increased connective tissue growth factor relative to...
TRANSCRIPT
Increased connective tissue growth factor relative to brain natriuretic peptide
as a determinant of myocardial fibrosis
Norimichi Koitabashi, Masashi Arai, Shinya Kogure, Kazuo Niwano, Atai Watanabe,
Yasuhiro Aoki, Toshitaka Maeno, Takashi Nishida, Satoshi Kubota, Masaharu Takigawa,
Masahiko Kurabayashi
ONLINE DATA SUPPLEMENT
Address correspondence to:
Masashi Arai MD, PhD
Department of Medicine and Biological Science
Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine
3-39-22 Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan
E-mail: [email protected]
TEL: (+81) 27-220-8142 FAX: (+81) 27-220-8158
Koitabashi et al. CTGF vs BNP, and myocardial fibrosis HYPERTENSION/2006/077537/R4
Materials and Methods
Patients
The study was approved by the local ethics committee and conforms to the ethical
guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained
from all patients.
Forty-six consecutive patients with normal or minimally impaired left ventricular (LV)
ejection fraction (>40%) estimated by echocardiography who underwent endomyocardial
biopsy of the LV free wall in Gunma University Hospital were enrolled in this study.
Clinical diagnosis of these patients included hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n=13),
hypertensive heart disease (n=15), dilated cardiomyopathy (n=7), alcoholic
cardiomyopathy (n=3), sick sinus syndrome (n=1), hyperthyroidism (n=1), idiopathic
ventricular tachycardia (n=1), and other diseases (n=5). Of these patients, 31 patients who
had previous history of overt heart failure within the preceding year (i.e. dyspnea and rales
due to pulmonary congestion, as confirmed by chest radiography) in the absence of
impaired systolic function as estimated by echocardiography were designated as the
diastolic heart failure (DHF) group. Heart failure was clinically diagnosed according to the
criteria used in the Framingham Heart Study project 1 and the elevation of plasma BNP
2
Koitabashi et al. CTGF vs BNP, and myocardial fibrosis HYPERTENSION/2006/077537/R4
concentration was confirmed. All patients in the DHF group showed any of
echocardiographic criteria of DHF, i.e. impaired relaxation, pseudonormal, and restrictive
patterns. Another 15 patients without a previous history of heart failure were designated as
the non-failing (NF) group. Patients with significant coronary stenosis in angiography,
moderate or severe valvular disease, secondary hypertension, renal failure (serum creatinine
concentration >2.0mg/dl), myocarditis, epicarditis, or uncontrolled decompensated
congestive heart failure were excluded. Patients with cardiac sarcoidosis pathologically
diagnosed by their endomyocardial biopsy (i.e., lymphocytic infiltration) were also
excluded from the present analysis. At least two endomyocardial samples were obtained
from the LV free wall in each patient, and hemodynamic parameters were measured with an
LV and Swan-Ganz catheters. Two-dimensional, M-mode, and Doppler ultrasound
recordings were performed in each patient using transthoracic echocardiography, and left
ventricular ejection fraction and mass index was calculated from the echocardiogram.
Peripheral blood samples were obtained within a week before or after cardiac
catheterization for determination of plasma brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentration.
BNP levels were measured using immunoradiometric assay.
Histochemical analysis and immunostaining
3
Koitabashi et al. CTGF vs BNP, and myocardial fibrosis HYPERTENSION/2006/077537/R4
Endomyocardial biopsy samples were immediately fixed in 10% buffered formalin,
embedded in paraffin. Masson’s trichrome staining was performed for detection of collagen,
and five high-power field (X200) color images were randomly selected in each sample.
Myocardial fibrosis area (MFA) was determined by blue staining and quantified by an
automated image analysis system (MacScope)2.
