improving humidity control for commercial buildings · 2015. 6. 24. · ashrae journal improving hu...

7
ASHRAE Journal Improving Hu AIVC #13,454 Humidity Control for Commercial Buildings By Lewis G. Harriman Ill, Joseph Lstiburek, Ph.D., PEng., and Reinhold Kittler, PEng. Member ASHRAE Member ASHRAE· Member ASHRAE F or more than 100 years, temperature control has been the principal conce of our industry. That focus and our collective efforts have achieved immense i mprovements e h condition - improve- ments so ndamental that they are usually overlooked and unappreciated, even by ourselves. We seldom reflect on what the world was like bere the reigeration of od and medicine, or bere the availability oflow-cost, reliable heat in the winter and cooling in the suer. However, in spite of- or because of- those achievements, the expectations ofthe public have moved higher. Now, we ce the chall _nge of providing cost-effective control ofhudity. The Public Perceives a Problem In recent years, problems associated with too much or too little moisture in buildings have become notorious. The American Hotel & Mo tel Association es- timated its members spend more than $68 million each year dealing wi th mold and mildew problems (AH&MA 1991). Simi- larly, Engineering News Record reported that more than 50% of construction claims against architects, engi neers and contrac- tors were related to moisture and humid- ity problem (E R 199 I�. Television and print news energetically repo indoor air quality and healtp hazards caused by ex- cess moisture that promotes the growth of ngus in buildings and in HVAC sys- tems (WSJ 1999). These problems are less widespread than the public perceives. They have com- plex causes that are not always under the control of the HVAC de igner. On the other hand, some aspects of the problems are indeed related to the temperature and humidity of air in ide the building, and related to where the air moves in response to tbe pressure changes caused by rhe 1VAC sy tem. Our profession can help limit those problems, while pr oviding a more comrtable and productive environ- ment than ever bere -by improving humidity control . The process begins with better moisture load calculations. Moisture Load Data ASHRAE has taken a lead role in pro- viding the HVAC designer and equipment manucturers wi th moisture load data, a fundamental tool r better equipment and humidity control systems. Through Re- search Project 890, ASHRAE invested more than $250,000 to document and pub- lish the peak outdoor moisture conditions worldwide. Chapter 26 of the ASHRAE Handbook-Fundamentals now con- tains that data. A brief example will show how moisture loads are much larger than assumed in the past, when the sensible load was the main driver of the system design. Figure 2 shows the moisture difference between outdoor air at the peak sensible design condition compared to peak dew point conditions. The high dry-bulb tem- perature is 99°F (35°C), with an average hudity ratio of 105 gr/lb. In sharp con- trast to past industry perception, the peak dehumidification load actually occurs at the dew point extreme, when the humidity ratio is 153 gr/lb and the average tempera- About the Authors Lewis G. Harriman Ill is director of research at Mason-Grant, Portsmouth, N .H. He is the principal investigator r ASHRAE 1047- R Development of a Design Guide for Humidi Con- trol in Commercial Buildings. Joseph Lstiburek, Ph.D., PEng., is a principal at Building Science Corp., Westford, Mass. He is the author of several books on moisture control. Reinhold Kittler, PEng., is the emeritus chairman of Dectron d, and a member of ASH. RAE Technical Com- miee (TC) 7.5, Mechanical Dehumidi- fying Equipment. 24 ASHRAE Journal www. ash raejournal. o rg November 2000

Upload: others

Post on 15-Feb-2021

7 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • ASHRAE Journal

    Improving Hu

    AIVC #13,454

    Humidity Control for Commercial Buildings By Lewis G. Harriman Ill, Joseph Lstiburek, Ph.D., P.Eng., and Reinhold Kittler, P.Eng.

    Member ASH RAE Member ASH RAE· Member ASHRAE

    F or more than 100 years, temperature control has been the principal

    concern of our industry. That focus and our collective efforts have

    achieved immense improvements in the human condition - improve

    ments so fundamental that they are usually overlooked and unappreciated,

    even by ourselves. We seldom reflect on what the world was like before the

    refrigeration of food and medicine, or before the availability oflow-cost,

    reliable heat in the winter and cooling in the summer. However, in spite

    of- or because of- those achievements, the expectations of the public

    have moved higher. Now, we face the chall�_nge of providing cost-effective

    control ofhurnidity.

