bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com · in the spring of 2011, fred hoiberg (hoiberg), head...

SUMMARY DISPOSITION REPORT

Iowa State University

Case No. M380

April 8, 2013

INDIVIDUALS WHO MAY BE MENTIONED WITHIN THIS REPORT

Case No. M380 – Iowa State University

April 8, 2013

Bleil, Bill – assistant football coach. Burnham, Shane – assistant football coach. Elliott, Bobby – then assistant football coach and current University of Notre Dame assistant

football coach. Flaherty, Eileen – then assistant director of compliance and current University of Maine, Orono,

associate athletics director for compliance. Gray, Dustin – then assistant compliance director and current compliance director. Hoiberg, Fred – head men's basketball coach. Leath, Steven – president. Moore, Keith – then student men's basketball coach. Robinson, Daniyal – then assistant men's basketball coach and current University of Houston

assistant men's basketball coach. Snyder, Josh – then associate athletics director for compliance and current University of

Missouri-Kansas City associate athletics director for compliance. Wells, Luke – then assistant football coach and current Utah State University assistant football

coach.

A-1

SUMMARY DISPOSITION REPORT


April 8, 2013 A. Case Chronology.

1. How the investigation began.

In the spring of 2011, Fred Hoiberg (Hoiberg), head men's basketball coach, was in attendance at his son's nonscholastic basketball game and witnessed Keith Moore (Moore), then student men's basketball coach, at the game. Knowing that Moore had previously coached one of the participating nonscholastic teams and that Moore's attendance at a nonscholastic event was contrary to NCAA legislation, Hoiberg approached Moore and asked why he was present and whether he had been contacting men's basketball prospective student-athletes. Moore replied that he had. That night, Hoiberg reported the potential violation to Jamie Pollard, the institution's director of athletics. The institution relieved Moore of his responsibilities and initiated an internal investigation the next day. The discovery of impermissible telecommunication with prospects by Moore ultimately led the internal investigative team to a comprehensive telephone and text messaging audit, not only of the men's basketball program, but of all its sports programs (18) and all its coaches (69). The review covered a three-year time period (2008-09 through 2010-11 academic years). At the conclusion of the review, the institution discovered that there were a significant number of recruiting communication violations involving most of its sports programs and provided a self-report to the NCAA enforcement staff November 23, 2011 (Exhibit NCAA-3).

2. Date of notice of inquiry.

Steven Leath, president, received a verbal notice of inquiry January 31, 2012.

SUMMARY DISPOSITION April 8, 2013 Case No. M380 ______________

B-1

B. General Overview of Findings.

1. Nature of the violations. The violations in this case involve impermissible telephone calls in all of the institution's sports programs, impermissible text messaging by Moore, impermissible coaching activities involving nonscholastic-based basketball by Moore and a current women's basketball noncoaching staff member, and a failure to monitor by the institution.

2. Why the case is major.

The enforcement staff, institution and involved individuals agree that the findings detailed in this summary disposition report constitute a major infractions case as a whole. More specifically, based on the significant number and frequency of the telephone call violations, as detailed in Finding Nos. 1, 2-b and 3 through 7, as well as the volume of impermissible text messages sent by Moore as detailed in Finding No. 2-a, the institution and enforcement staff are in agreement that those findings constitute major violations. However, with regard to some of the involved individuals, while all agree that the case as a whole constitutes a major infractions case, some involved individuals will be taking the position that some findings standing alone should be found to be secondary violations. The information following the specific findings will highlight if such a position has been taken with regard to any particular finding. Finally, as detailed in Finding No. 8, the institution did not follow its procedures for monitoring telephone calls for a three-year period and the fact that the coaches involved did not understand logging requirements indicated deficiencies in rules education, which contributed to the significant number of violations outlined in Finding Nos. 1, 2-b and 3 through 7. Therefore, the institution and the enforcement staff agree that Finding No. 8 constitutes a major violation.

3. Show-cause advisement.

The following coaches have been advised that by consenting to the use of the summary disposition process, they are acknowledging personal involvement in their respective findings and are at risk for a show-cause penalty, as outlined in NCAA Bylaw 19.5.2.2-(1): a. Bobby Elliott (Elliott), then assistant football coach and current University

of Notre Dame assistant football coach, is named and at risk for his involvement in Finding No. 1-b-(1).


B-2

b. Bill Bleil (Bleil), assistant football coach, is named and at risk for his involvement in Finding No. 1-b-(2).

c. Shane Burnham (Burnham), assistant football coach, is named and at risk for his involvement in Finding No. 1-b-(3).

d. Luke Wells (Wells), then assistant football coach and current Utah State University assistant football coach, is named and at risk for his involvement in Finding No. 1-b-(4).

e. Moore is named and at risk for his involvement in Finding Nos. 2-a and Secondary Finding No. 3-a.

f. Daniyal Robinson (Robinson), then assistant men's basketball coach and current University of Houston assistant men's basketball coach, is named and at risk for his involvement in Finding No. 2-c-(1).

4. Culpability Analysis

A thorough review of the evidence revealed that the telephone call violations in this case occurred across all sports and the majority of the violations were attributable to systemic logging failures wherein coaches failed to log a short call rendering subsequent calls within the legislated time period impermissible. Very specifically, systemic logging failures occurred because many of the coaches were not logging calls in which they left messages or did not make contact. Thereafter, subsequent impermissible calls were placed. As a result, numerous violations occurred and the monitoring processes in place at the time failed to detect this ongoing, deficient practice. [Note: One thousand four hundred five of the 1,484 total impermissible calls involved logging issues.]. In addition, while some rules education was provided via email in July 2008 (Exhibit NCAA-4) and a general PowerPoint presentation in June 2009 (football coaches only) and October 2009 (all other sports programs), some of the institution's coaches generally reported a lack of knowledge regarding the need to log all calls, even calls where no contact occurred or voicemail messages were left (Exhibit NCAA-5). As a result, the institution's coaches generally reported a lack of knowledge of the need to log all calls, even calls where no contact occurred or voicemail messages were left. While coaches are responsible for all violations in which he or she is involved, it is also important to look at the totality of the circumstances in assessing the culpability of the coaches who commit violations. Because of the circumstances in this case, specifically the institution's acknowledgement of a systemic deficiency with regard to the prior standards set by the NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions for contemporaneous documentation of telephone calls,


B-3

the enforcement staff believed that it was important to look at more than just the total number of impermissible calls attributed to a coach in determining individual culpability. While acknowledging that the culpability analysis used in this case is a different approach than has been taken in past cases, the enforcement staff is mindful of recent efforts to deregulate these types of contacts. While the degree of deregulation of telephone call deregulation is up for debate, the enforcement staff believes that the membership generally supports deregulation. In addition, the enforcement staff believed that the remarkable number of logging-type violations involved in this case, coupled with a lack of adequate rules education regarding logging requirements, dictated that a new and appropriate approach be used to distinguish the violations that could be attributed to what appeared to be institutional-wide, systemic breakdowns from violations to which specific, individualized culpability should be assessed. In order to evaluate individual culpability in a more precise manner the enforcement staff used the following analysis: a. All telephone call violations were identified based on existing standards as

set by the Committee on Infractions. More specifically, the calls were identified without regard to a one-, two- or three-minute analysis. The total number of telephone call violations for all sports was 1,484. [Note: The 1,484 number includes 55 impermissible calls placed by noncoaching staff members in football and men's basketball as detailed in Finding Nos. 2-a and 7.]

b. The more clear-cut, intentional violations were then separated out from the

violations where some type of logging issue was involved. Specifically, all calls placed when the coaches were not allowed to make any telephone contact at all (e.g., before April 15 of a prospect's junior year in football or calling during an impermissible time period) were identified. Those types of more clear-cut violations were counted and that number was placed in the "culpable call" category for each coach. [Note: Out of the total 1,484 impermissible calls, 24 of these calls were the more clear-cut, intentional type violations.]

c. With regard to the remaining impermissible calls involving logging issues

(1,405) (i.e., those calls where a permissible call is made and then followed up by additional contact), the first step in the process was to identify the applicable "trigger call." Specifically:


B-4

(1) Initially, the enforcement staff analyzed the facts under the established Committee on Infractions requirements that a "trigger call" occurred if there was no contemporaneous documentation of the call. Using that standard, over 33 coaches across all sports programs would have been named and considered at-risk for 1,405 impermissible calls.

(2) Because of the nature and extent of the systemic breakdowns, the enforcement staff then re-examined what constituted an unquestionable "trigger call." (i) Initially, the enforcement staff identified the "trigger call"

as any initial call longer than one minute in length. Based on that standard, over 26 coaches across all sports programs would have been named and considered at-risk for 938 violations.

(ii) Based on the degree of systemic breakdowns, in order to

mitigate the large number of potential involved individuals, the enforcement staff then identified the "trigger call" as any initial call longer than two minutes in length. This approach significantly reduced the number of coaches at risk to six.

(3) With the "trigger call" identified, the enforcement staff then

identified the subsequent impermissible call(s). If a coach made a "trigger call" of more than two minutes in length and then that same coach placed a subsequent impermissible call, the enforcement staff deemed that violation to fall in the "culpable call" category. If the subsequent call was placed by a different coach, that violation was placed in the "logging issue" category.

(4) Finally, the enforcement staff then looked at the total number of culpable calls for each individual, which included those clear-cut, culpable calls and those logging issues where the same coach placed the trigger and offending call(s). That total number of culpable calls was then analyzed taking into consideration the overall total number of impermissible calls, frequency and nature of the violations.

The following diagram provides a simplified breakdown of the analysis of the "culpable" versus the "logging issues" calls. Also, a chart showing the complete breakdown of all calls in all sports can be found at Exhibit NCAA-6.


B-5

Additionally, an abbreviated chart can be found following each finding that shows the analysis of the culpable calls for each coach.

Total Impermissible Telephone Calls for All Sports

1,484

Noncoaching Staff Impermissible Contact

Telephone Call Violations 55

Pure Logging Issues 1,260

Culpable Telephone Call

Violations 145

Remaining Impermissible Telephone Calls

1,405

Clear-Cut Intentional Telephone Call Violations

24


C-1

C. Specific Findings and Narratives.

1. [NCAA Bylaws 13.1.3.1 and 13.1.3.1.2]

It is agreed that between July 2008 and May 2011, members of the football coaching staff violated NCAA recruiting communication legislation by placing 919 impermissible telephone calls to 235 football prospective student-athletes. Specifically:

a. The majority of impermissible calls (821) were attributed to systemic

logging failures wherein a football coach failed to document a message or lack of contact resulting in a subsequent call to be deemed impermissible.

b. The remaining 98 impermissible calls were the result of the football

coaches placing calls for which more specific, individualized culpability was attached. Specifically:

(1) Between May 2010 and May 2011, Bobby Elliott (Elliott), then

assistant football coach, placed 19 impermissible telephone calls. All calls were placed after Elliott had already made one permissible call to a prospect during the legislated time period.

(2) Between January 2009 and March 2011, Bill Bleil (Bleil), assistant

football coach, placed 20 impermissible telephone calls. Specifically:

(a) Bleil placed one call prior to April 15 of a prospect's junior

year. (b) Bleil placed one call after May 31 but prior to September 1

of a prospect's senior year. (c) Bleil placed 18 calls after he had already made one

permissible call to a prospect during the legislated time period.

(3) Between October 2009 and February 2011, Shane Burnham

(Burnham), assistant football coach placed 13 impermissible telephone calls. Specifically:

(a) Burnham placed four calls after May 31 but prior to

September 1 of a prospect's senior year.


C-2

(b) Burnham placed nine calls after he had already made one permissible call to a prospect during the legislated time period.

(4) Between December 2009 and December 2010, Luke Wells

(Wells), then assistant football coach, placed 12 impermissible telephone calls. Specifically:

(a) Wells placed one call prior to April 15 of a prospect's

junior year. (b) Wells placed seven calls after May 31 but prior to

September 1 of a prospect's senior year. (c) Wells placed four calls after he had already made one

permissible call to a prospect during the legislated time period.

(5) Between July 2008 and May 2011, 11 members of the football

coaching staff placed a total of 34 impermissible telephone calls. Specifically: (a) The coaches placed five calls after May 31 but prior to

September 1 of a prospect's senior year. (b) The coaches placed 29 calls after they had already placed

one permissible call to a prospect during the legislated time period.

Supporting Narrative: The NCAA enforcement staff, institution, Bleil, Burnham, Elliott and Wells are in agreement with the facts of these findings. The enforcement staff believes that major violations of NCAA legislation occurred. While the institution agrees that this is a major infractions case overall, the institution takes no position and defers to the judgment of the NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions on whether a finding against each involved individual should be deemed to be major or secondary. Bleil, Burnham, Elliott and Wells argue that their individual violations constitute secondary violations. Please see each individual's position statement attached to this report explaining their position. The institution's telephone audit revealed that members of the football staff placed a total of 919 impermissible telephone calls to 235 prospects. A thorough review


C-3

of the evidence revealed that the majority of the telephone call violations involving the football staff (821) were attributed to systemic logging failures wherein a football coach failed to document a message or lack of contact, which caused a subsequent call to be deemed impermissible. The following information details the remaining 98 impermissible calls relating to the "culpable calls," including those placed by individual football staff members that the enforcement staff believes should be named and at risk for Finding No. 1:

a. Elliott.

In addition to the 180 impermissible calls that Elliot placed due to staff-wide "logging issues," Elliott placed 19 "culpable calls" to 12 prospects during a 12-month period. All 19 of Elliott's "culpable calls" were placed after he had already made one permissible call to a prospect during the legislated time period. The following is a detailed breakdown of Elliott's impermissible telephone calls:

Coach Total Violations

Logging Issue

Impermissible Time Period Culpable Total

Culpable Elliott 199 180 0 19 19

During his August 22, 2011, interview with the institution, Elliott stated that he used his own personal log book to track telephone contact made with a prospect. Elliott explained that he would continue to call the prospect until he reached the prospect. Elliott reported that he did not document voicemails, unanswered calls or dropped calls. Elliott reported that he felt a one- or two-minute call "spoke for itself;" he did not feel it was necessary to mark those as calls on his logs and he has never documented those types of calls during his coaching career. Additionally, Elliott reported that he is not that good with technology and he believed many of the calls attributed to him to be "pocket dials" even though he did not note them as such in his phone logs. Elliott stated that he did not recall receiving rules education about the subject and that it was not until he was questioned about this issue during the institution's inquiry that the compliance staff talked to him about the need to log such calls. Elliott stated that he was not familiar with the 2008 NCAA enforcement document outlining that there was no "three-minute rule" and that a countable call occurred unless a log showed


C-4

contemporaneous documentation indicating no contact was made on the call.1 During the investigation, the institution produced documentation showing that July 28, 2008, the institution sent an email to all coaches regarding that there was no "three-minute rule" and also attached to the email the enforcement document explaining the need to contemporaneously document all calls. In addition, a PowerPoint presentation was given to the football coaches in June 2009 that generally addressed telephone calls (Exhibit NCAA-5). Elliott began employment at the institution in February 2010 after the documentation and presentation was provided to coaches.

b. Bleil. In addition to the 58 impermissible calls that Bleil placed due to staff-wide "logging issues," Bleil placed 20 "culpable calls" to five prospects over a 26-month period. Bleil placed one "early" call (i.e., prior to a permissible time to make contact), two calls during an impermissible time period and the remaining "culpable calls" were placed after Bleil had already made one permissible call to a prospect during the legislated time period. The following is a detailed breakdown of Bleil's impermissible telephone calls:


Logging Issue


Culpable Bleil 78 58 2 18 20

During his August 22, 2011, interview with the institution, Bleil explained that if he placed a call to a prospect and left a message, he would try and remember to put an "M" in the log to indicate that he left a message. Bleil stated that if he did not put an "M" in the log when he left a message, it was a housekeeping error and he believed that most of the time he noted in the log when he had left a message. Bleil reported that he was not sure what conversations the compliance staff had with him regarding how to log such calls, but stated that he was sure the staff did talk to him about logging these types of calls. Bleil added that Dustin Gray, then assistant compliance director and current compliance director, and Josh Snyder, then associate athletics director for compliance, were good at their jobs and they met with the compliance staff once per month. Bleil stated that

1 NCAA member institutions and its coaches were under the false belief that calls made to prospects that were less than three minutes in length were not a countable call under NCAA legislation.


C-5

failing to log an "M" meant he did not make contact with the prospect and he did not view such calls as a countable call. Bleil stated that he was not familiar with the 2008 NCAA enforcement document outlining there was no "three-minute rule" and that a countable call occurred unless a log showed contemporaneous documentation indicating no contact was made on the call. [Note: On July 28, 2008, the institution sent an email to all coaches regarding that there was no "three-minute rule" and also attached to the email the enforcement document explaining the need to contemporaneously document all calls (Exhibit NCAA-4). In addition, a PowerPoint presentation was given to the football coaches in June 2009 that generally addressed telephone calls (Exhibit NCAA-5).] Bleil began employment at the institution in December 2009.

c. Burnham. In addition to the 80 impermissible calls that Burnham placed due to staff-wide "logging issues," Burnham placed 13 "culpable calls" to eight prospects over a 16-month period. Four of Burnham's calls were placed during a time period when it was not permissible to place telephone calls and nine calls were placed after he had already made one permissible call to a prospect during the legislated time period. The following is a detailed breakdown of Burnham's impermissible telephone calls:


Logging Issue


Culpable Burnham 93 80 4 9 13 Regarding the four calls placed during an impermissible time period, Burnham explained that the calls were placed around the time of an institutional camp and Burnham believed that three of the prospects that were called had either attended camp or expressed an interest in camp. During his August 22, 2011, interview with the institution, Burnham explained he kept a file on all prospects he was recruiting and in that file he noted each time he talked by phone with a prospect. Burnham explained that at the end of each month, information was provided to the assistant recruiting coordinator who then entered the calls in Recruiting Radar.2 Burnham stated that to ensure that the football staff only placed one call per week to a prospect, each coach was responsible for calling the

2 Recruiting Radar is a web-based compliance tool used by the institution to track recruiting telephone calls placed by coaches.


C-6

prospects they were recruiting. The lead recruiter would then ask the head coach to call the prospect if needed during a particular week. Burnham stated that if a call was placed to a prospect but no contact was made, he may have documented that in the log on a few occasions. Burnham reported that a compliance staff member may have told him it was necessary to log a telephone call made to a prospect even if he only left a message or made no contact, but he said he did not know that failing to log such calls could result in the calls being deemed a violation of NCAA legislation. Burnham stated that he was not familiar with the 2008 NCAA enforcement document outlining that there was no "three-minute rule" and that a countable call occurred unless a log showed contemporaneous documentation indicating no contact was made on the call. [Note: On July 28, 2008, the institution sent an email to all coaches regarding that there was no "three-minute rule" and also attached to the email the enforcement document explaining the need to contemporaneously document all calls (Exhibit NCAA-4). In addition, a PowerPoint presentation was given to the football coaches in June 2009 that generally addressed telephone calls (Exhibit NCAA-5).] Burnham began employment at the institution in February 2009.

d. Wells. In addition to the 81 impermissible calls Wells placed due to staff-wide "logging issues," Wells placed 12 "culpable calls" to nine prospects over a 16-month period. Eight of Wells' calls were placed during a time period when it was not permissible to place telephone calls and four calls were placed after he had already made one permissible call to a prospect during the legislated time period. The following is a detailed breakdown of Wells' impermissible telephone calls:


Logging Issue


Culpable Wells 93 81 8 4 12

Regarding the calls he placed during an impermissible time period, Wells explained during his April 22, 2011, interview that five of the calls were placed to prospects near the time they attended an institutional camp. Wells also reported that he kept a file for each individual prospect he recruited and he would provide his logs to the assistant recruiting coordinator who would then turn them into compliance. Wells explained he typically would not note in his file if he did not reach the prospect or left a message. Wells stated that he did not know that he was supposed to


C-7

identify a left message in his logs and that on the occasions he did note left message it was for his own personal knowledge, not for compliance purposes. Wells reported that he was never informed by anyone at Iowa State University or his previous institution that he needed to document dropped calls, pocket dials or voicemail messages. [Note: On July 28, 2008, the institution sent an email to all coaches regarding that there was no "three-minute rule" and also attached to the email the enforcement document explaining the need to contemporaneously document all calls. In addition, a PowerPoint presentation was given to the football coaches in June 2009 that generally addressed telephone calls (Exhibit NCAA-5).] Wells began employment at the institution in February 2009.

e. Other staff members. Regarding the remaining 34 "culpable calls" placed by other members of the football staff, most of the coaches reported that they did not think calls in which they did not make contact with a prospect or left a message were presumed to be a countable call without contemporaneous documentation. Some coaches reported that even if they identified a left message on the log, it was not for a compliance reason but for personal use to track that they had attempted to contact a prospect. The coaches also reported that they met monthly with the compliance staff to review NCAA rules. Most of the coaches reported that they were unaware of the 2008 educational document from the NCAA informing institutions it was necessary to document all calls, including voicemail messages, as without contemporaneous documentation, those calls would be deemed countable calls.

The following is a detailed breakdown of the impermissible telephone calls placed by the other coaches on the football staff:


Logging Issue


Culpable A 57 51 1 5 6 B 92 87 0 5 5 C 33 28 0 5 5 D 16 11 0 5 5 E 43 40 2 1 3 F 30 28 2 0 2 G 6 4 0 2 2 H 23 21 0 2 2


C-8


Logging Issue


Culpable I 17 15 0 2 2 J 81 80 0 1 1 K 30 29 0 1 1 L 2 2 0 0 0 M 4 4 0 0 0 N 3 3 0 0 0 O 20 20 0 0 0 P 3 3 0 0 0 Q 1 1 0 0 0 R 1 1 0 0 0 S 1 1 0 0 0 T 7 7 0 0 0

2. [NCAA Bylaws 13.1.3.1.2 (2008-09 NCAA Division I Manual), 13.1.3.4.1 and

13.4.1.2] It is agreed that between July 2008 and August 2011, members of the men's basketball coaching staff violated NCAA recruiting communication legislation by sending 160 impermissible text messages and placing 158 impermissible telephone calls to 21 men's basketball prospective student-athletes. Specifically:

a. Between August 2010 and August 2011, Keith Moore (Moore), then

student men's basketball coach and former boy's nonscholastic coach, sent 160 impermissible text messages and placed 12 impermissible telephone calls to five prospects. [NCAA Bylaw 13.4.1.2]

b. The majority of impermissible calls (118) were attributed to systemic

logging failures wherein a men's basketball coach failed to document a message or lack of contact resulting in a subsequent call to be deemed impermissible.

c. The remaining 28 impermissible calls were the result of the men's

basketball coaches placing calls for which more specific, individualized culpability was attached. Specifically:

(1) Between July 2008 and February 2009, Daniyal Robinson

(Robinson), then assistant men's basketball coach, placed 21 impermissible telephone calls. All calls were placed after Robinson had already made the permissible call(s) to a prospect during the legislated time period. [NCAA Bylaws 13.1.3.1.2 (2008-09 NCAA Division I Manual)]


C-9

(2) Between July 2009 and February 2011, two members of the men's

basketball staff placed a total of seven impermissible telephone calls. All calls were placed after the coaches had already made the permissible call(s) to a prospect during the legislated time period. [NCAA Bylaws 13.1.3.1.2 (2008-09 NCAA Division I Manual)]

Supporting Narrative: The NCAA enforcement staff, institution and Robinson are in agreement with the facts of these findings. The enforcement staff believes that major violations of NCAA legislation occurred. While the institution agrees that this is a major infractions case overall, the institution takes no position and defers to the judgment of the NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions on whether a finding against each involved individual should be deemed to be major or secondary. Please see Robinson's position statement attached to this report explaining his position. After several requests by the enforcement staff, Moore failed to respond or submit information related to the violations outlined in this finding. (See Exhibit NCAA-7.) The institution's telephone audit revealed that members of the men's basketball coaching staff placed 158 impermissible telephone calls to 21 prospects and that one then assistant student men's basketball coach sent 160 impermissible text messages to five prospects. A thorough review of the evidence revealed that the majority of the telephone call violations (118) involving the men's basketball staff were attributed to systemic logging failures wherein a men's basketball coach failed to document a left message or lack of contact, which caused a subsequent call to be deemed impermissible. The following information details the remaining 40 "culpable calls," including those placed by individual men's basketball staff members that the enforcement staff believes should be named and at risk for Finding No. 2:

a. Moore.

Prior to being hired as a student coach for the men's basketball program in the fall of 2010, Moore attended the institution from 1977 through 1981 and was a member of the baseball and men's basketball teams. Immediately prior to returning to the institution as a student coach, Moore coached the 15- and 16-year-old teams for the All Iowa Attack nonscholastic boys' basketball club. While employed as a student coach at Iowa State University, Moore sent 160 text messages to prospects that he coached with the All Iowa Attack squads.


C-10

During his April 18, 2011, interview with the institution, Moore indicated that he received NCAA rules education from the compliance staff regarding limitations on his relationship with the prospects he had previously coached. Moore also stated that he knew he could not recruit those prospects on behalf of the institution, and he was aware that the limitations on contact with those prospects included placing telephone calls and sending text messages. Moore explained that he received text messages from the prospects in the fall of 2010 and the spring of 2011, which corresponded with the conclusion of the 2010 and the beginning of the 2011 nonschoalstic basketball seasons. Moore stated that he did not view the contacts with the prospects as "recruiting" because his communication with them was related to their nonscholastic team; therefore, he did not think it was an issue. However, during his August 23, 2011, interview with the institution, Moore clarified that his knowledge surrounding whether he could text message prospects evolved over his time at the institution. Moore explained that he initially thought he could text his former players, then believed he could only respond to texts and finally came to the conclusion that he could not text at all3.

b. Robinson.

In addition to the 43 impermissible calls that Robinson placed due to staff-wide "logging issues," Robinson placed 21 "culpable calls" to two prospects over a seven-month period. All 21 of Robinson's "culpable calls" were placed after he had already made the permissible call(s) to a prospect during the legislated time period. The following is a detailed breakdown of Robinson's impermissible telephone calls:


Logging Issue


Culpable Robinson 64 43 0 21 21

During his June 27, 2012, interview with the enforcement staff and institution, Robinson stated that he used a notebook to track the telephone calls placed to prospects and he would then provide the notebook to a graduate assistant or manager who entered the information into Recruiting Radar.4 Robinson explained that the only calls he logged in the notebook were calls in which he made contact with a prospect or a parent.

3 Moore was not issued an institutional cell phone. Moore placed all of the impermissible calls and sent all of the impermissible text messages from his personal cell phone. 4 Recruiting Radar is a web-based compliance tool used by the institution to track recruiting telephone calls placed by coaches.


C-11

Robinson stated that he was told he did not have to log calls in which no contact was made with a prospect or only left a message, but Robinson could not recall who told him that information. Robinson reported that he received NCAA rules education from compliance on a regular basis through meetings that involved the men's basketball staff and other meetings that included the entire athletics department. However, Robinson stated that he was not familiar with the 2008 NCAA enforcement document outlining that there was no "three-minute rule" and that a countable call occurred unless a log showed contemporaneous documentation indicating no contact was made on the call. [Note: On July 28, 2008, the institution sent an email to all coaches regarding that there was no "three-minute rule" and also attached to the email the enforcement document explaining the need to contemporaneously document all calls (Exhibit NCAA-4). In addition, a PowerPoint presentation was given to the coaches in October 2009 that generally addressed telephone calls (Exhibit NCAA-5).] Robinson began employment at the institution in May 2008.

c. Other staff members.

Regarding the other seven "culpable calls" placed by the basketball staff, the most common explanation provided by the other coaches for the telephone call violations was that they did not believe that calls in which no contact was made with the prospect constituted a countable call. The following is a detailed breakdown of impermissible telephone calls placed by other coaches on the men's basketball staff:


Logging Issue


Culpable A 33 33 0 0 0 B 23 18 0 5 5 C 10 8 0 2 2 D 9 9 0 0 0 E 6 6 0 0 0 F 1 1 0 0 0

3. [NCAA Bylaws 13.1.3.1 (2008-09 NCAA Division I Manual) and 13.1.3.1.1]

It is agreed that between September 2008 and December 2010, members of the men's and women's track and cross country coaching staffs violated NCAA recruiting communication legislation by placing 138 impermissible telephone calls to 41 men's and women's track and cross country prospective student-athletes. Specifically:


C-12


logging failures wherein a track and field and cross country coach failed to document a message or lack of contact resulting in a subsequent call to be deemed impermissible.

b. The remaining 16 impermissible calls were the result of five track and

field and cross country coaches placing calls to a prospect after that coach had already placed one permissible call to a prospect during the legislated time period.

Supporting Narrative: The NCAA enforcement staff and institution are in agreement of the facts of these findings. The enforcement staff believes that major violations of NCAA legislation occurred. While the institution agrees that this is a major infractions case overall, the institution takes no position and defers to the judgment of the NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions on whether a finding against each involved individual should be deemed to be major or secondary. The following is a detailed breakdown of the impermissible telephone calls for coaches on the track and cross country staffs:


Logging Issue

Impermissible Time Period

Culpable Total Culpable

Coach A 28 22 0 6 6 Coach B 16 12 0 4 4 Coach C 54 51 0 3 3 Coach D 4 2 0 2 2 Coach E 21 20 0 1 1 Coach F 11 11 0 0 0

The institution's telephone audit revealed that members of the men's and women's track and field and cross country staff placed a total of 138 impermissible telephone calls to 41 prospects. A thorough review of the evidence revealed that the majority of the telephone call violations (122) involving the track and field and cross country programs were attributed to systemic logging failures wherein a track and field and cross country coach failed to document a left message or lack of contact, which caused a subsequent call to be deemed impermissible. There were a total of 16 "culpable calls" among five staff members with the largest number attributed to one staff member being six. As a result of the low number of culpable calls, the enforcement staff and the institution did not believe


C-13

that any involved track and field or cross country coach should be named and at risk. Two track and field and cross country coaching staff members interviewed by the institution and/or enforcement staff explained that the track and field and cross country coaches used Recruiting Radar5 to track calls to prospects, but there was confusion among the staff interviewed regarding what calls needed to be logged. One coach reported that she knew all calls, including voicemail messages, needed to be logged into Recruiting Radar, but she was unaware that failing to log such calls would mean the calls were presumed to be countable calls. Another coaching staff member reported that he used Recruiting Radar to track calls to prospects, but he did not know that they were required to log all calls, including voicemail messages. The two coaches interviewed attributed the majority of the impermissible calls to failing to log voicemail messages or dropped calls with prospects. One coach interviewed recalled receiving an email from compliance a few years prior noting the importance of documenting dropped calls and voicemail messages and admitted that the coaches needed to do a better job logging such calls. The other coach stated that he was not familiar with the 2008 NCAA enforcement document outlining that there was no "three-minute rule" and that a countable call occurred unless a log showed contemporaneous documentation indicating no contact was made on the call. [Note: On July 28, 2008, the institution sent an email to all coaches regarding that there was no "three-minute rule" and also attached to the email the enforcement document explaining the need to contemporaneously document all calls (Exhibit NCAA-4). In addition, a general PowerPoint presentation was given to coaches in October 2009 that generally addressed telephone calls (Exhibit NCAA-5).] The reporting coaches' employment at the institution began after July 2008 but before October 2009.

4. [NCAA Bylaw 13.1.3.1.4] It is agreed that between July 2008 and June 2011, members of the women's basketball coaching staff violated NCAA recruiting communication legislation by placing 55 impermissible telephone calls to 19 women's basketball prospective student-athletes. Specifically: a. The majority of impermissible calls (45) were attributed to systemic

logging failures wherein a women's basketball coach failed to document a



C-14

message or lack of contact resulting in a subsequent call to be deemed impermissible.

b. The remaining 10 impermissible calls were the result of two women's

basketball coaches placing three calls to a prospect prior to April of the prospect's junior year and three coaches placing seven calls to a prospect after that coach had already placed one permissible call to a prospect during the legislated time period.

Supporting Narrative: The NCAA enforcement staff and institution are in agreement with these findings. The enforcement staff believes that major violations of NCAA legislation occurred. While the institution agrees that this is a major infractions case overall, the institution takes no position and defers to the judgment of the NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions on whether a finding against each involved individual should be deemed to be major or secondary. The following is a detailed breakdown of the impermissible telephone calls placed by the coaches on the women's basketball staff:


Logging Issue


Culpable Coach A 24 19 2 3 5 Coach B 6 3 0 3 3 Coach C 23 21 1 1 2 Coach D 2 2 0 0 0

The institution's telephone audit revealed members of the women's basketball coaching staff placed a total of 55 impermissible telephone calls to 19 prospects. A thorough review of the evidence revealed that the majority of the telephone call violations (45) involving the women's basketball staff were attributed to systemic logging failures wherein a women's basketball coach failed to document a left message or lack of contact, which caused a subsequent call to be deemed impermissible. There were a total of 10 "culpable calls" among four staff members with the largest number attributed to one staff member being five. As a result of the low number of culpable calls, the enforcement staff and the institution did not believe that any involved women's basketball coach should be named and at risk. The women's basketball coaching staff member interviewed by the institution regarding the impermissible calls explained that the coaches used Recruiting


C-15

Radar6 to track calls to prospects and that signatures of the coaches were required after the printouts were reviewed. The coach interviewed attributed the majority of the impermissible calls to failing to log voicemail messages or dropped calls with prospects. The coach recalled receiving an email from compliance a few years prior noting the importance of documenting dropped calls and voicemail messages and admitted that the coaches needed to do a better job logging such calls. [Note: On July 28, 2008, the institution sent an email to all coaches regarding that there was no "three-minute rule" and also attached to the email the enforcement document explaining the need to contemporaneously document all calls (Exhibit NCAA-4).] The reporting coach was employed at the institution in both July 2008 and October 2009.

5. [NCAA Bylaw 13.1.3.1 (2008-09 Manual) and 13.1.3.1 (2011-12 Manual)]

It is agreed that between July 2008 and April 2010, members of the women's tennis coaching staff violated NCAA recruiting communication legislation by placing 50 impermissible telephone calls to seven women's tennis prospective student-athletes. Specifically:


logging failures wherein a women's tennis coach failed to document a message or lack of contact resulting in a subsequent call to be deemed impermissible.

b. The remaining eight impermissible calls were the result of a women's

tennis coach placing one call prior to July 1 following a prospect's junior year and two coaches placing seven calls to three prospects after that coach had already placed the one permissible call to a prospect during the legislated time period.

Supporting Narrative: The NCAA enforcement staff and institution are in agreement with these findings. The enforcement staff believes that major violations of NCAA legislation occurred. While the institution agrees that this is a major infractions case overall, the institution takes no position and defers to the judgment of the NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions on whether a finding against each involved individual should be deemed to be major or secondary. The following is a detailed



C-16

breakdown of the impermissible telephone calls placed by the coaches on the women's tennis staff:


Logging Issue


Culpable Coach A 45 40 1 4 5 Coach B 5 2 0 3 3

The institution's telephone audit revealed that members of the women's tennis staff placed 50 impermissible telephone calls to seven prospects. A thorough review of the evidence revealed that the majority of the telephone call violations (42) involving the women's tennis program were attributed to systemic logging failures wherein a women's tennis coach failed to document a message or lack of contact, which caused a subsequent call to be deemed impermissible. There were eight total "culpable calls" among two staff members with each coach having placed four "culpable calls." As a result of the low number of culpable calls, the enforcement staff and the institution did not believe that any involved tennis coach should be named and at risk. One tennis coach interviewed reported that the tennis staff met with compliance once per month to go over NCAA rules and the staff also received emails from compliance updating the staff on NCAA legislation. In addition, the coach explained that he did not believe he was required initially to identify whether he had left a voicemail with a prospect within the Recruiting Radar7 software. The coach reported that prior to the institution obtaining Recruiting Radar, he logged calls in a recruiting log book, made copies of the log and provided it to compliance at the end of each month. The coach reported that before the institution began investigating the issue, he only logged telephone calls in which he actually spoke to the prospect and he did not log left messages or unanswered calls in Recruiting Radar. The coach stated that he did not remember compliance instructing him to put an "LM" or "NA" in the log if he did not reach a prospect, but he did recall compliance telling him to make sure to log all calls. The coach explained that he took that directive to mean staff needed to be more cognizant in logging all calls. The coach stated that he was not familiar with the 2008 NCAA enforcement document outlining that there was no "three-minute rule" and that a countable call occurred unless a log showed contemporaneous documentation indicating no contact was made on the call. [Note: On July 28, 2008, the institution sent an



C-17

email to all coaches regarding that there was no "three-minute rule" and also attached to the email the enforcement document explaining the need to contemporaneously document all calls (Exhibit NCAA-4). In addition, a PowerPoint presentation was given to the coaches in October 2009 that generally addressed telephone calls (NCAA-5).] The reporting coach was employed at the institution in both July 2008 and October 2009.

6. [NCAA Bylaw 13.1.3.1]

It is agreed that between July 2008 and April 2011, coaches from eight sports programs (other than the sports programs identified in Finding Nos. 1 through 5) violated NCAA recruiting communication legislation by placing 121 impermissible telephone calls to 64 prospective student-athletes. Specifically:


logging failures wherein a coach failed to document a message or lack of contact resulting in a subsequent call to be deemed impermissible.

b. The remaining nine impermissible calls were the result of coaches placing

calls for which more specific, individualized culpability was attached. Specifically:

(1) Between July 2008 and October 2010, three wrestling coaches

placed three impermissible telephone calls to three prospects. One call was placed prior to July of a prospect's junior year and two calls were placed after the coach had already placed one permissible call to a prospect during the legislated time period.

(2) In February 2011, a women's soccer coaching staff member placed

one impermissible telephone call to a prospect. The call was placed after the coach had already placed one permissible call to the prospect during the legislated time period.

(3) Between August 2010 and January 2011, two members of the

women's gymnastics staff placed a total of three impermissible calls to three prospects. The calls were placed after the coaches had already placed one permissible call to a prospect during the legislated time period.

(4) In September 2010, a women's swimming and diving coach placed

one impermissible telephone call to a prospect. The call was placed after the coach had already placed one permissible call to the prospect during the legislated time period.


C-18

(5) In September 2008, a women's golf coach placed one

impermissible telephone call to a prospect. The call was placed after the coach had already placed one permissible call to a prospect during the legislated time period.

(6) In November 2008, a women's volleyball coach placed one

impermissible telephone call to a prospect. The call was placed after the coach had already placed one permissible call to a prospect during the legislated time period.

Supporting Narrative: The NCAA enforcement staff and institution are in agreement with these findings. The enforcement staff believes that major violations of NCAA legislation occurred. While the institution agrees that this is a major infractions case overall, the institution takes no position and defers to the judgment of the NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions on whether a finding against each involved individual should be deemed to be major or secondary. The institution's telephone audit revealed coaching staff members from eight sports programs not previously identified in Finding Nos. 1 through 5 placed a total of 121 impermissible telephone calls to 64 prospects. A thorough review of the evidence revealed that the majority of the telephone call violations (112) involving these other sports programs were attributed to systemic logging failures wherein a coach failed to document a message or lack of contact, which caused a subsequent call to be deemed impermissible. The coaching staff members in the eight sports programs were not specifically interviewed regarding the impermissible calls attributed to their sports programs because the number of impermissible calls was low and because the majority of the impermissible calls were a result of the coaches failing to properly log calls. Also, most of the coaches in the other sport programs interviewed during the investigation provided explanations regarding logging failures and the institution's rules education program consistent with the other coaches interviewed. As a result, the enforcement staff and institution did not believe it necessary or efficient to conduct interviews with each coach from every sport program.

7. [NCAA Bylaw 13.1.3.4.1]

It is agreed that between August 2008 and January 2011, noncoaching staff members from the football and men's basketball staffs violated NCAA recruiting


C-19

communication legislation by placing 43 telephone calls as impermissible recruiters to 14 prospective student-athletes. Specifically:

a. Between October 2008 and July 2010, a then assistant football recruiting

coordinator and current graduate assistant football coach placed 30 telephone calls as an impermissible recruiter to eight prospects.

b. Between August and November 2008, a then assistant director of football

operations placed seven impermissible telephone calls as an impermissible recruiter to a prospect.

c. In June 2010, a then graduate assistant football coach placed two

impermissible telephone calls as an impermissible recruiter to a prospect. d. In June 2010, an assistant director of football operations placed two

impermissible telephone calls as an impermissible recruiter to two prospects.

e. In April 2010, a then graduate assistant men's basketball coach placed an

impermissible call as an impermissible recruiter to a prospect. f. In January 2011, a then assistant director of men's basketball operations

and current assistant men's basketball coach placed one call as an impermissible recruiter to a prospect.

Supporting Narrative: The NCAA enforcement staff and institution are in agreement with these findings. The enforcement staff believes that major violations of NCAA legislation occurred. The institution takes no position. With regard to the then assistant football recruiting coordinator and current graduate assistant football coach referenced in Finding No. 7-a (football noncoaching staff member No. 1), the enforcement staff did not believe it was appropriate to consider him to be at risk for his involvement in this finding because a majority of his telephone calls were placed around the time that many of the prospects paid a deposit to enroll at the institution or during the prospect's official paid visit. In addition, football noncoaching staff member No. 1 reported that any calls he placed to prospects was done at the direction of a coach and that, typically, those calls were related to collecting academic transcripts or other necessary paperwork. Football noncoaching staff member No. 1 explained that the main recruiter for that particular prospect would have been the coach who directed him to make the call but he was not able to identify a specific coach who


C-20

directed him to make such calls. The full-time football coaches interviewed in this case denied telling football noncoaching staff member No. 1 to make calls to prospects; rather, the coaches indicated that he likely placed the call on his own initiative in order to obtain paperwork. The then assistant director of football operations referenced in Finding No. 7-b (football noncoaching staff member No. 2) reported that once a recruited prospect had signed a National Letter of Intent or once a walk on had paid the proper enrollment fees, he believed that it was permissible to call those individuals in order to collect final admission paper work (e.g., transcripts, housing forms, etc.). Football noncoaching staff member No. 2 stated that he did not recall anyone informing him that it was permissible to make such contact, but he believed that since the prospect had signed or paid an enrollment fee, it was permissible to call. Football noncoaching staff member No. 2 stated that he knew he could not place recruiting telephone calls to prospects, but he also believed that it was permissible to call prospects that were on campus for official paid visits because the prospect was physically located on campus. Football noncoaching staff member No. 2 reported he received NCAA rules education through monthly football meetings with compliance and taking the NCAA coaches certification exam and the Big 12 Conference exam. Based on a lack of clear evidence of culpability of football noncoaching staff member No. 1 and/or the full-time football coaches, the institution and the enforcement staff did not believe that an individual should be named or at risk for Finding No. 7. Additionally, because of the information reported by football noncoaching staff members No. 1 and 2, and the low number of culpable telephone calls attributed to the coaches detailed in Finding Nos. 7-c through 7-f, the enforcement staff did not believe it necessary to interview those individuals.

8. [NCAA Constitution 2.8.1]

It is agreed that from July 2008 through August 2011, the scope and nature of the violations detailed in Finding Nos. 1 through 7 demonstrate that the athletics department failed to adequately monitor its sports programs and educate its coaches regarding telephone communication with prospective student-athletes. Specifically, regarding the failure to monitor, the institution failed to follow procedures in place to monitor telephone calls in the sport of football from July 2008 to May 2011 and, in all sports, the institution did not consistently cross-check the coaches' telephone logs with their telephone records, which contributed to the violations outlined above occurring over a three-year period. Additionally, the NCAA rules education provided to athletics department staff members regarding telephone calls to prospects was inadequate because (a) coaching staff members reported that they were not told that the failure to contemporaneously


C-21

document a message or no contact would result in a countable call and (b) no rules education about the contemporaneous documentation requirement was provided to athletics department staff members after October 2009. Supporting Narrative: The NCAA enforcement staff and institution are in agreement with these findings and that major violations of NCAA legislation occurred. Between July 2008 and August 2011, coaches from 13 sport programs placed over 1,484 impermissible telephone calls as detailed in Finding Nos. 1, 2-b, 2-c, and 3 through 7. During his August 23, 2011, interview with institution, Dustin Gray (Gray), then assistant director of compliance and current director of compliance, reported that in August 2008, the institution began requiring coaches to use Recruiting Radar8 to track contacts and telephone calls with prospects. Gray explained that coaches or a designated staff member were supposed to input their telephone contacts with prospects and associated handwritten notes into Recruiting Radar, print out individual reports for each coach and provide those reports to compliance. Gray reported that compliance was supposed to also conduct random audits on one to two sports programs per month and that Eileen Flaherty (Flaherty), then assistant director of compliance, was responsible for determining which sports were audited each month. During her September 15, 2012, interview with the enforcement staff and institution, Flaherty explained that if a team that was just audited was selected again by the program, she would do another random selection. Flaherty reported that she never spoke with Josh Snyder (Snyder), then associate athletics director for compliance, about the auditing process and was never questioned about the sports that were or were not audited. However, during his September 16, 2012, interview with the enforcement staff and institution, Snyder reported that he oversaw the compliance staff from May 2005 through December 2010, and he had informed Flaherty that she was to include one football or one men's basketball coach each month in the audit due to the high profile nature of those sports. However, Flaherty stated that she did not keep track to make sure each sports program was audited every year, and there was never any direction to give special attention to any particular sport program during certain high recruiting periods.

8 Recruiting Radar is a web-based compliance tool used by the institution to track recruiting telephone calls placed by coaches


C-22

Regarding the institution's failure to adequately educate coaches regarding NCAA telephone legislation, the compliance staff members reported that the issue of contemporaneous documentation was discussed verbally with the coaches several times. As previously mentioned, the institution provided an email sent to all coaches July 28, 2008, containing a memo from the enforcement staff outlining the need to document all telephone calls to prospects. Further, the institution provided the enforcement staff with a PowerPoint presentation from an October 2009 rules education session conducted by the compliance staff for institutional coaching staff members, which included an instruction that coaches log messages and dropped calls. However, the session did not include information indirectly that failing to document such calls could result in a countable call under NCAA rules. Many coaches interviewed by the institution and/or the enforcement staff reported that they did not know, nor were they ever told by compliance, that it was necessary for them to log all telephone calls placed to prospects, even calls where no contact was made or a voicemail message was left. In addition, many of the coaches involved in the violations were not employed at the institution when the July 28, 2008, email was sent, and those new coaches could not recall being informed of the memo by their previous institutions. Further, besides the July 28, 2008, email, June 2009 PowerPoint (football coaches only) and October 2009 PowerPoint (all other sports programs), the institution was unable to provide any other documentation indicating it educated its coaches about the need to log all telephone calls. In summary, despite having a monitoring system in place, the institution failed to follow those procedures in that telephone calls were not adequately monitored, especially in the sport of football from July 2008 to May 2011. In addition, with regard to all sports, the institution did not consistently cross-check the coaches' telephone logs with their telephone records. Further, the lack of adequate NCAA rules education that was provided to the institution's coaches regarding the need to log all telephone calls contributed to the violations outlined in Finding Nos. 1 through 7.


D-1

D. The Involved Parties' Statements and Overall Positions on the Infractions Case.

1. Statement submitted by Bill Bleil. See Exhibit NCAA-8.

2. Statement submitted by Shane Burnham.

See Exhibit NCAA-9.

3. Statement submitted by Bobby Elliott.

See Exhibit NCAA-10.

4. Statement submitted by Keith Moore.

No statement provided.

5. Statement submitted by Daniyal Robinson.


6. Statement submitted by Luke Wells.


7. Statement submitted by Iowa State University.


8. Statement submitted by University of Notre Dame.


9. Statement submitted by University of Houston.


10. Statement submitted by Utah State University.

No statement provided.

11. Statement submitted by the enforcement staff.



E-1

E. Review of Other Issues.

1. Unresolved allegations.

There are no unresolved allegations.

2. Ethical conduct.

Although the coaches named in this case committed the text messaging and/or recruiting telephone call violations detailed in this summary disposition report, the enforcement staff and institution do not believe their actions rose to the level of unethical conduct because of the low number of culpable calls. Additionally, the enforcement staff thought that it was important to consider the feedback provided by the membership for less emphasis and a deregulation of telephone call violations. Telephone calls placed during a time period when it is impermissible to have any contact at all is the primary concern in the aftermath of deregulation. In this case, most of the calls placed by the coaches involved institutional-wide logging issues with very few calls placed during impermissible time periods. For these reasons, the enforcement staff did not believe it was appropriate to allege an unethical conduct charge against the coaches in addition to the underlying violations. Regarding Wells, who placed eight calls during a time period when he should not have been calling, Wells reported a majority of those calls were related to camp. Because calls related to camp are now permissible under NCAA legislation, the enforcement staff did not believe it was appropriate to specifically subject Wells to an unethical conduct charge despite the large number of culpable calls.

3. Secondary infractions.

a. [NCAA Bylaw 13.11.1.7]

It is agreed that between April 2010 and April 2011, members of the men's and women's basketball staffs impermissibly participated in coaching activities involving nonscholastic-based basketball. Specifically:

(1) Between August 2010 and April 2011, Moore provided individual

skill instruction to several girls' basketball prospective student-athletes.

(2) Between May 2010 and July 2011, the women's basketball director

of basketball operations participated in coaching activities involving a boys' nonscholastic basketball team. On at least five


E-2

occasions, the director of operations served as an assistant coach for a boys' nonscholastic-based team.

4. Student-athlete reinstatement issues.

All student-athlete reinstatement issues in this case have been resolved.

5. Miscellaneous issues. There are no remaining issues.


F-1

F. Institution's Corrective Actions and Penalties.

1. Institution's corrective actions.

a. Invest over $82,000 over the next three years in compliance and recruiting software with Bluechip Athletics Solution. The software will simplify recording telephone calls and monitoring telephone calls and text messages as it will be one system from start to finish. Further, other recruiting and monitoring processes will be improved.

b. Added a statement at the bottom of the Telephone Log Form in the Recruiting Logbook indicating the necessity to denote a no answer/left message call.

c. Discontinue the practice of assigning student coaches from the continuing

education program to sports-specific functions

d. Require all current University coaching staff members named in this inquiry to attend an educational session on NCAA compliance in addition to the monthly meetings.

e. Dedicate a monthly coaches' meeting to telephone calls and in the meeting emphasize to the coaching staff members the necessity to log a no answer/left message call.

2. Institution's self-imposed penalties for major violations.

a. Place itself on a two-year probationary period effective November 13,

2011. b. Impose a Department-wide forfeiture of one-week of recruiting phone

calls for all sports, served at an appropriate time for each sport. c. Undertook overall punitive actions for each sport and individual coaching

staff members involved in a text message or impermissible telephone call violation utilizing the following guidelines. All penalties are stackable, for example: each coach gets the one-week department penalty, plus any team penalties, plus individual penalties.

(1) Team Penalties

(a) Less than 25 violation in that sport – One week of no

telephone calls by all coaching staff members.


F-2

(b) 25 to 60 violations in that sport – Two weeks of no

telephone calls by all coaching staff members.

(c) 61 to 199 violations in that sport – Three weeks of no telephone calls by all coaching staff members and decrease recruiting opportunities by one per prospect for the 2011-12 recruiting year; and

(d) More than 900 violations in that sport – Five weeks of no telephone calls by all coaching staff members, reduce official visits by 20 percent from the four year average, and limit the number of off campus recruiters to five for the spring evaluation period.

(2) Individual Penalties

(a) Less than 30 violation for that coach – No additional

individual restrictions;

(b) 30 to 50 violations for that coach – One additional week of no telephone calls and a letter of admonishment;

(c) 50 to 80 violations for that coach – Four additional weeks of no telephone calls and a letter of reprimand; and

(d) More than 100 violations for that coach – Nine additional weeks of no telephone calls and no off-campus recruiting for a month.

d. The penalties by team/individual were as follows:

(1) Women's Gymnastics

• Department-wide one-week restriction from initiating

telephone contact with prospects November 13-19, 2011.

(2) Men's Basketball (a) Department-wide one-week restriction from initiating



F-3

(b) Serve an additional two-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the weeks of November 20-26 and November 27 – December 3, 2011.

(c) Decrease the number of recruiting opportunities by one for all prospects during the 2011-12 academic year.

(d) Cease recruiting any of the prospects Student Coach Keith Moore had impermissible telephone or text contact with;

(e) Reduce official visits by 20 percent from the previous four year average for 2011-12.

(f) Coach A received an additional one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the week of December 4 – 10, 2011.

(g) Student Coach Keith Moore was relieved from his duties as student coach and removed from the athletics department continuing education program.

(3) Women's Basketball (a) Department-wide one-week restriction from initiating

telephone contact with prospects.

(b) Serve an additional one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the weeks of November 20-26.

(4) Men's Golf • Department-wide one-week restriction from initiating


(5) Women's Golf • Department-wide one-week restriction from initiating


(6) Women's Swimming and Diving


F-4

• Department-wide one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with prospects November 13-19, 2011.

(7) Women's Soccer • Department-wide one-week restriction from initiating


(8) Softball • Department-wide one-week restriction from initiating


(9) Tennis (a) Department-wide one-week restriction from initiating


(b) Serve an additional one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the weeks of November 20-26.

(c) Coach B received an additional one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the week of November 27 – December 3, 2011.

(10) Men's and Women's Track and Cross Country (a) Department-wide one-week restriction from initiating


(b) Serve an additional two-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the weeks of November 20-26 and November 27 – December 3, 2011.

(c) Decrease the number of recruiting opportunities by one for all prospects during the 2011-12 academic year.

(d) Coach C received an additional three-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects from December 4 – 24, 2011.


F-5

(11) Women's Volleyball • Department-wide one-week restriction from initiating


(12) Wrestling (a) Department-wide one-week restriction from initiating


(b) Serve an additional one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the week of November 27 – December 3, 2011.

(13) Football (a) Department-wide one-week restriction from initiating

telephone contact with prospects February 5-11, 2012.

(b) Serve an additional four-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects from February 12 – March 10, 2012.

(c) Decrease the number of recruiting contacts by one for all prospects during the 2011-12 academic year.

(d) Reduce official visits by 20 percent from the previous four-year average for the 2011-12 academic year;

(e) Decrease the number of permissible off-campus recruiters by two for the spring 2012 evaluation period.

(f) Coach D received an additional five-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects from March 11 – April 14, 2012.

(g) Coach Bleil received an additional three-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects from March 11 – 31, 2012.

(h) Coach E received an additional one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects from March 11 – 17, 2012.


F-6

(i) Coach S. Burnham an

additional five-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects from March 11 – April 14, 2012.

(j) Coach F received an additional one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects from March 11 – 17, 2012.

(k) Coach G received an additional one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects from March 11 – 17, 2012.

(l) Coach Elliott was not allowed to have off-campus contact in the month of December, and an additional 10-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects from March 11 – May 19, 2012.

(m) Coach H received an additional five-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects from March 11 – April 14, 2012.

(n) Coach I received an additional one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects from March 11 – 17, 2012.

(o) Coach J received an additional five-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects from March 11 – April 14, 2012.

3. Conference actions.

The Big 12 Conference took no additional actions.

4. Application of NCAA Executive Regulations [Bylaws 19.5.2.2-(e), 31.2.2.3 and 31.2.2.4]. Not applicable.


G-1

G. Background Information on the Institution.

1. General information.

Iowa State University is classified as a NCAA Division I Bowl Championship Subdivision member institution and is a member of the Big 12. The institution sponsors 7 men's programs (basketball, cross country, football, golf, indoor track and field, outdoor track and field, and wrestling), and 11 women's programs (basketball, cross country, golf, gymnastics, soccer, softball, tennis, indoor track and field, outdoor track and field, swimming and diving, and volleyball).

