improving water productivity by applying magnetic technology · 2020. 3. 8. · 4. quantify water...

63
Improving Water Productivity by Applying Magnetic Technology Ahmed Al-Busaidi Department of Soils, Water and Agricultural Engineering, College of Agricultural & Marine Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Oman

Upload: others

Post on 26-Jan-2021

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Improving Water Productivity by Applying Magnetic Technology

    Ahmed Al-Busaidi

    Department of Soils, Water and Agricultural Engineering,College of Agricultural & Marine Sciences, Sultan Qaboos

    University, Oman

  • Global Water Resources• World population food production limited fresh water resources

    http://maps.grida.no/library/files/storage/population-increase-and-water-resources.jpg�

  • Global Water Resources• Save water

    * Increase water productivity * Use saline and unconventional waters

  • Dead Water

  • Original water active watergood structure

    Human activities destruction & pollution

    Today waterdead waterdisturbed structure

  • Magnetic Water

    1- Water 2-Magnetic field 3-Magnetic WaterScattered Well organized (Plus & Minus)

    Human

    Soil & Plant

  • Restructuring Water Molecules Clusters:

  • Enhance nutrients mobility in the soil Save fertilizers up to 30% Improved fruit quality; size, shape Increase water productivityCleaner piping, de-scaling and reduced scale

    deposition

    Benefits

    1 2 3

    Removing Scale

  • Impacts on Agriculture

    Magnetic waterNormal water

  • Not Magnetic Magnetic Not Magnetic Magnetic

    Impacts on Agriculture

  • source: fei Company

    Impacts on AgricultureNormal waterMagnetic water

  • WheatIrrigation with magnetized water Irrigation with normal water

  • Hot ClimateArea: 309,500 Km2

    *Arid Country withannual rainfall of 100 mm*Groundwater is the main source of water

  • Sectoral Water Use in the Sultanate

    7%

    0.6%

    2.4%

    90%

    Total Demand = 1657 MCM/Yr

    Domestic

    Industrial

    Agricultural

    Municipal

    (1491 MCM/Yr)

    (117 MCM/Yr)

    (9 MCM/Yr)

    (40 MCM/Yr)

    Water Balance in the Sultanate (MCM/Yr)

    Supply

    Demand

    Deficit

    1267390

    1657

  • Seawater Intrusion

    PressurePressure

    Salt Affected Area of Oman = 44.18%

    http://frontpage.uwsuper.edu/bajjali/proj/oman/o5_2.jpg�

  • Seawater Intrusion

  • Seawater Intrusion

    Can Magnetic water do something for us?

  • Objectives1. Conduct research to assess the performance of the tested crops under magnetized brackish and treated waste

    waters.

    2. Evaluate the quality of magnetically treated crops.

    3. Examine the performance of magnetically treated potable water and saline water on plant growth, yield and

    produce nutrient composition of selected plant types.

    4. Quantify water productivity and water saving potential of magnetically treated irrigation water.

    5. Improve water use efficiency.

    6. Determine the changes in soil properties and pipes scaling due to irrigation with magnetically treated water

    from different sources.

    7. Understand the impact of salinity levels on magnetically treated water.

    8. Evaluate the effect of magnetic technology on elements availability in the soils.

    9. Study the response of different parts of plants to irrigation with magnetic water compared to plants irrigated

    with ordinary water.

    10. Understand the impact of magnetic technology to soil microorganisms and plant diseases and future uses for

    bioremediation.

    11. Investigate the effect of heat stress in plant growth treated with/out magnetic device.

  • Objectives

    Study the effect of magnetically treated potable water and saline water on:

    Plant growth and yield Water productivity Soil properties

  • Materials and Methods

  • Result & DiscussionCucumber

  • Materials and Methods

  • Result & DiscussionCucumber

  • Materials and Methods (2011)Growth area = 2016 m2

    (ECw ≈ 2 dS/m)

  • Materials and MethodsGrowth area = 2016 m2

    (ECw ≈ 2 dS/m)

  • Result & DiscussionSoil salinity, ECe

    Desalinating the soil

  • Result & DiscussionElement Concentration

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    400

    M1 N1 M2 N2 M3 N3

    Elem

    ent C

    onc.

    (mg/

    kg)

    Treatment

    Na Mg Ca Zn S

  • Result & Discussion

  • Result & DiscussionYield lost compared to Magnetic treatment

  • Rhodes grass (2011-2014)Rhodes grass irrigated by magnetized and non-magnetized water

    field)

  • 0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    Magnetic Control

    Soil

    EC (d

    S/m

    )

    Treatment

    Soil salinity as affected by magnetized water (2014)

  • 0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    20.02.2014 07.11.2013. 06.09.2013. 07.08.2013. 20.06.2013. 09.05.2013. 04.03.2013.

    Bal

    e N

    umbe

    r

    Date

    Magnetic Control

    Yield of Rhodes grass as affected by magnetized and non-magnetized water

  • Treatment Differences

    Sum of

    Squares DF

    Mean

    Square F Sig.

    Bale NO. Between

    Groups882.00 1 882.00 1323.00 0.00

    Within Groups 4.00 6 0.67

    Total 886.00 7

    Soil EC Between

    Groups0.714 1 0.71 197.65 0.00

    Within Groups 0.02 6 0.004

    Total 0.74 7

    ANOVA analysis for magnetized and control samples** The mean difference is significant at the .05 level.