    The Public Perceives a Problem In recent years, problems associated

    with too much or too little moisture in buildings have become notorious. The American Hotel & Motel Association e.stimated its members spend more than $68 million each year dealing with mold and mildew problems (AH&MA 1991). Similarly, Engineering News Record reported that more than 50% of construction claims against architects, engineers and contractors were related to moisture and humidity problem (E R 199 I�. Television and print news energetically report indoor air quality and healtp hazards caused by excess moisture that promotes the growth of fungus in buildings and in HVAC systems (WSJ 1999).

    These problems are less widespread than the public perceives. They have complex causes that are not always under the

    control of the HVAC de igner. On the other hand, some aspects of the problems are indeed related to the temperature and humidity of air in ide the building, and related to where the air moves in response to tbe pressure changes caused by rhe 1-IVAC sy tem. Our profession can help limit those problems, while providing a more comfortable and productive environment than ever before - by improving humidity control . The process begins with better moisture load calculations.

    Moisture Load Data ASHRAE has taken a lead role in pro

    viding the HVAC designer and equipment manufacturers with moisture load data, a fundamental tool for better equipment and humidity control systems. Through Research Project 890, ASHRAE invested more than $250,000 to document and pub-

    lish the peak outdoor moisture conditions worldwide. Chapter 26 of the ASHRAE Handbook-Fundamentals now contains that data. A brief example will show how moisture loads are much larger than assumed in the past, when the sensible load was the main driver of the system design.

    Figure 2 shows the moisture difference between outdoor air at the peak sensible design condition compared to peak dew point conditions. The high dry-bulb temperature is 99°F (35°C), with an average humidity ratio of 105 gr/lb. In sharp contrast to past industry perception, the peak dehumidification load actually occurs at the dew point extreme, when the humidity ratio is 153 gr/lb and the average tempera-

    About the Authors Lewis G. Harriman Ill is director of research at Mason-Grant, Portsmouth, N .H. He is the principal investigator for ASHRAE 1047- RP, Development of a Design Guide for Humidity Control in Commercial Buildings. Joseph Lstiburek, Ph.D., P.Eng., is a principal at Building Science Corp., Westford, Mass. He is the author of several books on moisture control. Reinhold Kittler, P.Eng., is the emeritus chairman of Dectron Ltd, and a member of ASH.RAE Technical Committee (TC) 7.5, Mechanical Dehumidifying Equipment.

    24 ASHRAE Journal www. ash raejourn al. o rg November 2000

  • •11

    ASHRAE .Journal

    ... and is pulled through cool wall cavities, where its moisture condenses

    .. feeding mold and mildew behind the vinyl wall covering

    All because leaking exhaust duct connections

    create suction inside building cavities

    Figure 1 : Suction created by unsealed exhaust ducts leads to mold problems in humid climates.

    ture is only 83°F (28°C). (At the extreme temperature of 37.2°C (99°F), the humidity ratio is only 15 g/kg. The largest moisture load occurs at the more moderate temperature of 83°F (28°C), when the humidity ratio outdoors is much higher at 21.9 g/kg).

    If a designer were making equipment decisions based on the moisture at the sensible peak, the system would encounter moisture loads far in excess of the designer's ex.pectations. Also, those loads occur when the temperature is moderate-not when the sensible load is high. With the new peak dew-point information, system designers an.d manufacturers can make better judgements about equipment selection and controls.

    In addition to ASHRAE-funded tools like the inf01mation in Chapter 26 of ASHRAE Handbook-Fundamentals, the U.S. and Canadian governments also have contributed new humidity-related design data. The psychrometric display of weather history shown in Figure 2 is one example of new, taxpayerfunded information resources. These data, along with their availability and use, were described in an earlier ASHRAE Journal article (Harriman et al. 1999).

    Beyond a better quantification of the loads, HVAC designers need a clear understanding of tbe mechanisms of humidityrelated problems. Much progress has been made in this respect, aJthough the issues :I.re o complex that complete unrlerstanding remains elusive.

    Humidity-Related Problems in Buildings Several problems are well understood and have relatively

    simple solutions. Others are more complex. All are caused by

    too much moisture in the building, combined with an inability of the building and/or the HVAC system to remove the excess moisture. The problems fall into three broad categories:

    1. Water intrusion. 2. Cold-climate condensation. 3. Hot & humid climate condensation.

    Water Intrusion The most common and serious moisture-related problems are

    caused by rain or groundwater intrusion combined with the building's inability to dry out. These problems often happen dming or shortly after construction. Examples include the highly visible problems in the Pacific Northwest, and the failure of hotels in the southeast United States (Tsongas 1992, Handigord 1994 and Lstiburek 1993 ). In these cases, water leaked through cracks or holes in the building exterior, usually where one component is joined to another. Historically such leakage happens all the time without problems. The difficulty arises when walls trap that water, creating a fungus incubator. This happens when an interior vapor barrier prevents the water from d1ying out to the inside, or when vapor-tight exterior surfaces do not let breezes carry away evaporating water from the outside.

