improving school performance: a cautionary tale …šонференции/ron... · math and...

21
29th 30th OF SEPTEMBER 2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE USE OF THE EDUCATION QUALITY RESEARCH RESULTS: PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS IMPROVING SCHOOL PERFORMANCE: A CAUTIONARY TALE FROM CANADA WITH A HAPPY ENDING T. SCOTT MURRAY

Upload: others

Post on 26-Jan-2021

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 29th 30thOF SEPTEMBER 2016

    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE

    USE OF THE EDUCATION QUALITY RESEARCH RESULTS: PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS

    IMPROVING SCHOOL PERFORMANCE: A CAUTIONARY TALE FROM CANADA WITH A HAPPY ENDING

    T. SCOTT MURRAY

  • SCHOOLS GENERATE THREE TYPES OF OUTCOMES:

    THEY IMPART:

    Technical skills and knowledge

    Cognitive skills that are needed to apply technical

    skills and knowledge

    Attitudes and beliefs that encourage the application

    of these skills in work

  • … BUT THE GAME HAS CHANGED:

    Schools main job used to be select the top performing students who would

    go on to post-secondary education, the rest got basic skills

    Now education systems need to impart higher levels of skills to a much higher proportion of

    the population to prepare them for the demands of post-secondary education

    To achieve this goal schools need to improve the literacy

    and numeracy skills of students

  • IRONICALLY THE SOVIET SYSTEM REALIZED

    THE CENTRAL IMPORTANCE OF LITERACY IN 1948

  • THE DEFINITION OF LITERACY HAS

    EVOLVED CONSIDERABLY OVER THE PAST 30 YEARS

    Advances in theory have have provided a means to understand the determinants of task difficulty

    The improved understanding of task difficulty has supported the development of much more reliable

    assessments

    Literacy is now defined as a continuum than moves from learning

    to read to reading to learn

  • LEARNING TO READ TO READING TO LEARN: WE NEED MORE

    PEOPLE ABLE TO FUNCTION AT LEVEL 3 IN THE PRE-FRONTAL CORTEX

    Students and workers need the cognitive skills to support efficient acquisition of technical skills and knowledge and then to apply these skills in work to globally competitive levels

    0

    Level 1

    225 275 325 375 500

    Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5

    Learning to read Reading to learnProficiency dominated by mechanics of reading Proficiency dominated by cognitive strategies

  • THE THRESHOLD BETWEEN LEARNING TO READ AND READING

    TO LEARN FALLS AT A CRITICAL THRESHOLD IN BLOOMS REVISED TAXONOMY

    Creating

    Evaluating

    Analyzing

    Applying

    Understanding

    Remembering

    The critical boundary between Level 2 and 3

  • …AND IN THE SOLO TAXONOMY

    Prestructural Unistructural Multistructural Relational Extended abstract

    QUANTITATIVE PHASE QUANTITATIVE PHASE

    misses point

    identifydo simpleprocedure

    enumerate describelist combinedo algorithms

    compare/contrastexplain causesanalyserelateapply

    hypothesizereflect

  • CANADA HAS INVESTED HEAVILY IN USING

    ASSESSMENT TO IMPROVE LEARNING OUTCOMES:

    CANADA:

    Participated in PIRLS, TIMSS and PISA to provide assessments

    of literacy, math and science outcomes

    Established a national assessment of literacy,

    math and science outcomes

    Established provincial assessments of literacy, math

    and science outcomes at various grades

  • THE RESULTS OF THESE ASSESSMENTS REVEAL THAT ROUGHLY HALF

    OF SECONDARY GRADUATES DO NOT REACH LEVEL 3. THESE RESULTS HAVE

    PRECIPITATED LARGE INVESTMENTS BUT PISA SCORES CONTINUE TO FALL

    540

    535

    530

    525

    520

    515

    510

    505

    500

    2000 2003 2006 2009 2012

    534

    528 527

    524 523

    534

    529

    525

    Reading

    Science

  • OUR ANALYSIS SUGGESTS A DIFFERENT APPROACH

    TO ASSESSMENT IS NEEDED…KEY WEAKNESSES INCLUDE:

    All the current assessment resultstell teachers is that a significant number of them are doing a bad job

    Assessment results only arrive when the assessed students have moved to the next grade

    The assessment results are seldom adjusted to account for differences in the characteristics of the students being served or for factors over which teachers and schools have control

    Assessments results are not reliable for individual students so do not identify the students are struggling

    Assessments provide relatively little information about students in the lower ranges of the scales, the very students who need help

  • ACCOUNTABILITY AND PERVERSE EFFECTS:

    SOMETIMES THE RESULT IS NOT AS EXPECTED:

  • THERE IS NO MECHANISM

    TO TRANSFER INNOVATIONS ONCE IDENTIFIED

  • SCHOOL PROFILE

    FOR ONTARIO

    ONTARIO UNDERPERFORMS ACROSS THE BOARD…

    The analysis of socioeconomic gradients

    (Figure 3) indicated that Ontario students scored well below

    their counterparts in Quebec and Alberta, across the full range

    of SES. The school profile above shows that the SES intake of

    most schools in Ontario is above the OECD mean. However,

    the majority of Ontario’s schools scored below the regression

    line, indicating that they were not performing as well as other

    Canadian schools with comparable student intake. Thus,

    Ontario’s relatively low overall performance is not attributable

    to a few low SES schools with low performance. Rather, it is

    associated with a more general pattern of slightly lower than

    expected performance among the majority of its schools.

    Source: J. D. Willms, UNB

    700

    600

    500

    400

    V

    IV

    III

    II

    I

    Level

    Socioeconomic Status

    -1 0 1

    Rea

    ding

    Sco

    re

  • A NEW GENERATION OF ASSESSMENTS

    IS YIELDING THE LONG AWAITED SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT:

    ASSESSMENTS THAT GIVE INDIVIDUAL RESULTS IN REAL TIME AND IDENTIFY STRUGGLING STUDENTS I.E.:

    The Early Years Evaluation that assesses physical, social and

    cognitive skills in Grades 1 – 4 in real time

    The Bow Valley College web-based adaptive real time assessment of the reading

    mechanics that underlie learning to read

  • EARLY YEARS EVALUATION

    COGNITIVE SCORES BY LETTER NAMING FLUENCY

    Lett

    er-N

    amin

    g Fl

    uenc

    y (D

    IBEL

    S)

    Kindergarten Year

    EYE (above 2)

    EYE (1 – 2)

    EYE (below 1)

    Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

  • BOW VALLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ASSESSMENT

    1.0

    0.9

    0.8

    0.7

    0.6

    0.5

    0.4

    0.3

    0.2

    0.1

    0

    Vocabulary Real Word recognition

    Pseudo-word recognition

    Spelling Digit Span

  • SUMMARY OF DECODING AND VOCABULARY LEVEL BY LATENT CLASS

    Latent Class

    Very limited

    Limited

    Adequate

    A

    PRINT SKILLS

    COMPREHENSION SKILLS

    A B C D

  • A NEW GENERATION OF ASSESSMENTS

    IS YIELDING THE LONG AWAITED SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT:

    The SkillPlan teacher in-service literacy instruction training that provides teachers with a deep knowledge of how to help struggling students

    Professional learning communities that serve to transfer promising practices and awards that acknowledge innovation

    Extra resources for schools serving disadvantaged populations

  • Provides them with information they need in real time to help struggling students

    Provides the skills needed to help struggling students

    Acknowledges innovators

    Provides measues that can be aggregated to higher levels

    THIS NEW GENERATION OF ASSESSMENTS:Values teachers

    Transfers innovations rapidly

    Rewards teachers serving disadvantaged populations

  • 2016

    THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!