Immunostaining with a human connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) antibody (Santa
Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) and with a normal goat IgG1 (R&D systems) as a negative
control for non-specific staining was performed in the same serial sections as that used in
the MFA study. Variation of control IgG1 staining among samples was minimized, and
sections that demonstrated significantly higher staining intensity with CTGF antibody than
with control IgG1 were selected for densitometry 3. Average data of the percentage of
positively stained area relative to the sample area in 5 different positions in each sample
was used to determine the “CTGF-stained area”.
Animal models
Constriction of the suprarenal abdominal aorta was established with a 21G silver clip 4 in
male Wister rats (Charles River, Japan) weighing 250-300 g after intraperitoneal (IP)
injection of pentobarbital. After hemodynamic measurement on the experimental day, the
4
Koitabashi et al. CTGF vs BNP, and myocardial fibrosis HYPERTENSION/2006/077537/R4
heart was excised and weighed. The LV was divided into three pieces for histological
analysis, RNA isolation and protein extraction. All animal experiments were performed
according to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the US
National Institutes of Health and were approved by the Animal Research Committee of the
Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine.
Hemodynamic measurements in rats
Before constriction of the suprarenal abdominal aorta, blood pressure was measured by the
tail-cuff method.
On Day 28, hemodynamic parameters were measured using a pressure-volume (PV)
catheter. Rats were anesthetized with 2% isoflurane, and tracheostomy was performed to
allow mechanical ventilation. The LV apex was exposed under sternotomy, and a microtip
PV catheter (SPR-838, Millar Instruments) was advanced through the apex along the
longitudinal axis. Absolute volume was calibrated, and PV data were measured at a steady
state and during transient reduction of venous return, as described previously 5. Blood
pressure was measured in rats before sacrifice on Days 1, 4, 7 and 14 using a fluid-filled
manometer via the carotid artery under isoflurane anesthesia 4
To assess ventricular function and hypertrophy, transthoracic echocardiography was
5
Koitabashi et al. CTGF vs BNP, and myocardial fibrosis HYPERTENSION/2006/077537/R4
performed with a 10-MHz transducer (EUB-6000, HITACHI) in all rats on Days 0, 1, 4, 7,
14 and 28. Rats were sedated with ketamine (40 mg/kg IP) and xylazine (10 mg/kg IP) to
maintain blood pressures equivalent to the awake condition. M-mode tracings and
transmitral pulse wave Doppler spectra were measured as described previously 6.
RNA isolation and Northern blot analysis
Total cellular RNA was isolated using the ISOGEN reagent (Nippongene) in accordance
with the manufacturer’s instruction. Probes for Northern blots were as follows: 1) rat CTGF
(nucleotide +1201~1795 bp; Acc. No. NM_022266) 7 isolated using RT-PCR; 2) rat
procollagen type 1α1 (COL1A1) (nucleotide +5096~5669 bp; Acc. No. Z78279) isolated
using RT-PCR; 3) rat procollagen type 3α1 (COL3A1) (nucleotide +2046~2350 bp; Acc.
No. XM_216813) isolated using RT-PCR; 4) a 628-bp fragment of the rat BNP cDNA 8;
and 5) a 490-bp fragment of the rat transforming growth factor (TGF) β1 cDNA 9; 6) rat
sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase 2a (SERCA2a) (nucleotide +3557-3865 bp; Acc. No.
J04023) isolated usinf RT-PCR. Messenger RNA levels were quantified using scanning
autoradiographs and computerized optical densitometry and were normalized with 28S
rRNA.
6
Koitabashi et al. CTGF vs BNP, and myocardial fibrosis HYPERTENSION/2006/077537/R4
Plasma analysis in rats
Blood sample was obtained via the carotid artery before sacrifice. Plasma TGF-β
concentration was examined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Plasma endothelin
(ET)1 and aldosterone (Aldo) concentration were examined by radioimmunoassay.