    Water trapped in exterior walls and in floor slabs generates odors quickly, as fungus thrives and consumes cellulo.sic or other carbon-based food sources from the building materials. Sun heats the exterior wall, accelerating the problem by creating the ideal environment for fungal growth in building cavities and on wallboard facing.

    -

    26 ASHRAE Journal www.ash raej ou rn al. o rg November 2000

  • ,I

    I' I

    ,, � (

    �PURE Humidifier Company

    "The PURE choice for humidification"

    New 11 I N STY- PAC 11 Humidifier Tube

    Assembly

    Providing Superior Performance To The

    Industry The new unique INSTY-PAC can be easily installed in AHUs or ductwork. It is designed to be used when short dissipation distances are essential.

    • Industry's shortest dissipation distances

    • Easy installation

    • Maintenance free design

    • Easy to use published dissipation distance charts

    • Steam jacketed design reduces condensate resulting in energy savings·

    • Unique patent pending design ·

    Pure Humidifier Company 4035 Norex Drive Chaska, MN 55318 Ph: (612) 368-9335 Fax: (612) 368-9338

    E mail: pure@wavetech,_net Website: purehumidifier.com

    (Circle No. 30 on Reader Service Card)

    28 ASHRAE Journal

    ASHRAE .Journal Design Extremes vs 30 Years of Hourly Observations

    Maxwell Air Force Base - Alabama

    "l-Hll-l-+-l-+-+120 ;a-Cooling Design ---j::i=1:$$:l=l=:l=t$$;: 1 -f'tflr-1--t-t-t--t-100 � • >: 105 gr/lb, 99°F 40.3 Btu/lb

    15.0 g/kg, 37.l"C, 75.9 ki/kg ,...,f-·l'f!.c+-+-l--+--H-XU �· =

    1'-rti'-t-t--T--1-+--t-+liO :@

    DOD Engineering Weather Data - Air Force Handbook 32-1163 (20001

    Figure 2: Ventilation moisture loads peak at moderate temperatures, not at the peak dry bulb condition.

    Ventilation Air Dehumidifier

    Reltlfn f\lt CuntUlloner

    9f=J D '� ,, �1 � ..1 : [I! 1. Ou1door Air

    Hot and humid, it must be cooled and dehumidified

    2. Ventilation Dehumidifier Dries the incornino air to a condition below the desired humidity set point

    14" . : r- �� ::.: �, . I -90 12.0 --� -: 11:.:1 HumiJHv

    3. Dry Ventilation Air Will remove the moisture loads generated inside the building

    4. Air Inside The Building Is at or below the desi1ed humidity set point

    Gontrcl 30 11.3 ��fnt 10 I.�

    Figure 3: In humid climates, one solution uses pre-dried ventilation air to control humidity and downsize cooling.

    In many of these cases, the HVAC designer becomes involved because the problem first becomes apparent to occupants as "bad indoor air quality." The building smells musty and people develop allergic reactions to the mold (Bayer et al. 1995). In most cases, the HVAC designer eventually stands aside quietly, watching while our colleagues in the legal, architectural and contracting professions sort out the problems and come up with a solution. These are primarily design and construction problems with the exterior envelope or construction-wetted materials, on which the HVAC system has little influence.

    Our profession, however, is directly involved with condensation problems. These often are difficult to separate from

    water intrusion, since a building may suffer from both intrusion and condensation at the same time (Kudder et al. 1986).