2. Overview of athletics department structure. The structure of the institution's intercollegiate athletics department is presented in the organization chart attached as Exhibit NCAA-17.

3. Previous major infractions cases.

Iowa State has been involved in one prior major infraction case. December 19, 1986 The institution's major infractions case in 1986 primarily involved major violations in its football program and a failure to properly monitor by the institution. A summary of the violations found by the Committee on Infractions and penalties imposed is as follows: a. Members of the football staff arranged for four junior-college prospects to

receive free lodging and food on credit from a local motel. Further, a former member of the football coaching staff paid cash deposits towards rent and utilities for four student-athletes' apartment.

b. On numerous occasions, an assistant coach provided impermissible automobile transportation to prospects for their personal use and money to one prospect for rent. During two or three occurrences, the assistant coach allowed prospects to charge gasoline expenses to a university credit card. Also, on one occasion the assistant coach leased an apartment for three Prospects and another assistant coach provided money to prospects to pay the rent.

c. An assistant coach arranged for prospects to participate in winter conditioning drills with the team and intermittently monitored the prospects working out at another facility.


G-2

d. Head coach paid the balance of meal charges incurred by the junior-

college prospects at the local motel using his personal funds, as well as money from an undisclosed source.

e. Former head coach and former assistant coach violated the NCAA Principles of Ethical Conduct by knowingly and willfully operating the university's football program contrary to NCAA legislation. Also, the former head coach provided false and misleading information when questioned on his involvement in the matter by the NCAA.

f. The Committee on Infractions issued a public reprimand to the institution and placed the institution on probation for two years, required the institution to develop and implement a comprehensive educational program to instruct coaches and athletics department personnel on NCAA legislation and instructed the institution to file progress reports with the enforcement staff. Additionally, the Committee of Infractions imposed a reduction in grants-in-aid to 26 for one year.

g. The institution self-imposed further corrective and disciplinary measures, including terminating the head coaches' services, notifying bowl game representatives the university would not accept invitations to any bowl games following the 1986 season and suspending relations with the local motel for one year.

4. Background information for the football and men's basketball programs.

a. Overview of grant-in-aid information.

The overview of the grant-in-aid information is presented in the sports data chart attached as Exhibit NCAA-18.

b. Student-athletes on athletically related financial aid.

The student-athletes on athletically related financial aid information is presented in the sports data chart attached as Exhibit NCAA-19.

c. Redshirt data.

The redshirt data is presented in the sports data chart attached as Exhibit NCAA-19.


G-3

d. Student-athletes on athletically related financial aid who withdrew.

The student-athletes on athletically related financial aid who withdrew is presented in the sports data chart attached as NCAA Exhibit-20.

e. Institution's win-loss records.

The institution's win-loss records are presented in the sports data chart attached as Exhibit NCAA-19.

f. Official visits.

The institution's official visit numbers are presented in the sports data chart attached as Exhibit NCAA-19.

g. Institution's squad lists (past four academic years).

The institution's squad lists are presented in the document attached as Exhibit NCAA-20.

h. Room, board, books and tuition data.

The institution's room, board, books, and tuition data are presented in the full grant-in-aid costs chart attached as Exhibit NCAA-18.

i. Pre-existing contracts. The license for live telecasts to contests has been granted generally to the Big 12 for all football games and first right to all other sports. An additional license for live contests not selected under the obligations of the Big 12 license for live telecasts has been granted to the institution's licensee, Learfield Sports, doing business as Cyclone Sports Properties.

j. Media guides (past two academic years).

Iowa State has not published media guides since 2008-09.

5. Identities, titles and biographical background for all involved individuals named in a Finding.

The identities, titles, and biographical background for all involved individuals named are presented in biographies document as Exhibit NCAA-21.


H-1

H. Exhibits

NCAA-1 Detailed chronology.

NCAA-2 Interview list.

NCAA-3 Iowa State University self report.

NCAA-4 July 2008 email to coaching staff regarding no "three-minute rule."

NCAA-5 July 2008/October 2009 PowerPoint presentation.

NCAA-6 Chart detailing all calls in all sports.

NCAA-7 Enforcement staff correspondence with Keith Moore.

NCAA-8 Bill Bleil's personal statement.

NCAA-9 Shane Burnham's personal statement.

NCAA-10 Bobby Elliott's personal statement.

NCAA-11 Daniyal Robinson's personal statement.

NCAA-12 Luke Wells' personal statement.

NCAA-13 Iowa State University's position statement.

NCAA-14 University of Notre Dame's position statement.

NCAA-15 The University of Houston's position statement.

NCAA-16 Enforcement staff's position statement.

NCAA-17 Agreements by the parties.

Iowa State-1 Iowa State University's athletics department organizational chart.

Iowa State-2 Iowa State University's grant-in-aid costs chart.

Iowa State-3 Iowa State University's student-athlete sports data.

Iowa State-4 Iowa State University's 2009-13 squad lists.

Iowa State-5 Involved individuals' biographies.

NCAA-1

Detailed Chronology


April 8, 2013

Detailed Chronology April 2011 – Fred Hoiberg (Hoiberg), men's basketball head coach, observed Keith Moore (Moore), former men's basketball student coach, in attendance at a boy's nonscholastic basketball game, which was contrary to NCAA legislation. Hoiberg then contacted Jamie Pollard, director of athletics, to make him aware of Moore's actions. April 18, 2011 – The institution interviewed Moore. August 22 and 23, 2011 – The institution conducted interviews with several coaches and student-athletes. September 6, 2011 – The institution informed Julie Roe Lach, then NCAA vice president of enforcement, that it discovered numerous telephone call violations within several sports programs and was preparing to provide a self-report to the NCAA enforcement staff related to the violations. September 15 and 16, 2011 – The enforcement staff and institution conducted telephone interviews with two former assistant directors of compliance. January 31, 2012 – A verbal notice of inquiry was provided to the institution. February 15, 2012 – The enforcement staff and institution conducted on-campus interviews. June and July 2012 – The enforcement staff conducted additional telephone interviews with several former Iowa State University coaches from various sports programs. September 11, 2012 – The enforcement staff sent a draft of the summary disposition report to all involved individuals and the institution. October 16, 2012 – The enforcement staff informed the involved individuals that it will be noted in the summary disposition report that they disagree that their violations should be considered major. December 10, 2012 – The enforcement staff received the final involved individuals' amendments to the daft summary disposition report. January 31, 2012 – The enforcement staff sent the revised draft of the summary disposition report to all involved individuals and the institution.

NCAA-2

Interview List


Interviews conducted jointly by the enforcement staff and institution Name of Interviewee Date of Interview Abdelmassih, Matt February 15, 2012 Carper, Josh February 15, 2012 Flaherty, Eileen September 15, 2011 Hoiberg, Fred February 15, 2012 Mann, Cornell February 15, 2012 McKim, Ryan March 15, 2012 Otzelberger, TJ February 15, 2012 Pope, Kenneth June 25, 2012 Popp, Kristy June 25, 2012 Rutter, Jeff February 15, 2012 Snyder, Josh September 16, 2011 Interviews conducted by the enforcement staff Name of Interviewee Date of Interview Ash, Chris July 2, 2012 Link, Eric June 26, 2012 Fountain, Scott July 3, 2012 Robinson, Danyial June 27, 2012

INTERVIEW LIST April 8, 2013 Page No. 2 _________

NCAA-2

Interviews conducted by the institution Name of Interviewee Date of Interview Bleil, Bill August 22, 2011 Burnham, Shane August 22, 2011

August 23, 2011

August 22, 2011

August 23, 2011 Elliott, Bobby August 22, 2011 Espinoa, Armando August 23, 2011 Grey, Dustin August 23, 2011

August 22, 2011

August 23, 2011

Messingham, Courtney August 22, 2011 Moore, Keith April 18 and August 23, 2011 Otzelberger, TJ August 23, 2011

August 23, 2011

August 22, 2011 Rhoads, Paul August 22, 2011 Steyer, Jodi August 23, 2011 Uhlenhopp, Nick August 22, 2011 Wells, Luke August 22, 2011 Wiens, Nate August 23, 2011

IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

College of Veterinary Medicine Department of Biomedical Sciences Ames, Iowa 50011-1250 Phone (515) 294-2440 FAX (515) 294-2315

Julie Roe Lach Vice President of Enforcement [email protected] The National Collegiate Athletic Association 700 W. Washington Street P.O. Box 6222 Indianapolis, Indiana 46206-‐6222

November 23, 2011 Ms Lach, Attached is a detailed report from Iowa State University that summarizes our internal investigation into violations related to phone calls and their documentation. We enlisted the assistance of The Compliance Group (Lanexa, KS) in our investigation, and this report is pursuant to a conversation that you had with Chuck Smrt in August of this year. As the Faculty Athletics Representative, I can attest that the investigation was extremely thorough and diligently pursued every possible violation. I can also attest that the written report is an accurate representation of all of the findings of that thorough investigation. Please do not hesitate to contact me directly if I can assist or facilitate the work of your office. Respectfully,

Tim Day Professor of Molecular Pharmacology Faculty Athletics Representative Office: 515-‐294-‐7100 Cell Phone: 515-‐451-‐9258 [email protected]

NCAA-3

REPORT TO:

NCAA ENFORCEMENT STAFF

FROM:

IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY

November 2011

NCAA-3

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page No. A. INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW…………………………………………………… .. 1

1. Initiation of Inquiry………………………………………………………………….. 1 2. Results of Inquiry……………………………………………………………………. 2 3. Contents of Report…………………………………………………………………… 3

B. INQUIRY……………………………………………………………………………………. 4

1. Overview……………………………………………………………………………… 4 2. Overview of NCAA Involvement…………………………………………………..... 5

C. TELEPHONE VIOLATIONS………………………………………………………………...... 6

1. Overview………………………………………………………………………………… 6 a. NCAA Legislation……………………………………………………………… 6 b. Violations……………………………………………………………………….. 6 c. Overall Reasons…………………………………………………………………. 7

2. Analysis by Sport……………………………………………………………………….. 8 a. Women’s Gymnastics….……………………………………………………….. 8 b. Men’s Basketball…………….………………………………………………….. 9 c. Women’s Basketball…………………………………………………………….. 9 d. Men’s Golf………………………………………………………………………. 9 e. Women’s Golf……………………………………………..…………………….. 10 f. Women’s Swimming/Diving……….……………………..…………………….. 10 g. Women’s Soccer…………………………………..…………………………….. 10 h. Softball……..……………………………..…………………………………….. 11 i. Women’s Tennis…………………………..…………………………………….. 11 j. Men’s & Women’s Track And Field/Cross Country..………………………….. 11 k. Women’s Volleyball.……………….…………………………………………….. 11 l. Wrestling…………………………………..…………………………………….. 12 m. Football……..……………………………..…………………………………….. 12

D. TEXT MESSAGE VIOLATIONS…………………………………………………………... 13

1. Overview……………………………………………………………………………… 13 a. NCAA Legislation……………………………………………………………. 13 b. Text Messaging Billing Documentation…………………………………….... 13

2. Violations……………………………………………………………………………… 14 3. Overall Reasons……………………………………………………………………….. 14 4. Analysis By Sport……………………………………………………………………... 15

a. Men’s Basketball……………………………………………………………… 15 b. Other Sports…………………………………………………………………… 17

NCAA-3

Page No. E. FAILURE TO MONITOR……………………………………………………………………… 18 1. Overview………………………………………………………………………………… 18

a. NCAA Legislation………………………………………………………………. 18 b. Violation................................................................................................................. 18

2. Monitoring Program……………………………………………………………………… 19 a. Overview…………………………………………………………………………. 19 b. Specific Monitoring and Audit Process..………………………………………... 19 c. Current Process…………………………………………………………………… 24

3. Education Program………….……………………………………………………………. 24 a. Overview………………………………………………………………………….. 24 b. Coaches’ Knowledge of Logging No Contact Calls…..………………………….. 25

F. CORRECTIVE AND PUNITIVE ACTIONS………………………………………………….. 26

1. Institution’s Corrective Actions…………………………………………………………. 26 2. Institution’s Punitive Actions……………………………………………………………. 27

G. CONCLUSION………………………………………………………………………………….. 37 EXHIBITS: Exhibit A – List of Individuals Interviewed Exhibit B – Dates of Impermissible Calls Exhibit C – Recruiting Logbook Screen Regarding Telephone Calls Exhibit D – Recruiting Radar Page From Compliance Manual Exhibit E – Recruiting Radar Input Screen Exhibit F – July 2008 E-Mail and Attachment

NCAA-3

1

A. INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW

1. Initiation of Inquiry – In April 2011, the head men’s basketball coach notified the

institution’s Director of Athletics concerning a potential violation involving a student coach,

who was assigned to the men’s basketball team as part of the athletics department’s

continuing education program for former student-athletes. The Director of Athletics and

men’s basketball coach immediately shared the information with the institution’s Assistant

Athletics Director for Compliance. The Assistant Athletics Director for Compliance then

notified the Faculty Athletics Representative. The Assistant Athletics Director for

Compliance and Faculty Athletics Representative interviewed the student coach and reported

they believed the student coach had participated in impermissible text messaging and phone

conversations with several prospects who the student coach previously coached on an AAU

team.

Upon receiving the information from the Assistant Athletics Director for Compliance and

Faculty Athletics Representative about the potential violations, the Director of Athletics and

Faculty Athletics Representative both contacted the institution’s President. In addition, the

Director of Athletics made the decision the student coach be immediately relieved of his

assignment with the men’s basketball team and also be discontinued from the athletics

department’s continuing education program. Furthermore, the Faculty Athletics

Representative and the Director of Athletics requested and received approval from the

institution’s President to engage The Compliance Group (TCG) to assist the institution in a

thorough and complete review of the potential violations.

Based on the results of the initial review and the advice of TCG, the decision was made to

have the institution’s compliance staff conduct a full telephone and text audit of all the

institution’s coaches (69 coaches) in all the institution’s 18 sports for a three-year-period

(2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-11 academic years). The scope of the audit included all sports

and all coaches for a three-year-period because the institution wanted to be sure the

department was in compliance with NCAA rules. The results of those audits were then

reviewed and supported by TCG.

NCAA-3

2

2. Results of Inquiry – The extensive and thorough review of phone and text records for all 18

sports over a three year period resulted in the institution self-identifying the following

inadvertent violations:

a. A total of 31 telephone calls were made to prospects during impermissible time periods.

b. A total of 38 telephone calls were made to prospects during a week that another

member of the coaching staff had previously contacted the prospect.

c. A total of 126 telephone calls were made to prospects during a week in which the coach

had previously contacted the prospect.

d. A total of 34 telephone calls were made by an impermissible caller.

e. A student coach in men’s basketball sent 160 impermissible text messages. The

majority of the text messages were the result of the student coach either responding to

or initiating contact with members of his former team.

In addition to the violations noted above, the institution’s investigation found members of its

coaching staff failed to adequately record in their telephone logs over the three-year-period

1,243 calls to prospects in which no impermissible contact was involved. Specifically, the

vast majority of these were instances in which no contact was made with the prospect or in

which the call was a return of a dropped call. While these instances do not involve

impermissible contact, the calls are a violation because the coaches failed to properly log the

call.

Although the institution’s comprehensive and thorough audit did not result in the discovery

of any other violations of NCAA rules, the institution acknowledges a violation of Bylaw

2.8.1. While the institution had an auditing program that compared telephone records and

recruiting logs, the institution should have undertaken more effective efforts to identify

insufficient documentation and any other types of impermissible telephone calls. Had the

institution had a more effective process for identifying insufficient documentation and

impermissible calls, the majority of the violations could have been avoided.

NCAA-3

3

As a result of the discovery of these violations, the institution has:

a. Imposed significant corrective actions, including (1) investing over $82,000 in

software to assist in compliance, (2) the elimination of sport specific duties for students

participating in the athletic department’s continuing education program, (3) the

detailing of a specific audit process in order to improve monitoring text and telephone

activities and (4) conducting additional educational activities for each sport staff in this

area; and

b. Imposed significant punitive actions, including (1) placing itself on two years

probation, (2) suspending recruitment of and all contact with two potential student

athletes for over eight months (3) applying significant reductions in the number of

future telephone calls (4) applying significant reductions in the periods when these calls

can occur, (5) enforcing a reduction in the number of official visits, and (6) imposing a

reduction in the number of off-campus recruiters.

Although these actions are significant, the University believes it received a limited, if any,

competitive and recruiting advantage as a result of these impermissible telephone calls and

text messages because:

a. The vast majority (nearly 82%) of the impermissible telephone calls were three minutes

or less, which resulted in no contact between the coaching staff members and the

prospect;

b. The violations resulted from a lack of clarity or carelessness on applicable legislation as

opposed to deliberate violations. Coaching staff members did not deliberately violate

the legislation; and

c. The student-athletes interviewed during this investigation indicated their choice of

institution was not affected by additional telephone calls.

3. Contents of Report – This report will detail: (1) the University’s inquiry; (2) those violations

the University believed occurred; and (3) the corrective, punitive, and other actions taken by

the University.

NCAA-3

4

B. INQUIRY

1. Overview – In April 2011, the head men’s basketball coach, Fred Hoiberg, notified the

institution’s Director of Athletics, Jamie Pollard, that a student coach (Keith Moore) assigned

to men’s basketball by the athletics department as part of the department’s continuing

education program for former student-athletes, may have had impermissible contact with

several prospects who the student coach had previously coached on an AAU team. Pollard

and Hoiberg immediately shared the information with the institution’s Assistant Athletics

Director for Compliance, Dustin Gray. Gray immediately contacted the institution’s Faculty

Athletics Representative, Dr. Tim Day, and apprised him of the possible rules violation, per

University policy.

Gray and Day interviewed Moore on April 18. He reported telephone and text contacts with

four of his former players from the team he had coached. After reviewing Moore’s records a

fifth former player was identified. While the institution only intended to recruit two of these

individuals, all five individuals are considered prospects due to their age. Since Moore did

not have access to a University-issued cell telephone because he was only a student coach,

the University requested and Moore provided his personal telephone and text records to Gray

on April 22. Shortly thereafter, text messages and telephone records were reviewed, and

impermissible texts messages were identified.

Upon receiving more substantive indication that violations may have occurred, Day and

Pollard independently notified the institution’s President, Dr. Gregory Geoffroy. In addition,

in consultation with Day, Gray and Hoiberg, Pollard made the decision that Moore be

relieved immediately of his assignment with the men’s basketball team and also be

discontinued from the athletics department’s continuing education program. In addition, the

decision was made to immediately cease recruitment of the two individuals the men’s

basketball coaching staff had previously intended to recruit. Furthermore, Day and Pollard

requested and received approval from Geoffroy to engage The Compliance Group (TCG) to

assist the institution in a thorough and complete review of the potential violations.

NCAA-3

5

On April 25, institutional officials contacted Chuck Smrt with TCG to discuss the

institution’s inquiry. Shortly thereafter, the Director of Athletics instructed the basketball

staff to cease any contact with Moore or others who could be interviewed about the

investigation. Moore also was asked not to have any contact with any of the participants on

the team he formerly coached. The review of the men’s basketball staff records ensued.

In its review, the institution had numerous conversations with its cell telephone provider (Verizon) about its position that text message records of coaching staff members could not be provided to the institution. Due to the institution’s persistence, text message records were provided by Verizon for the period of June 2010 to the present. Thorough review of those records revealed nearly all of the text message violations involved Moore and his former team members. In early August, the institution concluded its initial review of all telephone calls for the prior three academic years. Soon after, the institution began submitting restoration requests for fall sports in accordance with NCAA student-athlete reinstatement procedures. In late August, Smrt visited campus and interviewed numerous coaches, student-athletes, and Gray. Regarding the interviews, a determination was made that those coaching staff members still employed at the University who were potentially involved in numerous telephone or text messaging violations initially would be interviewed by Smrt. Some currently enrolled student-athletes who may have received these messages or calls were also interviewed. All of these interviews were tape recorded by Smrt and observed by Day. In addition, interviews with two former compliance staff members were subsequently conducted in conjunction with the NCAA Enforcement Staff. Exhibit A is a list of the persons interviewed by University and TCG personnel to date. In late August, as required by NCAA procedures, the institution began declaring recipient student-athletes ineligible as a result of these telephone call violations. To date, all student-athletes have been reinstated by the NCAA through the normal reinstatement process, without loss of competition.

2. Overview of NCAA Involvement – On September 6, 2011, Smrt contacted NCAA Vice

President for Enforcement Services Julie Roe Lach to inform Roe Lach of the University’s inquiry. Roe Lach asked that the University keep the Enforcement Staff apprised of the

NCAA-3

6

investigation. She requested that the Enforcement Staff be present for the interviews of the two former compliance staff members. These were conducted on September 15 and 16, 2011.

C. TELEPHONE VIOLATIONS

1. Overview

a. NCAA Legislation – NCAA Bylaw 13.1.3.1 details the permissible time period and frequency of telephone contact between coaching staff members and prospective student-athletes. These time periods and frequencies vary by sport. In this case, telephone violations occurred in 18 sports. Three of these sports have legislation on the number of contacts specific to that sport, while the others have language that is the same as other sports.

Bylaw 13.1.3.4.1 restricts telephone contact with prospects only to certain authorized staff members.

Generally, legislation in most of the sports restricts telephone calls to once per week. Once an institution reaches its applicable limit on the number of telephone calls to a prospect per week, it may not initiate any additional telephone calls during this same period, even if no conversation occurs (i.e., the coaching staff member could not leave a voice mail message). [NOTE: Legislation has been enacted for men’s basketball, and is expected to be enacted for all other sports during this academic year, to allow unlimited telephone calls to prospective student-athletes entering their junior year in high school.]

b. Violations – The University acknowledges the following:

During June 2008 through July 2011, the University violated NCAA legislation pertaining to telephone calls made to prospects by coaching staff members in that approximately 229 impermissible calls occurred. Also, on approximately 1,243 occasions, coaching staff members did not contemporaneously document their phone call as a noncountable call (e.g., place a notation on their recruiting logs that the coaching staff member did not make contact with the prospect during a telephone attempt, or that a call was dropped); the absence of those contemporaneous notes makes those “countable” calls (even without contact), and therefore renders

NCAA-3

7

subsequent calls in excess of numeric call restrictions. [NCAA Bylaws 13.1.3.1 and 13.1.3.4.1 ]

Below is a summary of the violations by sport:

Sport # of Imp.

Calls Reasons for Imp. Calls Reasons for “True” Violations

Not Logging Previous No

Contact Call or Dropped Call

“True” Violations

Imp. Time

Period

Another Coach

Previously Called

Imp. Call After an

Earlier > 3 Min. Call

W Gymnastics 18 16 2 0 1 1 M Basketball Current Staff 54 45 9 3 0 6* M Basketball Previous Staff 93 68 25 2 7^ 16 W Basketball 55 48 7 3 1 3 M Golf Current Staff 3 3 0 0 0 0 M Golf Previous Staff 12 11 1 0 0 1 W Golf 5 4 1 0 0 1 W Swimming/Diving 10 8 2 0 1 1 W Soccer 21 19 2 1 0 1 Softball 14 14 0 0 0 0 W Tennis 50 43 7 1 0 6 MW Track & Field 137 120 17 1 0 16 W Volleyball 5 5 0 0 0 0 Wrestling Current Staff 30 26 4 1 2 1 Wrestling Former Staff 3 3 0 0 0 0 Football Current Staff 900 777 123 17 19 87# Football Former Staff 62 33 29 2 7 20%

TOTAL 1472 1243 229 31 38 160 *One call was made by an impermissible recruiter; ^One call was made by an impermissible recruiter; #29 calls were made by an impermissible recruiter; %Three calls were made by an impermissible recruiter

c. Overall Reasons – During their interviews, University coaching staff members stated

they understood NCAA restrictions concerning contact with prospects via telephone

and that only one call per week was permissible. Further, almost all of the coaches

expressed some level of understanding they were supposed to log all of their calls,

and several diligently denoted this on their phone logs. However, the inadequate

monthly auditing process in place at the institution failed to reinforce the necessity of

noting, “left message” or “no contact.” Therefore, while the coaches were informed

they were supposed to log all calls (not just calls in which contact was made with a

prospect), they did not clearly understand a failure to do so would render further

phone calls in that week as violations. Further, the auditing process in place was not

effective in identifying the insufficient practices it fostered.

NCAA-3

8

The following are several other general reasons coaching staff members reported why

violations occurred:

i. A few indicated their lack of knowledge about necessity to document a

dropped call;

ii. Several reported they did not realize another coaching staff member already

had made the one call per week; and

iii. The coaching staff member had forgotten he or she previously had made the

one call earlier that week.

As will be noted later in this report, the University believes it took significant

educational measures to ensure coaching staff members understood NCAA legislation

about one call per week and these coaching staff members understood other

applicable telephone legislation. However, while education existed, the institution

acknowledges further education could have reinforced the necessity of documenting a

call that did not result in a contact with a prospect and that absent such

documentation, the call became countable.

2. Analysis by Sport – Below is an overview of the violations by sports. Exhibit B details the

dates of the impermissible calls:

a. Women’s Gymnastics

Sport # of Imp.





Imp. Time

Period

Another Coach

Previously Called

Imp. Call After an


Jay Ronayne 4 3 1 0 0 1 Jay Santos 8 7 1 0 1 0 Teshawne Jackson 1 1 0 0 0 0 Jessica Bartgis 5 5 0 0 0 0

TOTAL 18 16 2 0 1 1

NCAA-3

9

b. Men’s Basketball Current Staff

Sport # of Imp. Calls

Reasons for Imp. Calls Reasons for “True” Violations Not Logging Previous No



Imp. Time

Period

Another Coach

Previously Called

Imp. Call After an


Fred Hoiberg 10 7 3 0 0 3 TJ Otzelberger 20 17 3 3 0 0 Matt Abdelmassih 1 0 1 0 0 1* Elwyn McRoy 23 21 2 0 0 2

TOTAL 54 45 9 3 0 6 *This call was made by an impermissible recruiter.

Men’s Basketball Previous Staff

Sport # of Imp.





Imp. Time

Period

Another Coach

Previously Called

Imp. Call After an


Greg McDermott 9 5 4 2 2 0 TJ Otzelberger 13 11 2 0 1 1 Daniyal Robinson 64 48 16 0 2 14 Jeff Rutter 6 4 2 0 1 1 Nathan Wieseler 1 0 1 0 *1 0


c. Women’s Basketball





Imp. Time

Period

Another Coach

Previously Called

Imp. Call After an


Bill Fennelly 23 21 2 1 1 0 Jodi Steyer 24 22 2 2 0 0 Latoja Schaben 6 3 3 0 0 3 Jack Easley 2 2 0 0 0 0

TOTAL 55 48 7 3 1 3 d. Men’s Golf – Current Staff





Imp. Time

Period

Another Coach

Previously Called

Imp. Call After an


Andrew Tank 3 3 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 3 3 0 0 0 0

NCAA-3

10

Men’s Golf – Previous Staff





Imp. Time

Period

Another Coach

Previously Called

Imp. Call After an


Jay Horton 12 11 1 0 0 1 TOTAL 12 11 1 0 0 1

e. Women’s Golf





Imp. Time

Period

Another Coach

Previously Called

Imp. Call After an


Christie Martens 5 4 1 0 0 1 TOTAL 5 4 1 0 0 1

f. Women’s Swimming and Diving





Imp. Time

Period

Another Coach

Previously Called

Imp. Call After an


Kelly Nordell 7 6 1 0 0 1 Duane Sorenson 3 2 1 0 1 0

TOTAL 10 8 2 0 1 1

g. Women’s Soccer





Imp. Time

Period

Another Coach

Previously Called

Imp. Call After an


Tim Bennett 6 6 0 0 0 0 Wendy Dillinger 10 9 1 1 0 0 Tracy Grose 1 0 1 0 0 1 Ben Madsen 4 4 0 0 0 0

TOTAL 21 19 2 1 0 1

NCAA-3

11

h. Softball





Imp. Time

Period

Another Coach

Previously Called

Imp. Call After an


Stacey Gemeinhardt 14 14 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 14 14 0 0 0 0

i. Women’s Tennis





Imp. Time

Period

Another Coach

Previously Called

Imp. Call After an


Armando Espinosa 45 41 4 1 0 3 Chris Williams 5 2 3 0 0 3

TOTAL 50 43 7 1 0 6

j. Men’s and Women’s Track/Cross Country





Imp. Time

Period

Another Coach

Previously Called

Imp. Call After an


Nate Wiens 54 51 3 0 0 3 Travis Hartke 16 11 5 1 0 4 Corey Ihmels 21 20 1 0 0 1 John Dagata 3 3 0 0 0 0 Kristy Popp 28 22 6 0 0 6 Grant Wall 4 2 2 0 0 2 Pete Herber 11 11 0 0 0 0

TOTAL 137 120 17 1 0 16

k. Women’s Volleyball





Imp. Time

Period

Another Coach

Previously Called

Imp. Call After an


Dawn Sullivan 3 3 0 0 0 0 Christy Johnson 1 1 0 0 0 0 Trudy Vande Berg 1 1 0 0 0 0

TOTAL 5 5 0 0 0 0

NCAA-3

12

l. Wrestling Current Staff





Imp. Time

Period

Another Coach

Previously Called

Imp. Call After an


Yero Washington 19 19 0 0 0 0 Chris Bono 1 1 0 0 0 0 Kevin Jackson 9 5 4 1 2 1 Molly Donnelly 1 1 0 0 0 0

TOTAL 30 26 4 1 2 1

Wrestling Previous Staff





Imp. Time

Period

Another Coach

Previously Called

Imp. Call After an


Cael Sanderson 3 3 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 3 3 0 0 0 0

m. Football Current Staff

Sport # of

Imp. Calls




Imp. Time

Period

Another Coach

Previously Called

Imp. Call After an


Paul Rhoads 92 81 11 1 6 4 Bill Bleil 78 60 18 2 1 15 Curtis Bray 30 28 2 2 0 0 Shane Burnham 93 80 13 3 4 6 Wally Burnham 43 40 3 2 1 0 Nick Caley 30 29 1 0 0 1 Bobby Elliott 199 183 16 0 0 16 Tom Herman 23 20 3 0 3 0 Courtney Messingham 81 79 2 2 0 0 Ken Pope 43 41 2 1 0 1 Luke Wells 93 83 10 4 3 3 Markus Alleyne 2 2 0 0 0 0 Eric Link 16 13 3 0 0 3 Chris Ash 32 23 9 0 0 9 Ryan McKim 31 2 29 0 0 29* Scott Fountain 12 11 1 0 1 0 Matt Karleskint 2 2 0 0 0 0

TOTAL 900 777 123 17 19 87 * McKim made 27calls as an impermissible recruiter.

NCAA-3

13

Football Previous Staff





Imp. Time

Period

Another Coach

Previously Called

Imp. Call After an


Gene Chizik 4 2 2 0 2 0 Shawn Raney 3 0 3 0 3 0 Chris Ash 1 1 0 0 0 0 Ryan McKim 3 0 3 0 0 3* Wayne Bolt 6 3 3 1 0 2 Scott Fountain 12 4 8 0 0 8 Jay Rodgers 20 20 0 0 0 0 Tom Howe 3 2 1 0 1 0 Tony Petersen 1 1 0 0 0 0 Robert McFarland 1 0 1 1 0 0 Jeff Koonz 1 0 1 0 1 0 Shane Beatty 7 0 7 0 0 7

TOTAL 62 33 29 2 7 20 * McKim made 3 calls as an impermissible recruiter.

D. TEXT MESSAGE VIOLATIONS

1. Overview

a. NCAA Legislation – Effective August 1, 2007, NCAA Bylaw 13.4.1.2 prohibits the

sending of text messages by coaching staff members to prospective student-athletes.

An override vote on January 12, 2008, at the NCAA Convention ultimately upheld

the legislation. [NOTE: Legislation has been enacted for men’s basketball and is

expected to be enacted for all other sports during this academic year to allow

unlimited texting to prospective student-athletes entering their junior year in high

school.]

b. Text Messaging Billing Documentation – Based upon interviews with coaching staff

members, nearly all telephone calls to prospects originated from University-issued

cellular telephones. Few occurred from their University office telephones. The

coaches indicated their cellular telephones were their primary mode of

communication.

NCAA-3

14

During the time of the violations in this case, the University was unable to receive

monthly detailed text reports from Verizon, its service provider. Upon initiation of

the inquiry, the institution began a lengthy process of cajoling Verizon to provide text

message information in monthly bill statements, as Verizon indicated such provision

was not possible. After significant discussions, text message records beginning in

June 2010 were provided. (A monthly text report will be provided moving forward).

The text messaging records indicated the telephone number that was texted and

whether it was an incoming or an outgoing text. It should be noted the possibility

exists that one text message resulted in two or more text messages being reflected in

the billing statement. Nevertheless, the University still classified it as multiple

violations.

Other than with the student coach, the University discovered only four impermissible

text messages over the past 12 months.

2. Violations – The University acknowledges the following:

During the period of August 2010 to August 2011, a then-student coach, assigned to men’s basketball by the athletics department as part of the department’s continuing education program for former student-athletes, sent 160 impermissible text messages to several prospective student-athletes who had played on a team previously coached by the then-student coach. The student coach also made 12 impermissible telephone calls to these same prospects. Further, coaches in three other sports made a total of four impermissible texts to various prospects. [NCAA Bylaws 13.1.3.1 and 13.4.1.2] The following chart depicts the number of impermissible texts by sport:

Sport Number

Men’s Basketball 161 Women’s Volleyball 2 Softball 1 Men’s Track & Field 1

Total 165

3. Overall Reasons – Only four sports had any impermissible texts, and the student coach

assigned to the basketball program during the 2010-11 academic year sent 97 percent of

those texts. Other than the then-student coach, coaching staff members stated they

NCAA-3

15

understood the prohibition on text messages. All coaches clearly understood texts were

prohibited until at least after the prospect signed a NLI. The texts in three other sports were

inadvertent.

4. Analysis By Sport

a. Men’s Basketball – Approximately 97 percent of all text messages resulted from the

actions of then-student coach Keith Moore. Moore attended Iowa State and competed

in basketball and baseball during the 1977-78 through 1980-81 academic years. He

subsequently played and coached in the Continental Basketball Association. In 2006,

he started his own business in the Ames area that included providing basketball skill

development instruction for boys and girls at different age levels. In 2008, he became

affiliated with the All Iowa Attack AAU basketball team. During the summer of

2008, he coached a fifth-grade team, and during each of the subsequent three

summers (2009, 2010, and 2011), he progressed with the majority of those team

members on a sixth-, seventh-, and eighth-grade team. During the summers of 2010

and 2011, he also coached a 15-year-old and a 16-year-old team for the All Iowa

Attack.

In the fall of 2010, the athletics department offered Moore the opportunity to return to

Iowa State University as part of its continuing education program. The department’s

continuing education program allows former student-athletes to return to school to

complete their undergraduate degrees. In return for the institution paying for the

student’s tuition, fees and books, the student agrees to serve in some capacity within

the athletics department. In the fall of 2010, Moore returned to Iowa State University

as a full-time undergraduate student. Moore took a total of 24 credit hours during the

2010-11 academic year and needed an additional 12 more credit hours, at the time he

was dismissed from the department’s continuing education program, to receive his

undergraduate degree. In return for Iowa State University paying for his tuition, fees

and books, Moore was assigned by the athletics department to men’s basketball to

serve in the role as an undergraduate student coach beginning in the fall of 2010.

NCAA-3

16

In early April of 2011, Hoiberg became aware Moore had been staying in contact

with several of his former AAU players. Hoiberg immediately brought that

information to Pollard and the investigation began. The investigation revealed during

the 2010-11 academic year, Moore had made 160 impermissible outgoing texts to

prospects and 12 outgoing calls. All of these were to members of his previous team

and are summarized below:

Prospective Student-Athlete # Impermissible Texts

# Impermissible Calls

65 8 60 2 26 2 4 0 5 0

The majority of these texts and calls occurred either in the fall of 2010 or the spring

of 2011. During his interview with the institution, Moore indicated that as a result of

the education he received from the compliance staff upon being hired in the fall of

2010, he knew his relationship with the four prospects that he had coached for the last

two years needed to change. He understood he could not recruit the prospects, and he

knew recruitment included telephone calls and texts. (At that time, the institution

only had interest in recruiting and Moore reported he had had a

very close relationship with for the two years in that he had coached the young

man and became a confidant. However, he understood he needed to separate himself

from his former players due to his status as a student coach. He reported he made

these efforts, but the majority of these calls in the fall related to the conclusion of the

AAU season or in the spring when the players began texting or calling him about his

coaching their team during the upcoming summer. He did not perceive these contacts

as “recruiting” since they related to the AAU program.

Regarding Moore indicated that

Moore indicated he has known since the young man’s seventh grade.

.

Moore coached during the summers prior to the prospect’s

NCAA-3

17

As a result, Moore indicated he has a very close relationship with in that

previously was calling him “a lot” about life situations. Until he began his role as the

student coach, he indicated that called him almost daily. When he took his

position at the University, Moore said he told that he could not come to his games

or call him anymore. Moore indicated that since his release by the University, he and

have reestablished their close relationship.

during the University’s self-imposed

cessation of recruiting and contact. Moore reported that he

Moore indicated that he never coached but provided him skill instruction on six to seven occasions during the young man’s

– at least one year prior to becoming a student assistant coach at Iowa State. paid Moore for these sessions. During his recent interview, he initially indicated that he “probably knew” that he could not text prospects. He later indicated that his belief on texting evolved in that he initially thought he could text his former team members, he later believed he that he could respond to a text, and he subsequently believed that he could not text. (The institution believes it was made very clear to Moore upon his hiring when he received an individual educational session about the impermissibility of texting prospects, including his former team members). Nevertheless, the institution believes that Moore’s relationship with the five prospects and the purpose of many of these texts and calls allowed Moore to believe that contacts with his former team members were not considered recruiting and permissible.

b. Other Sports – The number of texts in these sports were minimal and resulted

primarily from not realizing a text had been sent or to whom.

NCAA-3

18

E. FAILURE TO MONITOR

1. Overview

a. NCAA Legislation – The majority of violations previously acknowledged in this self-report focused upon impermissible telephone calls, primarily related to the lack of documentation of a no contact telephone call to a prospective student-athlete. The University believes it undertook significant educational efforts with coaching staff members about NCAA legislation regarding the number of permissible calls, as all coaching staff members stated they were aware of the legislation restricting telephone calls to once per week. The University also believes it undertook significant efforts to monitor telephone calls. In essence, the institution required coaching staff members to submit monthly recruiting logs. The compliance staff reviewed those logs to ensure they did not reveal violations. As an additional measure, the institution compared the recruiting logs to telephone records in some sports for a period of time.

However, based upon the results of this inquiry, the University realizes more effort could have been undertaken to reinforce the necessity of documenting those occasions when they made a call but did not make a contact with the prospect. Although the correct information was provided to the coaches, inadequate monitoring failed to detect or correct lax practices by the coaches and failed to reinforce the necessity of contemporaneous records for all attempted phone calls to prospects. The institution acknowledges the overall auditing process was not as effective as it needed to be, as evidenced by the 229 telephone call violations occurred in 18 sports over a three-year period.

b. Violation

The University acknowledges that: While the institution educated its coaching staff members on applicable NCAA legislation, many coaching staff members did not adequately understand that a no-contact telephone call with a prospect is a countable call unless the coach

NCAA-3

19

contemporaneously denotes it as such on a recruiting log. Further, while the institution undertook efforts to compare coaches’ monthly telephone logs to long distance billing statements, the institution’s monitoring processes were not sufficient to detect impermissible calls. As a result, from the 2008-09 academic year through spring 2011, the scope and nature of the violations detailed in this report demonstrates that the institution failed to adequately monitor its sports programs to assure compliance regarding NCAA telephone call legislation. [NCAA Bylaw 2.8.1]

2. Monitoring Program

a. Overview – The general monitoring process in the telephone records area utilized by the University’s compliance staff involved the following: i. Coaches were required to submit telephone logs monthly to the compliance

staff. A member of the compliance staff reviewed these logs to ensure no violations existed based upon the information on the logs; and

ii. The person then compared these telephone logs to actual billing statements.

(The University’s billing statement did not list text messages). This audit process occurred for at least the 2008-09 academic year.

b. Specific Monitoring and Audit Process – As noted above, the institution had a

program in which coaching staff members were required to submit telephone logs monthly from the institution’s recruiting software entitled Recruiting Radar. Effective August 1, 2008, all telephone logs had to be submitted by coaching staff members to the compliance staff using Recruiting Radar. Prior to and subsequent to that time, the compliance staff distributed a recruiting logbook that included contact, evaluation, and telephone log sheets. Some coaching staff members contemporaneously utilized the logbook to denote telephone calls, while others denoted elsewhere the date, time, and prospect called. Regardless of the means by which the call was initially denoted, the information had to be included in the Recruiting Radar system, and the telephone logs submitted to the compliance staff had to be printed off from Recruiting Radar. The page in the Recruiting Logbook for telephone calls included the following columns (See Exhibit C):

NCAA-3

20

− Date − Time − Name (of PSA) − School (State) − Phone Number

− Position − Call Made From − Call Made To (Cell/Home/Other) − Call Complete (Y/N)

No definition of “Call complete Y/N” is provided. Besides the option of inserting the above contact information in the Logbook, the coaching staff members could insert the information directly into Recruiting Radar. The screen from Recruiting Radar includes (See Exhibit D): − Type of Contact − Date − Response

− Phone # − Call Origination − Phone History

As indicated in Exhibit D, under “Response”, the drop down screen includes: − Talk with Prospect − Left Message − No Answer

− Prospect Initiated Call − Talked with Coach

As noted above, if the coaching staff member contemporaneously denoted the telephone contact/attempt in the Logbook, that information needed to be inserted into Recruiting Radar in order for the Recruiting Radar logs to be printed and submitted to the compliance staff. As part of this inquiry, the institution reviewed the logs printed out from Recruiting Radar. The number of no answer/left message (NA/LM) calls denoted on the printout varied by coach. While it is unknown whether a call resulted in a NA/LM unless noted, it appears some coaches routinely placed a NA/LM in their logs, while many coaches did not. Overall, it appears many coaching staff members did not frequently write down the no answer/left message NA/LM calls in their logbook. If they did, they did not insert that information into Recruiting Radar when the information was transferred. Instead, only the calls in which contact was made were denoted. The printout from Recruiting Radar forwarded to the compliance staff had a different format than the Recruiting Radar input screen (See Exhibit E). If the coaching staff member inserted no information under the “Response” tab in Recruiting Radar, it

NCAA-3

21

defaulted to “Talk with Prospect” and printed out as “Talk with Prospect”. While Recruiting Radar allowed coaching staff members to insert “LM/NA” calls, some coaching staffs were more diligent than others in denoting such calls. During the time period when the majority of the violations occurred, the institution’s compliance staff consisted of the following: − Josh Snyder, Associate Athletics Director for Compliance (primarily

responsibility was overall supervisor of the compliance staff) − Eileen Flaherty, Assistant Director of Compliance (primary responsibility was

monitoring and financial aid) − Dustin Gray, Associate Director of Athletics for Compliance (primary

responsibility was education) − Ed Banach, Assistant Director of Athletics for Compliance (primary responsibility

was initial and continuing eligibility and camps and clinics) Flaherty was employed at the institution from approximately August 2006 to July 2010. She had various responsibilities throughout her tenure, with one of her primary responsibilities being monitoring of several areas, including recruiting. Flaherty stated the monitoring process consisted of two steps. Initially, effective August 2008, all coaches were to submit telephone logs using the Recruiting Radar form. She reported she looked at all of the logs for all sports for all coaches monthly for any obvious violations on the logs. Flaherty also stated she monthly selected a team and compared the information from Recruiting Radar logs to the actual telephone billing statements. She stated that utilizing an Excel spreadsheet, she randomly selected one sport each month. She would not review the same sport back to back in consecutive months, although she could have done the same sport later in the year. She indicated men’s and women’s basketball and football were always on the Excel spreadsheet, but they were not singled out for a monthly audit. She indicated she would have reviewed all coaches for all telephone logs for that month for that sport. She stated she did this type of audit until her departure in the summer of 2010. Josh Snyder was the coordinator of the compliance staff at the University. He assumed the overall responsibility for the compliance staff in May 2005 and left the University in December 2010. Snyder reported the institution’s primary monitoring

NCAA-3

22

of telephone logs was the monthly submission by coaching staff members and the audit conducted by Flaherty. Snyder believed this occurred until the summer of 2009, when the ACS system was purchased. He reported Flaherty would select at least one coach in two or three sports monthly to review logs and telephone billing statements. These were randomly selected by a computer. Snyder stated he also informed Flaherty she was to include one football or one men’s basketball coach each month due to the high profile of those sports. Snyder believed Flaherty then would be reviewing at least three coaches in three different sports each month, although not all of the coaches in that sport would be reviewed. He did not get copies of Flaherty’s audit but occasionally talked with her about the audit results. The University has the monthly telephone logs submitted by the coaches in each sport for the three academic years. These would have been reviewed by Flaherty and served as the basis for the institution’s review of the number of occasions when a NA/LM call was placed in the log. Since Flaherty indicated she kept a record of the sports she audited each month, the University attempted to locate such information. The following is a list of the sports that were audited for the 2008-09 academic year. The electronic file clearly identified the audited sport but did not indicate the results: September 2008 – Wrestling October 2008 – Softball November 2008 – Women’s Golf January 2009 – Women’s Tennis February 2009 – Football March 2009 – Women’s Outdoor Track April 2009 – Women’s Tennis May 2009 – Softball June 2009 – Women’s Swimming July 2009 – Volleyball In the compliance department area of the athletics department hard drive, telephone records for all sports for each month of the 2009-10 academic year are filed. However, no information exists as to the specific sport that may have been audited. As noted above, the ACS system was purchased in the summer of 2009 in part to help with the auditing of the telephone records. Both Snyder and Flaherty indicated that difficulty arose from importing the Recruiting Radar data into the ACS system.

NCAA-3

23

Snyder believed that Flaherty was continuing to undertake some auditing utilizing the previous method, although he acknowledged that it was possible her efforts focused more on matching the Recruiting Radar and the ACS systems. Based upon the information, the institution is unclear if the monthly audits continued from the summer of 2009 until early 2011. No doubt exists coaches were required to submit their monthly logs from the Recruiting Radar throughout all months of the period of the violations and Flaherty was reviewing them until her departure in late summer 2010. As part of this inquiry, the institution undertook an analysis of the specific month in which each telephone violation occurred by sport in order to determine if the violations now identified should have been identified at least during the one-year period when a specific sport can be identified as having been monitored. The results are below:

Time Period of Telephone Call Violations By Sport

Month WGYM MBB WBB MGF WGF WSW WSOC SB WTN MWTF WVB WR FB 06/08 X X 07/08 X X X X X X X X 08/08 X X X X X X X X X X 09/08 X X X X X A X 10/08 X X X X X/A X X X 11/08 X X A X X X X 12/08 X X X 01/09 X X X/A X X 02/09 X X X X X/A 03/09 X X/A X 04/09 X A X X 05/09 A X 06/09 X X A X X X X 07/09 X X X X X A X X 08/09 X X X X X X X X X 09/09 X X X X X X X X 10/09 X X X X X X 11/09 X X X X X X 12/09 X X 01/10 X X X X X X 02/10 X X X X X 03/10 X X X 04/10 X X X X X 05/10 X X X X X 06/10 X X X X X 07/10 X X X X X 08/10 X X X X X X X 09/10 X X X X

NCAA-3

24

Month WGYM MBB WBB MGF WGF WSW WSOC SB WTN MWTF WVB WR FB 10/10 X X X X X X X X 11/10 X X X X X 12/10 X X X 01/11 X X X 02/11 X X 03/11 X X 04/11 X X X X X X 05/11 X X X X 06/11 X X X 07/11 X

X = Violations Occurred A = Audited Month

Based upon a comparison of the information in the chart and the audited sports during the 2008-09 academic year, violations occurred during the month in about a third of the sports that were audited. This, in part, serves as a basis for the institution’s position on acknowledging a failure to monitor.

c. Current Process – In March 2011, the University successfully instituted the use of the ACS software to perform these audits. The University used ACS to assist in determining the violations in this report until the end of its contract with ACS. In July 2011, the University purchased a new monitoring system through Bluechip Athletics Solutions, the parent company of Recruiting Radar. This system, part of Bluechip’s complete compliance package purchased by the University, makes for a much easier monitoring process. Monthly audits of all sports are being conducted. The audits will be conducted monthly with every sport reviewed every month. The Bluechip Athletics Soulutions system organizes and processes thousands of telephone calls in minutes through an electronic import system. The system uploads electronic telephone records, sorts them by recruiting weeks, and analyzes them under current NCAA regulations dependent upon the prospect's year in school and sport.

3. Educational Program

a. Overview – The University conducts educational sessions individually with each of

its sport teams on approximately eight occasions annually. These in-person sessions

include written materials and PowerPoint presentations. Between meetings, coaches

electronically receive e-mails, memorandums, etc. that include information about

interpretations, recent NCAA infractions cases, etc.

NCAA-3

25

As noted earlier in this report, all coaches understood the NCAA telephone legislation

applicable to their sport concerning the number of telephone calls per week. The

violations in this report resulted primarily from a coaches’ failure to

contemporaneously denote they did not make contact with a prospect or the call was

dropped.

b. Coaches’ Knowledge of Logging No Contact Calls – In their recent interviews, Gray,

Snyder, and Flaherty reported coaches were instructed during educational sessions of

the need to write down at the time of the call if the coach did not have a contact with

the prospect. This could have been either a “no answer” or a “left message” notation.

Gray, who had primary responsibility for education, indicated he clearly understood

coaching staff members had to document in their logs notations such as “NA” or

“LM” and, if they did not, these calls were countable. He was very convinced the

coaching staff members knew they had to document whether they made contact with

a prospect, as that had always been the institution’s policy.

During their interviews, the majority of the coaches indicated they were not aware

they had to denote on their logs a “NA” or “LM” in order to avoid being a countable

call. A few reported they occasionally denoted such calls because they were to do so,

but these coaches did not realize the call became countable without such notation.

Moreover, none of the coaches indicated an awareness if they did not

contemporaneously denote it was such on their logs, a violation would occur.

Gray was asked for his reasons why he believed the coaching staff members were

aware they knew not only the necessity to log a “NA” or “LM” but also this would be

a countable call, and he responded that there was an interpretation in July 2008 that

was forwarded to the coaching staff members. (It should be noted that several

coaching staff members identified in violations began employment at the University

subsequent to the July 2008 memorandum). That e-mail and attachment is included

as Exhibit G. Below is the wording of an e-mail dated July 28, 2008, from Gray to all

coaches concerning the institution’s telephone call policy:

NCAA-3

26

Coaches, Attached is a document referring to the fictional “three-minute phone call” rule. Please review this document and let me know if there are any questions. The synopsis is there is not a three-minute rule; a phone call less than three minutes is likely a countable call. That can be the same for phone calls under two minutes and under a minute. In addition, this document reiterates the importance of making notes of your calls (e.g., dropped calls, left message). Thanks, Dustin

As part of this inquiry, the institution reviewed all other e-mails or interpretations sent electronically to coaching staff members. While several included information on number of permissible calls, none of these additional materials specifically addressed the area of dropped calls or the reasons a NA/LM call becomes a countable call. A review of all other educational materials identifies many times telephone legislation was addressed and the requirement of documenting nontraditional phone calls but no written documentation was found specifically addressing the area of dropped calls or the reasons a NA/LM call becomes a countable call (other than the email above).. Compliance staff members reported it was discussed verbally on several occasions when telephone legislation was reviewed. As noted above, the institution’s position is that educational efforts were made (and the July 28, 2008, e-mail is an example), but additional efforts could have been undertaken to reinforce the application of this NCAA legislation.

F. CORRECTIVE AND PUNITIVE ACTIONS

1. Institution’s Corrective Actions – The institution has or will implement the following: a. Invest over $82,000 over the next three years in compliance and recruiting software

with Bluechip Athletics Solution. The software will simplify recording telephone calls and monitoring telephone calls and text messages as it will be one system from start to finish. Further, other recruiting and monitoring processes will be improved.

b. Added a statement at the bottom of the Telephone Log Form in the Recruiting Logbook indicating the necessity to denote a no answer/left message call.

NCAA-3

27

c. Dismissed the student coach involved in impressible telephone calls and text messages from the program’s continuing education program.

d. Discontinued the practice of assigning students from the continuing education program to sports-specific functions

e. Require all current University coaching staff members named in this inquiry to attend an educational session on NCAA compliance in addition to the monthly meetings.

f. Dedicate a monthly coaches’ meeting to telephone calls and in the meeting emphasize to the coaching staff members the necessity to log a no answer/left message call.

2. Institution’s Punitive Actions – The institution has or will implement the following: a. Place itself on a two-year probationary period effective November 13, 2011. b. Impose a Department-wide forfeiture of one-week of recruiting phone calls for all

sports, served at an appropriate time for each sport. c. Undertook overall punitive actions for each sport and individual coaching staff

members involved in a text message or impermissible telephone call violation utilizing the following guidelines:

Team Penalties:

− Less than 25 violations in that sport – One week of no telephone calls by all

coaching staff members;

− 25 to 60 violations in that sport – Two weeks of no telephone calls by all coaching

staff members;

− 61 to 199 violations in that sport – Three weeks of no telephone calls by all

coaching staff members and decrease recruiting opportunities by one per prospect

for the 2011-12 recruiting year; and

− More than 900 violations in that sport – Five weeks of no telephone calls by all

coaching staff members, reduce official visits by 20 percent from the four-year

average, and limit the number of off-campus recruiters to five for the spring 2012

evaluation period.

Individual Penalties (This would be in addition to the number of no telephone call

weeks for that sport’s team penalties. For example, if the team had a penalty of four

NCAA-3

28

weeks of no telephone calls, this coach would have a total five weeks of no telephone

calls):

− Less than 30 violations for that coach – No additional individual restrictions;

− 30 to 50 violations for that coach – One additional week of no telephone calls and

a letter of admonishment;

− 50-80 violations for that coach – Three additional weeks of no telephone calls and

a letter of admonishment;

− 80 to 100 violations for that coach – Four additional weeks of no telephone calls

and a letter of reprimand; and

− More than 100 violations for that coach – Nine additional weeks of no telephone

calls and no off-campus recruiting for a month.

A chart depicting the number of violations in that sport and the involved coaching

staff member is provided as a reference:

Women’s Gymnastics

Sport # of Imp.





Imp. Time

Period

Another Coach

Previously Called

Imp. Call After an


Jay Ronayne 4 3 1 0 0 1 Jay Santos 8 7 1 0 1 0 Teshawne Jackson 1 1 0 0 0 0 Jessica Bartgis 5 5 0 0 0 0

TOTAL 18 16 2 0 1 1 − The Gymnastics coaching staff will serve its Department-wide, one-week restriction from

initiating telephone contact with all prospects the week of November 13-19, 2011.

