impureza 2: 1 h-imidazol -...
TRANSCRIPT
IMPUREZA 2: 1 H-Imidazol Rattus Norvergicus TA
APÉNDICE 6
1 / 30Prediction of LD50 for imidazole, LD50 for Rat Trend Analysis
QSAR Toolbox prediction for single chemical
The template of the current report is based on "GUIDANCE DOCUMENT ON THEVALIDATION OF (QUANTITATIVE) STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIPS MODELS"published by OECD (September, 2007) and "GUIDANCE ON INFORMATIONREQUIREMENTS AND CHEMICAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT / CHAPTER R.6: QSARS ANDGROUPING OF CHEMICALS" published by ECHA (May, 2008). The report provides information about the target substance, chemical characteristicsused for the grouping, the resulting boundaries of the group of chemicals (applicabilitydomain), the type of data gap filling approach that was applied (read-across, trendanalysis or QSAR models), the predicted result(s) and in the Annex information aboutthe category members or training set and test set chemicals. The chemicals are ordered by the distance to the target substance within thedescriptors space. Only chemicals with experimental data are listed as categorymembers. Depending on the settings selected by the user, detailed information (incl. 2D imageand profiling results) is provided for some chemicals while more limited information(CAS, name, SMILES) is provided for others. If not otherwise specified, the experimental values are reported in bold, recalculatedexperimental values are reported in bold & italic and calculated values are reported inregular font.
QSAR Toolbox 3.2.0.103 TPRF v.3.2.1.32002Database version: 3.5.0/3.1.2
2 / 30Prediction of LD50 for imidazole, LD50 for Rat Trend Analysis
Table of content
Summary 3
1. Target substance
1.1. CAS number 41.2. Other regulatory numbers 4
1.3. Chemical name(s) 41.4. Structural formula 41.5. Structure codes 41.6. Quality of structure identity (CAS/2D quality) 5
2. General information
2.1. Date of report generation 52.2. Report author(s) and contact details 5
3.1. Category definition 53.2. Category justification 83.3. Data matrix 8
3. Category definit ion
4. Prediction
4.1. Defined endpoint (OECD Principle 1) 84.2. Unambiguous algorithm (OECD Principle 2) 84.3. Applicability domain (OECD Principle 3) 94.4. Uncertainty of the prediction (OECD Principle 4) 104.5. Chemical and biological mechanisms (OECD Principle 5) 11
5. Adequacy
5.1. Regulatory purpose 125.2. Approach for regulatory interpretation of the model result 125.3. Outcome 125.4. Conclusion 12
Appendix 1 13
Appendix 2 28
Appendix 3 29
Appendix 4 29
Appendix 5 29
- Category members
- Data matrix
- QMRF
- QMRF, training set
- QMRF, test set
Appendix 6 29 - Additional information from QSAR
Appendix 7 30 - Chemical components
QSAR Toolbox 3.2.0.103 TPRF v.3.2.1.32002Database version: 3.5.0/3.1.2
3 / 30Prediction of LD50 for imidazole, LD50 for Rat Trend Analysis
QSAR Toolbox prediction based on trend analysis
Prediction of LD50 for imidazole, LD50 for Rat Trend Analysis
Summary
Toxicity of the target chemical (602 mg/kg) is predicted from category members using trend analysis basedon 11 values within the range 1.53E+03 - 2.00E+03 mg/kg from 11 category members. Category membersare single chemicals or mixtures and are selected based on the profile of the target chemical. Only chemicalshaving experimental data are listed in the category.
The target chemical FALLS within applicability domain of the prediction (see Section 4.3 for details).
The descriptor values for the target chemical and the category members in case they are set oftautomers, set of metabolites or mixtures are calculated using the following rule(s):
1. "log Kow" - taking the weighted average value
The endpoint data used in the prediction is selected from the following database(s):
1. Toxicity Japan MHLW
Below is a summary table for endpoint & descriptor values for the target chemical and the first 10category members. Experimental values from data matrix are presented in bold font. Recalculated endpoint values (ifrequired by selected data usage option in Gap Filling) are presented in italic font. Recalculated endpointvalues based on experimental data only are presented in bold and italic font.
