punjab Small Industries and Export Corporation (a Government of Punjab undertaking)
As per MSE-CDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory --
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report
Submitted Received
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
The Focal Point, Amritsar is located close to NH-1 and is around 12 km from Amritsar Railway Station. Being an existing industrial area, basic infrastructure facilities viz. roads, power, water supply and telecom
--
246
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
facilities are available.
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Punjab Small Scale Industries & Export Corporation Ltd. (PSIEC) was the original owner of the land. When the focal point Amritsar was developed, the entire land was allotted to the unit holders present in the focal point. PSIEC is still responsible for operation and maintenance of focal point.
Undertaking from PSIEC that land is in possession of PSIEC received.
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
Project is about upgradation of Industrial Focal Point
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been constituted
Yes Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Mentioned in Cover letter (Signed by MD)
Received
Basis of elements of project Cost The cost and specifications have been given in the DPR. The cost estimates have been signed by the Executive Engineer and Sub-Divisional Engineer of PSIEC.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project Better roads will improve connectivity/ accessibility to Industrial Focal Point.
Proper usage of water will have a positive impact on the environment and thus improve the access to water supply.
With the upgradation of basic infrastructure, employment opportunities (direct & indirect) will increase.
The increase in manufacturing activity in the region will further result in ignition of support services, thereby leading to the overall development in the region.
Increased investments due to development of the infrastructure will also improve the occupancy of Focal Point.
--
Justification of the proposal The focal point was developed during late 2002 with all infrastructure facilities required for upgradation. However, with time basic infrastructures in the
--
247
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
focal point has been deteriorated and require upgradation. The proposal will cater to the basic need of maintenance of road, drainage system, power, administrative and other services complex etc. Upgradation of Industrial focal Point will help in attracting the more and more investors/unit holders to establish their units.
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA Recommended
by SIDBI /
As per MSE-
CDP
Approved
project cost
Revised
Project
cost
(i) Cost of land filling/leveling including
boundary wall and fencing:
108.88 108.88 100.00
(ii) Cost of laying roads 205.03 489.40 200.00
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 9.86 9.86 9.86
(iv) Water supply including overhead
tanks, and pump houses
101.61 101.61 101.61
(v) Water harvesting 12.96 12.96 10.00
(vi) Drainage 58.31 58.31 58.31
(vii) Power distribution, Street light
arrangements, etc.
231.57 231.47 231.47
(viii) Administrative and Other Services
Complex
46.22 46.22 20.00
(ix) Telecom/Cyber/Documentation
centre
20.00 20.00 20.00
(x) Conference Hall/Exhibition centre 30.00 30.00 30.00
(xi) Bank/Post office 20.00 20.00 20.00
(xii) First aid centre, Creche Canteen 20.00 20.00 20.00
(xiii) Effluent Treatment Facilities 150.00 150.00 80.00
(xiv) Contingencies & Pre operative
expenses
14.81 20.00 20.00
(xv) Other (Sanitary Convenience ) 10.15 10.25 10.00
Total 1039.40 1328.96 931.25
248
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Approved
Amount
Revised
Amount
As per MSE-
CDP
(i) GoI grant under MSE-CDP 740.81* 745.00 745.00**
(ii) Contribution from PSIEC 298.59 583.96 583.96
Total 1039.40 1328.96 1328.96
* 80% of eligible project cost i.e. Rs. 926.06 lakh.
** 80% of eligible project cost i.e. Rs. 931.25 lakh.
6. Observations: (i) As per the letter submitted by GM, DIC, Amritsar, there are 137 nos. of units
working in the Industrial Focal Point whereas as per SIDBI report, there are 115
operational units in the Industrial Estate.
(ii) On examination of submitted documents and revised DPR, it is noted that PSIEC
have made certain changes to the costs of the components due to which approved
project cost has also been revised by PSIEC from Rs. 1039.40 lakhs to Rs. 1328.96
lakhs.
(iii) Clarification regarding the no. of units operating in the Industrial Estate including
micro units is required to be submitted.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate
at Focal Point, Amritsar, Punjab at a total project cost of Rs. 1328.96 lakh with GoI assistance of
Rs. 745.00 lakh and contribution from PSIEC of Rs. 583.96 lakh.
*****
249
Agenda No.50.4.21: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate
at Focal Point, Chanalon, District SAS Nagar, Punjab.
Background
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 48th
SCM held on 12.11.18
subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 15.02.19 & 15.05.19, Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation
(PSIEC) Ltd., Chandigarh submitted the following documents and requested to
consider the proposal for final approval.
Documents required Status
(i) SIDBI Appraisal Report Received
(ii) Registered land documents in the name of
Implementing Agency
Undertaking from PSIEC that land is in
possession of PSIEC, Notification of
land from Government of Punjab and
Jamabandi in English have been
received in this regard.
(iii) Certificate from State Government that more
than 50% of units in the Industrial Estate are
micro.
Received
(iv) Details of Industries operating in the
Industrial Estate.
Received
(v) PSIEC, Chandigarh should consider laying
of roads with Cement Concrete in place of
Bituminous and proper drainages built in a
professional manner to serve the purpose for
relatively longer period of time. The
additional cost on this account shall be borne
by the Government of Punjab/ PSIEC,
Chandigarh
Undertaking received from PSIEC to
consider laying of road with Cement
Concrete in place of bituminous.
(vi) MSME-DI, Ludhiana should undertake visit
to proposed ID Project along with
representative of Government of Punjab
(GM, DIC), Industries Associations and
submit a Report justifying up-gradation in
view of limited occupancy. The reason for
low occupancy should also be reported.
Report submitted by MSME-DI,
Ludhiana justifying upgradation in view
of limited occupancy.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation
State : Punjab
District : S.A.S NAGAR
Industrial Estate : Upgradation of Industrial Focal Point Chanalon
250
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
Yes
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre)
150.58 acres
Area to be developed (acre) 150.58 acres
Number and sizes of plots developed
338 plots with 152 operational units (out of which 101 units are micro).
Implementing Period 24 months
Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up etc.
N/A
Performance of ID projects in State
Projects which were successfully completed under IID scheme are New Dhanchala of Jhans, Distt. Hoshiarpur, New Malaout Distt. Muktsar. In both the cases PSIEC was the implementing agency.
3. Details about proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Punjab Small Industries and Export Corporation (a Government of Punjab undertaking)
As per MSE-CDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory -- Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report
Submitted Received
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
The Focal Point, Chanalon is located besides NH-21. Being an existing industrial area, basic infrastructure facilities viz. roads, power, water supply and telecom facilities are available.
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Punjab Small Scale Industries & Export Corporation Ltd. (PSIEC) was the original owner of the land. When the focal point Chanalon was developed, the entire land was allotted to the unit holders present in the focal point. PSIEC is still responsible for operation and maintenance of focal point.
Undertaking from PSIEC that land is in possession of PSIEC received.
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
Project is about upgradation of Industrial Focal Point
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been constituted
Yes Constituted
251
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Mentioned in Cover letter (Signed by MD)
Received
Basis of elements of project Cost The cost and specifications have been given in the DPR. The cost estimates have been signed by the Executive Engineer and Sub-Divisional Engineer of PSIEC.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project Better roads will improve connectivity/ accessibility to Industrial Focal Point.
Proper usage of water will have a positive impact on the environment and thus improve the access to water supply.
With the upgradation of basic infrastructure, employment opportunities (direct & indirect) will increase.
The increase in manufacturing activity in the region will further result in ignition of support services, thereby leading to the overall development in the region.
Increased investments due to development of the infrastructure will also improve the occupancy of Focal Point.
--
Justification of the proposal The focal point was developed during 1986 with all infrastructure facilities required for upgradation. However, with time basic infrastructures in the focal point has been deteriorated and require upgradation. The proposal will cater to the basic need of maintenance of road, drainage system, power, administrative and other services complex etc. Upgradation of Industrial focal Point will help in attracting the more and more investors/unit holders to establish their units.
--
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA As per MSE-
CDP Approved project cost
Revised Project cost
(i) Cost of land filling/leveling including boundary wall and fencing
103.87 103.87 100.00
(ii) Cost of laying roads 250.73 480.62 200.00 (iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 8.00 8.00 8.00 (iv) Water supply including overhead
tanks, and pump houses 115.76 115.76 110.00
252
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA As per MSE-CDP Approved
project cost Revised
Project cost (v) Water harvesting 8.00 8.00 8.00 (vi) Drainage 56.00 56.00 56.00 (vii) Power (Sub-station and distribution
network) 99.92 99.92 99.92
(viii) Other (Sanitary Conveniences etc.) 8.00 8.00 8.00 (ix) Administrative Office Building 21.52 21.52 20.00 (x) Cyber Centre/Documentation centre/
Telecommunication 20.00 20.00 20.00
(xi) Conference Hall/Exhibition centre 20.00 20.00 20.00 (xii) Bank/Post office 20.00 20.00 20.00 (xiii) First aid centre, Creche Canteen
facilities 19.89 19.89 19.89
(xiv) Effluent Treatment Facilities / Sewerage Treatment Plant
94.00 94.00 80.00
(xv) Contingencies & Pre operative expenses
16.71 21.51 20.00
Total 862.40 1097.09 789.81
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Approved
Amount
Revised
Amount
As per MSE-
CDP
(i) GoI grant under MSE-CDP 629.22* 631.85** 631.85
(ii) Contribution from PSIEC 233.18 465.24 465.24
Total 862.40 1097.09 1097.09
* 80% of eligible project cost i.e. Rs. 786.52 lakh.
** 80% of eligible project cost i.e. Rs. 789.81 lakh.
6. Observations:
(i) As per letter submitted by DIC, SAS Nagar, there are 150 operational units in the
Industrial Estate, whereas, as per SIDBI appraisal report, there are 152 operational
units in the Industrial Estate.
(ii) On examination of submitted documents and revised DPR, it is noted that PSIEC has
the costs of certain components, due to which the total approved project cost has been
revised by PSIEC from Rs. 862.40 lakhs to Rs. 1097.09 lakhs.
(iii) Clarification regarding the no. of units operating in the Industrial Estate including
micro units is required to be submitted.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate
at Focal Point, Chanalon, District SAS Nagar, Punjab at a total project cost of Rs.1097.09 lakh
with GoI assistance of Rs.631.85 lakh and contribution from PSIEC of Rs.465.24 lakh.
******
253
Agenda No.50.4.22: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate at
Focal Point, Batala, Gurdaspur, Punjab.
Background
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during 49th
SCM held on 27.02.19,
subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 30.05.19; Punjab Small Industries and Export Corporation
(PSIEC) Ltd., Chandigarh submitted the following documents and requested to
consider the proposal for final approval:
Documents required Status (i) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Received (ii) Registered land documents with clear title, in
the name of Implementing Agency Undertaking from PSIEC that land is in possession of PSIEC.
(iii) Status of completed ID projects in the State as per format provided and details of Industries operating in the Industrial Estate.
Received
(iv) PSIEC, Chandigarh should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Punjab/ PSIEC, Chandigarh
As per SIBDI, the internal roads will be laid with concrete, laying of roads have been designed as per standards stipulated in MoRTH specifications (4
th
revision and guidelines of IRC 37-2001).
