in vitro affinity screening of protein and peptide binders ... · in vitro affinity screening of...

18
In Vitro Affinity Screening of Protein and Peptide Binders by Megavalent Bead Surface Display Pietro Gatti-Lafranconi Dept. of Biochemistry, Univ. of Cambridge (UK) Malaga, 26 November 2013

Upload: hoangminh

Post on 15-Feb-2019

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

In Vitro Affinity Screening ofProtein and Peptide Binders by

Megavalent Bead Surface Display

Pietro Gatti-Lafranconi

Dept. of Biochemistry, Univ. of Cambridge (UK)

Malaga, 26 November 2013

Applied Synthetic Biology in Europe26/11/2013 Malaga, Spain

p 2/22

WHY A NEW PROTEIN DISPLAY SYSTEM?

Growing number of formats/scaffolds for molecular recognition

Library screening vs selection

Advantages of an entirely in vitro method

Increasing complexity for applications in binding/catalysis

Applied Synthetic Biology in Europe26/11/2013 Malaga, Spain

p 3/22

Holliger, P. & Hudson, P. J. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 1126-36 (2005). ; Hosse, R., Rothe, A. & Power, B. Protein Science 15, 14-27 (2006). ; Kutchukian, Yang, Verdine, and Shakhnovich, JACS 131 (13), 4622-4627 (2009) ; Heinis, C., Rutherford, T., Freund, S. & Winter, G. Nat. Chem. Biol. 5, 502-507 (2009).

VARIETY OF FORMATS CALLS FOR FLEXIBLE SCREENING

Natural, designed and chemically-modified protein binders diversity.

Applied Synthetic Biology in Europe26/11/2013 Malaga, Spain

p 4/22

Hoogenboom, H. R. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 1105-1116 (2005).

AVAILABLE FORMATS, AND THEIR LIMITATIONS

Applied Synthetic Biology in Europe26/11/2013 Malaga, Spain

p 5/22

Hoogenboom, H. R. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 1105-1116 (2005).

AVAILABLE FORMATS, AND THEIR LIMITATIONS

Mostly in vitro

Display one/few proteins per template

Allow sampling of large libraries

Survival-based selection

I. Selection

Applied Synthetic Biology in Europe26/11/2013 Malaga, Spain

p 6/22

Hoogenboom, H. R. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 1105-1116 (2005).

AVAILABLE FORMATS, AND THEIR LIMITATIONS

Almost exclusively in vivo

Multiple proteins displayed per template

Small(er) library size

Quantitative screening

II. Screening

Applied Synthetic Biology in Europe26/11/2013 Malaga, Spain

p 7/22

SCREENING COMPROMISES COVERAGE FOR RESOLUTION

experiment 1 experiment 2

62 positives 148 positives

SCREENING COMPROMISES COVERAGE FOR RESOLUTION

experiment 1 experiment 2

from selectionto screening

62 positives 148 positives

31% 29%

Applied Synthetic Biology in Europe26/11/2013 Malaga, Spain

p 9/22

Ideally, we would do this on large libraries (>106) and using small volumes (50 uL per library)

ESSENTIAL FEATURES OF DISPLAY SYSTEMS

--RGYSLGNWVCAAKFESN--

isolate

amplify genotype

accumulate proteinscreen for

binding

decode

Applied Synthetic Biology in Europe26/11/2013 Malaga, Spain

p 10/22

Antje Keppler et al., A general method for the covalent labeling of fusion proteins with small molecules in vivo Nature Biotechnology 21, 86 - 89 (2002)

BUILDING BLOCKS OF BESD

SNAP-tag based genotype/phenotype linkage

magnetic 1-5 um beads water-in-oil emulsion

Applied Synthetic Biology in Europe26/11/2013 Malaga, Spain

p 11/22

Houlihan G, Lowe D, Hollfelder F. SNAP display - an in vitro method for the selection of protein binders. CurrPharm Des. 2013;19(30):5421-8.

BUILDING BLOCKS OF BESD

supportsize (FACS)recovery

covalent linkage genotype/phenotype

monoclonality

SNAP-Display

Diamante, L., Gatti-Lafranconi, P., Schaerli, Y. & Hollfelder, F. In vitro affinity screening of protein and peptide binders by megavalent bead surface display. PEDS (2013).

THE FINAL PRODUCT

Dr. LetiziaDiamante

Quantitative screening after in vitro PCR and protein expression

Applied Synthetic Biology in Europe26/11/2013 Malaga, Spain

p 13/22

MONOCLONAL DNA AMPLIFICATION EFFICIENCY

Amplification of 1 copy of

template DNA in emulsion

leads to 103 – 105 copies bound

to beads, depending on length

and polymerase used.

SATURATION OF DISPLAY LEVELS

• Protein synthesised >> DNA copies

• Excess of anchors bound on beads

• Display levels amplified and normalised

Beads-displayed GFP GFP ‘lost’ in the supernatant

SCREENING OF HA-TAG LIBRARIES

negative

positive

library

1x NNS2x NNS3x NNS

mutant kDDYA 12 nMNYA 18 nMDYS 16 nM

NYS 21 nM

on beads

kD measurement

Applied Synthetic Biology in Europe26/11/2013 Malaga, Spain

p 16/22

SELF-SUFFICIENT AND UN-BIASED

•One single systems toamplify DNAexpress proteinquantify proteinrecover individual DNA variants

•Libraries reduced to individual mutants•Amplification and recovery are unbiased

ePCR

eIVTT

Quantification

1-bead recovery PCR

Applied Synthetic Biology in Europe26/11/2013 Malaga, Spain

p 17/22

MODULAR AND “SIMPLE”

Independent optimisation of:DNA amplificationProtein expressionBinding assay

Required hardwareVortexThermocycler/ThermomixerFACS

polymerase

length

specificity

IVTT extract

Incubation time

Incubation temperature

Presence of cofactors

Concentration of antigen

Competing antigen

• Tags

• GFP

• ScFV

• DARPins

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Florian Hollfelder

Letizia Diamante

Sylwia Mankowska

Markus Shober

Funding