NCAA-3

29

Men’s Basketball Current Staff





Imp. Time

Period

Another Coach

Previously Called

Imp. Call After an


Fred Hoiberg 10 7 3 0 0 3 TJ Otzelberger 20 17 3 3 0 0 Matt Abdelmassih 1 0 1 0 0 *1 Elwyn McRoy 23 21 2 0 0 2


Men’s Basketball Previous Staff





Imp. Time

Period

Another Coach

Previously Called

Imp. Call After an


Greg McDermott 9 5 4 2 2 0 TJ Otzelberger 13 11 2 0 1 1 Daniyal Robinson 65 48 16 0 2 14 Jeff Rutter 6 4 2 0 1 1 Nathan Wieseler 1 0 1 0 *1 0

TOTAL 93 68 25 2 7 16 *This call was made by an impermissible recruiter. − The Men’s Basketball coaching staff will:

i. serve its Department-wide, one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the week of November 13-19, 2011;

ii. serve an additional two-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the weeks of November 20-26 and November 27-December 3, 2011;

iii. decrease the number of recruiting opportunities by one for all prospects during the 2011-12 academic year;

iv. cease the recruiting any of the prospective student-athletes Student Coach Keith Moore had impermissible telephone or text contact within April 2011 and will not recruit the prospective students-athletes through December 2011; and

v. reduce official visits by 20 percent from the previous four year average (10.25) for 2011-12.

− Coach TJ Otzelberger will: i. serve an additional one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all

prospects the week of December 4-10, 2011 (totaling four weeks of no telephone calls for Otzelberger);

− Student Coach Keith Moore was*: i. relieved of his duties as student coach; and ii. removed from the athletics department’s continuing education program. *Penalties resulting from student coach text violation.

NCAA-3

30

Women’s Basketball





Imp. Time

Period

Another Coach

Previously Called

Imp. Call After an


Bill Fennelly 23 21 2 1 1 0 Jodi Steyer 24 22 2 2 0 0 Latoja Schaben 6 3 3 0 0 3 Jack Easley 2 2 0 0 0 0

TOTAL 55 48 7 3 1 3 − The Women’s Basketball coaching staff will:

i. serve its Department-wide, one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the week of November 13-19, 2011; and

ii. serve an additional one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the week of November 20-26, 2011.

Men’s Golf – Current Staff





Imp. Time

Period

Another Coach

Previously Called

Imp. Call After an


Andrew Tank 3 3 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 3 3 0 0 0 0

Men’s Golf – Previous Staff





Imp. Time

Period

Another Coach

Previously Called

Imp. Call After an


Jay Horton 12 11 1 0 0 1 TOTAL 12 11 1 0 0 1

− The Men’s Golf coaching staff will serve its Department-wide, one-week restriction from

initiating telephone contact with all prospects the week of November 13-19, 2011.

NCAA-3

31

Women’s Golf





Imp. Time

Period

Another Coach

Previously Called

Imp. Call After an


Christie Martens 5 4 1 0 0 1 TOTAL 5 4 1 0 0 1

− The Women’s Golf coaching staff will serve its Department-wide, one-week restriction

from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the week of November 13-19, 2011.

Women’s Swimming and Diving





Imp. Time

Period

Another Coach

Previously Called

Imp. Call After an


Kelly Nordell 7 6 1 0 0 1 Duane Sorenson 3 2 1 0 1 0

TOTAL 10 8 2 0 1 1 − The Women’s Swimming and Diving coaching staff will serve its Department-wide, one-

week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the week of November 13-19, 2011.

Women’s Soccer





Imp. Time

Period

Another Coach

Previously Called

Imp. Call After an


Tim Bennett 6 6 0 0 0 0 Wendy Dillinger 10 9 1 1 0 0 Tracy Grose 1 0 1 0 0 1 Ben Madsen 4 4 0 0 0 0

TOTAL 21 19 2 1 0 1 − The Women’s Soccer coaching staff will serve its Department-wide, one-week restriction

from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the week of November 13-19, 2011.

NCAA-3

32

Softball





Imp. Time

Period

Another Coach

Previously Called

Imp. Call After an


Stacey Gemeinhardt 14 14 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 14 14 0 0 0 0

− The Women’s Softball coaching staff will serve its Department-wide, one-week

restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the week of November 13-19, 2011.

Women’s Tennis

Sport # of Imp.





Imp. Time

Period

Another Coach

Previously Called

Imp. Call After an


Armando Espinosa 45 41 4 1 0 3 Chris Williams 5 2 3 0 0 3

TOTAL 50 43 7 1 0 6 − The Women’s Tennis coaching staff will:

i. serve its Department-wide, one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the week of November 13-19, 2011; and

ii. serve an additional one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the week of November 20-26, 2011.

− Head Coach Armando Espinosa will: i. serve an additional one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all

prospects the week of November 27-December 3, 2011 (totaling three weeks of no telephone calls for Espinosa);

NCAA-3

33

Men’s and Women’s Track/Cross Country





Imp. Time

Period

Another Coach

Previously Called

Imp. Call After an


Nate Wiens 54 51 3 0 0 3 Travis Hartke 16 11 5 1 0 4 Corey Ihmels 21 20 1 0 0 1 John Dagata 3 3 0 0 0 0 Kristy Popp 28 22 6 0 0 6 Grant Wall 4 2 2 0 0 2 Pete Herber 11 11 0 0 0 0

TOTAL 138 120 17 1 0 16 − The Track and Field coaching staff will:

i. serve its Department-wide, one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the week of November 13-19, 2011;

ii. serve an additional two-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the weeks of November 20-26 and November 27-December 3, 2011; and

iii. decrease the number of recruiting opportunities by one for all prospects during the 2011-12 academic year.

− Coach Nate Wiens will: i. serve an additional three-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all

prospects, including the weeks of December 4-10, December 11-17, and December 18-24, 2011 (totaling six weeks of no telephone calls for Wiens);

Women’s Volleyball





Imp. Time

Period

Another Coach

Previously Called

Imp. Call After an


Dawn Sullivan 3 3 0 0 0 0 Christy Johnson 1 1 0 0 0 0 Trudy Vande Berg 1 1 0 0 0 0

TOTAL 5 5 0 0 0 0 − The Women’s Volleyball coaching staff will serve its Department-wide, one-week

restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the week of November 13-19, 2011.

NCAA-3

34

Wrestling Current Staff





Imp. Time

Period

Another Coach

Previously Called

Imp. Call After an


Yero Washington 19 19 0 0 0 0 Chris Bono 1 1 0 0 0 0 Kevin Jackson 9 5 4 1 2 1 Molly Donnelly 1 1 0 0 0 0

TOTAL 30 26 4 1 2 1

Wrestling Previous Staff





Imp. Time

Period

Another Coach

Previously Called

Imp. Call After an


Cael Sanderson 3 3 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 3 3 0 0 0 0

− The Wrestling coaching staff will:

i. serve its Department-wide one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the week of November 20 - 26, 2011; and

ii. serve an additional one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all prospects the week of November 27 – December 3, 2011.

NCAA-3

NCAA-3

35

Football Current Staff





Imp. Time

Period

Another Coach

Previously Called

Imp. Call After an


Paul Rhoads 92 81 11 1 6 4 Bill Bleil 78 60 18 2 1 15 Curtis Bray 30 28 2 2 0 0 Shane Burnham 93 80 13 3 4 6 Wally Burnham 43 40 3 2 1 0 Nick Caley 30 29 1 0 0 1 Bobby Elliott 199 183 16 0 0 16 Tom Herman 23 20 3 0 3 0 Courtney Messingham 81 79 2 2 0 0 Ken Pope 43 41 2 1 0 1 Luke Wells 93 83 10 4 3 3 Markus Alleyne 2 2 0 0 0 0 Eric Link 16 13 3 0 0 0 Chris Ash 32 23 9 0 0 9 Ryan McKim 31 2 29 0 0 29* Scott Fountain 12 11 1 0 1 0 Matt Karleskint 2 2 0 0 0 0

TOTAL 900 777 123 17 19 87 * Alleyne made two and McKim made 27calls as impermissible recruiters.

Football Previous Staff





Imp. Time

Period

Another Coach

Previously Called

Imp. Call After an


Gene Chizik 4 2 2 0 2 0 Shawn Raney 3 0 3 0 3 0 Chris Ash 1 1 0 0 0 0 Ryan McKim 3 0 3 0 0 3* Wayne Bolt 6 3 3 1 0 2 Scott Fountain 12 4 8 0 0 8 Jay Rodgers 20 20 0 0 0 0 Tom Howe 3 2 1 0 1 0 Tony Petersen 1 1 0 0 0 0 Robert McFarland 1 0 1 1 0 0 Jeff Koonz 1 0 1 0 1 0 Shane Beatty 7 0 7 0 0 7

TOTAL 62 33 29 2 7 20 * McKim made 3 calls as impermissible recruiter.

NCAA-3

36

− The Football coaching staff will: i. serve its Department-wide, one-week restriction from initiating telephone contact

with all prospects the week of February 5-11, 2012; ii. serve an additional four-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with all

prospects the weeks of February 12-18, February 19-25, February 26-March 3, and March 4-10, 2012;

iii. decrease the number of recruiting contacts by one for all prospects during the 2011-12 academic year;

iv. reduce official visits by 20 percent from the previous four year average (46.5) for the 2011-12 academic year; and

v. decrease the number of permissible off campus recruiters by two for the spring 2012 evaluation period.

− Head Coach Paul Rhoads will:

i. serve an additional five-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with prospects, including the weeks of March 11-17, March 18-24, March 25-31, April 1-7, and April 8-14, 2012 (totaling ten weeks of no telephone calls for Rhoads);

− Coach Bill Bleil will: i. serve an additional three-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with

prospects, including the weeks of March 11-17, March 18-24, and March 25-31, 2012 (totaling eight weeks of no telephone calls for Bleil);

− Coach Curtis Bray will: i. serve an additional week restriction from initiating telephone contact with prospects,

the week of March 11-17, 2012 (totaling six weeks of no telephone calls for Bray);

− Coach Shane Burnham will: i. serve an additional five-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with

prospects, including the weeks of March 11-17, March 18-24, March 25-31, April 1-7, and April 8-14, 2012 (totaling ten weeks of no telephone calls for S. Burnham);

− Coach Wally Burnham will:

i. serve an additional week restriction from initiating telephone contact with prospects, the week of March 11-17, 2012 (totaling six weeks of no telephone calls for W. Burnham);

− Coach Nick Caley will: i. serve an additional week restriction from initiating telephone contact with prospects,

the week of March 11-17, 2012 (totaling six weeks of no telephone calls for Caley);

− Coach Bobby Elliott will:

NCAA-3

37

i. serve an additional ten-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with prospects, including the weeks of March 11-17, March 18-24, March 25-31, April 1-7, April 8-14, April 15-21, April 22-28, April 29-May 5, May 6-12, and May 13-19, 2012 (totaling fifteen weeks of no telephone calls for Elliott);

ii. not have off campus contact in the month of December;

− Coach Courtney Messingham will:

i. serve an additional five-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with prospects, including the weeks of March 11-17, March 18-24, March 25-31, April 1-7, and April 8-14, 2012 (totaling ten weeks of no telephone calls for Messingham);

− Coach Ken Pope will:

i. serve an additional week restriction from initiating telephone contact with prospects, the week of March 11-17, 2012 (totaling six weeks of no telephone calls for Pope);

− Coach Luke Wells will:

i. serve an additional five-week restriction from initiating telephone contact with prospects, including the weeks of March 11-17, March 18-24, March 25-31, April 1-7, and April 8-14, 2012 (totaling ten weeks of no telephone calls for Wells);

G. CONCLUSION

The University believes it has conducted a thorough inquiry and has imposed appropriate corrective

and punitive actions.

NCAA-3

IOWA STATE – INDIVIDUALS INTERVIEWED

Name Title Date of Interview Bleil, Bill Asst. Head Coach/Offensive Line 8/22/11 Messingham, Courtney Asst. FB Coach/Wide Receivers 8/22/11 Wells, Luke Asst. FB Coach/Tight Ends 8/22/11

8/22/11 8/22/11

8/22/11 Burnham, Shane Asst. FB Coach/Defensive Backs 8/22/11 Elliot, Bobby Asst. FB Coach/Secondary 8/22/11 Uhlenhopp, Nick Asst. Recruiting Coordinator 8/22/11 Rhoads, Paul Head FB Coach 8/22/11 Moore, Keith Former MBB Student Asst. Coach 4/18/11 & 8/23/11

8/23/11 8/23/11

Espinoa, Armando Head WTN Coach 8/23/11 Wiens, Nate Asst. T&F Coach 8/23/11

8/23/11 Steyer, Jodi Asst. WBB Coach 8/23/11 Otzelberger, TJ Assoc. Head MBB Coach 8/23/11

8/23/11 Gray, Dustin Asst. AD for Compliance 8/23/11 Flaherty, Eileen Assoc. AD at Univ. of Maine 9/15/11 Snyder, Josh Assoc. AD at UM, Kansas City 9/16/11

NCAA-3

1

REVIEW OF SPECIFIC VIOLATIONS BY SPORT

1. Women’s Gymnastics

a. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its

recruitment of prospective student-athlete .

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller April 19, 2009 April 21 – 2 minutes

April 22 – 12 minutes (8:28 pm)√ April 22 – 1 minute (8:40 pm)√

Jay Santos Jay Santos Jay Santos

b. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller August 10, 2008 August 14 – 1 minute (12:16 pm)

August 14 – 2 minutes (12:17 pm)√ Teshawne Jackson Teshawne Jackson

c. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller August 9, 2009 August 9 – 7 minutes

August 13 – 3 minutes√ Teshawne Jackson Jay Santos

d. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller June 28, 2009 July 1 – 2 minutes (6:25 pm)

July 1 – 2 minutes (6:31 pm)√ Jay Ronayne Jay Ronayne

August 9, 2009 August 11 – 2 minutes (4:59 pm) August 11 – 2 minutes (5:10 pm)√

Jay Santos Jay Santos

e. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



August 18 – 2 minutes (2:50 pm)√ August 21 – 2 minutes (5:49 pm)√ August 21 – 2 minutes (8:36 pm)√

Jay Santos Jay Santos Jay Santos Jay Santos

f. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller September 20, 2009 September 21 – 1 minute (8:55 pm)

September 21 – 8 minutes (8:56 pm)√ Jay Ronayne Jay Ronayne

NCAA-3

2

g. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller August 16, 2009 August 19 – 1 minute

August 21 – 10 minutes√ Jay Santos Jay Santos

h. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller September 26, 2010 September 29 – 1 minute (7:05 pm)

September 29 – 11 minutes (7:11 pm)√ Jessica Bartgis Jessica Bartgis

October 10, 2010 October 13 – 2 minutes October 14 – 3 minutes√

Jessica Bartgis Jessica Bartgis

i. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller January 16, 2011 January 18 – 3 minutes

January 19 – 2 minutes√ January 20 – 1 minute√

Jessica Bartgis Jessica Bartgis Jessica Bartgis

February 20, 2011 February 22 – 2 minutes February 23 – 2 minutes√

Jessica Bartgis Jessica Bartgis

j. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



August 14 – 3 minutes√ Jay Ronayne Jay Ronayne

k. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



August 14 – 2 minutes√ Jay Ronayne Jay Ronayne

NCAA-3

3

2. Men’s Basketball

a. On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2009 grad).

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller October 5, 2008

October 6 – 1 minute October 6 – 1 minute October 7 – 2 minute√ October 7 – 1 minute√ October 7 – 1 minute√ October 7 – 1 minute√ October 7 – 1 minute√ October 8 – 1 minute√ October 8 – 2 minute√ October 8 – 1 minute√ October 8 – 1 minute√ October 11 – 1 minute√

Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson

October 26, 2008 October 26 – 3 minute October 28 – 1 minute October 29 – 2 minute√ October 31 – 11 minute√

Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson

November 2, 2008 November 3 – 1 minute November 5 – 5 minute November 6 – 1 minute√ November 6 – 1 minute√ November 6 – 1 minute√

Greg McDermott Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson

November 9, 2008 November 10 – 1 minute November 11– 1 minute November 15 – 1 minute√ November 15 – 1 minute√


b. On 13 occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its

recruitment of prospective student-athlete (two-year prospect).


October 12 – 8 minutes October 16 – 1 minute√

Daniyal Robinson Greg McDermott

October 19, 2008

October 25– 2 minutes October 25– 2 minute√ October 25– 3 minute√ October 25– 1 minute√ October 25– 2 minute√ October 25– 1 minute√ October 25– 2 minute√ October 25– 1 minute√

Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson

October 26, 2008

October 26 – 1 minute October 27– 1 minute√

Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson

November 16, 2008

November 17 – 2 minutes November 17 – 4 minute√ November 17 – 1 minute√ November 17 – 1 minute√ November 17 – 1minute√ November 17 – 1 minute√

Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson

November 23, 2008 November 27 – 1 minute November 28– 2 minute√ November 29 – 3 minute√

Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson

NCAA-3

4

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller December 14, 2008 December 14 – 1 minute

December 14– 1 minute√ December 15 – 9 minute√


December 21, 2008 December 21 – 1 minute December 25– 7minute√


January 4, 2009 January 8 – 1 minutes January 8– 1minute√


January 11, 2009 January 15 – 1 minute January 16– 1minute√


January 18, 2009 January 18 – 1 minute January 19– 8minute√


January 25, 2009 January 25 – 8 minutes January 30– 2minute√ January 30– 1minute√ January 30– 3minute√ January 31– 1minute√ January 31– 1minute√

Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson

February 22, 2009 February 23 – 7 minutes February 24– 1minute√ February 25– 1minute√


March 1, 2009 March 1 – 1minute March 1– 3minute√ March 1– 1minute√ March 2– 2minute√ March 2– 1minute√ March 3– 1minute√ March 6– 1minute√ March 7– 1minute√

Greg McDermott Greg McDermott Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson

c. On seven occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during

its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (two-year prospect).

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller July 20, 2008 July 25 – 1 minutes

July 25 – 1 minutes√ July 25 – 3 minutes√ July 26 – 1 minutes√ July 26 – 3 minutes√

Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson Daniyal Robinson

July 27, 2008 July 27 – 4 minutes July 30 – 2 minutes√ July 31 – 13 minutes√

Daniyal Robinson TJ Otzelberger Greg McDermott

August 3, 2008 August 4 – 7 minutes August 6 – 8 minutes√ August 7 – 2 minutes√ August 8 – 7 minutes√


August 10, 2008 August 10 – 5 minutes August 15 – 6 minutes√

Greg McDermott Daniyal Robinson

October 12, 2008 October 12 – 2 minutes October 13 – 1 minutes√ October 13 – 4 minutes√ October 13 – 2 minutes√

Daniyal Robinson TJ Otzelberger Greg McDermott Daniyal Robinson

October 26, 2009 October 29 – 2 minutes October 29 – 1 minutes√ October 30 – 2 minutes√ October 30 – 2 minutes√


NCAA-3

5

November 5, 2009 November 9 – 2 minutes November 11 – 9 minutes√

Greg McDermott Daniyal Robinson

d. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its

recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2009 grad).

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller June 7, 2009 June 8 – 2 minutes

June 10 – 2 minutes June 12 – 1 minutes√ June 12 – 2 minutes√

TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger



Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller September 27, 2009 September 29 – 4 minutes

September 29 – 3 minute September 29 – 1 minute√ September 30 – 1 minute√ September 30 – 1 minute√ September 30 – 1 minute√

TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger

f. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its

recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2-year prospect).


July 8 – 2 minute√ July 8 – 5 minute√ July 8 – 1 minute√

TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger

July 12, 2009 July 12 – 3 minutes July 17 – 2 minute√

TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger

g. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller January 24, 2010 January 25 – 1 minute

January 27 – 2 minutes January 29 – 2 minutes√ January 29 – 2 minutes√

TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger Greg McDermott

April 11, 2010 April 12 – 2 minutes April 14 – 1 minute April 14 – 2 minutes√

Greg McDermott Greg McDermott Greg McDermott


recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2010 grad). On one occasion and impermissible (Wieseler) caller made a call.


April 12 – 1 minute April 16 – 2 minutes√ April 16 – 2 minutes√

Jeff Rutter Jeff Rutter Nathan Wieseler Jeff Rutter

April 25, 2010 April 26 – 3 minutes (9:05) Greg McDermott

NCAA-3

6

April 26 – 6 minute (9:08 pm) April 26 – 2 minutes (9:17 pm) √ April 26 – 10 minutes√ April 27 – 8 minutes√

Greg McDermott Greg McDermott Jeff Rutter Jeff Rutter

i. On six occasions, the institution violated who it may permissibly contact by calling

(2010 grad). signed a NLI with November 13, 2009.

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller November 15, 2009 – 2 minutes√

January 9, 2010 – 3 minutes√ February 20, 2010 – 2 minutes√ May 9, 2010 – 1 minute√ June 23, 2010 – 1 minute√ June 23, 2010 – 1 minute√

Greg McDermott Jeff Rutter Greg McDermott TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger



Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller February 14, 2010 February 17 – 2 minutes

February 18 – 1 minute (7:17 pm) February 18 – 9 minutes (7:18 pm) √ February 18 – 2 minutes (7:27 pm) √

Jeff Rutter Jeff Rutter Jeff Rutter Jeff Rutter


recruitment of prospective student-athlete (four-year transfer).

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller May 30, 2010 June 1 – 11 minutes

June 1 – 1 minute√ June 1 – 1 minutes√

Fred Hoiberg Fred Hoiberg Fred Hoiberg

l. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its

recruitment of prospective student-athlete (two-year transfer).


August 2 – 5 minutes√ Fred Hoiberg Fred Hoiberg

m. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per month during its


Month Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller August, 2010 August 2 – 2 minutes

August 4 – 5 minutes√ Fred Hoiberg Fred Hoiberg

n. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller August 22, 2010 August 23 – 6 minutes (8:40 am)

August 23 – 1 minute (8:45 am) August 24 – 8 minute√ August 26 – 1 minute√

Fred Hoiberg Fred Hoiberg Fred Hoiberg Fred Hoiberg

NCAA-3

7

o. On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per month during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2012 grad).

Month Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller August, 2010 August 29 – 2 minutes

August 29 – 2 minute√ August 30 – 1 minute√

TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger

October, 2010 October 7 – 2 minutes October 8 – 1 minute√ October 8 – 2 minute√ October 8 – 2 minute√ October 11 – 2 minute√ October 12 – 2 minute√ October 18 – 2 minute√ October 26 – 2 minute√ October 27 – 1 minute√

TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger TJ Otzelberger

November, 2010 November 3 – 2 minutes November 16 – 1 minute√ November 22 – 9 minute√


December, 2010 December 6 – 1 minutes December 17 – 1 minute√ December 21 – 2 minute√


p. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller October 17, 2010 October 19 – 2 minutes

October 21 – 2 minute√ October 22 – 2 minute√


q. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its




Elwin McRoy Elwin McRoy Elwin McRoy

November 14, 2010 November 15 – 2 minutes November 15 – 2 minute√ November 15 – 7 minute√


r. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per month during

its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2012 grad).

Month Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller October, 2010 October 12 – 2 minutes

October 27 – 2 minutes√ Fred Hoiberg TJ Otzelberger

November, 2010 November 11 – 2 minutes November 16 – 2 minutes√ November 23 – 1 minutes√ November 27 – 1 minutes√

TJ Otzelberger Fred Hoiberg Fred Hoiberg Fred Hoiberg

NCAA-3

8

s. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller December 12, 2010 December 13 – 2 minutes

December 18 – 2 minutes√ December 18 – 2 minutes√


February 13, 2011 February 14 – 2 minutes February 15 – 2 minutes√ February 16 – 1 minutes√ February 17 – 1 minutes√

Elwin McRoy Elwin McRoy Elwin McRoy Elwin McRoy

t. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per month and on

one occasion, the institution had an impermissible recruiter call during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2012 grad).

Month Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller January, 2011 January 1 – 1 minute√ Matt Abdelmassih January 2, 2011 January 1 – 2 minutes

January 4 – 2 minutes√ Fred Hoiberg Fred Hoiberg

u. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its

recruitment of prospective student-athlete (two-year prospect).

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller January 30, 2011 February 2 – 1 minute

February 2 – 1 minute√ February 3 – 33 minute√


February 2, 2011 February 8 – 1 minute February 8 – 4 minutes√ February 8 – 1 minutes√ February 11 – 10 minutes√

Elwin McRoy Elwin McRoy Elwin McRoy Elwin McRoy

v. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



February 10 – 1 minutes√ Elwin McRoy Elwin McRoy

February 13 2011 February 15 – 1 minutes February 16 – 1 minutes√ February 16 – 1 minutes√ February 16 – 1 minutes√ February 16 – 1 minutes√ February 17 – 1 minutes√ February 17 – 1 minutes√ February 17 – 1 minutes√ February 17 – 1 minutes√

Elwin McRoy Elwin McRoy Elwin McRoy Elwin McRoy Elwin McRoy Elwin McRoy Elwin McRoy Elwin McRoy Elwin McRoy

NCAA-3

9

3. Women’s Basketball

a. On seven occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (May 2010 grad).

Week/Month Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller June 21 – 30, 2009

June 29 – 2 minutes June 30 – 2 minute√ June 30 – 2 minute√

Bill Fennelly Bill Fennelly Bill Fennelly

July 5, 2009 July 16 – 2 minutes July 16 – 2 minute√ July 16 – 2 minute√


August 9, 2009 August 10 – 2 minute August 12– 2 minute√ August 15 – 2 minute√ August 15 – 6 minute√

Bill Fennelly Bill Fennelly Bill Fennelly Bill Fennelly

September 6, 2009 September 9 – 2 minute September 10– 2 minute√ September 11 – 2 minute√ September 12 – 10 minute√

Jodi Steyer Jodi Steyer Jodi Steyer Jodi Steyer

October 4, 2009 October 8 – 2 minute October 10– 2 minute√

Jodi Steyer Jodi Steyer

October 11, 2009 October 11 – 2 minute October 12– 2 minute√


b. On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during

its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (May 2010 grad).

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller July 26, 2009 August 2 – 2 minute

August 4 – 2 minute√ August 4 – 11minute √

Jodi Steyer Bill Fennelly Bill Fennelly

August 23, 2009

August 24– 3 minutes August 26– 2 minute√ August 27– 11 minute√

Jodi Steyer Jodi Steyer Jodi Steyer

September 20, 2009

September 23 – 2 minutes September 23 – 1 minute√ September 24– 7 minute√

Jack Easley Latoja Schaben Jack Easley

c. On two occasions, the institution violated the permissible time to call prospective student-

athlete (2014 grad).

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller February 27, 2010 February 27 – 2 minutes√

February 27 – 3 minutes√ Jodi Steyer Jodi Steyer

d. On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time

period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad).

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller June 21 - 30, 2010 June 24 – 2 minutes

June 27 – 2 minutes√ June 29 – 1 minute√


July 11, 2010 July 17 – 4 minutes (1:01 pm) July 17 – 7 minutes (1:04 pm)√

Bill Fennelly Bill Fennelly

NCAA-3

10

November 7, 2010 November 8 – 2 minutes November 8 – 2 minutes√ November 9 – 2 minutes√ November 9 – 1 minute√

Jodi Steyer Jodi Steyer Jodi Steyer Jodi Steyer

e. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller June 1 - 20, 2010 June 19 – 2 minutes

June 19 – 2 minutes√ Jack Easley Jack Easley





Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller April 11, 2010 April 12– 2 minutes

April 15 – 2 minutes√ Bill Fennelly Bill Fennelly

g. On one occasions, the institution violated the permissible time period to call prospective

student-athlete (2014 grad).

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller December 23, 2010 December 23 – √ Bill Fennelly

h. On one occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per month during


Month Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller April, 2011 April 11 – 5 minutes

April 16 – 2 minutes√ Latoja Schaben Bill Fennelly

i. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller October 31, 2010 November 4 – 2 minutes

November 6 – 2 minutes√ November 6 – 2 minutes√


j. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per month during its



April 7 – 2 minute√ April 7 – 9 minutes√


k. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per month during its




NCAA-3

11

l. On two occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per month during its


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller April, 2011 April 11 – 1 minute


May, 2011 May 19 – 2 minutes May 24 – 55 minutes√


m. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller May, 2011 May 12 – 2 minutes

May 12 – 2 minutes√ May 19 – 11 minutes√

Bill Fennelly Bill Fennelly Jodi Steyer

June 1 – 20, 2011 June 20 – 2 minutes June 20 – 18 minutes√

Jodi Steyer Jodie Steyer

n. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per month during


Month Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller May, 2011 May 11 – 2 minutes



o. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller October 17, 2010 May 13 – 2 minutes

May 16 – 28 minutes√ Jodi Steyer Jodi Steyer

o. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



July 17 – 1 minute√ Latoja Schaben Latoja Schaben

p. On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller July 27, 2008 August 1 – 2 minutes

August 1 – 2 minutes√ August 1 – 2 minutes√



Bill Fennelly Bill Fennelly

September 14, 2008 September 15 – 3 minutes September 16 – 31 minutes√




NCAA-3

12

q. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2009 grad).

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller October 12, 2008 October 18 – 1 minute

October 18 – 1 minute√ Jodi Steyer Jodi Steyer

r. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



October 20 – 7 minutes√ October 20 – 1 minutes√ October 21 – 1 minutes√ October 21 – 4 minutes√

Latoja Schaben Latoja Schaben Latoja Schaben Latoja Schaben Latoja Schaben

NCAA-3

13

4. Men’s Golf

a. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete .

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller October 12, 2008 October 16 – 3 minutes (8:56 pm)

October 16 – 1 minute (8:58 pm)√ October 16 – 6 minutes (8:59 pm)√

Jay Horton Jay Horton Jay Horton

November 16, 2008 November 18 – 1 minute November 21 – 1 minute√

Jay Horton Jay Horton

b. On six occasions, the institution violated t f permissible calls per week during its



July 15 – 14 minutes√ Jay Horton Jay Horton



September 6, 2009 September 7 – 2 minutes (1:33 pm) September 7 – 15 minutes (8:40 pm)√


October 11, 2009 October 12 – 1 minute October 13 – 26 minutes√




November 1, 2009 November 3 – 1 minute November 5 – 7 minutes√ November 7 – 2 minutes√




Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller October 24, 2010 October 28 – 1 minute (12:16 pm)

October 28 –11 minutes (12:17 pm)√ Andrew Tank Andrew Tank




October 28 –11 minutes (7:19 pm)√ Andrew Tank Andrew Tank



Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls

Caller

March 27, 2011 March 30 – 1 minute April 2 – 11 minutes√

Andrew Tank Andrew Tank




Caller

October 12, 2008 October 16 – 0.5 minutes October 16 – 0.7 minutes√ October 16 – 7.8 minutes√


NCAA-3

14

5. Women’s Golf



Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller June 29, 2008 July 5 – 1 minute (4:01 pm)

July 5 – 21 minutes (4:10 pm)√ Christie Martens Christie Martens

b. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller August 31, 2008 September 3 – 2 minutes (9:01 pm)

September 3 – 7 minutes (9:13 pm)√ Christie Martens Christie Martens

September 21, 2008 September 22 – 2 minutes (6:54 pm) September 22 – 11 minutes (6:59 pm)√ September 25 – 1 minute√

Christie Martens Christie Martens Christie Martens



Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller October 31, 2010 November 4 – 2 minutes (2:01 pm)

November 4 – 29 minutes (3:20 pm)√ Christie Martens Christie Martens

NCAA-3

15

6. Women’s Swimming and Diving

a. On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete .


September 17 – 8 minutes√ Kelly Nordell Kelly Nordell

October 12, 2008 October 15 – 2 minutes (8:05 pm) October 15 – 6 minutes (9:07 pm)√

Kelly Nordell Kelly Nordell


Duane Sorenson Duane Sorenson




September 1 – 1 minute√ Duane Sorenson Duane Sorenson




October 28 – 8 minutes√ Kelly Nordell Kelly Nordell

d. On one occasion, the institution violated t missible calls per week during its


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller September 26, 2010 September 27 – 5 minutes (9:11 pm)

September 27 – 1 minute (9:37 pm)√ Kelly Nordell Kelly Nordell




August 19 – 1 minute (1:18 pm)√ August 19 – 7 minutes (8:09 pm)√

Kelly Nordell Kelly Nordell Kelly Nordell



Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller April 3, 2011 April 3 – 1 minute

April 6 – 7 minutes√ Kelly Nordell Kelly Nordell

e. On one occasion, the instituti he permissible time to call during its recruitment of

prospective student-athlete (2012 grad). This violation was self-reported. Coach Nordell made a perm ct. Following that Coach Sorenson asked Coach Nordell for the number of PSA . Coach Nordell gave Sorenson number

stake. Coach Sorenson called and left a message (the voicemail wasn’t set up). returned Sorenson’s call and informed him of the error. Sorenson reported the ion after speaking with on the phone.

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller

July 10, 2011 July 11 – Spoke to her July 12 – Left message√

Kelly Nordell Duane Sorenson

NCAA-3

16

7. Women’s Soccer




July 11 – 2 minutes√ July 11 – 4 minutes√

Tim Bennett Tim Bennett Tim Bennett




December 23 – 1 minute√ December 23 – 11 minutes√

Tim Bennett Tim Bennett Tim Bennett

January 4, 2009 January 9 – 2 minutes January 9 – 24 minutes√

Tim Bennett Tim Bennett




February 3 – 7 minutes√ Tim Bennett Tim Bennett

d. One two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during

its recruitment of prospective student-athlete .

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller June 29, 2008 July 1 – 2 minutes

July 2 – 1 minute√ Wendy Dillinger Wendy Dillinger

August 31, 2008 September 2 – 2 minutes September 2 – 11 minutes√

Wendy Dillinger Wendy Dillinger

e. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller June 28, 2009 July 1 – 2 minutes (11:01am)

July 1 – 2 minutes (3:36pm)√ July 1 – 5 minutes (6:12pm) √

Wendy Dillinger Wendy Dillinger Wendy Dillinger

August 23, 2009 August 23 – 2 minutes (12:50pm) August 26 – 8 minutes (9:21pm) √

Wendy Dillinger Wendy Dillinger



Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller January 24, 2010 January 27 – 2 minutes (3:14pm)

January 28 – 18 minutes (9:34am)√ Wendy Dillinger Wendy Dillinger

NCAA-3

17



Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller August 23, 2009 August 26 – 1 minute (6:28pm)

August 26 – 2 minutes (6:33pm)√ Ben Madsen Ben Madsen

h. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



August 19 – 2 minutes (4:05pm)√ August 19 – 1 minute (7:31pm)√ August 21 – 1 minute√

Ben Madsen Ben Madsen Ben Madsen Ben Madsen




October 4 – 1 minute (8:58pm)√ Wendy Dillinger Wendy Dillinger




April 7 – 1 minute√ April 7 – 12 minutes√

Wendy Dillinger Wendy Dillinger Wendy Dillinger



Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller January 30, 2011 February 1 – 4 minutes

February 1 – 7 minute√ Tracy Grose Tracy Grose

l. On one occasion, the institution violated the permissible time period to call during its

recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2013 grad). This violation was self-reported. Coach Dillinger was driving on campus and asked Coach Grose for ISU employee, Lindsay Long. was going to meet with Lindsay to discuss ISU. Mistakenly, Coach Grose gave Coach Dillinger phone number. Coach Dillinger called the number and it went to voicemail. At that point she realized she had called This all occurred while was in the car with Coach Dillinger. didn’t answer her phone because she had it on silent.

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller July 10, 2011 July 11 – 2 minutes√ Wendy Dillinger

NCAA-3

18

8. Softball

a. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete .

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller July 6, 2008

July 6 – 1 minute July 7 – 7 minutes√

Gary Hines Stacy Gemeinhardt

b. On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller August 31, 2008

September 2 – 2 minutes September 5 – 2 minutes√

Stacy Gemeinhardt Stacy Gemeinhardt

October 5, 2008

October 10 – 2 minutes October 10 – 2 minutes√


October 19, 2008

October 23 – 16 minutes (8:28 pm) October 23 – 1 minute√ (8:43 pm)


November 2, 2008

November 6 – 2 minutes November 7 – 3 minutes√





September 10 – 2 minutes√ September 11 – 2 minutes√

Stacy Gemeinhardt Stacy Gemeinhardt Stacy Gemeinhardt




July 4 – 1 minute (6:27 pm)√ July 4 – 1 minute (6:28 pm)√





July 15 – 1 minute√ Stacy Gemeinhardt Stacy Gemeinhardt

September 6, 2009 September 7 – 2 minutes September 10 – 2 minutes√ September 11 – 2 minutes√


f. On two occasions, the institution violated the permissible time to call during its recruitment

of prospective student-athlete (2012 grad). These calls were related to a camp was attending.

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller January 3, 2010 January 5 – 3 minutes√

January 6 – 2 minute√ Stacy Gemeinhardt Stacy Gemeinhardt

NCAA-3

19

9. Women’s Tennis

a. On five occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete .


July 12 – 2 minutes (12:47 pm)√ July 12 – 8 minutes (2:23 pm)√

Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa

July 27, 2008 July 30 – 8 minutes (11:44 am) July 30 – 1 minute (11:52 am)√

Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa



October 12, 2008 October 12 – 2 minutes October 13 – 2 minutes√ October 18 – 2 minutes√







January 27 – 2 minutes√ January 28 – 1 minute (10:19 am)√ January 28 – 1 minute (10:40 am)√ January 28 – 1 minute (4:11 pm)√

Armando Espinosa Chris Williams Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa


Armando Espinosa Chris Williams

c. On fifteen occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week, and

on one occasion violated the permissible time to call, during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete .

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller June 21, 2009 June 26 – 2 minutes√ Armando Espinosa July 5, 2009 July 7 – 2 minutes (8:30 am)

July 7 – 2 minutes (8:33 am) √ Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa

August 16, 2009 August 17 – 2 minutes (11:18 am) August 17 – 2 minutes (11:39 am)√


August 23, 2009 August 25 – 2 minutes (5:37 pm) August 25 – 1 minute (7:08 pm)√ August 26 – 1 minute (3:16 pm)√ August 26 – 2 minutes (3:32 pm)√

Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa

October 11, 2009 October 12 – 2 minutes October 16 – 1 minute√




November 1, 2009 November 1 – 1 minute (6:23 pm) November 1 – 3 minutes (6:53 pm)√ November 1 – 2 minutes (7:59 pm)√




November 15, 2009 November 16 – 2 minutes (12:16 pm) November 16 – 3 minutes (6:14 pm)√


NCAA-3

20

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller November 19 – 1 minute√ Armando Espinosa

January 10, 2010 January 11 – 8 minutes January 14 – 4 minutes (4:10 pm)√ January 14 – 3 minutes (8:27 pm)√


January 31, 2010 February 2 – 1 minute (2:08 pm) February 2 – 1 minute (2:29 pm)√ February 2 – 7 minutes (6:32 pm)√


February 28, 2010 March 6 – 1 minute (4:18 pm) March 6 – 2 minutes (4:59 pm)√


April 4, 2010 April 9 – 1 minute (2:55 pm) April 9 – 6 minutes (3:39 pm)√


April 11, 2010 April 16 – 1 minute April 17 – 1 minute (10:28 am)√ April 17 – 1 minute (11:45 am)√ April 17 – 2 minutes (1:36 pm)√


April 18, 2010 April 21 – 2 minutes (10:00 am) April 21 – 1 minute (11:46 am)√ April 21 – 1 minute (2:45 pm)√ April 21 – 1 minute (4:55 pm)√ April 23 – 2 minutes (6:56 pm)√ April 23 – 1 minute (7:01 pm)√

Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa

April 25, 2010 April 29 – 1 minute (12:01 pm) April 29 – 1 minute (12:40 pm)√ April 29 – 1 minute (6:32 pm)√ April 30 – 1 minute√


d. On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller November 8, 2009 November 10 – 1 minute (4:21 pm)

November 10 – 7 minutes (4:40 pm)√ Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa

January 3, 2010 January 5 – 2 minutes (9:17 am) January 5 – 1 minute (3:31 pm)√


April 11, 2010 April 15 – 1 minute April 16 – 1 minute (1:00 pm)√ April 16 – 2 minutes (1:38 pm)√





October 21 – 21 minutes (8:31 pm)√ Armando Espinosa Armando Espinosa



Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller May 16, 2010 May 18 – 4 minutes (7:30 am)

May 18 – 2 minutes (7:48 am)√ May 18 – 1 minute (5:45 pm)√ May 19 – 1 minute√

Chris Williams Chris Williams Chris Williams Chris Williams

NCAA-3

21

10. Men’s and Women’s Track/Cross Country


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller March 1, 2009 March 2 – 1 minute

March 2 – 2 minutes√ March 5 – 2 minutes√ March 7 – 15 minutes√

Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens

March 8, 2009 March 9 – 1 minute March 12 – 6 minutes√

Nate Wiens Nate Wiens

b. On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller November 30, 2008

November 30 – 1 minute November 30 – 5 minutes√

Travis Hartke Travis Hartke

February 15, 2009

February 16 – 4 minutes February 19 – 2 minutes√ February 19 – 8 minutes√

Travis Hartke Travis Hartke Travis Hartke

April 19, 2009

April 21 – 1 minute April 21 – 14 minutes√





October 28 – 10 minutes√ John Dagata John Dagata

d. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



October 9 – 11 minutes√ John Dagata John Dagata

November 16, 2008 November 17 – 1 minute November 17 – 22 minutes√

John Dagata John Dagata



Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller November 2, 2008 November 5 – 1 minute

November 6 – 1 minute√ Nate Wiens Nate Wiens



Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller July 6, 2008 July 8 – 1 minute

July 9 – 9 minutes√ Corey Ihmels Corey Ihmels

September 14, 2008 September 18 – 1 minute September 18 – 1 minute√

Corey Ihmels Corey Ihmels

NCAA-3

22

g. On six occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



September 25 – 1 minute√ Nate Wiens Nate Wiens

November23, 2008 November 25 – 1 minute November 25 – 2 minutes√


January 11, 2009 January 14 – 2 minutes (6:55 pm) January 14 – 2 minutes (6:56 pm)√




February 1, 2009 February 3 – 2 minutes February 3 – 1 minute√


April 5, 2009 April 6 – 2 minutes April 7 – 2 minutes√ April 11 – 3 minutes√

Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens


recruitment of prospective student-athlete (HS senior).

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller November 23, 2008 November 26 – 2 minutes

November 26 – 11 minutes√ Travis Hartke Travis Hartke




recruitment of prospective student-athlete (HS senior).

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller March 15, 2009 March 19 – 2 minutes

March 19 – 18 minutes√ Pete Herber Pete Herber

j. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



December 9 – 6 minutes√ December 9 – 3 minutes√ December 10 – 4 minutes√

Kristy Popp Kristy Popp Kristy Popp Kristy Popp

January 3, 2010 January 5 – 4 minutes January 6 – 1 minute√ January 6 – 2 minutes√

Kristy Popp Kristy Popp Kristy Popp

k. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



September 16 – 2 minutes√ Nate Wiens Nate Wiens

January 17, 2010 January 19 – 1 minute January 19 – 15 minutes√


NCAA-3

23

l. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete .


November 18 – 5 minutes√ Corey Ihmels Corey Ihmels

January 24, 2010 January 25 – 2 minutes (8:50 pm) January 25 – 1 minute (8:51 pm) √


m. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per month during







n. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



December 12 – 2 minute√ Nate Wiens Nate Wiens

February 21, 2010 February 26 – 1 minute February 27 – 2 minutes√


o. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per month during


Month Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller August 9, 2009 August 10 – 1 minute

August 11 – 11 minutes√ Pete Herber Pete Herber

February 28, 2010 March 3 – 2 minutes March 3 – 15 minutes√

Pete Herber Pete Herber

p. On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during



September 21 – 27 minutes (10:18 pm)√ Nate Wiens Nate Wiens

March 7, 2010 March 7 – 1 minute March 8 – 1 minute√


March 21, 2010 March 23 – 2 minutes March 23 – 1 minute√


q. On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during



August 25 – 2 minutes√ August 26 – 12 minutes√

Corey Ihmels Corey Ihmels Corey Ihmels

September 27, 2009 September 28 – 2 minutes Corey Ihmels

NCAA-3

24

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller September 30 – 7 minutes√ Corey Ihmels

November 1, 2009 November 3 – 2 minutes November 4 – 1 minute√ November 5 – 2 minutes√

Corey Ihmels Corey Ihmels Corey Ihmels

November 15, 2009 November 17 – 2 minutes November 19 – 1 minute√


r. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its


Month Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller September 27, 2009 September 30 – 2 minutes

September 30 – 6 minutes√ Pete Herber Pete Herber

s. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



August 7 – 15 minutes√ Pete Herber Pete Herber


Pete Herber Pete Herber

t. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its


Month Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller September 13, 2009 September 14 – 6 minutes

September 17 – 2 minutes√ Travis Hartke Travis Hartke

u. On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller November 1, 2009 November 3 – 4 minutes (7:54 pm)

November 3 – 7 minutes (7:57 pm)√ Kristy Popp Kristy Popp

November 15, 2009 November 17 – 2 minutes November 19 – 1 minute√

Kristy Popp Kristy Popp



v. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller September 6, 2009 September 6 – 1 minute

September 6 – 2 minutes√ Travis Hartke Travis Hartke

w. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



November 4 – 3 minutes√ Pete Herber Pete Herber

NCAA-3

25

x. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete .


September 16 – 6 minutes√ Kristy Popp Kristy Popp



y. On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during



November 19 – 2 minutes√ Kristy Popp Kristy Popp





z. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



January 4 – 1 minute√ Travis Hartke Travis Hartke

aa. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



January 5 – 1 minute√ Nate Wiens Nate Wiens



ab. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



January 6 – 14 minutes√ Kristy Popp Kristy Popp

ac. On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during



January 7 – 15 minutes√ Nate Wiens Nate Wiens

January 24, 2010 January 27 – 1 minute January 27 – 2 minutes√ January 28 – 1 minute√ January 28 – 7 minutes√

Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens Nate Wiens

February 21, 2010 February 22 – 1 minute February 25 – 1 minute√ February 25 – 74 minutes√


NCAA-3

26

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller February 28, 2010 March 5 – 1 minute

March 5 – 2 minutes√ March 6 – 1 minute√


ad. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



January 6 – 2 minutes√ Travis Hartke Travis Hartke

ae. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its




af. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



January 19 – 1 minute√ January 19 – 15 minutes√


ag. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



January 21 – 9 minutes√ Kristy Popp Kristy Popp

ah. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its




ai. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its




aj. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



February 10 – 8 minutes√ Kristy Popp Kristy Popp

NCAA-3

27

ak. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete .

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller February 7, 2010 February 11 – 1 minute

February 12 – 1 minute√ February 12 – 9 minutes√

Kristy Popp Kristy Popp Kristy Popp

al. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



February 15 – 5 minutes√ Corey Ihmels Corey Ihmels

am. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



February 17 – 1 minute√ February 18 – 1 minute√ February 18 – 1 minute√

Kristy Popp Kristy Popp Kristy Popp Kristy Popp

an. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller February 28, 2010 March 2 – 2 minutes

March 2 – 7 minutes√ March 3 – 2 minutes√


April 25, 2010 April 26 – 1 minute April 26 – 10 minutes√


ao. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller February 28, 2010 March 3 – 2 minutes

March 3 – 15 minutes√ Pete Herber Pete Herber

ap. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



February 3 – 1 minute√ February 3 – 1 minute√

Pete Herber Pete Herber Pete Herber

aq. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



March 16 – 2 minutes√ March 19 – 9 minutes√


NCAA-3

28

ar. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



April 16 – 2 minutes√ Nate Wiens Nate Wiens

as. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller April 18, 2010 April 21 – 8 minutes (6:00 pm)

April 21 – 1 minute (6:08 pm)√ April 21 – 7 minutes (6:09 pm)√


at. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



April 22 – 3 minutes√ Travis Hartke Travis Hartke

June 6, 2010 June 9 – 1 minute June 10 – 7 minutes√ June 12 – 4 minutes√

Travis Hartke Travis Hartke Travis Hartke

au. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



April 28 – 6 minutes√ Kristy Popp Kristy Popp

av. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller May 2, 2010 May 4 – 3 minutes


Grant Wall Grant Wall Grant Wall

aw. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



May 6 – 13 minutes√ Nate Wiens Nate Wiens

ax. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



May 24 – 2 minutes√ May 24 – 1 minute√


NCAA-3

29

ay. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete .

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller May 30, 2010 June 2 – 1 minute

June 2 – 2 minutes√ Pete Herber Pete Herber

az. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



June 17 – 1 minute√ Kristy Popp Kristy Popp

ba. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller August 1, 2010 August 2 – 4 minutes (5:33 pm)

August 2 – 1 minute (5:37 pm)√ Nate Wiens Nate Wiens

bb. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



August 3 – 2 minutes√ Grant Wall Grant Wall

bc. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



August 5 – 2 minutes√ Grant Wall Grant Wall

bd. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



August 11 – 4 minutes√ Kristy Popp Kristy Popp

be. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



July 31 – 12 minutes√ Kristy Popp Kristy Popp

bf. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its




NCAA-3

30

bg. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete .


August 2 – 42 minutes√ Nate Wiens Nate Wiens

bh. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its




bi. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its




bj. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its




bk. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its




bl. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its

recruitment of prospective student-athlete


August 11 – 8 minutes√ Travis Hartke Travis Hartke

bm. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



December 13 – 5 minutes√ Nate Wiens Nate Wiens

bn. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



December 22 – 9 minutes√ Kristy Popp Kristy Popp

NCAA-3

31

bo. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete .


December 30 – 6 minutes√ Kristy Popp Kristy Popp

bp. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



December 20 – 2 minutes√ December 21 – 2 minutes√ December 21 – 2 minutes√

Corey Ihmels Corey Ihmels Corey Ihmels Corey Ihmels

bq. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



December 21 – 1 minute√ December 21 – 1 minute√ December 22 – 2 minutes√ December 22 – 4 minutes√

Corey Ihmels Corey Ihmels Corey Ihmels Corey Ihmels Corey Ihmels

December 26, 2010 December 29 – 2 minutes December 30 – 2 minutes√


br. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



July 10 – 10 minutes√ Corey Ihmels Corey Ihmels

bs. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



July 24 – 4minutes√ Kristy Popp Kristy Popp

bt. On one occasion, the institution violated the permissible time to call during its recruitment of

prospective student-athlete (2013 grad). This violation was self-reported by Coach Hartke the day after the occurrence. As school policy, Hartke verified graduation year with two sources he trusted. Hartke believed was a 2012 grad so he called and left a message. called Hartke back and in the discussion informed Hartke he was a 2013 grad.

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller July 17, 2011 July 22 – 2 minutes√ Travis Hartke

NCAA-3

32

11. Women’s Volleyball




Dawn Sullivan Dawn Sullivan Dawn Sullivan


Dawn Sullivan Dawn Sullivan




August 11 – 9 minutes (9:24 pm)√ Christy Johnson Christy Johnson




November 2 – 11 minutes (6:37 pm)√ Trudy VandeBerg Trudy VandeBerg

NCAA-3

33

12. Wrestling

a. On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete .


July 7 – 4 minutes√ Cael Sanderson Cael Sanderson

August 24, 2008 August 28 – 3 minutes (9:30 pm) August 28 – 56 minutes(9:35 pm)√

Cael Sanderson Cael Sanderson

August 31, 2008 September 4 – 1 minute September 4 – 1 minute√

Cael Sanderson Cael Sanderson

b. On two occasions, the institution violated t of permissible calls per week during its



July 1 – 1 minute√ July 2 – 1 minute√ July 2 – 2 minutes√

Yero Washington Yero Washington Yero Washington Yero Washington

August 9, 2009 August 10 – 2 minutes August 10 – 1 minute√

Yero Washington Yero Washington

c. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



August 11 – 3 minutes√ Yero Washington Yero Washington

September 27, 2009 September 29 – 5 minutes October 1 – 3 minutes√

Chris Bono Kevin Jackson

d. On one occasion, the institution violated t permissible calls per week during its



August 24 – 2 minutes (7:53 pm)√ Chris Bono Chris Bono




March 26 – 1 minute√ Yero Washington Yero Washington

March 28, 2010 March 29 – 2 minutes March 31 – 6 minutes√

Yero Washington Yero Washington


recruitment of prospective student-athlete

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller May 9, 2010 May 10 – 1 minute

May 13 – 2 minutes√ Yero Washington Yero Washington

July 11, 2010 July 15 – 1 minute July 15 – 1 minute√ July 15 – 21 minutes√

Yero Washington Yero Washington Yero Washington

NCAA-3

34




May 18 – 2 minutes√ Yero Washington Yero Washington



Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller May 30, 2010 June 1 – 1 minute

June 1 – 2 minutes√ Yero Washington Yero Washington

i. On one occasion, the institution violated a permissible time to call during its recruitment of

prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). registered for a wrestling camp that summer. The camp was later canceled but Donnelly asserts this call was about logistics at that camp.

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller June 20, 2010 June 22 – 2 minutes√ Molly Donnelly




July 2 – 2 minutes√ Kevin Jackson Kevin Jackson

k. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



July 6 – 9 minutes√ Yero Washington Yero Washington

August 16, 2010 August 19 – 1 minute August 19 – 1 minute√ August 20 – 1 minute√


n. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



August 23, 2010 August 24 – 2 minutes (9:12 pm) August 24 – 2 minutes (9:13 pm)√

Kevin Jackson Kevin Jackson

August 30, 2010 September 1 – 1 minute September 3 – 2 minutes√


NCAA-3

35

o. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete .


Caller



p. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



September 24 – 2 minutes√ Yero Washington Yero Washington

September 26, 2010 September 26 – 1 minute September 26 – 1 minute√ September 26 – 3 minutes√


q. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



October 27 – 2 minutes√ Yero Washington Yero Washington

r. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller October 31, 2010 November 1 – 2 minutes (8:39 pm)

November 1 – 1 minute (8:40 pm)√ Kevin Jackson Kevin Jackson



s. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



April 27 – 2 minute√ Erik Voelker Kevin Jackson

t. On one occasion, the institution violated the permissible time to call during its recruitment of

prospective student-athlete (2012 grad). called Coach Jackson and left him a voice message indicating he was committing to wrestle at ISU. In his excitement, Coach Jackson momentarily lost his train of thought and called This violation was self-reported by Coach Jackson the day after the call occurred.

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller May 15, 2011 May 16 √ Kevin Jackson

NCAA-3

36

13. Football

a. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad).

Week/Month Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller September 5, 2010

September 8 – 1 minute September 11 – 1 minute√

Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham

b. On one occasion, the institution violated t e calls per week during its

recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2 year transfer).

Week/Month Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller May 2, 2010

May 5 – 2 minutes May 6 – 2 minutes√

Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott




May 28 – 13 minute√ Luke Wells Luke Wells



Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller April 4, 2010

April 5 – 2 minutes April 8 – 2 minutes√ April 8 – 5 minutes√

Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil

e. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week, and on

one occasion had an impermissible caller during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2010 Grad). paid his deposit to attend ISU on June 10, 2010. Ryan McKim was a designated coach December 17, 2008 – March 2, 2009.