Endpoint(s)
Acute Toxicity
mg/kg
Descriptor(s)
log Kow
-
0 Target chemical
1 Cat. member No. 1
2 Cat. member No. 2
3 Cat. member No. 3
4 Cat. member No. 4
5 Cat. member No. 5
6 Cat. member No. 6
7 Cat. member No. 7
8 Cat. member No. 8
9 Cat. member No. 910 Cat. member No. 10
- 0.0600
2.00E+03 0.460
2.00E+03 -0.500
2.00E+03 0.920
2.00E+03 1.59
1.53E+03 -2.64
2.00E+03 2.84
2.00E+03 -4.42
2.00E+03 -4.42
2.00E+03 9.07
2.00E+03 12.3
QSAR Toolbox 3.2.0.103 TPRF v.3.2.1.32002Database version: 3.5.0/3.1.2
4 / 30Prediction of LD50 for imidazole, LD50 for Rat Trend Analysis
Section 1 Target chemical-
1.1. CAS number:
288-32-4
1.2. Other regulatory numbers:
Not reported
1.3. Chemical name(s):imidazole1h-imidazoleimidazole (solid)imidazole:imidazol
1.4. Structural formula:
NH
N
1.5. Structure codes:
a. SMILES:
C1=CNC=N1
b. Input structure code (if different from SMILES):
Not available
c. Stereochemical features:
Not provided by the user
manually editable field
QSAR Toolbox 3.2.0.103 TPRF v.3.2.1.32002Database version: 3.5.0/3.1.2
5 / 30Prediction of LD50 for imidazole, LD50 for Rat Trend Analysis
1.6. Quality of structure identity (CAS/2D quality):
High Quality
Databases:
Aquatic OASISBacterial mutagenicity ISSSTYBiodegradation NITEECHA CHEMECOTOXExperimental pKaEye Irr itation ECETOCGenotoxicity OASISPhys-chem EPISUITE
Section 2 General information-
2.1. Date of report generation:
11.10.2014
2.2. Report author(s) and contact details:
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
manually editable field
Section 3 Category definition and category members-
3.1. Category definit ion:
a. Category hypothesis:
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
manually editable field
b. Applicability domain of the category:
The applicability domain is defined by following scheme
QSAR Toolbox 3.2.0.103 TPRF v.3.2.1.32002Database version: 3.5.0/3.1.2
6 / 30Prediction of LD50 for imidazole, LD50 for Rat Trend Analysis
1 2 3
11
NOT
15
A ND
18
A ND
4 5
12
NOT
16
A ND
19
A ND
6
20
A ND
7 8
13
NOT
17
A ND
21
A ND
9 10
14
A ND
22
A ND
1) Referential boundary:
The target chemical should be classified as High (Class III) by Toxic hazard classification by Cramer(original)
2) Referential boundary:
The target chemical should be classified as No alert found by DNA binding by OASIS v.1.2
3) Referential boundary:
The target chemical should be classified as AN2 OR AN2 >> Michael-type addition, quinoidstructures OR AN2 >> Michael-type addition, quinoid structures >> Quinones OR AN2 >>Michael-type addition on alpha, beta-unsaturated carbonyl compounds OR AN2 >> Michael-typeaddition on alpha, beta-unsaturated carbonyl compounds >> Four- and Five-Membered LactonesOR AN2 >> Shiff base formation after aldehyde release OR AN2 >> Shiff base formation afteraldehyde release >> Specific Acetate Esters OR Non-covalent interaction OR Non-covalentinteraction >> DNA intercalation OR Non-covalent interaction >> DNA intercalation >> DNAIntercalators with Carboxamide Side Chain OR Non-covalent interaction >> DNA intercalation >>Quinones OR Radical OR Radical >> Generation of reactive oxygen species OR Radical >>Generation of reactive oxygen species >> Thiols OR Radical >> Generation of ROS by glutathionedepletion (indirect) OR Radical >> Generation of ROS by glutathione depletion (indirect) >>Haloalkanes Containing Heteroatom OR Radical >> Radical mechanism by ROS formation ORRadical >> Radical mechanism by ROS formation (indirect) or direct radical attack on DNA ORRadical >> Radical mechanism by ROS formation (indirect) or direct radical attack on DNA >>Organic Peroxy Compounds OR Radical >> Radical mechanism by ROS formation >>Polynitroarenes OR Radical >> Radical mechanism via ROS formation (indirect) OR Radical >>Radical mechanism via ROS formation (indirect) >> Hydrazine Derivatives OR Radical >> Radicalmechanism via ROS formation (indirect) >> Nitroarenes with Other Active Groups OR Radical >>Radical mechanism via ROS formation (indirect) >> Nitrophenols, Nitrophenyl Ethers andNitrobenzoic Acids OR Radical >> Radical mechanism via ROS formation (indirect) >> QuinonesOR SN1 OR SN1 >> Nucleophilic attack after carbenium ion formation OR SN1 >> Nucleophilicattack after carbenium ion formation >> Specific Acetate Esters OR SN1 >> Nucleophilic attackafter diazoniu ...