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation
State : Punjab
District : Gurdaspur
Industrial Estate : Batala
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
Yes
Total Area of Industrial Estate/ Area (acre)
104.00 acres
Area to be developed (acre) 66.09 acres Number and sizes of plots to be developed
154 plots with 83 operational units (out of which 62 units are micro and rest 21 units are small units). Details of plots: Category of plots No. of
plots Area
(in acres) 4.0 acres and above plots 2 10.85 1.0 acres and above plots 10 12.20 ½ acres plots 46 25.18 ¼ acres plots 80 15.98 500 sq. yards plots 16 01.66
Total 154 65.87
Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
Nil
Performance of ID projects in State : Satisfactory
254
3. Details about proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency
(IA) Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA): Punjab Small Industries and Export Corporation (a Government of Punjab undertaking)
As per MSE-CDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory -- Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Submitted Received
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
The Focal Point, Batala is located on Aliwal- Batala road, close to NH-54 and Batala – Amritsar road and is around 2 km away from Batala Railway Station. Being an existing industrial area, basic infrastructure facilities viz. roads, power, water supply and telecom facilities are available.
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Punjab Small Scale Industries & Export Corporation Ltd. (PSIEC) was the original owner of the land. When the focal point Batala was developed, the entire land was allotted to the unit holders present in the focal point. PSIEC is still responsible for operation and maintenance of focal point.
Undertaking from PSIEC that land is in possession of PSIEC received.
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with):
Project is about upgradation of Industrial Focal Point
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted :
Yes Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost :
Mentioned in Cover letter (Signed by MD)
Received
Basis of elements of project Cost :
The cost and specifications have been given in the DPR. The cost estimates have been signed by the Executive Engineer and Sub-Divisional Engineer of PSIEC.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project
Better roads will improve connectivity/ accessibility to Industrial Focal Point.
Proper usage of water will have a positive impact on the environment and thus improve the access to water supply.
With the upgradation of basic infrastructure, employment opportunities (direct & indirect) will increase.
The increase in manufacturing activity in the region will further
--
255
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
result in ignition of support services, thereby leading to the overall development in the region.
Increased investments due to development of the infrastructure will also improve the occupancy of Focal Point.
Justification of the Proposal The focal point was developed during late 1970s with all infrastructure facilities required for upgradation. However, with time basic infrastructures in the focal point has been deteriorated and require upgradation. The proposal will cater to the basic need of maintenance of road, drainage system, power, administrative and other services complex etc. Upgradation of Industrial focal Point will help in attracting the more and more investors/unit holders to establish their units.
--
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA Recommended by SIDBI /
As per MSE-CDP
Approved project
cost
Revised Project cost
(i) Cost of land filling / leveling including boundary wall/ fencing
47.76 47.76 47.76
(ii) Cost of laying roads 252.45 252.45 200.00
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry
10.84 10.84 10.00
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks and pump houses
94.18 94.18 94.18
(v) Water harvesting 6.48 6.48 6.48
(vi) Drainage 34.90 34.90 34.90
(vii) Power (Sub-station and distribution network, including street lighting etc., Generation of non-conventional energy)
218.27 229.00 229.00
(viii) Other (Sanitary conveniences etc.)
10.25 10.25 10.00
(ix) Administrative office building 20.00 20.00 20.00
(x) Telecommunication/Cyber Centre/ Documentation Centre
19.42 0.00 0.00
(xi) Conference Hall/Exhibition Centre
29.30 29.30 29.30
(xii) Bank/Post Office 28.65 0.00 0.00
256
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA Recommended by SIDBI /
As per MSE-CDP
Approved project
cost
Revised Project cost
(xiii) Raw material storage facility, marketing outlets
18.85 0.00 0.00
(xiv) First Aid centre, crèche, canteen facilities
20.00 0.00 0.00
(xv) Contingencies and pre-operative expenses
16.23 16.30 16.30
(xvi) Effluent Treatment Facilities 0.00 80.00 80.00
Total 827.58 831.46 777.92
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Approved
Amount
Revised
Amount
As per MSE-
CDP
(i) GoI grant under MSE-CDP 612.31* 622.34** 622.34
(ii) Contribution from PSIEC 215.27 209.12 209.12
Total 827.58 831.46 831.46
* 80% of eligible project cost i.e. Rs. 765.39 lakh.
** 80% of eligible project cost i.e. Rs. 777.92 lakh.
6. Observations:
(i) PSIEC has requested to adjust the funds for the component “Cost of laying roads”
from the savings from the other component “Cost of land filling/leveling including
boundary wall/fencing”. (As per the shcmee guidelines this is not permissible).
(ii) PSIEC has revised the costs of the components due to which approved project cost
has changed from Rs.827.58 lakhs to Rs. 831.46 lakhs.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate
at Focal Point, Batala, Gurdaspur, Punjab at a total project cost of Rs. 831.46 lakh with GoI
assistance of Rs. 622.34 lakh and contribution from PSIEC of Rs. 209.12 lakh.
****
257
Agenda No.50.4.23: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate at
Focal Point, District Hoshiarpur, Punjab.
Background
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during 49th
SCM held on 27.02.19,
subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 30.05.19, Punjab Small Industries and Export Corporation (PSIEC)
Ltd., Chandigarh submitted the following documents and requested to consider the
proposal for final approval.
Documents required Status
(i) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Received (ii) Registered land documents with clear title, in
the name of Implementing Agency Undertaking from PSIEC that land is in possession of PSIEC, Notification of land from Government of Punjab and Jamabandi in English have been received in this regard.
(iii) Status of completed ID projects in the State as per format provided and details of Industries operating in the Industrial Estate.
Received
(iv) PSIEC, Chandigarh should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Punjab/ PSIEC, Chandigarh
Request received from PSIEC to consider laying of road with bituminous in place of Cement Concrete.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation
State : Punjab
District : Hoshiarpur
Industrial Estate : Focal Point Hoshiarpur
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
Yes
Total Area of Industrial Estate/ Area (acre)
82 acres
Area to be developed (acre) 82 acres Number and sizes of plots to be developed
127 plots with 72 units (out of which more than 50% units are micro).
Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
New Dhanchala of Jhans, Distt. Hoshiarpur
Performance of ID projects in State Satisfactory
258
3. Details about proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency
(IA) Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA): Punjab Small Industries and Export Corporation (Government of Punjab undertaking)
As per MSE-CDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory -- Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Report submitted Received
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
The Focal Point, Hoshiarpur is located close to NH-103A. Being an existing industrial area, basic infrastructure facilities viz. roads, power, water supply and telecom facilities are available.
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Punjab Small Scale Industries & Export Corporation Ltd. (PSIEC) was the original owner of the land. When the focal point Hoshiarpur was developed, the entire land was allotted to the unit holders present in the focal point. PSIEC is still responsible for operation and maintenance of focal point.
Undertaking from PSIEC that land is in possession of PSIEC received.
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with):
Project is about upgradation of Industrial Focal Point
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted :
Yes, constituted Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost :
Mentioned in Cover letter (Signed by MD)
Received
Basis of elements of project Cost :
The cost and specifications have been given in the DPR. The cost estimates have been signed by the Executive Engineer and Sub-Divisional Engineer of PSIEC.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project
Better roads will improve connectivity/ accessibility to Industrial Focal Point.
Proper usage of water will have a positive impact on the environment and thus improve the access to water supply.
With the upgradation of basic infrastructure, employment opportunities (direct & indirect) will increase.
The increase in manufacturing activity in the region will further result in ignition of support services, thereby leading to the overall development in the region.
--
259
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
Increased investments due to development of the infrastructure will also improve the occupancy of Focal Point.
Justification of the Proposal The focal point was developed during late 1970s with all infrastructure facilities required for upgradation. However, with time basic infrastructures in the focal point has been deteriorated and require upgradation. The proposal will cater to the basic need of maintenance of road, drainage system, power, administrative and other services complex etc. Upgradation of Industrial focal Point will help in attracting the more and more investors/unit holders to establish their units.
--
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA Recommended by SIDBI /
As per MSE-CDP Approved project cost
Revised Project cost
(i) Cost of land filling / leveling including boundary wall/ fencing
16.06 16.06
16.06
(ii) Cost of laying roads 237.77 237.77 200.00
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry
13.02 13.02 10.00
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks and pump houses
56.51 56.51 56.51
(v) Water harvesting 0.00 0.00 0.00
(vi) Drainage 49.60 49.60 49.60
(vii) Power (Sub-station and distribution network, including street lighting etc., Generation of non-conventional energy)
200.26 220.47 220.47
(viii) Other (Sanitary conveniences etc.)
10.25 10.25 10.00
(ix) Administrative office building 0.00 0.00 0.00
(x) Telecommunication/Cyber Centre/ Documentation Centre
0.00 0.00 0.00
(xi) Conference Hall/Exhibition Centre
14.28 14.28 14.28
(xii) Bank/Post Office 0.00 0.00 0.00
(xiii) Raw material storage facility, 33.41 33.41 33.41
260
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA Recommended by SIDBI /
As per MSE-CDP Approved project cost
Revised Project cost
marketing outlets
(xiv) First Aid centre, crèche, canteen facilities
0.00 0.00 0.00
(xv) Effluent Treatment Facilities 0.00 0.00 0.00
(xvi) Contingencies and pre-operative expenses
12.87 13.02 13.02
Total 644.03 664.39 623.35
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Approved
Amount
Revised
Amount
As per
MSE-CDP
(i) GoI grant under MSE-CDP 482.39* 498.68** 498.68
(ii) Contribution from PSIEC 161.64 165.71 165.71
Total 644.03 664.39 664.39
* 80% of eligible project cost i.e. Rs.602.99 lakh.
** 80% of eligible project cost i.e. Rs. 623.35 lakh.
6. Observations:
(i) While seeking final approval, PSIEC has requested to consider laying of roads with
bituminous in place of Cement Concrete.
(ii) PSIEC has also requested to adjust the funds for the component “Cost of laying
roads” from the savings under the component “Cost of land filling/leveling including
boundary wall/fencing”. The estimated cost of „laying of roads‟ and „land
filling/leveling including boundary wall/fencing‟ are Rs.237.77 lakh and Rs.16.06
lakh respectively. The maximum GoI grant permissible on the component „Cost of
laying roads‟ and „Cost of land filling/leveling including boundary wall/fencing‟ are
Rs. 200 lakh and Rs. 100 lakh respectively. PSIEC has requested to adjust the saving
amount of Rs. 83.94 lakh (Rs.100.00 lakhs-16.06 lakh) which will remain un-availed
from the estimated cost of „land filling/leveling including boundary wall/fencing‟.
(As per the shcmee guidelines this is not permissible). (iii) PSIEC has made changes to the costs of certain components, due to which approved
project cost has changed from Rs. 644.03 lakh to Rs. 664.39 lakh.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate
at Focal Point, District Hoshiarpur, Punjab at a total project cost of Rs. 664.39 lakh with GoI
assistance of Rs. 498.68 lakh and contribution from PSIEC of Rs. 165.71 lakh.