November 11 – 2 minutes (9:14 pm)√ Nick Caley Nick Caley

February 28, 2010 March 3 – 5 minutes (5:33 pm) March 3 – 1 minutes (5:38 pm)√

Shane Burnham Shane Burnham

May 30, 2010 June 3 – 1 minutes√ June 4 – 8 minutes√

Ryan McKim Ryan McKim

f. On four occasions, the institution violated the numb ble calls per time period

during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad).

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller April 15 – May 31, 2010 May 27 – 1 minute

May 27 – 2 minutes√ Bill Bleil Bill Bleil

September 12, 2010 September 14 – 2 minute September 14 – 1 minute√ September 14 – 5minute √


November 14, 2010

November 18– 2 minutes November 20– 2 minute√

Bill Bleil Bill Bleil


Bill Bleil Paul Rhoads

NCAA-3

37

g. On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2009 grad).

Week/Month Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller January 25, 2009

January 28 – 4 minutes January 28 – 3 minutes√

Eric Link Eric Link

February 1, 2009 February 1 – 2 minutes February 1– 2 minute√ February 1– 2 minute√ February 1- 7 minutes√

Eric Link Eric Link Eric Link Eric Link

February 8, 2009 February 9 – 2 minutes February 12– 2 minute√ February 12– 2 minute√

Eric Link Eric Link Eric Link

February 8, 2009 February 26 – 2 minutes February 26– 2 minute√

Eric Link Eric Link





Kenneth Pope Kenneth Pope

i. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its


Month Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller October 18, 2009 October 21 – 2 minutes

October 21 – 11 minutes√ Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads


Luke Wells Luke Wells

j. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time


Time Period Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller April 15-May 31, 2010 May 29 – 1 minute

May 30 – 2 minutes√ May 31 – 1 minute√ May 31 – 1 minute√

Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott

k. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time




l. On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during


Month Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller August 30, 2009 September 1 – 2 minutes

September 2 – 5 minutes√ Tom Herman Tom Herman


Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads

NCAA-3

38

Month Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller October 28 – 1 minute√ October 28 – 8 minutes√



Tom Herman Tom Herman

January 31, 2010 January 31 – 1 minute January 31 – 1 minute√


m. On nine occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during

its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (two-year transfer).



Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott

May 23, 2010 May 27 – 2 minutes May 27 – 8 minutes√


June 6, 2010 June 7 – 2 minutes June 7 – 2 minutes√




August 15, 2010 August 19 - 2 minutes August 19 - 7 minutes√

Bobby Elliot Bobby Elliot

August 22, 2010 August 26 - 2 minutes August 26 - 4 minutes√ August 28 - 4 minutes√

Bobby Elliot Bobby Elliot Bobby Elliot

September 5, 2010 September 5 – 2 minutes September 6 - 2 minutes√ September 6 - 1 minutes√ September 6 - 1 minutes√ September 7 - 6 minutes√

Bobby Elliot Bobby Elliot Bobby Elliot Bobby Elliot Bobby Elliot

September 12, 2010 September 12 – 2 minutes September 12 - 1 minutes√ September 13 - 2 minutes√ September 13 - 1 minutes√ September 14 - 2 minutes√ September 15 – 2 minutes√ September 16 - 12 minutes√ (12:48 pm) September 16 - 1 minutes√ (1:21 pm) September 16 - 1 minutes√ (1:22 pm) September 16 - 1 minutes√ (1:51 pm)

Bobby Elliot Bobby Elliot Bobby Elliot Bobby Elliot Bobby Elliot Bobby Elliot Bobby Elliot Bobby Elliot Bobby Elliot Bobby Elliot



n. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time


Time Period Dates, Times, and Length of Calls

Caller

April 15 – May 31, 2011 May 17 – 2 minutes May 17 – 4 minutes√


NCAA-3

39

o. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



October 16 – 1 minute√ October 17 – 1minute √ October 17 – 1minute √

Gene Chizik Shawn Raney Shawn Raney Shawn Raney

February 1, 2009

February 1– 1 minutes February 1– 16 minute√


p. On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week, and on

two occasions had an impermissible caller during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2010 grad). Ryan McKim was a designated coach December 17, 2008 – March 2, 2009.


December 21 – 9 minutes√ Luke Wells Luke Wells

February 21, 2010 February 22 – 1 minute February 23 – 2 minutes√ February 23 – 1 minute√ February 24 – 10 minutes√

Luke Wells Wally Burnham Ryan McKim Luke Wells

March 7, 2010 March 9 – 11 minutes March 9 – 2 minutes√ March 13 – 2 minutes√

Wally Burnham Luke Wells Luke Wells

March 21, 2010 March 22 – 1 minute March 24 – 1 minute√√ March 24 – 1 minute√√ March 25 – 2 minutes√√ March 25 – 2 minutes√√ March 25 – 6 minutes√

Luke Wells Ryan McKim Ryan McKim Ryan McKim Ryan McKim Luke Wells

q. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller February 1, 2009

February 1– 1 minute February 1– 1 minute√ February 1– 2 minutes√ February 1– 1 minute√

Chris Ash Tom Herman Scott Fountain Scott Fountain

r. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time



Caller



NCAA-3

40

s. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad).


Caller

April 15 – May 31, 2011 May 11 – 1 minute May 12 – 1 minute√


t. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time



April 15 – 13 minutes√ Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads

u. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its


Month Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller May 2, 2010 May 6 – 1 minute

May 7 – 1 minute√ Shane Burnham Shane Burnham

v. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller October 10, 2010 October 11– 2 minutes

October 12 – 2 minute√ Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott

w. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its




Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells

x. On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week, and on

one occasion called a prospect after he had signed an NLI with another school, during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2 year transfer). signed an NLI with on February 3, 2010.


July 2 – 1 minute (1:38 pm)√ Chris Ash Chris Ash

December 20, 2009 December 21 – 1 minute December 22 – 1 minute√ December 22 – 1 minute√ December 22 – 1 minute√ December 22 – 1 minute√ December 22 – 1 minute√ December 23 – 1 minute√ December 24 – 2 minutes√ December 24 – 2 minutes√ December 26 – 6 minutes√

Chris Ash Chris Ash Chris Ash Chris Ash Chris Ash Chris Ash Chris Ash Chris Ash Chris Ash Chris Ash

December 27, 2009 January 2 – 2 minutes January 2 – 3 minutes√

Chris Ash Chris Ash

June 27, 2010 June 30 – 2 minutes√ Paul Rhoads

NCAA-3

41

y. On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week and on one occasion violated the permissible time to call during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad).

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller May 30, 2010 June 4 – 1 minute√ Curtis Bray October 31, 2010 November 2– 1 minute

November 2 – 13 minute√ Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads


Curtis Bray Curtis Bray

December 19, 2010 December 23 – 1 minute December 24 – 1 minute√ December 24 – 1 minute√

Curtis Bray Curtis Bray Curtis Bray

December 26, 2010 December 27 – 1 minute December 31 – 10 minute√


z. On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during



October 13 – 2 minutes√ Curtis Bray Curtis Bray

November 21, 2010 November 23 – 2 minutes November 24 – 1 minute√ November 24 – 7 minutes√




December 26, 2010 December 27 – 1 minute December 30 – 1 minute√ December 31 – 10 minutes√

Curtis Bray Paul Rhoads Bobby Elliott

aa. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



November 3– 1 minutes November 5 – 2 minute√


November 21, 2010

November 24– 2 minutes November 26– 2 minute√


ab. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



May 6 – 4 minutes√ Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott

ac. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time


Time Period Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller April 15-May 31, 2010

May 30 – 2 minutes May 31 – 1 minute√


NCAA-3

42

ad. On five occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (two-year prospect). signed a financial aid agreement on .


May 5 – 1 minute√ May 5 – 6 minutes√ May 5 – 3 minutes√

Chris Ash Chris Ash Chris Ash Paul Rhoads

May 10, 2009 May 12 – 9 minutes May 12– 2 minutes√ May 16 – 3 minutes√

Paul Rhoads Chris Ash Chris Ash

May 17, 2009 May 19 – 1 minute May 19– 1 minute√ May 19 – 3 minutes√

Chris Ash Chris Ash Chris Ash

May 31, 2009 June 2 – 5 minutes June 3 – 2 minutes√

Chris Ash Paul Rhoads

June 14, 2009 June 18 – 1 minutes June 18 – 2 minutes√ June 18 – 2 minutes√


ae. On five occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week and on

one occasion the institution had an impermissible caller during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2009 grad). Ryan McKim was a designated coach December 17, 2008 – March 2, 2009.


October 8 – 13 minutes√ Scott Fountain Scott Fountain

October 12, 2008 October 14 – 10 minutes October 16– 11 minutes√ October 16 – 2 minutes√ October 16 – 7 minutes√ October 16– 1 minutes√ October 17 – 1 minutes√ October 17 – 2 minutes√ October 17 – 1 minutes√ October 19 – 2 minutes√

Scott Fountain Scott Fountain Scott Fountain Gene Chizik Scott Fountain Scott Fountain Scott Fountain Ryan McKim Scott Fountain

January 4, 2009 January 4 – 2 minutes January 4 – 2 minutes √

Chris Ash Scott Fountain


Scott Fountain Scott Fountain

February 1, 2009 February 1 – 1 minutes February 1 – 2minutes√

Chris Ash Scott Fountain

af. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time


Time Period Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller April 15-May 31, 2010 May 31 – 5 minutes (12:15 pm)

May 31 – 3 minutes (12:19 pm)√ Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham

NCAA-3

43

ag. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller January 11, 2009 January 15– 8 minutes

January 15 – 4 minute√ Eric Link Eric Link

February 21, 2009 February 26 – 2 minutes February 26 – 5minutes√

Eric Link Eric Link

ah. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week and on

one occasion violated the permissible time to call during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad).

Time Period Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller May 30, 2009 June 1 – 13 minutes√ Wally Burnham August 29, 2010 September 1 – 1 minute

September 1- 2 minute√ Wally Burnham Wally Burnham

ai. On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week and on



May 30, 2010 June 3 – 10 minutes√ Shane Burnham September 12, 2010 September 16 - 7 minutes

September 16 - 12 minutes√ Shane Burnham Shane Burnham

December 19, 2010 December 22 – 9 minute December 24 – 1 minute√ December 24 – 2 minute√ December 24 – 2 minute√ December 24 – 6 minute√

Paul Rhoads Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham

December 26, 2010 December 26 – 2 minute December 27 – 3 minute√ December 27 – 3 minute√ December 29 – 4 minute√

Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham

aj. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time



May 10 – 1 minute√ May 10 – 2 minutes√ May 11 – 1 minutes√ May 11 – 2 minutes√ May 12 – 22 minutes√

Nick Caley Nick Caley Nick Caley Nick Caley Nick Caley Nick Caley

ak. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



May 25 – 6 minutes√ Shane Burnham Shane Burnham

NCAA-3

44

al. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2009 grad).

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller January 11, 2009 January 11– 2 minutes

January 11 – 13 minute√ (11:23 am) January 14 – 2 minute√ (11:37 am) January 16 – 2 minute√ January 17 – 4 minute√

Ryan McKim Ryan McKim Ryan McKim Tom Herman Tom Herman

February 1, 2009 February 1 – 1 minute February 1- 1minute√

Tom Herman Paul Rhoads

am. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



February 10 – 5 minutes√ Shane Burnham Shane Burnham

an. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its

recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2 year transfer).



ao. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time



May 31 – 1 minute√ Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham

ap. On seven occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during



September 24 – 8 minutes√ Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham



October 18, 2009 October 21 – 1 minute October 21 – 1 minute√ October 21 – 1 minute√ October 22 – 1 minute√ October 24 – 2 minutes√

Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham

October 25, 2009 October 26 – 2 minutes October 31 – 1 minute√ October 31 – 4 minutes√

Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham



November 15, 2009 November 18 – 9 minutes (8:32 pm) November 18 – 5 minutes (8:40 pm)√




NCAA-3

45

aq. On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad).

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller April 15 – May 31, 2010 April 15 – 2 minutes

April 15 – 10 minutes√ Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads





ar. On one occasion, the institution violated t ermissible calls per week during its



May 5 – 10 minutes√ Nick Caley Nick Caley

as. On nine occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller August 29, 2010 September 1 – 2 minutes





October 3, 2010 October 4 – 1 minutes October 4 – 1 minutes√ October 4 – 1 minutes√ October 5 – 1 minutes√ October 6 – 1 minutes√

Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott


Bobby Elliott Paul Rhoads

October 24, 2010







January 9, 2011 January 10 – 3 minutes January 11 – 1 minute√


January 30, 2011 January 30 – 1 minute January 31 – 1 minute√ January 31 – 10 minutes√


at. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time

period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2012 grad). Although is not contemporaneous documentation, Coach Rhoads knows he never once spoke to or his family on the phone.

Time Period Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller April 15 – May 31, 2011 May 19 – 1 minute

May 28 – 2 minutes√ May 30 – 3 minutes√ May 31 – 2 minutes√

Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads

NCAA-3

46

au. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per month during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad).

Month Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller

December 26, 2010 December 27 – 2 minutes December 29 – 2 minute√


av. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its




aw. On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during



September 8 - 1 minutes√ September 9 - 2 minutes√


October 17, 2010 October 18– 2 minutes October 23 – 2 minutes√




ax. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



September 8 – 2 minutes√ (8:38 pm) September 8 – 1 minutes√ (8:44 pm)

Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham

ay. On five occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



September 2 – 1 minute√ September 2 – 2 minutes√

Ken Pope Ken Pope Ken Pope





November 22, 2009 November 25 – 3 minutes November 25 – 1 minute√ November 25 – 1 minute√


March 7, 2010 March 10 – 3 minutes March 10 – 2 minutes√ March 10 – 1 minute√


NCAA-3

47

az. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



November 13 – 7 minute√ Shane Burnham Shane Burnham

ba. On six occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its

recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). The coaches assert the calls on October 13 were dropped calls. They were in an office together and Rhoads made the first call Bleil made the second after the call dropped. There is not any contemporaneous documentation of this.


September 27 – 2 minute√ September 27 – 1 minute√ September 29 – 2 minute√ September 30 – 1 minute√ October 2 – 1 minute√

Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Paul Rhoads Bill Bleil Bill Bleil



October 10, 2010 October 13 – 1 minutes October 13 – 7 minute√ 9:32 pm October 13 – 3 minute√ 9:40 pm

Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Bill Bleil

October 24, 2010



October 31, 2010



December 26, 2010 December 26 – 2 minutes December 26 – 2 minute√ December 27 – 1 minutes√ December 27 – 2 minute√ December 28 – 2 minutes√ December 30 – 8 minute√

Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads

bb. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time



Caller

April 15 – May 31, 2011 May 28 – 2 minutes May 29 – 1 minute√ May 31 – 1 minute√ May 31 – 2 minutes√ May 31 – 2 minutes√ May 31 – 4 minutes√

Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott

bc. On two occasions, the institution violated t f permissible calls per week during its


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller April 15-May 31, 2010 May 30 – 1 minute




NCAA-3

48

bd. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2010 grad).


October 7 – 2 minutes√ Bill Bleil Bill Bleil

be. On seven occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per month during


Month Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller April 15 – May 31, 2009 May 29 – 1 minute


September 12, 2010 September 13 - 1 minute 9:12 pm September 13 - 6 minutes√ 9:13 pm


September 26, 2010 September 29 – 2 minutes 8:59 pm September 29 – 1 minute√ 9:00 pm September 27 – 1 minute√ September 29 – 2 minute√ September 30 – 1 minute√ October 2 – 1 minute√

Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott



October 10, 2010 October 12 – 1 minute 10:13 pm October 12 – 6 minute√ 10:14 pm


October 24, 2010

October 26 – 1 minutes 10:05 pm October 26 – 10 minutes√ 10:05 pm


January 30, 2011 February 4 – 1 minutes February 5 – 2 minutes√ February 5 – 1 minutes√


bh. On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (two-year transfer).

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller June 20, 2010 June 21 – 5 minutes (3:05 pm)

June 21 – 1 minute (3:09 pm)√ June 21 – 4 minutes (3:10 pm)√


October 10, 2010 October 14 – 1 minute October 15 – 1 minute√


November 7, 2010 November 10 – 1 minutes November 11 – 1 minutes√ November 11 – 1 minutes√ November 12 – 1 minutes√ November 13 – 9 minutes√

Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells



bi. On one occasion, the institution violated the permissible time to call during its recruitment of

prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). attend ISU football camp summer 2010, the coach indicates the calls were made to discuss camp logistics.

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller June 6, 2010 June 6 – 1 minute√

June 6 – 1 minute√ Luke Wells Luke Wells

NCAA-3

49

bj. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller September 5, 2010 September 5 – 8 minutes 10:04 pm

September 5 - 6 minutes√ 10:12 pm September 11 - 5 minutes√

Tom Herman Tom Herman Luke Wells

October 17, 2010 October 19 – 1 minutes October 20 – 1 minute√ October 20 – 1 minutes√

Tom Herman Tom Herman Tom Herman

bk. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time


Time Period Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller April 15-May 31 May 28 – 1 minute


bl. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



May 24 – 2 minutes√ May 24 – 1 minute√ May 24 – 7 minutes√ May 24 – 1 minute√


bm. On one occasion, the institution violated the permissible time to call, and on one occasion

violated the number of permissible calls per given time period, during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad).

Week/Time Period Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller March 28, 2010 April 1 – 1 minute√ Bill Bleil April 15-May 31 May 31 – 1 minute

May 31 – 3 minutes√ Bill Bleil Bill Bleil

bn. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time




NCAA-3

50

bo. On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during



March 27 – 1 minute√ Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads

April 18, 2010 April 22 – 2 minutes April 22 – 2 minutes√




bp. On twelve occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller June 6, 2010 June 7 – 1 minute

June 7 – 1 minute√ Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott

June 13, 2010 June 15 – 1 minute June 16 – 1 minute√


September 5, 2010 September 5 – 2 minutes September 6 - 2 minutes√ September 6 - 1 minute√ September 6 - 1 minute√


September 12, 2010 September 13 - 1 minute September 13 - 1 minutes√


October 10, 2010 October 11 – 1 minute October 11 – 1 minute√ October 12 – 1 minute√ October 15 – 2 minute√ October 15 – 2 minute√ October 15 – 2 minute√




October 31, 2010 November 1 – 1 minutes November 2 – 4 minutes√


November 7, 2010 November 8 – 1 minutes November 9 – 2 minutes√ November 9 – 1 minutes√ November 9 – 8 minutes√









Bobby Elliot Bobby Elliott

bq. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time


Time Period Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller April 15 – May 31, 2011 May 13 – 1 minute

May 16 – 9 minutes√ Luke Wells Luke Wells

NCAA-3

51

br. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time




bs. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



September 30 – 1 minute√ Curtis Bray Curtis Bray

bt. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week and on

two occasions the institution violated the permissible time to call during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad).


March 21, 2010 March 23 – 1 minute√ March 23 – 1 minute√


September 5, 2010 September 7 – 1 minutes September 10 - 2 minutes√ September 11 - 2 minute√

Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Paul Rhaods

bu. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time

period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete .



bv. On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during



April 12 – 5 minutes√ Shane Burnham Shane Burnham

April 25, 2010 April 26 – 1 minute April 26 – 1 minute√ April 26 – 5 minutes√

Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham

May 23, 2010 May 24 – 2 minutes May 24 – 2 minutes√ May 26 – 1 minute√


bx. On three occasions, the institution violated th permissible calls per week during



September 5 – 1 minute√ Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads



NCAA-3

52

by. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time




bz. On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during



September 16 – 1 minute√ Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads





ca. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller May 2, 2010 May 6 – 2 minutes (7:01 pm)

May 6 – 23 minutes (7:02 pm)√ Nick Caley Nick Caley

cb. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



September 2 – 4 minutes√ Curtis Bray Curtis Bray

cc. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



July 2 – 2 minutes√ Chris Ash Chris Ash

cd. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its





ce. On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during



October 2 – 1 minute√ Shane Burnham Shane Burnham

October 17, 2010 October 18 – 1 minutes October 20 – 1 minutes√ October 23 – 2 minute√


NCAA-3

53

January 9, 2011 January 13 – 1 minutes January 13 – 1 minute√ January 13 – 1 minute√ January 13 – 1 minute√ January 13 – 5 minute√

Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham Shane Burnham

cf. On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during










cg. On eight occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller September 13, 2009 September 14 – 1minute

September 16 – 1 minute√ September 16 – 16 minutes√


September 27, 2009 September 30 – 1 minute September 30 – 15 minutes√


October 4, 2009 October 5 – 1 minute October 6 – 1 minute√ October 6 – 12 minutes√






November 8, 2009 November 9 – 2 minutes November 10 – 2 minutes√ November 10 – 1 minute√






ch. On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per time period



May 22 – 1 minute√ May 23 – 1 minute√ May 23 – 3 minutes√


August 29, 2010 September 1 – 1 minute September 1 – 8 minute√


September 5, 2010 September 6 – 2 minutes September 6 - 8 minutes√


NCAA-3

54

ci. On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad).


October 31, 2010 November 1 – 2 minute November 1 – 4 minutes√




April 3, 2011 April 6 – 4 minutes April 6 – 2 minutes√


cj. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



October 26 – 2 minutes 10:05 pm October 26 – 26 minutes√ 10:05 pm


ck. On seven occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during



June 25 – 1 minutes√ June 26 – 2 minutes√

Curtis Bray Curtis Bray Paul Rhoads

August 9, 2009 August 9 – 1 minute August 9 – 8 minutes√




September 20, 2009 September 22 – 1 minute September 22 -1 minute√ September 23 – 24 minutes√


September 27, 2009 September 30 – 2 minutes October 1 – 1 minute√




June 20, 2010 June 25 – 1 minute June 26 – 2 minutes√

Curtis Bray Paul Rhoads

cl. On one occasion, the institution violated the permissible time to call during its recruitment of

prospective student-athlete (2011 grad).

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller May 30, 2010 June 2 – 1 minutes√ Shane Burnham

cm. On one occasion, the institution violated the permissible time to call during its recruitment of

prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). attend ISU football camp summer 2010, the coach indicates the call were made to discuss camp logistics.

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller June 13, 2010 June 14 – 1 minute√ Luke Wells

NCAA-3

55

cn. On one occasion, the institution violated the permissible time to call during its recruitment of


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller June 20, 2010 June 26 – 1 minute√ Curtis Bray

co. On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week and on

two occasions the institution had an impermissible caller during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2009 grad). paid his acceptance fee on March 27, 2009. Ryan McKim was a designated coach December 17, 2008 – March 2, 2009.

Month Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller February 14, 2009 February 15 – 4 minutes

February 17 – 2 minute√ Eric Link Eric Link

February 21, 2009 February 23– 2 minutes February 23 – 1 minute√

Eric Link Eric Link

April 5, 2009 April 7 – 3 minutes April 8 – 3 minutes√ April 11 – 1 minute√

Eric Link Eric Link Eric Link

June 7, 2009 June 8 – 3 minutes (received)√ June 9 – 2 minutes √

Ryan McKim Ryan McKim

cp. On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during



October 20 – 1 minutes√ October 23 – 2 minute√


October 31, 2010

November 3– 2 minutes November 4 – 2 minute√ November 4 – 12 minute√


November 14, 2010 November 14 – 1 minute November 15 – 2 minute√ November 15 – 1 minute√ November 15 – 2 minute√ November 15 – 8 minute√

Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells

cq. On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during



October 30 – 1 minute√ Curtis Bray Curtis Bray



October 31, 2010




Paul Rhoads Curtis Bray

NCAA-3

56

cr. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time



Caller

April 15 – May 31, 2011 May 28 – 2 minutes May 30 – 1 minute√ May 31 – 9 minutes√

Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads

cs. On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during



September 30 – 8 minutes√ Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads

October 18, 2009 October 19 – 1 minute October 21 – 1minute√


October 25, 2009 October 26 – 1 minute October 28 – 1 minute√




ct. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its







cu. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per time period



May 27 – 1 minute√ Wally Burnham Wally Burnham

October 10, 2010 October 13 – 4 minutes 8:01 pm October 13 – 9 minute√ 8:21 pm

Wally Burnham Paul Rhoads

cv. On seven occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during



Caller

June 28, 2009 July 1 – 10 minutes (9:55 pm) July 1 – 1 minute (10:05 pm)√

Chris Ash Chris Ash

July 12, 2009 July 15 – 2 minutes July 16 – 5 minutes√

Chris Ash Chris Ash

August 23, 2009 August 23 – 6 minutes August 24 – 2 minutes√ August 29 – 2 minutes√

Courtney Messingham Chris Ash Chris Ash


Chris Ash Chris Ash

NCAA-3

57




Chris Ash Chris Ash


Chris Ash Chris Ash

cw. On seven occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during



September 23 – 7 minutes√ Tom Herman Tom Herman

October 25, 2009 October 28 – 1 minute October 28 – 1 minute√ October 28 – 4 minutes√



Paul Rhoads Tom Herman



November 22, 2009 November 24 – 1 minute November 24 – 1 minute√ November 25 – 1 minute√




January 3, 2010 January 3 – 6 minutes (3:42 pm) January 3 – 1 minute (3:50 pm)√


cx. On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during



September 8 - 2 minutes√ September 8 - 2 minute√ September 9 - 15 minute√

Kenneth Pope Kenneth Pope Kenneth Pope Kenneth Pope

September 12, 2010 September 15 - 2 minute 8:21 pm September 15 - 18 minutes√ 8:23 pm


September 26, 2010 September 29 – 4 minutes September 30 – 13 minute√


cy. On nine occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller August 29 , 2010 September 1 – 1 minutes

September 1 - 1 minutes√ September 1 - 1 minute√ September 4 - 2 minute√


September 5, 2010 September 5 – 1 minutes September 5 - 1 minutes√ September 5 - 3 minute√




NCAA-3

58

September 19, 2010 September 19 – 1 minutes September 19 – 1 minutes √ September 19 – 1 minutes √








October 24, 2010

October 27 – 1 minutes October 28 – 5 minutes√ October 29 – 10 minutes√


October 31, 2010





cz. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time


Time Period Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller April 15 – May 31, 2011 May 26 – 2 minutes



da. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



May 31 – 1 minute√ Bill Bleil Bill Bleil

db. On five occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



September 18 – 7 minute √ Jay Rodgers Jay Rodgers

September 21, 2008 September 23 – 1 minutes September 25 – 1 minute √ September 25 – 3 minute √

Jay Rodgers Jay Rodgers Jay Rodgers

November 16, 2008 November 19 – 1 minutes November 10 – 1 minute √

Jay Rodgers Jay Rodgers

December 28, 2008 January 2 – 2 minutes January 2 – 2 minutes√




dc. On six occasions, the institution violated t of permissible calls per week during its



September 23 – 4 minutes√ Wally Burnham Wally Burnham

NCAA-3

59



October 11, 2009 October 11 – 3 minutes October 14 – 1 minute√ October 15 – 1 minute√




November 1, 2009 November 3 – 1 minute November 3 – 1 minute√ November 4 – 9 minutes√ (8:44 pm) November 4 – 12 minutes√ (9:06 pm)

Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Shane Burnham Shane Burnham



dd. On one occasion, the institution violated the permissible time to call and had an

impermissible caller (Markus Alleyne) during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2001 grad). attend ISU football camp summer 2010, Markus

indicates the call was made to discuss camp logistics.

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller June 13, 2010 June 18 – 1 minute√ Markus Alleyne

de On one occasion, the institution violated the number of le calls per given time


Time Period Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller April 15-May 31 May 30 – 2 minutes


df. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



November 11 – 1 minute√ November 11 – 1 minute√


dg On seven occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during



September 1 - 2 minutes√ September 2 - 5 minute√


September 12, 2010 September 15 - 1 minute September 18 - 1 minutes√

Bobby Elliott Shane Burnham

September 19, 2010 September 20 – 2 minutes September 21 – 1 minutes √ September 21 – 2 minutes √ September 22 – 2 minutes √ September 22 – 1 minutes √ September 22 – 1 minutes √

Shane Burnham Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Shane Burnham Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott

September 26, 2010 September 28 – 2 minutes September 29 – 1 minutes √ October 2 – 1 minutes √

Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Shane Burnham


Shane Burnham Bobby Elliott

NCAA-3

60

October 10, 2010 October 13 – 1 minutes October 13 – 1 minute√ October 14 – 1 minute√ October 15 – 1 minute√

Shane Burnham Bobby Elliott Shane Burnham Shane Burnham

January 2, 2011 January 2 – 1 minutes January 2 – 1 minutes√ January 2 – 1 minutes√ January 3 – 1 minutes√ January 3 – 1 minutes√


dh. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per time period


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller April 15-May 31, 2010 May 27 – 2 minutes

May 27 – 1 minute√ Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott



di On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per month during its


Month Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller February 1, 2009 February 1 – 5 minute

February 1- 2minute√ Paul Rhoads Scott Fountain

dj. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time



Caller

April 15 – May 31, 2011 May 31 – 1 minute May 31 – 1 minute√

Ken Pope Ken Pope

dk. On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during



October 7 – 1 minutes√ October 9 – 1 minutes√ October 9 – 1 minutes√ October 9 – 2 minutes√ October 9 – 2 minutes√

Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads




Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham

NCAA-3

61

dl. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time



May 25 – 1 minute√ May 25 – 2 minutes√ May 26 – 27 minutes√

Nick Caley Nick Caley Nick Caley Nick Caley

dm. On seven occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during



September 19 – 1 minute√ Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham





November 15, 2009 November 18 – 1 minute November 18 – 1 minute√ November 18 – 1 minute√ November 19 – 1 minute√ November 19 – 1 minute√ November 19 – 1 minute√ November 19 – 1 minute√

Ken Pope Ken Pope Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham

December 27, 2009 December 31 – 2 minutes January 1 – 1 minute√

Courtney Messingham Paul Rhoads


Ken Pope Ken Pope



dn. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



May 6 – 6 minutes√ Wally Burnham Wally Burnham

do. On five occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



November 1 – 1 minute November 1 – 6 minute√


November 7, 2010 November 10 – 1 minute November 10 – 1 minute√ November 10 – 1 minute√ November 11 – 1 minute√


November 14, 2010 November 14 – 1 minute November 15 – 1 minute√ November 15 – 1 minute√ November 17 – 2 minute√ November 20 – 2 minute√


NCAA-3

62

November 21, 2010 November 24 – 2 minute November 25 – 2 minutes√ November 26 – 4 minutes√ (9:23 pm) November 26 – 2 minutes√ (9:33 pm)




dp. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



April 21 – 2 minute√ Eric Link Eric Link

dq. On six occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its





October 25, 2009 October 28 – 2 minutes October 29 – 2 minutes√ October 29 – 2 minutes√ October 29 – 1 minute√






January 10, 2010 January 14 – 1 minute January 14 – 1 minute√ January 14 – 1 minute√ January 15 – 2 minutes√


January 31, 2010 January 31 – 2 minutes January 31 – 1 minute√ January 31 – 2 minutes√ January 31 – 2 minutes√ January 31 – 1 minute√ January 31 – 2 minutes√

Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham

dr. On five occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week and on

one occasion the institution violated the permissible time to call during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2009 grad).

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller August 1, 2008 August 1 – 1 minute√ Wayne Bolt August 31, 2008 September 1 – 2 minutes

September 1 – 11 minutes√ Wayne Bolt Wayne Bolt


Wayne Bolt Wayne Bolt

September 21, 2008 September 27 – 1 minutes September 27 – 5 minutes√ (12:34 pm) September 27 – 1 minutes√ (12:51 pm)

Wayne Bolt Wayne Bolt Wayne Bolt

September 28, 2008 October 1 – 7 minutes October 2 – 12 minutes√

Wayne Bolt Tom Howe

NCAA-3

63

October 3 – 1 minutes√ Wayne Bolt January 11, 2009 January 14 – 2 minutes

January 14 – 1minutes√ January 14 – 1 minutes√ January 16 – 2 minutes√

Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil

ds. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time





dt. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per give time period


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller September 28, 2008 October 2 – 2 minutes

October 2 – 10 minutes√ Tom Howe Tom Howe

du. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller November 8, 2009 November 11 -- 2 minutes

November 11 – 17 minutes√ Tom Howe Tom Howe

dv. On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during



October 24 – 1 minute October 24 – 1 minute√ October 24 – 1 minute√ October 30 – 1 minute√

Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells





November 21, 2010 November 23 – 1 minute November 23 – 1 minute√ November 25 – 5 minutes√


dw. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time



May 26 – 1 minute√ May 31 – 6 minutes√


NCAA-3

64

dx. On six occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per time period and on one occasion violated the permissible time to call during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad).

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller April 15-May 31, 2010 April 15 – 2 minutes

May 19 – 10 minutes√ Paul Rhoads Luke Wells

June 6, 2010 June 8 – 1 minute√ Luke Wells August 29 , 2010 September 1 – 2 minutes

September 1 - 9 minutes√ Luke Wells Luke Wells



September 26, 2010 September 28 – 2 minutes October 2 – 2 minutes √

Paul Rhoads Luke Wells



December 26, 2010 December 31 – 1 minute January 1 – 7 minute√


dy. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller October 17, 2010 October 21 – 4 minutes 12:14pm

October 21 – 10 minutes√ 12:18pm Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott



dz. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its




ea. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per month and on

two occasions the institution had an impermissible caller during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (two-year transfer). signed a

. Ryan McKim was a designated coach December 17, 2008 – March 2, 2009.

Month Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller May 17, 2009 May 19 – 2 minutes

May 19 – 2 minute√ Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads

May 31, 2009 June 1 – 2 minutes June 1 – 1 minute√


June 7, 2009 June 9 – 3 minutes June 10 – 3 minute√ June 11 – 1 minute√ June 11 – 1 minute√ June 12 – 2 minute√

Curtis Bray Curtis Bray Ryan McKim Curtis Bray Ryan McKim

NCAA-3

65

eb. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



May 6 – 2 minutes√ May 7 – 1 minute√ May 7 – 9 minutes√


May 23, 2010 May 25 – 7 minutes May 28 – 1 minute√


ec. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time



May 19 – 6 minutes√ May 27 – 5 minutes√ May 27 – 1 minute√


ed. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time




ee. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



January 2 – 3 minutes√ Shane Burnham Shane Burnham

ef. On five occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



September 19 – 11 minutes√ Tony Petersen Gene Chizik


Tony Petersen Tony Petersen


Gene Chizik Gene Chizik





NCAA-3

66

eg. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its




Nick Caley Nick Caley Nick Caley

eh. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its





ei. On one occasion, the institution violated the permissible time to call and on one occasion

violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2009 grad). It appears from the timing of the calls on July 15 called Coach McFarland and McFarland called back after a disconnect.


July 15, 2008 July 15 – 8 minutes 4:26 pm (incoming) July 15 – 1 minute 4:36 pm√ July 15 – 8 minutes 4:37 pm (incoming)

Robert McFarland Robert McFarland Robert McFarland



ej. On one occasion, the institution violated the permissible time to call and had an

impermissible caller (Markus Alleyne), during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete . attend ISU football camp summer 2010, Markus indicates the call was

made to discuss camp logistics.

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller June 13, 2010 June 13 – 2 minutes√ Markus Alleyne

ek. On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during

its recruitment of prospective student-athlete 2010 grad).


November 12 – 1 minute√ Chris Ash Chris Ash

November 22, 2009 November 24 – 1 minute November 25 – 2 minutes√ November 27 – 1 minute√




December 27, 2009 December 27 – 1 minute December 28 – 1 minute√ January 2 – 1 minute√


NCAA-3

67

el. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad).


May 25 – 2 minutes√ May 25 – 2 minutes√ May 25 – 2 minutes√ May 25 – 5 minutes√


em. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



September 21 – 2 minutes √ September 21 – 10 minutes √


en. On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during



November 17 – 1 minute√ November 18 – 1 minute√



Curtis Bray Paul Rhoads Bobby Elliot Paul Roads

January 9, 2011 January 12 – 1 minutes January 13 – 1 minute√ January 13 – 22 minute√

Curtis Bray Bobby Elliot Bobby Elliott



eo. On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per time period


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller April 15 – May 31, 2010 May 25 – 2 minutes

May 28 – 2 minutes√ Ken Pope Ken Pope

October 31, 2010







NCAA-3

68

ep. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its




Bill Bleil Bill Beil

eq. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



May 31 – 6 minutes√ Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham

er. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



November 11 – 17 minutes√ Tom Herman Tom Herman

es. On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller August 30, 2009 September 2 – 1 minute

September 3 – 1 minute√ Wally Burnham Wally Burnham


Wally Burnham Wally Burnham

January 10, 2010 January 12 – 2 minutes January 12 – 1 minute√ January 13 – 3 minutes√ January 14 – 1 minute√ January 15 – 1 minute√ January 15 – 1 minute√ January 15 – 1 minute√ January 15 – 1 minute√ January 15 – 1 minute√ January 15 – 1 minute√

Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham Wally Burnham

et. On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during

its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Official visit ended on itinerary has him arriving in at 1:35 pm.


October 31– 12 minutes (9:12 pm) November 2 – 2 minute√






NCAA-3

69

eu. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



November 23 – 1 minutes√ Shane Burnham Shane Burnham

ev. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per time period






ew. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time


Time Period Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller April 15-May 31 May 27 – 5 minutes (4:56 pm)

May 27 – 17 minutes (5:01 pm)√ Ken Pope Ken Pope

ex. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time





ey. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time




ez. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its





fa. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



April 21 – 2 minutes√ April 21 – 3 minutes√


NCAA-3

70

fb. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller December 27, 2009 January 2 – 7 minutes (11:32 am)

January 2 – 2 minutes (11:39 am)√ Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham

fc. On five occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week, and on

one occasion violated the permissible time to call, during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2010 grad).

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller August 23, 2009 August 29 – 1 minute√ Wally Burnham August 30, 2009 September 1 – 2 minutes

September 1 – 7 minutes√ Wally Burnham Wally Burnham



September 20, 2009 September 23 – 1 minute September 23 – 1 minute√ September 23 – 1 minute√


October 11, 2009 October 14 – 1 minute October 14 – 2 minutes√ October 14 – 4 minutes√




fd. On one occasion, the institution violated the permissible time to call during its recruitment of

prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). attend ISU football camp summer 2010, the coach indicates the call was made to discuss camp logistics.


June 6, 2010 June 6 – 1 minute√ Shane Burnham

fe. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad).





ff. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



October 23 – 2 minutes√ Shane Burnham Shane Burnham



NCAA-3

71

fg. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



September 4 - 4 minutes√ Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott

September 19, 2010 September 22 – 2 minutes September 22 – 2 minutes √ September 23 – 2 minutes √ September 24 – 1 minutes √ September 25 – 1 minutes √ September 25 – 1 minutes √

Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads

fh. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



September 16 – 1 minute√ September 16 – 1 minute√ September 17 – 2 minutes√




fi. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time





fj. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



November 12 – 1 minute√ Tom Herman Tom Herman

fk. On five occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its

recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Official visit ended on , itinerary has him arriving in at 1:35 pm.


October 31, 2010

October 31– 1 minutes 9:22 pm October 31– 1 minutes 9:43 pm√ November 1 – 1 minute√ November 1 – 1 minute√

Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells Luke Wells







NCAA-3

72

December 26, 2010 December 29 – 1 minute December 30 – 1 minute√ January 1 – 1 minute√


fl. On one occasion, the institution violated the permissible time to call, and on one occasion

violated the number of permissible calls per given time period, during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad).

Week/Time Period Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller March 28, 2010 March 29 – 1 minute√ Luke Wells April 15-May 31 May 19 – 1 minute

May 24 – 1 minute√ May 28 – 1 minute√


fm. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller February 6, 2011

February 9 – 4 minutes February 9 – 2 minutes√ February 9 – 7 minutes√


fn. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time



Caller

April 15 – May 31, 2011 May 23 – 1 minute May 24 – 2 minutes√ May 31 – 2 minutes√

Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Bobby Elliott

fo. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time


Time Period Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller April 15-May 31 April 26 – 1 minute

May 27 – 1 minute√ May 27 – 1 minute√


fp. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



May 24 – 1 minute√ Nick Caley Nick Caley

fq. On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during

its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). Coach attests the March 22 is a left message as has an unusually long voice message.


February 18 – 2 minute√ Bill Bleil Bill Bleil



NCAA-3

73



fr. On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week and on




Ken Pope Ken Pope

August 15, 2010 August 17 – 2 minute√ Kenneth Pope September 5, 2010 September 8 – 2 minutes

September 8 - 8 minutes√ Kenneth Pope Kenneth Pope

September 12, 2010 September 15 - 1 minute September 15 - 2 minutes√ September 15 - 1 minutes√

Kenneth Pope Kenneth Pope Kenneth Pope

October 24, 2010





fs. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time




Nick Caley Nick Caley Nick Caley Nick Caley

ft. On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during




Scott Fountain Scott Fountain Scott Fountain


Scott Fountain Jeff Koonz Scott Fountain

January 4, 2009 January 4 – 2 minutes January 4 – 2 minutes √



Scott Fountain Chris Ash

fu. On 10 occasions, the institution violated either the number of permissible calls per week or

had an impermissible caller have phone contact during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (two-year transfer). Beatty was a designated coach 12/1/08 – 12/31/08.


August 6 – 1 minute√ August 7 – 1 minute√ August 7 – 4 minutes√

Jay Rodgers Jay Rodgers Jay Rodgers Jay Rodgers

NCAA-3

74

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller August 24, 2008 August 27– 1 minutes

August 27 – 5 minutes√ August 29 – 5 minutes√ (incoming) August 29 – 4 minutes√ (incoming) August 30 – 2 minutes√

Jay Rodgers Jay Rodgers Shane Beatty Shane Beatty Shane Beatty

August 31, 2008 August 31– 1 minute√ August 31 – 1 minute√ September 3 – 2 minutes√ September 5 – 4 minutes√

Shane Beatty Shane Beatty Jay Rodgers Jay Rodgers

September 7, 2008 September 10 – 2 minutes September 13 – 1 minute√


October 5, 2008 October 9 – 1 minute October 9 – 1 minute√ October 9– 18 minute√

Jay Rodgers Jay Rodgers Jay Rodgers



November 16, 2008 November 16 – 1 minute√ November 20 – 11 minutes√

Shane Beatty Jay Rodgers

November 22, 2008 November 25 – 2 minute√ November 25 – 1 minute√ November 27 – 4 minutes√

Shane Beatty Jay Rodgers Jay Rodgers

December 27, 2008 December 29 – 1 minute December 29 – 3 minutes√


February 1, 2009 February 1 – 2 minutes February 1 – 2 minutes√ February 1 – 2 minutes√ February 1 – 2 minutes√

Bill Bleil Tom Herman Tom Herman Bill Bleil

fv. On five occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its




May 23, 2010 May 23 – 2 minutes May 23 – 9 minutes√ May 26 – 2 minutes√




August 29, 2010 August 30 – 1 minute August 30 – 9 minute√




fw. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its





NCAA-3

75

fx. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



November 19 – 1 minute√ November 21 – 12 minutes√

Chris Ash Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads

December 27, 2009 December 27 – 1 minute December 28 – 10 minutes√


fy. On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during



September 28 – 2 minutes √ September 29 – 13 minutes √




December 26, 2010 December 29 – 1 minute December 29 – 2 minute√ December 29 – 6 minute√ December 31 – 1minute√ December 31 – 3minute√


fz. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



October 6 – 7 minutes√ Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads



ga. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week and on

two occasions violated the permissible time to call during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad).

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller June 20, 2010 June 23 – 1 minute√ Luke Wells July 11, 2010 July 16 – 1 minute√ Luke Wells August 29 , 2010 September 1 – 1 minutes



October 24, 2010

October 27 – 1 minutes October 27 – 1 minutes√ October 27 – 1 minutes√


gb. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



May 24 – 1 minute√ Curtis Bray Curtis Bray

NCAA-3

76

May 24 – 7 minutes√ Curtis Bray

gc. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad).






gd. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time



Caller

April 15 – May 31, 2011 May 19 – 1 minute May 23 – 7 minutes√


ge. On eight occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per time period




August 29 , 2010 September 1 – 2 minutes September 1 - 2 minutes√ September 4 - 2 minute√ September 4 - 2 minute√








October 31, 2010






Bobby Elliot Bobby Elliott

gf. On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week and on

two occasions had an impermissible caller have phone contact during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (two-year transfer). Ryan McKim was a designated coach December 17, 2008 – March 2, 2009.

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller May 30, 2010 June 1 – 2 minutes√

June 2 – 2 minutes√ June 2 – 2 minutes√ June 3 – 2 minutes√

Ryan McKim Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Ryan McKim

NCAA-3

77

June 6, 2010 June 10 – 6 minutes June 11 – 1 minute√


July 25, 2010 July 26 – 1 minutes √ July 27 – 1 minutes √ July 27 – 2 minutes √ July 28 – 2 minutes √ July 28 – 6 minutes √ July 29 – 1 minutes √

Ryan McKim Ryan McKim Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott

gg. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time



May 30 – 2 minutes√ Curtis Bray Curtis Bray

gh. On five occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its









December 27, 2009 December 31 – 2 minutes December 31 – 2 minutes√ January 2 – 2 minutes√ January 2 – 4 minutes√




gi. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



September 5 – 1 minute√ September 5 – 1 minute√


January 3, 2010 January 3 – 1 minute (11:42 am) January 3 – 3 minutes (11:43 am)√ January 3 – 2 minutes (11:46 am)√


gj. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time


Time Period Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller April 15 – May 31, 2011 April 25 – 2 minutes (8:55 am)

April 25 – 3 minutes (8:57 am)√ Bobby Elliott Bobby Elliott

NCAA-3

78

gk. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



January 15 – 2 minutes√ January 16– 2 minutes√ January 16 – 2 minutes√

Scott Fountain Scott Fountain Scott Fountain Scott Fountain

gl. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



November 18 – 10 minutes√ (9:16 pm) Shane Burnham Shane Burnham

gm. On eight occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during






August 15, 2010 August 20 – 1 minutes August 20 – 2 minutes √


August 29, 2010 August 31 – 1 minute September 1 – 2 minute√ September 1 – 1 minute√ September 1 – 2 minute√ September 1 – 1 minute√ September 3 – 8 minute√




February 20, 2011 February 20 – 2 minutes February 20 – 2 minutes√ February 21 – 2 minutes√ February 23 – 2 minutes√ February 25 – 2 minutes√


March 6, 2011 March 7 – 2 minutes March 8 – 1 minutes√ March 9 – 5 minutes√




gn. On one occasion, the institution violated the permissible time to call during its recruitment of


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller June 20, 2010 June 23 – 2 minutes√ Bill Bleil

NCAA-3

79

go. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its






Shane Burnham Wally Burnham Shane Burnham

gp. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



December 22 – 7 minute√ Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads

gq. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its




May 16, 2010 May 17 – 1 minute May 21 – 8 minutes√


gr. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per time period





January 2, 2011 January 2 – 2 minutes January 2 – 1 minutes√ January 2 – 1 minutes√


gs. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time




gt. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its





NCAA-3

80

gu. On seven occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week and on 14 occasions the institution had an impermissible caller have phone contact during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (two-year transfer). came on official visit on and signed , accepting admissions on June 10. Ryan McKim was a designated coach December 17, 2008 – March 2, 2009.

Month Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller March 8, 2009 March 10 – 5 minutes

March 12 – 2 minute√ March 12 – 1 minute√ March 12 – 11 minute√ March 13 – 1 minute√

Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Paul Rhoads Bill Bleil

March 15, 2009 March 19 – 3 minutes March 20 – 1 minute√ March 20 – 1 minute√ March 20 – 9 minute√

Bill Bleil Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads

March 27 – 29, 2009 – During his Official Visit

March 27 – 2 minutes (incoming) √ March 27 – 1 minute√ March 27 – 1 minute√ March 27 – 1 minute√ March 27 – 1 minute√ March 28 – 1 min√ March 28 – 1 minute√ March 28 – 1 minute√ March 29 – 1 minute√ March 29 – 2 minute√

Ryan McKim Ryan McKim Ryan McKim Ryan McKim Ryan McKim Ryan McKim Ryan McKim Ryan McKim Ryan McKim) Ryan McKim

March 29, 2009 March 30 – 3minutes March 31 – 4 minute√ March 31 – 13 minute√ April 2 – 2minute√ April 3 – 3 minute√ April 3 – 3 min√ April 3 – 2 minute√

Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads Bill Bleil



May 31, 2009 June 2 – 6 minutes June 4 – 1 minute√ June 5 – 2 minutes√ June 5 – 1 minute√


June 7, 2009 June 8 – 3 minutes June 8 – 1 minute√ June 9 – 1 minutes√ June 10 – 1 minute√ June 10 – 1 minute√ June 10 – 1 minute√

Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Ryan McKim Ryan McKim Ryan McKim Ryan McKim

gv. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller October 3, 2010 October 9 – 2 minutes (12:29 pm)

October 9 – 2 minutes√ (12:33 pm) Nick Caley Nick Caley


Nick Caley Nick Caley

NCAA-3

81

gw. On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad).

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller April 15-May 31 May 27 – 1 minute

May 27 – 6 minutes√ Wally Burnham Wally Burnham





gx. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time



Caller



gy. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



November 18 – 2 minutes (8:16 pm)√ Curtis Bray Curtis Bray

gz. On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per time period



May 27 – 1 minute√ Ken Pope Ken Pope





ha. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



October 31– 5 minutes October 31 – 2 minute√ October 31 – 1 minute√ October 31 – 3 minute√ November 2 – 7 minute√ November 2– 1 minute√ November 2– 1 minute√

Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil Bill Bleil



NCAA-3

82

hb. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time period during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2012 grad).

Time Period Dates, Times, and Length of

Calls Caller

April 15 – May 31, 2011 April 25 – 2 minutes April 25 – 1 minute√


hc. On one occasion, the institution violated the permissible time to call during its recruitment of

prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). attend ISU football camp summer 2010, the coach indicates the call was made to discuss camp logistics.

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller June 13, 2010 June 17 – 1 minute√ Luke Wells

hd. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its





he On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller August 30, 2009 September 3 – 1 minute

September 5 – 2 minutes√ Paul Rhoads Paul Rhoads


Chris Ash Chris Ash


Chris Ash Chris Ash

hf. On four occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per time period


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller April 15-May 31 May 19 – 2 minutes


Nick Caley Nick Caley Nick Caley

October 24, 2010



October 31, 2010





hg. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time



Caller



NCAA-3

83

hh. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its







hi. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time

period, and on one occasion violated the permissible time to call, during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad).

Time Period/Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller April 15-May 31 May 25 – 2 minutes

May 25 – 5 minutes√ (7:37pm) May 25 – 1 minute√ (7:43 pm)


June 27, 2010 July 2 – 1 minute√ Shane Burnham

hj. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2009 grad). accepted his admission (but did not pay the fee) on May 27, 2009.

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller May 31, 2009 June 3 – 8 minutes

June 4 – 4 minute√ Nick Caley Nick Caley

hk. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time




hl. On two occasions, the institution violated the permissible time to call during its recruitment

of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). attend ISU football camp summer 2010, the coach indicates the call was made to discuss camp logistics.

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller June 13, 2010 June 17 – 5 minutes√

June 18 – 1 minute√ Matt Karleskint Matt Karleskint

hm. On five occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



September 4 – 1 minute√ Tom Herman Tom Herman

September 13, 2009 September 17 – 2 minutes (8:43 pm) September 17 – 1 minute (8:44 pm)√


NCAA-3

84







hn. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



June 21 – 2 minutes√ Bill Bleil Bill Bleil

ho. On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time


Time Period Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller April 15-May 31 April 15 – 2 minutes


Nick Caley Nick Caley Nick Caley Paul Rhoads

hp. On five occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week, and on

two occasions had an impermissible caller (Ryan McKim) have phone contact, during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2009 grad). Ryan McKim was a designated coach December 17, 2008 – March 2, 2009.

Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller October 5, 2008 October 6 – 6 minutes 8:35 pm

October 6 – 2 minutes 9:03 pm√ Scott Fountain Scott Fountain

October 19, 2008 October 19 – 2 minutes October 23 – 1 minute √ October 23 – 2 minutes √ October 23 – 7 minute√

Scott Fountain Ryan McKim Ryan McKim Gene Chizik







hq. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time


Time Period Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller April15-May 31 May 28 – 2 minutes

May 28 – 5 minutes√ Ken Pope Ken Pope

NCAA-3

85

hr. On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during



September 22 – 2 minutes √ Shane Burnham Shane Burnham



January 2, 2011 January 2 – 1 minutes January 2 – 1 minutes√ January 2 – 1 minutes√ January 3 – 1 minutes√ January 3 – 1 minutes√


hs. On three occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during



June 15 – 5 minutes√ Bill Bleil Bill Bleil

June 20, 2010 June 21 – 2 minutes June 23 – 2 minutes√ June 23 – 2 minutes√




ht. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its







hu. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time




hv. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time



Caller

April 15 – May 31, 2011 May 31 – 1 minute May 31 – 2 minutes√


NCAA-3

86

hw. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad).




hx. On two occasions, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



January 11 – 2 minutes√ Eric Link Eric Link

March 22, 2009 March 24 – 1 minutes March 24 – 7 minute√

Eric Link Eric Link

hy. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its


Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller May 9, 2010 May 14 – 3 minutes (11:55 am)

May 14 – 2 minutes√ (11:57 am) Bill Bleil Bill Bleil

hz. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



January 16 – 2 minutes√ Courtney Messingham Courtney Messingham

ia. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per week during its



October 29 – 2 minutes√ October 29 – 3 minutes√


ib. On one occasion, the institution violated the number of permissible calls per given time

period, and on one occasion violated the permissible time to call, during its recruitment of prospective student-athlete (2011 grad). attend ISU football camp summer 2010, the coach indicates the June call was made to discuss camp logistics.

Time Period/Week Dates, Times, and Length of Calls Caller April 15-May 31 May 31 – 1 minute


June 13, 2010 June 15 – 1 minute√ Shane Burnham

NCAA-3

IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY TELEPHONE LOGSCall Call Made From Call Made To

Date Time Name Phone Number Complete (We=Work, Il=Horne, c-can School (State) Pos. (CvCeil, H'=Home, O~Other)y

fNotes: N --Iy

NfNotes: --I

yN --

I=.

IyN

--Ir=

yNEs: --

IyNEs: --

IyNr= --

IyNr= --

IyN

--,Es:

yN

--IEs:

97 NCAA-3

NCAA-3

Iowa State University Compliance Manual 54

CONTACTS & EVALUATIONS Recording telephone calls, contacts and evaluations

On the “ncaa” tab, complete the following fields: � Type:

o Phone o Contact o Evaluation

� Rec. coach (select the coach who performed the action)

� Date (click on the box next to the date to select the date/time on a calendar grid)

� Persons present (list any other coaches in attendance)

� Location o Home o High School o Game Other o Notes

The following fields are for phone calls only:

� Response o Talk with prospect o Left message o No answer o Prospect initiated call o Talked with coach

� Next call (optional – sets task) � Phone number � Call originated

o Home o Cell o Work

NCAA-3

NCAA-3

NCAA-3

day_temporary

Text Box

This "response" field appears blank, but it is a pull-down menu. IF THE FIELD IS NEGLECTED, IT DEFAULTS TO "TALKED WITH PROSPECT"

NCAA-3

1

Gray, Dustin [ATHDP]

From: Gray, Dustin [ATHDP]Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 3:01 PMTo: Athletics - All Coaches [ATHDP]Cc: Banach, Edward J [ATHDP]; Flaherty, Eileen [ATHDP]; Snyder, Joshua M [ATHDP]Subject: FW: Information from NCAA enforcementAttachments: Phone call policy 0708.doc

Importance: High

Coaches, Attached is a document referring to the fictional “three-minute phone call” rule. Please review this document and let me know if there are any questions. The synopsis is there is not a three-minute rule; a phone call less three minutes is likely a countable call. That can be the same for phone calls under two minutes and under a minute. In addition, this document reiterates the importance of making notes of your phone calls (e.g. dropped calls, left message).