    Cold-Climate Condensation Musty odors in cold climates often are

    caused by fungal growth in building cavities, and structural ·problems can occur with buildings containing swimming pools in cold climates. The HVAC designer can help the architect and owner avoid these problems by:

    1. Keeping the indoor air dew point as low as possible, consistent with health and comfort requirements.

    2. Keeping internal air pressure neutral near the exterior wall to avoid positive internal air pressure that would force humid indoor air into cold cavities.

    www. ash raejou rn al. o rg November 2000

  • Most HVAC designers· are aware of the potential for condensation in cold climates. We all. know rhat water vapor will diffuse outward through building materials in response to differences in vapor pre sure. At some locations in the wall, the water encounters a surface col d enough to produce condensation. Much attention is given to this potential problem in the literature, and we have good calculation tools for es timating rates of diffusion and heat loss from building components (Chapter 24, ASHRAE Handbook-Fundamentals). Unfortunately, we lack good tools for predicting and avoiding the more common, but more complex problem: localized air pressure differences that force humid air outwards and into cold building cavities.

    Diffusion through solid material is a very slow transport mechanism and only allows small amounts of condensation. In contrast, humid air exfiltration is fast and can create large volumes of con-

    densed water inside the walls in a short period of time. The mechanics of the problem are not obvious.

    In theory, the designer can balance the airflows e11tering and leaving the b uilding o that apart from wind gusrs, 1�0 pressure difference exists across the exterior wall. However, wall systems and HVAC systems are complex assemblies of small, connected chambers. Contrary to intuition, a building is not a simple large vessel in which interior pressure can be equal at all points. Just because inost of the building has an average neutral air pressure with respect to the outdoors does not prevent some parts of the interior from being positive with respect to the building cavities. Humid air can be forced to leak outwards in some places while at the same time, cold air is leaking inwards.

    Consider the common design detail of a supply air duct passing through the unfinished space above a dropped ceiling. In moderate or cold climates, such

    (Circle No. 38 on Reader Service Card)

    November 2000

    Humidity

    Figure 4: Suction created by unsealed return air and exhaust air ducts pulls humid air into the building to teed mold and mildew.

    Relay_s Your Switching Solution

    - •!I:;.

    DELTROL £J,!J!tflti!P/fiUS

    (Circle No. 34 on Reader Service Card)

    ASHRAE Journal 29

  • ,1 J

    ;

    ASHRAE Journal ductwork is not always sealed and insulated, since the duct is indoors. When air leaks outward through seams and joints, humidity blows into the cold wall cavities that connect to the area above the dropped ceiling. The "locally positive" air pressure caused by leaking supply ducts contributes to condensation problems in cold climates.

    One solution is to spe\;ify that all supply and return ductwork be sealed and insulated, and that the return air registers be sealed to the ductwork and gasketed to the interior finish. Sealing prevents accidental suction or excess pressure in building cavities. And, insulation prevents condensation inside ductwork as it passes tlu·ough cool cavities. These precautions are especially useful in buildings that need humidification to ensure comfort and health during cold, d1y seasons.

    Hot-Climate Condensation

    I

    Basu

    1. Purpose 2, Crilical Tasks J. Psychrometrics

    Humidity Effects

    4. Comrort

    5. Corrosion 6. Static Discharge 7. Mold & Mildew

    8. Oust Mites 9. Bacteria & Viruses

    svstem Design

    10. Design Procedure

    11. Oehumidirication Loads

    12. Humidilicalion loads

    Equipment

    13. Dehumidifiers

    14,Humidiliers

    15. Load Reducers

    Controls

    16, Building Pressure 17. Humidity Sensors

    Applications References

    18. Schools 32. Clirult Data 19. Ollices

    20 Retail Buildings 21. Hol�s & Motels

    22. Aeslauranls 23. Museums, Libruies

    & Archives 24. Hospilals

    25 Eldercare · 26. Dormitories

    27. Swimminy Pools r 28. Ice Rinks

    [ "·"""""-Wareh ouses

    JO. Ory Stora!Je 31 L

  • ing, so that the cooling units are largely relieved of the dehumidification load carried by the ventilation air, as shown in Figure 3 (Turpin 2000).

    Although providing a dedicated dehumidification unit certainly improves humidity control and comfort, the really severe problems are caused by condensation and high relative humidity inside the walls of buildings-not in the occupied spaces. Problems in hot climates often occur when humid outdoor air is pulled through the exterior walls by suction created accidentally, by unsealed return air or exhaust ducts, or by packaged air-conditioning units installed in the walls (Lstiburek 1999). W hen incoming humid air contacts a cold surface like an inside wall near a cooling unit, moisture condenses and fungus thrives. The problem is magnified and accelerated when the incoming moisture is prevented from passing into the conditioned space by a vapor retarder, such as the popular vinyl wall covering used in many commercial buildings. More trapped moisture means more fungus behind the wall covering.

