improving student performance with daylighting

14
Improving Student Performance with Daylighting Straub Hall, University of Oregon

Upload: maxmoriyama

Post on 20-Jul-2016

27 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

By Energy Studies in Buildings LaboratoryPresented to Shanghai Xian Dai Architects at the University of Oregon

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Improving Student Performance with Daylighting

Improving Student Performance with DaylightingStraub Hall, University of Oregon

Page 2: Improving Student Performance with Daylighting

Why focus on daylighting?

_Daylighting can increase learning and test performance by 20-26% _Glare reduces performance by 15% _Daylit classrooms reduce absenteeism _Daylighting reduces energy use

Page 3: Improving Student Performance with Daylighting

How much energy can be saved?

_Electric lighting accounts for 20% of all building energy usage _Lower required light levels need less glazing

© 2007, Energy Studies in Buildings Laboratory, University of Oregon

Annual lighting energy saved during daylight hours in Portland, OR with a 5% minimum dimming ballast

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% 8.0% 9.0% 10.0%

Daylight factor

Per

cent

lighti

ng e

ner

gy s

avin

gs

5fc

10fc

20fc

30fc

50fc

© 2007, Energy Studies in Buildings Laboratory, University of Oregon

Annual lighting energy saved during daylight hours in Portland, OR with a 5% minimum dimming ballast

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% 8.0% 9.0% 10.0%

Daylight factor

Per

cent

lighti

ng e

ner

gy s

avin

gs

5fc

10fc

20fc

30fc

50fc

© 2007, Energy Studies in Buildings Laboratory, University of Oregon

Annual lighting energy saved during daylight hours in Portland, OR with a 5% minimum dimming ballast

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% 8.0% 9.0% 10.0%

Daylight factor

Per

cent

lighti

ng e

ner

gy s

avin

gs

5fc

10fc

20fc

30fc

50fc

More Windows

Mor

e En

ergy

Sav

ings

Page 4: Improving Student Performance with Daylighting

Straub Hall

Page 5: Improving Student Performance with Daylighting

What was the initial design?

_Large skylights _View windows to the south and north _Clerestory to the east _Deep acoustic clouds _No light under mezzanine

North

Page 6: Improving Student Performance with Daylighting

How to test the daylighting?

_TheArtificialSkyisamirrorbox that simulates overcast sky conditions _Photometric sensors are placed inside of a scale model to determine daylight intensity and distribution in a space _Interiorsurfacereflectancesare simulated with papers of similar reflectances

interior light levelexteriorlightlevel

=Daylight Factor (DF)

interior sensors

exteriorsensor

Page 7: Improving Student Performance with Daylighting

Plan

Balcony Plan

6+ 0-1Daylight Factor

5-6 4-5 3-4 2-3 1-2

Section

© 2013 Energy Studies in Buildings Laboratory, University of Oregon

Straub Hall - Lecture HallDaylighting Analysis

2 Linear SkylightsTotal Skylight Area: 500 sf

Iteration #1

_Large skylights creating “hot spots” _Too much light on screen _Deep lightwells reduces daylight _Adequate daylight

Presentation Board

Page 8: Improving Student Performance with Daylighting

Plan

Balcony Plan

6+ 5-6 4-5 3-4 2-3 1-2 0-1Daylight Factor

Section

© 2013 Energy Studies in Buildings Laboratory, University of Oregon

Straub Hall - Lecture HallDaylighting Analysis

2 Linear SkylightsTotal Skylight Area: 500 sf

Iteration #2

_Small skylights reduce “hot spots” _Screen is adequately darkened _Deep lightwells reduce daylight _Front seats are too dark

Presentation Board

Page 9: Improving Student Performance with Daylighting

Plan

Balcony Plan

6+ 5-6 4-5 3-4 2-3 1-2 0-1Daylight Factor

Iteration #3

_Small skylights reduce “hot spots” _Screen is slightly too bright _Shallow lightwells increase daylight _Adequate daylight in all seating

Presentation Board

Page 10: Improving Student Performance with Daylighting

Plan

Balcony Plan

6+ 5-6 4-5 3-4 2-3 1-2 0-1Daylight Factor

Iteration #4

_Small skylights reduce “hot spots” _Screen is adequately darkened _Shallow lightwells increase daylight _Adequate daylight in all seating

Presentation Board

Page 11: Improving Student Performance with Daylighting

How to control the daylight levels?

_Different space uses require different lighting levels _Daylight levels vary with seasonal and daily climate

_Adaptable shading is required!

Page 12: Improving Student Performance with Daylighting

How to adapt the shading?

_Louvers are integrated into the skylights to instantaneously adjust to maintain light levels _Automated cloth shades on vertical glazing block daylight while retaining views out _Daylight sensors adjust electric lighting levels under mezzanine to match the daylight levels in the rest of space

Vertical Glazing: 0% Open

Vertical Glazing: 0% Open

Vertical Glazing: 100% Open

Vertical Glazing: 0% Open

WINTER SUMMER

Figure 2: Current Visible Transmission (Vt_vertical=75%, Vt_skylight=52%)

Average: 1.6 fc

Average: 1.4 fc

Max: 0.3 fc

Average: 3.0 fc

Average: 1.5 fc

Max: 0.5 fc

Average: 8.5 fc

Average: 3.2 fc

Max: 5.0 fc

Average: 6.3 fc

Average: 6.0 fc

Max: 1.6 fc

Values represent overcast conditions only

15752:da Copyright 2013, Energy Studies in Buildings Laboratory, University of Oregon

Middle & Front Skylights: 50% Open

Middle & Front Skylights: 0% Open

Middle & Front Skylights: 100% Open

Middle & Front Skylights: 67% Open

Back Skylights: 0% Open

Back Skylights: 100% Open

Back Skylights: 0% Open

Back Skylights: 0% Open

FEAT

UR

E PR

ESEN

TATI

ON

S (1

FC

)AV

WIT

H N

OTE

TA

KIN

G (5

FC

)

Page 13: Improving Student Performance with Daylighting

Vertical Glazing: 0% Open

Vertical Glazing: 0% Open

Vertical Glazing: 100% Open

Vertical Glazing: 0% Open

WINTER SUMMER

Figure 2: Current Visible Transmission (Vt_vertical=75%, Vt_skylight=52%)

Average: 1.6 fc

Average: 1.4 fc

Max: 0.3 fc

Average: 3.0 fc

Average: 1.5 fc

Max: 0.5 fc

Average: 8.5 fc

Average: 3.2 fc

Max: 5.0 fc

Average: 6.3 fc

Average: 6.0 fc

Max: 1.6 fc

Values represent overcast conditions only

15752:da Copyright 2013, Energy Studies in Buildings Laboratory, University of Oregon

Middle & Front Skylights: 50% Open

Middle & Front Skylights: 0% Open

Middle & Front Skylights: 100% Open

Middle & Front Skylights: 67% Open

Back Skylights: 0% Open

Back Skylights: 100% Open

Back Skylights: 0% Open

Back Skylights: 0% Open

FEAT

UR

E PR

ESEN

TATI

ON

S (1

FC

)AV

WIT

H N

OTE

TA

KIN

G (5

FC

)How much shading is needed? _The vertical glazing contributes daylight differently than the skylights, so the vertical glazing is shaded differently than the skylights

Page 14: Improving Student Performance with Daylighting

A better space for learning?