Thanks,

- Dustin Got Questions, Ask Compliance!

NCAA-3

- - --.,...-

History of the three-minute trigger

In the last two years, the enforcement staff processed three major infractions cases involvingtelephone calls made by coaching staff who did not maintain logs/records. Rather than assumeany call, regardless of length, established contact with the prospect, the enforcement staff used athree-minute threshold to determine when a contact occurred. Any call after that contact wasassumed a violation. The staffs rationale for initially establishing the three-minute standard wasto manage an infractions case involving voluminous calls in a fair and reasonable manner inestablishing when a recruiting contact occurred. As a result, the staff established three minutesas the trigger for what would be considered a countable call, absent any circumstances indicatingotherwise.

It has come to the staff s attention that some in the membership have taken the staff s discretionexercised in a handful of cases as legislating a minimum time period for what triggers acountable contact. The staff did not intend that any call to a prospect lasting less than threeminutes should be excluded from being considered a telephone contact in every circumstanceand recognizes that a call lasting less than three minutes could, in fact, be a countable telephonecontact with a prospect. The staff reviewed this issue with the Division I Committee onInfractions during the April 2008 agenda session. The following policy is in effect.

Major enforcement's policy

NCAA Bylaw 13.1.3.1 remains in effect, and any discretion used in prior cases as a means toreasonably and fairly approach the specific facts of those cases will not presumably be applied infuture cases. Future cases include any case pending, as there is not a notice requirement affordedto member institutions/representatives on how violations will be treated since the rule should notbe violated in the first place.

The staff reserves the discretion to analyze and evaluate each individual case it processes butwants to make clear that there is not a "three-minute rule." The starting point for the staffsanalysis will consider every call a countable telephone contact. Therefore, any call after thepermissible call is made to a prospect is presumably a violation. If a coaching staff makesmultiple calls to a prospect within the same week, the coaching staff shoulders the burden(including contemporaneous documentation/logs/records) of demonstrating why the additionalcalls are not violations. Similarly, if a coaching staff is on the phone with a prospect and the callis dropped, the follow-up call to the prospect is presumed a violation unless the coaching staffmember can demonstrate (along with contemporaneous documentation/logs/records) that the firstcall was dropped. Examining the actual phone records after-the-fact and noting where droppedcalls occurred is not sufficient; contemporaneous notes/ logs should be kept by the coachingstaff.

Any questions on the interpretation of the rule should be directed to Membership Services. Anyquestions regarding major enforcement's policy should be directed to Julie Roe, Director ofEnforcement.

NCAA-3

NCAA-4

Monthly Compliance Ed. Meeting

October

NCAA-5

Paperwork

NCAA-5

Guess Who Rules • Players will alternate answering a compliance question.

• A player that answers a compliance question correctly

gets to peel off a layer of the puzzle.

• The first player to correctly guess the hidden individual wins.

• The topic for this game is telephone calls.

NCAA-5

11

1 2 3 4 5

6 7

10 9

12

8

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

NCAA-5

Violation or No Violation

• It is July 10 and a coach tries calling a prospect in Barcelona, Spain. The prospect’s 16-year-old sister answers the phone. The coach asks to talk to the prospect. The sister says her mother is going to get him, but the sister remains on the phone. Not wanting to seem rude she begins talking to you about the Tour de France, which started in their town today. You are also a cycling enthusiast and talk to her about Lance Armstrong’s chances. Five minutes later the mother comes on and says the prospect went to play fútbol with his friends and won’t be back until later.

1.

NCAA-5

NO VIOLATION

Does this call count?

Talking to the 16-year old sister is also not an infraction as long as no recruiting took place.

NCAA-5

This phone call does not count as a countable call because no recruiting actually took place. However, you should document the call and indicate that you did not talk to the prospect.

NCAA-5

A coach is visiting a prospect in Valentine, Nebraska on Friday afternoon. However, the coach gets lost and cannot find the prospect’s house. He already called the prospect on Tuesday to make plans with prospect. He calls the prospect, gets back on Highway 20 and eventually arrives safely at the prospects house.

2.

NCAA-5

Coaches can make unlimited telephone calls to a prospect on the day they are making a in-person, off-campus contact.

NO VIOLATION

NCAA-5

You are trying to call a prospect on Wednesday afternoon. You dial her cell phone and her boyfriend answers. He says she is finishing up practice and should be free shortly. The boyfriend, apparently a big fan of yours, asks you what you think of his girlfriend. What should you do? Pick the best answer.

3.

NCAA-5

A. Answer the question, it would be rude not to. Call back later to talk to the prospect.

B. Answer his question and send a text later to tell the prospect to call you. You’ve already used your call for the week.

C. Don’t answer, tell him thank you, hang up and call back later.

D. Thank him for his time and don’t call back later. You’ve already used your call for the week for the prospect.

NCAA-5

Talking to the boyfriend about the prospect can be considered recruiting and would then count as a the phone call for the week. If you did not respond to the question the first phone call would not count against the weekly limitation if no other conversation took place. Then if you called later the second phone call would be permissible.

Texting is a violation.

BEST CHOICE = C

NCAA-5

You are calling to arrange an official visit with a prospect. When you call the cell phone listed for the prospect, the prospect’s mother answers. She tells you they switched phones because her phone was better for texting. You talk to her about the possibility of arranging an official visit for next weekend. She says that she would be interested but you need to call the prospect to figure out the details. You hang up the phone and call the prospect to set up a visit that will occur in two weeks.

4.

NCAA-5

Once you begin discussing the possibility of an official visit the phone call counts.

VIOLATION

NCAA-5

Your phone is in your pocket while you are eating lunch. When you look at your phone later you notice the prospect’s number who you spoke with earlier in the day was redialed from your pocket.

5.

NCAA-5

If you purposely hit the call button because you forgot you or another coach already called that week and hang up before the prospect answers, that is a violation. But an accidental call will not be reported as a violation.

NO VIOLATION

Do you need to record this phone call?

NCAA-5

Yes, you need to record it even though you didn't mean to dial the prospect and did not speak with the prospect, the call will still show up in your phone records. Record the call in your phone logs and include an explanation of the accidental call.

NCAA-5

On Sunday evening a prospect flies home from an official visit at ISU. Later that night, you call him to make sure he made it home safely. On the following Wednesday another coach on your staff makes a telephone call to the prospect.

6.

NCAA-5

Coaches may make unlimited telephone calls to prospects the five days prior to an official visit and during an official visit. In this example, a call was made after the conclusion of the official visit.

VIOLATION

13.1.3.3.1 & 4/16/2009 NCAA-5

A prospect departs from his official visit at ISU on a Monday evening. Earlier that day, during the visit, you place several calls to the prospect while she’s on campus. On Friday that same week you make a recruiting phone call to the prospect.

7.

NCAA-5

Coaches may make unlimited telephone calls to prospects the five days prior to an official visit and during an official visit. In weeks where a portion of the week is unlimited and another portion is limited (e.g. one call per week) ISU is allowed one call during the “limited” portion of the week.

NO VIOLATION

13.1.3.3.1 & 3/3/1994 NCAA-5

A prospect is scheduled to make an official visit on Friday so you make a phone call to her on Wednesday and Thursday that week. On Friday morning you find out the prospect has to cancel the visit. What needs to happen?

8.

NCAA-5

A. You notify compliance and the compliance office files an official visit cancellation exception form with the Big 12.

B. You notify compliance and compliance reports a secondary violation. No penalty is implemented as this is out of your control.

C. Do nothing, you don’t need to notify anyone.

D. Notify compliance and record in your phone records what happened. Compliance does not report official visit cancellations.

NCAA-5

While your team is going through its pregame warm-ups you take a minute to call your prized recruit to making sure they’re following the game. You’re off the phone by time the team finishes warming up and the National Anthem begins.

9.

NCAA-5

Phone calls to a prospect (or the prospective student-athlete's relatives or legal guardians) may not be made during a contests in that sport from the time the team reports on call at the competition site at the direction of the coach until the competition has concluded and the team has been dismissed by the coach. Electronic mail is permissible.

VIOLATION

13.1.3.2.1 NCAA-5

Signing date is November 11. Despite a good recruiting phone call prospect Awesome Alex doesn’t sign with any institution on the 11th. The next day you call Alex again and he is so moved by your speech he signs an NLI with ISU.

10.

NCAA-5

Unlimited phone calls are allowed on the initial day for signing a NLI and the two days immediately following.

NO VIOLATION

13.1.3.3.2 NCAA-5

Compliance Excellence Cup

NCAA-5

What is the first permissible date a coach may encourage a prospect to call a student-athlete and what year must the prospect be entering in high school?

NCAA-5

July 1 – Prospect must be heading into his or her junior year of high school.

NCAA-5

On a December afternoon you download your team’s online media guide to a blank 128 megabyte flash drive. The digital guide is 115 megabytes, contains color pictures throughout the guide, and is 200 pages in length.

NCAA-5

VIOLATION

08/14/2009 & 09/10/2009 NCAA-5

2010 Proposals

NCAA-5

2009-22 An individual may enter into an agreement to compete on a professional team and compete on a professional team, provided the agreement does not allow for receipt of more than actual and necessary expenses to participate on the team; further, in sports other than tennis, swimming and diving and women's volleyball, to specify that a student-athlete who does not initially enroll full-time in a collegiate institution within one year (six months for tennis) or the next opportunity to enroll following the high school graduation date.

NCAA-5

2009-87 Eliminates foreign tours.

NCAA-5

Iowa State Football Individual Culpability Analysis

Coach Total Violations Average Per Month Logging IssueImpermissible Time Period Culpable Calls Total Culpable Calls

Bobby Elliott 199 8.29 180 0 19 19Shane Burnham 93 4.89 80 4 9 13

Luke Wells 93 4.65 81 8 4 12Bill Bleil 78 3 58 2 18 20Coach A 57 2.86 51 1 5 6Coach B 92 3.4 87 0 5 5Coach C 33 2.75 28 0 5 5Coach D 16 3.2 11 0 5 5Coach E 43 2.04 40 2 1 3Coach F 30 1.66 28 2 0 2Coach G 6 3 4 0 2 2Coach H 23 1.04 21 0 2 2Coach I 17 4.25 15 0 2 2Coach J 81 5.4 80 0 1 1Coach K 30 1.76 29 0 1 1Coach L 2 2 2 0 0 0Coach M 4 1 4 0 0 0Coach N 3 3 3 0 0 0Coach O 20 3.3 20 0 0 0Coach P 3 1.5 3 0 0 0Coach Q 1 1 1 0 0 0Coach R 1 1 1 0 0 0Coach S 1 1 1 0 0 0Coach T 7 1.75 7 0 0 0

NCAA-6

Iowa State Men's BasketballIndividual Culpability Analysis


Daniyal Robinson 64 4.06 43 0 21 21Coach A 33 1.13 33 0 0 0Coach B 23 5.75 18 0 5 5Coach C 10 4.6 8 0 2 2Coach D 9 0.42 9 0 0 0Coach E 6 2 6 0 0 0Coach F 1 1 1 0 0 0

NCAA-6

Iowa State Women's BasketballIndividual Culpability Analysis


Coach A 24 0.72 19 2 3 5Coach B 6 0.22 3 0 3 3Coach C 23 0.69 21 1 1 2Coach D 2 0.25 2 0 0 0

NCAA-6

Iowa State Track and Field and Cross CountryIndividual Culpability Analysis


Coach A 28 1.86 22 0 6 6Coach B 16 0.76 12 0 4 4Coach C 54 2 51 0 3 3Coach D 4 1.33 2 0 2 2Coach E 21 0.72 20 0 1 1Coach F 11 0.73 11 0 0 0

NCAA-6

Iowa State Women's TennisIndividual Culpability Analysis

Coach Total Violations Average Per Month Logging IssueImpermissible Time Period Culpable CallsTotal Culpable Calls

Coach A 45 2.14 40 1 4 5Coach B 5 0.31 2 0 3 3

NCAA-6

NCAA-7

Bill Bleil – Iowa State University

Wednesday, March 13, 2013

I would like to convey remorse for any difficulty I have caused Iowa State University through this process. I would also like to express that I do not feel my actions constitute a Major Violation.

I think it is of the upmost importance to note that I did not intentionally break any NCAA rule to gain a recruiting advantage. Hopefully, I can explain myself in a manner that you will understand my actions. I understand that I cannot make more than one call per week outside the contact period and I never would have intentionally done so.

When I took my current position at Iowa State University, our compliance department specifically told me that I was not responsible for documenting voicemails that were left because they were not considered countable calls. Therefore, I have no records of many of these calls because all they consisted of was a left voicemail.

For four of the calls that are in questions, I left a voicemail. The NCAA has interpreted that a 3 minute message is a Countable Call. Per Verizon, any placed call that lasts 121 seconds to 180 seconds is logged as a 3 minute call. Verizon also allows customers to have a voice mailbox message of up to 2 minutes. I believe that with some recruits messages being long, it is reasonable to believe that a standard voicemail could be listed as a three minute call based on how Verizon calculates call length. Please see my attached notes from my conversation with Verizon.

Another four of my calls listed as “culpable” were to after he had signed his FAA. It was my understanding that I was allowed unlimited calls to as the rule is currently. was returning to campus to begin his summer class work and his mom was very . I was attempting to alleviate his stress and guide him during that difficult time. As I previously stated, there was no attempt to gain a recruiting advantage, nor did I intentionally break an NCAA rule.

Six of the calls in question involved . There were seven calls placed over two days resulting in six violations. family and I had been planning an Official Visit to Iowa State University on November 5th, 2010. With

coming on an Official Visit I knew that I could contact an unlimited amount the 5 days prior to his visit. On the following Thursday, verbally committed to and cancelled his trip to Iowa State University. Please see the attached e-‐mail from mom about their intentions of making an Official Visit that weekend.

My 32 year coaching record indicates that I have never attempted to circumvent the system. Furthermore, I hope the details of these calls make it apparent to anyone looking at this case that the infractions I have been accused of are not just clear-‐cut as there are mitigating circumstances to each. Also, it is important to note that none of the calls in questions provided Iowa State University with a recruiting advantage.

Sincerely,

Bill Bleil Assistant Head Football Coach

NCAA-8

Verizon Phone

3/8/2013

With the NCAA’s response that a number of the placed calls on my cell phone bill that were listed as 3:00 minutes would be considered calls that I had in actuality talked with the Recruit and not left messages, I contacted Verizon and posed the question.

“How are placed calls timed and listed on Verizon’s bill.”

They noted that all calls are rounded up every 60 seconds. 1:01 minutes would be billed and listed as 2:00 minutes. 2:35 minutes would be billed and listed as 3:00 minutes. I then asked the question

“How long (how many minutes) can a message in the Voice Mailbox be within the Verizon system”.

They told me that Verizon allowed voice mailbox messages of up to 2:00 minutes in length.

With these answers I find it unusual that the NCAA would make the statement that a call listed as 3:00 minutes long is not capable of being a voice message, only those listed as 2:00 minutes or shorter.

NCAA-8

Dustin— Please see the email from mom about coming on an Official Visit during the time period of the calls that Coach Bleil made. canceled on us late in the week and no paper work was given and no plane ticket was bought due to the uncertainty of the kid. Going forward, the recruiting office will send an email on Sunday with all kids that our coaches plan on bringing on an official for the that following weekend so we have record on both ends in case someone cancels on us late and we don’t have this situation. Please let me know if I need to do something different on this to make sure all parties are covered. Thanks Nick

From: Chernoff, Gerrit M [ATHDP] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 7:35 PM To: Nicholas N Uhlenhopp [ATHDP] Subject: Fwd: Check out our new website Gerrit Chernoff Begin forwarded message:

From: "Iowa State Football [ATHDP]" <IMCEAEX-_O=IASTATE_OU=A+5FD+5FP_CN=RECIPIENTS_CN=FOOTBALL-1@mail.iastate.edu> Date: October 29, 2010, 6:30:14 PM CDT To: "Bleil, William [ATHDP]" <[email protected]> Subject: FW: Check out our new website

From: Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 2:42 PM To: Recruiting, Football Subject: Re: Check out our new website Hi Iowa State. and from would like to go on offical visit next weekend Nov 5 th. Let us know if that would work. Thanks

NCAA-8

March 14, 2013

5025 Keats Street Ames, IA 50014 To whom it may concern:

This is intended to serve as my personal statement regarding the recent findings in the final summary disposition. First and foremost I would like to apologize for any trouble I have brought upon Iowa State University. I would also like to state that I do not feel my actions constitute a major violation. At no point did I intentionally break NCAA bylaws. I understand that I cannot make more than one call per week if not in a contact period and wouldn’t do so intentionally.

A number of the impermissible contacts that have been documented in the report were a matter of me not being made aware by our compliance department that documentation was needed if I left a message or did not make contact with the PSA.

Four of the 13 culpable calls, follow a call lasting three-‐minutes in length, which the NCAA deems a countable call. A call that last 121 seconds is technically a three minute call per Verizon’s billing structure. Verizon allows a customer to have a voicemail greeting up to 2 minutes in length. These calls, which I remember to be voicemails left at the end of the greeting, went undocumented.

I attribute 2 of my culpable calls to dropped service. I re-‐established a connection, however the calls were not completed immediately following the dropped service. Finally, another call was made to a prospect attending camp during the summer camp window.

I take great pride in my knowledge of the NCAA bylaws under which we operate. At no point in my coaching career have I intended to gain any sort of a recruiting advantage by knowingly circumventing any rules. I am very aware that I am only as good as my name, and I believe the entirety of my coaching career reflects just that. I feel that coaching is a special calling. At the end of the day, our job is to help young boys grow into young men, and I take this responsibility very seriously.

Sincerely,

R. Shane Burnham

NCAA-9

Iowa State University genuinely appreciates the assistance from the NCAA enforcement staff with processing this case. Specifically, Elizabeth Ramsey has been very helpful and always available, greatly assisting us in our efforts to discover, report and resolve the unique specifics of our case. Iowa State University is absolutely committed to NCAA rules compliance; the progression of this entire case is an illustration of that commitment.

• The telecommunications investigation was triggered when the head men’s basketball coach witnessed a possible violation involving student coach, and reported that immediately to the Director of Athletics and the Compliance office. The department took immediate action (within 24 hours) to terminate the student coach and begin thoroughly investigating the possible violations.

• Our investigation progressed exactly as prescribed by our protocol for dealing with potential rules violations. The center of the investigation rested within the President’s office, and the Compliance staff was uncompromisingly thorough in their investigation.

• All Athletics Department personnel were completely cooperative and open throughout the investigation.

• Due to the institution’s commitment to uncover every potential violation, the resultant telecommunications investigation was the most extensive that has ever been completed, to the best of our knowledge. Our investigation included reviewing nearly three years of telecommunication records (over 750,000 phone calls), for the entire Athletics Department, including all of our 69 coaches and our non-coaching staff members.

We spared neither expense nor effort in order to discover the extent of these potential violations. The exhaustive investigation unfortunately uncovered that our institution was not thorough enough in the monitoring of our telecommunication records. This deficiency contributed to a significant number of telecommunication violations. Iowa State University profoundly regrets that these violations occurred, and the institution has already taken significant, effective action to prevent any further violations. This Summary Disposition, based on our investigative data, accurately reports those violations. Regarding the impermissible telephone calls throughout our sports programs: Our examination of over 750,000 individual telephone call records uncovered a total of 1,484 impermissible calls (less than 0.2%) over three years across all sports. Of the 1,484 phone calls, 1,260 of the calls were attributed to purely logging issues, as detailed in this report and acknowledged by the NCAA’s enforcement staff. To be as clear as possible, these are instances in which coaches may not have made impermissible contact with recruits, but simply failed to properly document why the call was a noncountable call. These are binned in the Summary Disposition as “Pure Logging Issues.”

NCAA-13

The remaining 224 impermissible calls (0.02% of the total calls made) amongst all of our coaches and noncoaching staff over the three-year period include 145 “culpable telecommunication violations”, 55 “noncoaching staff impermissible telecommunications contact violations”, and 24 “clear-cut intentional telecommunication violations”. These impermissible calls are detailed in the Summary Disposition, and Iowa State University agrees with the characterization of those calls within the report. Iowa State University acknowledges that the institution failed to effectively monitor these aspects of telecommunications during this time. The compliance office had purchased software (through ACS) intended to meet the telecommunications monitoring needs of the department. When personnel experienced repeated setbacks in implementing the software, a manual process for monitoring was drafted. The process was simply not sufficiently followed, due in part to the sheer volume of phone records that were required to be reviewed manually each month. Our institution’s failure to implement its own written policies is significantly responsible for the number of coaches that failed to properly log “non-countable” calls. If we had appropriately implemented our monitoring system, inadvertent logging practices of our coaches would have been detected, and a prompt monitoring response would have deterred those coaches from accumulating the appreciable number of logging issues in this report. It is appropriately characterized in the Summary Disposition as a systemic problem that incubated “systemic logging failures.” The institution deeply regrets our failure to monitor and enforce NCAA telecommunications rules and has implemented procedures to properly address this problem. Along with our monitoring failures, the coaches’ testimonies within the report indicate that our educational efforts left them unclear regarding logging obligations. ISU acknowledges there were educational deficits. We would ask the committee to consider that many of our coaches did understand their obligations and, in fact, most of our coaches properly logged their calls most of the time. The same dataset from which we discovered these violations also reveals that most of our coaches were properly logging their calls most of the time. The table below demonstrates that each of the randomly selected coaches properly logged most of their non-countable calls. They properly logged over 95% of their non-countable calls; although they obviously understood their obligations, their practice was deficient 5% of the time.

Random'Coach'IDCoach'ACoach'BCoach'CCoach'DCoach'ECoach'FCoach'GCoach'HCoach'ICoach'JCoach'KCoach'LCoach'MTotal

Coaches(were(selected(from(13(different(sports(and(their(phone(records(analyzed(for(one(year.

Analysis'of'a'Selection'of'ISU'Coaches''Phone'Records

Sport'ID Year

properly 'documented'nonFcountable'calls'(e.g.'

contemporaneous'"LM")

improperly'documented'nonFcountable'calls'(e.g.'no'contemporaneous'"LM")

1 2010F2011 109 182 2009F2010 48 43 2009F2010 46 84 2008F2009 51 45 2009F2010 572 86 2009F2010 140 17 2010F2011 30 38 2010F2011 7 39 2010F2011 3 010 2010F2011 9 111 2010F2011 24 112 2010F2011 3 313 2010F2011 2 0

1044 54Coaches(were(selected(from(13(different(sports(and(their(phone(records(analyzed(for(one(year.

Analysis'of'a'Selection'of'ISU'Coaches''Phone'Records

NCAA-13

We absolutely believe that the coaches who generated the most violations did not properly understand their logging obligations, pointing to an educational deficit. We appeal that our efforts were effective enough to educate most of the coaches, while acknowledging that they were not sufficient to prevent all misunderstanding. As described in the report, and acknowledged above, a lack of effective monitoring allowed those misunderstandings to go undetected and fostered the accumulation of a large number of logging violations over time. Our institution swiftly overhauled our entire approach to telecommunications monitoring in order to ensure timeliness and efficacy, including the purchase and implementation of a different software-based tool (Bluechip Athletic Solutions). The new, comprehensive monitoring protocols were implemented in August of 2011, and they have been demonstrably effective. For example, for the first six months, the new protocols identified an average of 1.5 impermissible phone calls per month; over the next 12 months that dropped dramatically to 0.5 impermissible phone calls per month. Firstly, this demonstrates that our new approach is effective in detecting impermissible or improperly logged phone calls. Secondly, the data show that the timely negative feedback provided through the thorough an effective monitoring system facilitated a decrease in inadvertent violations. Regarding the impermissible text messaging by an individual who was then a student coach for the men's basketball team: Keith “Lefty” Moore, a former Iowa State University student-athlete, was a student assistant coach working with the Men’s Basketball team from the fall of 2010 through April 12, 2011. Moore was not hired by the basketball program, but rather was assigned to the basketball program, under the former head basketball coach, as a participant in a degree-completion program within the Athletics Department. Moore had coached and mentored a number of potential student-athletes on non-scholastic teams prior to returning to Iowa State University to work toward completing his degree. Our investigation discovered that Moore sent 160 impermissible text messages to five of these prospects. Again, our institution deeply regrets that Moore communicated via texts with his former players, even if he was responding as a mentor, and not in any way recruiting those prospective student athletes. Upon discovery of the violations, Iowa State University immediately removed Moore from his position and ceased all recruiting contact with the potential student athletes. None were offered athletics financial aid or a spot on the team as a walk-on student athlete, so Iowa State University clearly received no competitive advantage from Moore’s impermissible texts. In order to prevent future violations of this nature, our institution completely restructured the returning student-athlete program. Returning student athletes can no longer be assigned to specific sport coaching staffs; they are now limited to administrative

NCAA-13

responsibilities meeting department-wide objectives (and not objectives related to any specific sport). Regarding our self-imposed penalties We imposed meaningful sanctions in order to negate any potential advantage, and to admonish violators. Those sanctions are detailed in Section F of this report. Precedent set by the three most recent similar telecommunications cases guided our sanctions (University of California, University of Cincinnati, and Baylor University). Also, as reflected in the report produced by our collaboration with NCAA enforcement, we considered the number of violations per month for individuals, in order to normalize for the remarkably long period scrutinized in our extensive investigation. We meted the sanctions in three levels: department-wide, teams and individuals. The sanctions were stacked at each level.

• Firstly, the entire Athletics Department was placed on a two-year probationary period effective November 13, 2011. Further, the entire Athletics Department served a forfeiture of one week of recruiting calls at an appropriate time for each sport. To be clear, those penalties were imposed on all coaches, all sports regardless of culpability.

• Secondly, each specific sport was given penalties commensurate with their team culpability which were added to the department-wide penalties

• Thirdly, each coach was given penalties commensurate with their individual culpability, which were added to the department-wide and team penalties.

The result was the self-imposition of sanctions that affected the entire department with escalated severity to specific sports and individuals as warranted by their culpability. The sanctions were quite punitive to those with the most violations, and they provided an unmistakable message to everyone in the department that all NCAA rules are taken seriously at ISU. Conclusion In conclusion, Iowa State University acknowledges and accepts responsibility for the violations detailed in this report, as discovered by our own investigation with support from NCAA enforcement. We would ask the committee to consider:

1. Our institution responded rapidly and resolutely to potential violations. 2. Our institution conducted a remarkably thorough investigation, sparing no

expense in uncovering every possible violation. 3. The violations that we discovered produced very little, if any, recruiting

advantage. a. Over 85% of the phone call violations did not result in contact beyond that

which was permissible.

NCAA-13

b. Student-athletes interviewed in the investigation uniformly reported that any additional phone contact did not contribute to their decision to attend ISU.

c. ISU discontinued recruiting of all prospects that received impermissible text messages from the student assistant basketball coach.

4. Although the telephone legislation has been and continues to be significantly deregulated, ISU took these violations seriously, imposing significant penalties. We imposed significant penalties Department-wide, on specific sports coaching staffs, and on specific coaches.

5. In the 18 months since the submission of our thorough self-report, we have enacted thoughtful, aggressive changes in protocol to address the issues that permitted the violations. The data prove that those changes have been effective.

NCAA-13

ISU & Case Precedent

NCAA-13

Where ISU Stands Reviewed over 750,000 telephone calls; Found a total 1,484 impermissible calls; A total of 1,260 telephone calls that became violaHons due to poor documentaHon (e.g., leL message, dropped call, no answer); A total of 145 impermissible calls deemed culpable; A total of 55 impermissible calls deemed contact violaHons; A total of 24 impermissible calls deemed clear cut intenHonal violaHons; and A total of 165 text message violaHons.

NCAA-13

Case Precedent

California

February 25, 2011

NCAA-13

California

Total ViolaHons:

1.  364 Total Telephone ViolaHons 2.  305 Because of Poor DocumentaHon

ViolaHon per Coach

1.  Coach A – 23/23 2.  Coach B – 22/17 3.  Coach C – 107/104 4.  Coach D – 212/161

NCAA-13

California

Penalty Structure: 1. Department 2. Team 3. Individual

NCAA-13

California

Department PenalHes: 1.  Public reprimand and censure; 2.  Two years of probaHon; 3.  Had to place the fact they are on probaHon the

department’s website; 4.  AddiHonal compliance educaHon for all.

NCAA-13

California

Team PenalHes: 1.  The men’s basketball team was limited to five official visits per year

(a reducHon in one per year from what they had used over the previous four years);

2.  The men’s basketball coaches had to inform prospects they were on probaHon prior to an official visit or wri]en offer of aid.

NCAA-13

California

Coach A PenalHes (23/23): 1.  Was not allowed to make telephone contact for one week; and 2.  Had to a]end NCAA Regional Rules Seminar.

NCAA-13

California

Coach B PenalHes (22/17): 1.  Was not allowed to make telephone contact for two weeks.

NCAA-13

California

Coach C PenalHes (107/104): 1.  Was not allowed to make telephone contact for fiLeen weeks; and 2.  Had to a]end NCAA Regional Rules Seminar.

NCAA-13

California

Coach D PenalHes (212/161): 1.  Was not allowed to make or receive telephone calls for one year; 2.  Could not recruit off campus for two months; 3.  Could not have any off campus contact for nine months; and 4.  Had to a]end NCAA Regional Rules Seminar

NCAA-13

Case Precedent

CincinnaH

September 29, 2011

NCAA-13

Cincinna5

Total ViolaHons:

1.  220 Total Telephone Call ViolaHons

ViolaHon per Coach

1.  Women’s Basketball – 200 (176 from one assistant coach)

2.  Football – 20

NCAA-13

Cincinna5


NCAA-13

Cincinna5

Department PenalHes: 1.  Public reprimand and censure; 2.  Two years of probaHon; 3.  AddiHonal compliance educaHon for all.

NCAA-13

Cincinna5 Women’s Basketball Team PenalHes (200): 1.  The staff was penalized one off-‐campus recruiter for six months; 2.  The staff was penalized one staff member performing recruiHng

coordinaHon funcHons for six months; 3.  The women’s basketball coaches had to inform prospects they

were on probaHon prior to an official visit or wri]en offer of aid. 4.  Had to place the fact they are on probaHon in the WBB media

guide or website.

NCAA-13

Cincinna5 Head Coach PenalHes (13 to three PSA’s): 1.  Couldn’t call for two weeks.

NCAA-13

Cincinna5 Assistant Coach A PenalHes (10 to four PSA’s): 1.  Couldn’t call for five weeks.

NCAA-13

Cincinna5 Assistant Coach B PenalHes (1): 1.  Couldn’t call for one week.

NCAA-13

Cincinna5 Former Assistant Coach PenalHes (176): 1.  Couldn’t place or receive calls for one year; and 2.  Any insHtuHon wanHng to hire the former assistant coach within a

one-‐year period must provide show-‐cause documentaHon, detailing the efforts it will make to monitor the coach.

NCAA-13

Cincinna5 Football Team PenalHes (20): 1.  The enHre football staff was precluded from having telephone

contact for one week a month for four months.

NCAA-13

Cincinna5 Assistant Coach A PenalHes (10): 1.  Prohibited from making telephone contact for 4.5 months and

received a le]er of reprimand.

NCAA-13

Cincinna5 Assistant Coach B PenalHes (5): 1.  Prohibited from making telephone contact for three months and

received a le]er of admonishment.

NCAA-13

Cincinna5 Assistant Coach C PenalHes (4): 1.  Couldn’t call two prospects for the first two weeks of the iniHal

period to call recruits.

NCAA-13

Case Precedent

Baylor

April 11, 2012

NCAA-13

Baylor

Total ViolaHons:

1.  580 Total Telephone Calls 2.  778 Text Messages 3.  ?? Because of Poor DocumentaHon

ViolaHon per Coach – Phone Calls/Texts

1.  MBB Coach A – 181/17 2.  MBB Head Coach B – 81/24 3.  MBB Former Coach – 15/509 4.  MBB Coach B – 15/14 5.  WBB coach A – 184/166 6.  WBB Head Coach – 31/4

NCAA-13

Baylor

Other ViolaHons:

1.  MBB – Failure to Monitor by Head Coach 2.  MBB – Impermissible Talent Scouts 3.  WBB – Impermissible Employment of Prospects 4.  WBB – Impermissible RecruiHng Publicity 5.  WBB – Impermissible RecruiHng Contacts

NCAA-13

Baylor


NCAA-13

Baylor

Department PenalHes: 1.  Public reprimand and censure; 2.  Three years of probaHon; 3.  Had to place the fact they are on probaHon the

department’s website; and 4.  ConHnued educaHon for all.

NCAA-13

Baylor MBB Team PenalHes:

1.  Head coach was suspended for first two conference games; 2.  The program lost two scholarships, one in 2011-‐12 and one in

2012-‐13; 3.  The program reduced its recruiHng person days by 15; 4.  The team was limited to seven official visits per year; 5.  The program removed one coach from the road during July 2010

evaluaHon period; 6.  The staff a]ended the 2012 NCAA Regional Rules Seminar; 7.  The program canceled its elite men’s basketball camps for the

summers of 2009, 2010, and 2011. 8.  The men’s basketball coaches had to inform prospects they were

on probaHon prior to an official visit or wri]en offer of aid.

NCAA-13

Baylor WBB Team PenalHes:

1.  The program lost two scholarships in 2011-‐12;

NCAA-13

Baylor

MBB Coach A PenalHes (181 calls/17 texts): 1.  Was not allowed to make telephone contact for two months; and 2.  No texts to prospects he impermissibly sent texts (two weeks for

each impermissible text).

NCAA-13

Baylor

MBB Head Coach PenalHes (81 calls/24 texts/Failure to Monitor): 1.  Suspended from two conference compeHHons; 2.  Was not allowed to make telephone contact for two months; and 3.  No texts to prospects he impermissibly sent texts (two weeks for


NCAA-13

Baylor

MBB Former Coach (15 calls/509 texts/Unethical Conduct): 1.  One year show-‐cause.

NCAA-13

Baylor

MBB Coach B (15 calls/14 texts): 1.  Was not allowed to make telephone contact for two weeks.

NCAA-13

Baylor

WBB Coach A PenalHes (184 calls/166 texts): 1.  Was not allowed to make telephone contact for four months; and 2.  No texts to prospects she impermissibly sent texts (two weeks for


NCAA-13

Baylor

WBB Head Coach PenalHes (31 calls/4 texts/Improper Contact & PSA Employment): 1.  Was not allowed to make telephone contact for one month and

two weeks; and 2.  No travel for one week in July 2010 evaluaHon period and not

allowed to travel at all in July 2012 evaluaHon period.

NCAA-13

Iowa State Penalty Structure: 1. Department PenalHes 2. Team PenalHes 3. Individual PenalHes

NCAA-13

Department Penal5es

1.  Two years of probaHon; 2.  One week of no outgoing calls; and 3.  AddiHonal compliance educaHon for all.

NCAA-13

Team Penal5es

Team penalHes outlined in the next slide are in addi5on to the departmental penalHes.

NCAA-13

Four AddiHonal Weeks of No Outgoing Phone Calls Decrease RecruiHng OpportuniHes by One Per Prospect for 11-‐12 Decrease Official Visits by 20 Percent from Four-‐Year Average

Restrict the Number of Off-‐Campus Recruiters During Spring 2012

500

Three AddiHonal Weeks of No Outgoing Phone Calls Decrease RecruiHng OpportuniHes by One Per Prospect for 11-‐12 Decrease Official Visits by 20 Percent from Four-‐Year Average

200

Two AddiHonal Weeks of No Outgoing Phone Calls Decrease RecruiHng OpportuniHes by One Per Prospect for 11-‐12

60

One AddiHonal Week of No Outgoing Phone Calls

25

No Team PenalHes

Team Penal5es

NCAA-13

Individual Penal5es

Individual penalHes outlined in the next slide are in addi5on to the departmental penalHes and the team penalHes for your parHcular team.

NCAA-13

Individual Penal5es Ten AddiHonal Weeks of No Outgoing Phone Calls

A Le]er of Reprimand No Off-‐Campus RecruiHng for a Month

100

Five AddiHonal Weeks of No Outgoing Phone Calls A Le]er of Reprimand

80

Three AddiHonal Weeks of No Outgoing Phone Calls A Le]er of Admonishment

50

One AddiHonal Week of No Outgoing Phone Calls A Le]er of Admonishment

30

No Individual Penalty

NCAA-13

NCAA-16

NCAA Enforcement Staff Position Statement

As outlined in the findings of this report, the involved individuals named and at risk acknowledge their involvement in violations of NCAA legislation but believe that the violations should be found as secondary violations. The NCAA enforcement staff believes that all coaches named and at risk should be found responsible for major violations because the violations were not isolated or inadvertent and, based on the large number of impermissible calls, provided more than a minimal recruiting advantage. The respective findings for those involved individuals who are contesting that the violations are major and the breakdown of impermissible calls for each is as follows: Finding No. 1-b-(1) – Bobby Elliott, then assistant football coach and current University of Notre Dame assistant football coach:

Coach Total Violations Logging Issue Impermissible Time Period Culpable Total Culpable

Elliott 199 180 0 19 19 Finding No. 1-b-(2) – Bill Bleil, assistant football coach:


Bleil 78 58 2 18 20 Finding No. 1-b-(3) – Shane Burnham, assistant football coach:


Logging Issue


Culpable Burnham 93 80 4 9 13

Finding No. 1-b-(4) – Luke Wells, then assistant football coach and current Utah State University assistant football coach:


Wells 93 81 8 4 12 Finding No. 2-c-(1) – Danyial Robinson, then assistant men's basketball coach and current University of Houston assistant men's basketball coach:


Logging Issue


Culpable Robinson 64 43 0 21 21

ENFORCEMENT STAFF POSITION STATEMENT Page No. 2 _________

NCAA-16

It is important to note that the culpability analysis used by the enforcement staff in determining which coaches to name in the findings outlined in this report is not the same analysis used by the enforcement staff in determining whether the violations should be classified as major or secondary. As detailed in the findings, the total impermissible calls placed by the coaches was quite significant and the enforcement staff has consistently processed allegations as major that involve such a large number of calls. Even if the staff only took into account the culpable calls in determining whether to process the violations as major or secondary, the enforcement staff has processed allegations as major where individuals had placed fewer impermissible calls than those "culpable calls" placed by coaches involved in this case. In addition, based on the large number of culpable calls for each coach, the enforcement staff believes that the calls were not inadvertent. The number of culpable calls attributed to each coach consisted largely of repeated calls by the same coach during a designated time period. Therefore, the staff does not believe the evidence supports a conclusion that the calls were inadvertent. Finally, the staff believes that as with most telephone call violations, the fact that the coaches were calling more often than other coaches resulted in more than a minimal recruiting advantage. For these reasons and based on the specific facts and circumstances outlined in this report, the staff believes that the violations involving the coaches listed above should be found to be major.

NCAA-17

SUMMARY DISPOSITION AGREEMENT FORMFOR INVOLVED PARTY

(Former Staff Member)

BOBBY ELLIOTT

Iowa State University - Case No. M380

I understand this case wil be processed by the NCAA summary disposition process as outlinedin NCAA Bylaw 32.7 and the NCAA Committee on Infractions wil review the summarydisposition report and all accompanying materials forwarded to it by the institution, theenforcement staff and any involved individuals named in a finding of a violation. I acknowledgethat the summary disposition report wil contain findings of NCAA violations and proposedpenalties. 1 further acknowledge that 1 have been given the opportunity to propose limitations onmy athletically related duties associated with my current or future employment at an NCAAmember institution.

I have reviewed all sections of this report provided to me by the enforcement staff regardingfindings in which T have been named and agree that the facts contained in those findings aresubstantially correct, those findings are contrary to NCAA legislation, and thus, NCAAviolations occurred. I agree that this case is major in nature. Further, I accept and agree to theimposition of any proposed penalties set forth in the summary disposition report.

r understand that the Committee on Infractions, subsequent to its review of this summardisposition report, may accept the proposed limitations on my athletically related duties or directan employing institution impose additional limitations on my athletically related duties based onthe findings in which I am named. If there are additional limitations on my athletically relatedduties that are not identified in the summary disposition report, 1 understand that 1 have theopportnity to request that an expedited, in-person hearing be conducted pursuant to Bylaw

32.7.1.4.3..1'..

~ -'...

fy~Bobby Ellott

31 ~0 / VJDate / I

1/;) -r IrsDate tTimothy EpAttorney

NCAA-17

NCAA-17

NCAA-17

SUMMARY DISPOSITION AGREEMENT FORM FOR NCAA ENFORCEMENT STAFF

Iowa State University – Case No. M380

The NCAA enforcement staff, with the consent of the institution and any involved individual, submits this summary disposition report and all accompanying materials for processing pursuant to the NCAA summary disposition process as outlined in NCAA Bylaw 32.7. The enforcement staff certifies that the enforcement staff's inquiry and investigation, as assisted by the institution, has resulted in a complete and thorough examination of issues relating to potential violations of NCAA legislation in the conduct of the athletics program at the institution. The enforcement staff further certifies that the institution and any involved individual have cooperated to the fullest extent possible during the processing of this inquiry. The enforcement staff agrees that the facts as outlined in the findings are substantially correct, those findings are contrary to NCAA legislation and thus, NCAA violations occurred. The enforcement staff further agrees that this case is major in nature. Therefore, it is the enforcement staff's position that this case qualifies for adjudication through the summary disposition process.

___________________________________ April 8, 2013 Jonathan F. Duncan Date Interim Vice President of Enforcement

___________________________________ April 8, 2013 LuAnn Humphrey Date Director of Enforcement

___________________________________ April 8, 2013 Elizabeth Ramsey Date Assistant Director of Enforcement

Services

Operations

Video Services

Technical Services

Equipment

Tennis

Organization

Julie BrightSr Associate ADAdministration

Adminstrative

Business Services

Purchasing

Human Resources

Cyclone Sports

Compliance

Soccer

Softball

Special Projects

Women's Track & Cross Country

Men's Track &Cross Country

Men's Golf

Gymnastics

Concessions

Swimming & Diving

Strength & Conditioning

Wrestling

Men's Basketball

Properties

Academic Services

Ticket Operations

Women'sGolf

Sports Medicine

Web Services

Steve Malchow

Volleyball

Communications Football Women's Basketball

David HarrisSr Associate ADStudent Services

Calli SandersSr Associate AD

Sports Administration

Event Management

Facilities & Grounds

Communications

Licensing

Letterwinner's

Marketing

Special Events

Capital Projects Development

Chris JorgensenSr Associate AD

Facilities, Planning, & Mgt

Director of AthleticsFootball Coach

Frank NogelSr Assoicate AD

External RelationsSr Associate AD

Men's & Women'sBasketball Coaches

Janet LovellAdmin Specialist

ISU ATHLETICS DEPARTMENT ORGANIZATIONAL CHART

Jamie Pollard

01/18/11Iowa State-1

Full Grant-in-Aid Costs

2008-09

Residency Tuition Room Board Books

Iowa Resident $5,524.00 $3,659.00 $3,297.00 $400.00

Non-Resident $16,514.00 $3,659.00 $3,297.00 $400.00

2009-10


Iowa Resident $5,756.00 $3,750.00 $3,527.00 $400.00

Non-Resident $16,976.00 $3,750.00 $3,527.00 $400.00

2010-11


Iowa Resident $6,102.00 $3,881.00 $3,591.00 $400.00

Non-Resident $17,668.00 $3,881.00 $3,591.00 $400.00

2011-12


Iowa Resident $6,408.00 $3,993.00 $3,628.00 $400.00

Non-Resident $18,280.00 $3,993.00 $3,628.00 $400.00

2012-13


Iowa Resident $6,648.00 $2,046.50 $3,628.00 $800.00

Non-Resident $18,760.00 $2,046.50 $3,628.00 $800.00

Iowa State-2

2008-09

Sport # of Scholarships

Used # of Student-Athletes

on Athletic Aid # of

Redshirts # of Student-Athletes on Athletic Aid

who Withdrew from ISU Won-Loss

Record # of Official

Visits

MBB 13 13 2 0 15-17 7

MCC n/a n/a 6 n/a n/a n/a

MFB 84 90 30 0 2-10 52

MGO 4.5 10 2 0 n/a 5

MTI n/a n/a 9 n/a n/a n/a

MTO 12.6 31 12 0 n/a 37

MWR 9.9 17 12 0 15-3 15

WBB 15 16 0 0 27-9 5

WCC n/a n/a 9 n/a n/a n/a

WGO 6 8 2 0 n/a 2

WGY 12 12 1 0 4-15 11

WSB 11.99 19 0 0 26-29 4

WSO 13.68 26 2 0 5-12-2 10

WSW 13.57 30 0 0 5-5 11

WTE 8 8 0 0 10-13 2

WTI n/a n/a 5 n/a n/a n/a

WTO 15.79 31 7 1 n/a 43

WVB 12 14 0 0 22-13 5

Iowa State-3

2009-10







Visits

MBB 13 14 2 3 15-17 12


MFB 79 83 31 1 7-6 35

MGO 4.49 9 0 0 n/a 3


MTO 12.6 28 11 0 n/a 62

MWR 9.72 18 7 1 13-2 22

WBB 12 14 0 0 25-8 6


WGO 5.99 8 1 0 n/a 3

WGY 12 12 2 0 9-13 7

WSB 11.96 16 2 0 26-29 8

WSO 13.99 25 3 0 7-9-4 12

WSW 13.36 32 1 0 6-4 14

WTE 8 8 0 0 9-15 6


WTO 17.77 37 11 1 n/a 56

WVB 12 12 1 0 27-5 3

Iowa State-3

2010-11







Visits

MBB 13 13 4 0 16-16 10


MFB 85 93 37 3 5-7 41

MGO 4.48 10 2 0 n/a 0


MTO 12.3 32 23 1 n/a 42

MWR 9.64 20 12 0 9-10 36

WBB 11 11 0 0 22-11 5


WGO 5.99 7 2 0 n/a 0

WGY 12 15 1 0 8-12-2 5

WSB 11.98 16 0 0 21-28 7

WSO 14 29 3 0 8-10-2 13

WSW 13.96 34 0 0 5-5 14

WTE 8 9 1 0 10-16 2


WTO 17.96 38 22 0 n/a 42

WVB 11 14 1 0 20-9 5

Iowa State-3

2011-12







Visits

MBB 13 13 2 0 23-11 8


MFB 85 89 36 4 6-7 31

MGO 4.51 11 1 0 n/a 4


MTO 12.55 34 9 0 n/a 36

MWR 9.9 23 13 0 4-13 28

WBB 13 13 0 0 18-13 4


WGO 6 7 0 0 n/a 1

WGY 11 12 2 0 8-13-1 7

WSB 11.88 15 0 0 14-39 10

WSO 13.98 29 1 0 9-9-1 4

WSW 14 35 0 0 5-3 10

WTE 8 9 0 0 4-19 2


WTO 17.95 33 11 0 n/a 38

WVB 12 13 1 0 25-6 8

Iowa State-3

2012-13 (* as of 1/15/13)


Used*

# of Student-Athletes on Athletic

Aid*

# of Redshirts

# of Student-Athletes on Athletic Aid who Withdrew from ISU*

Won-Loss Record

# of Official Visits*

MBB 12 12 n/a 0 n/a 6


MFB 85 85 36 1 6-7 27

MGO 4.1 7 n/a 0 n/a 1

MTI n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

MTO 11.4 22 n/a 0 n/a 31

MWR 9.85 25 n/a 0 n/a 19

WBB 12 13 n/a 0 n/a 7


WGO 5.5 6 n/a 0 n/a 2

WGY 12 13 n/a 0 n/a 4

WSB 11.97 17 n/a 0 n/a 5

WSO 13.92 30 1 0 10-10 9

WSW 13.95 30 n/a 0 n/a 8

WTE 7 9 n/a 0 n/a 1

WTI n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

WTO 17.35 37 n/a 0 n/a 28

WVB 12 13 2 0 22-8 3

Iowa State-3

Squad ListReport Date: 1/14/2013 Academic Year: 2009-10

Institution: I O WA S TAT E UNIVERSITY

Sport: Football

City/State: AMES, IA Maximum Grants Permitted: 85.0

First Contest of the SPRING Segment:First Contest of the FALL Segment: 09/03/2009

Name/I.D. No. ELIG

Status of Student Financial Aid EXEMPT

Countable Players Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.

F S Term 1stenrolledA n y Your

# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Ini-tial

Over-all

Equi-valentaward

Reason Date Equi-valentaward

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,527.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $25,747.70 $.00 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $26,617.70 $.00 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 X X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $26,617.70 $.00 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 X X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,613.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 3.0 N FY $11,979.85 $.00 $11,979.85 X $11,979.85 .00 1.00

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $26,757.70 $.00 $26,757.70 $26,757.70 X X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $26,617.70 $.00 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 X X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,998.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,397.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $26,182.70 $.00 $26,182.70 $26,182.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $23,618.00 $.00 $23,618.00 $26,347.70 X .90 .90

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $26,617.70 $.00 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 X X 1.00 1.00

Y N 3.00 2.0 Y F $13,308.85 $.00 $13,308.85 $26,617.70 X .50 .50



Sport: Football



Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Ini-tial

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


N Y 1.50 2.0 Y S $13,448.85 $.00 $13,448.85 $26,757.70 X X .50 .50

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y FY $25,747.70 $.00 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 2.00 3.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,387.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $25,747.70 $.00 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 X 1.00 1.00

N Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,613.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,000.00 .00 .00

Y Y .00 3.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,747.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,434.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,353.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $25,747.70 $.00 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $14,473.60 $.00 $14,473.60 $14,473.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $24,763.60 $.00 $24,763.60 $24,763.60 X 1.00 1.00

N Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,667.70 .00 .00

N Y .00 0.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,763.70 .00 .00



Sport: Football



Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Ini-tial

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


N Y .00 0.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,148.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $15,397.70 $.00 $15,397.70 $15,397.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y F $12,873.85 $.00 $12,873.85 $12,873.85 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $26,617.70 $.00 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $26,617.70 $.00 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,397.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $26,617.70 $.00 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 X 1.00 1.00

N Y 1.50 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,767.70 .00 .00

N Y 1.00 2.0 Y F $13,308.85 $.00 $13,308.85 $26,617.70 X .50 .50

N Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,153.70 .00 .00

N Y .00 2.0 Y S $13,448.85 $.00 $13,448.85 $26,757.70 X .50 .50

N Y 3.00 2.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,067.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 2.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,067.70 .00 .00

N N .00 0.0 Y F $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,547.70 .00 .00



Sport: Football



Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Ini-tial

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


.00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,527.70 .00 .00

.00 0.0 Y FY $26,617.70 $.00 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 X X 1.00 1.00

3.00 2.0 Y FY $25,747.70 $.00 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 X 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.0 Y FY $26,617.70 $.00 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 X 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.0 Y FY $26,617.70 $.00 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 X 1.00 1.00

4.00 3.0 Y F $11,889.75 $.00 $11,889.75 $11,889.75 X 1.00 1.00

.00 3.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,747.70 .00 .00

.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,747.70 .00 .00

1.00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $13,122.00 .00 .00

.00 0.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,550.70 .00 .00

2.00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,397.70 .00 .00

.00 0.0 Y FY $26,617.70 $.00 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 X X 1.00 1.00

1.00 3.0 Y F $7,669.85 $.00 $7,669.85 X $15,339.70 .00 .50

.00 0.0 Y FY $15,397.70 $.00 $15,397.70 $15,397.70 X X 1.00 1.00



Sport: Football



Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Ini-tial

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,067.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $26,617.70 $.00 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $15,067.70 $.00 $15,067.70 $15,067.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $26,617.70 $.00 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 X X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $15,397.70 $.00 $15,397.70 $15,397.70 X X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $15,613.70 $.00 $15,613.70 $15,613.70 X X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y FY $17,109.60 $.00 $17,109.60 $17,109.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $26,617.70 $.00 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $14,527.70 $.00 $14,527.70 $14,527.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 2.0 N S $1,888.60 $.00 $1,888.60 $14,527.70 X .13 .13

N Y 1.00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $13,122.00 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $15,397.70 $.00 $15,397.70 $15,397.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y F $10,443.83 $.00 $10,443.83 $25,747.70 X .41 .41

Y Y .00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,527.70 .00 .00



Sport: Football



Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Ini-tial

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 N FY $26,617.70 $.00 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 X X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,434.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,397.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,527.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 2.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,747.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.50 1.0 Y FY $14,527.70 $.00 $14,527.70 $14,527.70 X 1.00 1.00

N N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,672.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 2.0 N FY $15,067.70 $.00 $15,067.70 $15,067.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $24,157.70 $3,000.00 $27,157.70 $27,157.70 X 1.00 .89

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $26,157.70 $.00 $26,157.70 $26,157.70 X 1.00 1.00

N Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $13,466.32 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,397.70 .00 .00

N Y 1.50 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,672.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $26,617.70 $.00 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 X 1.00 1.00



Sport: Football



Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Ini-tial

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y F $11,465.85 $.00 $11,465.85 $11,465.85 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $26,617.70 $.00 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 X X 1.00 1.00

N Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,773.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $26,617.70 $.00 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 X X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $26,287.70 $.00 $26,287.70 $26,287.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y F $13,308.85 $.00 $13,308.85 $26,617.70 X .50 .50

Y Y .00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,617.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $26,617.70 $.00 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $13,964.85 .00 .00

N Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $15,539.70 $.00 $15,539.70 X $15,539.70 .00 1.00

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $15,067.70 $.00 $15,067.70 $15,067.70 X 1.00 1.00

N Y .00 0.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $11,996.00 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 3.0 N F $9,419.00 $.00 $9,419.00 $9,419.00 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $26,617.70 $.00 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 X X 1.00 1.00



Sport: Football



Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Ini-tial

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y N .50 2.0 Y FY $27,387.70 $.00 $27,387.70 $27,387.70 X X 1.00 1.00

N Y 4.00 4.0 Y F $13,109.85 $.00 $13,109.85 X $26,219.70 .00 .50

Y Y .00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,527.70 .00 .00

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y F $7,263.85 $.00 $7,263.85 $7,263.85 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 2.00 3.0 Y FY $15,862.70 $.00 $15,862.70 $15,862.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,747.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $26,617.70 $.00 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 X X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,144.70 .00 .00

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y F $11,984.75 $.00 $11,984.75 $11,984.75 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,547.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $26,617.70 $.00 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 X X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $26,617.70 $.00 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,397.70 .00 .00

Y Y .50 1.0 Y FY $15,397.70 $.00 $15,397.70 $15,397.70 X X 1.00 1.00



Sport: Football



Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Ini-tial

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


N Y .00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,527.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 3.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,473.60 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $26,617.70 $.00 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 X X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $26,617.70 $.00 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 X X 1.00 1.00

N Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,617.70 .00 .00

N Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,527.70 .00 .00

N Y 4.50 4.0 Y F $14,029.50 $.00 $14,029.50 X $14,029.50 .00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $26,617.70 $.00 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 X X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 2.0 N FY $14,395.10 $.00 $14,395.10 $14,952.70 X .96 .96

Y Y 2.50 1.0 Y FY $27,587.70 $.00 $27,587.70 $27,587.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 2.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,527.70 .00 .00

N Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,672.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $23,617.70 $3,000.00 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 X X 1.00 .89

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,397.70 .00 .00



Sport: Football



Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Ini-tial

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,747.70 .00 .00

N Y .00 2.0 Y S $13,308.85 $.00 $13,308.85 $26,617.70 X .50 .50

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $22,381.70 $4,500.00 $26,881.70 $26,881.70 X X 1.00 .83

Y Y .00 3.0 N FY $25,747.70 $.00 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 X 1.00 1.00

Squad-List Totals $1,712,834.41 $1,664,505.66 25 79 73.31 76.78

ContemporaneousPenalties (CP)

Legislated MaximumTeam Limit for Sport(x)

CP Team is Subject to in 2009-10(y)

CP Carried Over from PREVIOUSAcademic Year (if any) Applicableto Current Academic Year (z)(N/A in 2005-06)

Maximum Team Limit forThis Academic Year(x - y) - z

CP Applicable to 2009-10 Carried Over to 2010-11 (if any)

* = Student-athlete's aid counts in another sport+ = Student-athlete has been over-awarded> = Team limit exceeded

Form completed by: _____________________ Title: _____________________ Telephone: ___________ Date: ___________Form approved by: _____________________ Date: ___________

Director of Athletics' Signature: _____________________ Date: ___________

Head Coach's Signature: _____________________ Date: ___________

Additional Signature: _____________________ Title: _____________________

Additional Signature: _____________________ Title: _____________________Required by Bylaw 15.5.10.2. File in director of athletics' office.