QSAR Toolbox 3.2.0.103 TPRF v.3.2.1.32002Database version: 3.5.0/3.1.2
7 / 30Prediction of LD50 for imidazole, LD50 for Rat Trend Analysis
4) Referential boundary:
The target chemical should be classified as No alert found by DNA binding by OECD
5) Referential boundary:
The target chemical should be classified as Acylation OR Acylation >> Isocyanates andIsothiocyanates OR Acylation >> Isocyanates and Isothiocyanates >> Isothiocyanates OR Michaeladdition OR Michael addition >> Polarised Alkenes-Michael addition OR Michael addition >>Polarised Alkenes-Michael addition >> Alpha, beta- unsaturated esters OR SN1 OR SN1 >>Iminium Ion Formation OR SN1 >> Iminium Ion Formation >> Aliphatic tertiary amines OR SN1>> Nitrenium Ion formation OR SN1 >> Nitrenium Ion formation >> Aromatic azo OR SN1 >>Nitrenium Ion formation >> Aromatic nitro OR SN1 >> Nitrenium Ion formation >> Secondaryaromatic amine OR SN1 >> Nitrenium Ion formation >> Tertiary aromatic amine OR SN2 OR SN2>> SN2 at an sp3 Carbon atom OR SN2 >> SN2 at an sp3 Carbon atom >> Aliphatic halides byDNA binding by OECD
6) Referential boundary:
The target chemical should be classified as High (Class III) by Toxic hazard classification by Cramer(original)
7) Referential boundary:
The target chemical should be classified as H-acceptor-path3-H-acceptor by in vivo mutagenicity(Micronucleus) alerts by ISS
8) Referential boundary:
The target chemical should be classified as No alert found OR Primary aromatic amine, hydroxylamine and its derived esters by in vivo mutagenicity (Micronucleus) alerts by ISS
9) Parametric boundary:
The target chemical should have a value of log Kow which is >= -4.44
10) Parametric boundary:
The target chemical should have a value of log Kow which is <= 14
c. Endpoints covered:
Not provided by the user
manually editable field
d. Category members:
The list of the category members is available in Appendix 1
The category members shown with respect to the descriptor log Kow
Trend analysis prediction of LD50,making a linear approximation, based on 11 values from 11 analogue chemicals,
Observed target value: N/A, Predicted target value: 602 (244 to 1.48E+03; 95.0%) mg/kg,
Model equation: LD50 = +2.05 (±0.12) +0.0286 (±0.0184) * log Kow, log(1/mol/kg)
log Kow14.013.012.011.010.09.08.07.06.05.04.03.02.01.00.0-1.0-2.0-3.0-4.0-5.0
LD
50
(o
bs
.),
log
(1/m
ol/
kg
)
2.40
2.20
2.00
1.80
QSAR Toolbox 3.2.0.103 TPRF v.3.2.1.32002Database version: 3.5.0/3.1.2
8 / 30Prediction of LD50 for imidazole, LD50 for Rat Trend Analysis
3.2. Category justification:
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
manually editable field
3.3. Data matrix:
The data matrix is available in Appendix 2
Section 4 Prediction-
4.1. Defined Endpoint (OECD Principle 1):
a. Endpoint (e.g. Acute toxicity to fish):
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
manually editable field
b. Dependent variable (e.g. LC50):
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
manually editable field
c. Units:
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
manually editable field
d. Duration:
6 h
manually editable field
e. Species:
Rattus norvegicus
manually editable field
4.2. Unambiguous algorithm (OECD Principle 2):
a. Prediction approach:Trend analysis from category membersExperimental values for the target chemical (if any) were not used in prediction calculations
manually editable field
b. Calculation approach:Linear approximationModel equation:LD50 = +2.05 (±0.12) +0.0286 (±0.0184) * log Kow, log(1/mol/kg)
c. Model name:
Not applicable
d. Model version:
Not applicable
e. Reference to QMRF:
Not applicable
f. Input for prediction (target chemical):
SMILES
QSAR Toolbox 3.2.0.103 TPRF v.3.2.1.32002Database version: 3.5.0/3.1.2