*****
261
Agenda No.50.4.24: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate at
Focal Point, Nawanshahr, Punjab.
Background
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during 49th
SCM held on 27.02.19,
subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 30.05.19; Punjab Small Industries and Export Corporation
(PSIEC) Ltd., Chandigarh submitted the following documents and requested to
consider the proposal for final approval:
Documents required Status
(i) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Received (ii) Registered land documents with clear title, in
the name of Implementing Agency Undertaking from PSIEC that land is in possession of PSIEC and Jamabandi in English have been received in this regard.
(iii) Status of completed ID projects in the State as per format provided and details of Industries operating in the Industrial Estate.
Received
(iv) PSIEC, Chandigarh should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Punjab/ PSIEC, Chandigarh
As per SIBDI, the internal roads will be laid with concrete, laying of roads have been designed as per standards stipulated in MoRTH specifications (4
th
revision and guidelines of IRC 37-2001).
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation
State : Punjab
District : Nawanshahr
Industrial Estate : Focal Point Nawanshahr
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan :
Yes
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre):
50.70 acres
Area to be developed (acre) 34.73 acres
Number and sizes of plots to be developed :
116 plots with 34 operational units (out of which 28 units are micro). Details of plots: Category of plots No. of plots 1½ acres plots 1 1 acres plots 3
262
¾ acres plots 5 ½ acres plots 14 3 Kanal plots 15 ¼ acres plots 26 500 sq. yards plots 52
Total 116
Implementing Period : 24 months
Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.:
Nil
Performance of ID projects in State: Satisfactory
3. Details about proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA): Punjab Small Industries and Export Corporation (a Government of Punjab undertaking)
As per MSE-CDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory. --
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Submitted Received
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
The Focal Point, Nawanshahr is well connected to NH-18 & NH-103A. Nawanshahr Railway Station is present in Industrial focal point, which is 4.2 kms away. Being an existing industrial area, basic infrastructure facilities viz. roads, power, water supply and telecom facilities are available.
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Punjab Small Scale Industries & Export Corporation Ltd. (PSIEC) was the original owner of the land. When the focal point Batala was developed, the entire land was allotted to the unit holders present in the focal point. PSIEC is still responsible for operation and maintenance of focal point.
Undertaking from PSIEC that land is in possession of PSIEC received.
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with):
Project is about upgradation of Industrial Focal Point
--
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted:
Yes Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost:
Mentioned in Cover letter (Signed by MD)
Received
263
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
Basis of elements of project Cost: The cost and specifications have been given in the DPR. The cost estimates have been signed by the Executive Engineer and Sub-Divisional Engineer of PSIEC.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project: Better roads will improve connectivity/ accessibility to Industrial Focal Point.
Proper usage of water will have a positive impact on the environment and thus improve the access to water supply.
With the upgradation of basic infrastructure, employment opportunities (direct & indirect) will increase.
The increase in manufacturing activity in the region will further result in ignition of support services, thereby leading to the overall development in the region.
Increased investments due to development of the infrastructure will also improve the occupancy of Focal Point.
--
Justification of the Proposal: The focal point was developed during 1978 with all infrastructure facilities required for upgradation. However, with time basic infrastructures in the focal point has been deteriorated and require upgradation. The proposal will cater to the basic need of maintenance of road, drainage system, power, administrative and other services complex etc. Upgradation of Industrial focal Point will help in attracting the more and more investors/unit holders to establish their units.
--
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA Recommended by SIDBI/ As per
MSE-CDP Approved project cost
Revised Project cost
(i) Cost of land filling / leveling including boundary wall/ fencing
28.50 28.50
28.50
(ii) Cost of laying roads 205.92 205.92 200.00
(iii) Road side greenery & social 4.43 4.43 4.43
264
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA Recommended by SIDBI/ As per
MSE-CDP Approved project cost
Revised Project cost
forestry
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks and pump houses
113.34 113.34 110.00
(v) Water harvesting 0.00 0.00 0.00
(vi) Drainage 28.83 28.83 28.83
(vii) Power (Sub-station and distribution network, including street lighting etc., Generation of non-conventional energy)
170.70 193.13 193.13
(viii) Other (Sanitary conveniences etc.)
10.25 10.25 10.00
(ix) Administrative office building
0.00 0.00 0.00
(x) Telecommunication/Cyber Centre/ Documentation Centre
0.00 0.00 0.00
(xi) Conference Hall/Exhibition Centre
14.28 14.28 14.28
(xii) Bank/Post Office 0.00 0.00 0.00
(xiii) Raw material storage facility, marketing outlets
33.41 33.41 33.41
(xiv) First Aid centre, crèche, canteen facilities
0.00 0.00 0.00
(xv) Effluent Treatment Facilities
150.00 150.00 80.00
(xvi) Contingencies and pre-operative expenses
12.43 15.64 15.64
Total 772.09 797.73 718.22
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S.
No.
Particulars Approved
Amount
Revised
Amount
As per MSE-
CDP
(i) GoI grant under MSE-CDP 554.06* 574.58** 574.58
(ii) Contribution from PSIEC 218.03 223.15 223.15
Total 772.09 797.73 797.73
* 80% of eligible project cost i.e. Rs.692.58 lakh.
** 80% of eligible project cost i.e. Rs. 718.22 lakh.
265
6. Observations:
(i) PSIEC has requested to adjust the funds for the component “Effluent treatment
facilities” from the savings under the component “Drainage”. The estimated cost of
„Effluent treatment facilities‟ and „Drainage‟ are Rs. 150.00 lakh and Rs. 28.83 lakh
respectively. The maximum GoI grant permissible on the component „Effluent
treatment facilities‟ and „Drainage‟ are Rs. 80.00 lakh and Rs. 60.00 lakh
respectively. PSIEC has requested to adjust the saving amount of Rs. 31.17 lakh
(Rs.60.00 lakhs-28.83 lakh) which will remain un-availed from the estimated cost of
Drainage and also requested O/o DC, MSME to provide excess amount of Rs. 70.00
lakh (150.00 lakh-80.00 lakh) of Effluent treatment facilities. (As per the shcmee
guidelines this is not permissible).
(ii) PSIEC has made certain changes to the costs of the components due to which
approved project cost has also changed from 772.09 lakhs to Rs. 797.73 lakhs.
(iii) As per letter submitted by DIC, SBS Nagar, there are 42 operational units in the
Industrial Estate, whereas, as per the details submitted by PSIEC (verified by GM,
DIC), 35 units are operating in the Industrial Estate.
(iv) In light of point No.(iii) above, clarification regarding the no. of units operating in the
Industrial Estate including micro units is required to be submitted.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate
at Focal Point, Nawanshahr, Punjab at a total project cost of Rs. 797.73 lakh with GoI assistance
of Rs. 574.58 lakh and contribution from PSIEC of Rs. 223.15 lakh.
********
266
Agenda No.50.4.25: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Industrial Focal
Point, Kotkapura, District Faridkot, Punjab.
Background
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 49th
SCM held on 27.02.19,
subject to submission of the requisite documents prior to final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 30.05.19, Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation (PSIEC)
Ltd., Chandigarh submitted the following documents and requested to consider the
proposal for final approval.
Documents required Status (i) Registered land documents with clear title
in the name of Implementing Agency Undertaking from PSIEC that land is in possession of PSIEC, Notification of land from Government of Punjab along with copy of layout plan received.
(ii) Copy of approved layout plan Received (iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Received (iv) Certificate from State Government for
compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines. Received
(v) Status of Completed ID Projects in the State as per format provided and details of operating units in present project.
Received
(vi) Undertaking from State Government that more than 50% units are micro units.
As per the letter dated 15.10.18 by GM, DIC, Faridkot, there are 98 units, out of which, more than 50% are micro units whereas as per the details of industries operating in the Industrial Estate submitted by PSIEC vide letter dated 07.05.19 (verified by GM, DIC) and SIDBI appraisal report, 47 units are operating in the Industrial Estate.
(vii) PSIEC, Chandigarh should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Punjab/ PSIEC, Chandigarh
The roads will be laid with cement concrete, laying of roads have been designed as per standards stipulated in MoRTH specifications (4th revision and guidelines of IRC 37-2001) as mentioned in Detailed project report and SIDBI appraisal report.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation
State : Punjab
District : Faridkot
Industrial Estate : Focal Point Kotkapura
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
Yes
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre)
53.25 acres
267
Particulars Description Area to be developed (acre) 35.28 acres Number and sizes of plots developed 111 plots with 47 operational units.
Category of plots No. of plots
Area (in acres)
A:- Irregular plots 05 6.50 B:- ½ acres plots 10 5.80 C:- ¼ acres and above plots
16 22
4.56 4.78
D:- 500 sq. yards plots 32 2.97 “C” Type Plots C-12 to C-37 along with road allotted
26 6.05
Total 111 30.66
Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
Nil
Performance of ID projects in State Satisfactory
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks Implementing Agency (IA) Punjab Small Industries and Export
Corporation (Government of Punjab undertaking)
As per MSE-CDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory -- Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Report submitted Received
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
The Focal Point, Kotkapura is located close to NH-54. Being an existing industrial area, basic infrastructure facilities viz. roads, power, water supply and telecom facilities are available.
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Punjab Small Scale Industries & Export Corporation Ltd. (PSIEC) was the original owner of the land. When the focal point Kotkapura was developed, the entire land was allotted to the unit holders present in the focal point. PSIEC is still responsible for operation and maintenance of focal point.
Undertaking from PSIEC that land is in possession of PSIEC received.
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
Project is about upgradation of Industrial Focal Point
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been constituted
Yes, constituted Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Mentioned in Cover letter (Signed by MD) Received
Basis of elements of project Cost
The cost and specifications have been given in the DPR. The cost estimates have been signed by the Executive Engineer and Sub-
--
268
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks Divisional Engineer of PSIEC.
Tangible Outcomes of the project
Better roads will improve connectivity/ accessibility to Industrial Focal Point.
Proper usage of water will have a positive impact on the environment and thus improve the access to water supply.
With the upgradation of basic infrastructure, employment opportunities (direct & indirect) will increase.
The increase in manufacturing activity in the region will further result in ignition of support services, thereby leading to the overall development in the region.
Increased investments due to development of the infrastructure will also improve the occupancy of Focal Point.
--
Justification of the Proposal The focal point was developed during 1990s with all infrastructure facilities required for upgradation. However, with time basic infrastructures in the focal point has been deteriorated and require upgradation. The proposal will cater to the basic need of maintenance of road, drainage system, power, administrative and other services complex etc. Upgradation of Industrial focal Point will help in attracting more and more investors/unit holders to establish their units.