Institution: I O W A S T A T E UNIVERSITY

Sport: M e n ' s Basketball


First Contest of the REGULAR (with QRMTE) Segment: 11/02/2009

Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.

F S Term 1stenrolledAny Your

# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $24,763.60 $.00 $24,763.60 $24,763.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $20,397.10 $.00 $20,397.10 $20,397.10 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $24,295.60 $.00 $24,295.60 $24,295.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $26,287.70 $.00 $26,287.70 $26,287.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $25,633.60 $.00 $25,633.60 $25,633.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $25,747.70 $.00 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,998.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $23,359.60 $.00 $23,359.60 $23,359.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 3.0 Y FY $25,887.70 $.00 $25,887.70 $25,887.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $20,731.60 $4,500.00 $25,231.60 $25,231.60 X 1.00 .82

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $26,617.70 $.00 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,397.70 .00 .00

N N 4.00 4.0 N F/S $7,399.85 $.00 $7,399.85 X $7,399.85 .00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y F $7,263.85 $.00 $7,263.85 $14,627.70 X .50 .50

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $12,025.78 $.00 $12,025.78 $14,630.09 X .82 .82

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $24,763.60 $.00 $24,763.60 $24,763.60 X 1.00 1.00






Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Squad-List Totals $295,174.98 $292,275.13 13 12.32 13.14















Sport: Men's Cross Country


First Contest of the CHAMPIONSHIP Segment: 09/04/2009

Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,652.85 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,627.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.50 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,287.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,717.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,863.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,981.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 3.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,211.85 .00 .00

u Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,747.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,017.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,617.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,963.70 .00 .00

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,747.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,627.70 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,304.20 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,899.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,747.70 .00 .00



Sport: Men's Cross Country



Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,899.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,897.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,427.70 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,449.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.50 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,799.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,863.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,534.70 .00 .00

N Y 3.00 4.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $13,705.85 .00 .00

Y Y .00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,627.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 3.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,717.70 .00 .00

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,287.70 .00 .00

Squad-List Totals $.00 $.00 .00 .00 Totals for Cross Country/Indoor Track/Outdoor Track: $326,267.72 $315,376.24 12.60 13.20


Institution: IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY Sport: Men's Golf


First Contest of the $segment.segmentType Segment: 02/06/2010

First Contest of the Segment: 09/12/2009

Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $13,778.11 $.00 $13,778.11 $26,757.70 .51 .51

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $537.62 $.00 $537.62 $26,881.70 .02 .02

Y Y 3.50 3.0 Y FY $11,318.68 $.00 $11,318.68 $14,147.70 .80 .80

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $13,778.11 $.00 $13,778.11 $26,757.70 .51 .51

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $13,143.84 $.00 $13,143.84 $26,287.70 .50 .50

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $11,622.16 $.00 $11,622.16 $14,527.70 .80 .80

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,287.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $7,698.84 $.00 $7,698.84 $15,397.70 .50 .50

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $6,571.92 $.00 $6,571.92 $26,287.70 .25 .25

N Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,672.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $8,716.62 $.00 $8,716.62 $14,527.70 .60 .60

Squad-List Totals $87,165.90 $87,165.90 4.49 4.49

Squad ListR e p o r t Date:

1/14/2013 Academic Year: 2009-10


Sport: Men's Track and Field (P and P only) (non-NCAA sport)




Name/I.D. No. ELIG


C o u n t a b l e Players

Change inStatus


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward

Reason Date

Squad-List Totals $.00 $.00 .00














Institution: IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY Sport: Men's Track, Indoor


Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 1.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,781.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,652.85 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,627.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,647.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,427.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.50 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,287.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,699.70 .00 .00

N N .00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,517.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,717.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,327.70 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,687.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,327.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,863.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,981.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 3.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,211.85 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,863.70 .00 .00

N Y .00 2.0 Y S $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,183.60 .00 .00




Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 2.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,747.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 2.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,627.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,197.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,627.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,747.70 .00 .00

N Y 2.50 2.0 Y S $12,793.85 $.00 $12,793.85 $25,837.70 .50 .50

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,017.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,003.70 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,617.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,435.70 .00 .00

N N .00 1.0 Y F $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,767.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,963.70 .00 .00

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,747.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,627.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,627.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,899.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,627.70 .00 .00




Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,747.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,899.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,427.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,057.60 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,847.70 .00 .00

Y Y 4.00 4.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,527.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,897.70 .00 .00

N Y .00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,627.70 .00 .00

N N 1.00 1.0 Y F $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,747.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,427.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,018.70 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,449.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,467.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,467.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.50 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,799.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,863.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $12,296.00 .00 .00




Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,643.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,534.70 .00 .00

N N .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,919.20 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,687.70 .00 .00

N N .00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,627.70 .00 .00

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $13,705.85 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,529.70 .00 .00

N N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,973.70 .00 .00

N N .00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,279.85 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,747.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,627.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 3.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,717.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,847.70 .00 .00

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,287.70 .00 .00

Squad-List Totals $12,793.85 $12,793.85 .50 .50 Totals for Cross Country/Indoor Track/Outdoor Track: $326,267.72 $315,376.24 12.60 13.20



Sport: M e n ' s Tr a c k , Outdoor


Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 1.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,781.70 .00 .00

Y Y .50 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,652.85 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $1,462.76 $.00 $1,462.76 $14,627.70 .10 .10

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,647.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,427.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.50 2.0 Y FY $26,287.70 $.00 $26,287.70 $26,287.70 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,699.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 2.0 Y FY $400.00 $.00 $400.00 $16,717.70 .02 .02

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $429.82 $.00 $429.82 $14,327.70 .03 .03

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $12,973.85 $.00 $12,973.85 $25,687.70 .51 .51

.00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,327.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,863.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,981.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 3.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,211.85 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,863.70 .00 .00





Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


N Y 4.00 4.0 Y FY $15,891.48 $.00 $15,891.48 X $19,818.35 .00 .80

N Y .00 2.0 Y S $12,397.75 $.00 $12,397.75 $25,183.60 .49 .49

tu Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $25,747.70 $.00 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 2.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,627.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,197.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,627.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $2,059.80 $.00 $2,059.80 $25,747.70 .08 .08

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $26,017.70 $.00 $26,017.70 $26,017.70 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,003.70 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $498.52 $.00 $498.52 $16,617.70 .03 .03

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $721.78 $.00 $721.78 $14,435.70 .05 .05

N N 1.00 1.0 Y F $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,767.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 N FY $25,963.70 $.00 $25,963.70 $25,963.70 1.00 1.00

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y FY $25,747.70 $.00 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,627.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,627.70 .00 .00





Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,899.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,627.70 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $1,287.38 $.00 $1,287.38 $25,747.70 .05 .05

Y Y 1.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,899.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,427.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $1,227.07 $2,750.00 $3,977.07 $25,057.60 .16 .05

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,847.70 .00 .00

Y Y 4.00 4.0 Y FY $2,614.98 $.00 $2,614.98 $14,527.70 .18 .18

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,897.70 .00 .00

N Y 1.00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,627.70 .00 .00

N N 2.00 2.0 Y F $10,623.85 $2,250.00 $12,873.85 $25,747.70 .50 .41

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,427.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $27,918.70 $.00 $27,918.70 $28,018.70 1.00 1.00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,449.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $434.02 $.00 $434.02 $14,467.70 .03 .03

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $1,193.07 $.00 $1,193.07 $14,467.70 .08 .08





Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 2.50 2.0 Y FY $27,799.70 $.00 $27,799.70 $27,799.70 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,863.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $12,296.00 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,643.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,534.70 .00 .00

N N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,919.20 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $23,199.92 $.00 $23,199.92 $25,687.70 .90 .90

N N 1.00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,627.70 .00 .00

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y FY $9,060.16 $.00 $9,060.16 $13,705.85 .66 .66

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $435.88 $.00 $435.88 $14,529.70 .03 .03

N N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,973.70 .00 .00

N N 1.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,279.85 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $25,747.70 $.00 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,627.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 3.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,717.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,847.70 .00 .00





Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y FY $5,331.18 $.00 $5,331.18 $26,287.70 .20 .20

Squad-List Totals $313,473.87 $302,582.39 12.10 12.70 Totals for Cross Country/Indoor Track/Outdoor Track: $326,267.72 $315,376.24 12.60 13.20














Institution: IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY Sport: Men's Wrestling




Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $17,883.38 $.00 $17,883.38 $25,547.70 .70 .70

N Y 1.00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,647.70 .00 .00

Y Y 4.00 3.0 N FY $514.94 $.00 $514.94 $25,747.70 .02 .02

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $15,587.00 $1,500.00 $17,087.00 $26,287.70 .65 .59

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,390.20 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,863.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,088.20 .00 .00

Y Y .00 3.0 Y F $.00 $.00 $.00 $17,738.60 .00 .00

N Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $24,863.60 .00 .00

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y FY $13,858.90 $.00 $13,858.90 $16,812.25 .82 .82

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,627.70 .00 .00

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y FY $26,287.70 $.00 $26,287.70 $26,287.70 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,427.70 .00 .00

Y N 3.00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,847.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $1,506.76 $.00 $1,506.76 $15,167.70 .10 .10

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $443.92 $.00 $443.92 $14,797.70 .03 .03






Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $10,169.38 $.00 $10,169.38 $14,527.70 .70 .70

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,780.70 .00 .00

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y FY $12,692.08 $.00 $12,692.08 $14,234.70 .89 .89

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $22,787.70 $3,500.00 $26,287.70 $26,287.70 1.00 .87

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,133.60 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,713.60 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,627.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $1,179.14 $1,000.00 $2,179.14 $14,527.70 .15 .08

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $515.34 $.00 $515.34 $25,767.70 .02 .02

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y F $5,447.88 $.00 $5,447.88 $14,627.70 .37 .37

Y N 1.00 0.0 Y F $2,574.77 $.00 $2,574.77 $25,747.70 .10 .10

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y FY $18,566.75 $.00 $18,566.75 $18,620.75 1.00 1.00

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $22,832.52 $.00 $22,832.52 $24,763.60 .92 .92

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $4,340.30 $.00 $4,340.30 $14,467.70 .30 .30

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,329.70 .00 .00

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y FY $20,631.42 $.00 $20,631.42 $21,755.50 .95 .95






Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward

















Sport: W o m e n ' s Basketball


First Contest of the REGULAR (no QRMTE) Segment: 11/01/2009

Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


N N .00 3.0 N S $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,527.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $14,527.70 $.00 $14,527.70 $14,527.70 X 1.00 1.00

N N .00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,527.70 .00 .00

N N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,667.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $26,739.70 $.00 $26,739.70 $26,739.70 X 1.00 1.00

N N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,467.70 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $26,058.00 $.00 $26,058.00 $26,287.70 X .99 .99

N N .00 4.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,617.70 .00 .00

N N .00 3.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,747.70 .00 .00

N N .00 3.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,067.70 .00 .00

N N .00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,527.70 .00 .00

N N .00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,593.70 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $25,747.70 $.00 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 3.0 N FY $14,945.60 $.00 $14,945.60 X $14,945.60 .00 1.00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $23,359.60 $.00 $23,359.60 $23,359.60 X 1.00 1.00






Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $14,127.10 $1,250.00 $15,377.10 $15,279.10 X 1.00 .92

Y Y 4.00 4.0 Y F $12,309.85 $.00 $12,309.85 X $13,109.85 .00 .94

N N .00 3.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,067.70 .00 .00

N N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,752.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $15,325.60 $.00 $15,325.60 $15,325.60 X 1.00 1.00

N N .00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,527.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $25,616.00 $.00 $25,616.00 $26,599.70 X .96 .96

N N .00 1.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,527.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $26,376.00 $.00 $26,376.00 $26,599.70 X .99 .99

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $24,295.60 $.00 $24,295.60 $24,295.60 X 1.00 1.00

N N .00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,527.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $25,876.00 $.00 $25,876.00 $26,599.70 X .97 .97

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $15,980.70 $.00 $15,980.70 $15,980.70 X 1.00 1.00




Sport: Wo m e n ' s C r o s s Country



Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 3.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,847.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,003.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,467.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,747.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,747.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 3.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,287.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $24,453.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,717.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,527.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,787.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,527.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,747.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,868.20 .00 .00

Y Y .00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,067.70 .00 .00






Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,427.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,683.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,717.70 .00 .00

Y Y .50 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,747.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,167.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,747.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,963.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,527.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y F $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,897.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,747.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,887.70 .00 .00



Institution: IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY Sport: Women's Golf




Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y N 1.00 1.0 Y F $10,942.77 $.00 $10,942.77 $25,847.70 .42 .42

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $26,907.70 $.00 $26,907.70 $26,907.70 1.00 1.00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y S $6,314.82 $.00 $6,314.82 $14,893.70 .42 .42

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $14,743.70 $.00 $14,743.70 $14,743.70 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $25,481.70 $.00 $25,481.70 $25,481.70 1.00 1.00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $27,157.70 $.00 $27,157.70 $27,157.70 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 1.0 N FY $3,836.04 $.00 $3,836.04 $25,573.70 .15 .15

Y Y 2.50 2.0 Y FY $26,617.70 $.00 $26,617.70 $26,617.70 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,353.70 .00 .00




Sport: W o m e n ' s Gymnastics



First Contest of the Segment:

Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,527.70 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $24,327.75 $.00 $24,327.75 $24,763.60 X .98 .98

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $22,391.90 $.00 $22,391.90 $24,763.60 X .90 .90

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $25,618.00 $.00 $25,618.00 $25,747.70 X .99 .99

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $22,876.00 $1,000.00 $23,876.00 $28,942.70 X .82 .79

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $26,287.70 $.00 $26,287.70 $26,287.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $25,747.70 $.00 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y FY $24,295.60 $.00 $24,295.60 $24,295.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y FY $22,838.85 $.00 $22,838.85 $22,838.85 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $25,747.70 $.00 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $23,376.00 $.00 $23,376.00 $25,747.70 X .91 .91

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,942.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,747.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,802.70 .00 .00






First Contest of the Segment:

Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $26,287.70 $.00 $26,287.70 $26,287.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,747.70 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $25,747.70 $.00 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 X 1.00 1.00



Institution: IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY Sport: Women's Soccer



First Contest of the NONCHAMPIONSHIP Segment:

Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $20,550.16 $.00 $20,550.16 $25,687.70 .80 .80

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y F $8,700.69 $500.00 $9,200.69 $26,037.70 .35 .33

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $18,247.70 $7,500.00 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 1.00 .71

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $21,306.15 $.00 $21,306.15 $24,774.60 .86 .86

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $19,190.76 $.00 $19,190.76 $25,587.70 .75 .75

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $7,706.30 $.00 $7,706.30 $25,687.70 .30 .30

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,643.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $8,468.72 $.00 $8,468.72 $15,397.70 .55 .55

N Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,762.70 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $19,568.24 $.00 $19,568.24 $25,747.70 .76 .76

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,647.70 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y F $8,149.85 $.00 $8,149.85 $27,899.70 .29 .29

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $19,716.52 $.00 $19,716.52 $26,288.70 .75 .75

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $14,527.70 $.00 $14,527.70 $14,527.70 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $2,882.72 $.00 $2,882.72 $14,413.60 .20 .20

1.00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,166.85 .00 .00






Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $7,263.84 $.00 $7,263.84 $14,527.70 .50 .50

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $15,392.32 $1,500.00 $16,892.32 $25,988.70 .65 .59

Y Y 1.00 1.0 N FY $3,178.00 $670.00 $3,848.00 $15,437.70 .25 .21

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $11,622.16 $.00 $11,622.16 $14,527.70 .80 .80

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $20,598.16 $.00 $20,598.16 $25,747.70 .80 .80

Y N 3.00 3.0 Y FY $12,381.79 $.00 $12,381.79 $24,763.60 .50 .50

N N 4.00 4.0 Y F $6,050.70 $.00 $6,050.70 X $12,873.85 .00 .47

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $14,973.60 $.00 $14,973.60 $14,973.60 1.00 1.00

N N .00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,527.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,647.70 .00 .00

N N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,627.70 .00 .00

N N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,627.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y F $9,039.69 $.00 $9,039.69 $25,687.70 .35 .35

N N 4.00 3.0 Y F $13,109.85 $.00 $13,109.85 X $13,109.85 .00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $19,564.64 $.00 $19,564.64 $25,988.20 .75 .75

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $15,989.48 $.00 $15,989.48 $25,795.70 .62 .62






Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 1.00 1.0 N FY $2,566.04 $1,500.00 $4,066.04 $25,747.70 .16 .10















Institution: IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY Sport: Softball



First Contest of the NONCHAMPIONSHIP Segment: 09/05/2009

Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,757.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $23,359.60 $.00 $23,359.60 $23,359.60 1.00 1.00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $15,448.62 $.00 $15,448.62 $25,747.70 .60 .60

N Y 4.00 3.0 Y F $10,201.00 $.00 $10,201.00 X $10,201.00 .00 1.00

N Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,547.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $13,354.00 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $15,551.00 $.00 $15,551.00 $15,680.70 .99 .99

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $23,359.60 $.00 $23,359.60 $23,359.60 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,949.70 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $13,493.48 $3,500.00 $16,993.48 $25,747.70 .66 .52

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $18,538.34 $.00 $18,538.34 $25,747.70 .72 .72

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $7,065.19 $.00 $7,065.19 $14,527.70 .49 .49

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $7,943.84 $.00 $7,943.84 $14,054.85 .57 .57

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $18,247.70 $7,500.00 $25,747.70 $25,747.00 1.00 .71

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $20,838.74 $.00 $20,838.74 $28,942.70 .72 .72

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $22,376.00 $.00 $22,376.00 $25,747.70 .87 .87






Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $24,452.00 $.00 $24,452.00 $27,209.70 .90 .90

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $25,747.70 $.00 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 1.00 1.00

Y Y 2.00 3.0 Y FY $8,744.16 $.00 $8,744.16 $14,473.60 .60 .60

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $22,376.00 $.00 $22,376.00 $26,617.70 .84 .84



Institution: IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY Sport: Women's Swimming



First Contest of the $segment.segmentType Segment:

Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 1.0 N FY $400.00 $.00 $400.00 $14,527.70 .03 .03

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $5,709.34 $1,500.00 $7,209.34 $25,747.70 .28 .22

Y Y 1.00 2.0 Y FY $1,029.90 $.00 $1,029.90 $25,747.70 .04 .04

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $2,779.96 $.00 $2,779.96 $27,799.70 .10 .10

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $10,395.00 $.00 $10,395.00 $14,527.70 .72 .72

N N 4.00 4.0 Y FY $23,658.92 $.00 $23,658.92 X $26,287.70 .00 .90

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $7,808.72 $5,500.00 $13,308.72 $25,593.70 .52 .31

Y Y 3.00 3.0 N FY $26,287.70 $.00 $26,287.70 $26,287.70 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,459.60 .00 .00

N N .00 0.0 Y S $13,013.85 $.00 $13,013.85 $26,127.70 .50 .50

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $650.52 $1,500.00 $2,150.52 $26,881.70 .08 .02

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $6,571.92 $.00 $6,571.92 $26,287.70 .25 .25

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $1,966.03 $.00 $1,966.03 $14,513.70 .14 .14

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $511.68 $8,500.00 $9,011.68 $25,747.70 .35 .02

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $10,299.08 $.00 $10,299.08 $25,747.70 .40 .40

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $25,747.70 $.00 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 1.00 1.00






Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $14,513.70 $.00 $14,513.70 $14,513.70 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,513.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,847.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $4,358.30 $.00 $4,358.30 $14,527.70 .30 .30

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $6,665.42 $.00 $6,665.42 $26,661.70 .25 .25

Y Y 3.00 3.0 N FY $25,747.70 $.00 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $8,373.84 $4,500.00 $12,873.84 $25,747.70 .50 .33

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $2,909.54 $.00 $2,909.54 $14,547.70 .20 .20

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $2,874.74 $.00 $2,874.74 $14,373.70 .20 .20

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $24,247.70 $1,500.00 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 1.00 .94

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $6,433.42 $.00 $6,433.42 $25,833.70 .25 .25

N Y 4.00 4.0 Y FY $13,143.84 $.00 $13,143.84 X $26,287.70 .00 .50

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $19,381.26 $.00 $19,381.26 $25,841.70 .75 .75

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $13,143.84 $.00 $13,143.84 $26,287.70 .50 .50

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $13,899.84 $.00 $13,899.84 $27,799.70 .50 .50

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $12,643.84 $500.00 $13,143.84 $26,287.70 .50 .48






Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $3,032.24 $3,500.00 $6,532.24 $25,747.70 .25 .12

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $14,810.76 $4,500.00 $19,310.76 $25,747.70 .75 .58

N Y 4.00 4.0 Y F $13,379.85 $.00 $13,379.85 X $13,579.85 .00 .99

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,755.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,780.70 .00 .00



Institution: IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY Sport: Women's Tennis




Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $25,747.70 $.00 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $25,747.70 $.00 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $25,747.70 $.00 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $24,618.00 $.00 $24,618.00 $25,747.70 X .96 .96

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $23,604.00 $1,500.00 $25,104.00 $26,397.70 X .95 .89

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,141.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,847.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $25,787.70 $.00 $25,787.70 $25,787.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,961.70 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $25,747.70 $.00 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $25,047.70 $.00 $25,047.70 $25,747.70 X .97 .97




Sport: Women's Track and Field (P and P only) (non-NCAA sport)




Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward

Reason Date
















Sport: Women's Track, Indoor


Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


N N .00 0.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,787.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,527.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,787.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,787.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 3.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,847.70 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,527.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,417.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,572.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,513.70 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,573.60 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,003.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,451.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,467.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,747.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,427.70 .00 .00





Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,473.60 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,747.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,747.70 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,747.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.50 2.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,627.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,473.60 .00 .00

Y Y 4.00 4.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,287.70 .00 .00

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $24,453.70 .00 .00

N N .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,427.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,767.70 .00 .00

N N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,573.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,717.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,527.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,787.70 .00 .00

N N .00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,117.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,527.70 .00 .00





Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


N Y 3.50 2.0 Y S $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,887.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,747.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,868.20 .00 .00

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,067.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,427.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,687.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,683.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,717.70 .00 .00

Y Y .50 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,747.70 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,527.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 3.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,167.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,747.70 .00 .00

N N 1.00 2.0 Y F $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,627.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,687.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,963.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,527.70 .00 .00





Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y F $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,897.70 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,747.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,887.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,781.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 3.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,908.70 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,747.70 .00 .00

$.00 $.00 .00 .00 Totals for Cross Country/Indoor Track/Outdoor Track: $402,867.97 $407,585.97 17.77 17.60



Sport: Women's Track, Outdoor


Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


N N .00 0.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,787.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $3,631.92 $.00 $3,631.92 $14,527.70 .25 .25

Y Y .00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 .00 .00

N Y .00 0.0 Y FY $12,843.84 $.00 $12,843.84 $25,787.70 .50 .50

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $20,550.16 $.00 $20,550.16 $25,787.70 .80 .80

Y Y 2.00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,847.70 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $14,527.70 $.00 $14,527.70 $14,527.70 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $15,849.20 $3,000.00 $18,849.20 $27,417.70 .69 .58

Y Y .00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,572.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $1,441.35 $.00 $1,441.35 $14,513.70 .10 .10

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $3,618.39 $.00 $3,618.39 $14,573.60 .25 .25

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $7,992.00 $.00 $7,992.00 $26,003.70 .31 .31

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $7,617.50 $918.00 $8,535.50 $28,451.70 .30 .27

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $2,039.46 $.00 $2,039.46 $14,467.70 .14 .14

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $25,747.70 $.00 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,427.70 .00 .00





Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $9,842.04 $.00 $9,842.04 $14,473.60 .68 .68

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $2,574.76 $.00 $2,574.76 $25,747.70 .10 .10

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $12,230.15 $.00 $12,230.15 $25,747.70 .47 .47

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $5,149.54 $.00 $5,149.54 $25,747.70 .20 .20

Y Y 1.50 2.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,627.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $5,934.16 $.00 $5,934.16 $14,473.60 .41 .41

Y Y 4.00 4.0 N FY $26,287.70 $.00 $26,287.70 $26,287.70 1.00 1.00

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y FY $24,453.70 $.00 $24,453.70 $24,453.70 1.00 1.00

N N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,427.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,767.70 .00 .00

N N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $12,786.84 $.00 $12,786.84 $25,573.70 .50 .50

Y Y 1.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,717.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,527.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $4,880.66 $.00 $4,880.66 $25,787.70 .19 .19

N N 1.00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,117.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $9,443.00 $.00 $9,443.00 $14,527.70 .65 .65





Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


N Y 3.50 2.0 Y S $13,013.85 $.00 $13,013.85 $25,887.70 .50 .50

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $17,232.40 $.00 $17,232.40 $25,747.70 .67 .67

Y Y .00 0.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,868.20 .00 .00

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y FY $1,054.72 $.00 $1,054.72 $15,067.70 .07 .07

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,427.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $8,961.32 $800.00 $9,761.32 $25,687.70 .38 .35

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $3,817.76 $.00 $3,817.76 $14,683.70 .26 .26

Y Y 1.00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,717.70 .00 .00

Y Y .50 1.0 Y FY $25,747.70 $.00 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 1.00 1.00

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $435.82 $.00 $435.82 $14,527.70 .03 .03

Y Y .00 3.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,167.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $514.94 $.00 $514.94 $25,747.70 .02 .02

N N 2.00 2.0 Y F $7,263.85 $.00 $7,263.85 $14,627.70 .50 .50

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $13,162.49 $.00 $13,162.49 $25,687.70 .51 .51

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $25,963.70 $.00 $25,963.70 $25,963.70 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $1,452.76 $.00 $1,452.76 $14,527.70 .10 .10





Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y F $2,397.07 $.00 $2,397.07 $14,897.70 .16 .16

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $772.42 $.00 $772.42 $25,747.70 .03 .03

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $25,887.70 $.00 $25,887.70 $25,887.70 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,781.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 3.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,908.70 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $25,747.70 $.00 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 1.00 1.00



Institution: IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY Sport: Women's Volleyball


First Contest of the NONCHAMPIONSHIP Segment:First Contest of the CHAMPIONSHIP Segment: 08/28/2009

Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $24,295.60 $.00 $24,295.60 $24,295.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $22,932.85 $2,250.00 $25,182.85 $25,747.70 X .98 .89

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $21,247.70 $4,500.00 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 X 1.00 .83

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $9,498.00 $.00 $9,498.00 $14,961.70 X .63 .63

N N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,599.70 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $17,471.60 $.00 $17,471.60 $17,489.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,821.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $25,240.00 $.00 $25,240.00 $26,201.70 X .96 .96

Y Y .00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,747.70 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $25,747.70 $.00 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $24,763.60 $.00 $24,763.60 $24,863.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,642.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $24,763.60 $.00 $24,763.60 $24,763.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,527.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $20,247.70 $5,500.00 $25,747.70 $25,747.70 X 1.00 .79

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $24,690.00 $.00 $24,690.00 $26,181.70 X .94 .94


Institution: IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY Sport: Women's Volleyball



Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $14,473.60 $.00 $14,473.60 $14,473.60 X 1.00 1.00















Institution: I O WA S T AT E UNIVERSITY

Sport: Football


First Contest of the FALL Segment: 09/02/2010

Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Ini-tial

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


N N .00 0.0 Y F $1,192.46 $.00 $1,192.46 $19,014.08 X .06 .06

N N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,205.25 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $27,542.70 $.00 $27,542.70 $27,542.70 X 1.00 1.00

N Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,377.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,976.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

N N 4.00 4.0 N S $594.79 $.00 $594.79 X $15,075.70 .00 .04

Y Y 1.00 2.0 Y FY $27,542.70 $.00 $27,542.70 $27,542.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $27,542.70 $.00 $27,542.70 $27,542.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,893.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,976.70 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $26,641.70 $.00 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $27,707.70 $.00 $27,707.70 $27,666.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,621.10 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $27,542.70 $.00 $27,542.70 $27,542.70 X 1.00 1.00



Sport: Football



Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Ini-tial

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 Y F $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,976.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 2.0 Y FY $26,641.70 $.00 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 2.0 Y FY $26,641.70 $.00 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,811.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $15,976.70 $.00 $15,976.70 $15,976.70 X X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,983.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $29,509.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $24,814.00 $.00 $24,814.00 $27,542.70 X X .90 .90

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,058.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,976.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 3.0 Y F $13,320.85 $.00 $13,320.85 X $26,641.70 .00 .50

N N .00 4.0 Y F $6,168.00 $.00 $6,168.00 X $15,075.70 .00 .41

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,405.10 .00 .00

.00 2.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $16,192.70 $.00 $16,192.70 $16,192.70 X X 1.00 1.00



Sport: Football



Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Ini-tial

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 1.50 0.0 Y FY $27,542.70 $.00 $27,542.70 $27,542.70 X X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,976.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $27,542.70 $.00 $27,542.70 $27,542.70 X X 1.00 1.00

Y N 1.00 0.0 Y FY $27,542.70 $.00 $27,542.70 $27,542.70 X X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $27,542.70 $.00 $27,542.70 $27,542.70 X X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,269.10 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $15,075.70 $.00 $15,075.70 $15,075.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y F $13,320.85 $.00 $13,320.85 $26,641.70 X .50 .50

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $26,641.70 $.00 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 X 1.00 1.00

N N 1.50 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y N 1.50 2.0 Y FY $26,641.70 $.00 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 X 1.00 1.00

N N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,061.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $27,542.70 $.00 $27,542.70 $27,542.70 X X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,811.10 .00 .00

N Y .00 2.0 Y S $13,961.35 $.00 $13,961.35 $27,732.70 X .50 .50



Sport: Football



Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Ini-tial

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


.00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y Y .50 2.0 Y FY $26,641.70 $.00 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 X X 1.00 1.00

N N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

N Y .00 2.0 Y S $13,961.35 $.00 $13,961.35 $27,732.70 X .50 .50

Y N 1.00 0.0 Y FY $27,542.70 $.00 $27,542.70 $27,542.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $15,976.70 $.00 $15,976.70 $15,976.70 X X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y F $8,001.75 $.00 $8,001.75 $8,001.75 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $26,641.70 $.00 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y F $13,320.85 $.00 $13,320.85 $26,641.70 X .50 .50

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $27,542.70 $.00 $27,542.70 $27,542.70 X X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 3.0 N FY $26,641.70 $.00 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 X 1.00 1.00

N N 1.00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $18,013.10 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,976.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $26,641.70 $.00 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 X 1.00 1.00



Sport: Football



Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Ini-tial

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


N N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,890.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $15,075.70 $.00 $15,075.70 $15,075.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,811.10 .00 .00

N Y .00 0.0 Y FY $7,988.35 $.00 $7,988.35 $14,370.85 X .56 .56

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,593.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 3.0 N FY $16,145.70 $.00 $16,145.70 $16,145.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $26,641.70 $.00 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y F $7,557.85 $.00 $7,557.85 X $15,115.70 .00 .50

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $26,641.70 $.00 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $15,075.70 $.00 $15,075.70 $15,075.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,910.10 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $15,291.70 $.00 $15,291.70 $15,291.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $25,659.00 $.00 $25,659.00 $27,542.70 X X .93 .93

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $27,542.70 $.00 $27,542.70 $27,542.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $15,075.70 $.00 $15,075.70 $15,075.70 X 1.00 1.00



Sport: Football



Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Ini-tial

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y N .00 3.0 N FY $7,537.85 $.00 $7,537.85 $15,075.70 X .50 .50

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $27,542.70 $.00 $27,542.70 $27,542.70 X X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .50 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,500.34 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $15,075.70 $.00 $15,075.70 $15,075.70 X 1.00 1.00

N Y .00 0.0 Y S $7,932.35 $.00 $7,932.35 $7,932.35 X X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 3.0 N S $7,537.85 $.00 $7,537.85 $15,075.70 X .50 .50

Y Y 1.00 0.0 N FY $27,542.70 $.00 $27,542.70 $27,542.70 X 1.00 1.00

N N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,593.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $27,542.70 $.00 $27,542.70 $27,542.70 X X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 1.0 N FY $13,248.00 $.00 $13,248.00 $15,976.70 X .83 .83

Y Y .00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y Y 3.50 2.0 Y FY $15,075.70 $.00 $15,075.70 $15,075.70 X 1.00 1.00

N N .00 2.0 Y FY $27,542.70 $.00 $27,542.70 $27,542.70 X X 1.00 1.00

N N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,910.10 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 3.0 N F $8,072.85 $.00 $8,072.85 X $8,072.85 .00 1.00



Sport: Football



Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Ini-tial

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $24,542.70 $3,000.00 $27,542.70 $27,542.70 X 1.00 .89

Y N 4.00 3.0 Y F $13,320.85 $.00 $13,320.85 $26,641.70 X .50 .50

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,630.70 .00 .00

N N .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,976.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $26,641.70 $.00 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $27,092.20 $.00 $27,092.20 $27,113.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y N 1.00 2.0 Y FY $26,641.70 $.00 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $27,542.70 $.00 $27,542.70 $27,542.70 X X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y F $13,340.85 $.00 $13,340.85 $26,641.70 X .50 .50

Y Y .00 2.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $17,112.10 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $26,641.70 $.00 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 X 1.00 1.00

N N 3.00 2.0 Y FY $16,617.70 $.00 $16,617.70 X $15,630.70 .00 1.00

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y FY $16,145.70 $.00 $16,145.70 X $16,145.70 .00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,976.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $27,542.70 $.00 $27,542.70 $27,542.70 X 1.00 1.00



Sport: Football



Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Ini-tial

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,967.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,377.10 .00 .00

Y N 1.50 3.0 Y FY $27,719.70 $.00 $27,719.70 $27,719.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,786.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,893.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 3.0 N FY $11,772.00 $.00 $11,772.00 $11,772.00 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $26,641.70 $.00 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,377.10 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,608.10 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 2.0 Y FY $26,641.70 $.00 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 X 1.00 1.00

N Y .00 2.0 Y S $13,961.35 $.00 $13,961.35 $27,732.70 X .50 .50

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $25,540.00 $.00 $25,540.00 $27,542.70 X X .93 .93

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,274.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $26,641.70 $.00 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 X 1.00 1.00

N N .00 0.0 Y F $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,976.70 .00 .00



Sport: Football



Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Ini-tial

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 1.50 0.0 Y FY $15,976.70 $.00 $15,976.70 $15,976.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $16,192.70 $.00 $16,192.70 $16,192.70 X X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

N N .00 0.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,647.10 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $26,641.70 $.00 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $27,542.70 $.00 $27,542.70 $27,542.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,785.46 .00 .00

N N 1.00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,976.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $27,542.70 $.00 $27,542.70 $27,542.70 X X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $27,542.70 $.00 $27,542.70 $27,542.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y N 1.00 3.0 N F $6,503.00 $.00 $6,503.00 $6,503.00 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 3.50 2.0 Y FY $26,641.70 $.00 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 X 1.00 1.00

N N .50 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,811.10 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $23,226.00 $3,000.00 $26,226.00 $27,542.70 X .95 .84

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $13,325.70 $1,750.00 $15,075.70 $15,075.70 X X 1.00 .88



Sport: Football



Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Ini-tial

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 1.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 .00 .00

Y N .00 2.0 Y FY $26,641.70 $.00 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 X X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $27,542.70 $.00 $27,542.70 $27,542.70 X X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 2.0 Y FY $23,355.70 $5,418.00 $28,773.70 $28,773.70 X 1.00 .81

N Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00







Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


N N 3.00 3.0 Y FY $26,624.70 $.00 $26,624.70 $26,641.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $28,376.70 $.00 $28,376.70 $28,376.70 X 1.00 1.00

N N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $27,542.70 $.00 $27,542.70 $27,542.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $27,707.70 $.00 $27,707.70 $27,707.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $26,641.70 $.00 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $26,641.70 $.00 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $27,732.70 $.00 $27,732.70 $27,732.70 X 1.00 1.00

N N 2.50 3.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

N Y .50 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,500.34 .00 .00 *

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $27,542.70 $.00 $27,542.70 $27,542.70 X 1.00 1.00

N Y .00 3.0 N S $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00 *

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,703.10 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y F $13,320.85 $.00 $13,320.85 $13,320.85 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $27,542.70 $.00 $27,542.70 $27,542.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y FY $21,322.60 $.00 $21,322.60 $21,322.60 X 1.00 1.00






Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


N N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $26,641.70 $.00 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 X 1.00 1.00

N N 1.00 0.0 Y FY $26,831.70 $.00 $26,831.70 $26,831.70 X 1.00 1.00















Institution: IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY Sport: Men's Cross Country



Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,840.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,624.70 .00 .00

Y Y 3.50 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,707.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $20,676.10 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,154.85 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,831.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,174.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,624.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,608.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,246.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,624.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,732.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,707.70 .00 .00

Y Y 4.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $17,112.10 .00 .00





Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 2.00 2.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,773.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,257.35 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $21,322.60 .00 .00

Y Y .00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $18,824.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.50 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,773.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,485.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,126.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,624.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,485.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 3.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,840.70 .00 .00







Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $16,624.62 $.00 $16,624.62 $27,707.70 .60 .60

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $400.00 $.00 $400.00 $28,608.10 .01 .01

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $13,853.84 $.00 $13,853.84 $27,707.70 .50 .50

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $12,060.56 $.00 $12,060.56 $15,075.70 .80 .80

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $15,075.70 $.00 $15,075.70 $15,075.70 1.00 1.00

N N 4.00 4.0 Y FY $3,663.46 $.00 $3,663.46 X $26,641.70 .00 .14

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $400.00 $.00 $400.00 $16,654.70 .02 .02

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $15,985.02 $.00 $15,985.02 $26,641.70 .60 .60

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $5,822.14 $.00 $5,822.14 $16,634.70 .35 .35

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $9,045.42 $.00 $9,045.42 $15,075.70 .60 .60

$92,930.76 $89,267.30 4.48 4.62





Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward

Reason Date

















Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 2.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,893.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,840.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,798.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,624.70 .00 .00

Y Y 3.50 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,707.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,871.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $20,676.10 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,154.85 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,831.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,863.10 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,174.10 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,624.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,608.10 .00 .00




Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,246.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,893.10 .00 .00

N Y 1.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,100.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,189.20 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,624.70 .00 .00

N Y .00 2.0 Y S $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,831.70 .00 .00

N N .00 3.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,535.10 .00 .00

N N .00 2.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,732.70 .00 .00

N N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,109.10 .00 .00

N Y .00 0.0 Y S $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,831.70 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $18,976.60 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,707.70 .00 .00




Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,134.10 .00 .00

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $17,112.10 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,976.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 1.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,773.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,257.35 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,893.10 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,831.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $21,322.60 .00 .00

Y Y .00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $18,824.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,274.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,507.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

N N .00 3.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00




Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y N .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 .00 .00

.00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,893.10 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,630.70 .00 .00

Y Y 3.50 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,773.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,485.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,919.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,126.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,624.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,491.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,485.10 .00 .00

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,047.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,194.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 3.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 .00 .00




Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,840.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 .00 .00















Institution: IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY Sport: Men's Track, Outdoor




Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 2.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $1,507.56 $.00 $1,507.56 $15,075.70 .10 .10

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,893.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $10,467.86 $.00 $10,467.86 $26,840.70 .39 .39

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,798.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $6,948.62 $4,500.00 $11,448.62 $26,624.70 .43 .26

Y Y 3.50 3.0 Y FY $27,611.70 $.00 $27,611.70 $27,707.70 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,871.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $20,676.10 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 3.0 Y FY $414.29 $.00 $414.29 $16,154.85 .03 .03

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $26,831.70 $.00 $26,831.70 $26,831.70 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,863.10 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $400.00 $.00 $400.00 $15,075.70 .03 .03

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,174.10 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $7,139.43 $.00 $7,139.43 $26,624.70 .27 .27






Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,608.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,246.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,893.10 .00 .00

N Y .00 3.0 Y FY $5,328.34 $.00 $5,328.34 $26,641.70 .20 .20

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,100.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,189.20 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $6,656.16 $.00 $6,656.16 $26,624.70 .25 .25

N Y .00 2.0 Y S $6,755.42 $.00 $6,755.42 $26,831.70 .25 .25

N N .00 3.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,535.10 .00 .00

N N .00 2.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $6,433.16 $250.00 $6,683.16 $26,732.70 .25 .24

N N .00 1.0 Y FY $2,131.32 $.00 $2,131.32 X $26,641.70 .00 .08

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,109.10 .00 .00

N Y .00 0.0 Y S $13,510.85 $.00 $13,510.85 $26,831.70 .50 .50






Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $8,586.21 $.00 $8,586.21 $18,976.60 .45 .45

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $27,707.70 $.00 $27,707.70 $27,707.70 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,134.10 .00 .00

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y FY $400.00 $.00 $400.00 $17,112.10 .02 .02

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $798.82 $.00 $798.82 $15,976.70 .05 .05

Y Y 2.00 1.0 N FY $28,773.70 $.00 $28,773.70 $28,773.70 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,257.35 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,893.10 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $13,415.84 $.00 $13,415.84 $26,831.70 .50 .50

Y Y .00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y FY $920.12 $100.00 $1,020.12 $21,322.60 .05 .04

Y Y .00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $18,824.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $2,664.16 $.00 $2,664.16 $26,641.70 .10 .10

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $758.32 $.00 $758.32 $15,274.70 .05 .05






Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,507.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

N N 1.00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $26,641.70 $.00 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 1.00 1.00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $400.00 $.00 $400.00 $15,075.70 .03 .03

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,893.10 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $1,250.44 $.00 $1,250.44 $15,630.70 .08 .08

Y Y 3.50 3.0 Y FY $26,935.64 $.00 $26,935.64 $28,773.70 .94 .94

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,485.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,919.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,126.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $14,898.42 $.00 $14,898.42 $26,624.70 .56 .56

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $20,618.76 $.00 $20,618.76 $27,491.70 .75 .75

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,485.10 .00 .00






Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y FY $400.00 $.00 $400.00 $16,047.70 .02 .02

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $27,194.70 $.00 $27,194.70 $27,194.70 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 3.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,840.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 .00 .00







Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


N Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 .00 .00

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y FY $16,510.00 $1,500.00 $18,010.00 $27,707.70 .65 .60

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,703.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,628.35 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $26,641.70 $.00 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 .00 .00

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y FY $15,265.70 $.00 $15,265.70 $15,265.70 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $5,535.02 $.00 $5,535.02 $15,183.70 .36 .36

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $14,108.00 $.00 $14,108.00 $26,641.70 .53 .53

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $15,075.70 $.00 $15,075.70 $15,075.70 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 1.0 Y FY $14,785.93 $.00 $14,785.93 $26,831.70 .55 .55

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $6,478.67 $.00 $6,478.67 $25,914.70 .25 .25

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,666.10 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,666.10 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y F $4,053.25 $.00 $4,053.25 $26,831.70 .15 .15

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $3,015.14 $.00 $3,015.14 $15,075.70 .20 .20






Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,536.35 .00 .00

N N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,710.35 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $7,537.84 $.00 $7,537.84 $15,075.70 .50 .50

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,621.10 .00 .00

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y FY $19,074.60 $.00 $19,074.60 $19,074.60 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $2,261.34 $.00 $2,261.34 $15,075.70 .15 .15

Y Y .00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 N FY $2,261.34 $.00 $2,261.34 $15,075.70 .15 .15

Y Y .00 2.0 Y FY $3,015.14 $.00 $3,015.14 $15,075.70 .20 .20

Y Y .00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $5,992.26 $1,000.00 $6,992.26 $15,075.70 .46 .40

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $4,381.60 $.00 $4,381.60 $27,707.70 .16 .16

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,316.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $400.00 $.00 $400.00 $15,291.70 .03 .03

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $22,645.44 $.00 $22,645.44 $26,641.70 .85 .85






Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $6,774.42 $.00 $6,774.42 $15,075.70 .45 .45

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,607.10 .00 .00



















Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $7,998.00 $900.00 $8,898.00 $16,147.70 X .55 .50

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $14,234.85 $.00 $14,234.85 $14,234.85 X 1.00 1.00

N N 1.00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

N N 1.00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $11,298.00 $.00 $11,298.00 $15,957.70 X .71 .71

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $26,641.70 $.00 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 X 1.00 1.00

N N .00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,703.10 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y F $13,320.85 $.00 $13,320.85 $26,641.70 X .50 .50

N N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $25,712.00 $.00 $25,712.00 $27,523.70 X .93 .93

N N 1.00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

N N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 .00 .00

N N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 .00 .00

N N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 .00 .00

N N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 .00 .00






Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


N N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $26,831.70 $.00 $26,831.70 $26,831.70 X 1.00 1.00

N N 1.00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $15,957.70 $.00 $15,957.70 $15,957.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $20,023.70 $7,500.00 $27,523.70 $27,523.70 X 1.00 .73

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $25,149.85 $.00 $25,149.85 $27,523.70 X .91 .91

N N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 .00 .00

N N 1.00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $15,957.70 $.00 $15,957.70 $15,957.70 X 1.00 1.00







Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,434.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,058.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 4.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,475.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,058.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,857.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,840.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,939.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,459.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,367.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,058.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,829.85 .00 .00






Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,976.70 .00 .00

N N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,047.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,868.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 3.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $17,112.10 .00 .00

Y Y 1.50 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,893.10 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,773.70 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y F $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 .00 .00






First Contest of the ALL Segment: 02/13/2011

Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,405.10 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $27,707.70 $.00 $27,707.70 $27,707.70 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.50 2.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,976.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $13,568.34 $.00 $13,568.34 $27,136.70 .50 .50

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $24,935.70 $.00 $24,935.70 $24,935.70 1.00 1.00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $15,914.00 $1,250.00 $17,164.00 $17,277.70 .99 .92

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $27,542.70 $.00 $27,542.70 $27,542.70 1.00 1.00

Y N 1.00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,377.10 .00 .00

Y Y 3.50 3.0 Y FY $25,829.85 $.00 $25,829.85 $25,829.85 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,976.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $13,568.34 $.00 $13,568.34 $27,136.70 .50 .50

$149,066.63 $150,316.63 5.99 5.92





First Contest of the Segment:First Contest of the $segment.segmentType Segment: 01/07/2011

Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

N N 4.00 4.0 Y F $13,556.85 $.00 $13,556.85 X $26,641.70 .00 .51

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $20,376.00 $.00 $20,376.00 $26,641.70 X .76 .76

N N 4.00 3.0 Y FY $27,113.70 $.00 $27,113.70 X $26,641.70 .00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $25,976.00 $.00 $25,976.00 $26,641.70 X .98 .98

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $27,707.70 $.00 $27,707.70 $27,707.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $20,580.00 $.00 $20,580.00 $26,641.70 X .77 .77

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $23,618.85 $.00 $23,618.85 $23,618.85 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $29,803.70 $.00 $29,803.70 $29,803.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $29,993.70 $.00 $29,993.70 $29,993.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $29,993.70 $.00 $29,993.70 $29,993.70 X 1.00 1.00

N Y 4.00 3.0 Y FY $25,177.70 $.00 $25,177.70 $25,177.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $24,276.00 $.00 $24,276.00 $26,641.70 X .91 .91

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 .00 .00





First Contest of the Segment:First Contest of the $segment.segmentType Segment: 01/07/2011

Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $29,803.70 $.00 $29,803.70 $29,803.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $26,448.00 $.00 $26,448.00 $29,803.70 X .89 .89

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,434.70 .00 .00

N N 4.00 4.0 Y F $5,317.75 $.00 $5,317.75 X $27,707.70 .00 .19

$359,743.35 $313,755.05 12 11.31 13.01






Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $16,981.27 $3,000.00 $19,981.27 $26,641.70 .75 .64

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $19,141.70 $7,500.00 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 1.00 .72

N N 4.00 4.0 Y FY $21,742.39 $.00 $21,742.39 X $26,641.70 .00 .82

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $9,697.68 $.00 $9,697.68 $27,707.70 .35 .35

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $18,649.18 $.00 $18,649.18 $26,641.70 .70 .70

Y N .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,119.10 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $12,060.55 $.00 $12,060.55 $15,075.70 .80 .80

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 .00 .00

N N 4.00 4.0 Y FY $20,247.68 $.00 $20,247.68 X $26,641.70 .00 .76

Y Y .00 1.0 N S $3,996.25 $.00 $3,996.25 $26,641.70 .15 .15

N N 4.00 4.0 Y FY $24,874.00 $.00 $24,874.00 X $26,213.85 .00 .95

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $25,276.00 $.00 $25,276.00 $26,624.70 .95 .95

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $26,624.00 $.00 $26,624.00 $26,624.70 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $7,820.84 $5,500.00 $13,320.84 $26,641.70 .50 .29

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $19,968.52 $.00 $19,968.52 $26,624.70 .75 .75

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,893.10 .00 .00






Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $15,075.70 $.00 $15,075.70 $15,075.70 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,703.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 N FY $10,649.88 $.00 $10,649.88 $26,624.70 .40 .40

N N .00 4.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,101.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $13,312.34 $.00 $13,312.34 $26,624.70 .50 .50

N N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $7,537.84 $.00 $7,537.84 X $15,075.70 .00 .50

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $15,817.10 $1,500.00 $17,317.10 $26,641.70 .65 .59

Y Y 1.00 2.0 N FY $5,454.93 $.00 $5,454.93 $17,046.70 .32 .32

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $12,060.56 $.00 $12,060.56 $15,075.70 .80 .80

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $22,469.48 $.00 $22,469.48 $26,434.70 .85 .85

N N 4.00 4.0 Y FY $21,313.36 $.00 $21,313.36 X $26,641.70 .00 .80

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,675.10 .00 .00

N N 4.00 4.0 Y FY $13,320.84 $.00 $13,320.84 X $26,641.70 .00 .50

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $5,324.94 $.00 $5,324.94 $26,624.70 .20 .20

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $14,615.08 $.00 $14,615.08 $26,624.70 .55 .55

N N 4.00 4.0 Y FY $14,749.85 $.00 $14,749.85 X $15,075.70 .00 .98






Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


N N .00 3.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $6,637.17 $.00 $6,637.17 $26,624.70 .25 .25

N N .00 3.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $23,380.00 $1,500.00 $24,880.00 $26,624.70 .93 .88

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,459.10 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $11,416.02 $4,500.00 $15,916.02 $26,526.70 .60 .43






Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y N .00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,542.70 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $26,641.70 $.00 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 1.00 1.00

N N 4.00 4.0 Y F $7,992.51 $.00 $7,992.51 X $26,641.70 .00 .30

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,459.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $14,100.34 $.00 $14,100.34 $28,200.70 .50 .50

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,109.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,893.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $18,412.46 $200.00 $18,612.46 $28,200.70 .66 .65

Y N .00 0.0 Y F $.00 $500.00 $500.00 $16,279.10 .03 .00

N Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y F/S $8,072.85 $.00 $8,072.85 $15,610.70 .52 .52

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $15,727.00 $1,437.00 $17,164.00 $17,749.70 .97 .89

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $25,200.70 $3,000.00 $28,200.70 $28,200.70 1.00 .89

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

N N 4.00 4.0 Y F $8,791.76 $.00 $8,791.76 X $26,641.70 .00 .33

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $19,182.02 $.00 $19,182.02 $26,641.70 .72 .72





Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 1.00 2.0 Y FY $14,936.25 $.00 $14,936.25 $15,075.70 .99 .99

Y Y .00 0.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,405.10 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $19,141.70 $7,500.00 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 1.00 .72

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $25,320.85 $.00 $25,320.85 $26,641.70 .95 .95

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $23,276.00 $.00 $23,276.00 $28,200.70 .83 .83

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $20,708.85 $4,250.00 $24,958.85 $26,641.70 .94 .78

Y N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,459.10 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $26,641.70 $.00 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 1.00 1.00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $23,276.00 $.00 $23,276.00 $26,641.70 .87 .87

Y N .00 0.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,675.10 .00 .00







Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


N N 1.00 2.0 N FY $400.00 $.00 $400.00 X $15,075.70 .00 .03

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $11,820.84 $1,500.00 $13,320.84 $26,641.70 .50 .44

Y Y 2.00 3.0 Y FY $3,996.24 $.00 $3,996.24 $26,641.70 .15 .15

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $11,509.48 $.00 $11,509.48 $28,773.70 .40 .40

N N 4.00 4.0 Y F $4,640.25 $.00 $4,640.25 X $15,075.70 .00 .31

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $2,492.50 $5,500.00 $7,992.50 $26,641.70 .30 .09

N N 4.00 4.0 N F $14,089.85 $.00 $14,089.85 X $26,641.70 .00 .53

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $1,909.00 $.00 $1,909.00 $14,868.70 .13 .13

Y Y .50 1.0 Y FY $17,317.10 $.00 $17,317.10 $26,641.70 .65 .65

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $4,775.42 $2,418.00 $7,193.42 $28,773.70 .25 .17

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $13,853.84 $.00 $13,853.84 $27,707.70 .50 .50

Y N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,666.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $1,044.16 $.00 $1,044.16 $14,916.70 .07 .07

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $15,985.02 $.00 $15,985.02 $26,641.70 .60 .60

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $18,116.35 $.00 $18,116.35 $26,641.70 .68 .68

N N 4.00 4.0 Y FY $13,556.85 $.00 $13,556.85 X $26,641.70 .00 .51






Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $7,534.35 $.00 $7,534.35 $15,106.70 .50 .50

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $15,075.70 $.00 $15,075.70 $15,075.70 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 N FY $3,015.14 $.00 $3,015.14 $15,075.70 .20 .20

Y Y 1.00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $4,522.70 $.00 $4,522.70 $15,075.70 .30 .30

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $533.95 $4,500.00 $5,033.95 $26,672.70 .19 .02

N N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $6,920.92 $.00 $6,920.92 X $27,518.10 .00 .25

