improving speaking ability of the tenth grade …eprints.umk.ac.id/3253/1/cover.pdfiii improving...
TRANSCRIPT
i
IMPROVING SPEAKING ABILITY
OF THE TENTH GRADE STUDENTS
OF SMA NU AL MA’RUF KUDUS
IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2013/2014
BY USING FISHBOWL DISCUSSION
By
NA’IMATUL ROSIDAH
NIM. 2010 32 183
DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH EDUCATION
FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION
UNIVERSITY OF MURIA KUDUS
2014
ii
iii
IMPROVING SPEAKING ABILITY
OF THE TENTH GRADE STUDENTS
OF SMA NU AL MA’RUF KUDUS
IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2013/2014
BY USING FISHBOWL DISCUSSION
SKRIPSI Presented to
Muria Kudus University
in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements
for Completing the Sarjana Program
in English Education
By
NA’IMATUL ROSIDAH
NIM 2010 32 183
DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH EDUCATION
FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION
UNIVERSITY OF MURIA KUDUS
2014
iv
MOTTO AND DEDICATION
MOTTO
Don’t give up
Where there is a will there is away
Better late than never
Our parents are the greatest gift in a life
Allah is always with us
DEDICATION
This skripsi is dedicated to:
Her beloved Father and Mother
(Mr.Suharno and Mrs.Rukanah)
Her beloved sister and brother (Mega
Asmara Dewi, Kharfan Sadid
Hidayatullah and Tirta Adi Kusuma)
Everyone who always supports her to
finish her skripsi: her beloved someone,
her big family, and her best friends
v
vi
vii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
In the name of Allah, the most gracious and the most merciful, in this
occasion, the writer would like to express his gratitude to the God, Allah S.W.T,
who has given us mercies and blessing so that the writer can finish this research
proposal entitle “The Speaking Ability of the Tenth Grade Students of SMA
NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus in Academic Year 2013/2014 by Using Fishbowl
Discussion”.
During this struggle to finísh this proposal, the writer would also like to
convey her special gratitude to:
1. Dr. Drs. Slamet Utomo, M.Pd as the Dean of English Education Department
of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Muria Kudus University.
2. Diah Kurniati, S.Pd, M.Pd as the Head of English Education Department of
Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Muria Kudus University.
3. Drs. Muh Syafei, M.Pd as the first advisor, who has guided and given her
advice to the writer in finishing this skripsi wisely and patiently.
4. Fajar Kartika, SS, M.Hum as the second advisor who has assisted the writer to
develop and finish her skripsi with her calm mind
5. Drs. H. Shodiqun M.Ag, as the principal of SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus who
gives the writer permission and ease to conduct the research
6. English teachers especially H. Dalkhin, S.Pd who have supported the
researcher during research in SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus.
viii
7. Students of SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus in Academic Year 2013/2014,
especially X1 for their participation.
8. All lecturers and staffs of English Education Department who have given
worthy knowledge and support
9. Her beloved family, Mom Rukanah, Dad Suharno, her sister Mega Asmara
Dewi for support, criticism and suggestion, her brothers Kharfan Sadid
Hidayatullah and Tirta Adi Kusuma who cute, her big family members for the
support, and her beloved someone “flat-nose” for extraordinary support and
love, also everlasting warm care
10. Her beloved friends, Yunita Dwi Nuraeni, Novella Widyastika, Rokis Alfiah,
Anita Murdiani, Hidayathul Mahmudah, Chintya Aini Badria, Siti Nur Jannah,
Fidiana Astuti for the togetherness in happiness and sadness
11. All of her friends in Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Muria Kudus
University
12. All of her friends since she was born until now
The writer hopes that this skripsi will be useful for those especially who are
in the field of education.
Kudus, July 2014
The writer
Na’imatul Rosidah
ix
ABSTRACT
Rosidah, Na’imatul. 2014. The Speaking Ability of the Tenth Grade Students of
SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus in Academic Year 2013/2014 by Using
Fishbowl Discussion. Skripsi. Department of English Education.
Faculty of Teacher Training and Education. Muria Kudus University.
Advisors (i) Drs. Muh Syafei, M.Pd. (ii) Fajar Kartika, S.S, M.Hum.
Key Words: Speaking Ability, Fishbowl Discussion.
Speaking is one of elements of human daily activities. The writer can share
ideas and thoughts with other people by speaking. A smooth interaction between
people can take place in that way. Speaking skill is taught to students to make
them capable of communicating by using English correctly. In fact, a teacher has
less motivation to give the students’ special treatment in teaching speaking.