--
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA As per MSE-
CDP / Recommended
by SIDBI
Approved project
cost
Revised Project cost
(i) Cost of land filling / leveling including boundary wall/ fencing
21.10 25.50 25.50
(ii) Cost of laying roads 107.92 165.00 165.00 (iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 4.69 4.69 4.69 (iv) Water supply including overhead tanks
and pump houses 10.00 47.52 47.52
(v) Water harvesting 6.48 6.48 6.48 (vi) Drainage 5.68 5.68 5.68
(vii) Power (Sub-station and distribution network, including street lighting etc., Generation of non-conventional energy)
248.20 248.20 248.20
(viii) Other (Sanitary conveniences etc.) 10.00 10.00 10.00 (ix) Administrative office building 0.00 21.52 20.00 (x) Telecommunication/Cyber Centre/
Documentation Centre 0.00 20.00 20.00
(xi) Conference Hall/Exhibition Centre 0.00 30.00 30.00 (xii) Bank/Post Office 0.00 20.00 20.00
(xiii) Raw material storage facility, marketing outlets
0.00 0.00 0.00
(xiv) First Aid centre, crèche, canteen facilities
0.00 19.89 19.89
(xv) Effluent Treatment Facilities 0.00 165.00 80.00 (xvi) Contingencies and pre-operative
expenses 8.28 15.79 15.79
Total 422.35 805.27 718.75
269
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Approved Amount Revised Amount
(i) GoI grant under MSE-CDP 337.88* 575.00**
(ii) Contribution from PSIEC 84.47 230.27
Total 422.35 805.27
* 80% of eligible project cost i.e. Rs.422.35 lakh (as per DPR).
** 80% of eligible project cost i.e. Rs. 718.75 lakh (as per SIDBI Appraisal Report)
6. Observations:
(i) PSIEC has requested to adjust the funds for the component “Effluent treatment
facilities” from the savings under the component “Drainage”. The estimated cost of
„Effluent treatment facilities‟ and „Drainage‟ are Rs. 165.00 lakh and Rs. 5.68 lakh
respectively. The maximum GoI grant permissible on the component „Effluent
treatment facilities‟ and „Drainage‟ are Rs. 80.00 lakh and Rs. 60.00 lakh
respectively. PSIEC has requested to adjust the saving amount of Rs. 54.32 lakh
(Rs.60.00 lakhs-5.68 lakh) which will remain un-availed from the estimated cost of
Drainage and also requested O/o DC, MSME to provide excess amount of Rs.
85.00 lakh (165.00 lakh-80.00 lakh) of Effluent treatment facilities. (As per the
shcmee guidelines this is not permissible).
(ii) On examination of submitted documents and revised DPR, it is noted that PSIEC
have made certain changes to the costs of the components due to which approved
project cost has been changed from Rs. 422.35 lakh to Rs. 805.27 lakh.
(iii) Clarification regarding the no. of units operating in the Industrial Estate including
micro units is required to be submitted.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate
at Focal Point, Kotkapura, District Faridkot, Punjab at a total project cost of Rs. 805.27 lakh with
GoI assistance of Rs. 575.00 lakh and contribution from PSIEC of Rs. 230.27 lakh.
*********
270
Agenda No.50.4.26: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate at
Sanwar, Udaipur, Rajasthan.
Background
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 48th
SCM held on 12.11.18
subject to submission of following documents prior to Final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 19.03.19, Commissioner, Industries & Corporate Social
Responsibility, Government of Rajasthan submitted the documents and requested to
consider the proposal for final approval:
S. No. Documents required Status
(i) SIDBI appraisal report. Received
(ii) Copy of approved layout plan signed by
Competent Authority.
Received
(iii) Registered land documents in the name of
Implementing Agency.
Received
(iv) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost
escalation, if any, over and above the approved
project cost.
Received
(v) Status of completed ID projects in the State as
per format to be provided by Office of DC
(MSME).
Received
(vi) Certificate from State Government for
compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.
Received
(vii) Certificate from State Government that more
than 50% of units in the Industrial Estate are
micro.
Received
(viii) RIICO, Jaipur should consider laying of roads
with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous
and proper drainages built in a professional
manner to serve the purpose for relatively
longer period of time. The additional cost on
this account shall be borne by the Government
of Rajasthan / RIICO, Jaipur.
As SIDBI appraisal report,
construction of cement
roads is necessary to
withstand heavy loads.
The project involves
construction of cement
concrete road of 1.75 km.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization: Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment Corporation Ltd.
State: Rajasthan
District: Udaipur
Industrial Estate: Industrial Area Sanwar
271
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
Yes
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 129.18 acres
Area to be developed (acre) 129.18 acres
Number and sizes of plots developed Size of plots (m)
No. of plots
30x65 : 36 30x50 : 36 25x40 : 74 20x50 : 23 20x25 : 14
Total : 183
Implementing Period 24 months
Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up etc.
IID Kaladwas in Udaipur District was sanctioned on 09.11.98
Performance of ID projects in State Satisfactory
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Rajasthan State Industrial Development & Investment Corporation (RIICO) Ltd., Jaipur
As per guidelines
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory --
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report
Submitted Received
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
Sanwar Industrial Area is situated in the Udaipur district of Rajasthan. The Industrial Area is easily accessible through all modes of transport and is situated near Udaipur-Chittaurgarh road and is located 2 kms from main National Highway. Nearest bus stand is a distance of about 3km from the Industrial Area. Nearest Railway Station, Fatehnagar is also situated at a distance of about 3 kms and nearest Airport is Udaipur is situated at a distance of 45km.
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Yes Received
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc
Already existing Industrial Estate
272
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
complied with)
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Yes Received
Basis of elements of project Cost As per DPR, the estimates have been prepared on the basis of schedules of rates as per PWD BSR-2016 for road and BSR-2013 building works (Udaipur Circle).
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project Some of the benefits of the proposed project are: The proposed development shall also increase the employment generation both direct & indirect and economic status. Presently, there are around 1095 direct and indirect employees and it is expected that there would be an increase of employment generation by 41% i.e. 450 new employment shall be generated.
--
Justification of the Proposal The said Industrial Area was set up during 1998 by RIICO and most of the infrastructure facilities have become obsolete. There is sever need for up-gradation of infrastructure in the area specially the roads and drainage system.
--
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars As per IA As per MSE-CDP/ Recommended by SIDBI
(i) Cost of land filling/levelling including boundary wall and fencing
28.33 28.33
(ii) Cost of laying roads 251.43 200.00
(iii) Drainage 60.02 60.00
(iv) Power (Sub-station & distribution network including street lights etc.)
79.45 79.45
Total 419.23 367.78
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars As per IA As per SIDBI / MSE-CDP
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 294.22 294.22*
273
S. No. Particulars As per IA As per SIDBI / MSE-CDP
(ii) Contribution form RIICO 125.01 125.01
Total 419.23 419.23
*SIDBI recommended GoI grant of Rs. 294.22 lakh as 80% of eligible project cost of Rs. 367.78
lakh.
6. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate
at Sanwar, Udaipur, Rajasthan at a total project cost of Rs.419.23 lakh with GoI grant of
Rs.294.22 lakh and RIICO‟s contribution of Rs.125.01 lakh.
*******
274
Agenda No.50.4.27: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate at
Ajeetgarh, Sikar, Rajasthan.
Background
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 48th
SCM held on 12.11.18
subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 21.02.19, RIICO, Jaipur submitted the following documents and
requested to consider the proposal for final approval.
S. No. Documents required Status (i) SIDBI appraisal report. Received (ii) Copy of approved layout plan signed by Competent
Authority. Received
(iii) Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency.
Received
(iv) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost.
Received
(v) Status of completed ID projects in the State as per format to be provided by Office of DC (MSME).
Received
(vi) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.
Received
(vii) RIICO, Jaipur should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Rajasthan / RIICO, Jaipur.
As per SIBDI report, the roads will be laid down with Cement concrete.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization: Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment
Corporation Ltd.
State: Rajasthan
District: Sikar
Industrial Estate: Industrial Area Ajeetgarh
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
Yes
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre)
142.56 acres
Area to be developed (acre) 142.56 acres
Number and sizes of plots developed
Size of plots (m)
No. of plots
80x100 : 14 50x100 : 4 50x80 : 24 30x65 : 34 30x50 : 31
275
Particulars Description
25x40 : 6 20x35 : 30 20x25 : 33
Total : 176
Implementing Period 24 months
Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
Yes, IID centre Palsana was sanctioned by GoI on 09.02.11 and completed on 31.03.15.
Performance of ID projects in State Satisfactory
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment Corporation (RIICO) Ltd., Jaipur
As per guidelines
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory --
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Submitted Received
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
The Industrial Area is easily accessible through all modes of transport and is located at Shahpura-Sikar road. It is just 2km from main Ajeetgarh Town. Nearest Bus stand is at a distance of about 2km, Nearest Railway station is Shri Madhopur at a distance of about 30km and nearest Airport is at Jaipur which is at a distance of 85km.
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Yes Received
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
Already existing Industrial Estate
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Yes Received
Basis of elements of project Cost The detailed estimates for up-gradation of Infrastructural facilities have been prepared on the basis of basic schedule of rates of PWD Sikar circle BSR (Road) 2016 & its corrigendum for road.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project Up-gradation will provide support to --
276
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
industry as a whole. The project will have significant socio-economic benefit to the region in terms of the employment generation, improvement in quality of life of the workers, reducing congestion, competitiveness to existing units and development of infrastructure.
Justification of the Proposal The Industrial area was set up during the year 2005-06 and needs up-gradation. The up-gradation of the infrastructure facility will not only give face lift but also increase the production of the industrial estate by attracting investors and collaborators with modern technology.
--
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
As per MSE-CDP/ Recommended by
SIDBI
(i) Cost of land filling/levelling including boundary wall and fencing:
11.06 11.06
(ii) Cost of laying roads 394.44 200.00
(iii) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses
12.62 12.62
(iv) Water harvesting 10.64 10.00
(v) Drainage 59.38 59.38
(vi) Power distribution, Street light arrangements, etc. 26.76 26.76
Total 514.90 319.82
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA As per SIDBI / MSE-CDP
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 255.86 255.86*
(ii) Contribution from RIICO 259.04 259.04
Total 514.90 514.90
*SIDBI recommended GoI grant of Rs. 255.86 lakh as 80% of eligible project cost of Rs. 319.82
lakh.
6. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate
at Ajeetgarh, Sikar, Rajasthan at a total project cost of Rs. 514.90 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs.
255.86 lakh and RIICO‟s contribution of Rs. 259.04 lakh.
*****
277
Agenda No.50.4.28: Proposal for Final approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre
in Okhrey Carpet Making Cluster, West Sikkim.
Background:
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 48th
SCM held on 12.11.18,
subject to submission of following documents prior to Final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 10.04.19, IIE, Guwahati (Implementing Agency) has submitted the
documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.
Documents required Status
(i) SIDBI appraisal report Received (ii) List of SPV members (with units address) along with
shareholding pattern Received
(iii) NOC from State Pollution Control Board Received (iv) Certificate from State Government regarding compliance of
GFR/ CVC guidelines Received
(v) Registered land deed in the name of SPV (if land is on lease basis, registered lease deed for a minimum period of 30 years)
Received
(vi) Name of the State Govt. and MSME officials in SPV Received
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Basic Information of Cluster
Name of Cluster: Okhrey Carpet Making Cluster District: West Sikkim Location of Cluster: Okhrey, West Sikkim Lok Sabha Constituency: Sikkim Main Product: Sofa Set Carpet (5‟x2‟ one no. & 2‟x2‟ two nos.), Single
Bed Carpet (6‟x3‟), Diwan Carpet (6‟x2‟), Car Carpet (4‟x1.5‟ & 1.5‟x1.5‟ two nos.).