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,723.10 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $4,522.70 $.00 $4,522.70 $15,075.70 .30 .30

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $6,784.06 $.00 $6,784.06 $15,075.70 .45 .45

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $25,141.70 $1,500.00 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 1.00 .94

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $11,917.21 $.00 $11,917.21 $26,482.70 .45 .45

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $20,004.52 $.00 $20,004.52 $26,672.70 .75 .75

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $17,074.72 $7,000.00 $24,074.72 $26,857.70 .90 .64

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $16,624.62 $.00 $16,624.62 $27,707.70 .60 .60

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $19,985.11 $.00 $19,985.11 $28,773.70 .69 .69






Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $10,669.08 $.00 $10,669.08 $26,672.70 .40 .40

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $15,481.26 $4,500.00 $19,981.26 $26,641.70 .75 .58

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $8,679.05 $1,000.00 $9,679.05 $14,860.70 .65 .58

Y Y .00 1.0 N FY $7,954.77 $.00 $7,954.77 $26,857.70 .30 .30

Y Y 2.00 3.0 N FY $4,246.30 $937.00 $5,183.30 $17,112.10 .30 .25




Sport: W o m e n ' s Tennis




Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .50 1.0 Y FY $27,352.70 $.00 $27,352.70 $27,352.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $26,641.70 $.00 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $26,641.70 $.00 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $26,641.70 $.00 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $25,518.00 $.00 $25,518.00 $26,641.70 X .96 .96

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $19,857.70 $7,000.00 $26,857.70 $26,857.70 X 1.00 .74

Y Y .00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,434.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $27,707.70 $.00 $27,707.70 $27,707.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,888.70 .00 .00

N N 4.00 4.0 Y F $13,556.85 $.00 $13,556.85 X $26,641.70 .00 .51

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,946.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,946.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,136.70 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $26,641.70 $.00 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 X 1.00 1.00



1/14/2013 Academic Year: 2010-11




Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward

Reason Date


















Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


N N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,624.70 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,607.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,675.10 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,434.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,058.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 4.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,475.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,491.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,491.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,266.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,058.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 3.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,868.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,058.70 .00 .00

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,058.70 .00 .00





Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,857.70 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,542.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,459.10 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,773.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,840.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,058.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,542.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.50 3.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,624.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,939.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,459.10 .00 .00





Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,367.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,650.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,732.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,058.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,474.85 .00 .00

N Y 4.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $25,829.85 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,976.70 .00 .00

N N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,047.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,868.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,529.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 3.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $17,112.10 .00 .00

Y Y 1.50 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,058.70 .00 .00





Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 .00 .00

N N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,893.10 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,773.70 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y F $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 .00 .00

N N .00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $22,386.00 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,459.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,570.70 .00 .00 *




Sport: Women 's Track , Outdoor




Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


N N .00 0.0 Y FY $3,083.69 $.00 $3,083.69 $26,624.70 .12 .12

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,607.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,675.10 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $3,768.92 $.00 $3,768.92 $15,075.70 .25 .25

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,434.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $1,505.86 $.00 $1,505.86 $15,058.70 .10 .10

Y Y .00 4.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,475.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $13,745.84 $.00 $13,745.84 $27,491.70 .50 .50

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $21,993.36 $.00 $21,993.36 $27,491.70 .80 .80

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $19,504.02 $.00 $19,504.02 $28,266.70 .69 .69

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $10,541.08 $.00 $10,541.08 $15,058.70 .70 .70

Y Y .00 3.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $1,486.86 $.00 $1,486.86 $14,868.70 .10 .10

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $1,505.86 $.00 $1,505.86 $15,058.70 .10 .10







Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y FY $5,039.83 $.00 $5,039.83 $15,075.70 .33 .33

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $903.52 $.00 $903.52 $15,058.70 .06 .06

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $10,994.64 $7,000.00 $17,994.64 $26,857.70 .67 .41

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,542.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,459.10 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $8,689.70 $.00 $8,689.70 $28,773.70 .30 .30

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $8,593.14 $.00 $8,593.14 $15,075.70 .57 .57

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $26,641.70 $.00 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 1.00 1.00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $10,251.46 $.00 $10,251.46 $15,075.70 .68 .68

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $2,664.16 $.00 $2,664.16 $26,641.70 .10 .10

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $5,210.16 $1,500.00 $6,710.16 $26,840.70 .25 .19

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,058.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $16,525.62 $.00 $16,525.62 $27,542.70 .60 .60

Y Y 1.50 3.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00







Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $6,656.16 $.00 $6,656.16 $26,624.70 .25 .25

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $10,628.36 $.00 $10,628.36 $15,075.70 .70 .70

Y Y .00 3.0 Y FY $26,939.70 $.00 $26,939.70 $26,939.70 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,459.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 3.0 Y FY $25,367.70 $.00 $25,367.70 $25,367.70 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,650.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $5,346.54 $.00 $5,346.54 $26,732.70 .20 .20

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $14,789.96 $.00 $14,789.96 $26,641.70 .56 .56

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $3,764.66 $.00 $3,764.66 $15,058.70 .25 .25

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $8,970.04 $.00 $8,970.04 $15,075.70 .59 .59

Y Y .00 0.0 N FY $8,684.91 $.00 $8,684.91 $14,474.85 .60 .60

N Y 4.00 3.0 Y FY $5,328.34 $.00 $5,328.34 $26,641.70 .20 .20

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $10,656.68 $.00 $10,656.68 $25,829.85 .41 .41

Y Y .00 0.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,976.70 .00 .00







Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


N N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $27,047.70 $.00 $27,047.70 $27,047.70 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $3,717.16 $.00 $3,717.16 $14,868.70 .25 .25

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $10,081.28 $.00 $10,081.28 $26,529.70 .38 .38

Y N .00 3.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $17,112.10 .00 .00

Y Y 1.50 2.0 Y FY $26,641.70 $.00 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $1,505.86 $.00 $1,505.86 $15,058.70 .10 .10

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 .00 .00

N N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,893.10 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $2,131.32 $.00 $2,131.32 $26,641.70 .08 .08

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $27,858.00 $.00 $27,858.00 $28,773.70 .97 .97

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y F $13,320.85 $.00 $13,320.85 $26,641.70 .50 .50

N N .00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $22,386.00 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,459.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,570.70 .00 .00 *








Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Totals for Cross Country/Indoor Track/Outdoor Track: $412,086.34 $420,586.34 17.96 17.64















Sport: W o m e n ' s Volleyball




Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $7,690.35 $1,325.00 $9,015.35 $15,570.70 X .58 .49

N N .00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 .00 .00

Y N 4.50 3.0 Y FY $4,728.75 $.00 $4,728.75 X $18,049.60 .00 .26

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $25,558.00 $.00 $25,558.00 $27,707.70 X .92 .92

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $22,141.70 $4,500.00 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 X 1.00 .83

Y N 1.00 0.0 Y FY $15,075.70 $.00 $15,075.70 X $15,075.70 .00 1.00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,868.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $24,558.00 $.00 $24,558.00 $26,681.70 X .92 .92

Y Y .00 2.0 Y FY $27,707.70 $.00 $27,707.70 $27,707.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $26,641.70 $.00 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $26,946.70 $.00 $26,946.70 $26,946.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $26,641.70 $.00 $26,641.70 $26,641.70 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $23,792.85 $.00 $23,792.85 $26,641.70 X .89 .89







Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $23,018.00 $.00 $23,018.00 $26,641.70 X .86 .86

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $15,547.70 $.00 $15,547.70 X $15,075.70 .00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $15,570.70 $.00 $15,570.70 $15,570.70 X 1.00 1.00




Sport: Football


First Contest of the FALL Segment:

Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Ini-tial

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $27,919.65 $.00 $27,919.65 $27,919.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 2.0 Y FY $29,068.65 $.00 $29,068.65 $29,068.65 X X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,506.60 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $28,474.65 $.00 $28,474.65 $28,474.65 X X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $27,919.65 $.00 $27,919.65 $27,919.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $25,926.80 $.00 $25,926.80 $29,221.65 X .89 .89

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $25,620.10 $.00 $25,620.10 $25,620.10 X 1.00 1.00

N N 2.00 2.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,023.00 .00 .00

N N 1.00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,507.35 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $16,602.65 $.00 $16,602.65 $16,602.65 X X 1.00 1.00

Y N 2.00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,023.00 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $15,140.80 $.00 $15,140.80 $15,758.00 X X .96 .96

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $23,407.45 $.00 $23,407.45 $25,340.00 X X .92 .92

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y F $14,950.17 $.00 $14,950.17 $20,336.05 X .74 .74

Y Y .00 2.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,844.60 .00 .00



Sport: Football



Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Ini-tial

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $15,697.65 $.00 $15,697.65 $15,697.65 X 1.00 1.00

N Y .00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,669.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,507.35 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $28,474.65 $.00 $28,474.65 $28,564.60 X X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $23,304.00 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $22,685.45 $4,500.00 $27,185.45 $27,802.65 X .98 .82

N Y 1.50 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,507.35 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,506.60 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,581.60 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $15,913.65 $.00 $15,913.65 $15,913.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 2.50 2.0 Y FY $28,363.65 $.00 $28,363.65 $28,980.85 X .98 .98

Y Y .00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $19,109.60 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $28,624.65 $.00 $28,624.65 $28,624.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $27,619.65 $.00 $27,619.65 $27,619.65 X 1.00 1.00

N N 2.50 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $17,236.65 .00 .00



Sport: Football



Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Ini-tial

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y N 2.00 2.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,692.60 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $27,619.65 $.00 $27,619.65 $27,619.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $16,526.65 $.00 $16,526.65 $16,526.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,479.05 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $27,919.65 $.00 $27,919.65 $27,919.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.50 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y N 2.50 3.0 Y FY $26,594.65 $.00 $26,594.65 $27,794.65 X .96 .96

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $17,093.75 $2,505.00 $19,598.75 $28,474.65 X .69 .60

Y Y .00 0.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,772.65 .00 .00

Y N .50 2.0 Y FY $28,022.15 $.00 $28,022.15 $28,186.85 X X .99 .99

Y Y 1.50 3.0 Y FY $28,163.65 $.00 $28,163.65 $28,163.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $24,907.45 $3,000.00 $27,907.45 $28,474.65 X X .98 .87

Y Y .50 2.0 Y FY $27,919.65 $.00 $27,919.65 $27,919.65 X X 1.00 1.00

N N 2.00 1.0 Y F $13,939.85 $.00 $13,939.85 $27,769.65 X .50 .50

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $15,697.65 $.00 $15,697.65 $15,697.65 X 1.00 1.00



Sport: Football



Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Ini-tial

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,722.60 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $28,250.65 $.00 $28,250.65 $28,250.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $27,569.65 $.00 $27,569.65 $27,569.65 X 1.00 1.00

N N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,189.00 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $27,844.65 $.00 $27,844.65 $27,844.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $17,369.65 $.00 $17,369.65 $17,369.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,882.60 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $15,913.65 $.00 $15,913.65 $15,913.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $22,086.00 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $27,919.65 $.00 $27,919.65 $27,919.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $17,150.75 $.00 $17,150.75 $17,170.65 X X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $23,974.65 $4,500.00 $28,474.65 $28,564.60 X X 1.00 .84

Y N 4.00 3.0 Y F $12,513.85 $.00 $12,513.85 $26,343.65 X .48 .48

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $16,602.65 $.00 $16,602.65 $16,602.65 X X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $15,953.65 $.00 $15,953.65 $16,364.85 X .97 .97



Sport: Football



Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Ini-tial

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,882.60 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $17,454.80 $.00 $17,454.80 $18,072.00 X .97 .97

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $19,069.65 $8,500.00 $27,569.65 $27,569.65 X 1.00 .69

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $20,357.45 $7,500.00 $27,857.45 $28,474.65 X X .98 .71

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $27,919.65 $.00 $27,919.65 $27,919.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $16,097.65 $.00 $16,097.65 $16,364.85 X .98 .98

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y F $14,192.35 $.00 $14,192.35 $28,564.60 X .50 .50

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,712.65 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $15,747.65 $.00 $15,747.65 $15,747.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,564.60 .00 .00

Y Y .50 0.0 Y FY $15,697.65 $.00 $15,697.65 $15,697.65 X X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,564.60 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $28,474.65 $.00 $28,474.65 $28,564.60 X 1.00 1.00

N Y .00 0.0 Y S $8,536.30 $.00 $8,536.30 $17,072.60 X X .50 .50

Y Y 1.00 2.0 N FY $16,558.70 $.00 $16,558.70 $16,602.65 X 1.00 1.00



Sport: Football



Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Ini-tial

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,564.60 .00 .00

N N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,507.35 .00 .00

Y Y .00 2.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,847.70 .00 .00

N Y .00 0.0 Y S $14,472.30 $.00 $14,472.30 $28,664.65 X X .50 .50

Y Y 3.50 3.0 Y F $7,903.85 $.00 $7,903.85 X $15,797.65 .00 .50

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $23,357.45 $4,500.00 $27,857.45 $28,474.65 X X .98 .82

Y N 1.00 2.0 Y FY $27,794.65 $.00 $27,794.65 $27,794.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $19,974.65 $8,500.00 $28,474.65 $28,564.60 X X 1.00 .70

Y N 4.00 3.0 Y F $14,698.35 $.00 $14,698.35 X $14,698.35 .00 1.00

N Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,507.35 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,152.00 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $28,524.65 $.00 $28,524.65 $28,770.60 X X .99 .99

N N .00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,692.60 .00 .00

N N 3.00 2.0 Y F $14,113.45 $.00 $14,113.45 X $28,251.85 .00 .50



Sport: Football



Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Ini-tial

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $28,063.65 $.00 $28,063.65 $28,063.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y N 2.00 3.0 Y FY $26,813.65 $.00 $26,813.65 $28,013.65 X .96 .96

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $28,774.65 $.00 $28,774.65 $28,774.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $22,357.45 $.00 $22,357.45 $28,474.65 X X .79 .79

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $24,965.45 $3,000.00 $27,965.45 $28,582.65 X X .98 .87

Y N .00 3.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $18,089.60 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $27,919.65 $.00 $27,919.65 $27,919.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $27,719.65 $.00 $27,719.65 $27,719.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,564.60 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 2.0 Y FY $28,864.65 $.00 $28,864.65 $28,864.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,954.60 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,946.60 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $11,996.00 .00 .00

Y N 4.00 3.0 Y FY $13,824.85 $.00 $13,824.85 X $13,824.85 .00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $28,474.65 $.00 $28,474.65 $28,564.60 X X 1.00 1.00



Sport: Football



Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Ini-tial

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


N Y 2.50 2.0 Y S $14,622.30 $.00 $14,622.30 $29,244.60 X X .50 .50

Y N 2.00 3.0 Y FY $27,669.65 $.00 $27,669.65 $27,669.65 X X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.50 2.0 Y FY $28,063.65 $.00 $28,063.65 $28,063.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $21,451.25 $3,750.00 $25,201.25 $27,644.65 X .91 .78

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,920.00 .00 .00

N Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $28,119.65 $.00 $28,119.65 $28,561.85 X .98 .98

Y Y 2.50 1.0 Y FY $16,113.65 $.00 $16,113.65 $16,113.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $14,912.65 $1,000.00 $15,912.65 $15,912.65 X 1.00 .94

Y Y .00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,837.60 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $28,370.65 $.00 $28,370.65 $28,370.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $27,719.65 $.00 $27,719.65 $27,719.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $11,996.00 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $28,474.65 $.00 $28,474.65 $28,564.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $27,969.65 $.00 $27,969.65 $28,386.85 X .99 .99

Y Y 1.50 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,692.60 .00 .00



Sport: Football



Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Ini-tial

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $25,057.45 $3,000.00 $28,057.45 $28,674.65 X .98 .87

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $15,980.25 $.00 $15,980.25 $16,047.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y N 1.00 3.0 Y FY $28,254.65 $.00 $28,254.65 $28,486.85 X .99 .99

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $28,050.65 $.00 $28,050.65 $28,050.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 2.00 3.0 Y FY $25,649.65 $4,500.00 $30,149.65 $30,149.65 X 1.00 .85

Y Y 1.00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00






First Contest of the REGULAR (no QRMTE) Segment:

Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y FY $27,854.65 $.00 $27,854.65 $27,854.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $27,819.65 $.00 $27,819.65 $28,436.85 X .98 .98

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y FY $20,664.85 $.00 $20,664.85 $20,664.85 X 1.00 1.00

N N 3.00 3.0 Y FY $28,075.65 $.00 $28,075.65 $28,075.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $27,775.65 $.00 $27,775.65 $27,775.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $27,569.65 $.00 $27,569.65 $27,569.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,564.60 .00 .00

N N 3.00 3.0 Y FY $28,131.65 $.00 $28,131.65 $28,131.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 3.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,692.60 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $27,925.65 $.00 $27,925.65 $27,925.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .50 1.0 Y S $8,704.80 $.00 $8,704.80 $17,409.60 X .50 .50

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $28,175.65 $.00 $28,175.65 $28,175.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $27,569.65 $.00 $27,569.65 $27,569.66 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $27,950.65 $.00 $27,950.65 $28,567.85 X .98 .98

Y Y 2.00 0.0 Y FY $28,054.65 $.00 $28,054.65 $28,054.65 X 1.00 1.00





First Contest of the CHAMPIONSHIP Segment:

Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,796.60 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,684.65 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,590.65 .00 .00

N N 3.50 4.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $30,782.80 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,749.60 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,578.65 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,977.65 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,546.60 .00 .00

N N .00 0.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,692.65 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,659.60 .00 .00

N Y 2.00 2.0 Y S $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,569.65 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,890.65 .00 .00

Y N .50 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,879.65 .00 .00

N N 3.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $30,240.85 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,739.60 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $29,859.60 .00 .00





Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


N N .00 0.0 Y S $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,987.65 .00 .00

Y Y .00 2.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,823.60 .00 .00

N N .50 3.0 Y F $13,409.35 $.00 $13,409.35 X $30,000.00 .00 .45

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $29,794.65 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $18,089.60 .00 .00

N Y .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,809.65 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,724.60 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,659.65 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,864.60 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,472.65 .00 .00

.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,959.65 .00 .00

Squad-List Totals $13,409.35 $.00 .00 .45 Totals for Cross Country/Indoor Track/Outdoor Track: $407,970.92 $341,790.84 12.55 14.75






Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


N N 4.00 4.0 Y F $8,724.51 $.00 $8,724.51 X $29,171.65 .00 .30

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $22,736.52 $.00 $22,736.52 $28,570.65 .80 .80

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $13,264.62 $.00 $13,264.62 $27,478.65 .48 .48

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $22,864.52 $.00 $22,864.52 $28,580.65 .80 .80

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $4,165.65 $.00 $4,165.65 $16,562.60 .25 .25

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y FY $9,962.92 $.00 $9,962.92 $19,925.85 .50 .50

N N 4.00 4.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $7,998.82 $.00 $7,998.82 $15,862.60 .50 .50

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $400.00 $.00 $400.00 $15,697.65 .03 .03

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $3,177.53 $.00 $3,177.53 $15,887.65 .20 .20

N Y 1.00 2.0 Y FY $16,841.79 $.00 $16,841.79 $28,019.65 .60 .60

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $5,599.17 $.00 $5,599.17 $15,847.65 .35 .35

Squad-List Totals $115,736.05 $107,011.54 4.51 > 4.81





Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward

Reason Date

















Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,745.05 .00 .00

Y Y .00 3.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,659.60 .00 .00

N N 2.00 2.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,692.60 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,796.60 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $11,996.00 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,684.65 .00 .00

N N .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,692.60 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,590.65 .00 .00

N N 3.50 4.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $30,782.80 .00 .00

N N 3.00 3.0 Y F $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,749.60 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,716.65 .00 .00

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y S $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,659.60 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,578.65 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,977.65 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,546.60 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,641.65 .00 .00




Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $17,453.65 .00 .00

N N 1.00 4.0 Y F $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,869.65 .00 .00

N Y .00 2.0 Y S $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,435.65 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,597.65 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $22,086.00 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,659.60 .00 .00

Y Y 2.50 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,619.65 .00 .00

N Y 2.00 2.0 Y S $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,569.65 .00 .00

Y Y .00 3.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,562.10 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,890.65 .00 .00

N Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,659.60 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $11,996.00 .00 .00

Y N .50 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,879.65 .00 .00

N N 3.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $30,240.85 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $23,304.00 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,564.60 .00 .00 *

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,373.10 .00 .00




Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,739.60 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 2.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $29,859.60 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,566.65 .00 .00

N N 3.00 2.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,659.60 .00 .00

N N .50 0.0 Y S $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,987.65 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $22,984.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,288.65 .00 .00

Y Y .00 2.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,823.60 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,919.65 .00 .00

N N 3.00 4.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

N Y .00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,416.65 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,606.65 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $17,319.65 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $29,794.65 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $18,089.60 .00 .00

N Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,809.65 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,724.60 .00 .00




Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,659.65 .00 .00

.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,692.60 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,759.65 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,864.60 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $29,171.65 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,115.65 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,472.65 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,959.65 .00 .00

$.00 $.00 .00 .00 Totals for Cross Country/Indoor Track/Outdoor Track: $407,970.92 $341,790.84 12.55 14.75





First Contest of the Segment:First Contest of the Segment:

Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,745.05 .00 .00

Y Y .00 3.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,659.60 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $9,423.99 $.00 $9,423.99 $15,796.60 .60 .60

Y Y .00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $11,996.00 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $9,734.00 $.00 $9,734.00 $28,684.65 .34 .34

Y N 1.00 0.0 Y FY $7,363.97 $4,500.00 $11,863.97 $27,590.65 .43 .27

N N 3.50 4.0 Y FY $21,597.55 $.00 $21,597.55 X $30,782.80 .00 .70

N N 3.00 3.0 Y F $200.00 $.00 $200.00 $15,075.70 .01 .01

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $11,893.62 $.00 $11,893.62 $27,749.60 .43 .43

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $1,597.46 $.00 $1,597.46 $15,716.65 .10 .10

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y S $4,849.35 $.00 $4,849.35 $27,659.60 .18 .18

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $400.00 $.00 $400.00 $27,578.65 .01 .01

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $12,141.80 $.00 $12,141.80 $27,977.65 .43 .43

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,546.60 .00 .00






Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $400.00 $.00 $400.00 $15,641.65 .03 .03

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $17,453.65 .00 .00

N N .00 0.0 Y F $2,807.97 $.00 $2,807.97 X $27,869.65 .00 .10

N Y .00 2.0 Y S $14,287.80 $.00 $14,287.80 $28,435.65 .50 .50

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,597.65 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $22,086.00 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $6,919.41 $.00 $6,919.41 $27,659.60 .25 .25

Y Y 2.50 3.0 Y FY $13,884.82 $.00 $13,884.82 $27,619.65 .50 .50

N Y 2.00 2.0 Y S $13,386.40 $.00 $13,386.40 $27,569.65 .49 .49

Y Y .00 3.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,562.10 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $7,292.91 $.00 $7,292.91 $28,890.65 .25 .25

N Y 3.00 0.0 Y FY $2,224.36 $.00 $2,224.36 X $27,659.60 .00 .08

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $11,996.00 .00 .00

Y N .50 1.0 Y FY $27,879.65 $.00 $27,879.65 $27,879.65 1.00 1.00






Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


N N 3.00 2.0 Y FY $30,240.85 $.00 $30,240.85 X $30,240.85 .00 1.00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $23,304.00 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,564.60 .00 .00 *

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $794.78 $.00 $794.78 $15,373.10 .05 .05

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,739.60 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 2.0 N FY $29,769.65 $.00 $29,769.65 $29,859.60 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,566.65 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $2,298.40 $.00 $2,298.40 $22,984.10 .10 .10

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,288.65 .00 .00

Y Y .00 2.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,823.60 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $27,919.65 $.00 $27,919.65 $27,919.65 1.00 1.00

N N .00 0.0 Y FY $400.00 $.00 $400.00 X $15,075.70 .00 .03

N Y 1.00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,416.65 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $1,563.16 $.00 $1,563.16 $15,606.65 .10 .10






Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


.00 0.0 Y FY $889.18 $.00 $889.18 $17,319.65 .05 .05

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $29,794.65 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $18,089.60 .00 .00

N Y .00 0.0 Y FY $27,809.65 $.00 $27,809.65 $27,809.65 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $13,842.32 $.00 $13,842.32 $27,724.60 .50 .50

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,659.65 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $19,431.75 $.00 $19,431.75 $27,759.65 .70 .70

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,864.60 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $29,171.65 $.00 $29,171.65 $29,171.65 1.00 1.00

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $14,185.82 $.00 $14,185.82 $28,115.65 .50 .50

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,472.65 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $27,959.65 $.00 $27,959.65 $27,959.65 1.00 1.00





First Contest of the ALL Segment:First Contest of the Segment:

Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,702.65 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $13,167.21 $.00 $13,167.21 $27,569.65 .48 .48

N N 5.00 4.0 Y FY $14,720.16 $.00 $14,720.16 X $26,693.65 .00 .55

Y Y .00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,558.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,692.60 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $29,769.65 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,745.05 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $28,780.65 $.00 $28,780.65 $28,780.65 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $4,709.29 $.00 $4,709.29 $15,787.60 .30 .30

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $28,607.65 $.00 $28,607.65 $28,607.65 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,507.35 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $16,602.65 $.00 $16,602.65 $16,602.65 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 2.0 Y FY $11,027.86 $.00 $11,027.86 $27,659.60 .40 .40

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $6,898.66 $.00 $6,898.66 $27,659.60 .25 .25

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,288.65 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,602.65 .00 .00





Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $3,198.73 $.00 $3,198.73 $15,943.65 .20 .20

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,770.65 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $18,054.65 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $7,067.65 $.00 $7,067.65 $28,270.65 .25 .25

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,530.65 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $7,928.82 $.00 $7,928.82 $15,787.60 .50 .50

N N 1.00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,067.65 .00 .00

N N .00 0.0 Y F $3,378.54 $.00 $3,378.54 $16,792.65 .20 .20

Y Y 1.00 1.0 N FY $2,396.64 $.00 $2,396.64 $15,787.60 .15 .15

Y Y 1.00 3.0 Y FY $6,153.45 $.00 $6,153.45 $15,787.60 .39 .39

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $3,340.53 $.00 $3,340.53 $16,702.65 .20 .20

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y FY $15,137.68 $.00 $15,137.68 $16,819.65 .90 .90

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $23,738.92 $.00 $23,738.92 $29,673.65 .80 .80

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,787.60 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,787.60 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $2,172.63 $.00 $2,172.63 $16,662.65 .13 .13





Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $12,050.06 $.00 $12,050.06 $28,690.65 .42 .42

Y N .00 0.0 Y F $.00 $.00 $.00 $17,008.65 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,659.60 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $483.58 $.00 $483.58 $15,805.65 .03 .03

Y Y 4.00 3.0 Y FY $10,057.06 $.00 $10,057.06 $25,142.65 .40 .40

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $7,857.32 $.00 $7,857.32 $15,656.65 .50 .50

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $6,915.73 $.00 $6,915.73 $17,319.65 .40 .40

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,787.60 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,503.65 .00 .00







Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $14,116.45 $.00 $14,116.45 $16,983.65 X .83 .83

N N .00 3.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

N N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,507.35 .00 .00

N N .00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $16,802.65 $.00 $16,802.65 $16,802.65 X 1.00 1.00

N N .00 0.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,507.35 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $27,875.65 $.00 $27,875.65 $27,875.65 X 1.00 1.00

N N 1.00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,473.10 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $24,907.45 $3,000.00 $27,907.45 $28,524.65 X .98 .87

N N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,507.35 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $21,972.80 $.00 $21,972.80 $28,524.65 X .77 .77

N N .00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,507.35 .00 .00

N N .00 1.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,379.35 .00 .00

N N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,507.35 .00 .00

N N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,507.35 .00 .00






Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


N N .00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,507.35 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $28,075.65 $.00 $28,075.65 $28,075.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $28,524.65 $.00 $28,524.65 $28,524.65 X 1.00 1.00

N N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,507.35 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $24,907.45 $3,000.00 $27,907.45 $28,474.65 X .98 .87

N N .00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,379.35 .00 .00

N N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,507.35 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $15,962.65 $.00 $15,962.65 $15,962.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $21,601.25 $3,750.00 $25,351.25 $27,794.65 X .91 .78

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y F $11,958.85 $2,250.00 $14,208.85 $28,038.65 X .51 .43

N N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,507.35 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $24,274.65 $4,500.00 $28,774.65 $28,774.65 X 1.00 .84

Y Y .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,501.65 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $15,847.65 $.00 $15,847.65 $15,847.65 X 1.00 1.00




Sport: Women ' s C ros s Country



Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,867.60 .00 .00

N N 2.00 2.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,234.65 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,747.65 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $29,769.65 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,875.65 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,824.65 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,839.60 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,797.65 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,092.65 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,580.65 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $30,119.65 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,785.65 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,748.60 .00 .00

Y Y 2.50 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,659.60 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,802.85 .00 .00



Sport: Women ' s C ros s Country



Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


N N 2.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $30,435.65 .00 .00

Y N 2.50 3.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $17,409.60 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,606.60 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,568.60 .00 .00







Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $29,314.65 $.00 $29,314.65 $29,314.65 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,692.60 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $14,337.32 $.00 $14,337.32 $28,524.65 .50 .50

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $28,474.65 $.00 $28,474.65 $28,564.60 1.00 1.00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $17,454.80 $2,750.00 $20,204.80 $18,089.60 1.00 .96

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $29,275.65 $.00 $29,275.65 $29,275.65 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $28,624.65 $.00 $28,624.65 $28,624.65 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $8,091.32 $.00 $8,091.32 $16,272.60 .50 .50







Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 1.00 3.0 Y FY $14,305.45 $1,000.00 $15,305.45 $15,822.65 X .97 .90

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $26,911.80 $.00 $26,911.80 $31,025.65 X .87 .87

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $19,723.45 $.00 $19,723.45 $27,840.65 X .71 .71

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $19,975.45 $.00 $19,975.45 $28,092.65 X .71 .71

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $27,902.65 $.00 $27,902.65 $27,902.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $27,569.65 $.00 $27,569.65 $27,569.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $27,719.65 $.00 $27,719.65 $27,719.65 X 1.00 1.00

N N 5.00 4.0 Y F $200.00 $.00 $200.00 X $29,026.85 .00 .01

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $22,950.80 $.00 $22,950.80 $27,747.90 X .83 .83

Y Y .00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,659.60 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $28,055.65 $.00 $28,055.65 $28,055.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $23,072.80 $.00 $23,072.80 $27,569.65 X .84 .84

Y Y .00 2.0 Y FY $25,268.80 $.00 $25,268.80 $28,177.65 X .90 .90







Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


N N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $17,733.48 $.00 $17,733.48 X $27,659.60 .00 .64

N N 4.00 4.0 Y FY $25,085.30 $.00 $25,085.30 X $25,485.10 .00 .98

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $783.82 $.00 $783.82 $15,576.65 .05 .05

Y N 3.00 2.0 Y FY $8,435.02 $.00 $8,435.02 $24,100.10 .35 .35

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $5,528.93 $.00 $5,528.93 $27,664.65 .20 .20

Y Y 1.00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,641.70 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,379.35 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $11,079.46 $.00 $11,079.46 $27,618.65 .40 .40

Y Y .50 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,659.60 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $16,529.19 $.00 $16,529.19 $27,538.60 .60 .60

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $19,325.65 $8,500.00 $27,825.65 $27,825.65 1.00 .69

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y F $12,636.40 $.00 $12,636.40 $27,569.65 .46 .46

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $9,213.57 $.00 $9,213.57 $27,809.65 .33 .33

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $20,863.23 $.00 $20,863.23 $27,659.60 .75 .75

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $15,747.65 $.00 $15,747.65 $15,747.65 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 N FY $9,729.47 $.00 $9,729.47 $27,807.65 .35 .35






Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $22,830.65 $4,500.00 $27,330.65 $27,330.65 1.00 .84

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $10,486.32 $3,500.00 $13,986.32 $27,972.65 .50 .37

N N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 .00 .00

N N 3.00 2.0 Y FY $7,976.82 $.00 $7,976.82 X $15,075.70 .00 .53

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $16,754.53 $1,500.00 $18,254.53 $28,021.70 .65 .60

Y Y 2.00 3.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $18,274.65 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $7,936.32 $.00 $7,936.32 $15,872.65 .50 .50

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $18,833.06 $7,500.00 $26,333.06 $27,569.65 .96 .68

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $9,399.32 $.00 $9,399.32 $27,798.65 .34 .34

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $24,784.78 $.00 $24,784.78 $27,628.60 .90 .90

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $5,581.93 $.00 $5,581.93 $27,659.60 .20 .20

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $8,270.89 $.00 $8,270.89 $27,659.60 .30 .30

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,438.60 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $9,819.76 $.00 $9,819.76 $27,977.65 .35 .35

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $20,657.80 $1,500.00 $22,157.80 $27,954.65 .79 .74

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $7,841.32 $.00 $7,841.32 $15,682.65 .50 .50






Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $6,425.64 $.00 $6,425.64 $16,026.65 .40 .40

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $13,922.32 $.00 $13,922.32 $27,844.65 .50 .50

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $16,538.19 $.00 $16,538.19 $27,563.65 .60 .60





First Contest of the NONCHAMPIONSHIP Segment:First Contest of the CHAMPIONSHIP Segment:

Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $17,098.65 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $15,922.91 $.00 $15,922.91 $27,802.65 .57 .57

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $23,349.50 $.00 $23,349.50 $27,919.65 .84 .84

Y Y .00 1.0 N FY $2,434.14 $1,170.00 $3,604.14 $15,917.65 .23 .15

Y Y .00 1.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,656.60 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,379.35 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $28,277.65 $.00 $28,277.65 $28,277.65 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,787.60 .00 .00

Y Y .50 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $17,319.65 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $17,198.65 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $25,149.65 $3,000.00 $28,149.65 $28,149.65 1.00 .89

Y Y .00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,596.65 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,379.35 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $29,435.65 $.00 $29,435.65 $30,052.85 .98 .98

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $20,295.82 $.00 $20,295.82 $28,038.65 .72 .72

Y Y 2.00 3.0 Y FY $15,653.12 $.00 $15,653.12 $15,882.65 .99 .99




First Contest of the NONCHAMPIONSHIP Segment:First Contest of the CHAMPIONSHIP Segment:

Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


N N 1.00 1.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,696.60 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $24,402.41 $.00 $24,402.41 $29,171.65 .84 .84

Y Y .00 0.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,656.65 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $20,401.25 $8,500.00 $28,901.25 $27,594.65 1.00 .74

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $21,660.65 $7,500.00 $29,160.65 $29,160.65 1.00 .74

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $25,272.80 $.00 $25,272.80 $29,160.65 .87 .87

N Y .00 0.0 N S $808.38 $.00 $808.38 $15,887.65 .05 .05

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,970.65 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,507.35 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $22,102.80 $.00 $22,102.80 $27,809.65 .79 .79

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $28,175.65 $.00 $28,175.65 $28,175.65 1.00 1.00







Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


N N 2.00 3.0 N FY $400.00 $.00 $400.00 X $15,772.65 .00 .03

N N 2.00 4.0 Y FY $2,171.97 $.00 $2,171.97 X $28,309.56 .00 .08

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $3,214.22 $4,812.00 $8,026.22 $26,754.10 .30 .12

Y Y 1.00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,691.65 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 2.0 Y FY $3,219.53 $.00 $3,219.53 $15,847.65 .20 .20

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $1,982.70 $.00 $1,982.70 $18,024.65 .11 .11

Y Y .00 0.0 N FY $3,173.33 $.00 $3,173.33 $15,766.65 .20 .20

Y Y .00 0.0 N FY $3,193.33 $.00 $3,193.33 $15,816.65 .20 .20

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $19,410.05 $.00 $19,410.05 $27,628.65 .70 .70

Y Y 1.00 2.0 Y FY $793.38 $.00 $793.38 $15,777.65 .05 .05

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $19,501.75 $.00 $19,501.75 $27,709.65 .70 .70

N N 4.00 4.0 Y FY $9,628.69 $.00 $9,628.69 X $27,989.65 .00 .34

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $9,433.59 $.00 $9,433.59 $15,722.65 .60 .60

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $15,747.65 $.00 $15,747.65 $15,747.65 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 N FY $5,539.67 $.00 $5,539.67 $15,722.65 .35 .35

Y Y 1.00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $29,171.65 .00 .00






Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 N FY $20,803.98 $.00 $20,803.98 $27,638.65 .75 .75

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $773.00 $4,500.00 $5,273.00 $27,644.65 .19 .03

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $20,653.98 $.00 $20,653.98 $27,538.65 .75 .75

N N 3.00 3.0 Y FY $6,892.41 $.00 $6,892.41 X $27,569.65 .00 .25

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $20,653.98 $.00 $20,653.98 $27,538.65 .75 .75

Y Y .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,538.65 .00 .00

N N 3.00 3.0 Y FY $3,139.53 $.00 $3,139.53 X $15,697.65 .00 .20

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $6,339.06 $.00 $6,339.06 $15,772.65 .40 .40

N N 4.00 4.0 Y FY $14,198.45 $.00 $14,198.45 X $27,719.65 .00 .51

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $16,736.79 $.00 $16,736.79 $27,894.65 .60 .60

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $23,407.84 $.00 $23,407.84 $27,538.65 .85 .85

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $20,920.98 $.00 $20,920.98 $27,769.65 .75 .75

Y Y .00 0.0 N FY $13,957.32 $.00 $13,957.32 $27,834.65 .50 .50

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $7,923.82 $.00 $7,923.82 $15,691.65 .50 .50

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $17,533.48 $3,500.00 $21,033.48 $28,044.65 .75 .63

N N 4.00 4.0 Y FY $13,234.06 $.00 $13,234.06 X $29,769.65 .00 .44






Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $11,137.86 $.00 $11,137.86 $27,694.65 .40 .40

N N 4.00 4.0 Y F $10,499.88 $.00 $10,499.88 X $27,829.65 .00 .38

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $14,497.65 $1,250.00 $15,747.65 $15,747.65 1.00 .92

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $15,741.65 $.00 $15,741.65 $15,741.65 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 2.0 N FY $9,943.86 $1,984.00 $11,927.86 $29,794.65 .40 .33

N N 3.00 4.0 N FY $2,334.52 $.00 $2,334.52 X $16,826.55 .00 .14




Sport: W o m e n ' s Tennis




Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $27,014.65 $.00 $27,014.65 $27,014.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.50 2.0 Y FY $27,857.65 $.00 $27,857.65 $27,875.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $27,479.80 $.00 $27,479.80 $28,079.65 X .98 .98

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $27,569.65 $.00 $27,569.65 $27,569.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $25,397.80 $.00 $25,397.80 $27,594.65 X .92 .92

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $22,769.65 $7,000.00 $29,769.65 $29,769.65 X 1.00 .76

Y Y 1.00 3.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,593.65 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $29,221.65 $.00 $29,221.65 $29,221.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 2.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $17,188.65 .0 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $28,129.65 $.00 $28,129.65 $28,129.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,288.65 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,288.65 .00 .00

N N 4.00 4.0 Y FY $14,048.45 $.00 $14,048.45 X $27,569.65 .00 .51






Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward

Reason Date


















Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,692.60 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,847.65 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,867.60 .00 .00

N N 2.00 2.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,234.65 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $29,441.65 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,561.65 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,747.65 .00 .00

N N .00 4.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,416.65 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,722.65 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,697.65 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $29,769.65 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,719.65 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,338.65 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $30,534.65 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,897.65 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,875.65 .00 .00





Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,695.65 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,869.65 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,692.60 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,478.65 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,288.65 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,947.65 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,824.65 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $22,086.00 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,839.60 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,797.65 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,092.65 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,697.65 .00 .00

N Y .00 0.0 Y S $.00 $.00 $.00 $29,142.80 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,585.65 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,580.65 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $30,119.65 .00 .00





Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,785.65 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,624.65 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,748.60 .00 .00

Y Y 2.50 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,659.60 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,882.60 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,052.40 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,802.85 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,709.65 .00 .00

N N 2.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $30,435.65 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,606.60 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,568.60 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,747.65 .00 .00 *

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,658.65 .00 .00








Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,692.60 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $10,032.26 $.00 $10,032.26 $15,847.65 .63 .63

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $1,584.26 $.00 $1,584.26 $15,867.60 .10 .10

N N 2.00 2.0 N FY $21,740.67 $.00 $21,740.67 $28,234.65 .77 .77

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $7,391.65 $.00 $7,391.65 $29,441.65 .25 .25

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $22,889.32 $.00 $22,889.32 $28,561.65 .80 .80

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $11,098.95 $.00 $11,098.95 $15,747.65 .70 .70

N Y .00 3.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,416.65 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $8,676.68 $.00 $8,676.68 $15,722.65 .55 .55

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $1,590.36 $.00 $1,590.36 $15,697.65 .10 .10

.00 0.0 Y FY $1,129.19 $9,505.00 $10,634.19 $29,769.65 .36 .04

Y Y 2.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,719.65 .00 .00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,338.65 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $12,473.80 $1,984.00 $14,457.80 $30,534.65 .47 .41







Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $12,718.12 $.00 $12,718.12 $15,897.65 .80 .80

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $7,172.44 $1,500.00 $8,672.44 $27,875.65 .31 .26

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,695.65 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $20,902.23 $.00 $20,902.23 $27,869.65 .75 .75

Y Y .00 0.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,692.60 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $17,861.11 $.00 $17,861.11 $27,478.65 .65 .65

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $15,136.23 $.00 $15,136.23 $27,288.65 .55 .55

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $4,305.85 $.00 $4,305.85 $15,947.65 .27 .27

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $27,824.65 $.00 $27,824.65 $27,824.65 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $22,086.00 .00 .00

Y Y 2.00 1.0 Y FY $1,690.77 $.00 $1,690.77 $27,839.60 .06 .06

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $9,869.76 $.00 $9,869.76 $15,797.65 .62 .62

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $16,092.65 $.00 $16,092.65 $16,092.65 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 N FY $12,576.11 $.00 $12,576.11 $15,697.65 .80 .80







Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


N Y .00 0.0 Y S $14,612.80 $.00 $14,612.80 $29,142.80 .50 .50

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $28,585.65 $.00 $28,585.65 $28,585.65 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 1.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,580.65 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $24,095.72 $.00 $24,095.72 $30,119.65 .80 .80

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $3,946.40 $.00 $3,946.40 $15,785.65 .25 .25

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $10,344.65 $.00 $10,344.65 $28,624.65 .36 .36

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $9,804.77 $.00 $9,804.77 $27,748.60 .35 .35

Y Y 2.50 3.0 Y FY $27,569.65 $.00 $27,569.65 $27,659.60 1.00 1.00

Y Y .00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,882.60 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $8,828.78 $.00 $8,828.78 $16,052.40 .55 .55

.00 0.0 Y FY $22,377.90 $.00 $22,377.90 $27,802.85 .80 .80

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $2,234.22 $.00 $2,234.22 $27,709.65 .08 .08

N N 3.00 3.0 Y FY $2,159.31 $4,560.00 $6,719.31 $30,435.65 .22 .07

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,606.60 .00 .00







Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,568.60 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,747.65 .00 .00 *

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $13,869.32 $.00 $13,869.32 $27,658.65 .50 .50







Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,262.60 .00 .00

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $15,965.65 $.00 $15,965.65 $15,965.65 X 1.00 1.00

N N .00 3.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,787.60 .00 .00

Y Y 3.00 2.0 Y FY $27,076.80 $.00 $27,076.80 $29,371.65 X .92 .92

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $28,158.65 $.00 $28,158.65 $28,158.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,684.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $16,240.90 $.00 $16,240.90 $16,240.90 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 1.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,506.60 .00 .00

Y Y .00 0.0 Y FY $16,042.65 $.00 $16,042.65 $16,042.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $26,026.80 $.00 $26,026.80 $29,321.65 X .89 .89

Y Y 1.00 3.0 Y FY $29,556.65 $.00 $29,556.65 $29,556.65 X 1.00 1.00

N N 4.00 4.0 Y F $14,343.45 $.00 $14,343.45 X $28,776.85 .00 .50

Y Y 1.00 1.0 Y FY $28,941.65 $.00 $28,941.65 $28,941.65 X 1.00 1.00

Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $27,975.65 $.00 $27,975.65 $27,975.65 X 1.00 1.00






Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y Y 3.00 3.0 Y FY $24,422.80 $.00 $24,422.80 $27,719.65 X .88 .88

Y Y 2.00 2.0 Y FY $22,862.80 $.00 $22,862.80 $27,569.65 X .83 .83

Y Y 1.00 0.0 Y FY $15,747.65 $.00 $15,747.65 $15,747.65 X 1.00 1.00

N N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,659.60 .00 .00




Sport: Football



Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Ini-tial

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y N 4.00 3.0 Y FY $29,108.60 $.00 $29,108.60 $29,108.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $28,480.00 $.00 $28,480.00 $29,818.60 X .96 .96

Y N 4.00 3.0 Y FY $30,537.60 $.00 $30,537.60 $30,537.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,408.60 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 0.0 Y FY $16,584.60 $.00 $16,584.60 $16,584.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $29,572.60 $.00 $29,572.60 $29,572.60 X 1.00 1.00

N N 2.00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.60 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 0.0 Y FY $15,686.60 $1,250.00 $16,936.60 $16,936.60 X 1.00 .93

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $29,522.60 $.00 $29,522.60 $29,522.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $29,572.60 $.00 $29,572.60 $29,572.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 3.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,887.05 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $16,584.60 $.00 $16,584.60 $16,584.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,560.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $29,522.60 $.00 $29,522.60 $29,522.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N 4.00 3.0 Y F $8,848.30 $.00 $8,848.30 $17,646.60 X .50 .50



Sport: Football



Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Ini-tial

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y N 1.00 0.0 Y FY $29,622.60 $.00 $29,622.60 $29,622.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 3.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,465.30 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $24,221.60 $4,500.00 $28,721.60 $28,721.60 X 1.00 .84

Y N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $17,615.60 .00 .00

Y N 1.50 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $17,615.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,246.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $16,850.60 $.00 $16,850.60 $16,850.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N 3.50 2.0 Y FY $28,696.60 $.00 $28,696.60 $28,696.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $18,678.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $28,646.60 $.00 $28,646.60 $28,646.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N 2.00 3.0 Y FY $29,308.60 $.00 $29,308.60 $29,308.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 3.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,692.60 .00 .00



Sport: Football



Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Ini-tial

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $28,858.60 $.00 $28,858.60 $28,858.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $17,410.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.60 .00 .00

Y N 4.00 3.0 Y FY $24,833.05 $.00 $24,833.05 $24,833.05 X 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 0.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $29,522.60 $.00 $29,522.60 $29,522.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 0.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,600.60 .00 .00

Y N 1.50 3.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,771.05 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,840.60 .00 .00

Y N .50 3.0 Y FY $28,696.60 $.00 $28,696.60 $28,696.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N 2.50 3.0 Y FY $28,696.60 $.00 $28,696.60 $28,696.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $25,696.60 $3,000.00 $28,696.60 $28,696.60 X 1.00 .90

Y N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.60 .00 .00

Y N 1.50 3.0 Y FY $28,646.60 $.00 $28,646.60 $28,646.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $18,216.60 $.00 $18,216.60 $18,216.60 X 1.00 1.00



Sport: Football



Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Ini-tial

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $28,696.60 $.00 $28,696.60 $28,696.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N 3.00 3.0 Y FY $28,736.60 $.00 $28,736.60 $28,736.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N 3.00 3.0 Y FY $18,216.60 $.00 $18,216.60 $18,216.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $28,669.00 $.00 $28,669.00 $29,522.60 X .97 .97

Y N .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $17,460.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $17,833.60 $.00 $17,833.60 $17,833.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N 4.00 3.0 Y FY $28,696.60 $.00 $28,696.60 $28,696.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N 1.00 0.0 Y FY $16,634.60 $.00 $16,634.60 $16,634.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 0.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $29,572.60 $.00 $29,572.60 $29,572.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 0.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.60 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $16,584.60 $.00 $16,584.60 $16,584.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N 3.00 3.0 Y FY $18,216.60 $.00 $18,216.60 $18,216.60 X 1.00 1.00

N N 1.00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,882.60 .00 .00

Y N 3.00 2.0 Y FY $19,266.60 $.00 $19,266.60 $19,266.60 X 1.00 1.00



Sport: Football



Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Ini-tial

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $28,646.60 $.00 $28,646.60 $28,646.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $21,196.60 $7,500.00 $28,696.60 $28,696.60 X 1.00 .74

Y N 4.00 3.0 Y FY $28,646.60 $.00 $28,646.60 $28,646.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N 1.00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $17,716.60 .00 .00

Y N 4.00 3.0 Y FY $16,644.60 $.00 $16,644.60 $16,644.60 X 1.00 1.00

N N .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $29,722.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $26,522.60 $3,000.00 $29,522.60 $29,522.60 X 1.00 .90

Y N 1.50 1.0 Y FY $16,534.60 $.00 $16,534.60 $16,534.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $28,696.60 $.00 $28,696.60 $28,696.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N .50 1.0 Y FY $16,614.60 $.00 $16,614.60 $16,614.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N 2.00 3.0 N F $8,898.30 $.00 $8,898.30 $17,696.60 X .50 .50

N N .00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,351.60 .00 .00

Y N .50 0.0 Y FY $29,522.60 $.00 $29,522.60 $29,522.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N 1.00 0.0 Y FY $24,196.60 $4,500.00 $28,696.60 $28,696.60 X 1.00 .84

Y N 2.00 3.0 Y FY $28,646.60 $.00 $28,646.60 $28,646.60 X 1.00 1.00



Sport: Football



Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Ini-tial

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $17,410.60 $.00 $17,410.60 $17,410.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.60 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 0.0 Y FY $21,172.60 $8,500.00 $29,672.60 $29,672.60 X 1.00 .71

N N .00 0.0 FY $100.00 $.00 $100.00 $100.00 X 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $17,410.60 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 0.0 Y FY $28,696.60 $.00 $28,696.60 $28,696.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N 3.00 3.0 Y FY $28,746.60 $.00 $28,746.60 $28,746.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $28,796.60 $.00 $28,796.60 $28,796.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $27,321.00 $.00 $27,321.00 $28,646.60 X .95 .95

Y N 1.00 0.0 Y FY $25,696.60 $3,000.00 $28,696.60 $28,696.60 X 1.00 .90

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $17,410.60 $.00 $17,410.60 $17,410.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $25,331.00 $.00 $25,331.00 $29,522.60 X .86 .86

Y N 3.00 2.0 Y FY $28,746.60 $.00 $28,746.60 $28,746.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $16,410.60 $1,000.00 $17,410.60 $17,410.60 X 1.00 .94

Y N .00 0.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.60 .00 .00



Sport: Football



Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Ini-tial

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y N .00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $30,152.60 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 3.0 Y FY $28,646.60 $.00 $28,646.60 $28,646.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,358.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 1.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $18,743.60 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 0.0 Y FY $28,696.60 $.00 $28,696.60 $28,696.60 X 1.00 1.00

N N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,600.60 .00 .00

Y N 3.00 2.0 Y FY $28,796.60 $.00 $28,796.60 $28,796.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $17,740.10 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,600.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.50 3.0 Y FY $28,746.60 $.00 $28,746.60 $28,746.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $21,146.60 $7,500.00 $28,646.60 $28,646.60 X 1.00 .74

Y N .00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $17,990.60 .00 .00

Y N 4.00 3.0 Y FY $28,856.60 $.00 $28,856.60 $28,856.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N 3.50 2.0 Y FY $16,896.60 $.00 $16,896.60 $16,896.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.60 .00 .00



Sport: Football



Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Ini-tial

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $15,674.60 $1,000.00 $16,674.60 $16,674.60 X 1.00 .94

Y N .00 3.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,754.05 .00 .00

Y N 3.00 2.0 Y FY $30,290.60 $.00 $30,290.60 $30,290.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N 3.00 2.0 Y FY $28,796.60 $.00 $28,796.60 $28,796.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $11,996.00 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $26,522.60 $3,000.00 $29,522.60 $29,522.60 X 1.00 .90

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $28,742.60 $.00 $28,742.60 $28,696.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $29,572.60 $.00 $29,572.60 $29,572.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N 3.00 2.0 Y FY $28,696.60 $.00 $28,696.60 $28,696.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $25,022.60 $4,500.00 $29,522.60 $29,522.60 X 1.00 .85

Y N .50 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $17,928.60 .00 .00

Y N 3.00 2.0 Y FY $26,175.60 $3,000.00 $29,175.60 $29,175.60 X 1.00 .90

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $16,739.60 $.00 $16,739.60 $16,739.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N 4.00 3.0 Y FY $28,696.60 $.00 $28,696.60 $28,696.60 X 1.00 1.00



Sport: Football



Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Ini-tial

Over-all

Equi-valentaward




















Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y N 4.00 3.0 Y FY $28,696.60 $.00 $28,696.60 $28,696.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N 4.00 3.0 Y FY $28,746.60 $.00 $28,746.60 $28,746.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $24,125.00 $.00 $24,125.00 $26,677.05 X .90 .90

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $28,696.60 $.00 $28,696.60 $28,696.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,246.60 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $28,696.60 $.00 $28,696.60 $28,696.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,696.60 .00 .00

Y N 4.00 3.0 Y FY $28,746.60 $.00 $28,746.60 $28,746.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N .50 3.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,882.60 .00 .00

Y N 3.00 3.0 Y FY $28,696.60 $.00 $28,696.60 $28,696.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $28,646.60 $.00 $28,646.60 $28,646.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $28,646.60 $.00 $28,646.60 $28,646.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $28,696.60 $.00 $28,696.60 $28,696.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N .50 2.0 Y FY $18,266.60 $.00 $18,266.60 $18,266.60 X 1.00 1.00






Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y N 4.00 3.0 Y FY $28,696.60 $.00 $28,696.60 $28,696.60 X 1.00 1.00


















Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,600.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,600.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.60 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,674.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $29,468.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,781.60 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,646.60 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,816.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,811.60 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,911.60 .00 .00

N N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.50 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $30,290.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,448.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $30,290.60 .00 .00

Y N 1.50 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,996.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,739.60 .00 .00





Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


N N 4.00 4.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $30,898.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 3.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $30,650.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $18,778.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,696.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,686.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 2.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,659.60 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,574.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,518.60 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,760.60 .00 .00







Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y N 1.00 2.0 Y FY $24,646.88 $.00 $24,646.88 $30,808.60 .80 .80

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $28,398.60 $.00 $28,398.60 $28,398.60 1.00 1.00

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $25,781.94 $.00 $25,781.94 $28,646.60 .90 .90

Y N 1.00 0.0 Y FY $4,255.41 $.00 $4,255.41 $17,021.60 .25 .25

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $3,643.32 $.00 $3,643.32 $18,216.60 .20 .20

Y N 2.00 3.0 Y FY $17,187.96 $.00 $17,187.96 $28,646.60 .60 .60

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $6,375.82 $.00 $6,375.82 $18,216.60 .35 .35



1/15/2013 Academic Year: 2012-13




Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward

Reason Date

















Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,600.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,745.05 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,600.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.60 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,674.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 2.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,436.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $29,468.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,781.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,646.60 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,684.60 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,816.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,811.60 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,534.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,911.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.60 .00 .00




Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y N 2.50 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $30,290.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,286.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,448.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $30,290.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,653.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.40 .00 .00

Y N .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.40 .00 .00

Y N 1.50 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,996.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,960.40 .00 .00

Y N .00 2.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $30,746.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,739.60 .00 .00