This research is to find out the answer from the statement of the problem;
First, “can Fishbowl Discussion improve student’s speaking ability of the tenth
grade students of SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus in academic year 2013/2014?”.
Second, “What are the strengths and the weaknesses of using Fishbowl Discussion
when it is applied at the tenth grade students of SMA NU AL Ma’ruf Kudus in
academic year 2013/2014 to improve students’ speaking ability?”
This is a classroom action research. The research was conducted in SMA
NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus. Subject of the research is the grade X-1 in second semester.
The material used is descriptive text. The writer uses some instrument in this
research. Observation and achievement test. There were four steps in conducting
the Classroom Action Research i.e. planning, acting, observing and reflecting.
The result of this research shows that the improvements happen in every
cycle. In cycle I, the average score of achievement test of speaking ability by
using Fishbowl Discussion technique is 71.06 then the average from 71.06 into
percentage to be 71.06%. In cycle II, the average score of achievement test of
speaking ability by using Fishbowl Discussion technique in cycle II is 81.46 then
the average score from 81.46 into percentage to be 81.46% so the speaking ability
in cycle II is very satisfied. The writer concluded that Fishbowl Discussion as a
technique of teaching English had proven effective in improving the ability of
English speaking of the students of SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus in academic year
2013/2014.
Based on the result of the research above, the writer can conclude that the
use of Fishbowl Discussion can improve students’ speaking ability at the Tenth
Grade Students of SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus in the academic 2013/2014. First,
the writer suggests that the English teacher should try to use fishbowl discussion
as one of the teaching technique. Second, English teacher should encourage the
students to improve their speaking ability by giving more practice and exercise. It
is to make students fell fun and active in class. So it can improve their speaking
ability.
x
ABSTRAKSI
Rosidah, Na’imatul. 2014. Kemampuan Berbicara Siswa Kelas Sepuluh di SMA
NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus Tahun Ajaran 2013/2014 dengan Menggunakan
Fishbowl Discussion. Skripsi. Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa
Inggris, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Muria
Kudus. Pembimbing (i) Drs. Muh Syafei, M.Pd. (ii) Fajar Kartika, S.S,
M.Hum.
Key Words: Kemampuan berbicara, Fishbowl Doscussion.
Berbicara adalah salah satu element dari beberapa aktivitas manusia
sehari-hari. Penulis dapat membagi ide dan pemikiran kita dengan orang lain
dengan berbicara. Interaksi yang lancar diantaranya orang dapat menggunakan
kearah itu. Keterampilan berbicara diajarkan kepada siswa untuk membuat
mereka mampu berkomunikasi dengan bahasa Inggris yang benar. Faktanya, guru
kurang memiliki motivasi untuk memberikan perlakuan khusus kepada siswa
dalam pengajaran berbicara.
Penelitian ini mempunyai beberapa tujuan untuk menemukan jawaban dari
pernyataan dari sebuah masalah adakah this research has a purpose to find out
menjawab dari pernyataan masalah; Pertama, “Dapatkah Fishbowl Discussion
meningkatkan kemampuan berbicara siswa kelas X SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus di
tahun 2013/2014?”. Kedua, “kekuatan dan kelemahan apa dari penggunaan
Fishbowl Discussion ketika diaplikasikan pada murid-murid kelas X SMA NU Al
Ma’ruf di tahun 2013/2014 untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berbicara siswa?”.
Ini merupakan penelitian tindak kelas (Classroom Action Research).
Penelitian ini di SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus. Subject penelitian adalah kelas X1
pada semester kedua. Materi yang digunakan adalah descriptive text. Penulis
menggunakan beberapa instrument di dalam penelitian ini. Yang digunakan
adalah observation and achievement test menggunakan fishbowl discussion. Ada
empat langkah dalam melakukan Penilitian Tindakan Kelas yaitu perencanaa,
pelaksanaa, observasi, dan refleksi.