Cell culture
Neonatal rat cardiac myocytes were isolated from 1- to 3-day-old Wistar rats, as previously
described 10, and were seeded on gelatin-coated tissue culture plates or FlexWell plates
(Flexcell International) 10. Cardiac myocytes were cultured for 24 h in Dulbecco’s modified
Eagle’s medium (DMEM) containing 10% fetal bovine serum and 0.1 mmol/L
bromodeoxyuridine and then switched to DMEM containing 0.1%
insulin/transferring/selenium (Gibco) before being stimulated with various agents 24 h later.
For cell stretch experiments, cardiac myocytes were stretched biaxially (15%, 0.5 Hz) using
a FlexCell Strain Unit (FX-4000; FlexCell International). Control myocytes were cultured
on FlexWell plates without mechanical stretch.
Neonatal rat cardiac fibroblasts were prepared as described previously 10. After the
second passage, cells were plated (3×105 cells) in 60 mm-culture dishes and grown in
DMEM containing 10% FBS. Just before reaching confluence, the medium was replaced
7
Koitabashi et al. CTGF vs BNP, and myocardial fibrosis HYPERTENSION/2006/077537/R4
with serum-free DMEM or with conditioned medium from cardiac myocytes culture.
Cardiac myocyte-conditioned medium was prepared as a supernatant of cultured media
after 24 h stimulation of cardiac myocytes by TGF-β, ET-1 or Aldo. The medium for
neonatal cardiac fibroblasts was replaced with the cardiac myocyte-conditioned medium,
and fibroblasts were harvested 24 hrs after the replacement. In neutralizing antibody
experiments, antibodies for CTGF and TGF-β (R&D systems) and normal IgG (R&D
systems) were supplemented at the time of medium replacement.
Immunofluorescent microscopic analysis
Immunofluorescent microscopic analysis was performed with CTGF antibody and
Cy3-conjugated anti-goat IgG antibody (Sigma) in methanol-fixed cultured cells. Mouse
monoclonal sarcomeric actinin antibody (Sigma) and FITC-conjugated anti-mouse IgG
antibody (Sigma) were used for detection of cardiac myocytes. Mouse monoclonal
vimentin antibody (Sigma) was used for detection of cardiac fibroblasts.
Western blotting
The protein extracts of in vivo experiments were homogenized with buffer containing 10
mmol/L imidazole, 300 mmol/L sucrose, and protease inhibitors. Cultured cells were lysed
8
Koitabashi et al. CTGF vs BNP, and myocardial fibrosis HYPERTENSION/2006/077537/R4
by adding ice-cold radioimmunoprecipitation buffer. Protein concentration was determined
by the Bradford dye-binding method (BioRad). The cell lysates or culture media were
subjected to electrophoresis on a SDS-13% polyacrylamide gel and transferred to
nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were then blocked in TBS (10 mmol/L Tris, pH 7.6,
and 150 mmol/L NaCl) containing 5% skim milk, followed by overnight incubation with
anti-CTGF antibody (Santa Cruz). Chemiluminescent detection was performed with the
enhanced chemiluminescence protocol (ECL; Amersham Bioscience). After CTGF
detection, the membranes were stripped and reprobed with anti sarcomeric α-actin (Sigma)
as an internal control.
Reagents
Synthetic rat BNP and recombinant human ET-1 were obtained from the Peptide Institute.
Norepinephrine, Ang II, Aldo, and human recombinant TGF-β were obtained from Sigma,
Bachem, Acros Organics, and Roche, respectively. Recombinant human CTGF was purified
as previously described 11. KT5823 was obtained from Calbiochem.
Statistical analysis
Data are expressed as means±SD. Overall differences within groups were determined by
9
Koitabashi et al. CTGF vs BNP, and myocardial fibrosis HYPERTENSION/2006/077537/R4
one-way analysis of variance. When this test indicated that differences existed, individual
experimental groups were compared by Bonferroni’s test. Categorical variables were
analyzed by the χ2 test or Fisher’s exact probability test when necessary. Bivariate
correlations between variables were assessed by simple least-squares linear regression
analysis. A probability value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
10
Koitabashi et al. CTGF vs BNP, and myocardial fibrosis HYPERTENSION/2006/077537/R4
References for Supplemental Methods
1. McKee PA, Castelli WP, McNamara PM, Kannel WB. The natural history of
congestive heart failure: the Framingham study. N Engl J Med.