9 / 30Prediction of LD50 for imidazole, LD50 for Rat Trend Analysis
g. Descriptor and endpoint values for target chemical (if applicable):
Descriptor(s) log Kow 0.0600
Endpoint (dep. variable) Human Health Hazards#AcuteToxicity
-
h. Additional data eliminations (not determined by domain):
1. By user:
2 value(s) for 1 chemical
The chemical(s) were removed manually by user
Chemical No.1:
CAS: 78-97-7SMILES: CC(O)C#N
EPValue: 31.0 mg/kg
Name(s): 2-hydroxypropanenitr ilelactonitr ilepropanenitrile, 2-hydroxy-
2. By user:
2 value(s) for 1 chemical
The chemical(s) were removed manually by user
Chemical No.1:
CAS: 583-39-1SMILES: S=C1Nc2ccccc2N1
EPValue: 208 mg/kg
Name(s): 2h-benzimidazole-2-thione, 1,3-dihydro-2-mercaptobenzimidazole1,3-dihydro-benzoimidazole-2-thionebenzimidazole-2-thiol1,3-dihydro-2h-benzimidazole-2-thione1,3-dihydrobenzimidazole-2-thione
i. Predicted value (model result):
602 mg/kg
j. Predicted value (comments):
Not provided by the user
manually editable field
4.3. Applicability domain (OECD Principle 3):
The target chemical FALLS within applicability domain(see Section 3.1.b for detailed description of the domain)
QSAR Toolbox 3.2.0.103 TPRF v.3.2.1.32002Database version: 3.5.0/3.1.2
10 / 30Prediction of LD50 for imidazole, LD50 for Rat Trend Analysis
1 2 3
11
NOT
15
A ND
18
A ND
4 5
12
NOT
16
A ND
19
A ND
6
20
A ND
7 8
13
NOT
17
A ND
21
A ND
9 10
14
A ND
22
A ND
4.4. Uncertainty of the prediction (OECD Principle 4): manually editable field
Adequacy of prediction
Model statistic: R2 = 0.579, R2adj = 0.532, s = 0.165
LD50 (obs .), log(1/m ol/kg)2.502.452.402.352.302.252.202.152.102.052.001.951.901.851.801.75
LD
50
(p
red
.),
log
(1/m
ol/
kg
)
2.50
2.40
2.30
2.20
2.10
2.00
1.90
1.80
Adequacy of prediction
QSAR Toolbox 3.2.0.103 TPRF v.3.2.1.32002Database version: 3.5.0/3.1.2
11 / 30Prediction of LD50 for imidazole, LD50 for Rat Trend Analysis
95% of Residuals =< 0.294, log(1/mol/kg)
Res iduals , Y - Y.calc0.320.30.280.260.240.220.20.180.160.140.120.10.080.060.040.020
Cu
mu
lati
ve
fre
qu
en
cy
, %
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Cumulative frequency
Prediction range:244 - 1.48E+03, mg/kg (95.0% confidence)
Statistic of the prediction model:N = 11; count of data pointsR2 = 0.579; coefficient of deteminationR2adj = 0.532; adjusted coefficient of deteminationQ2 = 0.390; coefficient of detemination by "leave-one-out" validationSSR = 0.244; sum of squared residualss = 0.165; sample standard deviation of residualsF = 12.4; Fisher functionFa = 7.71; Fisher threshold for statistical significance (95.0% confidence)
4.5. Chemical and biological mechanisms (OECD Principle 5):
Profiling results for the target substance:
DNA binding by OASIS v.1.2
No alert found
DNA binding by OECD
No alert found
Estrogen Receptor Binding
Non binder, without OH or NH2 group
OECD HPV Chemical Categories
Not categorized
Protein binding by OASIS v1.2
No alert found
Protein binding by OECD
No alert found
Protein binding potency
Not possible to classify according to these rules (GSH)
Superfragments
No superfragment
Toxic hazard classification by Cramer (original)
QSAR Toolbox 3.2.0.103 TPRF v.3.2.1.32002Database version: 3.5.0/3.1.2
12 / 30Prediction of LD50 for imidazole, LD50 for Rat Trend Analysis
High (Class III)
Toxic hazard classification by Cramer (with extensions)
High (Class III)
US-EPA New Chemical Categories
Not categorized
Not provided by the user
Comments:
manually editable field
Section 5 Adequacy-
5.1. Regulatory purpose:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
manually editable field
5.2. Approach for regulatory interpretation of the model result:
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
manually editable field