No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium)
Micro 40 Small - Medium -
Turn over for the last five years (Rs. in lakh):
Year Amount 2013-14 68.00 2014-15 74.00 2015-16 81.00 2016-17 89.00 2017-18 98.50
Exports for the last five years (Rs. in crore):
Nil
Employment in Cluster: 800 nos. (Direct – 300 & Indirect – 500) Technology Details: The weavers of Okhrey Carpet Making Cluster have
inherited the skill from their ancestors and use traditional Indian carpet making processes with age old type of implements and tools.
Whether DS Conducted: Yes. Main findings of DSR: The Diagnostic study was conducted over Lower
Okhrey, Bhareng, Saprey Nagi, Latteytar, Pureytar and Ribdi.
Total no. of carpet weaving units in Okhrey is 106. Most of the unit stakeholders are women. They all
belong to the ST category. 40 No. of units have already being registered and is a part of the SPV at present.
There are 4 major varieties of products they produce
278
at present- Sofa Set Carpet, Single Bed Carpet, Divan Carpet and Car Carpet.
They use Wool, Cotton String and Thin cotton string as raw materials for the production of the carpets.
The artisans get the raw material from the local markets like Sombaria and Jorethang. Lack of proper supply of raw materials is also a serious setback faced by the stakeholders.
Main Problems of Cluster : The artisans or weavers in the Okhrey carpet making cluster has limited access to Institutional services due to their low level of information process capacity and knowledge.
Due to poor economic status, access to technological advancement among the core cluster actors is poor.
The educational attainment in respect of qualification and technical skills is limited and becomes barrier for developing business orientation among the artisans weavers.
Due to socioeconomic status of low income segment, the credit assistance to Carpet Artisan or weavers is totally absent.
Study reveals that rarely the support institutions provide technical, marketing, training, advisory services to the artisans weavers of the cluster.
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks (a.) Justification for CFC
The growth of this cluster has been sluggish, in spite of high level skill of the artisans due to the following reasons: They are making smaller carpets with the
help of traditional and cheap wooden carpet weaving looms due to their inability to procure metallic looms required for floor carpets, larger carpets.
They cannot afford buying, using high end hardware, software for modern carpet design.
They are little aware about Tufted Carpets they cannot afford to procure Tufting Machines.
Moreover they cannot afford latex application, secondary backing machines
Their basic inability to afford the facilities, mentioned above, has turned the cluster growth inconsistent and sluggish.
--
(b.) Location of CFC Village : Latteytar, Okhrey, West Sikkim. -- % age of units in radius of 5km
100 --
% age of units in radius of 10km
0 --
(c.) Land for CFC i. Whether land acquired Yes on lease. Lease deed in the
name of SPV for a period of 30 years received.
ii. Title is in name of Title is in name of the SPV i.e. Okhrey Carpet Making Cluster Cooperative Society Ltd.
iii. Valuation and its basis
Rs. 5.00 lakhs for 20 years lease.
iv. Land is sufficient Yes v. Change of land use Yes.
279
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks vi. If on lease, duration of lease
30 years
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
Yes.
(d.) Total Building area(sq ft)
3000 sq. ft. --
(e.) Rate of construction of building
-- --
(f.) Main Facility Proposed
Carpet Design CAD and Compatible printing facility.
Metallic looms of various sizes for production of floor carpets up to 18‟ X 18‟ Size.
Tufted Carpet Making. Latex and Backing application. Spooling facility. Carpet washing and Drying.
--
g.) Prod capacity of CFC The member stakeholders will bring woolen yarns, thick cotton and thin cotton yarn of required quantity to the CFC for making woven knotted carpets in the metallic looms (for bigger size only). They will continue to manufacture carpets up to 6/3 ft sizes in their home based units. However, they will start weaving carpets up to 18‟x18‟ with the help of big metallic looms in the CFC.
The stakeholders will bring necessary raw materials to manufacture tufted carpets from the machine commissioned in the CFC. The CFC is planned in such a way that the stakeholders can get all required services to produce a. Woven Carpet 3000 sq m per yr b. Tufted Carpet - 6000sq m peryr The above two figures are for 100percent capacity utilization of the CFC as well as the individual units of the Cluster.
--
(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)
S. No. Parameter Before Intervention
After Intervention
1. Total No. of units 40 200 2 Total sales
(Rs. in lakh) 98.50
174.00
3 Investment (Rs. in lakh)
15.00 30.00
4 Profit (%) 8-10 20-25 5 Employment
Direct – 300 Indirect – 500
Direct – 600 Indirect – 1000
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
Not required.
Received
(j.) Man Power in CFC 25 nos. -- (k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
The total revenue per year (at 100% capacity utilisation) will be Rs. 123.13 lakh. The revenue generation includes another small channel for generation of income through training.
280
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA) Remarks
(a.) Name and Address Okhrey Carpet Making Cluster Cooperative Society Ltd., P.O. – Okhrey, West Sikkim – 737122.
--
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)
The SPV is a registered society. --
(c.) Name of the State Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
- Received
(d.) Date of formation of SPV
26.07.13 --
(e.) Number of Members 40 nos.
--
(f.) Bye Laws or MoA and AOA submitted
Yes. --
(g.) Authorized Share Capital
Rs. 1.50 lakh --
(h.) Paid up capital Rs. 0.40 lakh. -- (i.) Shareholding Pattern Submitted. Received (j.) Commitment letter for contribution
Submitted. --
(k.) SPV specific A/c Sikkim State Co-operative Bank Ltd : A/c No: 101334004100038
--
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation.
-- --
(m.) Technical Institution IIE, Guwahati (n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
Submitted. --
(o) (a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
40 KW --
(b) Water Local supply -- (c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities
Not required --
4. Implementation Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency
Indian Institute of Entrepreneurship (IIE) (autonomous organisation under Ministry of Skill Development & Entrepreneurship), Guwahati
As per MSE-CDP guidelines.
(b.) Fund receiving Agency (c.) Implementation 12 months 24 Months from
281
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
Period date of final approval as per guidelines.
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
Submitted Received
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 62nd
meeting held on 05.11.18, recommended the proposal for placing before Steering Committee for in-principle approval. (f.) Approval of Technical
Committee (g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:
-- --
(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)
-- -
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency Remarks
(a.) BEP 56.77% As per SIDBI
55.03%
(b.) IRR, Payback period 19.19% (Before Tax)
14.37% (After Tax)
5 years
As per SIDBI
IRR before tax –
9.90%
IRR after tax –
9.90 %
(c.) DSCR N/A --
(d.) Return on Capital
employed (ROCE)
26.76% (Before Tax)
21.34% (After Tax)
As per SIDBI
16.45 %
(e.) NPV Positive --
(f.) DER Not Applicable --
(g.) Sensitivity Analysis Yes, the figures are positive as required
by guidelines: a) NPV – positive
c)Breakeven Point 56.77%
--
(h.) Status of CFCs
approved in the State
Nil --
6. Proposed project cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA As per MSE-CDP/
Recommended by
SIDBI
(i) Building & Civil Works 32.00 32.00
(ii) Plant & Machinery 218.88 218.88
(iii) Miscellaneous Fixed Assets 2.45 2.45
(iv) Preliminary Expenses 1.48 1.48
(v) Pre-operative expenses 3.00 3.00
(vi) Provision for contingencies 11.58 11.58
(vii) Margin money for working
capital
0.87 0.87
Total 270.26 270.26
282
7. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars % Proposed by
IA
As per MSE-
CDP
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 88.16 238.26 238.26
(ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Sikkim 9.99 27.00 27.00
(iii) SPV contribution 1.85 5.00 5.00*
Total 100.00 270.26 270.26
As approved in 48th
SCM, SPV contribution is <10%
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Description No. Cost
A Main Equipments
1. Computer, Plotter for Carpet Cad 1 2.50
2. Carpet Cad Software 1 5.00
3. Metallic Loom, 6m X 6m 1 0.80
4. Metallic Loom, 6m X 4m 5 3.50
5. Metallic Loom, 15 ft X 10 ft 8 3.60
6. Jacquard Loom 1 2.00
7. Powered Charkha/spool making/weft making machine 10 1.22
8. Tufted Carpet making Machine 1 set 68.00
9. Powered Designing Scissor 10 0.30
10. Carpet Leveling Machine 2 0.14
11. Carpet Washing Machine 1 0.25
12. Carpet Drying Machine 1 0.25
13. Carpet Backing Machine - Small 2 9.90
14. Carpet Backing Machine - Medium 1 8.00
15. Carpet Backing Machine - Big 1 11.40
16. Shuttle 120 0.68
17. Measuring Tape 40 0.19
18. Toolkit for Weavers 40 1.58
19. Knife 40 0.80
20 Yarn stand 20 0.17
21. Weighing Balance (10 Kg) 1 0.08
22 Weighing Balance (100 Kg) 1 0.25
23 Low Pressure Steam generator 1 2.00
24 Other Miscellaneous Hand Tools 10 sets 1.50
25 Water Supply system 1 set 9.20
26 Fire Prevention system 1 set 6.00
27. Transformer 1 2.39
28. Captive D G set and other electrical 1 set 9.50
283
S. No. Description No. Cost
29. Cost towards GST, P&F, Transit Insurance etc. 35.93
30. Cost towards GST, P&F, Transit Insurance, Sea Freight, duties, clearing charges etc.
25.00
31. Power connection 14.25
Total 218.88
9. Observation:
(i) As recommended by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC), a clause would be
added in the Sanction Order “In case of any deviation from the agreed principles of
utilization and denial of fair access to the eligible stakeholders, assets created would be
handed over to another SPV through a transparent procedure for smooth and effective
operationalization of the facilities”.
10. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of Common Facility
Centre (CFC) in Okhrey Carpet Making Cluster, West Sikkim at a total project cost of Rs.270.26
lakh with GoI grant of Rs.238.26 lakh, State Government‟s contribution of Rs.27.00 lakh and
SPV‟s contribution of Rs.5.00 lakh.
*******
284
Agenda No.50.4.29: Proposal for final approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre
(CFC) in Wooden Furniture Cluster, Salem, Tamil Nadu.
Background:
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 48th SCM held on
12.11.18, subject to submission of following documents prior to Final approval:
(i) Confirmation from State Government regarding enhancement of
their contribution towards the project.
(ii) Registered land documents in the name of SPV (If land is on lease
basis, registered lease deed for a minimum period of 30 years is
required).
(iii) Tangible outcomes such as number of units, turnover, export,
employment etc.
(iv) Certificate from State Pollution Control Board.
(v) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution.
(vi) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(vii) Details of SPV bank account.
(viii) Commitment letter from State Government / IA to meet the cost
escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost.