1971;285:1441-1446.
2. Querejeta R, Varo N, Lopez B, Larman M, Artinano E, Etayo JC, Martinez Ubago
JL, Gutierrez-Stampa M, Emparanza JI, Gil MJ, Monreal I, Mindan JP, Diez J.
Serum carboxy-terminal propeptide of procollagen type I is a marker of myocardial
fibrosis in hypertensive heart disease. Circulation. 2000;101:1729-1735.
3. Wallace CK, Stetson SJ, Kucuker SA, Becker KA, Farmer JA, McRee SC, Koerner
MM, Noon GP, Torre-Amione G. Simvastatin decreases myocardial tumor necrosis
factor alpha content in heart transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant.
2005;24:46-51.
4. Takizawa T, Arai M, Yoguchi A, Tomaru K, Kurabayashi M, Nagai R. Transcription
of the SERCA2 gene is decreased in pressure-overloaded hearts: A study using in
vivo direct gene transfer into living myocardium. J Mol Cell Cardiol.
1999;31:2167-2174.
11
Koitabashi et al. CTGF vs BNP, and myocardial fibrosis HYPERTENSION/2006/077537/R4
5. Pacher P, Mabley JG, Liaudet L, Evgenov OV, Marton A, Hasko G, Kollai M, Szabo
C. Left ventricular pressure-volume relationship in a rat model of advanced
aging-associated heart failure. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol.
2004;287:H2132-2137.
6. Masuyama T, Yamamoto K, Sakata Y, Doi R, Nishikawa N, Kondo H, Ono K,
Kuzuya T, Sugawara M, Hori M. Evolving changes in Doppler mitral flow velocity
pattern in rats with hypertensive hypertrophy. J Am Coll Cardiol.
2000;36:2333-2338.
7. Yokoi H, Mukoyama M, Sugawara A, Mori K, Nagae T, Makino H, Suganami T,
Yahata K, Fujinaga Y, Tanaka I, Nakao K. Role of connective tissue growth factor in
fibronectin expression and tubulointerstitial fibrosis. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol.
2002;282:F933-942.
8. Kojima M, Minamino N, Kangawa K, Matsuo H. Cloning and sequence analysis of
cDNA encoding a precursor for rat brain natriuretic peptide. Biochem Biophys Res
Commun. 1989;159:1420-1426.
9. Tsuji T, Okada F, Yamaguchi K, Nakamura T. Molecular cloning of the large subunit
of transforming growth factor type beta masking protein and expression of the
mRNA in various rat tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87:8835-8839.
12
Koitabashi et al. CTGF vs BNP, and myocardial fibrosis HYPERTENSION/2006/077537/R4
10. Yokoyama T, Sekiguchi K, Tanaka T, Tomaru K, Arai M, Suzuki T, Nagai R.
Angiotensin II and mechanical stretch induce production of tumor necrosis factor in
cardiac fibroblasts. Am J Physiol. 1999;276:H1968-1976.
11. Nishida T, Nakanishi T, Shimo T, Asano M, Hattori T, Tamatani T, Tezuka K,
Takigawa M. Demonstration of receptors specific for connective tissue growth
factor on a human chondrocytic cell line (HCS-2/8). Biochem Biophys Res Commun.
1998;247:905-909.
