increased access to insurance - a sri lankan perspective
DESCRIPTION
This presentation was delivered by Ms Damayanthi Fernando (Director Legal at Insurance Board of Sri Lanka) at the ICMIF-AOA Development Network Seminar (18-20 September 2013; Manila, The Philippines).TRANSCRIPT
Increased Access to Insurance
A Sri Lankan perspective
Manila, Philippines18 -20 September 2013
Damayanthi FernandoDirector Legal
Insurance Board of Sri Lanka
Agenda Key Social Indicators Relevant Insurance Industry data How are others covered from shocks? Challenges to develop an inclusive
insurance market Scope of MI Regulation Challenges in regulation and supervision of
MI What have previous studies shown? What steps next?
Key Social Indicators
Mid year population (‘000) in 2012 – 20,328 Age distribution 2011
0-14 yrs – 5,488 15-64 yrs – 14,065 65 years and over – 1,316
Literacy rate (2011) – Average 92.2% Poverty Head Count Index (2002) 22.7 (2006/2007) 15.2 (2009/2010) 8.9 GDP Per Capita @ market prices – US$ 2,836Source – Central Bank A/R 2012
Relevant Insurance Industry Data
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Total Premium Income (US$ millions)
447 443 510 604 670
GDP (US$ billions) 34 37 43 50 58
Penetration % (Total Industry Premium as % of GDP)
1.32 1.19 1.18 1.20 1.15
Insurance Density (Total Industry Premium Income/Population) US$
22 22 25 29 33
Mid Year Population (‘000)
1US$ = Rs 130.00
20,217 20,450 20,653 20,869 20,328
Number of Branches Number of Employees Number of Agents
Branch Network, Employees and Agents of Insurance Companies operated in the Island as at 31st December 2012
How are others covered from shocks? Public Sector
Private Sector Self Employed Unemployed
Pensions, EPF’s, ETF’s
Govt. welfare systems
Cooperatives and self helped groups
Conventional insurers offering MI products
MI providers, MFI’s
Savings , family support
Section 12 of the Insurance Law in Sri Lanka
No person shall carry on insurance business in Sri Lanka unless such person is for the time being registered to carry on such business.
Challenges to develop an inclusive insurance market
Inclusive Insurance Market
Downscale ?
Up scale ?
Insurer partner model
?
Downscaling: Commercial Insurers serving the Low-income Market
Up scaling: Formalising informal insurance schemes
Downscaling - issues1) Is it the responsibility of insurance
supervisors to promote MI?2) Should functional regulation be
considered?3) Can the corporate culture in
commercial insurers be conducive to serving the poor?
4) Will Policyholders be protected?
Up scaling – issues
1) Can a tiered approach to MI regulations work?2) What aspects of insurance regulations would
need to be adjusted to formalise informal schemes?
3) Can a market orientation develop in an institution that has had a social orientation?
4) Can MI organisations truly play by the rules of the game?
5) Do they have the staff and systems capacity?
Scope of MI Regulation
Prudential Regulation Market Conduct Regulation Product Regulation Institutional and corporate
governance regulation
Challenges in Regulation and Supervision of MI
Creating an appropriate regulatory framework is a complex task - despite increasing experience with MI, there are still a host of unanswered questions about appropriate steps for overcoming regulatory barriers and achieving greater inclusiveness
Who should supervise? Direct, Self or Delegated
What degree of supervision?
What have previous studies shown ?
Large insures are very active in the market – even at village level
Awareness of insurance products and names of insurers high
Low usage of insurance amongst low income households is not due to lack of access to insurers and therefore, marketing new MI products can be even more difficult
What have previous studies shown ?
There is a need and demand for MI A substantial segment of low
income households is uneducated and skeptical about insurance
A fixed mind-set about insurance and insurers
To penetrate – a balanced combination of the right product and the right strategic marketing
What have previous studies shown ?
Products offered are not suitable Premiums not affordable Delivery mechanism and premium
collection mechanism are not pro-poor
A low cost and easy to understand MI products should be developed
Mind-set should be changed by series of re-orientation programmes and marketing campaigns
What have previous studies shown ?
Demand for life, health and funeral insurance but not property
A low cost delivery mechanism needs to be identified
Tradition of bringing financial services to the rural people through diverse setting of government, private and grass root level initiatives
What have previous studies shown ?
An ideal combination would be an insurer-agent partnership between commercial insurers and grass root level financial intermediaries
What steps next ? Assessment of Sri Lanka’s MI
market, i.e. what is in place in the entire island; MI products issued by registered insurers and unregistered providers, including identifying insurance needs of low income groups
Identify best practices, methods and guidelines in MI in emerging markets and recommend the best suited model for Sri Lanka.
Thank you.