(ix) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the
cluster are Micro/SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
(x) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC
guidelines.
(ii) Vide PUC dated 09.04.19, General Manager (Admin), TANSIDCO, Chennai
submitted above documents and requested to consider the proposal for final
approval:
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Basic Information of Cluster
Name of Cluster : Wooden Furniture Cluster
District : Salem
Location of Cluster : Salem
Lok Sabha Constituency : Dharamapuri, Kallakurichi, Namakkal, Salem
Main Product :
(i) Finger Joint Board Development.
(ii) Raw Material Primary Processing
(iii)Seasoning of Wood
(iv) Value Added Components Development
No. of Enterprises including break
up (Micro, Small, Medium) :
Micro 250
Small 50
Total 300
285
Turnover for the last five years :
Year Amount
(Rs. in crore)
2010-11 195.00
2011-12 215.00
2012-13 240.00
2013-14 270.00
2014-15 300.00
Exports for the last five years : Nil
Employment in Cluster : 9600 Persons (Direct – 3600 & Indirect – 6000)
Technology Details : (i) Govt. College of Engineering Salem,
(ii) Thyiagarajar Polytechnic College, Salem,
(iii) Govt. ITI, Salem
Whether DS Conducted : Yes
Main findings of DSR : The diagnostic study recommended the establishment of a
common facility centre
Main Problems of Cluster : No facility to process wood
Other Information : -
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Justification for CFC To have facilities like wood processing, Quality enhancement etc.
--
(b.) Location of CFC Salem --
% age of units in radius of 5km 20
% age of units in radius of 10km
50 --
(c.) Land for CFC
i. Whether land acquired Leased land for 33 years Received
ii. Title is in name of Salem Furniture Cluster India Private Limited
iii. Valuation and its basis Land on lease basis at the cost of Rs.1.37 cr
iv. Land is sufficient Yes
v. Change of land use NA
vi. If on lease, duration of lease 33 Years
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
Yes
(d.) Total Building area 25100 sq ft --
(e.) Rate of construction of building
Rs. 125.5 lakh --
(f.) Main Facility Proposed (i) Primary processing of Raw material (ii) seasoning of soft and hard wood (iii) Finger joint board development
--
(g.) Prod capacity of CFC (i) Wood Seasoning - 7500 cft pm b) finger joint - 4200 boards pm
--
(h.) Major Outputs / Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of
Parameters Before CFC After CFC Employme 9600 11500
Received
286
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/ domestic sales and direct/ indirect employment, etc.)
nt (in Nos) Export (Rs in Cr)
- 10.00
Turnover (Rs in Cr)
300.00 500.00
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
Provided Received
(j.) Man Power in CFC 101 Nos --
(k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
Provided Received
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Name and Address Salem Furniture Cluster India Private Limited, 58, AKM Complex, Brindhavan Road, Fairlands , Salem -16, Tamil Nadu
--
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)
Company under act 2013 Rule 8 --
(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
- --
(d.) Date of formation of SPV 29.01.16 --
(e.) Number of Members 30 Members
(f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted
Yes --
(g.) Authorized Share Capital - --
(h.) Paid up capital - --
(i.) Shareholding Pattern Provided Received.
(j.) Commitment letter for contribution
Provided Received.
(k.) SPV specific A/c Account No: 819020110000626 (Bank of India)
Received.
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation
- --
(m.) Technical Institution (i) Government College of Engineering , Salem (ii) Tyagarajar Polytechnic College, Salem (iii) Government ITI, Salem
--
(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
- Required
(o.)
287
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
815 KVA --
(b) Water 20000 Ltr/Day --
(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities - --
4. Implement Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency Tamilnadu Small Industries Development Corporation Limited (TANSIDCO), Chennai
As per MSE-CDP guidelines
(b.) Fund receiving Agency Tamilnadu Small Industries Development Corporation Limited (TANSIDCO), Chennai
(c.) Implementation Period 2 Years
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
DPR Appraised by SLSC meeting held in Salem on 10.11.16 under chairmanship of Principal Secretary, MSME, Govt. of Tamil Nadu
Received
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
- --
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee
- Recommended the Proposal
(g.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)
- --
5. Financial Analysis of CFC:
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) BEP 27% --
(b.) IRR, Payback period 23.14% --
(c.) DSCR Not Applicable --
(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
28.96% --
(e.) NPV - --
(f.) DER - --
(g.) Sensitivity Analysis - --
6. Proposed Project Cost is as follow:
(Rs. in Lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
As per SIDBI/ MSE-CDP
1 Land and its Development 15.00 15.00
2 Building and other Civil Constructions 125.50 125.50
3 Plant & Machinery(including electrification) 1197.00 1197.00
288
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
As per SIDBI/ MSE-CDP
4 Misc. fixed assets 10.00 10.00
5 Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses, maximum 2% of project cost
28.00 28.00
6 Contingency (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery)
62.36 62.36
7 Margin money for Working Capital 8.47 8.47
Total Project Cost 1446.33 1446.33
7. Proposed means of finance are as follows:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed
by IA
As per SIDBI/
MSE-CDP
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 1112.22 1112.22
(ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Tamil Nadu 144.63 144.63
(iii) SPV contribution 189.48 189.48
Total 1446.33 1446.33
8. Plant and Machinery (with brief specification) –
(Rs. in lakh)
S.
No.
Description No. Power Requirement
(HP/KW)
Cost
1. Server 1 0 1.00
2. Work Station Computer CPU 4 1 1.46
3. Work Station Monitor 4 1 0.42
4. UPS for Work Station Computers 1 0 0.32
5. Battery for Work Station Computer Ups 6 0 0.82
6. All in one printer 1 1 0.54
8. LCD Projector 1 1 0.45
9. Projector Screen 1 0 0.22
10. WIFI Networking 1 0 0.04
11. Plotter 1 0 1.15
12. Softwares for Design Studio and CNC
Machines
1 0 5.25
14. Chemical Treatment Plant 1 20 10.46
15. Wood Seasoning Klin 5 60 34.56
16. Boiler 1 30 25.34
17. Mother Trolley 1 0 1.28
18. Klin Trolley 10 0 10.24
19. CTP Trolley 6 0 3.84
289
S.
No.
Description No. Power Requirement
(HP/KW)
Cost
20. Track Prallel Line 1 0 12.50
21. Thin Kerf Band Saw with Tool Grinding
Accessories and Related Equipment
1 25 41.30
22. Multi Rip Saw 1 50 47.20
23. Six Side Moulder 1 60 35.40
24. Pneumatic Cross Cut Saw 1 12 5.56
25. Sliding Table Panel Saw 1 10 7.80
26. Finger Joint Machine 1 50 154.07
27. CNC Master Cut ( templating solutions ) 1 30 123.90
29. auto copy lathe 1 12 47.00
30. wide belt sander with spiral cutter head 1 70 47.40
31. rotary composer 1 12 64.90
32. rectangular twin tabel tennoner 1 8 21.24
33. twin table motiser 1 4 11.32
34. multi functional cnc router 1 25 82.40
35. wide belt sander ( smooth sanding) 1 60 47.20
36. auto copy shaper 1 22 29.50
37. double end tenoner 1 34 88.50
38. dust extraction system provision 1 25 53.10
39. air compressor 1 45 5.90
40. pneumatic lines 1 0 9.44
41. universal tool grinder 1 6 11.80
42. tooling for various machine 1 0 29.50
43. dg sets 2 0 30.30
44. transformer 1 0 21.24
45. fork lift 2 0 14.16
Total 1140.00
9. Observations:
(A) Following documents are required to be submitted prior to issue of final approval:
(i) Documentary proof from SPV for utilization of CFC facilities by at least 51% of the
cluster members.
(ii) Compliance of terms & conditions as mentioned in SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(iii) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilize at least 60% of installed capacity.
290
(B) As recommended by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC), a clause would be
added in the Sanction Order “In case of any deviation from the agreed principles of
utilization and denial of fair access to the eligible stakeholders, assets created would be
handed over to another SPV through a transparent procedure for smooth and effective
operationalization of the facilities”.
9. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of CFC in Wooden
Furniture Cluster, Salem, Tamil Nadu at a total project cost of Rs. 1446.33 lakh with GoI
assistance of Rs. 1112.22 lakh, State Government contribution of Rs.144.63 lakh and SPV
contribution of Rs. 189.48 lakh.
*******
291
Agenda No.50.4.30: Proposal for Final approval for setting up of New Industrial Estate at
Ravalkole (V), Malkajgiri District, Telangana.
Background:
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 44th
SCM held on 05.09.17, subject
to submission of following documents prior to Final approval.
(ii) MSME-DI, Hyderabad vide letter dated 15.02.19, forwarded the documents and requested
to consider the proposal for final approval:
Documents required Status
(i) Land documents on the name of IA complying with Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion.
Received
(ii) SIDBI appraisal report with revised funding pattern as mentioned above
Received
(iii) Commitment letter from IA that it will meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost.
Received
(iv) Status of completed ID projects in the State including achievements vis-à-vis projected targets, as per format to be provided by Office of DC (MSME).
Received
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited
Hyderabad
State : Telangana
District : Medchal
Industrial Estate : Setting up of New Industrial Park at Ravalkole (V), Medchal-
Malkajgiri District, Telangana.
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan :
Yes
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre):
44.09 Acres
Area to be developed (acre) 44.09 Acres
Number and sizes of plots to be developed :
No. of plots – 159 Size of the plots: 540 sq. yds to 1111 sq. yds.
Implementing Period : 24 Months
Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc. :
Nil.
Performance of ID projects in state. : Satisfactory.
292
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency(IA)
Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA): Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited (TSIIC).Hyderabad.
As per MSE-CDP guidelines.
Track Record of the IA TSIIC is a State Owned Undertaking developed more than 300 Industrial Parks in the State of Telangana.
--
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Submitted SIDBI appraisal received.
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
Yes --
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Yes Land documents received.
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with):
Yes --
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted :
Yes Constituted.
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost :
Yes Received
Basis of elements of project Cost :
As per Standard Schedule Rates (SSR).
--
Tangible Outcomes of the
project S.No. Parameters Infrastructure Development
Before After
1. No. of units 159 159
2. Turnover 92.35 cr. 102.00 cr.
3. Employment
(Direct)
1877 2000
4. Employment
(Indirect)
1000 2000
Justification of the Proposal The main objective of the proposed
ID project is to develop a dedicated
industrial area for the engineering
--
293
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency(IA)
Remarks
units operating in the residential
areas adjacent to Balanagar /
Sanathnagar / Jeedimetla Industrial
areas.
Operating from a dedicated
industrial area will help them
eliminate the operational hurdles
emanating from the objections
raised by increasing residents in the
Balanagar, Sanathnagar, Jeedimetla
areas, where the units are currently
operating.
The proposed project infrastructure
Development includes development
of internal roads, water and power
supply, drainage system and
administrative facility.