13
Koitabashi et al. CTGF vs BNP, and myocardial fibrosis HYPERTENSION/2006/077537/R4
Figure legends for supplemental figures
Supplemental Figure I
LV diastolic function and myocardial fibrosis in rats with different ratios of CTGF and BNP
mRNAs. Representative echocardiograms (A), and histological analysis (B); In each row,
left, central and right panels show sham, a AC rat with comparable mRNA levels of CTGF
and BNP, and a AC rat with disproportionate increase of CTGF against BNP, respectively;
(A) M-mode echocardiography (left) and transmitral Doppler flow pattern (right). Mean
E/A ratios of consecutive five beats are shown below the panels. (B) Histological analysis
of LVs; upper panel, Masson’s trichrome staining; lower panel, immunohistologic staining
with an anti-CTGF antibody. All scale bars are 50 μm. Arrows indicate CTGF-positive
cardiac myocytes (CM). Asterisks indicate vascular structure.
Supplemental Figure II
(A) Correlation between CTGF/BNP expression ratio and EDPVR in Day 28 sham (n=5)
and AC (n=14) rats.
(B) Correlation between CTGF/BNP expression ratio and COL1A1 mRNA expression level
estimated by quantitative Northern blot in Day 28 sham (n=5) and AC (n=14) rats.
14
Koitabashi et al. CTGF vs BNP, and myocardial fibrosis HYPERTENSION/2006/077537/R4
Supplemental Figure III
Difference in plasma concentration of TGFβ, ET1 and Aldo between higher (filled columns,
n=7) and lower (open columns, n=7) groups of CTGF/BNP expression ratio in Day 28 AC
rats.
Supplemental Figure IV
Immunofluorescent imaging of CTGF (detected by Cy3) and vimentin (detected by FITC)
protein in cultured cardiac cells. Vimentin is an intermediated filament, which has been
shown to be abundant in fibroblasts. A right cell in these panels shows a cardiac fibroblast.
Supplemental Figure V
(A) Northern blot showing the effect of norepinephrine (NE) and angiotensin II (AngII) on
CTGF and BNP mRNA levels in cardiac myocytes.
(B) Northern blot showing the temporal changes of CTGF mRNA levels in CM in
response to synthetic BNP (sBNP: 0.1 μmol/L).
(C) Effect of the protein kinase G inhibitor, KT5823 (1 μmol/L), on the
BNP-mediated suppression of CTGF mRNA levels in CM. Four hours after
15
Koitabashi et al. CTGF vs BNP, and myocardial fibrosis HYPERTENSION/2006/077537/R4
incubation with synthetic BNP in the presence or absence of KT5823, CTGF
mRNA expression was examined by Northern blot analysis. Experiments were
performed in triplicate.
Supplemental Figure VI
(A) Northern blot showing basal expression of CTGF in cultured neonatal rat cardiac
myocytes (CM) and cardiac fibroblasts (CFB). Cultured rat cardiac fibroblasts were used
after the second passage. Bar graphs show mean values of four independent experiments
relative to the mean level of CTGF mRNA in cardiac myocytes. * P<0.05 vs. cardiac
myocytes.
(B) Northern blot showing the effect of various humoral factors (4 hours) on CTGF mRNA
level in cultured cardiac fibroblasts. Bar graphs show mean values of four independent
experiments. Values in the vehicle-stimulated group are defined as 1. *P<0.05 vs.
vehicle-treated group.
