independent logistics assessment trend analysis files/day3... · independent logistics assessment...

PRESENTED TO:

PRESENTED BY:

Independent Logistics AssessmentTrend Analysis

Product Support Managers

The Smart Center; Joint Base Andrews, MD

Mr. John HarrisNAVAIR ILA Branch Head

Distribution Statement A – Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited – NAVAIR SPR# 2017-490

NAVY ILA Policy

AcquisitionCategory (ACAT)

US Navy PolicySECNAVINST 5000.2E & SECNAVINST 4105.1C

I C & ID B, C, FRP, Post Full Rate Production (FRP)

II B, C, FRP, Post FRP

III & IV B, C, FRP

2Distribution Statement A – Approved for public release;Distribution is unlimited – NAVAIR SPR# 2017-490

NAVAIR ILA Roles & Responsibilities

Assessment TeamSMEs

Comprised from the

competencies

Ensures all Product Support

Elements (PSEs) and more are covered

AIR-6.0Issues ILA

certification recommendation

to the PEO

PEOcertifies the

program

Dedicated NAVAIR Logistics

Team Leaders(AIR-6.0T/ HQ / WD)

Provide review and assessment

Independent of the PEOs and

Program Offices

Program Offices

Prepare appropriate

documentation

APML provides the ILA kick off

brief to the assessment

team

Step 2

Once finalized

Step 3Step 1 Repeat


NAVAIR 6.0 ILA Process


17 Programs Assessed

FY14 – FY17 ILA Assessments

5

5

5

2

Milestone

Milestone B

Milestone C

MilestoneFRP

MilestoneAAP/ECP

6

5

3

3

ACAT / Programs

ACAT I

ACAT II

ACAT III

ACAT IV

5

6

4

7

Systems

Weapons /Targets

TMSAIRCRAFT

Components

Distribution Statement A – Approved for public release;Distribution is unlimited – NAVAIR SPR# 2017-490

WHAT IS ASSESSED

• PRODUCT SUPPORT MANAGEMENT

• DESIGN INTERFACE / RELIABILITY & MAINTAINABILITY

• SUSTAINING ENGINEERING

• SUPPLY SUPPORT

• MAINTENANCE PLANNING & MANAGEMENT

• PRODUCT & TECHNICAL DATA

• SUPPORT EQUIPMENT

• TRAINING & TRAINING SUPPORT

• MANPOWER & PERSONNEL

• FACILITIES, INFRASTRUCTURE / PLATFORM INTEGRATION

• COMPUTER RESOURCES & SOFTWARE SUPPORT

• PRODUCT SUPPORT BUDGETING FUNDING

• ENVIRONMENTAL, SAFETY & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH


RISK FINDINGS

ACAT I / II / III / IV

DI/R&M not selected for analysis as Critical Safety Items (CSI) deficiencies drive the numbers high.

7

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

ACAT I&II

ACAT III&IV


TECH DATA

ANALYSIS RESULTS / OBSERVATIONS Risks center around Technical Data Package (TDP) and data rights Data requirements are not understood Data requirements are not adequately funded

CAUSES Lack of or incorrect knowledge of data requirements and rights Planning for TDP is not begun early enough

Results in inadequate funding Inadequate TDP strategy


BUDGET

ANALYSIS RESULTS / OBSERVATIONS Logistics Requirements Funding Summary (LRFS) type document is

essential to capture and understand the details of the logistics program Started too late in the program Not tied to Integrated Master Schedule (IMS)

CAUSES LRFS tool is not used by all programs LRFS tool is labor intensive


MAINTENANCE PLANNING

ANALYSIS RESULTS / OBSERVATIONS Development of product support elements often predate completion of

maintenance plans Maintenance Planning (MaPl) effort not appropriately identified on

schedules, budgets PSEs are not being integrated allowing the MaPl to driving other PSEs

as needed

CAUSES Programs may be using the last program’s documentation as their source

for logistics product data/reports ACAT III / IV program APMLs have less experience, smaller staffs


PLANNING

ANALYSIS RESULTS / OBSERVATIONS Logistics must start in lockstep with engineering design development Culture needs to view Life Cycle Sustainment Plan (LCSP) as a living

document used as a day to day planning tool Integrated Master Schedules (IMS) tend to be high level, not enough

detail Inadequate linkage between PSEs

CAUSES LCSP is viewed as a document for the decision maker IMS lack standard elements

Again, PSEs are viewed as stovepipes


DEPOT

ANALYSIS RESULTS / OBSERVATIONS Initial operational capability (IOC) + 4 – Planning for depot establishment

must start earlier than IOC Start at Milestone (MS) B or earlier Facilities additions / changes require time Inadequate Tech Data strategy to address depot standup

CAUSES MaPl data availability Tech Data requirements need to be known / discussed with depot


Results Influence

ILA Trend Data

ILA Kick-OffKnowledge

Management Portal

(KMP)

College of Logistics

& Industrial Ops

Strategic

Priorities

Results Influence

13

Standard Work

Package (SWP)


Challenges / Take Aways

ILAs “require a tailored approach” to achieve Speed to the Fleet Bring in SMEs and program office early to influence logistics

structure and documentation to ensure success. Utilizing independent SMEs will ensure recommendations were

incorporated

Proper execution requires: Proactively tailoring and completing program documentation prior

to kick off Keep the assessment team engaged from the beginning

ILA SMEs are both ADVISORS and ASSESSORS


Questions?


independent logistics assessment trend analysis files/day3... · independent logistics assessment...

Documents