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S.No. Particulars Proposed by IA
As per SIDBI
As per MSE-CDP
1. Land Development and other overhead infrastructure
(i) Cost of land filling/levelling including boundary wall /fencing:
184.43 100.00 100.00
(ii) Cost of laying roads 211.12 200.00 200.00
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00 10.00 10.00
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses
88.51 88.51 88.51
(v) Water harvesting 10.00 10.00 10.00
(vi) Drainage 87.01 60.00 60.00
(vii) Power (sub-station and distribution net-work including street light etc), generation of non-conventional energy
271.00 250.00 250.00
(viii) Others (sanitary conveniences etc.) 11.38 10.00 10.00
2. Administrative and Other Services Complex
153.12
(i) Administrative Office Building 20.00 20.00
(ii) Telecommunication / Cyber Centre / Documentation Centre
20.00 20.00
(iii) Conference Hall / Exhibition Centre 30.00 30.00
294
S.No. Particulars Proposed by IA
As per SIDBI
As per MSE-CDP
1. Land Development and other overhead infrastructure
(iv) Bank / Post Office 20.00 20.00
(v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets.
40.00 40.00
(vi) First Aid Centre, Creche, Canteen Facilities.
20.00 20.00
3. Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses
10.00 10.00 10.00
Total 1036.57 888.51 888.51
5. Proposed Means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA As per MSE-CDP
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP: 800.00 444.00*
(ii) State Government Contribution 236.57 592.57
Total 1036.57 1036.57
* As per the recommendations of SIDBI, the eligible project cost is Rs.888.51lakh and GoI
assistance is Rs. 444.00 Lakh (50% of eligible cost)
6. Observations:
(i) Compliance of terms and conditions as mentioned in SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(ii) TSIIC should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and
proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period
of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Telangana.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of New Industrial Estate at
Ravalkole (V), Malkajgiri District, Telangana, at a total project of Rs. 1036.57 lakh with GoI grant of
Rs.444.00 lakh and Govt. of Telangana/TSIIC contribution of Rs. 592.57 lakh.
*****
295
Agenda Item No. 50.5.1: Ratification of Time Extension granted for setting up of new
Industrial Estate at Pathsala, District Barpeta, Assam.
S. No. Description Status
1 Name of the proposal
and location
Setting up of new Industrial Estate at Pathsala,
District Barpeta, Assam.
2 Approval accorded 30th
SCM held on 19.06.12
3 Final approval order
issued on
24.09.12
4 Name of the IA Assam Industrial Development Corporation Ltd.
(AIDC), Guwahati.
5 Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh)
Govt. of India Grant : 584.00
Govt. of Assam : 145.44
Total : 729.44
6 Project Costs and
component wise
details
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No Particulars Approve
d cost
(i) Land filling/leveling including
boundary wall and fencing
100.00
(ii) Laying roads 199.98
(iii) Road side greenery & social
forestry
7.10
(iv) Water supply including overhead
tanks, and pump houses
70.98
(v) Drainage 52.48
(vi) Power distribution, Street light
arrangements, etc.
208.01
(vii) Administrative and Other Services
Complex
76.59
(viii) Contingencies & Pre operative
expenses
14.30
Total 729.44
7 Total GoI grant released Installment & Date (Rs. in
lakh)
1st on 28.03.14 : 65.00
2nd
on 24.08.16 : 95.568
3rd
on 15.03.18 : 230.00
Total : 390.568
8 Validity upto 30.06.18
9 Time extension
accorded on file up to
31.01.20
10 Proposal for Steering
Committee
Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time
extension accorded on file.
*********
296
Agenda Item No. 50.5.2: Ratification of Time Extension granted for upgradation of
infrastructure facilities at Amingaon Export Promotion Industrial
Park (EPIP) in Kamrup (Metro) District, Assam.
S. No. Description Status
1 Name of the
proposal and
location
Upgradation of infrastructure facilities at Amingaon Export
Promotion Industrial Park (EPIP) in Kamrup (Metro) District,
Assam.
2 Approval accorded 38th
SCM held on 28.07.15
3 Final approval
order issued on
19.07.16
4 Name of the IA Assam Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. (AIDC),
Guwahati.
5 Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh)
Govt. of India Grant : 474.56
Govt. of Assam : 118.64
Total : 593.20
6 Project Costs and
component wise
details
(Rs. in lakh)
S.N
o.
Particulars Approved
Cost
1 Land Development and Other Overhead Infrastructure
(i) Land filling/leveling including boundary wall
and fencing:
70.82
(ii) Laying roads 200.00
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 7.10
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and
pump houses
0.00
(v) Water harvesting 9.64
(vi) Drainage 59.98
(vii) Power distribution, Street light arrangements,
etc.
82.73
(viii
)
Other (Sanitary Convenience): 0.00
Sub Total 430.27
2 Administrative and Other Services Complex
(i) Administrative Office building 150.00
(ii) Telecom/Cyber/Documentation centre
(iii) Conference Hall/Exhibition centre
(iv) Bank/Post office
297
S. No. Description Status
(v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing
outlets
(vi) First aid centre, Creche, Canteen
Sub Total 150.00
3 Effluent Treatment Facilities 0.00
4 Contingencies & Pre operative expenses 12.93
Grand Total 593.20
7 Total GoI grant
released Installment & Date (Rs. in lakh)
1st on 25.04.17 : 200.00
Total : 200.00
8 Validity upto 28.02.19
9 Time extension
accorded on file up
to
31.12.19
10 Proposal for
Steering
Committee
Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time extension
accorded on file.
**********
298
Agenda Item No.50.5.4: Ratification of Time Extension granted for setting up of CFC
in Stainless Steel Utensils Cluster, Kundli, Sonepat, Haryana.
S.
No.
Description Status
1. Name of the proposal
and location
Setting up of CFC in Stainless Steel Utensils Cluster,
Kundli, Sonepat, Haryana
2. Approval accorded 33rd
SCM held on 14.06.13
3. Final approval order
issued on
09.09.13
4. Name of the IA Bureau of Industrial Policy and Promotion (BIPP),
Chandigarh (then Investment Promotion Centre)
5. Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh)
Govt. of India Grant : 1022.54
Govt. of Haryana Grant : 150.00
SPV contribution : 530.78
Total : 1703.32
6. Project Costs and
component wise details
(Rs. in lakh)
(i) Land and its Development 283.50
(ii) Building and other Civil Constructions 216.27
(iii) Plant & Machinery(including
electrification)
(list of plant and machinery with
tentative cost – Annexed)
1076.91
(iv) Misc. fixed assets 20.00
(v) Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses,
maximum 2% of project cost
34.06
(vi) Contingency (2% building and 5% on
plant and machinery)
58.16
(vii) Margin money for Working Capital 14.42
Total 1703.32
7. Total GoI grant
released
Nil
8. Validity upto 31.03.18
9. Time extension
accorded on file up to
31.01.20
10. Proposal for Steering
Committee
Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time extension
accorded on file.
*********
299
Agenda Item No.50.5.5: Ratification of Time Extension granted for setting up of CFC
in Engineering Cluster, Yamunanagar, Haryana.
S. No. Description Status
1. Name of the proposal
and location
Setting up of CFC in Engineering Cluster, Yamunanagar,
Haryana
2. Approval accorded 40th
SCM held on 02.07.16
3. Final approval order
issued on
06.10.16
4. Name of the IA Bureau of Industrial Policy and Promotion (BIPP),
Chandigarh (then Investment Promotion Centre)
5. Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh)
Govt. of India Grant : 1199.45
Govt. of Haryana Grant : 150.00
SPV contribution : 208.00
Total : 1557.45
6. Project Costs and
component wise
details
(Rs. in lakh)
(i) Land and its Development 50.00
(ii) Building and other Civil
Constructions
150.00
(iii) Plant & Machinery (including
electrification) (Annexure)
1295.58
(iv) Misc. fixed assets 10.00
(v) Preliminary & Pre-operative
expenses, maximum 2% of project
cost
30.00
(vi) Contingency (2% building and 5%
on plant and machinery)
15.87
(vii) Margin money for Working Capital 6.00
Total 1557.45
7. Total GoI grant
released
Nil
8. Validity upto 05.10.18
9. Time extension
accorded on file up to
31.03.20
10. Proposal for Steering
Committee
Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time extension
accorded on file.
*****
300
Agenda Item No.50.5.6: Ratification of Time Extension granted for setting up of CFC in
Plywood Cluster, Yamunanagar, Haryana.
S. No. Description Status
1. Name of the proposal
and location
Setting up of CFC in Plywood Cluster, Yamunanagar,
Haryana
2. Approval accorded 43rd
SCM held on 09.03.17
3. Final approval order
issued on
04.05.17
4. Name of the IA Bureau of Industrial Policy and Promotion (BIPP),
Chandigarh (then Investment Promotion Centre)
5. Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh)
Govt. of India Grant : 1319.00
Govt. of Haryana Grant : 150.00
SPV contribution : 171.00
Total : 1640.00
6. Project Costs and
component wise details
(Rs. in lakh)
(i) Land and its Development 113.20
(ii) Building and other Civil Constructions 67.30
(iii) Plant & Machinery (including
electrification)
1410.43
(iv) Misc. fixed assets 10.00
(v) Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses,
maximum 2% of project cost
10.00
(vi) Contingency (2% building and 5% on
plant and machinery)
29.07
Total Project Cost 1640.00
7. Total GoI grant
released
Nil
8. Validity upto 03.05.19
9. Time extension
accorded on file up to
04.05.20
10. Proposal for Steering
Committee
Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time extension
accorded on file.
*******
301
Agenda Item No. 50.5.7: Ratification of Time Extension granted for setting up of new
Industrial Estate at TM Kasom, Ukhrul District, Manipur.
S. No. Description Status
1 Name of the
proposal and
location
Setting up of new Industrial Estate at TM Kasom, Ukhrul
District, Manipur.
2 Approval
accorded
38th
SCM held on 28.07.15
3 Final approval
order issued on
30.09.15
4 Name of the IA Directorate of Commerce & Industries, Department of
Commerce & Industries, Govt. of Manipur.
5 Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh)
Govt. of India Grant : 759.35
Govt. of Manipur : 189.84
Total : 949.19
6 Project Costs and
component wise
details
(Rs. in lakh)
S.No. Particulars Approved
Cost
1 (i) Land filling, site development & compound
wall
100.00
(ii) Laying of internal roads 200.00
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and
pump houses
110.00
(v) Water harvesting 10.00
(vi) Drainage 60.00
(vii) Power distribution, Street light
arrangements, etc.
250.00
(viii) Sanitary Convenience 10.00
2 (i) Administrative office building 20.00
(ii) Telecom/ Documentation centre 19.35
(iii) Conference Hall/Exhibition centre 28.15
(iv) Bank/Post office 20.00
(v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing
outlets
40.00
(vi) First aid centre, Creche Canteen 20.00
3. Effluent Treatment Facilities 41.69
4. Contingencies 10.00
Total 949.19
7 Total GoI grant
released Installment & Date (Rs. in lakh)
1st on 31.12.15 : 200.00
302
S. No. Description Status
2nd
on 18.04.17
3rd
on 06.03.19
:
:
300.00
259.35
Total : 759.35
8 Validity upto 31.03.18
9 Time extension
accorded on file
up to
31.12.18 (Project completed)
10 Proposal for
Steering
Committee
Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time extension
accorded on file.