16
Age
Sex (Male/Female)
HCM/HHD/other
Prior Medication
Hypertension(N)
Atrial Fibrillation(N)
Renal Failure(N)
Diabetes(N)
Prior PCI/CABG (N)
PAWP (mmHg)
LVEDP (mmHg)
LVEF (%)
LVEDD (mm)
LAD
LVM (g)
E/A
DcT (msec)
BNP (pg/mL)
58±15
9/6
7/3/5
2
3
0
0
3
1
11.8±3.0
15.0±8.8
62.5±9.6
48.4±8.8
37.5±4.6
153.6±134.5
0.89 ±0.55
226.7±24.6
68.2±73.5
57±16
20/11
6/12/13
19
12
14
2
3
0
10.5±6.8
18.0±8.3
54.1±12.8
52.3±11.3
43.6±6.3
189.4±131.6
0.79±0.72
195.0±31.9
263.5±214.2
VariableNF
(N=15)DHF
(N=31)
NS
NS*
NS*
<0.05†
NS†
<0.01†
NS†
NS†
NS†
NS
NS
NS
NS
<0.05
NS
NS
NS
<0.05
P
Supplemental Table I. Clinical characteristics in patients
Prior Medication: angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker/aldosterone
blocker/beta adrenoceptor blocker; HHD, hypertensive heart disease; HCM, hypertrophic
cardiomyopathy; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; PAWP,
mean pulmonary artery wedge pressure; LVEDP, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure; MFA, myocardial
fibrosis area; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LVEDD, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; LAD,
left atrial diameter, LVM, left ventricular mass; DcT, deceleration time; P, ANOVA with the exceptions
indicated as follows:* χ2 test; † Fisher’s exact probability test
17
Shamn=5
ACn=12
Shamn=5
ACn=14
Day 7 Day 28
BW, g
HR
SBP, mmHg
LVEDD, mm
FS, %
LVM, mg
E/A
LVW/BW, mg/g
MFA, %
257±1
312±11
103 ±10
7.15 ±0.23
32.4 ±2.6
526 ±29
2.17 ±0.3
2.03 ±0.11
1.10 ±0.07
250±14
320 ±18
155 ±25*
7.72 ±0.08
33.0 ±3.3
637 ±18
2.13 ±0.04
2.45 ±0.14*
1.38 ±0.15
Shamn=4
ACn=5
Day 14
Shamn=4
ACn=6
Day 4
281±7
300 ±19
98 ±9
7.42 ±0.78
33.0 ±0.8
540 ±29
1.92 ±0.11
2.00 ±0.06
1.06 ±0.10
261±7
341 ±18
149 ±27*
7.70 ±0.17
31.2 ±1.4
788 ±26*
2.55 ±0.25
2.80 ±0.10*
2.93 ±0.71
318±12
333 ±26
100 ±5.9
7.90 ±0.21
33.5 ±2.5
696 ±32
2.09 ±0.26
2.06 ±0.07
0.76 ±0.05
318±6
316 ±19
162 ±26*
7.70 ±0.24
33.9 ±1.6
958 ±64*
1.89 ±0.23
2.78 ±0.07*
2.66 ±0.19*
385±12
350 ±11
113±9
8.26 ±0.18
34.6 ±1.1
706 ±27
2.00 ±0.11
1.86 ±0.04
1.00 ±0.24
363±11
341 ±18
141 ±20*
8.03 ±0.17
32.3 ±1.6
991 ±84*
1.88 ±0.23
2.61 ±0.08*
2.85 ±0.64*
* P<0.05 vs. Sham
BW, body weight, HR, heart rate, LVEDD, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, FS, fractional shortening, LVM, left ventricular mass, LVW/BW, left
ventricular weight to body weight ratio, MFA, myocardial fibrosis area
258±8
342±19
98 ±10
7.25 ±0.25
35.0 ±3.0
466 ±18
1.75±0.10
2.06 ±0.19
0.89 ±0.11
280±20
340 ±20
160 ±25*
7.70 ±0.03
32.2 ±1.3
457 ±60
2.01 ±0.17
2.19 ±0.17
1.01 ±0.37
Shamn=3
ACn=4
Day 1
Supplemental Table II. Time-dependent changes in cardiac morphologic and functional parameters after aortic constriction
18
Supplemental Table III. Hemodynamic parameters in sham- and AC-operated rats measured by the Millar pressure-volume conductance catheter system
ShamDay 28
N=5
ACDay 28N=14
LVESP (mmHg)
LVEDP (mmHg)
EF (%)
dP/dtmax (mmHg/s)
dP/dtmin (mmHg/s)
PRSW (mmHg)
Emax (mmHg/μL)
EDPVR (mmHg/μL)
τ (msec)
κ
108.7±5.7
7.0±1.6
50.3±4.9
9229±723
-7971±536
123.0±25.3
2.02±0.77
0.010±0.004
12.1±0.9
0.002±0.001
141.0±10.8*
12.0±3.3
41.5±2.2
9178±958
-7810±725
112.4±17.0
1.27±0.27
0.052±0.013*
17.3±0.9*
0.004±0.003
* P<0.05 vs. Sham
LVESP, left ventricular end-systolic pressure; LVEDP, left ventricular end-diastolic
pressure; LVESV, left ventricular end-systolic volume; LVEDV, left ventricular end-
diastolic volume; EF, ejection fraction; dP/dtmax, maximal rate of pressure
development; dP/dtmin, maximal rate of pressure decline; PRSW, preload-recruitable
stroke work; Emax, maximal elastance; EDPVR, end-diastolic pressure-volume
relationship; τ, monoexponential time constant of relaxation; κ, constant of chamber
stiffness.