5.3. Outcome:Not provided by the user
manually editable field
5.4. Conclusion:
Not provided by the user
manually editable field
QSAR Toolbox 3.2.0.103 TPRF v.3.2.1.32002Database version: 3.5.0/3.1.2
13 / 30Prediction of LD50 for imidazole, LD50 for Rat Trend AnalysisAppendix 1 - Category members
QSAR Toolbox prediction based on trend analysis
Prediction of LD50 for imidazole, LD50 for Rat Trend Analysis
APPENDIX 1 - Category members
From 11 category members, 10 chemicals are reported in more detail,the remaining category members are listed in a table with basic information
1. Cat. member No.1:
1.1. CAS number:
7580-85-0
1.2. Other regulatory numbers:
Not reported
1.3. Chemical name(s):ethanol, 2-(1,1-dimethylethoxy)-2-(t-butoxy)ethanol2-tert-butoxyethanol
1.4. Structural formula:
SMILES
CC(C)(C)OCCO
CH3
CH3
CH3
O
OH
QSAR Toolbox 3.2.0.103 TPRF v.3.2.1.32002Database version: 3.5.0/3.1.2
14 / 30Prediction of LD50 for imidazole, LD50 for Rat Trend AnalysisAppendix 1 - Category members
1.5. Profiling results:
DNA binding by OASIS v.1.2
No alert found
DNA binding by OECD
No alert found
Estrogen Receptor Binding
Non binder, non cyclic structure
OECD HPV Chemical Categories
Not categorized
Protein binding by OASIS v1.2
No alert found
Protein binding by OECD
No alert found
Protein binding potency
Not possible to classify according to these rules (GSH)
Superfragments
Has superfragment
OCCOR{*}
Toxic hazard classification by Cramer (original)
High (Class III)
Toxic hazard classification by Cramer (with extensions)
High (Class III)
US-EPA New Chemical Categories
Ethylene Glycol Ethers
Nonionic Surfactants
2. Cat. member No.2:
2.1. CAS number:
24800-44-0
2.2. Other regulatory numbers:
Not reported
QSAR Toolbox 3.2.0.103 TPRF v.3.2.1.32002Database version: 3.5.0/3.1.2
15 / 30Prediction of LD50 for imidazole, LD50 for Rat Trend AnalysisAppendix 1 - Category members
2.3. Chemical name(s):propanol, [(1-methyl-1,2-ethanediyl)bis(oxy)]bis-tr ipropylene glycol[(methylethylene)bis(oxy)]dipropanoltripropylene gycol
2.4. Structural formula:
SMILES
CC(CO)OCC(C)OCC(C)O
CH3 OH
O
CH3
O
CH3
OH
2.5. Profiling results:
DNA binding by OASIS v.1.2
No alert found
DNA binding by OECD
No alert found
Estrogen Receptor Binding
Non binder, non cyclic structure
OECD HPV Chemical Categories
Propylene glycol ethers
Protein binding by OASIS v1.2
No alert found
Protein binding by OECD
No alert found
Protein binding potency
Not possible to classify according to these rules (GSH)
Superfragments
Has superfragment
OC(R{*})COR{*}
OCC(R{*})OR{*}
Toxic hazard classification by Cramer (original)
High (Class III)
QSAR Toolbox 3.2.0.103 TPRF v.3.2.1.32002Database version: 3.5.0/3.1.2
16 / 30Prediction of LD50 for imidazole, LD50 for Rat Trend AnalysisAppendix 1 - Category members
Toxic hazard classification by Cramer (with extensions)
High (Class III)
US-EPA New Chemical Categories
Neutral Organics
3. Cat. member No.3:
3.1. CAS number:
70-55-3
3.2. Other regulatory numbers:
Not reported
3.3. Chemical name(s):
toluene-4-sulfonamide4-methylbenzenesulfonamidep-toluenesulfonamidetoluene-4-sulphonamidebenzenesulfonamide, 4-methyl-
3.4. Structural formula:
SMILES
Cc1ccc(S(N)(=O)=O)cc1
CH3
S
NH2
O
O
3.5. Profiling results:
DNA binding by OASIS v.1.2
No alert found
DNA binding by OECD
No alert found
Estrogen Receptor Binding
Non binder, without OH or NH2 group
QSAR Toolbox 3.2.0.103 TPRF v.3.2.1.32002Database version: 3.5.0/3.1.2
17 / 30Prediction of LD50 for imidazole, LD50 for Rat Trend AnalysisAppendix 1 - Category members
OECD HPV Chemical Categories
Not categorized
Protein binding by OASIS v1.2
No alert found
Protein binding by OECD
No alert found
Protein binding potency
Not possible to classify according to these rules (GSH)