Hasil dari penelitian ini memperlihatkan bahwa terjadi peningkatan pada
setiap cycle. Pada cycle I, nilai rata-rata test kemampuan berbicara menggunakan
Fishbowl Discussion adalah 71.06 kemudian rata-rata dari 71.06 kedalam
presentase yaitu 71.06%. Pada cycle II nilai rata-rata test kemampuan berbicara
menggunakan Fishbowl Discussion adalah 81.46 kemudian rata-rata dari 81.46
kedalam presentase yaitu 81.46 %. Jadi kemampuan berbicara pada cycle II sangat
puas. Penulis dapat menarik kesimpulan bahwa pengajaran menngunakan
Fishbowl Discussion untuk mengajar bahasa Inggris terbukti efektif untuk
meningkatkan penguasaan berbicara murid-murid SMA MU Al Ma’ruf Kudus di
tahun pelajaran 2013/2014.
Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diatas, peneliti bisa menyimpulkan bahwa
penggunaan Fishbowl Discussion bisa meningkatkan kemampuan siswa dalam
xi
berbicara terhadap kelas X di SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus di tahun ajaran
2013/2014. Pertama, penulis menyarankan bahwa guru bahasa Inggris harus
mencoba untuk menggunakan Fishbowl Discussion sebagai salah satu tehnik
pembelajaran. Kedua, guru bahasa Inggris harus mendorong siswa untuk
meningkatkan keterampilan berbahasa mereka dengan memberikan lebih banyak
praktek dan latihan. Itu untuk membuat siswa merasa senang dan aktif dikelas.
Sehingga dapat meningkatkan pemahaman mereka dalam berbicara.
xii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
COVER ...................................................................................................... i
PAGE OF LOGO ...................................................................................... ii
PAGE OF TITLE ...................................................................................... iii
MOTTO AND DEDICATION ................................................................. iv
ADVISORS’ APPROVAL ....................................................................... v
EXAMINERS’ APPROVAL .................................................................... vi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ........................................................................ vii
ABSTRACT ............................................................................................... ix
ABSTRAK ................................................................................................. xi
TABLE OF CONTENTS .......................................................................... xiii
LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................... xvi
LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................. xvii
LIST OF APPENDICES .......................................................................... xviii
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the Research .............................................................. 1
1.2 Statement of the Problems ................................................................. 3
1.3 Objective of the Research .................................................................. 4
1.4 Significance of the Research ............................................................. 4
1.5 Scope of the Research ........................................................................ 5
1.6 Operational Definition ....................................................................... 5
CHAPTER II REVIEW TO RELATED LITERATURE AND
HYPOTHESIS
2.1 Teaching English in SMP NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus ............................................ 6
2.1.1 Purposes of Teaching English in SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus .................... 7
2.1.2 The Curriculum in SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus .......................................... 8
2.1.3 The Material of Teaching English in SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus .............. 9
2.2 Speaking ...................................................................................................... 10
2.2.1 The Nature of Teaching Speaking ............................................................... 11
2.3 Fishbowl Discussion .................................................................................... 12
2.4 Review of Previous Research ....................................................................... 14
2.5 Theoretical Framework ............................................................................... 15
2.6 Action Hypothesis ....................................................................................... 16
xiii
CHAPTER III METHOD OF THE RESEARCH
3.1 Setting and characteristic of the Research ...................................... 17
3.2 Variable of the Research ................................................................. 18
3.3 Design of the Research.................................................................... 19
3.4 Procedure of the Research ............................................................... 20
3.4.1 Planning of the Research .......................................................................... 21
3.4.1.1 Action Planning ....................................................................................... 21
3.4.1.2 Observing the Action Research ................................................................ 22
3.4.1.3 Analysis and Reflection ............................................................................ 23
3.5 Technique of Analyzing Data ................................................................... 23
CHAPTER IV FINDING OF THE RESEARCH
4.1 Pre-reflection ..................................................................................... 27
4.2 The Cycle Action Procedure .............................................................. 29
4.2.1 The Result of Cycle I ......................................................................... 29
4.2.1.1 Planning .......................................................................................... 30
4.2.1.2 Implementing the Action................................................................. 30
4.2.1.2.1 The First Meeting of Action (Cycle I) ........................................ 31
4.2.1.2.2 The Second Meeting of Action (Cycle I) .................................... 32
4.2.1.3 Observation ..................................................................................... 32
4.2.4 Analysis and Reflection of the Observation Result ........................... 39
4.3 The Result of Cycle II ........................................................................... 41
4.3.1 Planning ............................................................................................. 41
4.3.2 Implementing the Action.................................................................... 42