    Figure 1 shows the classic example of a small hotel in the southeastern United Sates. The rooms are equipped with a wallmounted cooling unit on the exterior wall and have vinyl wall covering. Air is exhausted from the bathroom continuously, and pulled out of the hotel by roof-mounted fans. The rooms feel damp, they .smell musty, and vinyl keeps peeling off the wallboard.

    The investigation showed how the mold and mildew growth follows the path of humid air pulled into the building by the suction created by unsealed exhaust ductwork. Fans pull air from the walls between rooms, creating suction at the exterior wall. It does not matter that the room pressure is positive--the wall cavity pressure,is negative, so humid outdoor air flows into the building, condensing moisture behind the vinyl wall covering and feeding the fungus shown in Figures 1 and 4.

    One could argue that the problem is caused by the vinyl wall covering, and by the leaky exterior wall and by the overcooling of the room by the occupants. Not our problem. As-Mark Twain once observed, "Nothing needs reforming more than other people's habits." The HVAC designer can contribute to the solution as well.

    Continuous suction can be avoided by specifying that the return and exhaust duct work must be sealed, and that the exhaust and return grilles be gasketed to the interior finish.

    Wall-mounted air-conditioning units can also create suction inside the walls if their internal casings have slots or holes that allow the fan to pull a negative pressure on the wall cavity. Any manufacturer's product can be mounted incorrectly, and some have internal casing designs with negative-pressure plenums that are not airtight. The designer should consider the equipment selection or the mounting specifications accordingly. Finally, as a minimum the building should be supplied with more pre-dried makeup air than the volume of air exhausted from the building.

    These minimal _precautions will help avoid the_ worst of the problems seen in commercial buildings. As noted earlier, many more complex issues are associated with humidity control. In an effort to assist all members ·of a design and construction team, ASHRAE has partnered with the U.S. Department of En-

    N o v ember 2000

    Humidity

    ergy and industry to provide design guidance in more depth.

    New ASHRAE Humidity Control Design Gulde Work is currently in progress to produce a design guide for

    humidity control that takes a multidisciplinary approach to the topic, and incorporates the results of research perfonned in recent years. The project was generated by ASHRAE Technical Committee 9.12, Tall Buildings, and is supervised by a joint committee with representatives from TC 3.5, Desiccant and Sorption Technology, TC 7.5, Mechanical Dehumidification Equipment and Heat Pipes and TC 8.7, Humidifying Equipment as well as with representatives of the co-funding organizations: the Gas Research Institute and Oak Ridge National Laboratory acting on behalf of the U.S. Department of Energy.

    The authors and the monitoring committee have been humbled by the magnitude of the task of compressing what is known about humidity control in commercial buildings into a single volun1e. The guide will be, at best, a good start on the subject rather than the definitive reference containing answers to all questions.

    The project began with an info1mal survey of the needs of the design community, equipment manufacturers and of building owners that have directly experienced the difficulty of improving humidity control in budget-limited commercial buildings. Based on that input, the book will be focused on the needs of the board-level HVAC designer more than the needs of the senior HVAC engineer or the building scientist.

    The book assumes the client has attached a value to better humidity control, identified a budget for that purpose and asked the HVAC designer to proceed accordingly. The information is structured and written for the designer who then " ... has to get it done by Friday." Consequently, the book will contain more photos, diagrams and checklists than complex equations. Figure 5 shows the structure and content. The project is scheduled for completion in early 2001.

    Summary Creating the design guide has convinced its authors that

    better and more cost-effective humidity control is not simply a matter of adding equipment-although that is usually a necessary part of the solution and adds cost beyond the typical commercial building budget. Avoiding problems and minimizing costs will demand a holistic, multidisciplinary approach.

    In the past, our industry has shown more talent for reducing problems to individual components than for bridging the gaps between members of the construction team. We have good tools for calculating heat and mass transfer across exterior wall sections at steady state-but no tools to quantify and to avoid problems created in a building with cracks between the airconditioning unit and the wallboard-which are delivered to the job site and installed through separate subcontracts completed at different times. The current business structure of the construction industry reflects specialization and separation of responsibilities._ This atomization leads to coordination foulups, which probably create more frequent and serious problems than any caused by sub-optimal components. The riew

    - humidity control design guide will be one attempt to bridgesome of those gaps with the goal of better and more cost-

    ASHRAE Journal 31

  • 32

    Innovation Heat-Fab has been

    pioneering venting

    solutions for high

    efficiency appliances

    for more than a dozen

    years. We're the only

    ones to adopt the latest

    laser' technology to

    precision-weld corrosion

    resistant AL 29-4C®

    stainless steel from

    Allegheny Ludlum into

    high-performance,

    leakproof Saf-T Vent®

    and Saf-T Cl Vent®.

    in venting.