Superfragments
No superfragment
Toxic hazard classification by Cramer (original)
High (Class III)
Toxic hazard classification by Cramer (with extensions)
High (Class III)
US-EPA New Chemical Categories
Not categorized
4. Cat. member No.4:
4.1. CAS number:
95-32-9
4.2. Other regulatory numbers:
Not reported
4.3. Chemical name(s):
4-morpholinyl-2-benzothiazole diisulfidebenzothiazole, 2-(4-morpholinyldithio)-2-(4-morpholinyldithio)benzothiazole2-(morpholinodithio)benzothiazolebenzothiazole, 2-(morpholinodithio)-2-(morpholin-4-yldisulfanyl)-1,3-benzothiazole
4.4. Structural formula:
SMILES
C1CN(SSC2=Nc3ccccc3S2)CCO1
QSAR Toolbox 3.2.0.103 TPRF v.3.2.1.32002Database version: 3.5.0/3.1.2
18 / 30Prediction of LD50 for imidazole, LD50 for Rat Trend AnalysisAppendix 1 - Category members
N
S
S
N
S
O
4.5. Profiling results:
DNA binding by OASIS v.1.2
No alert found
DNA binding by OECD
No alert found
Estrogen Receptor Binding
Non binder, without OH or NH2 group
OECD HPV Chemical Categories
Not categorized
Protein binding by OASIS v1.2
SN2
SN2 >> Interchange reaction with sulphur containing compounds
SN2 >> Interchange reaction with sulphur containing compounds >> Thiols and disulfidecompounds
Protein binding by OECD
No alert found
Protein binding potency
Not possible to classify according to these rules (GSH)
Superfragments
No superfragment
Toxic hazard classification by Cramer (original)
High (Class III)
Toxic hazard classification by Cramer (with extensions)
High (Class III)
US-EPA New Chemical Categories
Not categorized
QSAR Toolbox 3.2.0.103 TPRF v.3.2.1.32002Database version: 3.5.0/3.1.2
19 / 30Prediction of LD50 for imidazole, LD50 for Rat Trend AnalysisAppendix 1 - Category members
5. Cat. member No.5:
5.1. CAS number:
4189-44-0
5.2. Other regulatory numbers:
Not reported
5.3. Chemical name(s):
thiourea dioxidethiourea s,s-dioxidethiourea, s,s-dioxide
5.4. Structural formula:
SMILES
NC(=N)S(=O)=O
NH2
NH
SH
O
O
5.5. Profiling results:
DNA binding by OASIS v.1.2
No alert found
DNA binding by OECD
No alert found
Estrogen Receptor Binding
Non binder, non cyclic structure
OECD HPV Chemical Categories
Not categorized
Protein binding by OASIS v1.2
Nucleophilic addition
Nucleophilic addition >> Addition to carbon-hetero double bonds
Nucleophilic addition >> Addition to carbon-hetero double bonds >> Azomethyme type compounds
SN2
SN2 >> Interchange reaction with sulphur containing compounds
QSAR Toolbox 3.2.0.103 TPRF v.3.2.1.32002Database version: 3.5.0/3.1.2
20 / 30Prediction of LD50 for imidazole, LD50 for Rat Trend AnalysisAppendix 1 - Category members
SN2 >> Interchange reaction with sulphur containing compounds >> Thiols and disulfidecompounds
Protein binding by OECD
No alert found
Protein binding potency
Not possible to classify according to these rules (GSH)
Superfragments
No superfragment
Toxic hazard classification by Cramer (original)
High (Class III)
Toxic hazard classification by Cramer (with extensions)
High (Class III)
US-EPA New Chemical Categories
Not categorized
6. Cat. member No.6:
6.1. CAS number:
840-65-3
6.2. Other regulatory numbers:
Not reported
6.3. Chemical name(s):2,6-naphthalenedicarboxylic acid, 2,6-dimethyl esterdimethyl 2,6-naphthalenedicarboxylatedimethyl naphthalene-2,6-dicarboxylate2,6-naphthalenedicarboxylic acid, dimethyl ester2,6-napthalenedicarboxylic acid, dimethyl ester
6.4. Structural formula:
SMILES
COC(=O)c1ccc2cc(C(=O)OC)ccc2c1
QSAR Toolbox 3.2.0.103 TPRF v.3.2.1.32002Database version: 3.5.0/3.1.2
21 / 30Prediction of LD50 for imidazole, LD50 for Rat Trend AnalysisAppendix 1 - Category members
CH3
O
O
O
O
CH3
6.5. Profiling results:
DNA binding by OASIS v.1.2
No alert found
DNA binding by OECD
No alert found