********
303
Agenda Item No. 50.5.8: Ratification of Time Extension granted for setting up of new Industrial
Estate at Salemthar, Chandel, Manipur.
S. No. Description Status
1 Name of the proposal
and location
Setting up of new Industrial Estate at Salemthar,
Chandel, Manipur.
2 Approval accorded 38th
SCM held on 28.07.15
3 Final approval order
issued on
11.12.15
4 Name of the IA Directorate of Commerce & Industries, Department
of Commerce & Industries, Govt. of Manipur.
5 Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh)
Govt. of India Grant : 725.24
Govt. of Manipur : 181.31
Total : 906.55
6 Project Costs and
component wise
details
(Rs. in lakh)
S.No. Particulars Approved Cost
1.(i) Land filling/leveling including boundary wall
100.00
(ii) Laying of roads 197.00
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry
10.00
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses
108.05
(v) Water harvesting 10.00
(vi) Drainage 59.00
(vii) Power distribution, Street light arrangements, etc.
250.00
(viii) Public Convenience 10.00
2. (i) Administrative office building
132.00
(ii) Telecom/Cyber/Documentation centre
(iii) Conference Hall/Exhibition centre
(iv) Bank/Post office
(v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets
(vi) First aid centre, Creche Canteen
3. Effluent Treatment Facilities
20.00
304
4. Contingencies 10.50
Total 906.55
7 Total GoI grant released Installment & Date (Rs. in lakh)
1st on 28.04.16 : 200.00
2nd
on 25.04.17
3rd
on 06.03.19
:
:
300.00
225.19
Total
:
725.19
8 Validity upto 31.03.18
9 Time extension
accorded on file up to
30.11.18 (Project completed)
10 Proposal for Steering
Committee
Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time
extension accorded on file.
**********
305
Agenda Item No. 50.5.9: Ratification of Time Extension granted for setting up of new
Industrial Estate at Khopuibung, Churachandpur, Manipur.
S. No. Description Status
1 Name of the
proposal and
location
Setting up of new Industrial Estate at Khopuibung,
Churachandpur, Manipur.
2 Approval accorded 38th
SCM held on 28.07.15
3 Final approval order
issued on
30.09.15
4 Name of the IA Directorate of Commerce & Industries, Department of
Commerce & Industries, Govt. of Manipur.
5 Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh)
Govt. of India Grant : 759.35
Govt. of Manipur : 189.84
Total : 949.19
6 Project Costs and
component wise
details
(Rs. in lakh)
S.No. Particulars Approve
d Cost
1 (i) Land filling, site development & compound
wall
100.00
(ii) Laying of internal roads 200.00
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and
pump houses
110.00
(v) Water harvesting 10.00
(vi) Drainage 60.00
(vii) Power distribution, Street light arrangements,
etc.
250.00
(viii) Sanitary Convenience 10.00
2 (i) Administrative office building 20.00
(ii) Telecom/ Documentation centre 19.35
(iii) Conference Hall/Exhibition centre 28.15
(iv) Bank/Post office 20.00
(v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing
outlets
40.00
(vi) First aid centre, Creche Canteen 20.00
3. Effluent Treatment Facilities 41.69
4. Contingencies 10.00
Total 949.19
7 Total GoI grant
released Installment & Date (Rs. in lakh)
1st on 31.12.15 : 200.00
2nd
on 17.02.17
3rd
on 11.03.19
:
:
200.00
359.35
306
S. No. Description Status
Total
:
759.35
8 Validity upto 31.03.18
9 Time extension
accorded on file up
to
31.05.18 (Project completed)
10 Proposal for
Steering Committee
Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time
extension accorded on file.
******
307
Agenda No. 50.5.10: Ratification of Time Extension granted for setting up of Common
Facility Centre (CFC) in Gota Zari Lace Cluster, Ajmer, Rajasthan.
S. No. Description Status
1. Name of the proposal and
Location
Setting up of CFC in Gota Zari Lace Cluster, Ajmer,
Rajasthan
2. Approval accorded 38th
SCM held on 28.07.15
3. Final approval order issued
on
04.03.16
4. Name of the Implementing
Agency
Udhyam Prothsahan Sansthan, Ajmer
5. Means of Finance
(Rs. in lakh)
Govt. of India grant : 217.24
SPV contribution : 24.14
Total : 241.38
6. Project Cost and component-
wise details
(Rs. in lakh)
i) Land & its Development 0.00
ii) Building and other civil
construction
0.00
iii) Plant & Machinery 205.06
iv) Misc. Fixed Asset 13.56
v) Preliminary & Pre-operative
expenses, Provision of
contingency @5% on P&M
10.76
vii) Margin money for working
capital
12.00
Total 241.38
7. Total GoI grant released
Instalment & Date (Rs. in lakh)
1st on 07.02.18 : 86.89
Total : 86.89
8. Validity upto 30.09.18
9. Time extension accorded on
file upto
31.03.20
10. Proposal for Steering
Committee
Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time
extension accorded on file.
*****
308
Agenda Item No. 50.5.11: Ratification of Time Extension granted for setting up new
Industrial Estate at Madikonda Village, Warangal District,
Telangana.
S. No. Description Status
1 Name of the proposal
and location
Setting up new Industrial Estate at Madikonda Village,
Warangal District, Telangana.
2 Approval accorded 35th
SCM held on 15.01.14.
3 Final approval order
issued on
28.03.14.
4 Name of the IA Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation
(TSIIC) Ltd., Hyderabad.
5 Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh)
Govt. of India Grant : 735.60*
Govt. of Telangana Grant : 325.59
Total : 1061.19
* 80% of the total eligible cost as per MSE-CDP i.e.
Rs.919.50 lakhs.
6 Project Costs and
component wise
details
(Rs. in lakh)
S.
No.
Particulars Estimated by
IA
As per
MSE-CDP
1. Land filling /leveling
including boundary wall
and fencing
101.87 100.00
2. Laying roads 323.59 200.00
3. Road side greenery &
social forestry
10.19 10.00
4. Water supply including
overhead tanks and pump
houses
112.72 110.00
5. Water harvesting 10.48 10.00
6. Drainage 60.09 60.00
7. Power distribution, street
lights etc.
250.14 250.00
8. Sanitary conveniences 10.41 10.00
9. Admin. & other services
complex
21.52 20.00
10. Telecom/cyber/document
ation centre
20.00 20.00
11. Conference hall/
Exhibition centre
30.00 30.00
12. Bank /Post office 20.37 20.00
13. First aid centre, Creche
centre
19.89 19.89
14. Raw material storage
facility, marketing outlets
39.61 39.61
15. Contingencies & pre-
operative exp.
30.31 20.00
Total 1061.19 919.50
309
7 Total GoI grant
released Installment & Date (Rs. in lakh)
1st on 27.02.15 : 200.00
2nd
on 03.08.17 : 236.00
3rd
on 02.05.19 : 226.00
Total : 662.00
8 Validity upto 30.06.18
9 Time extension
accorded on file up to
30.09.19
10 Proposal for Steering
Committee
Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time
extension accorded on file.
*******
310
Agenda Item No. 50.5.12: Ratification of Time Extension granted for setting up of new
Industrial Estate at Kumarghat, Unakoti District, Tripura.
S. No. Description Status
1 Name of the
proposal and
location
Setting up of new Industrial Estate at Kumarghat, Unakoti District,
Tripura.
2 Approval accorded 40th
SCM held on 02.07.16
3 Final approval order
issued on
19.01.17
4 Name of the IA Tripura Industrial Development Corporation (TIDC), Agartala.
5 Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh)
Govt. of India Grant : 638.48
Govt. of Tripura : 326.79
Total : 965.27
6 Project Costs and
component wise
details
(Rs. in lakh)
S.
No.
Particulars Approved
cost
1 Land filling/leveling including boundary wall
and fencing:
98.14
2 Laying roads 224.20
3 Road side greenery & social forestry 9.92
4 Water supply including overhead tanks, and
pump houses
187.91
5 Water harvesting 9.94
6 Drainage 115.99
7 Power (substation and distribution network
including street lights).
133.50
Sub total 779.60
8 Administrative and Other Services Complex
9 Repairing, renovation works of existing
structure and other services
13.13
10 Telecom/Cyber/Documentation centre 12.68
11 Conference Hall/Exhibition centre 9.86
12 Bank/Post office 6.33
13 Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets 25.56
14 First aid centre, Creche Canteen 18.61
Sub total 86.17
15 Effluent Treatment Facilities 79.50
16 Contingencies & Pre operative expenses : 20.00
Sub total 99.50
Total 965.27
7 Total GoI grant Installment & Date (Rs. in lakh)
311
released 1st on 25.04.17 : 200.00
2nd
on 29.05.19 : 342.00
Total : 542.00
8 Validity upto 18.01.19
9 Time extension
accorded on file up
to
30.06.19
10 Proposal for
Steering Committee
Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time extension
accorded on file.
*******
50.6 Any Other Points
Agenda No. 50.6.1: Dropping of proposal of setting up of new ID centre atIbrahimpatnam, Rangareddy District, Telangana.
S. Description StatusNo.1. Name of the proposal Setting up of new ID centre at Ibrahimpatnam, Rangareddy
and Location District, Telangana.2. Approval accorded 44m SCM held on 05.09.173. Final approval Letter 12.10.17
issued on4. Name of the Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation (TSIIC)
Implementing Ltd. Hyderabad.Agency
5. Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh)Particulars : Approved CostGovt. of India grant 741.05Govt. of Telangana 4826.45Total : 5567.50
6. Project Cost and (Rs. in lakh)component-wise S. Particulars Proposed As perdetails No. by IA MSE-
CDPi) Land compensation cost 676.50 0.00ii) Land filling/levelling including 397.25 100.00
boundary wall and fencingiii) Laying roads 1855.50 200.00iv) Road side greenery &social forestry 15.00 10.00v) Water supply including overhead 317.86 110.00
tanks and pump housevi) Drainage 1086.98 70.00vii) Power distribution, Street lights etc. 433.67 250.00viii) Administrative and other services 44.55 20.00
complexes.ix) Telecom/cyber/documentation 7.00 7.00
centrex) Conference hall/exhibition centre 15.30 15.30xi) Bank/Post Office 6.10 6.10xii) Raw material storage 25.60 25.60
facilities/marketing outletsxiii) First aid centre/creche canteen 12.32 12.32xiv) Effluent Treatment facilities 329.97 80.00xv) Contingencies &preoperative 343.90 20.00
expencesTotal 5567.50 926.32
312
7. Total Gol grant No Gol grant has been released till date.released
8. Validity up to 12.10.19
» Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation (TSIIC) Ltd. vide their letter dated28.05.19 informed that during the 5th State Level project Steering Committee (SLPSC)meeting held on 26.03.19 decided to withdraw the proposal.
» As requested by Government of Telangana, proposal is being placed before SteeringCommittee to deliberate on dropping the proposal.
9. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Steering Committee may consider dropping the proposal of setting up of new ID centre atIbrahimpatnam, Rangareddy District, Telangana
********
313
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321