Y N 4.00 3.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $30,898.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $17,410.40 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.60 .00 .00

N N .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $17,410.40 .00 .00

Y N .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,696.60 .00 .00




Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y N .00 3.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,646.60 .00 .00

Y N 4.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $29,090.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 2.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.40 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,246.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $30,650.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $17,410.40 .00 .00

Y N .00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $18,778.60 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,696.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,686.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,659.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 2.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,646.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,646.60 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,574.60 .00 .00

Y N 4.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $30,290.60 .00 .00

Y N 3.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,817.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,518.60 .00 .00




Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,760.60 .00 .00




















Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,600.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,745.05 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,600.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.60 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 0.0 Y FY $10,004.76 $.00 $10,004.76 $16,674.60 .60 .60

Y N .00 2.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,436.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $5,992.76 $5,500.00 $11,492.76 $29,468.60 .39 .20

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $7,876.09 $4,500.00 $12,376.09 $28,781.60 .43 .27

Y N .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 2.0 Y FY $4,297.00 $.00 $4,297.00 $28,646.60 .15 .15

Y N 1.00 0.0 Y FY $1,668.46 $.00 $1,668.46 $16,684.60 .10 .10

Y N 1.00 0.0 Y FY $800.00 $.00 $800.00 $28,816.60 .03 .03

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $4,321.75 $.00 $4,321.75 $28,811.60 .15 .15

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $800.00 $.00 $800.00 $16,534.60 .05 .05







Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y N .00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $7,227.91 $.00 $7,227.91 $28,911.60 .25 .25

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.50 3.0 Y FY $6,058.12 $.00 $6,058.12 $30,290.60 .20 .20

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,286.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,448.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $7,572.66 $.00 $7,572.66 $30,290.60 .25 .25

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $28,653.60 $.00 $28,653.60 $28,653.60 1.00 1.00

Y N 2.00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.40 .00 .00

Y N .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.40 .00 .00

Y N 1.50 2.0 Y FY $28,996.60 $.00 $28,996.60 $28,996.60 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,960.40 .00 .00

Y N .00 2.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $30,746.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,739.60 .00 .00







Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y N 4.00 3.0 N FY $30,898.60 $.00 $30,898.60 $30,898.60 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $17,410.40 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.60 .00 .00

N N .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $17,410.40 .00 .00

Y N .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,696.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 3.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,646.60 .00 .00

Y N 4.00 3.0 Y FY $29,090.60 $.00 $29,090.60 $29,090.60 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 2.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.40 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 0.0 Y FY $1,624.66 $.00 $1,624.66 $16,246.60 .10 .10

Y N .00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $30,650.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $17,410.40 .00 .00

Y N .00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $18,778.60 .00 .00







Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y N 1.00 0.0 Y FY $28,696.60 $.00 $28,696.60 $28,696.60 1.00 1.00

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $14,343.30 $.00 $14,343.30 $28,686.60 .50 .50

Y N .00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,659.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 2.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,646.60 .00 .00

Y N 3.00 2.0 Y FY $20,052.62 $.00 $20,052.62 $28,646.60 .70 .70

Y N 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,574.60 .00 .00

Y N 4.00 3.0 Y FY $30,290.60 $.00 $30,290.60 $30,290.60 1.00 1.00

Y N 3.00 3.0 Y FY $14,408.80 $.00 $14,408.80 $28,817.60 .50 .50

Y N .00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,518.60 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $28,760.60 $.00 $28,760.60 $28,760.60 1.00 1.00





First Contest of the ALL Segment:First Contest of the Segment: 11/03/2012

Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


N N 1.00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,692.60 .00 .00

N N .00 0.0 Y FY $4,182.41 $.00 $4,182.41 $16,729.60 .25 .25

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $17,295.96 $.00 $17,295.96 $28,826.60 .60 .60

N N 1.00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,692.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $17,410.40 .00 .00

Y N .00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,659.60 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,745.05 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $4,960.38 $.00 $4,960.38 $16,534.60 .30 .30

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $3,201.40 $.00 $3,201.40 $17,785.60 .18 .18

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $21,643.96 $.00 $21,643.96 $28,858.60 .75 .75

Y N .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,692.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $13,514.08 $.00 $13,514.08 $16,846.60 .80 .80

Y N 2.00 3.0 Y FY $14,429.30 $.00 $14,429.30 $28,858.60 .50 .50

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $7,861.04 $4,500.00 $12,361.04 $28,746.60 .43 .27

Y N .00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $22,086.00 .00 .00





Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $17,410.40 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $17,410.40 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $3,482.12 $.00 $3,482.12 $17,410.60 .20 .20

Y N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,646.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 3.0 N FY $900.86 $1,000.00 $1,900.86 $19,008.60 .10 .05

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $17,410.60 $.00 $17,410.60 $17,410.60 1.00 1.00

Y N 1.00 0.0 Y FY $7,161.66 $.00 $7,161.66 $28,646.60 .25 .25

Y N .00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $29,740.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $6,964.24 $.00 $6,964.24 $17,410.60 .40 .40

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $8,329.80 $.00 $8,329.80 $16,575.05 .50 .50

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $17,410.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,646.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 2.0 N FY $3,316.92 $.00 $3,316.92 $16,584.60 .20 .20

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $29,767.60 $.00 $29,767.60 $29,767.60 1.00 1.00





Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $3,347.92 $.00 $3,347.92 $16,739.60 .20 .20

N N 4.00 3.0 Y FY $24,744.48 $.00 $24,744.48 X $30,930.60 .00 .80

Y N .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $17,410.60 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $842.24 $.00 $842.24 $17,410.60 .05 .05

Y N .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.60 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 0.0 Y FY $1,664.96 $.00 $1,664.96 $16,649.60 .10 .10

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $12,164.30 $.00 $12,164.30 $28,962.60 .42 .42

Y N .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,646.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $902.24 $.00 $902.24 $18,044.60 .05 .05

Y N 1.00 0.0 Y FY $9,950.76 $.00 $9,950.76 $16,584.60 .60 .60

Y N 3.00 2.0 Y FY $10,019.14 $.00 $10,019.14 $18,216.60 .55 .55

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $12,399.50 $.00 $12,399.50 $29,522.60 .42 .42

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,552.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.60 .00 .00







Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $14,364.60 $.00 $14,364.60 $16,614.60 X .86 .86

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $16,410.60 $.00 $16,410.60 $17,410.60 X .94 .94

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $29,522.60 $.00 $29,522.60 $29,522.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $29,522.60 $.00 $29,522.60 $29,522.60 X 1.00 1.00

N N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 .00 .00

N N .00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,507.35 .00 .00

N N .00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,075.70 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $16,804.60 $.00 $16,804.60 $16,779.60 X 1.00 1.00

N N 4.00 4.0 Y F/S $14,464.30 $.00 $14,464.30 X $28,643.60 .00 .50

N N .00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,473.10 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $26,672.60 $3,000.00 $29,672.60 $29,672.60 X 1.00 .90

N N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $12,706.84 $.00 $12,706.84 $16,534.60 X .77 .77

N N .00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,507.35 .00 .00

N N .00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,507.35 .00 .00






Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


N N .00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,507.35 .00 .00

N N .00 3.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,507.35 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $26,672.60 $3,000.00 $29,672.60 $29,672.60 X 1.00 .90

N N .00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 .00 .00

N N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,507.35 .00 .00

Y N 3.00 3.0 Y FY $16,684.60 $.00 $16,684.60 $16,684.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N 3.00 3.0 Y FY $24,045.00 $.00 $24,045.00 $28,646.60 X .84 .84

N N .00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 .00 .00

N N .00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,507.35 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $25,047.60 $4,500.00 $29,547.60 $29,547.60 X 1.00 .85

Y N 3.00 3.0 Y FY $16,584.60 $.00 $16,584.60 $16,584.60 X 1.00 1.00




Sport: Women ' s Cros s Country



Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,534.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 2.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,761.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $18,388.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,634.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $30,998.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $29,008.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,441.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,765.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,578.60 .00 .00

Y N 3.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,646.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,638.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,438.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,341.60 .00 .00

Y N 3.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,734.60 .00 .00



Sport: Women ' s Cros s Country



Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y N .50 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $29,536.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,271.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,617.60 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,826.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,408.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.50 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,646.60 .00 .00

N N 2.00 4.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,796.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,591.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,528.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,600.60 .00 .00







Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $29,572.60 $.00 $29,572.60 $29,572.60 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,692.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $28,736.60 $.00 $28,736.60 $28,736.60 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $29,717.60 $.00 $29,717.60 $29,717.60 1.00 1.00

Y N 3.00 3.0 Y FY $31,166.60 $.00 $31,166.60 $31,166.60 1.00 1.00

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $29,722.60 $.00 $29,722.60 $29,722.60 1.00 1.00

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $9,125.80 $.00 $9,125.80 $18,251.60 .50 .50







Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $26,555.00 $.00 $26,555.00 $28,671.60 X .93 .93

Y N 4.00 4.0 Y FY $28,508.60 $.00 $28,508.60 X $28,508.60 .00 1.00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $19,847.00 $.00 $19,847.00 $31,847.00 X .62 .62

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $31,110.00 $.00 $31,110.00 $31,110.00 X 1.00 1.00

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $21,236.60 $.00 $21,236.60 $28,736.60 X .74 .74

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $28,721.60 $.00 $28,721.60 $28,721.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $28,842.60 $.00 $28,842.60 $28,842.60 X 1.00 1.00

N N .00 0.0 Y FY $24,245.00 $.00 $24,245.00 $31,645.00 X .77 .77

Y N .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $31,110.00 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $28,646.60 $.00 $28,646.60 $28,646.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $27,813.00 $.00 $27,813.00 $32,000.60 X .87 .87

Y N .00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,646.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $28,861.60 $.00 $28,861.60 $28,861.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $27,149.00 $.00 $27,149.00 $28,750.60 X .94 .94

Y N 1.00 3.0 Y FY $29,536.60 $.00 $29,536.60 $29,536.60 X 1.00 1.00






Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $31,030.00 .00 .00



















Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y N 1.00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,729.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $7,182.90 $.00 $7,182.90 $28,731.60 .25 .25

N N 3.00 2.0 Y FY $21,484.96 $.00 $21,484.96 X $28,646.60 .00 .75

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $2,509.45 $.00 $2,509.45 $16,729.60 .15 .15

Y N 3.00 3.0 Y FY $11,458.64 $.00 $11,458.64 $28,646.60 .40 .40

.00 0.0 Y S $12,361.90 $.00 $12,361.90 $28,553.60 .43 .43

Y N .00 2.0 N FY $21,146.60 $7,500.00 $28,646.60 $28,646.60 1.00 .74

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $11,498.64 $.00 $11,498.64 $28,746.60 .40 .40

Y N .50 3.0 N FY $1,417.94 $.00 $1,417.94 $28,358.60 .05 .05

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $28,790.00 $.00 $28,790.00 $28,891.60 1.00 1.00

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $23,045.00 $.00 $23,045.00 $28,796.60 .80 .80

N N 3.00 2.0 Y FY $3,876.49 $.00 $3,876.49 X $28,413.60 .00 .14

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $21,522.46 $.00 $21,522.46 $28,696.60 .75 .75

N N 4.00 4.0 Y FY $13,716.80 $.00 $13,716.80 X $13,716.80 .00 1.00

Y N 2.00 2.0 N FY $15,959.14 $.00 $15,959.14 $29,016.60 .55 .55

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $22,970.78 $4,500.00 $27,470.78 $28,866.60 .95 .80






Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $14,388.30 $.00 $14,388.30 $28,776.60 .50 .50

Y N 3.00 3.0 Y FY $17,312.05 $1,500.00 $18,812.05 $28,941.60 .65 .60

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $10,029.81 $.00 $10,029.81 $28,656.60 .35 .35

N N 4.00 4.0 Y FY $8,273.30 $.00 $8,273.30 X $16,546.60 .00 .50

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $22,990.60 $7,500.00 $30,490.60 $30,490.60 1.00 .75

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y F $5,013.16 $.00 $5,013.16 $28,646.60 .18 .18

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $14,303.30 $.00 $14,303.30 $28,606.60 .50 .50

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $5,749.32 $.00 $5,749.32 $28,746.60 .20 .20

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $12,116.24 $.00 $12,116.24 $30,290.60 .40 .40

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $10,101.57 $.00 $10,101.57 $28,861.60 .35 .35

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $21,625.00 $1,500.00 $23,125.00 $28,726.60 .81 .75

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $12,419.71 $.00 $12,419.71 $16,584.60 .75 .75

Y N .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,729.60 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $6,659.84 $.00 $6,659.84 $16,649.60 .40 .40

Y N 3.00 2.0 Y FY $14,323.30 $.00 $14,323.30 $28,646.60 .50 .50

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $17,292.96 $.00 $17,292.96 $28,821.60 .60 .60






Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward




















Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $9,011.80 $.00 $9,011.80 $18,023.60 .50 .50

Y N 1.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,659.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $26,555.00 $.00 $26,555.00 $28,671.60 .93 .93

Y N 1.00 2.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $17,928.60 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 2.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,379.35 .00 .00

N N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $15,670.00 $.00 $15,670.00 $18,920.00 .83 .83

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $26,490.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $24,095.00 $.00 $24,095.00 $30,185.60 .80 .80

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $12,890.98 $.00 $12,890.98 $28,646.60 .45 .45

Y N .00 2.0 Y FY $18,433.10 $.00 $18,433.10 $28,358.60 .65 .65

Y N .00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $27,379.35 .00 .00

N N 4.00 4.0 Y F $4,074.12 $.00 $4,074.12 X $19,837.80 .00 .21

Y N 3.00 3.0 Y FY $16,634.60 $.00 $16,634.60 $16,634.60 1.00 1.00

N N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $11,041.54 $.00 $11,041.54 $16,729.60 .66 .66

Y N 3.00 3.0 Y FY $25,689.00 $.00 $25,689.00 $30,290.60 .85 .85






Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $16,633.12 $3,500.00 $20,133.12 $28,761.60 .70 .58

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $23,195.00 $5,500.00 $28,695.00 $28,796.60 1.00 .81

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $28,646.60 $.00 $28,646.60 $28,646.60 1.00 1.00

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $24,075.00 $.00 $24,075.00 $28,676.60 .84 .84

Y N 2.50 3.0 N FY $11,659.43 $4,000.00 $15,659.43 $16,483.60 .95 .71

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,246.60 .00 .00

Y N 3.00 3.0 Y FY $23,125.00 $.00 $23,125.00 $28,726.60 .81 .81

Y N 4.00 4.0 Y FY $28,483.60 $.00 $28,483.60 X $28,483.60 .00 1.00






Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $21,465.28 $1,500.00 $22,965.28 $28,706.60 .80 .75

Y N 1.00 1.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,473.10 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 3.0 Y FY $813.37 $.00 $813.37 $16,534.60 .05 .05

Y N 1.00 1.0 N FY $3,327.92 $.00 $3,327.92 $16,639.60 .20 .20

Y N 1.00 1.0 N FY $3,326.92 $.00 $3,326.92 $16,634.60 .20 .20

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $20,192.62 $.00 $20,192.62 $28,846.60 .70 .70

Y N 3.00 3.0 Y FY $2,501.20 $.00 $2,501.20 $16,674.60 .15 .15

N N 4.00 4.0 Y FY $18,955.34 $.00 $18,955.34 X $27,079.05 .00 .70

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $11,472.64 $.00 $11,472.64 $28,681.60 .40 .40

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $3,303.92 $.00 $3,303.92 $16,519.60 .20 .20

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $5,721.32 $.00 $5,721.32 $28,606.60 .20 .20

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $6,613.84 $.00 $6,613.84 $16,534.60 .40 .40

Y N 3.00 3.0 Y FY $16,534.60 $.00 $16,534.60 $16,534.60 1.00 1.00

Y N 2.00 2.0 N FY $5,795.87 $.00 $5,795.87 $16,559.60 .35 .35

Y N 1.00 1.0 N FY $21,833.71 $.00 $21,833.71 $29,111.60 .75 .75





Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $400.00 $2,477.00 $2,877.00 $28,771.60 .10 .01

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $10,233.63 $5,500.00 $15,733.63 $28,606.60 .55 .36

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $21,556.96 $.00 $21,556.96 $28,696.60 .75 .75

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $21,631.96 $.00 $21,631.96 $28,796.60 .75 .75

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,646.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,606.60 .00 .00

N N 4.00 4.0 Y FY $6,646.64 $.00 $6,646.64 X $16,616.60 .00 .40

Y N 3.00 3.0 Y FY $12,962.98 $.00 $12,962.98 $28,806.60 .45 .45

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $24,370.87 $.00 $24,370.87 $28,671.60 .85 .85

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $21,612.46 $.00 $21,612.46 $28,816.60 .75 .75

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $26,150.94 $.00 $26,150.94 $29,056.60 .90 .90

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $8,292.30 $.00 $8,292.30 $16,584.60 .50 .50

Y N 3.00 3.0 Y FY $21,484.96 $.00 $21,484.96 $28,646.60 .75 .75

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $800.00 $.00 $800.00 $16,490.60 .05 .05

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $11,478.64 $.00 $11,478.64 $28,696.60 .40 .40

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $9,694.96 $1,250.00 $10,944.96 $18,241.60 .60 .53





Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $12,419.71 $.00 $12,419.71 $16,559.60 .75 .75

Y N 2.00 3.0 N FY $10,343.44 $2,036.00 $12,379.44 $30,948.60 .40 .33















Institution: IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY Sport: Women's Tennis




Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y N 1.00 0.0 Y FY $28,646.60 $.00 $28,646.60 $28,646.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N 2.50 3.0 Y FY $31,110.60 $.00 $31,110.60 $31,110.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $27,045.00 $.00 $27,045.00 $28,646.60 X .94 .94

N N 4.00 4.0 Y FY $28,756.60 $.00 $28,756.60 X $28,756.60 .00 1.00

Y N 3.00 3.0 Y FY $23,898.60 $7,000.00 $30,898.60 $30,898.60 X 1.00 .77

Y N .00 3.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $14,473.10 .00 .00

Y N .00 2.0 Y FY $28,646.60 $.00 $28,646.60 $28,646.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $28,646.60 $.00 $28,646.60 $28,646.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 1.0 Y FY $25,674.00 $.00 $25,674.00 X $30,202.60 .00 .85

Y N .00 2.0 Y FY $26,231.00 $.00 $26,231.00 $28,832.60 X .91 .91






Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward

Reason Date


















Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y N .00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,692.60 .00 .00

Y N 3.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,684.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,534.60 .00 .00

Y N 3.00 2.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,761.60 .00 .00

Y N 3.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,433.60 .00 .00

Y N 3.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,418.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $18,388.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,634.60 .00 .00

N N 3.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,692.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,699.60 .00 .00

N N 2.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,458.60 .00 .00

N N .00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,358.60 .00 .00

Y N 4.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,534.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $30,998.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.60 .00 .00





Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y N 4.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,646.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $29,008.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,692.60 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,383.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $29,674.60 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,646.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,441.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,765.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,646.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,578.60 .00 .00

Y N 3.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,646.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,638.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,438.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,341.60 .00 .00

Y N 4.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,734.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 1.0 N FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,684.60 .00 .00





Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y N .50 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $29,536.60 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $29,536.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,271.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,617.60 .00 .00

Y N 3.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $29,597.60 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,826.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,408.60 .00 .00

Y N 3.50 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,646.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 2.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,882.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,506.60 .00 .00

Y N 4.00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,796.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,849.60 .00 .00

Y N 3.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,696.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,553.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,591.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $29,623.60 .00 .00





Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,528.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,528.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,600.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,416.60 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,851.60 .00 .00




Sport: Women ' s Track , Outdoor




Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y N .00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,692.60 .00 .00

Y N 4.00 3.0 Y FY $4,171.16 $.00 $4,171.16 $16,684.60 .25 .25

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $1,653.46 $.00 $1,653.46 $16,534.60 .10 .10

Y N 3.00 2.0 N FY $20,420.73 $.00 $20,420.73 $28,761.60 .71 .71

Y N 3.00 2.0 Y FY $7,108.41 $.00 $7,108.41 $28,433.60 .25 .25

Y N 3.00 2.0 Y FY $22,734.88 $.00 $22,734.88 $28,418.60 .80 .80

Y N .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $5,516.58 $.00 $5,516.58 $18,388.60 .30 .30

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $11,644.22 $.00 $11,644.22 $16,634.60 .70 .70

N N 3.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,692.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $1,669.96 $.00 $1,669.96 $16,699.60 .10 .10

N N 3.00 4.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,458.60 .00 .00

N N 1.00 2.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,358.60 .00 .00

Y N 4.00 3.0 Y FY $13,227.68 $.00 $13,227.68 $16,534.60 .80 .80







Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $6,249.66 $1,500.00 $7,749.66 $30,998.60 .25 .20

Y N .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,490.60 .00 .00

Y N 4.00 3.0 Y FY $21,484.96 $.00 $21,484.96 $28,646.60 .75 .75

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $20,306.02 $.00 $20,306.02 $29,008.60 .70 .70

Y N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,692.60 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 0.0 Y FY $18,449.35 $.00 $18,449.35 $28,383.60 .65 .65

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $3,857.70 $.00 $3,857.70 $29,674.60 .13 .13

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,646.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $1,644.16 $.00 $1,644.16 $16,441.60 .10 .10

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $800.00 $.00 $800.00 $28,765.60 .03 .03

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,646.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $5,715.72 $.00 $5,715.72 $28,578.60 .20 .20

Y N 3.00 2.0 Y FY $1,718.80 $.00 $1,718.80 $28,646.60 .06 .06

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $2,163.02 $.00 $2,163.02 $16,638.60 .13 .13







Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $800.00 $.00 $800.00 $28,438.60 .03 .03

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $18,739.12 $1,100.00 $19,839.12 $28,341.60 .70 .66

Y N 4.00 3.0 Y FY $15,730.52 $.00 $15,730.52 $16,734.60 .94 .94

Y N 2.00 1.0 N FY $9,009.68 $.00 $9,009.68 $16,684.60 .54 .54

Y N .50 1.0 Y FY $29,536.60 $.00 $29,536.60 $29,536.60 1.00 1.00

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $29,536.60 $.00 $29,536.60 $29,536.60 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 2.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,271.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $4,202.41 $.00 $4,202.41 $16,617.60 .25 .25

Y N 3.00 3.0 Y FY $9,285.00 $.00 $9,285.00 $29,597.60 .31 .31

Y N 1.00 0.0 Y FY $10,089.32 $.00 $10,089.32 $28,826.60 .35 .35

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $28,408.60 $.00 $28,408.60 $28,408.60 1.00 1.00

Y N 3.50 3.0 Y FY $28,646.60 $.00 $28,646.60 $28,646.60 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 2.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,882.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,506.60 .00 .00







Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Change inStatus

Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Equi-valentaward


Y N 4.00 3.0 Y FY $21,309.48 $.00 $21,309.48 $28,796.60 .74 .74

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $2,884.96 $.00 $2,884.96 $28,849.60 .10 .10

Y N 3.00 2.0 Y FY $2,295.72 $.00 $2,295.72 $28,696.60 .08 .08

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $11,421.44 $.00 $11,421.44 $28,553.60 .40 .40

Y N .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,591.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $29,623.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,528.60 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $11,411.44 $.00 $11,411.44 $28,528.60 .40 .40

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $28,600.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 1.0 Y FY $16,416.60 $.00 $16,416.60 $16,416.60 1.00 1.00

Y N 1.00 0.0 Y FY $14,425.80 $.00 $14,425.80 $28,851.60 .50 .50








Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


N N .00 0.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 .00 .00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $16,966.00 $250.00 $17,216.00 $17,132.60 X 1.00 .99

Y N .00 1.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,246.60 .00 .00

Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $16,624.60 $.00 $16,624.60 $16,624.60 X 1.00 1.00

N N 1.00 4.0 N $.00 $.00 $.00 $15,787.60 .00 .00

Y N 4.00 3.0 Y FY $20,822.80 $.00 $20,822.80 $21,168.80 X .98 .98

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $29,143.60 $.00 $29,143.60 $29,143.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N 1.00 1.0 Y FY $28,696.60 $.00 $28,696.60 $28,696.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N 3.00 2.0 Y FY $17,398.60 $.00 $17,398.60 X $17,398.60 .00 1.00

Y N .00 3.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $17,928.60 .00 .00

Y N 1.00 0.0 Y FY $16,584.60 $.00 $16,584.60 $16,584.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $16,836.60 $.00 $16,836.60 $16,836.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N 3.00 3.0 Y FY $27,224.00 $.00 $27,224.00 $30,340.60 X .90 .90

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $24,045.00 $.00 $24,045.00 $28,948.60 X .83 .83







Name/I.D. No. ELIG



Rev.Dist.


# yrsrec'daid

# ofseasutil

Recr. Periodofaward

Athleticgrantamount

Othercntbl.aid

Totalcntbl.aid

Fullgrantamount

Over-all

Equi-valentaward


Y N 2.00 2.0 Y FY $28,786.60 $.00 $28,786.60 $28,786.60 X 1.00 1.00

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $24,391.00 $.00 $24,391.00 $29,294.60 X .83 .83

Y N .00 0.0 Y FY $.00 $.00 $.00 $29,048.60 .00 .00

Y N 3.00 3.0 Y FY $24,080.00 $.00 $24,080.00 $28,696.60 X .84 .84

Y N .00 0.0 Y $.00 $.00 $.00 $16,836.60 .00 .00


0 Tweet 0 Like 0

Meet Bill Bleil

Iowa State University Athletics Official Web Site - www.CYCLONES.com - The home of Iowa State Cyclone Sports

Bill Bleil

Position: Assistant Head Coach/Offensive LineExperience: 3 YearsPhone: (515) 294-8059

Bill BleilCourtesy: cyclones.comRelease: 04/06/2009

Remsen native Bill Bleil, who coached with Iowa State headcoach Paul Rhoads at Pacific and Pittsburgh, begancoaching under Rhoads as assistant head coach andoffensive line coach at Iowa State in 2009. In a short time,Bleil has revamped the Cyclone offensive front. SportsIllustrated affirmed the job Bleil is doing as offensive tackleKelechi Osemele was named a 2011 first-team All-American.Osemele also earned an individual berth in the 2012 SeniorBowl. He was a second round NFL draft pick of theBaltimore Ravens. Osemele earned first-team All-Big 12 honors in 2011 withtackle Hayworth Hicks earning honorable mention All-Big 12recognition. Hicks signed a free agent contract withIndianapolis Colts.

One of Bleil's Iowa State protégés, center Reggie Stephens,plays in the NFL for the Chicago Bears after being draftedand playing for the Cincinnati Bengals. His 2010replacement, Ben Lamaak earned second-team All-Big 12honors in 2010. Bleil's men in the trenches figured large in Iowa State'soffensive improvement in 2011. The Cyclones improved theirstatistical standing in rushing offense, passing offense andtotal offense over 2010. Iowa State's scoring offenseimproved for the third straight season.In 2010, Alexander Robinson finished his career ranking fourth in rushing on the all-time Iowa State list. Quarterback Austen Arnaud finished his Cyclonetenure last season as the No. 2 passer in school history.

With Bleil coaching the offensive line, Iowa State improved its rushing yards per game total by more than 40 yards per contest in 2009, ranking third in theBig 12 and 35th nationally. The Cyclones cut their sacks allowed total from 40 in 2008 (3.3 per game) to 16 (1.23 per game) in 2009. Stephens earnedfirst-team All-Big 12 honors before departing for the NFL. Osemele earned second-team all-conference honors. Bleil, who has coached all-star performers in several conferences, including the Big Ten and Big East, was the head coach at Western Carolina for fiveseasons.Bleil coached four seasons at Akron, where he was the assistant head coach the last three campaigns. After overseeing the running backs in his first twoseasons with the Zips, Bleil coached the tackles and tight ends in 2007 and 2008.

Bleil's success in producing standout players continued at Akron in 2008 as offensive tackle Chris Kemme became the first Zip to be a three-time All-Mid-American Conference selection. He was the eighth Akron player to be named first-team All-MAC. Kemme anchored an offensive line that allowed just 1.5sacks per game in 2008 as the Zip offense averaged nearly 400 yards per contest.

In his inaugural season at Akron, Bleil helped tutor second-team All-Mid-American Conference running back Brett Biggs, the program's first 1,000-yardrusher since the 2002 season. Biggs finished the year with 1,230 rushing yards, the fifth-highest single-season total in school history, and most since theZips moved to the Football Bowl Subdivision in 1987. Biggs was also among the top receiving backs in the nation in 2005. His five catches per gameranked third nationally among backs. Biggs' efforts enabled the Zips to become the 31st team in NCAA history with a 1,000-yard rusher, 1,000-yardreceiver and 3,000-yard passer.

In 2006, Dennis Kennedy was tabbed second-team All-MAC, rushing for 914 yards despite missing a game-and-a-half due to an injury. Bleil's runningbacks also took care of the football. They lost just one fumble in 2005. Biggs fumbled only once in 284 carries. In 2008, Kennedy coughed the ball up justtwice in 226 carries, while Andre Walker did not fumble in 65 carries.

Bleil Photos

View Gallery

Bill Bleil - Iowa State University Athletics Official Web Site - www.C... http://www.cyclones.com/ViewArticle.dbml?SPSID=48392&SPID=46...

1 of 2 1/18/2013 4:41 PM

Iowa State-5

Bleil spent the 2004 season as the offensive tackles/tight ends coach under Walt Harris at Pittsburgh as the Panthers went to their first-ever BCS bowlgame when they took part in the 2005 Fiesta Bowl versus Utah. Rhoads was the Pitt defensive coordinator that season.

He served the 2003 season under Joe Novak at Northern Illinois, knocking off traditional powers Alabama and Maryland en route to posting a school-record 10-2 mark, and one year (2002) at South Dakota.

Bleil also has head-coaching experience, having led the Western Carolina program for five years (1997-01). During that span, he was named 2001Southern Conference Coach of the Year and led the Catamounts to their first winning season since 1994 with a 6-5 mark in 1998. Prior to his stint in Cullowhee, N.C., Bleil served four seasons at Pacific (1992-95) and two years at Northwestern College (1990-91), his alma mater. Hewas the offensive line coach at both stops before being elevated to offensive coordinator for the final three years with Pacific. Rhoads was also an assistantcoach on that staff.He and his wife Laurel have two sons, Kevin, a graduate assistant coach with the Cyclones, and Tim.

To remove your e-mail address from our mailing list, please click on Customer Care and select Remove From Mailing List from theArea of Interest list and specify your e-mail address. Note: This does not apply to opt-in e-mail. To modify your opt-in e-maildeliveries, log in to the site and modify your preferences. Customer Care

Bill Bleil - Iowa State University Athletics Official Web Site - www.C... http://www.cyclones.com/ViewArticle.dbml?SPSID=48392&SPID=46...

2 of 2 1/18/2013 4:41 PM

Iowa State-5

0 Tweet 0 Like 0

Cyclone Audible: Shane Burnham

Iowa State University Athletics Official Web Site - www.CYCLONES.com - The home of Iowa State Cyclone Sports

Shane Burnham

Position: Defensive TacklesAlma Mater: South CarolinaGraduating Year: 1998Phone: (515) 294-8059

Shane BurnhamCourtesy: cyclones.comRelease: 02/19/2009

Shane Burnham’s coaching ability was underscored by theimproved play of Iowa State’s defensive tackles throughthree seasons under Burnham’s tutelage. Burnham worksin Ames under his father, Iowa State defensive coordinatorWally Burnham.

Defensive tackle Nate Frere finished his career underBurnham in 2009, completing his eligibility with 69 tackles,34 of them in 2009. It was Stephen Ruempolhamer whostepped up under Burnham’s coaching the last twoseasons. Ruempolhamer finished his career with 91tackles, 14 for loss, and six sacks. Former walkon PatrickNeal closed out his career with 98 tackles and 5.5 sacks.

Burnham’s contribution coaching special teams can’t beunderplayed. His oversight of the Iowa State kickoffcoverage team netted great results in 2009, as theCyclones ranked seventh nationally, allowing just 18.1yards per return. His punt return unit improved fromranking 99th nationally in 2009 to 40th in 2010.

Burnham had been linebackers/defensive ends coach andspecial teams coordinator at Elon from 2005-08. Elonfinished the 2008 season ranked 19th in the final FCScoaches poll. The Phoenix was third in the SouthernConference and 29th nationally in total defense, allowing388.9 net yards per contest. Elon landed second in the conference and 30th in the country in scoring defense. At Elon, Burnham coached formerJacksonville Jaguar Chad Nkang to SoCon Defensive Player-of-the-Year and All-America honors.

As special teams coordinator, Burnham saw the Elon punt return unit rank 17th nationally by averaging 11.93 yards per return in 2007. Senior MichaelMayers, a first-team All-SoCon selection as a return specialist, ranked seventh in the country, averaging 28.77 yards per kickoff return that fall.

Burnham joined the Phoenix staff for the 2005 season after serving at The Citadel as a linebackers coach in 2004. Previously, Burnham was a linebackerscoach at Richmond for four years (1998, 2001-03). While there, he coached All-Atlantic 10 Conference selections Adrian Archie and Mark Thompson. Healso helped the Spiders claim a conference title and an NCAA I-AA playoff berth during his tenure.

A 1998 graduate of South Carolina, Burnham earned a bachelor’s of science degree in exercise science while collecting four varsity letters for theGamecocks’ football team. The two-year starter was named his team’s most outstanding inside linebacker as both a junior and a senior.

As a senior, the three-time Academic All-SEC choice received his team’s leadership award and was named the Honda/Jefferson-Pilot Scholar-Athlete ofthe Week for his performance in games against both Kentucky and Auburn.

Shane Burnham is married to the former Meagan Drolet, who was a swimmer at Virginia Tech. The couple are parents of daughters Lindsay and Brady.

BurnhamPhotos

View Gallery

BurnhamVideos

Play VideoMore Videos

Shane Burnham - Iowa State University Athletics Official Web Site - w... http://www.cyclones.com/ViewArticle.dbml?SPSID=48392&SPID=46...

1 of 2 1/18/2013 4:41 PM

Iowa State-5

To remove your e-mail address from our mailing list, please click on Customer Care and select Remove From Mailing List from theArea of Interest list and specify your e-mail address. Note: This does not apply to opt-in e-mail. To modify your opt-in e-maildeliveries, log in to the site and modify your preferences. Customer Care

Shane Burnham - Iowa State University Athletics Official Web Site - w... http://www.cyclones.com/ViewArticle.dbml?SPSID=48392&SPID=46...

2 of 2 1/18/2013 4:41 PM

Iowa State-5

12/17/2012An Interview with Brian KellyCoach Kelly discusses the upcoming NationalChampionship Game

10/28/2012Coach Kelly Press Conference Transcript - AfterOklahoma

02/10/2012Brian Kelly Announces 2012 Notre DameFootball Coaching StaffKelly plus nine assistant coaches total 199 years ofcoaching experience.

03/30/2012FB: Practice Update March 30The UND.com practice report for March 30 shiftsits focus to the Irish defensive safety position,under the guidance of first-year Notre Dameassistant Bob Elliott.

02/10/2012FB: Coach Kelly Staff Changes PresserNotre Dame head coach Brian Kelly meets withthe media to talk about recent changes to thecoaching staff for the 2012 season.

02/10/2012FB: New Coaching Staff Interviews

01/04/2013Irish in Miami - Defensive Interviews & Practice(AP)Images from Thursday of Notre Dame preparing forthe BCS National Championship Game.

Bob Elliott

Position:SafetiesAlma Mater:Iowa (1976)

COACHING ACCOMPLISHMENTS

• Spent 29 of his 33 seasons coaching defense, primarily as a defensive backscoach or defensive coordinator. Served as defensive coordinator for a combined11 seasons at San Diego State, Kansas State, Iowa and Ball State.

• Has had three two-year coaching stints at Iowa State in the last 30 years andmost recently served as the Cyclones' secondary coach from 2010-11.

• Helped improve an Iowa State pass defense that ranked 84th in passefficiency defense the season before he arrived to 46th this year. He alsohelped Iowa State improve 29 spots in the pass defense rankings from 2009 to2011.

• Cyclones cornerback Leonard Johnson earned second-team all-Big 12 honorsin 2010 and 2011. Safety Ter'Ran Benton was an honorable mention all-Big 12selection in 2011 and safety David Sims totaled 96 tackles in 11 games en routeto earning all-Big 12 honorable mention accolades in 2010.

• Assistant head coach and defensive coordinator for three seasons at SanDiego State from 2006-08. Added the duties of inside linebackers coach in2008. He worked in the Aztecs athletics department in 2009.

• Elliott was the first hire by then-head coach Chuck Long at San Diego State. Inhis first two seasons with the Aztecs, San Diego State had the top tackler inMountain West Conference games as Joe Martin averaged 10.0 tackles pergame in 2006 and Russell Allen recorded 10.6 tackles per contest in 2007.

• In his first year at San Diego State, the Elliott's defense allowed only 171.0passing yards per game and ranked second in pass defense in the MountainWest Conference. The Aztecs allowed scores on only 67.3 percent of opponentred zone trips to rank second in the conference.

• Defensive coordinator at Kansas State from 2002-05 and helped the Wildcatsto a 31-19 record, including four wins over nationally-ranked opponents.

• K-State recorded two 11-win seasons, claimed the school's lone Big 12championship and advanced to the 2003 Fiesta Bowl - the only BCS bowlappearance in school history.

• In his four seasons as the Wildcats' defensive coordinator, Elliott's defenses allowed an average of 111.6 rushing yards per gameand 194.1 passing yards per game.

• Kansas State intercepted 58 passes from 2002-05 and returned 12 interceptions for touchdowns.

• Twelve of Elliott's players received all-Big 12 accolades and four players were drafted.

• The 2002 defense directed by Elliott led the nation in scoring defense (11.8 points per game), ranked second in the country in totaldefense (249.0 yards) and rushing defense (69.5 yards) and was third in pass efficiency defense (91.7).

http://www.cstv.com/printable/schools/nd/sports/m-footbl/mtt/bob_elliot...

1 of 3 1/22/2013 10:22 AM

Iowa State-5

• The 69.5 rushing yards allowed per game in 2002 was a school record while the 11.8 points per game were the second-fewestpoints allowed by a K-State defense. The 249.0 total yards permitted was third-best in Wildcats history.

• Cornerback Terence Newman was a consensus All-American at Kansas State in 2002 and was recipient of the Jim Thorpe Award,presented annually to college football's best defensive back. Newman was named 2002 Big 12 Defensive Player of the Year andbecame the fifth overall selection in the 2003 NFL Draft by the Dallas Cowboys.

• Elliott's defense intercepted 20 passes in 2002 and five picks were returned for touchdowns to set a school record.

• Safety Bobby Walker led the Wildcats with six interceptions in 2002. Walker returned two interceptions for touchdowns in a23-second span against Iowa State and was named National Defensive Player of the Week for his performance.

• The 2003 Wildcats defense also recorded 20 interceptions, tying the 2002 squad for third-most interceptions in a season.

• The 40 combined interceptions in Elliott's first two seasons as Kansas State defensive coordinator were the second most in schoolhistory.

• Elliott's defense in his second season at Kansas State ranked sixth nationally in total defense (283.1 yards per game), seventh inpass defense (174.6), eighth in scoring defense (16.3 points) and 17th in rushing defense (108.8 yards). The Wildcats set a schoolrecord with 51 sacks in 2003.

• Linebacker Josh Buhl broke the Kansas State record with 184 tackles in 2003 en route to being named a first-team All-American bySporting News and a second-team All-American by Associated Press and Sports Illustrated.

• From 2000-01, was the Iowa State associate head coach and worked with the Cyclones secondary and coordinated the specialteams.

• Elliott's secondary recorded 18 interceptions in 2001, the most picks by an Iowa State defensive backfield in 25 years. TheCyclones ranked fourth nationally in passing defense (151.8 yards per game) and 21st in pass efficiency defense.

• Iowa State defensive backs intercepted 10 passes in 2000, the most in eight years. Defensive back Jamarcus Powers and safetyDustin Avey earned all-Big 12 honors while safety Marc Simmons was one of the Big 12's top freshman players.

• The Cyclone special teams shined in 2000, blocking seven kicks to lead the Big 12. Kick returner J.J. Moses earned first-teamall-Big 12 accolades.

• Member of the Iowa athletics department from 1987-99. He was on Hayden Fry's coaching staff from 1987-94 and from 1996-98. In1999, Elliott served as a special assistant to Iowa athletics director Bob Bowlsby. Elliott was executive director of the University ofIowa Alumni Association in 1995.

• Served as secondary coach from 1987-94. He returned as defensive coordinator from 1996-98 and added the title assistant headcoach in 1998. Elliott's position group focus switched to the Hawkeyes outside linebackers from 1996-98.

• Elliott coached seven first-team all-Big Ten selections and eight second-team all-conference players at Iowa. The Hawkeyes were74-52-5 (.584) in his 11 seasons as an assistant coach and helped Iowa get invited to seven bowl games.

• In his 11 seasons coaching at Iowa, opposing quarterbacks completed only 51.6 percent of passes and averaged only 176.9 yardsper game. Six of Elliott's players rank in the top 10 in career interceptions at Iowa.

• The 1997 defense coordinated by Elliott ranked among the best in the Big Ten and the nation. The Hawks ranked fourth nationallyin scoring defense and pass efficiency defense, seventh in total defense and 11th in rushing defense. Iowa recorded three shutoutsin 1997 and held two other opponents to only one touchdown.

• Defensive lineman Jared DeVries was named Big Ten Defensive Lineman of the Year in 1997 and was a consensus All-Americanin 1998 en route to setting the career school record for tackles for loss and sacks.

• Iowa led the Big Ten in pass defense in two seasons between 1987-94 and had the best third-down defense four times in thateight-year window.

• Former NFL All-Pro safety Merton Hanks was a top defensive back for Elliott and helped Iowa win the Big Ten in 1990 and play inthe 1991 Rose Bowl. Hanks was a first-team All-American and semifinalist for the Thorpe Award.

• Only stint coaching offense came at North Carolina from 1983-86 when he coached the wide receivers and tight ends.

• Prior to North Carolina, made his first stop at Iowa State as the secondary coach from 1981-82. The Cyclones pass defense in1982 led the Big Eight and produced professionals Ron Osborne and John Arnaud.

• Earned his first defensive coordinator position at Ball State in 1980 after serving as the Cardinals' secondary coach the previoustwo seasons.


2 of 3 1/22/2013 10:22 AM

Iowa State-5

• First full-time coaching job was as the secondary coach at Kent State in 1977 and he served as a graduate assistant at Iowa in1976.

PERSONAL INFORMATION

• Son of former Iowa athletics director and Michigan head football coach Bump Elliott .

• Graduated with high distinction from Iowa.

• Candidate for Rhodes Scholarship in 1976 and was named an Academic All-American in 1974 and 1975.

• NCAA Postgraduate Scholarship recipient and member of Phi Beta Kappa and Omicron Delta Kappa honor societies.

DYNAMIC DISCIPLES

Josh Buhl, LB (Kansas State)• First-Team All-American; Butkus Award semifinalist

Terence Newman, DB (Kansas State), Dallas Cowboys• 2002 Consensus All-American; Thorpe Award winner; Big 12 Defensive Player of the Year; Fifth overall pick in 2003 NFL Draft

Merton Hanks, DB (Iowa)• First-Team All-American

Tom Knight, DB (Iowa)• First-round NFL Draft pick in 1997


3 of 3 1/22/2013 10:22 AM

Iowa State-5

Hometown:Rock Island, Ill.High School:Rock Island '94Last College:UALR '99

Position:Assistant CoachBirthdate:04/28/1976Years at Houston:Third (in 2012-13)

10/16/20122012-13 Men's Basketball Season PreviewVeteran Leaders, Talented Newcomers Poised forGreat Things

07/06/2012Ronnie Hamilton Joins Men's Basketball asAssistant CoachComes to the Cougars following stints at Tulane,The Citadel, Tarleton State and UNC Pembroke

11/09/2011Men's Basketball Inks Nationally Ranked SigningClassFreshmen forwards Danuel House, Danrad Knowlesto join Cougars in 2012-13

DANIYAL ROBINSONFull Name Harvey Daniyal RobinsonBorn April 28, 1976Hometown Rock Island, Ill.

Assistant coach Daniyal Robinson begins his third season with the Cougars in2012-13.

He assists in all coaching aspects with the Cougars, including practices,recruiting and scouting opponents, and owns more than a decade of coachingexperience as an assistant at Illinois State, UALR and Iowa State.

In addition, he has guided 18 players who have competed professionally,including Craig Brackins, who was taken with the No. 21 pick in the 2010 NBADraft.

AT WORK IN HOUSTONIn 2011-12, Robinson helped lead the Cougars to wins against Arkansas andNCAA Tournament participant Southern Miss.

Through Robinson's work with the Cougar frontcourt, forward TaShawn Thomaswas one of two Houston players named to the Conference USA All-FreshmanTeam and was a two-time Freshman of the Week honoree.

Forward Alandise Harris also was named the league's Player of the Week after helping lead the Cougars to a win against theRazorbacks in Little Rock, Ark.

Off the court, four Cougars - including Thomas and forward Rakim Stevenson - earned places on the C-USA Commissioner's HonorRoll with cumulative GPAs of 3.0 or higher.

On the recruiting side, Robinson played a key role in the Cougars' award-winning signing class which was ranked among thenation's top 20 by several national media organizations.

During his first season at Houston in 2010-11, Robinson worked closely with the Cougar bigs. By the end of the season, forwardMaurice McNeil led the Cougars in both scoring and rebounding and was named a Conference USA Player of the Week.

Harris also was named the league's Freshman of the Week following a 19-point, 11-rebound performance against ConferenceUSA-rival SMU early in the conference season.

COACHING CAREERRobinson, whose first name is pronouncedDan-YELL, joined the Houston program after workingas an assistant coach at Iowa State from 2008 to2010. In only a short time, he made a tremendousimpact with the Cyclones on the court and on therecruiting trail.

He was instrumental in helping ISU land Chris Colvin,who was ranked in the top 100 nationally in themajority of the recruiting services in 2009. He alsoplayed an important role in bringing in MarquisGilstrap and LaRon Dendy, a pair of top-100 prepplayers who were considered two of the best juniorcollege players in the class of 2009. Gillstrap wasrecognized as the 2009 Big 12 Preseason Newcomer

http://www.cstv.com/printable/schools/hou/sports/m-baskbl/mtt/robinso...

1 of 3 1/22/2013 9:47 AM

Iowa State-5

Education UALR • 1999Bachelor's in health education

Indian Hills CC • 1996Associate's degree in arts andsciences

Rock Island High • 1994Family Wife: The former Kim Hunter

Daughter: DevynSons: Reece, Reid

COACHING EXPERIENCEYear School, Position2010 - Houston, assistant coach2008-10 Iowa State, assistant coach2007-08 UALR, assistant coach2003-07 Illinois State, assistant coach2000-03 UALR, administrative assistantCHAMPIONSHIPS WONYear Championship2007-08 SBC West Division Champions (UALR)PLAYING EXPERIENCELevel School (Years)

CollegeUALR (1996-98)• 1997-98 team co-captain• Two-year letterman

Junior College

Indian Hills CC (1995-96)• All-Region Second Team• State and regional champions• NJCAA National Tournament berth• Led team to No. 1 ranking in finalNJCAA regular-season poll

High School

Rock Island (1992-94)• 1994, 1993 IBCA All-State• 1994, 1993 Western Big SixAll-Conference• 1994 Quad City Times All-MetroFirst Team• 1994 Team Most Valuable Player

NBA PLAYERS COACHED (1)Player SchoolCraig Brackins Iowa State

of the Year.

In his first season with the Cyclones, Robinsonmentored All-America Honorable Mention and All-Big12 First-Team member Craig Brackins. Brackins,along with Gilstrap, were All-Conference performersin Robinson's second season in Ames. Under histutelage, Gilstrap emerged as the only player in theBig 12 to average a double-double in league play.

A native of Rock Island, Ill., Robinson spent the2007-08 season as an assistant at UALR, helping hisalma mater earn its first 20-win season (20-11) since1995-96 and claim the Sun Belt Conference WestDivision title under head coach Steve Shields.

The Trojans led the league and ranked among the top35 teams nationally in field goal percentage defense(40.1) and 3-point field goal percentage defense(28.9).

Prior to his second stint at UALR, Robinson spent fourseasons (2003-07) as an assistant coach on PorterMoser's staff at Illinois State. He was the leadrecruiter on 2006-07 Missouri Valley ConferenceFreshman of the Year Osiris Eldridge, who earnedAll-MVC First-Team honors in 2007-08.

Eldridge was a top-150 recruit in high school withfellow Robinson signee Bobby Hill. Robinson's effortsalso landed Lorenzo Gordon, MVC Newcomer of theYear and All-MVC First-Team honoree, and Levi Dyer,the 2006-07 MVC Most Improved Player.

A 1999 graduate of UALR, Robinson was anadministrative assistant for three seasons for Moser,when he was the head coach of the Trojans. He wasa part of one of the biggest turnarounds in Sun BeltConference history, helping the team win 18 gamesafter registering just four wins during the previousseason.

PLAYING CAREERRobinson played two seasons at UALR aftertransferring from Indian Hills Community College inOttumwa, Iowa. He played in 56 games during hiscollegiate career with the Trojans for head coachWimp Sanderson and started 22 games as a senior in1997-98.

While at Indian Hills Community College in 1995-96,Robinson helped build a junior college dynasty withthe Warriors, posting a 35-4 record and leading theteam to state and regional championships as well asa berth in the NJCAA national tournament.

He received All-Region Second-Team honors as theWarriors ended the regular season ranked No. 1 inthe NJCAA poll.

Robinson was a two-time IBCA All-State andAll-Conference honoree at Rock Island High Schoolunder head coach Duncan Reid. He was named tothe Quad City Times All-Metro First Team andrecognized as the team's Most Valuable Player while serving as team co-captain.

PERSONAL


2 of 3 1/22/2013 9:47 AM

Iowa State-5

He and his wife Kim have three children: daughter Devyn and sons Reece and Reid.


3 of 3 1/22/2013 9:47 AM

Iowa State-5

blankLuke Wells

Position:Co-Offensive Coordinator/TE's/RecruitingCoordinatorExperience:1st Year at USUAlma Mater:Oklahoma, 2001

Luke Wells, who helped Iowa State to back-to-back bowl appearances the past two seasons, has been named Utah State'sco-offensive coordinator, tight ends coach and recruiting coordinator it was announced Saturday by Aggie head coach Matt Wells.Luke Wells is the younger brother of Matt Wells.

"I am very happy to announce Luke Wells as a member of our staff," said Matt Wells. "Luke's background in the Big 12 Conferencefor the last four years, along with his familiarity with spread and no-huddle offenses, will be very beneficial here at Utah State. Hisbackground in recruiting Texas will be an integral part of our recruiting efforts and we are happy that he and his family are joining ourAggie football family."

In all, Luke Wells spent four seasons at Iowa State (2009-12) working with the tight ends for the past two years after coaching thewide receivers during his first two seasons in Ames. During the past two years, Luke Wells helped the Cyclones to back-to-backbowl games as it played in the 2011 New Era Pinstripe Bowl against Rutgers and the 2012 Auto Zone Liberty Bowl against Tulsa.

"Matt has a track record of being a great football coach and an outstanding recruiter and I'm ecstatic about coming to Utah State andworking for my brother, which is something I've wanted to do for a long time and something we have talked about in the past. It's anincredible opportunity not only professionally, but personally as well," said Luke Wells. "I'm excited for the chance to come to auniversity that's been extremely successful on the football field and won a bunch of games, and to be part of an explosive offensethat's going to put points on the board."

During this past season at Iowa State, Luke Wells mentored Cyclone tight end Ernst Brun who earned honorable mention all-Big 12honors as he caught 26 passes for 330 yards (25.4 ypg) with six touchdowns. Brun was also named ISU's Offensive Player of theGame at the Auto Zone Liberty Bowl as he had four receptions for 102 yards, which included a 69-yard touchdown.

As wide receivers coach at Iowa State during the 2009 and 2010 seasons, Luke Wells coached wide receivers Darius Darks andDarius Reynolds who finished their careers combining for 208 receptions for 2,396 yards and 16 touchdowns. Darks now stands tiedfor seventh on the all-time Iowa State career reception list.

Prior to his stint at Iowa State, Luke Wells spent six years at Louisiana-Monroe serving as an offensive graduate assistant in 2003before being elevated to a full-time assistant coach from 2004-08. During his last two years at ULM, Wells served as the Warhawks'recruiting coordinator, as well as wide receivers coach, and helped bring in the highest-rated recruiting classes in school history.

The Louisiana-Monroe offense posted the highest scoring average in the school's NCAA FBS history in 2008 as Warhawk widereceiver Anthony McCall set a school record for freshman touchdown receptions that season.

Luke Wells took over the wide receivers at ULM in 2007 and mentored all-Sun Belt second-team selection LaGregory Sapp who ledthe league in yards per reception with 19.6 on 40 catches for 784 yards. In all, Warhawk receivers caught 16 touchdown passes thatyear.

In 2004 and 2005, Luke Wells worked with the tight ends and all-Sun Belt first-teamer Joey Trappey who was the top receiving tightend in the Sun Belt with 42 receptions for 425 yards.

http://www.cstv.com/printable/schools/ust/sports/m-footbl/mtt/luke_well...

1 of 2 1/22/2013 10:26 AM

Iowa State-5

Prior to ULM, Luke Wells coached wide receivers at Denton High School in Texas, helping his team win the 2002 bi-districtchampionship.

Before that, Luke Wells was a student assistant coach at Oklahoma from 1999-2001. His responsibilities included assisting withquarterbacks and wide receivers, coaching and coordinating scout team defense and special teams, and assisting with recruiting.His work helped the Sooners win the 2000 Big 12 Conference crown and national title. The Sooners also won the 2001 Cotton Bowland participated in the 1999 Independence Bowl. Wells worked under several outstanding coaches during his time at OU - BobStoops, Mike Leach and Mark Mangino.

Luke Wells earned his bachelor's degree from Oklahoma in secondary education in 2001 and did graduate work at ULM. He ismarried to the former Coby Groves and the couple has one son, Walker (5), and one daughter Kinsley (3).

Luke Wells FileCoaching History:2013- Utah State - Co-Offensive Coordinator/TE's/Recruiting Coordinator2009-12 Iowa State - Tight Ends/Wide Receivers2004-08 Louisiana Monroe - Wide Receivers/Recruiting Coordinator2003 Louisiana Monroe - Offensive Graduate Assistant2002 Denton HS (Denton, Texas) - Wide Receivers1999-2001 Oklahoma - Offensive Student Assistant

Bowl Games:Iowa State - Auto Zone Liberty Bowl, 2012; New Era Pinstripe Bowl, 2011; Insight Bowl, 2009Oklahoma - Independence Bowl, 1999; Orange Bowl, 2000; Cotton Bowl, 2001

Playing Experience:1997-99 Oklahoma - Quarterback

Education:2001 Oklahoma - Secondary Education

Birthdate: July 27, 1978 in Sallisaw, Okla.Family: Wife, Coby; Son - Walker (5); Daughter - Kinsley (3).

http://www.cstv.com/printable/schools/ust/sports/m-footbl/mtt/luke_well...

2 of 2 1/22/2013 10:26 AM

Iowa State-5

bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com · in the spring of 2011, fred hoiberg (hoiberg), head...

Documents