Estrogen Receptor Binding
Non binder, without OH or NH2 group
OECD HPV Chemical Categories
Not categorized
Protein binding by OASIS v1.2
No alert found
Protein binding by OECD
No alert found
Protein binding potency
Not possible to classify according to these rules (GSH)
Superfragments
No superfragment
Toxic hazard classification by Cramer (original)
High (Class III)
Toxic hazard classification by Cramer (with extensions)
High (Class III)
US-EPA New Chemical Categories
Esters (Acute toxicity)
7. Cat. member No.7:
QSAR Toolbox 3.2.0.103 TPRF v.3.2.1.32002Database version: 3.5.0/3.1.2
22 / 30Prediction of LD50 for imidazole, LD50 for Rat Trend AnalysisAppendix 1 - Category members
7.1. CAS number:
13939-25-8
7.2. Other regulatory numbers:
Not reported
7.3. Chemical name(s):
triphosphoric acid, aluminum salt (1:1)triphosphoric acid aluminium saltaluminium dihydrogen triphosphatetriphosphoric acid, aluminum salt (1:1)"aluminum [oxido(phosphonatooxy)phosphoryl] phosphatealuminium tripolyphosphate
7.4. Structural formula:
SMILES
OP(O)(=O)OP1(=O)OP2(=O)O{-}.[Al]{3+}(.O{-}1).O{-}2
OHP
OHO
O
P
OO
P OO-
Al+++
O-
O-
7.5. Profiling results:
DNA binding by OASIS v.1.2
No alert found
DNA binding by OECD
No alert found
Estrogen Receptor Binding
Non binder, non cyclic structure
OECD HPV Chemical Categories
Not categorized
Protein binding by OASIS v1.2
No alert found
Protein binding by OECD
No alert found
Protein binding potency
Not possible to classify according to these rules (GSH)
QSAR Toolbox 3.2.0.103 TPRF v.3.2.1.32002Database version: 3.5.0/3.1.2
23 / 30Prediction of LD50 for imidazole, LD50 for Rat Trend AnalysisAppendix 1 - Category members
Superfragments
No superfragment
Toxic hazard classification by Cramer (original)
High (Class III)
Toxic hazard classification by Cramer (with extensions)
High (Class III)
US-EPA New Chemical Categories
Aluminum Compounds
Phosphates, Inorganic
8. Cat. member No.8:
8.1. CAS number:
13939-25-8
8.2. Other regulatory numbers:
Not reported
8.3. Chemical name(s):
triphosphoric acid, aluminum salt (1:1)aluminum dihydrogen tr iphosphatetriphosphoric acid, aluminium salt (1:1)
8.4. Structural formula:
SMILES
OP1(=O)OP2(=O)OP(O)(=O)O{-}.[Al]{3+}(.O{-}1).O{-}2
OH
PO
O
PO
OP
OHO
O-
Al+++
O-
O-
8.5. Profiling results:
DNA binding by OASIS v.1.2
No alert found
DNA binding by OECD
QSAR Toolbox 3.2.0.103 TPRF v.3.2.1.32002Database version: 3.5.0/3.1.2
24 / 30Prediction of LD50 for imidazole, LD50 for Rat Trend AnalysisAppendix 1 - Category members
No alert found
Estrogen Receptor Binding
Non binder, non cyclic structure
OECD HPV Chemical Categories
Not categorized
Protein binding by OASIS v1.2
No alert found
Protein binding by OECD
No alert found
Protein binding potency
Not possible to classify according to these rules (GSH)
Superfragments
No superfragment
Toxic hazard classification by Cramer (original)
High (Class III)
Toxic hazard classification by Cramer (with extensions)
High (Class III)
US-EPA New Chemical Categories
Aluminum Compounds
Phosphates, Inorganic
9. Cat. member No.9:
9.1. CAS number:
26967-76-0
9.2. Other regulatory numbers:
Not reported
9.3. Chemical name(s):
tris(p-cumenyl)phosphatetris(p-isopropylphenyl)phosphatetris(isopropylphenyl) phosphatetris[2-(propan-2-yl)phenyl] phosphatephenol, (1-methylethyl)-, phosphate (3:1)
9.4. Structural formula:
SMILES
CC(C)c1ccccc1OP(=O)(Oc1ccccc1C(C)C)Oc1ccccc1C(C)C
QSAR Toolbox 3.2.0.103 TPRF v.3.2.1.32002Database version: 3.5.0/3.1.2
25 / 30Prediction of LD50 for imidazole, LD50 for Rat Trend AnalysisAppendix 1 - Category members
CH3
H3C
O
PO
O
H3C
CH3
O
CH3
CH3
9.5. Profiling results:
DNA binding by OASIS v.1.2
No alert found
DNA binding by OECD
No alert found
Estrogen Receptor Binding