4.3.2.1 The First Meeting of Action (Cycle II) .......................................... 43
4.3.2.2 The second Meeting of Action (Cycle II) ...................................... 45
4.3.3 Observation ........................................................................................ 45
4.3.4 Analysis and Reflection of the Observation Result ........................... 52
4.4 The recapitulation of the Result of Second ........................................... 53
xiv
CHAPTER V DISCUSSION
5.1 Improving Speaking Ability of the Tenth Grade Students of SMA NU Al
Ma’ruf Kudus by Using Fishbowl Discussion ...................................... 55
5.2 The Process of Improving Speaking Ability by Using Fishbowl Discussion of
the Tenth Grade Students of SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus .................... 57
CHAPTER VI CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
6.1 Conclusion ......................................................................................... 59
6.2 Suggestion ......................................................................................... 61
REFERENCES .......................................................................................... 63
APPENDICES ........................................................................................... 64
STATEMENT ............................................................................................ 105
CURRICULUM VITAE ........................................................................... 106
xv
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
2.1 The Material of Tenth Grade Students of SMA NU Al Ma’ruf
Kudus in Academic Year 2014/2015 ........................................................ 9
3.5 The Criteria of Test Score ...................................................................... 25
3.5 The Students’ Achievement Criteria ....................................................... 28
4.1 Score of daily assessment of class X1 of SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus in
Academic Year 2013/2014 ................................................................... 33
4.2 The Result of Observation To Know The students’ Activities In Teaching
Learning Process In Improving Students’ Speaking Ability By Using
Fishbowl Discussion In Academic Year 2013/2014 ............................ 46
4.3 Scores of Students Speaking Ability of SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus by Using
Fishbowl Discussion in Academic Year 2013/2014 ............................. 37
4.4 The Result of Observation to Know the Students’ Activities in the Teaching
Learning Process in Improving Students’ Speaking Ability by Using
Fishbowl Discussion in Academic Year 2013/2014 ............................ 45
4.5 Scores of Students’ Speaking Ability of SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus by
Using Fishbowl Discussion in Academic Year 2013/2014 ................... 50
4.6 Recapitulayion of the Result of Second Cycle in Improving Speaking
Ability of the Class X1of SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus by Using Fishbowl
Discussion in Academic Year 2013/2014 ............................................. 53
xvi
LIST OF FIGURES
Figures Page
2.1 The Chronological of the Action Research ...........................................15
2.1 The Burn's model of action research ....................................................19
xvii
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix Page
1. The Syllabus The Syllabus of SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus in academic
2013/2014 ................................................................................................ 65
2 LESSON PLAN I ..................................................................................... 70
3 LESSON PLAN II ................................................................................... 78
4 Speaking Test Cycle I ............................................................................... 86
5 Speaking Test Cycle II .............................................................................. 87
6 The Name of Tenth Grade Students of SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus In
Academic Year 2013/2014........................................................................ 88
7 The result of observation cycle I to know the students’ activities in the
teaching learning process in improving students’ speaking ability by
using fishbowl discussion of SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus in Academic
year 2013/2014 .......................................................................................... 90
8 Score of students’ speaking ability of SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus by
Using Fishbowl Discussion in Academic year 2013/2014 in First Cycle. 94
9 Accounting Means of Students’ Speaking Ability of SMA NU Al
Ma’ruf Kudus by Using Fishbowl Discussion in Academic Year
2013/2014 in First Cycle ........................................................................... 96
10 The result of observation cycle II to know the students’ activities in the
teaching learning process in improving students’ speaking ability by
using fishbowl discussion of SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus in Academic
year 2013/2014 .......................................................................................... 97
11 Score of students’ speaking ability of SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus by
Using Fishbowl Discussion in Academic year 2013/2014 in Second
Cycle ......................................................................................................... 101
xviii
12 Accounting Means of Students’ Speaking Ability of SMA NU Al
Ma’ruf Kudus by Using Fishbowl Discussion in Academic Year
2013/2014 in Second Cycle ...................................................................... 103
13 Recapitulation of the Result of Second Cycles in Improving Speaking
Ability of the Class X1 of SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus by Using
Fishbowl Discussion in Academic Year 2013/2014 ................................. 104
14 Penetapan Pembimbing Skripsi Letter ...................................................... 105
15 Keterangan Selesai Bimbingan ................................................................. 106
16 Permohonan Ujian Skripsi ....................................................................... 107
17 Reseacrh Permission Letter ....................................................................... 108
18 Research Decision Letter from SMA NU Al Ma’ruf Kudus .................... 109
19 Berita Acara Bimbingan ........................................................................... 110