19
Variable
VariableCorrelationCoefficient P value
Hemodynamic parametersLVESPLVEDPdP/dtmax
dP/dtmin
PRSWEmaxτEDPVRFS*E/A*
Gene expressionsCOL1A1COL3A1TGFβSERCA2a
Histomorphological parameterMFA
0.2460.3490.310-0.1350.3300.2040.2700.7200.1610.315
0.4580.2700.0500.179
0.525
0.2740.1130.1630.5430.1590.3930.337<0.0010.1590.009
<0.0010.0060.6220.183
<0.001
Supplemental Table IV. Correlation between CTGF/BNP ratio and hemodynamic or genetic parameters
LVESP, left ventricular end-systolic pressure; LVEDP, left ventricular end-
diastolic pressure; dP/dtmax, maximal rate of pressure development; dP/dtmin,
maximal rate of pressure decline; PRSW, preload-recruitable stroke work;
Emax, maximal elastance; τ, monoexponential time constant of relaxation;
EDPVR, end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship; FS, fractional shortening;
COL1A1, procollagen type 1α1 mRNA, COL3A1; procollagen type 3 α1 mRNA;
TGFβ, transforming growth factor β1 mRNA; SERCA2a, sarcoplasmic reticulum
Ca2+ ATPase 2a mRNA; MFA, myocardial fibrosis area. * Parameters
estimated by echocardiography
20
Sham day 28 AC day 28CTGF=BNP
AC day 28CTGF>BNPA
E/A=1.6 E/A=1.3 E/A=5.2
Sham Day 28 AC Day 28CTGF>BNP
AC Day 28CTGF=BNP
B
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
EEAA
Supplemental Figure I
21
A B
r=0.720P<0.001
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0 1 2 3CTGF/BNP ratio
EDPV
R (m
mH
g/μL
)
r=0.458 P<0.001C
OL1
A1
mR
NA
Fold
Incr
ease
0 1 2 3CTGF/BNP ratio
5
4
3
2
1
0
Supplemental Figure II
22
Plasma TGFβ
0
10
20
30
40
ng/m
L
Plasma Endothelin 1
0123456
pg/m
L
Plasma Aldosterone
*
0200400600800
10001200
pg/m
L
CTGF/BNP<1.2 CTGF/BNP>1.2
Supplemental Figure III
23
Supplemental Figure IV
CTGFVimentin Merged
24
NE (μmol/L)0 1010 101
AngII (μmol/L)
Supplemental Figure V
1 2 4
sBNPhrs0
CTGF
28S
0 0.5sBNP(μmol/L) 0.1 0 0.50.1
KT5823Vehicle
CTGF
28S
B C
A
28S
BNP
CTGF
25
CM CFB
CTGF
28S
0
1
2
3
Rel
ativ
e In
tens
ityA *
Veh 1 10 0.1 1 10 0.01 0.1 0.1 1
TGFβ(ng/mL)
AngII(μmol/L)
NE(μmol/L)
ET1(μmol/L)
Aldo(μmol/L)
CTGF
28S
0
0.5
1
1.5 *
Rel
ativ
e In
tens
ityB
Supplemental Figure VI
26