Non binder, without OH or NH2 group
OECD HPV Chemical Categories
Not categorized
Protein binding by OASIS v1.2
No alert found
Protein binding by OECD
No alert found
Protein binding potency
Not possible to classify according to these rules (GSH)
Superfragments
No superfragment
Toxic hazard classification by Cramer (original)
High (Class III)
Toxic hazard classification by Cramer (with extensions)
High (Class III)
US-EPA New Chemical Categories
Not categorized
10. Cat. member No.10:
QSAR Toolbox 3.2.0.103 TPRF v.3.2.1.32002Database version: 3.5.0/3.1.2
26 / 30Prediction of LD50 for imidazole, LD50 for Rat Trend AnalysisAppendix 1 - Category members
10.1. CAS number:
7299-99-2
10.2. Other regulatory numbers:
Not reported
10.3. Chemical name(s):
hexanoic acid, 2-ethyl-, 1,1'-[2,2-bis[[(2-ethyl-1-oxohexyl)oxy]methyl]-1,3-propanediyl] esterpentaerythritol tetra(2-ethylhexanoate)2,2-bis[[(2-ethyl-1-oxohexyl)oxy]methyl]propane-1,3-diyl bis(2-ethylhexanoate)hexanoic acid, 2-ethyl-, 2,2-bis[[(2-ethyl-1-oxohexyl)oxy]methyl]-1,3-propanediyl esterhexanoic acid, 2-ethyl-, 2,2-bis (2-ethyl-1-oxohexyl)oxy methyl -1,3-propanediyl esterhexanoic acid, 2-ethyl-, 2,2-bis (2-ethyl-1-oxohexyl)oxy methyl -1,3-propanediyl ester3-[(2-ethylhexanoyl)oxy]-2,2-bis{[(2-ethylhexanoyl)oxy]methyl}propyl 2-ethylhexanoatepentaerythritol tetraisooctanoate3-[(2-ethylhexanoyl)oxy]-2,2-bis{[(2-ethylhexanoyl)oxy]methyl}propyl 2-ethylhexanoate (non-preferredname)
10.4. Structural formula:
SMILES
CCCCC(CC)C(=O)OCC(COC(=O)C(CC)CCCC)(COC(=O)C(CC)CCCC)COC(=O)C(CC)CCCC
CH3CH3
O
O
O
O
CH3CH3
O
OCH3
CH3
O
OH3C
H3C
10.5. Profiling results:
DNA binding by OASIS v.1.2
No alert found
DNA binding by OECD
No alert found
Estrogen Receptor Binding
Non binder, MW>500
OECD HPV Chemical Categories
Not categorized
Protein binding by OASIS v1.2
No alert found
Protein binding by OECD
QSAR Toolbox 3.2.0.103 TPRF v.3.2.1.32002Database version: 3.5.0/3.1.2
27 / 30Prediction of LD50 for imidazole, LD50 for Rat Trend AnalysisAppendix 1 - Category members
No alert found
Protein binding potency
Not possible to classify according to these rules (GSH)
Superfragments
No superfragment
Toxic hazard classification by Cramer (original)
High (Class III)
Toxic hazard classification by Cramer (with extensions)
High (Class III)
US-EPA New Chemical Categories
Not categorized
Chemical(s) No. 11 - 11 are reported below:
No. CAS Chem. name SMILES
11 110-30-5 octadecanamide,n,n'-1,2-ethanediylbis-
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC(=O)NCCNC(=O)CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
QSAR Toolbox 3.2.0.103 TPRF v.3.2.1.32002Database version: 3.5.0/3.1.2
28 / 30Prediction of LD50 for imidazole, LD50 for Rat Trend AnalysisAppendix 2 - Data matrix
QSAR Toolbox prediction based on trend analysis
Prediction of LD50 for imidazole, LD50 for Rat Trend Analysis
APPENDIX 2 - Data matrix
OMITTED BY THE USER
QSAR Toolbox 3.2.0.103 TPRF v.3.2.1.32002Database version: 3.5.0/3.1.2
29 / 30Prediction of LD50 for imidazole, LD50 for Rat Trend AnalysisAppendices 3, 4, 5, 6 - QMRF
QSAR Toolbox prediction based on trend analysis
Prediction of LD50 for imidazole, LD50 for Rat Trend Analysis
APPENDIX 3 - QMRF
NOT APPLICABLE
APPENDIX 4 - QMRF, training set chemicals
APPENDIX 5 - QMRF, test set chemicals
APPENDIX 6 - Additional information from (Q)SAR
QSAR Toolbox 3.2.0.103 TPRF v.3.2.1.32002Database version: 3.5.0/3.1.2
30 / 30Prediction of LD50 for imidazole, LD50 for Rat Trend AnalysisAppendix 7 - Chemical components
QSAR Toolbox prediction based on trend analysis
Prediction of LD50 for imidazole, LD50 for Rat Trend Analysis
APPENDIX 7 - Chemical components
NOT APPLICABLE
QSAR Toolbox 3.2.0.103 TPRF v.3.2.1.32002Database version: 3.5.0/3.1.2