  • Watermelon and sweet melon irrigated by magnetized and non-magnetized water

  • Sweet melon

  • Sweet corn irrigated by magnetized and

    non-magnetized water (Open field)

  • 0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    Mag-front Con-front Mag-middle Con-middle Mag-back Con-back

    Frui

    ts W

    eigh

    t/bag

    (Kg)

    Treatment

    Sweet corn irrigated by magnetized and non-magnetized water.

  • vegetables irrigated by magnetized Mix

    magnetized water (Open field)-and non

  • Mix Vegetables

  • 1.45

    1.5

    1.55

    1.6

    1.65

    1.7

    1.75

    Start Mag Con

    Soil

    EC (d

    S/m

    )

    Treatment

    Soil electrical conductivity at different treatments

  • 44

    45

    46

    47

    48

    49

    50

    51

    52

    Mag1 Con1 Mag2 Cont2

    Chl

    orop

    hyll

    (spa

    d)

    Treatment

    Chlorophyll values for magnetized and non-magnetized treatments

  • 0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    180

    Mag1 Con1 Mag2 Cont2

    Cuc

    umbe

    r Yie

    ld

    Treatment

    No. of Fruits Weight (Kg)

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    Mag1 Con1 Mag2 Cont2

    Lettu

    ce Y

    ield

    Treatment

    No. of Fruits Weight (Kg)

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    Mag1 Con1 Mag2 Cont2

    Car

    rot Y

    ield

    Treatment

    No. of Fruits Weight (Kg)

    Crops productivity as affected by magnetized and non-magnetized treatments.

  • Improving Water Productivity

  • Al-Batinah Farmer Society (Privet farms)

  • Al-Batinah Farmer Society with magnetic device the farmers harvested 47000 Boxes of Tomato/4 hawithout magnetic device, they harvested 20000 Boxes of Tomato/4 ha

  • Al-Mesena Farm

  • Al-Mesena Farm Normal water Magnetic water

  • Al-Mesena FarmSecond visit

    Plant color look better with Mag water Soil analysis (in progress)

  • Ibri Farm

  • Ibri FarmSoil analysis (In progress)

  • Adam Farm

    Old saline groundwater

  • Adam FarmGood productivity with Mag water.

    Better growth in second season even for date palms

  • Magnetic water Normal water

    Privet houses with small gardens: 10 houses

    Garden of privet house irrigated by magnetized and non-magnetized waters

  • 1 2 3

    Removing Scale

    The effect of magnetic device in scale removing

  • Leaching ability (Lab Study)

  • Treatment pH EC

    Normal (distilled) water 1.3

    Column 1 8.7 1.2 ms/cm

    Column 2 8.6 1.5 ms/cm

    Magnetized water 1.6

    Column 1 8.8 1.5 ms/cm

    Column 2 8.7 1.7 ms/cm

    Water leached from the columns

  • 0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    0 0.5 1 1.5

    Soil

    dept

    h (c

    m)

    Ece (Ms/l)

    Magnetized 2 times

    Non-magnetized 2 times

    Reduction in soil salinity (dS/m) with magnetized water

  • Columns*

    Element1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

    301 198 311 311 154 240 823 2.08 22.246 37.2 57.0 67.3 53.1 74.3 147 13.4 6.53

    5.96 4.82 6.27 7.00 30.0 22.4 17.3 10.6 4.9294.2 83.4 117 128 174 245 357 44.4 28.3

  • 0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    50

    Na Mg Ca

    Analysis of different ions of soil extract for different soil column at depth of (0-10 cm)

    NW2INW3IMW2IMW3I

  • Magnetic water can help in leaching salts from the soil, balancing nutrient absorption and improving

    plant growth

    Conclusion

  • Acknowledgment

    Thank you for all co-investigators for their continuous support during the study.

    Special thanks to Agriculture & Fisheries Development Fund (AFDF) for their financial support.

  • Improving Water Productivity by Applying Magnetic Technology Global Water ResourcesGlobal Water ResourcesDead WaterOriginal water �active water�good structure ��Human activities �destruction & pollution� �Today water�dead water�disturbed structureMagnetic WaterSlide Number 7BenefitsImpacts on AgricultureImpacts on AgricultureImpacts on AgricultureSlide Number 12Slide Number 13Slide Number 14Seawater IntrusionSlide Number 16Slide Number 17ObjectivesObjectivesSlide Number 20Slide Number 21Slide Number 22Slide Number 23Slide Number 24Slide Number 25Slide Number 26Slide Number 27Slide Number 28Slide Number 29Slide Number 30Slide Number 31Slide Number 32Slide Number 33Slide Number 34Slide Number 35Slide Number 36Slide Number 37Slide Number 38Slide Number 39Mix Vegetables Slide Number 41Slide Number 42Slide Number 43Slide Number 44Al-Batinah Farmer Society Al-Batinah Farmer Society Al-Mesena Farm Al-Mesena Farm Slide Number 49Ibri Farm Ibri Farm�Soil analysis (In progress)� Adam Farm Adam Farm�Good productivity with Mag water. �Better growth in second season even for date palms Slide Number 54Slide Number 55Slide Number 56Slide Number 57Slide Number 58Slide Number 59Slide Number 60Slide Number 61Acknowledgment Slide Number 63