    Our products perform,

    year after year. If you

    need Category II, Ill and

    IV venting options you

    can rely on, choose

    Heat-Fab. We're ahead

    of our time. And behind

    you all the way.

    For more information or

    an itemized estimate call us at 1-800-772-0739. www.heat-fab.com

    \ h�c:at"f.aal:> H;gh-performance chimneys and vents._

    (Circle No. 29 on Reader Service Card)

    ASHRAE Journal

    ASHRAE Journal effective service to the building owner.

    References American Hotel & Motel Association.

    1991. Mold & Mildew in Hotels and Motels (The Survey).

    Engineering News Record. July, 1991. Wall Street Journal. The Dish on Hotel Ait'.

    July 18th, 1999, pp: WI and W l4. Harriman, L.G. lll, D. Colliver, K.Q. Hart.

    "New weather data for design & energy calculations." ASHRAE Journal, 41(3):31-38.

    Chapter 26, "Climatic design information." 1997 ASHRAE Handbook-Fundamentals.

    U.S. Department of Defense. 1999. Engineering Weather Data. USAF Handbook 32-1163. HQUSAF/AFCESA, Tyndall AFB, FL.

    Tsongas, G. 1992. "A field study of indoor moisture problems and damage in new northwest houses." Proceeding of the 5th coriference on the Thermal Pe1formance of Exterior

    Envelopes.

    Handigord, G. \ 994. Chapter 18, "New High-rise conimercia\ and residential construction." Mamial for Moisture Control in Buildings. Arn. Society for Testing & Materials, Philadelphia, Pa.

    Lstiburek, J. "Humidity control in the hu-

    mid south." 1993. Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Bugs, Mold & Rot. National Institute of Building Sciences, (NIBS) Wash- � ington, DC. ' Bayer, C., S. Crow, J.A. Noble. 1995. "Pro- 1 duct ion of volatile emissions by fungi." Proceedings of the l 99 5 Conference on indoor Air-Quality.

    Kudder, R.J., Lies, K.!Vl, Hoigard, K.R. l 986. "Construction details affecting wall

    condensation." Proceedings of the Symposium 011 Air Infiltration, Ventilation and Moisture Tra11sfe1: NIBS.

    Shakun, W. "A review of water migration at selected Florida hotel and motel sites."

    I 8 tv

    1990. Report to the Florida Hotel & Motel Association, Clayton State College, Morrow, , 1 Ga. �

    Shirey, D.B. Ill, and K. Rengarajan. \ 996. "Impacts of ASHRAE Standard 62 on small

    Florida offices." ASHRAE Transactions 102(1):153-164.

    Turpin, J.R. "Dehumidification: the problem no one wants to talk about." 2000. Engi

    neered Systems. April, 2000. pp:46-52. Lstiburek, J. "The pressure response of

    buildings." 1999. Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Thermal Envelopes, pp: 799-817.•

    di

    pl

    fl<

    SC

    se

    thi

    fo

    Easy Does It! No set-up, No switches, No problem

    pe I

    we she a SC We wil to tl mg us t will lllOI bye

    For more information on the complete line of

    ACR data logging instruments, please contact

    us at: 604.591.1128, Toll free lCDA & USA): 1.800.663.7845 BJ Fax: 604.591 .2252 � Web: www.acrsystems.com n., 08. E·mail: [email protected] Bldg 210 - 12960 84th Avenue, srsrrMsmc. Surrey BC V3W 1 K7, Canada

    Introducing the ACR SmartReader Plus 2 data logger. For easy critical control point auditing of temperature and relative humidity.

    Easy-to-use software: To view data, just connect the logger to an ACR interface cable and the serial port of a PC

    Features: • Portable • 4 channels • 1 O·year battery life • 12-bit resolution • Up to 128 K memory • Multiple loggers can be

    linked to form a network •Accessible remotely

    by modem

    T !er i proJ cate sarn ti on twe< sure the< watt du cf

    Pr It as 20% 7out data, it's just an opinion coil

    2561 (Circle No. 24 on Reader Service Card) N 0 v e m be r 2 0 0 0 N 0 v